Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi"

Transcription

1 Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi

2 Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions o representations (4p) 5. Let regular representations (3p) 6. Construction o let induced representations (12p)

3 1. Internal categories and H algebroids Let C be a category with inite limits. Deinition 1.1 An internal category in C consists o the ollowing data. (1) A pair (C 0, C 1 ) o objects o C. (2) Four morphisms,: C 1 C 0,: C 0 C 1, :C 1 C 1 C C0 1 pr 1 pr 2 o C, where C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 is a limit o C 1 C 0 C 1, such that = = 1 C0 commute. C 0 and the ollowing diagrams pr C 1 pr 1 C 1 C 2 1 C C0 1 C 0 C 1 C 0 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 C 0 1 C 0 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 1 C 1 C 1 C0 (1, ) (, 1) C 1 C 1 C 1 1

4 We also have a notion o internal unctors between internal categories. Deinition 1.2 Let C = (C 0, C 1 ;,,, ) and D = (D 0, D 1 ;,,, ) be internal categories in C. An internal unctor rom C to D is a pair ( 0, 1 ) o morphisms 0 : C 0 D 0 and 1 : C 1 D 1 which make the ollowing diagrams commute. C 0 C 1 C 0 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 C D 0 D 1 D D 1 D 1 D 1 D 0 D 0

5 Let k be a commutative ring. We denote by Alg k the category o commutative graded k-algebras and homomorphisms between them. For objects A and B o Alg k, we deine maps i 1 : A A k B and i 2 : B A k B by i 1 (x) = x 1 and i 2 (y) = 1 y, respectively. Then, a diagram A i 1 i A k B 2 B is a croduct o A and B in Alg k. For morphisms, g : A B o Alg k, let I be the ideal o B generated by {(x) - g(x) x A }. Then the quotient map p : B B /I is a coequalizer o and g. Hence, Alg k is a category with inite colimits.

6 In other words, the posite category Alg k o Alg k is a category with inite limits. Thus we can consider the notion o internal categories in Alg k. Deinition 1.3 We call an internal category in Alg k a H algebroid. Namely, a H algebroid consists o the ollowing data. (1) A pair (A,) o objects o Alg k. (2) Four morphisms, : A, : A, : A o A A i 1 i A 2 A id A A A A Alg k, where A is a colimit o A, such that i 1 i 2 = = id A and the ollowing diagrams in Alg k are commutative. A id id id (1, ) (, 1) A

7 Deinition 1.4 Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k. An internal unctor rom to is make the ollowing diagrams commute. A called a morphism o H algebroids rom to. Namely, a morphism o H algebroids rom to is a pair ( 0, 1 ) o morphisms 0 : A B and 1 : which A 0 1 B B A A B B

8 For a category C with inite limits and an object A o C, pr 1 pr 2 id A id A let A A A A A be a limit o A A A and d : A A A A the unique morphism that satisies pr 1 d = pr 2 d = id A. Then, d is an isomorphism and -1 (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, d ) is an internal category in C. Deinition 1.5 We call (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, d -1 ) the trivial internal category in C with object A o objects. We denote this by. Remark 1.6 For an internal category C = (C 0, C 1 ;,,, ) in C, (id C, ) : C is unique internal unctor rom C to 0 C 0 C0 whose irst component is the identity morphism o C 0. A

9 Deinition 1.7 For an object A o Alg k, the trivial internal category in Alg k with object A o objects is called the trivial H 0 algebroid over A and denote it by. Remark 1.8 A For a H algebroid = (A,;,,, ) in Alg k, it is clear that (id A, ) : A is unique morphism o H algebroids whose irst component is the identity map o A. We denote this morphism by e A. A Let : A A A A be the isomorphism that maps 1 to 1 1. Then, we have = (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, ). 0

10 2. Fibered category o modules For a commutative ring k, we denote by Mod k the category o graded k-modules and homomorphisms preserving degrees. We deine a category MOD as ollows. Ob MOD consists o triples (R, M,) where R Ob Alg k, M Ob Mod k and : M k R M is a right R -module structure o M. o morphisms Alg k (R, S ) the right diagram commutes. A morphism rom (R, M,) to (S, N,) is a pair (, ) and Mod k (M, N ) such that M k R N k S M k Composition o (, ) :(R, M,) (S, N,) and (, ):(S, N,) (T, L,) is deined to be (, ). N

11 Deine a unctor p : MOD Alg k by p(r, M,) = R and p(,) = For a morphism : S R o Alg k and an object (S, N,) o MOD, let : (N S R ) k R N S R be the ollowing composition. Here mdenotes the multiplication o R. morphisms o the orm (id R, ). (N S R ) k R N S (R k R ) N S R For an object R o Alg k, let MOD R be a subcategory o MOD consisting o objects o the orm (R, M,) and id N m

12 For a morphism : S R o Alg k, we deine unctors : MOD S MOD R : MOD R MOD S We can show the ollowing. Prosition 2.1 (Fibered category o modules) by (S, N,) = (R, N S R, ), (id S,) = (id R, S id R ) p : MOD Alg k is a ibered category. and (R, M,) = (S, M,(id M K )), (id S,) = (id R, ). Prosition 2.2 is a let adjoint o : MOD S MOD R. is called the inverse image unctor. For any morphism : R S o Alg k, : MOD R MOD S

13 Remark 2.3 For an object M = (R, M,) o MOD R and an object N = (S, N,) o MOD S, the natural bijection ad : MOD R ( (N), M) MOD S (N, (M)) maps (id R, ) :(N) M to (id S, i N ): N (M). Here, : N S R M and i N : N N S R is gven by i N (x) = x 1.

14 For morphisms : R S We also deine an isomorphism o MOD T, : S T o Alg k and an object M = (R, M,) o MOD R, we deine a morphism c c (M): ( )(M) (M), (M) : M R T (M R S ) S T, by c (M)(m t) = (m 1) t. Then, c (M) is an isomorphism.,, by c (M) = (id T, c (M)).,,

15 Let : R S,: T S, : S U be morphisms o Alg k and M = (R, M,) an object o MOD R, N = (T, N,) an object o MOD T. c For a morphism :(M) (N) o MOD S, we denote by (M), ( ) (M) (M) (N) ( ) (N) then, : M R U N T U is the ollowing composition. : ( ) (M) ( ) (N) the ollowing composition. ( ) c (N) c (N) N T U, -1 I = (id S,) or: M R S N T S and = (id U, ), c, (M) S id U M R U (M R S ) S U (N T S ) S U, -1

16 3. Representations o H algebroids Let = (A,;,,, ) be a H algebroid in Alg k. Deinition 3.1 A pair (M, ) o an object M o MOD A and a morphism : (M) (M) o MODis called a representation o on M i the ollowing conditions (A) and (U) are satisied. (A) The ollowing diagram in MODis commutative. i2 ( )(M) = (i 2 )(M) (i 2 )(M) = (i 1 )(M) (U) i1 ( )(M) = (i 1 )(M) : M = ( )(M) ( )(M) = M coincides with the identity morphism o M.

17 Prosition 3.2 For a morphism : (M) (M) o MOD, let : ˆ M (M) be the image o by the natural bijection ad : MOD A ( (M), (M)) MOD A (M, (M)). M We put = ˆ (id A, ) or : M M A. (1) satisies (A) o (3.1) i and only i the ollowing let diagram is commutative. (2) satisies (U) o (3.1) i and only i the ollowing right diagram is commutative. M A id M M A M A A M M A id id M M A A

18 Deinition 3.3 A pair (M, ) o right A -module M and a homomorphism : M Let M A o right A -modules which makes the : M ollowing diagrams commute is called a right M M A M M A id id M M A M A A Remark 3.4 e -comodule. id M M A A M A A be a map which maps x to x 1. Then, it is an isomorphism and (M, ) is a right -comodule. We call this a trivial -comodule. A e A

19 We deine the category Rep( ) o representations o a H algebroid as ollows. Objects o Rep( ) are representations o. For representations (M, ) and (N, ) o, the set : N M o MOD A commute. Rep( )((M, ), (N, )) o morphisms rom (M, ) to (N, ) consists o morphims which make the ollowing diagram (N) (M) (N) ( ) ( ) (M)

20 We deine the category Comod( ) o right -comodules as ollows. Objects o Comod( ) are right -comodules. For right -comodules (M, ) and (N, ), the set Comod( )((M, ), (N, )) o morphisms rom (M, ) to (N, ) consists o homo- morphisms : M N o right A -modules which make the ollowing diagram commute. M N M A id N A

21 Prosition 3.5 Let M = (A, M,) and N = (A, N,) be objects o MOD A. For representations (M, ) and (N, ) o, we put ad ( ) = (id A, ) and ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A and : N N A. a morphism A homomorphism : N (id A,:(M, ) (N, ) o representations o i and only i is a morphism o right M o right A -modules deines : (N, ) (M, ) -comodules.

22 We deine a unctor as ollows. : Rep( ) Comod( ) For an object (M, ) o Rep( ), i M = (A, M,) and ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A, we put (M, ) = (M, ). For a morphism (id A, :(M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ), i ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A, we put (id A,) = ( : (N, ) (M, )). (M, ). Combining results so ar, we have the ollowing. We call (M, ) the right -comodule associated with Prosition 3.6 : Rep( ) Comod( ) is an isomorphism o categories.

23 4. Restrictions o representations Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k. For a morphism = ( 0, 1 ) : o H algebroids and a representation (M, ) o, we deine a morphism o MOD to be the ollowing composition. c (M) : ( 0 (M)) ( 0 (M)) 0, ( 0 (M)) ( 0 ) (M) = ( 1 ) (M) ( 1 ) (M) 1 c (M) -1 0, = ( 0 ) (M) ( 0 (M))

24 Prosition 4.1 (1) ( 0 (M), ) is a representation o on 0 (M). (2) I o We call ( 0 (M), ) the restriction o (M, ) along. deine a unctor : (M, ) (N, ) is a morphism o representations, 0 ( ) :( 0 (M), ) ( 0 (N), ) is a morphism o representations o. Deinition 4.2 For a morphism = ( 0, 1 ) : o H algebroids, we. : Rep( ) Rep( ). by (M, ) = ( 0. (M), ) and ( ) = 0 ( ) or an object (M, ) and a morphism : (M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ).

25 Prosition 4.3 For a representation (M, ) o on M = (A, M,), let (M, ) be the right -comodule associated with (M, ).. Then, the right -comodule ( (M, )) associated with. (M, ) is given as ollows. Deine a map by : (M A ) A B (M A B ) B ((x y) b) = (x 1) y (b) and let : M A B (M A B ) B M A B (M A ) A B (M A ) A B A id B be the ollowing composition. (id M A 1 ) A id B. Then, we have ( (M, )) = (M A B, ). (M A B ) B

26 Remark 4.4 I is the morphism e A = (id A, ) : A given in (1.8), 0 (M) = id A (M) = (A, M A A, ) is isomorphic to M. Since (id M A ) : M M A A maps x to x 1 and coincides with the identity morphism,. (e A (M, )) = (M A A, ) (3.4). : (M A A is isomorphic to a trivial -comodule (M, ) given in id A ) A A (M A A ) A A A e A A e

27 5. Let regular representations Let = (A,;,,, ) be a H algebroids in Alg k. We denote by U : Rep( ) MOD A the orgetul unctor. That is, U is given by U (M, ) = M and U ( ) =. Deine a unctor F id M A M A M A ( A ) (M A ) A F () = A id. : MOD A Comod( ) as ollows. For an object M = (A, M,) o MOD A, let : M A (M A ) A We put F (M) = (M A, ). For a morphism = (id A, ) : M N o MOD A, we put be the ollowing composition. M M

28 Let F : MOD A Rep( ) be the ollowing composition. Lemma 5.1 F MOD A Comod( ) Rep( ). (M, ) be the right -comodule associated with (M, ). -1 For a representation (M, ) o on M = (A, M,), let Then, : M M A deines a morphism o representations o. (id A, ) : F (M) (M, )

29 Prosition 5.2 For a representation (M, ) o and N an object o MOD A, let (M, ) be the right with (M, ) and we deine a map N ad : MOD A (N, U (M, )) Rep( )(F (N),(M, )) (M, ) N (M, ) by ad (id A, ) = (id A, F ( )). Then, ad is bijective. Hence F is a let adjoint o U. Deinition 5.3 For an object M o MOD A, we call F (M) the let regular regular representation associated with M. -comodule associated N (M, )

30 6. Construction o let induced representations Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k and = ( 0, 1 ) : a morphism o H algebroids. We deine maps by 0 (x) = 1 x and 0 : B A and : B B A (b) = b 1, respectively. Then, is cocartesian. A B 0 0 B A

31 Let M = (B, M,) an object o MOD B. Then, we have ( 0 ) (M) = (A, M B (B A ), (id M (B ) k( 0 ))). We regard M as a right A -module by on M A by ((x y) (b z)) = (-1) We also deine a map Lemma 6.1 deine a right B A -module strcture (x y) = x (1 y). The ollowing morphism is an isomorphism in MOD A. (id A, ):(A, M A, (id M k ( 0 ))) ( 0 ) (M) A B A :(M A ) k (B A ) M A : M A M B (B A ) by deg(y)deg(b) (id M k 0 ) and (x b) yz.

32 We put = (id M k ( 0 )) and identiy ( 0 ) (M) with (A, M A A, ) by (id A, ) below. Deine a homomorphism (M): M A (M A ) A Thus we have a unctor MOD B Comod( ) by assigning an object M = (B, M,) o MOD B to (M A, ˆ (M)). We put (M A, ˆ (M)) = (( 0 ) (M), (M)). ˆ o right A -module to be the ollowing composition. (M A id M A M A M A ( A ) (M A ) A Prosition 6.2, ˆ (M)) is a right -comodule. -1 l

33 For a representation (M, ) o on M = (B, M,), we put (M, ) = (M, ). Here is a homomorphism 1 2 is the ollowing composition. A id M A (M B id M A (( 1 A id ) ) ) A M B ( A ) M A M A ( A ) M B ( A ) 0 : M M B o right B -modules. We deine homomorphisms o right A -modules 1, : M A M B ( A ) as ollows. is the ollowing composition. 2 0 Here, is the quotient map induced by 0 : A B.

34 Let us denote by : K(M,; ) M A the kernel o - : M A M B ( A ). 1 2 (M, ) We assume that : A is lat. Then, is the kernel o A id - A id : (M A ) A (M B ( A )) A. 1 2 (M, ) A id : K(M,; ) A (M A ) A Then, the ollowing diagram is commutative. (M, ) K(M,; ) (M, ) ˆ(M) M A M A (M A ) A ˆ(M) (M A ) A 1 A id (M B ( A )) A 2 A id

35 There exists unique homomorphism o right A -modules l (M): K(M,; ) K(M,; ) A that makes the ollowing diagram commute. Prosition 6.3 K(M,; ) (M, ) M A l (M) K(M,; ) A ˆ(M) (K(M,; ), (M)) is a right (M, ) l l (M A ) A (M, ) A id -comodule and :(K(M,; ), (M)) (M A, (M)) ˆ is a morphism o right -comodules.

36 Let M = (B, M,) and N = (B, N,) be objects o MOD B. For a morphism (id A, :(M, ) (N, ) be o representa- tions o, we put (M, ) = (M, ) and (N, ) = (N, ). :(N, ) (M, ) is a morphism o right -comodules. Since is natural in morphism o right 1 : K(N,; ) K(M,; ) K(N,; ) N A A id -comodules and is natural in homomorphism o right B -modules, there 2 exists unique homomorphism o right A -modules that makes the ollowing diagram commute. K(M,; ) (N, ) (M, ) M A

37 Prosition 6.4 l :(K(N,; ),(N)) (K(M,; ),(M)) is a morphism o right We deine a unctor -1 -comodules.! : Rep( ) Rep( ) l by! (M, ) = (K(M,; ),(M)) and! (id B, ) = (id A, ) or an object (M, ) and a morphism (id B, ) :(M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ). Theorem 6.5! is a let adjoint o.. l We call! (M, ) the let induced representation o (M, ) associated with.

38 For an object M = (B, M,) o MOD B, we deine a map M :(M A ) A B M ( ) : K(M,; ) A B M K(M,; ) A B (M A ) A B M We put (M, ) = (M, ). Then, by M ((x y) b) = (x 0 ( (y))b) and i (M, ) is an object o Rep( ), let us deine (M, ) to be the ollowing composition. Prosition 6.6 is a morphism o right (M, ) A id B -comodules. M ( ) :(K(M,; ) A B,((M)) ) (M, ) (M, ) l

39 Let (N, ) be a representation o and (M, ) a represen- tation o ad (M, ) (N, ). Put M = (B, M,) and N = (A, N,). We also right -comodules, ad put (M, ) = (M, ) and (N, ) = (N, ). We deine a map : Comod( )((N, ), (K(M,; ),(M))) Comod( )((N A B, ),(M, )) below. For a morphism : (N, ) (K(M,; ),(M)) o (M, ) (N, ) ( ) is the ollowing composition. A id B ( ) N A B K(M,; ) A B M l (M, ) l

40 Prosition 6.7 ad (M, ) (N, ) is bijective. Since we have the ollowing equalities, the above result shows that we have the ollowing natural bijection. Rep( )(! (M, ), (N, )) Rep( )((M, ), (N, )). This shows Theorem ! (M, ) = (K(M,; ),(M)) l. -1 (N, ) = (N A B, )

41 Remark 6.8 For an object M = (A, M,) o MOD A, we consider the the trivial right -comodule (M, ) and denote by A e (M, ) the representation which is mapped to (M, ) by M induced representation e A! (M, ) associated with e A = (id A, ) : isomorphic to the let regular e For a H algebroid in Alg k, we claim that the let representation o on M. In act, or a representation. (N, ) o, the A -comodule associated with e A (N, ) is isomorphic to the trivial right -comodule by (4.4), U : Rep( A A the orgetul unctor U : Rep( ) Comod( ). A A A A M )((M, ), e A (N, )) MOD A (M, N). A. A gives a bijection M

42 Thank you or listening and your patience.

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and

More information

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2. Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by

More information

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence

More information

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity. MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an

More information

Categories and Natural Transformations

Categories and Natural Transformations Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical

More information

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.

More information

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories ariv:1201.3789v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions

More information

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset 5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,

More information

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond Category Theory Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, 2010 Typset by Cathal Ormond Contents 1 Types, Composition and Identities 3 1.1 Programs..................................... 3 1.2 Functional Laws.................................

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the

More information

A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.

A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. DIETER HAPPEL AND DAN ZACHARIA Abstract. Let P n be the projective n space over the complex numbers. In this note we show that an indecomposable

More information

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S) Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does

More information

University of Cape Town

University of Cape Town The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where

More information

Math 248B. Base change morphisms

Math 248B. Base change morphisms Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback

More information

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.

More information

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will

More information

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012 Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Categories joseph.muscat@um.edu.mt 1 December 2012 1 Objects and Morphisms category is a class o objects with morphisms : (a way o comparing/substituting/mapping/processing to ) such

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not

More information

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 12 CHRCTERIZTION OF CENTRL EXTENSIONS IN THE VRIETY OF QUNDLES VLÉRIN EVEN, MRINO GRN ND NDRE MONTOLI bstract: The

More information

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle

More information

Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra

Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra John H. Palmieri Department of Mathematics University of Washington WCATSS, 27 August 2011 Cohomology operations cohomology operations = NatTransf(H n ( ;

More information

The Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories

The Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 69 (2003) URL: http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume69.html 19 pages The Uniormity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories Masahito Hasegawa Research

More information

Toward a representation theory of the group scheme represented by the dual Steenrod algebra. Atsushi Yamaguchi

Toward a representation theory of the group scheme represented by the dual Steenrod algebra. Atsushi Yamaguchi Toward a representation theory of the group scheme represented by the dual Steenrod algebra Atsushi Yamaguchi Struggle over how to understand the theory of unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra from

More information

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0

More information

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i

More information

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 22 and 23

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 22 and 23 Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 22 and 23 Amod Agashe December 4, 2008 1 Fibered Products (contd..) Recall the deinition o ibered products g!θ X S Y X Y π 2 π 1 S By the universal mapping property o ibered

More information

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Dragan Miličić Introduction This paper is inspired by two classical results in homological algebra o modules over an enveloping algebra lemmas o Casselman-Osborne

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017 arxiv:1710.10238v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017 Notes on clans and tribes. Joyal October 30, 2017 bstract The purpose o these notes is to give a categorical presentation/analysis o homotopy type theory. The notes

More information

THE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE

THE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new

More information

NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS

NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS CİHAN BAHRAN I will try to define the notion of a splitting field of an algebra over a field using my words, to understand it better. The sources I use are Peter Webb s and T.Y

More information

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S

More information

The basics of frame theory

The basics of frame theory First version released on 30 June 2006 This version released on 30 June 2006 The basics o rame theory Harold Simmons The University o Manchester hsimmons@ manchester.ac.uk This is the irst part o a series

More information

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories PART I Abstract algebraic categories It should be observed first that the whole concept of category is essentially an auxiliary one; our basic concepts are those of a functor and a natural transformation.

More information

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7) Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7) February 19, 2014 In this course, we will need to discuss the l-adic homology and cohomology of algebro-geometric objects of a more general nature than algebraic

More information

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 SOME EXERCISES This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 (1) Let C be a category and let X C. Prove that the assignment Y C(Y, X) is a functor

More information

Vector Bundles vs. Jesko Hüttenhain. Spring Abstract

Vector Bundles vs. Jesko Hüttenhain. Spring Abstract Vector Bundles vs. Locally Free Sheaves Jesko Hüttenhain Spring 2013 Abstract Algebraic geometers usually switch effortlessly between the notion of a vector bundle and a locally free sheaf. I will define

More information

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection 3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection is called the objects of C and is denoted Obj(C). Given

More information

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread! The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord

More information

NORI FUNDAMENTAL GERBE OF ESSENTIALLY FINITE COVERS AND GALOIS CLOSURE OF TOWERS OF TORSORS

NORI FUNDAMENTAL GERBE OF ESSENTIALLY FINITE COVERS AND GALOIS CLOSURE OF TOWERS OF TORSORS NORI FUNDAMENTAL GERBE OF ESSENTIALLY FINITE COVERS AND GALOIS CLOSURE OF TOWERS OF TORSORS MARCO ANTEI, INDRANIL BISWAS, MICHEL EMSALEM, FABIO TONINI, AND LEI ZHANG Abstract. We prove the existence o

More information

A CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT

A CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 11 A CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT Abstract: For a particular

More information

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction 1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the

More information

Homotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, and Coinvariants

Homotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, and Coinvariants LECTURE 10 Homotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, an Coinvariants Please note that proos o many o the claims in this lecture are let to Problem Set 5. Recall that a sequence o abelian groups with ierential is a

More information

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007 Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves

More information

CHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton

CHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton CHOW LEMMA Matthew Emerton The aim o this note is to prove the ollowing orm o Chow s Lemma: uppose that : is a separated inite type morphism o Noetherian schemes. Then (or some suiciently large n) there

More information

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES Theory and pplications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2012, pp. 304 330. THE COLGEBRIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES THOMS THORNE bstract. The relative cell complexes with respect to a generating set o coibrations

More information

arxiv: v3 [math.at] 28 Feb 2014

arxiv: v3 [math.at] 28 Feb 2014 arxiv:1101.1025v3 [math.at] 28 Feb 2014 CROSS EFFECTS AND CALCULUS IN AN UNBASED SETTING (WITH AN APPENDIX BY ROSONA ELDRED) KRISTINE BAUER, BRENDA JOHNSON, AND RANDY MCCARTHY Abstract. We studyunctors

More information

E ring spectra and Hopf invariant one elements

E ring spectra and Hopf invariant one elements University of Aberdeen Seminar 23rd February 2015 last updated 22/02/2015 Hopf invariant one elements Conventions: Everything will be 2-local. Homology and cohomology will usually be taken with F 2 coefficients,

More information

Weak bisimulations for coalgebras over ordered functors

Weak bisimulations for coalgebras over ordered functors Weak bisimulations or coalgebras over ordered unctors Tomasz Brengos Faculty o Mathematics and Inormation Sciences Warsaw University o Technology Koszykowa 75 00-662 Warszawa, Poland t.brengos@mini.pw.edu.pl

More information

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1) II. De Rham Cohomology There is an obvious similarity between the condition d o q 1 d q = 0 for the differentials in a singular chain complex and the condition d[q] o d[q 1] = 0 which is satisfied by the

More information

2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations

2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations 2 Coherent D-Modules As described in the introduction, any system o linear partial dierential equations can be considered as a coherent D-module. In this chapter we ocus our attention on coherent D-modules

More information

ON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION

ON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION Bulletin o the Institute o Mathematics Academia Sinica (New Series) Vol 4 (2009), No 1, pp 47-66 ON KAN ETENSION OF HOMOLOG AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION B AKRUR BEHERA AND RADHESHAM OTA Abstract Under a set

More information

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to

More information

Arrow-theoretic differential theory

Arrow-theoretic differential theory Arrow-theoretic dierential theory Urs Schreiber August 17, 2007 Abstract We propose and study a notion o a tangent (n + 1)-bundle to an arbitrary n-category Despite its simplicity, this notion turns out

More information

Unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra revisited

Unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra revisited 245 288 245 arxiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from GTM published version Unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra revisited GEOREY M L POWELL A new and natural description of the category

More information

THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY

THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, DAVID A. JORGENSEN & STEFFEN OPPERMANN Dedicated to Ranar-Ola Buchweitz on the occasion o his sixtieth birthday Abstract. We consider the homotopy cateory

More information

Kathryn Hess. Conference on Algebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009

Kathryn Hess. Conference on Algebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009 Institute of Geometry, lgebra and Topology Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Conference on lgebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009 Outline 1 2 3 4 of rings:

More information

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFYING RING OF FORMAL GROUPS WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION.

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFYING RING OF FORMAL GROUPS WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION. THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFYING RING OF FORMAL GROUPS WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION. ANDREW SALCH Abstract. If A is a commutative ring, there exists a classifying ring L A of formal groups with complex

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 9 Jul 2018

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 9 Jul 2018 MOTIVIC TAMBARA FUNCTORS TOM BACHMANN arxiv:1807.02981v1 [math.kt] 9 Jul 2018 Abstract. Let k be a ield and denote by SH(k) the motivic stable homotopy category. Recall its ull subcategory SH(k) e [2].

More information

Kathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011

Kathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011 MATHGEOM Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011 Joint work with... Steve Lack (foundations) Jonathan Scott (application

More information

SYMMETRIC MONOIDAL G-CATEGORIES AND THEIR STRICTIFICATION

SYMMETRIC MONOIDAL G-CATEGORIES AND THEIR STRICTIFICATION SYMMETRIC MONOIDAL G-CATEGORIES AND THEIR STRICTIFICATION B. GUILLOU, J.P. MAY, M. MERLING, AND A.M. OSORNO Abstract. We give an operadic deinition o a genuine symmetric monoidal G-category, and we prove

More information

Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1

Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1 Replace this ile with prentcsmacro.sty or your meeting, or with entcsmacro.sty or your meeting. Both can be ound at the ENTCS Macro Home Page. Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract)

More information

SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES

SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 26, 212, pp. 729 742. SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES SUSAN NIEFIELD Abstract. Given a double category D such that D has pushouts, we characterize

More information

Categorical Background (Lecture 2)

Categorical Background (Lecture 2) Cateorical Backround (Lecture 2) February 2, 2011 In the last lecture, we stated the main theorem o simply-connected surery (at least or maniolds o dimension 4m), which hihlihts the importance o the sinature

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we were 1 2. Yoneda s lemma 2 3. Limits and colimits 6 4. Adjoints 8 First, some bureaucratic details. We will move to 380-F for Monday

More information

OMEGA-CATEGORIES AND CHAIN COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.6(1), 2004, pp RICHARD STEINER

OMEGA-CATEGORIES AND CHAIN COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.6(1), 2004, pp RICHARD STEINER Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.6(1), 2004, pp.175 200 OMEGA-CATEGORIES AND CHAIN COMPLEXES RICHARD STEINER (communicated by Ronald Brown) Abstract There are several ways to construct omega-categories

More information

UNSTABLE MODULES OVER THE STEENROD ALGEBRA REVISITED

UNSTABLE MODULES OVER THE STEENROD ALGEBRA REVISITED UNSTABLE MODULES OVER THE STEENROD ALGEBRA REVISITED GEOREY M.L. POWELL Abstract. A new and natural description of the category of unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra as a category of comodules

More information

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS EMILY RIEHL The aim o this note is to briely summarize techniques or building weak actorization systems whose right class is characterized by a particular liting

More information

RELATIVE HOMOLOGY. M. Auslander Ø. Solberg

RELATIVE HOMOLOGY. M. Auslander Ø. Solberg RELATIVE HOMOLOGY M. Auslander Ø. Solberg Department of Mathematics Institutt for matematikk og statistikk Brandeis University Universitetet i Trondheim, AVH Waltham, Mass. 02254 9110 N 7055 Dragvoll USA

More information

DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES. Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ.

DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES. Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ. DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES J. P. MAY Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ. Definition 1. An operad C in S consists of objects C (j), j 0, a unit map η :

More information

ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES

ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 3, No. 9, 1997, pp. 213 250. ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES G. M. KELLY AND STEPHEN LACK Transmitted by R. J. Wood ABSTRACT. A category may bear many monoidal structures,

More information

NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS MARCO GRANDIS AND WALTER THOLEN Abstract. In order to acilitate a natural choice or morphisms created by the (let or right) liting property as used in the deinition o

More information

How to glue perverse sheaves

How to glue perverse sheaves How to glue perverse sheaves A.A. Beilinson The aim o this note [0] is to give a short, sel-contained account o the vanishing cycle constructions o perverse sheaves; e.g., or the needs o [1]. It diers

More information

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015 Operads Spencer Liang March 10, 2015 1 Introduction The notion of an operad was created in order to have a well-defined mathematical object which encodes the idea of an abstract family of composable n-ary

More information

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. What we re doin this week 1 2. Precise statements 2 2.1. Basic operations and properties 4 3. Provin thins 6

More information

Hopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU)

Hopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU) Hopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU) Vitaly Lorman July 1, 2012 Note: These are my notes on sections B.3 and B.4 of Doug Ravenel s Orange Book (Nilpotence and Periodicity in Stable Homotopy Theory).

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset

More information

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j. 1.51. The distinguished invertible object. Let C be a finite tensor category with classes of simple objects labeled by a set I. Since duals to projective objects are projective, we can define a map D :

More information

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry

More information

NAP Module 4. Homework 2 Friday, July 14, 2017.

NAP Module 4. Homework 2 Friday, July 14, 2017. NAP 2017. Module 4. Homework 2 Friday, July 14, 2017. These excercises are due July 21, 2017, at 10 pm. Nepal time. Please, send them to nap@rnta.eu, to laurageatti@gmail.com and schoo.rene@gmail.com.

More information

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES TOBIAS BARTHEL AND EMIL RIEHL Abstract. We present general techniques or constructing unctorial actorizations appropriate or model

More information

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ra] 12 Jan 2001

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ra] 12 Jan 2001 INTRODUCTION TO A-INFINITY ALGEBRAS AND MODULES arxiv:math/9910179v2 [math.ra] 12 Jan 2001 BERNHARD KELLER Dedicated to H. Keller on the occasion o his seventy ith birthday Abstract. These are expanded

More information

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)

More information

Completed power operations for Morava E-theory

Completed power operations for Morava E-theory Completed power operations for Morava E-theory Tobias Barthel 1 Martin Frankland* 2 1 Harvard University 2 University of Western Ontario AMS Session on Homotopy Theory Joint Mathematics Meetings, Baltimore

More information

Algebraic Geometry

Algebraic Geometry MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

and this makes M into an R-module by (1.2). 2

and this makes M into an R-module by (1.2). 2 1. Modules Definition 1.1. Let R be a commutative ring. A module over R is set M together with a binary operation, denoted +, which makes M into an abelian group, with 0 as the identity element, together

More information

3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity

3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity Ž. Journal o Algebra 236, 778795 2001 doi:10.1006jabr.2000.8526, available online at http:www.idealibrary.com on 3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity Dominique Bourn Uniersite du Littoral, 220 a. de l Uniersite,

More information

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr ) MODULI PROBLEMS AND GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY 43 5.3. Linearisations. An abstract projective scheme X does not come with a pre-specified embedding in a projective space. However, an ample line bundle

More information

Categories and functors

Categories and functors Lecture 1 Categories and functors Definition 1.1 A category A consists of a collection ob(a) (whose elements are called the objects of A) for each A, B ob(a), a collection A(A, B) (whose elements are called

More information

LECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM

LECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM LECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM 1. Introduction Suppose we wanted to prove that all p-local finite spectra of type n were evil. In general, this might be extremely hard to show. The thick subcategory

More information

Towards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language for Monad-based Semantics

Towards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language for Monad-based Semantics Towards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language or Monad-based Semantics Julian Jakob Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg julian.jakob@au.de 21.06.2016 Introductory Examples 1 2 + 3 3 9 36 4 while

More information

Representable presheaves

Representable presheaves Representable presheaves March 15, 2017 A presheaf on a category C is a contravariant functor F on C. In particular, for any object X Ob(C) we have the presheaf (of sets) represented by X, that is Hom

More information

Fibrations of bicategories

Fibrations of bicategories Fibrations o bicategories Igor Baković Faculty o Natural Sciences and Mathematics University o Split Teslina 12/III, 21000 Split, Croatia Abstract The main purpose o this work is to describe a generalization

More information

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to

More information

D-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules

D-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules D-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules Notes by Takumi Murayama Fall 2016 and Winter 2017 Contents 1 September 19 (Harold Blum) 4 1.1 Deinitions [HTT08, 1.1]...................................... 4 1.2 The

More information

MORITA EQUIVALENCE OF MANY-SORTED ALGEBRAIC THEORIES

MORITA EQUIVALENCE OF MANY-SORTED ALGEBRAIC THEORIES Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 04 39 MORITA EQUIVALENCE OF MANY-SORTED ALGEBRAIC THEORIES JIŘÍ ADÁMEK, MANUELA SOBRAL AND LURDES SOUSA Abstract: Algebraic

More information

Arithmetic invariant theory II

Arithmetic invariant theory II Arithmetic invariant theory II Manjul Bhargava, Benedict H. Gross, and Xiaoheng Wang November 3, 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Liting results 4 2.1 Pure inner orms.....................................

More information

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 ) Math 762 Spring 2016 Homework 3 Drew Armstrong Problem 1. Yoneda s Lemma. We have seen that the bifunctor Hom C (, ) : C C Set is analogous to a bilinear form on a K-vector space, : V V K. Recall that

More information

1 Categorical Background

1 Categorical Background 1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,

More information