, A insworth. , B rennan, Clark. ences in Close Relationship s Inventory, ECR), Bowlby. A insworth, : ( 1)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ", A insworth. , B rennan, Clark. ences in Close Relationship s Inventory, ECR), Bowlby. A insworth, : ( 1)"

Ilene Stephens
5 years ago
Views:

2006, 38 (3) : 399 406 A cta Psychologica S in ica : ( ECR) 3 1 2 ( 1, 100871) ( 2, 8130016, ) ( ECR) 371,, 59 231,, ( ) ( ), ( ECR),,, B848 1 20,,,, A insworth,, B rennan, Clark Shaver [ 1 ] (

1 2006, 38 (3) : A cta Psychologica S in ica : ( ECR) ( 1, ) ( 2, , ) ( ECR) 371,, ,, ( ) ( ), ( ECR),,, B ,,,, A insworth,, B rennan, Clark Shaver [ 1 ] ( Experi2 ences in Close Relationship s Inventory, ECR), 1. 1 Bowlby [ 2 ] A insworth [ 3 ] :,,, : ( 1) ( availability) ( responsive2 ness) ; (2), /,,, [ 4 ] Bowlby,,: [ 5 ] ,, 1987,,, Hazan Shaver [ 6 ] A insworth A insworth,,,,,, : ( ) :E - mail: litg@pku. edu. cn; :

2 400 38, [ 7, 8 ] Bartholomew, Bowlby,,,,, ( Prototype) [ 9 11 ], ( ) ( ), ( ) ( ) : ; ;, ;,, Bartholomew Horowitz, (Relation2 ship Questionnaire, RQ ) [ 9 ], 7,, Hazan Shaver [ 6 ] Bartholomew Horowitz [ 9 ],,,,,, [ 12 ],,,? B rennan,, ( ECR) [ 1 ] 14, 60, 323,1086,,, 36,,, 18 (, ),( ) [ 8 ],,, 1. 3 ECR, ECR, ( ) [ 13, 14 ],, ( ), B rennan [ 1 ], Rosenberg [ 15, 16 ], [ 17 ] ,,,231 B rennan , ( ), 20, 97, 130, 4, ( ), : (1) : [ 1 ] ( ECR) [ 9 ] (RQ ) ; ( 2) Rosenberg [ 15 ] ; (3) [ 17 ] ( 1) [ 1 ] ( ECR) : 36,, (, )

3 3 :: ( ECR) 401,,,,,, 5,, 1 2 (2) (RQ) : RQ : ECR, ( ECR) (RQ ), RQ Bartholomew Horowitz 4, 4, 7,,4, RQ : Rosenberg [ 18 ], RQ (1) Rosenberg ( SE) : 10, Bartholomew & Horowitz, ( 9,[ 19 ] ),39. 20%,( = 0. 87; 0180) (2) RQ : Griffin Bar2 tholomew [ 10 ], RQ, () (), : = (+) - (+ ) : [ 17 ], RQ (1) : [ 17 ], 19,, : / /,, %, ( , ) /, Bowlby [ 12 ],,, (236 ) (2) RQ : Griffin Bar2 tholomew [ 10 ], RQ () (), : = (+) - (+ ) 2. 3, 59 4,,,, 20 3 RQ,, ECR 36, [ 13, 14 ] MULTILOG [ 20 ],, ANOVA, ECR,, ECR 3. 1 ECR, MULTILOG: ( ) [ 13, 14 ], ( ),0,,,,

4 ( ) ( ) 7, ( ) 6 ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ),, Fraley [ 13 ],ECR ( ), 1 2,, 0,,, [ 13, 14 ], ( 15, 31, 35, 19 ) ( 32, 18 )0. 5, ECR, 1, 1,, ,, ECR ( n = 231) Item parameter estimates F2 Item s , , , (R) , (R) , (R) (R) , ,, (R) (R) ,, (R) (R) (R) : (1) B rennan (2) ( ) (3) (R) (4) ECR :,,?,, 1, 7, ECR, ( Cronbach s ), ( ) 3. 2 ECR, Bar2 tholomew & Horowitz, :,RQ 4 ECR,, ECR RQ :Bartholo2 mew, : ( 1),, RQ,

5 3 :: ( ECR) 403 ; (2),, 2 ECR ( n = 231) Item s Item parameter estimates F (R) ( / ) , , , , , ,, / : (1) B rennan (2) ( ) (3) (R) 3 ECR,RQ ( n = 109) ( n = 36) ( n = 50) ( n = 24) F 3. 87a 3. 88a 4. 63b 4. 40b F (3, 215) = a 3. 62c 3. 15b 3. 90c F (3, 215) = : (1), 12 (2),0. 05, ECR, RQ ( 3) :,, F (3, 215) = , p < ( p = ) ( p = ), ( p = ) ( p = ),, F (3, 215) = , p < ( p = ) ( p = ), ( p = ) ( p = ) :,

6 Bartholomew,,, ECRRQ, 4 ECR,, ECR RQ ( r = , p <0. 01), Rosenberg ( r = , p < 0. 05), ECR RQ ( r = , p < 0. 01), ( r = , p < 0. 05) 4 ECR ECR (Rosenberg, 1965) RQ (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) : (, 1999) : RQ (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) : ECR, RQ ECR,ECR, ECR, 22,,, ECR, [ 23 ] ( STA I), [ 24 ] ( SAD ), 7 : ( 1),, /? (2),, /? 7, STA I20 ( SA I), 20 ( TA I), SAD 14, 14 ECR, 5 5, ECR :STA I ( SA I: r = 0. 46, p < 0. 01; TA I: r = 0. 37, p < 0. 05), SAD ( r = 0. 35, p < 0. 05), ( r = 0. 34, p < 0105) ;, ECR SAD ( r = 0. 28, p < 0. 05), ( r = 0. 50, p < 0. 01) 5 ECR ( n = 44) STA I SAD SA I TA I : SA I, TA I 4, ECR, [ 21, 25 ], ECR,

7 3 :: ( ECR) 405 ECR ECR,, Cronbach s ECR,, RQ,RQ,,,, ( ),,, ECR RQ,, [ 11, 22 ],,,,,, RQ, 109 (4918% ), 36 (16. 4% ), 50 (2218% ), 24 (11% ),, [ 1 ] 46%, 15%, 16%, 23%,,,ECR, ;,,,,ECR,,,,ECR,,,,, [ 25 ], :, 1 B rennan K A, Clark C L, Shaver P R. Self2report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In: Simpson J A, Rholes W S eds. A ttachment theory and close relationships. New York: The Guilford Press, Bowlby J. A ttachment and loss. Vol. 1. A ttachment. Pim lico, 1969 / A insworth M D S. A ttachments beyond infancy. American Psycholo2 gist, 1989, 44: W aters E, Cumm ings E M. A secure base from which to exp lore close relationship s. Child Development, 2000, 71: A insworth M D S, B lehar M C, W aters E, W all S. Patterns of at2 tachment: A p sychological study of strange situation. H illsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Hazan C, Shaver P. Concep tualizing romantic love as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52 (3) : Stein H, Jacobs N J, Ferguson K S, A llen J G., Fonagy P. W hat do adult attachment scales measure? Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1998, 62: Crowell J A, Fraley R C, Shaver P R. Measurement of Individual D ifferences in Adolescent and Adult A ttachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver P R eds. Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical app lications. New York: Guilford, Bartholomew K, Horowitz L M. A ttachment styles among young a2 dults: A test of a four2categorymodel. Journal of Personality and So2 cial Psychology, 1991, 61: Griffin D, Bartholomew K. Models of self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Per2

8 sonality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67: Griffin D, Bartholomew K. The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In: Bartholomew K, Parlman D eds. Ad2 vance in personal relationship, 5, A ttachment process in adulthood. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers L td, Bowlby J. A ttachment and loss. Vol. 2. Separation. Pim lico, 1973 / Fraley R C, W aller N G, B rennan K A. An item response theory analysis of self2report measure of adult attachment. Journal of personality and social p sychology, 2000, 78 (2) : Embretson S E, Reise S P. Item response theory for p sychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum A ssociates, Inc, RosenbergM. Society and the adolescent self2image. Princeton Uni2 versity Press, Cozzarelli C, Sumer N, Major B. Mental models of attachment and coping with abortion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1998, 74 (2) : Nakao T, Kato K. Exam ining reliabilities and validities of adult at2 tachment scales for " the generalized other". Kyushu University Psy2 chological Research, 2004, 5: (,. g g g g., 2004, 5: 19 27) 18 Yang Z F. Measurement for personality and social p sychology. Yuan liu chu ban gong si, Man K O, Ham id P N. The relationship between attachment p roto2 types, self2esteem, loneliness and causal attributions in Chinese trainee teachers. Personality & Individual D ifferences, 1998, 24 (3) : Thissen D. MULTILOG user s guide: Multip le, categorical item and test scoring using item response theory ( version 7. 05) software ]. Chicago: Scientific Software, 2003 [ Computer 21 Nakao T, Kato K. Constructing the Japanese version of the adult at2 tachment style scale. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 2004, 75 (2) : (,. t g g g g., 2004, 75 (2) : ) 22 Cozzarelli C, Hoekstra S J, Bylsma W H. General versus specific mental models of attachment: A re they associated with different out2 comes? Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26 ( 5) : Sp iellberger D, Charles G R L, Lushenne R. Manual for the State2 Trait Anxiety Inventory ( Formy). Inc. Palo A lto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 24 W atson D, Friend R. Measurement of social2evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33: OnishiM, Gjerde P F, B lock J. Personality imp lications of romantic attachment patterns in young adults: A multi2method, multi2 informant study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27 (9) : M ea sur ing Adult A ttachm en t: Ch inese Adapta tion of the ECR Sca le L i Tonggui 1, Kato Kazuo 2 ( 1 D epartm ent of Psychology, Peking U niversity, B eijing , China) ( 2 Faculty of Hum an2environm ent S tudies, Kyushu U niversity, Fukuoka , Japan) Abstract To p romote research on adult attachment in China, the " Experiences in Close Relationship s Inventory ( ECR ) ", a scale widely used and considered as the " standard" one in USA, was adap ted into Chinese. 371 college students in China were asked to respond to the scale along with Rosenberg s self2esteem and O ther2view scales for testing construct validities, and 59 of them to retake the scales 4 weeks later for testing temporal reliability. Of them, 231 who reported had / have had romantic experiences were selected to final analyses. A s a result, this scale was demonstrated to have adequate relia2 bilities ( internal and temporal consistency) and validities ( construct and criterion2related). Key words adult attachment, ECR, Chinese version, reliability, validity.

( cop ing) , Gentry (1983) : ( Science of Cop ing) [ 1 ] Van D ick W agner ( 2001) (mobbing), [ 9 ], Sirbaskn Cohen (2001) ,,,

( cop ing) , Gentry (1983) : ( Science of Cop ing) [ 1 ] Van D ick W agner ( 2001) (mobbing), [ 9 ], Sirbaskn Cohen (2001) ,,, 2005, 37 (3) : 413 419 A cta Psychologica S in ica : 3 (, 215021) 1806, 30 :, SARS, ; 0. 86, 0. 79, 63 0. 71, 30,,, B849 1 ( cop ing), Gentry (1983) : ( Science of Cop ing) [ 1 ],,, ;, [ 2, 3 ], [ 4 7