Maximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement
|
|
- Lewis Ball
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Maximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement Salman Beigi School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences IPM, Tehran, Iran arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 11 May 014 Abstract Maximal correlation is a measure of correlation for bipartite distributions. This measure has two intriguing features: 1 it is monotone under local stochastic maps; it gives the same number when computed on i.i.d. copies of a pair of random variables. This measure of correlation has recently been generalized for bipartite quantum states, for which the same properties have been proved. In this paper, based on maximal correlation, we define a new measure of entanglement which we call maximal entanglement. We show that this measure of entanglement is faithful is zero on separable states and positive on entangled states, is monotone under local quantum operations, and gives the same number when computed on tensor powers of a bipartite state. I. MAXIMAL CORRELATION Suppose that two parties, Alice and Bob, respectively receive a A and b B sampled from a joint distribution p. Their goal is to respectively output c C and d D with some predetermined distributionq CD. The question is whether this goal is achievable, assuming that there is no communication link between Alice and Bob. We call this problem the local transformation problem transformation of a bipartite distribution to another one under local stochastic maps. Deciding whether local transformation is possible, is a hard problem in general due to the non-linearity of the problem, especially when the size of A B is large. In this case one is willing to obtain necessary or sufficient conditions for the problem. Local stochastic maps channels cannot transform a less-correlated bipartite distribution, to a morecorrelated one. So we may find bounds on this problem using measures of correlation. For instance, due to the data processing inequality, if the mutual information between A and B, denoted by IA;B, is less than IC;D then p cannot be transformed to q CD under local operations. Suppose that Alice and Bob receive multiple samples from the source distribution p, and want to generate only one sample from q CD. That is, their inputs are a n A n and b n B n, for some arbitrary n, sampled with probability p n a n,b n := i pa i,b i, and they want to output c and d with probability qc,d. Mutual information in this case does not give any bound simply because IA n ;B n = nia;b is greater than IC; D for sufficiently large n assuming that IA; B is non-zero. In general, additive or even weakly additive measures of correlation do not give any bound for the latter problem. There is a measure of correlation called maximal correlation which is first introduced by Hirschfeld [1] and Gebelein [] and then studied by Rényi [3], [4]. Later it is studied in [5] by Witsenhausen, and in the recent works [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Maximal correlation is defined as follows: µp = max E[fg] 1 E[f] = E[g] = 0, E[f ] = E[g ] = 1, in which f and g are functions on A and B respectively. µp is indeed the maximum of the expectation value of the product of two random variables that have zero mean and variance 1. Maximal correlation is not additive. Indeed this measure of correlation, has the intriguing property that µp n A n B n = µp. Moreover, as a measure of correlation it satisfies the data processing inequality. Putting these together we conclude that if µp < µq CD then local transformation of p to p CD is impossible even when an arbitrary large number of samples of the source p is available. Let us consider an example. Let A = B = and define the distribution p ǫ p ǫ ab = { 1 ǫ a = b, ǫ a b. by Then for 0 ǫ 1/ we have µ p ǫ = 1 ǫ. As a result, having even infinitely many samples from p ǫ we cannot locally generate samples from pδ if 0 δ < ǫ 1/.
2 Maximal correlation has recently been defined for bipartite quantum states [1]. In this paper we first review the definition and properties of maximal correlation in the quantum case. Then based on maximal correlation, we define a new measure of entanglement, which we call maximal entanglement. We show that this measure of entanglement is zero on separable states and positive on entangled ones, is monotone under local quantum operations, and gives the same number when computed on tensor powers of a bipartite state. This measure of entanglement, however, is not monotone under classical communication. II. MAXIMAL CORRELATION FOR QUANTUM STATES Let us first fix some notations. The Hilbert space corresponding to a register A is denoted by H A, and the space of linear operators acting on H A by LH A. In this paper we use Dirac s ket-bra notation for vectors: vectors of H A are denoted by v, and vectors in the dual space are denoted by w ; Then v w is a linear operator and belongs to LH A. The dimension of H A is denoted by d A in this paper we only consider finite dimensional quantum registers. The same notations are adopted for other quantum registers. We equip LH A with the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product X,Y := trx Y for X,Y LH A, where X is the adjoint of X. Now to define maximal correlation for a bipartite density matrix ρ LH A LH B, we should think of f, g in 1 as quantum observables, whose expectations are computed with Born s rule. Based on this intuition, maximal correlation of ρ is defined by µρ = max trρ X A Y B trρ A X A = trρ B Y B = 0, 3 trρ A X A X A = trρ BY B Y B = 1. 4 Here ρ A = tr B ρ and ρ B = tr A ρ are the reduced density matrices on subsystems A and B respectively, and X A LH A and Y B LH B. As shown in [1] in the above optimization one may assume that X A and Y B are hermitian. To study properties of µρ it would be useful to define ρ = I A ρ 1/ B ρ ρ 1/ A I B. Here the inverses of ρ A and ρ B are defined on their supports Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse. In fact without loss of generality, by restricting H A,H B to the supports of ρ A,ρ B respectively, we may assume that the local density matrices are full-rank. The following theorem proved in [1] is the quantum version of the results of [7] and [9] connecting maximal correlation to certain Schmidt coefficients see also [11]. Theorem 1 [1] The first Schmidt coefficient of ρ as a vector in the bipartite Hilbert space LH A LH B is equal to 1, and its second Schmidt coefficient is equal to µρ. Note that LH A and LH B are Hilbert spaces equipped with the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product. So Schmidt decomposition, and then Schmidt coefficients, of vectors in LH A LH B are computed with respect to Hilbert-Schmidt inner product. To be more precise, the Schmidt decomposition of ρ is of the form ρ = λ i M i N i, i where λ 1 λ 0 are Schmidt coefficients, and M i LH A and N i LH B are orthonormal bases, i.e., trm i M j = trn i N j = δ ij where δ ij is the Kronecker delta function. The above theorem states that λ 1 = 1 and λ = µρ. Let us examine this theorem in the classical case. Let p be a joint distribution. Let P be a A B -matrix whose a,b-th entry is equal to p ab. Also let P A be the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries p a. Define P B similarly. Define P = P 1/ A P P 1/ B which is the classical analogue of ρ defined above. Then the first singular value of P is equal 1 and its second singular value is equal to µp. For example, if A = B = {0,1}, then P = p 00 p00+p 01p 00+p 10 p 10 p10+p 11p 00+p 10 p 01 p00+p 01p 01+p 11 p 11 p10+p 11p 01+p 11.
3 3 P has two singular values one of which is 1. So the other one is equal to µp = det P. 5 Relating maximal correlation of ρ to Schmidt coefficients of ρ, we can now state the main properties of maximal correlation. Theorem [1] µ satisfies the following properties: a µρ σ A B = max{µρ,µσ A B }. b Let Φ A A,Ψ B B be completely positive trace-preserving super-operators. Let σ A B = Φ Ψρ. Then µσ A B µρ. Proof: a This is a simple consequence of the fact that Schmidt coefficients of the tensor product of two vectors are equal to the pairwise products of Schmidt coefficients of the two vectors. b Completely positive trace-preserving maps are compositions of isometries and partial traces. It is not hard to see that local isometries do not change µρ. So we only need to show that µσ µσ AA BB. This inequality holds because in the definition of maximal correlation for σ AA BB we may restrict X AA,Y BB to have the form X AA = X A I A and Y BB = Y B I B. With these restrictions we obtain µσ as the optimal value. The following corollary is a direct consequence of the above theorem. Corollary 1 Suppose that ρ n, for some n, can be locally transformed to σ EF. Then µρ µσ EF. Let us workout an example. Let ψ = be the Bell state on two qubits. Define ρ ǫ = 1 ǫ ψ ψ +ǫ I 4, 6 where 0 ǫ 1 and I /4 is the maximally mixed state. It is not hard to see that µ ρ ǫ = 1 ǫ see [1] for details. Now using the above corollary, having an arbitrary large number of copies of ρ ǫ one cannot transform them into one copy of ρ δ under local transformations if ǫ > δ. The following theorem characterizes the extreme values of maximal correlation. Theorem 3 [1] 0 µρ 1 and the followings hold: a µρ = 0 if and only if ρ = ρ A ρ B. b µρ = 1 if and only if there exist local measurements {M 0,M 1 } on A, and {N 0,N 1 } on B such that 0 < trρ M 0 N 0 < 1, and trρ M 0 N 1 = trρ M 1 N 0 = 0. c For a pure state ρ = ψ ψ, we have µρ = 0 if ψ is a product state, and µρ = 1 if ψ is entangled. Part b of this theorem is the quantum version of Witsenhausen s result [5] that maximal correlation of a bipartite distribution is equal to 1 iff the distribution has a common data. We finish this section by proving two lemmas which will be used in the next section. Lemma 1 Letρ be a bipartite density matrix such that ψ ρ ψ 1 ǫ, where ψ = Then µρ 1 ǫ. Proof: There is nothing to prove for ǫ 1/ since maximal correlation is non-negative. So we assume that 0 ǫ < 1/. Let us define ψ i = i 11, i = 0,1 ψ i = i 10 i =,3. Then ψ 0 = ψ and { ψ i : 0 i 3} is an orthonormal basis for the space of two qubits. Therefore there are c ij C such that 3 ρ = c ij ψ i ψ j. i,j=0
4 4 By assumption we have c 00 1 ǫ. Moreover, since ρ is a density matrix i c ii = 1 and c 01 c 00 c 11, c 1 c c Now suppose that we measure each qubit A,B in the computational basis { 0, 1 }. We let p EF be the outcome distribution. We have p 00 = 1 c 00 +c 11 +c 01 +c 10 p 11 = 1 c 00 +c 11 c 01 c 10 p 01 = 1 c +c 33 +c 3 +c 3 p 10 = 1 c +c 33 c 3 c 3. By the monotonicity of maximal correlation under local measurements Theorem we have µρ µp EF. Moreover, maximal correlation of p EF can be computed using 5. Thus we obtain µρ p 00 p 11 p 01 p 10 [. p00 +p 01 p 00 +p 10 p 10 +p 11 p 01 +p 11 ]1 Let q = c 00 +c 11 which gives c +c 33 = 1 q, a = c 01 +c 10 and b = c 3 +c 3. Then q 1 ǫ, and by 7 we have a q and b 1 q. Indeed there is a stronger upper bound on a ; Using c 00 1 ǫ and c 00 +c 11 = q we have a c 01 c 00 c 11 1 ǫq 1+ǫ. Using this inequality, and the fact that q 1 ǫ 1/ we find that a q 1. Now rewriting the above bound in terms of these new variables we obtain µρ = = q a 1 q +b [ 1+a+b1+a b1 a+b1 a b ] 1/ q 1+b a [ 1+a4 +b 4 a b a b ] 1/ q 1+b a [ 1+a4 +b 4 a b a b ] 1/, where in the last line we use a q 1. The numerator of the latter bound is obviously an increasing function of b. Moreover using the fact that b 1 q 1 + a, it is not hard to see that the denominator is a decreasing function of b. Therefore q 1 a µρ 1 a q 1 = 1+ 1 a 1+q 1 1 ǫ. Lemma Let {σ n } be a sequence of density matrices and suppose that lim n σ n = ρ and that lim n µσ n = λ. Then we have µρ λ. In particular if λ = 0, then ρ is a product state. Proof: Let X,Y be the operators that achieve the optimal value µρ in -4. For every n define and X n := Y n := X trσ n A [, n tr σ A XX trσ n A X ] 1/ Y trσ n B [. n trσ B YY trσ n B Y ] 1/
5 5 Then for every n we have trσ n A X n = trσ n B Y n = 0 and trσ n A X nx n = trσ n B YY = 1. On the other hand, it is easy to see that lim tr σ n n X n Y n = tr ρ X Y = µρ. This means that if µρ λ+ǫ for some ǫ > 0, then for sufficiently large n, µ σ n λ+ǫ/, which is a contradiction since lim n µσ n = λ. Therefore µρ λ. Note that, by the assumption of the above lemma we cannot conclude the equality of µρ and λ. For example, define the distributions p n by pn 00 = 1 1/n, pn 11 = 1/n and pn 01 = pn 10 = 0. Then for every n we have µp n = 1, but this sequence of distributions converges to q with q 00 = 1 and q 01 = q 10 = q 11 = 0, for which we have µq = 0. III. MAXIMAL ENTANGLEMENT In this section we define a measure of entanglement in terms of maximal correlation. By part c of Theorem 3, maximal correlation is already a measure of entanglement on pure states; This is the measure that is 0 for pure product states and 1 for pure entangled states. Nevertheless, maximal correlation is not a measure of entanglement since there are bipartite classical distributions whose maximal correlation is 1. Convex roof extension is the idea that is usually applied to construct measures of entanglement in such situations. In our case however, convex roof does not result in a measure that satisfies our desired properties. So we propose the following definition: µ ent ρ := infmaxµτ i i, where the infimum is taken over all decompositions ρ = i p i τ i where p i 0 and τ i s are density matrices. We call µ ent maximal entanglement. From the definition we clearly have i 0 µ ent ρ 1. ii µ ent ρ µρ. iii µ ent ρ = 0 for all separable states ρ. iv If ρ is pure then µ ent ρ = µρ. v Maximal entanglement is quasi-convex, i.e., we have µ ent i λ iρ i maxi µ ent ρ i. Statement iii holds simply because every separable state can be written in the form ρ = i p iτ i τ i B, and for all i we have µτi A τi B a unique decomposition. The following theorems state the main properties of maximal entanglement. A = 0. Statement iv holds because pure states essentially have Theorem 4 Suppose that σ A B = Φ Ψρ where Φ A A and Ψ B B are completely positive trace-preserving maps. Then µ ent ρ µ ent σ A B. Proof: Let ρ = i p iτ i be a decomposition of ρ. Then σ A B = i p iφ Ψτ i is a decomposition of σ A B. Using Theorem for every i we have µ τ i i µ Φ Ψτ. Then taking maximum over i, and then infimum over all decompositions of ρ we obtain the result. Theorem 5 For all density matricesρ,σ A B we haveµ entρ σ A B = max{µ entρ,µ ent σ A B }. Proof: Using the data processing inequality Theorem 4 by considering local partial trace maps tr and tr A B we obtain µ ent ρ σ A B max{µ entρ,µ ent σ A B }. For the other direction consider decompositions ρ = i p iτ i and σ A B = j q jξ j A B. Then ρ σ A B = i,j p i q j τ i ξj A B,
6 6 is a decomposition of ρ σ A B. As a result µ ent ρ σ A B maxµ τ i i,j = max max i,j ξj A B { µ τ i,µ ξ j A B }. Taking infimum over all decompositions of ρ and σ A B gives the desired result. The above two theorems imply the following analogue of Corollary 1 for maximal entanglement. Corollary Suppose that ρ n, for some n, can be locally transformed to σ EF. Then µ ent ρ µ ent σ EF. Theorem 6 Maximal entanglement is faithful, i.e., µ ent ρ = 0 if and only if ρ is separable. Proof: We already know that separability of ρ implies µ ent ρ = 0. So we need to show that if µ ent ρ = 0 then ρ is separable. By definition µ ent ρ = 0 means that for every ǫ > 0 there is a decomposition ρ = i p iτ i such that µτ i ǫ for all i. Let S ǫ be the set of all density matrices whose maximal correlation is at most ǫ: S ǫ := {σ : µσ ǫ}. Therefore, µ ent ρ = 0 implies that ρ is in the convex hull of S ǫ for every ǫ > 0. Now using Carathéodory s theorem, for every ǫ > 0 there is a decomposition ρ = M i=1 p ǫ i τ i,ǫ, such that µ τ i,ǫ ǫ for all i, and M = MdA,d B is a constant independent of ǫ. Now by a standard compactness argument there is a sequence ǫ 1 > ǫ > with lim n ǫ n = 0 such that p ǫn 1,...,p ǫn M,τ1,ǫn,...,τM,ǫn, converges to some p 0 1,...,p0 M,τ1,0,...,τM,0. This tuple then gives a valid decomposition where {p 0 i ρ = M i=1 p 0 i τ i,0, is a density matrix. On the other hand, since lim n τ i,ǫn = τi,0 and that µτi,ǫn ǫ n, using Lemma we find that µτ i,0 = 0. Then by part a of Theorem 3, τ i,0 is a product state for every i. As a result ρ is separable. : 1 i M} is a probability distribution and each τ i,0 We showed in Theorem 4 that maximal entanglement is monotone under local quantum operations. As a measure of entanglement one may expect that maximal entanglement is also monotone under classical communication too. However, this is not the case. Theorem 7 Maximal entanglement is not monotone under classical communication. Proof: We know that any two-qubit entangled state is distillable [13]. That is, having copies of an entangled two-qubit stateρ, approximations of the maximally entangled state ψ = can be distilled using local quantum operations and classical communication LOCC. However, we know that there are two-qubit entangled states ρ such that µ ent ρ = µ ent ρ n µρ < 1 = µ ent ψ ψ see for instance the example after Corollary 1. On the other hand, local quantum operations do not increase maximal entanglement. Therefore, it should be classical communication that sometimes increases maximal entanglement. Computing maximal entanglement µ ent ρ seems a hard problem in general since we need to take an infimum over all decompositions of ρ. Finding upper bounds on µ ent ρ however, is easy; We only need to pick a decomposition to find an upper bound. In particular we have µ ent ρ µρ.
7 7 In the following we present some ideas that may serve as a useful tool for proving lower bounds on maximal entanglement. In the previous section we observed that the maximal correlation of ρ ǫ defined by 6 is equal to µ ρ ǫ = 1 ǫ. Computing the maximal entanglement of these states however, does not seem easy. By the partial transpose test we know that ρ ǫ is separable if and only if ǫ /3 [14], [15]. Then using the faithfulness of maximal entanglement Theorem 6, µ ent ρ ǫ = 0 if ǫ /3 and µ entρ ǫ > 0 otherwise. ǫ In the following we present a characterization of µ ent ρ in terms another optimization problem. Theorem 8 Define λǫ = min{µσ : ψ σ ψ 1 3ǫ/4}, where ψ = 1 ǫ ǫ Then µ ent ρ = λǫ, where ρ = 1 ǫ ψ ψ + ǫi /4. Moreover, λǫ = 0 for ǫ /3, and for ǫ < /3 we have 1 3ǫ/ λǫ 1 ǫ. Proof: For every decomposition ρ ǫ = i p iσ i, we have ψ ρ ǫ ψ = i p i ψ σ i ψ = 1 3ǫ/4. Then there exists i such that ψ σ i ψ 1 3ǫ/4. Therefore, by definition µ σ i λǫ. This means that for any such decomposition we have max i µσ i λǫ, and then µ entρ ǫ λǫ. For the other direction let σ be a state with ψ σ ψ 1 3ǫ/4 and µσ = λǫ. Let us define τ := U U σ U U du, 8 where du denotes the Haar measure on the unitary group. τ is an isotropic state [16], i.e., for every unitary U we have U U τ U U = τ. Any isotropic state is of the form τ = 1 δ ψ ψ +δi /4 = ρ δ. On the other hand, since U U ψ = ψ for every unitary U, we have 1 3δ/4 = ψ τ ψ = ψ σ ψ 1 3ǫ/4. Therefore δ ǫ. Now observe that 8 is already a decomposition of τ = ρ δ. Moreover, maximal correlation does not change under local unitaries. Therefore, we have µ ent ρ δ µσ = λǫ. To finish the prove we only need to notice that δ ǫ and then µ ent ρ δ µ entρ ǫ. The latter inequality holds because ρ ǫ = 1 ǫ 1 δ ρδ + 1+ǫ δ I/4, 1 δ and that maximal entanglement is quasi-convex. λǫ = 0 for ǫ /3 is implied by the partial transpose test as discussed above. The lower bound λǫ 1 3ǫ/ is an immediate consequence of Lemma 1. The upper bound λǫ 1 ǫ is because ǫ ǫ µ ent ρ µ ρ. IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS In this paper we defined a measure of entanglementµ ent for quantum states that is faithful, monotone under local quantum operations, and gives the same number when computed on tensor powers of a bipartite state. The latter property, in particular, implies that maximal entanglement is neither superadditive nor monogamous. As we saw in Theorem 7 a measure of entanglement with the above properties is either not monotone under classical communication or achieves its maximum value on all distillable states.
8 8 REFERENCES [1] H. O. Hirschfeld, A connection between correlation and contingency, Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Soc. 31, [] H. Gebelein, Das statistische problem der Korrelation als variations-und Eigenwertproblem und sein Zusammenhang mit der Ausgleichungsrechnung, Z. für angewandte Math. und Mech. 1, [3] A. Rényi, New version of the probabilistic generalization of the large sieve, Acta Math. Hung. 10, [4] A. Rényi, On measures of dependence, Acta Math. Hung. 10, [5] H. S. Witsenhausen, On sequences of pairs of dependent random variables, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 8: [6] G. Kumar, Binary Rényi Correlation, December 01. [7] G. Kumar, On Sequences of Pairs of Dependent Random Variables, December, 01. [8] S. Kamath and V. Anantharam, Non-interactive Simulation of Joint Distributions: The Hirschfeld-Gebelein-Rényi Maximal Correlation and the Hypercontractivity Ribbon, Proceedings of the 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communications, Control and Computing 01. [9] W. Kang and S. Ulukus, A New Data Processing Inequality and Its Applications in Distributed Source and Channel Coding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 57, [10] V. Anantharam, A. Gohari, S. Kamath, and C. Nair, On Maximal Correlation, Hypercontractivity, and the Data Processing Inequality studied by Erkip and Cover, arxiv: [11] Y. Polyanskiy, Hypothesis testing via a comparator, Information Theory Proceedings ISIT, 01 IEEE International Symposium on, [1] S. Beigi, A New Quantum Data Processing Inequality, J. Math. Phys. 54, [13] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Inseparable Two Spin- 1 Density Matrices Can Be Distilled to a Singlet Form, Physical Review Letters 78, [14] A. Peres, Separability Criterion for Density Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, [15] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Separability of Mixed States: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions, Physics Letters A 3, [16] M. Horodecki and P. Horodecki, Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols, Physical Review A 59,
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones
Entanglement Measures and Monotones PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University March 30, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones March 30, 2017 1 / 11 Quantifying
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006
1 Ph 219/CS 219 Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006 1.1 How far apart are two quantum states? Consider two quantum states described by density operators ρ and ρ in an N-dimensional Hilbert space, and
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015
Entanglement and swap of quantum states in two qubits Takaya Ikuto and Satoshi Ishizaka Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, 739-8521, Japan (Dated:
More informationDECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS
DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS SCOTT HOTTOVY Abstract. Quantum networks are used to transmit and process information by using the phenomena of quantum mechanics.
More informationQuantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects
Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects Debasis Sarkar Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata- 700009, India Abstract Entanglement is one of the most useful
More informationProbabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract
Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling Arun Kumar Pati Quantum Optics and Information Group, SEECS, Dean Street, University of Wales, Bangor LL 57 IUT, UK (August 5, 999) Abstract
More informationApplication of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)
Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU) Singlet fraction and its usefulness in Teleportation Singlet
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationQuantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra
Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces
More informationSquashed entanglement
Squashed Entanglement based on Squashed Entanglement - An Additive Entanglement Measure (M. Christandl, A. Winter, quant-ph/0308088), and A paradigm for entanglement theory based on quantum communication
More informationQuantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix
Quantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix Marco Pedicini (Roma Tre University) in collaboration with Anna Chiara Lai and Silvia Rognone (La Sapienza University of Rome) SIMAI2018 - MS27: Discrete Mathematics,
More informationThe Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University February 15, 2018 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 February 15, 2018
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Coherence of Assistance and Regularized Coherence of Assistance by Ming-Jing Zhao, Teng Ma, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 14 2018
More informationPrinciples of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2
Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 9, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 February 9, 2017 1 / 13 The
More information1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics
1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics How to describe the states of an ideally controlled system? How to describe changes in an ideally controlled system? How to describe measurements on an ideally controlled
More informationA Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt distance measure
Journal of Quantum Information Science, 205, *,** Published Online **** 204 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/**** http://dx.doi.org/0.4236/****.204.***** A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt
More informationLinear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 3
Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 3 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 1, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 3 February 1, 2017 1 / 16
More informationChapter 2 The Density Matrix
Chapter 2 The Density Matrix We are going to require a more general description of a quantum state than that given by a state vector. The density matrix provides such a description. Its use is required
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2
Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 8, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 April 8, 2017 1 / 13 Entanglement
More informationCompression and entanglement, entanglement transformations
PHYSICS 491: Symmetry and Quantum Information April 27, 2017 Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations Lecture 8 Michael Walter, Stanford University These lecture notes are not proof-read
More informationHilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.
CS 94- Bell States Bell Inequalities 9//04 Fall 004 Lecture Hilbert Space Entanglement Quantum Gates Bell States Superdense Coding 1 One qubit: Recall that the state of a single qubit can be written as
More informationEstimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN)
Estimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN) Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University satyabrata@dtu.ac.in December 4, 2018 Satyabrata Adhikari (DTU) Estimation
More informationQuantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification
Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades,,Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien eingereicht von Philipp
More informationNon-interactive Simulation of Joint Distributions: The Hirschfeld-Gebelein-Rényi Maximal Correlation and the Hypercontractivity Ribbon
Non-interactive Simulation of Joint Distributions: The Hirschfeld-Gebelein-Rényi Maximal Correlation and the Hypercontractivity Ribbon Sudeep Kamath and Venkat Anantharam EECS Department University of
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2008
A paradigm for entanglement theory based on quantum communication Jonathan Oppenheim 1 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge U.K. arxiv:0801.0458v1 [quant-ph]
More informationEnsembles and incomplete information
p. 1/32 Ensembles and incomplete information So far in this course, we have described quantum systems by states that are normalized vectors in a complex Hilbert space. This works so long as (a) the system
More informationDecay of the Singlet Conversion Probability in One Dimensional Quantum Networks
Decay of the Singlet Conversion Probability in One Dimensional Quantum Networks Scott Hottovy shottovy@math.arizona.edu Advised by: Dr. Janek Wehr University of Arizona Applied Mathematics December 18,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2013
Genuine hidden quantum nonlocality Flavien Hirsch, 1 Marco Túlio Quintino, 1 Joseph Bowles, 1 and Nicolas Brunner 1, 1 Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève, 111 Genève, Switzerland H.H.
More informationChapter 5. Density matrix formalism
Chapter 5 Density matrix formalism In chap we formulated quantum mechanics for isolated systems. In practice systems interect with their environnement and we need a description that takes this feature
More informationBasics on quantum information
Basics on quantum information Mika Hirvensalo Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Turku mikhirve@utu.fi Thessaloniki, May 2016 Mika Hirvensalo Basics on quantum information 1 of 52 Brief
More informationEntanglement: Definition, Purification and measures
Entanglement: Definition, Purification and measures Seminar in Quantum Information processing 3683 Gili Bisker Physics Department Technion Spring 006 Gili Bisker Physics Department, Technion Introduction
More informationMultilinear Singular Value Decomposition for Two Qubits
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 10(S) August: 69 83 (2016) Special Issue: The 7 th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics (ICREM7) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL
More informationSingle-shot Quantum State Merging
ETH ZICH arxiv:0912.4495v1 [quant-ph] 22 Dec 2009 Single-shot Quantum State Merging by Mario Berta A Diploma thesis submitted to the Institute for Theorectical Physics Department of Physics Supervisor
More informationGeometry of Entanglement
Geometry of Entanglement Bachelor Thesis Group of Quantum Optics, Quantum Nanophysics and Quantum Information University of Vienna WS 21 2659 SE Seminar Quantenphysik I Supervising Professor: Ao. Univ.-Prof.
More informationUnitary evolution: this axiom governs how the state of the quantum system evolves in time.
CS 94- Introduction Axioms Bell Inequalities /7/7 Spring 7 Lecture Why Quantum Computation? Quantum computers are the only model of computation that escape the limitations on computation imposed by the
More informationTHE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS
THE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS Armin Uhlmann University of Leipzig, Institute for Theoretical Physics After a short introduction to anti-linearity, bounds for the number of orthogonal (skew) conjugations
More informationTheory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
More informationNullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality. Yu Guo
Jul. 18-22, 2011, at Taiyuan. Nullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality Yu Guo (Joint work with Pro. Jinchuan Hou) 1 1 27 Department of Mathematics Shanxi Datong University Datong, China guoyu3@yahoo.com.cn
More informationMajorization-preserving quantum channels
Majorization-preserving quantum channels arxiv:1209.5233v2 [quant-ph] 15 Dec 2012 Lin Zhang Institute of Mathematics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China Abstract In this report, we give
More informationBasics on quantum information
Basics on quantum information Mika Hirvensalo Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Turku mikhirve@utu.fi Thessaloniki, May 2014 Mika Hirvensalo Basics on quantum information 1 of 49 Brief
More informationQuantum Correlations: From Bell inequalities to Tsirelson s theorem
Quantum Correlations: From Bell inequalities to Tsirelson s theorem David Avis April, 7 Abstract The cut polytope and its relatives are good models of the correlations that can be obtained between events
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationValerio Cappellini. References
CETER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIECES WARSAW, POLAD RADOM DESITY MATRICES AD THEIR DETERMIATS 4 30 SEPTEMBER 5 TH SFB TR 1 MEETIG OF 006 I PRZEGORZAłY KRAKÓW Valerio Cappellini
More informationQuantum entanglement and symmetry
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Quantum entanglement and symmetry To cite this article: D Chrucisi and A Kossaowsi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 87 012008 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationFree probability and quantum information
Free probability and quantum information Benoît Collins WPI-AIMR, Tohoku University & University of Ottawa Tokyo, Nov 8, 2013 Overview Overview Plan: 1. Quantum Information theory: the additivity problem
More informationCS/Ph120 Homework 4 Solutions
CS/Ph10 Homework 4 Solutions November 3, 016 Problem 1: Robustness of GHZ and W states, part Solution: Due to Bolton Bailey a For the GHZ state, we have T r N GHZ N GHZ N = 1 0 N 1 0 N 1 + 1 N 1 1 N 1
More informationTransmitting and Hiding Quantum Information
2018/12/20 @ 4th KIAS WORKSHOP on Quantum Information and Thermodynamics Transmitting and Hiding Quantum Information Seung-Woo Lee Quantum Universe Center Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) Contents
More informationEntropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory
Entropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory William Fedus Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. Entropy is a central concept in both classical and quantum information theory,
More informationA completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension
isibang/ms/2006/6 March 28th, 2006 http://www.isibang.ac.in/ statmath/eprints A completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension B. V. Rajarama Bhat Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore Centre 8th
More informationMaximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement
Maximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement William Arveson arveson@math.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley Summer 2008 arxiv:0712.4163 arxiv:0801.2531 arxiv:0804.1140 Overview Quantum Information
More informationQuantum Correlations as Necessary Precondition for Secure Communication
Quantum Correlations as Necessary Precondition for Secure Communication Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217903 (2004) quant-ph/0307151 Marcos Curty 1, Maciej Lewenstein 2, Norbert Lütkenhaus 1 1 Institut für Theoretische
More informationPHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix
PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix Here follows a short summary of the definitions of qubits, EPR states, entanglement, the density matrix, pure states, mixed states, measurement, and
More informationQuantum Entanglement and Error Correction
Quantum Entanglement and Error Correction Fall 2016 Bei Zeng University of Guelph Course Information Instructor: Bei Zeng, email: beizeng@icloud.com TA: Dr. Cheng Guo, email: cheng323232@163.com Wechat
More informationMonogamy, Polygamy and other Properties of Entanglement of Purification
Monogamy, Polygamy and other Properties of Entanglement of Purification Shrobona Bagchi, and Arun Kumar Pati, Quantum Information and Computation Group, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road,
More informationDistinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states
Distinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states Chandan Datta Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar chandan@iopb.res.in YouQu-2017, HRI Chandan Datta (IOP) Tripartite Entanglement
More informationVarious notions of positivity for bi-linear maps and applications to tri-partite entanglement
Various notions of positivity for bi-linear maps and applications to tri-partite entanglement 2015.06.16., Waterloo Seung-Hyeok Kye (Seoul National University) a joint work with Kyung Hoon Han [arxiv:1503.05995]
More information2. Introduction to quantum mechanics
2. Introduction to quantum mechanics 2.1 Linear algebra Dirac notation Complex conjugate Vector/ket Dual vector/bra Inner product/bracket Tensor product Complex conj. matrix Transpose of matrix Hermitian
More informationLinear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1
Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 1, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1 February 1, 2017 1 / 13
More informationStructure of Unital Maps and the Asymptotic Quantum Birkhoff Conjecture. Peter Shor MIT Cambridge, MA Joint work with Anand Oza and Dimiter Ostrev
Structure of Unital Maps and the Asymptotic Quantum Birkhoff Conjecture Peter Shor MIT Cambridge, MA Joint work with Anand Oza and Dimiter Ostrev The Superposition Principle (Physicists): If a quantum
More informationHypercontractivity, Maximal Correlation and Non-interactive Simulation
Hypercontractivity, Maximal Correlation and Non-interactive Simulation Dept. Electrical Engineering, Stanford University Dec 4, 2014 Non-interactive Simulation Scenario: non-interactive simulation: Alice
More informationIn the beginning God created tensor... as a picture
In the beginning God created tensor... as a picture Bob Coecke coecke@comlab.ox.ac.uk EPSRC Advanced Research Fellow Oxford University Computing Laboratory se10.comlab.ox.ac.uk:8080/bobcoecke/home en.html
More informationLecture 11 September 30, 2015
PHYS 7895: Quantum Information Theory Fall 015 Lecture 11 September 30, 015 Prof. Mark M. Wilde Scribe: Mark M. Wilde This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
More informationQuantum decoherence. Éric Oliver Paquette (U. Montréal) -Traces Worshop [Ottawa]- April 29 th, Quantum decoherence p. 1/2
Quantum decoherence p. 1/2 Quantum decoherence Éric Oliver Paquette (U. Montréal) -Traces Worshop [Ottawa]- April 29 th, 2007 Quantum decoherence p. 2/2 Outline Quantum decoherence: 1. Basics of quantum
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 17 Jun 1996
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices arxiv:quant-ph/9604005v2 17 Jun 1996 Asher Peres Department of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel Abstract A quantum system
More informationLecture 19 October 28, 2015
PHYS 7895: Quantum Information Theory Fall 2015 Prof. Mark M. Wilde Lecture 19 October 28, 2015 Scribe: Mark M. Wilde This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006
Ph 9/CS 9 Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 006. Fidelity We saw in Exercise. that the trace norm ρ ρ tr provides a useful measure of the distinguishability of the states ρ and ρ. Another useful measure
More informationTeleportation of Quantum States (1993; Bennett, Brassard, Crepeau, Jozsa, Peres, Wootters)
Teleportation of Quantum States (1993; Bennett, Brassard, Crepeau, Jozsa, Peres, Wootters) Rahul Jain U. Waterloo and Institute for Quantum Computing, rjain@cs.uwaterloo.ca entry editor: Andris Ambainis
More informationCS286.2 Lecture 13: Quantum de Finetti Theorems
CS86. Lecture 13: Quantum de Finetti Theorems Scribe: Thom Bohdanowicz Before stating a quantum de Finetti theorem for density operators, we should define permutation invariance for quantum states. Let
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 13 Mar 2007
Quantumness versus Classicality of Quantum States Berry Groisman 1, Dan Kenigsberg 2 and Tal Mor 2 1. Centre for Quantum Computation, DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics R. J. Renka Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of North Texas 03/19/2018 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics The postulates (axioms) of quantum mechanics
More informationLecture: Quantum Information
Lecture: Quantum Information Transcribed by: Crystal Noel and Da An (Chi Chi) November 10, 016 1 Final Proect Information Find an issue related to class you are interested in and either: read some papers
More informationShared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States
Shared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States Anindya Biswas Harish-Chandra Research Institute December 3, 2013 Anindya Biswas (HRI) Shared Purity December 3, 2013 1 / 38 Outline of the talk 1 Motivation
More informationQUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING THEOREM p.1/36
QUANTUM INFORMATION - THE NO-HIDING THEOREM Arun K Pati akpati@iopb.res.in Instititute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751005, Orissa, INDIA and Th. P. D, BARC, Mumbai-400085, India QUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871
Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Lecture 9 (2017) Jon Yard QNC 3126 jyard@uwaterloo.ca http://math.uwaterloo.ca/~jyard/qic710 1 More state distinguishing
More informationA Single-letter Upper Bound for the Sum Rate of Multiple Access Channels with Correlated Sources
A Single-letter Upper Bound for the Sum Rate of Multiple Access Channels with Correlated Sources Wei Kang Sennur Ulukus Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland, College
More informationQuantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar
Quantum Computing Lecture 3 Principles of Quantum Mechanics Anuj Dawar What is Quantum Mechanics? Quantum Mechanics is a framework for the development of physical theories. It is not itself a physical
More informationOn a Block Matrix Inequality quantifying the Monogamy of the Negativity of Entanglement
On a Block Matrix Inequality quantifying the Monogamy of the Negativity of Entanglement Koenraad M.R. Audenaert Department of Mathematics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW0 0EX, United Kingdom
More informationHomework 3 - Solutions
Homework 3 - Solutions The Transpose an Partial Transpose. 1 Let { 1, 2,, } be an orthonormal basis for C. The transpose map efine with respect to this basis is a superoperator Γ that acts on an operator
More informationQuantification of Gaussian quantum steering. Gerardo Adesso
Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering Gerardo Adesso Outline Quantum steering Continuous variable systems Gaussian entanglement Gaussian steering Applications Steering timeline EPR paradox (1935)
More informationOn PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
More informationAbstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization relations.
HIROSHIMA S THEOREM AND MATRIX NORM INEQUALITIES MINGHUA LIN AND HENRY WOLKOWICZ Abstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization
More informationQubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable,
Qubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable, A qubit: a sphere of values, which is spanned in projective sense by two quantum
More informationMathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory. Part I: Matrix Analysis. Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK)
Mathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory Part I: Matrix Analysis Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK) September 14, 2008 Preface Books on Matrix Analysis: R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, 1997.
More informationEfficient achievability for quantum protocols using decoupling theorems
Efficient achievability for quantum protocols using decoupling theorems Christoph Hirche and Ciara Morgan Institut für Theoretische Physik Leibniz Universität Hannover Appelstraße, D-3067 Hannover, Germany
More informationOn the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement
On the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement by Eric Webster A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics
More informationThe Minimax Fidelity for Quantum Channels: Theory and Some Applications
The Minimax Fidelity for Quantum Channels: Theory and Some Applications Maxim Raginsky University of I!inois V.P. Belavkin, G.M. D Ariano and M. Raginsky Operational distance and fidelity for quantum channels
More informationGenuine three-partite entangled states with a hidden variable model
Genuine three-partite entangled states with a hidden variable model Géza Tóth 1,2 and Antonio Acín 3 1 Max-Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany 2 Research Institute for Solid State Physics
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/2 PARTICLES
CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/ PARTICLES S. Ghosh, G. Kar, and A. Roy Physics and Applied Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute 03, B. T. Road Calcutta 700 035 India. E
More informationQuantum Computing 1. Multi-Qubit System. Goutam Biswas. Lect 2
Quantum Computing 1 Multi-Qubit System Quantum Computing State Space of Bits The state space of a single bit is {0,1}. n-bit state space is {0,1} n. These are the vertices of the n-dimensional hypercube.
More informationLecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background
Lecture notes on Quantum Computing Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Vector states of a quantum system with n physical states are represented by unique vectors in C n, the set of n 1 column vectors 1 For
More informationExtremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, (2013).
1 / 24 Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, 032324 (2013). G. Tóth 1,2,3 and D. Petz 4,5 1 Theoretical Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 26 Mar 2012
Optimal Probabilistic Simulation of Quantum Channels from the Future to the Past Dina Genkina, Giulio Chiribella, and Lucien Hardy Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline Street North,
More informationQuantum Achievability Proof via Collision Relative Entropy
Quantum Achievability Proof via Collision Relative Entropy Salman Beigi Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) Tehran, Iran Setemper 8, 2014 Based on a joint work with Amin Gohari arxiv:1312.3822
More informationAsymptotic Pure State Transformations
Asymptotic Pure State Transformations PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 18, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Asymptotic Pure State Transformations April 18, 2017 1 / 15 Entanglement
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 27 Feb 2009
arxiv:0811.803v3 [quant-ph] 7 Feb 009 Entanglement detection Otfried Gühne Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 1A, A-600 Innsbruck,
More informationLecture 14: Quantum information revisited
CPSC 59/69: Quantum Computation John Watrous, University of Calgary Lecture 4: Quantum information revisited March 4, 006 So far, this course has focused almost entirely on quantum algorithms The next
More informationThe Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem Based on One-Shot Information Theory
Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 579 65 (0) Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 0.007/s000-0-309-7 Communications in Mathematical Physics The Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem Based on One-Shot Information Theory Mario
More informationMathematical Introduction
Chapter 1 Mathematical Introduction HW #1: 164, 165, 166, 181, 182, 183, 1811, 1812, 114 11 Linear Vector Spaces: Basics 111 Field A collection F of elements a,b etc (also called numbers or scalars) with
More informationLecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics
Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics Rajat Mittal IIT Kanpur The postulates of quantum mechanics provide us the mathematical formalism over which the physical theory is developed. For people studying
More information