METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models September to November 2016 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
|
|
- Jasper Gervase Ferguson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 METinfo No. /6 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models September to November 6 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter Photo: Jan Erik Haugen
2 Contents Introduction Models Postprocessedforecasts TheHARMONIE system Verification measures Observations Mean Sea Level Pressure figures Statisticsbylead time Monthlysummarystatisticsthelastthreeyears Temperature m figures Statisticsbylead time Monthlymeanerrorthe lastthreeyears Monthlystandarddeviation oferrorthe lastthreeyears Monthlymeanabsoluteerrorthe lastthreeyears Mapsfor eachregion Timeseriesfor selectedstations Post processed temperature m figures Statisticsbylead time Long term ECMWF temperature m figures Statisticsbylead time Wind speed m figures Statisticssummarizedover Norwegianstations Statisticssummarizedover Svalbardstations Statisticssummarizedover northnowegian stations Monthlymeanerrorthe lastthreeyears Monthlystandarddeviation oferrorthe lastthreeyears Monthlymeanabsoluteerrorthe lastthreeyears Mapsfor eachregion Timeseriesfor selectedstations Post processed maximum mean wind speed m figures Statisticsbylead time Statisticsforcategorisedevents
3 Wind gust figures Statisticsbylead time Statisticsforcategorisedevents Long term ECMWF wind speed m figures Statisticsbylead time Precipitation figures Statisticsbylead time(rr) Statisticsforcategorisedevents (RR) Monthlymeanerrorthe lastthreeyears (RR) Monthlystandarddeviation oferrorthe lastthreeyears (RR) Monthlymeanabsoluteerrorthe lastthreeyears (RR) Mapsfor eachregion(rr) Timeseriesfor selectedstations(rr) More information... Verification results are also available on internal web pages AROME-MetCoOp verification- 7 and 3 last days - timeseries and windroses- on Google map 3
4 Models The following models are verified in this report. ECMWF AROME-Norway AROME-MetCoOp (AM) AROME-Arctic (AA) MetCoOp ensemble system (MEPSmbr) Global model (IFS) at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. From 6 January horizontal resolution approximately 6 6 km. From 8 March 6 cycle r with horizontal resolution about 9km. ECMWF is available about hours laterthan models runat MET. HARMONIE cycle 37h. with AROME physics and nonhydrostatic dynamics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid. Experimental since October, replacing Harmonie. from 6 February 3, on Yr from October 3. HARMONIE with AROME physics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid on same domain as AROME- Norway. Run in cooperation with Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI). Experimental with cycle 38h. since 9 December 3, operational since March, cycle 38h. since 8 December. HARMONIE with AROME physics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid, same domain size as AROME- MetCoOp. Experimental with cycle 38h. since October. MEPS has ensemble members, only member, the control, is verified in this report. MEPS is based on HARMONIE cycle h. with AROME physics and non-hydrostatic dynamics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid. Experimental since May 6. Operational status since 8 November 6. Analysis and lead times of forecasts are denoted by e.g. +3 UTC which indicates forecast generated atutcand valid3hourslater. Post processed forecasts Mostof therawmodeldataarepostprocessedbeforebeingpublished on Yr. For m temperature, the raw data is first adjusted to a fine scale ( m) topography applying a vertical temperature gradient of -.6 degrees pr. m. The height corrected m temperature forecasts (AMHC) are in a next step adapted to observations by a Kalman filter at all observing stations. The Kalman filter corrections are interpolated horizontally to the m grid by kriging, using weights which decrease with increasing distance from the observing stations, both horizontally and vertically. The interpolated Kalman filter corrections are finally added to the heigth corrected field, giving AMKF. m wind speed is statistically post processed to represent maximum wind speed m last hour, and called AMPP.
5 The precipitation forecasts are post processed by a neighbourhood method giving a median field, AMmedian. This field is used to determine the precipitation symbol on Yr. ECMWF provides probabilistic forecasts based on a member ensemble system at 3 km resolution. Consensus forecasts(ecens) are calibrated (ECensPP) before being presented on Yr. The HARMONIE system HARMONIE is the acronym for HIRLAM s meso-scale forecast system(hirlam Aladin Regional/Mesoscale Operational NWP In Europe). The HARMONIE system includes several configuration options. This section presents some of the main components and setups that are used at MET. More documentation is available on and A change log for AROME- MetCoOp is found on ALARO- physics ALARO- has physical parameterizations targeted for grey scale resolutions( - km). It is a spin-off of the Météo-France physical parameterizations used in the globale ARPEGE, but with a separate radiation scheme, 3MT micro-physical frame work, and the Toucans turbulence scheme. Much of the development has been done by the RC LACE (Regional Cooperation for Limited Area modeling in Central Europe) community. AROME physics AROME(Applications of Research to Operations at MEsoscale) is targeted for horizontal resolution. km or finer. It uses physical parameterizations based on the French academia model Meso-NH and the external surface model SURFEX. AROME has been operational at Météo-France since 8 December 8, with a horizontal resolution of. km. SURFEX as surface model SURFEX (Surface externalisée) is developed at Météo-France and academia for offline experiments and introduced in NWP models to ensure consistent treatment of processes related to surface. Météo- France is already using SURFEX for some of their configurations and is planning to use it for all their configurations. Surface modelling and assimilation will benefit from the possibility of running offline experiments. SURFEX is also used for offline applications in e.g. hydrology, vegetation monitoring and snow avalanche forecasts. SURFEX includes routines to simulate the exchange of energy and water between the atmosphere and surface types (tiles); land, sea (ocean), lake (inland water) and town. The land or nature tile can be divided further into vegetation types (patches). ISBA (Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere) is used for modelling the land surface processes. There are 3 ISBA options; - and 3-layer force restore and a diffusive approach, where the first one is used in HIRLAM. Towns may be treated by a separate TEB (Town Energy Balance) module. Seas and lakes are also treated separately. The lake model, FLAKE (Freshwater LAKE), has recently been introduced in SURFEX. A global ECOCLIMAP database which combines land cover maps and satellite information gives information about surface properties. The orography is taken from gtopo3.
6 SURFEX Scientific Documentation and User s Guide are available on Data assimilation NWP models are updated regularly using observations received in real-time from the global observing system. AROME-MetCoOpis updatedeach thirdhour;at,3,6,9,,,8andutc. Surface analysis Surface analysis is performed by CANARI (Code d Analyse Nécessaire à ARPEGE pour ses Rejets et son Initialisation) (Taillefer, ). The analysis method is Optimal Interpolation and only conventional synoptic observations are used. meter temperature and relative humidity observations are used to update the surface and soil temperature and moisture. The snow analysis is also performed with CANARI in analogy with the HIRLAM snow analysis. Snow depth observations are used to update Snow Water Equivalent. The snow fields are analysed only at 6 and8utc asthereareveryfewsnowdepth observationsat,3,9,, and. The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and Sea Ice Concentration (SIC) is not analysed, but taken from the boundaries. ECMWF uses the OSTIA (Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis) product, including SST from UK Met Office and SIC from MET. SST and SIC for the Baltic Sea have since6november been takenfromthe oceanmodel HIROMBrunat SMHI. The surface temperature over sea ice was taken from the boundary model and remained unchanged through the forecast. A simple thermodynamical sea ice scheme (SICE) giving prognostic sea ice temperatures in fixed layers was introduced 6 November. Upper air analysis AROME-MetCoOp runs three dimensional variational (3D VAR) data assimilation using conventional observations from synop stations, ships, radiosondes and aircrafts and AMSU-A and AMSU-B/MHS data from polar orbiting NOAA and METOP satellites. GNSS were introduced 7 February, radar reflectivities 6 June and IASI data 6 November. Boundary fields AROME-MetCoOp gets its boundary values (-hourly) from the ECMWF model at approximately 6 km resolution, and has currently 6 vertical levels. None of the HARMONIE configurations at MET have applied digital filter initialization (DFI). 6
7 Verification measures All model forecasts in this report are verified against observations by interpolating(linear) the grid based forecasts to the observational sites. As a consequence, it should be noted that it is the models abilities to forecast the observations that is being quantifed and assessed. Thus, there is no attempt in this report to verify area averaged precipitation for example. Verification is carried out both for raw and categorized forecasts. In the following, let f,..., f n denote theforecastsando,...,o n thecorrespondingobservations. Forecasts of continuous variables The verification statistics applied to continuous variables are defined in the table below Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Mean Error Mean Absolute Error ME MAE Standard Deviation of Error SDE Root Mean Square Error Correlation RMSE COR ( n n n i= (f i o i ) to n n i= f i o i to n i= ( n (f i o i ME) ) / n i= In the formula for COR the following definitions are used (f i o i ) ) / n n i= (f i f)(o i ō) SD(f)SD(o) to to to f = n n i= f i, ō = n n o i i= SD(f) = ( n n i= (f i f) ) / (, SD(o) = n for the means and standard deviations of the forecasts and observations. n i= (o i ō) ) / 7
8 Forecasts of categorical variables All variables in this report are continuous in raw form, but it is possible to categorize them and verify these. For example, wind speed above a given threshold could be of interest which would result in two possible outcomes (yes and no). The verification is then completely summarized by a contingency table as theone shownbelow event observed yes no event forecasted yes a b no c d Verification statistics for such forecasts are listed in the following table Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Hit rate HR a a+c to False alarm rate F b b+d to False alarm ratio FAR b a+b to Equitable threat score ETS a ar a+b+c ar /3to (=noskill) Hanssen-Kuipers skill score KSS HR - F to ( = no skill) Heidke skill score HSS (a+d)/n ssf ssf to (=noskill) Intheformulafor ETSar=(a+b)(a+c)/n. Intheformulafor HSSthescoreforthestandardforecastssf =[(a+b)(a+c)+(b+d)(c+d)]/n. Observations All observations come from Klimadatavarehuset at MET. Only synop stations are used. The model wind speed is verified against mean wind observations, FF. The post processed wind speed is intended to represent maximum wind speed m last hour, and is verified against FX. 8
9 Sep to Nov 6 Mean Sea Level Pressure. Mean Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error 3 North Scand. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 3 North Scand. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 3 North Scand. stations +3,+6,...,
10 Sep to Nov 6 Mean Sea Level Pressure Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+3,+36,+ UTC. ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr..... Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Standard Deviation of Error Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6. Mean Error Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6
11 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m Mean Error Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error 7 North Scand. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 7 North Scand. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 7 North Scand. stations +3,+6,...,
12 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m Mean Error 6 Norwegian stations +,+3,+36,+ UTC ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian inland stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6
13 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m Standard Deviation of Error 6 Norwegian stations ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr +,+3,+36,+ UTC 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian inland stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 3
14 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m Mean Absolute Error 6 Norwegian stations +,+3,+36,+ UTC ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian inland stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6
15 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
16 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
17 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
18 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
19 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
20 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
21 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
22 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
23 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
24 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
25 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
26 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
27 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m SVALBARD LUFTHAVN Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
28 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m BJØRNØYA Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
29 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m TROMSØ Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
30 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m KAUTOKEINO Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
31 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m ØRLAND III Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
32 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m BERGEN FLORIDA Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
33 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m FINSEVATN Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
34 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m NESBYEN TODOKK Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
35 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m EKOFISK Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
36 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m SOLA Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
37 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m FÆRDER FYR Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
38 Sep to Nov 6 Temperature m OSLO BLINDERN Celsius Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct Celsius Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Celsius Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
39 Sep to Nov 6 Post processed temperature m (AMHC and AMKF). Mean Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM AMHC AMKF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 6 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error Nor. coastal stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM AMHC AMKF 3. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. coastal stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Nor. coastal stations +3,+6,..., Mean Error 8 Nor. inland stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM AMHC AMKF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 8 Nor. inland stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 8 Nor. inland stations +3,+6,...,
40 Sep to Nov 6 Long term ECMWF temperature m Mean Error 66 Norwegian stations ECMWF ECens ECensPP coastal stations inland stations
41 Sep to Nov 6 Long term ECMWF temperature m Standard Deviation of Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP 66 Norwegian stations coastal stations inland stations
42 Sep to Nov 6 Long term ECMWF temperature m Mean Absolute Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP 66 Norwegian stations coastal stations inland stations
43 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m. Mean Error 9 Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 9 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 9 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Hit Rate 3 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AM ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+3,+36. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score 3 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AM ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+3,+36. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) 3
44 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m. Mean Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +3,+6,..., Hit Rate Svalbard stations +8,+,+3,+36 AA ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+3,+36. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score Svalbard stations +8,+,+3,+36 AA ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+3,+36. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
45 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m. Mean Error 63 North Scand. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AA AM ECMWF 3. Standard Deviation of Error 63 North Scand. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error 63 North Scand. stations +3,+6,..., Hit Rate 9 North Scand. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AA AM ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+3,+36. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score 9 North Scand. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AA AM ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+3,+36. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
46 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m Mean Error 9 Norwegian stations ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr +,+3,+36,+ UTC 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian mountainous stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 6
47 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m Standard Deviation of Error 9 Norwegian stations +,+3,+36,+ UTC ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian mountainous stations Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 7
48 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m Mean Absolute Error 9 Norwegian stations +,+3,+36,+ UTC ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian coastal stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 Norwegian mountainous stations 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 8
49 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
50 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
51 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
52 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
53 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
54 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m AM + SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
55 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m SVALBARD LUFTHAVN m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
56 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m BJØRNØYA m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
57 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m TROMSØ m/s 8 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s 8 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s 8 6 Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
58 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m SLETTNES FYR m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, AA: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
59 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m ØRLAND III m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
60 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m YTTERØYANE FYR m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
61 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m FINSEVATN m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
62 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m NESBYEN TODOKK m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
63 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m EKOFISK m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
64 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m SOLA m/s 8 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s 8 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s 8 6 Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
65 Sep to Nov 6 Wind speed m FÆRDER FYR m/s Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct m/s Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct m/s Oct 3 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Min Mean Max Std N synop:,6,, AM: +8,+,+3, ECMWF: +8,+,+3, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
66 Sep to Nov 6 Post processed maximum mean wind speed m (AMPP). Mean Error Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM AMPP 3. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Hit Rate 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AM AMPP. False Alarm Rate 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36. False Alarm Ratio 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AM AMPP. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36. Heidke Skill Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) 66
67 Sep to Nov 6 Wind gust (AM FG) and AM 9 Mean Error 3 Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 AM_FG AM_9 Standard Deviation of Error 3 Nor. stations +3,+6,...,+66 Mean Absolute Error 3 Nor. stations +3,+6,..., Hit Rate Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AMFG AM9. False Alarm Rate Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36. False Alarm Ratio Nor. stations +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36 AMFG AM9. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score Nor. stations +8,+,+3,+36. Heidke Skill Score Nor. stations +8,+,+3, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) 67
68 Sep to Nov 6 Long term ECMWF wind speed m Mean Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP 8 Norwegian stations coastal stations mountainous stations
69 Sep to Nov 6 Long term ECMWF wind speed m Standard Deviation of Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP 8 Norwegian stations coastal stations mountainous stations
70 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation Mean Absolute Error. ECMWF ECens ECensPP 8 Norwegian stations coastal stations mountainous stations
71 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation. Mean Error 6 Nor. stations +8,+3,...,+66 AM ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error 6 Nor. stations +8,+3,...,+66. Mean Absolute Error 6 Nor. stations +8,+3,..., Hit Rate 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+,+66 AM ECMWF. False Alarm Rate 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+,+66. False Alarm Ratio 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+, Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm). Equitable Threat Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+,+66 AM ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+,+66. Heidke Skill Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+3,+,+, Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) 7
72 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation Mean Error 8 Norwegian stations ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr +3 UTC Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 coastal stations Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 37 stations more than m above sea level Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 7
73 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation Standard Deviation of Error 8 8 Norwegian stations ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr +3 UTC 6 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 coastal stations 8 6 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 37 stations more than m above sea level 8 6 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm 8 6 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 73
74 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations ECMWF AROME_Norway AM MEPSmbr +3 UTC Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 7 coastal stations 6 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep stations more than m above sea level 6 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 7 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm 6 3 Sep3 Dec3 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar6 Jun6 Sep6 7
75 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
76 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
77 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
78 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
79 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 ME at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
80 Sep to Nov 6 Daily precipitation AM +3 SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) forecast means
81 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation SVALBARD LUFTHAVN mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
82 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation BJØRNØYA mm 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm 6 Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
83 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation TROMSØ mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
84 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation BODØ VI mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop AA synop ECMWF synop
85 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation ØRLAND III mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
86 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation BERGEN FLORIDA mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
87 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation LÆRDAL IV mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
88 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation GARDERMOEN mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
89 Sep to Nov 6 hour precipitation NELAUG mm Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Sep Sep 6 Oct mm Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct Oct 6 Oct mm Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov Nov 3 Min Mean Max Std N synop: 6, AM: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AM synop ECMWF synop
METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models December 2017 to February 2018 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
METinfo No. /8 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models December 7 to February 8 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter Photo: Jan Erik Haugen Contents Introduction
More informationMETinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models June to August 2017 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
METinfo No. /7 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models June to August 7 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter Contents Introduction Models..............................................
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008 The Norwegian Meteorological Institute 1. Summary of major highlights The ECMWF products are widely used by forecasters to make forecasts for
More informationSMHI activities on Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction
SMHI activities on Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction ECMWF visit to SMHI, 4-5 December, 2017 Magnus Lindskog and colleagues Structure Introduction Observation usage Monitoring Methodologies
More informationSnow analysis in HIRLAM and HARMONIE. Kuopio, 24 March 2010 Mariken Homleid
Snow analysis in HIRLAM and HARMONIE Kuopio, 24 March 2010 Mariken Homleid Outline Motivation: the surface temperature depends on snow cover, in reality and in NWP advanced snow schemes show larger sensitivity
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Bolli Pálmason and Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Hungarian Meteorological Service 1. Summary of major highlights The objective verification of ECMWF forecasts have been continued on all the time ranges
More informationMeteo-France operational land surface analysis for NWP: current status and perspectives
Meteo-France operational land surface analysis for NWP: current status and perspectives Camille Birman, Jean-François Mahfouf, Yann Seity, Eric Bazile, Françoise Taillefer, Zied Sassi, Nadia Fourrié, Vincent
More informationSTATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION
STATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION Mihaela NEACSU & Otilia DIACONU ANM/LMN/AMASC COSMO-September 2013 Mihaela NEACSU & Otilia DIACONU (ANM/LMN/AMASC) MOS & VERIF COSMO-September 2013 1 / 48 SUMMARY 1
More informationHIRLAM/HARMONIE work on surface data assimilation and modelling
HIRLAM/HARMONIE work on surface data assimilation and modelling Ekaterina Kourzeneva *, Laura Rontu, Trygve Aspelien, Maria Diez, Mariken Homleid, Kalle Eerola, Suleiman Mostamandi, Patrick Samuelsson,
More informationMET report. The IASI moisture channel impact study in HARMONIE for August-September 2011
MET report no. 19/2013 Numerical Weather Prediction The IASI moisture channel impact study in HARMONIE for August-September 2011 Trygve Aspelien, Roger Randriamampianina, Harald Schyberg, Frank Thomas
More informationScatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office
Scatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office James Cotton International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team (IOVWST) meeting, Brest, June 2014 Outline Assimilation status Global updates: Metop-B and spatial
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2008
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003.
More informationIMPACT OF IASI DATA ON FORECASTING POLAR LOWS
IMPACT OF IASI DATA ON FORECASTING POLAR LOWS Roger Randriamampianina rwegian Meteorological Institute, Pb. 43 Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, rway rogerr@met.no Abstract The rwegian THORPEX-IPY aims to significantly
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Turkish State Meteorological Service Unal TOKA,Yelis CENGIZ 1. Summary of major highlights The verification of ECMWF products has continued as in previous
More informationData impact studies in the global NWP model at Meteo-France
Data impact studies in the global NWP model at Meteo-France Patrick Moll, Fatima Karbou, Claudia Faccani, Nathalie Saint- Ramond, Florence Rabier Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques CNRS/GAME,
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Turkish State Meteorological Service Ünal TOKA, Mustafa BAŞARAN, Yelis CENGİZ 1. Summary of major highlights The verification of ECMWF products has continued
More informationValidation of 2-meters temperature forecast at cold observed conditions by different NWP models
Validation of 2-meters temperature forecast at cold observed conditions by different NWP models Evgeny Atlaskin Finnish Meteorological Institute / Russian State Hydrometeorological University OUTLINE Background
More informationS e a s o n a l F o r e c a s t i n g f o r t h e E u r o p e a n e n e r g y s e c t o r
S e a s o n a l F o r e c a s t i n g f o r t h e E u r o p e a n e n e r g y s e c t o r C3S European Climatic Energy Mixes (ECEM) Webinar 18 th Oct 2017 Philip Bett, Met Office Hadley Centre S e a s
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2010
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationApplication and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007
Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007 National Meteorological Administration Romania 1. Summary of major highlights The medium range forecast activity within the National Meteorological
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia August 2008 1. Summary of major highlights At Croatian Met Service, ECMWF products are the major source of data used in the operational weather
More informationRe-analysis activities at SMHI
Re-analysis activities at SMHI by: Anna Jansson and Per Kållberg Contents Variational data assimilation at SMHI Operational MESAN Applications of MESAN MESAN used for a long time period Variational data
More informationSurface issues for High Resolution NWP
Surface issues for High Resolution NWP François Bouyssel - Jean-François Mahfouf with many contributors High Resolution NWP Workshop, 17-20 May 2010, Brac, Croatia Outline Introduction (specificities of
More informationCERA-SAT: A coupled reanalysis at higher resolution (WP1)
CERA-SAT: A coupled reanalysis at higher resolution (WP1) ERA-CLIM2 General assembly Dinand Schepers 16 Jan 2017 Contributors: Eric de Boisseson, Per Dahlgren, Patrick Lalolyaux, Iain Miller and many others
More informationSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norrköping, Sweden 1. Summary of highlights HIRLAM at SMHI is run on a CRAY T3E with 272 PEs at the National Supercomputer Centre (NSC) organised together
More informationWhat s new for ARPEGE/ALADIN since Utrecht 2009?
What s new for ARPEGE/ALADIN since Utrecht 2009? E. Bazile with contributions from GMAP/OBS and GMAP/PROC ASM HIRLAM ALADIN 12-16 April, 2010 Krakow Outline QPF performance of ARPEGE/ALADIN with the new
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007 By Lovro Kalin, Zoran Vakula and Josip Juras (Hydrological and Meteorological Service) 1. Summary of major highlights At Croatian Met
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2012
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. (IPMA) 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are used as the main source of data for operational
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia Lovro Kalin and Zoran Vakula 1. Summary of major highlights At Meteorological and Hydrological Service
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2017
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017 Finnish Meteorological Institute compiled by Weather and Safety Centre with help of several experts 1. Summary of major highlights FMI s forecasts are
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2010
Application and verification of ECMWF products Hydrological and meteorological service of Croatia (DHMZ) Lovro Kalin. Summary of major highlights At DHMZ, ECMWF products are regarded as the major source
More informationSurface data assimilation activities in the HIRLAM consortium
Surface data assimilation activities in the HIRLAM consortium LACE DA Working Days 016 September, 016 Magnus Lindskog and Patrick Samuelsson Outline Introduction Surface data assimilation for nature tile
More informationNo. 8/2018 ISSN Meteorology. METreport. StrålInn. Evaluation of Predicted Shortwave Radiation Åsmund Bakketun, Jørn Kristiansen
METreport No. 8/2018 ISSN 2387-4201 Meteorology StrålInn Evaluation of Predicted Shortwave Radiation Åsmund Bakketun, Jørn Kristiansen METreport Title Date StrålInn August 27, 2018 Section Report no. Senter
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Hungarian Meteorological Service 1. Summary of major highlights The objective verification of ECMWF forecasts have been continued on all the time ranges
More informationCurrent Limited Area Applications
Current Limited Area Applications Nils Gustafsson SMHI Norrköping, Sweden nils.gustafsson@smhi.se Outline of talk (contributions from many HIRLAM staff members) Specific problems of Limited Area Model
More informationState of the art of wind forecasting and planned improvements for NWP Helmut Frank (DWD), Malte Mülller (met.no), Clive Wilson (UKMO)
State of the art of wind forecasting and planned improvements for NWP Helmut Frank (DWD), Malte Mülller (met.no), Clive Wilson (UKMO) thanks to S. Bauernschubert, U. Blahak, S. Declair, A. Röpnack, C.
More informationPresentation of met.no s experience and expertise related to high resolution reanalysis
Presentation of met.no s experience and expertise related to high resolution reanalysis Oyvind Saetra, Ole Einar Tveito, Harald Schyberg and Lars Anders Breivik Norwegian Meteorological Institute Daily
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003.
More informationNinth Workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems. Timeliness and Impact of Observations in the CMC Global NWP system
Ninth Workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom 10 14 November 2003 Timeliness and Impact of Observations in the CMC Global NWP system Réal Sarrazin, Yulia Zaitseva
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2011
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationJOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007
JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007 SMHI Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. 1. Summary of major highlights At Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA) ECMWF products are
More information1. Current atmospheric DA systems 2. Coupling surface/atmospheric DA 3. Trends & ideas
1 Current issues in atmospheric data assimilation and its relationship with surfaces François Bouttier GAME/CNRM Météo-France 2nd workshop on remote sensing and modeling of surface properties, Toulouse,
More informationEWGLAM/SRNWP National presentation from DMI
EWGLAM/SRNWP 2013 National presentation from DMI Development of operational Harmonie at DMI Since Jan 2013 DMI updated HARMONIE-Denmark suite to CY37h1 with a 3h-RUC cycling and 57h forecast, 8 times a
More informationRevisiting predictability of the strongest storms that have hit France over the past 32 years.
Revisiting predictability of the strongest storms that have hit France over the past 32 years. Marie Boisserie L. Descamps, P. Arbogast GMAP/RECYF 20 August 2014 Introduction Improving early detection
More informationDevelopment of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA) and the Canadian Land Data Assimilation System (CaLDAS)
Development of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA) and the Canadian Land Data Assimilation System (CaLDAS) Marco L. Carrera, Vincent Fortin and Stéphane Bélair Meteorological Research Division Environment
More informationAVIATION APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF MESOSCALE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEM OF THE HONG KONG OBSERVATORY
P452 AVIATION APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF MESOSCALE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEM OF THE HONG KONG OBSERVATORY Wai-Kin WONG *1, P.W. Chan 1 and Ivan C.K. Ng 2 1 Hong Kong Observatory, Hong
More informationVerification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute
Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute by Juha Kilpinen, Pertti Nurmi, Petra Roiha and Martti Heikinheimo 1. Summary of major highlights A new verification system became
More informationAdvances in weather modelling
Advances in weather modelling www.cawcr.gov.au Robert Fawcett - speaking on behalf of CAWCR Earth-System Modelling and CAWCR Weather and Environmental Prediction May 2013 The Centre for Australian Weather
More informationChanges in the Arpège 4D-VAR and LAM 3D-VAR. C. Fischer With contributions by P. Brousseau, G. Kerdraon, J.-F. Mahfouf, T.
Changes in the Arpège 4D-VAR and LAM 3D-VAR C. Fischer With contributions by P. Brousseau, G. Kerdraon, J.-F. Mahfouf, T. Montmerle Content Arpège 4D-VAR Arome-France Other applications: Aladin Overseas,
More informationHIRLAM Regional 3D-VAR and MESAN downscaling re-analysis for the recent. 20 year period in the FP7 EURO4M project SMHI
HIRLAM Regional 3D-VAR and MESAN downscaling re-analysis for the recent 20 year period in the FP7 EURO4M project Per Undén, Tomas Landelius Per Dahlgren, Per Kållberg Stefan Gollvik, Sébastien Villaume
More informationWeather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann. Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012
Weather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012 Overview Background HIRLAM Models Local Implementation Verification Development work Background Met Éireann Dept of the
More informationSnow-atmosphere interactions at Dome C, Antarctica
Snow-atmosphere interactions at Dome C, Antarctica Éric Brun, Vincent Vionnet CNRM/GAME (Météo-France and CNRS) Christophe Genthon, Delphine Six, Ghislain Picard LGGE (CNRS and UJF)... and many colleagues
More informationHigh resolution regional reanalysis over Ireland using the HARMONIE NWP model
High resolution regional reanalysis over Ireland using the HARMONIE NWP model Emily Gleeson, Eoin Whelan With thanks to John Hanley, Bing Li, Ray McGrath, Séamus Walsh, Motivation/Inspiration KNMI 5 year
More informationThe ECMWF Extended range forecasts
The ECMWF Extended range forecasts Laura.Ferranti@ecmwf.int ECMWF, Reading, U.K. Slide 1 TC January 2014 Slide 1 The operational forecasting system l High resolution forecast: twice per day 16 km 91-level,
More informationSummary of activities with SURFEX data assimilation at Météo-France. Jean-François MAHFOUF CNRM/GMAP/OBS
Summary of activities with SURFEX data assimilation at Météo-France Jean-François MAHFOUF CNRM/GMAP/OBS Outline Status at Météo-France in 2008 Developments undertaken during 2009-2011 : Extended Kalman
More informationAssimilating AMSU-A over Sea Ice in HIRLAM 3D-Var
Abstract Assimilating AMSU-A over Sea Ice in HIRLAM 3D-Var Vibeke W. Thyness 1, Leif Toudal Pedersen 2, Harald Schyberg 1, Frank T. Tveter 1 1 Norwegian Meteorological Institute (met.no) Box 43 Blindern,
More informationThe benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting
The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting Erik Andersson Slide 1 ECMWF European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Slide 1 ECMWF s global forecasting system High resolution forecast
More informationComparing the SEKF with the DEnKF on a land surface model
Comparing the SEKF with the DEnKF on a land surface model David Fairbairn, Alina Barbu, Emiliano Gelati, Jean-Francois Mahfouf and Jean-Christophe Caret CNRM - Meteo France Partly funded by European Union
More informationMethodology for the creation of meteorological datasets for Local Air Quality modelling at airports
Methodology for the creation of meteorological datasets for Local Air Quality modelling at airports Nicolas DUCHENE, James SMITH (ENVISA) Ian FULLER (EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre) About ENVISA Noise
More informationGPC Exeter forecast for winter Crown copyright Met Office
GPC Exeter forecast for winter 2015-2016 Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5 (GloSea5) ensemble prediction system the source for Met Office monthly and seasonal forecasts uses a coupled model (atmosphere
More informationSnow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF Patricia de Rosnay, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Lars Isaksen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, 25-29 July 2011 Slide
More informationInvestigating the urban climate characteristics of two Hungarian cities with SURFEX/TEB land surface model
Investigating the urban climate characteristics of two Hungarian cities with SURFEX/TEB land surface model Gabriella Zsebeházi Gabriella Zsebeházi and Gabriella Szépszó Hungarian Meteorological Service,
More informationALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. November 17, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region
ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING November 17, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region Today Feature of the month: More climate models! Climate Forecast Basics Climate System Review
More informationShort range weather forecasts in the European Arctic; recent work and experiences with AROME Arctic
Short range weather forecasts in the European Arctic; recent work and experiences with AROME Arctic Morten Køltzow, Malte Müller, Teresa Valkonen, Yurii Batrak, Eivind Støylen, Jørn Kristiansen MET Norway
More informationDijana Klarić RC LACE Program Manager
Dijana Klarić RC LACE Program Manager www.rclace.eu 10-13 October 2011 33rd EWGLAM, Tallinn, Estonia 1 2011 report LACE Projects () 3y summary 2011 R&D highlights ~ 2012 plans LACE future ALARO phy 5km
More informationRecent ECMWF Developments
Recent ECMWF Developments Tim Hewson (with contributions from many ECMWF colleagues!) tim.hewson@ecmwf.int ECMWF November 2, 2017 Outline Last Year IFS upgrade highlights 43r1 and 43r3 Standard web Chart
More informationReport on stay at ZAMG
Report on stay at ZAMG Viena, Austria 13.05.2013 05.07.2013 Simona Tascu NMA, Romania Supervised by: Yong Wang and Theresa Gorgas Introduction The goal of the present stay was to develop and optimize the
More informationIntroduction : Scientific context : SRNWP Expert Team on Surface Processes (model and data assimilation) Draft of a workplan for
SRNWP Expert Team on Surface Processes (model and data assimilation) Draft of a workplan for 2008-2009 Revised version (05 September 2008) Introduction : The Expert Team on Surface Processes will focus
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Gu rún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationCurrent research issues. Philippe Bougeault, Météo France
Current research issues for short range NWP Philippe Bougeault, Météo France The expectations from government and society as seen from Météo France Improve the accuracy of short range forecasts for security
More informationPrecipitation verification. Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO
Precipitation verification Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO Outline 1) Status of WGNE QPF intercomparisons 2) Overview of the use of recommended methods for the verification
More informationGridded observation data for Climate Services
Gridded observation data for Climate Services Ole Einar Tveito, Inger Hanssen Bauer, Eirik J. Førland and Cristian Lussana Norwegian Meteorological Institute Norwegian annual temperatures Norwegian annual
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 RHMS of Serbia 1 Summary of major highlights ECMWF forecast products became the backbone in operational work during last several years. Starting from
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 METEO- J. Stein, L. Aouf, N. Girardot, S. Guidotti, O. Mestre, M. Plu, F. Pouponneau and I. Sanchez 1. Summary of major highlights The major event is
More informationTowards a Definitive High- Resolution Climate Dataset for Ireland Promoting Climate Research in Ireland
Towards a Definitive High- Resolution Climate Dataset for Ireland Promoting Climate Research in Ireland Jason Flanagan, Paul Nolan, Christopher Werner & Ray McGrath Outline Project Background and Objectives
More informationImpact of GPS and TMI Precipitable Water Data on Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model Forecasts
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 82, No. 1B, pp. 453--457, 2004 453 Impact of GPS and TMI Precipitable Water Data on Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model Forecasts Ko KOIZUMI
More informationAssimilation of the IASI data in the HARMONIE data assimilation system
Assimilation of the IASI data in the HARMONIE data assimilation system Roger Randriamampianina Acknowledgement: Andrea Storto (met.no), Andrew Collard (ECMWF), Fiona Hilton (MetOffice) and Vincent Guidard
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Danish Meteorological Institute Author: Søren E. Olufsen, Deputy Director of Forecasting Services Department and Erik Hansen, forecaster M.Sc. 1. Summary
More informationSeasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019
Seasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019 Date issued: Aug 31, 2018 1. Overview The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is still in a neutral phase and is still expected to rise towards an
More informationUSE OF SATELLITE INFORMATION IN THE HUNGARIAN NOWCASTING SYSTEM
USE OF SATELLITE INFORMATION IN THE HUNGARIAN NOWCASTING SYSTEM Mária Putsay, Zsófia Kocsis and Ildikó Szenyán Hungarian Meteorological Service, Kitaibel Pál u. 1, H-1024, Budapest, Hungary Abstract The
More informationSoil Moisture Prediction and Assimilation
Soil Moisture Prediction and Assimilation Analysis and Prediction in Agricultural Landscapes Saskatoon, June 19-20, 2007 STEPHANE BELAIR Meteorological Research Division Prediction and Assimilation Atmospheric
More informationMesoscale meteorological models. Claire L. Vincent, Caroline Draxl and Joakim R. Nielsen
Mesoscale meteorological models Claire L. Vincent, Caroline Draxl and Joakim R. Nielsen Outline Mesoscale and synoptic scale meteorology Meteorological models Dynamics Parametrizations and interactions
More informationGlobal reanalysis: Some lessons learned and future plans
Global reanalysis: Some lessons learned and future plans Adrian Simmons and Sakari Uppala European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts With thanks to Per Kållberg and many other colleagues from ECMWF
More informationVALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING
VALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING Niilo Siljamo, Otto Hyvärinen Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palménin aukio 1, P.O.Box 503, FI-00101 HELSINKI Abstract Hydrological
More informationECMWF. ECMWF Land Surface Analysis: Current status and developments. P. de Rosnay M. Drusch, K. Scipal, D. Vasiljevic G. Balsamo, J.
Land Surface Analysis: Current status and developments P. de Rosnay M. Drusch, K. Scipal, D. Vasiljevic G. Balsamo, J. Muñoz Sabater 2 nd Workshop on Remote Sensing and Modeling of Surface Properties,
More informationAbout HARMONIE/AROME in AEMET
About HARMONIE/AROME in AEMET Javier Calvo With contributions from Imanol Guerrero, Gema Morales, Arancha Amo, Carlos Santos and Daniel Martín Aladin/Hirlam ASM,15-18 Apr 2013, Reykjavic Outline The Harmonie/Arome
More informationThe Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction. Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA
The Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA Outline Data Analysis system of JMA in Global Spectral Model (GSM) and Meso-Scale Model
More informationLatest developments and performances in ARPEGE and ALADIN-France
Latest developments and performances in ARPEGE and ALADIN-France François Bouyssel ( and many contributors ) CNRM-GAME, Météo-France 18th ALADIN / HIRLAM Workshop, Bruxelles, 7-10 April 2008 Plan Recent
More informationVisualising and communicating probabilistic flow forecasts in The Netherlands
Visualising and communicating probabilistic flow forecasts in The Netherlands Eric Sprokkereef Centre for Water Management Division Crisis Management & Information Supply 2-2-2009 Content The basins Forecasting
More informationECMWF snow data assimilation: Use of snow cover products and In situ snow depth data for NWP
snow data assimilation: Use of snow cover products and In situ snow depth data for NWP Patricia de Rosnay Thanks to: Ioannis Mallas, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Philippe Lopez, Anne Fouilloux, Mohamed Dahoui, Lars
More informationOperations Portugal (second half of 2010)
Operations Portugal (second half of 2010) In the second half of 2010, important changes happened in the operational procedures, the main event being the operationalization of AROME for Madeira archipelago
More informationRecent experience at Météo-France on the assimilation of observations at high temporal frequency Cliquez pour modifier le style du titre
Recent experience at Météo-France on the assimilation of observations at high temporal frequency Cliquez pour modifier le style du titre J.-F. Mahfouf, P. Brousseau, P. Chambon and G. Desroziers Météo-France/CNRS
More informationRegional climate modelling in the future. Ralf Döscher, SMHI, Sweden
Regional climate modelling in the future Ralf Döscher, SMHI, Sweden The chain Global H E H E C ( m 3/s ) Regional downscaling 120 adam 3 C HAM 4 adam 3 C HAM 4 trl A2 A2 B2 B2 80 40 0 J F M A M J J A S
More informationConvective-scale NWP for Singapore
Convective-scale NWP for Singapore Hans Huang and the weather modelling and prediction section MSS, Singapore Dale Barker and the SINGV team Met Office, Exeter, UK ECMWF Symposium on Dynamical Meteorology
More informationDrought forecasting methods Blaz Kurnik DESERT Action JRC
Ljubljana on 24 September 2009 1 st DMCSEE JRC Workshop on Drought Monitoring 1 Drought forecasting methods Blaz Kurnik DESERT Action JRC Motivations for drought forecasting Ljubljana on 24 September 2009
More informationALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. December 22, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region
ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING December 22, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region Today s Outline Feature of the month: Autumn sea ice near Alaska Climate Forecast Basics Climate
More informationMétéo-France NWP developments and AROME
Météo-France NWP developments and AROME F. Bouttier & collaborators - CNRM/GMAP, Météo-France bouttier@meteo.fr - Bratislava, June 2005 General NWP strategy ARPEGE/ALADIN MF progress & plans AROME progress
More informationICON. Limited-area mode (ICON-LAM) and updated verification results. Günther Zängl, on behalf of the ICON development team
ICON Limited-area mode (ICON-LAM) and updated verification results Günther Zängl, on behalf of the ICON development team COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 07.09.2016 Outline Status of limited-area-mode
More information