arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.gen-ph] 1 Apr 2005 On the problem of Zitterbewegung of the Dirac electron

Transcription

1 arxiv:physis/548v [physis.gen-ph] Apr 25 On the problem of Zitterbewegung of the Dira eletron Daniel Sepunaru Researh Center for Quantum Communiation Engineering, Holon Aademi Institute of Tehnology, 52 Golomb Str., Holon 582, Israel Reeived 6 July 24, revised 23 September 24, aepted 8 Otober 24 Abstrat Reformulation of Dira equation in terms of real quadrati division algebra of quaternions is given. Similar equations with different mass term are identified as suitable for desription of free propagating quark motion. The omplete orthonormal set of the positive-energy plane wave solutions is presented. Therefore, Zitterbewegung phenomenon is absent in this formulation. The probability urrent is proportional to the momentum, as in standard Shrödinger wave mehanis. PACS:. Eq Introdution In this paper I will disuss an old, well-known and apparently insignifiant problem that lies in the foundation of the relativisti quantum mehanis or, more preisely, in the foundation of the quantum eletrodynamis. A story starts with the elebrated paper of P.A.M. Dira[] that desribes relativisti motion of a free propagating eletron, and had tremendous suess of natural explanation of spin, orret non-relativisti limit, orret oupling with the external magneti field, orret gyromagneti ratio and, finally, predition of positron. Presented at Researh Workshop of the Israel Siene Foundation Correlated Eletrons at High Magneti Fields, Ein-Gedi/Holon, Israel, 9-23 Deember 24

2 The mathematial formalism used requires presene of the negative kineti energy states in order to obtain the omplete orthonormal set of the linearly independent fundamental solutions of the suggested equation. Indeed, suh states do not make sense from the physial point of view. Sine the Dira equation is written in the Hamiltonian form, it allows us to work in the Heisenberg representation and determine diretly whether or not a given observable is a onstant of motion. Then we find, for example, that the momentum is a onserved quantity as it should be. However, the orbital momentum, as well as the spin, are not onserved separately and only the sum of them is a onstant of motion. Conventionally, the spin is assoiated with the internal degree of freedom of the eletron and therefore apparently has nothing to do with isotropy of the spae-time ontinuum indeed, if we assign to the quantum mehanial spae-time point internal algebrai struture, then this will be rather naturally expeted result. Even more surprising result [2] is obtained if we onsider veloity x in the Dira formulation. Instantaneous group veloity of the eletron has only values ± in spite of the non-zero rest mass of eletron. In addition, veloity of a free moving eletron is not a onstant of motion. An analyti solution for the oordinate operator of a free propagating eletron was found by E. Shrödinger [3]. It turns out that in addition to the uniform retilinear motion onsistent with the lassial eletrodynamis, the Dira eletron exeutes osillatory motion, whih E. Shrödinger alled Zitterbewegung. Let us reall that entire non-relativisti quantum mehanis was raised in order to explain the absene of radiation during the osillatory motion of the eletron bounded by the eletri potential of the nuleus. Therefore, the Dira theory of eletron ontains a definite predition that the free moving eletron will loose all a kineti energy through eletromagneti radiation [4]. It is rather surprising that the Zitterbewegung Problem attrated only sporadi [5, 6] attention during years of development of the theory of quantum fields and efforts to ahieve the unifiation of all fundamental interations. It was demonstrated [6, 7] that the Zitterbewegung osillations are due solely to interferene between the positive- and negative- energy omponents in the wave paket. The Zitterbewegung is ompletely absent for a wave paket made up exlusively of positive energy plane wave solutions. It is lear from the above analysis that if one ahieves the reformulation of the Dira equation suh that the omplete orthonormal set of linearly independent solutions will ontain only positive energy states then the Zitterbewegung osillations will disappear. Indeed, the harge-onjugated solutions, assoiated with the positron, must be retained. 2

3 It has been known for a long time that the algebrai struture of Dira equation is losely related to the quadrati normal division algebra of quaternions. Here we suggest a quaternioni reformulation of the Dira equations [8], as well as an additional set of similar equations suitable for desription of the free propagating quark motion. The main effort is made to obtain equations with the intrinsi SU 2 U loal gauge invariane. In ontrast with the approah of S.L. Adler and others [9, ], we onsider the possibility that the previously obtained quaternioni extension [] of the Hilbert spae desription of quantum fields represents a onsistent mathematial framework for the eletroweak unifiation sheme a brief summary of relevant results is given in the Appendix. It is obvious that in order to ahieve unifiation of all fundamental interations, the algebrai extension beyond the quaternions is needed. We demonstrate that mathematial struture of the obtained equations of motion suggests that the required extension may proeed through wave funtions whih possess three and seven phases, whereas the salar produt remains omplex. In that ase the examples of nonextendability to otonioni quantum mehanis [9] are not valid. 2 Equations of motion for fundamental fermions Let us onsider the algebrai struture of the Dira equation. The problem is to ahieve fatorization of the energy-momentum relation E 2 = p m 2 4 in suh a way, that the orrespondent Hamiltonian is the generator of Abelian translations in time, whih is expressed by the Shrödinger equation i ψ = Hψ. 2 It was demonstrated by P.A.M. Dira [] that in terms of the twodimensional ommutative quadrati division algebra of omplex numbers no solution an be found. The problem requires intrinsially an extension of the algebrai basis of the theory. The Dira s solution of the problem, i ψ = i α ψ j β m 2 ψ Hψ, j =,2,3 3 3

4 uses the generators of the C 4 Clifford algebra: α i α k + α k α i = 2δ ik α i β + βα i = α 2 i = β 2 =. i,k =,2,3 4 However, suh a drasti growth in algebra is only apparent. The true physial ontent of the obtained result is expressed more distintly if 3 is written in the following form: i i ψ φ + iσ j ψ = m φ +iσ j φ = m ψ we hoose to work in the Weyl representation [2] σi α i = σ i β = Ψ = ψ φ j =,2,3 5 i =,2,3 6 by the reason, whih will be explained below. In a preise analogy with the physial ontent of Maxwell s equations, we again have to deal with two mutually onneted waves, whih propagate together in a spae with onstant veloity. Now, thefullbasis oftheertain algebra C 2 Cliffordalgebra is symmetrially used in 5. However, it is assumed that i in 5 ommutes with σ i, that is the algebra is defined over the field of omplex numbers. Therefore, the algebrai foundation of this formulation is based on an eight-dimensional non-division algebra. In addition, it is ustomary in the appliations to ontinue working with omplex numbers as an abstrat algebra, but for the C 2 Clifford algebra, one makes use of a representation Pauli matries introduing into the theory an asymmetry, whih has neither mathematial nor physial justifiation. Now, I will demonstrate that the algebrai foundation of 5 may be redued to a four-dimensional real quadrati division algebra of quaternions 4

5 and that the struture of Dira equations is intrinsially onneted with the funtional-analytial strutures mentioned above. First of all, let us substitute into 5. Then i i ψ φ e j = iσ j j =,2,3 7 e j ψ = m φ e j φ = m ψ j =,2,3 8 or, equivalently, { e e { e e ej e j = m ej e j = m e e e e } ψ ψi φ φi } φ φi ψ ψi j =,2,3 9 and { e e { e e ej e j = m ej e j = m e e e e } ψ ψi φ φi } φ φi ψ ψi. j =,2,3 5

6 Notie that the states have the form A and all operators have the form A and A2. Besides that, an additional and only one mass term is allowed: { e e { m = { e e = { m ej e j e e + m 2 ej e j e e + m 2 } ψ ψi e e e e } φ φi } φ φi } ψ ψi j =,2,3 { e e { m = { e e e ej e j e + m 2 ej e j } ψ ψi e e } φ φi } φ φi j =,2,3 { m e = + m } 2 e ψ. e e ψi It may be verified that the energy-momentum relation is not spoiled if one defines M m 2 + m Here we are fored to onsider masses as given phenomenologial parameters. If m, the presene of this additional term does not inrease the number of fundamental plane wave solutions of the equations. Therefore, we will onsider the equations with m = as a separate independent set and in order to maintain the diret onnetion with the Dira equations, will neglet the m 2 term in the presene of the non-vanishing m term. 6

7 Indeed, only two equations are independent: ψ i e j φ i e j ψ = m φ φ = m ψ. j =,2,3 3 The form 3 is very onvenient for the investigation of gauge invariane group of the Dira equations. The U gauge invariane group from the right is generated by the transformations ψ = ψz, φ = φz z = a + bi, z =, a, b are real numbers. 4 Sine for every pair of solutionsψ, φ of the linear differential equations, ψa, φa a is a real number is also a solution, it is always enough to show that the partiular transformation ψ = ψi φ = φi i.e. a =, b = 5 leaves the equations invariant. Invariane of the equations 3 with respet to this transformation is obvious. Let us onsider what is a left gauge invariane group of the Dira equations. Remember that 3 are the equations for free propagating waves and thus admit solutions of the form ψ = U exp iet p x iet p x φ = U 2 exp. Therefore, the U transformations 6 ψ = z ψ, φ = z φ z = a + bi, z = 7 i e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 p 7

8 leave the equations 3 invariant and onstitute the left gauge invariane group of the Dira equations. In order to see that, it is suffiient to show again that ψ = i ψ φ = i φ 8 is a solution of the equations 3: i U i U 2 Then ie i e i U ip e 2 i U ip 2 e e 2 i U ip 3 = m i U 2 ie i e i U 2 ip e 2 i U 2 ip 2 e e 2 i U 2 ip 3 = m i U. 9 i U E e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 i U i = m i U 2 i U 2 E e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 i U 2 i = m i U. By definition see 7, 2 e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 = i p. 2 Therefore, i [ U E ] e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 U i = i mu 2 [ i U ] 2E e p +e 2 p 2 +e e 2 p 3 U 2 i = i mu. 22 It is assumed in the Dira equations [3], that [i,e j ] =, j =,2,3 23 and hene the obtained gauge invariane group is U U. Now it beomes lear why the Dira equations allow us to inorporate an additional harge [4] and turn out to be suitable for the realization of the eletroweak 8

9 unifiation sheme [5] without ontradition with the Aharonov-Bohm effet [6]. However, the group-theoretial ontent of this sheme [5], side by side with the funtional-analytial strutures [], suggests that the left gauge invariane group should be larger at least U ;q = SU 2 and should not ontain an Abelian invariant subgroup. The simplest way to satisfy these requirements is to identify the Abelian groups 4 and 7 disussed above, that is to attah to the Dira equations the following form: ψ i ψ e j = m φ φ i φ e j = m ψ j =,2,3 24 and to drop the assumption 23. Then the algebrai foundation of the theory is redued to a four-dimensional real quadrati division algebra of quaternions. The U right gauge invariane of the equations 24 may be maintained if i = e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 p 25 and may be demonstrated exatly in the same way as Consequently, we have obtained the additional meaning for i, whih appears originally in the Shrödinger equation. An algebra itself forms a vetor spae, and the basis of algebra onstitutes a suitable set of orthogonal axes in that spae, for example, a omplex algebra may be onsidered as a twodimensional plane with the orthogonal diretions and i. In that spae i standing in the left-hand side of the Shrödinger equation define the diretion of the time translations, whih form an Abelian group. Therefore, the U right gauge invariane of the equations 24 leads us to the onlusion that these equations define the ondition 25 the diretion of the time translations at the three-dimensional quaternioni surfae the spae of quantum mehanial phases. Then, a possible physial interpretation is that, ompared with a lassial relativisti partile, a quantum partile has not only its proper time but, in addition, a proper diretion of time. Perhaps, this may serve as an explanation of why quantum equations of motion ontain the first time derivative, whereas the lassial equations of motion are expressed in terms of the seond derivative. 9

10 We investigate now how our manipulations have affeted the orresponding solutions. As it is well known, the general solution of Dira equation may be formed as a linear ombination of the four independent solutions, whih are four spinors with four omponents. Two of them are obtained for E > for two spin states U 2 = and U 2 2 =, respetively. The other two we are fored to obtain using E < sine there are no other possibilities. They orrespond to the arbitrary hoie of U 3 = and U 4 =. Let us hek what happens in our quaternioni version of the Dira equation. In order to maintain onnetion with the original Dira solutions, let us form a omplete orthonormal set of it: ψ D = ψ 2 D = ψ 3 D = ψ 4 D = U p exp U pi U2 p exp U 2 pi U p exp U pi U2 p exp U 2 pi i Et p x i Et p x i Et p x i Et p x 26 we have E + p m U + U m U 2 = E p The existene of non-trivial solutions is ensured by U 2 =. 27 and E 2 2 p 2 m 2 2 = U,2 = m 2 E + p U,

11 Let Then Now U 2 = ψ D = m2 N E + p = m2 N E + p ψ 2 D = N = N and U 2 2 = i i i i exp. i Et p x i Et p x exp exp i Et p x i Et p x exp. 29 Let Then U 3,4 2 = U 3 = E + p m 2 U 3,4. 3 and U 4 =. ψ 3 D = N 2 = N 2 i i ψ 4 D = E + p N 2 m 2 exp i Et p x i Et p x exp = E + p N 2 m 2 i i exp i Et p x exp i Et p x 3

12 Our hoie is made in order to ompare with the standard set of the linearly independent solutions for the Dira equation. Indeed, the alternative and ψ 3 D = m2 N E + p D = N ψ 4 i i i Et p x exp i Et p x exp. 32 may serve us equally well and at the same time make things more transparent, sine we have obtained exatly the same solutions as ψ D and ψ2 D, whih would be negative energy solutions in the Dira equation with p = - p if we make the substitution i = i = e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p p Obviously, the obtained set is mutually orthogonal. Finally, using standard normalization ondition, we obtain: ψ D = 2 m 2 E + p ψ 2 D = E + p 2 m 2 ψ 3 D = 2 m 2 E + p ψ 4 D = E + p 2 m 2 i i 2 i i i Et p x exp i Et p x exp exp i Et p x i Et p x exp. 34

13 The obtained solutions maintain symmetry with respet to spae oordinates that may be expeted based on the assumption of homogeneity of the spae-time ontinuum. Indeed, the orretness of the suggested equations may be verified only through areful omparison with the experimental data. Now let us onsider similar equations ψ i ψ e j = m φi φ i φ e j = m ψi j =,2,3 35 and verify that they admit an additional set of plane wave solutions, for example, in the following form: ψ j = U e j exp e j Et p x j =,2,3 36 φ j = U 2 exp e j Et p x. Here U and U 2 are assumed to be real numbers. Then or U e j U 2 ej Ei e jei U e j e jei U 2 ej Ei But aording to 25 e j p e e j p 2 e 2 e j p 3 e e 2 e j p e e j p 2 e 2 e j p 3 e e 2 e j e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 e j e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 = mu 2 i = mu e j i = mu 2 i = mu e j i e p + e 2 p 2 + e e 2 p 3 = i p. 39 3

14 whih gives U E + p i = mu 2 i U 2 e j E p i = mu e j i 4 or E U + p = mu 2 4 E U 2 e j p = mu e j and E U + p = mu 2 E U 2 p e j = mu e j. 42 Thus, we finally obtain E + p U mu 2 = E m U + p U 2 = 43 whih justifies the above-made assumption onerning the reality of U and U 2. The existene of non-trivial solutions is ensured by and E 2 2 p 2 m 2 2 = U = m 2 E + p U 2 44 Thus, we have obtained a triplet of solutions, eah one assoiated with the same mass, but with [ ] [ ψj, ψ k ] [ φj, φ k ] j,k =,2,3 45 ψj, φ k j k 4

15 In addition, in the apaity of e j, j =,2,3, one may hoose not only the quaternion basis itself but other sets, for example, or ie i, ie 2 i, ie 2 e i 46 e ie, e 2 ie 2, e e 2 ie e Notie, however, that 47 do not form a quaternion but e ie +e 2 ie 2 + e e 2 ie e 2 = i. 48 Additional knowledge is required in order to define whih set is relevant and how it may be assoiated with the orrespondent physial objets. So far, our disussion has been restrited to the four-dimensional real quadrati division algebra of quaternions. However, it is lear that the equations 24 and 35 serve in an uniform manner also the otonioni extension of the omplex Hilbert spae. If the underlying algerai foundation of the theory is extended to inlude the eight-dimensional real quadrati division algebra of otonions, then the orresponding additional set of solutions for the equations 35 may be obtained. They may have, e.g., the following form: i is given by 25 i Et p x ψ = U i exp i Et p x φ = U 2 exp ψ k = U e k exp e k Et p x φ k = U 2 exp e k Et p x ψ jk = U j k exp j k Et p x φ jk = U 2 exp j k Et p x k = 4,5,6,7 49 where U, U 2 5

16 are real numbers; U = m 2 E + p U 2 j k = e k i, k = 4,5,6,7 5 and, as before, form a quaternion. This quaternion turns out to form an algebrai foundation of the momentum spae and, therefore, the algebrai symmetry between oordinate and momentum spaes may be broken in this formulation. The partiularly symmetri ase ours, if k = 7. Then i = e p + e 2 p 2 + e 3 p 3 p j = e 4p + e 5 p 2 + e 6 p 3. p 5 Indeed, in eah ase the set of equations 24 and 35 should be supplemented by orresponding leptoni equations, for example, for 5 χ j χ x e 4 χ y e 5 χ z e 6 = m ξ ξ j ξ x e 4 ξ y e 5 ξ z e 6 = m χ. 52 Based on the results of M. Zorn [7] that eah automorphism of the otonion algebra is ompletely defined by the images of three independent basis units [8], it was demonstrated by M. Günaydin and F. Gürsey [9] that under given automorphism σ we have three quaternioni planes in the spae formed by otonion algebra spae of quantum mehanial phases, whih undergo rotations by the angles φ, φ 2, φ 3, respetively, suh that φ + φ 2 + φ 3 = mod 2π 53 remains invariant. The planes e i, e j are determined by the onditions e i e j = e k and e k is the fixed point ommon to all of those planes ompare with 49 and 5. These results might help to extrat the set of independent solutions and to obtain its orret lassifiation. 6

17 It is worth mentioning that an alternative arrangement an be also possible. We may onsider a septet of solutions, eah one assoiated with the same mass, namely ψ = U e k exp e k Et p x φ = U 2 exp e k Et p x and, perhaps, an additional one in the form k =,...,7 54 where ψ = U e j exp e j Et p x φ = U 2 exp e j Et p x j =,...,7 55 or j k = e k ie k j k+3 = e k+3 je k+3 k =,2,3 56 j 7 = e 7 j k = ie k i j k+3 = je k+3 j k =,2,3 57 j 7 = e 7 with the ommon fixed point e 7 : i and j are given by 5. The number of independent solutions, whih are arranged in suh a way, is sharply redued and serves as a slight reminder of a similar possibility disussed in the literature [2]. Now it may be larified why we have hosen to disuss the Dira equations in the Weyl representation. The reason is merely tehnial. In order to perform lean otonioni alulations, we assume that the solutions of the equations 35 have the form 36, where U and U 2 are real numbers. Then the obtained relations 43 justify the assumption. Notie that the eletroweak unifiation sheme [5] is based on the use of this representation of the Dira equations; in addition, in that ase the solutions behave naturally with respet to the Lorentz transformations. Let us demonstrate that the Dira equations in the form 24, as well as the set 35, permit a onsistent probabilisti interpretation here the disussion is restrited to the ase where the underlying algebrai basis are quaternions. 7

18 Consider formally Then ψ i ψ e j = m φ + m 2 φi φ i φ e j = m ψ + m 2 ψi. j =,2,3 58 and ψ φ + ψ e j i = m φi + m 2 φ φ e j i = m ψi m 2 ψ j =,2,3 59 Thus, we have ψ φ + ie j ψ = m i φ + m 2 φ ie j φ = m i ψ m 2 ψ. j =,2,3 6 ψ ψ + ψ e j i ψ = m φi ψ + m 2 φ ψ ψ ψ + ψie j ψ = m ψi φ + m 2 ψ φ φ φ φ e j i φ = m ψi φ m 2 ψ φ j =,2,3 6 φ φ φie j φ = m φi ψ m 2 φ ψ. 8

19 Adding all equations 6, we find { ψ ψ + ψ ψ + φ φ + φ φ } j =,2,3 { ψ ψ + e j i ψ + ψie j φ } φ e j i φ φie j = 62 Notie that the mass terms vanish separately and, hene, the derivation holds separately for 24 and 35 and from now on it is understood that we onsider the solutions of these equations separately. The equation 62 is invariant under the gauge transformation 5 with i given by 25. Then we have + ψ ψ + φ φ { ψ ie j ψ + ψej i ψ φ ie j φ φej i φ Adding equations 62 and 63, we obtain } =. j =,2,3 63 ψ ψ + φ φ + 2 { ψ e j i + ie j ψ + ψe j i + ie j ψ j =,2,3 64 or φ e j i + ie j φ φ e j i + ie j φ } = where ρ + div j = 65 ρ = ψ ψ + φ φ j k = 2 { ψek i + ie k ψ φ e k i + ie k φ }. k =,2,3 66 9

20 If i is given by 25, then e k i + ie k = 2p k, k =,2,3. 67 p Thus, in aordane with the Galileo, Maxwell and Shrödinger theories, the probability urrent j is proportional to the veloity operator, whih is a onstant of motion for free partiles. Zitterbewegung [3] phenomenon is absent in this formulation. 3 Conlusion In aount of the experimental information that beame available during the last entury, it is desirable for the equations of motion for the fundamental fermions to have the following properties: - the equations should possess SU 2 U loal gauge invariane intrinsially sine the eletron is not a soure of pure eletromagneti radiation but also has the ability to partiipate in weak interations; - the eletron is the only partiular member of the entire family of fundamental fermions, it is desirable that all fermions are desribed in the uniform manner; - there exist three repliation of the families of the fundamental fermions; - leptons do not have a olor; - quarks do have a olor; - eah quark appear in triplet assoiated with the same mass; - a olor is assoiated with the internal degree of freedom; - a olor symmetry an t be broken. In ontrast to the existing quaternioni formulations [9, ] of the Dira equation, we suggested here losely related but essentially different sets of equations that allow desription of the free motion for eletron and neutrinos, as well as triplets of quarks. The suggested solution possesses SU 2 U loal gauge invariane intrinsially. All obtained solutions have the struturea anda2. These solutions are substantially different from the standard ones and may yield, therefore, different values for observable physial quantities. We propose to ompare and verify them against the existing experimental information. The suggested reexamination may help to deide what is a relevant mathematial framework suitable to ahieve a solution of the unifiation problem for the fundamental interations. 2

21 During the last deades, an enormous progress in the understanding of quantum theory of fields took plae. It beame almost apparent that we have to deal with four essentially fundamental interations, whih have a similar origin, namely, presene of phases in the quantum mehanial desription of the fundamental soures of these fields [2]. In addition, the investigation of the properties of the fundamental soures leptons, quarks learly established that the quantum numbers in addition to eletri harge week hyperharge and olor appear in amazing orrespondene with the omplex variety of the radiated fields. The formulation of lassial mehanis and the lassial theory of fields have demonstrated that the presene of additional interations requires a suitable generalization of the mathematial language used. Appliation of the analogy with the struture of lassial physis in the framework of funtional analysis naturally onentrated around attempts to extent it on all Hurwitz algebras, as the underlying algebrai foundation of the theory. The above disussion may be onsidered as an additional step towards realization of a program initiated by E. Shrödinger [22] to treat all of the physis as wave mehanis: a The universal mathematial arhiteture of the physis is given in terms of ten funtional - analytial frameworks, suitable to inorporate the results of physial measurements. Real, omplex, quaternion and otonion states with real salar produt should be equivalent to the theory of lassial fields. Unifiation of eletromagnetism with gravitation should our already in the lassial field theory. Complex, quaternion and otonion states with omplex salar produt should allow realization of present unifiation shemes. Notie that pure relativisti quantum eletrodynamis does not exist beause there are no elementary soures of pure eletromagneti radiation. Neutrino is an elementary soure of pure weak radiation. Quaternion and otonion states with quaternion salar produt should desribe wave mehanis of spae-time ontinuum. Otonion states with otonion salar produt should allow ultimate realization of idea of elementary partiles piture of natural phenomena. b One expets that the quantum mehanial spae-time ontinuum should be different from its lassial ounterpart. Perhaps, the spin is not a dynamial variable, but the feature of the quantum mehanial world, namely, the world point is desribed by the following expression before inlusion of quantum gravity: 2

22 X = t e x + e 2 y + e 3 z e x e 2 y e 3 z t It is interesting to onstrut the orrespondent metri spae and the appliation of Least Ation should lead to the equations of motion for the fundamental fermions. In the present disussion we onsider masses as external phenomenologial parameters. However, the struture of otonion quantum mehanis with omplex salar produt suggest natural mehanism to generate masses of the fundamental fermions as energy gaps obtained after splitting states of initially degenerated two-level physial system. IamgratefultoL.P.Horwitz, Y.Aharonov, S.Nussinov, andi.d.vagner for the stimulating disussions. This work has been supported in part by the Binational Siene Foundation, Jerusalem. Appendix This paper is onerned with the relativisti dynamis of single partile states and for this reason we have used only the following results of the partiular realization of this program for the quaternioni and otonioni Hilbert spaes with omplex salar produts: In the quaternioni extension, quantum mehanial states are represented by or Ψ = 2 f fe Ψ 2 = 2 f fe A where f = f + 3 i = f i e i ; f, f i are real funtions of the spae-time oordinates and e i, i =, 2, 3 form a basis for the real quadrati division algebra of quaternions; 22

23 In the otonioni extension quantum mehanial states are represented by: or Ψ 3 = 2 f fe 7 Ψ 4 = 2 f fe 7 A2 where f = f + 7 i = f i e i ; f, f i are real funtions of the spae-time oordinates and e i, i =,..., 7 are a basis for the real quadrati division algebra of otonions. The e and e 7 in the definition of the states A and A2 play the role of a label for the generator of a omplex field in the spae of one-body states. For example, any one of the quaternioni units or some linear ombination of them i = ae + be 2 + e 3 A3 a 2 + b a,b, are arbitrary real numbers may be used for this purpose. Thus, a definition of this ombination annot be obtained kinematially and turns out to be a matter of the dynamis of single partile states. 2 Consider the general form of operators, indued by the struture A of the vetor spae. For the omplex linear operators a a A z = 2 A4 a 2 a 22 where matrix elements a ij are real operators over quaternions and, in turn, are assumed to be at least z-linear operators, we have Ψ = 2 f f e = A z Ψ = 2 a a 2 a 2 a 22 f fe A5 and a 2 f + a 22 f e = f e = a f + a 2 fe e = a fe a 2 f. A6 Therefore, a 2 = a 2 ; a = a 22. A7 23

24 The restritions A7 on the matrix elements of the operator A4, obtained for the states of the form Ψ, are also valid if one onsiders the transformations Ψ 2 = A z Ψ 2. A8 Ψ 2 However, for the operators transforming the state Ψ we have and vie versa, Ψ 2 = 2 f f e = a a 2 a 2 a 22 a 2 = a 2 ; a = a f fe into the state, A9 A Thus, we have obtained two possible types of omplex linear operators, either A z a a = 2 A a 2 a or A 2 z = a a 2 a 2 a We remark that the matrix elements a and a 2 do not ommute. Referenes [] P.A.M. Dira, Pro. Roy. So. A 7, [2] G. Breit, Pro. Am. Aad. 4, A2 [3] E. Shrödinger, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Physik-Math. 24, [4] I am grateful to I.D. Vagner for the larifiation disussions of that point. [5] H. Hönl and A. Papapetrou, Z. Phys. 6, 53 94; H. Jehle, Phys. Rev. D 3, 36 97; G.A. Perkins, Found. Phys. 6, ; J.A. Lok, Am. J. Phys. 47, ; A.O. Barut and A.J. Braken, Phys. Rev. D 23, [6] K. Huang, Am. J. Phys. 2,

25 [7] J.J. Sakurai, Advaned Quantum Mehanis Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 967. [8] First appear in D. Sepunaru, On the Problem of Zitterbewegung in Relativisti Quantum Mehanis Tel-Aviv University preprint, TAUP 59-82, 982, Sanned Version, KEK Library. [9] S.L. Adler, Quaternioni Quantum Mehanis and Quantum Fields Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford - N.Y., 995. [] S.L. Adler, Phys. Lett. B 22, ; A. Govorkov, Theor. Math. Phys. 68, ; A. Govorkov, Theor. Math. Phys. 69, 7987; P. Rotelli, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4, ; P. Rotelli, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4, [] D. Sepunaru, Hadroni J. 6, 8 983; D. Sepunaru, Quantum Mehanis of Non-Abelian Waves, Ph.D. thesis, Tel-Aviv University, 982; Duke University preprint, September 98, unpublished. [2] H. Weyl, Z. Physik 56, [3] Compare with P.A.M. Dira, Pro. Roy. Irish Aad. A 5, [4] L.D Landau, Nul. Phys. 3, ; T.D. Lee and C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 5, ; A. Salam, Nuovo Cimento 5, [5] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, ; A. Salam, In: Elementary Partile Theory, Ed. N. Svartholm, p. 367 Almquist and Wiksells, Stokholm, 968; S.L. Glashow, Nul. Phys. 22, [6] Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 5, [7] M. Zorn, Pro. Natl. Aad. Si. USA 2, [8] By three independent elements is implied any three elements e i, e j and e k suh that none of them is proportional to a produt of the other two, i.e. e k ae i e j. [9] F. Gürsey and M. Günaydin, J. Math. Phys. 4, [2] H. Harari, Phys. Lett. B 86, ; M.A. Shupe, Phys. Lett. B 86, [2] C.N Yang and R.L. Mills, Phys. Rev. 96,

26 [22] E. Shrödinger, Ann. Physik 79, ; ibid 79, ; ibid 8, ; ibid 8, 9 926; P.A.M. Dira, The Priniples of Quantum Mehanis, 4-th ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford,