Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories
|
|
- Johnathan Lynch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ariv: v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions D Cospan(D 0 ) or which the right adjoint is normalandrestricts totheidentity on D 0, where Cospan(D 0 ) is the double category on D 0 whose vertical morphisms are cospans. We show that such a pair exists i and only i D has companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators. The right adjoints are induced by the companions and conjoints, and the let adjoints by the 1-cotabulators. The notion o a 1-cotabulator is a common generalization o the symmetric algebra o a module and Artin-Wraith glueing o toposes, locales, and topological spaces. 1 Introduction Double categories, irst introduced by Ehresmann [2], provide a setting in which one can simultaneously consider two kinds o morphisms (called horizontal and vertical morphisms). Examples abound in many areas o mathematics. There are double categories whose objects are sets, rings, categories, posets, topological spaces, locales, toposes, quantales, and more. There are general examples, as well. I D is a category with pullbacks, then there is a double category Span(D) whose objects and horizontal morphisms are those o D, and vertical morphisms 0 are spans, i.e., morphisms 0 o D, with vertical compositions via pullback. I D is a category with pushouts, thencospan(d) is deined dually, in the sense that vertical morphisms 0 are cospans 0 with vertical compositions via pushout. Moreover, i D has both, then pushout o spans 1
2 and pullback o cospans induce an oplax/lax adjunction (in the sense o Paré [12]) Span(D) F G Cospan(D) which restricts to the identity on the horizontal category D. Now, suppose D is a category with pushouts, and we replace Span(D) by a double category D whose horizontal category is also D. Then several questions arise. Under what conditions on D is there an oplax/lax adjunction D Cospan(D) which restricts to the identity on D? In particular, id has cotabulators, then there is an induced oplax unctor F:D Cospan(D), and so one can ask when this unctor F has a right adjoint. Similarly, i D has companions and conjoints, there is a normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D) D c 0 which takes a cospan 0 c 1 c 0 1 to the composite 0 c 1, and so one can ask when the induced unctor G has a let adjoint. We will see that these questions are related. In particular, there is an oplax/lax adjunction D F Cospan(D) G such that G is normal and restricts to the identity on D precisely when D has 1-cotabulators, conjoints, and companions (where or 1-cotabulators we drop the tetrahedron condition in the deinition o cotabulator). Moreover, i D has pullbacks, then the result dualizes to show that there is oplax/lax adjunctions Span(D) D whose let adjoint is opnormal and restricts to the identity on D precisely when D has 1-tabulators, conjoints, and companions. The double categories mentioned above all have companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators, and the unctors F and G are related to amiliar constructions. In the double category o commutative rings (as well as, quantales), the unctor F is given by the symmetric algebra algebra on a bimodule and G is given by restriction o scalars. For categories (and posets), F is the collage construction. In the case o topological spaces, locales, and toposes, the unctor F uses Artin-Wraith glueing. The paper proceeds as ollows. We begin in Section 2 with the double categories under consideration, ollowed by a review o companions and conjoints in Section 3. The notion o 1-tabulators (duallly, 1-cotabulators) is then introduced in Section 4. Ater a brie discussion o oplax/lax adjunctions in Section 5, we present our characterization (Theorem 5.5) o those o 2
3 the orm D Cospan(D) such that right adjoint is normal and restricts to the identity on D. Along the way, we obtain a possibly new characterization (Proposition 5.3) o double categories with companions and conjoints, in the case where the horizontal category D has pushouts, as those or which the identity unctor on D extends to a normal lax unctor Cospan(D) D. We conclude with the dual (Corollary 5.6) classiication o oplax/lax adjunctions Span(D) D let adjoint is opnormal and restricts to the identity on D. 2 The Examples o Double Categories Following Paré [5, 12] and Shulman [13], we deine a double categoryd to be a weak internal category d 0 d 1 D 1 D0 D c D 1 D 1 D 0 in CAT. It consists o objects (those o D 0 ), two types o morphisms: horizontal (those o D 0 ) and vertical (objects o D 1 with domain and codomain given by d 0 and d 1 ), and cells (morphisms o D 1 ) denoted by m n 1 ϕ 1 1 Composition and identity morphisms are given horizontally in D 0 and vertically via c and, respectively. The objects, horizontal morphisms, and special cells (i.e., ones in which the vertical morphisms are identities) orm a 2-category called the horizontal 2-category o D. Since D is a weak internal category in CAT, the associativity and identity axioms or vertical morphisms hold merely up to coherent isomorphism, and so we get an analogous vertical bicategory. When these isomorphisms are identities, we say that D is a strict double category. The ollowing double categories are o interest in this paper. Example 2.1. Top has topological spaces as objects and continuous maps as horizontal morphisms. Vertical morphisms 0 are inite intersectionpreserving maps O( 0 ) O( ) on the open set lattices, and there is a cell o the orm ( ) i and only i 1 1 n m ( )
4 Example 2.2. Loc has locales as objects, locale morphisms (in the sense o [8]) as horizontal morphisms, and inite meet-preserving maps as vertical morphisms. There is a cell o the orm ( ) i and only i 1n m 0. Example 2.3. Topos has Grothendieck toposes as objects, geometric morphisms (in the sense o [9]) as horizontal morphisms, and natural transormations 1n m 0 as cells o the orm ( ). Example 2.4. Cat has small categories as objects and unctors as horizontal morphisms. Vertical morphisms m: 0 are prounctors (also known as distributors and relators), i.e., unctors m: op 0 Sets, and natural transormations m n( 0, 1 ) are cells o the orm ( ). Example 2.5. Pos has partially-ordered sets as objects and order-preserving maps as horizontal morphisms. Vertical morphisms m: 0 are order ideals m op 0, and there is a cell o the orm ( ) i and only i (x 0,x 1 ) m ( 0 (x 0 ), 1 (x 1 )) n. Example 2.6. For a category D with pullbacks, the span double category Span(D) has objects and horizontal morphisms in D, and vertical morphisms which are spans in D, with composition deined via pullback and the identities id : given by id id. The cells m n are commutative diagrams in D o the orm m n 0 m n 1 1 In particular, Span(Set) is the double category Set considered by Paré in [12], see also [1]. Example 2.7. Cospan(D) is deined dually, or a category D with pushouts. In particular, Span(Top) is the double category used by Grandis [3, 4] in his study o 2-dimensional topological quantum ield theory. Example 2.8. For a symmetric monoidal category V with coequalizers, the double category Mod(V) has commutative monoids in V as objects and monoid homomorphisms as horizontal morphisms. Vertical morphisms rom 4
5 0 to are ( 0, )-bimodules, with composition via tensor product, and cells are bimodule homomorphisms. Special cases include the double category Ring o commutative rings with identity and the double category Quant o commutative unital quantales. 3 Companions and Conjoints Recall [6] that companions and conjoints in a double category are deined as ollows. Suppose : is a horizontal morphism. A companion or is a vertical morphism : together with cells id id η ε id id whose horizontal and vertical compositions are identity cells. A conjoint or is a vertical morphism morphism : together with cells α id id id β id whose horizontal and vertical compositions are identity cells. We say D has companions and conjoints i every horizontal morphism has a companion and a conjoint. Such a double category is also known as a ramed bicategory [13]. I has a companion, then one can show that there is a bijection between cells o the ollowing orm m g ϕ h n g m ψ h n 5
6 Similarly, i has a conjoint, then there is a bijection between cells m g ϕ h n g m ψ h n There are two other cases o this process (called vertical lipping in [6]) which we do not recall here as they will not be used in the ollowing. All o the double categories mention in the previous section have well known companions and conjoints. In Top, Loc, and Topos, the companion and conjoint o are the usual maps denoted by and. ForCat, they are the prounctors deined by (x,y) = (x,y) and (y,x) = (y,x), and analogously, orpos. I V is a symmetric monoidal category and : is amonoidhomomorphism, then becomes an(,)-bimoduleanda(,)- bimodule via, and so is both a companion and conjoint or. Finally, or Span(D) (respectively, Cospan(D)) the companion and conjoint o are the span (respectively, cospan) with as one leg and the appropriate identity morphism as the other. 4 1-Tabulators and 1-Cotabulators Tabulators in double categories were deined as ollows in [5] (see also [12]). Suppose D is a double category and m: 0 is a vertical morphism in D. A tabulator o m is an object T together with a cell such that or any cell T 0 τ m 0 ϕ m 6
7 there exists a unique morphism : commutative tetrahedron o cells T such that τ = ϕ, and or any there is a unique cell ξ such that 0 n n 1 ξ T m 0 τ m gives the tetrahedron in the obvious way. Tabulators (and their duals cotabulators) arise in the next section, but we do not use the tetrahedron property in any o our proos or constructions. Thus, we drop this condition in avor o a weaker notion which we call a 1-tabulator (and dually, 1-cotabulator) o a vertical morphism. When the tetrahedron condition holds, we call these tabulators (respectively, cotabulators) strong. It is easy to show that the ollowing proposition gives an alternative deinition in terms o adjoint unctors. Proposition 4.1. A double category D has 1-tabulators (respectively, 1- cotabulators) i and only i :D 0 D 1 has a right (respectively, let) adjoint which we denote by Σ (respectively, Γ). Corollary 4.2. M od(v) does not have 1-tabulators. Proo. Suppose (V,,I) is a symmetric monoidal category. Then I is an initial object Mod(V) 0, which is the category o commutative monoids in V. Since I is not an initial object o Mod(V) 1, we know does not have a right adjoint, and so the result ollows rom Proposition 4.1. The eight examples under consideration have 1-cotabulators, and we know that 1-tabulatorsexist in all but one (namely,mod(v)). In act, we will prove a general proposition that gives the existence o 1-tabulators rom a property o 1-cotabulators (called 2-glueing in [11]) shared by Top, Loc, Topos, Cat, 7
8 and Pos. We will also show that the 1-cotabulators in Ring are not strong, and so consideration o only strong cotabulators would eliminate this example rom consideration. The cotabulator o m: 0 in Cat (and similarly, Pos), also known as the collage, is the the category over 2 whose ibers over 0 and 1 are 0 and, respectively, and morphism rom objects o 0 to those o are given by m: op 0 Sets, with the obvious cell m id. Cotabulators in Topos, Loc, and Top are constructed using Artin-Wraith glueing (see [9], [10], [11]). In particular, given m: 0 in Top, the points o Γm are given by the disjoint union o 0 and with U open in Γm i and only i U 0 is open in 0, U 1 is open in, and U 1 m(u 0 ), where U i = U i. c 0 For Cospan(D), the cotabulator o 0 c 1 1 is given by with cell (c 0,id,c 1 ). I D has pullbacks and pushouts, then the cotabulator o s 0 0 s 1 in Span(D) is the pushout o s 0 and s 1. The situation in Mod(V) is more complicated. Suppose M: 0, i.e., M is an ( 0, )-bimodule. Then M is an 0 -module, and so (with appropriate assumptions which apply to Ring and Quant), we can consider the symmetric 0 -algebra SM, and it is not diicult to show that the inclusion M SM deines a cell which gives SM the structure o a 1-cotabulator o M. However, as shown by the ollowing example, the tetrahedron condition need not hold in M od(v). Consider 0: together with S0 = and the unique homomorphism 0 in Mod(Ab) = Ring. Then, taking ι 1 (n) = (n,0) and ι 2 (n) = (0,n), the diagram 0 ι = 0 ι 2 deines a commutative tetrahedron which does not actor 0 ϕ 0 8
9 or any homomorphism ϕ:. Thus, the 1-cotabulators in Mod(V) need not be strong. To deine 2-glueing, suppose D has 1-cotabulators and a terminal object 1, and let 2 denote the image under Γ o the vertical identity morphism on 1, where Γ:D 1 D 0 is let adjoint to (see Proposition 4.1). Then Γ induces a unctor D 1 D 0 /2, which we also denote by Γ. I this unctor is an equivalence o categories, then we say D has 2-glueing. In Cat (and similarly, Pos), 2 is the category with two objects and one non-identity morphism. It is the Sierpinski space 2 in Top, the Sierpinski locale O(2) in Loc, and the Sierpinski topos S 2 in Topos. That Cat has 2- glueing is Bénabou s equivalence cited in [14]. For Top, Loc, and Topos, the equivalence ollows rom the glueing construction (see [9], [10], [11]). Note that in each o these cases, 2 is exponentiable in D 0 (see [7, 9]), and so the unctor 2 :D 0 D 0 /2 has a right adjoint, usually denoted by Π 2. Proposition 4.3. I D has 2-glueing and 2 is exponentiable in D 0, then D has 1-tabulators. 2 Proo. Consider the composite F:D 0 D 0 /2 D 1. Since it is not diiculty to show that Γ takes the vertical identity on to the projection 2 2, it ollows that F =, and so has a right adjoint Σ, since 2 does. Thus, D has 1-tabulators by Proposition 4.1. Applying Proposition 4.3, we see that Cat, Pos, Top, Loc, and Topos have 1-tabulators (which are can be shown to be strong). Unraveling the construction o Σ given in the proo above, one gets the ollowing descriptions o 1-tabulators in Cat and Top which can be shown to be strong. Given m: 0 in Cat (and similarly Pos), the tabulator is the category o elements o m, i.e., the objects o Σm are o the orm (x 0,x 1,α), where x 0 is an object o 0, x 1 is an object o, and α m(x 0,x 1 ). Morphisms rom (x 0,x 1,α) to (x 0,x 1,α ) in Σm are pairs (x 0 x 0,x 1 x 1) o morphisms, compatible with α and α. The tabulator o m: 0 in Top is the set Σm = {(x 0,x 1 ) U 0 O( 0 ),x 1 m(u 0 ) x 0 U 0 } 0 with the subspace topology. Note that one can directly see that this is the tabulator o m by showing that ( 0, 1 ): 0 actors through Σm i and only i 1 1 m
10 Although Span(D) and Cospan(D) do not have 2-glueing (since Γ(id 1 ) = 1), and so Proposition[11] does not apply, the construction o their tabulators is dual to that o their cotabulators. Finally, Ring and Quant do not have 1-tabulators, as they are special cases o Corollary The Adjunction Recall rom[5]thatalax unctorf:d Econsists ounctorsf i :D i E i, or i = 0,1, compatible with d 0 and d 1 ; together with identity and composition comparison cells ρ :id F F(id ) and ρ m,m :Fm Fm F(m m) or every object and every vertical composite m m o D, respectively; satisying naturality and coherence conditions. I ρ is an isomorphism, or all, we say that F is a normal lax unctor. An oplax unctor is deined dually with comparison cells in the opposite direction. An oplax/lax adjunction consists o an oplax unctor F:D E and a lax double unctor G:E D together with double cells η 0 0 GF 0 η m FGn ε n GF FG 1 1 m GFm η 1 ε 0 FG 0 0 satisying naturality and coherence conditions, as well as the usual adjunction identities (see [6]). Example 5.1. Suppose D is a double category with 1-cotabulators and D 0 has pushouts. Then, by Proposition 4.1, the unctor :D 0 D 1 has a let adjoint (denoted by Γ), and so there is an oplax unctor F:D Cospan(D 0 ) which is the identity on objects and horizontal morphisms, and deined on vertical morphisms and cells by m m 1 1 ε i 0 i ϕ 0 Γm i 1 Γm i n
11 where is induced by the universal property o the 1-cotabulator. The comparison cells F(id ) id F and F(m m) Fm Fm also arise via the universal property, with the latter given by the horizontal morphism Γ(m m) P corresponding to the diagram m m 0 id m ι m Γm P m ι m Γm 2 2 id 2 2 where P is a pushout and the large rectangle commutes. Dually, we get: Example 5.2. SupposeD is a double category with 1-tabulators andd 0 has pullbacks. Then there is a lax unctor F:D Span(D 0 ) which is the identity on objects and horizontal morphisms and takes m: 0 to the span 0 Σm, where Σ is the right adjoint to. Proposition 5.3. SupposeD is a double category andd 0 has pushouts. Then D has companionsand conjoints i and onlythe identity unctor ond 0 extends to a normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D 0 ) D. Proo. Suppose D has companions and conjoints. Then it is not diicult to show that there is a normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D 0 ) D which is the identity on objects and horizontal morphisms, and is deined on cells by 0 0 c 0 c 0 g c 1 1 c 1 1 g 0 g 1 1 g c ψ 0 0 c 0 g c 1 c ψ g 1 1 where ψ 0 and ψ 1 arise rom the commutativity o the squares in the cospan cell, and the deinitions o companion and conjoint. 11
12 Conversely, suppose there is a normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D 0 ) D which is the identity on objects and horizontal morphisms. Then the companion and conjoint o : are deined as ollows. Consider = G( id ): = G( id Applying G to the cospan diagrams ): id id id id id id id id id and composing with ρ and ρ 1, we get cells id id id id id id ρ G(id,,) id id G(,idy,id ) ρ 1 id id whichserveasη andε, respectively, making thecompaniono. Notethat the horizontal and vertical identities or η and ε ollow rom the normality and coherence axioms o G, respectively. Similarly, the cells α and β or arise rom the cospan diagrams id id id id id id id id id and it ollows that D has companions and conjoints. Corollary 5.4. SupposeD is a double category andd 0 has pullbacks. ThenD has companions and conjoints i and only the identity unctor on D 0 extends to an opnormal oplax unctor Span(D 0 ) D. Proo. Apply Proposition 5.3 to D op. 12
13 Theorem 5.5. The ollowing are equivalent or a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts: (a) there is an oplax/lax adjunctiond F Cospan(D 0) such that G is normal G and restricts to the identity on D 0 ; (b) D has companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators; (c) D has companions and conjoints, and the induced normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D 0 ) D has an oplax let adjoint; (d) D has companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators, and the induced oplax unctor F:D Cospan(D 0 ) is let adjoint to the induced normal lax unctor G:Cospan(D 0 ) D; (e) D has 1-cotabulators and the induced oplax unctor F:D Cospan(D 0 ) has a normal lax right adjoint. Proo. (a) (b) Given F G such that G is normal and restricts to the identity ond 0, we knowd has companions and conjoints by Proposition 5.3. To see that D has 1-cotabulators, by Proposition 4.1, it suices to show that :D 0 D 1 has a let adjoint. Since actors as D 0 Cospan(D 0 ) G 1 D 1, by normality o G, and both these unctors have let adjoints, the desired result ollows. (b) (c) Suppose D has companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators, and consider the induced unctor F:D Cospan(D 0 ). Given m: 0 and c 0 0 c 1 1, applying the deinition o 1-cotabulator, we know that every cell in Cospan(D 0 ) o the orm corresponds to a unique cell Γm m c 0 c ϕ c 1 1 c 0 c 1 id 13
14 and hence, a unique cell m ψ c 0 1 c by vertical lipping, and it ollows that F G. (c) (d) Suppose D has companions and conjoints, and the induced normal lax unctor G has an oplax let adjoint F. As in the proo o (a) (b), we know that D has 1-cotabulators, and so, it suices to show that F is the induced unctor. We know F takes m: 0 to a cospan o the orm c 0 0 Γm c 1 1, since F is the identity on objects and the let adjoint o c 0 :D 0 Cospan(D 0 ) takes 0 Γm c 1 1 to, and so the desired result easily ollows. (d) (e) is clear. (e) (a) Suppose D has 1-cotabulators and the induced oplax unctor F has a normal lax right adjoint G. Since F restricts to the identity on D 0, then so does G, and the proo is complete. Note that this proo shows that i there is an oplax/lax adjunction D F Cospan(D 0) G such that G is normal and restricts to the identity on D 0, then F is the induced by 1-cotabulators and G by companions and conjoints. Since the double categories in Examples all have companions, conjoints, and 1-cotabulators, it ollows that they each admits a unique (up to equivalence) oplax/lax adjunction o this orm and it is induced in this manner. Applying Theorem 5.5 to D op, we get: Corollary 5.6. The ollowing are equivalent or a double category D such that D 0 has pullbacks: (a) there is an oplax/lax adjunctionspan(d 0 ) G D such that G is opnormal F and restricts to the identity on D 0 ; 14
15 (b) D has companions, conjoints, and 1-tabulators; (c) D has companions and conjoints, and the induced opnormal oplax unctor G:Span(D 0 ) D has an lax right adjoint; (d) D has companions, conjoints, and 1-tabulators, and the induced lax unctor F:D Span(D 0 ) is right adjoint to the induced opnormal oplax unctor G:Span(D 0 ) D; (e) D has 1-tabulators and the induced lax unctor F:D Span(D 0 ) has a opnormal oplax let adjoint. As in the cospan case, i there is an oplax/lax adjunction Span(D 0 ) G F such that G is opnormal and restricts to the identity on D 0, then F is the induced by 1-tabulators and G is by companions and conjoints. Since the double categories in Examples (i.e., all by M od(v) ) have companions, conjoints, and 1-tabulators, it ollows they each admits is a unique (up to equivalence) oplax/lax adjunction o this orm, and it is induced by companions, conjoints, and 1-tabulators. D Reerences [1] R. J. MACG. Dawson, R. Paré, amd D. A. Pronk, The span construction, Theory Appl. Categ. 24 (2010), [2] Charles Ehresmann. Catégories structuées, Ann. Sci. E?cole Norm. Sup. 80 (1963) [3] M. Grandis, Higher cospans and weak cubical categories (Cospans in Algebraic Topology, I), Theory Appl. Categ. 18 (2007), [4] Marco Grandis, Collared cospans, cohomotopy and TQFT (Cospans in Algebraic Topology, II), Theory Appl. Categ. 18 (2007), [5] Marco Grandis and Robert Paré, Limits in double categories, Cahiers de Top. et Géom. Di. Catég. 40 (1999),
16 [6] Marco Grandis and Robert Paré, Adjoints or double categories, Cahiers de Top. et Géom. Di. Catég. 45 (2004), [7] J. M. E. Hyland, Function spaces in the category o locales, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 871 (1981) [8] P. T. Johnstone, Stone Spaces, Cambridge University Press, [9] P. T. Johnstone, Topos Theory, Academic Press, [10] S. B. Nieield, Cartesian inclusions: locales and toposes, Comm. in Alg. 9(16) (1981), [11] S. B. Nieield, The glueing construction and double categories, to appear in J. Pure Appl. Algebra. [12] Robert Paré, oneda theory or double categories, Theory Appl. Categ. 25 (2011), [13] M. Shulman, Framed bicategories and monoidal ibrations, Theory Appl. Categ. 20 (2008), [14] R. Street, Powerul unctors, expository note: street/pow.un.pd (2001). 16
SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 26, 212, pp. 729 742. SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES SUSAN NIEFIELD Abstract. Given a double category D such that D has pushouts, we characterize
More informationDescent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014
Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and
More informationHSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS
HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN
VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not
More information1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.
MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an
More informationMath 248B. Base change morphisms
Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback
More informationCategories and Natural Transformations
Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical
More informationGENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS
GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions
More informationRepresentation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi
Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions
More informationGrothendieck construction for bicategories
Grothendieck construction or bicategories Igor Baković Rudjer Bošković Institute Abstract In this article, we give the generalization o the Grothendieck construction or pseudo unctors given in [5], which
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the
More informationExponentiable functors between quantaloid-enriched categories
Exponentiable functors between quantaloid-enriched categories Maria Manuel Clementino, Dirk Hofmann and Isar Stubbe July 3, 2007 Abstract. Exponentiable functors between quantaloid-enriched categories
More informationFibrations of bicategories
Fibrations o bicategories Igor Baković Faculty o Natural Sciences and Mathematics University o Split Teslina 12/III, 21000 Split, Croatia Abstract The main purpose o this work is to describe a generalization
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.
More informationJoseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012
Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Categories joseph.muscat@um.edu.mt 1 December 2012 1 Objects and Morphisms category is a class o objects with morphisms : (a way o comparing/substituting/mapping/processing to ) such
More informationMADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS EMILY RIEHL The aim o this note is to briely summarize techniques or building weak actorization systems whose right class is characterized by a particular liting
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017
arxiv:1710.10238v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017 Notes on clans and tribes. Joyal October 30, 2017 bstract The purpose o these notes is to give a categorical presentation/analysis o homotopy type theory. The notes
More informationTopological aspects of restriction categories
Calgary 2006, Topological aspects of restriction categories, June 1, 2006 p. 1/22 Topological aspects of restriction categories Robin Cockett robin@cpsc.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Calgary 2006,
More informationLIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset
5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,
More informationTangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007
Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves
More informationTHE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.
More informationTHE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE
THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new
More informationON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION
Bulletin o the Institute o Mathematics Academia Sinica (New Series) Vol 4 (2009), No 1, pp 47-66 ON KAN ETENSION OF HOMOLOG AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION B AKRUR BEHERA AND RADHESHAM OTA Abstract Under a set
More informationUniversity of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor
Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theory Seminar University of Oxford, Michaelis 2011 November 16, 2011 References Johnstone, P.T.: Sketches of an Elephant. A Topos-Theory Compendium.
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i
More informationCategory Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond
Category Theory Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, 2010 Typset by Cathal Ormond Contents 1 Types, Composition and Identities 3 1.1 Programs..................................... 3 1.2 Functional Laws.................................
More informationCATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction
1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the
More informationA UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR GENERALIZED MULTICATEGORIES
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 24, No. 21, 2010, pp. 580 655. A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR GENERALIZED MULTICATEGORIES G.S.H. CRUTTWELL AND MICHAEL A. SHULMAN Abstract. Notions o generalized multicategory
More informationCategory Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017
Category Theory 2 Category Theory Travis Dirle December 12, 2017 2 Contents 1 Categories 1 2 Construction on Categories 7 3 Universals and Limits 11 4 Adjoints 23 5 Limits 31 6 Generators and Projectives
More informationUMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract
UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S
More informationFinite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)
More informationUniversity of Cape Town
The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial
More informationCATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)
CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS J. P. MAY Contents 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R) 1 2. Symmetric monoidal categories, K(C), and Pic(C) 2 3. The unit endomorphism ring R(C ) 5 4.
More informationNOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S
NOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S J.P. MAY As an example of categorification, I presented Atiyah s axioms [1] for a topological quantum field theory (TQFT) to undergraduates in the University of Chicago s summer
More informationELEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE NO.14 CATEGORY THEORY. Tatsuya Hagino
1 ELEMENTS IN MTHEMTICS FOR INFORMTION SCIENCE NO.14 CTEGORY THEORY Tatsuya Haino haino@sc.keio.ac.jp 2 Set Theory Set Theory Foundation o Modern Mathematics a set a collection o elements with some property
More informationGENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE
GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will
More informationTopos Theory. Lectures 21 and 22: Classifying toposes. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello. The notion of classifying topos
Lectures 21 and 22: toposes of 2 / 30 Toposes as mathematical universes of Recall that every Grothendieck topos E is an elementary topos. Thus, given the fact that arbitrary colimits exist in E, we can
More informationON THE CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITS AND COLIMITS IN -CATEGORIES
ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF LIMITS ND COLIMITS IN -CTEGORIES EMILY RIEHL ND DOMINIC VERITY bstract. In previous work, we introduce an axiomatic ramework within which to prove theorems about many varieties o
More informationCONTINUITY. 1. Continuity 1.1. Preserving limits and colimits. Suppose that F : J C and R: C D are functors. Consider the limit diagrams.
CONTINUITY Abstract. Continuity, tensor products, complete lattices, the Tarski Fixed Point Theorem, existence of adjoints, Freyd s Adjoint Functor Theorem 1. Continuity 1.1. Preserving limits and colimits.
More informationOn injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University
On injective constructions of S-semigroups Jan Paseka Masaryk University Joint work with Xia Zhang South China Normal University BLAST 2018 University of Denver, Denver, USA Jan Paseka (MU) 10. 8. 2018
More informationKathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011
MATHGEOM Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011 Joint work with... Steve Lack (foundations) Jonathan Scott (application
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 15 12 CHRCTERIZTION OF CENTRL EXTENSIONS IN THE VRIETY OF QUNDLES VLÉRIN EVEN, MRINO GRN ND NDRE MONTOLI bstract: The
More informationTheories With Duality DRAFT VERSION ONLY
Theories With Duality DRAFT VERSION ONLY John C. Baez Department of athematics, University of California Riverside, CA 9252 USA Paul-André elliès Laboratoire PPS Université Paris 7 - Denis Diderot Case
More informationThe Structure of Fusion Categories via Topological Quantum Field Theories
The Structure of Fusion Categories via Topological Quantum Field Theories Chris Schommer-Pries Department of Mathematics, MIT April 27 th, 2011 Joint with Christopher Douglas and Noah Snyder Chris Schommer-Pries
More informationNotes about Filters. Samuel Mimram. December 6, 2012
Notes about Filters Samuel Mimram December 6, 2012 1 Filters and ultrafilters Definition 1. A filter F on a poset (L, ) is a subset of L which is upwardclosed and downward-directed (= is a filter-base):
More informationA NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.
A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. DIETER HAPPEL AND DAN ZACHARIA Abstract. Let P n be the projective n space over the complex numbers. In this note we show that an indecomposable
More informationMath 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications
Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle
More informationHigher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications
Higher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications Thomas M. Fiore http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~fiore/ Why Homotopy Theory and Higher Categories? Homotopy Theory solves topological and geometric problems
More informationA 2-CATEGORIES COMPANION
A 2-CATEGORIES COMPANION STEPHEN LACK Abstract. This paper is a rather informal guide to some of the basic theory of 2-categories and bicategories, including notions of limit and colimit, 2-dimensional
More informationGabriel-Ulmer Duality and Lawvere Theories Enriched over a General Base
Under consideration or publication in J. Functional Programming 1 Gabriel-Ulmer Duality and Lawvere Theories Enriched over a General Base STEPHEN LACK School o Computing and Mathematics, University o Western
More informationON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES
Theory and Applications o Categories, Vol. 3, No. 9, 1997, pp. 213 250. ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES G. M. KELLY AND STEPHEN LACK Transmitted by R. J. Wood ABSTRACT. A category may bear many monoidal structures,
More informationA brief Introduction to Category Theory
A brief Introduction to Category Theory Dirk Hofmann CIDMA, Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal Office: 11.3.10, dirk@ua.pt, http://sweet.ua.pt/dirk/ October 9, 2017
More informationModel Structures on the Category of Small Double Categories
Model Structures on the Category of Small Double Categories CT2007 Tom Fiore Simona Paoli and Dorette Pronk www.math.uchicago.edu/ fiore/ 1 Overview 1. Motivation 2. Double Categories and Their Nerves
More informationCATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.
CATEGORY THEORY PROFESSOR PETER JOHNSTONE Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. Definition 1.1. A category C consists
More informationNATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS MARCO GRANDIS AND WALTER THOLEN Abstract. In order to acilitate a natural choice or morphisms created by the (let or right) liting property as used in the deinition o
More informationThe Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 69 (2003) URL: http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume69.html 19 pages The Uniormity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories Masahito Hasegawa Research
More informationAlgebra and local presentability: how algebraic are they? (A survey)
Algebra and local presentability: how algebraic are they? (A survey) Jiří Adámek 1 and Jiří Rosický 2, 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague,
More informationFUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS. 1. Functors
FUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS Abstract. Graphs, quivers, natural transformations, adjunctions, Galois connections, Galois theory. 1.1. Graph maps. 1. Functors 1.1.1. Quivers. Quivers generalize directed graphs,
More informationFROM LAX MONAD EXTENSIONS TO TOPOLOGICAL THEORIES
FROM LAX MONAD EXTENSIONS TO TOPOLOGICAL THEORIES MARIA MANUEL CLEMENTINO AND WALTER THOLEN To Manuela, teacher and friend Abstract. We investigate those lax extensions of a Set-monad T = (T, m, e) to
More informationOpen Petri Nets. John C. Baez
Open Petri Nets John C. Baez Department o Mathematics University o Caliornia Riverside CA, USA 9252 and Centre or Quantum Technologies National University o Singapore Singapore 7543 Jade Master Department
More information1 Categorical Background
1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,
More informationReview of category theory
Review of category theory Proseminar on stable homotopy theory, University of Pittsburgh Friday 17 th January 2014 Friday 24 th January 2014 Clive Newstead Abstract This talk will be a review of the fundamentals
More informationCATEGORICAL STRUCTURES ENRICHED IN A QUANTALOID: TENSORED AND COTENSORED CATEGORIES
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 06 14 CATEGORICAL STRUCTURES ENRICHED IN A QUANTALOID: TENSORED AND COTENSORED CATEGORIES ISAR STUBBE ABSTRACT: Our
More informationDUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS
DUALITY AND SMALL FUNCTORS GEORG BIEDERMANN AND BORIS CHORNY Abstract. The homotopy theory o small unctors is a useul tool or studying various questions in homotopy theory. In this paper, we develop the
More informationA Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors
Contents 5 Grothendieck topologies 1 6 Exactness properties 10 7 Geometric morphisms 17 8 Points and Boolean localization 22 5 Grothendieck topologies A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped
More informationAdjunctions! Everywhere!
Adjunctions! Everywhere! Carnegie Mellon University Thursday 19 th September 2013 Clive Newstead Abstract What do free groups, existential quantifiers and Stone-Čech compactifications all have in common?
More informationTowards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language for Monad-based Semantics
Towards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language or Monad-based Semantics Julian Jakob Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg julian.jakob@au.de 21.06.2016 Introductory Examples 1 2 + 3 3 9 36 4 while
More informationIn the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.
Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by
More informationSymbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid
Symbol Index 409 Symbol Index Symbols of standard and uncontroversial usage are generally not included here. As in the word index, boldface page-numbers indicate pages where definitions are given. If a
More informationSome glances at topos theory. Francis Borceux
Some glances at topos theory Francis Borceux Como, 2018 2 Francis Borceux francis.borceux@uclouvain.be Contents 1 Localic toposes 7 1.1 Sheaves on a topological space.................... 7 1.2 Sheaves
More informationMidterm Exam Solutions February 27, 2009
Midterm Exam Solutions February 27, 2009 (24. Deine each o the ollowing statements. You may assume that everyone knows the deinition o a topological space and a linear space. (4 a. X is a compact topological
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ct] 19 Feb 2008
Understanding the small object argument arxiv:0712.0724v2 [math.ct] 19 Feb 2008 Richard Garner Department o Mathematics, Uppsala University, Box 480, S-751 06 Uppsala, Sweden October 14, 2011 Abstract
More informationTHE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES
Theory and pplications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2012, pp. 304 330. THE COLGEBRIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES THOMS THORNE bstract. The relative cell complexes with respect to a generating set o coibrations
More informationON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES
ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES TOBIAS BARTHEL AND EMIL RIEHL Abstract. We present general techniques or constructing unctorial actorizations appropriate or model
More informationUniversal Properties
A categorical look at undergraduate algebra and topology Julia Goedecke Newnham College 24 February 2017, Archimedeans Julia Goedecke (Newnham) 24/02/2017 1 / 30 1 Maths is Abstraction : more abstraction
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES
INTRODUCTION TO PART V: CATEGORIES OF CORRESPONDENCES 1. Why correspondences? This part introduces one of the two main innovations in this book the (, 2)-category of correspondences as a way to encode
More informationENHANCED SIX OPERATIONS AND BASE CHANGE THEOREM FOR ARTIN STACKS
ENHANCED SIX OPERATIONS AND BASE CHANGE THEOREM FOR ARTIN STACKS YIFENG LIU AND WEIZHE ZHENG Abstract. In this article, we develop a theory o Grothendieck s six operations or derived categories in étale
More informationDuality, Residues, Fundamental class
Duality, Residues, Fundamental class Joseph Lipman Purdue University Department of Mathematics lipman@math.purdue.edu May 22, 2011 Joseph Lipman (Purdue University) Duality, Residues, Fundamental class
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ct] 12 Nov 2015
double-dimensional approach to ormal category theory Seerp Roald Koudenburg arxiv:1511.04070v1 [math.t] 12 Nov 2015 Drat version as o November 13, 2015 bstract Whereas ormal category theory is classically
More information3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity
Ž. Journal o Algebra 236, 778795 2001 doi:10.1006jabr.2000.8526, available online at http:www.idealibrary.com on 3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity Dominique Bourn Uniersite du Littoral, 220 a. de l Uniersite,
More informationEndomorphism Semialgebras in Categorical Quantum Mechanics
Endomorphism Semialgebras in Categorical Quantum Mechanics Kevin Dunne University of Strathclyde November 2016 Symmetric Monoidal Categories Definition A strict symmetric monoidal category (A,, I ) consists
More informationC2.7: CATEGORY THEORY
C2.7: CATEGORY THEORY PAVEL SAFRONOV WITH MINOR UPDATES 2019 BY FRANCES KIRWAN Contents Introduction 2 Literature 3 1. Basic definitions 3 1.1. Categories 3 1.2. Set-theoretic issues 4 1.3. Functors 5
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ct] 10 Jul 2016
ON THE FIBREWISE EFFECTIVE BURNSIDE -CATEGORY arxiv:1607.02786v1 [math.ct] 10 Jul 2016 CLARK BARWICK AND SAUL GLASMAN Abstract. Effective Burnside -categories, introduced in [1], are the centerpiece of
More informationPolynomials and Models of Type Theory
Polynomials and Models of Type Theory Tamara von Glehn Magdalene College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 This dissertation
More informationApplications of 2-categorical algebra to the theory of operads. Mark Weber
Applications of 2-categorical algebra to the theory of operads Mark Weber With new, more combinatorially intricate notions of operad arising recently in the algebraic approaches to higher dimensional algebra,
More informationEnriched and internal categories: an extensive relationship
DOI 10.1515/tmj-2017-0111 Enriched and internal categories: an extensive relationship Thomas Cottrell 1, Soichiro Fujii 2 and John Power 3 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath
More informationON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES
ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES CLEMENS BERGER AND IEKE MOERDIJK Abstract. We give sufficient conditions for the existence of a Quillen model structure on small categories enriched in a given
More informationTWO-SIDED DISCRETE FIBRATIONS IN 2-CATEGORIES AND BICATEGORIES
TWO-SIDED DISCRETE FIBRATIONS IN 2-CATEGORIES AND BICATEGORIES EMILY RIEHL Abstract. Fibrations over a category B, introduced to category theory by Grothendieck, determine pseudo-functors B op Cat. A two-sided
More informationClassification of effective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4
Classiication o eective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4 Shintarô Kuroki Department o Applied Mathematics, Faculty o Science, Okayama Uniervsity o Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005,
More informationCategory Theory (UMV/TK/07)
P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Košice Project 2005/NP1-051 11230100466 Basic information Extent: 2 hrs lecture/1 hrs seminar per week. Assessment: Written tests during the semester, written
More informationDerived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories
Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories October 8, 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Stable -Categories 3 3 The Homotopy Category of a Stable -Category 6 4 Properties of Stable -Categories 12 5
More informationQuantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras
Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications Vol. (008), No., 35 44 Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras Hilja Lisa HURU and Valentin LYCHAGIN Department of Mathematics,
More informationJournal of Pure and Applied Algebra
Journal o Pure and Applied Algebra 215 (2011) 2135 2147 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal o Pure and Applied Algebra journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa Internal Kleisli categories
More informationCellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems
Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems Emily Riehl University of Chicago http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eriehl 19 July, 2011 International Category Theory Conference
More informationThe Sectional Category of a Map
arxiv:math/0403387v1 [math.t] 23 Mar 2004 The Sectional Category o a Map M. rkowitz and J. Strom bstract We study a generalization o the Svarc genus o a iber map. For an arbitrary collection E o spaces
More informationh M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1
MODULI PROBLEMS AND GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY 7 2.3. Fine moduli spaces. The ideal situation is when there is a scheme that represents our given moduli functor. Definition 2.15. Let M : Sch Set be a moduli
More informationDerived Algebraic Geometry IX: Closed Immersions
Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Closed Immersions November 5, 2011 Contents 1 Unramified Pregeometries and Closed Immersions 4 2 Resolutions of T-Structures 7 3 The Proof of Proposition 1.0.10 14 4 Closed
More informationCoreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic
Coreflections in Algebraic Quantum Logic Bart Jacobs Jorik Mandemaker Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Abstract Various generalizations of Boolean algebras are being studied in algebraic quantum
More informationProgramming Languages in String Diagrams. [ one ] String Diagrams. Paul-André Melliès. Oregon Summer School in Programming Languages June 2011
Programming Languages in String Diagrams [ one ] String Diagrams Paul-ndré Melliès Oregon Summer School in Programming Languages June 2011 String diagrams diagrammatic account o logic and programming 2
More information