MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12


 Veronica Norton
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f : X Y for the structure morphism which is assumed to be of finite type. To show that X is Noetherian, it suffices to show that it is quasicompact and locally Noetherian. Since Y is quasicompact, it can be covered by finitely many affine open subsets, say V,..., V n. Then f (V j ) s cover X. Now f is quasicompact, so each f (V j ) is quasicompact and hence their finite union X is quasicompact. To show that every point in X has a Noetherian neighborhood, let x X. Since Y is locally Noetherian, f(x) is contained in an affine open subset V = Spec B of Y such that B is Noetherian. Let U = Spec A be an affine neighborhood of x such that U f (V ). Then since f is of finitetype, A is a finitely generated Balgebra, hence A is Noetherian. Moreover, in the above notation, if Y has finite dimension, then dim B < and so by Corollary the finitely generated Balgebra A has finite dimension. So every x X has a neighborhood with finite dimension. Since X is quasicompact, X itself has finite dimension Show that any open immersion into a localy Noetherian scheme is a morphism of finite type. Let f : X Y be an open immersion where Y is locally Noetherian. Let V be an affine open subscheme of Y. Then by Exercise V is Noetherian. Let U = f (V ), then clearly the restriction f U : U V is also an open immersion; hence by Proposition (a) U is Noetherian. By definition, U is then a finite union of affine open (hence quasicompact) subschemes, therefore U = f (V ) is quasicompact. This shows that f is quasicompact. Let {V i } i be an open covering of Y by affine open subsets. Via f, we can identify X as an open subset of Y. For each i, f (V i ) is quasicompact by above. Identifying X as an open subscheme of Y, f (V i ) = V i X is an open subset of the affine scheme V i and hence by quasicompactness can be covered by finitely many principal open sets U ij of V i. We can make the identifications V i = Spec A i for some ring A i and U ij = D(g ij ) where g ij A i. Observe that O Y (V i ) = A i and O X (U ij ) = O Y (U ij ) = O Vi (U ij ) = (A i ) gij such that the induced map O Y (V i ) O X (U ij ) is the localization A i (A i ) gij. In general, if A is a ring and g A, A[X] surjects on A g by the Aalgebra homomorphism X /g, so the localization A A g makes A g into a finitely generated Aalgebra. Thus O X (U ij ) is a finitely generated algebra over O Y (V i ) for every j. Hence by Proposition f is of finite type.
2 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK An immersion of schemes is a morphism which is an open immersion followed by a closed immersion. (a) Let f : X Y be an immersion. Show that it can be decomposed into a closed immersion followed by an open immersion. (b) Show that the converse of (a) is true if f is moreover quasicompact (e.g. if Y is locally Noetherian). Use the schemetheoretic closure of f (Exercise 2.3.7). (c) Let f : X Y, g : Y Z be two immersions with g quasicompact. Show that g f is an immersion. (a) Y has a closed subscheme C such that there is an open immersion h : X C such that when composed with the closed immersion i : C Y we get f, that is, f = i h. Identify X as an open subspace of C. Then Y has an open subset V such that X = C V. Since f(x) V and V is open, f restricts to a scheme morphism g : X V, that is, if we write j : V Y for the open immersion, then f = j g. Since X is identified with the closed subspace C V of V via f, the morphism g is a closed immersion of schemes. So j g is a decomposition of the desired form. (b) LATER (c) Write g = a b and f = c d where b, d are open immersions and a, c are closed immersions. Since g is quasicompact and a is an open immersion b is also quasicompact. Also c, being an open immersion is quasicompact. Thus the composite b c is quasicompact. Now by (b), b c = b c where b is an open immersion and c is a closed immersion. Thus?????????????????????????? g f = (a b ) (c d) Let X, Y be schemes over a locally Noetherian scheme S, with Y of finite type over S. Let x X. Show that for any morphism of Sschemes f x : Spec O X,x Y, there exist an open subset U x of X and a morphism of Sschemes f : U Y such that f x = f i x, where i x : Spec O X,x U is the canonical morphism (in other words, the morphism f x extends to an open neighborhood of x). We have a commutative diagram of schemes f x Spec O X,x Y where the diagonal morphism is given by the structure morphism h : X S Consider the image of x in S under the diagonal arrow and find an affine open neighborhood V around it. Then h (V ) is an open subset in X containing x so it contains an affine neighborhood U of x in X. Then since O X (U) maps to O X,x, Spec O X,x S factors through the restriction U V. That is, the diagonal arrow maps to an affine open subset of S. Then making the same argument for f x by taking an affine open W in Y which maps to V and shrinking U if necessary, we reduce to the case where all X, Y and S are affine. S.
3 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 3 Writing X = Spec A, Y = Spec B and S = Spec C and x = p Spec A, the commutative diagram of (now affine) schemes above correspond to the following commutative diagram of rings: A p B In addition to this, there is a ring homomorphism from C to A which is compatible with the above picture. So more compactly, both A and B are Calgebras and ϕ : B A p is a Calgebra homomorphism. We want to find an f A p such that ϕ factors through the canonical map A f A p ; because on the scheme level this amounts to extending the map from Spec O X,x to the principal open set D(f). Note that since C came from an affine open subset of a locally Noetherian scheme, we may assume C is Noetherian. And the finite type assumption ensures that B is a finitely generated Calgebra. So there exists n N such that there is a surjective Calgebra homomorphism C π : C[T,..., T n ] B say with kernel I. Because C is noetherian, so is C[T,..., T n ] (Hilbert basis theorem) therefore I is finitely generated. So I = (g,... g r ) for some polynomials g,..., g r C[T,..., T n ]. Write π(t i ) = b i i =,..., n. B and ϕ(b i ) = a i s i A p (so a i A and s i A p) for each Fix j {,..., m}. Now we know that g j (b,..., b n ) = 0 in B, therefore g j ( a s,... an s n ) = 0 in A p. Clearing the denominators in the latter equation, we get a polynomial g j A[T,..., T n ] such that hence there exists t j A p such that in A (we may take g j = ( n i= s i ) g j ). Now let g j (a,..., a n ) = 0 A p t j g j (a,..., a n ) = 0 n m f = s i t j A p. i= j= Since f is invertible in A f, every s i is invertible in A f. So we can define a Calgebra homomorphism Now since every t j in A f, we have ψ : C[T,..., T n ] A f g j (a,..., a n ) T i s i a i. = 0 A f
4 so by decomposing back we get MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 4 g j (s a,..., s n a n ) = 0. Therefore the polynomial g j C[T,..., T n ] lies in the kernel of ψ. Since this is true for every j =,..., m we get I ker ψ. Thus ψ uniquely factors through B, that is, we get a Calgebra homomorphism B A f which by construction makes B ϕ A p A f commute. This is what we wanted Let S be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let X, Y be Sschemes of finite type. Let us fix s S. Let ϕ : X S Spec O S,s Y S Spec O S,s be a morphism of Sschemes. Show that there exist an open set U s and a morphism of S schemes f : X S U Y S U such that ϕ is obtained from f by the base change Spec O S,s U. If ϕ is an isomorphism, show that there exists such an f which is moreover an isomorphism. We first solve the problem for for S = Spec A, X = Spec B, Y = Spec C are all affine. By the assumptions, A is Noetherian and B, C are finitely generated Aalgebras. Write s = p. So we have an Aalgebra map ϕ : B p C p. Let s write ψ : B C p for the composition of ϕ with the localization B B p. Say b,..., b n generate B as an Aalgebra. Write ψ(b j ) = c j f j for each j where c j C and f j A p. Let f = n j= f j A p. So ψ factors through B f, say via σ : B f C p Let f : X Y be a morphism of integral schemes. Let ξ be the generic point of X. We say that f is birational if f # ξ : K(Y ) K(X) is an isomorphism. Let us suppose that X and Y are of finite type over a scheme S, and that f is a morphism of Sschemes. Show that f is birational if and only if there exists a nonempty open subset U of X and an open subset V of Y such that f induces an isomorphism from U onto V Let k be a field and k the algebraic closure of k. Let X, Y be algebraic varieties over k, f a morphism from X to Y. Show that there exist a finite extension K of k, algebraic varieties X, Y over K, and a morphism f : X Y, such that X k = X, Y k = Y, and f = f k Let f : X Y be a morphism of schemes. We say that f has finite fibers if f (y) is a finite set for every y Y. We say that f is quasifinite ([4], II and ErrIII, 20) if, moreover, O X,x is finite over k(y) for every x X y. Show that a morphism of finite type with finite fibers is quasifinite. Give an example of a morphism with finite fibers which is not quasifinite.
5 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK Let A be an integral domain with field of fractions K, and let B be a finitely generated Aalgebra. We suppose that B A K is finite over K. (a) For any b B, show that there exists a g A {0} such that gb is integral over A. (b) Show that there exists an h A {0} such that B h is finite over A h. (a) Write S = A {0}. So S B is finite over K = S A. Then for every b B, b/ S B is integral over S A so there exists a 0, a,..., a n A and s 0, s,..., s n S such that Ç å b n + a n s n Ç å b n + + a b s + a 0 = 0. s 0 Write t = n k=0 s k S. Then multiplying the above equation by t n we obtain Ç å tb n + a Ç å n t tb n n Ç å at tb + + a 0t n = 0. s 0 s n Since s k t for every k = 0,..., n, we can write c k = a kt n k (tb) n + c n (tb) n + + c (tb) + c 0 = 0 in S B. So there exists s S such that in B. Then multiplying by s n, we get s(tb) n + sc n (tb) n + + sc (tb) + sc 0 = 0 (stb) n + s 2 c n (stb) n + + s n 2 c (stb) + s n c 0 = 0. Write g = st S. Then the monic polynomial is satisfied by gb. p(x) = X n + s 2 c n X n + + s n 2 c X + s n c 0 A[X] s s k A. So we have (b) Suppose B is generated by b,..., b m B as an Aalgebra. By (a), there exists g,..., g m A {0} such that g j b j is integral over A. The elements g j B B are trivially integral over A, therefore if we write h = m j= g j A {0}, the element hb j B is integral over A for every j. Hence the element hb j B h is integral over A h. But h is a unit in A h, so multiplying by /h we obtain that each b j B h is integral over A h. But these elements generate B h over A h ; thus B h is finite over A h (recall that finitely generated + integral implies finite) Let Y be an irreducible scheme with generic point ξ, and let f : X Y be a dominant morphism of finite type (Exercise 2.4.). (a) Let x be a closed point of X ξ. Let Z be the reduced subscheme {x} of X. Show that there exists a dense open subset V of Y such that f (V ) Z V is surjective (use Exercises 2.6 and 2..8). (b) Deduce from this that f(x) contains a dense open subset of Y.
6 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 6 (c) Show that f(x) is a constructible subset of Y, that is f(x) is a finite disjoint union of sets Z i, with each Z i the intersection of an open subset and a closed subset (see [43], Exercise II.3.8) Let B be a finitely generated algebra over a ring A. Show that there exist a subring A 0 of A that is finitely generated over Z and a finitely generated A 0 algebra B 0 such that B = B 0 A0 A. If B is homogenous, we can take B 0 as homogenous. Remark. We can show, more generally, that if X is a scheme of finite type over A with A Noetherian, then there exist A 0 as above and an A 0 scheme of finite type X 0 such that X = X 0 Spec A0 Spec A. See [4], IV (ii) Let X S be a proper morphism. Let f : X Y be an open immersion of Sschemes. Let us suppose that Y is separated over S and connected. Show that f is an isomorphism. It suffices to show that f is surjective, since by the definition of open immersion f(x) is an open subset of Y and f factors as (X, O X ) (f(x), O Y f(x) ) (Y, O Y ) Write g : Y S for the structure morphism of Y. We are given that g is separated and g f is proper. Then by Proposition 3.6(e), f is proper. In particular, f is a closed map. Thus f(x) is both open and closed in Y. So f(x) is a nonempty (X should be nonempty for the question to make sense) subset which is both open and closed in Y. Since Y is connected, this forces f(x) = Y Let S be a locally Noetherian scheme, s S. Let Y be a scheme of finite type over Spec O S,s. Show that there exist an open neighborhood U of s and a scheme of finite type X U such that Y = X U Spec O S,s. Moreover, if Y is separated, we can take X U separated Let X be a Y scheme. (a) Show that for any Y scheme Z, X red Y Z X Y Z is a closed immersion and a homoeomorphism on the underlying topological spaces. Deduce from this that X Y separated X red Y separated X red Y red separated. (b) Let {F i } i be a finite number of closed subsets of X such that X = i F i. Let us endow F i with the structure of reduced closed subschemes. Show that X Y is separated if and only if F i Y is separated for every i. (c) Let us suppose X is of finite type over Y. Show that X Y proper X red Y proper X red Y red proper. Also show that (b) is true for proper morphisms (by supposing X Y of finite type) Let f : X Y be a surjective morphism. We suppose that Y is connected and that all of the fibers X y are connected. (a) Show that if X is proper over Y, then X is connected. (b) Study the example Spec k[t, T 2 ]/T (T T 2 ) Spec k[t ], where k is a field. Deduce from this that (a) is false if f is not proper.
7 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 7 (a) For the sake of contradiction, suppose that X is not connected. Then there exist disjoint nonempty closed subsets C and D of X such that X = C D. Since f is proper, in particular f is a closed map. So Y = f(x) is equal to the union of the nonempty closed subsets f(c) and f(d). As Y is connected, f(c) f(d). Pick a y from this intersection, so there exist x C and t D such that f(x) = f(t) = y. So x, y are both in f (y). Now we have x f (y) C and t f (y) D. So f (y) C and f (y) D are nonempty disjoint closed subsets of f (Y ) and they cover f (y). Thus f (y) is not connected. But by Proposition 3..6, f (y) is homeomorphic with the fiber X y, which is connected by assumption; a contradiction. (b) Let I and J be the ideals of the ring A = k[t, T 2 ] generated by T and T T 2, respectively. Since = T 2 T (T T 2 ), I and J are coprime, that is, I + J = A. Thus by the Chinese remainder we have A/IJ = A/I A/J. Write B = k[t ]. Consider the kalgebra homomorphism B A given by T T. Composing with the projections A A/I and A A/J, we get ring homomorphisms f : B A/I and g : B A/J. Note that A/I is isomorphic to B and A/J is isomorphic to the localization B T. Under these identifications, we get f to be given by the map T 0 and g to be the localization map B B T (T gets sent to T which is formally inverted with the inverse T 2 ). Let s consider two cases for a prime ideal in p in B: T p. On one hand, there is no prime in B T whose inverse image under g is p. On the other hand, since (T ) is maximal in B, we get p = (T ). Observe that for every q Spec B, we have p = f (0) f (q). But p is maximal and f (q) is prime in A, so p = f (q). T / p. Then there is a unique q Spec B T such that g (q) = p, namely q = p T. However, by what we have seen above, there is no prime ideal in B whose inverse image under f is p. Thus if we consider the ring homomorphism then h : B A/I A/J b (f(b), g(b)), Spec h : Spec A/I Spec A/J Spec B f (q) q g (q) if q Spec A/I if q Spec A/J Let p Spec B. By our analysis above, if T / p there is a unique q Spec A/IJ such that (Spec h)(q) = p, that is, (Spec h) (p) is a singleton, hence connected. And if T p, (Spec h) (p) = Spec B = A k is irreducible since B is a domain, and in particular connected. But Spec A/IJ = Spec A/I Spec A/J is not connected (Rational maps) Let X, Y be schemes over S, which are integral, with Y S separated. A rational map from X to Y, denoted by X Y, is an
8 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 8 equivalence class of morphisms of Sschemes from a nonempty open subscheme of X to Y. Two such morphisms U Y, V Y are called equivalent if they coincide on U V. Let us fix a rational map f : X Y. (a) Show that in every equivalence class, there exists a unique element f : U Y such that U is maximal for the inclusion relation, and that every element g : V Y of the class verifies g = f V. We call U the domain of definition of X Y. We then denote the rational map associated to f by f : X Y. (b) Let us suppose that f is dominant, that X, Y are of finite type over S, and that S is locally Noetherian. Let x X. Show that f is defined at x (i.e., x U) if and only if there exists a y Y such that the image of O Y,y under K(Y ) K(X) is a local ring dominated by O X,x. (c) Let Γ f be the closure in X S Y of the graph of f : U Y. We call it the graph of the rational map f. We endow Γ f with the structure of a reduced closed subscheme. Show that Γ f is integral and that the projection p : X S Y X induces a birational morphism from Γ f to X. (d) Show that there exist a birational morphism g : Z X and a morphism f : Z Y such that f = f g on g (U) (we say that we have eliminated the indetermination of X Y ). Moreover, if Y is proper (reps. projective) over S, we can choose g proper (resp. projective) Let X, Y be integral separated schemes over a Noetherian scheme S. Let f : X Y be a birational map (i.e. f comes from an isomorphism from a nonempty open subset U X onto an open subset of Y ). Show that f is defined everywhere if and only if Γ f X is an isomorphism We say that a morphism of schemes f : X Y is finite (resp. integral) if for every affine open subset V of Y, f (V ) is affine and O X (f (V )) is finite (resp. integral) over O Y (V ). Let f : X Y be a morphism such that there exists an affine open covering Y = i Y i with f (Y i ) affine and O X (f (Y i )) finite over O Y (Y i ). We want to show that f is finite. (a) Show that we can reduce to the case when Y is affine and that Y i = D(h i ) a principal open subset. (b) Show that X then verifies condition (3.2), Subsection Deduce from this that the canonical morphism X Spec O X (X) is an isomorphism (hence X is affine). (c) Show that O X (X) is finite over O Y (Y ) Present a statement analogous to that of Exercise 3.5 by replacing finite morphism with integral morphism Show that the following properties are true. (a) Any finite morphism is of finite type and quasifinite. (b) The class of finite morphisms verifies hypotheses ()(3) of Lemma 3.5. (c) Let ρ : A B be a finite ring homomorphism. Then for any ideal I of B, we have (Spec ρ)(v (I)) = V (ρ (I)). (d) Any finite morphism is proper (see also Exercise 3.22).
9 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK Let K be a number field. We know that the ring of integers O K of K is finite over Z. Show that if X is separated connected scheme containing Spec O K as an open subscheme, then X = Spec O K (use Exercises 3.7(d) and 3.5) Let X be a proper algebraic variety over a field k. Let f : X Y be a morphism of kschemes with Y affine. Show that f(x) is a finite set of closed points (hint: f factors into X Spec O X (X) Y ).
MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1
MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1 CİHAN BAHRAN I discussed several of the problems here with Cheuk Yu Mak and Chen Wan. 4.1.12. Let X be a normal and proper algebraic variety over a field k. Show
More informationCHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES
CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.
More informationCOMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY
COMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY BRIAN OSSERMAN Classical algebraic geometers studied algebraic varieties over the complex numbers. In this setting, they didn t have to worry about the Zariski
More informationPROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasiaffine varieties
PROBLEMS, MATH 214A k is an algebraically closed field Basic notions Affine and quasiaffine varieties 1. Let X A 2 be defined by x 2 + y 2 = 1 and x = 1. Find the ideal I(X). 2. Prove that the subset
More informationReid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.
Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 5
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 5 5. Quasiaffine, quasiprojective, proper and projective morphisms 5.1. Quasiaffine morphisms. Definition (5.1.1). A scheme is quasiaffine if it is isomorphic
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4 4.1. Definition of projective bundles. 4. Projective bundles. Ample sheaves Definition (4.1.1). Let S(E) be the symmetric algebra of a quasicoherent O Y module.
More informationLecture 3: Flat Morphisms
Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms September 29, 2014 1 A crash course on Properties of Schemes For more details on these properties, see [Hartshorne, II, 15]. 1.1 Open and Closed Subschemes If (X, O X ) is a
More informationSCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, FebruaryMarch 2005
SCHEMES David Harari Tsinghua, FebruaryMarch 2005 Contents 1. Basic notions on schemes 2 1.1. First definitions and examples.................. 2 1.2. Morphisms of schemes : first properties.............
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Proper morphisms 1 2. Schemetheoretic closure, and schemetheoretic image 2 3. Rational maps 3 4. Examples of rational maps 5 Last day:
More informationSmooth morphisms. Peter Bruin 21 February 2007
Smooth morphisms Peter Bruin 21 February 2007 Introduction The goal of this talk is to define smooth morphisms of schemes, which are one of the main ingredients in Néron s fundamental theorem [BLR, 1.3,
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 3
Math 03A  Solution Set 3 Problem 1 Which of the following algebraic sets are isomorphic: (i) A 1 (ii) Z(xy) A (iii) Z(x + y ) A (iv) Z(x y 5 ) A (v) Z(y x, z x 3 ) A Answer: We claim that (i) and (v)
More informationNONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN
NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that
More informationYuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99
Yuriy Drozd Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry Kaiserslautern 1998/99 CHAPTER 1 Affine Varieties 1.1. Ideals and varieties. Hilbert s Basis Theorem Let K be an algebraically closed field. We denote by
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationMath 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes
Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes 1 Affine Schemes Let R be a commutative ring with 1. Definition 1.1. The prime spectrum of R, denoted Spec(R), is the set of prime ideals of the ring R. Spec(R) = {P R
More informationCHEAT SHEET: PROPERTIES OF MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES
CHEAT SHEET: PROPERTIES OF MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES BRIAN OSSERMAN The purpose of this cheat sheet is to provide an easy reference for definitions of various properties of morphisms of schemes, and basic results
More informationLecture 7: Etale Fundamental Group  Examples
Lecture 7: Etale Fundamental Group  Examples October 15, 2014 In this lecture our only goal is to give lots of examples of etale fundamental groups so that the reader gets some feel for them. Some of
More informationAdic Spaces. Torsten Wedhorn. June 19, 2012
Adic Spaces Torsten Wedhorn June 19, 2012 This script is highly preliminary and unfinished. It is online only to give the audience of our lecture easy access to it. Therefore usage is at your own risk.
More information4.4 Noetherian Rings
4.4 Noetherian Rings Recall that a ring A is Noetherian if it satisfies the following three equivalent conditions: (1) Every nonempty set of ideals of A has a maximal element (the maximal condition); (2)
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationHYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA
HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA OFER GABBER, QING LIU, AND DINO LORENZINI Abstract. Let X/S be a quasiprojective morphism over an affine base. We develop in this article a technique
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) Contents. 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) JAN ŠŤOVÍČEK Contents 1. Affine varieties 1 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30 1. Affine varieties The basic objects
More informationMath 145. Codimension
Math 145. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples In class we have seen that the dimension theory of an affine variety (irreducible!) is linked to the structure of the function field in
More informationSummer Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where
More informationBoolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem
Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES
AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,
More information214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN
214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN 1.1 Let A = k[[t ]] be the ring of formal power series with coefficients in a field k. Determine SpecA. Proof. We begin with a claim that A = { a i T i A : a i k, and a 0 k }.
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN
VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not
More informationAlgebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties
Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties Trang June 16, 2010 1 Lecture 1 Let k be a field and k[x 1,..., x n ] the polynomial ring with coefficients in k. Then we have two
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationArithmetic Algebraic Geometry
Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry 2 Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Affine Varieties.......................... 1 1.2 Projective Varieties........................
More informationExploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry
Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Integration Workshop Project August 610, 2010 1 Introduction In this project, we will describe the basic topology
More informationAlgebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.
More informationDMATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski. Solutions Sheet 1. Classical Varieties
DMATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions Sheet 1 Classical Varieties Let K be an algebraically closed field. All algebraic sets below are defined over K, unless specified otherwise.
More information3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions
24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice
More informationSection Blowing Up
Section 2.7.1  Blowing Up Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Now we come to the generalised notion of blowing up. In (I, 4) we defined the blowing up of a variety with respect to a point. Now we will define
More informationConcentrated Schemes
Concentrated Schemes Daniel Murfet July 9, 2006 The original reference for quasicompact and quasiseparated morphisms is EGA IV.1. Definition 1. A morphism of schemes f : X Y is quasicompact if there
More information9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up
72 Andreas Gathmann 9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up In the course of this class we have already seen many examples of varieties that are almost the same in the sense that they contain isomorphic dense
More information2. Intersection Multiplicities
2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.
More information10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz
10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz 91 10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz In the last chapter we have gained much understanding for integral and finite ring extensions.
More information9. Integral Ring Extensions
80 Andreas Gathmann 9. Integral ing Extensions In this chapter we want to discuss a concept in commutative algebra that has its original motivation in algebra, but turns out to have surprisingly many applications
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More information1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results
An introduction to algebraic fundamental groups 1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results Throughout the talk, all schemes are locally Noetherian. All maps are of locally finite type. There two main
More informationThe Proj Construction
The Proj Construction Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006 Contents 1 Basic Properties 1 2 Functorial Properties 2 3 Products 6 4 Linear Morphisms 9 5 Projective Morphisms 9 6 Dimensions of Schemes 11 7 Points of
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 3
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 3 3. Homogeneous spectrum of a sheaf of graded algebras 3.1. Homogeneous spectrum of a graded quasicoherent O Y algebra. (3.1.1). Let Y be a prescheme. A sheaf
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More informationMATH 221 NOTES BRENT HO. Date: January 3, 2009.
MATH 22 NOTES BRENT HO Date: January 3, 2009. 0 Table of Contents. Localizations......................................................................... 2 2. Zariski Topology......................................................................
More information4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasiprojective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset
4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasiprojective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset Z X. Replacing X by Z we might as well assume that Z
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.
More informationDedekind Domains. Mathematics 601
Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the RiemannRoch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K/F is a finite
More informationExtension theorems for homomorphisms
Algebraic Geometry Fall 2009 Extension theorems for homomorphisms In this note, we prove some extension theorems for homomorphisms from rings to algebraically closed fields. The prototype is the following
More informationSection Divisors
Section 2.6  Divisors Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Contents 1 Weil Divisors 1 2 Divisors on Curves 9 3 Cartier Divisors 13 4 Invertible Sheaves 17 5 Examples 23 1 Weil Divisors Definition 1. We say a
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY. Throughout these notes all rings will be commutative with identity. k will be an algebraically
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY STEVEN DALE CUTKOSKY Throughout these notes all rings will be commutative with identity. k will be an algebraically closed field. 1. Preliminaries on Ring Homomorphisms
More informationExercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti
Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo Alex Massarenti SISSA, VIA BONOMEA 265, 34136 TRIESTE, ITALY Email address: alex.massarenti@sissa.it These notes collect a series of
More informationThis is a closed subset of X Y, by Proposition 6.5(b), since it is equal to the inverse image of the diagonal under the regular map:
Math 6130 Notes. Fall 2002. 7. Basic Maps. Recall from 3 that a regular map of affine varieties is the same as a homomorphism of coordinate rings (going the other way). Here, we look at how algebraic properties
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 1
Math 203A  Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationRings and groups. Ya. Sysak
Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...
More informationNOTES ON FINITE FIELDS
NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining
More information3.1. Derivations. Let A be a commutative kalgebra. Let M be a left Amodule. A derivation of A in M is a linear map D : A M such that
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 33 3. Lie algebras Now we introduce the Lie algebra of an algebraic group. First, we need to do some more algebraic geometry to understand the tangent space to an algebraic variety at
More informationIntroduction to Algebraic Geometry. Jilong Tong
Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Jilong Tong December 6, 2012 2 Contents 1 Algebraic sets and morphisms 11 1.1 Affine algebraic sets.................................. 11 1.1.1 Some definitions................................
More informationAlgebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra
Algebraic Varieties Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic varieties represent solutions of a system of polynomial
More informationInstitutionen för matematik, KTH.
Institutionen för matematik, KTH. Contents 7 Affine Varieties 1 7.1 The polynomial ring....................... 1 7.2 Hypersurfaces........................... 1 7.3 Ideals...............................
More informationLECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL
LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL In this lecture we discuss a criterion for nonstablerationality based on the decomposition of the diagonal in the Chow group. This criterion
More informationMath 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology
Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology 1. Motivation Recall the following fundamental general theorem, the socalled cohomology and base change theorem: Theorem 1.1 (Grothendieck).
More information(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i
Math 210B. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples Let k be a field, and A a domain finitely generated kalgebra. In class we have seen that the dimension theory of A is linked to the
More information14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces
14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14.1 Introduction The aim of this lecture and the next two is to address general adic spaces and their connection to rigid geometry. 14.2 Two open questions
More informationTunisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the Tunisian Mathematical Society
unisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the unisian Mathematical Society Ramification groups of coverings and valuations akeshi Saito 2019 vol. 1 no. 3 msp msp UNISIAN
More informationMATH32062 Notes. 1 Affine algebraic varieties. 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties
MATH32062 Notes 1 Affine algebraic varieties 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties We want to define an algebraic variety as the solution set of a collection of polynomial equations, or equivalently,
More informationwhere Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))subset
Classification of quasifinite étale separated schemes As we saw in lecture, Zariski s Main Theorem provides a very visual picture of quasifinite étale separated schemes X over a henselian local ring
More informationMATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.
MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS. The discussion of smooth morphisms is one place were Hartshorne doesn t do a very good job. Here s a summary of this week s material. I ll also insert some (optional)
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationMAS 6396 Algebraic Curves Spring Semester 2016 Notes based on Algebraic Curves by Fulton. Timothy J. Ford April 4, 2016
MAS 6396 Algebraic Curves Spring Semester 2016 Notes based on Algebraic Curves by Fulton Timothy J. Ford April 4, 2016 FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 Email address: ford@fau.edu
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CAUCHER BIRKAR
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CAUCHER BIRKAR Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Affine varieties 3 Exercises 10 3. Quasiprojective varieties. 12 Exercises 20 4. Dimension 21 5. Exercises 24 References 25 1. Introduction
More informationwhere m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism
8. Smoothness and the Zariski tangent space We want to give an algebraic notion of the tangent space. In differential geometry, tangent vectors are equivalence classes of maps of intervals in R into the
More information12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n
12. Linear systems Theorem 12.1. Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n A (1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections s 0, s
More information1. Valuative Criteria Specialization vs being closed
1. Valuative Criteria 1.1. Specialization vs being closed Proposition 1.1 (Specialization vs Closed). Let f : X Y be a quasicompact Smorphisms, and let Z X be closed nonempty. 1) For every z Z there
More informationMath General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions
Math 535  General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions Problem 1. (Willard Exercise 19B.1) Show that the onepoint compactification of R n is homeomorphic to the ndimensional sphere S n. Note that
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014
Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Affine Varieties........................ 9 2. The Zariski Topology......................
More information(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections
7. Linear systems First a word about the base scheme. We would lie to wor in enough generality to cover the general case. On the other hand, it taes some wor to state properly the general results if one
More informationMath 210B. Artin Rees and completions
Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions 1. Definitions and an example Let A be a ring, I an ideal, and M an Amodule. In class we defined the Iadic completion of M to be M = lim M/I n M. We will soon show
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More informationAssigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008
18.705 Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008 Problem Set 1. Due 9/11 Problem R 1.5 Let ϕ: A B be a ring homomorphism. Prove that ϕ 1 takes prime ideals P of B to prime ideals of A. Prove
More informationAPPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS
APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS We review in this appendix some basic definitions and results that we need about Chow groups. For details and proofs we refer to [Ful98]. In particular, we discuss
More informationLecture 9  Faithfully Flat Descent
Lecture 9  Faithfully Flat Descent October 15, 2014 1 Descent of morphisms In this lecture we study the concept of faithfully flat descent, which is the notion that to obtain an object on a scheme X,
More information4. Noether normalisation
4. Noether normalisation We shall say that a ring R is an affine ring (or affine kalgebra) if R is isomorphic to a polynomial ring over a field k with finitely many indeterminates modulo an ideal, i.e.,
More informationIntroduction to Topology
Introduction to Topology Randall R. Holmes Auburn University Typeset by AMSTEX Chapter 1. Metric Spaces 1. Definition and Examples. As the course progresses we will need to review some basic notions about
More informationExtended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f ArtinRees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module
Extended Index cokernel 19f for Atiyah and MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra colon operator 8f Key: comaximal ideals 7f  listings ending in f give the page where the term is defined commutative
More information15 Lecture 15: Points and lft maps
15 Lecture 15: Points and lft maps 15.1 A noetherian property Let A be an affinoid algebraic over a nonarchimedean field k and X = Spa(A, A 0 ). For any x X, the stalk O X,x is the limit of the directed
More informationLEVINE S CHOW S MOVING LEMMA
LEVINE S CHOW S MOVING LEMMA DENIS NARDIN The main result of this note is proven in [4], using results from [2]. What is here is essentially a simplified version of the proof (at the expense of some generality).
More information3 Lecture 3: Spectral spaces and constructible sets
3 Lecture 3: Spectral spaces and constructible sets 3.1 Introduction We want to analyze quasicompactness properties of the valuation spectrum of a commutative ring, and to do so a digression on constructible
More informationSUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY
SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY MARC LEVINE Contents 0. Introduction 1 1. The category of schemes 2 1.1. The spectrum of a commutative ring 2 1.2. Ringed spaces 5 1.3. Schemes 10 1.4. Schemes
More informationMath 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups
Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups 1. Motivation and examples In abstract group theory, the descending central series {C i (G)} of a group G is defined recursively by C 0 (G) = G and C
More information