TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION"

Transcription

1 r TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION FOREWORD r The enterprise budgets for the Trans-Pecos region are based on yields as shown on form The data contained in this report are based on estimates and actual records of operations within the two-county area (Reeves- Pecos). Even in a region so narrowly defined as this, variations in inputs and returns exist among farms and among managers. However, these budgets should serve as useful guides in planning and decision-making for persons con cerned with the area described above. Basic assumptions which are necessary to complete the budgeting process include a com pilation of crops to be budgeted, expected yields for irrigated only, and according to typical and high-level management. Farm size and machin ery complements for both levels of managment are required. Production practices, machinery operating rates and, finally, the budget develop ment complete the undertaking. In order, then, the assumptions were: farm size varied from 600 acres for the typical man ager to 1,000 acres for the high-level operator. Fully two-thirds of the land on die typical farm is fallowed while only one-third is handled in this manner on the high-level farm. Cotton is grown on approximately one-fourth of the typical farm and two-fifdis of the larger unit. Small grains are produced on fully 50 percent of die acreage in both cases. Calf grazing is heavily utilized. Irrigation systems vary from two wells of 1,000 GPM each on the smaller operation to four wells of 1,000 GPM capacity each on the larger unit. Management differences centered primarily on timing of operations rather than variations in cropping patterns or input levels. That is, the high level manager extracts greater yields, and usually greater profits from his enterprises due to superior ability to prepare for, plant, tend to and sell his crops in an optimum fashion. Land rent (net) is computed for cotton based on the landlord receiving one-fourth of the crop and government payment while supplying all of the land, the well, pump and irrigation system, and one-fourth of the fertilizer, herbicide, insec ticide, harvesting and ginning. No typical arrangements for cropsharing or cash leasing were identifiable; therefore, the opportunity cost concept on land value is used. r

2 TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION 1/ Assumed Prices Paid And Received By Farmers Item Unit Price Prices Paid (1975) Seed: Cotton (delinted) - Upland Grain Sorghum Barley Wheat (cleaned and treated) Alfalfa Cotton - Pima Forage Sorghum Oats Cantaloupe Custom Rates: Cotton (harvest and haul) - Upland Cotton (harvest and haul) - Pima Combining barley Combining wheat Combining grain sorghum Hay harvest Harvest cantaloupe Hauling: Grain sorghum Hay Wheat Barley Chemical spraying (aerial) Cotton ginning - Upland Cotton ginning - Pima Fuel and lubricants: Gasoline L.P. gas Diesel fuel Motor oil (heavy duty, detergent) F e r t i l i z e r ( b u l k ) : Nitrogen (anhydrous) Nitrogen (granular) Phosphorous Labor (except hoeing & irrigation) Labor (irrigation) Labor (hoeing) cwt cwt cwt bu cwt cwt cwt cwt lb lb. Lint.07 lb. Lint.08 acre acre acre ton crat 1.75 cwt..20 ton 6.00 bu..15 bu..15 acre 2.00 bale bale gal..36 gal..24 gal..35 gal lb..15 lb. lb hour 2.75 hour 2.75 hour 2.00

3 ijs^v Assumed Prices Paid And Received By Farmers Item Unit Price Capital Chemicals: Pre-emergence herbicide Methyl parathion Malathion Hail insurance: Wheat Cotton Interest Capital Operating 5 gal. gal. gal. acre acre Prices Received (1975) Cotton - Upland Cotton - Pima Cotton seed Wheat Grain sorghum Alfalfa hay Ensilage standing in field Pasture grazing Cantaloupe Barley lb. Lint lb. Lint ton bu cwt ton ton lb. gain.20 crat 6.50 cwt / These price assumptions are not to be interpreted as predictions or prospective prices.

4 ^ TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Purchase Estimated Estimated Fixed Costs Variable Costs Item and Size Price Years of Use Hours of Use Per Hour Per Hour Tractor HP Tractor HP Tractor - 90 HP Tractor - 45 HP Pickup - 1/2 ton Swather, self-propelled - 14 feet Shredder - 2 row Shredder - 4 row Offset Disc - 9 feet Offset Disc - 12 feet Plow - 3 bottom Plow - 5 bottom Float - 12 feet Lister - 4 row Lister - 6 row Rolling Cultivator - 4 row Rolling Cultivator - 6 row Rototiller - 2 row Cultivator - 4 row Cultivator - 6 row Bed Planter - 4 row Spray Rig - 4 row Border Disc Grain Drill - 14 feet Grain Drill - 16 feet Disc Ridger - 4 row Vegetable Planter - 2 row Baler Co

5 A L F A L F A F S T A B L I S H M F N T. I R R I G A T F D, T F X A S T R A N S - P E C O S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P F P A C R F TYPICAL MANAGEMENT JNIT P P T C E H R V A L U E H R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GPnss PFCFIPTS FROM PPODUCTIOM TDTAL 0.0?, VAPTARLE COSTS r»-?-hapvfst seed FPRT<^-46-n) FERTH.I7FR APPLI MACHINERY IP^TGATTON MACHINEPY IA30P(TRACTOP & MACHINEPY) I At?OP( TRP IGATION) TNT-PEST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL. PRE-HAPVFST _RS. 1.5^ 30. )C 45. CO ACRF 1 1. l.on ACR l.dd 1.75 ACRC C ACRE 7.^ ACRF 63. 7C ? HOJR HOUR C 8.79 DOL. 0,f>Q * HA^vrsT costs SUBTOTAL. HARVFST TDTAL VA^TABLF COST 0.? o IMTIM= ARnvF VARIABLE COSTS A. FIXFO COSTS MA'-H INFPY I RO I GATTCN MACHINEPY LAND (NFT RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS s ACPE P C ACRE ACRE ACRF 30.PC <^. TDTAL COSTS N T orjupns * ON_Y PHOSPHORUS REQUIPPD PROJECTED RUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 811P087P ANNUA_ CAPITAL MONTH 12

6 A.FALFA ESTABLISHMENT. IRRIGATED. TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION FSTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PFR ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUEL.OIL. FIXED I T E M T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N F L U B.. R E O. C O S T S D P F P A T I O N N O. D A T F O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E R A C R E P E R A C P E PLDW ^3 2,36 AUG 1.0C C C.36 OFFSET DISC 2,34 AUG l.oc D.345 C.23C 0.C n p p S F T p i c. c 2, 3 4 A U G l. O C D C f. 2 1 ^L'lAT 2,38 AUG 2.DC C.49 " I C K I P I H A U G C I O C ^. 2 3 (. 1 0 GRAIN DRILL 4,52 SEPT C PTCKU^ I? SFPT 0.10 }.125 C.lCf 0.23 CIO PICKU"5 ID OCT CIO C.10C 0.23 ^ 1 0 ^ T C K U ' 1 0 N O V _ 1 a. 1 _ 5. _ C a _ C. j l. L C L T O T A L S ? 6 C * H N. Y P H O S P H O R U S R E Q U I R E D. P R O J E C T E D, UDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 08110C ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 12

7 ALFALFA, IRRIGATFD, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT JNIT P R I C F D R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GPOSS RFCEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION HAY TDTAL T3N aiaa_i..al VAPTABLF COSTS DRFHAPVEST F E R T ( o ) A C R E F r :? T l L I 7 F R A P P L I A C R E M A C H I N E R Y A C R E I R R I G A T I O N M A C H I N E P Y A C R E T L A B O R ( T P A C T O R F, M A C H I N F P Y ) H O U P L A B < D R < I R R I G A T I O N ) H O U R INTEREST ON OP. CAP. DOL. O.C9 SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVFST 1.00 I C0 C CO r fi_t.f_.2l HARVEST COSTS MAYING ^STACKING SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TDTAL VARIABLE COST "*. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS TON _1_28..7C * FIXED COSTS MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINERY PRORATED ESTAB. COST LAND (NET RENT) TDTAL FIXFD COSTS ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRF ACRE ^0.OC C O l.oc U_t.&& TOTAL COSTS s NzT RrTURNS ESTABLISHMENT COST PROPATFD OVFR 4 YEARS. CUBING ADDS S3/ TON VALUE RUr ADDS S2/ TON HARVESTING COST. ONLY PHOSPHORUS REQUIRED. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR ^ 0 ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 10

8 ALFALFA, IRRIGATED, TFXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION FSTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PEP ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUEL.OIL, FIXED I T E M T I M E S L A 3 0 R M A C H I N E L U B.. P E P. C O S T S 0 C - E Q A T I 3 N N O. D A T F O V E R H O U R S H O U R S P E P A C R E P E R A C R E P I C K U = > 1 0 A P R O. 1 C C I O PICKUP 15 MAY O P I C K j a 1 " J U N E C PICKUP 10 JULY 0.10? OC P I C K U 1 0 A U G n. l r C ^. 1 0 PICKU^ 10 SEPT OolO C f.10 p i c k u p i o o c t c. i o _ i A i a s _ i l O ) - 0 * 2 2 _ 0 j _ l O T O T A L S C C. 7 1 FSTA1LISHMFNT COST PRORATED OVER 4 YEARS. CUBING ADDS S3/TON VALUF BUT ADDS S2/TON HARVESTING COST. ONLY PHOSPHORUS REQUIRED. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBE* ANNUA_ CAPITAL MONTH 10 /^%

9 A L F A L F A F S T A B L I S H M F N T, I R R I G A T E D, T E X A S T R A N S - P E C O S R F G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D P F T U ^ N S P E R A C ^ E HIGH LFVFL MANAGEMENT 8 JNIT P R I C F O R V A L U E n p COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G30SS RFCEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION TDTAL? VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEED FFPTC0-92-0) FF»TILI7ER APPLI MACHINERY TPAC TOPS IPPTGATTON MACHINEPY LA30R(TRACTOR!> MACHINERY) LAPOP( TPR IGATION) INTEPFST ON OP. CA. SUBTOTAL, PPF-HAPVFST HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL, HARVFST TDTAL VARIABLE COST 3. T^CDM=- ABOVE VARIABLF COSTS cr.3s C ^0 ACRE C0 22.C0 ACRE ACRF ACRE A ACRE 5?.9A HOUR HOUR DOL. 0.O * ^ 7 0.^ s A. FIXFD COSTS MACHINFRY T=*AC TO?S IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS ACRE ACRE ACPE ACRE CC0 1.CO l.or _?is.00 s TDTAL CPSTS *. NrT RETURNS *-2.}8. 08 * P N _ V P H O S P H O R U S R E Q U I R E D. PPCJECTED, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNJA. CAPITAL MONTH OC !

10 AI ralfa ESTABLISHMENT, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TPANS-RFCOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RFTURNS PFR ACRF HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT -UFL.OIL, FIXED I T F M T I M E S _. A 3 0 P M A C H I N E L U B., R E P. C O S T S n p e r R A T T - i N N O. D A T F O V E R H 3 U R S H O U R S ^ F R A C R E P E P A C P E Pt OW SR 1» 35 AUG HFFSFT DISC 3,3 3 AUG i. : o n F F S ^ r D I S C 3,33 AUG o. 2 2 FLOAT 3,^7 AUG PI CK')"> 11 AUG IOC GPATN DRILL 5,51 SEPT C PTCKJ3 11 SFnT RICKU^ 11 OCT o.icc 0.31 O.ll ^ICKU3 11 NOV 0.10 _2_.i2_i! L 3I JL*1L T3T&l.e O N L Y P H O S P H O R U S P F O U l R F D. P P O J E C T E D, /S% BUDGET infntiftcation NUMBER ft 01H 5 ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 12

11 A L F A L F A, I R R I G A T F D, T ^ X A S T P A N S - P F C O S R F G I C N F S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT 10 JNIT P R I C E O R V A L U F O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RFCEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION HAY TDTAL TON ti-_. Q. * 4 40.CO?. VARIABLE COSTS RREHARVFST -E=>T( 0-92-O) FERTIL T2ER APPLI MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LA3PR(TPACTOP t MACHINERY) LABOP( IRR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS pai_pd WIRE CJSTOM HAULING MACHINERY I. AHOP( TRACTOR & MACHINERY) SUBTOTAL, HARVFST ACRE 22. <^ CO ACRE 1.75 l.co ACRF l.co ACRE HOUR HOUR > DOL _U.I S TON C TON ACRE 6.75 l.co ACRE HOUR TDTAL VARIABLF COST 3 INCOME ABOVE VAPIABLP COSTS FIXED COSTS MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINERY PRORATED ESTAB. COST LAND (NFT RENT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS 5. TDTAL COSTS ACRE ACRE ACRE l.co ACRE ACPE ,(7 I s s NFT RETURN' 9.55 FSTA3LISHMFNT COST PRORATED OVER 5 YEARS. CUBING ADDS S3/TON VALUF n' JT ADDS H2/ TON HARVESTING COST. ONLY PHOSPHORUS REQUIRED. PPOJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 10

12 11 ALFALFA, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT FUEL,OIL, FIXED I T E M T I M E S L A 3 Q P M A C H I N E L U B., R E P. C O S T S O P E R A T I O N N O. D A T E O V E R H O U R S H O U R S» E R A C R E P F P A C P E PICKUP TCKU SWATHER S.P. BALER "TCKIJR SWATHER S.P. BALER PICKLJR SWATHER S.P. BAl.FR otcku3 SWATHER S.R. BALER PTCK'J3 SWATHER S.P. PALFR PICKU 11 APR 0.1 c C 10." MAY c.icr MAY ,63 MAY l.oc JUNE 0.1O O.IOC 0.31 C.ll 21 JUNE 1.00 D.177 C JUNF l.oc JULY C O.ll 21 JULY ,63 JULY AUG C 1 OC C.31 C.ll 21 AUG C ,63 AUG SEPT C IOC 0.31 O.ll 21 SEPT ,63 SEPT OCT _fi_a- : -0*21 _<U1I T O T A L S ESTABLISHMENT COST PRORATED OVEP 5 YEARS. CUBING ADDS S3/T0N VALUE BUT ADDS S2/ TON HARVESTING COST. DNLY PHOSPHORUS REQUIRED. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR 081 ( ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 10

13 12 B A R L E Y F O R G R A I N, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S T R A N S - P E C O S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT JNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION BARLEY GRAZING TDTAL 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SFED FERT(ICO-O-O) HAIL INSURANCE MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LABORCTPACTOR & MACHINERY) LABORtIRR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TDTAL VARIABLE COST 3. IMCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS CWT LBS S CWT OC ACRE 15.CO ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL fetli ACRE l.co CWT. o.l s FIXED COSTS MACHINERY TRACTOPS IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS ACRE 3.40 ACRE 4.09 ACRE ACRE ai * CROP. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH

14 13 BARLEY FOP GRAIN, IRPIGATFD. TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT OPERATION ITFM NO. DATE TIMES LABOR OVER HOURS FUEL,OIL, FIXED MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS HOURS PER ACRE PFP ACRE PLOW 3fiI 2.36 AUG OFFSET DISC 2.34 AUG l.oc C C.21 FFRT.apPLT,RENTD 4,86 AUG (.0 64 o.o 0.0 OFrs-T DISC 2 34 AUG C r _OAT 2,38 AUG o C.49 o l CK'JR 10 AUG CIOC 0.23 C I O LISTER 4P 2 40 AUG GRAIN DRILL 4,52 SEPT C6 C.92 MCKU"> 10 SEPT C PICKIJ* io OCT CIOC 0.23 c.io p I r k U 3 10 NOV C C I O RICKU3 10 DEC o.to C PICKUR 13 JAN cie C. 1*C PICKUP 10 ~EB C C.10 PICKU3 10 MAR cioc 0.23 c.io PICKU3 13 APR 0.10? CIOC pickup 13 MAY _li.l25 _.i-aaq. -0*22 C fl O /^% TDTAL? * CROP. PROJECTED BUDGFT IDCNTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH

15 14 if* B A R L E Y F O R G PA I N, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S T R A N S - P E C O S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT JNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GPOSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION BARLFY GRAZING TOTAL C VA R I A B L E C O S T S PREHARVFST SEED FFRT(?r.r-t-0 ) HAIL INSURANCE MACHINERY TRACTOPS IPRIGATTON MACHINERY LA30R{TRACTOR f, MACHINERY) LABOR(IPRIGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVFST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINF CUSTOM HAUL SU3TOTAL, HARVEST CWT _BS S ACRE ACRE l.co ACRF ACRE CI ACRE 8.0C ACRE 81.7A HOUR HOUR DOL * ACPE 10.CO CO CWT. C _s.±_ TDTAL VARTABLF COST "*. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS S fixfd COSTS MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINFRY LAND (NET PENT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS <6 ACRE ACRE 3.69 l.co 3.69 ACRE ACRp 3C0.00 C.C TOTAL COSTS NrT P~TURNS * Q CROP. PROJECTED, 1975 PUDGET IDF.NT IFTCATTON NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH '

16 15 BARLEY FOR GRAIN, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP ACRF HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT /^% OPERATION I T E M T I M E S. A B O R NO. DATF OVFR HOURS FUEL.OIL, FIXED M A C H I N E l _ U B., R E P. C O S T S HOURS 3ER ACRE PEP ACP: PLOW AUG C.43 OFFSFT DTSC 3,33 AUG l.oc o PFPT#/VPPLT,RENTD 3.87 AUG 1.00 D.097 f C O OFFSET DTSC 3 33 AUG l.«c FLOAT 1 37 AUG C.29.ISTFR 6P 1 39 AUG PICKU3 11 AUG C GRAIN DRILL 5.51 SEPT PICKUP SEPT 0* C I O C 0.31 Cl 1 PICKU OCT o.io c C. l l PICKIJR NOV C 1 OC 0.31 C. l l PICKUP DEC C 1 CO 0.31 C.ll PICKUP JAN o i or = E8 PICKUP 0.1C C C. l l PICKUP MAR PTCKU3 APR 0. 1 C oc 0.31 o.n PICKUP MAY 0.10 _2-_JL2 TOTALS * I Q * C R O P. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH

17 CANTALOUPS, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION FSTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PFP ACRE TYPTCAL MANAGEMENT 16 PRICF OR JNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUF OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION MFL3NS TDTAL 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEED F-RT(16f-5C-C) BEF RENT MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINEPY LABOR(TRACTOR & MACHINERY) LA30R<IRRIGATION) QTH^R LABOR INTERF^T ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PPE-HARVFST HARVFST COSTS HAND HARVEST RROCFSSeMARKET SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TDTAL VARIABLE COST 7. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS MACHINERY TPPIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TDTAL COSTS A. NET P'TUPNS CRAT _9i5«.e.a L3S. 3.0C 2.0* 6.00 ACRE ACRE 10.CC O C ACRE 4.02 l.co 4.C2 ACRE ACRE 51.6C l.cc HOUR HOUR HOUR DOL * CRAT C0C CRAT _.&&*.-!.-_ S ACRE ACRE ACRE l.co ACR^ C C 7-1* C C PPOJECTFD, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBFP ANNUA. CAPITA. MONTH O <* C

18 17 CANTALOUPS. IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRF TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OREPATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS "ER ACRE PEP ACRE PI OW 3B 2.36 JAN 1. *C C.36 p ICK'JP 10 JAN OFFSET DISC 2,34 FFB C.23C 0.C4 C.21 FFPT.APPUI»PFNTD 4,86 FEB CO OFFSET DISC 2,34 FFB 1.00 o C.21 F. OAT 2,38 FFB C 4 9 PTCKU3 10 FEB C LISTER 4R 2,40 MAR C.20 pickin IC MAP C PICKUP 10 APR C.15C C.35 C.15 ROLL. CU.TIVATOR 4,42 MAY l.oc C VEG.PLANTER 2.55 MAY l.oc C 7 3 pickup 10 MAY C.15 CULTIVATOR 4R 2»44 JUNF 2.00 ^ PTCKIJP 10 JUNF C CULTIVATOR 4R 2,44 JULY C.17 PICKUP 10 JULY C.15C 0.35 C. 15 PICKUP IC AUG C15C PICKUP 1" SEPT *121 J0*15 TOTALS PROJFCTFD fluogft IDENTIFICATION NUM3FP ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH C28 5

19 18 CANTALOUPS. IRRIGATED. TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRF HIGH LFVEL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION MELONS TOTAL 2. VARIABLF COSTS PREHARVEST SEEP" FEPT(18f-50-0) BEF PFNT MACHINFPY TRACTOPS IRPIf-ATTON MACHINERY LABORITPACTOR MACHINFRY) LABOR!IRP IGATION) OTHEP LABOR INTERFST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST RAT OC i2. Q.-l BS ACRE ACRE 10. OC ACRE ACRE 9.16 l.co ACRE HOUR HOUR HOUR C DOL *72 S # ^ HAPVFST COSTS HAND HARVEST PROCFSSF-MARKET SUBTOTAL, HARVEST CRAT CRAT S _S.0JLi.Q.Q. * TOTAL VARIABLF COST INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXFD COSTS MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET PFNT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TDTAL COSTS C NET RETURNS ACRE ACRE ACRE l.co ACRF C C 7 l_co PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH C

20 19 CANTALOUPS. IRPIGATED, TFXAS TPANS-PFCOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS 3ER ACRF HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT OPFPATION I T E M T I M E S L A B O R NO. DATF OVER HOURS FUEL.OIL, FIXED M A C H I N E L U B.. R E P. C O S T S HOURS RFR ACRE PER ACPE "LOW 5B PICKUP OFFSET DISC FERT.APPLI.RENTD OFFSFT DISC FLOAT PICKU3 PTCKU3 PICKUP.ISTE5 6R ROLL. CULTIVATOR VFG.PLANTEP PICKUP POLL. CULTIVATOR PICKUP ROLL. CULTIVATOR PICKIJR "ICKUP PICKU* 1,35 JAN C JAN C.15C ,33 FEB C ,87 FFB C C C O 3,33 FEB l.oo ,37 FEB C FEB C MAR APR ,39 MAY C MAY l.oc ,55 MAY C MAY C ,41 JUNE JUNF ,41 JULY LOG JULY C C AUG C SEPT *±1 JL*15 TOTALS PROJECTED 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH CI8 5

21 PIMA COTTON, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION FSTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRF TYPICAL MANAGEMENT 20 JNIT P R I C E O R V A L U F O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTI3N COTTON LINT COTTONSEED TDTAL C VA P I A B L F C O S T S PREHARVFST SFEO F^RT(250-10C-0) FERTILIZER APPLI HER3ICIDF INSECTICIDE HAIL INSURANCE MACHINERY TRACTOPS IRRIGATION MACHINERY LA30P(TPACT0R & MACHINERY) LABOR!TPR IGATION) INTFPEST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HAPVEST COSTS CUST COTTON PICK GIN, RAG, TIFS SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VAPIABLF COST -t. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET PENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TDTAL COSTS *. NFT RETURNS.BS C CO TON C o.36 ±2* CWT. 29.OC C ACRE ACRE 1.75 l.co 1.75 ACRE APPL C.C ACRE ACRE 3.55 l.co 3.55 ACRF ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL _BS BALE _ ACRF ACRE ACRE C.60 ACRE l.oc LAND CHARGE BASED ON LANDLORD SHARE OF 1/4 OF GROSS FERTILIZFP. INSECTICIDF. AND GINNING. INCOMF LESS 1/ 4 OF PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBEP 931D C 0 AMNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 11

22 21 P I M A C O T T O N. I R R I G A T E D. T F X A S T P A N S - P F C O S P F G I O N F S T I M AT F D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P F R A C R F TYPICAL MANAGEMENT OPFPAT TON I T E M T I M E S L A B O R N O. D AT E O V E R H O U R S FUEL.OIL. FIXED MACHINF LUB..REP. COSTS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACR? SHREDFR?P 4,32 JAN C 0 5 C.27 PLOW *B 2,36 JAN 1., o PICKUP 10 JAN 0 «, 10 o CIOC 0.23 C.IO OFFSET DISC 2.34 FFB SPRAY RIG 4,48 FEB C 2 4 OFFSET DICC 2,34 FEB 2, 00 D C.42 q.iat 2, 3 8 efb 2, C.49 PTCKIJR 10 FFB C c m LTSTF5 4P 2.40 MAR 1«, PICKUP 10 MAR 0<,10 : OO 0.23 C.IO POLL. CU.TIVATOR 4,42 APR 1, r. 2 4 PICKU3 13 APR CIOC BFD-PLANTFR 2,46 MAY 1, C.64 ROLL. CULTTVATDR 4,42 MAY C.24 PICKUP 10 MAY 0, c m CULTIVATOR 4R 2,44 JUNE 2, PTCKU3 10 JUNE 0 i Cl 00 C CULTIVATOR 4R 2,44 JULY I, C I 7 PICKUP 1 3 JULY 0, C I O C 0.23 C I O RICKUD 10 AUG C I O PICKUP! 0 SFPT C c.io PICKUP 13 OCT 0,.10-1* &* TOTALS ' LAMD CHARGE BASED ON LANDLORD SHARE OF 1/4 OF GROSS INCOME LESS 1/4 CF FERTILIZER. INSFCTICIDE, AND GINNING. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBEP ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH

23 P I M A C O T T O N, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S T R A N S - P E C O S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P F R A C R F HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT 22 JNIT P R I C F O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS PECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTON LINT COTTONSEED TOTAL?. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST c;-rpn FeRT(19C-50-0) FERTILIZER APPLI HERBICIDE INSEC TICIDE HAIL INSURANCE MACHINEPY TRACTOPS IRRIGATION MACHINERY LABOR!TRACTOR & MACHINERY) LABOR!IPR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SU3TOTAL. PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CJST COTTON PICK GIN, BAG, TIES SUBTOTAL, HARVEST LBS. CBO 7CO.0C TON 120.CO C ^ CWT. 29.CO C ACRE 39.CO ACRE 1.75 l.oc 1.75 ACRF CO APPL ACRE ACRF 5.43! ACRF ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. C * L3S CC BALE ± TOTAl VARIABLE COST 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXFD COSTS MACHINEPY TRACTOPS IRRIGATION MACHINEPY LAND (NET PENT) TDTAL FIXED COSTS C T D TA L C O S T S 6. NET RETURNS ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE * LAND CHARGE FFRTILlZFR BASED ON LANDLORD SHARE OF 1/4 OF GROSS INSECTICIDE, AND GINNIMS. INCOME LESS 1/4 0' PROJFCTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER C ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 11

24 SZ6I 30 */l *aaid3road SS31 3W0DNI E60 I I HiNOW DViloVD "VflNNV daawnn NoiivDidiiNJGi idoane 9NINNID ONV 301 Z liddsn 1 * d3z III i k ji SSGdS> JO Wl -0 3dVHS GdOiaNVI NO 03SV9 39dVhD GNVD 92»9 **S 569 1? 9 9#9 SDViOX \^/ TT*3" I!!> I l»0 I l»g EI 0 I! 0 92#G 11* I 1*0 2 f 0 Z8» J I l»0 82*0 tl#w 1*0 6l» J 62*0 22#0 2I80 22»0 I \90 trqg *»C TT»"7j- G0lT0~ s-gt'x- JI'O 10Q i t cfl>oia l *0 JO I *G _.ci C *>l#q id3s i i a()>'jlc l *0 0OI 0 92l»C Jl-0 cjnv 11 dfi>01d l»g 00l w» S2I *il*q A~inr u aflxdid II 0 *I 0 *12-C Ot*l Ainr Z94 d-9 dqlvallino l #0 JO I J 92l C 01*0 3NOC I I cnxjid ze*o 982*0 82*»C ao»2 3Nnr Z9* d-9 do^vaixdod l *0 001 ao 921 L 0!! ) AVW l l chmdla W C 2_.l#0 892* C 00# I AVW l*49 dulvainno 'llud l *0 301 #0 92I»C Jl»0 ddv I I cfl>»jla W» VC 02M ddv SV* d3inv~d-u^fc 6 #0 *2 0O 98t>*C JO- I ddv ** I t3"nii.0x0_j l #G 0Gl»0 92l»C Ol#0 dvw I I cn^dici W#G 2-.l#0 692# C OOM dvw 117*9 duivaiiino mob l *0 00 I 0 92l C Ol#0 833 l l enfold ll#0 *l *12BC COM 833 Z9*9 d-9 dlivajiind 80*0 *9l#0 l 2#C 0C# I 833 6» I ti9 tjlsll 02*0 *89#0 920* I 0C*2 833 Z * I iva i 21 *0 2. I *G 692-o 00* I 833 * _>SIO J.3S JG IaC 20»0 2&**C OtM 833 Z**9 S i t ) AV c i c i b 21 #0 _P0 692»C JC9 I * - d I d s i c i a s _ ) _ i u l»u 00l»'J 9 2 I C 0 l#0 Nvr l l doxjlc 9 *C 18 *0 219aC 00" I nvt 9fc» I fc_ flu "Id 60»0 Z_.l o 992-C JWl nvt l 4 d V d ^ C i a d H S 3 d 3 V d 3 d 3 d D V d 3 d S t i O O H S d fl O H d 3 A 0 S i S O D d 3 d * «8 m 3 N I H D V W t i 0 8 V " S 3 W i i 03X13 HO* J.V0 ON W3il NCllVdjaU Z 1NHW39VNVW 13A31 HOIH 3 t i D V d 3 d S N d fl i 3 d O N V S i S O D V M I 1 S 3 NQID3d SOD3d-SNVdi SVX3i Q3iV9IddI NOliDD VWIc

25 is UPLAND COTTON, IRPIGATFD, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION FSTIMATFD COSTS AND RETURNS PPR ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT 24 JNIT P R I C F O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM COTTON LINT COTTON^FED TDTAL PRODUCTION _BS< TON CC CO C56 67,.? ff*?. VARIABLF COSTS PPEHAPVEST SEFD FFPT!250-1OC-C) FERTILIZER APPLI HF-?3IC!PE INSECTICIDE HAIL INSURANCE MACHINERY IPPIGATION MACHINERY LABOR!TRACTOR F, MACHINERY) LABOR!IRR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CJST COTTON PICK GIN, BAG, TIES SUBTOTAL, HARVEST CWT. 29.CO C.44 ACRE ACRE ACRE 12.OC l.oc APPL 5.5C ACRE C ACRE 3.57 l.oo 3.57 ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL ii 3fl LBS. CO 7 7CO ALE *±0 85.4C TOTAL VARIABLE COST ^. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND!NFT RENT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS ACRE or 4.89 ACRE 7.44 l.oc 7.44 ACRE CO ACRE ±3+51 I C T D TA L C O S T S NET RETURNS LAMD CHAPGF BASED ON LANDLORD SHARE OF F E RT I L I Z E R, I N S E C T I C I 0 - A N D G I N N I N G. 1/4 OF GROSS INCOME LESS 1/4 OF PROJECTED ^ OUOGET IDENTIFICATION NUM9FR ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH ^

26 25 UPLAND COTTON, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PFR ACPE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB,..REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACPE PER ACPE SHP^DER 2R 2.32 JAN , 05 C. 2 7 PLOW 33 2,36 JAN C > P TCKUR IC JAN C I O C , OFFSFT DISC 2,34 FFB C SPRAY RIG 4,48 FEB Oi,07 f. 2 4 OFFSET DISC 2,34 FEB l.oc Oi FLOAT 2,38 FEB 2.0C , 13 C. 4 9 PICKIJR IC FEB 0.1C C I O C 0, 23 C.IO LISTcr? -ir 2.40 MAR l.oc Oi PICKUP 10 MAR 0.1C Ci ROLL. CULTIVATDP 4,42 APP Oi PICKIJ3 1*> APR C 0,, POLL. CULTIVATOR 4,42 MAY Oi 05 C.24 BFD-P.ANTEP 2,46 MAY , ROLL. CULTIVATOR 4,42 MAY 1.oc PICKUP 10 MAY i 23 C I O CULTIVATOR 4R 2,44 JUNF C4 76 Oi PICKUP 13 JUNF C.100 o.,23 C I O CULTIVATOR 4R 2,44 JULY l.oc Oi> 11 C 1 7 PTCKUP 10 JULY o.ir CO 0 i PICKUP 13 AUG O.lo C 1 OC' Oi,23 C.IO PTCKUR 13 SEPT o.ir C I O C Oi PICK'JP 10 OCT t.ia5 _ *!. _&* 2 J0*10 TOTALS I AND CHARGE BASFD ON LANDLORD SHARE OF 1/4 OF GROSS INCOME LESS 1/4 OF FFRTH IZFR, INSECTICIDF, AND GINNING. PROJECTED, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH C28 5

27 UPLAND COTTON, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP ACPE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT 26 JNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUF OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTON LINT COTTONSEFD TDTAL _BS. TON 0.4O 1 2C0O C.C0 3± CO VARIABLE COSTS PREHAPVFST SEED FERT!18C-5C-0) FFPTILIZER APPLI INSFCTICIDF HERBICIDE HAIL INSURANCE MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LABOR!TRACTOR & MACHINERY) LABOR! IRR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CuST COTTON PICK GIN, BAG, TIES SJBTOTAL, HARVEST CWT C A4 ACRE I OC ACRE , A POL ACRE 12.CO ACRE ACRE ACRE l.co ACRE l.do HOUR HOUR DOL * LBS BALE TOTAL VARIABLE COST INCOME ABOVF VARIABLE COSTS FIXFD COSTS MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINEPY LAND (NET RENT) TDTAL FIXEO COSTS ACRF ACRE ACRE ACRF l.co _« TDTAL COSTS N-T RETURNS LAND CHARGE f-rtii I 7F^, BASED ON LANDLORD SHARE OF INSECTICIDF, AND GINNING. 1/4 OF GROSS I N C O M E L F S S 1 / 4 O F PROJFCTED BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBF" ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH

28 27 UPLAND COTTON, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT OPERATION TTFM NO. DATE TIMES LABOR MACHINE OVER HOURS HOURS FUEL.OIL, FIXED LUB.,REP. COSTS REP ACPE PFP ACPE SHPFDBR 4o 3,31 JAN l.oc C177 O.C9 C.43 R i o w 5 B J A N I C 4 3 PICKUP 11 JAN C.IO CIOC 0.31 o.n D F F S F T D I S C F F B C. 1 2 C. 2 2 S P R A Y P I G 5, 4 7 F F B C C. 1 2 O F F S E T D I S C F E B l. f t F L O A T 1, 3 7 F F B C. 2 9 L I S T r R 6 R F E B P I C K ' j R 1 1 F F B C. I O C I O C D ROLL, CULTIVATOR 5.41 MAR l.oc C28 PICKUP 11 MAR O.U CIOC 0.31 C.ll ROTDTIL.FR 1.43 APR l.oc C FD-RLANTER.3,45 APR C32 PICKUP 11 APR CIOC 0.31 O.ll ROLL. CU.TIVATDP 5,41 MAY l.oc PICKjp 11 MAY CIOC C U L T I V A T O R 6 - P J U N E 2. C O C 2 6 P I C K U P 1 1 J U N E C I O C O. l l CULTIVATOR 6-R 3.57 JULY O.ll C.13 PICKUP U JULY O.ll PICKUP 11 AUG CIO O.IOO 0.31 O.ll RTCKUP 11 SERT C1C C C.ll "ICKUP U OCT *125!! _ ill TOTALS LANP CHARGE BASED ON LANDLORD SHAR= OF 1/4 OF GROSS FERTILIZER, INSECTICIDE, AND GINNING. INC3ME LESS 1/4 OF PROJFCTED, 1975 BUDGFT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH C

29 28 #*\ F O R A G E S O P G H U M S I L A G F, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S T PA N S - P F C O S R E G I O N F S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R F T U R N S P E P A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U F O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM SORGHUM SILAGE TDTAL PRODUCTION TON c _ 2. _ Q. a VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SFFD FERT(2'* ) FERTILIZER APPLI MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LA30P!TPACT0R F, MACHINERY) LABOR!IRP IGATION) INTEREST ON HP9 CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HAPVEST LBS ACRE ACRE 1.75 l.oc 1.75 ACRE ACRE 9.25 l.oc ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL * J^*s HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL, HARVEST _ cr T O TA L VA R I A B L E C O S T ^. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS A. FIXED COSTS MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND!NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE C 0 7 ai 70. C9 5. TDTAL COSTS 6. NET R-TUPNS CPDP SOLD STANDING IN FIELD. PPCJECTFD, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER C ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 10

30 9 820 Z8009Z80 Gl HiNQW IVilcVD "VflNNV d 3 8 W O N N Q I l V D 1 3 I i N 3 a i x 3 l J Q f l b 9Z6 1 *a3i->3rudd G ~ I 3 I 3 N l D N l Q N Vi S Q 1 U S d C d J 92* 66*2 Z9** 196*1? snvigi \^/ ST^T" f? T 0?3TT3" g?tti" 01*0 iog 01 doxdlc 01*0 2*G OGl *0 92l*C 01*0 id3s 01 cflxjld Ol*0 2*0 001*0 92l*C wl#0 90 V Cl coxdid 01*0 2*0 001*0 9cl*C 01*0 Ainr 01 c n > j i cj *0 JO 1*0 92l*Q 01*0 3NOC wl chxjl c 01*0 2#0 ool *0 921* C 01*0 AVW Cl cnxoi -; 9* a *2*0 Z92*0 98 *C 00*1 AVW 9t?*2 fcdlnvld-gjb *2*G 90*0 18 I *J IZ.2*C 00* I AVW 2t7*t7 d U i V A i i i n - ' n. - Ol * J 2*0 30 1*j> 92l*C 01*0 ddv Cl chxdid 01* J 2*0 001*0 921* C 01*0 tivia C I cfdtdld 02* 3 90*0 Z92*i 98 * C 00*1 dvw 0**2 at; t3isi1 01*0 2* *0 921*0 wl» coxold 6** 3 l*c t?89'0 920* I 0w* *2 J.VUD3 2t?» J Z0*0 09**u 069*0 0C*2 bad * *2 DSIC i3s33l 01* J 2*0 oo i#o 92l»C 0l#0 nvt Ul chxjld 9fc* J 21*0 629*0 *6*U OC* I nvt 9 *2 Bfc MOIci i d D V d 3 d 3 d D V d 3 a SdHUH SdOOH 6)3 AO 3iva ON NU1iVd3dO SiSOD o3d«-8m 3NIHDVW d08v~ S3WIi W3±I G3XI 3 lio#t303 \mtis in=w30vnvw IVDIdAi 3 d D V d 3 d S N t i H i 3 d O N V S i S O D V W l i S 3 N G I _ > 3 d S O D 3 d - S N V d i S V X 3 i * Q 3 1 V 9 I d d I * 3 9 V 1 I S W H H S d O S 3->VdU3 63

31 l C Z 8 G V i 9 Z H i N O W! V J. l d V 3 " V H N N V d38won NOI ivd131 J.N3UI!3L.Gn8 9Z6 1 *Q3iD3r0dd * a " d N l D N I O N V i S O D D S c L o J 90*Z 176*292 * 96#89 0^"»T2~ ±09J 0O»OD 3dDV OVlt/ 00*1 J V M P 3dDV 99 * CO* I 99* 3t»DV 66*2 GJ*l 66*2 3dDV 10*901 66* 6l 0*0 & 66* 6l 2*TZ *17»28 60* *2l 1/** 9Z*2 dogh 99* * / 9Z*2 dooh OV*ZZ 00*1 o**zz 3dDV 99 *Z 00* I 98»i_ 3dD* 2*V CO* I 2** 3dDV 9Z *l 00*1 9Z.*l 3dDV C2*Z9 00*1 C2*Z9 3tDV ij *t7 C 0 * 01 **0 S-~ SNdfli^a i-^n ** bisod ivili *cj SiSGD G3Xid DVJ.C1 ( i N 3 d i 3 N ) C N V D Ad3MHDVW NOllVUIddl i>tui3vdl AP3NIHDVV. SiSUD C13X1 * S i S G D 3 H 8 V I d V A d A J b V 5 W 0 3 M * L isgd 3T:8VldVA DViCX is3advh ivioxans SiSOD ISaAdVH is3aevh-3tid TViOilsins *dvd *do NU lb3d3lm CNOIiVSlddl)dOQVD lad3n!hdvh 3 doidvdl>dc8vi Ad3NlHDVW NGl-LVDlddl SdUiJVdi Ad3Nl*DVW I Dddv aazniid.d tj-w8-ju )ldjj G33S is3auvh3ec_ SiSOD 318VI-JVA ' & D3*0G * CJ*S2 00*21 NUi. NOi idogodd DViLa. 3 9 V I I S f c O H S d C S W0d3 SidI3D3d SSGt9 isod AiliNVOO ilnfl/isod do 303VA do 3Dldd ilnh oe in3fc39vnvw 13A31 H91H 3 d D V d 3 d S N d f U = d O N V S i S O D 0 3 i V l». I i S 3 N O! _ ) 3 d S 0 D 3 d - S N V d i S V X 3 i * Q : = i V 9 1 d d I * 3 0 V 1 1 S V. 0 H 9 d 0 S dvvtqj

32 Z8009Z8^ 0 1 HiNOW "IVildVD "VONNV d d S W O N N 0 l i V D l 3 l i N 3 a i i. 3 9 U f l t i SZ6 1 *a3id3r0dd Q13I3 Nl 9NI0NViS Q 1US ocbd 66*2 2*17 66*2 J*2»t SDViCJi ttto~ TT'TJ- aoto" ^TPT 01*0 idu l l dflxdic 11*0 l *0 001*0 921*^ 01*0 id3s I I coxdid 11*0 l *0 00 I *0 92l*C Jl*0 9CIV I I cfixdld I l * G l *0 J0l*0 92l*C 01*0 Ainr l l coxdld l l - 0 l *0 001*0 92l*C 01*0 3Nnr l l cfxdla 11*0 l *0 JO 1*0 92l*C 01*0 AVW l l dhxjla Z2#0 2l*Ci Z92*0 98 * C 00*1 AVW g** d3in\'"d-g_dt 82*0 VI *0 ZL I * 0 892* C Jw*l AVW 117*9 dgivalidfi:) l D G c j 61* J 80*0 *9l *0 l 2«0 00*1 AVW 6 * I ds t-isn 11*0 I *C 00 1*0 92l*C 01*0 ddv l l cflxdi d 11*0 l *0 001*0 921*0 01*0 dvw l l cf ixdl a 11*0 l * *0 921* 0 ol*0 83d l l coxdla 62* t789*0 92L* I ug*2 833 Z * XVLDii 17**0 172*0 9* *0 819*C 0C*2 833 DblG ids3ju I 1 * 0 l *C X) 1*0 S2l*C 01*0 NVT l l coxdld **G 9 *0 18 *0 2Z9* 0 og*i NVT 9 *l fc J S M L l d S d D V d 3 d 3 d D V d 3 d S d fl O H S d fl O H d 3 A G 3 i V C S i S O D * d 3 a * * 8 m 3 N I H D V W d O f c V l S 3 W 11 Q3XI3 *DIO* 1303 ON W311 Ml JLVd3uU in3w39vnvw 13A3D H9IH 3 d D V d 3 d S N d fi i H d G N V S i S G D G B i V W l i S d N O I 9 3 d S O D 3 d - S N V d i S V X d i * G H l V 9 i a d I 3 9 V 1 I S W f l H G d G S 39VdO_: TG

33 32 GRAIN SORGHUM, IRRIGATFD, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PFR ACRF TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RFCEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION GRAIN SORGHUM TDTAL C VA P I A B L F C O S T S PRFHARVEST SEFD F^RT!ICC-50-0) FERTILIZER APPLI MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINFRY LABOR!TRACTOR & MACHINFRY) LABOP!IRPIGATION) INTFPFST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRF-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CJSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL SUBTOTAL. HARVEST CWT * LBS. C C1 ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DDL ±* C ACRE ,00 CWT. 0.2O * TDTAL VARIABLE COST ^. INCOME ABOVF VARIABLE COSTS FIXED rosts MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND!NET RENT) TDTAL FIXED COSTS ACRF 3.85 l.co 3.85 ACRE ACRE ACRE CC7 21* TDTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUM3EP -- ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH O

34 33 GRAIN SORGHUM, IRRIGATED. TEXAS TRANS-PEC3S REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT ^*% FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS OPFRATI3N NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE PLOW 3B 2.36 JAN l.oc C C.36 PICKUP ID JAN 0.1C CIOC OFFSFT DISC 2.34 FEB C.42 FLOAT 2,38 FEB PICKUP 13 FEB CIO LISTER 4R 2.40 MAR PICKUP 10 MAR PICKU3 10 APR C ROLL. CULTIVATOR 4.42 MAY l.oc PTCKJR 10 MAY O.IOC 0.23 C.IO BED-PLANTER 2.46 JUNE C53 ROLL. CULTIVATOR 4.42 JUNE C CULTIVATOR 4R 2.44 JUNE l.oc C PICKUP 10 JUNE C.IO CULTIVATOR 4P 2,44 JULY C C.17 PICKUP 13 JULY IOC P1CKU 10 AUG C1CC PICKUP 10 SEPT CIO PICKU3 10 OCT 0.10 _2. 1 _ U.ia-- -0*22 _ jjl T3TALS PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH

35 34 GRAIN SORGHUM. IRRIGATFD. TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION FSTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS FR ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U F O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E C E I P T S F R O M P R O D U C T I O N GRAIN SORGHUM TOTAL CWT, OG _! & VARIABLF COSTS PREHARVEST SEED FFRT(18C-60-0) FERTILIZER APPLI MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LABOP!TRACTOR & MACHINERY) LABOPIIRR IGATION) INTEREST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL. PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL SUBTOTAL. HARVEST.BS. C C1 ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE 9.3C C ACRE l.co HOUR HOUR C82 DOL * ACRE C.C0 CWT. 0.2O 55.CO _11*.Q TOTAL VARIABLE COST 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINEPY LAND!NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS ACRE ACRE ACRE C ACRE C * TDTAL COSTS 245.C3 6. NET PETURNS PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER C ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 10

36 HiNOW "IVildVD 'VPNNV d38w0n N0llVDl3liN3ai i39gn8 9Z61 *CJ3iD3CQdd 9* 69*1? I917* Z26*t? SlVlUi 'tej^y TT*rr Tr'TJ"* 0-3TT0~ 9TY*?r 01*0 IDC n coxdld 11*0 l *0 001*0 921*0 01*0 id3s n coxdid l 1*0 l *0 00 1*0 92I*C Jl*0 90V u dflxdid 11*0 l *0 001*0 92l*C 01*0 Ainr u coxdic 1*0 11*0 Vl*0 V12*C 00*1 Ainr ZS* d--9 dgivalilod I 1*0 l *G 001*0 92l*C 01*0 3Nnr l l coxdid 1*0 11*0 Vl*0 W2*C 00*1 3Nflf Z9* d--9 dgivalilod 82*0 *l*c 2Zl*u 892 * ti 00#l 3N0C l**9 dqivaiiino mod Z2*0 21*0 Z92*0 98 #C OC*l 3Nnr 9V* d3j.nv~p-g38 11*3 l *0 001*0 92I*C 01*0 AVW U coxdlo 82*0 VI'O ZL\*» 892 *C 00*1 AVW IV*9 dgxval l"lfld DDUd 11*0 l *0 001*0 92l*C 01*0 ddv l l chxdio 11*0 l *G 001*0 92l*C 01*0 dvw l l coxdid 61*0 80*0 V9l*0 l 2*U 00*1 dvw 6 * I d S t 3 i S I l I 1*0 l *0 001*0 921*C 01*0 833 l l cox'jld * *0 92C* I 0C*2 833 Z * JLVUld v*#a V2*0 9* *0 819*C 00*2 833 DSIG i3s330 11*0 l *0 001*0 92l*C 01*0 nvt l l dflxdid V#0 S *G 18 *0 2Z9*C 00*1 nvt 9 *l 99 MG Id 3 d D V d 3 d 3dDV d3d SdflOH SdflOH d3a0 3iva ON N0IlVd3dG SiSOD d3d* *8m 3NIHDVW aoevi S3WI1 W3il G3XI3 110*1303 1N3W39VNVW 13A31 H9IH dtioyt d3d SNdfU3d GNV SiSOD G31VW11S3 NG193d SOD3d-SNVdi SVXSi *a3iv91ddi *WflH9dQS KlVd9 se

37 36 OAT GRAZING, IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PFCOS RFGION FSTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT JNTT P P I C F O P V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST G30SS RECEIPTS FROM GRAZING TDTAL PRODUCTION.BS, 0.2C 4 8C0O.9J5* VARIABLE COSTS pr=harvest SErn FF3T( 150-C-r ) MACHINERY TRPIGATION MACHINERY LABOR!TRACTOP G MACHINERY) LA30P!IRR IGATION) INTERFST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL. PRE-HARVEST CWT. 10.On C 0 ACRE C ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL _l HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL. HARVFST C C TDTAL VARIABLE COST >. INCOME ABOVF VARIABLE COSTS CIXFP COSTS MACHINEPY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NFT PENT) TDTAL FIXFD COSTS 5, TOTAL COSTS 6. NrT PFTURNS ACPE CO ACRE ACRE ACRE C 0 7 a.tv._ * C R O P. PPOJECTFD, 1975 BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 5

38 37 OAT GRAZING. IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT OPERATIDN ITFM NO. DATE FUEL,OIL, FIXED T I M E S L A B O R M A C H I N E L U B.. P E P. C O S T S OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACPE PER ACRE PLOW 3B OFFSET DISC FFpT.APPLI.RFNTD OFFSET DISC FLOAT LISTFR 4P PICKUP GRAIN DRILL pickup PTCKU3 PTCKU3 PICKUP RTCKU3 2,36 2,34 4,86 2,34 2,38 2, , AUG AUG AUG AUG AUG AUG AUG SEPT SEPT OCT DEC FEB APP l.oc l.oc 2.0C l.oc 0.10 l.oc 0.1C C1C 0.10 CIO 0.1 c C o _-._-l_i_> C064 C C C 1 OC 0. 1 OC C 1 OC.a^iie *22 C CC CIO 0.10 CIO C.IO -.Aia TOTALS Q * 1 R C R O P. PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH

39 38 # ^ OAT GRAZING. IRRIGATED. TEXAS.TRANS-PECOS REGION FSTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGFMENT UNIT P P T C E O R V A L U F O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 2. G50SS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION GRAZING TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST SEED FERT(25T-0-C) MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LA30R! TRACTOR & MACHINERY) LA30R!IRR IGATION) INTEPFST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL, PRE-HARVEST -3S, 0.2O 66C * CWT. 1C.3C l.oc 10.CO ACRE l.co ACRE 3.39 l.co 3.39 ACRE ACRE l.co 51.6C HOUR HOUR e. 12 DOL Sj HARVFST COSTS SUBTOTAL, HARVEST C O TOTAL VARIABLE COST "» INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS MACHINFRY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET PFNT) TOTAL FIXFD COSTS ACRE 3.22 l.oc 3.22 ACRE ACRE l.oc ACRE 300.^0 CC7 21*co TOTAL COSTS 6. NET RETURNS * C R O P. PPOJFCTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ' ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH 5

40 39 OAT GRAZING. IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS-PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LFVEL MANAGEMENT FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS OPERATIDN NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PEP ACRE PLOW 5B 1,35 AUG I f. 4 3 OFFSET DISC 3,33 AUG l.oc C173 C. 12 C.22 FERT.APPLI RENTD 5,87 AUG l.oc CO C O OFFSET DISC 3,33 AUG l.oc C FLOAT 3,37 AUG 2.CO C C.29 1 T S T F 3 6 p 1.39 AUG l.oc C C.19 PICKUP 1 1 AUG 0.1^ CIOC 0.31 C.ll GRATN DRILL 5,51 SEPT PICKU^ SEPT 0.1C c.io. C RICKU7* OCT 0.1C C C. l l PICKUP NOV CIOC 0.31 C. l l P ICKIJP DEC C1C O.IOC 0.31 C. l l PICKUP FEB 0.1C C C. l l PTCKUP APR o.ic C C. l l pickup MAY o.ir -sums _Ljl1_2_1! _ U.i TOTALS CROP. PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ANNUA. CAPITAL MONTH CC86 C18 5

41 WHEAT. IRRIGATED, TEXAS TRANS- PECOS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT 40 UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U F O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS PFCETPTS WHEAT GRA7ING TOTAL FROM PRODUCTION BU LBS C0C 4J_.j_C._L C VA R I A B L E C O S T S PPFHARVEST SEED FERT!10^-0-0) HAIL INSURANCE MACHINERY IRRIGATION MACHINERY LA30P!TRACTOR C MACHINERY) LABOR!IPP IGATION) INTEPEST ON OP. CAP. SUBTOTAL. PRF-HARVEST HAPVEST COSTS CUSTCM COMBINE CUSTOM HAUL SUBTOTAL, HARVEST BU. 1C0C ACRE 15.0^ l.oc ACRE ACRE ACRE ACRE C HOUR HOUR DOL Sa ACRE 1C.0C * 3U * TDTAL VARIABLE COST 3. INCOMF ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS fixed COSTS MACHINEPY TPACTORS IRRIGATION MACHINERY LAND (NET RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS ACRE 3.00 l.oc 3.CO ACRE ACRE ACRE C.07 21«.Cll TDTAL COSTS 6. MET RETURNS * C R O P. PROJECTED BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBFR ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH O

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED) -33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE

More information

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT 12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS

More information

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE, COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC

More information

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE 22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,

More information

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION

More information

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT 40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT

More information

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY 62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E

More information

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE 48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON

More information

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0 42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E

More information

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO

More information

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment

More information

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)

More information

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. ^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A

More information

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based

More information

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs

More information

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the

More information

Background & Assumptions

Background & Assumptions EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT 42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY

'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY 63 CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0

More information

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University

More information

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. 3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G

More information

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online

More information

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

More information

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI. P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF

More information

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local

More information

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns

More information

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to

More information

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,

More information

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S

More information

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual

More information

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS. MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6

More information

UNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*

UNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT* 36 WATERMELONS. NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION EST IMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE CF COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WATERMELONS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

More information

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8

More information

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated

More information

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA

More information

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...

More information

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK

More information

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:

More information

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5

More information

/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT

/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT 42 ORANGES. PURCASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER IG LEVEL MANAGEMENT / ^^v- OPERAMON IT-. NO. DATE FUEL.OIL. FIXED TIMES LABOR MACINE LUB..REP. COSTS

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns

More information

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.

More information

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base

More information

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE

More information

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80. c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc

More information

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department

More information

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 J A R T a l s o c o n c l u d e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e i n t e n t o f N e l s o n s r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p l a n i s t o e n h a n c e c o n n e

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and

More information

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and

More information

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell

More information

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. r r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains II Region are based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best

More information

T h e C S E T I P r o j e c t

T h e C S E T I P r o j e c t T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T

More information

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s A g la di ou s F. L. 462 E l ec tr on ic D ev el op me nt A i ng er A.W.S. 371 C. A. M. A l ex an de r 236 A d mi ni st ra ti on R. H. (M rs ) A n dr ew s P. V. 326 O p ti ca l Tr an sm is si on A p ps

More information

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing

More information

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide 2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not

More information

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was

More information

i;\-'i frz q > R>? >tr E*+ [S I z> N g> F 'x sa :r> >,9 T F >= = = I Y E H H>tr iir- g-i I * s I!,i --' - = a trx - H tnz rqx o >.F g< s Ire tr () -s

i;\-'i frz q > R>? >tr E*+ [S I z> N g> F 'x sa :r> >,9 T F >= = = I Y E H H>tr iir- g-i I * s I!,i --' - = a trx - H tnz rqx o >.F g< s Ire tr () -s 5 C /? >9 T > ; '. ; J ' ' J. \ ;\' \.> ). L; c\ u ( (J ) \ 1 ) : C ) (... >\ > 9 e!) T C). '1!\ /_ \ '\ ' > 9 C > 9.' \( T Z > 9 > 5 P + 9 9 ) :> : + (. \ z : ) z cf C : u 9 ( :!z! Z c (! $ f 1 :.1 f.

More information

A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W

A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N

More information

SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-6.1b NUCLEAR UNIT OUTAGE DATA. For the Test Year Ended March 31, 2009

SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-6.1b NUCLEAR UNIT OUTAGE DATA. For the Test Year Ended March 31, 2009 Schedule H-6.lb SOUTHWSTRN LCTRIC POWR COMPANY SCHDUL H-6.1b NUCLAR UNIT OUTAG DATA For the Test Year nded March 31, 29 This schedule is not applicable to SVvPCO. 5 Schedule H-6.1 c SOUTHWSTRN LCTRIC POWR

More information

I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o

I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o u l d a l w a y s b e t a k e n, i n c l u d f o l

More information

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms & RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012

More information

Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-US region

Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-US region Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-U region atoshi Inomata Institute of Developing Economies ETRO Development of cross-national production linkages, 1985-2005 1985

More information

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)

More information

~,. :'lr. H ~ j. l' ", ...,~l. 0 '" ~ bl '!; 1'1. :<! f'~.., I,," r: t,... r':l G. t r,. 1'1 [<, ."" f'" 1n. t.1 ~- n I'>' 1:1 , I. <1 ~'..

~,. :'lr. H ~ j. l' , ...,~l. 0 ' ~ bl '!; 1'1. :<! f'~.., I,, r: t,... r':l G. t r,. 1'1 [<, . f' 1n. t.1 ~- n I'>' 1:1 , I. <1 ~'.. ,, 'l t (.) :;,/.I I n ri' ' r l ' rt ( n :' (I : d! n t, :?rj I),.. fl.),. f!..,,., til, ID f-i... j I. 't' r' t II!:t () (l r El,, (fl lj J4 ([) f., () :. -,,.,.I :i l:'!, :I J.A.. t,.. p, - ' I I I

More information

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS 54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT

More information

TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report

TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-9 December 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

Future Self-Guides. E,.?, :0-..-.,0 Q., 5...q ',D5', 4,] 1-}., d-'.4.., _. ZoltAn Dbrnyei Introduction. u u rt 5,4) ,-,4, a. a aci,, u 4.

Future Self-Guides. E,.?, :0-..-.,0 Q., 5...q ',D5', 4,] 1-}., d-'.4.., _. ZoltAn Dbrnyei Introduction. u u rt 5,4) ,-,4, a. a aci,, u 4. te SelfGi ZltAn Dbnyei Intdtin ; ) Q) 4 t? ) t _ 4 73 y S _ E _ p p 4 t t 4) 1_ ::_ J 1 `i () L VI O I4 " " 1 D 4 L e Q) 1 k) QJ 7 j ZS _Le t 1 ej!2 i1 L 77 7 G (4) 4 6 t (1 ;7 bb F) t f; n (i M Q) 7S

More information

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst 2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for

More information

Partial budgets for cover crops in Midwest row crop farming

Partial budgets for cover crops in Midwest row crop farming Partial budgets for cover crops in Midwest row crop farming A. Plastina, F. Liu, W. Sawadgo, F. Miguez, and S. Carlson. Conservation Infrastructure (CI) - Cover Crops Working Group Iowa Farm Bureau Federation

More information

o C *$ go ! b», S AT? g (i * ^ fc fa fa U - S 8 += C fl o.2h 2 fl 'fl O ' 0> fl l-h cvo *, &! 5 a o3 a; O g 02 QJ 01 fls g! r«'-fl O fl s- ccco

o C *$ go ! b», S AT? g (i * ^ fc fa fa U - S 8 += C fl o.2h 2 fl 'fl O ' 0> fl l-h cvo *, &! 5 a o3 a; O g 02 QJ 01 fls g! r«'-fl O fl s- ccco > p >>>> ft^. 2 Tble f Generl rdnes. t^-t - +«0 -P k*ph? -- i t t i S i-h l -H i-h -d. *- e Stf H2 t s - ^ d - 'Ct? "fi p= + V t r & ^ C d Si d n. M. s - W ^ m» H ft ^.2. S'Sll-pl e Cl h /~v S s, -P s'l

More information