RELATIVE GOURSAT CATEGORIES
|
|
- Grant Baker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RELTIVE GOURST CTEGORIES JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE bstract. We deine relative Goursat cateories and prove relative versions o the equivalent conditions deinin reular Goursat cateories. These include 3-permutability o equivalence relations, preservation o equivalence relations under direct imaes, a condition on so-called Goursat pushouts, and the denormalised 3 3-Lemma. This extends recent wor by Gran and Rodelo on a new characterisation o Goursat cateories to a relative context. Introduction ccordin to. Carboni, G. M. Kelly and M. C. Pedicchio [2], a Goursat cateory can be deined as a reular cateory satisyin the 3-permutability o equivalence relations, that is, havin RSR = SRS or every two equivalence relations R and S on the same object. However, it is nown that there are several other equivalent deinitions and characterizations, includin the ollowin two, recently obtained by M. Gran and D. Rodelo [4]: 1. reular cateory is Goursat i and only i or every pushout C D o reular epimorphisms in, where and are split epimorphisms, the induced morphism between the ernel pairs o and is a reular epimorphism; such pushouts are called Goursat pushouts. 2. reular cateory is Goursat i and only i it satisies the so-called denormalized 3 3-Lemma. This denormalised 3 3-Lemma was irst introduced in a reular Mal tsev context by D. ourn in [1] and was proved to hold in reular Goursat cateories by S. Lac in [10]. The purpose o the present paper is to extend these two results to characterize what we call relative Goursat cateories by main the ollowin replacements: The reular cateory is replaced with a pair (, E) where E is a class o reular epimorphisms in satisyin suitable conditions; when has all inite limits and coequalizers o ernel pairs and E is the class o all reular epimorphisms in, these conditions mae reular; the Goursat pushouts are required to have all their arrows in E; the 3 3-Lemma is replaced by its E-relative version (see Theorem 3.2 below). In act, we show in detail that our conditions on (, E) allow us to repeat essentially all aruments o [10] and [4]. Our main tool here is the calculus o E-relations developed in [6, 7], which, unlie previously nown versions, does not require E to be part o a actorization system. Its oriinal motivation was to introduce and study relative semi-abelian and relative homoloical cateories in [7, 6, 5], and now we have the implications: relative semi-abelian [7, 6] relative homoloical [5] relative Mal tsev [3] relative Goursat relative reular. Date:?? but this version is dated 26th uust Mathematics Subject Classiication. 1820, 18G25, 18G50. Key words and phrases. Goursat; non-abelian relative homoloical alebra; three-permutable equivalence relations; relative reular cateories; relative Goursat cateories; relative denormalised 3x3 lemma; The irst author was supported by the FNRS rant Crédit aux chercheurs F. The second author was supported by Claude Leon Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship. 1
2 2 JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE 1. Relations in a relative settin When worin with relations, one usually uses the reular imae actorisation in a reular cateory to obtain composition o relations (see e.. [2]). In a relative settin, reular epimorphisms are replaced with a suitable class E o reular epimorphisms in the round cateory, and a relative actorisation axiom is used instead o reular imae actorisation to compose relations [7] (see also [6]). In this paper, we consider a slihtly more eneral settin or relations than the one in [7], namely, we do not require the existence o all pullbacs as in [7], but only as or pullbacs o morphisms in E to exist. We introduce: Deinition 1.1. relative reular cateory is a pair (, E) where is a cateory with inite products and E is a class o reular epimorphisms in such that the ollowin axioms hold: (E1) E contains all isomorphisms; (E2) pullbacs o morphisms in E exist in and are in E; (E3) E is closed under composition; (E4) i E and E then E; (F) i a morphism in actors as = em with m a monomorphism and e E, then it also actors (essentially uniquely) as = m e with m a monomorphism and e E. Note that i is a cateory with products and all pullbacs and E is a class o reular epimorphisms in containin all isomorphisms, then (, E) is a relative reular cateory (i.e. it satisies axioms (E2) (F)) i and only i (, E) satisies Condition 1.1 o [7]. Note also that this context is not as eneral as the one considered in [8] where products are not required to exist. Thereore, the level o enerality here is between those o [7] and [8]. Remar 1.2 (The absolute case ). s easily ollows rom Deinition 1.1, i is a cateory with inite limits and has coequalizers o ernel pairs and E is the class o all reular epimorphisms in, then (, E) is a relative reular cateory i and only i is a reular cateory. Relative reular cateories provide a convenient settin or the calculus o E-relations in the same way that reular cateories do or the calculus o relations. The ollowin deinitions and properties o E-relations are the relative versions o classical properties o relations. Their proos easily ollow those o the absolute version and appear in [6] (the absolute versions can be ound or example in [2]). Deinition 1.3 (E-relations). Given two objects and in, an E-relation R rom to is a subobject r 1, r 2 : R o such that the morphisms r 1 : R and r 2 : R are in E. We denote such an E-relation by (R, r 1, r 2 ) or just by R, and its opposite (R, r 2, r 1 ) by R ; we will also write R: or an E-relation R rom to. When =, we may also say that R is an E-relation on. We can compose two E-relations (R, r 1, r 2 ) rom to and (S, s 1, s 2 ) rom to C by ormin the pullbac o r 2 and s 1 and then usin the actorisation rom xiom (F) to obtain a monomorphism SR C: P mono P R S R r 1 S E r r 2 s 1 1 s 2 E s 2 SR C mono C xioms (E2), (E3) and (E4) ensure that this composite is aain an E-relation. Moreover, the composition is associative (as we identiy isomorphic relations) and we have: (R ) = R, (SR) = R S, R R R R (orderin as subobjects), i R R and S S then SR S R, or all E-relations R:, R :, S : C, and S : C in. Remar 1.4. Given a morphism : in E, we can use (E1) to view as an E-relation = (, 1, ); its opposite is = (,, 1 ). It is easy to see (c. [2, 7]) that is the ernel pair o, = 1,
3 RELTIVE GOURST CTEGORIES 3 =, =, or any E-relation (R, r 1, r 2 ) we have R = r 2 r 1. Deinition 1.5. n E-relation (R, r 1, r 2 ) on an object in is said to be relexive i 1 R, symmetric i R R (and thus R = R), transitive i RR R, an equivalence E-relation i it is relexive, symmetric and transitive; an E-eective equivalence E-relation i it is a ernel pair o some morphism in E. s easily ollows rom Deinition 1.5, an E-relation R: which is relexive and transitive satisies RR = R. Note also that the ernel pair o any morphism E is an (E-eective) equivalence E-relation, by pullbac-stability (E2). This allows us to copy the n = 3 version o [2, Theorem 3.5] to a relative version o the same theorem. We ive the proo or convenience. Proposition 1.6. Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. The ollowin conditions are equivalent: (i) or equivalence E-relations R and S on an object, we have RSR = SRS; (ii) this 3-permutability RSR = SRS holds when R and S are E-eective equivalence E-relations; (iii) every E-relation P rom to satisies P P P P = P P ; (iv) or every relexive E-relation E on an object, the E-relation EE is an equivalence E-relation; (v) or every relexive E-relation E, the E-relation EE is transitive; (vi) or every relexive E-relation E, we have EE = E E. Proo. Clearly (i) (ii). Given an E-relation P rom to we view it as p 1, p 2 : P such that P = p 2 p 1. Then p 1p 1 and p 2p 2 are the ernel pairs o p 1 and p 2 respectively, and thereore E-eective equivalence E-relations. Hence, by (ii) and usin Remar 1.4, we obtain: P P P P = p 2 p 1p 1 p 2p 2 p 1p 1 p 2 = p 2 p 2p 2 p 1p 1 p 2p 2 p 2 = p 2 p 1p 1 p 2 = P P, provin (ii) (iii). Now iven a relexive E-relation E on as in (iv), the relexivity 1 E and the induced 1 E imply 1 EE, ivin relexivity o EE. Symmetry is automatic as (EE ) = EE, and transitivity EE EE = EE ollows rom (iii), thereore (iii) (iv). Clearly (iv) (v), and (v) (vi) since relexivity o E ives E E EE EE EE. It remains to prove (vi) (i). Given two equivalence E-relations R and S on an object, we have R = R, RR = R and the same or S; moreover, their composite E = SR is clearly relexive. Thereore we have SRS = SRR S = R S SR = RSR, which ives (i). The case n = 2 o [2, Theorem 3.5] deines a reular Mal tsev cateory and is stated in its relative version in [3]. In the absolute case o reular cateories, it is possible to orm the direct imae o any endo-relation [2, 4]. In a similar way, we can orm an E-imae o an endo-e-relation in our relative settin. Deinition 1.7 (E-imae). Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Given an E-relation (R, r 1, r 2 ) on an object o and a morphism : in E, we deine the E-imae o R alon to be the relation S on which is induced by the (E, mono)-actorisation s 1, s 2 ϕ o the morphism ( ) r 1, r 2 r 1,r 2 R ϕ S s 1,s 2 which exists by axiom (F). We write (R) = S, which is aain an E-relation by axiom (E4). Remar 1.8. When R is a relexive E-relation, the essential uniqueness o (E, mono)-actorisations implies that (R) is also relexive, and when R is a symmetric E-relation, ϕ bein an epimorphism implies that (R) is symmetric. In the next section we will see under which conditions the E-imae (R) o an equivalence E-relation R is aain an equivalence E-relation.
4 4 JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE s in the absolute case [2, 4], we have an easy way to orm the E-imae: Lemma 1.9. Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Given an E-relation (R, r 1, r 2 ) on an object in and a morphism : in E, the E-imae (R) can be ormed as the composite (R) = R = r 2 r1. Furthermore, usin Remar 1.4 and the deinition o E-imae as well as Lemma 1.9, we easily see the ollowin. Corollary Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Given a commutative diaram R S r 1 r 2 s 1 s 2 where R and S are E-relations and E, the morphism is in E i and only i S = (R), or equivalently i and only i s 2 s 1 = r 2 r 1. I (R, r 1, r 2 ) and (S, s 1, s 2 ) are ernel pairs with coequalizers r and s in E, then the latter is also equivalent to s s = r r. For the main result in the next section, we need the ollowin lemma rom [3]: Lemma 1.11 ([3, Lemma 3.3]). Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Given a morphism o (downward) split epimorphisms h C with in E, the induced morphism between the ernel pairs o h and is also in E. D 2. The relative Goursat axiom We now prove an equivalence o several conditions, which in the absolute case all characterise reular Goursat cateories (see [2] and [4]). Theorem 2.1. Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Then the ollowin conditions are equivalent: (i) the E-Goursat axiom: iven a morphism o (downward) split epimorphisms h C in with,, h and in E, the induced morphism between the ernel pairs o and is also in E; (ii) the E-imae o an equivalence E-relation is an equivalence E-relation; (iii) or every relexive E-relation E on an object, the E-relation EE is an equivalence E-relation; (iv) or equivalence E-relations R and S on an object, we have RSR = SRS. Proo. The proo o (i) (ii) is the same as its absolute version iven in [4, Theorem 2.3]. We ive it here or completeness. Let (R, r 1, r 2 ) be an equivalence E-relation on and let : be in E. We want to show that the E-imae (R) = (S, s 1, s 2 ) o R alon is aain an equivalence E-relation. Since S is relexive and symmetric by Remar 1.8, we only have to show that it is transitive, that is, SS S. However, since S is symmetric, it suices to show the existance o a morphism t S : S 1 S, where (S 1, π 1, π 2 ) is the ernel pair o s 1, which maes the ollowin diaram commute: π 1 D t S S 1 S π 2 s 1 S s 2 s 2 (1)
5 RELTIVE GOURST CTEGORIES 5 Since R is (symmetric and) transitive, there exists a morphism t R : R 1 R, where R 1 is the ernel pair o r 1, main the correspondin diaram or R commute: t R R 1 R r 1 R r2 Usin the morphisms e R and e S which deine the relexivity o R and S, we obtain a diaram r 1 R ϕ S e R s 1 o type (1), where ϕ is the E-part o the (E, mono)-actorisation s 1, s 2 ϕ o ( ) r 1, r 2. Thereore, by (i), the induced morphism ϕ: R 1 S 1 between the ernel pairs o r 1 and s 1 is in E. Since every morphism in E is a reular epimorphism and thereore a stron epimorphism and s 1, s 2 is a monomorphism, we obtain a unique diaonal t S in the square r 2 e S R 1 ϕ S 1 ϕ t R t S S s1,s 2 (s 2 s 2) π 1,π 2 main both trianles commute, which is the required morphism. For (ii) (iii) it is easy to see that or a relexive E-relation (E, e 1, e 2 ) on an object we have EE = e 1 (E 2 ), where E 2 is the ernel pair o e 2. Thereore EE is an equivalence E-relation as the E-imae o the equivalence E-relation E 2. Conditions (iii) and (iv) are equivalent by Proposition 1.6. Finally, or (iv) (i) we aain use the proo rom [4, Theorem 2.3]. For convenience, we copy the proo and add our adapted justiications or the relative settin. Given a diaram such as (1), Lemma 1.11 implies that the induced split epimorphism between the ernel pairs H o h and K o is in E. This means that (H) = K. Now usin Lemma 1.9 and the three-permutability rom (iv) on the ernel pairs H = h h and F =, we see that h(f ) = h h (by Lemma 1.9) = hh h h hh (since hh h = h) = h h h h (by (iv)) = h h (since (H) = K) = hh hh (since = h) = (since hh = 1) = G, where G is the ernel pair o. y Corollary 1.10, this implies that the induced morphism between the ernel pairs F G is in E. s all these conditions characterise Goursat cateories in the absolute case [2, 4], we are now justiied in the ollowin deinition. Deinition 2.2. relative Goursat cateory is a relative reular cateory (, E) in which moreover the ollowin axiom holds: (G) the E-Goursat axiom: iven a morphism o (downward) split epimorphisms h C D
6 6 JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE in with,, h and in E, the induced morphism between the ernel pairs o and is also in E. Compare this to the deinition o relative Mal tsev cateories in [3]: the E-Mal tsev axiom (E5) iven there says that or any morphism o split epimorphisms (1) with,, h and in E, the canonical morphism, h to the pullbac D C is also in E. s in the absolute case, this relative Mal tsev axiom implies the E-Goursat axiom (G) (see [3, Lemma 3.4]). 3. The relative 3 3-Lemma In this section we prove the relative version o the so-called denormalized 3 3-Lemma in the context o relative Goursat cateories. Furthermore, ollowin the absolute case layed out in [4], we show that, in a relative reular cateory (, E), the relative 3 3-Lemma is in act equivalent to the E-Goursat axiom. Deinition 3.1. Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. We will say that the diaram is E-exact when (F, 1, 2 ) is the ernel pair o and is in E. 1 F (2) 2 Note that when (2) is E-exact, the morphisms 1 and 2 are also in E by pullbac-stability (E2). In the proo o the relative 3 3-Lemma, we will need the ollowin Lemma 3.2 ([7, Theorem 2.10]). Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. Given a diaram h C D with the morphisms, h,, and in E, we have h = i and only i = h and the canonical morphism, h : D C is in E. We irst show that the relative 3 3-Lemma does indeed hold in any relative Goursat cateory. Theorem 3.3 (The relative 3 3-Lemma). Let (, E) be a relative Goursat cateory. Given a commutative diaram F h 1 h 2 F h G 2 H 1 h 1 h K 2 1 h 2 C D 1 (3) with E-exact columns and middle row, the irst row is E-exact i and only i the third row is E-exact. Proo. The proo is the same as in the absolute case [10]; we repeat it here with the appropriate justiications or the relative case. Suppose the third row is E-exact. Since 1 and 2 are jointly monic, an easy diaram chase proves that (F, h 1, h 2 ) is the ernel pair o h. Thereore, it remains to show that h is in E. Note that since is in E, Corollary 1.10 implies that the E-imae (H) = H is equal to K. We have: = hh hh (since hh = 1) = h h (since h = ) = h h h h (since (H) = K) = hh h h hh (by Theorem 2.1(iv)) = h h (since hh h = h) Thereore G = h(f ) and, by Corollary 1.10, h is in E.
7 RELTIVE GOURST CTEGORIES 7 Conversely, suppose the irst row is E-exact. y xiom (E4) the morphisms 1, 2 and are in E. We have: = (since = 1) = h h (since h = ) = h h h h (since h(f ) = G) = h h (by Theorem 2.1(iv)) = h h (since = ) = h 2 h 1 (since H = h h = h 2 h 1) = 1 2 (since h i = i ) = 1 2 (since = 1) Thereore, since = 1 2 and the morphisms 1, 2, and are in E, Lemma 3.2 implies that 1e = 1 and 2e = 2 or some e E, where ( 1, 2) is the ernel pair o. It remains to prove that e is an isomorphism. For this, we replace ( 1, 2 ) by ( 1, 2) and by e in the 3 3-diaram (3). Then the three rows, the second column and the third column are E-exact; thereore, by the irst part o the proo, the irst column is also E-exact. Thus and e are both coequalizers o 1 and 2, yieldin that e is an isomorphism. Now we show that the relative 3 3-Lemma is equivalent to the E-Goursat axiom in a relative reular cateory. Theorem 3.4. Let (, E) be a relative reular cateory. The ollowin conditions are equivalent: (i) (, E) is a relative Goursat cateory, that is, the axiom (G) holds in (, E); (ii) the relative 3 3-Lemma holds in (, E); (iii) in a diaram such as (3), i the irst row is E-exact then the third row is also E-exact; (iv) in a diaram such as (3), i the third row is E-exact then the irst row is also E-exact. Proo. The proo is the same as in the absolute case [4]; we aain repeat it or convenience. The part (i) (ii) is Theorem 3.3, and the implications (ii) (iii) and (ii) (iv) are obvious. (iv) (i): Consider the commutative diaram (1) with the assumptions o axiom (G). Let (H, h 1, h 2 ) and (K, 1, 2 ) be the ernel pairs o h and respectively, and let : H K be the induced morphism; since is in E, Lemma 1.11 implies that is also in E. Tain the ernel pairs o, and and the induced morphisms between them, we obtain the diaram (3) with the three columns and the second and the third rows E-exact. Then (iv) implies that the irst row is also E-exact, and thereore the induced morphism between the ernel pairs o and is in E, provin (i). (iii) (i): ain consider the commutative diaram (1). Let (F, 1, 2 ) be the ernel pair o and let (T, t 1, t 2 ) be the E-imae o F alon h. To prove (i) it suices to show that (T, t 1, t 2 ) is the ernel pair o. For this, consider the commutative diaram 2 E H K 1 η 1 η 2 h 1 h F 1 η h T t 2 t 1 C (4) in which (E, η 1, η 2 ), (H, h 1, h 2 ), and (K, 1, 2 ) are the ernel pairs o η, h, and respectively, and 1, 2 : E H are the induced morphisms. Since is in E, Lemma 1.11 implies that is also in E. Moreover, since t 1 and t 2 are jointly monic, it ollows that (E, 1, 2 ) is the ernel pair o, main the irst column E-exact. Then, applyin (iii) to Diaram (4) with the role o columns and rows interchaned, we obtain that the third column is also E-exact. Thereore, (T, t 1, t 2 ) is the ernel pair o, as desired. Remar 3.5. Theorem 3.4 is in act the relative version o Proposition 3.2 o [4]; in particular, our (iii) (iv) corresponds to 3.2(c) 3.2(d) in [4], which itsel can be considered as a non-pointed version o 5.4(b) 5.4(c) in [9]. D
8 8 JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE s mentioned in the introduction, we have a chain o implications o various relative cateories: any relative Goursat cateory is by deinition relatively reular, and any relative Mal tsev cateory is relatively Goursat, as proved in [3, Lemma 3.4]. Furthermore, every relative homoloical cateory is relatively Mal tsev by [7, Theorem 2.14] or [3, Proposition 4.5], and any relative semi-abelian cateory is relatively homoloical by deinition, see [7, Deinition 3.2]. This is the same chain o implications as in the absolute case. cnowledements We would lie to than Marino Gran or his suestion to loo at relative Goursat cateories usin the Goursat pushout as a deinition. Reerences [1] D. ourn, The denormalized 3 3 lemma, J. Pure ppl. lebra 177 (2003), [2]. Carboni, G. M. Kelly, and M. C. Pedicchio, Some remars on Maltsev and Goursat cateories, ppl. Cate. Structures 1 (1993), [3] T. Everaert, J. Goedece, and T. Van der Linden, Resolutions, hiher extensions and the relative Mal tsev axiom, in preparation, [4] M. Gran and D. Rodelo, new characterisation o Goursat cateories, Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática, Universidade de Coimbra, Preprint Number 10-10, [5] T. Janelidze, Relative homoloical cateories, J. Homotopy Rel. Struct. 1 (2006), no. 1, [6] T. Janelidze, Foundation o relative non-abelian homoloical alebra, Ph.D. thesis, University o Cape Town, [7] T. Janelidze, Relative semi-abelian cateories, ppl. Cate. Structures 17 (2009), [8] T. Janelidze, Incomplete relative semi-abelian cateories, ppl. Cate. Structures, doi: /s (2009). [9] Z. Janelidze, The pointed subobject unctor, 3 3 lemmas, and subtractivity o spans, Theory ppl. Cate., 23 (2010), no. 11, [10] S. Lac, The 3-by-3 lemma or reular oursat cateories, Homoloy, Homotopy ppl. 6 (2004), no. 1, 1 3. Julia Goedece, Institut de recherche en mathématique et physique, Université catholique de Louvain, Chemin du Cyclotron 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, elium address: julia.oedece@cantab.net Tamar Janelidze, Department o Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private a X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South rica address: tamar@sun.ac.za
GOURSAT COMPLETIONS DIANA RODELO AND IDRISS TCHOFFO NGUEFEU
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 18 06 GOUSAT COMPLETIONS DIANA ODELO AND IDISS TCHOFFO NGUEFEU Abstract: We characterize categories with weak inite
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 12 CHRCTERIZTION OF CENTRL EXTENSIONS IN THE VRIETY OF QUNDLES VLÉRIN EVEN, MRINO GRN ND NDRE MONTOLI bstract: The
More informationUniversity of Cape Town
The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial
More informationTHE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE
THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new
More information3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity
Ž. Journal o Algebra 236, 778795 2001 doi:10.1006jabr.2000.8526, available online at http:www.idealibrary.com on 3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity Dominique Bourn Uniersite du Littoral, 220 a. de l Uniersite,
More informationTHE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY
THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, DAVID A. JORGENSEN & STEFFEN OPPERMANN Dedicated to Ranar-Ola Buchweitz on the occasion o his sixtieth birthday Abstract. We consider the homotopy cateory
More informationThe Category of Sets
The Cateory o Sets Hans Halvorson October 16, 2016 [[Note to students: this is a irst drat. Please report typos. A revised version will be posted within the next couple o weeks.]] 1 Introduction The aim
More informationHSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS
HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence
More informationA CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 11 A CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT Abstract: For a particular
More informationCategorical Background (Lecture 2)
Cateorical Backround (Lecture 2) February 2, 2011 In the last lecture, we stated the main theorem o simply-connected surery (at least or maniolds o dimension 4m), which hihlihts the importance o the sinature
More informationSTRONGLY GORENSTEIN PROJECTIVE MODULES OVER UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX ARTIN ALGEBRAS. Shanghai , P. R. China. Shanghai , P. R.
STRONGLY GORENSTEIN PROJETIVE MODULES OVER UPPER TRINGULR MTRIX RTIN LGERS NN GO PU ZHNG Department o Mathematics Shanhai University Shanhai 2444 P R hina Department o Mathematics Shanhai Jiao Ton University
More informationSNAKE LEMMA IN INCOMPLETE RELATIVE HOMOLOGICAL CATEGORIES Dedicated to Dominique Bourn on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 23, No. 4, 21, pp. 76 91. SNAKE LEMMA IN INCOMPLETE RELATIVE HOMOLOGICAL CATEGORIES Dedicated to Dominique Bourn on the occasion o his 6th birthday TAMAR JANELIDZE
More informationUMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract
UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S
More informationCategory Theory 2. Eugenia Cheng Department of Mathematics, University of Sheffield Draft: 31st October 2007
Cateory Theory 2 Euenia Chen Department o Mathematics, niversity o Sheield E-mail: echen@sheieldacuk Drat: 31st October 2007 Contents 2 Some basic universal properties 1 21 Isomorphisms 2 22 Terminal objects
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF GROUP EXTENSIONS AND H 2
CLASSIFICATION OF GROUP EXTENSIONS AND H 2 RAPHAEL HO Abstract. In this paper we will outline the oundations o homoloical alebra, startin with the theory o chain complexes which arose in alebraic topoloy.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 12 Nov 2017
TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES WITH CLUSTER TILTING SUBCATEGORIES WUZHONG YANG, PANYUE ZHOU, AND BIN ZHU Dedicated to Proessor Idun Reiten on the occasion o her 75th birthday arxiv:7.0490v [math.rt] Nov 07 Abstract.
More informationCategories and Quantum Informatics: Monoidal categories
Cateories and Quantum Inormatics: Monoidal cateories Chris Heunen Sprin 2018 A monoidal cateory is a cateory equipped with extra data, describin how objects and morphisms can be combined in parallel. This
More informationThe denormalized 3 3 lemma
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 177 (2003) 113 129 www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa The denormalized 3 3 lemma Dominique Bourn Centre Universitaire de la Mi-Voix Lab. d Analyse Geometrie et Algebre, Universite
More informationLIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset
5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,
More informationDERIVED CATEGORIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
REVISTA DE LA UNIÓN MATEMÁTICA ARGENTINA Volumen 48, Número 3, 2007, Páinas 1 26 DERIVED CATEGORIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS Abstract In this notes we start with the basic deinitions o derived cateories,
More informationEpimorphisms and maximal covers in categories of compact spaces
@ Applied General Topoloy c Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Volume 14, no. 1, 2013 pp. 41-52 Epimorphisms and maximal covers in cateories o compact spaces B. Banaschewski and A. W. Haer Abstract The
More informationVARIETAL TECHNIQUES FOR DIANA RODELO AND TIM VAN DER LINDEN. Dedicated to George Janelidze on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 12 19 VARIETAL TECHNIQUES FOR n-permutable CATEGORIES DIANA RODELO AND TIM VAN DER LINDEN Dedicated to George Janelidze
More informationThe excess intersection formula for Grothendieck-Witt groups
manuscripta mathematica manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Jean Fasel The excess intersection ormula or Grothendieck-Witt roups Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We prove the
More informationA Peter May Picture Book, Part 1
A Peter May Picture Book, Part 1 Steve Balady Auust 17, 2007 This is the beinnin o a larer project, a notebook o sorts intended to clariy, elucidate, and/or illustrate the principal ideas in A Concise
More informationThe inner automorphism 3-group of a strict 2-group
The inner automorphism 3-roup o a strict 2-roup Dav Roberts and Urs Schreiber July 25, 2007 Abstract or any roup G, there is a 2-roup o inner automorphisms, INN(G). This plays the role o the universal
More informationCOARSE-GRAINING OPEN MARKOV PROCESSES. John C. Baez. Kenny Courser
COARE-GRAINING OPEN MARKOV PROCEE John C. Baez Department o Mathematics University o Caliornia Riverside CA, UA 95 and Centre or Quantum echnoloies National University o inapore inapore 7543 Kenny Courser
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN
VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not
More informationELEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE NO.14 CATEGORY THEORY. Tatsuya Hagino
1 ELEMENTS IN MTHEMTICS FOR INFORMTION SCIENCE NO.14 CTEGORY THEORY Tatsuya Haino haino@sc.keio.ac.jp 2 Set Theory Set Theory Foundation o Modern Mathematics a set a collection o elements with some property
More informationCategories and Natural Transformations
Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. What we re doin this week 1 2. Precise statements 2 2.1. Basic operations and properties 4 3. Provin thins 6
More informationTriangulated categories and localization
Trianulated cateories and localization Karin Marie Jacobsen Master o Science in Physics and Mathematics Submission date: Januar 212 Supervisor: Aslak Bakke Buan, MATH Norweian University o Science and
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the
More informationCONVENIENT CATEGORIES OF SMOOTH SPACES
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 363, Number 11, November 2011, Paes 5789 5825 S 0002-9947(2011)05107-X Article electronically published on June 6, 2011 CONVENIENT CATEGORIES OF
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.
More informationTHE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.
More informationGENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE
GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will
More informationBECK'S THEOREM CHARACTERIZING ALGEBRAS
BEK'S THEOREM HARATERIZING ALGEBRAS SOFI GJING JOVANOVSKA Abstract. In this paper, I will construct a proo o Beck's Theorem characterizin T -alebras. Suppose we have an adjoint pair o unctors F and G between
More informationJoseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012
Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Categories joseph.muscat@um.edu.mt 1 December 2012 1 Objects and Morphisms category is a class o objects with morphisms : (a way o comparing/substituting/mapping/processing to ) such
More information( ) x y z. 3 Functions 36. SECTION D Composite Functions
3 Functions 36 SECTION D Composite Functions By the end o this section you will be able to understand what is meant by a composite unction ind composition o unctions combine unctions by addition, subtraction,
More informationDescent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014
Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and
More informationTHE AXIOMS FOR TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES
THE AIOMS FOR TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES J. P. MA Contents 1. Trianulated cateories 1 2. Weak pusouts and weak pullbacks 4 3. How to prove Verdier s axiom 6 Reerences 9 Tis is an edited extract rom my paper
More informationGENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS
GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions
More informationPart 1. 1 Basic Theory of Categories. 1.1 Concrete Categories
Part 1 1 Basic Theory o Cateories 1.1 Concrete Cateories One reason or inventin the concept o cateory was to ormalize the notion o a set with additional structure, as it appears in several branches o mathematics.
More informationWestern University. Imants Barušs King's University College, Robert Woodrow
Western University Scholarship@Western Psycholoy Psycholoy 2013 A reduction theorem or the Kripke-Joyal semantics: Forcin over an arbitrary cateory can always be replaced by orcin over a complete Heytin
More informationMath 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications
Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle
More informationMath 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)
Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does
More information1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.
MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an
More informationRepresentation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi
Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 17
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 17 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Were we are 1 1.1. Reined Gysin omomorpisms i! 2 1.2. Excess intersection ormula 4 2. Local complete intersection morpisms 6 Were we re oin, by popular
More informationMADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS EMILY RIEHL The aim o this note is to briely summarize techniques or building weak actorization systems whose right class is characterized by a particular liting
More informationCHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton
CHOW LEMMA Matthew Emerton The aim o this note is to prove the ollowing orm o Chow s Lemma: uppose that : is a separated inite type morphism o Noetherian schemes. Then (or some suiciently large n) there
More informationBARYCENTRIC SUBDIVISION AND ISOMORPHISMS OF GROUPOIDS
BARYCENTRIC SUBDIVISION AND ISOMORPHISMS OF GROUPOIDS JASHA SOMMER-SIMPSON Abstract Given roupoids G and H as well as an isomorpism Ψ : Sd G = Sd H between subdivisions, we construct an isomorpism P :
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i
More informationTHE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES
Theory and pplications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2012, pp. 304 330. THE COLGEBRIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES THOMS THORNE bstract. The relative cell complexes with respect to a generating set o coibrations
More informationOriented Bivariant Theories, I
ESI The Erwin Schrödiner International Boltzmannasse 9 Institute or Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Oriented Bivariant Theories, I Shoji Yokura Vienna, Preprint ESI 1911 2007 April 27, 2007 Supported
More informationCentral Limit Theorems and Proofs
Math/Stat 394, Winter 0 F.W. Scholz Central Limit Theorems and Proos The ollowin ives a sel-contained treatment o the central limit theorem (CLT). It is based on Lindeber s (9) method. To state the CLT
More informationON ACTIONS AND STRICT ACTIONS IN HOMOLOGICAL CATEGORIES
Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 27, No. 15, 2013, pp. 347 392. ON ACTIONS AND STRICT ACTIONS IN HOMOLOGICAL CATEGORIES MANFRED HARTL AND BRUNO LOISEAU Abstract. Let G be an object of a finitely
More informationA crash course in homological algebra
Chapter 2 A crash course in homoloical alebra By the 194 s techniques from alebraic topoloy bean to be applied to pure alebra, ivin rise to a new subject. To bein with, recall that a cateory C consists
More informationNotes on Serre fibrations
Notes on Serre ibrations Stehen A. Mitchell Auust 2001 1 Introduction Many roblems in tooloy can be ormulated abstractly as extension roblems A i h X or litin roblems X h Here the solid arrows reresent
More informationBAER INVARIANTS IN SEMI-ABELIAN CATEGORIES I: GENERAL THEORY
Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1 33. BAER INVARIANTS IN SEMI-ABELIAN CATEGORIES I: GENERAL THEORY T. EVERAERT AND T. VAN DER LINDEN ABSTRACT. Extending the work of Fröhlich,
More informationClassification of effective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4
Classiication o eective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4 Shintarô Kuroki Department o Applied Mathematics, Faculty o Science, Okayama Uniervsity o Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005,
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ct] 16 Jun 2006
arxiv:math/0606393v1 [math.ct] 16 Jun 2006 Strict 2-toposes Mark Weber bstract. 2-cateorical eneralisation o the notion o elementary topos is provided, and some o the properties o the yoneda structure
More informationOn Nonpermutational Transformation Semigroups with an Application to Syntactic Complexity
Acta Cybernetica 22 (2016) 687 701. On Nonpermutational Transormation Semiroups with an Application to Syntactic Complexity Szabolcs Iván and Judit Nay-Györy Abstract We ive an upper bound o n((n 1)! (n
More informationWork It, Wrap It, Fix It, Fold It
1 Work It, Wrap It, Fix It, Fold It NEIL SCULTHORPE University o Kansas, USA GRAHAM HUTTON University o Nottinham, UK Abstract The worker/wrapper transormation is a eneral-purpose technique or reactorin
More informationSpan, Cospan, and Other Double Categories
ariv:1201.3789v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions
More informationON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION
Bulletin o the Institute o Mathematics Academia Sinica (New Series) Vol 4 (2009), No 1, pp 47-66 ON KAN ETENSION OF HOMOLOG AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION B AKRUR BEHERA AND RADHESHAM OTA Abstract Under a set
More informationDUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS
DUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS GEORG BIEDERMANN AND BORIS CHORNY Abstract. The homotopy theory o small unctors is a useul tool or studying various questions in homotopy theory. In this paper, we develop the
More information5. Network Analysis. 5.1 Introduction
5. Network Analysis 5.1 Introduction With the continued rowth o this country as it enters the next century comes the inevitable increase in the number o vehicles tryin to use the already overtaxed transportation
More informationPROJECTIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS
IJMMS 31:2 22 97 11 II. S1611712218192 ttp://ijmms.indawi.com Hindawi ublisin Corp. ROJECTIVE RERESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS SANGWON ARK Received 3 Auust 21 We prove tat 2 is a projective representation o a
More informationClassifying Categories The Jordan-Hölder and Krull-Schmidt-Remak Theorems for Abelian Categories
U.U.D.M. Project Report 2018:5 Classiying Categories The Jordan-Hölder and Krull-Schmidt-Remak Theorems or belian Categories Daniel hlsén Examensarbete i matematik, 30 hp Handledare: Volodymyr Mazorchuk
More informationDiagrammatic logic applied to a parameterization process
Diarammatic loic applied to a parameterization process César Domínuez Dominique Duval Auust 25., 2009 Abstract. This paper provides an abstract deinition o some kinds o loics, called diarammatic loics,
More informationA NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.
A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. DIETER HAPPEL AND DAN ZACHARIA Abstract. Let P n be the projective n space over the complex numbers. In this note we show that an indecomposable
More informationSPLITTING OF SHORT EXACT SEQUENCES FOR MODULES. 1. Introduction Let R be a commutative ring. A sequence of R-modules and R-linear maps.
SPLITTING OF SHORT EXACT SEQUENCES FOR MODULES KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let R be a commutative rin. A sequence o R-modules and R-linear maps N M P is called exact at M i im = ker. For example, to say
More informationare well-formed, provided Φ ( X, x)
(October 27) 1 We deine an axiomatic system, called the First-Order Theory o Abstract Sets (FOTAS) Its syntax will be completely speciied Certain axioms will be iven; but these may be extended by additional
More informationMath 248B. Base change morphisms
Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback
More informationProof nets for additive linear logic with units
Proo nets or additive linear loic with units Willem Heijltjes LFCS, School o Inormatics, University o Edinburh bstract dditive linear loic, the rament o linear loic concernin linear implication between
More informationRelaxed Multiplication Using the Middle Product
Relaxed Multiplication Usin the Middle Product Joris van der Hoeven Département de Mathématiques (bât. 425) Université Paris-Sud 91405 Orsay Cedex France joris@texmacs.or ABSTRACT In previous work, we
More information2 Olo J. Staans where R is a iven positive semidenite matrix. At the end o this introduction we shall return to this second possibility, and show that
QUADRATIC OPTIMAL CONTROL THROUGH COPRIME AND SPECTRAL FACTORIZATIONS OLOF J. STAFFANS ABO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS FIN-25 ABO, FINLAND OLOF.STAFFANS@ABO.FI Abstract. We consider the
More informationASSOCIATIVITY DATA IN AN (, 1)-CATEGORY
ASSOCIATIVITY DATA IN AN (, 1)-CATEGORY EMILY RIEHL A popular sloan is tat (, 1)-cateories (also called quasi-cateories or - cateories) sit somewere between cateories and spaces, combinin some o te eatures
More informationFrom Loop Groups To 2-Groups
From Loop Groups To 2-Groups John C. Baez Joint work with: Aaron Lauda Alissa Crans Danny Stevenson & Urs Schreiber 1 G f 1 f D 2 More details at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/2roup/ 1 Hiher Gaue Theory
More informationHow to glue perverse sheaves
How to glue perverse sheaves A.A. Beilinson The aim o this note [0] is to give a short, sel-contained account o the vanishing cycle constructions o perverse sheaves; e.g., or the needs o [1]. It diers
More informationNATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS MARCO GRANDIS AND WALTER THOLEN Abstract. In order to acilitate a natural choice or morphisms created by the (let or right) liting property as used in the deinition o
More informationThe Sectional Category of a Map
arxiv:math/0403387v1 [math.t] 23 Mar 2004 The Sectional Category o a Map M. rkowitz and J. Strom bstract We study a generalization o the Svarc genus o a iber map. For an arbitrary collection E o spaces
More informationCARTESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CATEGORIES
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 22, No. 23, 2009, pp. 622 672. CARTESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CATEGORIES R.F. BLUTE, J.R.B. COCKETT AND R.A.G. SEELY Abstract. This paper revisits the authors notion
More informationCLEMENS BERGER AND DOMINIQUE BOURN
CENTRAL REFLECTIONS AND NILPOTENCY IN EACT MAL TSEV CATEGORIES ariv:1511.00824v3 [math.ct] 30 Dec 2016 CLEMENS BERGER AND DOMINIQUE BOURN Abstract. We study nilpotency in the context of exact Mal tsev
More informationPower-Set Functors and Saturated Trees
Power-Set Functors and Saturated Trees Jiří Adámek 1, Stean Milius 1, Lawrence S. Moss 2, and Lurdes Sousa 3 1 Institut ür Theoretische Inormatik, Technische Universität Braunschweig Germany 2 Department
More informationON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES
ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES TOBIAS BARTHEL AND EMIL RIEHL Abstract. We present general techniques or constructing unctorial actorizations appropriate or model
More informationWEAK AND STRONG CONVERGENCE OF AN ITERATIVE METHOD FOR NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS IN HILBERT SPACES
Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics available online at http://pemath.et.b.ac.yu Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2 (2008), 197 204. doi:10.2298/aadm0802197m WEAK AND STRONG CONVERGENCE OF AN ITERATIVE
More informationFinite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)
More informationA linear-non-linear model for a computational call-by-value lambda calculus (extended abstract)
A linear-non-linear model or a computational call-by-value lambda calculus (extended abstract) Peter Seliner 1 and Benoît Valiron 2 1 Dalhousie University, seliner@mathstat.dal.ca 2 University o Ottawa,
More informationSynchronous Machines: a Traced Category
Synchronous Machines: a Traced Cateory Marc anol, Guatto drien To cite this version: Marc anol, Guatto drien. Synchronous Machines: a Traced Cateory. [Research Report] 2012. HL Id: hal-00748010
More informationA NOTE ON HENSEL S LEMMA IN SEVERAL VARIABLES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 11, November 1997, Pages 3185 3189 S 0002-9939(97)04112-9 A NOTE ON HENSEL S LEMMA IN SEVERAL VARIABLES BENJI FISHER (Communicated by
More informationFORMAL CATEGORY THEORY
FORML TEGORY THEORY OURSE HELD T MSRYK UNIVERSITY IVN DI LIERTI, SIMON HENRY, MIKE LIEERMNN, FOSO LOREGIN bstract. These are the notes o a readin seminar on ormal cateory theory we are runnin at Masaryk
More informationOn a Closed Formula for the Derivatives of e f(x) and Related Financial Applications
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 9, no. 9, 41-47 On a Closed Formula or the Derivatives o e x) and Related Financial Applications Konstantinos Draais 1 UCD CASL, University College Dublin, Ireland
More informationCATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction
1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the
More informationThe Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!
The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord
More informationIn the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.
Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by
More informationSlowly Changing Function Oriented Growth Analysis of Differential Monomials and Differential Polynomials
Slowly Chanin Function Oriented Growth Analysis o Dierential Monomials Dierential Polynomials SANJIB KUMAR DATTA Department o Mathematics University o kalyani Kalyani Dist-NadiaPIN- 7235 West Benal India
More informationNonlinear Integro-differential Equations by Differential Transform Method with Adomian Polynomials
Math Sci Lett No - Mathematical Science Letters An International Journal http://ddoior//msl/ Nonlinear Intero-dierential Equations b Dierential Transorm Method with Adomian Polnomials S H Behir General
More information