Moving Frames Classical contributions: G. Darboux, É. Cotton, É. Cartan Modern contributions: P. Griffiths, M. Green, G. Jensen I did not quite unders
|
|
- Priscilla Turner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Moving Frames Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http : ==www:math:umn:edu= ο olver Beijing, March, 2001 ch 1
2 Moving Frames Classical contributions: G. Darboux, É. Cotton, É. Cartan Modern contributions: P. Griffiths, M. Green, G. Jensen I did not quite understand how he [Cartan] does this in general, though in the examples he gives the procedure is clear." Nevertheless, I must admit I found the book, like most of Cartan's papers, hard reading." Cartan on groups and differential geometry" Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1938) Hermann Weyl ch 2
3 ffl Fels, M., Olver, P.J., References Part I, Acta Appl. Math. 51 (1998) Part II, Acta Appl. Math. 55 (1999) ffl Olver, P.J., Selecta Math. 6 (2000) ffl Calabi, Olver, Shakiban, Tannenbaum, Haker, Int. J. Computer Vision 26 (1998) ffl Mar Beffa, G., Olver, P.J., Commun. Anal. Geom. 7 (1999) ffl Olver, P.J., Classical Invariant Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999 ffl Berchenko, I.A., Olver, P.J. J. Symb. Comp. 29 (2000) ffl Olver, P.J., Found. Comput. Math. 1 (2001) 3 67 ffl Olver, P.J., Geometric foundations of numerical algorithms and symmetry", Appl. Alg. Engin. Commun. Comput., to appear ffl Kogan, I.A., Olver, P.J., Invariant Euler-Lagrange equations and the invariant variational bicomplex", preprint, ch 3
4 Applications of Moving Frames ffl Differential geometry ffl Equivalence ffl Symmetry ffl Differential invariants ffl Rigidity ffl Joint Invariants and Semi-Differential Invariants ffl Invariant differential forms and tensors ffl Identities and syzygies ffl Classical invariant theory ffl Computer vision ffi object recognition ffi symmetry detection ffl Invariant numerical methods ffl Poisson geometry & solitons ffl Lie pseudogroups ch 4
5 The Basic Equivalence Problem M smooth m-dimensional manifold. G transformation group acting on M ffl finite-dimensional Lie group ffl infinite-dimensional Lie pseudo-group Equivalence: Determine when two n-dimensional submanifolds are congruent: N and N ρ M N = g N for g 2 G Symmetry: Self-equivalence or self-congruence: N = g N ch 5
6 Classical Geometry Equivalence Problem: Determine whether or not two given submanifolds N and N are congruent under a group transformation: N = g N. Symmetry Problem: Given a submanifold N, find all its symmetries (belonging to the group). ffl Euclidean group G = SE(n) or E(n) ) isometries of Euclidean space ) translations, rotations (& reflections) z 7! R z + a 8 >< >: R 2 SO(n) or O(n) a 2 R n z 2 R n ffl Equi-affine group: G = SA(n) R 2 SL(n) area-preserving ffl Affine group: R 2 GL(n) ffl Projective group: acting on RP n 1 G = A(n) G = PSL(n) =) Applications in computer vision ch 6
7 Classical Invariant Theory Binary form: Q(x) = nx k=0 ψ! n a k k x k Equivalence of polynomials (binary forms): Q(x) = (flx + ffi) n Q ψ! ffx + fi flx + ffi ψ ff g = fl fi ffi! 2 GL(2) ) multiplier representation of GL(2) ) modular forms Transformation group: g : (x; u) 7! ψ ffx + fi flx + ffi ;! u (flx + ffi) n Equivalence of functions () equivalence of graphs N Q = f (x; u) = (x; Q(x)) g ρ C 2 ch 7
8 Moving Frames Definition. A moving frame is a G-equivariant map ρ : M! G Equivariance: ρ(g z) = 8 < : g ρ(z) ρ(z) g 1 left moving frame right moving frame ρ left (z) = ρ right (z) 1 ch 8
9 Theorem. A moving frame exists in a neighborhood of a point z 2 M if and only if G acts freely and regularly near z. Necessity: Let z 2 M. Let ρ : M! G be a left moving frame. Freeness: If g 2 G z, so g z = z, then by left equivariance: ρ(z) = ρ(g z) = g ρ(z): Therefore g = e, and hence G z = feg for all z 2 M. Regularity: Suppose z n = g n z! z as n! 1 By continuity, ρ(z n ) = ρ(g n z) = g n ρ(z)! ρ(z) Hence g n! e in G. Sufficiency: By construction normalization". Q.E.D. ch 9
10 Isotropy subgroup for z 2 M: Isotropy G z = f g j g z = z g ffl free the only group element g 2 G which fixes one point z 2 M is the identity: G z = feg for all z 2 M. ffl locally free the orbits all have the same dimension as G: G z is a discrete subgroup of G. ffl regular all orbits have the same dimension and intersect sufficiently small coordinate charts only once ( 6ß irrational flow on the torus) ffl effective the only group element g 2 G which fixes every point z 2 M is the identity: g z = z for all z 2 M iff g = e: G M = G z = feg z2m ch 10
11 Geometrical Construction Normalization = choice of cross-section to the group orbits K z O z k g =ρ(z ) K cross-section to the group orbits O z orbit through z 2 M k 2 K O z unique point in the intersection ffl k is the canonical form of z ffl the (nonconstant) coordinates of k are the fundamental invariants g 2 G unique group element mapping k to z ρ(z) = g left moving frame ρ(h z) = h ρ(z) k = ρ 1 (z) z = ρ right (z) z =) freeness ch 11
12 Construction of Moving Frames Coordinate cross-section r = dim G» m = dim M K = f z 1 = c 1 ; ::: ;z r = c r g left w(g; z) = g 1 z right w(g; z) = g z Choose r = dim G components to normalize: w 1 (g; z) = c 1 ::: w r (g; z) = c r The solution is a (local) moving frame. g = ρ(z) =) Implicit Function Theorem ch 12
13 The Fundamental Invariants Substituting the moving frame formulae g = ρ(z) into the unnormalized components of w(g; z) produces the fundamental invariants: I 1 (z) = w r+1 (ρ(z);z) ::: I m r (z) = w m (ρ(z);z) =) These are the coordinates of the canonical form k 2 K. Theorem. Every invariant I(z) can be (locally) uniquely written as a function of the fundamental invariants: I(z) = H(I 1 (z);:::;i m r (z)) ch 13
14 Invariantization Definition. The invariantization of a function F : M! R with respect to a right moving frame ρ is the the invariant function I = (F ) defined by I(z) = F (ρ(z) z). [ F (z 1 ;:::;z m )] = F (c 1 ;;:::c r ;I 1 (z);:::;i m r (z)) Invariantization amounts to restricting F to the cross-section I j K = F j K and then requiring that I = (F ) be constant along the orbits. In particular, if I(z) is an invariant, then (I) = I. Invariantization defines a canonical projection : functions 7! invariants ch 14
15 The Rotation Group G = SO(2) acting on R 2 z = (x; u) 7! g z = ( x cos u sin ; x sin + u cos ) =) Free on M = R 2 nf0g Left moving frame: w(g; z) = g 1 z = (y; v) y = x cos + u sin v = x sin + u cos Cross-section K = f u = 0; x > 0 g Normalization equation Left moving frame: v = x sin + u cos = 0 = tan 1 u x =) = ρ(x; u) 2 SO(2) Fundamental invariant r = (x) = p x 2 + u 2 Invariantization [ F (x; u)]= F (r; 0) ch 15
16 Prolongation Most interesting group actions (Euclidean, affine, projective, etc.) are not free! An effective action can usually be made free by: ffl Prolonging to derivatives (jet space) G (n) : J n (M;p)! J n (M;p) =) differential invariants ffl Prolonging to Cartesian product actions G n : M M! M M =) joint invariants ffl Prolonging to multi-space" G (n) : M (n)! M (n) =) joint or semi-differential invariants =) invariant numerical approximations ch 16
17 Jet Space ffl Although in use since the time of Lie and Darboux, jet space was first formally defined by Ehresmann in ffl Jet space is the proper setting for the geometry of partial differential equations. M smooth m-dimensional manifold 1» p» m 1 J n = J n (M;p) (extended) jet bundle =) Defined as the space of equivalence classes of p- dimensional submanifolds under the equivalence relation of n th order contact at a single point. =) Can be identified as the space of n th order Taylor polynomials for submanifolds given as graphs u = f(x) ch 17
18 Local Coordinates on Jet Space J n = J n (M;p) n th extended jet bundle for p-dimensional submanifolds N ρ M Local coordinates: Assume N = fu = f(x)g is a graph (section). x = (x 1 ;:::;x p ) independent variables u = (u 1 ;:::;u q ) dependent variables p + q = m = dim M z (n) = (x; u (n) ) = ( ::: x i ::: u ff J ::: ) u ff J J uff 0» #J» n induced jet coordinates ffl No bundle structure assumed on M. ffl Projective completion of J n E when E! X is a bundle. ch 18
19 Prolongation of Group Actions G transformation group acting on M =) G maps submanifolds to submanifolds and preserves the order of contact G (n) prolonged action of G on the jet space J n The prolonged group formulae w (n) = (y; v (n) ) = g (n) z (n) are obtained by implicit differentiation: dy i = D y j = px j=1 px i=1 Pj i (g; z(1) ) dx j =) Q = P T Q i j (g; z(1) ) D x i vj ff = D y j 1 D y j k (v ff ) Differential invariant I : J n! R I(g (n) z (n) ) = I(z (n) ) =) curvatures ch 19
20 Freeness Theorem. If G acts (locally) effectively on M, then G acts (locally) freely on a dense open subset V n ρ J n for n fl 0. Definition. N ρ M is regular at order n if j n N ρ V n. Corollary. Any regular submanifold admits a (local) moving frame. Theorem. A submanifold is totally singular, j n N ρ J n n V n for all n, if and only if its symmetry group does not act freely on N. G N = f g j g N ρ N g ch 20
21 Moving Frames on Jet Space w (n) = (y; v (n) ) = 8 >< >: g (n) z (n) right (g (n) ) 1 z (n) left Choose r = dim G jet coordinates z 1 ;:::;z r x i or u ff J Coordinate cross-section K ρ J n z 1 = c 1 ::: z r = c r Corresponding lifted differential invariants: w 1 ;:::;w r y i or v ff J Normalization Equations Solution: w 1 (g; x; u (n) ) = c 1 ::: w r (g; x; u (n) ) = c r g = ρ (n) (z (n) ) = ρ (n) (x; u (n) ) =) moving frame ch 21
22 The Fundamental Differential Invariants I (n) (z (n) ) = w (n) (ρ (n) (z (n) );z (n) ) H i (x; u (n) ) = y i (ρ (n) (x; u (n) );x;u) I ff K (x; u(k) ) = v ff K (ρ(n) (x; u (n) );x;u (k) ) Phantom differential invariants w 1 = c 1 ::: w r = c r =) normalizations Theorem. Every n th order differential invariant can be locally uniquely written as a function of the non-phantom fundamental differential invariants in I (n). ch 22
23 Contact-invariant coframe dy i 7!! i = Invariant Differentiation px j=1 Invariant differential operators: D y j 7! D j = Duality: df = px i=1 px i=1 Pj i (ρ(n) (z (n) );z (n) ) dx i =) arc length element Q i j (ρ(n) (z (n) );z (n) ) D x i =) arc length derivative D i F! i Theorem. The higher order differential invariants are obtained by invariant differentiation with respect to D 1 ;:::;D p. ch 23
24 Euclidean Curves G = SE(2) Assume the curve is (locally) a graph: C = fu = f(x)g Prolong to J 3 via implicit differentiation y = cos (x a) + sin (u b) v = sin (x a) + cos (u b) v y = sin + u x cos cos + u x sin v yy = u xx (cos + u x sin ) 3 v yyy = (cos + u x sin )u xxx 3u2 xx sin (cos + u x sin ) 5. Normalization r = dim G = 3 9 = ; w = R 1 (z b) y = 0; v = 0; v y = 0 Left moving frame ρ : J 1! SE(2) a = x; b = u; = tan 1 u x ch 24
25 Differential invariants v yy 7!» = v yyy 7! d» ds v yyyy 7! d2» ds 2 3»3 = u xx (1 + u 2 x )3=2 = (1 + u2 x )u xxx 3u x u2 xx (1 + u 2 x )3 Invariant one-form arc length dy = (cos + u x sin ) dx 7! ds = q 1+u 2 x dx Invariant differential operator d dy = 1 cos + u x sin d dx 7! d ds = 1 q 1+u 2 x d dx Theorem. All differential invariants are functions of the derivatives of curvature with respect to arc length:»; d» ds ; d 2» ds ; 2 ch 25
26 Euclidean Curves e 2 e 1 x Moving frame R = 1 q 1+u 2 x ψ 1 ρ : (x; u; u x ) 7! (R; a) 2 SE(2)! ψ ux x = (e u x 1 1 ; e 2 ) a = u! Frenet frame e 1 = dx ds = ψ xs y s! e 2 = e? 1 ψ! = ys x s Frenet equations = Maurer Cartan equations: dx ds = e 1 de 1 ds =» e 2 de 2 ds =» e 1 ch 26
27 The Replacement Theorem Any differential invariant has the form I = F (x; u (n) ) = F (y; w (n) ) = F (I (n) ) =) T.Y. Thomas» = v yy (1 + v 2 y )2 = u xx (1 + u 2 x )2 (x) = (u) = (u x ) = 0 (u xx ) =» ch 27
28 Equi-affine Curves G = SA(2) z 7! Az+ b A 2 SL(2); b 2 R 2 Prolong to J 3 via implicit differentiation dy = (ffi u x fi) dx D y = 1 ffi u x fi D x y = ffi(x a) fi(u b) v = fl(x a)+ff(u b) 9 = ; w = A 1 (z b) v y = fl ffu x ffi fiu x v yy = v yyy = (ffi fiu x )u xxx +3fiu2 xx (ffi fiu x ) 5 u xx (ffi fiu x ) 3 v yyyy = u xxxx (ffi fiu x )2 +10u xx u xxx fi(ffi fiu x )+15u 3 xx fi2 (ff + fiu x ) 7. Nondegeneracy u xx =0 =) Straight lines are totally singular (three-dimensional equi-affine symmetry group) Normalization r = dim G =5 y = 0; v = 0; v y = 0; v yy = 1; v yyy = 0: ch 28
29 Left Moving frame ρ : J 3! SA(2) A = ψ = q 3 u xx q u x 3 dz ds u xx u 1=3 xx 1 3 u 5=3 xx u xxx 1 3 u 5=3 xx u xxx! d 2 z ds 2 1 A b = z = ψ! x u e 2 e 1 x ch 29
30 Frenet frame e 1 = dz ds e 2 = d2 z ds 2 Frenet equations = Maurer Cartan equations: dz ds = e 1 de 1 ds = e 2 de 2 ds =» e 1 Equi-affine arc length dy 7! ds = 3 qu xx dx = 3 q _z ^ z dt Invariant differential operator D y 7! d ds = qu 1 D x = xx 3 1 q D t _z ^ z 3 Equi-affine curvature v 4y 7!» = 5u xx u xxxx 3u2 xxx 9u 8=3 xx = z s ^ z ss v 5y 7! d» ds v 6y 7! d2» ds 2 5»2 ch 30
31 Equivalence & Signature Cartan's main idea: The equivalence and symmetry properties of submanifolds will be found by restricting the differential invariants to the submanifold J(x) = I(j n Nj x ). Equivalent submanifolds should have the same invariants. However, unless an invariant J(x) is constant, it carries little information by itself, since the equivalence map will typically drastically change the dependence of the invariant on the parameter x. =) Constant curvature submanifolds However, a functional dependency or syzygy among the invariants is intrinsic: J k (x) = Φ(J 1 (x);:::;j k 1 (x)) ch 31
32 The Signature Map Equivalence and symmetry properties of submanifolds are governed by the functional dependencies syzygies" among the differential invariants. J k (x) = Φ(J 1 (x);:::;j k 1 (x)) The syzygies are encoded by the signature map ± : N! S of the submanifold N, which is parametrized by the fundamental differential invariants: ±(x) = (J 1 (x);:::;j m (x)) = ( I 1 j N; ::: ;I m j N ) The image S = Im ± is the signature subset (or submanifold) of N. ch 32
33 Geometrically, the signature S ρ K is the image of j n N in the cross-section K ρ J n, where n fl 0 is sufficiently large. ± : N! j n N! S ρ K Theorem. Two submanifolds are equivalent N = g N if and only if their signatures are identical S = S ch 33
34 Signature Curves Definition. The signature curve S ρ R 2 of a curve C ρ R 2 is parametrized by the first two differential invariants» and» s S = ( ψ» ; d» ds! ) ρ R 2 Theorem. Two curves C and C are equivalent C = g C if and only if their signature curves are identical S = S =) object recognition ch 34
35 Symmetry Signature map ± : N! S Theorem. Let S denote the signature of the submanifold N. Then the dimension of its symmetry group G N = f g j g N ρ N g equals dim G N = dim N dim S Corollary. For a regular submanifold N ρ M, 0» dim G N» dim N =) Only totally singular submanifolds can have larger symmetry groups! ch 35
36 Maximally Symmetric Submanifolds Theorem. The following are equivalent: ffl The submanifold N has a p-dimensional symmetry group ffl The signature S degenerates to a point dim S = 0 ffl The submanifold has all constant differential invariants ffl N = H fz 0 g is the orbit of a p-dimensional subgroup H ρ G =) In Euclidean geometry, these are the circles, straight lines, spheres & planes. =) In equi-affine plane geometry, these are the conic sections. ch 36
37 Discrete Symmetries Definition. The index of a submanifold N equals the number of points in C which map to a generic point of its signature S: N = min n #± 1 fwg fi fi fi w 2 S o =) Self intersections Theorem. The cardinality of the symmetry group of N equals its index N. =) Approximate symmetries ch 37
38 Classical Invariant Theory (ψ! fi ff fi fifififi ) M = R 2 nfu = 0g G = GL(2) = ffffi fifl 6= 0 fl ffi (x; u) 7! ψ ffx + fi flx + ffi ;! u (flx + ffi) n n 6= 0; 1 ff = flx+ ffi = ffffi fifl Prolongation: y = ffx + fi flx + ffi v = ff n u v y = ffu x nflu ff n 1 v yy = ff2 u xx 2(n 1)flffu x + n(n 1)fl 2 u 2 ff n 2 v yyy = Normalization: y = 0 v = 1 v y = 0 v yy = 1 n(n 1) ch 38
39 Moving frame: ff = u (1 n)=np H fl = 1 n u(1 n)=n fi = xu (1 n)=np H ffi = u 1=n 1 n xu(1 n)=n H = n(n 1)uu xx (n 1) 2 u 2 x Hessian Nonsingular form: H 6= 0 Note: H 0 if and only if Q(x) = (ax + b) n =) Totally singular forms Differential invariants: J v yyy 7! n 2 (n 1) ß» v yyyy 7! K +3(n 2) n 3 (n 1) ß d» ds Absolute rational covariants: J 2 = T 2 H 3 K = U H 2 H = 1 2 (Q; Q)(2) = n(n 1)QQ 00 (n 1) 2 Q 02 ο Q xx Q yy Q 2 xy T = (Q; H) (1) =(2n 4)Q 0 H nqh 0 ο Q x H y Q y H x U = (Q; T ) (1) =(3n 6)Q 0 T nqt 0 ο Q x T y Q y T x deg Q = n deg H = 2n 4 deg T = 3n 6 deg U = 4n 8 ch 39
40 Signatures of Binary Forms Signature curve of a nonsingular binary form Q(x): S Q = ( (J(x) 2 ;K(x)) = ψ T (x) 2 H(x) 3 ; U(x) H(x) 2!) Nonsingular: H(x) 6= 0 and (J 0 (x);k 0 (x)) 6= 0. Signature map ±: N Q! S Q ±(x) = (J(x) 2 ;K(x)) Theorem. Two nonsingular binary forms are equivalent if and only if their signature curves are identical. ch 40
41 Maximally Symmetric Binary Forms Theorem. If u = Q(x) is a polynomial, then the following are equivalent: ffl Q(x) admits a one-parameter symmetry group ffl T 2 is a constant multiple of H 3 ffl Q(x) ' x k is complex-equivalent to a monomial ffl the signature curve degenerates to a single point ffl all the (absolute) differential invariants of Q are constant ffl the graph of Q coincides with the orbit of a one-parameter subgroup =) diagonalizable ch 41
42 Symmetries of Binary Forms Theorem. The symmetry group of a nonzero binary form Q(x) 6 0 of degree n is: ffl A two-parameter group if and only if H 0 if and only if Q is equivalent to a constant. =) totally singular ffl A one-parameter group if and only if H 6 0 and T 2 is a constant multiple of H 3 if and only if Q is complexequivalent to a monomial x k, with k 6= 0;n. =) maximally symmetric ffl In all other cases, a finite group whose cardinality equals the index Q = min n #± 1 fwg fi fi fi w 2 S o of the signature curve, and is bounded by Q» 8 < : 6n 12 U = ch 2 4n 8 otherwise ch 42
43 Let G act on M. Joint Invariants A k-point joint invariant is an invariant of the k-fold Cartesian product action on M M I(g z 1 ;:::;g z k ) = I(z 1 ;:::;z k ) A k-point joint differential invariant is an invariant of the prolonged action G (n) on a k-fold Cartesian product of jet space J n J n I(g (n) z (n) 1 ;:::;g (n) z (n) ) = I(z(n) 1 ;:::;z (n) k k ) =) Joint differential invariants are known as semi-differential invariants" in the computer vision literature, and are proposed as noise resistant" alternatives for object recognition. ch 43
44 Joint Euclidean Invariants SE(2) acts on M = R 2 R 2 : z i = (x i ;u i ) w i = (y i ;v i ) = g 1 z i i =0; 1; 2;::: y i = cos (x i a) + sin (u i b) v i = sin (x i a) + cos (u i b) Normalization (cross-section) Left moving frame y 0 = 0 v 0 = 0 y 1 > 0 v 1 =0 ρ : M! SE(2) ψ! a = x 0 b = u 0 = tan 1 u1 u 0 x 1 x 0 Joint invariants: y i 7! (z i z 0 ) (z 1 z 0 ) k z 1 z 0 k v i 7! (z i z 0 ) ^ (z 1 z 0 ) k z 1 z 0 k ch 44
45 Theorem. Every joint Euclidean invariant is a function of the interpoint distances k z i z j k and, in the orientation preserving case, a single signed area A(z 0 ;z 1 ;z 2 ) ch 45
46 Joint Invariant Signatures If the invariants depend on k points on a p-dimensional submanifold, then you need at least ` > kp distinct invariants I 1 ;:::;I` in order to construct a syzygy: The total number of syzygies is Φ(I 1 ;:::;I`) 0 ` kp Typically, the number of joint invariants is ` = km r = (#points)(dim M) dim G Therefore, to find a joint invariant signature, that involes no differentiation, we need at least k points on our submanifold. r m p +1 ch 46
47 Joint Euclidean Signature For the Euclidean group G = SE(2) acting on curves C ρ R 2 (or R 3 ) we need at least four points Joint invariants: z 0 ;z 1 ;z 2 ;z 3 2 C a = k z 1 z 0 k; b = k z 2 z 0 k; c = k z 3 z 0 k; d = k z 2 z 1 k; e = k z 3 z 1 k; f = k z 3 z 2 k: =) six functions of four variables Joint Signature: ±: C 4! S ρ R 6 dim S = 4 =) two syzygies Φ 1 (a; b; c; d; e; f) = 0 Φ 2 (a; b; c; d; e; f) = 0 Universal Cayley Menger syzygy: fi fi fi fi 2a det fi 2 a 2 + b 2 d 2 a 2 + c 2 e 2 fi fi fi a fi 2 + b 2 d 2 2b 2 b 2 + c 2 fi f 2 fi fi fi a 2 + c 2 e 2 b 2 + c 2 f 2 2c 2 fi =0 () C ρ R 2 ch 47
48 z 0 c z 3 a e b f z 1 d z 2 Four-Point Euclidean Joint Signature ch 48
49 Euclidean Joint Differential Invariants Planar Curves ffl One point ffl Two point ) curvature» = Π z ^ z ΠΠ k z Π k 3 ) distances k z 1 z 0 k ) tangent angles ffi k = <) (z 1 z 0 ; Π z k ) ch 49
50 Equi Affine Joint Differential Invariants Planar Curves ffl One point ) affine curvature» = (z t ^ z tttt )+4(z tt ^ z ttt ) 3(z t ^ z tt ) 5=3 5(z t ^ z ttt )2 9(z t ^ z tt ) 8=3 = z s ^ z ss ffl Two point ) tangent triangle area ratio Π z 0 ^ z ΠΠ 0 [(z 1 z 0 ) ^ z Π 0 ] = [ Π 0 Π Π 0 ] 3 [ Π ] 3 ffl Three point ) triangle area 1 (z z ) ^ (z z ) = 1 [ ] ch 50
51 Projective Joint Differential Invariants Planar Curves ffl One point ffl Two point ) projective curvature» = ::: ) tangent triangle area ratio ffl Three point ffl Four point ) tangent triangle ratio [ Π ] 3 [ 1 Π 1 ΠΠ ] [ Π ] 3 [ 0 Π 0 ΠΠ ] [ 0 2 Π 0 ][0 1 Π 1 ][1 2 Π 2 ] [ 0 1 Π 0 ][1 2 Π 1 ][0 2 Π 2 ] : ) area cross ratio [ ][0 3 4 ] [ ][0 2 4 ] ch 51
52 Transformation Groups and Jets (x 1 ;:::;x p ) independent variables (u 1 ;:::;u q ) dependent variables z (n) = (x; u (n) ) 2 J n n th order jet space u ff J derivative coordinates on J n G transformation group G (n) prolonged action on J n v 2 g Lie algebra v (n) 2 g (n) Prolonged inf. gens. The Prolongation Formula v (n) = px i=1 ' ff J = D J Qff + ο i i + nx px i=1 ο i u ff J;i ff;j ' ff J (x; ff J Characteristic Q ff (x; u (1) ) = ' ff px i=1 i ch 52
53 Rotation group SO(2) (x; u) 7! (x cos u sin ; x sin + u cos ) Transformed function Second prolongation v = μ f(y): y = x cos f(x) sin ; v = x sin + f(x) cos ; (x; u; u x ;u xx ) 7! (x cos u sin ; x sin + u cos ; Infinitesimal generator Second prolongation sin + u x cos cos u x sin ; v v (2) +(1+u2 x ) Q = x + uu u xx (cos u x sin ) x +3u x xx ' x = D x Q + οu xx = D x (x + uu x ) uu xx = 1+u 2 x ' xx = D 2 x Q + οu xxx = D2 x (x + uu x ) uu xxx = 3u x u xx ch 53
54 Differential invariant: Infinitesimal criterion: I(g (n) (x; u (n) )) = I(x; u (n) ) v (n) (I) = 0 for all v (n) 2 g (n) =) Solve the first order linear partial differential equation by the method of characteristics. =) Moving frames avoids integration! Note: If I 1 ;:::;I k are differential invariants, so is Φ(I 1 ;:::;I k ). =) Classify differential invariants up to functional independence. =) Local results on open subsets of jet space. ch 54
55 Theorem. Any transformation group admits a finite system of fundamental differential invariants J 1 ;:::;J` and p invariant differential operators D 1 ;:::;D p such that every differential invariant is a function of the differentiated invariants: I = Φ( ::: D K J ν ::: ) ch 55
56 Classification Problem. How many fundamental differential invariants J 1 ;:::;J` are required? =) For curves (p = 1), we have ` = q. Syzygy Problem. Determine the algebraic relations Φ( ::: D K J ν ::: ) = 0 among the differentiated invariants. Commutation Formulae. The order of invariant differentiation matters [ D i ; D j ] =??? =) Only an issue when p > 1. ch 56
57 The Fundamental Differential Invariants I (n) (z (n) ) = ρ (n) (z (n) ) 1 z (n) H i (x; u (n) ) = y i (ρ (n) (x; u (n) );x;u) I ff K (x; u(k) ) = v ff K (ρ(n) (x; u (n) );x;u (k) ) Recurrence Formulae: D j H i = ffi i j + M i j D j I ff K = Iff K;j + M ff K;j M i j ;Mff K;j correction terms Commutation Formulae: [D i ; D j ] = px i=1 A k ij D k ffl The correction terms can be computed directly from the infinitesimal generators! ch 57
58 Generating Invariants Theorem. A generating system of differential invariants consists of ffl all non-phantom differential invariants H i and I ff coming from the un-normalized zero th order lifted invariants y i, v ff, and ffl all non-phantom differential invariants of the form IJ;i ff where IJ ff is a phantom differential invariant. order» order ρ + 1 In other words, every other differential invariant can, locally, be written as a function of the generating invariants and their invariant derivatives, D K H i, D K I ff J;i. =) Not necessarily a minimal set! ch 58
59 Syzygies A syzygy is a functional relation among differentiated invariants: H( ::: D J I ν ::: ) 0 Derivatives of syzygies are syzygies =) find a minimal basis Remark: There are no syzygies among the normalized differential invariants I (n) except for the phantom syzygies" I ν = c ν corresponding to the normalizations. ch 59
60 Classification of Syzygies Theorem. All syzygies among the differentiated invariants are differential consequences of the following three fundamental types: D j H i = ffi i j + M i j H i non-phantom D J I ff K = c ν + M ff K;J I ff K generating I ff J;K = w ν = c ν phantom D J I ff LK D K Iff LJ = M ff LK;J M ff LJ;K I ff LK, Iff LJ generating, K J =? =) Not necessarily a minimal system! ch 60
61 Right Regularization If G acts on M, then the lifted action (h; z) 7! (h g 1 ;g z) on the trivial right principal bundle B = G M is always regular and free! The functions w : B! M given by w(g; z) = g z provide a complete system of global invariants for the lifted action. ch 61
62 Example. G = SO(2) M = R 2 B = SO(2) R 2 solid torus (x; u; ffi) 7! (x cos u sin ; x sin + u cos ; ffi + mod 2 ß) ch 62
63 Jet Regularization B n = J n G J n J n w = w (n) = g (n) z (n) ff (n) (z (n) ) = (z (n) ;ρ (n) (z (n) )) I (n) (z (n) ) = w (n) ffi ff (n) (z (n) ) = ρ (n) (z (n) ) z (n) Invariantization (F ) = (ff (n) ) Λ ffi (w (n) ) Λ F = F ffi I (n) ch 63
64 General Philosophy of Lifting All invariant objects on B n = J n G are well-behaved and easily understood. =) lifted invariants We use the G-equivariant moving frame section ff (n) : J n! B ff(z (n) ) = (ρ(z (n) );z (n) ) to pull back lifted invariants to construct ordinary invariants on J n. For example, ff Λ w (n) = w (n) ffi ff = I (n) gives the fundamental differential invariants. Similarly for lifted invariant differential forms, differential operators, tensors, etc. =) The key complication is that the pull-back process does not commute with differentiation! ch 64
65 Infinite jet space Inverse limit Local coordinates The Variational Bicomplex M = J 0 ψ J 1 ψ J 2 ψ J 1 = lim n!1 Jn z (1) = (x; u (1) ) = ( ::: x i ::: u ff J ::: ) Coframe basis for the cotangent space T Λ J 1 : Horizontal one-forms dx 1 ;:::;dx p Contact (vertical) one-forms ff J = duff J p X i=1 u ff J;i dxi Intrinsic definition of contact form j j 1 N = 0 () = X A ff J ff J ch 65
66 Vertical and Horizontal Differentials Bigrading of the differential forms on J 1 Differential Ω Λ = M r;s Ωr;s d = d H + d V d H F = px i=1 d V F = X ff;j d H : Ω r;s! Ω r+1;s d V : Ω r;s! Ω r;s+1 (D i F ) dx i ff J ff J variation =) Vinogradov, Tsujishita, I. Anderson ch 66
67 The Simplest Example. M = R 2 x; u 2 R Horizontal form Contact (vertical) forms Differential Total derivative dx = du u x dx x = du x u xx dx xx = du xx u xxx dx. x du xx du xx + = (D x F ) @u x xx xx + = d H F + d V F D x u x u xx u xxx + ch 67
68 Lifted Variational Tricomplex B 1 = J 1 G ffl Lifted horizontal forms d J y i i = 1;:::;p ffl Lifted invariant contact forms ff J = d J vff J p X i=1 v ff J;i d J yi ffl Right-invariant Maurer Cartan forms μ = dg g 1 =) μ 1 ;:::;μ r r = dim G Differential forms on B 1 Ω Λ = M Differential r;s;t bω r;s;t d = d H + d V + d G d H : d V : d G : b Ω r;s;t b Ω r;s;t b Ω r;s;t! b Ω r+1;s;t! b Ω r;s+1;t! b Ω r;s;t+1 ch 68
69 Invariantization : Functions! Invariants Forms! Invariant Forms Functions: (F ) = ff Λ ffi w Λ (F ) = F ffi I (1) Differential Forms: (Ω) = ff Λ (ß J (w Λ Ω)): ß J Jet projection T Λ B 1 = T Λ (J 1 G) ' T Λ J 1 Φ T Λ G ch 69
70 Invariant Variational Complex Fundamental differential invariants H i (x; u (n) ) = (x i ) IK ff (x; u(l) ) = (u ff K ) Invariant horizontal one-forms $ i = (dx i ) =! i + i! i contact-invariant forms i contact corrections" Invariant contact forms # ff K = ( ff J ) Differential forms Ω Λ = M r;s bω r;s Differential d = d H + d V + d W d H : Ω b r;s! Ω b r+1;s d V : Ω b r;s! Ω b r;s+1 d W : Ω b r;s! Ω b r 1;s+2 ch 70
71 The Key Formula d (Ω) = (dω) + px k=1 ν» ^ [v» (Ω)] v 1 ;:::;v r basis for g ν» = ff Λ μ» = fl» + "»» = 1;:::;r fl» 2 b Ω 1;0 "» 2 b Ω 0;1 pull back of the dual basis Maurer Cartan forms via the moving frame section ff Λ : J 1! B 1??? All recurrence formulae, syzygies, commutation formulae, etc. are found by applying the key formula for various forms and functions Ω ch 71
72 Euclidean Curves Lifted invariants y = w Λ (x) = x cos ffi u sin ffi + a v = w Λ (u) =x cos ffi + u sin ffi + b v y = w Λ (u x )= sin ffi + u x cos ffi cos ffi u x sin ffi v yy = w Λ (u xx ) = u xx (cos ffi u x sin ffi) 3 v yyy = w Λ (u xx ) = (cos ffi u x sin ffi )u xxx 3u2 xx sin ffi (cos ffi u x sin ffi ) 5 dy = (cos ffi u x sin ffi) dx (sin ffi) + da vdffi d J y = ß J (dy) = (cos ffi u x sin ffi) dx (sin ffi) D y = 1 cos ffi u x sin ffi D x = du u x dx Normalization Right moving frame y =0 v = 0 v y = 0 ρ : J 1! SE(2) ffi = tan 1 u x a = x + uu x q 1+u 2 x b = q xu x u 1+u 2 x ch 72
73 Fundamental normalized differential invariants 9 (x) = H =0 >= (u) = I 0 = 0 phantom diff. invs. >; (u x ) = I 1 = 0 (u xx ) = I 2 =» (u xxx ) = I 3 =» s (u xxxx ) = I 4 =» ss +3» 3 Invariant horizontal one-form (dx) = ff Λ ( d J y) = $ =! + q = 1+u 2 x dx + u q x 1+u 2 x Invariant contact forms ( ) = # = q 1+u 2 x ( x ) = # 1 = (1 + u2 x ) x u x u xx (1 + u 2 x )2 ch 73
74 Prolonged infinitesimal generators v 1 x v 2 u v 3 = u@ x + x@ u +(1+u 2 x ux +3u x u uxx + d H I = D s I $ Horizontal recurrence formula d H (F ) = (d H F )+ (v 1 (F )) fl 1 + (v 2 (F )) fl 2 + (v 3 (F )) fl 3 Use phantom invariants 0 = d H H = (d H x)+ X (v» (x)) fl» = $ + fl 1 ; 0 = d H I 0 = (d H u)+ X (v» (u)) fl» = fl 2 ; 0 = d H I 1 = (d H u x )+ X (v» (u x )) fl» =»$+ fl 3 ; to solve for fl 1 = $ fl 2 = 0 fl 3 =»$ ch 74
75 fl 1 = $ fl 2 = 0 fl 3 =»$ Recurrence formulae» s $ = d H» = d H (I 2 ) = (d H u xx )+ (v 3 (u xx )) fl 3 = (u xxx dx) (3u x u xx ))»$ = I 3 $» ss $ = d H (I 3 )= (d H u xxx )+ (v 3 (u xxx ) fl 3 = (u xxxx dx) (4u x u xxx +3u 2 xx )»$ = I 4 3I 3 2 $» = I 2 I 2 =»» s = I 3 I 3 =» s» ss = I 4 3I 3 2 I 4 =» ss +3» 3» sss = I 5 19I 2 2 I 3 I 4 =» sss +19» 2» s ch 75
76 Vertical recurrence formula d V (F ) = ( d V F )+ (v 1 (F )) " 1 + (v 2 (F )) " 2 + (v 3 (F )) " 3 Use phantom invariants 0= d V H = " 1 0= d V I 0 = # + " 2 0= d V I 1 = # 1 + " 3 to solve for " 1 = 0 " 2 = # = ( ) " 3 = # 1 = ( 1 ) Recurrence formulae d V I 2 = d V» = ( 2 )+ (v 3 (u xx )) " 3 = # 2 = (D 2 +» 2 ) #; d H #: D# = # 1 D# 1 = # 2» 2 # d V $ =»#^ $ ch 76
77 Example (x 1 ;x 2 ;u) 2 M = R 3 G = GL(2) (x 1 ;x 2 ;u) 7! (ffx 1 + fix 2 ;flx 1 + ffix 2 ; u) = ffffi fifl =) Classical invariant theory Prolongation (lifted differential invariants): y 1 = 1 (ffix 1 fix 2 ) y 2 = 1 ( flx 1 + ffx 2 ) v = 1 u v 1 = ffu 1 + flu 2 v 2 = fiu 1 + ffiu 2 Normalization v 11 = ff2 u 11 +2ffflu 12 + fl 2 u 22 v 12 = fffiu 11 +(ffffi + fifl)u 12 + flffiu 22 v 22 = fi2 u 11 +2fiffiu 12 + ffi 2 u 22 y 1 = 1 y 2 = 0 v 1 = 1 v 2 = 0 Nondegeneracy = 0 ch 77
78 First order moving frame ψ ff fl fi ffi! ψ! x 1 u = 2 x 2 u 1 Normalized differential invariants J 1 = 1 J 2 =0 u I = x 1 u 1 + x 2 u 2 I 1 = 1 I 2 = 0 I 11 = (x1 ) 2 u 11 +2x 1 x 2 u 12 +(x 2 ) 2 u 22 x 1 u 1 + x 2 u 2 I 12 = x1 u 2 u 11 +(x 1 u 1 x 2 u 2 )u 12 + x 2 u 1 u 22 x 1 u 1 + x 2 u 2 I 22 = (u 2 )2 u 11 2u 1 u 2 u 12 +(u 1 ) 2 u 22 x 1 u 1 + x 2 u 2 Phantom differential invariants Generating differential invariants I 1 I 2 I I 11 I 12 I 22 Invariant differential operators D 1 = x 1 D 1 + x 2 D 2 D 2 = u 2 D 1 + u 1 D 2 scaling process Jacobian process ch 78
79 Recurrence formulae D 1 J 1 = ffi 1 1 1=0 D 2 J 1 = ffi 1 2 0=0 D 1 J 2 = ffi 2 1 0=0 D 2 J 2 = ffi 2 2 1=0 D 1 I = I 1 I(1 + I 11 )= I(1 + I 11 ) D 2 I = I 2 II 12 = I I 12 D 1 I 1 = I 11 I 11 = 0 D 2 I 1 = I 12 I 12 = 0 D 1 I 2 = I 12 I 12 = 0 D 2 I 2 = I 22 I 22 = 0 D 1 I 11 = I 111 +(1 I 11 )I 11 D 2 I 11 = I 112 +(2 I 11 )I 12 D 1 I 12 = I 112 I 11 I 12 D 2 I 12 = I 122 +(1 I 11 )I 22 D 1 I 22 = I 122 +(I 11 1)I 22 2I 2 12 D 2 I 22 = I 222 I 12 I 22 Syzygies =) Use I to generate I 11 and I 12 D 1 I 12 D 2 I 11 = 2I 12 D 1 I 22 D 2 I 12 = 2(I 11 1)I 22 2I 2 12 (D 1 ) 2 I 22 (D 2 ) 2 I 11 = = 2I 22 D 1 I 11 +(5I 12 2)D 1 I 12 +(3I 11 5)D 1 I 22 (2I 11 5)(I 11 1)I 12 +4(I 11 1)I 2 12 Commutation formulae [D 1 ; D 2 ]= I 12 D 1 +(I 11 1)D 2 ch 79
80 Invariant Variational Problems I[u] = Z L(x; u (n) ) dx = Z P ( ::: D K I ff ::: )! I 1 ;:::;I` D K I ff fundamental differential invariants differentiated invariants! =! 1 ^ ^! p contact-invariant volume form Invariant Euler-Lagrange equations E(L) = F ( ::: D K I ff ::: ) = 0 Problem. Construct F directly from P. =) P. Griffiths, I. Anderson ch 80
81 Example. Planar Euclidean group G = SE(2) Invariant variational problem Z P (»;» s ;» ss ; ::: ) ds Euler-Lagrange equations E(L) = F (»;» s ;» ss ; ::: ) = 0 The Elastica (Euler): I[u] = Z 1 2»2 ds = Z u 2 xx dx (1 + u 2 x )5=2 Euler-Lagrange equation E(L) =» ss + 1 2»3 = 0 =) elliptic functions ch 81
82 Z P (»;» s ;» ss ; ::: ) ds Invariantized Euler operator E = 1X n=0 ( n D = d ds Invariantized Hamiltonian operator H(P ) = X i>j» i j ( i P Invariant Euler-Lagrange formula E(L) = (D 2 +» 2 ) E(P )+» H(P ): Elastica P = 1 2»2 E(P ) =» H(P ) = P = 1 2»2 E(L) =» ss + 1 2»3 = 0 ch 82
83 Euler-Lagrange Equations Integration by Parts: ß : Ω p;1! F 1 = Ω p;1 =d H Ω p 1;1 =) Source forms Variational derivative or Euler operator: ffi = ß ffi d V : Ω p;0! F 1 Variational Problems! Source Forms Hamiltonian ffi : = Ldx! H(L) = mx ff=1 X i>j 0 qx ff=1 u ff i j ( x ff i E ff (L) ff ^ dx L ch 83
84 The Simplest Example. M = R 2 x; u 2 R Lagrangian form = L(x; u (n) ) dx Vertical derivative d = d V @u x xx + xx Integration by parts d H (A ) = (D x A) dx ^ A x ^ dx! = [(D x A) + A x ] ^ dx ^ dx 2 Ω 1;1 Variational derivative ffi x + D 2 x = E(L) ^ dx 2 F ^ xx ch 84
85 Plane Curves Invariant Lagrangian Z P (»;»s;:::) $» fundamental differential invariant (curvature) $ =! + fully invariant horizontal form! = ds contact-invariant arc length Invariant integration by parts d V (P $) = E(P ) d V» ^ $ H(P ) d V $ Vertical differentiation formulae d V» = A(#) d V $ = B(#) ^ $ A Eulerian operator B Hamiltonian operator =) The explicit formulae follow from our fundamental recurrence formula, based on the infinitesimal generators of the action. Invariant Euler-Lagrange equation A Λ E(P ) B Λ H(P ) = 0 ch 85
86 General Framework Fundamental differential invariants Invariant horizontal coframe I 1 ;:::;I` $ 1 ;:::;$ p Dual invariant differential operators D 1 ;:::;D p Invariant volume form $ = $ 1 ^ ^$ p Differentiated invariants I ff ;K = DK J ff = D k1 D kn J ff =) order is important! ch 86
87 Eulerian operator d V I ff = qx fi=1 A ff fi (#fi ) A = ( A ff fi ) =) m q matrix of invariant differential operators Hamiltonian operator complex d V $ j = qx fi=1 B j i;fi (#fi ) ^ $ i B j i = ( B j i;fi ) =) p 2 row vectors of invariant differential operators $ (i) = ( 1) i 1 $ 1 ^ ^$ i 1 ^ $ i+1 ^ ^$ p Twist invariants Twisted adjoint d H $ (i) = Z i $ D y i = (D i + Z i ) ch 87
88 Invariant variational problem Z P (I (n) )$ Invariant Eulerian E ff (P ) = X K D ff ;K Invariant Hamiltonian tensor Hj i(p ) = P ffii j + qx ff=1 X J;K I ff ;J;j D ff ;J;i;K ; Invariant Euler-Lagrange equations A y E(P ) px i;j=1 (Bi j ) y Hj i (P ) = 0: ch 88
89 Euclidean Surfaces S ρ M = R 3 coordinates z = (x; y; u) Group: G = E(3) z 7! Rz+ a; R 2 O(3) Normalization coordinate cross-section x = y = u = u x = u y = u xy = 0: Left moving frame a = z R = ( t 1 t 2 n ) ffl t 1 ; t 2 2 TS ffl n Frenet frame unit normal ch 89
90 Fundamental differential invariants» 1 = (u xx )» 2 = (u yy ) =) principal curvatures Frenet coframe $ 1 = (dx 1 ) =! $ 2 = (dx 2 ) =! Invariant differential operators D 1 D 2 =) Frenet differentiation Fundamental Syzygy: Use the recurrence formula to compare (u xxyy ) with» 1 ;22 = D2 2 (u xx )» 2 ;11 = D2 1 (u yy )» 1 ;22»2 ;11 +»1 ;1»2 ;1 +»1 ;2»2 ;2 2(»2 ;1 )2 2(» 1 ;2 )2» 1» 2» 1» 2 (» 1» 2 ) =0 =) Codazzi equations ch 90
91 Twisted adjoints D y 1 = (D 1 + Z 1 ) Z 1 =»2 ;1» 1» 2 D y 2 = (D 2 + Z 2 ) Z 2 =»1 ;2» 2» 1 Gauss curvature Codazzi equations: K =» 1» 2 = D y 1 (Z 1 )+D y 2 (Z 2 ) = (D 1 + Z 1 )Z 1 (D 2 + Z 2 )Z 2 K is an invariant divergence =) Gauss Bonnet Theorem! ch 91
92 Invariant contact form # = ( ) = (du u x dx u y dy) Invariant vertical derivatives d V» 1 = ( xx )=( D Z D 2 2 +(»1 ) 2 ) # d V» 2 = ( yy ) =(D Z D 1 1 +(»2 ) 2 ) # Eulerian operator A = ψ D Z D! 2 2 +(»1 ) 2 D Z D 1 1 +(»2 ) 2 d V $ 1 =» 1 # ^ $ 1 1» 1» 2( D D 1 2 Z D 2 1 )# ^ $2 d V $ 2 = Hamiltonian operator complex 1» 1» 2( D 2 D 1 Z 1 D 2 )# ^ $1 +» 2 # ^ $ 2 B 1 1 =»1 ; B 2 2 =» 2 ; B 1 2 = 1» 1» 2( D 1 D 2 Z 2 D 1 )= B2 1 ch 92
93 Euclidean-invariant variational problem Z Z P (» (n) )! 1 ^! 2 = P (» (n) ) da Euler-Lagrange equations Special case: P (» 1 ;» 2 ) E(L) = A y E(P ) B y H(P ) =0; E(L) =[(D y 1 ) 2 D y 2 Z 2 +(» 1 ) 1 + Minimal surfaces: P = 1 +[(D y 2 ) 2 D y 1 Z 1 +(» 2 ) 2 +(»1 +» 2 ) P» 1 +» 2 =2H =0 Minimizing mean curvature: P = H = 1 2 (»1 +» 2 ) h i (» 1 ) 2 +(» 2 ) 2 +» 1 +» 2 = 2H 2 + H K =0: 1 2 Willmore surfaces: P = 1 2 (»1 ) (»2 ) 2 (» 1 +» 2 )+ 1 2 (»1 +» 2 )(» 1» 2 ) 2 =2 H +4(H 2 K)H = 0 Laplace Beltrami operator =(D 1 + Z 1 )D 1 +(D 2 + Z 2 )D 2 = D y 1 D 1 D y 2 D 2 ch 93
94 Multi Space Although in use since the time of Lie and Darboux, jet space was first formally defined by Ehresmann in Jet space is the proper setting for the geometry of partial differential equations. In this talk, I will propose a setting, named multispace, for the geometry of numerical approximations to derivatives and differential equations. =) Multi-space is the context for geometric integration. ch 94
95 Invariant Numerical Approximations Key remark: Every (finite difference) numerical approximation to the derivatives of a function require evaluating the function at several points z i = (x i ;u i ) = (x i ;f(x i )). ch 95
96 In other words, we seek to approximate the n th order jet of a submanifold N ρ M by a function F (z 0 ;:::;z n ) defined on the (n + 1)-fold Cartesian product space M (n+1) = M M, or, more correctly, on the off-diagonal" part M Π(n+1) = f z i 6= z j for all i 6= j g =) distinct (n + 1)-tuples of points. ch 96
97 Thus, multi-space should contain both the jet space and the off-diagonal Cartesian product space as submanifolds: M Π(n+1) # 9 >= ρ M (n) J n (M;p) >; Functions F : M (n)! R are given by F (z 0 ;:::;z n ) on M Π(n+1) and extend smoothly to J n as the points coalesce. In this manner, F j M Π(n+1) provides a finite difference approximation to the differential function F j J n. ch 97
98 Construction of M (n) Definition. An (n + 1)-pointed manifold M = (z 0 ;:::;z n ; M) M smooth manifold z 0 ;:::;z n 2 M not necessarily distinct Given M, let #i = # n j fi fi fi zj = z i o denote the number of points which coincide with the i th one. ch 98
99 Multi-contact for Curves Definition. Two (n + 1)-pointed curves C = (z 0 ;:::;z n ; C); f C = (~z 0 ;:::;~z n ; e C); have n th order multi-contact if and only if z i = ~z i ; and j #i 1 Cj zi = j e #i 1 Cj zi ; for each i = 0;:::;n. #i = # n j fi o fi fi zj = z i Definition. The n th order multi-space M (n) is the set of equivalence classes of (n + 1)-pointed curves in M under the equivalence relation of n th order multi-contact. ch 99
100 The Fundamental Theorem Theorem. If M is a smooth m-dimensional manifold, then its n th order multi-space M (n) is a smooth manifold of dimension (n + 1)m, which contains the off-diagonal part M Π(n+1) of the Cartesian product space as an open, dense submanifold, and the n th order jet space J n as a smooth submanifold. M Π(n+1) 9 J k 1 Π Π J k ν >= ρ M (n) J n (M;p) >; ch 100
101 Example. Let M = R m (i) M (1) is the space of two-pointed lines M (1) ' f (z 0 ;z 1 ; L) j z 0 ;z 1 2 L line g : =) Blow-up construction in algebraic geometry (ii) M (2) is the space of three-pointed circles, i.e., M (2) ' f (z 0 ;z 1 ;z 2 ;C) j z 0 ;z 1 ;z 2 2 C circle g : Straight lines are included as circles of infinite radius, but points are not included (even though they could be viewed as circles of zero radius). (iii) M (3)???? =) Grassmann bundles. Topology local and global. ch 101
102 Finite Differences Local coordinates on J n are provided by the coefficients of Taylor polynomials =) derivatives Local coordinates on M (n) are provided by the coefficients of interpolating polynomials. =) finite differences Given (z 0 ;:::;z n ) 2 M Π(n+1), define the classical divided differences by the standard recursive rule [ z 0 z 1 :::z k 1 z k ]= [ z 0 z 1 z 2 :::z k 2 z k ] [ z 0 z 1 z 2 :::z k 2 z k 1 ] x k x k 1 [ z j ]=u j =) Well-defined provided no two points lie on the same vertical line. =) Symmetric functions of z i. ch 102
103 Definition. Given an (n + 1)-pointed graph C = (z 0 ;:::;z n ; C), its divided differences are defined by [ z j ] C = f(x j ) [ z [ z 0 z 1 :::z k 1 z k ] C = lim 0 z 1 z 2 :::z k 2 z ] C [ z 0 z 1 z 2 :::z k 2 z k 1 ] C z!zk x x k 1 =) When taking the limit, the point z = (x; f(x)) must lie on the graph C, and take limiting values x! x k and f(x)! f(x k ). Theorem. Two (n + 1)-pointed graphs C; f C have n th order multi-contact if and only if they have the same divided differences: [ z 0 z 1 :::z k ] C = [ z 0 z 1 :::z k ]e C ; k = 0;:::;n: ch 103
104 Local coordinates on M (n) They consist of the independent variables along with all the divided differences u (0) = u 0 = [ z 0 ] C u (1) =[z 0 z 1 ] C x 0 ;:::;x n u (2) = 2[z 0 z 1 z 2 ] C ::: u (n) = n![z 0 z 1 :::z n ] C prescribed by (n + 1)-pointed graphs C = (z 0 ;:::;z n ; C) The n! factor is included so that u (n) agrees with the usual derivative coordinate when restricted to J n. ch 104
105 Numerical Approximations (x; u (n) ) differential function : J n! R System of differential equations: 1(x; u (n) ) = = k(x; u (n) ) = 0: Definition. An (n + 1)-point numerical approximation of order k to a differential function : J n! R is a k th order extension F : M (n)! R of to multi-space, based on the inclusion J n ρ M (n). F (x 0 ;:::;x n ;u (0) ;:::;u (n) )! F (x;:::;x;u (0) ;:::;u (n) ) = (x; u (n) ) ch 105
106 Invariant Numerical Approximations G Lie group acting on M Basic Idea: Every invariant finite difference approximation to a differential invariant must expressible in terms of the joint invariants of the transformation group. Differential Invariant Joint Invariant I(g (n) z (n) ) = I(z (n) ) J(g z 0 ;:::;g z k ) = J(z 0 ;:::;z k ) Semi-differential invariant = Joint differential invariant =) Approximate differential invariants by joint invariants ch 106
107 Euclidean Invariants Joint Euclidean invariant: Euclidean curvature: Euclidean arc length: d(z;w) = k z w k» = u xx (1 + u 2 x )3=2 ds = q 1+u 2 x dx Higher order differential invariants:» s = d» ds» ss = d2» ds 2 ::: Euclidean invariant differential equation: F (»;» s ;» ss ;:::) = 0 ch 107
108 Three point approximation Heron's formula e»(a; B; C) = 4 abc = 4 q s(s a)(s b)(s c) abc s = a + b + c 2 semi-perimeter Expansion: e» =» + 1 d» (b a) 3 ds (b2 ab + a 2 ) d2» ds (b3 ab 2 + a 2 b a 3 ) d3» ds (b a)(3b2 +5ab +3a 2 )» d» 2 ds + : ch 108
109 Higher order invariants» s = d» ds Invariant finite difference approximation: e» s (P i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ;P i+1 )= e»(p i 1 ;P i ;P i+1 ) e»(p i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ) d(p i ;P i 1 ) Unbiased centered difference: e» s (P i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ;P i+1 ;P i+2 )= e»(p i ;P i+1 ;P i+2 ) e»(p i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ) d(p i+1 ;P i 1 ) Better approximation (M. Boutin): e» s (P i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ;P i+1 ) =3 e»(p i 1 ;P i ;P i+1 ) e»(p i 2 ;P i 1 ;P i ) d i 2 +2d i 1 +2d i + d i+1 d j = d(p j ;P j+1 ) ch 109
110 Affine Joint Invariants x! Ax + b det A = 1 Area is the fundamental joint affine invariant [ijk ] = (P i P j ) ^ (P i P k ) = det fi fi fi fi fi fi fi x i y i 1 x j y j 1 x k y k 1 = Area of parallelogram = 2 Area of triangle (P i ;P j ;P k ) fi fi fi fi fi fi fi Syzygies: [ijl ] + [jkl] = [ijk ] + [ikl ] [ijk ] [ilm] [ijl ] [ikm] + [ijm] [ikl ] = 0 ch 110
111 Affine curvature Affine Differential Invariants» = 3u xx u xxxx 5u2 xxx 9(u xx ) 8=3 Affine arc length ds = 3 q uxx dx Higher order affine invariants:» s = d» ds» ss = d2» ds 2 ::: ch 111
112 Conic Sections Ax 2 +2Bxy + Cy 2 +2Dx +2Ey + F = 0 Affine curvature: Ellipse:» = S T 2=3 S = AC B 2 = det fi fi A B T = det fi fi fi fi fi fi fi A B D B C E D E F fi fi fi fi fi fi fi fi fi fi» = (ß=A) 2=3 B C fi fi fi fi fi Affine arc length of ellipse: Z Q P A = ß T = Area S3=2 s 1=3 T CT ds = S arcsin 1=2 S 2 = 2ST 2=3 A(P; Q) ψ x +!fi CD BE fififififi Q S P ch 112
113 Q A(P; Q) : P Triangular approximation: (O; P; Q) : O Q P Total affine arc length: q q 3 T L = 2 3 A = 2ß p S ch 113
114 Conic through five points P 0 ;:::;P 4 : [013][024][x12][x34] = [012][034][x13][x24] Affine curvature and arc length:» = S T 2=3 x = (x; y) ds = Area (O; P 1 ;P 3 ) = 1 2 [O; P 1 ;P 3 ] = N 2S 4T = Y 0»i<j<k»4 [ijk] 4S = [013] 2 [024] 2 ([124] [123]) [012] 2 [034] 2 ([134] + [123]) 2 2[012][034][013][024]([123][234] + [124][134]) 4N = [123][134] f[023] 2 [014] 2 ([124] [123]) + + [012] 2 [034] 2 ([134] + [123]) + + [012][023][014][034]([134] [123])g Theorem. P 0 ;P 1 ;P 2 ;P 3 ;P 4 points on the convex curve C. ch 114
115 » affine curvature of C at P 2 e» = e»(p 0 ;P 1 ;P 2 ;P 3 ;P 4 ) affine curvature of conic L i = Z Pi P 2 ds affine arc length of conic Expansion: e» =» ψ 4X i=0! 0 d» L i ds + 30 X 0»i»j»4 L i L j 1 A d2» ds 2 + ch 115
116 Multi-Invariants G Lie group which acts smoothly on M =) G preserves the multi-contact equivalence relation G (n) n th multi-prolongation to M (n) =) On J n ρ M (n) it coincides with the usual jet space prolongation =) On M Π(n+1) ρ M (n) it coincides with the (n + 1)-fold Cartesian product action. K : M (n)! R multi-invariant K(g (n) z (n) ) = K(z (n) ) =) K j J n differential invariant =) K j M Π(n+1) joint invariant =) K j J k 1 Π ΠJ k ν joint diff. invariant The theory of multi-invariants is the theory of invariant numerical approximations! ch 116
117 Moving frames provide a systematic algorithm for constructing multi-invariants! A moving frame on multi-space is called a multi-frame. ρ : M (n)! G ch 117
118 Example. G = R 2 nr (x; u) 7! ( 1 x + a; u + b) Multi-prolonged action: compute the divided differences of the basic lifted invariants We find y k = 1 x k + a; v k = u k + b: v (1) = [ w 0 w 1 ] = v 1 v 0 y 1 y 0 = 2 u 1 u 0 x 1 x 0 = 2 [ z 0 z 1 ] = 2 u (1) ; v (n) = n+1 u (n) : Moving frame cross-section Solve for the group parameters y 0 = 0 v 0 = 0 v (1) = 1 a = p u (1) x 0 b = u 0 p u (1) = 1 p u (1) =) multi-frame ρ : M (n)! G. ch 118
119 Multi-invariants: y k : H k = (x k x 0 ) p u (1) = (x k x 0 ) s u1 u 0 x 1 x 0 u k : K k = u k u 0 p u (1) u (n) : K (n) = = (u k u 0 ) s x1 x 0 u 1 u 0 u (n) (u (1) ) = n![z 0 z 1 :::z n ] (n+1)=2 [ z 0 z 1 ] (n+1)=2 Coalescent limit K (0) = K 0 = 0 K (1) =1 K (n)! I (n) = u (n) (u (1) ) (n+1)=2 =) K (n) is a first order invariant numerical approximation to the differential invariant I (n). =) Higher order invariant numerical approximations are obtained by invariantization of higher order divided difference approximations. F ( ::: x k ::: u (n) ::: )! F ( ::: H k ::: K (n) ::: ) ch 119
120 Invariantization To construct an invariant numerical scheme for any similarity-invariant ordinary differential equation F (x; u; u (1) ;u (2) ;:::u (n) ) = 0; we merely invariantize the defining differential function, leading to the general similarity invariant numerical approximation F (0; 0; 1;K (2) ;:::;K (n) ) = 0: =) Nonsingular! ch 120
121 Example. Euclidean group SE(2) y = x cos u sin + a v = x sin + u cos + b Multi-prolonged action on M (1) : y 0 = x 0 cos u 0 sin + a v 0 = x 0 sin + u 0 cos + b y 1 = x 1 cos u 1 sin + a v (1) = sin + u(1) cos cos u (1) sin Cross-section y 0 = v 0 = v (1) = 0 Right moving frame a = x 0 cos + u 0 sin = x + 0 u(1) u q 0 1+(u (1) ) 2 tan = u (1) : b = x 0 sin u 0 cos = x 0 u(1) u q 0 1+(u (1) ) 2 ch 121
122 Euclidean multi-invariants (y k ;v k )! I k = (H k ;K k ) H k = (x k x 0 )+u(1) (u k u 0 ) q =(x k x 0 ) 1+[z 0 z 1 ][z 0 z k q ] 1+(u (1) ) 2 1+[z0 z 1 ] 2 K k = (u k u ) 0 u(1) (x k x 0 ) q =(x k x 0 ) [ z 0 z k ] [ z 0 z 1 q ] 1+(u (1) ) 2 1+[z0 z 1 ] 2 Difference quotients I (1) = [ I 0 I 1 ]=0 [ I 0 I k ]= K k K 0 H k H 0 = K k H k = (x k x 1 )[ z 0 z 1 z k ] 1+[z 0 z k ][z 0 z 1 ] I (2) = 2[I 0 I 1 I 2 ] =2 [ I 0 I 2 ] [ I 0 I 1 ] H 2 H 1 = = 2[z 0 z 1 z 2 ] q 1+[z 0 z 1 ] 2 (1+[z 0 z 1 ][z 1 z 2 ])(1+[z 0 z 1 ][z 0 z 2 ]) u (2)q 1+(u (1) ) 2 h ih i 1+(u (1) ) u(1) u (2) (x 2 x 0 ) 1+(u (1) ) u(1) u (2) (x 2 x 1 ) Invariant numerical approximation to the Euclidean curvature: u (2) lim I (2) =» = z 1 ;z 2!z 0 (1+(u (1) ) 2 ) 3=2 Euclidean invariant approximation for» s = (u xxx ): I (3) = 6[I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3 ] = 6 [ I 0 I 1 I 3 ] [ I 0 I 1 I 2 ] H 3 H 2 ch 122
123 Higher Dimensional Submanifolds T (n) Mj z n th order tangent space Proposition. Two p-dimensional submanifolds N; f N have n th order contact at a common point z 2 N f N if and only if T (n) Nj z = T (n)f Nj z ψ! p + n =) Requires coalescing points to approximate n th order n derivatives ch 123
124 Surfaces p = 2 n ψ p + n n! ch 124
125 Definition. A subspace V ρ T (n) Mj z is called admissible if for every vector v 2 V T (k) Mj z, 1» k» n, there exists a submanifold N ρ M such that v 2 T (k) Nj z ρ V. Definition. Two submanifolds N; N f have r th order subcontact at a common point if and only if for some n, there exists an admissible common r- dimensional subspace S ρ T (n) Nj z T (n)f Nj z ρ T (n) Mj z ch 125
126 Example. Surfaces: order S; e S ρ M Conditions 0 z 2 S e S common point 1 tangent curves: TCj z = T e Cj z >< >: 8 >< >: tangent surfaces: osculating curves: TSj z = T e Sj z T (2) Cj z = T (2) e Cj z TSj z = T e Sj z and T (2) Cj z = T (2) e Cj z T (3) Cj z = T (3) e Cj z. 8. T (2) Sj z = T (2) e Sj z 5 >< TSj z = T e Sj z ; T (3) Cj z = T (3) e Cj z ; T (2) C 0 j z = T (2) e C 0 j z >: TSj z = T e Sj z ; T (4) Cj z = T (4) e Cj z T (5) Cj z = T (5) e Cj z ch 126
Symmetry Preserving Numerical Methods via Moving Frames
Symmetry Preserving Numerical Methods via Moving Frames Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver = Pilwon Kim, Martin Welk Cambridge, June, 2007 Symmetry Preserving Numerical
More informationInvariant Variational Problems & Invariant Curve Flows
Invariant Variational Problems & Invariant Curve Flows Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Oxford, December, 2008 Basic Notation x = (x 1,..., x p ) independent variables
More informationWhat are Moving Frames?
What are Moving Frames? Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver USU, March, 2007 Moving Frames Classical contributions: M. Bartels ( 1800), J. Serret, J. Frénet, G. Darboux,
More informationMoving Frames in Applications
Moving Frames in Applications Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Madrid, September 2009 Moving Frames Classical contributions: M. Bartels ( 1800), J. Serret, J. Frénet,
More informationMoving Frames. Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota olver. IMA, July, i 1
Moving Frames Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver IMA, July, 2006 i 1 Collaborators Mark Fels Gloria Marí Beffa Irina Kogan Juha Pohjanpelto Jeongoo Cheh i 2 Moving Frames
More informationÉlie Cartan s Theory of Moving Frames
Élie Cartan s Theory of Moving Frames Orn Arnaldsson Department of Mathematics University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Special Topics Seminar, Spring 2014 The Story of Symmetry Felix Klein and Sophus Lie
More informationAn Introduction to Moving Frames
An Introduction to Moving Frames Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Email: olver@ima.umn.edu Url: www.math.umn.edu/ olver October 31, 2003 Abstract
More informationInvariant Histograms and Signatures for Object Recognition and Symmetry Detection
Invariant Histograms and Signatures for Object Recognition and Symmetry Detection Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver North Carolina, October, 2011 References Boutin,
More informationInvariant Calculus with Vessiot
Invariant Calculus with Vessiot Irina Kogan (Yale University) August 13, 2002 Invariant Euler-Lagrange Equations and the Invariant Variational Bicomplex, I. Kogan, P.J.Olver. Maple package Vessiot for
More informationDifferential Invariants of Equi Affine Surfaces
Differential Invariants of Equi Affine Surfaces Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 olver@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Abstract. We show that
More informationInductive Approach to Cartan s Moving Frame Method. Irina Kogan Yale University
Inductive Approach to Cartan s Moving Frame Method Irina Kogan Yale University July, 2002 Generalized definition of a moving frame M. Fels and P.J. Olver (1999) A moving frame is an equivariant smooth
More informationB.7 Lie Groups and Differential Equations
96 B.7. LIE GROUPS AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS B.7 Lie Groups and Differential Equations Peter J. Olver in Minneapolis, MN (U.S.A.) mailto:olver@ima.umn.edu The applications of Lie groups to solve differential
More informationThe Invariant Variational Bicomplex
Contemporary Mathematics The Invariant Variational Bicomplex Irina A. Kogan and Peter J. Olver Abstract. We establish a group-invariant version of the variational bicomplex that is based on a general moving
More informationGeometric Foundations of Numerical Algorithms and Symmetry
Geometric Foundations of Numerical Algorithms and Symmetry Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 U.S.A. olver@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Abstract.
More informationDifferential Invariant Algebras
Differential Invariant Algebras Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 olver@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Abstract. The equivariant method of
More informationMoving Frames. Peter J. Olver 1. School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Moving Frames Peter J. Olver 1 School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A. Abstract This paper surveys algorithmic aspects of a general equivariant theory of moving frames.
More informationLectures on Moving Frames
Lectures on Moving Frames Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 olver@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Abstract. The goal of these lectures is to
More informationInfinite Dimensional Symmetry Groups
Infinite Dimensional Symmetry Groups Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Lausanne, July, 2007 Sur la théorie, si importante sans doute, mais pour nous si obscure, des
More informationObject Recognition, Symmetry Detection, Jigsaw Puzzles, and Melanomas
Object Recognition, Symmetry Detection, Jigsaw Puzzles, and Melanomas Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Lubbock, February, 2014 Symmetry = Group Theory! Next to the
More informationMoving Coframes. II. Regularization and Theoretical Foundations
Moving Coframes II. Regularization and Theoretical Foundations Mark Fels School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 fels@math.umn.edu Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University
More informationEquivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry
Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry PETER J. OLVER University of Minnesota CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Preface xi Acknowledgments xv Introduction 1 1. Geometric Foundations 7 Manifolds 7 Functions
More informationConstructive Algebra for Differential Invariants
Constructive Algebra for Differential Invariants Evelyne Hubert Rutgers, November 2008 Constructive Algebra for Differential Invariants Differential invariants arise in equivalence problems and are used
More informationGeometric Affine Symplectic Curve Flows in R 4
Geometric Affine Symplectic Curve Flows in R 4 Francis Valiquette 1 epartment of Mathematics and Statistics alhousie University alifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3 3J5 francisv@mathstat.dal.ca http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/
More informationInductive and Recursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups
Inductive and Recursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups Francis Valiquette (Joint work with Peter) Symmetries of Differential Equations: Frames, Invariants and Applications Department of Mathematics
More informationGroup Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations
Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations JUHA POHJANPELTO Oregon State and Aalto Universities Focused Research Workshop on Exterior Differential Systems and Lie Theory Fields Institute,
More informationSIAM Conference on Applied Algebraic Geometry Daejeon, South Korea, Irina Kogan North Carolina State University. Supported in part by the
SIAM Conference on Applied Algebraic Geometry Daejeon, South Korea, 2015 Irina Kogan North Carolina State University Supported in part by the 1 Based on: 1. J. M. Burdis, I. A. Kogan and H. Hong Object-image
More informationCALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =
CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.
More informationExercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1
Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines
More informationOn the classification of certain curves up to projective tranformations
On the classification of certain curves up to projective tranformations Mehdi Nadjafikhah Abstract The purpose of this paper is to classify the curves in the form y 3 = c 3 x 3 +c 2 x 2 + c 1x + c 0, with
More informationCORRECTIONS TO SECOND PRINTING OF Olver, P.J., Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
CORRECTIONS TO SECOND PRINTING OF Olver, PJ, Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995 On back cover, line 17 18, change prospective geometry projective geometry
More informationGlobal Lie-Tresse theorem
Global Lie-Tresse theorem Boris Kruglikov University of Tromsø, Norway (in part joint with: V.Lychagin, O. Morozov, E. Ferapontov) Group actions and classical Invariants The classical problem in invariant
More informationMoving Frame Derivation of the Fundamental Equi-Affine Differential Invariants for Level Set Functions
Moving Frame Derivation of the Fundamental Equi-Affine Differential Invariants for Level Set Functions Peter. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 olver@umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/
More informationMATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus
MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, 205 Elementary tensor calculus We will study in this section some basic multilinear algebra and operations on tensors. Let
More informationCORRECTIONS TO FIRST PRINTING OF Olver, P.J., Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
CORRECTIONS TO FIRST PRINTING OF Olver, P.J., Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. On back cover, line 17 18, change prospective geometry projective geometry
More informationALGORITHMS FOR DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS OF SYMMETRY GROUPS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
ALGORITHMS FOR DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS OF SYMMETRY GROUPS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS JEONGOO CHEH, PETER J. OLVER, AND JUHA POHJANPELTO Abstract. We develop new computational algorithms, based on the method
More informationContact trivialization of ordinary differential equations 1
Differential Geometry and Its Applications 73 Proc. Conf., Opava (Czech Republic), August 27 31, 2001 Silesian University, Opava, 2001, 73 84 Contact trivialization of ordinary differential equations 1
More informationThe only global contact transformations of order two or more are point transformations
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 135 143 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag The only global contact transformations of order two or more are point transformations Ricardo J. Alonso-Blanco and David Blázquez-Sanz
More informationWARPED PRODUCTS PETER PETERSEN
WARPED PRODUCTS PETER PETERSEN. Definitions We shall define as few concepts as possible. A tangent vector always has the local coordinate expansion v dx i (v) and a function the differential df f dxi We
More informationCourse Summary Math 211
Course Summary Math 211 table of contents I. Functions of several variables. II. R n. III. Derivatives. IV. Taylor s Theorem. V. Differential Geometry. VI. Applications. 1. Best affine approximations.
More informationWarped Products. by Peter Petersen. We shall de ne as few concepts as possible. A tangent vector always has the local coordinate expansion
Warped Products by Peter Petersen De nitions We shall de ne as few concepts as possible. A tangent vector always has the local coordinate expansion a function the di erential v = dx i (v) df = f dxi We
More informationSection 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry
Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry Weimin Sheng and 1. Bianchi identities The first and second Bianchi identities are R ijkl + R iklj + R iljk = 0 R ijkl,m + R ijlm,k + R ijmk,l
More informationCHAPTER 3. Gauss map. In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3.
CHAPTER 3 Gauss map In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3. 3.1. Surfaces in R 3 Let S R 3 be a submanifold of dimension 2. Let {U i, ϕ i } be a DS on S. For any p U i we have a
More informationAdventures in Imaging
Adventures in Imaging Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver MTNS 2016 Symmetry Definition. A symmetry of a set S is a transformation that preserves it: g S = S The set of
More informationClassification of curves in affine geometry
Classification of curves in affine geometry M. Nadjafikhah and A. Mahdipour-Shirayeh Abstract. This paper is devoted to represent a complete classification of space curves under affine transformations
More informationESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction
ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES ANDREAS ČAP AND KARIN MELNICK Abstract. We use the general theory developed in our article [1] in the setting of parabolic
More informationTEST CODE: MMA (Objective type) 2015 SYLLABUS
TEST CODE: MMA (Objective type) 2015 SYLLABUS Analytical Reasoning Algebra Arithmetic, geometric and harmonic progression. Continued fractions. Elementary combinatorics: Permutations and combinations,
More informationOn Affine Geometry of Space Curves
On Affine Geometry of Space Curves Ali Mahdipour Shirayeh Abstract In this expository paper, we explain equivalence problem of space curves under affine transformations to complete the method of Spivak
More informationNATIONAL BOARD FOR HIGHER MATHEMATICS. M. A. and M.Sc. Scholarship Test. September 25, Time Allowed: 150 Minutes Maximum Marks: 30
NATIONAL BOARD FOR HIGHER MATHEMATICS M. A. and M.Sc. Scholarship Test September 25, 2010 Time Allowed: 150 Minutes Maximum Marks: 30 Please read, carefully, the instructions on the following page 1 INSTRUCTIONS
More informationRecursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups
Recursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups Peter J. Olver 1 Francis Valiquette 2 School of Mathematics Department of Mathematics University of Minnesota SUNY at New Paltz Minneapolis, MN New Paltz,
More informationChapter 5. The Second Fundamental Form
Chapter 5. The Second Fundamental Form Directional Derivatives in IR 3. Let f : U IR 3 IR be a smooth function defined on an open subset of IR 3. Fix p U and X T p IR 3. The directional derivative of f
More informationComparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries
Comparison techniques for infinitesimal automorphisms of parabolic geometries University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2012 This talk reports on joint work in progress with Karin Melnick
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The
More informationLECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups
LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS 1. Lie groups A Lie group is a special smooth manifold on which there is a group structure, and moreover, the two structures are compatible. Lie groups are
More informationSymmetry Methods for Differential Equations and Conservation Laws. Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota
Symmetry Methods for Differential Equations and Conservation Laws Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Santiago, November, 2010 Symmetry Groups of Differential Equations
More informationPractice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.
Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Solutions (1) Let Γ be a discrete group acting on a manifold M. (a) Define what it means for Γ to act freely. Solution: Γ acts
More informationThe Symmetry Groupoid and Weighted Signature of a Geometric Object
The Symmetry Groupoid and Weighted Signature of a Geometric Object Peter J. Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 olver@umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Abstract.
More informationThe Canonical Contact Form
The Canonical Contact Form Peter J Olver School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA olver@mathumnedu http://wwwmathumnedu/ olver Abstract The structure group and the involutive
More informationSophus Lie s Approach to Differential Equations
Sophus Lie s Approach to Differential Equations IAP lecture 2006 (S. Helgason) 1 Groups Let X be a set. A one-to-one mapping ϕ of X onto X is called a bijection. Let B(X) denote the set of all bijections
More informationAPPENDIX A. Background Mathematics. A.1 Linear Algebra. Vector algebra. Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components x 1 x 2.
APPENDIX A Background Mathematics A. Linear Algebra A.. Vector algebra Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components 0 x x 2 B C @. A x n Definition 6 (scalar product). The scalar product
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry
Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry 18.782 Andrew V. Sutherland September 5, 2013 What is arithmetic geometry? Arithmetic geometry applies the techniques of algebraic geometry to problems in number theory
More informationContact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples
Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples Vladimir Rubtsov, ITEP,Moscow and LAREMA, Université d Angers Workshop "Geometry and Fluids" Clay Mathematical Institute,
More informationDifferential Invariants of Conformal and Projective Surfaces
Differential Invariants of Conformal and Projective Surfaces Evelyne Hubert INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France www.inria.fr/cafe/evelyne.hubert Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota Minneapolis, USA www.math.umn.edu/~olver
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 25 Aug 2009
Lie group analysis of Poisson s equation and optimal system of subalgebras for Lie algebra of 3 dimensional rigid motions arxiv:0908.3619v1 [math.ap] 25 Aug 2009 Abstract M. Nadjafikhah a, a School of
More informationMathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems
Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems Homework. Problem. Consider four points in R 3 : P (,, ), Q(,, 2), R(,, ), S( + a,, 2a), where a is a real number. () Compute the coordinates
More informationREGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES
REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES MAKIKO SUMI TANAKA 1. Introduction This article is based on the collaboration with Tadashi Nagano. In the first part of this article we briefly review basic
More informationTakao Akahori. z i In this paper, if f is a homogeneous polynomial, the correspondence between the Kodaira-Spencer class and C[z 1,...
J. Korean Math. Soc. 40 (2003), No. 4, pp. 667 680 HOMOGENEOUS POLYNOMIAL HYPERSURFACE ISOLATED SINGULARITIES Takao Akahori Abstract. The mirror conjecture means originally the deep relation between complex
More informationMoving Frames for Lie Pseudo Groups
Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo Groups Peter J. Olver University of Minnesota http://www.math.umn.edu/ olver Benasque, September, 2009 Sur la théorie, si importante sans doute, mais pour nous si obscure,
More informationPoisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions
The Bi hamiltonian Approach to Integrable Systems Paolo Casati Szeged 27 November 2014 1 Poisson Manifolds 2 Bihamiltonian Manifolds 3 Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems 4 Bihamiltonian structure
More informationMATH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Contents
MATH 3968 - DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Curves in R N 2 2. General Analysis 2 3. Surfaces in R 3 3 3.1. The Gauss Bonnet Theorem 8 4. Abstract Manifolds 9 1 MATH 3968 - DIFFERENTIAL
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationFaculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics
Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics JS & SS Mathematics SS Theoretical Physics SS TSM Mathematics Module MA3429: Differential Geometry I Trinity Term 2018???, May??? SPORTS
More information2. Intersection Multiplicities
2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.
More informationA Lie-Group Approach for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Described by Implicit Ordinary Differential Equations
A Lie-Group Approach for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Described by Implicit Ordinary Differential Equations Kurt Schlacher, Andreas Kugi and Kurt Zehetleitner kurt.schlacher@jku.at kurt.zehetleitner@jku.at,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN
UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN TRINITY COLLEGE JS & SS Mathematics SS Theoretical Physics SS TSM Mathematics Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science school of mathematics Trinity Term 2015 Module MA3429
More informationHolonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15
Holonomy groups Thomas Leistner School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, 2010 1/15 The notion of holonomy groups is based on Parallel translation Let γ : [0, 1] R 2 be
More informationLECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES
LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.
More informationConification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr
Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergravity c-map Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic and Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia Villasimius, September
More informationMath Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems:
Math 132 - Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring 2017. Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems: 1. Let H = {a + bi + cj + dk (a, b, c, d) R 4 }, where i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = 1, ij = k,
More informationν(u, v) = N(u, v) G(r(u, v)) E r(u,v) 3.
5. The Gauss Curvature Beyond doubt, the notion of Gauss curvature is of paramount importance in differential geometry. Recall two lessons we have learned so far about this notion: first, the presence
More informationMoving Frames and Noether s Finite Difference Conservation Laws I.
Moving Frames and Noether s Finite Difference Conservation Laws I. E. L. Mansfield *, A. Rojo-Echeburúa *, L. Peng ** and P. E. Hydon * arxiv:804.0037v3 [math.na] 6 Aug 208 * SMSAS, University of Kent,
More informationTHE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx
THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM BEN MCMILLAN Abstract. For any kind of geometry on smooth manifolds (Riemannian, Complex, foliation,...) it is of fundamental importance to be able to determine when two
More informationK-stability and Kähler metrics, I
K-stability and Kähler metrics, I Gang Tian Beijing University and Princeton University Let M be a Kähler manifold. This means that M be a complex manifold together with a Kähler metric ω. In local coordinates
More informationEva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid
b-symplectic manifolds: going to infinity and coming back Eva Miranda UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid Eva Miranda (UPC) b-symplectic manifolds Semptember,
More informationRuijsenaars type deformation of hyperbolic BC n Sutherland m
Ruijsenaars type deformation of hyperbolic BC n Sutherland model March 2015 History 1. Olshanetsky and Perelomov discovered the hyperbolic BC n Sutherland model by a reduction/projection procedure, but
More informationOn local normal forms of completely integrable systems
On local normal forms of completely integrable systems ENCUENTRO DE Răzvan M. Tudoran West University of Timişoara, România Supported by CNCS-UEFISCDI project PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-0103 GEOMETRÍA DIFERENCIAL,
More information4 Riemannian geometry
Classnotes for Introduction to Differential Geometry. Matthias Kawski. April 18, 2003 83 4 Riemannian geometry 4.1 Introduction A natural first step towards a general concept of curvature is to develop
More informationImplicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces
Chapter 11 Implicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces 11.1 Implicit Function Theorem Motivation. In many problems, objects or quantities of interest can only be described indirectly or implicitly. It is then
More informationHomogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky
Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013 16th October 1843 ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OF FOUR DIMENSIONS 1 SHIING-SHEN CHERN Introduction.
More informationAlgebra Review. Instructor: Laszlo Babai Notes by Vincent Lucarelli and the instructor. June 15, 2001
Algebra Review Instructor: Laszlo Babai Notes by Vincent Lucarelli and the instructor June 15, 2001 1 Groups Definition 1.1 A semigroup (G, ) is a set G with a binary operation such that: Axiom 1 ( a,
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.dg] 19 Jun 2017
THE GEOMETRY OF THE WIGNER CAUSTIC AND AFFINE EQUIDISTANTS OF PLANAR CURVES arxiv:160505361v3 [mathdg] 19 Jun 017 WOJCIECH DOMITRZ, MICHA L ZWIERZYŃSKI Abstract In this paper we study global properties
More informationThese notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.
These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND REPRESENTATIONS SPRING SEMESTER 2008 RICHARD A. WENTWORTH Contents 1. Lie groups and Lie algebras 2 1.1. Definition
More informationTopology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:
Topology Xiaolong Han Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA E-mail address: Xiaolong.Han@csun.edu Remark. You are entitled to a reward of 1 point toward a homework
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More informationChapter 4. Inverse Function Theorem. 4.1 The Inverse Function Theorem
Chapter 4 Inverse Function Theorem d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dd d d d d This chapter
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More informationM4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1
Problem Sheet. Let X and Y be n-dimensional topological manifolds. Prove that the disjoint union X Y is an n-dimensional topological manifold. Is S S 2 a topological manifold? 2. Recall that that the discrete
More informationPSEUDO GROUPS, MOVING FRAMES, AND DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS
PSEUDO GROUPS, MOVING FRAMES, AND DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS PETER J. OLVER AND JUHA POHJANPELTO Abstract. We survey recent developments in the method of moving frames for infinite-dimensional Lie pseudo-groups.
More informationTEST CODE: MIII (Objective type) 2010 SYLLABUS
TEST CODE: MIII (Objective type) 200 SYLLABUS Algebra Permutations and combinations. Binomial theorem. Theory of equations. Inequalities. Complex numbers and De Moivre s theorem. Elementary set theory.
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13, 3.07.08 5. Riemannian metrics. Examples. Connections 5.1. Length of a curve. Let γ : [a, b] R n be a parametried curve. Its length can be calculated as the limit of
More information