Web-based benthic databases: availability for science and quality issues. Sabine Cochrane (& friends) Akvaplan-niva Framsenteret, Tromsø

Transcription

1 Web-based benthic databases: availability for science and quality issues Sabine Cochrane (& friends) Akvaplan-niva Framsenteret, Tromsø

2 Outline Background What are benthic data? From paper to hard-disk to web From reality to ideals and back again Quality issues Names and authorities Limitations Availability Open access or restricted information Publicising resources Conclusions Optimal compromise Relevance for MAREANO for discussion!

3

4 Example: Benthic infauna Good indicators of sea floor conditions Quantitative sampling Sieve out fauna Identify and count Database and analysis Number taxa, individuals, diversity, similarity

5 Taxon lists the building blocks

6 Back to the background Paper archives Increased focus re time series Digitalising old species lists Hard disks and servers From individuals to company servers Property discussions. Inter-company cooperation National and international access Example MOD database Web based National Usually themed Wider focus Larger scope bigger undertaking

7 The process Data agreement Authorship issues Everyone provides data Needs standardising Either work to get all to fill in schemes Or leader does it for everyone Once the names and positions are in Positions need checking Names need checking Taxonomic levels need harmonising Several databases exist Harmonising and standardising variable stuff Challenges for user Do all users know what they get??

8 FP7 NoE: Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function

9 The MarBEF vision and lasting legacy (?)

10 From reality to ideals

11 And back to reality

12 Comparison of biodiversity from o N. Renaud et al (2009)

13

14

15 Global Biodiversity Information System (GBIF)

16 Finding datasets

17 Selecting data

18 Ocean Biogeographic Information System

19 «seek and thee shall find»

20 From paper pile to electronic pile Many parallel databases Some are linked, others not Quality disclaimers Which to choose? Are they compatible??

21 Why might data be incompatible? Discovery of taxa new to science Early descriptions very general Previous single species can be split into several Reassigned to other genera Different identifier practices Expertise Literature Time pressure Sampling bias Between institutes between gears sample size

22 Good girls don t

23 Back to the building blocks

24 The problem List A Aricidea hartmanni Aricidea quadrilobata Aricidea nolani Aricidea sp. = 4 taxa i.e. 4 statistical units Maldane sarsi List B Aricidea sp. = 1 taxon i.e. single statistical unit Maldane arctica Could be same taxon, could be differences in identifier competence or literature

25 European Register of Marine Species

26 Name check function

27

28 World Register of Marine Species

29 Problems solved and problems remaining Solved Taxonomic synonyms Spelling mistakes (Pectinaridae / Pectinariidae etc) Remaining «wriggles» Identifier differences several «correct» species Different levels the sp. ghost Historical data Name changes without ability to trace which now is valid

30 Possible approaches Surrogacy Selected taxa Ratios between taxa Lumping to higher taxon Genus? Family? Beware!! Consider information content Information value? Ecological function Names used as shorthand for function info anyway! Functional diversity has value in ecological studies Assess long term change in terms of ecosystem function

31 Function what do benthic fauna do?

32 List of functional groups See also work by Pearson, Jumars, Dawe, Lopez, Rosenberg, Bremer.

33 Spatial patterns: names F-1998 GA-2008 AL-2008 F-2000 F-2008 SA-2008 H-2003 LS-2008 SV-2008 N-2007 SF-2007 SN-2007 F-2003 SD-2007 A A N SE-2007 GT-2008 R9-01_08 GD-2008 G TO-2008 Grf-A_08 GB-2008 I-2008 GC-2008 GE-2008 CA-2008 GG Dots represent 8-50 stations Huge data resource Institute bias?? How to extract ecological info from this?

34 Spatial patterns: functional groups Institute bias removed (different name = same function) Spread of stations Sediment composition Function of depth

35 A question of scale Choose your data set to answer your questions Treat your data according to the questions Local scale vs large-scale, long-term etc Ecosystem function vs community composition Shifts in species distribution Know what s in your dataset Do with it what it can address Do not do things with it which it can t

36 Conclusions implications for MAREANO Decide what is wanted Max profiling of datasets Control of publications? Altruistic use of datasets? Decide on level of availability Presence/absence or full data Station/species maps, linked Compare with other datasets Norway (MOD) North Sea Atlantic Pan-European Who is going to do the harmonising?

37 Thank you!