APPENDIX C 6 WHARF DEVELOPMENT 3D GEOLOGICAL MODEL AND DREDGE VOLUMES
|
|
- Cory Boyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX C WHARF DEVELOPMENT 3D GEOLOGICAL MODEL AND DREDGE VOLUMES
2 Report Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Prepared for Napier Port Prepared by (Beca) 1 May 17
3 1//17
4 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Executive Summary Beca Ltd (Beca) was commissioned by Napier Port to undertake geotechnical investigations, development of 3D geological model, geotechnical interpretation and developed design of the proposed Wharf to support Resource Consent application to undertake the proposed works. (Refer Napier Port - RFP Wharf Development Preliminary Design of Wharf and Structure CONT-IS dated September 1). The proposed development includes the construction of a new wharf ( Wharf) structure approximately 3m long by 3m wide to increase capacity at the port for larger vessels and cargo volumes. Wharf will be constructed adjacent to the northern end of the existing container terminal. The proposed development also involves increasing maximum dredging level at the port from the existing level (approximately -1.m CD) to -1.m CD. The 3D geological model has been developed from the data provided by Napier Port using the software Leapfrog Geo v.3.1. The geotechnical data was reviewed by an engineering geologist and a geological layering system developed based on geology, material strength and material type. The extent and quality of data varies across the site, as such some interpretation of the data has been undertaken. The following units have been modelled: Reclamation Fill - Loose to medium dense, fine to medium gravel and some cobbles, typically the outer bund edge and loose to medium dense, fine to medium sand. All reclamation fill has been combined into one layer. Recent Marine Sediment (outer harbour) this unit represents the upper layer of marine sediment in Area A, the outer length of the shipping channel. The majority of this material in this area is expected to be very loose to loose fine to medium sand. No strength testing was completed in this unit however vibrocores were successful, indicating low strength (SPT-N < blows /3mm) material. Recent Marine Sediment (transition zone and inner harbour) this unit represents the upper layer of marine sediment in Areas A1, B, C and D. This material is predominantly a soft to firm clayey silt; however lenses of sandy silt and stiffer silt are present within this layer. This unit is defined by strengths of SPT-N typically less than blows/3mm. Quaternary Marine Sediment - this material predominantly comprises a firm to stiff clayey silt, with SPT-N typically greater than blows/3mm. However zones of medium dense sands and silty sands are also present within this layer. Residual Mangaheia Group This unit represents sandstone and siltstone of the underlying Mangaheia Group rock that has been residually weathered to very stiff to hard fine sandy silt with some clay. The SPT-N values for this unit are typically between and blows/3mm Mangaheia Group this rock comprises bedded sandstone, siltstone and limestone with SPT-N typically greater than blows/3mm. Dredge volumes have been calculated from the geological model. This was achieved be defining both the horizontal and vertical boundaries of the proposed dredge area. The volumes provided are separated into the following areas: outer channel (Area A); transition between Area A and B (Area A1); inner channel (Area B); swing basin (); Wharf No. berthing pocket (Area D). Beca // 1 May // NZ // ii
5 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Contents 1 Introduction 1 Project Description 1 3 Sources of Information 1 Geological Model Development Dredge Volumes 3.1 Dredge Volumes 3. Cross Sections.3 Isopach Maps Software Used 7 Applicability Statement Appendices Appendix A Sources of Information Appendix B Cross Sections Appendix C Isopach Maps Beca // 1 May // NZ // i
6 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes 1 Introduction Beca Ltd (Beca) was commissioned by Napier Port to undertake geotechnical investigations and interpretation, development of a 3D geological model and design of the proposed Wharf to support Resource Consent applications to undertake the proposed work. (Refer Napier Port - RFP Wharf Development Preliminary Design of Wharf and Structure CONT-IS dated September 1). This report documents development of the 3D geological model and presents dredge volumes for staged removal of material. Project Description The proposed development includes the construction of a new wharf ( Wharf) structure, approximately 3m long and 3m wide (with a m future extension also designated), to increase capacity at the port for larger vessels and cargo volumes. Wharf will be constructed adjacent to the northern end of the existing container terminal. The proposed development includes increasing the maximum dredged level at the port from the existing level (approximately -1.m CD) to -1.m CD. The proposed development includes dredging to form a berth pocket adjacent to Wharf, and to extend and deepen both the turning basin and channel into the port. The proposed dredging works, designed by Napier Port, is shown on Drawing Wharf Proposed Dredging Works Stage -1.m (31 & Rev F) and are provided in Appendix A. 3 Sources of Information Geotechnical data from historical investigations across the port area was provided by Napier Port. This was supplemented with geotechnical boreholes and 7 vibrocores undertaken by Beca between December 1 and January 1. Information used to build the geological model is summarised below, with some additional detail provided in Appendix A, Table A.1: Wharf Proposed Dredging Works Stage -1.m (Drawing 31 & Rev F dated 31//1). Napier Port survey and bathymetric data (provided 13/11/1) Seismic survey of offshore sediment thickness (provided 1/11/1) Geotechnical Investigations (provided //1) Breakwater Harbour Dredging Borehole Logs, 1977 Napier Port Wharf No. 1 Development Geotechnical Report for Dredging Work, 199 Wharf No. 1 Borehole Logs, Pro-Drill, 199 Geotechnical Report on the Proposed Reclamation to the West of the Port behind the Proposed No. Berth, OCEL, Wharf No. CPTs, Geomil / Opus, Liqueo Tanks Borehole Logs, T&T, Port Central Building Borehole Logs, Opus, 11 Port Central Building Borehole Logs, T&T, 1 Shed 9 Borehole Logs, T&T, 1 Reefer Towers Borehole Logs, T&T, 1 Kimahia Basin Dredge, Opus, 1 Beca // 1 May // NZ // page 1
7 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Wharf No. 1B Borehole Logs, Golder Associates, 1 Napier Port Conveyor Borehole Log, T&T, 1 Wharf No. Proposed Dredging Vibrocore Logs, 1 Beca geotechnical investigations Wharf No. Upgrade Borehole Logs, Beca, 1 Wharf No. Borehole Logs, Beca, 1-1 Geological Model Development The 3D geological model has been developed from the data provided by Napier Port and recent investigations using the software Leapfrog Geo v The geotechnical data was reviewed by an engineering geologist and a simplified geological layering system has been developed based on geology, material strength and material type. The extent and quality of data varies across the site, as such some re-interpretation and extrapolation of the data has been undertaken. The following units have been modelled: Reclamation Fill - Loose to medium dense, fine to medium gravel and some cobbles, typically the outer bund edge and loose to medium dense, fine to medium sand. All reclamation fill has been combined into one layer. Recent Marine Sediment (outer harbour) this unit represents the upper layer of marine sediment in Area A, the outer length of the shipping channel. The majority of this material in this area is expected to be very loose to loose fine to medium sand. No strength testing was completed in this unit however vibrocores were successful, indicating low strength (SPT-N < blows /3mm) material. Recent Marine Sediment (transition zone and inner harbour) this unit represents the upper layer of marine sediment in Areas A1, B, C and D. This material is predominantly a soft to firm clayey silt; however lenses of sandy silt and stiffer silt are present within this layer. This unit is defined by strengths of SPT-N typically less than blows/3mm. Quaternary Marine Sediment - this material predominantly comprises a firm to stiff clayey silt, with SPT-N typically greater than blows/3mm. However zones of medium dense sands and silty sands are also present within this layer. Residual Mangaheia Formation This unit represents sandstone and siltstone of the underlying Mangaheia Formation rock that has been residually weathered to very stiff to hard fine sandy silt with some clay. The SPT-N values for this unit are typically between and blows/3mm Mangaheia Formation this rock comprises bedded sandstone, siltstone and limestone with SPT-N typically greater than blows/3mm. The geological model was developed by bringing together various datasets. The Leapfrog software requires a specific workflow process which ensures models are developed in a consistent and logical way. The following steps were undertaken to create the final geological model: A topographic surface, defining the upper boundary of the geological model, was created from XYZ points, derived from topographic survey and bathymetric data. 1 Leapfrog Geo is a workflow solution for geological modelling. ARANZ Geo Limited is the developer of the 3D geological modelling software Leapfrog. Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
8 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Aerial imagery was draped on the topographic surface to aid with visualisation Model layers have been characterised from interpretation of investigation data including boreholes, cone penetration tests, water jet probes, seismic survey data and vibrocores. The location and interpreted geological data was then imported into Leapfrog. Geological contact surfaces were modelled using the interval data taken from the boreholes and seismic survey data. A chronological order was assigned to each unit, and each surface defined as either an erosional or depositional contact, which determines how each surface interacts and ultimately how each unit is displayed. These surfaces were then manually modified by the engineering geologist/modeller to reflect conceptual variability not captured by the available investigation data. The dredging plan was added to guide division of the model into discrete areas and dredging stages. Unit volumes are automatically calculated. The final geological model can be updated as new data becomes available. The model in its entirety has been delivered to Napier Port. The full version of the model requires a licence to update or modify. Should Napier Port obtain a licence, cross sections can be easily created within Leapfrog to present useful visualisations of the data and a series of images can be combined to create movies to highlight specific areas of importance within the model. Data created within the model can also be exported in various formats for use in other programs such as ArcGIS, CAD and Surfer. The geological model has also been provided in the form of a Leapfrog Viewer file, which can be viewed and manipulated, but not modified. The Leapfrog Viewer is a visualisation tool specifically designed to allow presentation and distribution of the model without requiring licenced software to operate or interrogate. To use it will require installation of free software, available to download from the developer s website ( Dredge Volumes.1 Dredge Volumes Dredge volumes have been calculated from the geological model and are provided in Table.1. This was achieved by defining both the horizontal and vertical boundaries of the proposed dredge area. The vertical boundaries of the dredge areas were defined using the proposed dredging plan provided by Napier Port. The upper horizontal boundary is defined using the topographic surface and the lower horizontal boundary is defined by the design dredge level. At the request of Napier Port dredge volumes were divided into.m intervals from -1.m CD to -1.m CD. Each dredge stage/interval was also split into the areas listed below and shown on Drawing 31 & Rev F (Refer to Appendix A): Area A: Outer channel Area A1: Transition between Area A and B Area B: Inner channel : Swing basin Area D: Wharf berthing pocket Volume estimates have been determined based on the following simplifications and assumptions: Beca // 1 May // NZ // page 3
9 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Dredge slope angles have been not been modelled. Vertical sides have been extended to provide an equivalent area and therefore volume. This may result in a slightly greater volume of residual soil and rock and lower volume of sediment. The volumes are incremental for each.m depth of dredging, up to -1.m CD by area and material type. Localised dredging beneath the proposed wharf, the shear key and scour protection for the berth has not been included in Table.1. Estimated additional volume is,m 3 and is included in total volumes in Table.. Over dredge allowance has been added to the total volume in each dredge area at a particular dredge level. An over dredge allowance of.m at design dredge -1.m is shown in Table.1. Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
10 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Table.1 - Napier Port Approximate Dredging Volumes Area Depth Interval (m CD) Recent Marine Sediment Quaternary Marine Sediment Residual Mangaheia Group Unit Volume (m 3 ) Mangaheia Group Total (excl. over dredge) Over Dredge Total (incl. Over Dredge) A -1. 7, a 7, , a 9, , a 17, -1.,3 a,3-1., a, A Total 7, 7,, 7, A1-1.,, ,9 33,9-13.,, -1. 9, 9, -1. 9,9 9,9 A1 Total 3, 3, 37, 3, B ,9,, , 1, 7, , 1, 3 31, -1. 7,9 1,,9 3,3-1. 3,9,,3 3, B Total 9, 77,7 11, 1,3 13, 11, C ,,9 97, ,9,9 17, ,3, 17, ,, 17, -1. 1,9 7, 17,9 C Total 1,7,3 3,3 1,1,, 1,, D -1.,,, 3, 1, , 9, 1, 11, -13.,3 9,, 11, -1. 1,7 1,,, 11,7-1. 1, 1,, 3, 11,7 D Total 97,,, 13,3 17,9, 17,9 Total (-1.mCD),,, 11,,,99, 7, 3,, Note: a) Refer Section. RMS in Area A predominantly very loose to loose sand. b) Excludes scour protection Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
11 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Table. - Summary Total Dredge Volume by Dredge Interval Dredge Level (m CD) Total Excluding Overdredge (m 3 ) Total Including Overdredge and Scour Protection (m 3 ) -1. 1,1, 1,79, -13 1,7, 1,, ,937,,, -1,9,,77,9-1.,99, 3,3,. Cross Sections..1 Vertical Sections Vertical sections have been created at approximately m intervals extending from the outer edge of the proposed dredge area and along the length of the proposed dredge channel. The cross sections display the geological units present within the dredge area. Vertical sections are attached in Appendix B, along with a location plan... Horizontal Sections Sections sliced horizontally at dredge levels of -1.m, -13m, -13.m, -1m, and -1.m have been created to show the geology expected to be encountered at that dredge level. Horizontal sections are attached in Appendix B..3 Isopach Maps Isopach maps have been created using Surfer v.11, a contouring and surface modelling program, using outputs from the Leapfrog model. These maps show the thickness of each naturally occurring material type to dredge levels of -1.m, -13m, -13.m, -1m, and -1.m, as specified by Napier Port. This allows areas with particularly thick layers of sediment or rock to be quickly identified, facilitating the development of area specific and economic dredging solutions. Isopach maps are attached in Appendix C. Software Used Leapfrog Geo version: 3.1.1, 1. ARANZ Geo Limited. Surfer version: 11..9, 13. Golden Software, Inc. 7 Applicability Statement This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
12 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Should you be in any doubt as to the applicability of this report and/or its recommendations for the proposed development as described herein, and/or encounter materials on site that differ from those described herein, it is essential that you discuss these issues with the authors before proceeding with any work based on this document. Beca // 1 May // NZ // page 7
13 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Appendix A Sources of Information Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
14 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Table A.1 - Napier Port Existing Geotechnical Investigations Project Date Type of Investigation BH CPT Vibrocore Shear Wave Survey Surface Sample Water Jet Probe Breakwater Harbour Dredging Napier Port Wharf No. 1 Development Wharf No. 1, Pro-Drill Proposed Western Reclamation, OCEL Wharf No., GeoMil / Opus Liqueo Tanks, T&T Port Central Building, Opus Port Central Building, T&T Shed 9, T&T 1 3 Reefer Towers, T&T 1 Wharf No. Upgrade, Beca Kimahia Basin Dredge, Opus Wharf No. 1B, Golder 1 3 Napier Port Conveyor, T&T Wharf No. Development, Beca Wharf No. Proposed Dredging Beca // 1 May // NZ // page 9
15 1 me me me NOTES: 1.. mn 3... All survey and GPS positions are in terms of HAWKES BAY CIRCUIT (HAWKTM) datum. All sounding depths are in terms of chart datum,.37m below BM (H). Stainless steel pin in concrete block near south west corner of PONL Admin Building. Major Isobaths are at 1.m intervals. Minor Isobaths are at.m intervals. Shaded areas are areas to be dredged (cut). Volume to be dredged 3,,m3 mn REFERENCES Existing ground contours from surveys: 1 Multibeam White Pointer Survey CZM F1S.ASC Colour Banding - Cut Depths (m) Number Minimum Elevation Maximum Elevation AREA A Color DESIGN GRADE 1:3. mn mn AREA C DESIGN -1.m m AREA B DESIGN -1.m AREA D harf DESIGN GRADE 1: 31//1 Layout modifications E 9//1 New channel layout as requested by pilots D //1 New channel layout post simulation study ISS DATE AMENDMENTS APPD CONCEPT DESIGN NOTE: SCALES SHOWN ARE FOR A1 DRAWING WHARF PROPOSED DREDGING WORKS STAGE -1.M 1 me me me AREA TO BE DETAILED DURING DESIGN PHASE ed W s o.m p 1 Pro /D= M m. T 3 = E K m ea OC B P / H m T 3 BER A O ip L h S l ode M DESIGN T X E E BERTH TUR U F AREA TO BE DETAILED -1.m M DURING DESIGN PHASE F REFERENCE DRGS FILE 31 CHECK DATE CADFILE SURVEY CP PV MdV //1 DESIGN CP PV MdV //1 DRAWN No. SCALE 1: APPROVED SHEET 31 REV F
16 19 mn mn mn mn 1 mn mn mn Colour Banding - Cut Depths (m) Maximum Elevation me 1. Color POR T MA me REFERENCES Existing ground contours from surveys: 1 Multibeam White Pointer Survey CZM F1S.ASC NAG E MEN T AR EA EX SP EC I IS TI 1 me All survey and GPS positions are in terms of HAWKES BAY CIRCUIT (HAWKTM) datum. All sounding depths are in terms of chart datum,.37m below BM (H). Stainless steel pin in concrete block near south west corner of PONL Admin Building. Major Isobaths are at 1.m intervals. Minor Isobaths are at.m intervals. Shaded areas are areas to be dredged (cut). Volume to be dredged 3,,m3 NG O SC JO AL CO ING SO UTH C HANN EL DU KC TR ACK Minimum Elevation NS ER CH VA NE AN TI O N 1 me EXIST Number NOTES: AR L EA KC DU TR K AC DESIGN -1.m me me AREA B EX IST IN G PW AT CH AN NE LD UK CT A D ER ARE DE E DESIGN GRADE 1:3. RA CK DESIGN BERTH -1.m AREA A1 me m me DESIGN -1.m AREA A Port Boun dary AREA C DESIGN GRADE 1: me me F 31//1 Layout modifications E 9//1 New channel layout as requested by pilots D //1 New channel layout post simulation study ISS DATE AMENDMENTS APPD WHARF PROPOSED DREDGING WORKS STAGE -1.M 19 mn NOTE: SCALES SHOWN ARE FOR A1 DRAWING mn mn mn 1 mn mn mn CONCEPT DESIGN REFERENCE DRGS FILE 31 CHECK DATE CADFILE SURVEY CP PV MdV //1 DESIGN CP PV MdV //1 DRAWN No. SCALE 1: APPROVED SHEET 31 REV F
17 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Appendix B Cross Sections Beca // 1 May // NZ // page
18 19 mn mn mn mn 1 mn mn mn Colour Banding - Cut Depths (m) Number Minimum Elevation Maximum Elevation Color All survey and GPS positions are in terms of HAWKES BAY CIRCUIT (HAWKTM) datum. All sounding depths are in terms of chart datum,.37m below BM (H). Stainless steel pin in concrete block near south west corner of PONL Admin Building. Major Isobaths are at 1.m intervals. Minor Isobaths are at.m intervals. Shaded areas are areas to be dredged (cut). Volume to be dredged 3,,m POR T MA me REFERENCES Existing ground contours from surveys: 1 Multibeam White Pointer Survey CZM F1S.ASC NAG E EX A SP EC I IS TI 1 me NG O SC JO AL CO ING SO UTH C HANN EL DU KC TR ACK MEN T AR EA NS ER CH VA NE AN TI O N 1 me EXIST me NOTES: AR L EA KC DU TR K AC J B A' DESIGN -1.m J' me me AREA B EX IST IN G I' PW AT C CH AN NE B' LD UK CT RA A D ER ARE DE E DESIGN GRADE 1:3. CK G D I DESIGN BERTH -1.m F E H' H AREA A1 me me m C' DESIGN -1.m AREA A AREA C Port Boun dary D' E' F' DESIGN GRADE 1: G' me me F 31//1 Layout modifications E 9//1 New channel layout as requested by pilots D //1 New channel layout post simulation study ISS DATE AMENDMENTS APPD WHARF PROPOSED DREDGING WORKS STAGE -1.M 19 mn NOTE: SCALES SHOWN ARE FOR A1 DRAWING mn mn mn 1 mn mn mn CONCEPT DESIGN REFERENCE DRGS FILE 31 CHECK DATE CADFILE SURVEY CP PV MdV //1 DESIGN CP PV MdV //1 DRAWN No. SCALE 1: APPROVED SHEET 31 REV F
19 Area B 1937 Area D 193 Area A Area A WHARF DEVELOPMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION 1 HORIZONTAL SECTION DREDGE LEVEL 1.m Rev
20 Area B 1937 Area D 193 Area A Area A WHARF DEVELOPMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION HORIZONTAL SECTION DREDGE LEVEL 13.m Rev
21 Area B 1937 Area D 193 Area A Area A WHARF DEVELOPMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION 3 HORIZONTAL SECTION DREDGE LEVEL 13.m Rev
22 Area B 1937 Area D 193 Area A Area A WHARF DEVELOPMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION HORIZONTAL SECTION DREDGE LEVEL 1.m Rev
23 Area B 1937 Area D 193 Area A Area A WHARF DEVELOPMENT HORIZONTAL SECTION HORIZONTAL SECTION DREDGE LEVEL 1.m Rev
24 A Viewpoint: looking southwest A' Elevation (m RL) Design 1.m VB1a-Beca1 3m Design cut grades 1: , , Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION 1 VERTICAL SECTION A A' Rev
25 B Viewpoint: looking southwest B' Elevation (m RL) VB3c-Beca1 17m Design 1.m VBa&b-Beca1 1m Design cut grades 1: , , 7 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Reclamation Fill Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION B B' Rev
26 C Viewpoint: looking southwest C' Elevation (m RL) Design 1.m VBb-Beca1 9m Design cut grades 1: , , Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Reclamation Fill Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION 3 VERTICAL SECTION C C' Rev
27 D Viewpoint: looking southwest D' Elevation (m RL) VB9a-Beca1 3m Design 1.m VBa-Beca1 9m Design cut grades 1: , , 139 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Reclamation Fill Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: 3x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION D D' Rev
28 E Viewpoint: looking south E' Elevation (m RL) VB1a-Beca1 m Design 1.m VB11a-Beca1 1m P13-OCEL 3m P1-OCEL 1m Design cut grades 1: , 7 193, 7 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: 3x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION E E' Rev
29 F Viewpoint: looking south F' Elevation (m RL) VB1a-Beca1 13m Design 1.m P7-OCEL m Design cut grades 1: P-OCEL m , Distance (m) 19313, 399 Scale: 1:1 Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: 3x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION F F' Rev
30 Elevation (m RL) G P-OCEL 1m VBa-Beca1 9m Area A1 Viewpoint: looking southeast Design 1.m PON1-P-OCEL m Design cut grades 1: VB17a-Beca1 9m PON-OCEL m G' , , 3399 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Recent Marine Sediments m Scale: 1:, Vertical exaggeration: x m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION 7 VERTICAL SECTION G G' Rev
31 H Viewpoint: looking east H' Elevation (m RL) Design 1.m BH1-Beca1 1m Area D BH-Beca1 3m BH13-Beca1 31m Proposed Wharf BH-Beca1 m BH1-Beca1 m , , 317 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Reclamation Fill Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION H H' Rev
32 1 I Viewpoint: looking east Proposed Wharf BH-Beca1 m BH-Beca1 17m I' Elevation (m RL) VBa-Beca1 m Area A1 Area B Design 1.m BH-Beca1 m VB1a-Beca1 m Area D BH1-Beca1 3m BH17-Beca1 m , , 3 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: 3x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION 9 VERTICAL SECTION I I' Rev
33 J Viewpoint: looking southeast J' 1 BH1-GA1 7.m BH-Beca1.m Elevation (m RL) BH-Beca1 17.1m Design cut grades 1: Design 1.m , , 317 Distance (m) Legend Mangaheia Fm (N = +) Reclamation Fill Quaternary Marine Sediments Recent Marine Sediments Residual Mangaheia Fm Scale: 1:1, Vertical exaggeration: 3x m m FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL SECTION VERTICAL SECTION J J' Rev
34 Wharf Development: 3D Geological Model and Dredge Volumes Appendix C Isopach Maps Beca // 1 May // NZ // page 11
35 ab Are D Area Area A1 193 Area A Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) Northing (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RECENT MARINE SEDIMENT TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
36 Are a B D Area Area A Area A Easting (NZTM) Thickness (m) 1937 Northing (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RECENT MARINE SEDIMENT TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev
37 Are 1937 D Area Area A1 Area A Thickness (m) ab Easting (NZTM) 1937 Northing (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RECENT MARINE SEDIMENT TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
38 Are a D Area Area A1 1 Area A Thickness (m) B Easting (NZTM) 1937 Northing (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RECENT MARINE SEDIMENT TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
39 D Area 1 Area A1 193 Area A Thickness (m) Are a B Easting (NZTM) Northing (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RECENT MARINE SEDIMENT TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
40 Area A Northing (NZTM) 37 3 Area B 3 Thickness (m) Area D Easting (NZTM) FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP ISOPACH MAP QUATERNARY MARINE SEDIMENT TO 1.m Rev 3
41 Area A Northing (NZTM) 37 3 Area B 3 Thickness (m) Area D Easting (NZTM) FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP ISOPACH MAP 7 QUATERNARY MARINE SEDIMENT TO 13.m Rev 3
42 Area A Northing (NZTM) 37 3 Area B 3 Thickness (m) Area D Easting (NZTM) FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP ISOPACH MAP QUATERNARY MARINE SEDIMENT TO 13.m Rev 3
43 Area A Northing (NZTM) 37 3 Area B 3 Thickness (m) Area D Easting (NZTM) FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP ISOPACH MAP 9 QUATERNARY MARINE SEDIMENT TO 1.m Rev 3
44 Area A Northing (NZTM) 37 3 Area B 3 Thickness (m) Area D Easting (NZTM) FOR PDF TENDER ONLY NOT FOR NO CONSTRUCTION WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP ISOPACH MAP QUATERNARY MARINE SEDIMENT TO 1.m Rev 3
45 Area A Are ab 3 D Area Northing (NZTM) 37 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RESIDUAL MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
46 Area A Are ab 3 33 D Area 1 3 Northing (NZTM) 7 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RESIDUAL MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
47 Area A Area Are a B 3 D Northing (NZTM) 37 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RESIDUAL MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
48 Area A Are ab Area 3 D Northing (NZTM) 37 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RESIDUAL MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
49 Area A Are a 3 1 B 33 D Area 3 Northing (NZTM) Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP RESIDUAL MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
50 Area A Are a Area D 3 B Northing (NZTM) 37 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
51 Area A Are ab 3 Area D Northing (NZTM) 9 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
52 Area A Area B 3 D 1 33 Are a 3 1 Northing (NZTM) 37 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -13.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
53 Area A Are ab 3 1 D Area Northing (NZTM) 9 Thickness (m) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
54 Area A Are ab 3 D Area Thickness (m) Northing (NZTM) Easting (NZTM) PDFTENDER ONLY FOR NO CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR WHARF DEVELOPMENT ISOPACH MAP MANGAHEIA FORMATION TO -1.m ISOPACH MAP Rev 3
ABP Southampton. Environmental Statement for Port of Southampton: Berth 201/202 Works. Appendix B. Dredge Material Characterisation
ABP Southampton Environmental Statement for Port of Southampton: Berth 201/202 Works Appendix B Dredge Material Characterisation Appendix B Dredge Material Characterisation Environmental Statement for
More informationOmaroro Lower Playing Field - Geotechnical Interpretive Report
Report Omaroro Lower Playing Field - Geotechnical Interpretive Report Prepared for Wellington Water Limited Prepared by Beca Limited 1 December 2017 Omaroro Lower Playing Field - Geotechnical Interpretive
More informationLEGEND BUSINESS ZONE NORTH OF AGRESEARCH BOREHOLE CPT SEISMIC CPT AUGER SCALE. Powells Road TEST PIT AGRESEARCH INNOVATION PARK. Hamilton Ring Road
LEGEND ra R aku Ru BUSINESS ZONE NORTH OF Powells Road oad AGRESEARCH BOREHOLE CPT SEISMIC CPT AUGER SCALE 3 mm TEST PIT AS121 SCPT12 TP18 BH13 TP15 2 AS125 AS126 TP14 BH12 AGRESEARCH CPT13 TP17 INNOVATION
More informationRun 028 (Note: error in UKC at start of exercise due incorrect tide input then corrected ok.)
Run 027 RNZ Full Bridge Simulation Run Plots Final Report Be-Software August 2016 Prepared for Royal Haskoning DHV on behalf of Refining New Zealand Limited 27 Run 028 (Note: error in UKC at start of exercise
More informationRedwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015
1 Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study Appendix D Geotechnical Engineering DRAFT April 2015 2 Contents 1 Purposes of Report... 3 2 Background... 3 3 References and
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More information14 Geotechnical Hazards
Volume 2: Assessment of Environmental Effects 296 14 Geotechnical Hazards Overview This Chapter provides an assessment of the underlying geotechnical conditions to identify: any potential liquefaction
More informationNew Plymouth CBD Site Subsoil Class: Results from ground investigation
Alexander, G.J., Chin, C.Y., Kayser, C. & Bradshaw, J. (2017) New Plymouth CBD Site Subsoil Proc. 20 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier New Plymouth CBD Site Subsoil Class:
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationREPORT. Housing Re-Zone. Middle Road and Iona Road - Geotechnical Investigation Report
REPORT Housing Re-Zone Middle Road and Iona Road - Geotechnical Investigation Report Prepared for Hastings istrict Council Prepared by Tonkin & Taylor Ltd ate April 06 Job Number 464.000 istribution: Hastings
More informationCONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.
CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Concrete Technology, Blasting Consultants Construction Quality Assurance / Quality Control 8 Bluewater Road, Bedford, NS BB J6 Phone (9)85-7
More informationAppendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note
Appendix A Producer Statement Advisory Note Ref. No. 17095 26 May 2017 PRODUCER STATEMENT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW (PS4) IMPORTANT ADVISORY NOTE The Building Consent Authority (BCA) frequently requires Producer
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More informationEarthquake Commission. Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Avondale
REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Avondale REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Avondale Report prepared
More informationHarmonized European standards for construction in Egypt
Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt EN 1998 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance Jean-Armand Calgaro Chairman of CEN/TC250 Organised with the support of the Egyptian Organization
More informationJune 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON
PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western
More informationSYDNEY MARINE TERMINAL Second Berth Progress
SYDNEY MARINE TERMINAL Second Berth Progress Second Berth - Project Proponents Second Berth - Project Partners Second Berth - Key Stakeholder Second Berth Project Components New Second Berth: 1 2 Main
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationGNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand NZSEE Conference
A Ground Shaking Amplification Map for New Zealand U. Destegul, G. Dellow & D. Heron GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. 2008 NZSEE Conference ABSTRACT: A ground shaking amplification map of New Zealand
More informationLiquefaction induced ground damage in the Canterbury earthquakes: predictions vs. reality
Bowen, H. J. & Jacka, M. E. () Proc. th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Ed. CY Chin, Queenstown Liquefaction induced ground damage in the Canterbury earthquakes: predictions vs. reality H J Bowen & M E Jacka
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationConstruction Shortfall and Forensic Investigation on Soft Ground
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Construction Shortfall and Forensic Investigation on Soft Ground To cite this article: M Saravanan and B N Ibrahim 2016 IOP Conf.
More informationMilford Centre Ltd. Private Plan Change GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
Milford Centre Ltd. Private Plan Change GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Final 15 April 2008 Milford Centre Ltd. Private Plan Change GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Final 15 April 2008 Sinclair Knight Merz 25 Teed Street
More informationAnnual transport rates at two locations on the fore-slope.
Sediment Transport by Currents Fore-slope Sediment transport rates and sediment concentrations were computed from the hydrodynamic model runs as well as from direct measurements of current velocities at
More informationEarthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton
REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton Report
More informationStation Description Sheet GRA
Station Description Sheet GRA 1. General Information 2. Geographical Information / Geomorphology 3. Geological Information 4. Geotechnical Site Characterization 5. Geophysical Site Characterization 6.
More informationREPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO. Prepared for:
REPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Prepared By: SIRATI & PARTNERS CONSULTANTS LIMITED
More informationpatersongroup Consulting Engineers April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive
patersongroup April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Attention: Mr. Adam Thompson Consulting Engineers 28 Concourse
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN AND CASE STUDIES
The University of the West Indies Organization of American States PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME: COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A COURSE IN DESIGN OF MARINE STRUCTURES
More informationHydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)
TABLE 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MOE WWR No Well ID Location Installation Date Status Easting Coordinates Northing Source Elevation Screened Interval Screened Material Borehole Well Stick-up Ground Top
More informationSeabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis
Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis Lindita Kellezi, GEO Danish Geotechnical Institute, Denmark Gregers Kudsk, Maersk Contractors, Denmark Hugo Hofstede, Marine Structure
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationJune 2018 Sediments and Dredging at GBR Ports
June 2018 Sediments and Dredging at GBR Ports Reef 2050 Long Term Sustainability Plan The Great Barrier Reef is over 2000 km long and covers an area of approximately 350,000 square kilometres. It is a
More informationAppendix G.18 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Potential Impacts of the Marine Structures on the Hydrodynamics and Sedimentation
Appendix G.18 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Potential Impacts of the Marine Structures on the Hydrodynamics and Sedimentation Patterns Project Memo H345670 To: Capt. David Kyle From:
More informationStation Description Sheet STE
Station Description Sheet STE 1. General Information 2. Geographical Information / Geomorphology 3. Geological Information 4. Geotechnical Site Characterization. Geophysical Site Characterization 6. Site
More informationIMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA
IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA David Harro The G3 Group, 2509 Success Drive, Suite 1, Odessa, FL 33556, david.harro@geo3group.com
More informationAPPENDIX H SOIL SURVEY
Environmental Impact Statement Beryl Solar Farm APPENDIX H SOIL SURVEY Beryl Solar Farm 16 347 Final V1 H i Geotechnical Engineers & Engineering Geologists NATA Accredited Laboratories for Asphalt, Aggregate,
More informationREPORT. Earthquake Commission. Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Bryndwr Appendix C: Borehole Logs
REPORT Earthquake Commission Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Bryndwr Appendix C: Borehole Logs REPORT Earthquake Commission Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual
More informationSoil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data
Mirjafari, S.Y. & Orense, R.P. & Suemasa, N. () Proc. th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding
More informationDepartment of National Defence B-Jetty Reconstruction
Department of National Defence B-Jetty Reconstruction CFB Esquimalt, BC Presented by: Stantec & Golder Associates February 2, 2016 Agenda 1 B-Jetty Project Background 2 Distinguishing Project Features
More informationGeneral. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation
DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationProposed Cemetery Thornhill Road. Tier One Hydrogeological Risk Assessment. Peter Mitchell Associates
Proposed Cemetery Thornhill Road Tier One Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Peter Mitchell Associates January 2015 Executive Summary This report uses a desk-based risk assessment technique published by the
More information3.4 Typical Soil Profiles
SEI.UoC.0002.11 Figure 4. Streams in central Christchurch as mapped in March 1850, superposed on aerial photography captured on 24 February 2011. Streams digitised from the Black Map of Christchurch (March
More informationComparison between predicted liquefaction induced settlement and ground damage observed from the Canterbury earthquake sequence
Power, P.M. & Jacka, M. (2013) the Canterbury earthquake sequence Proc. 19 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Ed. CY Chin, Queenstown Comparison between predicted liquefaction induced settlement and ground
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationFree Range Broiler Farm, Arapohue: Geotechnical assessment
Free Range Broiler Farm, Arapohue: Geotechnical assessment Prepared for Date September 2017 Job Number 1003028 Document Control Title: Date Version Description Prepared by: Reviewed by: Authorised by:
More informationDate: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303
City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120
More informationBP Connect Development Turangi Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Report
The Holmes Group BP Connect Development Turangi Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Report The Holmes Group BP Connect Development Turangi Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Report Prepared By Opus International
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARIES. Hong Kong Collection. gift from Hong Kong (China). Geotechnical Engineering Office.
THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARIES Hong Kong Collection gift from Hong Kong (China). Geotechnical Engineering Office. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering Department The Government of
More informationSeptember 7, 2017 (Revised November 1, 2017)
September 7, 2017 (Revised November 1, 2017) Project No. 10113.002 Environmental Advisors 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Attention: Subject: Mr. Greg McCafferty Response
More informationDistribution: Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (FILE) 1 copy 1 copy
REPORT Proposed Second Runway Geotechnical Environmental Baseline Report Prepared for Prepared by Tonkin & Taylor Ltd Date October 2015 Job Number 29777.2000.v3 Distribution: Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (FILE)
More informationK Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions
K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions The reader is advised to read the text in Chapter 13 before using these charts. The charts and figures are repeated here for quick
More informationStructure contours on Bone Spring Formation (Lower Permian), Delaware Basin
Structure contours on Bone Spring Formation (Lower Permian), Delaware Basin By Ronald F. Broadhead and Lewis Gillard New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, a division of New Mexico Tech, Socorro
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationH.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE) Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the proposed project. The Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationAPPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests
APPENDIX F 1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS F 1 In-Situ Tests 1. SPT (1) Sand (Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996), = effective vertical stress = effective friction angle = atmosphere pressure (Shmertmann, 1975)
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationChristchurch CBD: Lessons Learnt and Strategies for Foundation Remediation 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake
Christchurch CBD: Lessons Learnt and Strategies for Foundation Remediation 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake K.M. Murahidy & A.F. Sleight Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
More information16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN
16 January 2018 Job Number: 50595 RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN CHANSEN@CFMA.CO.NZ STORMWATER DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT Dear Richard, RDAgritech were requested
More informationDRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09 Reports\9.3 December 2009_Capping and
More informationAnnex B. Engineering & Planning Information Requirements
Annex B Engineering & Planning Information Requirements Project Memo 21 August 2008 TO: Zoë Day FROM: Ellen Campbell cc: Ken Russell KR HMG JV Alan Wijnberg AW PRDW Justin Cross JC PRDW Kenneth Pederson
More informationGeotechnical issues in seismic assessments: When do I need a geotechnical specialist?
Geotechnical issues in seismic assessments: When do I need a geotechnical specialist? B.H. Rama & S.J. Palmer Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (T+T), Wellington, New Zealand. 2016 NZSEE Conference ABSTRACT: The Canterbury
More informationSoil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update
Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update P.K. Robertson Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc., Signal Hill, California, USA ABSTRACT: One of the most common applications of CPT results is to evaluate soil type
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS Except where otherwise noted, the following Section is based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Medical Office Buildings and Mixed-Use
More informationDRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01
DILL HOLE # BH-BGC3-FN-0 Drill Method: Mud otary/coring Depth To ock (m): N/A Page of 7 eviewed by: AJB 0 GAVEL (GW) Fine to coarse, sandy, well graded, dense, max particle size = 30 mm, angular to subrounded,
More informationRosemerryn Subdivision, Lincoln Stages 10 to 18 Geotechnical Investigation Report Fulton Hogan Land Development Limited
This information Memorandum, title or other supplementary property information (the Information ) has been prepared by Whalan and Partners Limited, trading as Bayleys ( Bayleys ) as agent for the Vendor.
More informationR.SUNDARAVADIVELU Professor IIT Madras,Chennai - 36.
Behaviour of Berthing Structure under Changing Slope in Seismic Condition - A Case Study K.MUTHUKKUMARAN Research Scholar Department of Ocean Engineering, R.SUNDARAVADIVELU Professor IIT Madras,Chennai
More informationStation Description Sheet W03
Station Description Sheet W3 1. General Information 2. Geographical Information / Geomorphology 3. Geological Information 4. Geotechnical Site Characterization 5. Geophysical Site Characterization 6. Site
More informationProject No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD
Boring: SB-1 (1 of 1) Moist, brown to orange brown CLAY and SILT, trace sand with fine weathered rock fragments. POSSIBLE FILL. Dry, orange brown sandy SILT trace clay (SM-ML). RESIDUAL SOIL : Not Surveyed
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationCONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.
CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Concrete Technology, Blasting Consultants Construction Quality Assurance / Quality Control 8 Bluewater Road, Bedford, NS BB J6 Phone (9)85-7
More informationB-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationSeptember 18, 2017 Project No.: 5077
#109 3011 Underhill Avenue Burnaby, BC V5A 3C2 Phone: (604) 421-3288 Email: info@terrangeo.com September 18, 2017 Project No.: 5077 Kevin Brooks City of Campbell River 301 St. Ann s Road Campbell River,
More informationCore Description, Stratigraphic Correlation, and Mapping of Pennsylvanian Strata in the Appalachians
Core Description, Stratigraphic Correlation, and Mapping of Pennsylvanian Strata in the Appalachians The remaining laboratory sessions for the semester will be collected into a series of exercises designed
More informationCone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice
Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice Table Of Contents: LIST OF CONTENTS v (4) PREFACE ix (2) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi (1) SYMBOL LIST xii (4) CONVERSION FACTORS xvi (6) GLOSSARY xxii 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationKANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007
KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 2007-22 LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS Prepared by Michael T. Dealy L.G., Manager, Wichita Operations SITE LOCATION The site was approximately four miles
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More information3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 3.1 Methodology The Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) publication Geology of South Cork was consulted to establish the nature of the bedrock lithology and Quaternary sediments.
More informationPerformance and Post Earthquake Assessment of CFA Pile Ground Improvement 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake
Performance and Post Earthquake Assessment of CFA Pile Ground Improvement 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake K. M. Murahidy, S. W Sutherland & M. E. Jacka Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, Christchurch,
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationThe Casagrande plasticity chart does it help or hinder the NZGS soil classification process?
Hind, K.J. (2017) The Casagrande plasticity chart does it help or hinder the NZGS soil classification process? Proc. 20 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier The Casagrande
More informationConverse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services
Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services Ms. Rebecca Mitchell Mt. San Antonio College Facilities Planning & Management 1100 North
More informationEstimation of the static vertical subgrade reaction modulus ks from CPT for flexible shallow foundations on cohesionless soils
Barounis, N. & Philpot, J. (207) Estimation of the static vertical subgrade reaction modulus ks from CPT for flexible shallow foundations on cohesionless soils Proc. 20 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium.
More informationPrediction of subsoil subsidence caused by opencast mining
Land Subsidence (Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, The Hague, October 1995). IAHS Publ. no. 234, 1995. 167 Prediction of subsoil subsidence caused by opencast mining
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AND STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN SOILS OF CHENNAI CITY
DEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AND STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN SOILS OF CHENNAI CITY Uma Maheswari R 1, Boominathan A 2 and Dodagoudar G.R 3 1 Research Scholar,
More informationThe Arctic - A New Frontier The geological, environmental and engineering challenges for submarine telecommunication cables
The Arctic - A New Frontier The geological, environmental and engineering challenges for submarine telecommunication cables Ryan Wopschall 5 September 2013 Oceanology International China, Shanghai Fugro
More informationHISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)
HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR 257.73(c)(1)(i) (xii) (i) Site Name and Ownership Information: Site Name: E.C. Gaston Steam Plant Site Location:
More informationREGARDING SOME DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOILS AND THE LIQUIFACTION POTENTIAL OF SANDS IN SOFIA
REGARDING SOME DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOILS AND THE LIQUIFACTION POTENTIAL OF SANDS IN SOFIA Chief Ass. Prof. Ivailo Ivanov University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy Department
More informationAppendix G.19 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Maintenance Dredging at the Materials Offloading Facility
Appendix G.19 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Maintenance Dredging at the Materials Offloading Facility Project Memo H345670 To: Capt. David Kyle From: O. Sayao/L. Absalonsen December
More informationStructure contours on Abo Formation (Lower Permian) Northwest Shelf of Permian Basin
Structure contours on Abo Formation (Lower Permian) Northwest Shelf of Permian Basin By Ronald F. Broadhead 1, Lewis Gillard 1, and Nilay Engin 2 1 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, a
More informationDRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS
DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS Presented by: W. Morgan NeSmith, P.E. Berkel & Company Contractors Inc. 770.941.5100 mnesmith@berkelapg.com SC Engineering Conference
More informationCuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard
Cuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard Company Background plus Data Insights to Support GSP Development for the Cuyama Basin Presented by Grapevine Capital Partners and Cleath-Harris Geologists April 26th, 2018
More information