49. PEANUTS. SPANISH ORYLANO T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E
|
|
- Horace Hardy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 49. PEANUTS. SPANISH ORYLANO T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E ^ \ FUEL,OIL. FIXEO ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB..REP. CCSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS. MMM.M.C.).-.. «a«_«-_«.<*«a*a.aa a.ai-d d GiCX) GHEZt <t HOURS PER PER OFFSET DISC 1.34 OCT GRAIN ORILL 1.46 OCT C PEANUT DIG SHK2R 1.66 OCT 1.C PEANUT COMB. 2R I, 6 7 OCT PICKUP TRUCK 10 OCT O.flO C C.30 PICKUP TRUCK 10 OEC PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN MOLDBOARD PLOW 1.32 MAR l.co TAMOEN DISC 1.58 MAR i.oo H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 63 MAR l.co C O BEODER 6R 1.36 MAR ROLLING CULT 6R MAR PEANUT PLANTER 1.68 APR 1.CO PICKUP TRUCK 10 APR C.30 CULTIVATOR 6R 1.40 MAY l.co PICKUP TRUCK 10 JULY j_12-2a_g.2x32 TOTALS 4.9C ^**K ^ V
2 Noixvinand _o_i asaobddv ony sdiauss noisn3ix3 1 - t f. U _. D I d 9 V S V X l l _ i O S - > 3 8 * 3 «d r f V X S A d O T 3 A 3 0 O N V 0 3 X D 3 ~ r t O D 3 d 3 M S N O I r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N d 3 H D N V d B O H b V _ b V I T O l l b V d 3 N 0 A N V N O t M S N b n X S d O N V S I S O D 3 H 1 I D t J d B O 3 Z I N 9 0 D 3 b N 3 1 N 1 I O N Sl 3NV VU3N39 V SV A U.d3bd Sl 031N393bd NOIlVHbOdNI - 6 B * 2 _ > S 3 d D V S N _ D 1 3 a D 3 r 0 b d 1 3 N. nb/»6«b - 1 _B*ZI C 3bD. S1SDD 1V101 *3Dlbd N3A3-).V3b8 sisod asidarotid ivioj _ s -8»cei s 3 to. 3bDV s_*_i 0.*2fr 63*12 3bDV 3MDV 3dD* S S O ' &. I * 3 b D V SISOD 03Xld TV101 < l N 3 b «_ H V H S 1 3 N > O N V T NDUVDIbbl _N3Mdin03 boldvbl bismi _ S3XVI *XS3b3XNI**D3bd30 SXSOD asxid *. ' $ 5 & S 3 b D Y S I S O D 3 1 B V l d _ A 3 A O B V 3 N 0 D N I _ nfl/zi _. S1SDD 31BVlbVA _Dlbd N3A3-XV3bB S 0 0 * 1 2 3bDV m*_ 01*0 na 00*_ OS*_I os*o ne 0O*SC - S 0 * B 9 1 _r*r s 3bD. 91*0 nao 99*1. OB*0t 09*C dnoh oo*e 02*» OS _ bodm 02*1 66*01 09*. wnd-i, 2.0*8 3bDV C V 2 3bDV fr_*2 3b DV 08*22 3_DV 90*1 3bDV _1*E1 3bDV NIDV 00*21 00*01 00*01 3bDV 00*1 00*5 09*2 3bDV 00*2 5**I S_.M 3bD* 00*1 00*81 00*9 TddV 00*2 OS* _ 3bDV 00*1 OB* 92 2E*0 an 00*E9 05*01 92*0 *9T 00*2* ssn xndx SXSOD 3T3VIHVA lyxol ISSAbVH TYlOlHnS BS TnVH XSDD BS AUVH -SOD 91S0D 1S3ABVH xs3abvh3bd *ivxoiens IVXldVD 9NllVb3dO B3HX0 N01XV9IbbI Ab3NlHDYH -bobvi N01XV9Ibbl XN3M_1003 box DVbX Sb I Vd3b N0IXV9Ibbl XN3N_lln03 boidvbi asni 3 ignd b31vm NOIltfDlbbl H/0 N1H0V DS1N *l".dd. 30IDIXS3d 3_nii«3_ NOlSriD 3Q1DIXD3SNI 301DlUb3H 31VHdS0Hd 033S NV38ADS SISOD ISSAbVHSbd SXSOD 3~IBVIbVA *Z VJrJl^L.* 5 T f f * 8 * f SNbnxsb. B 0 0 * S E Q3XD3robd nvxoi SNV3BAOS SldI3D3b SSDbO 3 X V N I X S 3 3 H 1 V A l l M n / S X H n 0 T 3 I A anoa ~~o_x53.*5sd osxdaroad Ab093XVD N0i93b aajmo* sobv«33 s.xai 03XV9IbbI *SN.33A0S ( 9 1 D > l t r 2 l - a * l e / 9 0 / I 0 b 3 X d V 9 M i X V a d f > i n O H X i A 0 3 S D 3 B 0 1 X O N AHNO SBSOdUnd OMINNVld ttod SN0IlD3r0bd os
3 51. SOYBEANS, IRRIGATED TEXAS EOWARCS AQUIFER REGION /-1*sSv OPERATION TEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB..REP. CCSTS NO. DATE O V E R H O U R S H C U R S PER PER OFFSET DISC CHISEL PLOW HARROW SPIKE LAND PLANE CULTIVATOR 4R H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R ROLLING CULT 6R ROD WEEDER PLANTER 6R PICKUP TRUCK CULTIVATOR 6R CULTIVATOR 6R PICKUP TRUCK PICKUP TRUCK OFFSET DISC CHISEL PLOW PICKUP TRUCK TOTALS OEC C OEC OEC OEC JAN l.co FEB l.co C O C FEB I ,65 MAY ,42 MAY l.co MAY 0.10 C C JUNE JULY JULY 0.10 C C SEPT 0.10 C C NOV l.co NOV NOV *125-2*122-2*±5-2* ^
4 bz. PROJECTIONS FOP PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81. SUNFLOWERS, IRRIGATEO TEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION e-1241(cl6) CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS SUNFLOWERS TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS PROJECTEC YIELD UNIT LB. essjf T fi YOUR S / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E *2*22 $ O C $ 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST CCSTS SUNFLOWER SEED NITROGEN (DRY) HERB. SUNFL. INSECT. SUNFL. CUSTOM FERTILIZE PESTICIDE -APPLI MISC AOMIN 0/H WATER FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR RE PA I RS TR A CTOR LABOR - MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL^ PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS HARV HAUL SUNF CUSTOM HAUL SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS INPUT USE 4.00 L LB CO 3.00 APPL C ACIN hcur C HCUR CCL ±*&1 $ f CWT * $, '. s f 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST. TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LANO (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXEO COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS s $ ~22*S2 $ $ $ * $ S. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO IS NOT INTENOEO TO RECOGNIZE OR PREOICT TfcE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY PHFi COLLECTEO S^_I_.C ARri fts.m_.ss-.r^nch ANO DEVELOPEO BY STAFF OPERATION. MEMBERS THESE OF THEPROJECTIONS WERE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FOF PUBLICATION.
5 53 SUNFLOWERS. IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWAROS AQUIFER REGION FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. CCSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN O.IO C PICKUP TRUCK 10 APR C.30 OFFSET DISC 3.34 MAY BEDDER 6R 3.36 MAY PLANTER 6R 3.42 MAY CULTIVATOR 6R 3,40 MAY HERBICIDE SPRAYR 63 MAY l.co -J2_0-2*2&± S -2*25 TOTALS 1 _GC ^ \ /^%
6 54. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/04/81. WINTER WHEAT, IRRIGATED TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS ANO RETURNS PER B-124KC16) CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS WINTER WHEAT GRAZING TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT BU. DAYS fibqjesiecl... YOUR S / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E ±5xQ2 Jl 11 $ S r 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS WHEAT SD TREATED NITROGEN (ANHY) PHOSPHATE MISC ADMIN 0/H WATER FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR R E P A I R S T R A C T O R L A B O R M A C H I N E R Y OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL, PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUS HARV WHEAT I HAUL WHEAT SUBTOTAL, HARVEST INPUT USE LB. LB. LB. ACIN HOUR HOUR DOL. BU. BU ~ I HI f e ^ i S 1 ~ Z Z S S ±A 1 ~~ S $ TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC, INTEREST,TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS $ $ $ S ~ 30 l<_0_ Jl_lll $ $ S % S S INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
7 55. WINTER WHEAT. IRRIGATED TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB. REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 3.30 SEPT PICKUP TRUCK 10 SEPT CHISEL PLOW 3.33 OCT OFFSET DISC 3.34 OCT LAND PLANE 3.50 OCT BEDDER 6R 3.36 NOV 0el TRACTOR 3 NOV DRY FERT SPRDER 3.60 NOV GRAIN DRILL 3,46 NOV PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN TRACTOR 3 FEB PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAR PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAY *122 l S -2x32 TOTALS ^ \
8 56. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT JPDATING AFTER 02/04/81. B-124MC16) WINTER WHEAT, DRYLAND TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS WINTER WHEAT GRAZING TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS WHEAT SD TREATED NITROGEN (ANHY) PHOSPHATE MISC ADMIN 0/H FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR R E P A I R S T R A C T O R LABOR MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUST HARV WHEAT HAUL WHEAT SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VA.IA8LE COSTS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT BU DAYS IN»UT USE LB LB LB HOUR DOL BU. S IS-._.- S/UNIT VALUE a $ $ ±x23 $ $ a S $ $ $ YOUR ESTIMATE 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTSS 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST, TAXES & INSJR TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS $ $ _&_ S S S $ $ S I N F O R M AT I O N P R E S E N T E D I S P R E PA R E D S O L E LY A S A G E N E R A L G U I D E A N D I S N O T I N T E N D E D T O R E C O G N I Z E O R P R E D I C T T H E C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S F R O M A N Y O N E PA R T I C U L A R FA R M O R R A N C H O P E R AT I O N. T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S W E R E C O L L E C T E O A N D D E V E L O P E D B Y S TA F F. E M B E R S O F T H E T E X A S A G R I C U LT U R A L E X T E N S I O N S E R V I C E A N D A P P R O V E D «= 0 R P U B L I C AT I O N.
9 57. WINTER WHEAT. DRYLAND TEXAS EDWARDS AQJIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER /as\ FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. OATE DVER HOURS HOJRS PER PER SHREDDER 3.30 SEPT PICKUP TRUCK 10 SEPT CHISEL PLOW 3.33 OCT OFFSET DISC 3,34 OCT LAND PLANE 3.50 OCT BEDDER 6R 3.36 NOV TRACTOR 3 NOV DRY FERT SPRDER 3.60 NOV ol PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV OolOO GRAIN DRILL 3.46 OEC PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN TRACTOR 3 FEB PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAR PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAY x x122-2x*5 -_u2_2 T O T A L S ^*V ^""X
10 58. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/04/81. B-124KC16) SPRING WHEAT, IRRIGATED TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS SPRING WHEAT TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS WHEAT SD TREATED NITROGEN (ANHY) PHOSPHATE MISC ADMIN 0/H WATER FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR R E P A I R S T R A C T O R LABOR MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUS HARV WHEAT I HAUL WHEAT SUBTOTAL, HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT 8Q I > YOUR S / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E BU _ S..flfl S INPUT USE LB LB LB ACIN HOUR HOUR DOL BU BU _. S $ & _5S S s s s 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTSS $ 9.54 s 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST. TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS _00 S $ s $ s S INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
11 59. SPRING WHEAT. IRRIGATED T E X A S E D W A R D S A Q J I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 3.30 SEPT PICKUP TRUC< 10 SEPT CHISEL PLOW 3,33 OCT OFFSET DISC 3,34 OCT *5 LAND PLANE 3.50 OCT BEDDER 6R 3.36 NOV TRACTOR 3 NOV DRY FERT SPRDER 3.60 NOV PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV GRAIN DRILL 3.46 OEC PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN TRACTOR 3 FEB PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAR PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAY *125-2*122-2*±5 -.2S TOTALS ^ \
12 60. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT JPDATING AFTER 02/04/81. B-124KC16) SP=MMG WHEAT. DRYLAND TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED CDSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS SPRING WHEAT TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS PR3JECTED YIELD UNIT BU. _._. ebq_.e_;ie._-. YOUR S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E *22 $ $ VARIABLE COSTS IN3UT USE PREHARVEST COSTS WHEAT SD TREATED N I T R O G E N ( A N H Y ) P H O S P H A T E MISC ADMIN 0/H 0.30 FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR R E P A I R S T R A C T O R LABOR MACHINERY 4.44 OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUST HARV WHEAT HAUL WHEAT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST LB. LB. LB. HOUR DOL BU. T O T A L V A R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E 3. I N C O M E A 3 0 V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC..INTEREST,TAXES & INSJR. TRACTOR L A N D ( N E T S H A R E - R E N T ) A C R E T O T A L F I X E D C O S T S A C R E 5. T O T A L P R O J E C T E D C O S T S A C R E 6. N E T P R O J E C T E D R E T U R N S A C R E *23 S S * fl $ S $ S S $ *22 S S $ S S S INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FR3M ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AMD DEVELOPED BY STAF* MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
13 6.1. SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND T E X A S E D WA R D S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE 3VER HOURS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 3.30 SEPT PICKUP TRUCK 10 SEPT CHISEL PLOW 3,33 OCT OFFSET DISC 3,34 OCT BEODER 6R 3,36 NOV ,64 TRACTOR 3 NOV DRY FERT SPRDER 3,60 NQV 0« PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV ,30 GRAIN ORILL 3,46 DEC I*? PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN OolO TRACTOR 3 FEB PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAR 3.10 Ool PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAY 0.1 0»_.ia_i -2*122-2**5 _ft- 0 TOTALS * ^*5R\
14 64. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USSD WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/81. e-124hc16) CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS BEETS. PROCESS TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS BEET SEED NITROGEN CCRYl MTROGEN (LIQ) PHOSPHATE HERBICIDE BORON BORON APPLICAT. FUNGICIDE FUNGICIDE APPLI. MISC AOMIN 0/H HATER FUEL. LUBE TRACTOR EOUIPMENT REPAIRS- TRACTOR LABOR MACHINERY OTHER OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CUSTOM HARV&HAUL SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PRCCESSEO BEETS IRRIGATED TEXAS EC-ARCS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANC RETURNS PER PROJECTEO VIELO U. IT TON 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTSs s a 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC.INTEREST.TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LANO <NET SHARE-RENT} TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS INPUT USE _«; YOUR S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E $ ~ _ le.oo LB LB LB. LB ? SO s C ACIN e.oo SO 7.SO S eo 3.98 HCUR HOUR HOUR OCL TCN 4.SO _ S ei ! S a.ao _ s _--- _ s ~ s s 28.eo 48. ei « _ S NET PROJECTED RETURNS S YIELD BASED ON MEIGHTEO AVERAGE OF 12X*i; 42X12; I9X USABLE CULLS AND 27X NCNUSABLE CULLS INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO IS NOT INTENOED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FRCM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS MERE COLLECTED AND OEVELOPEO BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVEO FCR PUBLICATION.
15 65. PRCCESSEO BEETS IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER /tffsb%l. FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. OATE OVER HOURS HCURS PER PER SHREDDER 2.30 SEPT C OFFSET DISC 2.34 SEPT MOLDBOARD PLOW 1.32 SEPT LAND PLANE 1.50 SEPT ED0ER 6R 1,36 OEC PICKUP TRUCK 10 OEC C.30 H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 63 JAN DRY FERT SPRDER 1,60 JAN l.co PLANTER 4R 1.41 JAN BED SHAPER 6R 1.48 JAN PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN C.30 CULTIVATOR 4R 1.39 FEB I CULTIVATOR 4R 1.39 MAR PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAR C.30 CULTIVATOR 4R 1,39 APR C PICKUP TRUCK 10 MAY Q.xl25-2*122-2*±5 -L\x32 TOTALS /^N ^%.
16 66. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/ HC16. CA6BAGE. IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS CABBAGE TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT S50.00 BAGS SBfli-ESTEfl YOUR S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E 4.SO 2_.2fl.tJB_ S S 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS CABBAGE SEED NITROGEN (LIQ) PHOSPHATE HERBICO. CABBAGE NITROGEN (ORY) INSECTICIOE FUNGICIDE PESTICIDE APPLI. I.SC ADMIN 0/H HATER FUEL 6 LUBE TRACTOR RE PA I RS - -TR ACTOR LABOR*-- MACHINERY OTHER OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST C0ST6 HVST.PKG.MKT CBG SUBTOTAL. HARVEST NPUT USE l.so LB LB eo.oo LE _-» -_ _ T LB APPL 6.SO l IU APPL 6.SO SO O.SO «-_- -.-_ ACIN CC HOUR HOUR HCUR OCL Sj-22 S S BAGS 2.20._A_1 « ».. TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS S S B R E A K - E V E N P R I C E. VA R I A B L E C C S T S 3.01/EAGS J^N 3. I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C C S T S S_ 4. FIXEO CCSTS DEPREC..INTEREST.TAXES C INSUR. TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS e s.. S S. 5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS S 17eS.S2 «BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS S 3. 2 S / B A G S 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS A C R E S S CABBAGE ARE PACKEO AND MARKETED IN SO PCUNO BAGS. BUOGET RASED ON A FALL CROP INFORMATION PRESENTEO IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUICE ANO IS NOT INTENOEO TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH CPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS HERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF.EMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FCR PUBLICATION.
17 67. CAEBAGE, IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER s^%. OPERATION FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB.,PEP. COSTS NO. DATE OVER HCURS HCURS PER PER PICKUP TRUCK 10 DEC 0.10 C C.30 PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN C.30 PICKUP TRUCK 10 APR 0.10 C C.30 SHREDDER 2.30 JUNE O.IOO OFFSET DISC 2.34 JUNE MOLDEOARD PLOW 1.32 JUNE 1.00 C LANO PLANE 1.50 JUNE ORY FERT SPRDER 2,60 JUNE BEODER 6R 1.36 JULY C.lSl CULTIVATOR 4R 1,39 JULY 1.CO H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 63 JULY STANHAY PLANTER 2,44 JULY 1.CO OICKUP TRUCK 10 JULY C.30 CULTIVATOR 4R 1,39 SEPT 1.CO CULTIVATOR 4R 1,39 OCT PICKUP TRUCK 10 CCT 0.10 _A_A -0*122-2x±5.2x32 TOTALS >*V
18 68. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/81. e-1241(c16) fp*\ CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS CANTALOUPS TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS CANTALOUP SEFO NITROGEN (LIO) PHOSPHATE HERBICO. CNTLPS. INSCTCD CNTLOUPS FNGICO CANTALOUP PESTICIDE APPLI. BEEHIVE RENT NITROGEN (ORY) MISC ADMIN 0/H WATER F U E L - L U e E T R A C T O R REPA I RS TRACTOR EOUIPMENT LABOR - MACHINERY OTHER OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS HRV.PKG.MKT CNTP SUBTOTAL. HARVEST CANTALOUPES. IRRIGATEO TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER PROJECTEO YIELD UNIT 30C.00 CSTN INPUT USE LB. LB. LB. Efl_E_:L vour S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E 5.50.JLfiSfliSJi S S S.SO APPL APPL e.oo O.SO C.00 LB C ACIN 3.89 HCUR e HCUR HCUR C.0O DCL. CRTN S _ QQ S T O TA L VA R I A B L E C O S T S S J JfPN BREAKEVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS S 3. I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S 4. FIXEO COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST.TAXeS _ INSUR. TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXEO COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS 4.98/CRTN A C R E S S. A C R E A C R E Z '. A C R E I 9. e 5 A C R E X m a S J I A C R E S J A C R E S J * / C R T N A C R E S - l i e. 2 7 S INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPAREO SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANC IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FRO. ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED ANO DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FCP PU-LICATION. jp^n
19 69. OPERATION ITEM NO. CANTALOUPES, IRRIGATED T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N O R E T U R N S P E R A C R E DATE TIMES OVER LABOR HOURS toaoa <pc MACHINE HCURS i cn_o-in a o o c _a aaa qdp t FUEL.OIL, FIXED LUB..REP. CCSTS P E P A C R E P E R A C R E ) Q3 0GBGOCB tm Gf Q4I QQ Vfl tsm) mmm mmmmw ^^% P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 O C T CULTIVATOR 4R 3.39 NOV SHREDDER 3.30 DEC CULTIVATOR 4R 3,39 DEC P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 D E C OFFSET DISC 3.34 JAN MOLDBOARD PLOW 1,32 JAN L A N O P L A N E 5 0 J ^ N CULTIVATOR 4R 3.39 JAN P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A N OFFSET DISC 3,34 FEB 9EDDER 6R 1.36 FEB H E R B I C I D E S P R A Y R 6 3 F E B DRY FERT SPRDER 3.60 FEB CULTIVATOR 4R 3,39 MAR PLANTER 6R 3,42 MAR P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 M A R POLLING CULT 4R 3,37 APR L A N D P L A N E 5 0 M A Y P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 M A Y P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J U L Y 0.10 l.co l.co G * C Col C C OolOO o.io -2x125-2x *± C C , Co 30 4.C8 ->*«$* C.30-2*32 ^ \ TOTALS ^ ^sv
20 70. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81. e-124t(c16) CARROTS. IRRIGATEO TEXAS ECWAROS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO CCSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS CARROTS TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS?. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS CARROT SEEO NITROGEN (LIQ) PHOSPHATE HERBICIDE INSECTICIOE FUNGICIOE PESTICIDE APPLI. NITROGEN (DRY) MISC AOMIN 0/H WATER FUEL C LUBE TRACTOR REPA I RS -TRACTOR LABOR- MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS HRV.PKG.MKT CRRT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS P R O J E C T E D E B P - E C I E - Y O U R Y I E L O U N I T S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E CELO 6.00 _lmflj.fl2 S J NPUT USE 2.00 LB LB eo Le APPL APPL LB ACIN e HOUR 4.50 T HCUR OS OOL S S CELO 4.25!». S J. A C R E S S. BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS * 4. 9 S / C E L S_ 4. FIXEO COSTS DEPREC..INTEREST,TAXES 6 INSUR. TRACTOR EOUIPMENT LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXEO COSTS _., Qt S _ S S 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS BREAK-EVEN PRICE, TOTAL CCSTS S.40/CEL0 S l S e s 6. N E T P R O J E C T E O R E T U R N S A C R E S S CARROTS ARE PACKEO ANO MARKETEO IK 48 CNE PCUNO CELLO BAGS INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIOE ANC IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS ANO RETURNS FRCM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED ANO OEVELOPEO BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
21 71. CARROTS, IRRIGATEO TEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER OPERATION FUEL.OIL, FIXEO ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS NO. OATE OVER HCURS HOURS PER PEP OFFSET DISC MOLDBOARD PLOW LANO PLANE OFFSET DISC BEDOER 6R DRY FERT SPRDER PICKUP TRUCK CULTIVATOR 4R HERBICIDE SPRAYR STANHAY PLANTER PICKUP TRUCK CULTIVATOR 4R HERBICIDE SPRAYR PICKUP TRUCK CULTIVATOR 4R HERBICIDE SPRAYR PICKUP TRUCK PTCKUP TRUCK PICKUP TRUCK TOTALS 3.34 JUNE JUNE JUNE 0.20 O.CSO JULY C JULY JULY l.co JULY 0.10 C C AUG AUG 1.CO AUG AUG C.30 3,39 SEPT SEPT o.oe SEPT ,39 OCT C OCT OCT 0.10 C C NOV C DEC x125.2x122.2x ^-%v ^ *\
22 72. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANN INC PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81. B-1241IC16) CUCUMBERS. IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS CUCUMBERS TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS PROJECTED YIELO UNIT CRTN S B f l J T B v o u R S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E 5.50.ifllflaflfl S < 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST CCSTS CUCUMBER SEEO NITROGEN (LIQ) PHOSPHATE HRBICO. CUCUMBER INSECTICIDE PESTICIOE APPLI. BEEHIVE RENT NITROGEN (ORY) MISC ADMIN 0/H WATER FUEL - LUBE TRACTOR REPA I RS -TR ACTOR LABOR -MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS HRV.PKG.MKT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS INPUT USE 2.50 LB Le eo.oo LB S APPL C LB C ACIN HCUR HCUR OCL _ - 13 S S CRTN 3.30 ;. s S. A C R E S S. BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS $ / C R T N 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS S S _. 4. FIXEO COSTS DEPREC..INTEREST.TAXES C INSUR. TRACTOR EOUIPMENT IRRIGATICN LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) J.fi TOTAL FIXEO COSTS S S 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS A C R E S S _ BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS S / C R T N 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS A C R E S S CUCUMBERS ARE PACKED AND MARKETED IN SO POUND CARTONS. BUOGET BASED ON A FALL CROP INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPAREO SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANC IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS ANO RETURNS FRCM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND OEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION. /^*\
23 73, CUCUMBERS. IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARCS AOUIFER REGION ESTIMATE!}. COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB..REP C O S T S OPERATION NO. OATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV C.30 SHREOOER 3,30 JUNE _.17 OFFSET OISC 3.34 JUNE 2.20* C.5C MOLDBOARD PLOW 1,32 JUNE 1 CO LAND PLANE 1.50 JUNE 0.20 O.OSO H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 63 JUNE PICKUP TRUCK 10 JUNE ORY FERT SPRDER 3.60 JUl/Y C PICKUP TRUCK 10 JULY BEDDER 6R 1.36 AUG 1*C CULTIVATOR 4R 3.39 AUG STANHAY PLANTER 3.44 AUG C.3C3 C PICKUP TRUCK 10 AUG CULTIVATOR 4R 3,39 SEPT a _co C PICKUP TRUCK 10 SEPT o.io. 0f 125-2*122-2*±5-2*32 TOTALS ^ V
24 74. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/61. B-124KC16) #*^ CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS CUCUMB. PICKLES TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS CUCUMBERS (PICKLES) IRRIGATED TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER PROJECTED YIELD UNIT CUT. EBQJ I_La vow S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E S ». VARIABLE COSTS INPUT USE PREHARVEST COSTS CUCUMBER-PCKL SO 2.25 LB NITROGEN (LIQ) LB PHOSPHATE eo.oo LB HRBICD. CUCUMBER INSECTICIOE 4.00 AFPL PESTICIOE APPLI BEEHIVE RENT e.oo NITROGEN (ORY) LB MISC AOMIN 0/H C WATER ACIN FUEL 6 LUBE TRACTOR C REPAIRS -» TRACTOR C4 LABOR - MACHINERY 2.87 HCUR HCUR OTHER 6.00 HOUR OPERATING CAPITAL OCL $ _-_* SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST S S HARVEST COSTS HARVEST. PICKLES CWT _S- SUBTOTAL. HARVEST S «TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS s S9S.e4 «BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. PIXEO COSTS DEPREC INTEREST.TAXES INSUR. TRACTOR EOUIPMENT IRRIGATICN LANO (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FtxeO COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS S S. 6 7 / C W T. A C R E S S e5 s" s ,82/CWT s 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS S_ PRODUCTION VALUE AND HARVESTING EXPENSE CASED ON A WEIGHTEO AVERAGE OF 8JC-1 *S 13%«2*S. 34X#3»S. NAD 4SX»4*S. BUOGET BASEO ON FALL CROP. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PRE01CT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationJ J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS
L I S T I N G O F. - \ A M E S E T A N D P R I C - V E C T O R REGION number: DATE: 131480 151 PASTURE MAINT. 152 SM. GR. PASTURE 153 PASTURE. TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More information'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY
63 CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More information72. <~*x TOTALS lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i
lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i 72. C U C U M B E R S ( P I C K L E S ) I R R I G A T E D T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I G N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationUNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*
36 WATERMELONS. NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION EST IMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE CF COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WATERMELONS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS
More information» FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
P E A N U T S. S PA N I S H. D R Y L A N D, L O W E R S O U T H C E N T R A L T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION» FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More information/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT
42 ORANGES. PURCASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER IG LEVEL MANAGEMENT / ^^v- OPERAMON IT-. NO. DATE FUEL.OIL. FIXED TIMES LABOR MACINE LUB..REP. COSTS
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More information. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO
_- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationTRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report
TRADITIONAL VEGETABLES 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-9 December 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More information2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst
2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More informationEMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.
More informationGAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7
FYE 09/30/92 JULY 92 0.00 254,550.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254,550.00 AUG 10,616,710.31 5,299.95 845,656.83 84,565.68 61,084.86 23,480.82 339,734.73 135,893.89 67,946.95
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationrw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V
r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More information10:42 AM Sample Winery with Vineyard. 01/02/16 Profit & Loss Accrual Basis January through December 2016
10:42 AM Sample Winery with Vineyard Ordinary Income/Expense Income 410000 TRADE SALES 0.00 420000 RETAIL SALES 0.00 450000 EVENT 0.00 480100 BULK WINE SALES 0.00 490000 Bad Debt Expense 0.00 Total Income
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationCARROTS. IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT
84 CARROTS. IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT j * * * * * - OPERATION ITEI NO, DATE FUEL.OIL. FIXEO TI 4ES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS
More informationCHAPTER 1 EXPRESSIONS, EQUATIONS, FUNCTIONS (ORDER OF OPERATIONS AND PROPERTIES OF NUMBERS)
Aug 29 CHAPTER 1 EXPRESSIONS, EQUATIONS, FUNCTIONS (ORDER OF OPERATIONS AND PROPERTIES OF NUMBERS) Sept 5 No School Labor Day Holiday CHAPTER 1 EXPRESSIONS, EQUATIONS, FUNCTIONS (RELATIONS AND FUNCTIONS)
More information