arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 5 Sep 2001

Transcription

1 Vacuum Non Sngular Black Hole n Tetrad Theory of Gravtaton Gamal G.L. Nashed Mathematcs Department, Faculty of Scence, An Shams Unversty, Caro, Egypt e-mal:nasshed@asunet.shams.eun.eg arxv:gr-qc/ v1 5 Sep 001 The feld equatons of a specal class of tetrad theory of gravtaton have been appled to tetrad space havng three unknown functons of radal coordnate. The sphercally symmetrc vacuum stress-energy momentum tensor wth one assumpton concernng ts specfc form generates two non-trval dfferent exact analytc solutons for these feld equatons. For large r, the exact analytc solutons concde wth the Schwarzschld soluton, whle for small r, they behave n a manner smlar to the de Stter soluton and descrbe a sphercally symmetrc black hole sngularty free everywhere. The solutons obtaned gve rse to two dfferent tetrad structures, but havng the same metrc,.e., a statc sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole metrc. We then, calculated the energy assocated wth these two exact analytc solutons usng the superpotental method. We fnd that unless the tmespace components of the tetrad go to zero faster than 1 r at nfnty, the two solutons gve dfferent results. Ths fact mples that the tme-space components of the tetrad must vansh faster than 1 r at nfnty. 1

2 1. Introducton In the tetradc theores of gravtaton the gravtatonal feld s descrbed by a tetrad feld. In the past, several authors have consdered these theores to solve some problems of general relatvty or to extend t to nclude other felds. Whle searchng for a unfcaton of gravtaton and electromagnetsm Ensten consdered a tetrad theory [1], but soon he rejected t because there was no Schwarzschld soluton n hs feld equaton. Møller has shown that t s mpossble to fnd a satsfactory expresson for the energymomentum complex n the framework of Remannan geometry []. In a seres of papers, [, 3, 4] Møller was able to obtan a general expresson for a satsfactory energy-momentum complex n the absolute parallelsm space. The Lagrangan formulaton of ths tetrad theory of gravtaton was frst gven by Pellegrn and Plebansk [5]. In these attempts the admssble Lagrangans were lmted by the assumpton that the equatons determnng the metrc tensor should concde wth the Ensten equaton. Møller [6] abandoned ths assumpton and suggested to look for a wder class of Lagrangans, allowng for possble devaton from the Ensten equaton n the case of strong gravtatonal felds. Sáez [7] generalzed Møller theory nto a scalar tetrad theory of gravtaton. Meyer [8] showed that Møller theory s a specal case of Poncaré gauge theory [9, 10]. Hayash and Nakano [11] formulated the tetrad theory of gravtaton as the gauge theory of space-tme translaton group. Hayash and Shrafuj [1] studed the geometrcal and observatonal bass of the tetrad theory, assumng that the Lagrangan be gven by a quadratc form of torson tensor assumng the Lagrangan to be nvarant under party operaton nvolvng three unknown parameters to be fxed by experments, besdes a cosmologcal term. Two of the three parameters were determned by comparng wth solar-system experments, [1] whle only an upper bound has been estmated for the thrd one [1, 13]. The numercal values of the two parameters found were very small consstent wth beng equal to zero. If these two parameters are equal to zero exactly, the theory reduces to the one proposed by Hayash and Nakano [11] and Møller, [6] whch we shall here refer to as the HNM theory for short. Ths theory dffers from general relatvty only when the torson tensor has nonvanshng axal-vector part. It was also shown [1] that the Brkhoff theorem can be extended to the HNM theory. Namely, for sphercally symmetrc case n vacuum, whch s not necessarly tme ndependent, the axal-vector part of the torson tensor should vansh due to the antsymmetrc part of the feld equaton, and therefore, wth the help of the Brkhoff theorem [14] of general relatvty we see that the spacetme metrc s the Schwarzschld. Mkhal et al. [15] derved the superpotental of the energy-momentum complex n the HNM theory and appled t to two sphercally symmetrc solutons. It was found that n one of the two solutons the gravtatonal mass does not concde wth the calculated energy. Ths result was extended to a wder class of solutons wth sphercal symmetry [16]. An explct expresson was gven for all the statonary, asymptotcally flat solutons wth sphercal symmetry, whch were then classfed accordng to the asymptotc behavor of the components of λ a 0 and λ 0 α. It was found that the equalty of the gravtatonal and nertal masses holds only when λ a 0 and λ 0 α tend to zero faster than 1/ r.

3 Dymnkova [17] derved a statc sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole soluton n orthodox general relatvty assumng a specfc form of the stress-energy momentum tensor. Ths soluton practcally concdes wth the Schwarzschld soluton for large r, for small r behaves lke the de Stter soluton and descrbe a sphercally symmetrc black hole sngularty free everywhere [17]. The general form of the tetrad, λ µ, havng sphercal symmetry was gven by Robertson [18]. In the Cartesan form t can be wrtten as λ 0 0 λ α a = A, λ 0 = a Cxa, λ α = Dx α 0 = δab α +Fx a x α +ǫ aαβ Sx β, 1 where A, C, D, B, F, and S are functons of t and r = x α x α 1/, and the zeroth vector λ µ 0 has the factor = 1 to preserve Lorentz sgnature. We consder an asymptotcally flat space-tme n ths paper, and mpose the boundary condton that for r the tetrad 1 approaches the tetrad of Mnkowsk space-tme, that: 1-Improper rotaton are admtted f and only f S = 0. λ µ = dag,δ α a. Robertson has shown - The functons C and F can be elmnated by a mere coordnate transformatons,.e., by makng use of freedom to redefne t and r, leavng the tetrad 1 havng three unknown functons n the Cartesan coordnate, whch wll be used n secton 3 for calculatons of HNM feld equatons but n the sphercal polar coordnate. It s the am of the present work to fnd the, asymptotcally flat solutons wth sphercal symmetry whch s dfferent from the Schwarzschld soluton n the HNM theory. Assumng the same form of the stress-energy momentum tensor as gven by Dymnkova [17], we obtan two dfferent exact analytc solutons of the HNM theory. We then, calculate the energy of those solutons usng the superpotental of Mkhal et al. [15]. In secton we brefly revew the tetrad theory of gravtaton. In secton 3 we frst apply the tetrad 1 wth three unknown functons of the radal coordnate n sphercal polar coordnates to the feld equatons of HNM theory, then we derved the correspondng partal dfferental equatons. Assumng some condtons on these partal dfferental equatons we obtaned two dfferent exact asymptotcally flat solutons wth sphercal symmetry. In secton 4 the energy of the gravtatng source s calculated by the superpotental method. The fnal secton s devoted to the man results and dscusson. Computer algebra system Maple V Release 4 s used n some calculatons. In ths paper Latn ndces,j,... represent the vector number, and Greek ndces µ,ν,... represent the vectorcomponents. All ndces run from 0 to 3. The spatal part of Latn ndces are denoted by a,b,..., whle that of greek ndces by α,β,... In the present conventon, latn ndces are never rased. The tetrad λ µ s related to the parallel vector felds b µ of [1] by λ µ 0 3 = b 0 µ and λ µ a = b a µ.

4 . The tetrad theory of gravtaton In ths paper we follow Møller s constructon of the tetrad theory of gravtaton based on the Wetzenböck space-tme. In ths theory the feld varables are the 16 tetrad components, from whch the metrc s derved by λ µ g µν def. = λ µ λ ν. The Lagrangan L s an nvarant constructed from γ µνρ and g µν, where γ µνρ s the contorson tensor gven by γ µνρ def. = λ µλ ν;ρ, 3 where the semcolon denotes covarant dfferentaton wth respect to Chrstoffel symbols. The most general Lagrangan densty nvarant under party operaton s gven by the form L def. = g 1/ α 1 Φ µ Φ µ +α γ µνρ γ µνρ +α 3 γ µνρ γ ρνµ, 4 where and Φ µ s the basc vector feld defned by g def. = detg µν, 5 Φ µ def. = γ ρ µρ. 6 Here α 1,α, and α 3 are constants determned by Møller such that the theory concdes wth general relatvty n the weak felds: α 1 = 1 κ, α = λ κ, α 3 = 1 1 λ, 7 κ where κ s the Ensten constant and λ s a free dmensonless parameter. The same choce of the parameters was also obtaned by Hayash and Nakano [11]. Møller appled the acton prncple to the Lagrangan densty 4 and obtaned the feld equaton n the form G µν +H µν = κt µν, 8 where the Ensten tensor G µν s defned by F µν = 0, 9 G µν = R µν 1 g µνr. 10 Throughout ths paper we use the relatvstc unts, c = G = 1 and κ = 8π. 4

5 Here H µν and F µν are gven by def. H µν = λ [γ ρσµ γ ρσν +γ ρσµ γ ρσ ν +γ ρσν γ ρσ µ +g µν γ ρσλ γ λσρ 1 ] γ ρσλγ ρσλ, 11 and def. F µν = λ [ Φ µ,ν Φ ν,µ Φ ρ γ ρ µν γ ρ ρ νµ +γµν ;ρ], 1 and they are symmetrc and skew symmetrc tensors, respectvely. Møller assumed that the energy-momentum tensor of matter felds s symmetrc. In the Hayash-Nakano theory, however, the energy-momentum tensor of spn-1/ fundamental partcles has nonvanshng antsymmetrc part arsng from the effects due to ntrnsc spn, and the rght-hand sde of 9 does not vansh when we take nto account the possble effects of ntrnsc spn. Nevertheless, snce n ths paper we consder only solutons n whch the left hand sde of 9 s dentcally vanshng, we refer the tetrad theory of gravtaton based on the choce of the parameters, 7, as the Hayash-Nakano-Møller HNM theory for short. It can be shown [1] that the tensors, H µν and F µν, consst of only those terms whch are lnear or quadratc n the axal-vector part of the torson tensor, a µ, defned by a µ def. = 1 3 ǫ µνρσγ νρσ, 13 where ǫ µνρσ s defned by ǫ µνρσ def. = g 1/ δ µνρσ 14 wth δ µνρσ beng completely antsymmetrc and normalzed as δ 013 = 1. Therefore, both H µν and F µν vansh f the a µ s vanshng. In other words, when the a µ s found to vansh from the antsymmetrc part of the feld equatons, 9, the symmetrc part 8 concdes wth the Ensten equaton. 3. Sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole solutons The tetrad space havng three unknown functons of radal coordnate wth sphercal symmetry n sphercal polar coordnates, can be wrtten as [18] A Dr Bsnθcosφ B cosθcosφ Bsnφ r rsnθ λ µ = B 0 Bsnθsnφ r cosθsnφ Bcosφ, 15 rsnθ 0 Bcosθ B r snθ 0 5

6 where = 1. Applyng 15 to the feld equatons 8, 9 we note that the two tensors H µν and F µν are vanshng dentcally regardless of the values of the functons A, B and D. Thus Møller feld equatons reduce for the tetrad 15 to Ensten s equatons. Then the feld equatons 8 and 9 take the form } 1 κt 00 = [{3D +8B D DB +B D B r 3 B D ra B 4 { } DB +B D B 5DB BB 3D 3B BD 4DB r 4 BD 3 + r 5 D 3 BD 6DB r B 3 D 4B 5 B ], rb 4 + κt 01 = D [{ } DB +B D B 5DB r 3 D+ BB 3D 3B rb AB 4 ] BD 4DB r BD +4B 3 B, κt 11 = 1 } { } [{3D +B A+BA B rb DB +B D B 5DB r 3 AD + rab 4 ] BD 4DB r ABD AB 3 B B 4 A κt = r } [{DA +3A D B 3DA B ABD + {DB +5B D BD A B 4 DD +D B 5D B }A B D A, r 3 + {B 3D A AB A B BA +B A } rb {3BD 4DB A BDA }r ABD +A B 3 B +AB 4 A ], T 33 = snθ T, 16 where A = da dr, B = db dr and D = dd dr. Now we are gong to fnd some specal solutons to the partal dfferental equatons 16, assumng that the stress-energy momentum tensor has the form [17] T 0 0 = T 1 1, T = T A frst non-trval soluton can be obtaned by takng Dr = 0, and solvng for Ar and Br, then we obtan 6

7 A = 1 m R B = 1 m R 1, R 3 /r 3 1 R 3 /r 1 3, 18 where R s a new radal coordnate defned by R = r/b and The form of the energy-momentum tensor s and the tetrad 15 takes the form 1 m R λ µ = r 1 3 = r g r 0, r g = m, r 0 = 3 8πǫ T 0 0 = T 1 1 = ǫ 0 e R3 /r 1 3, T = T 3 3 = ǫ 0 e R3 /r R3 r 1 3, R 3 /r snθcosφ 0 snθsnφ 0 cosθ wth the assocated Remannan metrc 1 m R 1 m R 1 m R R 3 /r 1 3 cosθcosφ R R 3 /r 1 3 cosθsnφ R R 3 /r 1 3 snθ R snφ Rsnθ cosφ Rsnθ 0 1, ds = η 1 dt + dr η 1 +R dω, where η 1 = [ 1 m R R 3 /r1 3], 3 and dω = dθ +sn θdφ, whch s a statc sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole soluton [17] 7

8 A second non-trval soluton can be obtaned by takng Ar = 1, Br = 1, Dr 0 and solvng for Dr. In ths case the resultng feld equatons of 16 can be ntegrated drectly to gve m Dr = r3 r3 /r Substtutng for the value of Dr as gven by 4 nto 15, we get wth the assocated metrc m r 3 /r r cosθcosφ 0 snθcosφ λ µ = r cosθsnφ 0 snθsnφ r 0 cosθ snθ 0 r snφ rsnθ cosφ rsnθ, 5 [ ds = 1 m r r 3 /r1 3] m dt r r3 /r 3 1 drdt+dr +r dω, 6 t s to be noted that m n the metrc and 6 s a constant of ntegraton that wll play the role of the mass producng the feld n the calculatons of the energy. Also the form of the stress-energy momentum tensor for ths soluton s the same as gven by 0. Usng the coordnate transformaton dt = dt+ we can elmnate the cross term of 6 to obtan where η s defned by 3 and R = r. Dr 1 D rdr, 7 ds = η dt + dr η +r dω, 8 Thus we have two exact solutons of HNM feld equatons, each of whch leads to the same metrc, a statc sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole n the sphercal polar coordnate. The solutons 18 and 4 are the exact solutons of the HNM feld equatons. They practcally concde wth the Schwarzschld soluton for r >> r1 and behave lke the de Stter soluton, for r << r1. As s clear from 0, the sphercally symmetrc stress-energy momentum tensor s really ansotropc. The dfference between the prncple pressures T k k = p k, 9 8

9 correspond to the well known ansotropc character of evoluton of the space-tme nsde a black hole undergong a sphercally symmetrc gravtatonal collapse [19]. For r << r 1 sotropzaton occurs and the stress-energy momentum tensor takes the sotropc form T αβ = ǫg αβ. 30 When r 0 the energy densty tends to ǫ 0. For r >> r 1 all the components of the stressenergy momentum tensor tend to zero very rapdly. The mportant result obtaned n ths secton s that we have been able to derve two dfferent solutons for HNM theory; the Remannan metrc assocated wth these two solutons are dentcal, namely sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole. Snce HNM theory s a pure gravtatonal theory, the above two solutons have to be equvalent n the sense that they descrbe the same physcal stuaton. In what follows we examne the equvalence of these solutons by calculatng the energy assocated wth each of them, usng the superpotental derved for Møller s theory by Mkhal et al. [15]. 4. The Energy Assocated wth each Soluton The superpotental of the HNM theory s gven by Mkhal et al. [15] as U νλ µ = g1/ P τνλ χρσ [Φ ρ g σχ g µτ λg τµ γ χρσ 1 λg τµ γ σρχ ], 31 κ where P χρσ τνλ s wth g ρσ νλ beng a tensor defned by P χρσ τνλ def. = δ χ τ g ρσ νλ +δ ρ τ g σχ νλ δ σ τ g χρ νλ 3 The energy s expressed by the surface ntegral [0] g ρσ νλ def. = δ ρ ν δ σ λ δ σ ν δ ρ λ. 33 E = r lm U 0α 0 n α ds, 34 r=constant where n α s the unt 3-vector normal to the surface element ds. Now we are n a poston to calculate the energy assocated wth the two solutons 18 and 4 usng the superpotental 31. As s clear from 34, the only components whch contrbutes to the energy s U 0 0α. Thus substtutng from the frst soluton 18 nto 31 we obtan the followng non-vanshng value U 0α 0 = Xα m r 3 /r κr r 9

10 Substtutng from 35 nto 34 we get Er = m r3 /r Ths s a satsfactory result and should be expected. Now let us turn our attenton to the second soluton 4. Calculatng the necessary components of the superpotental, we get Substtutng from 37 nto 34 we get U 0α 0 = 4Xα m r 3 /r κr r Er = m r3 /r That s twce 36: t s clear from 36 and 38 that f r 0, Er 0 and as r, Er m for 36 and Er m for 38. Note that Er > 0 for all r: 0 r < 5. Man results and Dscusson In ths paper we have studed the nonsngular black hole sphercally symmetrc soluton n the HNM tetrad theory of gravty. The axal vector part of the torson, a µ for these solutons s dentcally vanshng. Two dfferent exact analytc solutons of the HNM feld equatons are obtaned for the case of sphercal symmetry. The two solutons gve rse to the same Remannan metrc sphercally symmetrc nonsngular black hole metrc. The exact solutons 18 and 4 represent a black hole whch contan the de Stter world nstead of a sngularty. The stressenergy momentum tensor 0 responsble for geometry descrbes a smooth transton from the standard state at nfnty to sotropc state at r 0 through ansotropc state n ntermedate regon. Ths agrees wth the Posson-Israel predcton concernng non-nflatonary materal at the nterface [1]. It was shown by Møller [3] that a tetrad descrpton of a gravtatonal feld equaton allows a more satsfactory treatment of the energy-momentum complex than does general relatvty. Therefore, we have appled the superpotental method gven by Mkhal et al.[15] to calculate the energy of the central gravtatng body. It s shown that the two solutons gve two dfferent values of the energy content. The followng suggestons may be consdered to get out of ths nconsstency: a The energy-momentum complex suggested by Møller [3] s not qute adequate; though t has the most satsfactory propertes. b Many authors beleve that a tetrad theory should descrbe more than a pure gravtaton 10

11 feld. In fact; Møller hmself [3] consdered ths possblty n hs earler trals to modfy general relatvty. In these theores, the most successful canddates for the descrpton of the other physcal phenomenon are the skew-symmetrc tensors of the tetrad space, e.g., Φ µ;ν Φ ν;µ. The most strkng remark here s that: All the skew-symmetrc tensors vansh for the frst soluton; but not all of them do so for the second one. Some authors; e.g; [, 3], beleve that these tensors are related to the presence of an electromagnetc feld. Others; e.g.; [4] beleve that these tensors are closely connected to the spn phenomenon. There are a lot of dffcultes to clam that HNM theory deserves such a wder nterpretaton. Ths needs a lot of nvestgatons before arrvng at a concrete concluson. c Other possblty s that HNM theory s n need to be generalzed rather than to be renterpreted. There are already some generalzatons of HNM theory. Møller hmself consdered ths possblty at the end of hs paper [6]; by ncludng terms n the Lagrangan other than the smple quadratc terms. Sáez [7] has generalzed HNM theory n a very elegant and natural way nto a scalar tetradc theores of gravtaton. In these theores the queston s: Do the feld equatons fx the tetradc geometry n the case of sphercal symmetry? Ths queston was dscussed n length by Sáez [5]. The results of the present paper can be consdered as a frst step to get a satsfactory answer to ths queston. Mayer [8] has shown that Møller s theory s a specal case of the poncaré gauge theory constructed by Hehl et al. [10]. Thus poncaré gauge theory can be consdered as another satsfactory generalzaton of Møller s theory. d Mkhal et al. [15] calculated the energy of two sphercally symmetrc solutons and found that the energy n one of the two solutons does not concde wth the gravtatonal mass. Shrafuj et al. [16] extended the calculatons to all the statonary asymptotcally flat solutons wth sphercal symmetry, dvdng them nto two classes, the one n whch the components λ a 0 and λ 0 α of the parallel vector felds λ a µ tend to zero faster than 1/ r for large r and the other, n whch those components go to zero as 1/ r. It was found that the equalty of the energy and the gravtatonal mass holds only n the frst class. It s of nterest to note that the two tetrad structures 1 and 5 have those propertes,.e., the frst tetrad structure 1 the components λ a 0 and λ 0 α go to zero faster than 1/ r for large r and so ts energy s the same as that obtaned before [7]. As for the second tetrad structure 5 the components λ a 0 and λ 0 α go to zero as 1/ r. So ts energy content s dfferent from the energy content of the frst soluton 18 and from that gven by Yang [6] and Radnsch [7] by factor. It s of nterest to note that we have obtaned two exact solutons for the partal dfferental equatons 16 under some specal constrant. The general soluton for the partal dfferental equaton n the case when the energy-momentum tensor does not vansh s not yet obtaned. Ths wll be studed n future work. Acknowledgements The author would lke to thank Professor I.F.I. Mkhal; An Shams Unversty, Professor M.I. Wanas, Professor M. Melek; Caro Unversty; Professor T. Shrafuj; Satama Unversty and Professor K. Hayash; Ktasato Unversty for ther stmulatng dscussons. 11

12 References [1] A. Ensten, Stzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wss. 198, 17. [] C. Møller, Ann. of Phys , 118. [3] C. Møller, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vd. Selsk , 10. [4] C. Møller, Nucl. Phys , 330. [5] C. Pellegrn and J. Plebansk, Mat. Fys. Skr. Dan. Vd. Selsk. 1963, 4. [6] C. Møller, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vd. Selsk , 13. [7] D. Sáez, Phys. Rev. D7 1983, 839. [8] H. Meyer, Gen. Rel. Grav , 531. [9] K. Hayash and T. Shrafuj, Prog. Theor. Phys , 866, 883, 1435, ; 65, 55. [10] F.W. Hehl, J. Ntsch and P. von der Heyde, n General Relatvty and Gravtaton, A. Held, ed. Plenum Press, New York [11] K. Hayash and T. Nakano, Prog. Theor. Phys , 491. [1] K. Hayash and T. Shrafuj, Phys. Rev. D , 354. [13] S. Myamoto and T. Nakano, Prog. Theor. Phys , 95. [14] G. Brkhoff, Relatvty and Modern Physcs Harvard Unv. Press, Cambrdge 193. [15] F.I. Mkhal, M.I. Wanas, A. Hndaw and E.I. Lashn, Int. J. of Theor. Phys , 167. [16] T. Shrafuj, G.G.L. Nashed and K. Hayash, Prog. Theor. Phys , 665. [17] I.G. Dymnkova, Gen. Rel. Grav , 35. [18] H.P. Robertson, Ann. of Math. Prnceton , 496. [19] Ya. B. Zeldovch and I.D. Novkov, The Structure and Evoluton of the Unverse Chcago Unv. Press, Chcago [0] C. Møller, Ann. of Phys , 347. [1] E. Posson and W. Israel, class. Quant. Grav , L01. [] A. Ensten, Stzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wss. 1930, 18. [3] F.I. Mkhal, and M.I. Wanas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A , 471. [4] F. Mü ller-hossen and J. Ntsch, Phys. Rev. D8 1983, 718. [5] D. Sáez, Gen. Rel. Grav ,

13 [6] I.-C. Yang, Chn. J. Phys , [7] I. Radnsch, Mod. Phys. Lett. A15 000,