1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity."

Transcription

1 MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity. 1.3 Functors ull=hom-unction is surjective (or every pair o objects), aithull=injective 1.4 Natural Transormations Given two unctors S, T : C B a natural transormation τ : S T is a unction which assigns to each object c o C an arrow τ c = τc: Sc T c o B in such a way that every arrow : c c in C yields a diagram c Sc τc T c S c Sc τc T c which is commutative. A natural transormation τ with every component τ c invertible in B is called natural equivalence or better a natural isomorphism. An equivalence between categories C and D is deined to be a pair o unctors S : C D, T : D C together with natural isomorphisms I c = T S, ID = S T. 1.5 Monics, Epis and Zeros monic=monomorphism, epic=epimorphism right inverse=section, let inverse=retraction An object t is terminal in C i to each object a in C there is exactly one arrow a t. Dual: initial object. A null object z in C is an object which is both initial and terminal. For any two objects a and b o C there is a unique arrow a z b, celled the zero arrow rom a to b. A groupoid is a category in which every arrow is invertible. A typical groupoid is the undamental groupoid π(x) o a topological space X. (objects=points, arrow x x =homotopy classes o paths rom x to x ) connected groupoid: there is an arrow joining any two o its objects. (It is determined up to isomorphism by a group.) 1.6 Foundations 1.7 Large Categories Ab-categories? (hom-sets are abelian groups) T 1

2 2 Construction on categories 2.1 Duality 2.2 Contravariance and Opposites 2.3 Products o categories Functors S : B C D rom a product category are called biunctors. Proposition Let B, C and D be categories. For all objects c C and b B, let L c : B D, M b : C D be unctors such that M b (c) = L c (b) or all b and c. Then there exists a biunctor S : B C D with S(, c) = L c or all c and S(b, ) = M b or all b i and only i or every pair o arrows : b b and g : c c one has M b g L c = L c M b g. These equal arrow in D are then the value S(, g) o the arrow unction o S. Proposition For biunctors S, S, the unction α which assigns to each pair o objects b B, c C an arrow α(b, c): S(b, c) S (b, c) is a natural transormation α : S S (i.e., o biunctors) i and only i α(b, c) is natural in b or each c C and natural in c or each b B. Such natural transormations appear in the undamental deinition o adjoint unctor (Chapter IV.) A unctor F : X C is the let adjoint o a unctor G: C X (opposite direction) when there is a bijection natural in x X and c C. 2.4 Functor categories hom C (F x, c) = hom x (x, Gc) B C F unct(c, B) with objects the unctors T : C B and morphism the natural transormations. Nat(S, T ) := B C (S, T ) = {τ τ : S T natural}. 2.5 The Category o All Categories We have deined a vertical composite τ σ, C σ τ B Given unctors and natural transormations, C S τ T B S τ T A (2.1) 2

3 one may construct natural transormation τ τ as (τ τ)c = T τc τ Sc = τ T C S τc. (2.2) This composition is readily shown to be associative. It moreover has identities. It is convenient to let the symbols S or a unctor also denote the identity transormation 1 S : S S. The deinition (2.2) can then be rewritten using also the vertical composition, as τ τ = (T τ) (τ S) = (τ T ) (S τ) (2.3) There is a more general rule. Given three categories and our transormations C σ τ B σ τ A (2.4) the vertical composites under and the horizontal composites under are related by the identity (interchange law) (τ σ ) (τ σ) = (τ τ) (σ σ) (2.5) Exercise 4: Let G be a topological group with identity element e, while σ, σ, τ, τ are continuous paths in G starting and ending at e. - skladanie ciest, pointwise product. Then interchange law holds. Exercise 5: (Hilton=Eckmann). Let S be a set with two (everywhere deined) binary operations : S S S, : S S S which both have the same (two-sided) unit element e and which satisy the interchange identity (2.5). Prove that and are equal, and that each is commutative. Exercise 6: Combine Exercises 5 and 6 to prove that the undamental group o a topological group is abelian. 2.6 Comma categories Category o objects under b is the category (b C) with objects all pairs, c, where c is an object o C and : b c is and arrow o c. Arrows are arrows o C (resp. commutative triangles). I a is an object o C, the category (C a) o objects over a has objects : c a. I b is an object o C and S : D C a unctor, the category (b S) o objects S-under b has an objects all pairs, d with : b Sd. (T a) o objects T -over a. Here is the general construction. Given categories and unctors E T C S D the comma category (T S), also written (T, S) has objects all triples e, d,, with d ObjD, e ObjE, and : T e Sd and as arrows e, d, e, d, all pairs k, h o arrows k : e e, h: d d such that T k = Sh. In pictures Objects e, d, T e ; arrows k, h T e T k T e (2.6) Sd Sd Sh Sd with the square commutative. The composite k, h k, h = k k, h h, when deined. 3

4 2.7 Graphs and Free Categories skipped 2.8 Quotient Categories skipped 3 Universals and limits Deinition I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S is a pair r, u consisting o an object r od D and an arrow u: c Sr o C, such that to every pair d, with d an object o D and : c Sd an arrow o C, there is a unique arrow : r d o D with S u =. In other words, every arrow to S actors uniquely through the universal arrow u, as in the commutative diagram u c Sr Sd S (3.1) Examples: Bases o vector spaces, ree categories orm graphs, ields o quotients, completion o metric space (universal or orgetul unctor rom complete metric spaces). I D is a category and H : D Set unctor, a universal element o the unctor H is a pair r, e consisting o an object r D and an element e Hr such that or every pair d, x with x Hd there is a unique arrow : r d o D with (H)e = x. Diagonal unctor: : C C C, c = c, c. 3.1 The Yoneda Lemma Proposition For a unctor S : D C a pair ru: c Sr is universal rom orm c to S i and only i the unction sending each : r d into S u: c Sd is a bijection o hom-sets D(r, d) = C(c, Sd) (3.2) This bijection is natural in d. Conversely, given r and c, any natural isomorphism (3.2) is determined in this way by a unique arrow u: c Sr such that r, u is universal rom C to s. Deinition Let D have small hom-sets. A representation o a unctor K : D Set is a pair r, ψ with r an object o D and ψ : D(r, ) = K (3.3) a natural isomorphism. The object r is called the representing object. The unctor K is said to be representable when such a representation exists. Proposition Let denote any one-point set and let D have small hom-sets. I r, u: Kr is a universal arrow rom to k : D Set, then the unction ψ which or each object d o D send the arrow : r d to K( )(u ) Kd is a representation o K. Every representation o K is obtained in this way rom exactly one such universal arrow. 4

5 The argument or Proposition rested on the observation that each natural transormation ϕ : D(r, ) K is completely determined by the image under ϕ r o the identity 1: r r. This act may be stated as ollows: Lemma (Yoneda). I k : D Set is a unctor rom D and r an object in D (or D a category with small hom-sets), there is a bijection y : Nat(D(r, ), K) = Kr (3.4) which sends each natural transormation α : D(r, ) K to α r 1 r, the image o the identity r r. Corollary For objects r, s D each natural transormation D(r, ) D(s, ) has the orm D(h, ) or a unique arrow h: s r. Lemma The bijection o 3.4 is a natural isomorphism y : N E between the unctors E, N : Set D D Set. 3.2 Coproducts and Colimits Cokernels. Suppose that C has zero object z, so that or any two objects b, c C there is a zero arrow 0: b z c. The cokernel o : a b is then an arrow u: b e such that (i) u = 0: ae; (ii) i h: b c has h = 0, then h = h u or a unique arrow h : e c. The picture is 3.3 Products and limits a b 3.4 Categories with inite products u h e u = 0, h c h = 0. Proposition I a category C has a terminal object t and a product diagram a a b b or any two o its objects, then C has all inite products. The product object provide, by a, b a b, a biunctor C C C. For any three objects there is an isomorphism α = α a,b,c : a (b c) = (a b) c (3.5) natural in a, b and c. For any object a there are isomorphisms λ = λ a : t a = a ϱ = ϱ a : a t = a (3.6) which are natural in a, where t is the terminal object o C. 3.5 Groups in categories Let C be a category with inite products products and a terminal object t. Then a monoid in C is a triple c, µ: c c c, η : t c, such that the ollowing diagrams commute c (c c) α (c c) c η 1 c c (3.7) 1 µ c c µ c µ 5

6 η 1 t c c c λ µ 1 η ϱ c c t (3.8) µ=multiplication, α=asocitivity isomorphism o (3.5). We now deine a group in C to be a monoid c, µ, η together with an arrow ξ : c c which makes the diagram (with δ c the diagonal) c δ c c c 1 η c c (3.9) t η c µ commute (ξ=right inverse). Proposition I C is a category with inite products, then an object c is a group (or, a monoid) in C i and only i the hom unctor C(, c) is a qroup (respectively, a monoid) in the unctor category Set Cop. 4 Adjoints 4.1 Adjunctions Deinition Let A and X be categories. F, G, ϕ : XA, where F and G are unctors An adjunction rom X to A is a triple F G F G while ϕ is a unction which assigns to each pair o objects x X, a A a bijection which is natural in x and a. ϕ = ϕ x,a : A(F x, a) = X(x, Ga) (4.1) An adjunction may also be described without hom-sets directly in terms o arrows. It is a bijection which assigns to each arrow : F x a an arrow ϕ = rad : x Ga, the right adjunct o, in such a way that the naturality conditions ϕ( F h) = ϕ h, ϕ(k ) = Gk ϕ, (4.2) hold or all and all arrows h: x x and k : a a. It is equivalent to require that ϕ 1 be natural; i.e., that or every h, k and g : x Ga one has ϕ 1 (gh) = ϕ 1 g F h, ϕ 1 (Gk g) = k ϕ 1 g. (4.3) Given such an adjunctions, the unctor F is said to be a let-adjoint or G, while G is called a right adjoint or F. (TODO Find TEXequivalent!!!) Every adjunction yields a universal arrow. Speciically, set a = F x in (4.1). The let hand hom-set o (4.1) then contains the identity 1: F x F x; call its ϕ-image η x. By Yoneda s 6

7 Proposition this η x is a universal arrow η x or every objects x. Moreover, the unction x η x is a natural transormation I X F G. The bijection ϕ can be expressed in terms o the arrow η x as ϕ() = G()η x or : F x a. (4.4) Theorem An adjunction F, G, ϕ : X A determines (i) A natural transormation η : I x GF such that or each object x the arrow η x is universal to G rom x, while the right adjunct o each : F x a is ϕ = G η x : x Ga; (4.5) (ii) A natural transormation ε: F G I A such that arrow ε a is universal to a rom F, while each g : x Ga has let adjunct ϕ 1 g = ε a F g : F x a. (4.6) Moreover, both the ollowing composites are the identities (o G, resp. F ). G ηg GF G Gε G, F We call η unit and ε the counit o the adjunction. F η F GF εf F. (4.7) Theorem Each adjunction F, G, ϕ : X A is completely determined by the items in any one o the ollowing lists: (i) Functors, G and a natural transormation η : 1 x GF such that each η x : x GF x is universal rom G to x. The ϕ id deined by (4.5). (ii) The unctor G: A X and or each x X an object F 0 x A and a universal arrow η x : x GF 0 x rom x to G. Then the unctor F has object unction F 0 and is deined on arrow h: x x by GF h η x = η x h. (iii) Functors F, G and a natural transormation ε : F G I A such that each ε a : F Ga a is universal rom F to a. Here ϕ 1 is deined by (4.6). (iv) The unctor F : X A and or each a A an object G 0 a X and an arrow ε a : F G 0 a a universal rom F to a. (v) Functors F, G and natural transormations η : I X GF and ε : GF I A such that both composites (4.7) are the identity transormations. Here ϕ is deined by (4.5) and ϕ 1 by (4.6). Corollary Any two let-adjoints F and F o a unctor G: A X are naturally isomorphic. Corollary A unctor G: A X has a let adjoint i and only i, or each x X, the unctor X(x, Ga) is representable as a unctor o a A. I ϕ: A(F 0 x, a) = X(x, Ga) is representation o this unctor, then F 0 is the object unction o a let-adjoint o G or which the bijection ϕ is natural in a and gives the adjunction. Theorem I the additive unctor G: A M between Ab-categories A and M has a let adjoint F : M A, then F is additive and the adjunction bijections ϕ: A(F m, a) = M(m, Ga) are isomorphisms o abelian groups (or all m M, a A). 7

8 4.2 Examples o Adjoints 4.3 Relective Subcategories Theorem For an adjunction F, G, η, ε : X A: (i) G is aithul i and only i every component ε a o the counit ε is epi, (ii) G is ull i and only i every ε a is a split monic. Hence G is ull and aithul i and only i each ε a is an isomorphism F Ga = a. Lemma Let : A(a, ) A(b, ) be the natural transormation induced by an arrow : b a o A. Then is monic i and only i is epi, while is epi i and only i is a split monic (i.e., i and only i has a let inverse). A subcategory A o B is called relective in B when the inclusion unctor K : A B has a let adjoint F : B A. This unctor F may be called a relector and the adjunction F, K, ϕ = F, ϕ : B A a relection o B in its subcategory A. 4.4 Equivalence o Categories skipped 4.5 Adjoints or Preorders skipped 4.6 Cartesian Closed Categories To assert that a category C has all inite products and coproducts is to assert that the unctors C 1 and : C C C have both let and right adjoints. Indeed, the let adjoints give initial object and coproduct respectively, while the right adjoints give terminal object and product, respectively. A category C with all inite products speciically given is called cartesian closed when each o the ollowing unctors C 1, C C C, C b C, c 0, c c, c, a a b has a speciied right adjoint (with a speciied adjunction). This adjoints are written as ollows t 0, a b a, b, c b c TODO oprav to na otocena mapsto The third required adjoint speciies or each unctor b: C C a right adjoint, with the corresponding bijection hom(a b, c) = hom(a, c b ) natural in a and c. By the parameter theorem (to be proved in the next section), b, c c b is then (the object unction o) a biunctor C op C C. Speciying the adjunction amounts to speciying or each c and b an arrow e e: c b b c 8

9 which is natural in c and universal orm b to c. We call e = e b the evaluation map. Exercise 1: a) I U is any set, show that the preorder P(U) o all subsets o U is a cartesian closed category. b) Show that any Boolean algebra, regarded as a preorder, is cartesian closed. Exercise 3: In any cartesian closed category, prove c t = c and c b b = (c b ) b. Exercise 4: In any cartesian closed category obtain a natural transormation c b b a c a which agrees in Set with composition o unctions. Prove it (like composition) associative. Exercise 5: Show that A cartesian closed need not imply A J cartesian closed. 9

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond Category Theory Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, 2010 Typset by Cathal Ormond Contents 1 Types, Composition and Identities 3 1.1 Programs..................................... 3 1.2 Functional Laws.................................

More information

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012 Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Categories joseph.muscat@um.edu.mt 1 December 2012 1 Objects and Morphisms category is a class o objects with morphisms : (a way o comparing/substituting/mapping/processing to ) such

More information

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence

More information

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S

More information

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions

More information

Categories and functors

Categories and functors Lecture 1 Categories and functors Definition 1.1 A category A consists of a collection ob(a) (whose elements are called the objects of A) for each A, B ob(a), a collection A(A, B) (whose elements are called

More information

Categories and Natural Transformations

Categories and Natural Transformations Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical

More information

Category Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017

Category Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017 Category Theory 2 Category Theory Travis Dirle December 12, 2017 2 Contents 1 Categories 1 2 Construction on Categories 7 3 Universals and Limits 11 4 Adjoints 23 5 Limits 31 6 Generators and Projectives

More information

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset 5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,

More information

Review of category theory

Review of category theory Review of category theory Proseminar on stable homotopy theory, University of Pittsburgh Friday 17 th January 2014 Friday 24 th January 2014 Clive Newstead Abstract This talk will be a review of the fundamentals

More information

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction 1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the

More information

An Introduction to Topos Theory

An Introduction to Topos Theory An Introduction to Topos Theory Ryszard Paweł Kostecki Institute o Theoretical Physics, University o Warsaw, Hoża 69, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland email: ryszard.kostecki % uw.edu.pl June 26, 2011 Abstract

More information

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. CATEGORY THEORY PROFESSOR PETER JOHNSTONE Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. Definition 1.1. A category C consists

More information

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will

More information

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories PART I Abstract algebraic categories It should be observed first that the whole concept of category is essentially an auxiliary one; our basic concepts are those of a functor and a natural transformation.

More information

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

Category Theory. Categories. Definition. Category Theory Category theory is a general mathematical theory of structures, systems of structures and relationships between systems of structures. It provides a unifying and economic mathematical modeling

More information

{1X } if X = Y otherwise.

{1X } if X = Y otherwise. C T E G O R Y T H E O R Y Dr E. L. Cheng e.cheng@dpmms.cam.ac.uk http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/ elgc2 Michaelmas 2002 1 Categories, unctors and natural transormations 1.1 Categories DEFINITION 1.1.1 category

More information

Category Theory 1 Categories and functors

Category Theory 1 Categories and functors Category Theory 1 Categories and functors This is to accompany the reading of 1 7 October and the lecture of 8 October. mistakes and obscurities to T.Leinster@maths.gla.ac.uk. Please report Some questions

More information

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid Symbol Index 409 Symbol Index Symbols of standard and uncontroversial usage are generally not included here. As in the word index, boldface page-numbers indicate pages where definitions are given. If a

More information

Categories and Modules

Categories and Modules Categories and odules Takahiro Kato arch 2, 205 BSTRCT odules (also known as profunctors or distributors) and morphisms among them subsume categories and functors and provide more general and abstract

More information

Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi

Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions

More information

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection 3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection is called the objects of C and is denoted Obj(C). Given

More information

University of Cape Town

University of Cape Town The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial

More information

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07)

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07) P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Košice Project 2005/NP1-051 11230100466 Basic information Extent: 2 hrs lecture/1 hrs seminar per week. Assessment: Written tests during the semester, written

More information

C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY

C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY PAVEL SAFRONOV WITH MINOR UPDATES 2019 BY FRANCES KIRWAN Contents Introduction 2 Literature 3 1. Basic definitions 3 1.1. Categories 3 1.2. Set-theoretic issues 4 1.3. Functors 5

More information

Lectures on Homological Algebra. Weizhe Zheng

Lectures on Homological Algebra. Weizhe Zheng Lectures on Homological Algebra Weizhe Zheng Morningside Center of Mathematics Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190, China University of the Chinese Academy

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the

More information

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.

More information

1 Cartesian bicategories

1 Cartesian bicategories 1 Cartesian bicategories We now expand the scope of application of system Beta, by generalizing the notion of (discrete) cartesian bicategory 1. Here we give just a fragment of the theory, with a more

More information

Notes on Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves

Notes on Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves Notes on Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves Ryan Reich June 4, 2009 In this paper I provide something o a skeleton key to A.A. Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves [1], which I ound hard to understand

More information

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY VIVEK SHENDE A ring is a set R with two binary operations, an addition + and a multiplication. Always there should be an identity 0 for addition, an

More information

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R) CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS J. P. MAY Contents 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R) 1 2. Symmetric monoidal categories, K(C), and Pic(C) 2 3. The unit endomorphism ring R(C ) 5 4.

More information

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories ariv:1201.3789v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions

More information

Lecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT.

Lecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT. Lecture 15: Duality We ended the last lecture by introducing one of the main characters in the remainder of the course, a topological quantum field theory (TQFT). At this point we should, of course, elaborate

More information

Assume the left square is a pushout. Then the right square is a pushout if and only if the big rectangle is.

Assume the left square is a pushout. Then the right square is a pushout if and only if the big rectangle is. COMMUTATIVE ALGERA LECTURE 2: MORE CATEGORY THEORY VIVEK SHENDE Last time we learned about Yoneda s lemma, and various universal constructions initial and final objects, products and coproducts (which

More information

The basics of frame theory

The basics of frame theory First version released on 30 June 2006 This version released on 30 June 2006 The basics o rame theory Harold Simmons The University o Manchester hsimmons@ manchester.ac.uk This is the irst part o a series

More information

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 SOME EXERCISES This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 (1) Let C be a category and let X C. Prove that the assignment Y C(Y, X) is a functor

More information

ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES

ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 3, No. 9, 1997, pp. 213 250. ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES G. M. KELLY AND STEPHEN LACK Transmitted by R. J. Wood ABSTRACT. A category may bear many monoidal structures,

More information

The Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories

The Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 69 (2003) URL: http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume69.html 19 pages The Uniormity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories Masahito Hasegawa Research

More information

Basic Category Theory

Basic Category Theory BRICS LS-95-1 J. van Oosten: Basic Category Theory BRICS Basic Research in Computer Science Basic Category Theory Jaap van Oosten BRICS Lecture Series LS-95-1 ISSN 1395-2048 January 1995 Copyright c 1995,

More information

Adjunctions! Everywhere!

Adjunctions! Everywhere! Adjunctions! Everywhere! Carnegie Mellon University Thursday 19 th September 2013 Clive Newstead Abstract What do free groups, existential quantifiers and Stone-Čech compactifications all have in common?

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.

More information

MISHA GAVRILOVICH, ALEXANDER LUZGAREV, AND VLADIMIR SOSNILO PRELIMINARY DRAFT

MISHA GAVRILOVICH, ALEXANDER LUZGAREV, AND VLADIMIR SOSNILO PRELIMINARY DRAFT A DECIDABLE EQUATIONAL FRAGMENT OF CATEGORY THEORY WITHOUT AUTOMORPHISMS MISHA GAVRILOVICH, ALEXANDER LUZGAREV, AND VLADIMIR SOSNILO Abstract. We record an observation of Nikolai Durov that there is a

More information

THE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE

THE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new

More information

WIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES

WIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES WIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES MARTIN HERSCHEND, PETER JØRGENSEN, AND LAERTIS VASO Abstract. A subcategory of an abelian category is wide if it is closed under sums, summands, kernels,

More information

1 Categorical Background

1 Categorical Background 1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,

More information

A brief Introduction to Category Theory

A brief Introduction to Category Theory A brief Introduction to Category Theory Dirk Hofmann CIDMA, Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal Office: 11.3.10, dirk@ua.pt, http://sweet.ua.pt/dirk/ October 9, 2017

More information

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITS AND COLIMITS IN -CATEGORIES

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITS AND COLIMITS IN -CATEGORIES ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITS ND COLIMITS IN -CTEGORIES EMILY RIEHL ND DOMINIC VERITY bstract. In previous work, we introduce an axiomatic ramework within which to prove theorems about many varieties o

More information

INTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES

INTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES INTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES 1. Why correspondences? This part introduces one of the two main innovations in this book the (, 2)-category of correspondences as a way to encode

More information

DUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS

DUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS DUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS GEORG BIEDERMANN AND BORIS CHORNY Abstract. The homotopy theory o small unctors is a useul tool or studying various questions in homotopy theory. In this paper, we develop the

More information

University of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor

University of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theory Seminar University of Oxford, Michaelis 2011 November 16, 2011 References Johnstone, P.T.: Sketches of an Elephant. A Topos-Theory Compendium.

More information

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors Contents 5 Grothendieck topologies 1 6 Exactness properties 10 7 Geometric morphisms 17 8 Points and Boolean localization 22 5 Grothendieck topologies A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017 arxiv:1710.10238v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017 Notes on clans and tribes. Joyal October 30, 2017 bstract The purpose o these notes is to give a categorical presentation/analysis o homotopy type theory. The notes

More information

are additive in each variable. Explicitly, the condition on composition means that given a diagram

are additive in each variable. Explicitly, the condition on composition means that given a diagram 1. Abelian categories Most of homological algebra can be carried out in the setting of abelian categories, a class of categories which includes on the one hand all categories of modules and on the other

More information

Introduction to Restriction Categories

Introduction to Restriction Categories Introduction to Restriction Categories Robin Cockett Department of Computer Science University of Calgary Alberta, Canada robin@cpsc.ucalgary.ca Estonia, March 2010 Defining restriction categories Examples

More information

LOCALIZATIONS, COLOCALIZATIONS AND NON ADDITIVE -OBJECTS

LOCALIZATIONS, COLOCALIZATIONS AND NON ADDITIVE -OBJECTS LOCALIZATIONS, COLOCALIZATIONS AND NON ADDITIVE -OBJECTS GEORGE CIPRIAN MODOI Abstract. Given two arbitrary categories, a pair of adjoint functors between them induces three pairs of full subcategories,

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not

More information

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Matt Booth June 3, 2016 Contents 1 Sheaves on topological spaces 1 1.1 Presheaves on spaces......................... 1 1.2 Digression on pointless topology..................

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where

More information

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Takahiro Kato June 23, 2015 This article provides yet another characterization of Boolean algebras and, using this characterization, establishes a more direct connection

More information

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS EMILY RIEHL The aim o this note is to briely summarize techniques or building weak actorization systems whose right class is characterized by a particular liting

More information

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and

More information

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 23

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 23 MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 23 6.4. Homotopy uniqueness of projective resolutions. Here I proved that the projective resolution of any R-module (or any object of an abelian category

More information

Limit Preservation from Naturality

Limit Preservation from Naturality CTCS 2004 Preliminary Version Limit Preservation from Naturality Mario Caccamo 1 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Cambridge, UK Glynn Winskel 2 University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory Cambridge,

More information

Coreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic

Coreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic Coreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic Bart Jacobs Jorik Mandemaker Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Abstract Various generalizations of Boolean algebras are being studied in algebraic quantum

More information

Modèles des langages de programmation Domaines, catégories, jeux. Programme de cette seconde séance:

Modèles des langages de programmation Domaines, catégories, jeux. Programme de cette seconde séance: Modèles des langages de programmation Domaines, catégories, jeux Programme de cette seconde séance: Modèle ensembliste du lambda-calcul ; Catégories cartésiennes fermées 1 Synopsis 1 the simply-typed λ-calculus,

More information

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Dragan Miličić Introduction This paper is inspired by two classical results in homological algebra o modules over an enveloping algebra lemmas o Casselman-Osborne

More information

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S) Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does

More information

Math 757 Homology theory

Math 757 Homology theory theory Math 757 theory January 27, 2011 theory Definition 90 (Direct sum in Ab) Given abelian groups {A α }, the direct sum is an abelian group A with s γ α : A α A satifying the following universal property

More information

Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma. 1. Hom(X, ) is left exact

Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma. 1. Hom(X, ) is left exact (April 8, 2010) Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ The best way to understand or remember left-exactness or right-exactness

More information

Topos Theory. Lectures 21 and 22: Classifying toposes. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello. The notion of classifying topos

Topos Theory. Lectures 21 and 22: Classifying toposes. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello. The notion of classifying topos Lectures 21 and 22: toposes of 2 / 30 Toposes as mathematical universes of Recall that every Grothendieck topos E is an elementary topos. Thus, given the fact that arbitrary colimits exist in E, we can

More information

2. ETALE GROUPOIDS MARK V. LAWSON

2. ETALE GROUPOIDS MARK V. LAWSON 2. ETALE GROUPOIDS MARK V. LAWSON Abstract. In this article, we define étale groupoids and describe some of their properties. 1. Generalities 1.1. Categories. A category is usually regarded as a category

More information

Recall: a mapping f : A B C (where A, B, C are R-modules) is called R-bilinear if f is R-linear in each coordinate, i.e.,

Recall: a mapping f : A B C (where A, B, C are R-modules) is called R-bilinear if f is R-linear in each coordinate, i.e., 23 Hom and We will do homological algebra over a fixed commutative ring R. There are several good reasons to take a commutative ring: Left R-modules are the same as right R-modules. [In general a right

More information

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i

More information

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007 Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves

More information

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES Theory and pplications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2012, pp. 304 330. THE COLGEBRIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES THOMS THORNE bstract. The relative cell complexes with respect to a generating set o coibrations

More information

Modules over a Ringed Space

Modules over a Ringed Space Modules over a Ringed Space Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect some useful facts about sheaves of modules on a ringed space that are either left as exercises in [Har77] or omitted

More information

Algebraic Geometry

Algebraic Geometry MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

Category Theory. Lectures by Peter Johnstone Notes by David Mehrle Cambridge University Mathematical Tripos Part III Michaelmas 2015

Category Theory. Lectures by Peter Johnstone Notes by David Mehrle Cambridge University Mathematical Tripos Part III Michaelmas 2015 Category Theory Lectures by Peter Johnstone Notes by David Mehrle dm33@cam.ac.uk Cambridge University Mathematical Tripos Part III Michaelmas 2015 Contents 1 Introduction.................................

More information

Theory of Categories 1. Notes M. Grandis Laurea e Laurea Magistrale in Matematica, Genova.

Theory of Categories 1. Notes M. Grandis Laurea e Laurea Magistrale in Matematica, Genova. Theory of Categories 1. Notes M. Grandis Laurea e Laurea Magistrale in Matematica, Genova. 0. Introduction Category Theory yields a general frame for studying mathematical structures and their universal

More information

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2. Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by

More information

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS SEFI LADKANI Abstract. By using only combinatorial data on two posets X and Y, we construct a set of so-called formulas. A formula produces simultaneously, for

More information

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

More information

Derived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino

Derived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino Derived Categories Mistuo Hoshino Contents 01. Cochain complexes 02. Mapping cones 03. Homotopy categories 04. Quasi-isomorphisms 05. Mapping cylinders 06. Triangulated categories 07. Épaisse subcategories

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 12 Nov 2015

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 12 Nov 2015 double-dimensional approach to ormal category theory Seerp Roald Koudenburg arxiv:1511.04070v1 [math.t] 12 Nov 2015 Drat version as o November 13, 2015 bstract Whereas ormal category theory is classically

More information

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY 1. Categories 1.1. Generalities. I ve tried to be as consistent as possible. In particular, throughout the text below, categories will be denoted by capital

More information

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to

More information

The synthetic theory of -categories vs the synthetic theory of -categories

The synthetic theory of -categories vs the synthetic theory of -categories Emily Riehl Johns Hopkins University The synthetic theory of -categories vs the synthetic theory of -categories joint with Dominic Verity and Michael Shulman Vladimir Voevodsky Memorial Conference The

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset

More information

Dual Adjunctions Between Algebras and Coalgebras

Dual Adjunctions Between Algebras and Coalgebras Dual Adjunctions Between Algebras and Coalgebras Hans E. Porst Department of Mathematics University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany porst@math.uni-bremen.de Abstract It is shown that the dual algebra

More information

Homotopy Theory of Topological Spaces and Simplicial Sets

Homotopy Theory of Topological Spaces and Simplicial Sets Homotopy Theory of Topological Spaces and Simplicial Sets Jacobien Carstens May 1, 2007 Bachelorthesis Supervision: prof. Jesper Grodal KdV Institute for mathematics Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mathematics

More information

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Takahiro Kato September 10, 2015 ABSTRACT. This article provides yet another characterization of Boolean algebras and, using this characterization, establishes a

More information

Modules over a Scheme

Modules over a Scheme Modules over a Scheme Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect various facts about quasi-coherent sheaves on a scheme. Nearly all of the material is trivial or can be found in [Gro60]. These

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO PERVERSE SHEAVES. Antoine Chambert-Loir

AN INTRODUCTION TO PERVERSE SHEAVES. Antoine Chambert-Loir AN INTRODUCTION TO PERVERSE SHEAVES Antoine Chambert-Loir Antoine Chambert-Loir Université Paris-Diderot. E-mail : Antoine.Chambert-Loir@math.univ-paris-diderot.fr Version of February 15, 2018, 10h48 The

More information

2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations

2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations 2 Coherent D-Modules As described in the introduction, any system o linear partial dierential equations can be considered as a coherent D-module. In this chapter we ocus our attention on coherent D-modules

More information

Topological aspects of restriction categories

Topological aspects of restriction categories Calgary 2006, Topological aspects of restriction categories, June 1, 2006 p. 1/22 Topological aspects of restriction categories Robin Cockett robin@cpsc.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Calgary 2006,

More information

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 12 CHRCTERIZTION OF CENTRL EXTENSIONS IN THE VRIETY OF QUNDLES VLÉRIN EVEN, MRINO GRN ND NDRE MONTOLI bstract: The

More information

Introduction to Chiral Algebras

Introduction to Chiral Algebras Introduction to Chiral Algebras Nick Rozenblyum Our goal will be to prove the fact that the algebra End(V ac) is commutative. The proof itself will be very easy - a version of the Eckmann Hilton argument

More information

CUBICAL APPROXIMATION FOR DIRECTED TOPOLOGY

CUBICAL APPROXIMATION FOR DIRECTED TOPOLOGY CUBICAL APPROXIMATION FOR DIRECTED TOPOLOGY SANJEEVI KRISHNAN Abstract. Topological spaces - such as classifying spaces, configuration spaces and spacetimes - often admit extra directionality. Qualitative

More information

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry

More information