BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
- Blaise Johns
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) MOTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) AND SETTLING PARTIES FOR ADOPTION OF STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FADIA RAFEEDIE KHOURY JANE LEE COLE Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Dated: July 6, 2018
2 MOTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) AND SETTLING PARTIES FOR ADOPTION OF STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Table of Contents Section Title Page I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. BACKGROUND...2 III. SUMMARY OF POSITIONS AND SETTLEMENT...3 A. B. C. D. Non-Allocated Revenues...3 Energy Charges and Customer Charges...5 Rate Option for Distribution Pole-Mounted Streetlights...6 Dimmable Streetlight and Ancillary Device Rate Design...7 IV. REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT...8 A. B. C. The Settlement Agreement is Reasonable In Light Of the Record...9 The Settlement Agreement is Consistent with Law...10 The Settlement Agreement Is In the Public Interest...10 V. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT...11 VI. CONCLUSION...12 ATTACHMENT A STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT i
3 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) MOTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) AND SETTLING PARTIES FOR ADOPTION OF STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Rule 12.1 et seq. of the California Public Utilities Commission s (Commission s) Rules of Practice and Procedure, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), on behalf of itself and the other Settling Parties the California City County Street Light Association (CAL-SLA), and the Coalition for Affordable Street Lights (CASL) requests that the Commission find reasonable and adopt the Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement), which is appended to this motion as Attachment A. CASL and CAL-SLA represent streetlight, area light and traffic control customer interests. The Settling Parties have executed a Settlement Agreement that resolves all issues that have been raised with respect to non-allocated revenues, rate design and tariff matters for streetlight and traffic control rate schedules. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and as soon as practicable following a Commission decision adopting the Settlement Agreement, but no earlier than the first quarter of 2019, SCE will adjust its rates for streetlight, area lighting, and traffic control customers pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Section II of this Motion provides the background related to this proceeding. Section III describes in general the positions advocated by the Settling Parties in this proceeding and the terms of 1
4 the Settlement Agreement. Section IV demonstrates that the Settlement Agreement is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest, and that it should be adopted without modification. Section V discusses the procedural requests of the Settling Parties for disposing of this Motion and implementing revised rates. II. BACKGROUND This proceeding, Application (A.) , was initiated by the filing of SCE s application on June 30, 2017, along with service of its prepared direct testimony regarding marginal costs, revenue allocation and other aspects of rate design. On November 22, 2017, the Assigned Commissioner and Assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a Scoping Memo and Ruling following a November 2, 2017 prehearing conference identifying the distribution pole-mounted streetlight option and streetlighting rate structure as some of the nonresidential rate design issues to be resolved in the proceeding. On March 23, 2018, CASL and CAL-SLA were the only parties to submit prepared testimony regarding the streetlight rate group s non-allocated revenue requirement, streetlight rate design issues and/or tariff issues. CASL and SCE then had a series of meetings and engaged in productive discussions regarding some issues raised in CASL s testimony and agreed to resolve them outside of SCE s General Rate Case (GRC) Phase 2 proceeding. Thus, on May 23, 2018, CASL filed a motion to withdraw the March 23, 2018 Direct Testimony of Fred Lyn on Behalf of the Coalition for Affordable Streetlights Concerning SCE s Streetlight Outage and Maintenance Protocol (CASL-2), and Chapter IV of the Direct Testimony of William A. Monsen on Behalf of the Coalition for Affordable Streetlights Concerning Streetlight Rates and LED Conversion (CASL-1) in this proceeding. As of the date of this filing, that motion has not yet been granted but, because it is unopposed, the issues raised in those portions of CASL s testimony are not addressed in the Settlement Agreement. SCE provided notice to all parties of its intent to conduct a settlement conference related to all issues raised in the proceeding, and an initial settlement conference was held on April 6,
5 Continuing discussions related to the potential settlement of issues in this proceeding occurred among the interested parties after the settlement conference. III. SUMMARY OF POSITIONS AND SETTLEMENT The Settlement Agreement resolves all issues related to non-allocated revenues assigned to the Streetlight Rate Group, streetlight and traffic control rate design issues and streetlight tariff matters. The Settlement Agreement s primary provisions are summarized below but these and others are set forth in more detail in a comparison exhibit, Appendix A to the Settlement Agreement, which summarizes the positions of the Parties in their prepared testimony and how each issue is resolved by the Settlement Agreement. 1 The Settlement Agreement resolves all issues raised in the proceeding with respect to nonallocated revenues, rate design and tariff matters for streetlight and traffic control rate schedules. Illustrative rates based on the Settlement Agreement are provided in Appendix B to the Settlement Agreement. A. Non-Allocated Revenues To determine the initial level of non-allocated revenues to be directly assigned to the Streetlight Rate Group to recover the costs of SCE-owned streetlight facilities such as lamps and streetlight poles, SCE proposed to retain the methodology agreed upon among settling parties in SCE s 2012 and 2015 GRC Phase 2 proceedings and adopted by the Commission, which, based on the net book value and O&M expenses for streetlight service in 2015 as recorded in FERC account 373 and related O&M 1 Capitalized terms are defined in Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement. The comparison exhibit also includes resolution of material uncontested issues, not summarized in this motion, such as SCE s proposal to eliminate incidental load exceptions to some time-of-use streetlight schedules and instead convert them into flat schedules with an assessment process to confirm that the customers usage is predominantly for lighting load. 3
6 expense accounts, equaled $ million. 2 To moderate bill impacts, SCE proposed that the level of non-allocated revenues not exceed 5 percent more than the current non-allocated revenues assigned to the streetlight class. SCE proposed that, for attrition years, it would adjust the non-allocated revenues consistent with the trigger mechanism used in the 2015 GRC Phase 2 streetlight (SL) Settlement Agreement. 3 CASL generally agreed with SCE s proposal in its direct testimony, and proposed to apply the methodology from the 2015 SL Settlement Agreement to the attrition year facilities charges, including SCE s proposal to cap non-allocated revenue requirement increases at five percent annually. 4 However, CASL proposed some adjustments, such as: 1) setting the baseline date at the cut-off date for data used in the test-year revenue requirement calculation, 5 2) reducing the trigger amounts to reflect smaller LS-1 customer base and any additional streetlight transfers that take place until the new baseline date for the 2018 GRC cycle, 6 and 3) including all approved streetlight transfers in the trigger amount, rather than those that have been physically transferred to the cities. 7 CAL-SLA opposed SCE s proposal to update the non-allocated revenue requirement based on triggers identified in 2015 SL Settlement Agreement (i.e., based on changes in the streetlight lamp or facilities counts) 8 because of a concern over potential rate volatility if a large number of streetlights were sold over the next three years. CAL-SLA explained that the revenue requirement would be adjusted downward by a maximum of 5% but the customer base of lamps paying facilities charges would decrease to a greater degree. To collect the adjusted revenue requirement, the rates would have to 2 The 2012 GRC Phase 2 settlement was approved in D The 2015 GRC Phase 2 settlement agreement was adopted in D See, also, Exhibit SCE-04A, p74 (and Appendix J). 3 SCE also updated its Results of Operations (RO) model to reflect the changes resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and recent sales of streetlight assets prior to settlement negotiations. 4 Direct Prepared Testimony of William A. Monsen On Behalf of CASL ( CASL-1 ), pp. 2-4, Id., p Id., p Id. pp Direct Prepared Testimony of CAL-SLA (CAL-SLA-1), p. 1 and pp
7 increase for the remaining LS-1 lamps. 9 Rather than continuing to applying the trigger mechanisms adopted in 2015 SL Settlement Agreement, CAL-SLA proposed that SCE s streetlight facilities revenue requirement be adjusted once only, keeping facilities charges constant through the attrition years. 10 CAL-SLA explained that its proposal is straightforward to implement and the revenues collected will directly scale with the number of LS-1 lamps and that fixed charges over the attrition years will allow customers to better understand and budget for their streetlight bills. 11 The Settling Parties reached a three-part compromise. First (as occurred in SCE s 2015 GRC Phase 2), the Settling Parties agreed that, as part of the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement, filed on July 3, 2018, the non-allocated revenues would be set at a certain level initially (here, $ million), and then leave to this attached Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Design Settlement the setting of attrition year non-allocated revenues. 12 Second, in the attached Settlement Agreement, the Settling Parties agreed that, upon initial implementation, SCE would hold the non-allocated revenue requirement constant but increase by 5 percent the facilities charges (in streetlight rate schedules that have facilities charges). SCE would collect the balance of non-allocated revenues via distribution energy charges. Third, in attrition years, the non-allocated revenues would then be updated annually to account for, among other things, the sales transfer of streetlights to eligible entities and LED conversions, but the facilities charges would remain fixed at the five percent level established upon initial implementation. B. Energy Charges and Customer Charges SCE proposed to update energy charges based on its proposed marginal costs and the usage characteristics of streetlight customers. CAL-SLA proposed to set energy charges residually after the non-energy charges have been computed. CASL did not address energy charges. The Settlement 9 CAL-SLA-1, p Id., p Id., p See Paragraph 4.B.3 on page 16 of the MC/RA Settlement Agreement. 5
8 Agreement provides that SCE will set energy charges residually after non-energy charges are computed (including after setting the non-allocated revenues consistent with the preceding paragraph), and use marginal costs and usage characteristics to set the energy rates. With respect to customer charges, SCE proposed to use the Real Economic Carrying Cost (RECC) methodology as the basis for setting the monthly charges for Schedules AL-2 and LS-3. For Schedule TC-1, SCE proposed to collect a maximum of 27 percent of allocated revenue via the customer charge. CAL-SLA agreed with the proposed treatment for Schedule TC-1 customer charges, but proposed lower customer charges than SCE for Schedules AL-2 and LS-3 because CAL-SLA used ORA s marginal customer cost methodology (the new-customer only, or NCO, method). 13 CASL did not comment on customer charges. The Settling Parties compromised by establishing customer charges using a 50/50 split of RECC and NCO for Schedules AL-2 and LS-3. C. Rate Option for Distribution Pole-Mounted Streetlights Pursuant to the 2015 SL Settlement Agreement, SCE proposed a rate option for lamps that are mounted on SCE s distribution poles, as compared to those that are mounted on poles that support only streetlights. 14 SCE s proposal included lamp charges based on a net-plant-in-service methodology described in Exhibit SCE-04A, and allocation of streetlights non-allocated revenue requirement based on the marginal costs of standard-configuration luminaires. The proposed rate would provide a credit of $/lamp to the standard configuration charge for those customers with distribution pole-mount configuration. SCE also proposed to modify the existing percent distribution pole adjustment proportionally based on the number of customers taking service on the new rate option in order to prevent an automatic increase in streetlight facilities charges for standard configurations to account for the reduced revenues collected from distribution pole-mount configurations. 13 CAL-SLA-1, p Exhibit SCE-04A, pp
9 In its direct testimony, 15 CASL agreed with SCE s proposal and recommended its adoption. CAL-SLA supported SCE s proposal for a lamp credit but opposed SCE s proposed inventory fee for non-transfer cities. 16 Ultimately, the Settling Parties agreed to SCE s proposal for establishment of a distribution pole-mounted streetlight rate option, the details of which are in Paragraph 4.J. of the Settlement Agreement. In summary, the Settling Parties agreed that SCE would provide a credit of $/lamp to the standard configuration charge for those customers who take service on the distribution pole-mount rate option but will implement an inventory fee for non-transfer entities who wish to participate on this rate. However, SCE agreed to provide additional customer outreach (via written and oral communication to customers) so that eligible streetlight customers are aware of this new rate option and can make more informed decisions about whether to avail themselves of this new optional rate. Relatedly, the Settling Parties also agreed that SCE would assess any cost-saving opportunities for customers taking service on this new optional rate and on Schedule LS-1, Option E light-emitting diode (LED) conversions, and present those findings in the next GRC Phase 2. D. Dimmable Streetlight and Ancillary Device Rate Design SCE s direct testimony made no proposal with respect to dimmable streetlights and SCE does not currently provide a dimmable streetlight rate option. However, CAL-SLA proposed in its direct testimony that: 1) SCE should offer a new dimmable streetlight rate structure that bills customers based on metered electricity usage which consists of base LS-2 facilities charges plus new SCE administrative fees, with the same energy rate as that applied to non-metered streetlights; and 2) SCE should offer a new tariff for ancillary devices attached to streetlight poles and separately metered by customer-owned, streetlight control modules. 17 CASL expressed support for the development of a rate structure for 15 CASL-1, p CAL-SLA Direct Testimony, pp Non-transfer cities are distinguished from those cities that purchased streetlight facilities from SCE when that option was available. 17 CAL-SLA-1, p
10 dimmable lamps and ancillary devices that would facilitate cities investments in these technologies. 18 The Settling Parties agreed that SCE would conduct an assessment evaluating the feasibility of a rate structure for a dimmable streetlight that bills customers based on metered electricity usage and for ancillary devices attached to streetlight poles that are separately metered by customer-owned streetlight control modules. SCE s feasibility assessment will include a determination of equipment and infrastructure needs, and impacts to SCE s billing system that would be required to accommodate this new rate. Under the Settlement Agreement, SCE may propose new rate option in its next GRC Phase 2 application depending on the results of the feasibility assessment, the approval of any necessary funding requirements in the next GRC Phase 1 proceeding and/or the deployment schedule for any necessary equipment. However, SCE is not obligated to propose such a new rate option. IV. REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Settlement Agreement is submitted pursuant to Rule 12.1 et seq. of the Commission s Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Settlement Agreement is also consistent with Commission decisions on settlements, which express the strong public policy favoring settlement of disputes if they are fair and reasonable in light of the whole record. 19 This policy supports many worthwhile goals, including reducing the expense of litigation, conserving scarce Commission resources, and allowing parties to reduce the risk that litigation will produce unacceptable results. 20 As long as a settlement taken as a whole is reasonable in light of the record, consistent with the law, and in the public interest, it should be adopted without change. The Settlement Agreement complies with Commission guidelines and relevant precedent for settlements. The general criteria for Commission approval of settlements are stated in Rule 12.1(d) as 18 CASL-1, pp See, e.g., D (30 CPUC 2d 189, ) and D (40 CPUC 2d, 301, 326). 20 D , 46 CPUC 2d 538,
11 follows: The Commission will not approve stipulations or settlements, whether contested or uncontested, unless the stipulation or settlement is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest. 21 The Settlement Agreement meets the criteria for a settlement pursuant to Rule 12.1(d), as discussed below. A. The Settlement Agreement is Reasonable In Light Of the Record The prepared testimony of SCE, CASL and CAL-SLA, the Settlement Agreement itself, and this motion contain the information necessary for the Commission to find the Settlement Agreement reasonable in light of the record. Prior to the settlement, parties conducted discovery and served testimony on the issues related to streetlight and traffic control rate design issues. The Settling Parties request that the Commission admit the prepared testimony and related exhibits into the Commission s record of this proceeding. The Settlement Agreement represents a reasonable compromise of the Settling Parties positions. The prepared testimony of the Settling Parties as well as Exhibit A to the Settlement Agreement (i.e., the comparison exhibit), together with this motion and attached Settlement Agreement, contain sufficient information for the Commission to judge the reasonableness of the proposed outcome. The Settlement Agreement is a reasonable compromise of the Settling Parties respective positions, as summarized in Section III. Specifically, the Settlement Agreement s treatment of nonallocated revenues helps ensure more manageable bill impacts upon initial implementation, and then rate stability across the attrition years (with an easier-to-manage adjustment than the triggers adopted in the 2015 SL Settlement Agreement). The Settlement Agreement is also reasonable because of its safeguards against cost-shifting, including SCE s proposed annual review of daytime usage of AL-2 and LS-3 customers to help ensure 21 See also, Re San Diego Gas & Electric Company, (D ), 37 CPUC 2d
12 those customers usage is predominantly for lighting. B. The Settlement Agreement is Consistent with Law The Settling Parties believe that the terms of the Settlement Agreement comply with all applicable statutes and prior Commission decisions, and reasonable interpretations thereof. In agreeing to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Settling Parties have explicitly considered the relevant statutes and Commission decisions and believe that the Commission can approve the Settlement Agreement without violating applicable statutes or prior Commission decisions. C. The Settlement Agreement Is In the Public Interest The Settlement Agreement is a reasonable compromise of the Settling Parties respective positions, as summarized in Section III. The Settlement Agreement is in the public interest and in the interest of SCE s customers. It fairly resolves issues and provides more certainty to customers regarding their present and future costs, which is in the public interest. SCE s commitment to exploring the feasibility of a dimmable and ancillary device streetlight option, and the Settling Parties proposed establishment of a rate designed for distribution pole-mounted streetlights, potentially offers more meaningful customer choice while remaining faithful to costcausation principles. This Settlement Agreement fairly resolves issues and provides more certainty to customers regarding their present and future costs, which is in the public interest. The Settlement Agreement, if adopted by the Commission, avoids the cost of further litigation, and frees up Commission resources for other proceedings. Given that the Commission s workload is extensive, the impact on Commission resources is doubly important. The Settlement Agreement frees up the time and resources of other parties as well, so that they may focus on other proceedings and the other unresolved issues in this proceeding. The prepared direct testimony contains sufficient information for the Commission to judge the reasonableness of the Settlement Agreement and for it to discharge any future regulatory obligation with respect to this matter. 10
13 Each portion of the Settlement Agreement is dependent upon the other portions of the Settlement Agreement. Changes to one portion of the Settlement Agreement would alter the balance of interests and the mutually agreed upon compromises and outcomes that are contained in the Settlement Agreement. As such, the Settling Parties request that the Settlement Agreement be adopted as a whole by the Commission, as it is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest. V. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Settling Parties seek approval of the terms of the Settlement Agreement so that SCE may implement rates as soon as practicable following the issuance of a final Commission decision approving the Settlement Agreement but no earlier than the first quarter of In order to accomplish this, and given that SCE expects this Settlement Agreement to be unopposed, the Settling Parties recommend the following time periods for comments and replies comments on the Settlement Agreement. In order to accommodate questions about the Settlement Agreement in the event that there are material contested issues of fact, or questions from the Commission following the filing of comments, the Settling Parties request that a portion of one day be scheduled for a hearing (with a panel of sponsoring witnesses) in accordance with the following schedule. Event Date Motion filed for Adoption of the Settlement Agreement July 6, 2018 Opening comments, if any, on the Settlement Agreement August 6, 2018 Reply comments, if any, on the Settlement Agreement August 21, 2018 Hearing on the Settlement Agreement, if necessary July 17, 2018 to July 18, On July 3, 2018, SCE submitted a procedural request to the ALJs, including its request to have hearings on the reasonableness of the streetlight settlement agreement on July 17 or 18th. 11
14 VI. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, the Settling Parties respectfully request that the Assigned Commissioner, Assigned ALJ, and the Commission: 1. Approve the attached Settlement Agreement as reasonable in light of the record, consistent with law, and in the public interest; and 2. Authorize SCE to implement changes in rates and tariffs in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Respectfully submitted, FADIA RAFEEDIE KHOURY JANE LEE COLE /s/ Jane Lee Cole By: Jane Lee Cole Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) And on behalf of the Settling Parties. 23 July 6, In accordance with Rule 1.8(d), each Settling Party has authorized SCE s counsel to sign and file this motion on its behalf. 12
15 Attachment A Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement
16 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Dated: July 6, 2018 Attachment A-1
17 Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement Table of Contents Section Title Page PARTIES...2 DEFINITIONS...2 RECITALS...4 AGREEMENT...5 A. B. Illustrative Rates...6 Non-Allocated Revenues...6 1) 2) Initial and Subsequent Setting of Non-Allocated Revenues...6 Relationship Between Non-Allocated Revenues and Distribution Allocation in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement...7 C. Rate Design and Allocation of Revenues Among Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Schedules...7 1) 2) 3) Rate Structures...7 Customer Charges...7 Energy Charges...8 a) b) Generation-Related Energy Charges...8 Non-Generation-Related Energy Charges...9 4) Allocation of Revenues...9 D. E. F. Schedules LS-1 and LS Schedule LS Schedule AL ) 2) Option AL-2-A (Flat Rate, Non-Grandfathered)...10 Option AL-2 (Grandfathered Rate)...10 G. H. I. Daytime Usage Limitations on Schedule LS-3 and AL Schedule OL-1 and Schedule DWL...11 Schedule TC Attachment A-i-
18 Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement Table of Contents (Continued) Section Title Page J. Distribution Pole-Mounted Rate Option ) 2) Customer Outreach...12 Customer Elections...13 K. L. Dimmable Streetlight and Ancillary Device Rate...13 Assessment of Any Cost Savings for Customers Electing Service on Schedule LS-1, Option E Together With the Distribution Pole-Mounted Rate Option IMPLEMENTATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT...14 INCORPORATION OF COMPLETE AGREEMENT...14 RECORD EVIDENCE...14 SIGNATURE DATE...14 REGULATORY APPROVAL...14 COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIMS...15 NON-PRECEDENT...15 PREVIOUS COMMUNICATIONS...15 NON-WAIVER...15 EFFECT OF SUBJECT HEADINGS...16 GOVERNING LAW...16 NUMBER OF ORIGINALS...16 APPENDIX A COMPARISON OF PARTY POSITIONS AND SETTLEMENT...17 APPENDIX B ILLUSTRATIVE STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATES...7 Attachment A-ii-
19 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, Design Rates. A (Filed June 30, 2017) STREETLIGHT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL RATE GROUP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement, or Agreement) is entered into by and among Southern California Edison Company (SCE), the California City-County Street Light Association (CAL-SLA), and the Coalition for Affordable Street Lights (CASL) (collectively referred to hereinafter as Settling Parties). 1. Parties A. SCE is an investor-owned utility (IOU) and is subject to the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission or CPUC) with respect to providing electric service to its CPUC-jurisdictional retail customers. B. CAL-SLA represents all streetlight and traffic control customers in California, with the primary purpose of educating and advocating positions on streetlight rates. C. CASL represents cities that take street and area lighting and traffic signal services from SCE. 2. Definitions When used in initial capitalization in this Settlement Agreement, whether in singular or plural, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below or, if not set forth below, then as they are defined elsewhere in this Agreement: A consolidated estimated revenue requirement shall be as it is defined in Paragraph 4.B.(1) of the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. Attachment A-2
20 B. Allocated Revenues mean the amount of SCE s authorized revenue requirement that is allocated to the Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group. Allocated Revenues are used to establish the Energy Charges and the Customer Charges applicable to the Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group. C. Commission or CPUC means the California Public Utilities Commission. D. Customer Charges mean the fixed dollar-per-month charges applicable to certain Streetlight Rate Group and Traffic Control rate schedules. E. Energy Charges mean the dollar per kilowatt-hour (kwh) charges applicable to Streetlight Rate Group and Traffic Control Rate Group rate schedules. Energy Charges recover SCE s costs for delivery services, generation, public policy and DWR revenue requirements. F. Functional SAPC Allocation means allocation of SCE s revenue requirement to each of SCE s rate groups based on the system average percentage change (SAPC) for the particular function, e.g., generation, or distribution and customer costs. In addition, this would include adjustments of FERC-jurisdictional transmission revenues as authorized by formula rates or otherwise. G. Grandfathered refers to the treatment the Commission has prescribed for eligible solar customers as set forth in Decisions (D.) and D H. Incidental Load is currently permitted for Schedule AL-2 and LS-3-Option B customers, and is defined as usage for non-lighting purposes incurred any time of day provided that such Incidental Load shall not either exceed 20 kw or comprise 15 percent of the customer s maximum 12- month lighting demand within any three months during a 12-month period. I. Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement refers to the settlement of the same name filed in this proceeding on July 3, J. Non-Allocated Revenues are revenues assigned directly to the rate groups that incur these costs. As used in this Agreement, Non-Allocated Revenues are established in Paragraph 4.B. to be a combination of streetlight facilities costs and distribution energy costs. K. Non-Energy Charges mean the distribution charges applicable to street and area lighting, expressed as dollars per lamp per month. Non-Energy Charges are synonymous with service charges, and other charges applicable to street and area lighting. They include facilities charges and operations and maintenance (O&M) charges. Attachment A-3
21 L. Shortfall means the balance of the revenues resulting from the subtraction of the facilities charge revenues from the then-current Non-Allocated Revenues. The Shortfall is to be collected via distribution energy charges. M. Streetlight Agency means a city, county or other entity that serves as the customer of record on a streetlight service account. N. Streetlight Rate Group means the following SCE rate schedules: Schedule LS-1 Lighting Street and Highway Company-Owned System Unmetered Service; Schedule LS-2 Lighting Street and Highway Customer-Owned Installation Unmetered Service; Schedule LS-3 Lighting Street and Highway Customer-Owned Installation Metered Service; Schedule OL-1 Outdoor Area Lighting Service Unmetered Service; Schedule DWL Residential Walkway Lighting Unmetered Service; and Schedule AL-2 Outdoor Area Lighting Service Metered. O. Transfer Entities are cities, counties, or other entity that purchased their streetlight facilities from SCE. 1 P. TOU periods mean time-of-use. These are the time periods established for the provision of electric service in which demand charges or energy charges may vary in relation to the cost of service. Q. Traffic Control Rate Group means Schedule TC Recitals A. In Phase 2 of SCE s 2018 GRC, the Commission allocates SCE s authorized revenue requirement among rate groups and authorizes rate design changes for rate schedules in each rate group. B. On June 30, 2017, SCE filed it 2018 GRC Phase 2 application (Application A ) and served supporting testimony regarding marginal costs, revenue allocation and rate design. C. Protests and responses to SCE s Application were filed on August 7, No party submitted a protest relating to SCE s streetlight rate design proposals. D. On November 22, 2017, the Assigned Commissioner and Assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a Scoping Memo and Ruling following a November 2, 2017 prehearing conference (at 1 SCE did not sell distribution pole-mounted streetlights to any city. Attachment A-4
22 which CASL and CAL-SLA were granted party status through oral motions) identifying as among the nonresidential rate design issues to be resolved in the proceeding a potential distribution pole-mounted streetlight option and streetlight rate structure issues. E. On March 23, 2018, CASL and CAL-SLA served their initial testimony on streetlight rate design and/or revenue allocation issues. F. On May 23, 2018, CASL filed a motion to withdraw the March 23, 2018 Direct Testimony of Fred Lyn on Behalf of the Coalition for Affordable Streetlights Concerning SCE s Streetlight Outage and Maintenance Protocol (CASL-2), and Chapter IV of the Direct Testimony of William A. Monsen on Behalf of the Coalition for Affordable Streetlights Concerning Streetlight Rates and LED Conversion (CASL-1) in this proceeding. As of the date of this filing, that motion has not yet been granted but, because it is unopposed, the issues raised in those portions of CASL s testimony are not addressed in this Settlement Agreement. G. SCE provided notice to all parties of its intent to conduct a settlement conference related to all issues raised in the proceeding, and an initial settlement conference was held on April 6, Continuing settlement discussions occurred among the parties after April 6, H. The Settling Parties have evaluated the impacts of the various proposals in this proceeding and desire to resolve all issues related to streetlight and traffic control rates beginning with the implementation of a CPUC decision approving this Agreement, and have reached agreement as indicated in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. I. Appendix A to this Agreement provides a comparison of the Settling Parties positions, where applicable, related to Streetlight and Traffic Control rates that have been resolved by this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and Appendix A, the terms of this Agreement shall control. J. Appendix B provides illustrative streetlight and traffic control rates based on the 2019 consolidated estimated revenue requirement. These rates are for illustrative purposes only and have no precedential value. 4. Agreement In consideration of the mutual obligations, covenants and conditions contained herein, the Settling Parties agree to the terms of this Settlement Agreement. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be deemed to constitute an admission by any party that its position on any issue lacks merit or Attachment A-5
23 that its position has greater or lesser merit than the position taken by any other Party. This Settlement Agreement is subject to the express limitation on precedent described in Paragraph 11. Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, this Agreement and its terms are intended to remain in effect from the date rate changes are implemented as a result of a Commission decision in this proceeding until a decision is implemented in Phase 2 of SCE s next GRC. 2 A. Illustrative Rates The Settling Parties agree that the results of the rate design process illustrated by the rate schedules in Appendix B to this Agreement are reasonable. These rates are based on the 2019 consolidated estimated revenue requirement of $11,420 million described in more detail in Paragraph 4.B(1) of the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. The Customer Charges and Energy Charges shall be adjusted to reflect SCE s actual authorized revenue requirement when this Agreement is first implemented consistent with the treatment of Allocated Revenues adopted in this proceeding. B. Non-Allocated Revenues 1) Initial and Subsequent Setting of Non-Allocated Revenues Consistent with Paragraph 4.B(3) of the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement, Non- Allocated Revenues specifically assigned to the Streetlight rate group shall be established initially at a level of $ million for Upon initial implementation of this Agreement, SCE will increase by five (5) percent the facilities charges (in streetlight rate schedules that have facilities charges) that are in effect at that time, and shall collect the Shortfall via distribution energy charges. Because facilities charges are collected only through unmetered rate schedules, the Shortfall shall be collected through the distribution energy charges in the unmetered rate schedules. 2 This Agreement supersedes and supplants the Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group Settlement Agreement adopted by the Commission in D (2015 Streetlight Agreement). Except as otherwise specified, any obligation from the 2015 Settlement Agreement not explicitly re-stated here shall not survive. Attachment A-6
24 The Non-Allocated Revenues will then be updated annually to account for, among other things, the sales transfer of streetlights to Transfer Entities and LED conversions. The streetlight lamp counts will also be updated annually to reflect the latest forecast and sales transfers from Schedule LS-1 to Schedule LS-2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facilities charges shall remain fixed at the level described in the prior paragraph. The updated Non-Allocated Revenues and streetlight lamp counts will then be used to calculate the Shortfall to be collected through distribution energy charges. 2) Relationship Between Non-Allocated Revenues and Distribution Allocation in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement Notwithstanding any provision in this Settlement Agreement, changes to the Non-Allocated Revenues resulting from the process described in Paragraph 4.B(1), above, shall not modify the distribution allocation reflected in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. Moreover, any gain on sales that is required to be returned to ratepayers will be allocated consistent with the allocators in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement, unless otherwise directed by the Commission as part of its approval of the transfer. C. Rate Design and Allocation of Revenues Among Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Schedules 1) Rate Structures Except for Schedules LS-3 and AL-2, changes to which are described in Paragraphs 4.E. and 4.F, below, the rate structures of currently existing streetlight and traffic control rate schedules, consisting of Customer Charges, Energy Charges and Non-Energy Charges, shall be maintained for all applicable Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group schedules. 2) Customer Charges Upon initial implementation of this Agreement, the Customer Charges for Schedule LS-3, Series Service shall be set equal to $ per month. Schedule LS-3, Multiple Service Attachment A-7
25 and Schedules AL-2 and AL-2-A shall be set equal at $7 per month. For Schedule TC-1, the Customer Charge shall be set at $ Thereafter, these Customer Charges shall be adjusted on a Functional SAPC basis. The illustrative Customer Charges in Appendix B are as follows: Illustrative Customer Charges 3 Schedule Customer Charge (per month) LS-3, Series Service $ LS-3, Multiple Service $7.00 AL-2 $7.00 AL-2-A $7.00 TC-1 $ ) Energy Charges Proposed Energy Charges, based on the 2019 estimated consolidated revenue requirement, are set forth in Exhibit B. When this Agreement is first implemented, these estimated Energy Charges shall be adjusted, as necessary, consistent with the then-current revenues allocated to each rate group in accordance with the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. Thereafter, these estimated Energy Charges shall be adjusted consistent with Paragraph 4.B(7) of the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement when SCE s authorized revenues change. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Energy Charges for unmetered service shall be consistent with the method set forth in Paragraph 4.B(1) of this Agreement. a) Generation-Related Energy Charges Generation-related Energy Charges shall be established based on the marginal energy costs set forth in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. However, for Schedule AL-2 (grandfathering option), which has TOU components, the on- 3 Customers served on Schedules LS-1 and LS-2 do not pay a Customer Charge. For these customers, fixed costs are recovered in non-generation-related energy charges. Attachment A-8
26 peak Energy Charges shall be set consistent with the Schedule TOU-GS-1-A Grandfathered Energy Charges. b) Non-Generation-Related Energy Charges Non-generation-related Energy Charges that are designed to recover revenues associated with customer costs (for Schedule LS-1 and LS-2 customers only), transmission, distribution, public purpose programs, new system generation service, nuclear decommissioning, CARE balancing account, the California Department of Water Resources bonds, and the CPUC reimbursement fee shall be established on the basis of the specified functional authorized revenue requirements and the terms specified in the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement. However, for Schedule AL-2 (grandfathering option), which has TOU components, the on-peak Energy Charges shall be set consistent with the Schedule TOU-GS-1-A Grandfathered Energy Charges. 4) Allocation of Revenues The initial facilities charges for the different lamp options are shown in Appendix B (as other charges ). The distribution energy charges for unmetered service will be adjusted to maintain the then-current Non-Allocated Revenues as described in Paragraph 4.B. After this Agreement is first implemented, any changes to the Allocated Revenues that are collected through Energy Charges and Customer Charges for the Streetlight and Traffic Control Rate Group shall be implemented on a Functional SAPC basis whenever a change to SCE s authorized revenues are implemented in rates, using the then-current forecast lamp count and the applicable kwh consumption per lamp. D. Schedules LS-1 and LS-2 There shall be no structural changes to Schedules LS-1 and LS-2, but Paragraph 4.J, below, describes a rate option to be added to Schedule LS-1. Attachment A-9
27 E. Schedule LS-3 Schedule LS-3 shall no longer have Option A and B and shall instead be modified to reflect what is described in Paragraph 4.C., 4 above, and the following: Schedule LS-3 shall become a non-time-variant rate structure with monthly limits on the allowable amount of on-peak usage (i.e., the existing Incidental Load provisions will be eliminated and an on-peak threshold is adopted instead). See Paragraph 4.G, below. All provisions of the current Schedule LS-3 not explicitly mentioned for revision herein shall survive. F. Schedule AL-2 1) Option AL-2-A (Flat Rate, Non-Grandfathered) Schedule AL-2-A will be applicable to all non-grandfathered customers who meet the eligibility requirements for Schedule AL-2. Schedule AL-2 shall be converted to non-time-variant rate structures with monthly limits on the allowable amount of on-peak usage (i.e., the existing incidental load provisions will be eliminated and an on-peak threshold is adopted instead). See Paragraph 4.G, below. 2) Option AL-2 (Grandfathered Rate) Off-peak energy charges shall be set consistent with Schedule AL-2-A (by function). Summer and winter on-peak Energy Charges shall be based on the grandfathered Schedule TOU-GS-1 A summer and winter on-peak charges (by function) 4 Certain provisions in the final version of Schedule LS-3, to be submitted via a compliance advice letter, will be moved around to reflect clearer organization. Attachment A-10
28 G. Daytime Usage Limitations on Schedule LS-3 and AL-2 SCE shall measure kwh usage to attempt to discern whether accounts served on Schedules LS- 3 and AL-2 incur usage predominately for nighttime lighting. On a rolling 12-month basis, SCE will compare all usage incurred on an account between the hours of 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. during the preceding 12 months to the account s total usage for the preceding 12 months. If the usage during the hours of 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. exceeds 30 percent of the account s total usage incurred, the account will become ineligible prospectively for service under Schedule AL-2 or LS-3 and will, at SCE s sole discretion unless the customer affirmatively and timely elects otherwise, be placed as soon as practicable on an applicable general service schedule. 5 For accounts with fewer than 12 months of historical usage data, where SCE determines that the usage incurred during the available months exceeds, or in SCE s opinion is likely to exceed, 30 percent of the total annual load, the accounts will become ineligible for service under Schedules AL-2 or LS-3 and will be placed on an applicable general service schedule. H. Schedule OL-1 and Schedule DWL There shall be no structural changes to Schedules OL-1 and DWL, but Paragraph J, below, describes a rate option to be added to Schedule OL-1. I. Schedule TC-1 Schedule TC-1 shall continue to consist of a monthly Customer Charge and a flat Energy Charge, as illustrated in Appendix B. SCE shall maintain the relationship between fixed and volumetric revenue recovery that was adopted by the Commission in the 2015 GRC Phase 2 Streetlight Settlement Agreement, as updated to account for differences in marginal costs between the GRCs, such that approximately 73 percent of revenue is recovered through volumetric charges and 27 percent through fixed charges. After this Agreement is first implemented, changes to Energy Charges and Customer Charges for Schedule TC-1 shall be 5 The 30 percent threshold provision will not apply to accounts with less than 35 kwh of annual load. Attachment A-11
29 implemented on a Functional SAPC basis whenever changes to SCE s authorized revenues are implemented in rates, using the then-current forecast number of service accounts, and the applicable kwh consumption per lamp. J. Distribution Pole-Mounted Rate Option Pursuant to an advice letter filing implementing the Commission s approval of this Agreement, SCE shall implement a rate option within Schedules LS-1 and OL-1 for distribution polemounted streetlights that will include lamp charges based on the difference between the netplant-in-service value of a standard configuration streetlight asset, and the net-plant-in-service value of a standard configuration streetlight asset that removes the pole cost entirely. This method is described in Exhibit SCE-04A. Accounts taking service on the distribution pole-mounted rate option will receive a credit offsetting the facilities charge equal to $4.29/lamp. This rate option will be offered to Transfer Entities. Non-transfer entities will also be eligible for this rate provided that they pay a tariffed fee of $1.58 per lamp to enable SCE to inventory SCE s streetlight facilities within the Streetlight Agency s jurisdiction to determine how many lamps are mounted on SCE s distribution poles. 1) Customer Outreach No later than the first quarter of 2019 provided that the Commission has adopted this Agreement by then, SCE shall begin outreach to eligible customers regarding the new distribution pole-mounted rate option. Specifically, SCE agrees to: Provide written notification to each LS-1/OL-1 streetlight customer about the new rate option and the process for enrolling to take elective service on the rate; Educate SCE account managers about the new rate option and how they can work with customers to get them served on the rate; Educate SCE s Local Public Affairs staff about the new rate option so they aware of it when they meet with local government customers; and, Attachment A-12
30 Discuss the rate option at the streetlight advisory panel meetings and in other meetings where SCE streetlight-related topics are discussed (e.g., council of governments or energy efficiency partnership meetings). 2) Customer Elections Customers must affirmatively elect to take service on this optional rate consistent with SCE s Tariff Rule 12. K. Dimmable Streetlight and Ancillary Device Rate SCE shall conduct an assessment to determine the feasibility of a dimmable streetlight rate schedule pursuant to which accounts might be billed based on metered electricity usage and for ancillary devices attached to streetlight poles separately metered by customer-owned streetlight control modules. SCE s feasibility assessment will include a determination of necessary equipment and infrastructure, and impacts to its billing system to accommodate this new rate. At its election and in its discretion, SCE may propose a new rate option in the 2021 GRC Phase 2 (or subsequent rate design proceeding) based on the results of the feasibility assessment, which proposal would include a potential deployment schedule for the equipment needed for the dimmable streetlight and ancillary devices as well as a timeframe to complete any necessary billing system changes. Any such proposal would also be subject to and conditioned upon Commission approval for any incremental funding required for the deployment of the new rate schedule(s). L. Assessment of Any Cost Savings for Customers Electing Service on Schedule LS-1, Option E Together With the Distribution Pole-Mounted Rate Option SCE shall conduct an assessment to determine whether there are any cost savings associated with customers who may elect to take service on both LS-1, Option E and the distribution polemounted rate option because both options require service work in the field. SCE will provide Attachment A-13
SUPPLEMENTAL PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER SWARTZ ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND AMENDED APPLICATION
Application: 1-0-0 Exhibit No.: SDG&E- Application of SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 0 E) For Authority To Update Marginal Costs, Cost Allocation, And Electric Rate Design. Application No. 1-0-0 (Filed
More informationREVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT COST ALLOCATION TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND
Application No: Exhibit No.: Witness: A.--00 ) In the Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas & ) Electric Company (U 0 G) and Southern California ) Gas Company (U 0 G) for Authority to Revise ) Their
More informationJune 2, 2006 ADVICE 2009-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION
Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Revenue and Tariffs June, 00 ADVICE 009-E (U -E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Revisions to Southern California Edison Company
More informationSUBJECT: Adjustments to Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicle Forecasts to be Used in Southern California Edison Company's Distribution Planning
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 December 5, 2017 Advice Letter 3670-E Russell G. Worden Director, State Regulatory
More information2018 General Rate Case Rebuttal Testimony
Application No.: A.16-09-001 Exhibit No.: SCE-18, Vol. 05 Witnesses: A. Edeson (U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case Rebuttal Testimony Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 05 - Distribution Construction
More informationLOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE
EB-00-0 Exhibit K Tab Schedule Page of 0 0 LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE The purpose of this evidence is to present the Company s load, customer and distribution revenue forecast for the test year. The
More informationRESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:
RESOLUTION 2017-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT APPROVING PROPOSED BUDGET(S) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 01 RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD COMPLIANCE
More informationDEMAND FORECASTING PROTOCOL
FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 443 DEMAND FORECASTING PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 444 DEMAND FORECASTING PROTOCOL Table of Contents DFP 1 OBJECTIVES,
More information4/26/94 Revised 12/26/96 5/9/99 7/30/01 WSCC UNSCHEDULED FLOW MITIGATION PLAN
4/26/94 Revised 12/26/96 5/9/99 7/30/01 WSCC UNSCHEDULED FLOW MITIGATION PLAN WSCC UNSCHEDULED FLOW MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 PARTIES... 1 2 RECITALS...1 3 TERM... 3 4 DEFINITIONS...
More informationPOLICY ISSUE (INFORMATION)
POLICY ISSUE (INFORMATION) August 12, 2011 SECY-11-0112 FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: The Commissioners Michael R. Johnson, Director /RA/ Office of New Reactors STAFF ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED SMALL MODULAR REACTOR
More informationStatement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme
Statement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme 2019-2020 South Staffs Water and Cambridge Water Indicative Wholesale Charges Scheme Since April 2017, eligible business customers have
More informationContents. Ipswich City Council Ipswich Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (No. 1) Page
Ipswich City Council Ipswich Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (No. 1) 2014 Contents Page Part 1 Introduction 3 1. Short title 3 2. Commencement 3 3. Sustainable Planning Act 2009 3 4. Purpose
More informationTechnical Requirements. Version No. 1.0 Effective Date 10/1/2008
PURPOSE This document applies to wind Generators and describes technical standards that such wind Generators must satisfy to be qualified as a Participating Intermittent Resource (PIR) under the CAISO
More informationAcknowledgment of Aramco Asia. Supplier Code of Conduct
Acknowledgment of Aramco Asia Supplier Code of Conduct (Applicable to Vendors, Manufacturers, and Contractors) Aramco Asia is committed to the highest ethical and legal standards in the conduct of its
More informationEngineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )
Engineer's Report for the Main Street Business Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year 2008-09) Prepared under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
More informationFacts and Findings. Exhibit A-1
Exhibit A-1 Facts and Findings The county periodically prepares coordinated countywide forecasts for all the cities in the county and the unincorporated area. These forecasts can be used by cities as a
More informationSECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3
2018 SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3 IV. GENERAL FUND 001 DESCRIPTIONS... 4 V. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS... 6
More informationT E S L A T O A C Q U I R E S O L A R C I T Y
T E S L A T O A C Q U I R E S O L A R C I T Y C R E A T I N G T H E W O R L D S L E A D I N G S U S T A I N A B L E E N E R G Y C O M P A N Y I N V E S T O R P R E S E N T A T I O N A u g u s t 1, 2 0
More informationPursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act ( FPA ) 1 and the Commission s
PJM Interconnection 2750 Monroe Boulevard Norristown, PA 19403-2497 Steven R. Pincus Associate General Counsel 610.666.4370 fax 610.666.8211 steven.pincus@pjm.com July 31, 2017 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
More informationDerogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code
Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code Decision Paper Reference: CER/17/084 Date Published: 13/04/2017 Closing Date: 0 Executive Summary Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/631
More information2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours
2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours Amber Motley Manager, Short Term Forecasting Clyde Loutan Principal, Renewable Energy Integration Karl Meeusen Senior Advisor, Infrastructure & Regulatory
More informationRD1 - Page 469 of 578
DOCKET NO. 45524 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of JANNELL E. MARKS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC
More informationDark Sky Initiative Draft Terms of Reference
Dark Sky Initiative Draft Terms of Reference July 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Initiative intent 2-3 3.0 Initiative goals 3 4.0 Legislation 3 5.0 Municipal Development Plan 3 6.0 Land
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-D
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-D ASSET-BACKED ISSUER DISTRIBUTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the
More informationButte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal
Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal Clerk of the Board Use Only Agenda Item: 3.38 Subject: Resolution to Establish the Butte County Groundwater Sustainability Agency in the West Butte
More informationTestimony. Before the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives
GAO United States General kccounting Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives For Release on Delivery
More informationAdopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017
2017-2018 Adopted Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017 Prepared by Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Christopher Rabing, Director of Fiscal Services FINANCIAL REPORTS School
More informationSUBPART MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING (Revised December 19, 2006)
SUBPART 217.1--MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING (Revised December 19, 2006) 217.103 Definitions. As used in this subpart-- Advance procurement means an exception to the full funding policy that allows acquisition
More informationSustainable Groundwater Management Act: Initial Notification of a Proposed Basin Boundary Modification
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: Initial Notification of a Proposed Basin Boundary Modification Proposed Boundary Modification The Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation has
More informationSECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4
2018 SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4 IV. GENERAL FUND 001 DESCRIPTIONS... 6 V. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS... 9
More informationNSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast
Page 1 of 5 7610.0320 - Forecast Methodology NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast OVERALL METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Xcel Energy prepared its forecast
More informationMarch 5, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3
Tom A. Loski Chief Regulatory Officer March 5, 2010 British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3 16705 Fraser Highway Surrey, B.C. V4N 0E8 Tel: (604) 592-7464
More informationAdministration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy
Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy DOCUMENT TYPE: REFERENCE: DATE PUBLISHED: QUERIES TO: Decision Paper CER/10/171 23 rd September 2010 Clive Bowers cbowers@cer.ie The Commission for
More informationAdopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016
2016-2017 Adopted Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016 Prepared by Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Christopher Rabing, Director of Fiscal Services FINANCIAL REPORTS School
More informationStreamlined Annual PHA Plan (Small PHAs)
Streamlined Annual PHA Plan (Small PHAs) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public and Indian Housing OMB No. 2577-0226 Expires: 02/29/2016 Purpose. The 5-Year and Annual PHA Plans
More informationE-Community Check Request Checklist
E-Community Check Request Checklist The E-Community must complete the following information on each business approved for a loan or grant in order for the Kansas Center of Entrepreneurship (KCFE) to disburse
More information2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E)
ANNUAL REPORT OF ON SUBSIDIARY, AFFILIATE, AND HOLDING COMPANY TRANSACTIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH R.92-08-008, ORDERING PARAGRAPH NO. 2 VOLUME III II.B. Requirement B, Part 2 - PROCEDURAL & ACCOUNTING SAFEGUARDS
More informationDigital Mapping License Agreement
City of Des Moines, Iowa GIS Division, Information Technology Department Digital Mapping License Agreement PURPOSE AND NATURE OF THE AGREEMENT This Digital Mapping License Agreement ("Agreement") is executed
More informationState GIS Officer/GIS Data
State GIS Officer/GIS Data This Act creates the position of state Geographic Information Systems (GIS) officer. The Act: requires the state GIS officer to adopt or veto the GIS data standards and a statewide
More informationBattery Energy Storage
Battery Energy Storage Implications for Load Shapes and Forecasting April 28, 2017 TOPICS» What is Energy Storage» Storage Market, Costs, Regulatory Background» Behind the Meter (BTM) Battery Storage Where
More informationRebate Report. $15,990,000 Public Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (Voyager Foundation, Inc. Project) Series 2012A
Rebate Report $15,990,000 Delivery Date: October 9, 2012 Installment Computation Period Ending Date: October 8, 2017 The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. Corporate Trust 5050 Poplar Avenue,
More informationSOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF ROSE-MARIE PAYAN (CUSTOMERS) June 2015
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U0G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SCG-0 SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF ROSE-MARIE PAYAN (CUSTOMERS) June 01 BEFORE THE PUBLIC
More informationForecast Postalised Tariff 2015/ /20. Utility Regulator Explanatory Note. August Introduction
Forecast Postalised Tariff 2015/16 2019/20 Utility Regulator Explanatory Note August 2015 1 Introduction Pursuant to condition 2A.4.3.1 (b) of the Gas Conveyance licences granted to GNI (UK) 1, Premier
More informationDepartment Mission: Non-Mandated Services: TITLE 33
Department: Veterans FY 2019 Proposed Budget Department Mission: To give aid and assistance to any veteran, the spouse or dependents of the veteran or the survivors of the veteran in applying for all benefits
More informationExhibit IV-1: Initiation of Zoning Map Amendments Case Report HEARING DATE: MAY 3, 2012
Exhibit IV-1: Initiation of Zoning Map Amendments Case Report HEARING DATE: MAY, 01 Case No.: 00.0MTZU Transit Center District Plan Amendments to Zoning Map Staff Contact: Joshua Switzky - (1) -1 joshua.switzky@sfgov.org
More information2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville
2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville Prepared for: Town of Cary Town of Apex Town of Morrisville RTP South/Wake County Submitted to: North
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No: A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: Gregory Teplow Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) for Authority to Revise their Natural Gas
More informationThe Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017
The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017 Overview of Methodology Dayton Power and Light (DP&L) load profiles will be used to estimate hourly loads for customers without
More informationAnnual PHA Plan. Effective July 1, 2017 June 30, Decatur Housing Authority
Decatur Housing Authority Annual PHA Plan Effective July 1, 2017 June 30, 2018 Decatur Housing Authority 7315 Hanna Street Fort Wayne, IN 46816 Phone: (260) 267-9300 Website: www.fwha.org PHA Plan Attachments
More informationSECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. FINAL OPERATING BUDGET... 3
2018 SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. FINAL OPERATING BUDGET... 3 IV. GENERAL FUND 001 DESCRIPTIONS... 4 Background Information The Four
More informationKenneth Shelton, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Los Angeles County Office of Education 9300 Imperial Highway Downey, CA 90242
April 17, 2009 Kenneth Shelton, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Los Angeles County Office of Education 9300 Imperial Highway Downey, CA 90242 Dear Assistant Superintendent Shelton: The purpose
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Len Gorecki, Director of Public Works Jerry Stock, City Engineer Public Hearing to Consider
More informationSubject: Availability of New and Revised Public Housing Agency (PHA) Five-Year and Annual Plan Templates and Other Forms
Special Attention: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public and Indian Housing Public Housing Agencies (PHA) NOTICE PIH-2015-18 (HA) Public Housing Hub Office Directors Public
More informationCOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFO IA
APP,,tovED MAIO OF SVIDERVISORS 1 ivo, W0,7-02 0 A 11 2017 Lit/ficfr ' By Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFO IA 71 For the Agenda of: April 11,2017 2:00 PM To: From: Subject: Supervisorial
More information$1.0600/$100 (proposed rate for maintenance and operations) School Debt Service Tax Approved by Local Voters
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS BUDGET AND PROPOSED TAX RATE The Fort Bend Independent School District will hold a public meeting at 5:30 PM, June 11, 2018 in the Board Room of the Administration Building,
More informationDate: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement
Section E 1.5 To: From: Regional Planning and Agriculture Committee Lee-Ann Garnett, Senior Regional Planner Planning, Policy and Environment Department Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, 2013 Subject:
More informationDepartment Mission: Mandated Services: Department Overview:
Department: Treasurer FY 2019 Proposed Budget Department Mission: Our mission is to provide financial stewardship for Klamath County by safeguarding financial resources while maximizing investment return
More informationGASB 34. Basic Financial Statements M D & A
GASB 34 Basic Financial Statements M D & A In June 1999, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 34 (GASB 34) which fundamentally changed the financial reporting model for state
More informationTariff Decision (BPSA) OR Tambo International Airport (ORTIA) Period covered by tariff application: 01 January December 2015.
Tariff Decision Application by: License number: Type of facility: Locality of facility: Period covered by tariff application: NERSA decision forum: BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd (BPSA) PPL.p.F3/35/6/2006
More informationINSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule Draft v2.1
INSPIRE Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule Draft v2.1 Title INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule v2.1 Creator DT Monitoring
More informationDepartment of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket No. NHTSA ; Notice 2]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/12/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-08362, and on FDsys.gov Department of Transportation National
More informationCity of Manitou Springs
March 2018 City of Manitou Springs Implementing Land Use tools to reduce and mitigate natural hazard risk Context & History Past Present Historic homes Older infrastructure Hillside development Creekside
More informationPARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS CIRCULAR
PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS CIRCULAR Date : 24 November 2011 R/R No. : 10 of 2011 DIRECTIVES ON SUBMISSION BY PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORTS BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION TO BURSA MALAYSIA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationCommittee Meeting November 6, 2018
Committee Meeting November 6, 2018 Agenda Where we are in the process Land Use Plan Transportation Element Housing & Neighborhoods Elements Next Steps Schedule November 6: Plan Elements December: Plan
More informationCEDAR CREST MUTUAL DOMESTIC WATER CONSUMERS & SEWAGE WORKS ASSOCIATION. December 31, 2016
CEDAR CREST MUTUAL DOMESTIC WATER CONSUMERS Table of Contents Page Official Roster i Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed Upon Procedures 1 Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures Budget and
More informationCAPRON TRAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
CAPRON TRAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY REGULAR BOARD MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 28, 2017 1:30 P.M. Special District Services, Inc. The Oaks Center 2501A Burns Road Palm Beach
More informationThe North American Electric Reliability Corporation hereby submits Informational Filing of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
!! January 19, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Jim Crone Director, Energy Division Manitoba Innovation, Energy and Mines 1200-155 Carlton Street Winnipeg MB R3C 3H8 Re: North American Electric Reliability Corporation
More informationCAISO Participating Intermittent Resource Program for Wind Generation
CAISO Participating Intermittent Resource Program for Wind Generation Jim Blatchford CAISO Account Manager Agenda CAISO Market Concepts Wind Availability in California How State Supports Intermittent Resources
More informationPayment of Funds
30 July 1999 CIRCULAR THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL Payment of Funds 1999-2000 Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT To Principals of colleges Principals of higher education institutions
More informationGENERATOR INTERCONNECTION APPLICATION
GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION APPLICATION FOR BUY-ALL/SELL-ALL PROJECTS WITH AGGREGATE GENERATOR OUTPUT OF MORE THAN 20 KW BUT LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1 MW Electric Utility Contact Information Great Lakes Energy
More informationPUBLIC UTILITY COMIVIISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016
PUBLIC UTILITY COMIVIISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016 ITEM NO. CA3 REGULAR CONSENT X EFFECTIVE DATE March 9,2016 DATE: TO: Public Utility Commission FROM: Lance Kaufman
More informationEl Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity Report Washington Ranch Storage Facility Docket Nos. RP72-6, et al.
January 9, 2017 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Attention: Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Re: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE 294. Load Forecast PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. Direct Testimony and Exhibits of
UE 294 / PGE / 1200 Dammen - Riter BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE 294 Load Forecast PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Sarah Dammen Amber
More informationExhibit A Proposed Order
Case 15-11755-CSS Doc 857-2 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 94 Exhibit A Proposed Order DOCS_DE:209531.1 88601/001 Case 15-11755-CSS Doc 857-2 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 94 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT
More informationOREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM
OREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM PROGRAM OVERVIEW BACKGROUND Beginning in 1973 with the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 100, Oregon s growth management system has relied on population forecasts as the primary
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION 3E - COSTS MANAGEMENT
Coming into force 22 April 2014 subject to the approval of the Lord Chancellor PRACTICE DIRECTION 3E - COSTS MANAGEMENT This Practice Direction supplements Section II of CPR Part 3 Contents of this Practice
More informationJune 26, Federal. Commissioners: Re: CP Pursuant to. the. Pursuant to. ordering
June 26, 2018 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Attention: Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Re: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity
More informationMultivariate Regression Model Results
Updated: August, 0 Page of Multivariate Regression Model Results 4 5 6 7 8 This exhibit provides the results of the load model forecast discussed in Schedule. Included is the forecast of short term system
More informationWeather Company Energy and Power Products
Service Weather Company Energy and Power Products This Service (SD) describes the Cloud Service IBM provides to Client. Client means the company and its authorized users and recipients of the Cloud Service.
More informationChapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY
INTRODUCTION Chapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY Freedom of choice is a hallmark of the housing choice voucher (HCV) program. In general, therefore, HUD regulations impose few restrictions
More informationPage No. (and line no. if applicable):
COALITION/IEC (DAYMARK LOAD) - 1 COALITION/IEC (DAYMARK LOAD) 1 Tab and Daymark Load Forecast Page No. Page 3 Appendix: Review (and line no. if applicable): Topic: Price elasticity Sub Topic: Issue: Accuracy
More informationOne way to deal with the unpredictable costs of winter weather. By Shane Belvin
One way to deal with the unpredictable costs of winter weather. By Shane Belvin 32 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 2016 Believe it or not, snow and ice are right around the corner. The volatility
More informationGUIDELINE: SD/GN/03 Last Updated on February 19, Application of Policy on Agency Minimum Standards on Environmental and Social Safeguards
GUIDELINE: SD/GN/03 Last Updated on February 19, 2015 Application of Policy on Agency Minimum Standards on Environmental and Social Safeguards Summary: This Guideline explains how the GEF will assess the
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Interconnection for Wind Energy ) Docket No. RM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Interconnection for Wind Energy ) Docket No. RM05-4-000 REQUEST FOR REHEARING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL
More informationEl Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity Report Washington Ranch Storage Facility Docket Nos. RP72-6, et al., CP79-224, and CP15-516
January 8, 2018 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Attention: Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Re: ; Semi-Annual Activity Report Washington Ranch Storage
More informationFINAL PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR. Prepared by the
PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR Prepared by the Rapid City Growth Management Department January 17, 2008 INTRODUCTION Tax Increment Financing is a method of financing improvements and
More informationGreen Chemistry Member Survey April 2014
Green Chemistry Member Survey April 2014 www.greenchemistryandcommerce.org Summary In 2014, the Green Chemistry & Commerce Council surveyed its business members to gain a better understanding of their
More informationSUBJECT: Commitment, CHDO Reservation, and Expenditure Deadline Requirements for the HOME Program
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING and URBAN DEVELOPMENT Community Planning and Development Special Attention: All Secretary s Representatives NOTICE: CPD 07-06 State Coordinators All CPD Division Directors All
More informationChapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY
INTRODUCTION Chapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY Freedom of choice is a hallmark of the housing choice voucher (HCV) program. In general, therefore, HUD regulations impose few restrictions
More informationChapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY
INTRODUCTION Chapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY Freedom of housing choice is a hallmark of the housing choice voucher (HCV) program. In general, HUD regulations impose few restrictions
More informationExpedited Filing Draft August 22, 2017
Applicability 1 Section 304.9 applies to: (a) (b) Requirements Expedited Filing Draft August 22, 2017 the legal owner of a wind or solar aggregated generating facility connected to the interconnected electric
More informationA Case Study in Public Engineering Liability: Water You Doing?
A Case Study in Public Engineering Liability: Water You Doing? Presented by: William Henn, J.D. Attorney Henn Lesperance PLC February 5, 2019 ENGINEERING LIABILITY: THE QUICK RUN DOWN 1. Professional negligence
More informationDebbie Lee, Communications and Public Affairs Officer. Update on Southern California Edison s Capital Improvement Projects
Information Item Date: June 22, 2015 To: From: Subject: Mayor and City Council Debbie Lee, Communications and Public Affairs Officer Update on Southern California Edison s Capital Improvement Projects
More informationWind Rules and Forecasting Project Update Market Issues Working Group 12/14/2007
Wind Rules and Forecasting Project Update Market Issues Working Group 12/14/2007 Background Over the past 3 MIWG meetings, NYISO has discussed a methodology for forecasting wind generation in the NYCA
More information(U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A Workpapers. RO- Property Taxes SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter III, Book B
(U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A.16-09- Workpapers RO- Property Taxes SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter III, Book B September 2016 2018 General Rate Case Application INDEX OF WORKPAPERS SCE-09, Vol. 02, Chapter
More informationChapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY
INTRODUCTION Chapter 10 MOVING WITH CONTINUED ASSISTANCE AND PORTABILITY Freedom of housing choice is a hallmark of the housing choice voucher (HCV) program. In general, HUD regulations impose few restrictions
More informationLaw on Spatial Planning
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo UNMIK NATIONS UNIES Mission d Administration Intérimaire des Nations Unies au Kosovo PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT Law
More information