arxiv:hep-th/ v2 5 Jul 1994
|
|
- Opal Phillips
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UT-678 April 94 arxiv:hep-th/940566v 5 Jul 994 Generalized Pauli-Villars Regularization and the Covariant Form of Anomalies Kazuo Fujikawa Department of Physics,University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo 3,Japan Abstract In the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization of chiral gauge theory proposed by Frolov and Slavnov, it is important to specify how to sum the contributions from an infinite number of regulator fields. It is shown that an explicit sum of contributions from an infinite number of fields in anomaly-free gauge theory essentially results in a specific choice of regulator in the past formulation of covariant anomalies. We show this correspondence by reformulating the generalized Pauli- Villars regularization as a regularization of composite current operators. We thus naturally understand why the covariant fermion number anomaly in the Weinberg-Salam theory is reproduced in the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization. A salient feature of the covariant regularization,which is not implemented in the lagrangian level in general but works for any chiral theory and gives rise to covariant anomalies, is that it spoils the Bose symmetry in anomalous theory. The covariant regularization however preserves the Bose symmetry as well as gauge invariance in anomaly-free gauge theory.
2 Introduction An interesting regularization of chiral gauge theory in the Lagrangian level has been proposed by Frolov and Slavnov []. This scheme incorporates an infinite number of bosonic and fermionic regulator fields,and as such how to sum the contributions from the infinite number of regulator fields constitutes an essential part of this regularization ; a formal introduction of an infinite number of regulator fields in the Lagrangian does not completely specify the theory. Detailed analysis of this regularization scheme have been also performed by several authors [][3] : For example, the covariant form of anomaly for the fermion number current in the Weinberg-Salam theory [4] is naturally reproduced in the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization[3]. The purpose of the present paper is to analyze the basic mechanism of this regularization scheme from a general view point of regularization and anomalies [5]. We show that the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization, after one sums the contributions from an infinite number of fields, essentially corresponds to a specific choice of regulator in the calculational scheme of covariant anomalies [6] [7]. The covariant form of fermion number anomaly is thus naturally understood. A reformulation of the genaralized Pauli-Villars regularization as a regularization of composite current operators is crucial in this analysis. The calculational scheme of covariant anomalies, which works for any chiral gauge theory,was introduced as a convenient means in the path integral formulation of anomalous identities [6] [8].This regularization is not implemented in the Lagrangian level,but rather it regularizes various currents and amplitudes directly. In terms of Feynman diagrams, this regularization imposes the gauge invariance on all the vertices except for the one corresponding to the Noether current generated by the change of path integral variables.the anomaly produced at the Noether current is thus gauge covariant, but it explicitly spoils the Bose symmetry of the underlying Feynman diagrams. If one applies this regularization to non-anomalous diagrams, however, the Noether current is conserved and the Bose symmetry in Feynman diagrams is preserved. In the following, we show the above correspondence ( and also some difference ) between the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization and the calculational scheme of covariant anomalies by explicitly evaluating several anomalous as well as non-anomalous
3 diagrams. Generalized Pauli-Villars Regularization We first recapitulate the essence of the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization and reformulate it as a regularization of composite current operators. The starting theory which we want to regularize is defined by where ( ) + γ5 L = ψi D ψ (.) D = γ µ ( µ iga a µ (x)t a ) γ µ ( µ iga µ (x)) (.) and T a is the hermitian generator of a compact semi-simple group, [T a, T b ] = if abc T c, TrT a T b = δab. (.3) In the main part of this paper, we treat the gauge field A µ (x) as a background field,and the dynamical aspects of A µ will be briefly commented on later. In the Euclidean metric we use, the γ - matrices satisfy {γ µ, γ ν } = g µν, g µν = (,,, ) (γ µ ) = γ µ, γ 5 = γ 5 (γ 5 ) =. The Dirac operator D is formally hermitian for the natural inner product of Euclidean theory (Φ, DΨ) d 4 xφ DΨ = ( DΦ, Ψ). (.4) The generalized Pauli-Villars regularization of (,) is defined by 3
4 L = ψi Dψ ψ L Mψ R ψ R M ψ L +φi Dφ φm φ (.5) where ψ R = ( + γ 5)ψ, ψ L = ( γ 5)ψ (.6) and the infinite dimensional mass matrices in (.5) are defined by M = Λ M M = Λ MM = Λ M = Λ = (M ) (.7) 4
5 where Λ is a parameter with dimensions of mass. The fields ψ and φ in (.5) then contain an infinite number of components, each of which is a conventional 4-component Dirac field;ψ(x) consists of conventional anticommuting (Grassmann) fields, and φ(x) consists of commuting bosonic Dirac fields. The regularization (.5) corresponds to the so-called vector - like formulation []. The Lagrangian (.5) is invariant under the gauge transformation ψ(x) ψ (x) = U(x)ψ(x) exp[iw a (x)t a ]ψ(x) ψ(x) ψ (x) = ψ(x)u(x) φ(x) φ (x) = U(x)φ(x) φ(x) φ (x) = φ(x)u(x) D D = U(x) DU(x). (.8) The Noether current associated with the gauge coupling in (.5) is defined by the infinitesimal change of matter variables in (.8) with D kept fixed : L = ψ i Dψ ψ LMψ R ψ RM ψ L +φ i Dφ φ M φ = (D µ w) a J µa (x) + L (.9) with Similarly, the U() transformation J µa (x) = ψ(x)t a γ µ ψ(x) + φ(x)t a γ µ φ(x). (.0) ψ(x) φ(x) e iα(x) ψ(x), ψ(x) ψ(x)e iα(x) e iα(x) φ(x), φ(x) φ(x)e iα(x) (.) gives rise to the U() fermion number current The chiral transformation J µ (x) = ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x) + φ(x)γ µ φ(x). (.) 5
6 ψ(x) e iα(x)γ 5 ψ(x), ψ ψ(x)e iα(x)γ 5 φ(x) e iα(x)γ 5 φ(x), φ φ(x)e iα(x)γ 5 (.3) gives the U() chiral current J µ 5 (x) = ψ(x)γ µ γ 5 ψ(x) + φ(x)γ µ γ 5 φ(x). (.4) Considering the variation of action under the transformation (.9) and (.), one can show that the vector currents (.0) and (.) are naively conserved (D µ J µ ) a (x) µ J µa (x) + gf abc A b µ (x)jµc (x) = 0, µ J µ (x) = 0 (.5) whereas the chiral current (.4) satisfies the naive identity µ J µ 5 (x) = iψ L Mψ R iψ R M ψ L + iφm γ 5 φ. (.6) The quantum theory of (.5) may be defined by the path integral as Z = DψDψDφDφexp[ Ld 4 x] dµexp[ Ld 4 x] (.7) and, for example, < ψ(x)t a γ µ ψ(x) >= dµψ(x)t a γ µ ψ(x)exp[ Ld 4 x]. (.8) The path integral over the bosonic variables φ and φ for the Dirac operator in Euclidean theory needs to be defined via a suitable rotation in the functional space. The fact that the regularized currents satisfy anomaly-free relations (.5) shows that the regularization (.5) is ineffective for the evaluation of possible anomalies in these vector currents. 6
7 Definition of Currents in Terms of Propagators We now define the currents in terms of propagators. The basic idea of this approach is explained for the un regularized theory in () as follows : We start with the current associated with the gauge coupling < ψ(x)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > = lim < T ψ(y)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > y x = lim < T (T a ) bc γ µ y x αδ ( + γ 5 ) δβ ψ βc (x)ψ αb (y) > = lim Tr[T a γ µ ( + γ 5 ) δ(x y)] (.9) y x i D where we used the anti-commuting property of ψ and the expression of the propagator < T ψ(x)ψ(y) >= ( + γ 5 ) ( ) δ(x y) (.0) i D x The trace in (.9) runs over the Dirac and Yang-Mills indices. We now notice the expansion i D = i + g A = i + ( g A) i i + ( g A) ( g A) i i i + (.) When one inserts (.) into (.9) and retains only the terms linear in A b ν (x), one obtains lim Tr[T a γ µ ( + γ 5 y x = lim y x ) ( ) i γν T b ga b ν(x) δ(x y)] i d 4 ztr[t a γ µ ( + γ 5 ) ( ) i δ(x z)t b γ ν i δ(x y)]gab ν (z) (.) where the derivative µ acts on all the x- variables standing on the right of it in (.). If one takes the variational derivative of (.) with respect to ga b ν (z), one obtains 7
8 lim γ µ ( + γ 5 ) ( ) y x i δ(x z)γν T b δ(x y)] i d 4 q d 4 k = lim y x (π) 4 (π) 4Tr[T a γ µ ( + γ 5 ) ( ) k+ q T b γ ν k ]e iq(x z) e ik(x y) = d 4 q d 4 k ( ) (π) 4e iq(x z) (π) 4Tr[T a γ µ ( + γ 5 ) k+ q T b γ ν ( + γ 5 ) k ] d 4 q Π ab (π) µν(q) 4e iq(x z) (.3) where we used the representations of δ-function δ(x z) = δ(x y) = d 4 q (π) 4e iq(x z) d 4 k (π) 4e ik(x y). (.4) The last expression in (.3) stands for the vacuum polarization tensor. Namely, one can generate the multiple correlation functions of currents ψt a γ µ ( +γ 5 )ψ in the perturbative sense by taking the variational derivative of (.9) with respect to gauge fields A a µ. This idea also works for the non-gauge currents (.) and (.4). We emphasize that we always take the limit y = x first before the explicit calculation, and thus (.9) differs from the point-splitting definition of currents. We now generalize the above definition of currents for the theory defined by (.5). For this purpose, we rewrite (.5) as with The gauge current (.0) is then defined by L = ψidψ + φid φ (.5) D D + im( + γ 5 ) + im ( γ 5 ) D D + im. (.6) J µa (x) = lim y x {< T ψ(y)t a γ µ ψ(x) > + < T φ(y)t a γ µ φ(x) >} = y x lim{ < T T a γ µ ψ(x)ψ(y) > + < T T a γ µ φ(x)φ(y) >} = y x lim Tr[T a γ µ ( id id )δ(x y)] (.7) 8
9 where trace includes the sum over the infinite number of field components in addition to Dirac and Yang-Mills indices. The anti-commuting property of ψ(x) and the commuting property of φ(x) are used in (.7). We next notice the relations D = D D D = D + M M( + γ 5 ) + MM ( γ 5 ) D D = = [( + γ 5 = We thus rewrite (.7) as ) D + M M + ( γ 5 ) D + MM ] [ D im ( + γ 5 (D ) D (D ) ) im( γ 5 )] D + (M ) ( D im ). (.8) Tr [ it a γ µ ( D ] D )δ(x y) [ = Tr { it a γ µ ( + γ 5 ) n=0 D + (nλ) +( γ 5 ) n= D + (nλ) ] } n=0 D Dδ(x y) + [(n + )Λ] = [ ] Tr it a γ µ n= + Tr [ it a γ µ γ 5 D ( ) n D D δ(x y) + (nλ) D ] δ(x y) = [ Tr T a γ µ f( D /Λ ) ] δ(x y) i D + [ ] Tr T a γ µ γ 5 δ(x y) i D (.9) where we explicitly evaluated the trace over the infinite number of components and used the fact that the trace over an odd number of γ-matrices vanishes. We also defined f(x ) by 9
10 f(x ) = n= ( ) n x x + (nλ) (πx/λ) sinh(πx/λ). (.30) This last expression of (.30) as a sum of infinite number of terms is given in ref.[]. The regulator f(x ), which rapidly approaches 0 at x =, satisfies f(0) = x f (x ) = 0 for x 0 f(+ ) = f (+ ) = f (+ ) = = 0 x f (x ) 0 for x. (.3) The essence of the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.5) is thus summarized in terms of regularized currents as follows: < ψ(x)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV { [ = lim y x Tr T a γ µ f( D /Λ ) ] δ(x y) i D + [ ]} Tr T a γ µ γ 5 δ(x y) i D < ψ(x)γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV { [ = lim y x Tr γ µ f( D /Λ ) ] δ(x y) i D + [ ]} Tr γ µ γ 5 δ(x y) i D < ψ(x)γ µ γ 5 ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV { [ = lim y x Tr γ µ γ 5 f( D /Λ ) ] δ(x y) i D + [ Tr γ µ ]} δ(x y). (.3) i D In the left-hand sides of (.3), the currents are defined in terms of the original fields appearing in (.). The axial-vector and vector U() currents written in terms of the 0
11 original fields in (.) are identical, but the regularized versions (i.e. the last two equations in (.3)) are different. In particular, the vector U() current(i.e., the second equation in (.3)) is not completely regularized. See also refs.[] and [3]. This reflects the different form of naive identities in (.5) and (.6) ; if all the currents are well regularized, the naive form of identities would also coincide. We emphasize that all the one-loop diagrams are generated from the (partially) regularized currents in (.3) ; in other words, (.3) retains all the information of the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.5). The trace of energy-momentum tensor generated by the matter field in (.) is also interesting. This is related to the variation of field variables[8] ψ(x) e α(x) ψ(x), ψ(x) ψ(x)e α(x) (.33) which is the flat space-time limit of the variation of the weighted variables under the Weyl transformation ψ(x) g 4 ψ(x), ψ(x) g 4 ψ(x) (.34) ψ(x) e 3 α(x) ψ(x), ψ(x) ψ(x)e 3 α(x) g µν (x) e α(x) g µν (x), g = detg µν. (.35) The Noether density generated by the (infinitesimal) transformation (.33) in (.) is given by d 4 xψ (x)i D( + γ 5 )ψ (x) = d 4 xα(x)ψ(x) i D ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) + d 4 xψ(x)i D( + γ 5 )ψ(x) (.36). Following the same procedure as in (.3), we find
12 < ψ(x) i D ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV = lim( i y x ){< T ψ(y) D x ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV < T ψ(y) D y ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > PV }. = lim y x ( )Tr [ f( D /Λ )δ(x y) ]. (.37) In summary, eqs (.30),(.3) and (.37) are the basic results of the generalized Pauli- Villars regularization (.5). 3 Covariant Regularization and Covariant Anomalies The calculational scheme of covariant anomalies starts with regularized current operators [9] for the theory in (.) as follows: < ψ(x)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov [ = lim y x Tr = n T a γ µ ( + γ 5 )f( D /Λ ) δ(x y) i D [ φ n (x) T a γ µ ( + γ 5 < ψ(x)γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov [ = lim y x Tr = n )f(λ n/λ ) iλ n γ µ ( + γ 5 )f( D /Λ ) δ(x y) i D [ φ n (x) γ µ ( + γ 5 < ψ(x) i D ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov = lim y x Tr )f(λ n /Λ ) iλ n [ ( )f( D /Λ )δ(x y) ] ] ] φ n (x) ] ] φ n (x) = φ n (x) f(λ n/λ )φ n (x) (3.) n where the complete set {φ n (x)} is defined by Dφ n (x) λ n φ n (x)
13 φ m (x) φ n (x)d 4 x = δ m,n δ αβ δ(x y) n φ n (x) α φ n (y) β (3.) with α and β including Dirac and Yang-Mills indices. The function f(x ) in (3.) is any smooth function which satisfies the condition (.3). For the moment, we assume that there is no zero eigenvalue in (3.). One recognizes a close relation between the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization ( (.3) and (.37) ) and the present covariant calculational scheme. The characteristic feature of (3.) is that it treats the vector and axial-vector components on an equal footing and regularizes them simultaneously. In principle, one could apply different regulator functions, for example, f( D /Λ ) and g( D /Λ ) respectively to vector and axial-vector components in (3.) instead of using f( D /Λ ) for both of them. In this case, (.3) is obtained as a special case of (3.) by taking the limit of either g( D /Λ ) = or f( D /Λ ) =. In this limit, however, not all the currents are completely regularized. The anomaly for the current in (3.) is evaluated as D µ < ψ(x)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov µ < ψ(x)t a γ µ ( + γ 5 = [ φ n (x) T a ( γ 5 n )ψ(x) > cov +gf abc A b µ < ψ(x)t c γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov )f(λ n /Λ ) iλ n ( Dφ n (x)) ( Dφ n (x)) T a ( + γ 5 )f(λ n/λ ) φ n (x) iλ n = [ ( i)φ n (x) T a ( γ 5 ) ( + γ ] 5 ) f(λ n n/λ )φ n (x) = i φ n (x) T a γ 5 f(λ n /Λ )φ n (x) n = i φ n (x) T a γ 5 f( D /Λ )φ n (x) n d 4 k = itr T a γ (π) 4e ikx 5 f( D /Λ )e ikx = ( ig 3π )TrT a ǫ µναβ F µν F αβ for Λ (3.3) where we used the relation (3.). We also normalized the anti-symmetric symbol as ] ǫ 30 = ǫ 34 =. (3.4) 3
14 In the last step of the calculation in (3.3), we replaced the complete set {φ n (x)} by the plane wave basis for the well-defined operator f( D /Λ ). The final result in (3.3) with F µν = ( µ A a ν νa a µ + gfabc A b µ Ac ν )T a holds for any function f(x ) which satisfies (.3). This fact is explained in Appendix for the sake of completeness. Eq.(3.3) shows that only the axial-vector component contributes to the anomaly. Similarly, the U() current in (3.) satisfies the identity µ < ψ(x)γ µ ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov = [ ( Dφ n (x)) ( + γ 5 )f(λ n n/λ ) φ n (x) iλ n +φ n (x) ( γ 5 )f(λ n /Λ ) ] ( Dφ n (x)) iλ n = i φ n (x) γ 5 f(λ n/λ )φ n (x) n = itr d 4 k (π) 4e ikx γ 5 f( D /Λ )e ikx = ( ig 3π )Trǫµναβ F µν F αβ for Λ (3.5) which is the result used in the analysis of baryon number violation [4] and naturally agrees with the result on the basis of the last current in (.3) in the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization [3]. Again, only the axial component contributes to the anomaly. The Weyl anomaly in the last relation in (3.) is evaluated as < ψ(x) i D ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) > cov = Tr d 4 k (π) 4e ikx f( D /Λ )e ikx = ( g 4π )TrF µν F µν for Λ (3.6) which is also known to be independent of the choice of f(x ) in (.3)[8]. The coefficient of TrF µν F µν in (3.6) gives the lowest order fermion contribution to the renormalization group β-function ; β(g r ) = ( )g3 r/(4π ). The anomaly in (3.3) is covariant under gauge transformation, which is the reason why (3.3) is called covariant anomaly [0]. From the diagramatic view point, all the vertices of one-loop diagrams are regularized by the gauge invariant regulator f(λ n /Λ ) except 4
15 for the vertex corresponding to the Noether current itself. Because of this asymmetric treatment of vertices, the anomaly (3.3) does not satisfy the so-called integrability (or Wess-Zumino consistency) condition []. The relation (3.3) however specifies precisely the essence of the anomaly, namely, one cannot impose gauge invariance on all the vertices of anomalous diagrams. It is also known that one can readily convert the covariant anomaly in (3. 3) to the anomaly which satisfies the Wess-Zumino condition [0]. The anomaly in (3.3) vanishes for TrT a {T b, T c } = 0. (3.7) For the anomaly-free gauge theory, which satisfies (3.7), one can impose gauge invariance on all the gauge vertices, and consequently the Bose symmetry is recovered. The regularization (3.) thus provides a natural regularization of all the one-loop diagrams in anomaly-free gauge theory. From the analysis presented above, one can understand the consistency of the partial regularization of the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.3) and (.37) for anomaly-free gauge theory, except for the second expression in (.3) which cannot produce U() anomaly by the naive treatment of the right-hand side. Our analysis, which is based on well-regularized operators in (3.), provides a transparent way to understand the conclusions in refs.[],[] and [3]. We now add several comments on the covariant regularization (3.). First of all, the regularization (3.) should not be confused with the higher derivative regularization, for example, L = ψ(x)i D( D + Λ ) ( + γ 5 Λ )ψ(x). (3.8) In the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization, all the vertices are treated on an equal footing and Bose symmetrically since the regularization is implemented in the Lagrangian level. The evaluation of anomaly for gauge couplings, if it should be performed in the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization, would therefore be quite different from the anomaly calculation in the covariant regularization (3.). The axial-vector component of gauge current, which could produce gauge anomaly, is however not regularized in (.5), as is seen in (.3). The regularized gauge current satisfies the naive identity (.5) and, consequently, the regularization (.5) as it stands is not applicable to the evaluation of possible gauge anomaly. 5
16 If one chooses f(x ) [Λ /(x + Λ )] in (3.), the regularization (3.) resembles the theory defined by (3.8). However, this resemblance is spurious, since the Noether current given by (3.8) contains higher derivative terms in addition to the minimal one and thus the one-loop diagrams are not regularized by (3.8). It is an interesting question whether (3.) for anomaly-free gauge theory can be implemented in the Lagrangian level if one incorporates an infinite number of regulator fields. Secondly, the regularization (3.) can be implemented for more general theory such as [ L = ψiγ µ µ irµ a (x)t a ( + γ 5 ) il a µ (x)t a ( γ ] 5 ) ψ = ψiγ µ ( µ ir µ )( + γ 5 )ψ + ψiγ µ ( µ il µ )( γ 5 )ψ. (3.9) In this case, left-and right-handed components separately satisfy the identities[5, 9] D µ < ψt a γ µ ( ± γ5 i )ψ > cov = ±( 3π )TrT a ǫ µναβ F µν F αβ. (3.0) The covariant regularization is quite flexible and works for arbitrary gauge theory ; for example, one can readily show that Yukawa couplings do not modify anomaly [9]. Finally, we comment on the treatment of zero modes of D in (3.) in some detail ; this problem is also shared by the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.3) in non-perturbative analysis. When the gauge field A µ (x) is topologically non-trivial, the eigenvalue equation (3.) contains well-defined zero eigenvalues []. The definition of current operators thus becomes subtle, but the divergence of currents such as (3.3) and (3.5) does not contain the singular factor /λ n and thus anomalies themselves are welldefined. In the path integral framework, this situation is treated in the following way: One first notices that γ 5 φ n (x) belongs to the eigenvalue λ n in (3.) since {γ 5, D} = 0. We thus define new complete basis sets [6] φ R n (x) ( + γ 5 )φ n (x) if λ n > 0 ( + γ 5 )φ n (x) if λ n = 0 φ L n (x) ( γ 5 )φ n (x) if λ n > 0 6
17 ( γ 5 )φ n (x) if λ n = 0. (3.) Note that φ n (x) with λ n = 0 can be chosen to be the eigenvector of γ 5. We thus expand ψ R (x) = ( + γ 5 )ψ(x) = a n φ R n(x) ψ R (x) = λ n 0 λ n 0 b n φ L n (x) (3.) where a n and b n are Grassmann numbers, and the action (.) and the path integral measure are formally defined by S = Ld 4 x = λ n b n a n λ n>0 dµ = Dψ R Dψ R = λ n 0 db n da n (3.3) The Jacobian factor under the (infinitesimal) chiral U() transformation ψ R(x) = e iα(x)γ 5 ψ R (x) = e iα(x) ψ R (x) ψ R (x) = ψ R(x)e iα(x) (3.4) is given by J = exp i = exp i d 4 xα(x) {φ R n(x) φ R n(x) φ L n(x) φ L n(x)} λ n 0 d 4 xα(x) φ n(x)γ 5 φ n (x) (3.5) allλ n The sum of terms in (3.5) may be defined by N lim φ n (x) γ 5 φ n (x) = lim φ n (x) γ 5 f(λ n N /Λ )φ n (x) (3.6) Λ n= n= by replacing the mode cut-off, which is natural for the definition (3.3), by the cut-off in λ n by using a suitable regulator satisfying (.3). By this way, one directly obtains the anomaly factor (3.5) as a Jacobian without referring to current operators. In the 7
18 generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.7) the measure is shown to be invariant under the chiral U() transformation but the variation of action, which corresponds to the right-hand side of (.6), gives rise to the same anomaly factor as in (3.5) for Λ. By recalling that γ 5 φ n (x) belongs to the eigenvalue λ n in (3.), the integration of (3.5) gives rise to n + n = φ n (x) γ 5 f(λ n /Λ )φ n (x)d 4 x n = g Trǫ µναβ F 3π µν F αβ d 4 x = ν (3.7) where n ± stand for the number of zero modes with γ 5 = ±,and ν is the Pontryagin index (or instanton number) []. Note that the replacement (3.6) is consistent with (3.7). From (3.5) and (3.7), we obtain dµ dµexp [ iαν] (3.8) for the x-independent α in (3.4). In (.7), the variation of the action gives rise to the same phase factor as (3.8) for Λ. Eqs.(3.4) and (3.8) show that < ψ R (x) ψ R (y) >= dµ [ [ ψ R (x) ψ R (y) ]exp ] Ld 4 x (3.9) is non-vanishing only for the Green s functions which contain ν more ψ variables than ψ variables. This gives the chirality selection rule and the fermion number non- conservation. Since the zero modes do not appear in the action (3.3), the path integral (i.e., leftderivative) over Grassmann variables corresponding to zero modes is completely consumed by n + ψ-variables and n ψ-variables appearing in Green s functions. As a result, the Green s function and current operators do not contain the (singular) inverse of zero eigenvalues any more, which could arise from the action. This procedure is thus consistent for anomaly-free gauge theory. As for the vector-like transformation corresponding to the naive identities (.5), the Jacobian is shown to be non-vanishing and give rise to (3.3) and (3.5) ; this evaluation of Jacobian corresponds to super-imposing the covariant regularization on the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization (.5) 8
19 When the gauge group contains anomaly, the Jacobian for the gauge transformation (.8) with gauge field kept fixed gives the covariant anomaly (3.3) for the Noether current. In this case, the variation of the partition function under the change of path integral variables has a definite meaning, but the partition function itself is ill-defined since the anomalous gauge theory cannot be completely regularized by gauge invariant cut-off in terms of λ n : To define the partition function, one needs to use a regulator which explicitly breaks gauge invariance such as the conventional Pauli-Villars regularization [3]. 4 Covariant Regularization of Anomaly-free Theory In view of the partial regularization (.3) of the generalized Pauli- Villars regularization, it is interesting to apply the fully regularized expressions (3.) for the practical calculations in anomaly- free gauge theory. We then enjoy much more freedom in choosing the regulator f(x ), simply because we do not require a Lagrangian-level implementation of f(x ). We illustrate this application by evaluating the vacuum polarization tensor. To be specific, we evaluate the vacuum polarization tensor for QED (in Euclidean metric) L = ψiγ µ ( µ iea µ )ψ mψψ (4.) by choosing a simple regulator Λ f(x ) = ( (4.) x + Λ ) which is convenient for practical calculations and satisfies the condition (.3). The final result can be readily extended to the chiral theory defined by the first current in (3.). We thus start with a regularized current with < ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x) > cov = lim y x Tr{γ µ i D m ( Λ D + Λ ) δ(x y)} (4.3) D = γ µ ( µ iea µ ) (4.4) By expanding (4.3) in powers of ea µ and retaining only the terms linear in ea µ, one obtains < ψ(x)γ µ ψ(x) > cov 9
20 = lim y x Tr {γ µ [ i m ( e A) i m ( Λ ] δ(x y) + Λ ) +γ µ i m ( Λ (ie){( + Λ ) ν A ν ) + A ν ν + 4 [γα, γ ν ] F αν } ( + Λ)δ(x y) +γ µ i m ( + Λ )(ie){( νa ν ) + A ν ν + 4 [γα, γ ν ]F αν } } Λ ( δ(x y) + Λ ) (4.5) where we used D = {γµ, γ ν }D µ D ν + [γµ, γ ν ]D µ D ν = D µ D µ ie 4 [γµ, γ ν ] F µν = µ µ ie [ µ A µ + A µ µ ] e A µ A µ ie 4 [γµ, γ ν ] F µν = µ µ ie [( µ A µ ) + A µ µ ] e A µ A µ ie 4 [γµ, γ ν ]F µν (4.6) with F µν = µ A ν ν A µ. The derivative operator µ in (4.5) and (4.6), except the one in ( µ A µ ) and F µν, acts on all the x-variables standing on the right of it. By taking the variational derivative of (4.5) with respect to ea ν (z), one finds a regularized expression of the vacuum polarization tensor { lim Tr y x γ µ ( ) Λ i m γν δ(x z)( δ(x y) + Λ ) +γ µ i m ( Λ + Λ ) (i) [ ( ν δ(x z)) + δ(x z) ν + ] [γα, γ ν ] ( α δ(x z)) ( + Λ)δ(x y) [ +γ µ i m ( + Λ )(i) ( ν δ(x z)) + δ(x z) ν + ] [γα, γ ν Λ } ] ( α δ(x z)) ( δ(x y) + Λ ) (4.7) 0
21 We now use (.4) in (4.7), and we obtain the momentum representation of the vacuum polarization tensor (see also (.3)) Π µν (q) = d 4 { k (π) 4Tr γ µ ( ) k+ q m γν k m ( Λ k + Λ ) [q ν + k ν + ] [γα, γ ν ] q α +γ µ k+ q m ( Λ (k + q) + Λ ) ( k + Λ ) [ +γ µ k+ q m ( (k + q) + Λ ) Λ ( k + Λ ) } q ν + k ν + [γα, γ ν ]q α ]. (4.8) The first term in (4.8) stands for the naive momentum cut-off by a form factor, which generally spoils gauge invariance. The remaining two terms in (4.8) recover gauge invariance spoiled by the first term. After the standard trace calculation and using the Feynman parameters, the first term in (4.8) gives ( Λ4 4π ) 0 { α dα dβ 0 g µν β α( α)q + ( β)m + βλ + [ m g µν α( α)g µν q + α( α)q µ q ν] } β [ α( α)q + ( β)m + βλ ] ( [ 4π ) dαα( α)(q µ q ν g µν q Λ ] )ln 0 α( α)q + m +( [ 4π ) (Λ m )g µν + 6 gµν q 3 qµ q ν 5 ] 8 (qµ q ν g µν q ) (4.9) for Λ large. Similarly, the second and third terms in (4.8) together give ( Λ4 4π ) 0 { α dα dβ g µν β 0 [ α(α )q µ q ν + α(g µν q q µ q ν ) ] α( α)q + βm + ( β)λ
22 } β [ α( α)q + βm + ( β)λ ] ( [ 4π ) (Λ m )g µν gµν q + 36 qµ q ν + ] 4 (qµ q ν g µν q ) (4.0) for Λ large. These two expressions in (4.9) and (4.0) put together finally give rise to the familiar gauge invariant result ( { [ q ν g µν q Λ ] ) dαα( α)ln 4π )(qµ 0 α( α)q + m 3 }. (4.) The result for the chiral gauge theory (.) is obtained from (4.) by setting m = 0 and multiplying it by TrT a T b. The covariant regularization scheme thus gives rise to a gauge invariant result on the basis of well-regularized finite calculations. It is important that we always stay in d=4 dimensional space-time in this calculation. This property is crucial for a reliable treatment of the anomaly. The coefficient of lnλ in (4.), which is related to the renormalization group β-function, is independent of the choice of f(x ) in (4.). For example, one can confirm that Λ f(x ) = (, n (4.) x + Λ )n gives the same numerical coefficient of lnλ by dividing (4.9) and (4.0) by Λ 4 and taking suitable derivatives with respect to Λ. The finite term, -/3, in (4.) depends on the specific regulator ; this is not a drawback since the finite term is uniquely fixed by the renormalization condition in renormalizable theory. The regulator independence of the coefficient of lnλ is also expected from the fact that the Weyl anomaly in (3.6) (and related β-function)is independent of f(x ). The present covariant regularization can be readily applied to the calculations of higher point functions and to practical calculations in chiral gauge theory such as the Weinberg- Salam theory ; the covariant regularization can handle gauge anomalies in a reliable way, and thus one can treat lepton and quark sectors separately without grouping the fermions into a multiplet of SO(0). The Higgs coupling, which mixes left-and righthanded components, is readily handled by the present method as is explained in [9].
23 5 Discussion and Conclusion Motivated by the interesting suggestion of generalized Pauli-Villars regularization, we reexamined the regularization and anomalies in gauge theory. The generalized Pauli-Villars regularization as reformulated as a regularization of component operators in this paper will perhaps make the covariant regularization, which has been known for some time, more acceptable ; the Lagrangian level realization of the covariant regularization for anomalyfree gauge theory however remains as an open question. The covariant regularization spoils the Bose symmetry for anomalous gauge theory, but it preserves the Bose symmetry as well as gauge invariance for anomaly-free gauge theory. Our analysis here is confined to one-loop level calculations, though certain nonperturbative aspects such as instantons are also involved. As for multi-loop diagrams, the higher derivative regularization in the sector of gauge fields [4], for example, can render all the multi-loop diagrams finite. The one-loop diagrams which include only the gauge fields cannot be regularized by the higher derivative regularization but they can be covariantly regularized if one uses the covariant background gauge technique[5]. In fact, we recently illustrated a simple non-diagramatic calculation of one-loop β-function of QCD by using the method of covariant anomaly[6]. The generalized Pauli-Villars regularization is also known to have interesting implications on lattice gauge theory [7], but its analysis is beyond the scope of the present paper. In conclusion, we have shown that the basic mechanism of generalized Pauli-Villars regularization of continuum theory is made transparent if one looks at it from the view point of a regularization of composite current operators ; by this way, one can readily compare the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization with the covariant regularization of chiral gauge theory. The covariant regularization scheme, which is quite flexible, has been also shown to be useful in practical calculations. 3
24 Appendix For the sake of completeness, we here quote the proof of f(x)- independence of (3.3) and (3.5)[6]. The calculation of (3.5), for example, proceeds as d 4 k itr γ (π) 4e ikx 5 f( D /Λ )e ikx d 4 k = itr (π) 4γ 5f( (ik µ + D µ )(ik µ + D µ ) ig 4 [γµ, γ ν ]F µν ) Λ = iλ 4 d 4 k Tr (π) 4γ 5f( k µ k µ + ikµ D µ + Dµ D µ Λ Λ ig 4Λ [γµ, γ ν ] F µν ) (A) where we used D = {γµ, γ ν }D µ D ν + [γµ, γ ν ]D µ D ν = D µ D µ ig 4 [γµ, γ ν ] F µν (A) and re-scaled the variable k µ Λk µ. We next expand the quantity involving f(x) in (A.) around x = k µ k µ = k as f( k µ k µ + ikµ D µ Λ + Dµ D µ Λ = f( k µ k µ ) + f ( k µ k µ ){ ikµ D µ Λ +! f ( k µ k µ ){ ikµ D µ Λ ig 4Λ [γµ, γ ν ] F µν ) + Dµ D µ Λ + Dµ D µ Λ ig 4Λ [γµ, γ ν ] F µν } ig 4Λ [γµ, γ ν ]F µν } +... (A3) When Λ, only the terms of order /Λ 4 or larger in (A.3) survive in (A.). Moreover, the trace Tr(γ 5...) is non-vanishing only for the terms with more than four γ-matrices. The only term that satisfies these two conditions is the third term in (A. 3) with ([γ µ, γ ν ] F µν ). The calculation of (A.) thus becomes itr d 4 k (π) 4γ 5! f ( k µ k µ ){ ig 4 [γµ, γ ν ] F µν } 4
25 = itrγ 5 { ig 4 [γµ, γ ν ] F µν } dxxf (x) 6π 0 = ( ig 3π )Trǫµναβ F µν F αβ after taking the trace over γ-matrices: We here used d 4 k = π k d k, and (A4) 0 dx xf (x) = xf (x) 0 dxf (x) 0 = f(x) 0 = f(0) = (A5) by noting the conditions (.3) including xf (x) 0 for x. The result (A.4) is thus independent of the regulator f(x) ; the convenient choice of f(x) for practical calculations is (4.) or f(x) = exp [ x]. The above analysis is also applicable to (3.3). It is known that a similar analysis holds for (3.6)[8]. Note Added After submitting the present paper, the works by Narayanan and Neuberger [8] on the Kaplan s formulation came to my attention. These authors analyze two-dimensional gauge anomaly, in particular consistent from of anomaly, from a view point of + dimensional theory. This calculational scheme is apparently different from the generalized Pauli-Villars regularization in (.5), which is not applicable to the evaluation of gauge anomaly. References [] S.A.Frolov and A.A.Slavnov, Phys. Lett. B309 (993)344 [] R.Narayanan and H.Neuberger, Phys. Lett.B30(993)6 [3] S.Aoki and Y.Kikukawa, Mod. Phys. Lett. A8(993)357 [4] G. t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37(976)8 ; Phys. Rev. D4(976)7 ; D8(978)99(E) [5] S.Adler, Phys.Rev. 77(969)46 J.S.Bell and R.Jackiw, Nuovo Cim, A60(969)47 5
26 [6] K.Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. D(980)848; (980)499(E); Phys. Rev. Lett. 4(979)95 [7] L.Alvarez-Gaumé and E.Witten, Nucl. Phys. B34(983)69 [8] K.Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(980)733; Phys. Rev. D3(98)6 [9] K.Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. D9(984)85 [0] W.A.Bardeen and B.Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B44(984)4 [] J.Wess and B.Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B(97)95 [] M.Atiyah and I.Singer, Ann. Math. 87(968)484 [3] W.A.Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 84(969)848 H.Shinke and H.Suzuki, Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(993)3835 [4] L.D.Faddeev and A.A.Slavnov, GaugeFields (Benjamin / Cummings, 980) [5] G. t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B6(973)444 [6] K.Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. D48(993)39 [7] D.B.Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B88(99)34 [8] R.Narayanan and H.Neuberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7(993)35 ; Nucl. Phys. B4(994)574 6
Regularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationSimple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator
141 Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 102, No. 1, July 1999 Simple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator Hiroshi Suzuki ) Department of Physics, Ibaraki University, Mito
More informationAnomaly. Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa. College de France, 14 February 2006
Anomaly Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa College de France, 14 February 2006 Abstract Symmetry and quantization U A (1) anomaly and π 0 decay Origin of anomalies Chiral and nonabelian anomaly Anomally
More informationSimple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator
IU-MSTP/31; hep-th/9812019 November 1998 Simple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator Hiroshi Suzuki Department of Physics, Ibaraki University, Mito 310-0056, Japan ABSTRACT
More informationA simplified version of Higher Covariant Derivative regularization.
A simplified version of Higher Covariant Derivative regularization. arxiv:hep-th/9812208v1 22 Dec 1998 T.D.Bakeyev Moscow State University Abstract A simplified version of Higher Covariant Derivative regularization
More informationTheory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)
Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII June 4) At the head of your report, please write your name, student ID number and a list of problems that you worked on in a report like II-1, II-3, IV- ).
More information8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 2010 Lecture 3
Lecture 3 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II Fall 200 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 200 Lecture 3 We begin with some comments concerning
More informationLight-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics
Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics David G. Robertson Department of Physics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Light-cone quantization of (3+1)-dimensional electrodynamics is
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14 Majorana spinors March 15, 2012 So far, we have only considered massless, two-component
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationThe Mandelstam Leibbrandt prescription and the Discretized Light Front Quantization.
The Mandelstam Leibbrandt prescription and the Discretized Light Front Quantization. Roberto Soldati Dipartimento di Fisica A. Righi, Università di Bologna via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, Italy Abstract
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Final exam 0..0 NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Contact: Kåre Olaussen, tel. 735 9365/4543770 Allowed tools: mathematical
More information6.1 Quadratic Casimir Invariants
7 Version of May 6, 5 CHAPTER 6. QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS Mesons, then are described by a wavefunction and baryons by Φ = q a q a, (6.3) Ψ = ǫ abc q a q b q c. (6.4) This resolves the old paradox that ground
More informationSpectral action, scale anomaly. and the Higgs-Dilaton potential
Spectral action, scale anomaly and the Higgs-Dilaton potential Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II Work in collaboration with A.A. Andrianov (St. Petersburg) and M.A. Kurkov (Napoli) JHEP 1005:057,2010
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v3 8 Dec 2001
Understanding CP violation in lattice QCD arxiv:hep-lat/0102008v3 8 Dec 2001 P. Mitra Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Calcutta 700064, India hep-lat/0102008 Abstract It is pointed
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More informationAnomalies and discrete chiral symmetries
Anomalies and discrete chiral symmetries Michael Creutz BNL & U. Mainz Three sources of chiral symmetry breaking in QCD spontaneous breaking ψψ 0 explains lightness of pions implicit breaking of U(1) by
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Jul 1998
α-representation for QCD Richard Hong Tuan arxiv:hep-th/9807021v1 2 Jul 1998 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies 1 Université de Paris XI, Bâtiment 210, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France Abstract
More informationYANG-MILLS THEORY. This theory will be invariant under the following U(1) phase transformations
YANG-MILLS THEORY TOMAS HÄLLGREN Abstract. We give a short introduction to classical Yang-Mills theory. Starting from Abelian symmetries we motivate the transformation laws, the covariant derivative and
More informationThe Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten
Lecture 4 QCD as a Gauge Theory Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local
More informationChiral Anomaly. Kathryn Polejaeva. Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics. Springterm 2006 Bonn University
Chiral Anomaly Kathryn Polejaeva Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics Springterm 2006 Bonn University Outline of the Talk Introduction: What do they mean by anomaly? Main Part: QM formulation of current
More informationarxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 4 Dec 2018
About electrodynamics, standard model and the quantization of the electrical charge Renata Jora a a National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering PO Box MG-6, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania (Dated:
More informationYou may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III Monday 7 June, 004 1.30 to 4.30 PAPER 48 THE STANDARD MODEL Attempt THREE questions. There are four questions in total. The questions carry equal weight. You may not start
More informationLecture 5 The Renormalization Group
Lecture 5 The Renormalization Group Outline The canonical theory: SUSY QCD. Assignment of R-symmetry charges. Group theory factors: bird track diagrams. Review: the renormalization group. Explicit Feynman
More informationQuantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition
Quantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition FRANZ MANDL and GRAHAM SHAW School of Physics & Astromony, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Preface
More informationDefining Chiral Gauge Theories Beyond Perturbation Theory
Defining Chiral Gauge Theories Beyond Perturbation Theory Lattice Regulating Chiral Gauge Theories Dorota M Grabowska UC Berkeley Work done with David B. Kaplan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 21 211602
More informationLecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory
Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela SUPERSYMMETRY Santiago de Compostela, November 22, 2012 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationIntroduction to Instantons. T. Daniel Brennan. Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Field Theory. Effects of Instanton- Matter Interactions.
February 18, 2015 1 2 3 Instantons in Path Integral Formulation of mechanics is based around the propagator: x f e iht / x i In path integral formulation of quantum mechanics we relate the propagator to
More informationGeometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010
March 4, 2010 Many uses of Mathematics in Physics The language of the physical world is mathematics. Quantitative understanding of the world around us requires the precise language of mathematics. Symmetries
More informationContact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED
Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED James Edwards QFT Seminar November 2014 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Worldline formalism
More informationDirac Equation. Chapter 1
Chapter Dirac Equation This course will be devoted principally to an exposition of the dynamics of Abelian and non-abelian gauge theories. These form the basis of the Standard Model, that is, the theory
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II T. Nguyen PHY 391 Independent Study Term Paper Prof. S.G. Rajeev University of Rochester April 2, 218 1 Introduction The purpose of this independent study is to familiarize ourselves
More informationLattice Gauge Theory: A Non-Perturbative Approach to QCD
Lattice Gauge Theory: A Non-Perturbative Approach to QCD Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz May 2011 Non-Perturbative Tools in Quantum Field Theory Limited: 1 Semi-classical
More informationSUSY QCD. Consider a SUSY SU(N) with F flavors of quarks and squarks
SUSY gauge theories SUSY QCD Consider a SUSY SU(N) with F flavors of quarks and squarks Q i = (φ i, Q i, F i ), i = 1,..., F, where φ is the squark and Q is the quark. Q i = (φ i, Q i, F i ), in the antifundamental
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationQED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014
QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014 Joel Goldstein University of Bristol Joel.Goldstein@bristol.ac.uk These lectures are designed to give an introduction to the gauge theories of the standard model
More informationSupersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions
Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions Frank FERRARI Université Libre de Bruxelles and International Solvay Institutes XVth Oporto meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics:
More informationSUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories
SUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories Joshua Berger With the Witten index constraint on SUSY breaking having been introduced in last week s Journal club, we proceed to explicitly determine the constraints on
More informationHIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY
HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY I.L. Buchbinder Tomsk I.L. Buchbinder (Tomsk) HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY Wroclaw, April, 2011 1 / 27 Aims Brief non-expert non-technical review of some old
More informationLecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics
UNIVERSITETET I STAVANGER Institutt for matematikk og naturvitenskap Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics Note 20, 19.4 2017 Additions and comments to Quantum Field Theory and the Standard
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In the h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass
More informationKonishi Anomaly. 32π 2 ǫκλµν F κλ F µν. (5)
Konishi Anomaly Consider the SQED with massless charged fields A and B. Classically, it has an axial symmetry A e +iϕ A, B e +iϕ B and hence a conserved axial current J ax = Ae +2gV A + B e 2gV B, () D
More informationLecture 10. September 28, 2017
Lecture 10 September 28, 2017 The Standard Model s QCD theory Comments on QED calculations Ø The general approach using Feynman diagrams Ø Example of a LO calculation Ø Higher order calculations and running
More informationNumerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories
Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories Christopher Bell 2011 NSF/REU Program Physics Department, University of Notre Dame Advisors: Antonio Delgado, Christopher Kolda 1 Abstract In this paper, preliminary
More informationQCD β Function. ǫ C. multiplet
QCD β Function In these notes, I shall calculate to 1-loop order the δ counterterm for the gluons and hence the β functions of a non-abelian gauge theory such as QCD. For simplicity, I am going to refer
More informationTopological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons
8 November 00 Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/npe Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons A. Imaanpur Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University,
More informationSchwinger-Dyson Equation(s)
Mobolaji Williams mwilliams@physics.harvard.edu x First Version: uly 8, 016 Schwinger-Dyson Equations In these notes we derive the Schwinger-Dyson equation, a functional differential equation whose solution
More informationManifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group
Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for Asymptotic Safety seminar,
More informationGroup Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories
Group Structure of SpontaneouslyBroken Gauge Theories p. 1/25 Group Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories Laura Daniel ldaniel@ucsc.edu Physics Department University of California, Santa Cruz
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 998971 Allowed tools: mathematical tables 1. Spin zero. Consider a real, scalar field
More informationEvaluation of Triangle Diagrams
Evaluation of Triangle Diagrams R. Abe, T. Fujita, N. Kanda, H. Kato, and H. Tsuda Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan E-mail: csru11002@g.nihon-u.ac.jp
More informationThe Affleck Dine Seiberg superpotential
The Affleck Dine Seiberg superpotential SUSY QCD Symmetry SUN) with F flavors where F < N SUN) SUF ) SUF ) U1) U1) R Φ, Q 1 1 F N F Φ, Q 1-1 F N F Recall that the auxiliary D a fields: D a = gφ jn T a
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Feb 1992
CP N 1 MODEL WITH A CHERN-SIMONS TERM arxiv:hep-th/9202026v1 7 Feb 1992 G. Ferretti and S.G. Rajeev Research Institute for Theoretical Physics Siltavuorenpenger 20 C SF-00170 Helsinki, Finland Abstract
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationPHY 396 K. Problem set #11, the last set this semester! Due December 1, 2016.
PHY 396 K. Problem set #11, the last set this semester! Due December 1, 2016. In my notations, the A µ and their components A a µ are the canonically normalized vector fields, while the A µ = ga µ and
More informationA construction of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model on the lattice with exact gauge invariance
A construction of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model on the lattice with exact gauge invariance Y. Kikukawa Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo based on : D. Kadoh and Y.K., JHEP 0805:095 (2008), 0802:063
More informationbe stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)
Chapter 7 A Synopsis of QED We will here sketch the outlines of quantum electrodynamics, the theory of electrons and photons, and indicate how a calculation of an important physical quantity can be carried
More informationFinite Temperature Field Theory
Finite Temperature Field Theory Dietrich Bödeker, Universität Bielefeld 1. Thermodynamics (better: thermo-statics) (a) Imaginary time formalism (b) free energy: scalar particles, resummation i. pedestrian
More informationChapter 13. Local Symmetry
Chapter 13 Local Symmetry So far, we have discussed symmetries of the quantum mechanical states. A state is a global (non-local) object describing an amplitude everywhere in space. In relativistic physics,
More informationCoordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates Amir H. Fatollahi Department of Physics, Alzahra University, P. O. Box 19938, Tehran 91167, Iran fath@alzahra.ac.ir Abstract
More informationQUANTUM FIELD THEORY. A Modern Introduction MICHIO KAKU. Department of Physics City College of the City University of New York
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY A Modern Introduction MICHIO KAKU Department of Physics City College of the City University of New York New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1993 Contents Quantum Fields and Renormalization
More informationSolutions to Problems in Peskin and Schroeder, An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. Chapter 9
Solutions to Problems in Peskin and Schroeder, An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory Homer Reid June 3, 6 Chapter 9 Problem 9.1 Part a. Part 1: Complex scalar propagator The action for the scalars alone
More informationThe 1/N expansion method in quantum field theory
III d International School Symmetry in Integrable Systems and Nuclear Physics Tsakhkadzor, Armenia, 3-13 July 2013 The 1/N expansion method in quantum field theory Hagop Sazdjian IPN, Université Paris-Sud,
More informationFinite-temperature Field Theory
Finite-temperature Field Theory Aleksi Vuorinen CERN Initial Conditions in Heavy Ion Collisions Goa, India, September 2008 Outline Further tools for equilibrium thermodynamics Gauge symmetry Faddeev-Popov
More informationThe Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology
The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology Juan Rojo STFC Rutherford Fellow University of Oxford Theoretical Physics Graduate School course Lecture 2: The QCD Lagrangian, Symmetries and Feynman Rules
More informationPhysics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions
Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions TAs: Hart Goldman and Ramanjit Sohal Fall 2018 1. THE DIRAC EQUATION [20 PTS] Consider a four-component fermion Ψ(x) in 3+1D, L[ Ψ, Ψ] = Ψ(i/ m)ψ, (1.1) where we use
More informationQuantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model MATTHEW D. Harvard University SCHWARTZ!H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS t Contents v Preface page xv Part I Field theory 1 1 Microscopic theory of radiation 3 1.1
More informationLecture 7 SUSY breaking
Lecture 7 SUSY breaking Outline Spontaneous SUSY breaking in the WZ-model. The goldstino. Goldstino couplings. The goldstino theorem. Reading: Terning 5.1, 5.3-5.4. Spontaneous SUSY Breaking Reminder:
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Jul 2004
IUHET-473 arxiv:hep-th/040717v1 0 Jul 004 Gauge Invariance and the Pauli-Villars Regulator in Lorentz- and CPT-Violating Electrodynamics B. Altschul 1 Department of Physics Indiana University Bloomington,
More informationBy following steps analogous to those that led to (20.177), one may show (exercise 20.30) that in Feynman s gauge, = 1, the photon propagator is
20.2 Fermionic path integrals 74 factor, which cancels. But if before integrating over all gauge transformations, we shift so that 4 changes to 4 A 0, then the exponential factor is exp[ i 2 R ( A 0 4
More informationParticle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet
Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet Five out of these 16 questions will be given to you at the beginning of the exam. (1) (a) Which are the different fundamental interactions that exist in Nature?
More informationAdvanced Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 1
Part III Maths Lent Term 2017 David Skinner d.b.skinner@damtp.cam.ac.uk Advanced Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 1 Please email me with any comments about these problems, particularly if you spot an
More informationIntroduction to the physics of highly charged ions. Lecture 12: Self-energy and vertex correction
Introduction to the physics of highly charged ions Lecture 12: Self-energy and vertex correction Zoltán Harman harman@mpi-hd.mpg.de Universität Heidelberg, 03.02.2014 Recapitulation from the previous lecture
More informationLattice Quantum Chromo Dynamics and the Art of Smearing
Lattice Quantum Chromo Dynamics and the Art of Georg Engel March 25, 2009 KarlFranzensUniversität Graz Advisor: Christian B. Lang Co-workers: M. Limmer and D. Mohler 1 / 29 2 / 29 Continuum Theory Regularization:
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationUniversal invariant renormalization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.
Universal invariant renormalization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. arxiv:hep-th/0305128v1 15 May 2003 A.A.Slavnov Steklov Mathematical Institute, 117966, Gubkina, 8, Moscow, Russia and Moscow State
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Jun 1994
FTUAM 94/8 NIKHEF-H 94/14 Shift versus no-shift in local regularizations of Chern-Simons theory UPRF 94/395 arxiv:hep-th/9406034v1 7 Jun 1994 G. Giavarini Libera Università della Bassa Ovest, Villa Baroni
More informationQFT 3 : Problem Set 1
QFT 3 : Problem Set.) Peskin & Schroeder 5. (a.) The basis for the fundamental representation of SU(N) is formed by N N traceless Hermitian matrices. The number of such matrices is = N. For SU(3) this
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 31 Jul 2000
Hopf term induced by fermions Alexander G. Abanov 12-105, Department of Physics, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. arxiv:hep-th/0005150v2 31 Jul 2000 Abstract We derive an effective
More informationA Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence
Department of Physics Universidad de los Andes Bogota, Colombia 2011 Outline of the Talk Outline of the Talk Introduction Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation
More informationLoop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51
Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51 Similarly, the exact Dirac propagator can be written as: Let s consider the theory of a pseudoscalar field and a Dirac field: the only couplings allowed
More informationGinsparg-Wilson Fermions and the Chiral Gross-Neveu Model
Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions and the DESY Zeuthen 14th September 2004 Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions and the QCD predictions Perturbative QCD only applicable at high energy ( 1 GeV) At low energies (100 MeV - 1
More informationPRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in
LONDON BEIJING HONG TSINGHUA Report and Review in Physics Vol2 PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS From Quantum Field Theory to Classical Mechanics Ni Jun Tsinghua University, China NEW JERSEY \Hp SINGAPORE World Scientific
More informationEDMs from the QCD θ term
ACFI EDM School November 2016 EDMs from the QCD θ term Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory 1 Lecture II outline The QCD θ term Toolbox: chiral symmetries and their breaking Estimate of the
More informationA Remark on BRST Singlets
A Remark on BRST Singlets E. Kazes arxiv:hep-th/00050v May 000 Department of Physics 04 Davey Laboratory University Park, PA 680 October, 07 Abstract Negative norm Hilbert space state vectors can be BRST
More informationA short overview on strong interaction and quantum chromodynamics
A short overview on strong interaction and quantum chromodynamics Christoph Klein Universität Siegen Doktorandenseminar 08.10.2008 Christoph Klein (Universität Siegen) QCD and strong interaction Doktorandenseminar
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 17 May 2010
Heavy χ Q tensor mesons in QCD arxiv:00.767v [hep-ph] 7 May 00 T. M. Aliev a, K. Azizi b, M. Savcı a a Physics Department, Middle East Technical University, 0653 Ankara, Turkey b Physics Division, Faculty
More informationMesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density
Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density Research Center for Nuclear Physics Osaka University Workshop on Strangeness and charm in hadrons and dense matter Yukawa Institute for
More informationLecture II. QCD and its basic symmetries. Renormalisation and the running coupling constant
Lecture II QCD and its basic symmetries Renormalisation and the running coupling constant Experimental evidence for QCD based on comparison with perturbative calculations The road to QCD: SU(3) quark model
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationTachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory
Tachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory N.D. Lambert 1 and I. Sachs 2 1 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA nlambert@physics.rutgers.edu 2 School of
More informationParity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)
4 Version of February 4, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION (0, 0) is a scalar. (/, 0) is a left-handed spinor. (0, /) is a right-handed spinor. (/, /) is a vector. Before discussing spinors in detail, let us
More informationGauge Symmetry in QED
Gauge Symmetry in QED The Lagrangian density for the free e.m. field is L em = 1 4 F µνf µν where F µν is the field strength tensor F µν = µ A ν ν A µ = Thus L em = 1 (E B ) 0 E x E y E z E x 0 B z B y
More informationAnomalies, gauge field topology, and the lattice
Anomalies, gauge field topology, and the lattice Michael Creutz BNL & U. Mainz Three sources of chiral symmetry breaking in QCD spontaneous breaking ψψ 0 explains lightness of pions implicit breaking of
More informationJuly 2, SISSA Entrance Examination. PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2018/2019. olve two among the three problems presented.
July, 018 SISSA Entrance Examination PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 018/019 S olve two among the three problems presented. Problem I Consider a theory described by the Lagrangian density
More informationFundamental Physics: Quantum Field Theory
Mobolaji Williams (mwilliams@physics.harvard.edu x) First Version: June 1, 216 Fundamental Physics: Quantum Field Theory What is the topic? Quantum field theory refers to the quantum theory of fields in
More informationSymmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics
Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari Symmetries have been the cornerstone of modern physics in the last century. Symmetries are used to classify solutions to physical
More informationDiscrete symmetry breaking and restoration at finite temperature in 3D Gross-Neveu model
1 Discrete symmetry breaking and restoration at finite temperature in 3D Gross-Neveu model arxiv:hep-th/981199v1 11 Nov 1998 Bang-Rong Zhou Department of Physics, Graduate School at Beijing University
More information