METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models June to August 2017 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
|
|
- Kathleen Robinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 METinfo No. /7 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models June to August 7 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
2 Contents Introduction Models Post processed forecasts The HARMONIE system Verification measures Observations Mean Sea Level Pressure figures Statistics by lead time Monthly summary statistics the last three years Temperature m figures Statistics by lead time Monthly mean error the last three years Monthly standard deviation of error the last three years Monthly mean absolute error the last three years Maps for each region Time series for selected stations Post processed temperature m figures Statistics by lead time Long term ECMWF temperature m figures Statistics by lead time Wind speed m figures Statistics summarized over Norwegian stations Statistics summarized over Svalbard stations Statistics summarized over north Nowegian stations Monthly mean error the last three years Monthly standard deviation of error the last three years Monthly mean absolute error the last three years Maps for each region Time series for selected stations Post processed maximum mean wind speed m figures Statistics by lead time Statistics for categorised events
3 Wind gust figures Statistics by lead time Statistics for categorised events Long term ECMWF wind speed m figures Statistics by lead time Precipitation figures Statistics by lead time (RR) Statistics for categorised events (RR) Monthly mean error the last three years (RR) Monthly standard deviation of error the last three years (RR) Monthly mean absolute error the last three years (RR) Maps for each region (RR) Time series for selected stations (RR) More information... Verification results are also available on internal web pages - MetCoOp Web Tools - including verification and observation monitoring - timeseries and windroses - on Google map
4 Models The following models are verified in this report. ECMWF AROME-MetCoOp (AM) AROME-Arctic (AA) MetCoOp ensemble system (MEPSctrl) Global model (IFS) at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. From January horizontal resolution approximately km. From 8 March cycle r with horizontal resolution about 9km. ECMWF is available about hours later than models run at MET. HARMONIE with AROME physics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid on same domain as AROME- Norway. Run in cooperation with Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI). Experimental with cycle 8h. from 9 December, operational from March to 8 November, cycle 8h. from 8 December. HARMONIE with AROME physics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid, same domain size as AROME- MetCoOp. Experimental with cycle 8h. from October, on Yr from December, cycle h. since 9 June 7. MEPS has ensemble members, only member, the control, is verified in this report. MEPS is based on HARMONIE cycle h. with AROME physics and non-hydrostatic dynamics, horizontal resolution defined by a.. km grid. Experimental since May. Operational status since 8 November. Analysis and lead times of forecasts are denoted by e.g. + UTC which indicates forecast generated at UTC and valid hours later. Post processed forecasts Most of the raw model data are post processed before being published on Yr. For m temperature, the raw data is first adjusted to a fine scale ( m) topography applying a vertical temperature gradient of -. degrees pr. m. The height corrected m temperature forecasts (PPHC) are in a next step adapted to observations by a Kalman filter at all observing stations. The Kalman filter corrections are interpolated horizontally to the m grid by kriging, using weights which decrease with increasing distance from the observing stations, both horizontally and vertically. The interpolated Kalman filter corrections are finally added to the heigth corrected field, giving PPKF. m wind speed is statistically post processed to represent maximum wind speed m last hour, and called PP. The precipitation forecasts are post processed by a neighbourhood method giving a median field. This field is used to determine the precipitation symbol on Yr.
5 ECMWF provides probabilistic forecasts based on a member ensemble system at km resolution. Consensus forecasts (ECens) are calibrated (ECensPP) before being presented on Yr. The HARMONIE system HARMONIE is the acronym for HIRLAM s meso-scale forecast system (Hirlam Aladin Regional/Mesoscale Operational NWP In Europe). The HARMONIE system includes several configuration options. This section presents some of the main components and setups that are used at MET. More documentation is available on and A change log for HAR- MONIE AROME is found on ALARO- physics ALARO- has physical parameterizations targeted for grey scale resolutions ( - km). It is a spin-off of the Météo-France physical parameterizations used in the globale ARPEGE, but with a separate radiation scheme, MT micro-physical frame work, and the Toucans turbulence scheme. Much of the development has been done by the RC LACE (Regional Cooperation for Limited Area modeling in Central Europe) community. AROME physics AROME (Applications of Research to Operations at MEsoscale) is targeted for horizontal resolution. km or finer. It uses physical parameterizations based on the French academia model Meso-NH and the external surface model SURFEX. AROME has been operational at Météo-France since 8 December 8, with a horizontal resolution of. km. SURFEX as surface model SURFEX (Surface externalisée) is developed at Météo-France and academia for offline experiments and introduced in NWP models to ensure consistent treatment of processes related to surface. Météo- France is already using SURFEX for some of their configurations and is planning to use it for all their configurations. Surface modelling and assimilation will benefit from the possibility of running offline experiments. SURFEX is also used for offline applications in e.g. hydrology, vegetation monitoring and snow avalanche forecasts. SURFEX includes routines to simulate the exchange of energy and water between the atmosphere and surface types (tiles); land, sea (ocean), lake (inland water) and town. The land or nature tile can be divided further into vegetation types (patches). ISBA (Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere) is used for modelling the land surface processes. There are ISBA options; - and -layer force restore and a diffusive approach, where the first one is used in HIRLAM. Towns may be treated by a separate TEB (Town Energy Balance) module. Seas and lakes are also treated separately. The lake model, FLAKE (Freshwater LAKE), has recently been introduced in SURFEX. A global ECOCLIMAP database which combines land cover maps and satellite information gives information about surface properties. The orography is taken from gtopo. SURFEX Scientific Documentation and User s Guide are available on
6 Data assimilation NWP models are updated regularly using observations received in real-time from the global observing system. MEPS is updated each third hour; at,,, 9,,, 8 and UTC. Surface analysis Surface analysis is performed by CANARI (Code d Analyse Nécessaire à ARPEGE pour ses Rejets et son Initialisation) (Taillefer, ). The analysis method is Optimal Interpolation and only conventional synoptic observations are used. meter temperature and relative humidity observations are used to update the surface and soil temperature and moisture. The snow analysis is also performed with CANARI in analogy with the HIRLAM snow analysis. Snow depth observations are used to update Snow Water Equivalent. The snow fields are analysed only at and 8 UTC as there are very few snow depth observations at,, 9,, and. The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and Sea Ice Concentration (SIC) is not analysed, but taken from the boundaries. ECMWF uses the OSTIA (Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis) product, including SST from UK Met Office and SIC from MET. SST and SIC for the Baltic Sea have since November been taken from the ocean model HIROMB run at SMHI. The surface temperature over sea ice was taken from the boundary model and remained unchanged through the forecast. A simple thermodynamical sea ice scheme (SICE) giving prognostic sea ice temperatures in fixed layers was introduced November. Upper air analysis MEPS runs three dimensional variational (D VAR) data assimilation using conventional observations from synop stations, ships, radiosondes and aircrafts and AMSU-A and AMSU-B/MHS data from polar orbiting NOAA and METOP satellites. GNSS were introduced 7 February, radar reflectivities June and IASI data November. Boundary fields MEPS gets its boundary values (-hourly) from the ECMWF model at approximately km resolution, and has currently vertical levels. None of the HARMONIE configurations at MET have applied digital filter initialization (DFI).
7 Verification measures All model forecasts in this report are verified against observations by interpolating (linear) the grid based forecasts to the observational sites. As a consequence, it should be noted that it is the models abilities to forecast the observations that is being quantifed and assessed. Thus, there is no attempt in this report to verify area averaged precipitation for example. Verification is carried out both for raw and categorized forecasts. In the following, let f,..., f n denote the forecasts and o,...,o n the corresponding observations. Forecasts of continuous variables The verification statistics applied to continuous variables are defined in the table below Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Mean Error Mean Absolute Error Standard Deviation of Error Root Mean Square Error Correlation ME MAE SDE RMSE COR ( n n n i= ( f i o i ) to n n i= f i o i to n i= ( n ( f i o i ME) ) / n i= In the formula for COR the following definitions are used ( f i o i ) ) / n n i= ( f i f)(o i ō) SD( f)sd(o) to to to f = n n i= f i, ō = n n o i i= SD( f) = ( n n i= ( f i f) ) / (, SD(o) = n for the means and standard deviations of the forecasts and observations. n i= (o i ō) ) / 7
8 Forecasts of categorical variables All variables in this report are continuous in raw form, but it is possible to categorize them and verify these. For example, wind speed above a given threshold could be of interest which would result in two possible outcomes (yes and no). The verification is then completely summarized by a contingency table as the one shown below event observed yes no event forecasted yes a b no c d Verification statistics for such forecasts are listed in the following table Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Hit rate HR a a+c to False alarm rate F b b+d to False alarm ratio FAR b a+b to Equitable threat score ETS a ar a+b+c ar / to ( = no skill) Hanssen-Kuipers skill score KSS HR - F to ( = no skill) Heidke skill score HSS (a+d)/n ss f ss f to ( = no skill) In the formula for ETS ar=(a+b)(a+c)/n. In the formula for HSS the score for the standard forecast ss f =[(a+b)(a+c)+(b+d)(c+d)]/n. Observations All observations come from Klimadatavarehuset at MET. Only synop stations are used. The model wind speed is verified against mean wind observations, FF. The post processed wind speed is intended to represent maximum wind speed m last hour, and is verified against FX. 8
9 Jun to Aug 7 Mean Sea Level Pressure. Mean Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +,+,..., Mean Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+ AA ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +,+,..., Mean Error North Scand. stations +,+,...,+ AA MEPSctrl ECMWF Standard Deviation of Error North Scand. stations +,+,..., Mean Absolute Error North Scand. stations +,+,...,
10 Jun to Aug 7 Mean Sea Level Pressure Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC. ECMWF AM MEPSctrl.... Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Standard Deviation of Error..... Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7. Mean Error..... Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7
11 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m Mean Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +,+,..., Mean Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+ AA ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +,+,..., Mean Error 78 North Scand. stations +,+,...,+ AA MEPSctrl ECMWF.. Standard Deviation of Error 78 North Scand. stations +,+,...,+.. Mean Absolute Error 78 North Scand. stations +,+,...,
12 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m Mean Error Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 88 Norwegian inland stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7
13 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m Standard Deviation of Error ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 88 Norwegian inland stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7
14 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 88 Norwegian inland stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7
15 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
16 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
17 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
18 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
19 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
20 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
21 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
22 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
23 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black). MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
24 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
25 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black). MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
26 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
27 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SVALBARD LUFTHAVN.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, AA: +8,+,+,+.. ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
28 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m BJØRNØYA Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
29 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m TROMSØ.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop....9 AA synop ECMWF synop
30 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m KAUTOKEINO.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,,8.. 8 MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, AA: +8,+,+,+. 9. ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop AA synop ECMWF synop..8..9
31 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m ØRLAND III.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+.8.. ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop.... ECMWF synop
32 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m BERGEN FLORIDA.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+,+.... ECMWF: +8,+,+,+.7.. ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop...7.
33 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m FINSEVATN.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+...8 ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop...7. ECMWF synop
34 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m NESBYEN TODOKK.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+,+.... ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
35 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m EKOFISK Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
36 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m SOLA.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+,+.... ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop...8.7
37 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m FÆRDER FYR Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
38 Jun to Aug 7 Temperature m OSLO BLINDERN.7.7 Celsius Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun Celsius Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul Celsius Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop..... ECMWF synop.... 8
39 Jun to Aug 7 Post processed temperature m (PPHC and PPKF).. Mean Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl PPHC PPKF.. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+.. Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +,+,..., Mean Error Nor. coastal stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl PPHC PPKF.. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. coastal stations +,+,...,+.. Mean Absolute Error Nor. coastal stations +,+,..., Mean Error Nor. inland stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl PPHC PPKF.. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. inland stations +,+,...,+.. Mean Absolute Error Nor. inland stations +,+,...,
40 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF temperature m Mean Error 7 Norwegian stations ECMWF ECens ECensPP coastal stations inland stations
41 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF temperature m Standard Deviation of Error 7 Norwegian stations ECMWF ECens ECensPP coastal stations inland stations
42 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF temperature m Mean Absolute Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP 7 Norwegian stations coastal stations inland stations
43 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m. Mean Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Nor. stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Nor. stations +,+,..., Hit Rate Nor. stations +8,+,+,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score Nor. stations +8,+,+,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
44 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m. Mean Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+ AA ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error Svalbard stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error Svalbard stations +,+,..., Hit Rate Svalbard stations +8,+,+,+ AA ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score Svalbard stations +8,+,+,+ AA ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
45 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m Mean Error 8 North Scand. stations +,+,...,+ AA MEPSctrl ECMWF Standard Deviation of Error 8 North Scand. stations +,+,..., Mean Absolute Error 8 North Scand. stations +,+,..., Hit Rate 9 North Scand. stations AA MEPSctrl +8,+,+,+ ECMWF. False Alarm Rate +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score 9 North Scand. stations AA MEPSctrl +8,+,+,+ ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score +8,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
46 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m Mean Error ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian mountainous stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7
47 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m Standard Deviation of Error Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian mountainous stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7
48 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+,+,+ UTC ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 Norwegian mountainous stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 8
49 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
50 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
51 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
52 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
53 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
54 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SDE at observing sites (numbers in black). MEPSctrl Model "climatology".7.8.7
55 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SVALBARD LUFTHAVN m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
56 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m BJØRNØYA.7.7 m/s 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s 8 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+.... ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop.....
57 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m TROMSØ m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+... ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop.... AA synop ECMWF synop
58 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SLETTNES FYR.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, AA: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+... ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop AA synop ECMWF synop
59 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m ØRLAND III.7.7 m/s 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s 8 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+,+.... ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
60 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m YTTERØYANE FYR.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop.....
61 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m FINSEVATN.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
62 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m NESBYEN TODOKK.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+,+... ECMWF: +8,+,+,+.8. ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop....9
63 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m EKOFISK.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop....
64 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m SOLA m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop.....9
65 Jun to Aug 7 Wind speed m FÆRDER FYR.7.7 m/s Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun m/s Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul m/s Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:,,, MEPSctrl: +8,+,+, ECMWF: +8,+,+, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
66 Jun to Aug 7 Post processed maximum mean wind speed m (PP). Mean Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrl PP. Standard Deviation of Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,..., Hit Rate Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Rate Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio Nor. stations +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score Nor. stations +8,+,+,+ MEPSctrl PP. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score Nor. stations +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s)
67 Jun to Aug 7 Wind gust (FG) and wind speed in 9 hpa (FF.9) Mean Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,...,+ MEPSctrlFG MEPSctrlFF.9 Standard Deviation of Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,...,+ Mean Absolute Error 9 Nor. stations +,+,..., Hit Rate 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Rate 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s). Equitable Threat Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+ MEPSctrlFG MEPSctrlFF.9. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score 8 Nor. stations +8,+,+, Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) Exceedance threshold (m/s) 7
68 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF wind speed m Mean Error ECMWF ECens ECensPP Norwegian stations coastal stations mountainous stations
69 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF wind speed m Standard Deviation of Error Norwegian stations ECMWF ECens ECensPP coastal stations mountainous stations
70 Jun to Aug 7 Long term ECMWF wind speed m Mean Absolute Error.. ECMWF ECens ECensPP Norwegian stations coastal stations mountainous stations
71 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation. Mean Error 8 Nor. stations +8,+,...,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Standard Deviation of Error 8 Nor. stations +8,+,...,+. Mean Absolute Error 8 Nor. stations +8,+,..., Hit Rate 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. False Alarm Rate 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+,+. False Alarm Ratio 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+, Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm). Equitable Threat Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+,+ MEPSctrl ECMWF. Hansen Kuiper Skill Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+,+. Heidke Skill Score 9 Nor. stations +8,+,+,+, Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) Exceedance threshold (mm) 7
72 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation Mean Error ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Norwegian stations + UTC Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 9 stations more than m above sea level Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7
73 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation Standard Deviation of Error ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Norwegian stations + UTC 8 Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 coastal stations 8 Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 9 stations more than m above sea level 8 Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm 8 Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7
74 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation Mean Absolute Error 7 ECMWF AM MEPSctrl Norwegian stations + UTC Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7 coastal stations Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7 9 stations more than m above sea level Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7 7 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar7 Jun7 7
75 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
76 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
77 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
78 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
79 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation ME at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
80 Jun to Aug 7 Daily precipitation SDE at observing sites (numbers in black) MEPSctrl Model "climatology"
81 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation SVALBARD LUFTHAVN mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
82 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation BJØRNØYA mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, AA: +8,+. 8. ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N AA synop ECMWF synop
83 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation TROMSØ.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, AA: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop AA synop ECMWF synop
84 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation BODØ VI.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, AA: +8,+.. ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop AA synop ECMWF synop
85 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation ØRLAND III.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
86 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation BERGEN FLORIDA.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
87 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation LÆRDAL IV.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
88 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation GARDERMOEN.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
89 Jun to Aug 7 hour precipitation NELAUG.7.7 mm Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun 8 Jun Jun mm Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul 8 Jul Jul mm Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Aug Aug 7 Sep Min Mean Max Std N synop:, MEPSctrl: +8, ECMWF: +8, ME SDE RMSE MAE Max.abs.err. N MEPSctrl synop ECMWF synop
METinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models December 2017 to February 2018 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
METinfo No. /8 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models December 7 to February 8 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter Photo: Jan Erik Haugen Contents Introduction
More informationMETinfo Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models September to November 2016 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter
METinfo No. /6 ISSN 89-79X Meteorology Verification of Operational Weather Prediction Models September to November 6 Mariken Homleid and Frank Thomas Tveter Photo: Jan Erik Haugen Contents Introduction
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008 The Norwegian Meteorological Institute 1. Summary of major highlights The ECMWF products are widely used by forecasters to make forecasts for
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Bolli Pálmason and Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts
More informationSMHI activities on Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction
SMHI activities on Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction ECMWF visit to SMHI, 4-5 December, 2017 Magnus Lindskog and colleagues Structure Introduction Observation usage Monitoring Methodologies
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Hungarian Meteorological Service 1. Summary of major highlights The objective verification of ECMWF forecasts have been continued on all the time ranges
More informationSTATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION
STATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION Mihaela NEACSU & Otilia DIACONU ANM/LMN/AMASC COSMO-September 2013 Mihaela NEACSU & Otilia DIACONU (ANM/LMN/AMASC) MOS & VERIF COSMO-September 2013 1 / 48 SUMMARY 1
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2008
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003.
More informationMET report. The IASI moisture channel impact study in HARMONIE for August-September 2011
MET report no. 19/2013 Numerical Weather Prediction The IASI moisture channel impact study in HARMONIE for August-September 2011 Trygve Aspelien, Roger Randriamampianina, Harald Schyberg, Frank Thomas
More informationApplication and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007
Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007 National Meteorological Administration Romania 1. Summary of major highlights The medium range forecast activity within the National Meteorological
More informationHIRLAM/HARMONIE work on surface data assimilation and modelling
HIRLAM/HARMONIE work on surface data assimilation and modelling Ekaterina Kourzeneva *, Laura Rontu, Trygve Aspelien, Maria Diez, Mariken Homleid, Kalle Eerola, Suleiman Mostamandi, Patrick Samuelsson,
More informationMeteo-France operational land surface analysis for NWP: current status and perspectives
Meteo-France operational land surface analysis for NWP: current status and perspectives Camille Birman, Jean-François Mahfouf, Yann Seity, Eric Bazile, Françoise Taillefer, Zied Sassi, Nadia Fourrié, Vincent
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2012
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. (IPMA) 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are used as the main source of data for operational
More informationRe-analysis activities at SMHI
Re-analysis activities at SMHI by: Anna Jansson and Per Kållberg Contents Variational data assimilation at SMHI Operational MESAN Applications of MESAN MESAN used for a long time period Variational data
More informationSnow analysis in HIRLAM and HARMONIE. Kuopio, 24 March 2010 Mariken Homleid
Snow analysis in HIRLAM and HARMONIE Kuopio, 24 March 2010 Mariken Homleid Outline Motivation: the surface temperature depends on snow cover, in reality and in NWP advanced snow schemes show larger sensitivity
More informationIMPACT OF IASI DATA ON FORECASTING POLAR LOWS
IMPACT OF IASI DATA ON FORECASTING POLAR LOWS Roger Randriamampianina rwegian Meteorological Institute, Pb. 43 Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, rway rogerr@met.no Abstract The rwegian THORPEX-IPY aims to significantly
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2010
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norrköping, Sweden 1. Summary of highlights HIRLAM at SMHI is run on a CRAY T3E with 272 PEs at the National Supercomputer Centre (NSC) organised together
More informationData impact studies in the global NWP model at Meteo-France
Data impact studies in the global NWP model at Meteo-France Patrick Moll, Fatima Karbou, Claudia Faccani, Nathalie Saint- Ramond, Florence Rabier Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques CNRS/GAME,
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Hungarian Meteorological Service 1. Summary of major highlights The objective verification of ECMWF forecasts have been continued on all the time ranges
More informationValidation of 2-meters temperature forecast at cold observed conditions by different NWP models
Validation of 2-meters temperature forecast at cold observed conditions by different NWP models Evgeny Atlaskin Finnish Meteorological Institute / Russian State Hydrometeorological University OUTLINE Background
More informationSurface data assimilation activities in the HIRLAM consortium
Surface data assimilation activities in the HIRLAM consortium LACE DA Working Days 016 September, 016 Magnus Lindskog and Patrick Samuelsson Outline Introduction Surface data assimilation for nature tile
More informationSurface issues for High Resolution NWP
Surface issues for High Resolution NWP François Bouyssel - Jean-François Mahfouf with many contributors High Resolution NWP Workshop, 17-20 May 2010, Brac, Croatia Outline Introduction (specificities of
More informationRevisiting predictability of the strongest storms that have hit France over the past 32 years.
Revisiting predictability of the strongest storms that have hit France over the past 32 years. Marie Boisserie L. Descamps, P. Arbogast GMAP/RECYF 20 August 2014 Introduction Improving early detection
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2010
Application and verification of ECMWF products Hydrological and meteorological service of Croatia (DHMZ) Lovro Kalin. Summary of major highlights At DHMZ, ECMWF products are regarded as the major source
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Turkish State Meteorological Service Ünal TOKA, Mustafa BAŞARAN, Yelis CENGİZ 1. Summary of major highlights The verification of ECMWF products has continued
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Turkish State Meteorological Service Unal TOKA,Yelis CENGIZ 1. Summary of major highlights The verification of ECMWF products has continued as in previous
More informationPresentation of met.no s experience and expertise related to high resolution reanalysis
Presentation of met.no s experience and expertise related to high resolution reanalysis Oyvind Saetra, Ole Einar Tveito, Harald Schyberg and Lars Anders Breivik Norwegian Meteorological Institute Daily
More informationScatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office
Scatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office James Cotton International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team (IOVWST) meeting, Brest, June 2014 Outline Assimilation status Global updates: Metop-B and spatial
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2017
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017 Finnish Meteorological Institute compiled by Weather and Safety Centre with help of several experts 1. Summary of major highlights FMI s forecasts are
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia August 2008 1. Summary of major highlights At Croatian Met Service, ECMWF products are the major source of data used in the operational weather
More informationNo. 8/2018 ISSN Meteorology. METreport. StrålInn. Evaluation of Predicted Shortwave Radiation Åsmund Bakketun, Jørn Kristiansen
METreport No. 8/2018 ISSN 2387-4201 Meteorology StrålInn Evaluation of Predicted Shortwave Radiation Åsmund Bakketun, Jørn Kristiansen METreport Title Date StrålInn August 27, 2018 Section Report no. Senter
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007
Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007 By Lovro Kalin, Zoran Vakula and Josip Juras (Hydrological and Meteorological Service) 1. Summary of major highlights At Croatian Met
More informationS e a s o n a l F o r e c a s t i n g f o r t h e E u r o p e a n e n e r g y s e c t o r
S e a s o n a l F o r e c a s t i n g f o r t h e E u r o p e a n e n e r g y s e c t o r C3S European Climatic Energy Mixes (ECEM) Webinar 18 th Oct 2017 Philip Bett, Met Office Hadley Centre S e a s
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia Lovro Kalin and Zoran Vakula 1. Summary of major highlights At Meteorological and Hydrological Service
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. 1. Summary of major highlights At Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA) ECMWF products are
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003.
More informationHigh resolution regional reanalysis over Ireland using the HARMONIE NWP model
High resolution regional reanalysis over Ireland using the HARMONIE NWP model Emily Gleeson, Eoin Whelan With thanks to John Hanley, Bing Li, Ray McGrath, Séamus Walsh, Motivation/Inspiration KNMI 5 year
More informationState of the art of wind forecasting and planned improvements for NWP Helmut Frank (DWD), Malte Mülller (met.no), Clive Wilson (UKMO)
State of the art of wind forecasting and planned improvements for NWP Helmut Frank (DWD), Malte Mülller (met.no), Clive Wilson (UKMO) thanks to S. Bauernschubert, U. Blahak, S. Declair, A. Röpnack, C.
More informationJOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007
JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007 SMHI Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2011
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationWeather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann. Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012
Weather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012 Overview Background HIRLAM Models Local Implementation Verification Development work Background Met Éireann Dept of the
More informationThe benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting
The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting Erik Andersson Slide 1 ECMWF European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Slide 1 ECMWF s global forecasting system High resolution forecast
More informationDevelopment of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA) and the Canadian Land Data Assimilation System (CaLDAS)
Development of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA) and the Canadian Land Data Assimilation System (CaLDAS) Marco L. Carrera, Vincent Fortin and Stéphane Bélair Meteorological Research Division Environment
More informationWhat s new for ARPEGE/ALADIN since Utrecht 2009?
What s new for ARPEGE/ALADIN since Utrecht 2009? E. Bazile with contributions from GMAP/OBS and GMAP/PROC ASM HIRLAM ALADIN 12-16 April, 2010 Krakow Outline QPF performance of ARPEGE/ALADIN with the new
More informationNinth Workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems. Timeliness and Impact of Observations in the CMC Global NWP system
Ninth Workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom 10 14 November 2003 Timeliness and Impact of Observations in the CMC Global NWP system Réal Sarrazin, Yulia Zaitseva
More informationVerification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute
Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute by Juha Kilpinen, Pertti Nurmi, Petra Roiha and Martti Heikinheimo 1. Summary of major highlights A new verification system became
More informationCurrent Limited Area Applications
Current Limited Area Applications Nils Gustafsson SMHI Norrköping, Sweden nils.gustafsson@smhi.se Outline of talk (contributions from many HIRLAM staff members) Specific problems of Limited Area Model
More information1. Current atmospheric DA systems 2. Coupling surface/atmospheric DA 3. Trends & ideas
1 Current issues in atmospheric data assimilation and its relationship with surfaces François Bouttier GAME/CNRM Météo-France 2nd workshop on remote sensing and modeling of surface properties, Toulouse,
More informationCERA-SAT: A coupled reanalysis at higher resolution (WP1)
CERA-SAT: A coupled reanalysis at higher resolution (WP1) ERA-CLIM2 General assembly Dinand Schepers 16 Jan 2017 Contributors: Eric de Boisseson, Per Dahlgren, Patrick Lalolyaux, Iain Miller and many others
More informationChanges in the Arpège 4D-VAR and LAM 3D-VAR. C. Fischer With contributions by P. Brousseau, G. Kerdraon, J.-F. Mahfouf, T.
Changes in the Arpège 4D-VAR and LAM 3D-VAR C. Fischer With contributions by P. Brousseau, G. Kerdraon, J.-F. Mahfouf, T. Montmerle Content Arpège 4D-VAR Arome-France Other applications: Aladin Overseas,
More informationAVIATION APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF MESOSCALE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEM OF THE HONG KONG OBSERVATORY
P452 AVIATION APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF MESOSCALE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEM OF THE HONG KONG OBSERVATORY Wai-Kin WONG *1, P.W. Chan 1 and Ivan C.K. Ng 2 1 Hong Kong Observatory, Hong
More informationComparing the SEKF with the DEnKF on a land surface model
Comparing the SEKF with the DEnKF on a land surface model David Fairbairn, Alina Barbu, Emiliano Gelati, Jean-Francois Mahfouf and Jean-Christophe Caret CNRM - Meteo France Partly funded by European Union
More informationLatest developments and performances in ARPEGE and ALADIN-France
Latest developments and performances in ARPEGE and ALADIN-France François Bouyssel ( and many contributors ) CNRM-GAME, Météo-France 18th ALADIN / HIRLAM Workshop, Bruxelles, 7-10 April 2008 Plan Recent
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 RHMS of Serbia 1 Summary of major highlights ECMWF forecast products became the backbone in operational work during last several years. Starting from
More informationAssimilating AMSU-A over Sea Ice in HIRLAM 3D-Var
Abstract Assimilating AMSU-A over Sea Ice in HIRLAM 3D-Var Vibeke W. Thyness 1, Leif Toudal Pedersen 2, Harald Schyberg 1, Frank T. Tveter 1 1 Norwegian Meteorological Institute (met.no) Box 43 Blindern,
More informationIntroduction : Scientific context : SRNWP Expert Team on Surface Processes (model and data assimilation) Draft of a workplan for
SRNWP Expert Team on Surface Processes (model and data assimilation) Draft of a workplan for 2008-2009 Revised version (05 September 2008) Introduction : The Expert Team on Surface Processes will focus
More informationInvestigating the urban climate characteristics of two Hungarian cities with SURFEX/TEB land surface model
Investigating the urban climate characteristics of two Hungarian cities with SURFEX/TEB land surface model Gabriella Zsebeházi Gabriella Zsebeházi and Gabriella Szépszó Hungarian Meteorological Service,
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2012
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012 National Meteorological Administration 1. Summary of major highlights The objective verification of all deterministic models forecasts in use have been
More informationICON. Limited-area mode (ICON-LAM) and updated verification results. Günther Zängl, on behalf of the ICON development team
ICON Limited-area mode (ICON-LAM) and updated verification results Günther Zängl, on behalf of the ICON development team COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 07.09.2016 Outline Status of limited-area-mode
More informationTowards a Definitive High- Resolution Climate Dataset for Ireland Promoting Climate Research in Ireland
Towards a Definitive High- Resolution Climate Dataset for Ireland Promoting Climate Research in Ireland Jason Flanagan, Paul Nolan, Christopher Werner & Ray McGrath Outline Project Background and Objectives
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2015
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015 METEO- J. Stein, L. Aouf, N. Girardot, S. Guidotti, O. Mestre, M. Plu, F. Pouponneau and I. Sanchez 1. Summary of major highlights The major event is
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2011
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011 National Meteorological Administration 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts are primarily based on the results of ECMWF and
More informationGridded observation data for Climate Services
Gridded observation data for Climate Services Ole Einar Tveito, Inger Hanssen Bauer, Eirik J. Førland and Cristian Lussana Norwegian Meteorological Institute Norwegian annual temperatures Norwegian annual
More informationSnow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF Patricia de Rosnay, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Lars Isaksen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, 25-29 July 2011 Slide
More informationReport on stay at ZAMG
Report on stay at ZAMG Viena, Austria 13.05.2013 05.07.2013 Simona Tascu NMA, Romania Supervised by: Yong Wang and Theresa Gorgas Introduction The goal of the present stay was to develop and optimize the
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Gu rún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts issued at IMO are mainly
More informationPrecipitation verification. Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO
Precipitation verification Thanks to CMC, CPTEC, DWD, ECMWF, JMA, MF, NCEP, NRL, RHMC, UKMO Outline 1) Status of WGNE QPF intercomparisons 2) Overview of the use of recommended methods for the verification
More informationHIRLAM Regional 3D-VAR and MESAN downscaling re-analysis for the recent. 20 year period in the FP7 EURO4M project SMHI
HIRLAM Regional 3D-VAR and MESAN downscaling re-analysis for the recent 20 year period in the FP7 EURO4M project Per Undén, Tomas Landelius Per Dahlgren, Per Kållberg Stefan Gollvik, Sébastien Villaume
More informationLake parameters climatology for cold start runs (lake initialization) in the ECMWF forecast system
2nd Workshop on Parameterization of Lakes in Numerical Weather Prediction and Climate Modelling Lake parameters climatology for cold start runs (lake initialization) in the ECMWF forecast system R. Salgado(1),
More informationDijana Klarić RC LACE Program Manager
Dijana Klarić RC LACE Program Manager www.rclace.eu 10-13 October 2011 33rd EWGLAM, Tallinn, Estonia 1 2011 report LACE Projects () 3y summary 2011 R&D highlights ~ 2012 plans LACE future ALARO phy 5km
More informationVALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING
VALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING Niilo Siljamo, Otto Hyvärinen Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palménin aukio 1, P.O.Box 503, FI-00101 HELSINKI Abstract Hydrological
More informationThe ECMWF Extended range forecasts
The ECMWF Extended range forecasts Laura.Ferranti@ecmwf.int ECMWF, Reading, U.K. Slide 1 TC January 2014 Slide 1 The operational forecasting system l High resolution forecast: twice per day 16 km 91-level,
More informationSummary of activities with SURFEX data assimilation at Météo-France. Jean-François MAHFOUF CNRM/GMAP/OBS
Summary of activities with SURFEX data assimilation at Météo-France Jean-François MAHFOUF CNRM/GMAP/OBS Outline Status at Météo-France in 2008 Developments undertaken during 2009-2011 : Extended Kalman
More informationThe ECMWF coupled data assimilation system
The ECMWF coupled data assimilation system Patrick Laloyaux Acknowledgments: Magdalena Balmaseda, Kristian Mogensen, Peter Janssen, Dick Dee August 21, 214 Patrick Laloyaux (ECMWF) CERA August 21, 214
More informationDrought forecasting methods Blaz Kurnik DESERT Action JRC
Ljubljana on 24 September 2009 1 st DMCSEE JRC Workshop on Drought Monitoring 1 Drought forecasting methods Blaz Kurnik DESERT Action JRC Motivations for drought forecasting Ljubljana on 24 September 2009
More informationAssimilation of the IASI data in the HARMONIE data assimilation system
Assimilation of the IASI data in the HARMONIE data assimilation system Roger Randriamampianina Acknowledgement: Andrea Storto (met.no), Andrew Collard (ECMWF), Fiona Hilton (MetOffice) and Vincent Guidard
More informationImpact of GPS and TMI Precipitable Water Data on Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model Forecasts
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 82, No. 1B, pp. 453--457, 2004 453 Impact of GPS and TMI Precipitable Water Data on Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model Forecasts Ko KOIZUMI
More informationThe satellite winds in the operational NWP system at Météo-France
The satellite winds in the operational NWP system at Météo-France Christophe Payan CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS 13th International Winds Workshop, Monterey, USA, 27 June 1st July 2016 Outline Operational
More informationNumerical Weather Prediction at high latitudes. Nils Gustafsson, SMHI
Numerical Weather Prediction at high latitudes Nils Gustafsson, SMHI High latitude NWP - outline of talk The HIRLAM-A program The reference HIRLAM forecasting system Verification scores The Nordic temperature
More informationAdvances in weather modelling
Advances in weather modelling www.cawcr.gov.au Robert Fawcett - speaking on behalf of CAWCR Earth-System Modelling and CAWCR Weather and Environmental Prediction May 2013 The Centre for Australian Weather
More informationImplementation of global surface index at the Met Office. Submitted by Marion Mittermaier. Summary and purpose of document
WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION COMMISSION FOR BASIC SYSTEMS OPAG on DPFS MEETING OF THE CBS (DPFS) TASK TEAM ON SURFACE VERIFICATION GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 20-21 OCTOBER 2014 DPFS/TT-SV/Doc. 4.1a (X.IX.2014)
More informationMAP Re-Analysis with IFS/ARPEGE/ALADIN
MAP Re-Analysis with IFS/ARPEGE/ALADIN Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan RC LACE Data Manager Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service ivateks@cirus.dhz.hr Contents - Why to care about MAP-SOP Period? - Modification
More informationEWGLAM/SRNWP National presentation from DMI
EWGLAM/SRNWP 2013 National presentation from DMI Development of operational Harmonie at DMI Since Jan 2013 DMI updated HARMONIE-Denmark suite to CY37h1 with a 3h-RUC cycling and 57h forecast, 8 times a
More informationThe Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction. Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA
The Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA Outline Data Analysis system of JMA in Global Spectral Model (GSM) and Meso-Scale Model
More informationVerification statistics and evaluations of ECMWF forecasts in
635 Verification statistics and evaluations of ECMWF forecasts in 29-21 D.S. Richardson, J. Bidlot, L. Ferranti, A. Ghelli, T. Hewson, M. Janousek, F. Prates and F. Vitart Operations Department October
More informationJOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007
JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007 [TURKEY/Turkish State Meteorological Service] 1. Summary
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2010
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010 METEO-FRANCE Bruno Lacroix 1. Summary of major highlights Implementation of a limited area model ALADIN configuration coupled with IFS over at 00 and
More informationSeasonal Climate Watch July to November 2018
Seasonal Climate Watch July to November 2018 Date issued: Jun 25, 2018 1. Overview The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is now in a neutral phase and is expected to rise towards an El Niño phase through
More informationCurrent research issues. Philippe Bougeault, Météo France
Current research issues for short range NWP Philippe Bougeault, Météo France The expectations from government and society as seen from Météo France Improve the accuracy of short range forecasts for security
More informationConvective-scale NWP for Singapore
Convective-scale NWP for Singapore Hans Huang and the weather modelling and prediction section MSS, Singapore Dale Barker and the SINGV team Met Office, Exeter, UK ECMWF Symposium on Dynamical Meteorology
More informationGPC Exeter forecast for winter Crown copyright Met Office
GPC Exeter forecast for winter 2015-2016 Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5 (GloSea5) ensemble prediction system the source for Met Office monthly and seasonal forecasts uses a coupled model (atmosphere
More informationVerification of ECMWF products at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
Verification of ECMWF products at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) DWD Martin Göber 1. Summary of major highlights The usage of a combined GME-MOS and ECMWF-MOS continues to lead to a further increase
More informationRegional climate modelling in the future. Ralf Döscher, SMHI, Sweden
Regional climate modelling in the future Ralf Döscher, SMHI, Sweden The chain Global H E H E C ( m 3/s ) Regional downscaling 120 adam 3 C HAM 4 adam 3 C HAM 4 trl A2 A2 B2 B2 80 40 0 J F M A M J J A S
More informationSeasonal prediction of extreme events
Seasonal prediction of extreme events C. Prodhomme, F. Doblas-Reyes MedCOF training, 29 October 2015, Madrid Climate Forecasting Unit Outline: Why focusing on extreme events? Extremeness metric Soil influence
More informationSeasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019
Seasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019 Date issued: Aug 31, 2018 1. Overview The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is still in a neutral phase and is still expected to rise towards an
More informationShort range weather forecasts in the European Arctic; recent work and experiences with AROME Arctic
Short range weather forecasts in the European Arctic; recent work and experiences with AROME Arctic Morten Køltzow, Malte Müller, Teresa Valkonen, Yurii Batrak, Eivind Støylen, Jørn Kristiansen MET Norway
More informationonboard of Metop-A COSMIC Workshop 2009 Boulder, USA
GRAS Radio Occultation Measurements onboard of Metop-A A. von Engeln 1, Y. Andres 1, C. Cardinali 2, S. Healy 2,3, K. Lauritsen 3, C. Marquardt 1, F. Sancho 1, S. Syndergaard 3 1 2 3 EUMETSAT, ECMWF, GRAS
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2009
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009 Danish Meteorological Institute Author: Søren E. Olufsen, Deputy Director of Forecasting Services Department and Erik Hansen, forecaster M.Sc. 1. Summary
More informationExtending the use of surface-sensitive microwave channels in the ECMWF system
Extending the use of surface-sensitive microwave channels in the ECMWF system Enza Di Tomaso and Niels Bormann European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, United
More information