arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 5 Apr 2005

Transcription

1 Slinky Infltion Griel Brenoim Deprtment de Físic Teòric, Universitt de Vlènci, Crrer Dr. Moliner 50, E-4600 Burjssot (Vlènci), Spin Joseph Lykken Theoreticl Physics Deprtment, Fermi Ntionl Accelertor Lortory, P.O. Box 500, Btvi, Illinois 6050 USA rxiv:stro-ph/ v 5 Apr 2005 We present new pproch to quintessentil infltion, in which oth drk energy nd infltion re explined y the evolution of single sclr field. We strt from simple sclr potentil with oth oscilltory nd exponentil ehvior.we employ the conventionl reheting mechnism of new infltion, in which the sclr decys to light fermions with decy width tht is proportionl to the sclr mss. Becuse our sclr mss is proportionl to the Hule rte, this gives dequte reheting t erly times while shutting off t lte times to preserve quintessence nd stisfy nucleosynthesis constrints. We discuss simple model which solves the horizon, fltness, nd why now prolems. Without ny dditionl tuning of prmeters, this model stisfies ll constrints from CMB, lrge scle structure, nd nucleosynthesis. The predictions for the infltionry spectrl indices re n S = n T =. In this model we re currently eginning the third cosmic epoch of ccelerted expnsion. PACS numers: Cq, d, Vc If we ssume the correctness of the stndrd Friedmnn eqution evolution, the existence of drk energy engenders two profound dilemms. The first is the cosmologicl constnt prolem, nd the second is the why now? prolem. Quintessence models ttempt to ddress the second prolem y introducing very wekly coupled sclr field whose potentil nd/or kinetic function hve specil properties. One of the most successful pproches to quintessence [, 2] is to comine trcking with n oscillting ehvior in the quintessence potentil. In such models the eqution of stte prmeter w(z) hs periodic component, leding to occsionl periods of ccelerted expnsion during epochs where w(z). It is nturl in this context to sk whether the quintessence sclr could replce the inflton. The ide of quintessentil infltion hs een exmined y numer of uthors [3]-[0]. The strightforwrd pproch is to cole together sclr potentil which hs oth flt, lrge vev portion (for infltion) nd flt, smll vev portion (for quintessence). These fetures re connected y steep step which corresponds to period of cosmic kintion. As discussed in [7, 0], such models suffer from generic prolems. First, they require significnt d hoc tuning to simultneously produce the fetures of infltion nd quintessence. Second, they require sterile inflton, in order to void the decy of the puttive quintessence sclr t the end of infltion. This in turn requires new mechnisms for reheting, such s grvittionl de Sitter phse prticle production, leding to difficulties in stisfying the constrints of CMB nisotropies nd of primordil nucleosynthesis. Our pproch to quintessentil infltion is to tke d- FERMILAB PUB T 0 Π 2Π 3Π φ 0 φ 0 FIG. : The upper (lower) pnel shows the sclr potentil V (θ) (V (φ)) for =, plotted on logrithmic scle. vntge of the trcking nd oscilltory potentil fetures tht work so well in ddressing the why now prolem of quintessence lone. We will descrie model with simple sclr lgrngin with exponentil nd oscilltory fetures. The model uses the conventionl reheting mechnism of new infltion [], in which the sclr

2 2 FERMILAB Pu 05/039 T decys to light fermions with decy width tht is proportionl to the sclr mss. We show tht the sclr mss is proportionl to the Hule rte. As result, the model hs dequte reheting t erly times while nturlly shutting off t lter times. We present successful model with only three djustle prmeters. One prmeter controls the period etween infltionry epochs, second controls the overll decy width, nd the third prmetrizes our ignornce out the reltive frction of mtter versus rdition produced y reheting. These three prmeters re djusted to produce sufficient infltion long with the correct frctions Ω r /Ω Λ, Ω m /Ω Λ of rdition, mtter, nd drk energy, s mesured tody. Hving thus fixed the model we find tht we utomticlly stisfy ll constrints of primordil nucleosynthesis, CMB, nd lrge-scle structure. AN OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL We strt with simple model with single rel sclr quintessence field θ. The ction is d 4 x [ ] g 2 f(θ)gµν µ θ ν θ V (θ), () where the kinetic function f(θ) nd potentil V (θ) re given y: f(θ) = 3M2 P π 2 sin2 θ ; (2) [ ] 3 V (θ) = ρ 0 cos 2 θ exp (2θ sin 2θ), (3) where M P is the Plnck mss: GeV; ρ 0 is the drk energy density oserved tody: (0 4 ev) 4 ; is dimensionless prmeter which controls the periodic ehvior. A cnonicl kinetic term cn e restored vi field redefinition θ(x) φ(x), where φ(x) = φ 0 cosθ, (4) with φ 0 3M 2 P /π2. In the pproximtion where we ignore the energy density of rdition nd mtter, nd where the only friction is from the metric expnsion, the evolution of the model cn e solved nlyticlly. Energy conservtion requires: ρ θ = 3H( + w)ρ θ, (5) where H is the Hule rte, w is the eqution of stte prmeter, nd ρ θ is the drk energy density. The solution to this eqution s function of the scle fctor (t) is: [ ρ θ () = ρ 0 exp 3 ] d ( + w()), (6) where ρ 0 is the drk energy density t = (tody). We lso know tht Mking the Anstz V (θ) = 2 ( w)ρ θ. (7) w() = cos2θ(), (8) one immeditely gets solution to the (flt) Friedmnn eqution comined with the reltions (6-7): θ() = ln ; 2 (9) w() = cos[ ln]. (0) The expecttion vlue of the quintessence field θ evolves logrithmiclly with scle fctor from positive initil vlue to zero tody. The potentil V (θ) hs the Slinky form shown in Figure. Accelerted expnsion corresponds to epochs (such s tody) where θ is evolving through one of the flt steps of the potentil. From (2) we see tht the kinetic function is simultneously suppressed in this epochs, slowing the roll of the sclr field evolution. Note lso tht our potentil V (θ) 0 s θ, which corresponds to t ; this is s desired for quintessence model. We cn understnd the sme ehvior y looking t the cnonicl sclr φ in (4). The potentil V (φ) resemles series of descending rmps, with the vlue of φ ounded etween φ 0 nd φ 0. Shifted round generic vev φ, the sclr hs n effective mss-squred given y m 2 φ H 2 = [ cos 3 ] 2 θ sin θ 2sin2 2θ sin2 2θ, () where H is the Hule rte. Insted of suppression of the kinetic function when θ is multiple of π, the sclr φ hs n effective mss tht diverges when φ = ±φ 0, i.e., t ech junction of the descending rmps. The eqution of stte prmeter w() hs the sme periodic form ssumed in two recent phenomenologicl nlyses [2, 3]. The nlysis in [2] showed tht, for =, w() s given in (0) is consistent with ll current dt from oservtions of the CMB, Type IA supernove, nd lrge scle structure. It follows fortiori tht our model with ny choice of less thn one lso grees with this dt. To complete the model, we will ssume tht the quintessence field φ hs wek perturtive coupling to light fermions. This is the stndrd reheting mechnism of new infltion []. To void the strong constrints on A Slinkyç is lrge spring with very wek spring constnt. A Slinky will wlk down stircse, producing in time-lpse pttern resemling the top pnel of Figure.

3 FERMILAB Pu 05/039 T 3 long-rnge forces medited y quintessence sclrs [4], it is simplest to imgine tht our sclr only hs direct coupling to sterile neutrino. This is sufficient to hide the quintessence force from Stndrd Model nonsinglet prticles [5], while still llowing the genertion of rditive therml th of Stndrd Model prticles from quintessence decy. With this ssumption for reheting the evolution equtions for quintessence, rdition, nd mtter ecome: ρ θ = 3H( + w)ρ θ k 0 m φ ( + w)ρ θ ; ρ r = 4H( + w)ρ r + ( f m )k 0 m φ ( + w)ρ θ ;(2) ρ m = 3H( + w)ρ m + f m k 0 m φ ( + w)ρ θ ; where k 0 nd f m re smll dimensionless constnts. From () we see tht, s long s θ is not ner multiple of π/2, it is resonle pproximtion to mke the replcement k 0 m φ kh, (3) where k is nother smll dimensionless prmeter. This replcement decouples the θ evolution eqution from the Friedmnn eqution, giving n immedite nlytic solution: [ ] ρ θ () = ρ 0 exp (3 + k)(2θ sin2θ), (4) where θ() nd w() re still given y (9)-(0). We hve used this pproximtion in the solutions quoted elow. Clerly this pproximtion overestimtes the reheting effect for epochs where θ is close to n odd multiple of π/2, however this is smll effect since these re the epochs of mximum rdition or mtter domintion. The pproximtion lso reks down in the epochs of mximum infltion, i.e. when sin θ 0. However when sinθ 0 we lso expect strong-coupling physics to enter in full theory, providing cutoff for the nive vnishing of the kinetic function of θ. Since we cnnot compute this effect without full Plnck-scle theory, we my s well sty with the pproximtion (3). RESULTS Figure 2 nd Tle show the results otined from our model with = /7, k = 0.06, nd f m = 0. Shown re the reltive energy density frctions in drk energy, rdition, nd mtter, s function of log. We hve chosen to integrte the evolution equtions strting from = 0 42, which in our model corresponds to temperture of slightly less thn 0 6 GeV, nd n initil comoving Hule rdius of out 00 Plnck lengths. For simplicity we hve lso chosen the vlue of w() now to e exctly. Neither of these choices corresponds to necessry tuning. Our three djustle prmeters hve een chosen such tht the vlues of Ω r /Ω Λ, Ω m /Ω Λ come out to their FIG. 2: History of slinky universe. Shown re the reltive energy density frctions in rdition (green), mtter (lue), nd drk energy (red), s function of the logrithm of the scle fctor (t). log w() Ω Λ Ω r Ω m log w() Ω Λ Ω r Ω m log w() Ω Λ Ω r Ω m log w() Ω Λ Ω r Ω m TABLE I: The reltive density frctions of drk energy, rdition, nd mtter, s function of the scle fctor. The future projections re only vlid if the quintessence sclr is still decying. mesured vlues t =, nd such tht we hve sufficient infltion. The ltter is checked y computing the rtio of the fully inflted size of the intitil comoving Hule rdius to the current comoving Hule rdius. This rtio is out 3 in our model, indicting tht the totl mount of infltion is indeed enough to solve the horizon prolem. The fltness prolem is solved ecuse the totl Ω r + Ω m + Ω Λ = within errors. From Figure (2) we see tht we re currently eginning

4 4 FERMILAB Pu 05/039 T the third epoch of ccelerted expnsion. The first epoch of infltion ccumulted out 8 e-foldings. Quntum fluctutions during this epoch produced the sptil inhomogeneities responsile for lrge scle structure nd CMB nisotropies oserved tody. Constrints on the physics responsile for the primodil power spectrum of these density fluctutions cn e set with WMAP nd 2dF dt, under the ssumption tht the Hule rte is dominted y the contriution from ρ φ during the oservle prt of infltion [6]. The sclr nd tensor perturtions with comoving wvenumer k re solutions of the eqution ( ) u k + k 2 z u k = 0, (5) z where prime denotes derivtive with respect to conforml time τ, nd z = φ/h for sclr perturtions while z = for the tensor cse. The power spectr hve the form P R (k) = H2 ǫ f k ; P h (k) = H 2 f k ; f k = k3 u 2 k 2 H 2, (6) where ǫ = Ḣ/H2. For stndrd infltion models [7], the solutions of (5) hve the property tht u 2 k 2 H 2 /k 3 for smll wvenumers k/h 0, nd thus f k constnt. This gives the stndrd formule for the spectrl indices n S = 4ǫ 2δ nd n T = 2ǫ, where δ is defined y δ + ǫ = ǫ /(2Hǫ). In our model (5) cn e solved in the limit k/h 0 y chnging vriles from τ to θ: d 2 u k dθ 2 2 ( 3 sin2 θ) du k dθ + c(θ)u k = 0 ; (7) c(θ) = 6 cotθ (cos2θ ) 3 2 sin 2θ ; (8) c(θ) = sin 2 θ, (9) 2 where the first/second expression for c(θ) is for the sclr/tensor cse. The solutions which mtch to the correct lrge k ehvior re: u k = N k k sin θ ; u k = N k k, (20) for the sclr nd tensor cses respectively, where N is constnt. We cn plug these solutions into the expressions (6) for the power spectr, using lso tht, for our model, ǫ = 3 sin 2 θ. Remrkly, one finds tht n S = n T =. To compre with contrints from primordil nucleosynthesis, we note tht the second epoch of drk energy domintion ended well efore 0 0, the time t which nucleosynthesis occured. Indeed drk energy reheting effects re completely negligile from 0 0 until tody. A possile exception is smll reheting effect occuring t very lte times in our current epoch of ccelerted expnsion; this only occurs if the quintessence sclr is still mnging to decy despite its incredily smll current mss of 0 36 ev. Even with such n effect, our model stisfies the constrints of successful nucleosynthesis [20]. Figure (2) lso shows one (very rief) prior epoch of mtter domintion. This only occurs if there is some suitly hevy nd long-lived mtter round to go out of therml equilirium when 0 22, e.g. superhevy neutrino. REMARKS It is fir to sy tht, compred to the simple model presented ove, the stndrd new infltion scenrio looks rther extreme. In the evolution history portryed in Figure 2, the interply etween infltionry expnsion nd reheting is much milder. In fct, prt from few very rief periods, reheting effects in our model do not ctully increse the temperture of the therml rdition th. Insted, the temperture is lmost lwys decresing, ut it decreses more slowly thn in the stndrd ΛCDM evolution. Our prticulr reliztion of Slinky infltion must e regrded s toy model (pun intended), since φ 0 > M P nd we hve not invoked ny consistent Plnck scle frmework such s string theory. However the model itself is surprisingly simple, nd the physicl picture which emerges from it hs some compelling fetures. These re worthy of further investigtion. Also, since the trget spce prmetrized y our sclr is S, it would e interesting to extend this scenrio to clss of nonliner sigm models with other compct trget spces. Fermil is operted y Universities Reserch Assocition Inc. under Contrct No. DE-AC02-76CH03000 with the U.S. Deprtment of Energy. J.L. is grteful for the hospitlity of José Bernéu nd the University of Vlenci. We thnk Scott Dodelson, Olg Men, Chris Quigg, José Vlle, nd Jochen Weller for helpful discussions. [] S. Dodelson, M. Kplinght nd E. Stewrt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000) [rxiv:stro-ph/ ]. [2] P.J.E. Peeles & B. Rtr, Phys. Rev. D (988); I. Zltev, L. Wng, & P.J. Steinhrdt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (998); P.J. Steinhrdt, L. Wng, & I. Zltev, Phys. Rev. D59, (999); A. Alrecht & C. Skordis, stro-ph/ (999). [3] P. J. E. Peeles nd A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 59, (999) [rxiv:stro-ph/980509]. [4] M. Peloso nd F. Rosti, JHEP 992, 026 (999) [rxiv:hep-ph/990827]. [5] E. J. Copelnd, A. R. Liddle nd J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D 64, (200) [rxiv:stro-ph/000642]. [6] A. B. Kgnovich, Phys. Rev. D 63, (200) [rxiv:hep-th/000744].

5 FERMILAB Pu 05/039 T 5 [7] K. Dimopoulos nd J. W. F. Vlle, Astroprt. Phys. 8, 287 (2002) [rxiv:stro-ph/047]. [8] A. S. Mjumdr, Phys. Rev. D 64, (200) [rxiv:stro-ph/00558]. [9] G. Huey nd J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Lett. B 54, 27 (200) [rxiv:stro-ph/004006]. [0] M. Smi nd V. Shni, Phys. Rev. D 70, (2004) [rxiv:hep-th/ ]. [] L. F. Aott, E. Frhi nd M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 7, 29 (982). [2] G. Brenoim, O. Men nd C. Quigg, rxiv:stroph/ [3] B. Feng, M. Li, Y. S. Pio nd X. Zhng, rxiv:stroph/ [4] S. M. Crroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 3067 (998) [rxiv:stro-ph/ ]. [5] R. Frdon, A. E. Nelson nd N. Weiner, JCAP 040, 005 (2004) [rxiv:stro-ph/ ]. [6] D. J. Schwrz nd C. A. Terrero-Esclnte, JCAP 0408, 003 (2004) [rxiv:hep-ph/040329]. [7] E. D. Stewrt nd D. H. Lyth, Phys. Lett. B 302, 7 (993) [rxiv:gr-qc/930209]. [8] W. H. Kinney, E. W. Kol, A. Melchiorri nd A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 69, 0356 (2004) [rxiv:hep-ph/030530]. [9] S. Eidelmn et l. [Prticle Dt Group], Phys. Lett. B 592, (2004). [20] R. Ben, S. H. Hnsen nd A. Melchiorri, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 0, 67 (2002) [rxiv:stro-ph/02027].