JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, B10402, doi: /2007jb004928, 2007
|
|
- Hilda Johnston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112,, doi: /2007jb004928, 2007 Burma plate motion Vineet K. Gahalaut 1 and Kalpna Gahalaut 1 Received 5 January 2007; revised 11 June 2007; accepted 13 July 2007; published 4 October [1] Plate motion in the Indo-Burmese Arc-Andaman-Sumatra region of Burma plate is poorly resolved. This is mainly due to lack of relevant data and complex tectonics of the region. We analyze (1) azimuths of coseismic displacements due to the 2004 Sumatra- Andaman and 2005 Nias earthquakes; (2) estimates of interseismic deformation in the Indo-Burmese Arc, Andaman, Sumatra, and Sagaing Fault regions (all based on GPS measurements); (3) long-term plate motion rates across Sumatra Fault System, Sagaing Fault, and Andaman Sea from geomorphological and other geophysical studies, and (4) the earthquake focal mechanisms in the region. We suggest that the SSW motion of Sunda plate with respect to Indian plate may be partitioned into the dextral strike-slip motion across the Sagaing Fault in the north and Sumatra Fault System in south in the back-arc region, and the arc-normal motion across the Sumatra subduction zone, which becomes oblique in Andaman and southern Indo-Burmese Arc region and dextral in the northern Indo-Burmese Arc region of the fore arc. Under the rigid plate approximation, we estimate a pole for India-Burma plate pair at 27 ± 1 N, 82 ± 1.1 E with an angular velocity of ± 0.12 /Ma and for Burma-Sunda at 22.3 ± 1.1 N, ± 2.5 E with an angular velocity of 0.67 ± 0.12 /Ma. Thus the plate motion in the northern and southern regions of Burma plate, namely, the Indo-Burmese Arc and Andaman-Sumatra Arc, may be explained by a single pole and does not require a boundary between the two. Citation: Gahalaut, V. K., and K. Gahalaut (2007), Burma plate motion, J. Geophys. Res., 112,, doi: /2007jb Introduction [2] Plate motions in many of the active deformation zones are poorly resolved and can be widely distributed [Bird, 2003]. This has also led to increase in defining the number of plates. In this article we focus on the region east of the eastern margin of the Indian plate. Extensive GPS measurements in Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia etc. have indicated that the plate motion in this part differs from that of Eurasian plate and it requires a different pole, which moves with a higher angular velocity [Michel et al., 2000, 2001; Becker et al., 2000; Bock et al., 2003; Vigny et al., 2003; Socquet et al., 2006]. This block has been referred as Sunda plate. The western margin of the Sunda plate converges obliquely with India-Australia plate. The relative motion between the Sunda and India-Australia plates is partitioned between the predominantly arc-normal subduction in the fore arc and dextral motion along the Sumatra Fault System in Sumatra region and Sagaing Fault in the back-arc region [Fitch, 1972; McCaffrey, 1992]. The region bounded by the fore and back arc has been referred by various names, e.g., Burma platelet [Guzman-Speziale and Ni, 1996]; Burma microplate [Stein and Okal, 2005]; Andaman microplate [DeShon et al., 2005]; small Burma plate [Bird, 2003]; Burma or Myanmar sliver plate [Curray, 2005, 1 National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India. Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union /07/2007JB004928$09.00 Socquet et al., 2006], Burma subplate [Lay et al., 2005], and Burma plate [Briggs et al., 2006], etc. Hereinafter, we refer it as Burma plate. Many investigators have suggested that the Burma plate terminates in the north near 16 N latitude, north of Andaman, [Bird, 2003; Stein and Okal, 2005; DeShon et al., 2005] and have estimated the pole of the India-Burma plate pair near the northern termination of the plate [Bird, 2003] or slightly east of it [Stein and Okal, 2005], whereas others have considered that the region lying further north, between the Indo-Burmese Arc and Sagaing Fault is also a part of it [Curray et al., 1979; Nielsen et al., 2004; Curray, 2005; Vigny et al., 2005; Lay et al., 2005; Briggs et al., 2006; Socquet et al., 2006]. It appears from the above that the motion and extent of Burma plate are not well constrained which has led to poor understanding of the plate kinematics and earthquake occurrence processes in the region. This has also led to poor assessment of the seismic hazard in the region. [3] In this article, we examine the GPS measurements of coseismic and interseismic deformation rates, long-term plate convergence rates, and earthquake focal mechanisms to understand the plate kinematics, partitioning of India- Sunda plate convergence and to define poles for India- Burma and Burma-Sunda plate pairs. 2. Prelude [4] For the definition of Burma plate, we follow Curray [2005] and define Burma plate sandwiched between India and Sunda plate. It is bounded in the east by Sumatra Fault 1of9
2 System in its southern part and Sagaing Fault in its northern part. In the west it is bounded by Sumatra Andaman fore-arc subduction zone in its southern part and Indo-Burmese Arc in its northern part [Nielsen et al., 2004]. Thus, according to this definition, the geographical region of Burma (now Myanmar) is also included in Burma plate. Further, we analyze all GPS measurements in the fore-arc region with reference to Indian plate. To estimate plate motion of Sunda plate with reference to Indian plate, we use the pole at 20.2 N and 26.1 E with an angular velocity of 0.37 /Ma [Socquet et al., 2006] that has been derived from extensive GPS measurements spanning 11 a from 190 sites in Asia, Nepal, and eastern Indonesia including Myanmar. 3. GPS Measurements of Coseismic Displacements [5] The 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 2005 Nias earthquakes are among the best GPS monitored great subduction zone earthquakes [Jade et al., 2005; Earnest et al., 2005; Subarya et al., 2006; Gahalaut et al., 2006; Gahalaut and Catherine, 2006; Briggs et al., 2006; Kreemer et al., 2006; Vigny et al., 2005]. GPS measurements before and after the two great earthquakes provided the most robust estimates of coseismic displacements and slip on the earthquake ruptures. The two earthquakes caused horizontal displacements reaching to 6 m in approximately WSW direction, Figure 1 and Table 1 [Subarya et al., 2006; Gahalaut et al., 2006; Gahalaut and Catherine, 2006; Briggs et al., 2006; Kreemer et al., 2006]. We considered the azimuths of these large coseismic displacements at sites located above the rupture only and avoided sites, which lie on the edges of the rupture or far from it. This procedure ensures that the azimuth of coseismic displacement vectors represent the azimuth of coseismic slip vectors. In fact the coseismic displacement azimuths at sites above the rupture have been found to be consistent with that of the rake of the modeled coseismic slip on the rupture [e.g., Subarya et al., 2006; Gahalaut et al., 2006; Gahalaut and Catherine, 2006; Briggs et al., 2006; Kreemer et al., 2006; Chlieh et al., 2007]. In the Nias region, the direction of coseismic displacement is almost perpendicular to the NW SE trending trench, while in Andaman it becomes oblique as the trench becomes N S (Figure 1). At some sites the direction of coseismic displacement differs from the nearby sites, e.g., at a site, HB (Table 1) in Little Andaman shows displacement in SW direction, whereas sites in the regions lying north or south of it, show motion in WSW direction. This could be due to slip variation on the rupture. We ignore this site in our analysis. GPS measurements of postseismic deformation at sites located in the source zone of the two earthquakes in the Andaman, Nicobar and Sumatra regions indicate that deformation continues to occur approximately in the same direction [Gahalaut et al., 2006; Banerjee et al., 2007; Hsu et al., 2006; V. K. Gahalaut et al., Afterslip in the Andaman-Nicobar region following the 26 December 2004 earthquake, manuscript in preparation, 2007]. [6] The azimuths of interseismic deformation in the Andaman-Sumatra region (discussed in section 4) agree, within ±5, with that of coseismic deformation. The consistency in the azimuths of coseismic, postseismic, and interseismic deformation suggests that the average azimuth of the coseismic displacements in the region may be considered as the direction of frontal arc motion with respect to Indian plate. We agree that this assumption may not be entirely correct as these measurements span a short time period. However, we emphasize that since the measurements are made in three essential and integral phases of deformation cycle, the average azimuth of the deformation should represent azimuth of fore-arc motion. In fact our subsequent analysis prove that the above assumption is true, at least in this case. 4. GPS Measurements of Interseismic Deformation and Other Long-Term Rates [7] Interseismic deformation rates have been reported from Myanmar, Andaman and Sumatra regions. Vigny et al. [2003] and Socquet et al. [2006] reported GPS measurements of interseismic deformation across the Sagaing Fault and at a few sites west of it. These observations have been used to estimate interseismic slip rate across the Sagaing Fault and Indo-Burmese Arc [Socquet et al., 2006; Sahu et al., 2006]. It has been reported that out of relative plate motion of about 36 mm/a between the Sunda and Indian plates at about 20 N latitude, dextral motion of about 18 mm/a occurs across the Sagaing Fault. This estimate is consistent with the long-term estimate of 18 mm/a derived from neotectonic studies [Bertrand et al., 1998]. The remaining motion of about mm/a is accommodated obliquely across the Indo-Burmese Arc, through dextral motion of about 18 mm/a and thrust motion of about 13 mm/a [Socquet et al., 2006]. [8] Extensive GPS measurements have been undertaken off the western coast of Sumatra. The measurements taken during are consistent with strain accumulation along the fore arc [Prawirodirdjo et al., 1997; Bock et al., 2003]. With respect to Indian plate the direction of motion at sites located on the island belt is generally toward WSW and perpendicular to the local strike of the trench axis (Figure 1). McCaffrey [2002] analyzed these GPS observations and used a variable slip model in which maximum interseismic slip was about 50 mm/a. Simoes et al. [2004] analyzed these and uplift rates derived from coral dating. They estimated that a long-term slip rate of mm/a on the Main Thrust Zone (MTZ) of the subduction zone is required to explain these data. [9] Paul et al. [2001] and Jade [2004] reported campaign mode GPS measurements during , at a single site, CARI, near Port Blair, Andaman, which suggest an interseismic deformation rate of 13.3 ± 3 mm/a toward N250 with respect to India. If we consider the locking of MTZ, having a dip of 12 and width of 120 km, to be full, it corresponds to a convergence slip rate of about 30 ± 6 mm/a toward N250. Gahalaut et al. [2006] reported another set of measurements at Port Blair by Survey of India, made in and April The observations at Port Blair provide a relative velocity of about 63 ± 6 mm/a toward N277 with reference to Indian plate. Large errors in the estimate are due to the shorter duration (less than 7 hours) of GPS measurements during the 1995 campaign and also due to single measurement. Though the two estimates vary significantly in their magnitudes, probably reflecting intense variation in strain accumulation both in 2of9
3 Figure 1. Simplified tectonic map of the eastern margin of the Indian plate. Solid black arrows denote the coseismic displacements due to the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake [Gahalaut et al., 2006; Subarya et al., 2006]. Sites from northern Sumatra having less displacement (<1 m) have been ignored. Grey arrows show the coseismic displacements due to 28 March 2005 Nias earthquake [Gahalaut and Catherine, 2006; Briggs et al., 2006; Kreemer et al., 2006]. The red arrow in the Andaman shows interseismic deformation during at a site near Port Blair [Paul et al., 2001; Jade, 2004]. Red arrows in Nias region show interseismic deformation during Pairs of pink arrows denote direction of horizontal principal stress, estimated from the inversion of focal mechanisms of earthquakes that occurred before the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, whereas pairs of purple arrows of smaller size denote direction of horizontal principal stress, estimated from the inversion of focal mechanisms of aftershocks of the two great earthquakes. Blue rectangle denotes the location of Sagaing Fault GPS network [Vigny et al., 2003], which yielded a dextral motion of 18 mm/a of the Sagaing Fault. Blue arrows, marked with rates of 38 and 23 mm/a, denote the motion of Sunda plate and Indo-Burmese Arc with reference to Indian plate [Socquet et al., 2006]. Numbers in the fore-arc region denote rates of plate convergence with reference to Indian plate, derived from GPS measurements during interseismic period. Numbers in the back-arc region denote opening rate in the Andaman Sea (16 38 mm/a [Kamesh Raju et al., 2004]) and rate of dextral motion across Sumatra Fault System (25 mm/a). The inset on top left shows the location of Sunda and other nearby plates. The arrows show plate motion in no net rotation [Kreemer et al., 2003]. 3of9
4 Table 1. GPS Site Description and Horizontal Coseismic Displacements at Sites Where It Exceeds 1 m a Observed Displacement Site Region Site Code Longitude Latitude Displacement, m b deg Horizontal Coseismic Displacements Due to 26 December 2004 Earthquake 1 North Andaman Aerial Bay AB North Andaman East Island EI Middle Andaman Long Island LI Middle Andaman Udaygarh UG Middle Andaman Govindgarh GG South Andaman Port Blair PB South Andaman Passage Island PI c Little Andaman Hut Bay HB Car Nicobar Car Nicobar CN Nicobar Islands Teresa Island TI Nicobar Islands Kardip KD Nicobar Islands Miroe Island MI Great Nicobar Campbell Bay CB Sumatra region R Sumatra region R Sumatra region K Sumatra region K Sumatra region K Sumatra region PIDI Sumatra region R Sumatra region R Sumatra region R Nias region R Horizontal Coseismic Displacements Due to 28 March 2005 Earthquake 24 Nias region BSIM Nias region LHWA a Coseismic displacements at sites 1 13 are reported by Gahalaut et al. [2006], by Subarya et al. [2006], and by Gahalaut and Catherine [2006]. b Error in these estimates does not exceed 5 [Gahalaut et al., 2006; Gahalaut and Catherine, 2006; Subarya et al., 2006; Chlieh et al., 2007]. c We did not consider the azimuth of coseismic displacement at this site in our analysis as it shows motion toward SW, whereas other nearby sites show motion toward WSW. time and space, they are almost consistent in direction. However, possibility of error in this estimate appears strong as it is based on only two measurements with one of them spanning only seven hours of measurements. Thus we prefer the estimate by Paul et al. [2001]. [10] Geologic rates of crustal deformation in Andaman Sea and across Sumatra Fault System have also been reported. Kamesh Raju et al. [2004] analyzed magnetic anomalies and reported an opening rate of mm/a in the Andaman Sea region. Sieh and Natawidjaja [2000] estimated dextral motion of about 25 mm/a across the Sumatra Fault System relying on offsets of geomorphic features, with a minimum of about 10 mm/a in the southern Sumatra and 37 mm/a north of Sumatra. 5. Analysis: India-Burma and Burma-Sunda Plate Pair Poles [11] Dextral motion in the back arc and thrust motion in the fore arc, which becomes oblique in Andaman and Indo- Burmese Arc, appear to be consistent with the view that the fore arc of Burma plate moves clockwise with respect to India with a pole located in central India. We performed a grid search in which we estimated the location of pole. The angular motion along this pole predicts such a linear motion in the fore arc, which provides minimum discrepancy between the average azimuth of reported coseismic and interseismic displacements and the direction of predicted displacement. Considering the scatter in the azimuths of coseismic displacement vectors, we considered their average directions, which are N230, N242 and N240 in the fore-arc regions of Sumatra (at 3 N, 96 E), Nicobar (at 8 N, 93 E) and Andaman (at 13 N, 93 E). In the Indo-Burmese Arc we considered an azimuth of N215 at 20 N, 94 E [Socquet et al., 2006]. As discussed earlier, at least one site, HB, in Little Andaman shows significant deviation in the azimuth of coseismic displacement from that in the northern and southern part, we ascribe this deviation to heterogeneity in the coseismic slip on the earthquake rupture and do not use this observation. For the assumed pole location within the search region, we computed the difference in the predicted and observed azimuth of displacement vector for each region, e.g., for the Indo-Burmese Arc region, we assumed the pole location within the search region and for each pole location we computed the azimuth of the predicted linear displacement at 20 N and 94 E and then plotted the difference between the predicted azimuth and the observed azimuth of N215 (Figure 2a). We performed such grid search for all the regions and then averaged the difference to obtain a common minimum (Figure 2e). The magnitude of rotation is constrained by the available estimate of 23 mm/a across the Indo-Burmese Arc [Socquet et al., 2006], 30 mm/a across Andaman and about 40 mm/a across Sumatra frontal arc region. The grid search approach suggests that the fore-arc motion can be explained by a rotation of ± 0.13 /Ma through a pole located at ± 1 N and ± 1.1 E. The error bars in location correspond to an average 5 discrepancy in the azimuth of 4of9
5 Figure 2. Results of grid search for estimating the India-Burma pole. We computed azimuth of motion in the fore-arc regions of (a) North Sumatra (at 3 N, 96 E), (b) Nicobar (at 8 N, 93 E), (c) Andaman (at 13 N, 93 E), and (d) Indo-Burmese arc (at 20 N, 94 E) by assuming poles located at every 1 interval within the search region. The difference in degree between the azimuths of predicted displacement and observed average direction of coseismic and/or interseismic displacement (N215, N240, N242, and N230 in Indo-Burmese Arc, Andaman, Nicobar, and north Sumatra region) is contoured. (e) Average discrepancy. The minimum occurs at N and N, which we adopt as the preferred location of pole for India-Burma plate pair. GPS measurements [e.g., Chlieh et al., 2007; Briggs et al., 2006] and that in the magnitude of rotation to an uncertainty of ±5 mm/a in the slip rate estimate in various regions. A higher rate will provide correspondingly higher rate in the Sumatra fore-arc region, which may be consistent with the reported rate but it may also cause higher rate across Indo- Burmese Arc making it inconsistent with what is reported [Socquet et al., 2006]. [12] We added the India-Sunda [Socquet et al., 2006] and the above estimated India-Burma Euler pole and calculated the Burma-Sunda pole at 22.3 ± 1.1 N and ± 2.5 E with an angular velocity of 0.67 ± 0.12 /Ma. The Burma- Sunda pole predicts velocity in the back arc (Figure 3), which are consistent with the reported results. The pole predicts a dextral motion of 28 mm/a on the Sumatra Fault System, a dextral motion of mm/a on the Sagaing Fault and an opening rate of 21 mm/a in the Andaman Sea. These rates are consistent with the reported estimates of long-term motion in these regions [Sieh and Natawidjaja, 5of9
6 Figure 3. (left) Prediction of the fore- and back-arc motion corresponding to the India-Burma pole at N, E with an angular velocity of /Ma and Burma-Sunda pole at 22.3 N, E with an angular velocity of 0.67 ± 0.12 /Ma. India-Burma pole is shown with 1s error, which approximately corresponds to 5 scatter in the azimuth of coseismic displacement vectors. The motion of Sunda with respect to India is calculated using the pole at 20.2 N and 26.1 E with an angular velocity of 0.37 /Ma [Socquet et al., 2006]. (right) Partitioning of India-Sunda motion in Indo-Burmese Arc, Andaman- Nicobar, and Nias-Sumatra regions. 2000; Vigny et al., 2003; Socquet et al., 2006; Bertrand et al., 1998; Kamesh Raju et al., 2004]. [13] We emphasize here that we did not use the deformation rate data from back-arc region to constrain the location of any of the poles and motion across them. Thus the agreement between the predicted and reported values of motion in the back-arc region further establishes the soundness and appropriateness of our model of poles in the region. It also validates the assumption of considering the azimuths of the interseismic, coseismic, and postseismic deformation to be the azimuth of long-term plate convergence in the fore-arc region. The partitioning of the rate of Sunda plate with respect to Indian plate into the rate of Burma plate with respect to Indian plate (i.e., fore-arc motion) and the rate of Burma plate with respect to Sunda plate (i.e., back-arc motion) is also shown in Figure 3. Partitioning in the Indo-Burmese Arc region is consistent with that by Vigny et al. [2003], Nielsen et al. [2004], and Socquet et al. [2006]. 6. Stress Directions From Plate Motion and Earthquake Focal Mechanisms [14] Here we assess whether the derived poles will cause the right kind of orientation of principal stresses that would produce slip in the observed direction on the faults. The plate motion in the fore-arc region of Burma plate, derived from the India-Burma pole should produce a stress state in 6of9
7 Table 2. Results of Inversion of Focal Mechanisms for Estimating the Principal Stress Directions a Fore Arc: Subduction Zone and Indo-Burmese Arc s 1 s 2 s 3 Back Arc: Sumatra Fault System, Andaman Sea, and Sagaing Fault s 1 s 2 s 3 Indo-Burmese region (14 26 N) 206, , 36 93, 47 41, 4 157, , 7 Andaman region (10 14 N) 260, , , , 39 41, , 14 Aftershocks 243, , , Nicobar-Sumatra (3 10 N) 204, , 15 57, 57 12, 1 277, , 10 Aftershocks 166, 7 263, 43 69, , 67 16, , 5 Sumatra (3 N 3 S) 219, , 5 48, , , 33 68, 48 Aftershocks 224, , 1 45, a For inversion, earthquake focal mechanisms for the period from 1973 to 25 December 2004 (1 day prior to the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake) have been used. We also inverted aftershock focal mechanism solutions. which maximum principal stress (s 1 ) should be almost NNE SSW oriented to cause a predominantly dextral motion in the northern Indo-Burmese Arc region, NE SW oriented to cause oblique (thrust plus dextral) and thrust motion in Andaman and Sumatra region, respectively. Similarly, in the back-arc region the Burma-Sunda pole should produce a stress state in which s 1 is NNE SSW oriented to cause dextral motion on Sagaing Fault and a subvertical s 1 to cause a tensile regime in the Andaman Sea where opening is reported, and almost N S oriented s 1 in the Sumatra Fault System region to cause dextral motion along it. We verify whether the available earthquake focal mechanism solutions are consistent with this view. [15] We used earthquake focal mechanism solutions from centroid moment tensor (CMT) catalogue (auxiliary material 1 Figure S1) to estimate the directions of principal stress in various parts of Burma plate. In the back-arc region of Sagaing Fault and Sumatra Fault System, predominantly dextral motion occurs on the approximately N S to NW SE oriented nodal planes. In the Andaman sea, earthquakes occur through normal and strike-slip motion on predominantly NE SW oriented planes. In the fore arc, predominantly thrust motion occurs in the Andaman- Nicobar and Sumatra region. However, a few earthquakes with normal motion have been reported in Sumatra region. These regions approximately coincide with the zones of transtension, which formed during the geological evolution of the Sumatra Fault System [Sieh and Natawidjaja, 2000]. The West Andaman Fault (WAF) in the Sumatra offshore region is characterized by thrust and strike-slip faulting and has been considered as a lithospheric-scale boundary which probably controlled the eastern limit of the 2004 Sumatra- Andaman earthquake rupture [Singh et al., 2005; Kamesh Raju et al., 2007]. In north, in the Indo-Burmese Arc region, strike-slip and thrust motion-type earthquakes are reported [Guzman-Speziale and Ni, 1996; Rao and Kumar, 1999; Satyabala, 2003; Rao and Kalpna, 2005]. We carefully segregated the earthquakes in fore and back-arc regions having distinct focal mechanisms and used the linear least squares inversion approach [Michael, 1984, 1987] to estimate the best fitting maximum (s 1 ), intermediate (s 2 )andminimum (s 3 ) stress directions (Figure 1 and Table 2). In the back-arc region, approximately NNE SSW direction of s 1 is consistent with dextral motion on the Sagaing Fault and 1 Auxiliary materials are available in the HTML. doi: / 2007JB Sumatra Fault System. In Andaman sea, we show subhorizontal s 3,whichalongwithsteeps 1 is consistent with the predominant normal motion and opening up of Andaman Sea. In the Sumatra fore-arc region, s 1 is almost perpendicular to the trench. However, in the Nicobar region it is very oblique to the trench axis. This could be because of the fact that in this region the distance between the back arc and fore arc is the least (Figure S1), and hence there could be problem in segregating the fault plane solutions in the two regions if the epicentral locations of the earthquakes contain large errors. Hence there could be some influence of earthquakes of the back-arc region on the fore-arc region due to the mixing up of the two. It could be more so as the earthquakes are more frequent in the back-arc region. In the Andaman, the direction of s 1 suggests predominance of thrust faulting, rather than oblique faulting. However, the direction is similar to the coseismic displacement due to the 2004 earthquake and with that of the interseismic deformation at CARI [Paul et al., 2001; Jade, 2004]. Further, north in the Indo-Burmese Arc, direction of s 1 is NNE SSW, which is consistent with the predominant dextral motion along N S planes and thrust motion across E W planes. We inverted the focal mechanisms of the aftershocks of the two earthquakes also (Table 2). Directions of s 1 and s 3 do not change appreciably in this case, except in the fore-arc region of Nicobar. In Andaman region the azimuth of s 1 is more consistent with azimuth of estimated coseismic displacements. In Sumatra and back-arc region of Nicobar, it does not change in any significant way, whereas in Nicobar, direction of s 1 is almost parallel to the trench axis. [16] In summary, the principal stress directions in the fore and back-arc regions, derived from the earthquake focal mechanisms, are generally (except in Nicobar region) consistent with that expected to arise from the motion predicted by the two poles. Thus the principal stress directions are generally consistent with the coseismic displacements of the two earthquakes and the direction of convergence derived from GPS measurements in the interseismic period. We suggest that the derived stress directions from the focal mechanisms may contain relatively large errors. An error in location of earthquake may lead to poor segregation of focal mechanisms in the fore and back arc. Uncertainties of ±15 in trend and ±5 in plunge of the slip vector from an individual earthquake are typical in the CMT focal mechanisms [McCaffrey, 1992]. We may expect similar error in our analysis of principal stress determination. 7of9
8 [17] McKenzie [1969] pointed out that it is not necessary that the stress state derived from the inversion of focal mechanisms should be consistent with the present-day motion as the present-day motion on these faults is the motion along the preexisting faults. Thus the stress state inferred from the focal mechanisms may not be consistent with the fault kinematics. It is more appropriate to estimate the orientation of principal stress, which is consistent with the estimated or measured direction of slip on the fault. In the present case, the direction of slip on faults appears to be consistent with the principal stress directions estimated from focal mechanisms. 7. Concluding Discussion [18] We suggest that a single pole located in north central India can explain the relative motion between the Burma fore arc and the Indian plate. The model does not require that the Andaman and Sumatra fore arc be terminated in the north at about 16 N or that the fore arc is fragmented into independent blocks along these two regions. The analysis allowed us to partition the India-Sunda motion into fore and back-arc motion of Burma plate that are consistent with that estimated in these regions. The model implies that part of the oblique convergence between India and Sunda plates in Andaman and southern Indo-Burmese Arc region is actually accommodated through oblique subduction in the fore-arc region of Burma plate. Thus the slip partitioning in this region is partial. Convergence in the northern Indo-Burmese Arc region is accommodated through predominantly dextral strike-slip motion. Increasing obliqueness of subduction in the north probably is one of the reasons why the 2004 earthquake rupture terminated north of Andaman. [19] Relocated aftershocks of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 2005 Nias earthquakes show a sharp boundary at about 1 2 N latitude [DeShon et al., 2005]. DeShon et al. [2005] proposed this as the southern extent of the Burma plate, which is about km further northward of that proposed earlier [Bird, 2003]. From our analysis we could not address this issue, but we are of the opinion that in the southern direction, the Burma plate extends at least to this region. Since the pole estimated here for the Burma-India plate pair can also explain the convergence rate in the island belt, west of Sumatra, there may be a possibility that the plate extends further south, till the southern tip of the Sumatra and Sumatra Fault System near 7 S. [20] The equatorial region of Indian Ocean that lie west of Sunda trench is now referred as the diffused plate boundary zone between the India and Australia plates [Gordon et al., 1990; Deplus, 2001; DeMets et al., 2005]. The zone is as wide as 1500 km [Chamot-Rooke et al., 1993; Krishna et al., 1998]. Relative motion of Australia with reference to Indian plate in the Simeulue and Nias islands region is no more than 1 cm/a toward N10 E, which increases to about 3 cm/a on the Australian mainland [Delescluse and Chamot- Rooke, 2007]. Off the west coast of Sumatra, though the relative motion is small, it implies that motion here is neither purely Australian nor purely Indian [Vigny et al., 2005; Delescluse and Chamot-Rooke, 2007]. Thus it may imply that our model, based on India-Sunda plate motion, represents plate motion in the northern Sumatra and further north of it more appropriately as in the region south of it, plate motion should be governed by the Sunda-Australia plate motion. However, we suggest that the motion of northern Sumatra fore arc is closer to Sunda-India motion rather than Sunda-Australia motion. The azimuth of interseismic deformation rates in the Sumatra-Nias region, when estimated with reference to Indian plate agrees with the azimuth of coseismic movements. However, with reference to Australia plate the azimuths of interseismic motion suggest southward motion of the fore arc. This kind of motion becomes oblique to trench axis and also is inconsistent with the azimuth of coseismic displacement and earthquake focal mechanisms. Thus we suggest that the fore-arc motion in the region off the west coast of Sumatra may be closer to Sunda-India motion rather than Sunda- Australia motion. [21] Besides the diffused plate boundary zone between the India-Australia plates, another important feature of the region is the 90 E Ridge (NER). Earlier work suggested that NER accommodated as much as 2 cm/a of sinistral shear [Stein and Okal, 1978]. However, after the introduction of concept of diffused plate boundary [Wiens et al., 1985], the role of NER in controlling the deformation is minimized and motion along the NER is about 3 mm/a only [DeMets et al., 1988; Petroy and Wiens, 1989]. Krishna et al. [1998], Deplus et al. [1998], and Tinnon et al. [1995] reported evidence of deformation close to NER which is suggestive of weak rheology for the NER [Delescluse and Chamot- Rooke, 2007]. It implies that plate motion of India-Australia in the NER and Wharton Basin, which lies to the east of NER, is affected by deformation in the region. However, in this article we did not consider its effect, assumed a rigid plate and adopted the India-Sunda pole of Socquet et al. [2006] to estimate the poles for India-Burma fore arc and Sunda-Burma back arc and fore- and back-arc motion of Burma plate. [22] Acknowledgments. Roland Bürgmann, Chris Vigny, and Anne Socquet provided valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, which significantly improved the quality. Roland rightly cautioned us in using the earthquake focal mechanisms for the analysis. Constructive reviews of Claude Rangin, an anonymous reviewer, and the Associate Editor, greatly improved the manuscript. Their comments/suggestions on the role of 90 E Ridge and diffused plate boundary between India and Australia are greatly appreciated. N. Chamot-Rooke and K. Kamesh Raju provided reprints of their papers. For estimation of Euler pole and adding two poles we used programs by Brennan Jordan and J.-Y. Royer, respectively. Support from V. P. Dimri (Director, NGRI), R. K. Chadha, and M. Ravi Kumar is greatly acknowledged. The work in Andaman Nicobar is financially supported by DST. References Banerjee, P., F. Pollitz, B. Nagarajan, and R. Burgmann (2007), Coseismic slip distributions of the 26 December 2006 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, S86 S102. Becker, M., et al. (2000), Improving the velocity field in south and South- East Asia: The third round of GEODYSSEA, Earth Planets Space, 52, Bertrand, G., et al. (1998), The Singu basalts (Myanmar): New constraints for the amount of recent offset on the Sagaing Fault, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. IIa, 327, Bird, P. (2003), An updated digital model of plate boundaries, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 4(3), 1027, doi: /2001gc Bock, Y., L. Prawirodirdjo, J. F. Genrich, C. W. Stevens, R. McCaffrey, C. Subarya, S. S. O. Puntodewo, and E. Calais (2003), Crustal motion in Indonesia from Global Positioning System measurements, J. Geophys. Res., (B8), 2367, doi: /2001jb Briggs, R. W., et al. (2006), Deformation and slip along the Sunda megathrust in the great 2005 Nias-Simeulue earthquake, Science, 311, of9
9 Chamot-Rooke, N., et al. (1993), Intraplate shortening in the central Indian Ocean determined from a 2100-km-long north-south deep seismic reflection profile, Geology, 21, Chlieh, M., et al. (2007), Coseismic slip and afterslip of the great (M w 9.15) Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 2004, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, S152 S173. Curray, J. R. (2005), Tectonics and history of the Andaman sea region, J. Asian Earth Sci., 25, Curray, J. R., et al. (1979), Tectonics of the Andaman Sea and Burma, in Geological and Geophysical Investigations of Continental Margins, edited by J. Watkins, L. Montadert, and P. W. Dickerson, Mem. AAPG, 29, Delescluse, M., and N. Chamot-Rooke (2007), Instantaneous deformation and kinematics of the India-Australia plate, Geophys. J. Int., 168, DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, and D. F. Argus (1988), Intraplate deformation and closure of the Australia-Antarctica-Africa plate circuit, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11,877 11,897. DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, and J.-Y. Royer (2005), Motion between the Indian, Capricorn and Somalian plates since 20 Ma: Implications for the timing and magnitude of distributed lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian Ocean, Geophys. J. Int., 161, Deplus, C. (2001), Plate tectonics Indian Ocean actively deforms, Science, 292, Deplus, C., et al. (1998), Direct evidence of active deformation in the eastern Indian oceanic plate, Geology, 26, DeShon, H. R., E. R. Engdahl, C. H. Thurber, and M. Brudzinski (2005), Constraining the boundary between the Sunda and Andaman subduction systems: Evidence from the 2002 M w 7.3 northern Sumatra earthquake and aftershock relocations of the 2004 and 2005 great earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L24307, doi: /2005gl Earnest, A., et al. (2005), Near-field observations on the co-seismic deformation associated with the 26 December 2004 Andaman Sumatra earthquake, Current Science, 89, Fitch, T. J. (1972), Plate convergence, transcurrent faults and internal deformation adjacent to Southeast Asia and the western Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 77, Gahalaut, V. K., and J. K. Catherine (2006), Rupture characteristics of 28 March 2005 Sumatra earthquake from GPS measurements and its implication for tsunami generation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 249, Gahalaut, V. K., B. Nagarajan, J. K. Catherine, and S. Kumar (2006), Constraints on 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake rupture from GPS measurements in Andaman-Nicobar Islands, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 242, Gordon, R. G., C. DeMets, and D. F. Argus (1990), Kinematic constraints on distributed lithospheric deformation in the equatorial Indian Ocean from present motion between the Australian and Indian plates, Tectonics, 9, Guzman-Speziale, M., and J. F. Ni (1996), Seismicity and active tectonics of the western Sunda Arc, in The Tectonic Evolution of Asia, edited by A. Yin and T. M. Harrison, pp , Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Hsu, Y.-J., et al. (2006), Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra, Science, 312, Jade, S. (2004), Estimates of plate velocity and crustal deformation in the Indian subcontinent using GPS geodesy, Current Sci., 86, Jade, S., et al. (2005), Coseismic and postseismic displacements in Andaman and Nicobar Islands from GPS measurements, Current Sci., 88, Kamesh Raju, K. A., T. Ramprasad, P. S. Rao, B. R. Rao, and J. Varghese (2004), New insights into the tectonic evolution of the Andaman basin, northeast Indian Ocean, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 221, Kamesh Raju, K. A., G. P. S. Murty, D. Amarnath, and M. L. M. Kumar (2007), The west Andaman fault and its influence on the aftershock pattern of the recent megathrust earthquakes in the Andaman- Sumatra region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L03305, doi: / 2006GL Kreemer, C., W. E. Holt, and A. J. Jaines (2003), An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation, Geophys. J. Int., 154, Kreemer, C., G. Blewitt, and F. Maerten (2006), Co- and postseismic deformation of the 28 March 2005 Nias M w 8.7 earthquake from continuous GPS data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L07307, doi: / 2005GL Krishna, K. S., M. V. Ramana, D. Gopala Rao, K. S. R. Murthy, M. M. Malleswara Rao, V. Subrahmanyam, and K. V. L. N. S. Sarma (1998), Periodic deformation of oceanic crust in the central Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,859 17,876. Lay, T., et al. (2005), The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004, Science, 308, McCaffrey, R. (1992), Oblique plate convergence, slip vectors, and forearc deformation, J. Geophys. Res., 97, McCaffrey, R. (2002), Crustal block rotations and plate coupling, in Plate Boundary Zones, Geodyn. Ser., vol. 30, edited by S. Stein and J. T. Freymueller, pp , AGU, Washington, D. C. McKenzie, D. (1969), The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 59, Michael, A. J. (1984), Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 11,517 11,526. Michael, A. J. (1987), Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study, J. Geophys. Res., 92, Michel, G., M. Becker, D. Angermann, C. Reigber, and E. Reinhart (2000), Crustal motion in E- and SE-Asia from GPS measurements, Earth Planets Space, 52, Michel, G., et al. (2001), Crustal motion and block behavior in SE-Asia from GPS measurements, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 187, Nielsen, C., N. Chamot-Rooke, C. Rangin, and the ANDAMAN Cruise Team (2004), From partial to full strain partitioning along the Indo-Burmese hyper-oblique subduction, Mar. Geol., 209, Paul, J., et al. (2001), The motion and active deformation of India, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, Petroy, D. E., and D. A. Wiens (1989), Historical seismicity and implications for diffuse plate convergence in the northeast Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12,301 12,319. Prawirodirdjo, L., et al. (1997), Geodetic observations of interseismic strain segmentation at the Sumatra subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, Rao, N. P., and Kalpna (2005), Deformation of the subducted Indian lithospheric slab in the Burmese arc, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L05301, doi: /2004gl Rao, N. P., and M. R. Kumar (1999), Evidences for cessation of Indian plate subduction in the Burmese arc region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, Sahu, V. K., et al. (2006), Crustal deformation in the Indo-Burmese Arc region: Implications from the Myanmar and Southeast Asia GPS measurements, Current Sci., 90, Satyabala, S. (2003), Oblique plate convergence in the Indo-Burma (Myanmar) subduction region, Pure Appl. Geophys., 160, Sieh, K., and D. Natawidjaja (2000), Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 28,295 28,326. Simoes, M., J. P. Avouac, R. Cattin, and P. Henry (2004), The Sumatra subduction zone: A case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 109,, doi: /2003jb Singh, S. C., et al. (2005), Sumatra earthquake research indicates why rupture propagated northward, Eos Trans, AGU, 86(48), 497. Socquet, A., C. Vigny, N. Chamot-Rooke, W. Simons, C. Rangin, and B. Ambrosius (2006), India and Sunda plates motion and deformation along their boundary in Myanmar determined by GPS, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B05406, doi: /2005jb Stein, S., and E. A. Okal (1978), Seismicity and tectonics of the Ninetyeast Ridge area: Evidence for internal deformation of the Indian plate, J. Geophys. Res., 83, Stein, S., and E. A. Okal (2005), Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake, Nature, 434, Subarya, C., et al. (2006), Plate-boundary deformation associated with the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Nature, 440, Tinnon, M. J., W. E. Holt, and A. J. Haines (1995), Velocity gradients in the northern Indian Ocean inferred from earthquakes moment tensors and relative plate velocities, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 24,315 24,329. Vigny, C., et al. (2003), Present-day crustal deformation around Sagaing fault, Myanmar, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B11), 2533, doi: / 2002JB Vigny, C., et al. (2005), Insight into the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in Southeast Asia, Nature, 436, Wiens, D. A., et al. (1985), A diffuse plate boundary model for Indian Ocean tectonics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, K. Gahalaut and V. K. Gahalaut, National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad , India. (vkgahalaut@yahoo.com) 9of9
Constraints on 2004 Sumatra Andaman earthquake rupture from GPS measurements in Andaman Nicobar Islands
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 242 (2006) 365 374 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Constraints on 2004 Sumatra Andaman earthquake rupture from GPS measurements in Andaman Nicobar Islands V.K. Gahalaut
More informationThe Size and Duration of the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from Far-Field Static Offsets
The Size and Duration of the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from Far-Field Static Offsets P. Banerjee, 1 F. F. Pollitz, 2 R. Bürgmann 3 * 1 Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun, 248001, India. 2
More informationSeismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches in the Sumatra Subduction Zone
IJMS 2017 vol. 4 (2): 49-54 International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS) Volume 4, Issue 2, 2017 DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/ijms.v4i2.22 Seismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches
More informationThe west Andaman fault and its influence on the aftershock pattern of the recent megathrust earthquakes in the Andaman-Sumatra region
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34,, doi:10.1029/2006gl028730, 2007 The west Andaman fault and its influence on the aftershock pattern of the recent megathrust earthquakes
More informationThe Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update
The Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update 01-October-2009 Christophe Vigny Directeur de recherches at CNRS Laboratoire de Géologie Geoscience Dept. Of ENS,
More informationThe 2007 Bengkulu earthquake, its rupture model and implications for seismic hazard
The 2007 Bengkulu earthquake, its rupture model and implications for seismic hazard A Ambikapathy, J K Catherine, V K Gahalaut, M Narsaiah, A Bansal and P Mahesh National Geophysical Research Institute,
More informationCoseismic Slip Distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias Earthquakes from GPS Static Offsets
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 1A, pp. S86 S102, January 2007, doi: 10.1785/0120050609 E Coseismic Slip Distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra Andaman and 28 March
More informationNews Release December 30, 2004 The Science behind the Aceh Earthquake
News Release December 30, 2004 The Science behind the Aceh Earthquake PASADENA, Calif. - Kerry Sieh, the Robert P. Sharp Professor of Geology at the California Institute of Technology and a member of Caltech's
More informationSeismic Characteristics and Energy Release of Aftershock Sequences of Two Giant Sumatran Earthquakes of 2004 and 2005
P-168 Seismic Characteristics and Energy Release of Aftershock Sequences of Two Giant Sumatran Earthquakes of 004 and 005 R. K. Jaiswal*, Harish Naswa and Anoop Singh Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, Vadodara
More informationGPS measurements of postseismic deformation in the Andaman- Nicobar region following the giant 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2007jb005511, 2008 GPS measurements of postseismic deformation in the Andaman- Nicobar region following the giant 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
More informationSLIP DISTRIBUTION FOR THE 2004 SUMATRA-ANDAMAN EARTHQUAKE CONSTRAINED BY BOTH GPS DATA AND TSUNAMI RUN-UP MEASUREMENTS
McKenzie D. and J. Jackson; 2002: Conditions for flow in the continental crust, Tectonics, 21, doi:10.1029/2002tc001394. McKenzie D. P.; 1977: The initiation of trenches: a finite amplitude instability,
More informationComment on A new estimate for present-day Cocos-Caribbean plate motion: Implications
Comment on A new estimate for present-day Cocos-Caribbean plate motion: Implications for slip along the Central American volcanic arc by Charles DeMets Marco Guzmán-Speziale Juan Martín Gómez Unidad de
More informationThis document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.
This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore. Title Author(s) Citation Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra Hsu, Ya-Ju;
More informationContinuous monitoring of seismicity by Indian permanent seismological observatory at Maitri
Indian Journal of Marine Sciences Vol. 37(4), December 2008, pp. 396-403 Continuous monitoring of seismicity by Indian permanent seismological observatory at Maitri E.C Malaimani*, N. Ravi Kumar, Simanchal
More informationBanda Aceh December 26th Earthquake monitored by GPS
Banda Aceh December 26th Earthquake monitored by GPS C. Vigny (1), W.J.F. Simons (2), S. Abu (3), Chalermchon Satirapod (4), M. Hashizume (5), Sarayut Yousamran (6), C. Subarya (7), K. Omar (8), H.Z. Abidin
More informationRodolphe Cattin, Nicolas Chamot-Rooke, M. Pubellier, A. Rabaute, M. Delescluse, C. Vigny, L. Fleitout, P. Dubernet
Stress change and effective friction coefficient along the Sumatra-Andaman-Sagaing fault system after the 26 December 2004 (M-w=9.2) and the 28 March 2005 (M-w=8.7) earthquakes Rodolphe Cattin, Nicolas
More informationReport on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004
Report on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004 Prepared January 7 th 2005 by C. Vigny, on behalf of the SEAMERGES (*) participants On the morning of December 26 th in SE Asia, 30 km below
More informationGNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD
Tectonics Lecture 10 Global Seismotectonics Rigid plate translation A Map of the World s Fracture Zones Magnetic anomalies and fracture zones form the basic building blocks for the construction of isochron
More informationStructural context of the great Sumatra-Andaman Islands earthquake
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 35, L05301, doi:10.1029/2008gl033381, 2008 Structural context of the great Sumatra-Andaman Islands earthquake Nikolai M. Shapiro, 1 Michael
More informationGPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise
GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise Strain Analysis Introduction Name: The earthquake cycle can be viewed as a process of slow strain accumulation
More informationRELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE SUMATRAN FAULT AND THEIR FAULT PLANES
Synopses of Master Papers Bulletin of IISEE, 47, 25-30, 2013 RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE SUMATRAN FAULT AND THEIR FAULT PLANES Biana Rahayu Wulandari MEE11605 Supervisor: Nobuo HURUKAWA ABSTRACT
More informationModelling Subduction Zone Seismogenic Hazards in Southeast Asia for Seismic Hazard Assessments
Modelling Subduction Zone Seismogenic Hazards in Southeast Asia for Seismic Hazard Assessments Vicki-Ann Dimas 1,2 and Gary Gibson 3 1. Corresponding Author. Seismic Hazard Analyst, Seismology Research
More information1.3 Short Review: Preliminary results and observations of the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake Kenji Hirata
1.3 Short Review: Preliminary results and observations of the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake Kenji Hirata We give a brief review about observations and preliminary results regarding the 2004 great
More informationThis document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.
This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore. Title Aceh Andaman earthquake : what happened and what's next? Author(s) Sieh, Kerry Citation Sieh, K. (2005).
More informationEARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS FOR SUBDUCTION ZONE EVENTS CAUSING TSUNAMIS IN AND AROUND THE PHILIPPINES
EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS FOR SUBDUCTION ZONE EVENTS CAUSING TSUNAMIS IN AND AROUND THE PHILIPPINES Joan Cruz SALCEDO Supervisor: Tatsuhiko HARA MEE09186 ABSTRACT We have made a set of earthquake source
More informationDETERMINATION OF SLIP DISTRIBUTION OF THE 28 MARCH 2005 NIAS EARTHQUAKE USING JOINT INVERSION OF TSUNAMI WAVEFORM AND GPS DATA
Synopses of Master Papers Bulletin of IISEE, 47, 115-10, 013 DETERMINATION OF SLIP DISTRIBUTION OF THE 8 MARCH 005 NIAS EARTHQUAKE USING JOINT INVERSION OF TSUNAMI WAVEFORM AND GPS DATA Tatok Yatimantoro
More informationCoseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great M w 9.15 Sumatra Andaman Earthquake of 2004
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 1A, pp. S15 S173, January 007, doi: 10.1785/010050631 Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great M w 9.15 Sumatra Andaman Earthquake of 004
More informationFOCAL MECHANISMS OF SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE JAVA TRENCH: PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR THE PSHA FOR YOGYAKARTA REGION, INDONESIA
FOCAL MECHANISMS OF SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE JAVA TRENCH: PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR THE PSHA FOR YOGYAKARTA REGION, INDONESIA Myo Thant 1, Hiroshi Kawase 2, Subagyo Pramumijoyo 3, Heru Hendrayana
More informationInversion of travel times to estimate Moho depth in Shillong Plateau and Kinematic implications through stress analysis of Northeastern India
Inversion of travel times to estimate Moho depth in Shillong Plateau and Kinematic implications through stress analysis of Northeastern India by Saurabh Baruah Geoscience Division North-East Institute
More informationReport on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004
Report on Banda Aceh mega-thrust earthquake, December 26, 2004 Prepared January 7 th 2005 by C. Vigny, on behalf of the SEAMERGES (*) participants On the morning of December 26 th, 2004 in SE Asia, 30
More informationKinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements
Title Page Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements Brendan Meade and Bradford Hager Three basic questions Large historical earthquakes One basic question How
More informationWidespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake
Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake Kazuki Koketsu 1, Hiroe Miyake 2, Srinagesh Davuluri 3 and Soma Nath Sapkota 4 1. Corresponding
More informationTwo seismic gaps on the Sagaing Fault, Myanmar, derived from relocation of historical earthquakes since 1918
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 38,, doi:10.1029/2010gl046099, 2011 Two seismic gaps on the Sagaing Fault, Myanmar, derived from relocation of historical earthquakes since 1918 Nouo Hurukawa 1 and Phyo
More informationChapter 3. Geology & Tectonics
Chapter 3 Geology & Tectonics 3.1 Geology The general geological features of Indonesia are shown in Figure 3.1. The basement formation is metamorphic and it is intruded with plutonic formations. They are
More informationPostseismic deformation of the Andaman Islands following the 26 December, 2004 Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL.???, XXXX, DOI:1.129/, Postseismic deformation of the Andaman Islands following the 26 December, 24 Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake J. Paul, 1 A. R. Lowry, 2 R. Bilham,
More informationSummary so far. Geological structures Earthquakes and their mechanisms Continuous versus block-like behavior Link with dynamics?
Summary so far Geodetic measurements velocities velocity gradient tensor (spatial derivatives of velocity) Velocity gradient tensor = strain rate (sym.) + rotation rate (antisym.) Strain rate tensor can
More informationRELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE
RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE Paulino C. FEITIO* Supervisors: Nobuo HURUKAWA** MEE07165 Toshiaki YOKOI** ABSTRACT
More informationRupture Characteristics of Major and Great (M w 7.0) Megathrust Earthquakes from : 1. Source Parameter Scaling Relationships
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth Supporting Information for Rupture Characteristics of Major and Great (M w 7.0) Megathrust Earthquakes from 1990-2015: 1. Source Parameter Scaling Relationships
More informationDEFORMATION KINEMATICS OF TIBETAN PLATEAU DETERMINED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS
DEFORMATION KINEMATICS OF TIBETAN PLATEAU DETERMINED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS Jinwei Ren Institute of Geology, China Seismological Bureau, Beijing 100029 China Tel: (10)62009095; Fax: (10)62009003; email:
More informationCONTINENTAL PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES
CONTINENTAL PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES Plate boundaries initially viewed as narrow Now recognize that many plate boundaries - especially continental - are deformation zones up to 1000 km wide, with motion spread
More informationInquiry: Sumatran earthquakes with GPS Earth Science Education
Inquiry: Sumatran earthquakes with GPS Earth Science Education www.earthobservatory.sg Preparation: Before doing this investigation, complete two introductory investigations using GPS data from UNAVCO
More informationSeismological Aspects of the December 2004 Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake
Seismological Aspects of the December 2004 Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake Hiroo Kanamori, a M.EERI The 2004 Great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake had an average source duration of about 500 sec. and a rupture
More informationElsevier Editorial System(tm) for Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Earth and Planetary Science Letters Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: EPSL-D-07-00028R2 Title: Structural analysis of aftershock sequences from the 2004-2005 Great Sumatran
More informationSubduction zones are complex plate boundaries in which variable geometry and structure can be
1 Chapter 1 Introduction Subduction zones are complex plate boundaries in which variable geometry and structure can be seismically observed. The along-strike transition from flat to normal subduction is
More informationCoseismic slip distribution of the 1946 Nankai earthquake and aseismic slips caused by the earthquake
Earth Planets Space, 53, 235 241, 2001 Coseismic slip distribution of the 1946 Nankai earthquake and aseismic slips caused by the earthquake Yuichiro Tanioka 1 and Kenji Satake 2 1 Meteorological Research
More informationCOULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES
COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES Madlazim Physics Department, Faculty Mathematics and Sciences of Surabaya State University (UNESA) Jl. Ketintang, Surabaya 60231, Indonesia. e-mail:
More informationEarthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results
Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network 2003-2006, preliminary results Objectives David Love 1, Phil Cummins 2, Natalie Balfour 3 1 Primary Industries and Resources South Australia
More informationChange of Strain Rate in Thailand after the 26 December 2004 and 28 March 2005 Earthquakes Using GPS Measurements
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (010) 14():15-0 DOI 10.1007/s105-010-015-4 Surveying and Geo-Spatial Information Engineering www.springer.com/105 Change of Strain Rate in Thailand after the 6 December
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi: 10.1038/ngeo739 Supplementary Information to variability and distributed deformation in the Marmara Sea fault system Tobias Hergert 1 and Oliver Heidbach 1,* 1 Geophysical
More informationLateral extrusion and tectonic escape in Ilan Plain of northeastern Taiwan
Lateral extrusion and tectonic escape in Ilan Plain of northeastern Taiwan Angelier, J., Chang, T.Y., Hu, J.C., Chang, C.P., Siame, L., Lee, J.C., Deffontaines, B., Chu, H.T, Lu, C.Y., Does extrusion occur
More informationRapid Determination of Earthquake Magnitude using GPS for Tsunami Warning Systems: An Opportunity for IGS to Make a Difference
Rapid Determination of Earthquake Magnitude using GPS for Tsunami Warning Systems: An Opportunity for IGS to Make a Difference Geoffrey Blewitt, 1 Corné Kreemer, 1 William C. Hammond, 1 Hans-Peter Plag,
More informationRELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PHILIPPINE FAULT ZONE AND THEIR FAULT PLANES
RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PHILIPPINE FAULT ZONE AND THEIR FAULT PLANES Rey M. Lumbang MEE12608 Supervisor: Nobuo Hurukawa ABSTRACT We relocated large magnitude (Mw 7.0) earthquakes that
More informationSubduction Tectonics and its Gravity and Magnetic response in Andaman Sea
P-342 Summary Subduction Tectonics and its Gravity and Magnetic response in Andaman Sea S.M. Chatterjee*, C.S. Bahuguna,, D. Saha, Kh. Nabakumar, D. Sar, and C.L. Baloni, Geophysics Division, KDMIPE, Oil
More informationLessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami
Lessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami Kenji Satake National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Outline 1. The largest earthquake in the last 40 years 2. Tsunami
More informationSource of the July 2006 West Java tsunami estimated from tide gauge records
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 33, L24317, doi:10.1029/2006gl028049, 2006 Source of the July 2006 West Java tsunami estimated from tide gauge records Yushiro Fujii 1 and Kenji Satake 2 Received 13
More information5-31. Cambodia. Vietnam. South China S ea. Malaysia. Kuala L umpur. Singapore. Kalimantan. Sunda S trait. Jakarta. Java 98E. Sumatra. Pini.
5-31 Ridge Ninetyeast 52mm/yr Wharton For e S umatran Ridge Indian Andaman Sea arc 1861 Burma Ridge 1833 Thailand Sumatran Sliver Subduction Southeast Asian P late Malaysia Fault P Cambodia Kuala L umpur
More informationBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 1A, pp. S43 S61, January 2007, doi: /
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 1A, pp. S43 S61, January 2007, doi: 10.1785/0120050614 Teleseismic Relocation and Assessment of Seismicity (1918 2005) in the Region of the
More informationAzimuth with RH rule. Quadrant. S 180 Quadrant Azimuth. Azimuth with RH rule N 45 W. Quadrant Azimuth
30 45 30 45 Strike and dip notation (a) N30 E, 45 SE ("Quadrant"): the bearing of the strike direction is 30 degrees east of north and the dip is 45 degrees in a southeast (SE) direction. For a given strike,
More informationIntegrated interpretation of Gravity & Magnetic data for delineation of sedimentary thickness in deepwater block of Andman Basin
P-204 Integrated interpretation of Gravity & Magnetic data for delineation of sedimentary thickness in deepwater block of D. Saha*, C.S. Bahuguna, Kh. Nabakumar, G.Singh, Sudhir Kumar, and Kunal Niyogi,
More informationSendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March
Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, 2011 Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March 14 2011 Earth has 11 large plates and many more smaller ones. Plates are 100-200 km thick
More informationto: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San
Supplementary material to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system by Yuri Fialko Methods The San Bernardino-Coachella Valley segment of the
More informationSager, W.W., Bull, J.M. and Krishna, K.S. (2013) Active faulting on. the Ninetyeast Ridge and its relation to deformation of the Indo-
1 2 3 4 5 Sager, W.W., Bull, J.M. and Krishna, K.S. (2013) Active faulting on the Ninetyeast Ridge and its relation to deformation of the Indo- Australian plate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid
More informationEARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION
6-1 6: EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISMS AND PLATE MOTIONS Hebgen Lake, Montana 1959 Ms 7.5 1 Stein & Wysession, 2003 Owens Valley, California 1872 Mw ~7.5 EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE
More informationActivity Pacific Northwest Tectonic Block Model
Activity Pacific Northwest Tectonic Block Model The Cascadia tectonic margin is caught between several tectonic forces, during the relentless motions of the giant Pacific Plate, the smaller subducting
More informationOn the validity of time-predictable model for earthquake generation in north-east India
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), Vol. 101, No. 4, December 1992, pp. 361-368. 9 Printed in India. On the validity of time-predictable model for earthquake generation in north-east India V
More informationEarthquake Trend Around Sumatra Indicated by a New Implementation of LURR Method
Pure appl. geophys. 165 (2008) 723 736 Ó Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 0033 4553/08/030723 14 DOI 10.1007/s00024-008-0322-z Pure and Applied Geophysics Earthquake Trend Around Sumatra Indicated by a New
More informationCoulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment
Coulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment Abstract D. Weatherley University of Queensland Coulomb stress change analysis has been applied in
More informationStrain accumulation studies between Antarctica and India through geodetic tying of two continents from continuous GPS measurements
Indian Journal of Marine Sciences Vol. 37(4), December 2008, pp. 404-411 Strain accumulation studies between Antarctica and India through geodetic tying of two continents from continuous GPS measurements
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,500 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More informationInsight into the 2004 Sumatra Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia
Vol 436 14 July 2005 doi:10.1038/nature03937 ARTICLES Insight into the 2004 Sumatra Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia C. Vigny 1, W. J. F. Simons 2, S. Abu 3, Ronnachai Bamphenyu
More informationMaterials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation.
Materials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation. In the process zone, stress amplitudes are poorly determined and much
More informationGEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13
UNDERSTANDING EARTH, SIXTH EDITION GROTZINGER JORDAN GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13 Earthquakes 2010 W.H. Freeman and Company Three different types of seismic waves are recorded by seismographs Key Figure
More informationGlobal deformation from the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake observed by GPS: Implications for rupture process and global reference frame
Earth Planets Space, 58, 141 148, 2006 Global deformation from the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake observed by GPS: Implications for rupture process and global reference frame Corné Kreemer, Geoffrey
More informationToday: Basic regional framework. Western U.S. setting Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) 1992 Landers EQ 1999 Hector Mine EQ Fault structure
Today: Basic regional framework Western U.S. setting Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) 1992 Landers EQ 1999 Hector Mine EQ Fault structure 1 2 Mojave and Southern Basin and Range - distribution of strike-slip
More informationSeismic images of the sliver strike-slip fault and back thrust in the Andaman-Nicobar region
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, VOL. 11, 5 5, doi:1.1/jgrb.537, 13 Seismic images of the sliver strike-slip fault and back thrust in the Andaman-Nicobar region Satish C. Singh, 1 Raphaele
More information3. PLATE TECTONICS LAST NAME (ALL IN CAPS): FIRST NAME: PLATES
LAST NAME (ALL IN CAPS): FIRST NAME: PLATES 3. PLATE TECTONICS The outer layers of the Earth are divided into the lithosphere and asthenosphere. The division is based on differences in mechanical properties
More informationBack-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference earthquake relocation
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, VOL. 118, 1 19, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50192, 2013 Back-arc extension in the Andaman Sea: Tectonic and magmatic processes imaged by high-precision teleseismic double-difference
More informationThe generation of the first order stress field caused by plate tectonics
The generation of the first order stress field caused by plate tectonics Jasmaria Wojatschke TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institut für Geologie, Bernhard-v.-Cotta Str. 2, 09599 Freiberg, Germany Abstract.
More informationSlip distributions of the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes including the horizontal movement effect on tsunami generation
Slip distributions of the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes including the horizontal movement effect on tsunami generation Toshitaka Baba Research Program for Plate Dynamics, Institute for Frontier
More informationPower-law distribution of fault slip-rates in southern California
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L23307, doi:10.1029/2007gl031454, 2007 Power-law distribution of fault slip-rates in southern California Brendan J. Meade 1 Received 31
More informationIntroduction to the Special Issue on the 2004 Sumatra Andaman Earthquake and the Indian Ocean Tsunami
Name /mea_ssa971a_605412/971_05633/mp_1 12/05/2006 11:35AM Plate # 0 pg 1 # 1 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 1A, pp. S1 S5, January 2007, doi: 10.1785/0120050633 Introduction
More informationThermal Structure of Subducting Slab along the Java Arc and Its Significance to the Volcanoes Distribution
ITB J. Sci. Vol. 42 A, No. 2, 2010, 127-134 127 Thermal Structure of Subducting Slab along the Java Arc and Its Significance to the Volcanoes Distribution Lina Handayani Research Center for Geotechnology,
More informationA search for seismic radiation from late slip for the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (M w = 9.15) earthquake
Click Here for Full Article GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 33, L18305, doi:10.1029/2006gl027286, 2006 A search for seismic radiation from late slip for the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (M w =
More informationDeformation of Rocks. Orientation of Deformed Rocks
Deformation of Rocks Folds and faults are geologic structures caused by deformation. Structural geology is the study of the deformation of rocks and its effects. Fig. 7.1 Orientation of Deformed Rocks
More informationPLATE MOTIONS: BASIC CONCEPTS
PLATE MOTIONS: BASIC CONCEPTS North American plate 20 mm/yr Eurasian plate Pacific plate 35 mm/yr North American plate Iceland Spreading Center, Thingvellir San Andreas Transform Fault Carrizo Plain BASIC
More informationSupplementary Material
1 Supplementary Material 2 3 4 Interseismic, megathrust earthquakes and seismic swarms along the Chilean subduction zone (38-18 S) 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 1 GPS data set We combined in a single data set
More informationAN ABNORMAL TSUNAMI GENERATED BY OCTOBER 25 th, 2010 MENTAWAI EARTHQUAKE
AN ABNORMAL TSUNAMI GENERATED BY OCTOBER 25 th, 2010 MENTAWAI EARTHQUAKE Bambang Sunardi 1, Suci Dewi Anugrah 2, Thomas Hardy 1, Drajat Ngadmanto 1 1 Research and Development Center, Indonesia Meteorological
More informationElectronic supplement for Forearc motion and deformation between El Salvador and Nicaragua: GPS, seismic, structural, and paleomagnetic observations
DR2011053 Electronic supplement for Forearc motion and deformation between El Salvador and Nicaragua: GPS, seismic, structural, and paleomagnetic observations by D. Alvarado et al., Lithosphere, April,
More informationThree dimensional FEM derived elastic Green s functions for the coseismic deformation of the 2005 M w 8.7 Nias Simeulue, Sumatra earthquake
Article Volume 12, Number 7 20 July 2011 Q07013, doi:10.1029/2011gc003553 ISSN: 1525 2027 Three dimensional FM derived elastic Green s functions for the coseismic deformation of the 2005 M w 8.7 Nias Simeulue,
More informationNEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKES AND PLATE
87 NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKES AND PLATE TECTONIC THEORY R.I. Walcott * ABSTRACT The rates and direction of shear strain from geodetic data and the direction of slip from earthquake mechanism studies in New
More informationAnalysis of Intraplate Earthquakes and Deformation in the Indo-Australian Plate: Moment Tensor and Focal Depth Modeling
Analysis of Intraplate Earthquakes and Deformation in the Indo-Australian Plate: Moment Tensor and Focal Depth Modeling Honor s Thesis by Wardah Mohammad Fadil Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Patterns of intraplate volcanism controlled by asthenospheric shear Clinton P. Conrad 1,,*, Todd A. Bianco 1,, Eugene I. Smith 2, and Paul Wessel 1 1 Department of Geology & Geophysics,
More informationThe 2004 and 2005 Sumatra Earthquakes: Implications for the Lisbon earthquake
250TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE 1755 LISBON EARTHQUAKE The 2004 and 2005 Sumatra Earthquakes: Implications for the Lisbon earthquake M. BEZZEGHOUD, J.F. BORGES, AND B. CALDEIRA Universidade de Évora, Departamento
More informationChapter 1. Introduction and Synthesis
Chapter 1 Introduction and Synthesis 1-2 Motivation: inadequacy of data for understanding earthquake cycles Understanding the behavior of active faults over multiple seismic cycles has been an elusive
More informationActive deformation in eastern Indonesia and the Philippines from GPS and seismicity data
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 105, NO. B1, PAGES 663-680, JANUARY 10, 2000 Active deformation in eastern Indonesia and the Philippines from GPS and seismicity data Corn6 Kreemer and William E.
More informationEvidence for and implications of a Bering plate based on geodetic measurements from the Aleutians and western Alaska
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2007jb005136, 2008 Evidence for and implications of a Bering plate based on geodetic measurements from the Aleutians and western Alaska Ryan S. Cross
More informationCoseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great (M w 9.15) Sumatra- Andaman Earthquake of 2004
Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great (M w 9.15) Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 24 Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great (M w 9.15) Sumatra- Andaman Earthquake of 24 Mohamed Chlieh 1, Jean-Philippe
More informationDeformation cycles of great subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth
Deformation cycles of great subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth Kelin Wang Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of Canada School of Earth and Ocean Science, University of Victoria????
More informationCentroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks
Earth Planets Space, 99, 1 8, 2011 Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks Meredith Nettles, Göran Ekström, and Howard C. Koss Lamont-Doherty
More informationMagnitude 7.5 PALU, INDONESIA
A magnitude 7.5 earthquake occurred 80.8 km (50.2 mi) north of Palu, Indonesia at a depth of 10 km (6.2 miles). This earthquake triggered a tsunami with wave heights up to 2 m (6.6 ft) that an official
More information