ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT. Jennifer Bock / Eric Evans / LaNoah Babcock HUC NUMBER: LLID:
|
|
- Daniela Norris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: South Fork Dixie Creek Burnt River DATES: July 6, September 3-7, SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: Jennifer Bock / Eric Evans / LaNoah Babcock Jennifer Bock / Charlie Stein STREAM ORDER: 4 BASIN AREA: 56 km FIRST ORDER TRIBUTARIES: 5 USGS MAPS: Mormon Basin, Rye Valley ECOREGION: Blue Mountains Uplands and Valleys HUC NUMBER: 75 LLID: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The South Fork Dixie Creek habitat survey began at the confluence with Dixie Creek and continues upstream 3,43 meters to end at confluence with the South Fork Dixie Creek. Five reaches were designated based on channel morphology, vegetation or water levels. The stream was predominantly constrained by alternating hillslopes and high terraces in reaches to 3 and by hillslopes in reaches 4 and 5. The land use was predominantly heavy grazing. The riparian zone was dominated by 3-5 cm dbh hardwood trees throughout reaches and (based on 5 riparian transects) and by a mix of hardwood and conifer species 3-5 cm dbh in reaches 3, 4, and 5. REACH DESCRIPTIONS: Reach : (T3S-R43E-S9SE) Length 4,79 meters. Reach began at the confluence with Dixie Creek. The stream was constrained by high terraces in a broad valley. The average valley width index was 38 (range: 5-4). Land use for the reach was agricultural. The average unit gradient was. percent. Stream habitat was comprised primarily of riffles (86%). Stream substrate was dominated by silt and sand (56%) and gravel (36%) sized sediment. The average residual pool depth was 43 cm. Wood volume was.9m 3 per m of stream channel. s 3-5cm dbh are the dominant riparian trees (based on four riparian transects). Reach : (T3S-R43E-S8SE) Length,97 meters. The stream was constrained by alternating terrace and hillslopes in a broad valley. The valley width index was. Land use for the reach was heavy grazing. The average unit gradient was 5.3 percent. Stream habitat was dominated by rapids (79%). Stream substrate was dominated by silt and sand (3%) and gravel (33%) sized sediment. Wood volume was low at.7m 3 per m of stream channel. s 3-5 cm dbh were the dominant riparian trees (based on one riparian transect).
2 South Fork Dixie Creek continued Reach 3: (T3S-R43E-S8SW) Length 3,49 meters. The stream was constrained by alternating terrace and hillslopes in a broad valley. The average valley width index was 8.9 (range:.5 - ). Land use for the reach was heavy grazing. The average unit gradient was 5.7 percent. Stream habitat was dominated by rapids (7%). Stream substrate was primarily gravel (3%) and cobble (3%) sized sediment. The average residual pool depth was 35 cm. Wood volume was.5m 3 per m of stream channel. A mix of hardwoods and conifer 3-5cm dbh are the dominant riparian trees (based on three riparian transects). Reach 4: (T3S-R4E-S4SW) Length 95 meters. The stream was constrained by hillslopes in a narrow valley. The valley width index was. Land use for the reach was light grazing. The average unit gradient was.5 percent. Cascades (8%) dominated the stream habitat. Stream substrate was primarily gravel (6%) and cobble (5%) sized sediment. Wood volume was.m 3 per m of stream channel. A mix of hardwoods and conifer 3-5 cm dbh were the dominant riparian trees (based on one riparian transect). Reach 5: (T3S-R4E-SNE) Length 3,649 meters. The stream was predominantly constrained by hillslopes in a narrow valley. The average valley width index is 6. (range.5 to 5). The valley width index (vwi) for a hillslope-constrained reach is typically less-than-or-equalto.5. Here due to averaging, the vwi is 6.. Land use for the reach was heavy grazing. The average unit gradient was.3 percent. Stream habitat was comprised of beaver pools (46%), riffles (7%), and rapids (9%). Stream substrate was dominated by silt and sand (8%). The average residual pool depth was 88 cm. Wood volume was 7. m 3 per m of stream channel. A mix of hardwoods and conifer 3-3 cm dbh were the dominant riparian trees (based on two riparian transects). COMMENTS: Cattle were observed throughout the survey. A high percentage (range of 5% to 9%) of silt and fine sized sediment was observed in riffle units throughout the survey. Fish were observed from the confluence with Dixie Creek and upstream approximately 8,795 meters to the beginning of reach 4 (unit #74). The upper distribution of fish was not determined. Beaver activity was observed extensively throughout reach 5. Very little large woody debris was observed.
3 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 REACH BRIDGE CULVERT 5 ELEVATION (meters) 3 TRIBUTARY DEBRIS JAM MASS FAILURE POTENTIAL BARRIER 3 4 BEAVER DAM METERS HIGH 9 STEP OVER BEDROCK - 4. METERS HIGH DISTANCE (meters) 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PERCENT SHADE 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
4 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PERCENT SILT AND ORGANICS 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PERCENT SILT, ORGANICS, AND SAND 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
5 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PERCENT GRAVEL 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PERCENT BEDROCK 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
6 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 ELEVATION (meters) 4 3 NUMBER OF BOULDERS (running average per m.) DISTANCE (meters) 6 SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 POOLS > OR = TO METER DEEP 5 4 DEPTH (meters) 4 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
7 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 PIECES OF LARGE WOOD 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 VOLUME OF LARGE WOOD (cubic meters) 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
8 6 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) 5 4 KEYPIECES OF LARGE WOOD 5 ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
9 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH T3S-R43E-S9SE REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 37.9 VWI Range: 5-4 Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 7 First Terrace n = 7 Width: Depth:.5. Width: Height: 4,79 5, ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) W:D ratio: 7.3 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.6 Stream Flow Type: MF Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Average Unit Gradient:.% Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): - Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary AG G EX S.3.4 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 7% Reach avg: 49% Undercut Banks: 5% Range: - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3 ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
10 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH T3S-R43E-S8SE REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain VWI Range: - Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = First Terrace n = Width: Depth:..3 Width: Height:,97, ( (.9 - ) ).9.4 (.5 -. ( -.7 ) ) W:D ratio: 7.4 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.5 Stream Flow Type: MF Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Average Unit Gradient: 5.3% Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary HG S AG D5.6.7 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: % Reach avg: 7% Undercut Banks: 3% Range: 39 - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3 ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel 8..7
11 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH 3 T3S-R43E-S8SW REACH 3 Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 8.9 VWI Range:.5 - Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 6 First Terrace n = 5 Width: Depth:..3 Width: Height: 3,49 3, (.9-9. (.8 -. ) ) 9..9 ( ( ) ) W:D ratio: 6.4 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.9 Stream Flow Type: MF Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Average Unit Gradient: 5.7% Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary HG C5 G.6.6 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 3% Reach avg: 7% Undercut Banks: 5% Range: - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3 ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
12 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/3/ REACH 4 T3S-R4E-S4SW REACH 4 Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) Valley Width Index Constrained % % %. VWI Range: - Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = First Terrace n = Width: Depth:.9 6 Width: Height: ( ( ) ) ( - ( - ) ) W:D ratio: 7.3 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.5 Stream Flow Type: MF Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Average Unit Gradient:.5% Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C):. -. Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary LG C3 S.3.3 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 6% Reach avg: 88% Undercut Banks: 5% Range: 56 - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3 ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel 6.8..
13 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/4/ REACH 5 T3S-R4E-SNE REACH 5 Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) Valley Width Index Constrained % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 6. VWI Range:.5-5 Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 5 First Terrace n = Width: Depth:.8.4 Width: Height: 3,649 3, (.3 -. ( ) ).5.7 ( ( ) ) W:D ratio:.9 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.3 Stream Flow Type: MF Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Average Unit Gradient:.3% Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary HG C3 AG G.6.6 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 4% Reach avg: 7% Undercut Banks: % Range: - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3 ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
14 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH T3S-R43E-S9SE REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS DRY UNIT POOL-BEAVER DAM POOL-LATERAL SCOUR POOL-PLUNGE RAPID/BOULDERS RIFFLE 58 3, , STEP/BEAVER DAM STEP/BEDROCK STEP/BOULDERS STEP/LOG STEP/STRUCTURE Total: 97 4,7.5. 5,93 4 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools % Scour Pools % Glides % Riffles 58 3, , % Rapids % Cascades % Step/Falls % Dry..4% Culverts % POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total 4 Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km 3.4 Primary Channel Length # / Km 3.4 Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):.43
15 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH T3S-R43E-S8SE REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS CULVERT CROSSING RAPID/BOULDERS,3..5, RIFFLE STEP/BOULDERS STEP/LOG STEP/STRUCTURE Total:,36..3, Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools % Scour Pools % Glides % Riffles % Rapids,3..5, % Cascades % Step/Falls % Dry % Culverts.9..76% POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km Primary Channel Length # / Km Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):
16 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// REACH 3 T3S-R43E-S8SW REACH 3 HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS CULVERT CROSSING POOL-DAMMED POOL-PLUNGE RAPID/BOULDERS 8,553.., RIFFLE STEP/BOULDERS STEP/LOG Total: 57 3,5..3 3,59 43 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools % Scour Pools % Glides % Riffles % Rapids 8,553..,5 7.35% Cascades % Step/Falls % Dry % Culverts % POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total 5 Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km.4 Primary Channel Length # / Km.4 Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): 3. Residual pool depth (avg):.35
17 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/3/ REACH 4 T3S-R4E-S4SW REACH 4 HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS RAPID/BOULDERS RIFFLE STEP/BOULDERS Total: Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools % Scour Pools % Glides % Riffles % Rapids % Cascades % Step/Falls. 5 3% Dry % Culverts % POOL SUMMARY ,99.4 All Pools: Total Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km Primary Channel Length # / Km Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):
18 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/4/ REACH 5 T3S-R4E-SNE REACH 5 HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS CULVERT CROSSING POOL-BEAVER DAM , POOL-LATERAL SCOUR RAPID/BOULDERS 7, RIFFLE 8, STEP/BEAVER DAM STEP/LOG Total: 57 3, ,65 33 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools , % Scour Pools % Glides % Riffles 8, % Rapids 7, % Cascades % Step/Falls % Dry % Culverts % POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total 6 Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km.6 Primary Channel Length # / Km.6 Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):.88
19 STREAM SUMMARY Number Total Avg Avg Total Substrate Large Units Length Width Depth Area Percent Wetted Area Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk (#>.5m) 45 3, , Habitat Group Wetted Area (m ) Percent Dammed & BW Pools Scour Pools Glides Riffles Rapids Cascades Step/Falls Dry, ,49 4,798, %.% % 37.% 33.%.87% 4.37%.5% Culverts.5% Unsurveyed %
20 (BURNT RIVER BASIN): HABITAT DISTRIBUTION 5 45 REACH REACH 4 WETTED AREA (m^) WETTED AREA (m^) DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY REACH 3 6 REACH 4 WETTED AREA (m^) 5 WETTED AREA (m^) DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY 8 6 REACH 5 4 WETTED AREA (m^) DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY
21 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) 4 transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft 35 5 Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%)
22 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft 73 Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%)
23 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH 3 REACH 3 Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) 3 transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%)
24 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/3/ RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH 4 REACH 4 Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%)
25 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/4/ RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH 5 REACH 5 Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%)
26 HABITAT INVENTORY - RIPARIAN SURVEY 9// Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) for all reaches transects Summary of riparian zone (- feet) extrapolated to, feet along stream Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft 4 Average number of trees in a 5-m wide band Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Zones -3-3 meters Conifer
27 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes LF HT 4 5 Conifer NO TREES,T LF HS Conifer LF 3 HS 5 Conifer NO HARDWOODS RT HT Conifer 4 RT HT Conifer RT 3 HT Conifer 4 LF HT 47 Conifer T:4685, UTM: LF HT Conifer, FIELD 4 LF 3 HT Conifer, FIELD 4 RT HT 5 7 Conifer 4 RT HT 5 Conifer, GRREN FIELD 4 RT 3 HT 5 Conifer RIDGE OF HILLSLOPE 6 LF HT 5 5 Conifer 6 LF HT 8 Conifer 6 LF 3 HT 8 Conifer 6 RT HT Conifer 6 6 RT HT 7 Conifer 6 RT 3 HT 4 Conifer, OPENS INTO A FIELD 9 LF HT 4 Conifer 3
28 9 LF HT 3 Conifer 9 LF 3 HT 3 Conifer 9 RT HT 5 Conifer 4 FIELD/ PASTURE 9 RT HT 4 Conifer 9 RT 3 HT 3 4 Conifer
29 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes 3 LF LT 9 9 Conifer 3 LF HT 9 7 Conifer 3 LF 3 HS 7 7 Conifer 3 RT LT Conifer 3 RT HT Conifer 3 RT 3 HT 9 Conifer
30 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9// RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach 3 Reach 3 Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes 3 LF LT 9 Conifer 3 LF HT 35 5 Conifer TRAMPLED BY COWS 3 LF 3 HS Conifer 3 3 RT HT 65 3 Conifer 3 RT HT 6 Conifer GRASS HIGHLY GRAZED 3 RT 3 HT 6 Conifer GRASS HIGHLY GRAZED 5 LF HS 75 Conifer 4 5 LF HS Conifer 5 LF 3 HS Conifer 5 RT HT Conifer 5 RT HS 4 3 Conifer NO TREES,ROAD BED STARTS 5 RT 3 HS 8 Conifer, ROAD BED / OF M 7 LF LT Conifer 7 LF HS 75 Conifer OLD ROAD BED 7 LF 3 HS 35 3 Conifer 7 RT HT 3 45 Conifer 7 RT RB Conifer 7 RT 3 HS 7 5 Conifer
31 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/3/ RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach 4 Reach 4 Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes 84 LF HS Conifer THERE ARE 9+ CONIFERS IN 84 LF HS Conifer 84 LF 3 HS 5 4 Conifer 84 RT HS 75 3 Conifer 84 RT HS 75 5 Conifer 84 RT 3 HS 9 3 Conifer
32 HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/7 Survey Date: 9/4/ RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach 5 Reach 5 Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes LF HS 9 Conifer LF HS Conifer LF HS Conifer LF RB 5 4 Conifer LF 3 HS 6 4 Conifer 3 LF 3 HS Conifer 3 RT HS 7 5 Conifer RT HT 5 Conifer 3 RT HT 5 6 Conifer OLD HOMESTEAD RT RB Conifer RT 3 HS Conifer RT 3 HS Conifer COW SKELETON, OUT HOUSE
33 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) COMMENT SUMMARY REACH UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST.(m) COMMENTS NOTE_ESTIMATOR NOTE_NUMERATOR RI 8 JCT. WITH DIXIE CREEK :45 SL t=.5 :45am, H =.8M HO FLOWS UNDER IT, H =.8M 4 LP 58 BV OLD ACTIVITY DAM BLOWN OUT NOW 5 RI 9 TERRACE / SLUFFING OFF 6 SL 93 BV H=.55 SM DJ, ALL SMALL PIECE POSS. OLD BEAV. DAM, NO BP 7 RI 7 FC FC - / UP 8 RI 7 BV OLD ACTIVITY 9 RI 38 8" CUTT 95% OF CR COVERED W/HO VEG SL 38 H=.6 HO FLOWS UNDER & THRU LOG RI 337 WL VALLEY WIDTH 4+ TRAIL RI 36 IRRIGATION CANAL DRY / IRRIGATION ENTRANCE 3 RI 4 COMES IN HERE ESTIMATED 5 RI 5 WL OLD FC IN CR FISH X 7 LP 54 FISH X 3 ~4 INCHES LONG RI 764 SS/ /SS, VWI = 4+ HAS FLOW,COMES UNDER GROUND 4 RI 949 FC, /TJ FENCE CROSSING WL-COW CROSSING 5 RB TRIB UNIT 7 SL 5 H=.6 H=.6M ROOTS AND LOGS 8 RI 7 SD,RF,FC BC, RF, FC AND BC, OLD RF NOW CATTLE FORG 9 RI 76 FC FC X 33 LP 347 BEEHIVE 34 RI 445 WL COW SKULLS AND SKELETON FROG, FISH, COWSKULLS 35 RI 539 WL FROG 37 RI 669 WL, FC FC TREE FROG X 38 RI 758 WL SM. OWL- LET US IT VERY 4 RI 798 VWI = 4 + RIP # 4 RI 85 /CE FISH 4 LP " CUTT FISH 46 SS 94 BC H =.M - LOGS BACK TO BACK H=.M IRRIGATION PIPE INTO CR 48 RI 35 USD, WL IRRIGATION PIPES, UNSCREENED D 49 RI 68 FISH 5 SS 7 H=.7M TWO STEPS COMBINED, H=.7M 5 RI 4 OLD WOODEN WAGON 53 RI 8 WL BEE HIVE HUGE!!!! ESTIMATED, BEES!!! FROG 54 RI 38 END FOR 9// STOPPED FOR THE DAY 55 RI 48 WL FROGS X, FISH 56 LP 44 FC FC 57 RI 47 COWS CROSSING CREEK 58 RI 58 TJ/ FC TJ/ T: 4648 UTM: FISH 59 RI TRIB UNIT TRIB UNIT 6 RI 598 T: 4636 UTM: LARGE TERRACE ON LEFT SIDE 6 RB 6 FC 6 SS 64 RR H=.M RIP RAP, H=.M 63 RI 7 WL FROG 64 RI 735 COWS TRAMPLING DOWN /BANK 65 RI 785 CHOKED W/ SHRUBS 66 RB 86 CHOKED W/ SHRUBS 67 RI 86 ACW PINCHED 68 RB 953 HILLSLOPE PINCHING IN/ 69 RI 353 /SS /TERRACE SLUFFING OFF 7 RI TRIB-ACW=.5,TER.H=3.,TER.W=6 UNIT OF SPRING SEEP 7 SR 353 PN H= 4. M H= 4.M PICTURE TAKEN 7 RI 3 IN FIELD NO CHANNEL GOES IN MEADOW NO REAL CHANNEL 73 RI TJ/ TJ/ ESTIMATED 74 DU DRY FOR M,LRG BP FED BY TJ TRIB UNIT GOES UP TO BEAV.POOL
34 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) COMMENT SUMMARY REACH UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST.(m) COMMENTS NOTE_ESTIMATOR NOTE_NUMERATOR 76 SD 3 BV H=.5M H =.5M 79 SD 354 BV H=.3 H=.3M 8 BP 377 WL SNAKE- GOOFER SNAKE 8 SD 39 BV H =.4M H=.4M 84 RI 3357 /SS, FC /SS NOT MUCH FOR TERRACE 85 SD 3358 BV H =.M H=.M 87 SD 339 BV H =.6 H =.6M 89 SD 3398 BV H=.55M H=.45, `.5M 9 RI 354 RIP # 4 9 RI 36 WIDE FLOOD PLAIN 9 RI 3773 WL, FC COWS BREAKING DOWN BANK FISH AND FROGS OBSERVED 93 SB 3779 H=.7 H=.7M 95 SS 3793 H =.6M H=.6M, HAS FILLED IN BEHIND 96 RI 399 RF 98 SL 48 H=.5 H=.5M 99 RI 476 FC COWS AND CHUCKERS BLM LAND STARTS RB 49 COW PIES / TRACKS SS 495 SD H =.7 IRRIGATION PIPE, H=.7M RB 435 WL FROG, FISH 3 RI 4338 /TJ COW CROSSING,T46833, RI END 9// 5 RB 4446 START 9// 6 RB 469 WL FROG,FISH. COWS BREAKING /BANK 8 SB 475 H=.3M H=.3M 9 RB 483 /SS, WL /SS OWL, RATTLESNAKE SB 4834 H=.M H=.M SS 4835 H=.7M H=.7, METAL CULVERT.3X. CC 4847 CC.3 ROUND, DURBIN CREEK ROAD DURBIN CREEK ROAD 3 RB 5 RIP #5, CHANNEL METRIC 4 RB 57 LI/ 6 RB 59 COWS KNOCKING DOWN /BANK 7 CB 59 ERROSION DUE TO COWS 8 SL 59 H =.55M 9 RB 5377 LI/ 3 RB 55 LI/ 3 RB 568 /TJ 3 3 CB TJ UNIT-T 45968,UTM RB 576 WL FISH- T=7 3:4 3 5 RB 5856 T = RB 67 WL COWS TRAMPLING HILL,5M TERRACE 3 8 RB 64 WL SNAKE GARDNER 3 3 RB 675 SS/ RIP # 6 T459,UTM RB 6577 WL, /SS SNAKE, /SS ON ROAD BED 3 33 RI 667 END FOR 9// 3 34 RB 6784 START ON 9/3/ T= :3, COW PIES/TRACK 3 35 RB 689 /SS 3 37 SB 7 H=.3M H=.3M 3 39 PP 773 H=.9M 3 4 SL 776 H=.9M 3 4 SL 788 H=.3M H=.3M 3 47 SB 78 H=.5M H=.5M, DEEP PP BELOW 3 5 SL 73 H=.6 H=.6M,T:45979,UTM CB 7376 WL FISH X 3 5 RB 7487 SS/, WL FISH X 3, COW PIES 3 54 RB 765 LI/ CONIFERS IN RIP NOW
35 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) COMMENT SUMMARY REACH UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST.(m) COMMENTS NOTE_ESTIMATOR NOTE_NUMERATOR 3 55 RB 7776 CE 3 56 CC 7783 METAL CC W/ ROCK BOTTOM X.3M 3 57 RB 796 SS/, RR CHANNEL STABLIZATION,OILED LOG 3 58 RB 797 WL FISH 3 6 CB 83 SS/ FISH X RB 8344 /SS,/SS ND /SS ROBINSON GULCH NO CHNL 3 63 CB 8454 WL, RF COWS CAUSE BANKS TO ERODE 3 64 SB 8454 H=.3M H=.3M (MAN MADE) 3 67 SB 847 H=.4M (MAN MADE 3 68 RB 854 RF 3 69 SL 855 H=.6M H=.6M 3 7 RB 859 RIP# CB 8795 WL FISH 3 75 CB 8868 /TJ 3 76 CB THORNTON GULCH TRIB UNIT, THORTON GULCH 4 77 RI 8879 T= : CB 9 SLOPE MAKES CB NOT SUBSTRATE 4 8 CB 983 SS/ 4 83 SB 983 H=.5M H= CB 948 RIP # CB 9599 SS/ COW TRAILS ALONG BANKS,ERODING 4 87 RB 9783 /TJ SS/ RF TJ/, SS/ RAINBOW GULCH 4 88 RB RAINBOW GULCH END 9/3/ TRIB UNIT, MUD UNIT!! 5 89 RB 98 START 9/4/ :5 T= :5 5 9 RI 9897 WL FRG,SQUIR, CHIP.NO CHNL,MEADOW 5 9 RI 997 COW TRACKS EVERYWHERE LONG CR 5 94 RB 5 NO CHNL, FP-HS TO HS 5 95 SL 5 H=.4M H= RB 89 WL TREE FROG,HIGH TERRACES ON BOT 5 RB 68 RIP# 5 RB 734 /TJ 5 CB BURNT CABIN GULCH BURNT CABIN GULCH 5 3 RB 79 /SS,RF,SS/ OLD RF, OLD HOUSE ABONDONED 5 4 CB 84 OLD HOUSE 5 5 RB 96 SS/ SS/ WHOLE SKELETON OF COW 5 6 RB 65 LOTS OF DOWNED WOOD SUPER SMALL ACW 5 8 RB 59 WL CHIPMUNCK,HAWK,SQUIRREL 5 RB 545 SS/ 5 3 CC 643 MORMAN BASIN ROAD METAL,.45X.9M METAL BOTTOM 5 4 RI 794 START ON 9/5/ T= RI 39 /SS, WL HAWK 5 7 RI 43 CHNL NOT VERY WELL DEFINED 5 8 SD 6 PN H= 3.5M H= 3.5M, M LONG LARGE DAM 5 9 BP 35 LOTS OF BEAVER ACTIVITY MAX DEPTH EST. 5 SD 37 BV H=.4M H.4M 5 BP 5 BV 5 SD 5 H=. 5 3 BP 84 BV 5 4 SD 86 BV H=.3M H=.4M 5 5 BP 3 BV 5 6 SD 33 BV H=.M H=.M 5 8 RI 4 OLD BARN 5 9 CC 49.45M ROUND GALV. METAL.45X.45, METAL BOTTOM 5 3 RI 46 OLD HOUSE 5 3 SL 46 H=.M ACTUALLY STEP OVER MUD
36 (SNAKE RIVER BASIN - ) COMMENT SUMMARY REACH UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST.(m) COMMENTS NOTE_ESTIMATOR NOTE_NUMERATOR 5 34 SL 66 H=.5M H=.5M 5 36 SL 649 H=.4M H=.4M 5 37 RI 83 /SS 5 38 RI 97 /SS 5 39 RI 395 SS/ 5 4 SL 396 H=.6M H=.6M 5 4 RI 356 /SS 5 43 CC 339.5M ROUND 5 44 RI 343 /SS END CC END CC
37 START OF SURVEY REACH REACH 3 REACH Name: RYE VALLEY Date: /8/7 Scale: inch equals feet Location: 4699 E 494 N Caption: HABITAT SURVEY BURNT RIVER BASIN SUMMER Copyright (C) 998, Maptech, Inc.
38 REACH 4 REACH 3 REACH Name: MORMON BASIN Date: /8/7 Scale: inch equals feet Location: E N Caption: HABITAT SURVEY BURNT RIVER BASIN SUMMER Copyright (C) 998, Maptech, Inc.
39 END SURVEY REACH 5 REACH 4 Name: MORMON BASIN Date: /8/7 Scale: inch equals feet Location: 4544 E 497 N Caption: HABITAT SURVEY BURNT RIVER BASIN SUMMER Copyright (C) 998, Maptech, Inc.
40 (BURNT RIVER BASIN) Reach unit typical of the reach Reach unit 6 right riparian transect zone Reach unit 7 potential natural barrier 4. meters high
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: Basin Creek Willow Creek DATE: July 9 3, 9 SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: USGS MAPS: ECOREGION: Nicole Bushey / Emily Zimmermann Staci Stein
More informationREACH 1 T37S-R14W-S07NW
OREGON DEPT. FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 3//3 Survey Date: 7/3/ REACH T37S-R4W-S7NW REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: South Fork Mill Creek Mill Creek / Columbia River DATES: September 7 9, 5 SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: Brian Bangs / LaNoah Babcock Staci
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT. Peggy Kavanagh, Trevan Cornwell TOLEDO SOUTH Coast Range Lora Tennant
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT STREAM: GCG: 2-MC SITE ID: 489 BASIN: YAQUINA TREATMENT DATE: 24 SURVEY DATE: 2/27/24 SURVEY CREW: USGS MAPS: ECOREGION: REPORT
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT STREAM: BASIN: SURVEY TYPE: South Sister Creek (U-5) Smith River Pre-Tx DATE: January 7, 4 SURVEY CREW:
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT STREAM: BASIN: SURVEY TYPE: Munson Creek (NC-342) Tillamook River Post-Tx DATE: February 2, 28 SURVEY
More informationA Guide To Interpreting Stream Survey Reports. Scott C. Foster Charles H. Stein Kim K. Jones. Edited by Patricia A. Bowers
A Guide To Interpreting Stream Survey Reports Scott C. Foster Charles H. Stein Kim K. Jones Edited by Patricia A. Bowers Aquatic Inventories Project Natural Production Program Oregon Department of Fish
More informationDETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6. The Eklutna River was divided into study reaches (figure 1) prior to this site visit. Prominent geologic or
More informationAppendix E Rosgen Classification
Appendix E Stream Type s Using the morphometric parameters described above, stream reaches are classified into 7 major stream types (Aa+ through G) based on s (1996) criteria. The relevant stream classifications
More informationFish Passage at Road Crossings
Fish Passage at Road Crossings 1 Crossing Design Workshop Outline 1:00 to 2:00 Intro, Design Overview, Channel Width 2:00 to 2:15 Break 2:15 to 3:15 No-Slope, Stream Simulation Design 3:15 to 3:30 Break
More informationRiparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.
Riparian Assessment vs. Monitoring Riparian Assessment What is a healthy stream? Determine stream/riparian health Determine change or trend, especially in response to mgmt Classification = designation
More informationRosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road
Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road Prepared for Poly Met Mining Inc. September 2013 Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road Prepared for Poly Met Mining Inc. September
More informationWhy Geomorphology for Fish Passage
Channel Morphology - Stream Crossing Interactions An Overview Michael Love Michael Love & Associates mlove@h2odesigns.com (707) 476-8938 Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage 1. Understand the Scale of the
More informationAPPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013
APPENDIX E GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2 Introduction Keystone Restoration Ecology (KRE) conducted geomorphological monitoring in
More informationGENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO
GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO Prepared For Trout Unlimited 300 North Main Street, Hailey, Idaho, 83333 Prepared By P. O. Box 8578, 140 E. Broadway, Suite 23,
More informationAPPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011
APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS Basin 615, South Fork of Quantico Creek - Project Reach Descriptions Reach Name: 615-A Coordinates (NAD 83, Virginia State Plane North): 11796510.57, 6893938.95 to 11801555.79,
More informationRapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s
Establishing Current Reference Conditions Rates and concentrations of suspended-sediment transport vary over time and space due to factors such as precipitation characteristics and discharge, geology,
More informationConceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar
Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed Chris Farrar Several features of creeks affect the interactions between surface and groundwater. This conceptual model uses the
More informationAssignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435
Assignment 1 Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435 Amanda Jardine 30100093 Jaime McDonald 14177083 Erica Massey 50870088 April 28, 2012 Introduction
More informationHabitat Assessment. Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator
Habitat Assessment Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator Adapted from a presentation by Jean Unmuth, Water Quality Biologist, WI DNR dnr.wi.gov www.uwex.edu erc.cals.wisc.edu
More informationPolyMet NorthMet Project
RS 26 Draft-01 December 8, 2005 RS26 Partridge River Level 1 Rosgen Geomorphic Survey Rosgen Classification Partridge River from Headwaters to Colby Lake Prepared for PolyMet NorthMet Project December
More informationAppendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types
Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types Table of Contents Channel Habitat Typing Background... 3 Small Estuarine Channel (ES)... 7 Large Estuarine Channel (EL)... 9 Low Gradient Large Floodplain
More informationElevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted
Version: 8/25/14 Meadow Name Date : / / MM DD YYYY GPS Location:. N. W GPS Datum (e.g., WGS 84, NAD 27) Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County Watershed (HUC8) Landowner USGS Quad Name Observers: 7.5 or 15 (circle
More informationStream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012 What Functions do Healthy Streams Provide? Flood mitigation Water supply Water quality Sediment storage and transport Habitat Recreation Transportation
More informationCR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District
CR AAO Bridge Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District Old County Road AAO Bridge Map courtesy of Marquette County Silver Lake Basin McClure Basin
More informationDan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time
Broad-Scale Models Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time Assess Potential for Fish Use and Productivity Assess
More informationAquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.
Aggradation raising of the streambed by deposition that occurs when the energy of the water flowing through a stream reach is insufficient to transport sediment conveyed from upstream. Alluvium a general
More information!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!
8:30 Sign in Hoosic River Revival Coalition!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(! 12-#30+4/#"5-(60 9:00 Welcome and Introductions 9:15 Goals for Today s Program: A Description of the Planning Process 9:30 First Session:
More informationADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN
ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN Conor Shea - Hydrologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Partnerships Program Arcata, CA Learning Objectives Examine
More informationStream Classification
Stream Classification Why Classify Streams? Communication Tool Describe Existing Conditions & Trends Describe Restoration Goals Research Tool Morphologic Stream Classification Systems Schumm (1977) Alluvial
More informationFluvial Driven Alluvial Fans
Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans Restoration Project Evaluations - Examples from the Russian and Napa River Watersheds Mia Docto Masters Thesis UC Berkeley 1. Basic Fan Description 2. Fluvial Driven Fan Characteristics
More informationFlood and Stream Restoration
2 3 4 Pedestrian bridge under construction 3 CSPs perched on DS side Large area of sand deposition Bottom layer of gabions has been scoured out large bar of gabion stone Gabions slumping bank slope failure
More informationSALMONID HABITAT ASSESSMENT UPPER MILLER CREEK
SALMONID HABITAT ASSESSMENT UPPER MILLER CREEK GRADY RANCH, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 2011 Prepared for: Skywalker Properties Ltd. 5858 Lucas Valley Road Nicasio, California 94946 Prepared by: WRA,
More informationC. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS
C. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS Student Name Date Time Stream Location Parameter to find Your Group s Results Units trial trial average Transparency cm Water Temperature Air Temperature Weather N sunny N
More informationLimitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %
Stream Stability Assessment & BEHI Surveys Joe Rathbun MDEQ Water Resources Division rathbunj@michigan.gov 517--373 517 373--8868 Stability Stream can transport its water and sediment inputs without changing
More informationSECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET
SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET INTRODUCTION A sediment budget has been constructed for the for the time period 1952-2000. The purpose of the sediment budget is to determine the relative importance of different
More information-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island
Re-inventing Government Creek -- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island Jon Houghton, Ph.D. and Derek Ormerod, M.S., P.E. - Pentec Environmental/Hart Crowser,
More informationUPPER KETTLE CREEK FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TRIBUTARIES ADDENDUM
UPPER KETTLE CREEK FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TRIBUTARIES ADDENDUM For: Kettle Creek Watershed Association and Trout Unlimited March 2005 1000 Commerce Park Drive Williamsport, PA 17701 Phone (570)
More informationForest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points
Forest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points Traci Sylte, P.E. Hydrology/Fluvial Geomorphology Lolo National Forest Is It True? Are Road Crossings a Dam with
More informationGEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip
GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip One of the more difficult variables to measure and/or estimate when studying flow in natural channels is that of roughness. Roughness, usually approximated with Manning
More informationBusiness. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?
Business Meteorologic monitoring Field trip? Reader Other? Classification Streams Characterization Discharge measurements Why classify stream channels? Why Classify Stream Channels? Provides a common language
More informationAssessment. Assessment
2001 SPRINGBROOK CREEK RESTORATION - THREE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION REVIEW - Presented by Bruce Henderson and Andy Harris 2005 River Restoration Northwest Symposium Skamania Lodge, Washington www.hendersonlandservices.com
More informationCarmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018
Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018 EXISTING CONDITION The proposed Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project
More informationUpper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop
Presentation to the Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop by Michael Rodgers River Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District August 17, 2007 Engineering
More informationStream Simulation: A Simple Example
Stream Simulation: A Simple Example North Thompson Creek, CO Paul T. Anderson U.S.D.A. Forest Service Here s How We Started May 2011 2-1 USDA-Forest Service Here s How We Finished Forest Service Aquatic
More informationCase Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords
Case Study : Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords Location Crossing Description Washington. Okanagan National Forest. Methow Valley Ranger District. Chewuch river basin, East Chewuch Road. The Twenty-mile Creek
More informationGeomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River
Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River Scott McBain and Bill Trush McBain & Trush, Inc. Clavey River and Cherry Creek vicinity
More informationScience EOG Review: Landforms
Mathematician Science EOG Review: Landforms Vocabulary Definition Term canyon deep, large, V- shaped valley formed by a river over millions of years of erosion; sometimes called gorges (example: Linville
More informationGeomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.
Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge Report Figures 33 34 Figure 1. Location of Middle and Lower Swan Lake watersheds
More informationWays To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion
Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion Establish Background Condition From Old Ground Photos, Aerial Photos, and Maps Compare Rate Over Time At the Same Location, or for Reaches Channel
More informationCase Study 14. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford
Case Study. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford Location West Central Arkansas. Ouachita National Forest; Oden Ranger District. Rocky Creek crossing on Forest Road 887 (Muddy Gibbs Road). Crossing Description
More informationTom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013
Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire 1 May 2013 1 Hydrology 2 Basic Hydrology Low flows most common Flows that fill the stream to the banks and higher are much less common Filling the stream to the
More informationStep 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes
Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes When disturbed, streams go through a series of adjustments to regain equilibrium with the flow and sediment supply of their watersheds. These adjustments often
More informationLower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project
Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Project Location The project is located in the South Fork McKenzie River Watershed,
More informationSurface Water and Stream Development
Surface Water and Stream Development Surface Water The moment a raindrop falls to earth it begins its return to the sea. Once water reaches Earth s surface it may evaporate back into the atmosphere, soak
More informationmountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output
mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output strong interaction between streams & hillslopes Sediment Budgets for Mountain Rivers Little
More information1.0 Appendix. Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Dia-4.
1.0 Appendix Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Shot ID-1 Shot Id-2 Shot Id-3 Shot Id-4 Tagid LWD Criteria Dia-1 (cm)
More informationYUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY Representative Site Selection Above Englebright Reservoir Stream Fish, Aquatic BMI, Aquatic Mollusks Yuba County Water Agency Yuba River Development Project FERC Project No. 2246
More informationField Trip Number One. By: Pat Dryer. Geography 360
Field Trip Number One By: Pat Dryer Geography 360 Table of Contents Introduction. Page 1 Stop One... Page 2 Stop Two... Page 4 Stop Three... Page 5 Stop Four... Page 7 Bibliography Page 8 Campus Map Source:
More informationThe River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant
The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration Dr Jenny Mant Jenny@therrc.co.uk Understanding your catchment Hydrology Energy associated with the
More informationImplementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns
Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project Leslie A. Berns "...to acquire... and hold lands... for the purpose of protecting and preserving the flora, fauna and scenic beauties...
More informationDesign and Construction
Design and Construction Stream Simulation With power point slides shamelessly stolen from: Forest Service AOP Training Course Bob Gubernick Paul Anderson John Kattell USDA Forest Service Interim Directive
More informationAddressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms
Scott Jackson University of Massachusetts Amherst Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms Dams Sub-standard Culverts Excessive Velocities Inlet Drop
More informationHW #2 Landscape Travel from A to B 12,
HW #2 Landscape 2016 Section: Name: ate: 1. ase your answer(s) to the following question(s) on the map below, which represents two bridges that cross the Green River. Letters,, and represent locations
More informationTable E1. Site details for reaches selected for PHABSIM surveys in 2007
SURVEY DATA The relationships between available trout habitat and stream flow were investigated during the 2007, 2008 and 2009 field seasons in 21 locations using the PHABSIM (Physical Habitat Simulation)
More informationGully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion
Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES Gully erosion A complex of processes whereby the removal of soil is characterised by incised channels in the landscape. NSW Soil Conservation Service,
More informationWhy Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough
Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough Several examples of alternatives to the County s design approach have been suggested. A common theme of these proposals is a less comprehensive effort focusing
More informationLong Valley Meadow Restoration Project
Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Mogollon Rim Ranger District Coconino National Forest Coconino County, Arizona T13N, R9E, Section 12 and T13N, R10E, Sections 6 and 7 Gila and
More informationRiver Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.
River Response River Response Sediment Water Wood Confinement Valley slope Channel morphology Bank material Flow obstructions Riparian vegetation climate catchment vegetation hydrological regime channel
More informationHAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE
HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE ROAD, PROJECT CONSTRUCTED IN 1 DAY, MARCH 10, 2009 BY
More informationStep 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA)
Step 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA) Background Physical processes, combined with chemical constituents and biological interactions, are what determine biological productivity and diversity; and, in
More informationAppendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report
Appendix G Meso-Habitat Surveys DRAFT Annual Technical Report Draft March 2010 1.0 Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.0 Introduction The following appendix includes a report provided by the California Department
More informationNatural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes
Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes Excerpts from Chapters 2 and 3 Photo Photo by Jane by Jane Herbert Herbert Did you know? Twenty-four species of amphibians, 25 species of reptiles,
More informationPHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas
PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY By Brett Lucas FLUVIAL PROCESSES Fluvial Processes The Impact of Fluvial Processes on the Landscape Streams and Stream Systems Stream Channels Structural Relationships The Shaping and
More informationHUMAN IMPACTS AND RIVER CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT, NORTHEASTERN OREGON: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESTORATION. Patricia F. McDowell 1 INTRODUCTION
Forthcoming in: Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds Symposium Proceedings, American Water Resources Association, Annual International Summer Specialty Conference, August 27-30,
More informationThe Effect of Weather, Erosion, and Deposition in Texas Ecoregions
The Effect of Weather, Erosion, and Deposition in Texas Ecoregions 7.8B: I can analyze the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the environment in ecoregions of Texas Weathering The breakdown
More informationLittle Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010
Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Sediment and habitat monitoring in the Little Blackfoot TPA was conducted in July of 2009 as outlined
More information7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION 7.2 HABITAT SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAMPLING REACH 7.3 LOGISTICS AND WORK FLOW 7
7 PHYSICAL HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION...97 7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION...101 7.2 HABITAT SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAMPLING REACH...103 7.3 LOGISTICS AND WORK FLOW...105 7.4 THALWEG
More informationSession C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design
University of Massachusetts - Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish
More informationPhase I System Characterization: Year 2 Study Plans
Phase I System Characterization: Year 2 Study Plans Year I Physical and Biological Data Sets Quarterly Storm Sampling Four storm events with 8 sample stations at bridges Monthly Baseline Characterization
More informationBlack Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget
Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget Prepared for: Prepared By: - I. Introduction The Black Gore Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was developed in collaboration
More informationHistorical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods
Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods www.archives.gov www.paztcn.wr.usgs.gov wrh.noaa.gov Upper Gila River
More informationStream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)
Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics Pierre Y. Julien Malaysia 2004 Objectives Brief overview of environmental river mechanics and stream restoration: 1. Typical problems in environmental
More informationTechnical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth
Technical Memorandum To: From: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth 5777 Central Avenue Suite 228 Boulder, CO 80301 www.otak.com Copies: [Electronic submittal] Date: 10/19/2017 Subject:
More informationRapid Assessment of Stream Conditions Along Length (RASCAL) Protocol
Draft Draft Rapid Assessment of Stream Conditions Along Length (RASCAL) Protocol Overview: The RASCAL procedure; Rapid Assessment of Stream Conditions Along Length, has been modified from the NRCS Stream
More informationAPPENDIX 4B FOOTHILL YELLOW-LEGGED FROG SURVEY DATASHEETS AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (BASED ON SELTENRICH AND POOL,
APPENDIX 4B FOOTHILL YELLOW-LEGGED FROG SURVEY DATASHEETS AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (BASED ON SELTENRICH AND POOL, 2002) February 2004 PacifiCorp Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Klamath River Visual
More informationDiagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?
Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades? Faith Fitzpatrick USGS WI Water Science Center, Middleton, WI fafitzpa@usgs.gov
More informationKootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update
Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative November 19, 2012 Bonners Ferry, Idaho Changes to Kootenai Basin Beaver trapping Floodplain
More informationPENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0 LYCOMING COUNTY S.R.15, SECTION C41 FINAL HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT STEAM VALLEY RUN STREAM RELOCATION DATE: June, 2006 REVISED:
More informationCase Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project
Case Study 8 Project Overview The North Fork Nooksack In-channel project was developed cooperatively between the USDA Forest Service and the Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association (NSEA), with the objectives
More informationAPPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS
APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS A worksheet provides the designer a representation of a measure that allows for input of specific design criteria. The plan designer will be required to assess field conditions
More informationSTUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT
STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Michigan Project No.: F-80-R-8 Study No.: 230702 Title: Effects of sediment traps on Michigan river channels Period Covered: October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007 Study
More informationGeomorphic Assessment of City Center Athletic Club Development Impacts on Existing Stream Channel Stability, Lenexa, KS.
Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute (OEWRI) Geomorphic Assessment of City Center Athletic Club Development Impacts on Existing Stream Channel Stability, Lenexa, KS. Final report to Olsson
More informationGeomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26
Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring 2004 Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26 This exercise is intended to give you experience using field data you collected
More informationBUREAU OF CLEAN WATER. Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Habitat Assessment DECEMBER 2013
BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Assessment DECEMBER 2013 HABITAT ASSESSMENT The Department has adopted the habitat assessment methods outlined in EPA s Rapid Bioassessment
More informationRAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Rail Environment Conference November 2016 AGENDA Objective Background Benefits
More informationMISSION CREEK WATERSHED (2002 Report Year 4)
Stream Channel Monitoring Program for the MISSION CREEK WATERSHED (2002 Report Year 4) (Penticton Forest District) Prepared for RIVERSIDE FOREST PRODUCTS LTD. Prepared by DOBSON ENGINEERING LTD. #4, 1960
More informationFigure A 6. Floodplain and instream geomorphic units associated with the Bedrock-controlled, elongate discontinuous floodplain river style.
Figure A 6. Floodplain and instream geomorphic units associated with the Bedrock-controlled, elongate discontinuous floodplain river style. This figure represents the naturally adjusting variant within
More informationOBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT
STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT Greg Babbit Graduate Research Assistant Dept. Forestry, Wildlife & Fisheries Seneca Creek, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia OBJECTIVES Introduce basic
More informationUpper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California
Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California Mike Rudd (Project Manager), Charley Miller & Chad Krofta Declines in Tahoe s Water Clarity The
More information