CHAPTER THREE NOISE EXPOSURE MAP UPDATE

Transcription

1 3.1 OVERVIEW CHAPTER THREE NOISE EXPOSURE MAP UPDATE This chapter presents the Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map and Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map for the Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW). In the Sponsor s Certification section immediately following the Table of Contents, the official Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) are presented as NEM-1 for Existing Conditions (2012) and NEM-2 for Future Conditions (2018). The information provided in this chapter represents the potential noise levels in 2018 if no further noise abatement actions are implemented to change the noise exposure pattern. Appendix D, Noise Modeling Methodology, presents the information used to model the noise exposure patterns, including the details on operating characteristics, number of operations, and arrival and departure flight paths at Midway Airport. 3.2 AIRCRAFT NOISE EXPOSURE Aircraft noise impacts were assessed using noise exposure contours produced by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Integrated Noise Model (INM). The INM was developed for evaluating aircraft noise impacts in the vicinity of airports and has been the FAA's standard tool since 1978 for determining the predicted noise impact in the vicinity of airports. The distribution of the noise pattern on each map calculated by the INM is a function of the number of aircraft operations, the types of aircraft flown, the time of day of the operation, how frequently each runway is used for arrivals and departures, and the routes of flight used to and from the runway. Substantial variations in any one of these factors may, when extended over a long period of time, cause marked changes to the annual noise pattern. The noise analysis conducted for this 2013 Part 150 Study Update was developed using INM version 7.0c. The noise exposure pattern at MDW is presented in terms of the Average Day-Night Sound Level (DNL). The DNL metric represents the total aircraft noise energy of the airport operations for an annual-average day. With DNL, the loudness of nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m.) noise events are increased by ten decibels (db) to reflect the greater sensitivity to noise at night. The NEMs display contour lines that connect points of equal DNL exposure at 65 db, 70 db, and 75 db. Appendix D, Noise Modeling Methodology, contains a complete discussion of DNL and the input data that was used for the calculation of the noise exposure contours at Midway Airport. April 2013 Page 3-1

2 3.2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP The Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map was based on aircraft operations occurring during calendar year Operations and noise level data for 2012 are sufficiently like those of 2011 and the information developed for the year 2011 is also representative of the noise levels present during The CDA believes that this data is substantially representative of conditions present in Data representative of an average-annual day of operations was obtained from the City of Chicago s Airport Noise Management System (ANMS), airline schedules, airport landing fee reports, discussions with operators and the FAA s Air Traffic Activity Data System (ATADS). This data included the number of arrival and departure operations by individual types of aircraft during daytime and nighttime periods, the distribution of aircraft activities among the runway ends, and the distribution of aircraft along the flight paths leading to or from each runway. These operating levels represent the average number of operations that occurred during the full 2011 calendar year. Table 3-1 depicts the number of operations by several aircraft groups used for the INM modeling of the Existing Conditions (2012) 1 Noise Exposure Map. Table 3-1 ANNUAL OPERATIONS EXISTING (2012) CONDITIONS PASSENGER GENERAL AVIATION MILITARY TOTAL 197,672 57,828 2, ,800 Source: Compilation of the 2012 annual conditions is based upon ANMS, airline schedules, airport landing fee reports, discussions with operators and the FAA s ATADS., Exhibit 3-1, Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map, depicts the average-annual day noise exposure pattern present at MDW for the existing condition, reflective of typical operating conditions at the Airport. Table 3-2 summarizes the area within each noise contour level. The noise exposure contours do not represent the noise levels present on any specific day, but rather, represent the daily energy average of all 365 days of operation during the year. The noise contour pattern extends from the Airport along each extended runway centerline, reflective of the flight tracks used by all aircraft. The relative distance of the contours from the airport along each route is a function of the frequency of the use of each runway for total arrivals and departures, as well as its use at night, and the number and type of aircraft assigned to it. The shape of the noise contours is primarily a function of the combination of flight tracks, time of operations, and runway use at MDW. The shape of the noise contours to the northwest of the Airport reflects the predominant use of Runway 1 The Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map was based on aircraft operations occurring during calendar year Operations and noise level data for 2012 are approximately those of 2011, so the information developed for the year 2011 is also representative of the noise levels present during The CDA believes that this data is representative of conditions present in April 2013 Page 3-2

3 31C for departures. The elongated shape of the contours to the southwest of the Airport reflects the predominant use of Runways 4L and 4R for arrivals. The minimal usage of Runway 13C for departures is apparent from minimal size of the noise exposure contour emanating to the southeast. Table 3-2 AREA (IN SQUARE MILES) WITHIN NOISE CONTOUR BANDS EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP CONTOUR RANGE CONTOUR AREA (SQ. MILES) DNL DNL DNL 0.6 TOTAL 65+ DNL 3.6 Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a square mile. The total area of the 65+ DNL noise exposure contour may not equal sum of individual contour bands due to rounding. Source:, Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map Impacts Identifying and evaluating all land uses within the airport environs is necessary to quantify residential and other noise-sensitive land uses impacted by aircraft noise. As discussed there, the FAA has developed land use compatibility guidelines relating types of land use to airport sound levels. These guidelines are defined in 14 CFR Part 150, Land Use Compatibility with Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Levels. (The compatibility table is provided in this document in Appendix B, FAA Policies, Guidance, and Regulations, as Table B-2.) These guidelines show the compatibility parameters for residential, public facilities (schools, churches, nursing homes, hospitals, and libraries), commercial, manufacturing and production, and recreational land uses. In general, the guidelines indicate that noise-sensitive land uses (residential and noise-sensitive public facilities) are considered incompatible with airport operations within the 65 DNL noise exposure contour, unless treated with some type of mitigation. All land uses exposed to noise levels below 65 DNL are generally considered by the FAA to be compatible with airport operations. Table 3-3 summarizes the estimated population, housing units, and number of noise-sensitive public facilities within the 65 DNL noise exposure contour for Existing Conditions (2012) conditions. There are 7,208 housing units and an estimated population of 21,544 people located within the 65 DNL of the Existing Conditions (2012) contour. All of these housing units are located within the City of Chicago and Unincorporated Cook County. Of those housing units, 4,874 have received, or are in the process of receiving sound insulation. The owners of 1,002 of the remaining housing units either did not respond to the Chicago Department of April 2013 Page 3-3

4 Aviation s (CDA) offer or refused previous offers for mitigation 2. There are six (6) schools and nine (9) churches located within the 65 DNL of the Existing Conditions (2012) contour. Churches were not included in the mitigation program measures in the 1992 Part 150 Study. Table 3-3 HOUSING UNITS, POPULATION, AND NOISE-SENSITIVE PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR 75+ DNL DNL DNL 65+ DNL Housing Units Sound Insulated Completed ,097 4,853 Sound Insulated In Progress Previously Dropped/Declined Participation ,002 Remaining Housing Units Potentially Eligible to Receive Sound Insulation ,034 1,332 Total Housing Units 103 1,056 6,049 7,208 Estimated Population 355 3,366 17,823 21,544 Noise-Sensitive Public Facilities Schools (All sound insulated) Churches Libraries Hospitals Nursing Homes Note 1: The numbers of housing units were found by utilizing CDA s RSIP GIS database and were verified through aerial photography and field verification. Population numbers were estimated by utilizing the U.S Census GIS layers, rounded to the nearest whole number. Note 2: Housing Units denoted as Sound Insulated Completed are those completed under RSIP Program years prior to 2011 and those denoted as Sound Insulated In Progress are homes in the RSIP 2011 Program Year. Note 3: Housing Units denoted as Previously Dropped/Declined Participation are those that were previously eligible for participation under past RSIP Program Years and either did not respond to invitations or declined to participate. These housing units would be invited to participate in future RSIP. Source:, The CDA sent letters to the owners of all properties that were eligible for participation in the Residential Sound Insulation Program under the 1995, 2000 and 2004 contours. An additional letter requesting their intent to participate in the program was sent to residences that did not respond to the initial invitation. These housing units would be invited to participate in future RSIP. April 2013 Page 3-4

5 Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Sensitive Public Facilities The noise-sensitive public facilities located within the Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map are listed in Table 3-4. No other planned noise-sensitive public facilities have been identified within the Part 150 Study Area. Table 3-4 NOISE-SENSITIVE PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP Map ID Name Schools S-1 Alexander Fleming Elementary* S-2 Edwards Elementary* S-3 Gloria Dei Lutheran Elementary* S-4 Grimes Elementary* S-5 St. Jane de Chantal Elementary* S-6 St. Richard School* Churches C-1 Centro Cristiano Church C-2 Crossroads Community Church C-3 Gloria Dei Evangelical Lutheran Church C-4 Resurrection United Methodist C-5 Risen Savior Assembly Church C-6 Soldiers for God Ministry C-7 St. Jane de Chantal Roman Catholic Church C-8 St. Richard Parish C-9 Wesleyan Missionary Church *Has been insulated as part of the School Sound Insulation Program Source: ESRI Data and Maps, 2012; Illinois Board of Education Listing, 2012; Medicare Provider Listing, 2012;, April 2013 Page 3-5

6 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK April 2013 Page 3-6

7 Midway Riverside Lyons McCook Summit Harlem Ave Ogden Ave Berwyn Forest View 55 55th St Ridgeland Ave 35th St Stickney Cicero Central Ave C7 S5 C3 S3 C5 C2 13R 13L 13C 47th St Archer Ave 22R Cicero Ave 22L S6 C8 H1 S2 C6 Pulaski Rd Kedzie Ave Chicago California Ave Western Ave Archer Ave 39th St 43rd St 47th St 51st St 55th St 59th St Damen Ave 35th St City of Chicago Rahm Emanuel Mayor Legend Municipal Boundaries Compatible Land Use Residential International Airport Department of Aviation Rosemarie S. Andolino Commissioner 14 CFR Part 150 Study Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map Noise Contours Study Area 63rd St C1 C4 4L H3 H2 C9 70 DNL 4R S4 75 DNL H4 31L S1 31R 31C 63rd St 67th St Institutional, Medical, Education, Religious Existing Airport Property Interstates Major Roads Railroads 65 DNL Bedford Park 71st St Schools Schools - Sound Insulated Bridgeview Justice Source: ESRI Data & Maps, 2012; Land Use: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, Harlem Ave 79th St Burbank Cicero Ave Pulaski Rd Kedzie Ave Sponsor s Certificate The Noise Exposure Maps and accompanying documentation for the Noise Exposure Map for submitted in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150 with the best available information, are hereby certified as true 79th St and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I verify that the data used to develop this Existing (2012) Noise Exposure Map is representative of existing conditions. Interested persons have been afforded adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Maps and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Date of Signature Western Ave Damen Ave 87th St Rosemarie S. Andolino Commissioner Chicago Department of Aviation Feet Churches Libraries Hospitals 0 2,000 4,000 Date: April 15, 2013 File: Existing_Conditions2.mxd Historical Sites Nursing Homes Permanent Noise Monitors Exhibit: 3-1

8 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9 3.2.2 FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP For the Future Conditions (2018) 3, the operational data was adjusted to reflect the projected fleet and levels of operations developed in the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF). Table 3-5 provides a summary of the current and forecasted future aircraft operational levels at Midway Airport that were used for noise modeling. Future operations (2018) reflect a growth in air carrier operations to accommodate the anticipated growth in passenger demand. Table 3-5 SUMMARY OF MODELED ANNUAL OPERATIONS YEAR PASSENGER GA MILITARY TOTAL ,672 57,828 2, , ,903 64,447 2, ,650 % Change 17% 12% 0% 16% Source: Compilation of the 2012 annual conditions is based upon ANMS, airline schedules, airport landing fee reports, discussions with operators and the FAA s ATADS., annual conditions is based upon 2012 annual conditions, FAA runway use and fleet mix projections and FAA TAF. Exhibit 3-2, Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map, presents the Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map. The projected contour assumes growth as forecasted in the FAA TAF for MDW. That forecast projects the 2018 aircraft operating levels to be approximately 15.8 percent greater than 2012, with the most notable increase being among the passenger traffic. 3 The term Future Conditions (2018) refers to the future noise exposure conditions with no changes to the currently-approved noise abatement measures and with the 2018 operating levels based on the Forecast of Aviation Activity. April 2013 Page 3-9

10 Table 3-6 summarizes the area within each noise contour level for the 2018 condition. Table 3-6 AREA (IN SQUARE MILES) WITHIN NOISE CONTOUR BANDS FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP CONTOUR RANGE CONTOUR AREA (SQ. MILES) DNL DNL DNL 0.6 TOTAL 65+ DNL 4.1 Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a square mile. The total area of the 65+ DNL noise exposure contour may not equal sum of individual contour bands due to rounding. Source:, Similar to the Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map, the shape of the Future Conditions (2018) contour to the northwest of the Airport reflects the predominant use of Runway 31C for departures, while the majority of arrivals occur on Runway 04R. The minimal usage of departures from Runway 13C is apparent from minimal size of the noise exposure contour emanating from this endpoint. The contour shape remains generally the same as the 2012 pattern because the key variables that determine shape including runway and flight track utilization were similar between 2012 and The 2018 noise contour does extend beyond the 2012 contour at the northeastern edge of the noise contour mainly due to the increase in arrivals on Runway 22L. April 2013 Page 3-10

11 Midway Riverside Lyons McCook Summit Harlem Ave Ogden Ave Berwyn Forest View 55 55th St Ridgeland Ave 35th St Stickney Cicero S9 C7 S5 C3 S3 C5 C2 Central Ave Cicero Ave 13L 13C 47th St 13R C11 Archer Ave S8 22R 22L S6 C8 H1 C10 Pulaski Rd S2 C6 L1 S7 Kedzie Ave Chicago California Ave Western Ave Archer Ave 39th St 43rd St 47th St 51st St 55th St 59th St Damen Ave 35th St City of Chicago Rahm Emanuel Mayor Legend Municipal Boundaries Compatible Land Use Residential International Airport Department of Aviation Rosemarie S. Andolino Commissioner 14 CFR Part 150 Study Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map Noise Contours Study Area 63rd St C1 4L H3 H2 C4 C9 70 DNL 4R S4 75 DNL H4 31L S1 31R 31C 63rd St 67th St Institutional, Medical, Education, Religious Existing Airport Property Interstates Major Roads Railroads 65 DNL Bedford Park 71st St Schools Schools - Sound Insulated Bridgeview Justice Source: ESRI Data & Maps, 2012; Land Use: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, Harlem Ave 79th St Burbank Cicero Ave Pulaski Rd Kedzie Ave Sponsor s Certificate The Noise Exposure Maps and accompanying documentation for the Noise Exposure Map for submitted in accordance with 14 CFR Part 150 with the best available information, are hereby certified as true 79th St and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I verify that the data used to develop this Future (2018) Noise Exposure Map is representative of future conditions. Interested persons have been afforded adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Maps and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Date of Signature Western Ave Damen Ave 87th St Rosemarie S. Andolino Commissioner Chicago Department of Aviation Feet Churches Historical Sites Nursing Homes Libraries Hospitals 0 2,000 4,000 Date: April 15, 2013 File: Future_Conditions2_2018.mxd Permanent Noise Monitors Exhibit: 3-2

12 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

13 Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map Impacts Table 3-8 summarizes the estimated population, housing units, and number of noise-sensitive public facilities within the 65 DNL noise exposure contour for Future Conditions (2018). There are 8,371 housing units with an estimated population of 24,883 located within the 65 DNL of the Future Conditions (2018) contour. All of these housing units are located within the City of Chicago and Unincorporated Cook County. Of the 8,371 housing units, 5,664 have received, or are in the process of receiving, sound insulation. The owners of 1,178 units either did not respond to CDA s offer or refused previous offers for mitigation. 4 There are nine (9) schools and eleven (11) churches located within the 65 DNL of the Future Conditions (2018) contour. Churches were not included in the mitigation program measures in the 1992 Part 150 Study. A search of historic sites in the databases revealed that there are four addresses that are characterized as historic sites within the Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Map. The same four addresses are located in the Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map. There are no newly impacted historic sites. The Historic sites located within the Existing Conditions (2012) and Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map are listed in Table 3-7. Exhibit 2-5, Historic Sites shows the location of Historic Sites within the Study Area. Table 3-7 HISTORIC SITES WITHIN THE EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) AND FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS Map ID HP-1 1 HP-2 2 HP-3 2 HP-4 Historic Site 5046 S Kolin Avenue, Chicago W 63rd Street, Chicago S Central Avenue, Chicago Illinois National Guard Amory 1 HP-1 is listed as a potential historic site in the Chicago Historic Resources Survey (CHRS), which is a local survey conducted from 1983 to This structure was listed as possessing some architectural feature or historical association that made it potentially significant in the context of the surrounding community. Full sound insulation of the structure was initiated in March 2007 and substantially complete in March HP-2 and HP-3 represent the same property at the northwest corner of 63 rd Street and Central Avenue. The City of Chicago has purchased the property with the intent to address existing obstruction issues, and is preparing an environmental evaluation and will identify all reasonable alternatives including working with the IHPA. Source: National Park Service NRHP Database, 2012; City of Chicago Landmarks Database, 2012; City of Chicago Historical Survey Database, The CDA sent letters to the owners of all properties that were eligible for participation in the Residential Sound Insulation Program under the 1995, 2000 and 2004 contours. An additional letter requesting their intent to participate in the program was sent to residences that did not respond to the initial invitation. These housing units would be invited to participate in future RSIP. April 2013 Page 3-13

14 Table 3-8 HOUSING UNITS, POPULATION, AND NOISE-SENSITIVE PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR 75+ DNL DNL DNL 65+ DNL Housing Units Sound Insulated Completed ,530 5,579 Sound Insulated In Progress Previously Dropped/Declined Participation ,049 1,178 Remaining Housing Units Potentially Eligible to Receive Sound Insulation ,141 1,529 Total Housing Units 113 1,458 6,800 8,371 Estimated Population 464 4,464 19,955 24,883 Noise-Sensitive Public Facilities Schools (All sound insulated) Churches Libraries Hospitals Nursing Homes Note 1: The numbers of housing units were found by utilizing CDA s RSIP GIS database and were verified through aerial photography and field verification. Population numbers were estimated by utilizing the U.S Census GIS layers, rounded to the nearest whole number. Note 2: Housing Units denoted as Sound Insulated Completed are those completed under RSIP Program years prior to 2011 and those denoted as Sound Insulated In Progress are homes in the RSIP 2011 Program Year. Note 3: Housing Units denoted as Previously Dropped/Declined Participation are those that were previously eligible for participation under past RSIP Program Years and either did not respond to invitations or declined to participate. These housing units would be invited to participate in future RSIP. Source:, 2013 April 2013 Page 3-14

15 Future Conditions (2018) Noise Sensitive Public Facilities The noise-sensitive public facilities located within the Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map are listed in Table 3-9. No other planned noise-sensitive public facilities have been identified within the Part 150 Study Area. Table 3-9 NOISE-SENSITIVE PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE MAP Map ID Name Schools S-1 Alexander Fleming Elementary* S-2 Edwards Elementary* S-3 Gloria Dei Lutheran Elementary* S-4 Grimes Elementary* S-5 St. Jane de Chantal Elementary* S-6 St. Richard School* S-7 Curie Metropolitan High School* S-8 Pasteur Elementary Branch* S-9 Twain Elementary* Churches C-1 Centro Cristiano Church C-2 Crossroads Community Church C-3 Gloria Dei Evangelical Lutheran Church C-4 Resurrection United Methodist C-5 Risen Savior Assembly Church C-6 Soldiers for God Ministry C-7 St. Jane De Chantal Church C-8 St. Richard Parish C-9 Wesleyan Missionary Church C-10 New Life Community Church C-11 St. Camillus Church Libraries L-1 Archer Heights Public Library *Has been insulated as part of the School Sound Insulation Program Source: ESRI Data and Maps, 2012; Illinois Board of Education Listing, 2012; Medicare Provider Listing, 2012;, COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE EXPOSURE Table 3-10 provides a comparison of the areas within the Existing Conditions (2012) and Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Maps. Exhibit 3-3, Existing Conditions (2012) Compared to Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Map, presents a comparison of the Existing Conditions (2012) noise exposure contour and the Future Conditions (2018) noise exposure contours. April 2013 Page 3-15

16 A comparison of Table 3-3 and Table 3-7 indicates that the growth of the noise contours between Existing Conditions (2012) and Future Conditions (2018) will result in the inclusion of only 1,163 additional housing units into the 65 DNL noise exposure contour. The management and control of the development of incompatible land uses is a primary topic of the recommendations of the NCP presented in Chapter Four. Table 3-10 COMPARISON OF AREA (IN SQUARE MILES) WITHIN THE EXISTING CONDITIONS (2012) AND FUTURE CONDITIONS (2018) NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS CONTOUR RANGE EXISTING (2012) CONTOUR AREA (SQ. MILES) FUTURE (2018) CONTOUR AREA (SQ. MILES) DIFFERENCE (SQ. MILES) DNL DNL DNL TOTAL 65+ DNL Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a square mile. The total area of the 65+ DNL noise exposure contour may not equal sum of individual contour bands due to rounding. Source:, 2013 April 2013 Page 3-16

17 Midway Riverside Lyons McCook Summit Harlem Ave Ogden Ave Berwyn Forest View 55 55th St Ridgeland Ave 35th St Stickney Cicero S9 C7 S5 C3 S3 C5 C2 Central Ave Cicero Ave 13L 13C 47th St 13R C11 Archer Ave S8 22R 22L S6 C8 H1 C10 Pulaski Rd S2 C6 L1 S7 Kedzie Ave Chicago California Ave Western Ave Archer Ave 39th St 43rd St 47th St 51st St 55th St 59th St Damen Ave 35th St City of Chicago Rahm Emanuel Mayor International Airport Department of Aviation Rosemarie S. Andolino Commissioner 14 CFR Part 150 Study Existing Conditions (2012) Baseline Compared to Future Conditions (2018) Legend Existing Conditions (2012) Noise Exposure Contour Future Conditions (2018) Noise Exposure Contour Study Area Municipal Boundaries Compatible Land Use 63rd St C1 C4 4L H3 H2 C9 70 DNL 4R S4 75 DNL H4 31L S1 31R 31C 63rd St 67th St Residential Institutional, Medical, Education, Religious Existing Airport Property Interstates Major Roads 65 DNL Bedford Park 71st St Railroads Schools Schools - Sound Insulated Churches Justice Bridgeview Harlem Ave 79th St 79th St Historical Sites Nursing Homes Libraries Hospitals Source: ESRI Data & Maps, 2012; Land Use: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, Burbank Cicero Ave Pulaski Rd Kedzie Ave Western Ave 87th St Damen Ave Feet 0 2,000 4,000 Date: February 5, 2013 File: Noise_Comparison.mxd Permanent Noise Monitors Exhibit: 3-3

18 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK