arxiv:hep-lat/ v3 8 Dec 2001

Transcription

1 Understanding CP violation in lattice QCD arxiv:hep-lat/ v3 8 Dec 2001 P. Mitra Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Calcutta , India hep-lat/ Abstract It is pointed out that any CP violation which may be found in lattice QCD with a chiral phase in the fermion mass term cannot be relevant for the continuum theory. CP is classically conserved in the corresponding continuum theory and is non-anomalous. A symmetry in a classical field theory is said to develop an anomaly in the quantized theory if it is not possible to find any regularization to preserve it. It is, of course, not difficult to find regularizations which violate a given symmetry. To prove that a classical symmetry is preserved in the quantum theory, it is sufficient to find one regularization which preserves the symmetry, whereas to prove the existence of an anomaly, it would be necessary to show that all regularizations break it. This principle will be applied here to the question of parity or CP violation in QCD with reference to lattice regularization. The strong interactions per se do not violate parity, but the Lagrangian of QCD may contain a θtr F F term which violates parity and CP. Further, the quark mass term ψme iγ5θ ψ has an unknown chiral phase θ which also appears to violate these. There is no experimental evidence of such violations, and it is difficult to estimate directly the effect of the gluonic θ term, but calculations and proposals are often made with θ. While the θ -term appears to violate CP classically [1], it is known [2] that a classically and perturbatively conserved parity can be defined: parity and CP violation can then occur only if induced by nontrivial topology of gauge fields in functional integration, i.e., if these symmetries develop nonperturbative anomalies [2, 3, 4]. A chiral transformation with an associated anomaly does mitra@tnp.saha.ernet.in 1

2 enter the definition of the conserved parity. The question that arises therefore is whether the CP symmetry is afflicted with an anomaly or is conserved in the quantum theory. An answer in favour of conservation has been given in the continuum [5] with the help of a generalized Pauli-Villars regularization. However, the lattice regularization is clearer in some ways and one may hope to detect nonperturbative anomalies this way. Lattice calculations of CP violation in QCD have also been considered in [3]. In this note we use this regularization. This reconfirms that the classically conserved CP does not develop an anomaly, so that if any CP violation is observed in lattice QCD with a chiral phase θ in the mass term, it must be regarded as an artefact and will not be relevant for continuum QCD. This means that not only quenched lattice calculations but even the dynamical calculations visualized in [3] have nothing to do with continuum QCD. The spinor part of the single flavour continuum QCD euclidean action reads S = d 4 x ψ[γ µ µ me iθ γ 5 ]ψ, (1) where µ stands for the covariant derivative. When θ is non-zero, this breaks the standard parity transformation in which A 0 transforms as a true scalar and A i as a polar vector and the fermion field transforms as ψ(x 0, x i ) ψ(x 0, x i )γ 0 ψ(x 0, x i ) γ 0 ψ(x 0, x i ). (2) As mentioned above, there is a parity transformation [2] that leaves S invariant. This involves the usual transformation for gauge fields but that for fermions is altered to include a chiral rotation proportional to θ : ψ(x 0, x i ) ψ(x 0, x i )e iθ γ 5 γ 0 ψ(x 0, x i ) γ 0 e iθ γ 5 ψ(x 0, x i ). (3) This θ -dependent parity is easily seen to leave the action, with exactly the same chiral phase θ in the mass term, invariant, except for any θ term in the pure gauge piece of the action, which of course changes sign. This is not enough to guarantee that θ does not violate CP in the quantized theory, as the altered parity transformation contains a chiral transformation and there may consequently be an anomaly associated with it. To investigate this matter, we regularize the action and go on the lattice. The standard lattice regularization for fermions with the Wilson prescription is [6] S W = x ψ[γ µd µ + D µ 2 ad µ D µ me iθ γ 5 ]ψ. (4) Here, a is the lattice spacing, D µ the forward covariant difference operator on the lattice and D µ the backward covariant difference operator. The fermion action is understood to be supplemented with the gauge field part of the action 2

3 which involves the standard plaquette piece together with a θ term, for which one may use one of the available forms [7] S g = S plaquette + iθq. (5) plaquettes The fermionic parts of the actions given above are not invariant under the lattice analogue of (3), with the link variables transformed in the usual way, and this is consistent with the fear that CP may be broken on the lattice. One may think that the classical symmetry of the unregularized theory is broken by a regularization and interpret it as an anomaly. Unlike the popular continuum approach to anomalies, this breaking does not arise from a regularization of the measure, but the lattice provides a regularization of the action, and the chiral anomaly is known to manifest itself as an explicit breaking of the symmetry of the action in this approach. However, this is not the whole story. As recognized in [8, 9], the D D term in the lattice action can be assigned a chiral phase in addition to the chiral phase in the mass term: S θ W = x ψ[γ µd µ + D µ 2 ad µ D µe iθ γ 5 me iθ γ 5 ]ψ. (6) This can be easily generalized to more general lattice actions, including the theoretically popular ones satisfying the Ginsparg-Wilson relation [10]: S θ GW = x ψ[e iθ γ 5 2 De iθ γ 5 2 me iθ γ 5 ]ψ, (7) where D stands for the generalized lattice Dirac operator, which does not anticommute with γ 5. Let us see what happens in the special case θ = θ. In this case, the lattice implementation of (3), with the link variables transformed in the usual way, leaves the fermionic action (7) invariant, i.e., parity is not broken by θ in the quantum theory. This is a very special, non-generic regularization, but the existence of just one parity conserving regularization means that the transformation (3) is not anomalous. Of course, the symmetry is explicitly broken by the θ term in S g. What happens in the general case θ θ? As the measure does not have to be worried about for γ 5 transformations on the lattice, 1 common phases may be rotated away [9], with the result that the effective CP violating parameter in the fermionic piece of the action is θ f = θ θ. (8) In addition, the θ term in S g also violates CP, so one may write θ g = θ. (9) 1 This is also true in the Ginsparg-Wilson case: note that only the standard chiral transformation is involved. 3

4 Thus there are two independent CP violating parameters on the lattice, θ f and θ g, because they cannot be transformed into each other through chiral rotations on the lattice. To first order, one may split up any measure of CP violation like the electric dipole moment of the neutron in the form CP(a) = f (a) θ f + g (a) θ g, (10) where the a-dependent quantities on the right hand side may be different for the fermion and gauge sectors. Numerical calculations with a nonzero θ would be difficult to perform, of course. One must now ask what happens to these two parameters in the continuum limit. In the limit a 0, the dependence on θ of the fermionic part of the action goes away, so any CP violation coming from θ must also go away, i.e., It follows that f (0) = 0. (11) CP(0) = g (0) θ g = g (0)θ, (12) showing that θ does not contribute and is thus an unphysical parameter. Any CP violation in the continuum limit can consequently come only from θ. The above arguments do not indicate whether g (0) is zero or not, so the vacuum angle, if nonzero, may lead to some CP violation, but the phase in the fermion mass term has no such effect. This is easy to understand from the earlier result that the parity which is classically conserved in the presence of θ (but not of θ) is not anomalous. The regularization which is needed on the lattice to preserve this symmetry has θ = θ, so that θ f = 0. The violation of the symmetry for any other value of this parameter has to be called a regularization artefact, because one symmetric choice of the regularization parameter θ is available. This is reminiscent of a more familiar situation; the broken rotation invariance on the cubical lattice is not an anomaly, it is merely a regularization artefact and can be avoided by using random lattices or continuum regularizations. In the same way, parity and CP are violated by θ in mathematically generic, but physically artificial regularizations. The violation by θ appears in contrast to be unremovable. To conclude, when experiments indicate zero CP violation in the strong interactions, it means θ = 0, and even nonzero CP violation can probably be accommodated through a nonzero θ term, but the chiral phase θ in the quark mass term cannnot be held responsible for CP violation, as demonstrated elsewhere in generalized Pauli-Villars [5] and here in lattice regularization. Lattice computations with the θ term would be welcome, but are difficult. It is a pleasure to thank H. Banerjee for a discussion. 4

5 References [1] V. Baluni, CP violating effects in QCD, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 2227 [2] H. Banerjee, D. Chatterjee & P. Mitra, Is there a strong CP problem? preprint SINP/TNP/90-5 (1990); Dirac fermion in euclidean metric and the U(1) and strong CP problems, Zeit. für Phys. C62 (1994) 511 [3] S. Aoki, A. Gocksch, A. Manohar & S. Sharpe, Calculating the neutron electric dipole moment on the lattice, Phys. Rev. Letters 65 (1990) 1092 [4] S. Aoki, & T. Hatsuda, Strong CP violation and the neutron electric dipole moment revisited, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 2427 [5] H. Banerjee, D. Chatterjee & P. Mitra, Is there still a strong CP problem? hep-ph/ [6] K. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 2445 [7] P. di Vecchia, K. Fabricius, G. C. Rossi and G. Veneziano, Preliminary evidence for U(1) A breaking in QCD from lattice calculations, Nucl. Phys. B192 (1981) 392 [8] E. Seiler, & I. O. Stamatescu, Lattice fermions and theta vacua, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 2177; D26 (1982) 534E [9] M. Creutz, Aspects of chiral symmetry on the lattice, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 119, hep-lat/ [10] P. Ginsparg & K. Wilson, A remnant of chiral symmetry on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982)

6 Appendix: Discussion of some experts comments Excerpts from comment: It is not clear to me what is the question to which the paper tries to give an answer. I thought that the concepts of anomaly and lattice artifacts were understood a long time ago (if indeed this is the subject is the subject [sic] of the paper). Well, it would be good if the subjects were understood by everyone! Excerpts from comments on a related continuum article: For a clear discussion consider a lattice regularization (as the author did...) where, for finite a, everything is explicitely defined. As the author says, one can introduce gauge field dependent phases in the measure in a QCD like theory. One might consider this as an extra contribution to the action. The action should be local, gauge invariant and Euclidean rotation (Lorentz) invariant. These constraints allow a nonzero theta term and also a nonzero phase in the fermion mass matrix. Due to the anomaly, these phases are connected, and we can put all the phases in theta....there is no CP anomaly here which would prevent us to define a CP symmetric QCD. On that point the author is correct... While these remarks tend to agree with this article, a clarification is needed here. The phases are indeed connected in the continuum, if there is no regularization. But for a clear discussion one has to go on the lattice and stay there. Then these phases are no longer connected because Jacobians are trivial for ordinary chiral rotations [9]. The phases of the mass term and the regulator term are of course connected, but not because of any anomaly. This is relevant for the strong CP problem [5]; but no statement about that issue has been made in the present article or in the version commented upon. 6