TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
|
|
- Roderick Martin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 r r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains II Region are based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment of local produc ers, county Extension agents-agriculture, financial institution representatives, farm machinery dealers and others knowledgeable of the area. Variation in yields, production inputs and production prac tices should be expected for particular farms. Budgets for all major crops produced in the area are included for two levels of management, when applicable. Crop yields are directly related to levels of management. These differences are due largely to timing of operational practices which may not be evident in the budgets. The machinery inventory is applicable to both typical and high level management. In some bud gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. Budgets for establishing permanent type pasture grasses were prepared and used for prorating estab lishment costs in the respective pasture and hay budgets. Forage crops include expenses only be cause it is expected that the income will be derived from livestock enterprises. Land charges were based on the customary land lord's crop share less his proportionate share of certain production and harvesting inputs and a percentage of fixed cost on the irrigation system when applicable. A per acre land charge was made when crop share was not used.
2 - > * > >
3 TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II REGION Assumed Prices Paid and Received by Farmers 1/ Item Unit Price Prices paid (1977) Seed Cotton (delinted) Grain Sorghum Soybean wheat (cleaned and treated) Alfalfa Corn (for grain) Corn (for silage) Forage Sorghum Sugar Beets bu Custom rates Cotton (strip and haul) Combining corn Combining soybeans Combining wheat (dryland) Combining wheat (irrigated) Combining grain sorghum (dryland) Combining grain sorghum (irrigated) Sugar beets (harvest and haul) Hay harvest, Swath, bale, haul Corn (harvest and haul) Drying corn cwt. bu. acre acre acre acre cwt. ton bale bu. bu Hauling Corn Grain sorghum Soybeans wheat bu. cwt bu. bu Cotton ginning cwt 1.25 Fuel and lubricants Gasoline L.P. gas Diesel fuel Motor oil (heavy duty, detergent) gal, gal, gal, gal, # ^ F e r t i l i z e r ( b u l k ) Nitrogen (anhydrous) Nitrogen (granular) Phosphorous
4 - 2 - Item Unit Price Prices paid (1977) - continued Labor (except hoeing) Labor (hoeing) Chemicals Pre-emergence herbicide Methyl parathion Malathion Land Lease (cash rent) Hail Insurance Wheat Cotton Corn Interest Prices received (1977) Cotton Cotton seed Wheat Grain sorghum Alfalfa hay (standing in field) Forage sorghum hay (baled) Ensilage ( corn) standing in field Corn (grain) Soybeans Sugar beets (14% sugar) hour hour 5 gal, gal. gal. acre $100 $100 $100 Lint ton bu. cwt. ton ton ton bu. bu. ton / These price assumptions are not to be interpreted as predictions or prospective prices. /^^\
5 ^ 1 TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II REGION \& Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Item Purchase Estimated Estimated Fixed Costs Variable Costs Item and Size No. Price Years of Use Hours of Use Per Hour Per Hour Tractor 1 1 $50, $19.87 $7.60 Tractor , Tractor , Tractor , Tractor 5 5 6, Pickup 10 5, Rolling Cultivator TM 30 1, Rolling Cultivator TM 31 2, Cultivator 8R TM 34 1, Lister Plntr 6R TM 36 1, Bed Planter 8R TM 39 2, Tandem Disc TM 40 1, Tandem Disc TM 41 2, Offset Disc TM 42 2, Chisel TM 44 4, Moldboard TM 46 1, Moldboard 6B TM 47 2, Rodweeder TM 50 1, Sand Fighter TM Furrow Opener TM 52 1, Packer TM Lister 6R TM Lister 8R TM 55 1, Shredder 2R TM Shredder 4R TM 57 2, Grain Drill TM 58 1, LM
6 TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II REGION (continued) Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Item Purchase Estimated Estimated Fixed Costs Variable Costs Item and Size No. Price Years of Use Hours of Use Per Hour Per Hour Float Box TM 60 $ $. 8 6 $.03 Herb Spr/Disc TM :o3 Rolling Cultivator HLM 66 2, Cultivator 8R HLM 69 1, Lister Plntr 8R HLM 72 1, Bed Plntr 8R HLM 74 2, Tandem Disc HLM 75 1, Tandem Disc HLM 76 2, Offset Disc HLM 77 2, Chisel HLM 79 4, Mlbd Rollover HLM 81 1, Moldboard 6B HLM 82 2, Rodweeder HLM 85 1, Sand Fighter HLM Furrow Opener HLM 87 1, Packer HLM Lister 6R HLM Lister 8R HLM 90 1, Shredder 2R HLM Shredder 4R HLM 92 2, Grain Drill HLM 93 1, Grain Drill HLM 94 6, Float Box HLM Herb Spr/Disc HLM
7 L l b \ U J i. L r u h d S V X 3 1 O l ' l l d V W V» X 3 v ± * S N O r t *» V S * M A V _ * o f J A H G J H V c j d d S1SUD G3XI^ Nul IV'Jl od I j j j. N 3 _ ) d 3 d J S S S i l ( l V l N J d 1 V 0 N N. c / 1 ) i e D V / 9? 3 _ S a i fl d D d V H J O N V 1 Ou*fat I $ b i S U _ ) " I V 1 0. L _. ^ f v v % S i S O J U 3 X I 3 I V l U x _. Z T b T O O M S Z ' B I 3 b 0 v < J. N 3 d ± 3 N ) J N V 1 6 t? * E t O O M 6 * # 2 I 3 _ O v A d 3 N l H D V * v N U I I V _ > I d _ 1 6 «6 C O M d * t o - i d D V S d U i J V d l i e * L O C M t d f c O V A d j N l H D t f r t 4 blbod G_3XI_3 M> 2 < _ * _, C - $ S 1 S U 3 _ n «V l d V A d A C ' f c V 3» U O M * k. < j y «c _ & i I S O D 3 1 G V l d V A I V X O i ^ c g, I S d A d V H ivioiens % 6 1 S O J i S d A d V h I is3aavh~3d<_ *ivj.lugns 2 j t c. * C 2 G l ' O 1 U ( J o V J * d u t \ 0 ± S 3 d d l N l e f c ' 9 2 Z M w O M» t i O O H ( N O I l V D I a d l ). 1 0 V I 9 < s ' «l 9 0 ' t? 0 _» * ^ d O O H ( A d d N I H D V W * j d O i D V d i ) J 3 H V I b c ' t z o o m 8 ^ c J ^ d d D V A a 3 N i H D v «N u i i v o i a d i l b ' 9 O C M l o ' y d d O V i h O x J V d l C d # ^ O C M O d ' Z d b D V A d d N I H D V W < C ' S O C M 0 C # C. 3 d D V O N l C I d ^ " i V l d. V 0 0 ' 0 w C # 0 < M ' S U l S 1 l b. A d V H j a o b _. S O _ > J I H V l d V A * c u»u * IvlOJ. 1 N L l l D O O U d d w f i M d l i i d H ' -» - l r t S S U d _ > M l b f _ J A l l u M V n O U N O / I S U J l l N O bu Ef,_lvA du LDlsd J.N3*ldSVNVW "ivdldal ^ d D V d i d S N d O l i f c C N V S i S O D C j 3 ± V W l ± S d N O I ) J d I I S M V l d H D I H S V X d l a _ U V > l d d I M N d W H S I l f c i V I S J V J T V d l V
8 \ii(^^ 21 H1NGW IVildVD 1VMNNV C t?200ll8 dduwon NO 1 1V 0 I 31 1 N lu I 130GIH-. Z Z 6 I C O U d f O d d S V X 3 1» U d V W V X d V l " S N O W w V S * M A V d d U A h O d. j V d J d u sisoo asxid Nuuvaiddi d O x N 3 0 t f 3 d 0 9 S S 3 ~ 1 C l V l N d f a 1 V H N N V 2 / I ) d d O V / S 3 S O J V H J C J N V 1»/0*ei 1IM1 Z01?*2 89G*t7 S I t f x U l bt^o" r*-y- cottc~ 927T"&~ 01* 0 AON 01 NOl 2/i cnxjid 6 l '0 **0 001 * *0 Ol'w» i_)u 01 NOl 2/1 ciiaj id Ol'o t* *0 OOI *0 921*0 0 1*0 ld_3s 01 N U x 2/1 n(lxj la 61 '0 **0 OOI *0 92 1*0 0 I * j onv 01 N U x 2 / 1,l\AJ\ a WZ*0 29*0 01 I'O &6I *0 00* 1 onv it? Wj. JilCJ WdUNV i 00* I vz'o Z91 '0 «2* 0 00* I onv 0*» Wl Ob I.J WJUNvi S/ *v!* 92z*o 90 " I 0o*2 onv 09 W x 1 V U 1. J x u t v0* vl *0 ^99*y uo*2 onv ot? * W l O S I G WziuNV 1 61 *0 **0 00 I *0 921*0 01* 0 Ainr u I NU1 2/1 doxjia 00* I VJ. *0 i s r o 92*0 uo* I Ainr Oi? e hi osia WdCNVl 96 *c: 60*2 i?-fr*c- b6_. *0 OC* I Ainr 9V» W l H v O a V O L O ' l U w 3 a D V d d d 3 d D V d a d S d n O H S d O O H d 3 A O d l V O * U N N U l l V d d d U S l S O D a 3 d * " H m 3 N I H D V W d O S V I S d w l l W d l l (jdxid *nio*iind 1N3W30VNVW "IVOIaAl 3 d 0 V d 3 d S N d O! 3 t i O N V S 1 S U D O d l v w l l b d N U l O d d I I S M V l d H O I H S V X 3 1 ' O d l V O l H d l ' I N y w H S I H O 1 / 1 S - 3 V d I V d I V
9 ALFALFA FSTA3LISHMENT, IRRIGATED, TCXAS HIGH =»LAINS II REGION ESTIMATFD COSTS AMD RETURNS PER/ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O P V A L U E T R UNIT COST/JNIT QUANTITY C1ST 1. GPOSS f?fclipts FROM PRODUCTION TnTAl. >. VAPIAOLF COST*; PREHARVEST SEE" AERIAL SEFDING MACHINERY TRACTORS IRRIGATION MACHINFPY LABOR ( TRACTOR F, MACHINFRY) LA30R(IRRIGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL. PRE-HARVEST LBS C 20.0? ACRE 5.CO ACRE ACPF 1 C. 4 C ! ACRE ?.2B HOUR 4.SO a P -1 HOUR A OOL a_I2 99.7«r HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COST " J. INC.OMF AROVE VARIABLE COSTS % $ o.r 99.7?, f> \ FIXFO COSTS MACHINERY TRACT OPS IRRIGATION' MACHINERY LAND (NET PFNT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS **. N^T 7pTyPNS ACRE *> ACRE I I HQPC ACRE l.oc S LAMO CHARGE USES S25/ ACRE ( 1/ 2 ANNUAL RENTAL) LESS 50 PERCENT OF IRRIGATION Fiyro COSTS. ORPOAPFD BY DF.»AY W. SAMMONS. TAEX. AMARILLO. TEXAS PROJECTED 1977
10 2 t H J. N U W l V l l d V : ) I v fi N N v 0 O c t l O l 7 2 w O I I B - " - - d d d W O N N U 1 1 V I 1 M d C J I l ^ O U I. l - Z Z 6 I a 3 l 0 3 r O d d S V X d l * ( J l l l d V W V * X 3 V 1 4 S N U I r t w V S * «A V d * d U A H U d t f V u o d d sisoo a-xir> N O l l V O I d d l d O l l S 3 0 d d d 0 9 S S 3 1 ( " I V I N d d I V P N N V 2 / t ) d d D V / 9 2 $ S 3 S O 3 ' D u V H D C N V T t / ^ L * t? I 1 9 * 2 1 < v Z l % c 9 9 * * S I V 1 U 1 61*0?"*(?"* oo"t~o~ 92TT0~ 01*0 AON O l N L 1 2/1 ao>i0id 6 1 * 0 17 *0 001 *C 921 *0 0 I * NU1 c/i aoxdla 6 I *0 fv'o 0 0 1*0 9 c I * 0 CI*u IddS 01 NU1 2/ I ofi>j lu dl *J * ' *0 921 * 0 cl* 0 onv 01 N L 1 _/l c(\ajhj 2t7 * i 12*1 692*0 99i7*0 00' I onv 9b * w l H GxiXJXlu L\ * I t L "0 9 I *0 9^2*0 oc* I onv 6* W ih "IlidO NlvoO 2t7* I 12*1 692 *0 9 9 f r ' 0 00* I onv «b*t W IH fljxjvc Z.v *C 29* * 0 feol *0 00* I onv 6b WlH d9 iuib I i QZ * 96 *2 629*0 I I * I u0'2 on? 96* W 1H JLVUld XUb 99' I 2*1 29 2*0 Uv*o 00'2 onv 9Z*_. W l H J W j U N V x 6 I *u Of * 0 00 i *0 921 'w 0 l " u Ainr 01 NUx 2/1 dixjla 8*0 29*0 l I *0 9 2*0 00* I Ainr 9^*fc WlH D'J I U indun V X V9 *2 10 *2 92* * L " o CO* I Ainr l&* WlH daullu/1 dbilrt d d O V d 3 d 3 d O V d 3 d S a O O H S d n U H d 3 A U j i V C l * O N N l i - V d d d L SISOO *c3d**qni 3MHDVW du9vl Sdt.Il W31I Cdxid *iiu*n3nd J.N3W30VNVW 13A31 HOIH 3 d D * / d 3 d S N d y O N V S l S O D V W H S 3 V ^ ^ N O l O d d I I S M V l c H 0 1 H S V X d l < J 3 i t f O I d d l M N d W H S i 1 U V 1 S 3 V J T V - T I V
11 A L FA L FA. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S I I R E G I O N ES7IMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST G P O S S R E C E I P T S F R O M P R O D U C T I O N HAY TOTAL TON 45.CO (S.CO ?. V A R I A B L E C O S T S PREHARVEST FEPT (P}APPL«D MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY L A H O P ( T R A C T O R & M A C H I N E R Y ) LA30R(IRRIGATION) INTEREST ON OR* CAP. SUBTOTAL* ORE-HARVEST Les» ACRF ACRE HOUR HOUR O0L DC *95 * HARVEST CPST^ SUBTOTAL* HARVEST < $ 0. 0 TOTAL VARIABLE COST $ INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS S 1 9 5» F I X E D C O S T S MACHINERY TRACTORS IRRIGATION MACHINERY PROPATFD ESTAB. COST LAND (NET RENT) rptal FIXFD COSTS ACRE AC^E ACRE ACRE ACRF 1.51 O.C *90 3R l.co t 1.51 C O ^ TOTAL COSTS a,. NET RETURNS $ 1 6 4, 4 5 $ K L A N D C H A R G E U S E S S 5 0 / A C R E L E S S 5 0 P E R C E N T O F I R R I G AT I O N F i X E D C O S T S. E S TA B L I S H M E N T C O S T S P R O PAT E D O V E R 5 Y E 4 R S. P O F P A P E D B Y D P. P A Y W. S A M M O N S. T A E X. A M A R I L L O, T E X A S P R O J F C T E D
12 Vito^ o H 1 N O W I V l I d V O 1 V H N N V C lb - «-d^ywdn NO I x V 0 1 d I IN d(j I IdOtiMU Z a d l D S P U f c d S V X d l ' U l l l d V W V * X 3 V 1 ' S N O W W V S * W A V d * d 0 A H a J b V d d a t i SdVdA 9 tiliau OdlVdOfcd SlSUO 1N3 WNS I "16 VISj SISOO 03X13 NOllVOIddl do INdDddd 09 SSdl 3dDV/o9* SdSH dodvho QimVI 19* I H?* * 0 O o O * I S IV 101 ot*"o" 6 1 *u 61 *0 61 '0 Rl *0 61 *0 6 I *0 61*0?*0 **0 V *C t>*0 f 0 17*0 t?*c **G 00TT7j" 0 0 1*0 00 1*0 001 *0 001 *C 0 0 1*0 0 C I o C 0 I * 0 e?1~0" * 0 921*0 92 l*u 921 *0 92 1*0 921* 0 921*0 Ol*0 01*0 0 1*0 01*0 01*0 0 I * u cl*0 0 1*0 IddS onv Ainr dnnr AVW ddv dvw 100 oi oi 01 0 i Cl 01 0 I 01 Nul 2/1 un»dl a ISU1 2/ I uft> j lo N u l 2/1 dn>jla NUx 2/ I do X0 I a NC 1 2/1 dflxj Id NU1 2/1 doxjlu NU1 c / l dfi>idlc. NOl 2/ I dh>dl a a O V d 3 o 3 d D V d 3 d S b n U H S d O O H d 3 A 0 SlSOD *d3d4*8ni 3NIHDVW douvl SdWli tidxid *no*i3nd 31V Q UN W31 I NOl IV ddtiu INdWdOVNVW IVOIdAl = d D V d d a S N t n i d d G N V S I S O D C J d l V w I l S d NUIOdd 11 SNlVld HOIH SVXdl CJdlVOIddl *VdlVdlV
13 II A L FA L FA, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S I I R E G I O N ESTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT UN I T P R I C E O R V A L U E 0» cnst/jnlt QUANTIFY COST -QP5S PFCf IPTS FROM PRODUCT ION HAY TOTAL >. WMAHLC COSTS ^PFHAPVEST t - F R T ( P ) A P P L ' D MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY L A»C'R(TRACTOR F MACHINFRY) LA30R( IRR I GAT ION ) INTFPEST ON OP. CAP. SUOTOTAL. ORP-HAPVFST TON 45.OC B.C^ $ * LBS. M fi 120.CO?1.60 ACRE ^ ACRE I HOUR ,5^ HOUR 4. 0^ :_ DOL S HARVEST COSTS SUOTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COST ^. TNCOMF ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS % $ O.r 1C ^IXFD COSTS MACHINERY TP ACTO S IRRIGATION MACHINERY ppnoatf-0 EST A3. COST LAND (NET PENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS ^. TOTAL COSTS ^. NFT RETURNS ACRE ACRE ACPp ACRF ACRp' 1.51 O.C ^0.^ ^ 1.51 I l.*>0? 0. * A 0.1 4?0, li t I R Q. 3 4 * 1 6 9, F I X E D C C S T S. LAND CHAPGF USES S50/ACRE LESS 50 ^RCFNT OF IRRIGATION -STAHLISHMFNT COSTS PRORATED OVER 7 YEAPS. PROJECTED 1^77 PPFPARFO BY DR. RAY W. SAMMONS. TAEX. AMARILLO. TFXAS /#^N
14 12 A l P A L F A, I R R I G A T E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S I I R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C H S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT ITEM mrivat ION Nn«DATE FUF-,OIL, FIXED T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L U B.. R E P. C O S T S O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E P A C R E P E «A C R E PICKUP 1/2 TON RTCK'JP 1/2 TON PICKU3 1/? TOM OICKIJP 1/2 TON "TCKUP 1/2 TON oickup 1/ T N PfMJP I/? TON u\ rkij» 1 /2 T N 1 o OCT ~ MAR * APR ^ C.43 1* MAY l2r JUNE CO JULY 0.10 ">.1 25 n. l AUG c.io SEPT *125 _Cil -l I IP P T O T AL S C L A N - C H A P G F U S E S S 5 0 / A C R E L E S S 5 0 P E R C E N T O F I R R I G A T I O N F I X F D C O S T S. P S TA H L I S H M E N T C O S T S P R O R AT E D O V E R 7 Y E A R S. S P A R E D * Y D P. P A Y W. S A M M O N S, T A E X, A M A R I L L O, T E X A S P R O J E C T E O c j o f. P T I ff : N T I F I C A T I O N N U M B E R ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 9
15 Z Z o l C - U D d f u d d S V X d l O l l l d V w V * X d V l * S N O W w V S * W A V d * d G A H C l d d V u d u d ONIinnIO d U t? / l S S 3 1 * S S U d O d U ( t? / l ) d d V H S S t O a O l C l N t fl N U G d S V f c i d O d V H D G N V l 99* 01- % 69* VO I % 62* t % 62* 1 Z 00* 1 62* 12 3dOV 96*_; 0 0*1 96*Z daov 9o*i? _.c* I 9v> mv 3dDV I 19*22 b 62' \L 1 SNHOldd 1-N *V d l S U O I V l U X * b SlSOD Q3XI3 1V1G1 ( 1 N 3 J x d N ) U N V 1 SdOlDVdl AddNIHDVW SISOO CJdXld * * S I S O O d l Q V l d V A 3 A U U V d W U O N i * t 1SUO 3 IfcJVIdVA IVIUx 9 *9l 9lT-P 00*/ CC*Z 00*2 9<i* I 00* I 1MD 1WD ISdAdVH IVj.uitinS Sdii *ova»nio tovh 3 uidis SISOD xsdadvn V9*99 $!S3AdVH-dd oz"m 96*91 0 1*0 * 100 *dv0 00*9 00*2 00*1? dfiuh VC*6 I 2*17 09*1? dcigh (AddNIHDVW 617 *Z OC* I 6 V Z 3dDV lo*t OC* I 16 * dddv 09* 0 0 ' 0 21*0 ICCI 00*-. 00' I O0*Z sai 09 * V 00*91 2 *0 Sbl a l J N O l S d d d l N l doqvl ddhio ' j d o i o v d i ) d O e v i SdUlOtfal AddNiHDVw ddnvdobni 11VH 3JIDIGa3H udl'3 l^dadvhjha SISUD dlhvldva 06* 6 % T^'TT""" 2 1*0 00'96 NUi 09*29 0t*C9I 99 " 0 Sbl 1V1U1 CJddSN OllOD 1NI1 NU1LUD Nuiionaodd wodd sididodo :>su jo *i lbod AlllNVnC UNC/ISGD dg dfllva dg ddidd iinn INdWdOVNVh ivdldal 3dDV ddd SNdnidd CNV SxSOO CldlVWllSd N O I O d f c 11 S N I V l u H 0 1 H S V X 3 1 * C N V l A d O ' N 0 11 U 0 13
16 r O T T O N, D R Y L A N O, T F X A S H I G H P L A I N S F " S T I M A T E D C O S f S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT II REGION OOFR AT I ON T TEM NO OATF FUEL,OIL, FIXFI) T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L U B., R E R. C O S T S O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E R A C R E P E R A C R F S H R E D D E R? P T M 4, 5 6 D E C " > T A N D r - ' M n i c. f T V 3, 4 0 D E C " I C K U ^ 1 / 2 T O M 1 0 D E C 'ICKUP I/? TON 10 JAN 0.10 M O L O R O A P D 6 B T M 2, 4 7 F E B l. C O P A C K E D T M 5 ^ P F B 1, 0 0 PICKUP 1/? TON 10 FED ^.10 PICKUP 1/2 TON 1«MAR 0.10 T A N D F M D I S C t m 3, 4 0 A R H E R B S P R / D I S C T * 3, 6 1 A P R nickijo \/2 TON 10 A<"»R 0.10 L I S T E R - P L N T f - P T M 3, 3 6 M A Y PICKUP 1/2 TON 10 MAY O.in S A N O F I G H T E R T M 5, 5 1 J U N E C U L T I V A T O R f P T M 4, 3 4 J U N F n i C K i j o x / 2 T O N 1 0 J U N «= PICKUP 1/2 TON 10 JULY 0.10 ^TCKUP 1/2 TIN 10 OCT C C rt.l C. 157 « O r» _Q.xloo l.? C C *±2 1.7~ 1. or 0.19 O o. i o 0. 1 Q 0.1^ l.or O I 9 1? TOTALS ^ L A M " ) C H A R G E B A S E D O N L A N D L O R D * S S H A R E ( 1 / 4 ) 0 C G R O S S, L C S 5 1 / 4 O F GTNNT NG. n o f PA R E D O Y D R. R AY W. S A M M O N S, TA E X, A M A R I L L O, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 ^ 7 7 B U D G E T I D E N T I F I C AT I O N N U M B E R ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 11
17 zz6i adiddrotd svxdi ciiidvwv *Xdvi 'snowwvs *w Avd *«o aw udhvu-jdo 0 N 1 N N 1 0 G N V d c l 3 j 3D v / i s s d i * s s o a o d o ( v / i ) d t v H S s. a d O i Q N v i n o g -. s v h 3 0 d V H 0 o n v i 9 1 * 9 1 S 9 0 * 6 J I $ 29*92 % 0*"*T2~~ 00*1 OV'IB 3dDv *l *9 00*1 V 1*9 3dDV 9C * t? 4 Ml' 29 $ V 2 2 S OCM 90** 3dDV S N d O l d a l d l M * 9 S i b 0 0 I V l U x ' 9 S1SU0 ddxi 3 1V101 ( I N d d 1 3 N ) O N V 1 SHUlDVHl Ad3NIHDVW Sj.90 0 GdXld * '/ S I S O D d l b V l d V A d A Q t J V J w O D N l * t. ISuO dlbvidva IViUi 92*02 $ 92TTT" * 00*6 92' I 1M0 uo *6 00*6 OOM I t t D 4 ISdAdVH IVlQldOS Sdl1 *OVt_ NIO "UIVH 3 dihls S19U0 ISdAdVH 91 *^9 4 T7TT * * l * Z l 0 1 * 0 10G 00*9 CC*2 00* i? dooh 99* l 8 0 * OQ'* dnoh Cw* V 00* I 0 9 ' * 3dDV 16* 00*1 16* 3bDv 09* t 0 c* 0 V 2 1 * 0 10 a CO'.. - C M 00*-. 3d0v 15dAdVH-3dd * IV1019ns d V ' J * d O N O I S d c i D l N l du'dv'l d3hio ( A d d N i H O v w - 3 d O x D V d i ) y n o v 3 SdOlDVdl 3DNVdOSNl AddN IHOVw 11VH 30 IOIHsdH 0 * Cb* P 00*0 00*91 1 1*0 22*0 Sbl * S b l ( U l d d V ( N ) l d d 3 GddS <±, lsdadvhddo SxSOO dlwvldva c Oc*92I $ "IVIUx C2*T9T 91*0 00*96 Nul ad3snullod CO'Lll CC*C02 99'u *Sfal 1NI3 NullUO 4 NDIlDnaOdd WOad SiuIdDdJ SSudO M isao AiiiNvno UNn/isoo UNn C 3 C 1 V A a U 3 D I d d INdWdOVNVW T3A31 HOIH 3 d D V d d d S N d n i d d O N V S l S O D G d l V w I l b i NUlO^d II SNlVld HOIH SVX31 CJUVlAdO *NU-iU J 3
18 24 C 0 T T O N, D R Y L A N D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S I I R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT ORf-RAT TON ITEM NO. DATE FUEL,OIL, FIXED T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L U B «,, R E P. C O S T S O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E R A C R E P E R A C R E SHREODEP 4P HLM T A N D F M D I S C H L M I CKUP 1/ 2 TON PICKUP 1/2 TON MOLDBOARD 6 3 HLM PICKUP 1/2 TON t a n h f m D I S C H L M HEP^ SPR/DISCHLM PICKUP 1/2 TON PICKUP 1/2 ton LIST-PLNTP8R HLM PICKUP 1/2 TON SANOFIGHTEO HL M CULT IV ATOP 8R HLM PICKUP 1/2 TON 'ICKUP 1/2 TON PI CK'JR 1 /?. TON 2,92 DEC OFC 1.0"> DEC o.io J AN Cl , 92 FEB FFB , ^ft MAR MAP MAR o.io APR o.io ,72 MAY C MAY CO ,85 JUNE C.39 4,69 JUNE JUNF CO C.4 3 1* AUG OCT C.IO Jl+125-0*100-0** ' <"> C C C TOTAL S L A M O C H A P G F t A S r D O N L A N D L O P D» S S H A R E ( 1 / 4 ) O F G R O S S, L E S S 1 / 4 O F F C P T U I 7 F " A N D G I N N I N G. P o e o a p F D M Y D P. R A Y W. S A M M O N S, T A F x, A M A R I L L O, T F X A S P R O J E C T E D 1 P 7 7 B U D G E T I D E N T I F I C A T I O N N U M B E R ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 11
19 Z-161 a. - J l D i r u t d S V X 3 1 ' O l l l d V W V» X = V 1 4 S N 0 W w V S * M AV d * d G A d G J d Va - i a d * w3lsas NOIlVOlddl 30 ISOD OdXld do % 09 ONV ONINNIO * d 3Z1II dg V/ I SS31 SSGdO dg V/l du ddvhs GdUlGNVl NO G3SVG 3 JdVHO ONVl $2*69 4 9Z* Q2 4 99*69 4 ZZ"*"29 CC* I ZZ*29 3dDV ev'ci uo* I 6t>*2 I dddv 2_.*9 00* I ZL"d i.ddv 99*9 00* I 99*9 dddv 99 " 9»7 I 4 2 I * t> ^ I 4 09 * ~Z2~" 00*22 92* I 0C*22 00*22 00* I 4 * itfi'j * i W j 29*1?lI 4 Z9"**Z -c*9 0 1*0 10G 00* * OJ'* dogh 69*9 2Z* I 00** dfigh t»y sjz 9** 09'V dfloh ZCZd 0C* I 82*22 dddv Z *b 00*1 Z*8 3dDV 09" V 00* I 38* V dddv v0*2l 00* OO I 21*0 * IGG I j C ' _ 00* I 00*^. dddv 09 * 00*02 61*0 Sbl v V * CC* 0* 11*0 *S9"1 00'9 0 C * *0 sa i 9Na013d IdN * ' * i>lbcd TVlGl -. SiSOO G.xld Wlux ( l N 3 d I d N ) G N V l Ad3NIHDVW NUllVOlddl SdGlDVJx AddNIHDVW SlSUO GJXU. '\ b l S U O 3 1 H V i d VA d A U fi w 3 w O D M * t isdadvii 1SUO 3 IHVIcVA 1V1U1 *iviuiyns Sdil 40Vd *NI0 1 U V H ' J d l u l S _1S0D isdauvk lsdadvh-3dd "IVlOlflnS dvo *dd ND IbdddlNl HGdVl ddhic ( k l I I V 0 I d d 1 ) d O a v i (AddNIHDVW '3 duldvdl )dgovl A63NIHDVW NUIxVOIddl SdOlOVdl AdjNIHDV* 3DNVdnSNl 1IVH 3G1 DU-d-iH G. l d d V ( d ) I d d d G. l d H V ( N ) I d 3 3 u _3S ls3advh^du SxSGD dl»3viava *c J v 0 * I 4 0C"*"9" J**0 CC#9Z2 00* *96 99*0 NGj. SGI NCilOnaOda WCdd IVlux addsnuiiuo 1 M 1 N U x l G D SioI-DJa SSG *JO * I 1SU0 AllliWOO iinn/isoo _o _rnva du do i dd UNn dddv NQIOdd 11 1N3W30VNVW IVDldAl d d d S N d n i 3 d G N V S i S G D G d l V W l l S d SNIVld HOIH SVX31 'QdlVOIddl 'NUxlGD S3
20 26 C O T T O N, I R R I G A T E D, T E X A S H I G H P L A I N S I I R E G I O N E S T I M A T E D C O S T S < \ N D R F T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT OOFR AT j ON ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL, FIXED T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L U B., R E P. C O S T S O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E R A C R E P F R A C R F SHPFDDEP AR TM T A N D F M [ ' I S C T M MOLDIOARD 60 TM PICKUP 1/2 TON CHISr-L TM oickur 1/2 TON T A N O E M D I S C t m oickup 1/2 TON T A N D F M D I S C T M HERH SPP/DISC TM PICKUP 1/2 TON I n y p fi r t m RICKUP 1/2 TON ROLLING CULT TM BED ^l.amtfr8p TM PICKUR 1/2 TON SAND F IGHTFR TM ROLLING CULT TM "ICKUP 1/2 TON OTCKUR 1/2 TON PICKUR 1/2 TON ^ I C K U P 1 / 2 T O N 1'ICKIJP l/^ TON 3,57 D^C , 41 DFC % 6 8 2,47 DEC DEC 0.10 " ,44 JAN JAN C.43 3,41 FEB IO FEB o.ic ,41 MAR R ,61 MAR C MAR p ,55 APR APR o.i oo n.4 3 4, 31 MAY n MAY MAY C I O , 51 JUNE ,31 JUNE * JUNF A.IO JULY o.io OC C AUG 0. 1 * SEPT Cl OCT o.io _o._!0. -0*±2 l *» P C , o , I P 0,, 19 o, _ -as* TOTALS L A N D C H A R C F B A S r D O N L A N D L O R D S H A R E O F 1 / 4 O F G R O S S L E S S 1 / 4 O F FEPTILI7F.R* GINNING AND 5^% OF PIX"=D COST OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. p r? «- r > A P E O «' ' Y D R. P A Y W. S A M M O N S, T A! = X, A M A P I L L O, T F y A S P R O J E C T E D RUHC-rT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER -. ANNUAL CARTTAL MONTH ^ 0 ' ^ V
21 Z Z C l J d x O d r C t d S V X 3 1 U l l l d V W V ' X 3 V 1» S N 0 W W V S * M A V d * d G A t ) G 3 d V u - - d u w j I S A S N C I l V O I d d l d U 1 S O O O d X l d d U % 0 9 O N V O N I N N I O ' d d Z I U l d d d d G * / I S S 3 1 S S O d O d G * / I d G d d V H S G d C l Q N V l N U O. d S V O d O a V H O G N V l 69* lul 4 96* ZLZ 4 S V I J l 4 VZ'll oc* I VZ'-l dddv o*'2l 00* I 6t7*2l dddv e9*9 00* I 2 8*9 36DV 68 * * oc* I 68* V dddv I * * l-_ I 4,,9*89 4 o9tl OC* Vc 9 2* I 1M0 00*92 00*92 OOM * 1 M D 2C* ll 4 69T" ug'2 I 68*9 ll 'I I 82*22 lz*9 8Z* % O 0 * 2 i 09" v I 09 *_ o?' «? 0 o b Zb*9 0 0 * Zl' I 9 6* OC* I OC* I OC* I 00*00 I Wb* I 00*02 uc*c* 00*92 0 1*0 O J*V 00*t7 09*t7 82*22 IZ*9 8Z *v 2 1*0 0D*Z 6 I * J 11*0 2 *U *1GG dpidh dogh dooh dddv 3cDV dddv IGG dddv SHI *Sul Sbl 9N<_ni3d idn SISGD TV 101 S i S G D G 3 X I J I V i G l ( I N d d l 3 f \ > O N V I AddNIHDVW NGI_.VDIddI adnovai AddN ]»IDV«SlSU- i 03X I J S I S G D d l f c l V l d VA 3 A G 8 V d W G O N i ISGD dlhvidva 1V1U1 ISdAdVH ivxuldds s31 i»yvd *nio THVH 3 dldls S13U0 isdaovh * ivioiuns!93advh-3dd *dvd uu NO l'j3d31nl duhvl ddhlo ( n g i l v o i d d i ) d O y V I ( A d d N I H D V W - 3 d U x D V b D d D U V I AddNIHDVW NUllVOIddl odoldvdl AddNIHDVW ddnvansni iivh dgldihd dh G» l d d V ( d ) I d d d G I d d V ( N ) l d d d Gd39 lsdadvhddci SlSOD d IGV I OVA 99*t?Z 99"*" VV~ CC*0 Z**C 00*009 00*36 99*C NGx SHI NGllDnaOdd WOdd IViGl GddSNGllJD IM'1 NJ11GO SlaI3Ddd SSGdO ISOD A111NVO0 UNO/ISCD LC 301VA do 3D I da UNn ln3wdovnvi. IdAdl HOIH daov d-ju SNdOldd ONV S1SUD GdlVWllSa NGI Odd il SNIV'ld HOIH SVXdl * Gd 1 VO I d.j I MUlLUJ LZ
COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY
63 CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationT h e C S E T I P r o j e c t
T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationTrade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-US region
Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-U region atoshi Inomata Institute of Developing Economies ETRO Development of cross-national production linkages, 1985-2005 1985
More informationTEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION
r TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION FOREWORD 08000300 r The enterprise budgets for the Trans-Pecos region are based on yields as shown on form 08000500. The data contained in this report are based on estimates
More informationA L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W
A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationP a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9
P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 J A R T a l s o c o n c l u d e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e i n t e n t o f N e l s o n s r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p l a n i s t o e n h a n c e c o n n e
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationI M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o
I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o u l d a l w a y s b e t a k e n, i n c l u d f o l
More information176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s
A g la di ou s F. L. 462 E l ec tr on ic D ev el op me nt A i ng er A.W.S. 371 C. A. M. A l ex an de r 236 A d mi ni st ra ti on R. H. (M rs ) A n dr ew s P. V. 326 O p ti ca l Tr an sm is si on A p ps
More information-Z ONGRE::IONAL ACTION ON FY 1987 SUPPLEMENTAL 1/1
-Z-433 6 --OGRE::OA ATO O FY 987 SUPPEMETA / APPR)PRATO RfQUEST PAY AD PROGRAM(U) DE ARTMET OF DEES AS O' D 9J8,:A:SF ED DEFS! WA-H ODM U 7 / A 25 MRGOPf RESOUTO TEST HART / / AD-A 83 96 (~Go w - %A uj
More informationCATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A. Ήχος Πα. to os se e e na aș te e e slă ă ă vi i i i i
CATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A Ήχος α H ris to os s n ș t slă ă ă vi i i i i ți'l Hris to o os di in c ru u uri, în tâm pi i n ți i'l Hris
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationUNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*
36 WATERMELONS. NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION EST IMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE CF COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WATERMELONS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS
More information/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT
42 ORANGES. PURCASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER IG LEVEL MANAGEMENT / ^^v- OPERAMON IT-. NO. DATE FUEL.OIL. FIXED TIMES LABOR MACINE LUB..REP. COSTS
More informationI N A C O M P L E X W O R L D
IS L A M I C E C O N O M I C S I N A C O M P L E X W O R L D E x p l o r a t i o n s i n A g-b eanste d S i m u l a t i o n S a m i A l-s u w a i l e m 1 4 2 9 H 2 0 0 8 I s l a m i c D e v e l o p m e
More informationS U E K E AY S S H A R O N T IM B E R W IN D M A R T Z -PA U L L IN. Carlisle Franklin Springboro. Clearcreek TWP. Middletown. Turtlecreek TWP.
F R A N K L IN M A D IS O N S U E R O B E R T LE IC H T Y A LY C E C H A M B E R L A IN T W IN C R E E K M A R T Z -PA U L L IN C O R A O W E N M E A D O W L A R K W R E N N LA N T IS R E D R O B IN F
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationEXTENDING A PLANT PRODUCTION MODEL WITH A VIEW TO PLANNING MONTHLY CASH-FLOW BALANCE, HIRED MACHINERY AND LABOUR COSTS
EXTENDING A PLANT PRODUCTION MODEL WITH A VIEW TO PLANNING MONTHLY CASH-FLOW BALANCE, HIRED MACHINERY AND LABOUR COSTS P. DRIMBA, I. ERTSEY, M. HERDON Debrecen University Centre for Agricultural Science,
More informationEMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.
More informationTRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report
TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-9 December 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More information~,. :'lr. H ~ j. l' ", ...,~l. 0 '" ~ bl '!; 1'1. :<! f'~.., I,," r: t,... r':l G. t r,. 1'1 [<, ."" f'" 1n. t.1 ~- n I'>' 1:1 , I. <1 ~'..
,, 'l t (.) :;,/.I I n ri' ' r l ' rt ( n :' (I : d! n t, :?rj I),.. fl.),. f!..,,., til, ID f-i... j I. 't' r' t II!:t () (l r El,, (fl lj J4 ([) f., () :. -,,.,.I :i l:'!, :I J.A.. t,.. p, - ' I I I
More informationA/P Warrants. June 15, To Approve. To Ratify. Authorize the City Manager to approve such expenditures as are legally due and
T. 7 TY LS ALATS A/P rrnts June 5, 5 Pges: To Approve - 5 89, 54.3 A/P rrnts 6/ 5/ 5 Subtotl $ 89, 54. 3 To Rtify Pges: 6-, 34. 98 Advnce rrnts 5/ 6/ 5-4 3, 659. 94 Advnce rrnts 6/ / 5 4, 7. 69 June Retirees
More information4 8 N v btr 20, 20 th r l f ff nt f l t. r t pl n f r th n tr t n f h h v lr d b n r d t, rd n t h h th t b t f l rd n t f th rld ll b n tr t d n R th
n r t d n 20 2 :24 T P bl D n, l d t z d http:.h th tr t. r pd l 4 8 N v btr 20, 20 th r l f ff nt f l t. r t pl n f r th n tr t n f h h v lr d b n r d t, rd n t h h th t b t f l rd n t f th rld ll b n
More information9.9 L1N1F_JL 19bo. G)&) art9lej11 b&bo 51JY1511JEJ11141N0fM1NW15tIr1
thunyitmn tn1 zni f1117n.nllfmztri Lrs v wu 4 t t701 f 171/ ti 141 o&oiv,3 if 042 9.9 L1N1F_JL 19bo vitioluutul fly11.1.g)onoo b5 et Nn`15fiwnwiymri1 nrikl5fini1nvi Ltol : Aeniln,flvnu 6m,wiutrmntn15Y
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More information