Oriented Bivariant Theories, I
|
|
- Anissa Cox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ESI The Erwin Schrödiner International Boltzmannasse 9 Institute or Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Oriented Bivariant Theories, I Shoji Yokura Vienna, Preprint ESI April 27, 2007 Supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry o Education, Science and Culture Available via
2 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I SHOJI YOKURA ABSTRACT. In 1981 W. Fulton and R. MacPherson introduced the notion o bivariant theory BT, which is a sophisticated uniication o covariant theories and contravariant theories. This is or the study o sinular spaces. In 2001 M. Levine and F. Morel introduced the notion o alebraic cobordism, which is a universal oriented Borel Moore unctor with products OBMF o eometric type, in an attempt to understand better V. Voevodsky s hiher alebraic cobordism. In this paper we introduce a notion o oriented bivariant theory OBT, a special case o which is nothin but the oriented Borel Moore unctor with products. The present paper is a irst one o the series to try to understand Levine Morel s alebraic cobordism rom a bivariant-theoretical viewpoint, and its irst step is to introduce OBT as a uniication o BT and OBMF. 1. INTRODUCTION William Fulton and Robert MacPherson have introduced the notion o bivariant theory as a cateorical ramework or the study o sinular spaces, which is the title o their AMS Memoir book [FM] see also Fulton s book [Fu]. The main objective o [FM] is bivarianttheoretic Riemann Roch s or bivariant analoues o various theorems o Grothendieck Riemann Roch type. Vladimir Voevodsky has introduced alebraic cobordism now called hiher alebraic cobordism, which was used in his proo o Milnor s conjecture [Voe]. Daniel Quillen introduced the notion o complex oriented cohomoloy theory on the cateory o dierential maniolds [Qui] and this notion can be ormally extended to the cateory o smooth schemes in alebraic eometry. Marc Levine and Fabien Morel constructed a universal oriented cohomoloy theory, which they also call alebraic cobordism, and have investiated urthermore see [L1, L2, LM1, LM2, LM3] and also see [Mer] or a condensed review. Recently M. Levine and R. Pandharipande [LP] ave another equivalent construction o the alebraic cobodism via what they call double point deeneration and they ound a nice application o the alebraic cobordism in the Donaldson Thomas theory o 3-olds. In this paper we extend Fulton MacPherson s bivariant theory to what we call an oriented bivariant theory or a eneral cateory, not just or a eometric cateory o, say, complex alebraic varieties, schemes, etc. In most interestin cases bivariant theories such as bivariant homoloy theory, bivariant Chow roup theory, bivariant alebraic K-theory and bivariant topoloical K-theory are already oriented bivariant theories. We show that even in this eneral cateory there exists a universal oriented bivariant theory, whose special case ives rise to a universal oriented Borel Moore unctor with products. Levine Morel s alebraic cobordism requires more eometrical conditions. Indeed, they call alebraic cobordism a universal oriented Borel Moore unctor with products o eometric type [LM3]. In a second paper [Yo1] we will deal with an oriented bivariant theory o eometric type. * Partially supported by Grant-in-Aid or Scientiic Research No and No , the Ministry o Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technoloy MEXT, and JSPS Core-to-Core Proram 18005, Japan. 1
3 2 SHOJI YOKURA One purpose o this paper is to brin Fulton MacPherson s Bivariant Theory to the attention o people workin on alebraic cobordism and/or subjects related to it. 2. FULTON MACPHERSON S BIVARIANT THEORY We make a quick review o Fulton MacPherson s bivariant theory [FM]. Let V be a cateory which has a inal object pt and on which the iber product or iber square is well-deined. Also we consider a class o maps, called conined maps e.., proper maps, projective maps, in alebraic eometry, which are closed under composition and base chane and contain all the identity maps, and a calss o iber squares, called independent squares or conined squares, e.., Tor-independent in alebraic eometry, a iber square with some extra conditions required on morphisms o the square, which satisy the ollowin: i i the two inside squares in X h X X or Y Y h Y X Y h h X Y Z h are independent, then the outside square is also independent, ii any square o the ollowin orms are independent: Z X id X X X Y where : X Y is any morphism. id X Y idx Y X Y A bivariant theory B on a cateory V with values in the cateory o raded abelian roups is an assinment to each morphism X Y in the cateory V a raded abelian roup in the rest o the paper we inore the radin BX Y which is equipped with the ollowin three basic operations: Product operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z, the product operation id Y is deined. : BX Y BY Z BX Z
4 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 3 Pushorward operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z with conined, the pushorward operation : BX Z BY Z is deined. Pullback operations: For an independent square the pullback operation X Y X Y, : BX Y BX Y is deined. And these three operations are required to satisy the seven compatibility axioms see [FM, Part I, 2.2] or details: B-1 product is associative, B-2 pushorward is unctorial, B-3 pullback is unctorial, B-4 product and pushorward commute, B-5 product and pullback commute, B-6 pushorward and pullback commute, and B-7 projection ormula. Let B, B be two bivariant theories on a cateory V. Then a Grothendieck transormation rom B to B γ : B B is a collection o homomorphisms BX Y B X Y or a morphism X Y in the cateory V, which preserves the above three basic operations: i γα B β = γα B γβ, ii γ α = γα, and iii γ α = γα. For more details o interestin eometric and/or topoloical examples o bivariant theories e.., bivariant theory o constructible unctions, bivariant homoloy theory, bivariant K-theory, etc., and Grothendieck transormations amon bivariant theories, see [FM]. In this paper we treat with bivariant theories more abstractly rom a eneral viewpoint. A bivariant theory uniies both a covariant theory and a contravariant theory in the ollowin sense: B X := BX pt become a covariant unctor or conined morphisms and B X := BX id X become a contravariant unctor or any morphisms. And a Grothendieck transormation γ : B B induces natural transormations γ : B B and γ : B B. As to the radin, B i X := B i X id X and B j X := B j X id X. In the rest o the paper we assume that our bivariant theories are commutative see [FM, 2.2], i.e., i whenever both
5 4 SHOJI YOKURA W X W Y Y Z X Z are independent squares, then or α BX Z and β BY Z α β = β α. Note: i α β = 1 deαdeβ β α, then it is called skew-commutative. Another assumption in the rest o the paper, which is not in Fulton MacPherson s bivariant theory, is the ollowin additivity: BX Y Z = BX X Z BY Y Z. When we want to emphasize this additivity, we call such a bivariant theory an additive bivariant theory. Deinition 2.1. [FM, Deinition, Part I] Let S be a class o maps in V, which is closed under compositions and containin all identity maps. Suppose that to each : X Y in S there is assined an element θ BX Y satisyin that i θ = θ θ or all : X Y, : Y Z S and ii θid X = 1 X or all X with 1 X B X := BX idx X the unit element. Then θ is called a canonical orientation o. Note that such a canonical orientation makes the covariant unctor B X a contravariant unctor or morphisms in S, and also makes the contravariant unctor B a covariant unctor or morphisms in C S: Indeed, * or a morphism : X Y S and the canonical orientation θ on S the ollowin Gysin homomorphism! : B Y B X deined by! α := θ α is contravariantly unctorial. And ** or a iber square which is an independent square by hypothesis X Y id X idy X Y, where C S, the ollowin Gysin homomorphism! : B X B Y deined by! α := α θ is coavariantly unctorial. The notation should carry the inormation o S and the canonical orientation θ, but it will be usually omitted i it is not necessary to be mentioned. Note that the above conditions i and ii o Deinition 2.1 are certainly necessary or the above Gysin homomorphisms to be unctorial. Deinition 2.2. i Let S be another class o maps in V, called specialized maps e.., smooth maps in alebraic eometry, which is closed under composition and under base chane and containin all identity maps. Let B be a bivariant theory. I S has canonical orientations in B, then we say that S is canonical B-orientable and an element o S is
6 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 5 called a canonical B-orientable morphism. O course S is also a class o conined maps, but since we consider the above extra condition o B-orientability on S, we ive a dierent name to S. ii Let S be as in i. Let B be a bivariant theory and S be canonical B-orientable. Furthermore, i the orientation θ on S satisies that or a iber square with S the ollowin condition holds X X Y Y θ = θ, which means that the orientation θ preserves the pullback operation, then we call θ a nice canonical orientation and say that S is nice canonical B-orientable and an element o S is called a nice canonical B-orientable morphism. Proposition 2.3. Let B be a bivariant theory and let S be as above. 1 Deine the natural exterior product by : BX pt BY πy pt BX Y pt α β := π Y α β. Then the covariant unctor B or conined morphisms and the contravariant unctor B or morphisms in S are both compatible with the exterior product, i.e., or conined morphisms : X X, : Y Y, α β = α β and or morphisms : X X, : Y Y in S, by! α β =! α! β. 2 Similarly, deine the natural exterior product : BX idx X BY idy Y BX Y idx X X X α β := p 1 α p 2 β where p 1 : X Y X and p 2 : X Y Y be the projections. Then the contravariant unctor B or any morphisms and the covariant unctor B or morphisms in C S are both compatible with the exterior product, i.e., or any morphisms : X X, : Y Y, α β = α β and or morphisms : X X, : Y Y in C S,! α β =! α! β. Proo. The proo is tedious, usin several axioms o the bivariant theory. For the sake o completeness we ive a proo. But, we ive a proo or only 1 and a proo or 2 is let or the reader. For morphisms : X X and : Y Y, consider the ollowin bi commutative diarams
7 6 SHOJI YOKURA X Y Id X Id Y X Y Id X p Id Y pt Y = Y X Y Id Y X Y p Id Y pt Y = Y Id X q q Id X q X = X pt X = X pt p The proo o α β = α β oes as ollows: pt. α β = q α β by deinition = q α β = Id X Id Y q α β = Id X Id Y q α β by B-4 = Id X Id Y q α β by B-6 = Id X q α β by B-6 = q α β by B-7 = α β by deinition Next we show! α β =! α! β. For this, irst we observe that On one hand we have that! := θ θ.! α β = θ θ q α β by deinition On the other hand we have that = θ θ q α β = Id X Id Y q θ p Id Y θ q α β! α! β = θ α θ β by deinition = q θ α θ β = q θ α θ β = Id Y q α q α θ β = Id X Id Y q θ q α θ β = Id X Id Y q θ p Id Y θ q α β The last equality ollows rom the commutativity o the bivariant theory. Thus we et the above equality.
8 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 7 Proposition 2.4. Let B be a bivaraint theory on a cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms. Let S be a class o nice B-orientable morphisms. Then or any independent square X Y X Y with S and C, the ollowin diaram commutes: B Y B X B Y B X. Here we remark the ollowin act about the covariant and contravariant unctors B and B, which will be needed in later sections. They are what Levine and Morel call Borel Moore unctor with products in [LM3, Mer]. Proposition 2.5. Let the situation be as above. 1-i For a disjoint sum X Y, B X Y = B X B Y, 1-ii or conined morphisms : X Y, the pushorward homomorphisms : B X B Y are covariantly unctorial, 1-iii or morphisms in S, i.e., or nice canonical B-orientable morphisms : X Y, the Gysin pullback homomorphisms are contravariantly unctorial, 1-iv or an independent square! : B Y B X X Y X with C and S, we have the ollowin diaram commutes: B Y! Y B X B Y! B X, 1-v the pushorward homomorphisms : B X B Y or conined morphisms and the Gysin pullback homomorphisms! : B Y B X or morphisms in S are both compatible with the exterior products 2-i or a disjoint sum X Y, : B X B Y B X Y. B X Y = B X B Y,
9 8 SHOJI YOKURA 2-ii or any morphisms : X Y, the pullback homomorphisms : B Y B Y are contravariantly unctorial, 2-iii or conined and specialized morphisms in C S, i.e., or conined and nice canonical B-orientable morphisms : X Y, the Gysin pushorward homomorphisms are covariantly unctorial, 2-iv or an independent square! : B X B Y X Y X with C S, we have the ollowin diaram commutes: B Y Y B X!! B Y! B X, 2-v the pullback homomorphisms : B Y B Y or any morphisms : X Y and the Gysin pushorward homomorphisms! : B X B Y or conined and specialized morphisms in C S are both compatible with the exterior products : B X B Y B X Y. 3. A UNIVERSAL BIVARIANT THEORY The ollowin theorem is about the existence o a universal one o the bivariant theories or a iven cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares and a class S o specialized morphisms. The construction is motivated by that o Levine Morel s alebraic cobordism. Theorem 3.1. Let V be a cateory with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares and a class S o specialized maps. We deine M C SX Y to be the ree abelian roup enerated by the set o isomorphism classes o conined morphisms h : W X such that the composite o h and is a specialized map: h C and h : W Y S. 1 The association M C S is a bivariant theory i the three operations are deined as ollows: Product operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z, the product operation is deined by m V [V hv X] V : M C SX Y M C SY Z M C SX Z W n W [W kw Y ] := V,W m V n W [V h V k W X],
10 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 9 where we consider the ollowin iber squares V h V X k W k W V h V W k W X Y Z. Pushorward operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z with conined, the pushorward operation : M C SX Z M C SY Z is deined by V n V [V hv X] := V n V [V hv Y ]. Pullback operations: For an independent square X X the pullback operation Y Y, : M C S X Y M C S X Y is deined by V n V [V hv X] := V n V [V h V X ], where we consider the ollowin iber squares: h V V h V V X Y X Y. 2 Let BT be a class o bivariant theories B on the same cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares and a class S o specialized maps. Let S be nice canonical B-orientable or any bivariant theory B BT. Then, or each bivariant theory B BT there exists a unique Grothendieck transormation γ B : M C S B such that or a specialized morphism : X Y S the homomorphism γ B : M C S X Y BX Y satisies the normalization condition that γ B [X idx X] = θ B.
11 10 SHOJI YOKURA Proo. For 1, we have to show that the three bivariant operations are well-deined, but we show only the well-deinedness o the bivariant product and the other two are clear. Let [V hv X] M C S X Y and [W kw Y ] M C S Y Z; thus h V : V X is conined and the composite h V : V Y is in S, and also k W : W Y is conined and the composite k W : W Z is in S. By deinition we have [V hv X] [W kw Y ] = [V h V k W X]. We want to show that [V h V k W X] M C S X Z, i.e., h V k W S. From the iber squares iven in Product operations above, we have h V k W = k W h V. h V is in S, because it is the pullback o h V and h V is in S and S is closed under base chane by hypothesis. k W is in S by hypothesis. Thus the composite k W h V is also in S. Thus the bivariant product is well-deined. The rest is to show that these three operations satisy the seven axioms B-1 B-7, which is let or the reader. For 2, irst we show the uniqueness. Suppose that there exists a Grothendieck transormation γ : M C SX Y BX Y such that or any : X Y S the homomorphism γ : M C S X Y BX Y satisies that γ[x idx X] = θ B. Note that or any : X Y S, [X idx X] M C S X Y is a nice canonical orientation, i.e., θ M C S = [X idx X]. Let h V : V X be a conined map such that h V : V Y is in S. We have that [V hv X] = h V [V idv V ], where [V idv V ] M C hv S V Y. Since h V S by hypothesis, it ollows rom the normalization that we et Thus it is uniquely determined. The rest is to show that the assinment γ[v hv X] = γh V [V idv V ] = h V γ[v idv V ] = h V θ B h V. γ : M C SX Y BX Y deined by γ B [V hv X] = h V θ B h V is a Grothendeick transormation, i.e., that it preserves the three bivariant operations: i it preserves the product operation: Lettin the situation be as in i, it suices to show that γ B [V hv X] [W kw Y ] = γ B [V hv X] γ B [W kw Y ].
12 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 11 Usin the iber squares iven in Product operations, we have γ B [V hv X] [W kw Y ] = γ B [V h V k W X] by the deinition = h V k W θ B h V k W by the deinition = h V k W θ B k W h V = h V k W θb h V θ B k W = h V k W k W θ B h V θ B k W = h V θ B h V k W θ B k W by B-7 projection ormula = h V θ B h V k W θ B k W by B-4 = γ B [V hv X] γ B [W kw Y ]. ii it preserves the pushorward operation: Consider X Y Z and a conined morphsim h V : V X such that the composite h V : V Y is in S. γ B [V hv X] = γ B [V hv Y ] = h V θ B h V = h V θ B h V = γ B [V hv X] iii it preserves the pullback operation: Consider a conined morphsim h V : V X such that the composite h V : V Y is in S and the iber squares iven in Pullback operations above, we have γ B [V hv X] = γ B [V h V X ] = h V θ B h V = h V θ B h V = h V θ B h V by B-5 This completes the proo o the theorem. = γ B [V hv X]. Remark By the deinition o M C S, any class S is nice canonical MC S -orientable. 2 The product operation : M C S X Y M C S Y Z M C S X Z can also be interpreted as ollows. The ree abelian roup MX enerated by the set o isomorphism classes o conined morphisms h V : V X is a commutative rin by the iber product h [V 1 h 1 X] 2 h [V2 X] := [V1 X V 1 Xh 2 2 X]. For a conined morphism : X Y we have the pushorward homomorphism : MX MY and or any morphism : X Y we have the pullback homomorphism : MY MX. Then the product operation is nothin but [V hv X] [W hw Y ] = [V hv X] [W hw Y ]. But in our case we need to chase the morphisms involved, so we just stick to our previous presentation.
13 12 SHOJI YOKURA Let S be a class o specialized morphisms as above and let S be canonical B-orientable or a bivariant theory B. I π X : X pt is in S, in which case we sometimes say, abusin words, that X is specialized, then we have the Gysin homomorphism which, we recall, is deined to be π X! : B pt B X π X! α = θ B π X α. In particular, i we let 1 pt Bpt be the unit, then we have π X! 1 pt = θ B π X 1 pt = θ B π X. This element π X! 1 pt = θ B π X is called the undamental class o X associated to the bivariant theory B c. [LM3, Mer], denoted by [X] B. Corollary 3.3. Let BT be a class o additive bivariant theories B on the same cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares and a class S o specialized maps. Let S be nice canonical B-orientable or any bivariant theory B BT. Then, or each bivariant theory B BT, 1 there exists a unique natural transormation Γ B : M C S B such that i π X : X pt is in S the homomorphism Γ B : M C S X B X satisies that Γ B [X idx X] = π! X 1 pt = [X] B, and 2 there exists a unique natural transormation Γ B : M C S B such that or any X the homomorphism Γ B : M C S X B X satisies that Γ B [X idx X] = 1 X B X. Example 3.4. Here we recall some important examples o bivariant theories rom [FM]. 1 Bivariant homoloy theory H: Let V be the cateory o complex varieties embeddable into smooth maniolds, C = Prop be the class o proper morphisms and let S = Lci be the class o local complete intersection abbr., l.c.i. morphisms. A Tor-independent square is an independent square. Then there is a unique Grothendieck transormation γ H : M Prop Lci H such that or : X Y Lci the homomorphism γ H : M Prop Lci X Y HX Y satisies the normalization condition that γ H [X idx X] = U. In particular, we have unique natural transormation: γ H : M Prop Lci H = H BM such that or any l.c.i. variety X, γ H [X idx X] = [X] H BM X and γ H : M Prop Lci H = H such that or any variety X, γ H [X idx X] = 1 X H X. Here H BM X is the Borel Moore homoloy roup and H X is the usual cohomoloy roup. 2 Bivariant Chow roup theory or Operational bivariant Chow roup theory A: Let V be the cateory o schemes, C = Prop be the class o proper morphisms and let S = Lci
14 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 13 be the class o local complete intersection abbr., l.c.i. morphisms. A Tor-independent square is an independent square. Then there is a unique Grothendieck transormation γ A : M Prop Lci A such that or : X Y Lci, γ A [X idx X] = []. We have unique natural transormations γ A : M Prop Lci A = A or CH such that or any l.c.i. variety X, γ A X] = [X] A X and γ A : M Prop Lci A = A or CH [X idx such that or any variety X, γ A [X idx X] = 1 X A X. Here A = CH is the Chow homoloy roup and A = CH is the Chow cohomoloy roup see [Fu]. 3 Bivariant alebraic K-theory K al : Let the situation be as in 2. Then there is a unique Grothendieck transormation γ Kal : M Prop Lci K al such that or : X Y Lci, γ Kal [X idx X] = O. We have unique natural transormations γ Kal : M Prop Lci K al = K 0 such that or any l.c.i. variety X, γ Kal [X idx X] = [O X ] K 0 X and γ Kal : M Prop Lci K al = K 0 such that or any variety X, γ Kal [X idx X] = 1 X K 0 X. 4 Bivariant topoloical K-theory K top : Let the situation be as in 2 with V bein the cateory o complex varieties. Then there is a unique Grothendieck transormation γ Ktop : M Prop Lci K top such that or : X Y Lci, γ Ktop [X idx X] = Λ. We have unique natural transormation γ Ktop : M Prop Lci K top = K 0 such that or any l.c.i. variety X, γ Ktop [X idx X] = [1 X ] K 0 X and γ Ktop : M Prop Lci Ktop = K 0 such that or any variety X, γ Ktop [X idx X] = 1 X K 0 X. 5 Bivariant theory o constructible unctions F: Let V be the cateory o complex alebraic varieties, C = Prop be the class o proper morphisms and let S = Sm be the class o smooth morphisms not local complete intersection morphisms. A iber square is an independent square. Then there is a unique Grothendieck transormation γ F : M Prop Sm F such that or : X Y Sm, γ F [X idx X] = 1 = 1 X. We have unique natural transormations γ F : M Prop Lci F = F
15 14 SHOJI YOKURA such that or any smooth variety X, γ F [X idx X] = 1 X FX and γ F : M Prop Lci F such that or any variety X, γ F [X idx X] = 1 X F X. Here F X is the abelian roup o locally constant unctions on X. Corollary 3.5. A naïve motivic bivariant characteristic class Let cl : K 0 H R be a multiplicative characteristic class o complex vector bundles with a suitable coeicients R. Then there exists a unique Grothendieck transormation γ cl H : M Prop Lci H R satisyin the normalization condition that or : X Y Lci γh cl idx [X X] = clt U. Corollary 3.6. A naïve motivic characteristic class o sinular varieties Let cl : K 0 H R be a multiplicative characteristic class o complex vector bundles with a suitable coeicients R. Then there exists a unique natural transormation cl : M Prop Lci H R such that or a l.c.i variety V in a smooth variety cl [V idv V ] = clt V [V ]. A urther discussion on motivic bivariant characteristic classes will be done in [Yo2] Remark 3.7. Riemann Roch Theorems We have the ollowin commutative diarams: K al γ Kal M Prop Lci α γktop γ Ktop K top K top ch M Prop Lci td γh i α : K al K top is a Grothendieck transormation such that or a l.c.i morphism : X Y, αo = Λ. ii ch : K top H Q is a Grothendieck transormation such that or an l.c.i morphism : X Y, αλ = tdt U, where T is the virtual relative tanent bundle o the morphism and tdt is the total Todd cohomoloy class o the bundle T. The composite ch α : K al H Q is a bivariant version o Baum Fulton MacPherson s Riemann Roch τ : K 0 H Q see [BFM1, Fu]. Thus one could say that ch α : K al H Q and ch : K top H Q are realizations o a motivic one: γh td : MProp Lci H Q. 4. ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES Here we introduce an orientation to bivariant theories. Deinition 4.1. Let B be a bivariant theory on a cateory. Let L be a class o morphisms in V, called line bundles e.., line bundles in eometry, which are closed under base chane. As in the theory o bundles, or a line bundle L X, we simply denote it by the source object L, unless some conusion is possible. For a line bundle L L, the irst Chern class operator on B associated to the line bundle L, denoted by c 1 L, is an endomorphism which satisies the ollowin properties: c 1 L : BX Y BX Y H Q
16 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 15 O-1 identity: I two line bundles L X and M X are isomorphic, i.e., there exists an isomorphism L = M over X, then we have c 1 L = c 1 M : BX Y BX Y. O-2 commutativity: Let L X and L X be two line bundles over X, then we have c 1 L c 1 L = c 1 L c 1 L : BX Y BX Y. O-3 compatibility with product: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z, α BX Y and β BY Z, a line bundle L X and a line bundle M Y c 1 Lα β = c 1 Lα β, c 1 Mα β = α c 1 Mβ O-4 compatibility with pushorward: With bein conined c 1 Mα = c 1 M α. O-5 compatibility with pullback: For an independent square X X Y Y c 1 Lα = c 1 L α. The above irst Chern class operator is called an orientation and a bivariant theory equipped with such a irst Chern class operator is called an oriented bivariant theory, denoted by OB. An oriented Gorthendieck transormation between two oriented bivariant theories is a Grothendieck transormation which preserves or is compatible with the irst Chern class operator. Remark 4.2. In the above deinition, the only requirement on the class L is that morphisms are closed under base chane, and nothin else. The ollowin lemma shows that Levine Morel s oriented Borel Moore unctor with products is a special case o an oriented bivariant theory. Lemma 4.3. Let OB be an oriented bivariant theory. Then the orientation c 1 L on the unctors OB and OB satisies the ollowin properties: 1 Let L X and L X be two line bundles over X, then we have c 1 L c 1 L = c 1 L c 1 L : OB X OB X, c 1 L c 1 L = c 1 L c 1 L : OB X OB X, and i L and L are isomorphic, then we have that c 1 L = c 1 L or both OB and OB. 2 For a line bundle L X and α OB X and β OB Y, we have c 1 Lα β = c 1 p 1 Lα β. Also, or α OB X and β OB Y, we have c 1 Lα β = c 1 p 1 Lα β. Here p 1 : X Y X is the projection. 3 For a conined morphism : X Y or a line bundle L Y, we have c 1 M = c 1 M : OB X OB Y. 4 For a specialized morphism : X Y S here we just require that is canonical OB-orientable and a or line bundle M Y, we have c 1 M! =! c 1 M : OB Y OB X.
17 16 SHOJI YOKURA 5 For a conined and specialized morphism : X Y and a line bundle M Y, we have! c 1 M = c 1 M! : OB X OB Y. 6 For any morphism : X Y and a line bundle M Y, we have c 1 M = c 1 M : OB Y OB X. Proo. 1 ollows rom O-1 and O-2. 2 ollows rom the irst ormula o O-3. 3 ollows rom O-4. 4 ollows rom the second ormula o O-3. 5 ollows rom the irst ormula o O-3 and O-4. 6 ollows rom O-5. Example 4.4. All the examples, except the bivariant constructible unctions F, iven in Example 3.4 are in act oriented bivariant theories. The Chern class operator is by takin the bivariant product with a bivariant element in the bivariant roup o the identity X idx X. And it ollows rom the axioms o the bivariant theory that this operator satisies the properties O-2 O-5. 1 Bivariant homoloy theory H: For a line bundle L X, the irst Chern class operator c 1 L : HX Y HX Y is deined by c 1 Lα := c 1 L α where c 1 L HX idx X = H X is the irst Chern cohomoloy class o the line bundle. 2 Bivariant Chow roup theory or Operational bivariant Chow roup theory A: As in 1 above, or a line bundle L X, the Chern class operator is deined by c 1 L : AX Y AX Y c 1 Lα := c 1 L α where c 1 L AX idx X is the irst Chern cohomoloy class o the line bundle. 3 Bivariant alebraic K-theory K al : For a line bundle L X, the Chern class operator c 1 L : K al X Y K al X Y is deined by c 1 Lα := 1 [L] α where [L] K al X idx X = Kal 0 X the Grothendieck roup o alebriac vector bundles or locally ree sheaves on X. 4 Bivariant topoloical K-theory K top : For a line bundle L X, the Chern class operator is deined by c 1 L : K top X Y K top X Y c 1 Lα := 1 [L] α
18 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 17 where [L] K top X idx X = KtopX 0 the Grothendieck roup o vector bundles on X. 5 As to the bivariant theory F, as ar as the author knows, there is not available a bivariant class ce F X = FX idx X associated to a vector bundle E over X, which is just the multiplication by locally constant unctions. Even i such a Chern class is available, we do not know what ce would be. So, it is not clear whether there is a reasonable Chern class operator in the case o the bivariant theory F. In act, ollowin Levine Morel s construction [LM3], we show the existence o a universal one o such oriented bivariant theories or any cateory. Let us consider a morphism h V : V X equipped with initely many line bundles over the source variety V o the morphism h V : V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r with L i bein a line bundle over V. This amily is called a cobordism cycle over X [LM3, Mer]. Then V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r is isomorphic to W hw X; M 1, M 2,, M r i and only i h V and h W are isomorphic, i.e., there is an isomorphism : V = W over X, there is a bijection σ : {1, 2,, r} = {1, 2,, r } so that r = r and there are isomorphisms L i = M σi or every i. Theorem 4.5. A universal oriented bivariant theory Let V be a cateory with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares, a class S o specialized morphisms and a class L o line bundles. We deine OM C SX Y to be the ree abelian roup enerated by the set o isomorphism classes o cobordism cycles over X such that the composite o h and [V h X; L 1, L 2,, L r ] h : W Y S. 1 The association OM C S becomes an oriented bivariant theory i the our operations are deined as ollows: Orientation: For a morphism : X Y and a line bundle L X, the irst Chern class operator is deined by c 1 L : OM C S X Y OM C S X Y c 1 L[V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r ] := [V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r, h V L]. Product operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z, the product operation : OM C S X Y OM C S Y Z OM C S X Z is deined as ollows: The product on enerators is deined by [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] [W kw Y ; M 1,, M s ] := [V h V k W X; k W L1,, k W Lr, h V M 1,, h V M s ],
19 18 SHOJI YOKURA and it extends bilinearly. Here we consider the ollowin iber squares V h V X k W k W V h V W k W X Y Z. Pushorward operations: For morphisms : X Y and : Y Z with conined, the pushorward operation is deined by V : OM C SX Z OM C SY Z n V [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] := V Pullback operations: For an independent square the pullback operation is deined by V X Y X Y, : OM C S X Y OM C S X Y n V [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] := V n V [V hv Y ; L 1,, L r ]. n V [V h V X ; L1,, Lr ], where we consider the ollowin iber squares: h V V V h V X Y X Y. 2 Let OBT be a class o oriented bivariant theories OB on the same cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares, a class S o specialized morphisms and a class L o line bundles. Let S be nice canonical OB-orientable or any oriented bivariant theory OB OBT. Then, or each oriented bivariant theory OB OBT there exists a unique oriented Grothendieck transormation γ OB : OM C S OB such that or any : X Y S the homomorphism γ OB : OM C SX Y OBX Y satisies the normalization condition that γ OB [X idx X; L 1,, L r ] = c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB.
20 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 19 Proo. 1: It is easy to see that the above our operations are well-deined. Here we note that the above Chern class operator is nothin but the bivariant product with the motivic irst Chern class o L, [X idx X; L] OM C SX idx X, i.e., we have c 1 L[V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r ] := [X idx X; L] [V hv X; L 1, L 2,, L r ]. 2: Suppose that there is an oriented Grothendieck transormation γ : OM C S OB satisyin that or any : X Y S the homomorphism γ : OM C SX Y OBX Y satisies that γ[x idx X] = θ OB. It suices to show that the value o any enerator [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] OM C SX Y is uniquely determined. For that, irst we notice the ollowin: [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] = h V [V idv V ; L 1,, L r ] = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r [V idv V ]. Since [V idv V ] OM C SV hv Y and h V S by hypothesis, we have γ[v hv X; L 1,, L r ] = γ h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r [V idv V ] = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r γ[v idv V ] = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V Thus the uniqueness ollows. Next, we show the existence o such an oriented Grothendieck transormation satisyin the above normalization condition. We deine the association deined by γ OB : OM C SX Y OBX Y γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] := h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V. This certainly satisies the normalization condition. The rest is to show that it is an oriented Grothendieck transormation. i it preserves the product operation:it suices to show that γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] [W kw Y ; M 1,, M s ] = γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] γ OB [W kw Y ; M 1,, M s ] Usin some parts o the proo o Theorem 3.1, we have γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] [W kw Y ; M 1,, M s ] = γ OB [V h V k W X; k W L1,, k W Lr, h V M 1,, h V M s ] = h V k W c1 k W L1 c 1 k W Lr c 1 h V M 1 c 1 h V M s θ OB h V θ OB k W. Here we use the property O-4 compatibility with pushorward and O-3 compatibility with product [ c 1 Mα β = α c 1 Mβ], the above equality continues as ollows:
21 20 SHOJI YOKURA = h V c1 L 1 c 1 L r k W c1 h V M 1 c 1 h V M s θ OB h V θ OB k W. = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r k W θob h V c 1 M 1 c 1 M s θ OB k W. = h V c1 L 1 c 1 L r k W = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r k W θ OB h V c 1 M 1 c 1 M s θ OB k W. θ OB h V k W c 1 M 1 c 1 M s θ OB k W by B-7 projection ormula. Furthermore, usin O-3 compatibility with product [ c 1 Lα β = c 1 Lα β ] and by B-4, it continues as ollows: = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V k W c 1 M 1 c 1 M s θ OB k W = γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] γ OB [W kw Y ; M 1,, M s ] ii it preserves the pushorward operation:consider X Y Z and a conined morphsim h V : V X such that the composite h V : V Y is in S. For a enerator we have [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] OM C S X Z, γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] = γ OB [V hv Y ; L 1,, L r ] = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V = γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ]. iii it preserves the pullback operation: Consider a conined morphsim h V : V X such that the composite h V : V Y is in S and the iber squares iven in Pullback operations above, we have γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] = γ OB [V h V X ; L1,, Lr ] = h V c1 L1 c 1 Lr θ OB h V = h V c1 L1 c 1 Lr θ OB h V = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V = h V c 1 L 1 c 1 L r θ OB h V by B-5 = γ OB [V hv X; L 1,, L r ].
22 ORIENTED BIVARIANT THEORIES, I 21 Corollary 4.6. The abelian roup OM C S X := OMC S X pt is the ree abelian roup enerated by the set o isomorphism classes o cobordism cycles [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] such that h V : V X C and V pt is a specialized map in S and L i is a line bundle over V. The abelian roup OM C S X := OM C S X idx X is the ree abelian roup enerated by the set o isomorphism classes o cobordism cycles [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] such that h V : V X C S and L i is a line bundle over V. Both unctor OM C S and OM C S are oriented Borel Moore unctors with products in the sense o Levine Morel. Corollary 4.7. A universal oriented Borel Moore unctor with products Let BT be a class o oriented additive bivariant theories B on the same cateory V with a class C o conined morphisms, a class o independent squares, a class S o specialized maps and a class o line bundles. Let S be nice canonical OB-orientable or any oriented bivariant theory OB OBT. Then, or each oriented bivariant theory OB OBT, 1 there exists a unique natural transormation o oriented Borel Moore unctors with products Γ OB : OM C S OB such that i π X : X pt is in S idx Γ OB [X X; L 1,, L r ] = c 1 L c 1 L r π! X 1 pt, and 2 there exists a unique natural transormation o oriented Borel Moore unctors with products such that or any object X Γ OB : OM C S OB Γ OB [X idx X; L 1,, L r ] = c 1 L c 1 L r 1 X. Remark Let k be an arbitrary ield. In the case when V k is the admissible subcateory o the cateory o separated schemes o inite type over the ield k, C = Proj is the class o projective morphisms, S = Sm is the class o smooth equi-dimensional morphisms and L is the class o line bundles, then OM Proj Sm X = OMProj Sm X pt is nothin but the oriented Borel Moore unctor with products Z X iven in [LM3]. In this sense, our associated contravariant one OM Proj Sm X = OM Proj idx Sm X X is a cohomoloical counterpart o Levine Morel s homoloical one Z X. Note that this cohomoloical one OM Proj Sm X or any scheme X is the ree abelian roup enerated by [V hv X; L 1,, L r ] such that h V : V X is a projective and smooth morphism. 2 One can see that in 1 Proj can be replaced by Prop. And urthermore one can consider OM Proj Lci and OM Prop Lci, which will be treated in [Yo1] An oriented bivariant theory can be deined or any kind o cateory as lon as we can speciy classes o conined morphisms, specialized morphisms toether with nice canonical orientations, line bundles, and independent squares. The above oriented bivariant theory is the very basis o other oriented bivariant theories o more eometric natures. In [Yo1] we will deal with a more eometrical oriented bivariant theory, i.e., what could be called bivariant alebraic cobordism or alebraic bivariant cobordism, which is a bivariant version o Levine Morel s alebraic cobordism.
23 22 SHOJI YOKURA Acknowledements. The author would like to thank the sta o the Erwin Schrödiner International Institute o Mathematical Physics or their hospitality durin his stay in Auust, 2006, durin which the present research was initiated. The author ave a talk on a very earlier version o this paper at the Kinosaki Alebraic Geometry Symposium Oct. 24 Oct.27, 2006: The author would like to thank the oranizers H. Kaji, F. Kato, S.-I. Kimura o the symposium or invitin him to ive a talk, and also thank M. Hanamura, S.-I. Kimura, Y. Shimizu, T. Terasoma or their interests on this subject. REFERENCES [BFM1] P. Baum, W. Fulton and R. MacPherson, Riemann Roch or sinular varieties, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S , [BFM2] P. Baum, W. Fulton and R. MacPherson, Riemann Roch and topoloical K-theory or sinular varieties, Acta Math , [Fu] W. Fulton, Intersection Theory, Spriner Verla, [FM] W. Fulton and R. MacPherson, Cateorical rameworks or the study o sinular spaces, Memoirs o Amer. Math. Soc. 243, [L1] M.Levine, Alebraic cobordism, Proceedins o the ICM Beijin 2002, Vol.II, 57 66, [L2] M.Levine, A survey o alebraic cobordism, Proceedins o the International Conerence on Alebra, Alebra Colloquium , 79 90, [LM1] M. Levine and F. Morel, Cobordisme alébrique I, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 332 Séri I 2001, , [LM2] M. Levine and F. Morel, Cobordisme alébrique II, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 332 Séri I 2001, , [LM3] M. Levine and F. Morel, Alebraic Cobordism, Spriner Monoraphsin Mathematics, Spriner-Verla 2007, [LP] M. Levine and R. Pandharipande, Alebraic cobordism revisited, math.ag/ , [Mer] A. Merkurjev, Alebraic cobordism theory Notes o mini-course in Lens, June 2004, math.ucla.edu/ merkurev [Qui] D. Quillen, Elementary proos o some results o cobordism theory usin Steenrod operations, Advances in Math , 29 56, [Voe] V. Voevodsky, The Milnor Conjecture, preprint Dec. 1996, /index.html [Yo1] S. Yokura, Oriented bivariant theory, II, in preparation. [Yo2] S. Yokura, On a naïve motivic bivariant characteristic class, in preparation. DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF KAGOSHIMA, KORIMOTO 1-CHOME, KAGOSHIMA , JAPAN address: yokura@sci.kaoshima-u.ac.jp
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. What we re doin this week 1 2. Precise statements 2 2.1. Basic operations and properties 4 3. Provin thins 6
More informationCategorical Background (Lecture 2)
Cateorical Backround (Lecture 2) February 2, 2011 In the last lecture, we stated the main theorem o simply-connected surery (at least or maniolds o dimension 4m), which hihlihts the importance o the sinature
More informationThe excess intersection formula for Grothendieck-Witt groups
manuscripta mathematica manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Jean Fasel The excess intersection ormula or Grothendieck-Witt roups Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We prove the
More informationTHE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY
THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, DAVID A. JORGENSEN & STEFFEN OPPERMANN Dedicated to Ranar-Ola Buchweitz on the occasion o his sixtieth birthday Abstract. We consider the homotopy cateory
More informationMath 248B. Base change morphisms
Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 17
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 17 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Were we are 1 1.1. Reined Gysin omomorpisms i! 2 1.2. Excess intersection ormula 4 2. Local complete intersection morpisms 6 Were we re oin, by popular
More informationCategories and Natural Transformations
Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical
More informationUMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract
UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S
More informationCategories and Quantum Informatics: Monoidal categories
Cateories and Quantum Inormatics: Monoidal cateories Chris Heunen Sprin 2018 A monoidal cateory is a cateory equipped with extra data, describin how objects and morphisms can be combined in parallel. This
More informationA Peter May Picture Book, Part 1
A Peter May Picture Book, Part 1 Steve Balady Auust 17, 2007 This is the beinnin o a larer project, a notebook o sorts intended to clariy, elucidate, and/or illustrate the principal ideas in A Concise
More informationDescent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014
Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and
More informationSTRONGLY GORENSTEIN PROJECTIVE MODULES OVER UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX ARTIN ALGEBRAS. Shanghai , P. R. China. Shanghai , P. R.
STRONGLY GORENSTEIN PROJETIVE MODULES OVER UPPER TRINGULR MTRIX RTIN LGERS NN GO PU ZHNG Department o Mathematics Shanhai University Shanhai 2444 P R hina Department o Mathematics Shanhai Jiao Ton University
More informationDERIVED CATEGORIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
REVISTA DE LA UNIÓN MATEMÁTICA ARGENTINA Volumen 48, Número 3, 2007, Páinas 1 26 DERIVED CATEGORIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS Abstract In this notes we start with the basic deinitions o derived cateories,
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF GROUP EXTENSIONS AND H 2
CLASSIFICATION OF GROUP EXTENSIONS AND H 2 RAPHAEL HO Abstract. In this paper we will outline the oundations o homoloical alebra, startin with the theory o chain complexes which arose in alebraic topoloy.
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the
More informationRELATIVE GOURSAT CATEGORIES
RELTIVE GOURST CTEGORIES JULI GOEDECKE ND TMR JNELIDZE bstract. We deine relative Goursat cateories and prove relative versions o the equivalent conditions deinin reular Goursat cateories. These include
More informationBECK'S THEOREM CHARACTERIZING ALGEBRAS
BEK'S THEOREM HARATERIZING ALGEBRAS SOFI GJING JOVANOVSKA Abstract. In this paper, I will construct a proo o Beck's Theorem characterizin T -alebras. Suppose we have an adjoint pair o unctors F and G between
More informationMath 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications
Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN
VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not
More informationClassification of effective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4
Classiication o eective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4 Shintarô Kuroki Department o Applied Mathematics, Faculty o Science, Okayama Uniervsity o Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005,
More informationMath 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)
Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.
More informationFrom Loop Groups To 2-Groups
From Loop Groups To 2-Groups John C. Baez Joint work with: Aaron Lauda Alissa Crans Danny Stevenson & Urs Schreiber 1 G f 1 f D 2 More details at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/2roup/ 1 Hiher Gaue Theory
More informationIn the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.
Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by
More informationNAIVE MOTIVIC DONALDSON THOMAS TYPE HIRZEBRUCH CLASSES AND SOME PROBLEMS
Journal of Singularities Volume 10 (2014), 26-53 Proc. of 12th International Workshop on Singularities, São Carlos, 2012 DOI: 10.5427/jsing.2014.10b NAIVE MOTIVIC DONALDSON THOMAS TYPE HIRZEBRUCH CLASSES
More informationGENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS
GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions
More informationWestern University. Imants Barušs King's University College, Robert Woodrow
Western University Scholarship@Western Psycholoy Psycholoy 2013 A reduction theorem or the Kripke-Joyal semantics: Forcin over an arbitrary cateory can always be replaced by orcin over a complete Heytin
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 12 Nov 2017
TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES WITH CLUSTER TILTING SUBCATEGORIES WUZHONG YANG, PANYUE ZHOU, AND BIN ZHU Dedicated to Proessor Idun Reiten on the occasion o her 75th birthday arxiv:7.0490v [math.rt] Nov 07 Abstract.
More informationCategory Theory 2. Eugenia Cheng Department of Mathematics, University of Sheffield Draft: 31st October 2007
Cateory Theory 2 Euenia Chen Department o Mathematics, niversity o Sheield E-mail: echen@sheieldacuk Drat: 31st October 2007 Contents 2 Some basic universal properties 1 21 Isomorphisms 2 22 Terminal objects
More informationELEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE NO.14 CATEGORY THEORY. Tatsuya Hagino
1 ELEMENTS IN MTHEMTICS FOR INFORMTION SCIENCE NO.14 CTEGORY THEORY Tatsuya Haino haino@sc.keio.ac.jp 2 Set Theory Set Theory Foundation o Modern Mathematics a set a collection o elements with some property
More informationRepresentation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi
Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions
More informationTriangulated categories and localization
Trianulated cateories and localization Karin Marie Jacobsen Master o Science in Physics and Mathematics Submission date: Januar 212 Supervisor: Aslak Bakke Buan, MATH Norweian University o Science and
More informationGrothendieck construction for bicategories
Grothendieck construction or bicategories Igor Baković Rudjer Bošković Institute Abstract In this article, we give the generalization o the Grothendieck construction or pseudo unctors given in [5], which
More informationCONVENIENT CATEGORIES OF SMOOTH SPACES
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 363, Number 11, November 2011, Paes 5789 5825 S 0002-9947(2011)05107-X Article electronically published on June 6, 2011 CONVENIENT CATEGORIES OF
More informationTangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007
Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves
More informationare well-formed, provided Φ ( X, x)
(October 27) 1 We deine an axiomatic system, called the First-Order Theory o Abstract Sets (FOTAS) Its syntax will be completely speciied Certain axioms will be iven; but these may be extended by additional
More informationEpimorphisms and maximal covers in categories of compact spaces
@ Applied General Topoloy c Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Volume 14, no. 1, 2013 pp. 41-52 Epimorphisms and maximal covers in cateories o compact spaces B. Banaschewski and A. W. Haer Abstract The
More informationThe inner automorphism 3-group of a strict 2-group
The inner automorphism 3-roup o a strict 2-roup Dav Roberts and Urs Schreiber July 25, 2007 Abstract or any roup G, there is a 2-roup o inner automorphisms, INN(G). This plays the role o the universal
More informationChern classes à la Grothendieck
Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gt] 20 Feb 2008
EQUIVALENCE OF REAL MILNOR S FIBRATIONS FOR QUASI HOMOGENEOUS SINGULARITIES arxiv:0802.2746v1 [math.gt] 20 Feb 2008 ARAÚJO DOS SANTOS, R. Abstract. We are going to use the Euler s vector ields in order
More informationAlgebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism
Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism UWO January 25, 2005 Marc Levine Prelude: From homotopy theory to A 1 -homotopy theory A basic object in homotopy theory is a generalized
More informationHSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS
HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence
More informationSpan, Cospan, and Other Double Categories
ariv:1201.3789v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions
More informationUniversity of Cape Town
The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial
More informationCentral Limit Theorems and Proofs
Math/Stat 394, Winter 0 F.W. Scholz Central Limit Theorems and Proos The ollowin ives a sel-contained treatment o the central limit theorem (CLT). It is based on Lindeber s (9) method. To state the CLT
More informationAlgebraic Cobordism. 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006.
Algebraic Cobordism 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006 Marc Levine Outline: Describe the setting of oriented cohomology over a
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i
More informationThe Riemann-Roch Theorem
The Riemann-Roch Theorem TIFR Mumbai, India Paul Baum Penn State 7 August, 2015 Five lectures: 1. Dirac operator 2. Atiyah-Singer revisited 3. What is K-homology? 4. Beyond ellipticity 5. The Riemann-Roch
More informationSTEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY
STEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY ALEXANDER MERKURJEV 1. Introduction Let p be a prime integer. For a pair of topological spaces A X we write H i (X, A; Z/pZ) for the i-th singular cohomology group
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Recap of Last day 1 1.1. New facts 2 2. Statement of the theorem 3 2.1. GRR for a special case of closed immersions f : X Y = P(N 1) 4 2.2. GRR for closed
More informationALGEBRAIC COBORDISM REVISITED
ALGEBRAIC COBORDISM REVISITED M. LEVINE AND R. PANDHARIPANDE Abstract. We define a cobordism theory in algebraic geometry based on normal crossing degenerations with double point singularities. The main
More informationThe Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!
The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord
More informationCATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction
1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the
More informationGENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE
GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will
More informationNotes on Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves
Notes on Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves Ryan Reich June 4, 2009 In this paper I provide something o a skeleton key to A.A. Beilinson s How to glue perverse sheaves [1], which I ound hard to understand
More informationFinite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)
More informationA crash course in homological algebra
Chapter 2 A crash course in homoloical alebra By the 194 s techniques from alebraic topoloy bean to be applied to pure alebra, ivin rise to a new subject. To bein with, recall that a cateory C consists
More informationLIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset
5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,
More informationMADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS EMILY RIEHL The aim o this note is to briely summarize techniques or building weak actorization systems whose right class is characterized by a particular liting
More informationCOARSE-GRAINING OPEN MARKOV PROCESSES. John C. Baez. Kenny Courser
COARE-GRAINING OPEN MARKOV PROCEE John C. Baez Department o Mathematics University o Caliornia Riverside CA, UA 95 and Centre or Quantum echnoloies National University o inapore inapore 7543 Kenny Courser
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Rational equivalence on bundles 1 1.1. Intersecting with the zero-section of a vector bundle 2 2. Cones and Segre classes of subvarieties 3 2.1. Introduction
More informationThe Category of Sets
The Cateory o Sets Hans Halvorson October 16, 2016 [[Note to students: this is a irst drat. Please report typos. A revised version will be posted within the next couple o weeks.]] 1 Introduction The aim
More informationProbabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1
Replace this ile with prentcsmacro.sty or your meeting, or with entcsmacro.sty or your meeting. Both can be ound at the ENTCS Macro Home Page. Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract)
More informationA NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.
A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. DIETER HAPPEL AND DAN ZACHARIA Abstract. Let P n be the projective n space over the complex numbers. In this note we show that an indecomposable
More informationTOPOLOGY FROM THE CATEGORICAL VIEWPOINT
TOOLOGY FROM THE CATEGORICAL VIEWOINT KYLE ORMSBY One o the primary insihts o twentieth century mathematics is that obects should not be studied in isolation. Rather, to understand obects we must also
More informationTHE AXIOMS FOR TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES
THE AIOMS FOR TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES J. P. MA Contents 1. Trianulated cateories 1 2. Weak pusouts and weak pullbacks 4 3. How to prove Verdier s axiom 6 Reerences 9 Tis is an edited extract rom my paper
More informationALGEBRAIC COBORDISM REVISITED
ALGEBRAIC COBORDISM REVISITED M. LEVINE AND R. PANDHARIPANDE Abstract. We define a cobordism theory in algebraic geometry based on normal crossing degenerations with double point singularities. The main
More information2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations
2 Coherent D-Modules As described in the introduction, any system o linear partial dierential equations can be considered as a coherent D-module. In this chapter we ocus our attention on coherent D-modules
More information(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets. Contents. 1 The characterizing results
(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets We know that both Q and R are something special. When we think about about either o these we usually view it as a ield, or at least some kind o
More informationTHE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ct] 16 Jun 2006
arxiv:math/0606393v1 [math.ct] 16 Jun 2006 Strict 2-toposes Mark Weber bstract. 2-cateorical eneralisation o the notion o elementary topos is provided, and some o the properties o the yoneda structure
More informationLECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES
LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class o ibrations given by iber bundles. Fiber bundles lay an imortant role in many geometric contexts. For examle, the Grassmaniann
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationDiagrammatic logic applied to a parameterization process
Diarammatic loic applied to a parameterization process César Domínuez Dominique Duval Auust 25., 2009 Abstract. This paper provides an abstract deinition o some kinds o loics, called diarammatic loics,
More informationϕ APPROXIMATE BIFLAT AND ϕ AMENABLE BANACH ALGEBRAS
THE PUBLISHING HOUSE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMNIN CDEMY, Series, OF THE ROMNIN CDEMY Volume 13, Number 1/2012, pp 3 10 PPROXIMTE BIFLT ND MENBLE BNCH LGEBRS Zahra GHORBNI, Mahmood Lashkarizadeh BMI Department
More informationThe Sectional Category of a Map
arxiv:math/0403387v1 [math.t] 23 Mar 2004 The Sectional Category o a Map M. rkowitz and J. Strom bstract We study a generalization o the Svarc genus o a iber map. For an arbitrary collection E o spaces
More informationFORMAL CATEGORY THEORY
FORML TEGORY THEORY OURSE HELD T MSRYK UNIVERSITY IVN DI LIERTI, SIMON HENRY, MIKE LIEERMNN, FOSO LOREGIN bstract. These are the notes o a readin seminar on ormal cateory theory we are runnin at Masaryk
More informationArrow-theoretic differential theory
Arrow-theoretic dierential theory Urs Schreiber August 17, 2007 Abstract We propose and study a notion o a tangent (n + 1)-bundle to an arbitrary n-category Despite its simplicity, this notion turns out
More informationON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION
Bulletin o the Institute o Mathematics Academia Sinica (New Series) Vol 4 (2009), No 1, pp 47-66 ON KAN ETENSION OF HOMOLOG AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION B AKRUR BEHERA AND RADHESHAM OTA Abstract Under a set
More informationSheafification Johan M. Commelin, October 15, 2013
heaiication Johan M. Commelin, October 15, 2013 Introduction Let C be a categor, equipped with a Grothendieck topolog J. Let 2 Ph(C) be a preshea. The purpose o these notes is to assign to a morphism to
More informationHow to glue perverse sheaves
How to glue perverse sheaves A.A. Beilinson The aim o this note [0] is to give a short, sel-contained account o the vanishing cycle constructions o perverse sheaves; e.g., or the needs o [1]. It diers
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ag] 14 Dec 2016
Some elementary remarks on lci algebraic cycles arxiv:1612.04570v1 [math.ag] 14 Dec 2016 M. Maggesi and G. Vezzosi Dipartimento di Matematica ed Informatica Università di Firenze - Italy Notes for students
More informationProblem Set. Problems on Unordered Summation. Math 5323, Fall Februray 15, 2001 ANSWERS
Problem Set Problems on Unordered Summation Math 5323, Fall 2001 Februray 15, 2001 ANSWERS i 1 Unordered Sums o Real Terms In calculus and real analysis, one deines the convergence o an ininite series
More informationNotes on Serre fibrations
Notes on Serre ibrations Stehen A. Mitchell Auust 2001 1 Introduction Many roblems in tooloy can be ormulated abstractly as extension roblems A i h X or litin roblems X h Here the solid arrows reresent
More informationThe homology of real subspace arrangements
Journal o Topology Advance Access published October 14, 2010 Journal o Topology (2010) Page 1 o 33 C 2010 London Mathematical Society doi:10.1112/jtopol/jtq027 The homology o real subspace arrangements
More information1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.
MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an
More informationPrerequisite material for thinking about fermionic topological phases
Prerequisite material or thinkin about ermionic topoloical phases Ethan Lake October 30, 2016 These notes are a collection o remarks on various thins needed to start doin real work on ermionic topoloical
More informationD-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules
D-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules Notes by Takumi Murayama Fall 2016 and Winter 2017 Contents 1 September 19 (Harold Blum) 4 1.1 Deinitions [HTT08, 1.1]...................................... 4 1.2 The
More informationSynchronous Machines: a Traced Category
Synchronous Machines: a Traced Cateory Marc anol, Guatto drien To cite this version: Marc anol, Guatto drien. Synchronous Machines: a Traced Cateory. [Research Report] 2012. HL Id: hal-00748010
More informationTHE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE
THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new
More informationSlopes of Lefschetz fibrations and separating vanishing cycles
Slopes of Lefschetz fibrations and separatin vanishin cycles Yusuf Z. Gürtaş Abstract. In this article we find upper and lower bounds for the slope of enus hyperelliptic Lefschetz fibrations. We demonstrate
More informationCharacteristic classes in the Chow ring
arxiv:alg-geom/9412008v1 10 Dec 1994 Characteristic classes in the Chow ring Dan Edidin and William Graham Department of Mathematics University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 Let G be a reductive algebraic
More informationSlowly Changing Function Oriented Growth Analysis of Differential Monomials and Differential Polynomials
Slowly Chanin Function Oriented Growth Analysis o Dierential Monomials Dierential Polynomials SANJIB KUMAR DATTA Department o Mathematics University o kalyani Kalyani Dist-NadiaPIN- 7235 West Benal India
More informationPROJECTIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS
IJMMS 31:2 22 97 11 II. S1611712218192 ttp://ijmms.indawi.com Hindawi ublisin Corp. ROJECTIVE RERESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS SANGWON ARK Received 3 Auust 21 We prove tat 2 is a projective representation o a
More information( ) x y z. 3 Functions 36. SECTION D Composite Functions
3 Functions 36 SECTION D Composite Functions By the end o this section you will be able to understand what is meant by a composite unction ind composition o unctions combine unctions by addition, subtraction,
More informationCARTESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CATEGORIES
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 22, No. 23, 2009, pp. 622 672. CARTESIAN DIFFERENTIAL CATEGORIES R.F. BLUTE, J.R.B. COCKETT AND R.A.G. SEELY Abstract. This paper revisits the authors notion
More informationMultiplicative Properties of Integral Binary Quadratic Forms
Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Articles and Preprints Department o Mathematics 2008 Multiplicative Properties o Integral Binary Quadratic Forms A. G. Earnest Southern Illinois University
More informationCOBORDISM Seminar of the Graduiertenkolleg WS 2017/18
COBORDISM Seminar of the Graduiertenkolleg WS 2017/18 Introduction Bordism or cobordism starts out quite naively as an equivalence relation of manifolds: two closed manifolds X, Y are cobordant if there
More informationA SHORT PROOF OF ROST NILPOTENCE VIA REFINED CORRESPONDENCES
A SHORT PROOF OF ROST NILPOTENCE VIA REFINED CORRESPONDENCES PATRICK BROSNAN Abstract. I generalize the standard notion of the composition g f of correspondences f : X Y and g : Y Z to the case that X
More information