Geometry of Entanglement
|
|
- August Marshall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geometry of Entanglement Bachelor Thesis Group of Quantum Optics, Quantum Nanophysics and Quantum Information University of Vienna WS SE Seminar Quantenphysik I Supervising Professor: Ao. Univ.-Prof. i.r. Dr. Reinhold Bertlmann Handed in by: Bogdan Pammer 8158 Vienna, June 29, 211
2 Contents 1 Introduction What is entanglement? entangled non local Free entanglement and bound entanglement Mathematical foundations 2.1 Positive operators and density matrices Positive Maps How to draw the line - necessary theorems 5.1 Pure states The PPT criterion A necessary condition for separability Entanglement witness theorem Three final steps to proof the PPT criterion Hilbert-Schmidt measure and entanglement witness Drawing a map for two-parameter entangled qubits 1.1 The Werner states A two parameter family Making a good guess? Finding the closest separable state in region I Finding the closest separable state in region II
3 1 Introduction 1.1 What is entanglement? Phenomenologically (experimentally) Entanglement is the correlation of results from mesurements in two different degrees of freedom within a physical system. (Alice, Bob,...) Mathematically (theoretically) Two degrees of freedom are entangled, iff they are not separable. Def. Pure or mixed states are separable in the Hilbertspaces A and B (bipartite system), if they can be written in the following way: ψ = ψ A ψ B (1) whereas ψ H A H B and ψ x H x ρ = i ρ mµnν = i p i ρ i A ρ i B p i ρ i Amn ρ i Bµν (2) whereas ρ x = i ψ i x ψ i, ψ x H x, p i 1 and i p i = 1. A separable state s eigenvalues therefore are invariant under separate unitary transformations of the bases used by the two observers. (U A U B )ρ(u A U B ) = i p i U A ρ i AU A U Bρ i BU B () Def. If a state H A H B is not separable in the way defined above, it is bipartite entangled. In this paper we will exclusively deal with bipartite entanglement. As example we can take a look at the (pure) spin-state ψ. ψ = 1 2 ( ) =
4 This vector cannot be written as tensor product of two state-vectors ( ) ( ) ac a c = ad b d bc. bd From (2) naturally follows that the set of separable states S is convex, meaning: ρ z = p ρ x + (1 p)ρ x S () ρ x, ρ y S and p entangled non local There are entangled states that can be described by a LRT (local realistic theory), that means due to hidden variables. Not all entangled states violate the Bell inequality. [1] So entangled states can be further classified in such that violate the bell inequality and those which don t. Def. An entangled state, that violates the Bell inequality maximally is defined as maximally entangled. 1. Free entanglement and bound entanglement Def. Fidelity F of an entangled state ρ ent in relation to an maximally entangled (and in this case pure) state ψ max is defined as: F ψmax = ψ max ρ ent ψ max, F ψmax 1 (5) Def. Def. Free entangled states ρ free are those states, which through repeated application of LOOC-Protocols (local operations and classical communication) can be distilled - reach an aribitrarily high fidelity.[2] Bound entangled states ρ bound are those states, which cannot be distilled. Bound entanglement is matter of intensive research in quantum information.
5 2 Mathematical foundations Dealing with bipartite entanglement in two qu-dit Hilbert spaces, we want to find out which states are entangled and which are not - draw the line. Qudits are the d-dimensional analogon to the two dimensional qu-bits. Before we can draw the line and analyse the geometry of entanglement in those two qu-dit Hilbert spaces we first need a criterion to distinguish entangled from not entangled states. Since this is a high dimensional problems this task is not as easy as it appears at first sight. 2.1 Positive operators and density matrices Operators acting on a Hilbert Space H of a qunatum mechanical system make up themselves a Hilbert Space called Hilbert-Schmidt Space A. Since we are dealing with Hilbert spaces of finit dimension the Elements of A written as matrices. The density matrices ρ from above are in strict mathematical terms elements of the positive semi-definite sub-space with a trace equal to 1.(In the case of pure states they are projectors on the respective ψ.) The respective scalar product of two operators A, B, A is defined as: A B = T ra B (6) Def. An operator P A on a Hilbert Space H is positive semi-definite iff P ψ ψ ψ H. Short: P A positive operator is necessarily Hermitian. 2.2 Positive Maps A linear map Λ : A 1 A 2 (7) maps an operator from A 1 into A 2. Def. A linear map Λ is positive iff Λ(A) A A 1. Short: Λ A postive map maps positive operators into positive operators. For a map Λ to be completely positive also a the map 1 d Λ : M d A 1 M d A 2 (8) needs to be positive d = 2,,,...; 1 d is the identity on the matrix space M d of all d d matrices. This is an advanced mathematical structure, since
6 not all positive maps remain positive when -expanded by the identity. A positive map therefore preserves hermiticity. How to draw the line - necessary theorems.1 Pure states It s rather easy to determine whether a pure states is separable. As we know from (1) ψ = ψ A ψ B ψ ψ = ( ψ A ψ B )( ψ A ψ B ) = ψ A ψ A ψ B ψ B (9) = ρ A ρ B For a separable state ψ ρ A and ρ B are density matrices of a pure state. The reduced density matrices ρ A = T r B ( ψ ψ ) and ρ B = T r A ( ψ ψ ) therefore need to be density matrices of a pure state, meaning T r(ρ 2 A ) = T r(ρ2 B ) = 1. If this is not the case the state is entangled..2 The PPT criterion The PPT (partial positive transposition) criterion is a necessary and sufficient criterion for C d C e (for d e 6) Hilbertspaces to determine whether a state is separable. For higher dimensional bipartite Hilbertspaces it is sufficient but not necessary. If a state ρ S A S B is separable, then ρ T B := (1 A T B )ρ (1) where T B is the transposition on the second subsystem of S A S B..2.1 A necessary condition for separability ρ T B := (1 A T B )ρ ρ S A S B is a necessary condition for separability. This is shown by Peres in [7]. Per definition (2) a separable state can be written as: 5
7 ρ = i p iρ i A ρi B ρ mµnν = i p iρ i Amn ρ i Bµν For the partial transposition T B we transpose the elements of the B-space, which is equivalent with switching the respective (greek) indices. ρ T B = ρ mνnµ = = i = i p i ρ i Amn ρ i Bνµ = p i ρ i A ρ i B T (11) Under separate unitary basis transformations, which are defined above (see ), the partial transposition s eigenvalues are conserved. This means the eigenvalues of ρ T B = (1 A T B )ρ are equal to the eigenvalues of (1 A T B )(U A U B ρ (U A U B ) ). This can be seen after a few manipulation steps: (1 A T B )(U A U B ρ U A U B ) = =(1 A T B ) p i U A ρ i AU A U Bρ i BU B = i = i = i = i p i U A ρ i AU A (U Bρ i BU B )T = p i U A ρ i AU A (U B )T ρ i B T U T B = p i U A ρ i AU A U Bρ i B T (U B) = (12) =(U A U B) ρ T B (U A U B) ρ T B (U A U B ) ρt B (U A U B ) is an unitary transformation und therefore conserves eigenvalues. For this reason it doesn t matter in which basis A and B view their system, the partial transposition s eigenvalues remain and are therefore able to conduct a useful criterion. ρ i B T is a density matrix as well, since a transposition keeps the matrix eigenvalues. ρ T B is therefore necceserily a legitimate (separable) density matrix and non-negative. The opposite direction 6
8 ρ T B := (1 A T B )ρ ρ S A S B is true only in the special cases of C d C e (for d + e 6). The Horodecki s showed this in the following steps [6]. The first step is the entanglement witness theorem..2.2 Entanglement witness theorem First it is to show, that a state ρ ent is entangled iff there exists an Hermitian operator A A, called entanglement witness [, 6, 9, 1] so that: ρ ent, A = T raρ ent <, σ, A = T raσ, σ S (1) The proof is based on the Hahn-Banach Theorem of functional analysis, saying that if W 1 and W 2 are convex closed sets in a real Banach space and one of them is compact, then there exists a continuous functional f and α R such that for all pairs w 1 W 1 and w 2 W 2 we have f(w 1 ) < α f(w 2 ) (1) We will operate on a subspace of the Hilbert-Schmidt space A 1 A 2 consisting only of hermitian operators. (It can be easily shown they generate a subspace). Therefore and since the separable states S are a closed set and a set consisting of one element is compact we can use the Hahn-Banach Theorem in the following way: W 1 ρ ent (the set consisting only of the not-separable density matrix ρ ent ) W 2 S (σ S) α β f g(ρ) = T raρ with A = A, we can obtain any continous linear functional g this way, since any continous functional in a Hilbert space is represented by a vector from this space. [6] Further we see that g is real. According to Hahn-Banach we therefore know, that there exists an A so that If we substitute: g(ρ ent ) < β g(σ) (15) A A = A β1 We obtain the desired entanglement witness, since 7
9 T ra ρ ent = g(ρ ent ) β < and T ra σ = g(σ) β Later we will see that the entanglement witness theorem in its own is a very useful tool in higher dimensions to draw the line..2. Three final steps to proof the PPT criterion 1. T raρ ρ S. (16) A A 1 A 2 with A = A. : If A = A then T ra( ψ ψ φ φ ). This can be easily shown by decomposing the basis of A 1 A 2 in the eigenbasis of the Hermitian operator A. Then from the definition of separability (see (2)) obviously follows the proof s first direction. : Indirect proof: Suppose for all Hermitian A T raρ, but ρ / S. Since ρ / S according to the EWT (1) there exists a Hermitian A so that T ra ρ <, which is a contradiction to the assumption A T raρ. Qed. 2. (1 Λ) ρ ρ S. (17) for all positive Λ s. In this second step as it is shown in [6] the Horodecki s translate (16) in the language of positive maps. For this purpose we use the following isomorphism, Λ S(Λ) = i E i Λ(E i) A 1 A 2. (18) Whereas Λ : A 1 A 2 is a linear map and E i is a arbitrary orthonormal basis for A 1 and A 2 respectivly. We can now substitute (16) A S(Λ) and gain: T r( i E i Λ(E i))ρ. (19) A theorem by Jamiolkowski [8] states, that for a map Λ to be positive it is necessary and sufficient that S(Λ) is Hermitian and T r(s(λ) P Q). Whereby P and Q are elements of A 1 and A 2 respectivly. As mentioned above a density matrix is a sum of tensored pairs of projectors. In this notation ρ could be written as 8
10 ρ = p n P n Q n (2) Therefore iff Λ is an arbitrary positive map (Λ ) S(Λ) is Hermitian, (19) fulfilled and the substitution allowed. Now we choose the specific projector basis {P ij } dimax i,j=1, with P ije l = δ jl e i P ij projects the basis vector e j on e i and the others on. (19) turns into: T r( i,j (1 Λ)P ji P ij )ρ T r((1 ΛT ) i,j P ij P ij )ρ (21) T r(1 ΛT P )ρ T is a positive map, since it conserves matrices eigenvalues. Λ := ΛT is accordingly a positive form. Written as scalar product: ρ (1 Λ P ) (22) Positive maps preserve hermiticity and hence the tensor product 1 Λ also does. Then, as P O is Hermitian we obtain: ρ 1 Λ P (2) Since we deal with finite operators we can pass to adjoint maps and gain: 1 Λ ρ P (2) for an arbitrary map Λ : A 2 A 1. For separable ρ this condition is obviously fulfilled. Conversely, since P is a sum of projectors, if 1 Λ ρ conditions (2) and accordingly (16) are fulfilled. whereas ρ T B := (1 A T B )ρ see (1).. ρ T B > ρ S. (25) According to the Strømer-Woronowicz Theorem [11, 12] for C d C e (d e 6) a positive operator Λ can be written as whereas Λ CP A and ΛCP B Λ = Λ CP A + Λ CP B T (26) are completely positive maps. 9
11 <[1 Λρ] = [1 (Λ CP A + Λ CP B T )]ρ = [1 Λ CP A ]ρ + [1 Λ CP B T ]ρ = [1 Λ CP A ]ρ + [1 Λ CP B ]ρ T B (27) Since Λ CP A and Λ CP B are completely positive maps is ρ T B > a sufficent condition for separability.. Hilbert-Schmidt measure and entanglement witness In (2.2.) it was shown that a state ρ ent is entangled iff there exists an Hermitian operator A A, called entanglement witness, so that: ρ ent, A = T raρ ent <, σ, A = T raσ, σ S (28) An entanglement witness A therefore divides the operator space in two spaces. Both spaces are convex due to the linearity of the scalar product. One of them contains the entangled state, the other S, the (convex) set of all separable states. An entanglement witness A is optimal, if additionally to the criterions mentioned in (28) there exists a separable state ρ S for which A ρ =. (29) A = ρ ρ ent ρ ρ ρ ent 1 ρ ρ ent A as defined above is an optimal entanglement witness. The states fulfilling A ρ = ρ ρ ent ρ ρ ρ ent 1 ρ ρ ρ ent = ρ ρ ρ ent ρ ρ ρ ρ ent 1 ρ ρ ρ ent = () (1) A ρ = (2) 1
12 can be illustrated as tangent plane to S, due to the linearity of the scalar product. If two different ρ 1 and ρ 2 fulfill (2) also their linear combinations do so. If σ 1 and σ 1 S fulfill equation (2) also those states on the straight line connecting them fulfill (2) and are in S, since S is convex. All separable states are either on the tangent plane or on the side of it. The situation can therfore be illustrated in the following way: Figure 1: Illustration of an optimal entanglement witness The Hilbert-Schmidt measure of entanglement is defined as the minimal Hilbert-Schmidt distance of an entangled state ρ ent to any separable state ρ S. D(ρ ent ) := min ρ S ρ ρ ent = ρ ρ ent () The entanglement witness theorem can help to identify the respective ρ. A separable state σ equals the separable state ρ closest to ρ ent iff is an entanglement witness. C = σ ρ ent σ σ ρ ent σ ρ ent () To show this we make use of the Bertlmann-Narnhofer-Thirring Theorem (BNT Theorem) []. Firstly we define the maximal violation of the entaglement witness inequality: B(ρ ent ) = max (min ρ A ρ ent A ) (5) A, A a1 1 ρ S 11
13 The BNT Theorem then states: Theorem 1 (BNT Theorem) Considering an abritary entangled state ρ ent, then its closest distance to the set of separable states D(ρ ent ) () equals the maximal violation of the entanglement witness inequality (5) The following graph illustrates the BNT Theorem: D(ρ ent ) = B(ρ ent ). (6) Figure 2: Illufation of the Bertlmann-Narnhofer-Thirring Theorem Due to the definition A from above and the BNT Theorem the very intuitive from above is justified: (1) The closest separable state ρ ent is on the straight line representing A (2) A is tangent to the convex set S () the line illustrated representing A can be illustrated as being orthogonal to the line connecting ρ ent and ρ, since for A the entanglement witness inequality gets violate maximally by ρ ent, the closest separable state. From the BNT Theorem we can conclude that if ρ is the closest separable state, the respective A is an entanglement witness. So we can guess closest separable states σ and proof them as such by analysing whether is an entanglement witness. C = σ ρ ent σ σ ρ ent σ ρ ent (7) 12
14 Drawing a map for two-parameter entangled qubits We will now explicitly calculate Hilbert-Schmidt measure of two-parameter entangled qubits. We will first guess states and then proof that they are the closest separable states by the criterion mentioned above..1 The Werner states The Werner State is the 2 2 dimensional case of an isotropic state. An isotropic state is a d d dimensional bipartite quantum state that is invariant under any unitary of the form U U, where * denotes complex conjugate. That is, any state with the property that for any unitary U on one part of the system, ρ = (U U )ρ(u (U ) ). (8) The isotropic states is a one-parameter familiy of states and can be written as ρ α = α φ + φ + (1 α)1 + (9) d 2 The Werner States therefore can be written as: ρ α = 1+α α 2 1 α 1 α α 1+α 2 Since ρ α is a density matrix all eigenvalues need to be positive, therefore: 1 < α 1. ρt B α can be written as ρ T B α = 1+α 1 α α 2 α 2 1 α 1+α The eigenvalues of ρ T B α are: λ 1,2, = 1+α and λ = 1 α. λ 1,2, are positiv for all α in its domain. λ is not negative for α 1. According to the PPT criterion therefore ρ α is separable for 1 < α 1 and entangled for 1 < α 1. 1
15 .2 A two parameter family We know now for this one parameter family, where the boarder between entangled and separable lies. From here we want to expand this by analysing the following state: ρ α,β = 1 α β 1 + α φ + φ + + β 2 ( ψ+ ψ + + ψ ψ ) () ρ α,β = 1+α β α 2 1 α+β 1 α+β α 2 1+α β The eigenvalues of ρ α,β are: λ 1,2 = 1 α+β, λ = 1 α β and λ = 1+α β. We see that the eigenvalues sum equals 1. This is basically the Werner State mixed with an additional parameter β. Again ρ α,β is only a density matrix if all its eigenvalues are positive. This constrains the possible values for α and β, namely: α β + 1, α 1 β 1, α β + 1, (1) We can now apply the partial transposition on ρ α,β eigenvalues and separability conditions for ρ α,β. and obtain following ρ T B α = 1+α β α 1 α+β α α+β 1+α The eigenvalues of ρ T B α,β are: λ 1,2 = 1+α β, λ = 1 α+β and λ = 1+α+β. α β 1, α 1 β + 1, α β 1, (2). Making a good guess? Now we need some intuition or a good guess for the closest separable state to progress on our endeavor. Since the states ρ α,β compile a plane in the Hilbert-Schmidt space Bertlmann and Krammer decided to make use of it s inner product to introduce a coordinate system and display it. After illustrating the situation and the lines (conditions) discerning separable and 1
16 entangle states, we will guess the closest state (in the Euclidian sense) as the closest separable state ρ (minimal Hilbert-Schmidt distance). We will proof that this guess was right, but as we will see this is by no means trivial. To find a helpful coordinate system to display the plane containing our states from (). We check first which angle the α- and β-axis include and where we have right angles (where the scalar product diminishes). Let us again take a look at the states we want to display: ρ α,β = 1 α β 1 + α φ + φ + + β 2 ( ψ+ ψ + + ψ ψ ) For α = β = we get the identity, which shall be at the origin of our coordinate system. Now our coordinate system needs axis and angles. A general vector (in the plane) is of the form ρ α,β 1: ρ α,β 1 = We calculate a general angle: α β α 2 α+β α+β α 2 +α β ρ α1,β 1 1 ρ α2,β 2 1 = T r((ρ α2,β 2 1) (ρ α1,β 1 1)) = 1 (α 1α 2 α 2 β 1 α 1 β 2 + β 1 β 2 ) () We can calculate for which vectors (α 2,β 2 ) the α-axis (β 1 = ) includes a right angle. We obtain: α 1 α 2 α 1 β 2 = α 2 = 1 β 2 () We see that the α-axis includes a right angle with those vectors fulfilling α = 1 β. Looking at the conditions constraining the separable states in (1) and (2), we see that in both cases the direction vector of those straight lines resembling the second conditions (α 1β 1 and α 1β + 1 ) fulfil the conditions and therefore include a right angle with the α-axis. For the β axis we optain through equivalent calculations, that the straight lines resembling the first conditions of (1) and (2) (α β+1 and α β 1) include a right angle with it. 15
17 The two parameter family of states and the positivity conditions constraining ρ α,β and ρ T B α,β can be displayed in the following way: Figure : Illustration of the qu-bit states ρ α,β and their partial transposition It is to mention that this illustration makes a significant compromise. If we calculate the angle between the α- and β-axis with equation we realize that their angle is a function of the position you are on the respective axis. Therefore the image above is a helpful illustration, but one needs to be careful with drawing conclusions from it. Three straight lines resembling the positivity conditions meet at the points (α =, β = 1) and (α =, β = 1). This can be easily seen, by inserting in equation 1 and 2. From this we can draw, that there are two sectors (I and II) of entangled states in ρ α,β. Those states fulfill the positivity criterion, but their partial transposition ρ T B α,β has negative eigenvalues.. Finding the closest separable state in region I The previous section s illustration helps us to make educated guesses, for the closest separable states. In section I α 1β + 1 is the constraining condi- 16
18 tion. The nearest states in the Euclidian sense (according to our coordinate system) to a state ρ ent α,β =(α,β) in area I is therefore ρ β =( 1 β + 1,β). Let us now proof whether C = ρ β ρent α,β ρ β ρ β ρent α,β 1 ρ ent α,β ρ β is an entanglement witness and thereby ρ β the closest separable state (). To calculate C we use a different but equivalent expression for ρ α,β : ρ α,β = 1 (1 + α(σ 1 σ 1 σ 2 σ 2 ) + (α β) σ σ ) (5) Whereby σ i represents the respective Pauli matrix. We gain with ρ β ρ ent α,β = 1 (1 + β α)σ (6) Σ = σ 1 σ 1 σ 2 σ 2 + σ σ. (7) Since Σ = T r(σσ) = 2 we optain, that ρ β ρ ent α,β = For the scale product we obtain 2 (1 + β α) (8) ρ β ρ ent α,β ρ β = T rρ β(ρ β ρ ent α,β = (α 1 β ). (9) Using (6),(8) and (9) we obtain C = 1 2 (1 Σ) (5) having calculated C we need, check whether it is an entanglement witness. For this to be the case it needs to fulfill the conditions pointed out in (). By construction we obtain for ρ ent C = ρ ρ ent <. The mathematically more interesting test to to prove whether all separable states σ fulfill σ C >. In [] this is done by proofing the following Lemma: 17
19 Lemma 1 For any Hermitian operator C on a Hilbert space of dimension 2 2 that is of the form C = a(1 + c i σ i σ i ), a R +, c i R (51) the expectation value for all separable states is positive, i=1 σ C σ S if c i 1 i. (52) Proof: Any separable state ρ is a convex combination of product states and thus a separable two qubit states can be written as σ = k p k (1 1 + i n k i σ i 1 + j m k j σ j 1 + i,j n k i m k j σ i σ j ), with n k i, m k j R, n k 1, m k 1, p k 1, k p k = 1, (5) where n k = i (nk i ) 2. Performing the trace, we obtain σ C = T rσc = k p k a(1 + i c i n k i m k i ), (5) and usig the restriction c i 1 i we have i c i n k i m k i i n k i m k i 1, (55) and since the convex sum of positive terms stays positive we get σ C σ S. Qed. Since (5) is of the form (51), we can use this Lemma to very that C from (5) as an entanglement witness. ρ β are therefore the closest separable states in area I. D I (ρ ent α,β) = ρ β ρ ent α,β = 2 (α 1 β ) (56) is therefore the Hilbert-Schmidt measure for area I and equal to the maximal violation of the entanglement witness inequality as mentioned above in (5). 18
20 .5 Finding the closest separable state in region II The calculation for region II follows the same pattern as in region I. α < β 1 is here the constraining condition separating entangled from separable states. In order to calculate the nearest states in the Euclidian sense (according to our coordinate system) to a state ρ ent α,β =(α,β) in area II we need to find the line including a right angle with those states fulfilling α = β 1. As in () we apply the scalar product and obtain ρ 1+2α β α,β =(, 2 2α+β ). To calculate C we need so that ρ α,β ρ ent α,β = 1 12 (α β)σ 1 σ 1 σ 2 σ 2 σ σ, (57) ρ α,β ρ ent α,β = 1 2 ( α 1 β) (58) ρ α,β ρ ent α,β ρ α,β = 1 (α β), (59) 12 C = 1 2 (1 + σ 1 σ 1 σ 2 σ 2 σ σ ). (6) The first condition of (1) is again fulfilled by the constuction of C. To poof the second condition we again apply the condition from (.) and obtain Therefore σ C σ S. (61) D II (ρ ent α,β) = ρ α,β ρ ent α,β = 1 2 ( α 1 β) (62) is the Hilbert-Schmidt measure for region II and equal to the maximal violation of the entanglement witness inequality as mentioned above in (5). With this we mapped this two parameter family of two entangled qu-bits properly and calculated the Hilbert-Schmidt measure. 19
21 References [1] J.S. Bell, On the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky paradox. Physics 1 (196) 195. [2] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, W. K. Wootters, Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. 76 (1996) 722. [] R. A. Bertlmann, P. Krammer, Entanglement witnesses and geometry of entanglement of two-qutrit states. Annals of Physics 2 (29) 188. [] R. A. Bertlmann, H. Narnhofer, W. Thirring A Geometric Picture of Entanglement and Bell Inequalities. Phys. Rev. 66 (21) 219. [5] P. Krammer, Quantum entanglement: Detection, classification, and quantification. Diploma Thesis, University of Vienna 25. [6] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Rev. 22 (1996) 1. [7] A. Peres Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. 77 (1996) 11. [8] A. Jamiolkowski. Rep. Math. Phys. (1972) 275. [9] B. M. Terhal. Bell Inequalities and The Separability Criterion Phys. Rev. 271 (2) 19. [1] D. Bruß. J. Math. Phys. (22) 27. [11] E. Strømer. Acta. Math. 11 (196) 2. [12] S. L. Woronowicz. Rep. Math. Phys. 1 (1976)
Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification
Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades,,Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien eingereicht von Philipp
More informationGeneralized Bell Inequality and Entanglement Witness
Nonlocal Seminar 2005 Bratislava, April 29th 2005 Reinhold A. Bertlmann Generalized Bell Inequality and Entanglement Witness Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Vienna Motivation Composite
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 17 Jun 1996
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices arxiv:quant-ph/9604005v2 17 Jun 1996 Asher Peres Department of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel Abstract A quantum system
More informationQuantum Entanglement and Geometry
Quantum Entanglement and Geometry arxiv:1003.3778v1 [quant-ph] 19 Mar 2010 Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades,,Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien eingereicht von Andreas
More informationQuantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects
Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects Debasis Sarkar Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata- 700009, India Abstract Entanglement is one of the most useful
More informationQuantum entanglement and symmetry
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Quantum entanglement and symmetry To cite this article: D Chrucisi and A Kossaowsi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 87 012008 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationEntanglement or Separability an introduction
Bachelor Thesis Entanglement or Separability an introduction Lukas Schneiderbauer December 22, 2012 Quantum entanglement is a huge and active research field these days. Not only the philosophical aspects
More informationChapter 5. Density matrix formalism
Chapter 5 Density matrix formalism In chap we formulated quantum mechanics for isolated systems. In practice systems interect with their environnement and we need a description that takes this feature
More informationApplication of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)
Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU) Singlet fraction and its usefulness in Teleportation Singlet
More informationEstimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN)
Estimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN) Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University satyabrata@dtu.ac.in December 4, 2018 Satyabrata Adhikari (DTU) Estimation
More informationPermutations and quantum entanglement
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Permutations and quantum entanglement To cite this article: D Chruciski and A Kossakowski 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 104 012002 View the article online for updates
More informationDIPLOMARBEIT. Titel der Diplomarbeit. Entanglement under Global Unitary Operations. angestrebter akademischer Grad
DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Entanglement under Global Unitary Operations angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Naturwissenschaften (Mag. rer.nat.) Verfasser: Philipp Köhler Matrikel-Nummer:
More informationTheory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
More informationEntanglement: Definition, Purification and measures
Entanglement: Definition, Purification and measures Seminar in Quantum Information processing 3683 Gili Bisker Physics Department Technion Spring 006 Gili Bisker Physics Department, Technion Introduction
More information1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics
1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics How to describe the states of an ideally controlled system? How to describe changes in an ideally controlled system? How to describe measurements on an ideally controlled
More informationOn PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones
Entanglement Measures and Monotones PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University March 30, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones March 30, 2017 1 / 11 Quantifying
More informationCharacterization of Multipartite Entanglement
Characterization of Multipartite Entanglement Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften des Fachbereichs Physik der Universität Dortmund vorgelegt von Bo Chong Juni 2006
More informationBell Inequalities and Entanglement Witnesses Using Two-Body Correlations
ational University of Singapore PC4199 Honours Project in Physics Bell Inequalities and Entanglement Witnesses Using Two-Body Correlations By: Tan Ying Zhe Ernest (A0003918J) Supervisors: Kwek Leong Chuan
More informationFINDING DECOMPOSITIONS OF A CLASS OF SEPARABLE STATES
FINDING DECOMPOSITIONS OF A CLASS OF SEPARABLE STATES ERIK ALFSEN AND FRED SHULTZ Abstract. We consider the class of separable states which admit a decomposition i A i B i with the B i s having independent
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006
1 Ph 219/CS 219 Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006 1.1 How far apart are two quantum states? Consider two quantum states described by density operators ρ and ρ in an N-dimensional Hilbert space, and
More informationBasics on quantum information
Basics on quantum information Mika Hirvensalo Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Turku mikhirve@utu.fi Thessaloniki, May 2016 Mika Hirvensalo Basics on quantum information 1 of 52 Brief
More informationDistinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states
Distinguishing different classes of entanglement for three qubit pure states Chandan Datta Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar chandan@iopb.res.in YouQu-2017, HRI Chandan Datta (IOP) Tripartite Entanglement
More informationBasics on quantum information
Basics on quantum information Mika Hirvensalo Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Turku mikhirve@utu.fi Thessaloniki, May 2014 Mika Hirvensalo Basics on quantum information 1 of 49 Brief
More informationSUPERDENSE CODING AND QUANTUM TELEPORTATION
SUPERDENSE CODING AND QUANTUM TELEPORTATION YAQIAO LI This note tries to rephrase mathematically superdense coding and quantum teleportation explained in [] Section.3 and.3.7, respectively (as if I understood
More informationTeleportation of Quantum States (1993; Bennett, Brassard, Crepeau, Jozsa, Peres, Wootters)
Teleportation of Quantum States (1993; Bennett, Brassard, Crepeau, Jozsa, Peres, Wootters) Rahul Jain U. Waterloo and Institute for Quantum Computing, rjain@cs.uwaterloo.ca entry editor: Andris Ambainis
More informationQuantum Gates, Circuits & Teleportation
Chapter 3 Quantum Gates, Circuits & Teleportation Unitary Operators The third postulate of quantum physics states that the evolution of a quantum system is necessarily unitary. Geometrically, a unitary
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/2 PARTICLES
CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/ PARTICLES S. Ghosh, G. Kar, and A. Roy Physics and Applied Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute 03, B. T. Road Calcutta 700 035 India. E
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 May 2011
Geometry of entanglement witnesses for two qutrits Dariusz Chruściński and Filip A. Wudarski Institute of Physics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Grudzi adzka 5/7, 87 100 Toruń, Poland May 25, 2011 arxiv:1105.4821v1
More informationENTANGLED STATES ARISING FROM INDECOMPOSABLE POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS. 1. Introduction
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 6, Number 2, December, 2003, Pages 83 91 ENTANGLED STATES ARISING FROM INDECOMPOSABLE POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS SEUNG-HYEOK KYE Abstract.
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015
Entanglement and swap of quantum states in two qubits Takaya Ikuto and Satoshi Ishizaka Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, 739-8521, Japan (Dated:
More informationGilles Brassard. Université de Montréal
Gilles Brassard Université de Montréal Gilles Brassard Université de Montréal VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 29 JANUARY 1996 Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful
More informationTHE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS
THE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS Armin Uhlmann University of Leipzig, Institute for Theoretical Physics After a short introduction to anti-linearity, bounds for the number of orthogonal (skew) conjugations
More informationPHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix
PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix Here follows a short summary of the definitions of qubits, EPR states, entanglement, the density matrix, pure states, mixed states, measurement, and
More informationEntanglement in Particle Physics: Bell Inequalities, Geometry and Relativistics
Entanglement in Particle Physics: Bell Inequalities, Geometry and Relativistics Colloquium at PSI Reinhold A. Bertlmann Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna June 10 th, 2010 Outline Part I Quantum
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics R. J. Renka Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of North Texas 03/19/2018 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics The postulates (axioms) of quantum mechanics
More informationMaximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement
1 Maximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement Salman Beigi School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences IPM, Tehran, Iran arxiv:1405.50v1 [quant-ph] 11 May 014 Abstract
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2013
Genuine hidden quantum nonlocality Flavien Hirsch, 1 Marco Túlio Quintino, 1 Joseph Bowles, 1 and Nicolas Brunner 1, 1 Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève, 111 Genève, Switzerland H.H.
More informationPrinciples of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2
Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 9, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 February 9, 2017 1 / 13 The
More informationMP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 9 Jan 2017
Lectures on Quantum Information Chapter 1: The separability versus entanglement problem Sreetama Das 1,, Titas Chanda 1,, Maciej Lewenstein 3,4, Anna Sanpera 4,5, Aditi Sen(De) 1,, and Ujjwal Sen 1, 1
More informationEntropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory
Entropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory William Fedus Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. Entropy is a central concept in both classical and quantum information theory,
More informationUnitary evolution: this axiom governs how the state of the quantum system evolves in time.
CS 94- Introduction Axioms Bell Inequalities /7/7 Spring 7 Lecture Why Quantum Computation? Quantum computers are the only model of computation that escape the limitations on computation imposed by the
More informationHomework 3 - Solutions
Homework 3 - Solutions The Transpose an Partial Transpose. 1 Let { 1, 2,, } be an orthonormal basis for C. The transpose map efine with respect to this basis is a superoperator Γ that acts on an operator
More informationLecture: Quantum Information
Lecture: Quantum Information Transcribed by: Crystal Noel and Da An (Chi Chi) November 10, 016 1 Final Proect Information Find an issue related to class you are interested in and either: read some papers
More informationBOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS
BOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS P. Caban, K. Podlaski, J. Rembieliński, K. A. Smoliński and Z. Walczak Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Lodz Pomorska 149/153,
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den aturwissenschaften Leipzig Bell inequality for multipartite qubit quantum system and the maximal violation by Ming Li and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 27 2013 Bell
More informationQuantum Entanglement and Measurement
Quantum Entanglement and Measurement Haye Hinrichsen in collaboration with Theresa Christ University of Würzburg, Germany 2nd Workhop on Quantum Information and Thermodynamics Korea Institute for Advanced
More informationPrivate quantum subsystems and error correction
Private quantum subsystems and error correction Sarah Plosker Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Brandon University September 26, 2014 Outline 1 Classical Versus Quantum Setting Classical Setting
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 27 Feb 2009
arxiv:0811.803v3 [quant-ph] 7 Feb 009 Entanglement detection Otfried Gühne Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 1A, A-600 Innsbruck,
More informationIs the world more classical or more quantum?
Is the world more classical or more quantum? A. Lovas, A. Andai BUTE, Department of Analysis XXVI International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Braga, 4-7 September 2017 A. Lovas, A. Andai Is the
More informationCompression and entanglement, entanglement transformations
PHYSICS 491: Symmetry and Quantum Information April 27, 2017 Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations Lecture 8 Michael Walter, Stanford University These lecture notes are not proof-read
More informationLecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics
Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics Rajat Mittal IIT Kanpur The postulates of quantum mechanics provide us the mathematical formalism over which the physical theory is developed. For people studying
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 13 Mar 2007
Quantumness versus Classicality of Quantum States Berry Groisman 1, Dan Kenigsberg 2 and Tal Mor 2 1. Centre for Quantum Computation, DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce
More informationQuantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra
Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces
More informationEnsembles and incomplete information
p. 1/32 Ensembles and incomplete information So far in this course, we have described quantum systems by states that are normalized vectors in a complex Hilbert space. This works so long as (a) the system
More informationMulti-particle entanglement via two-party entanglement
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICSPUBLISHING JOURNAL OFPHYSICSA: MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 6807 6814 PII: S0305-4470(01)21903-9 Multi-particle entanglement via two-party entanglement
More informationElementary linear algebra
Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The
More informationBoundary of the Set of Separable States
Boundary of the Set of Separale States Mingjun Shi, Jiangfeng Du Laoratory of Quantum Communication and Quantum Computation, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China,
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2014
REE From EOF Eylee Jung 1 and DaeKil Park 1, 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea Department of Physics, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea arxiv:1404.7708v3
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationEstimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states
Estimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states Sumiyoshi Abe 1,2,3 1 Physics Division, College of Information Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China 2 Department of Physical
More informationEntanglement Manipulation
Entanglement Manipulation Steven T. Flammia 1 1 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 2Y5 Canada (Dated: 22 March 2010) These are notes for my RIT tutorial lecture at the
More informationProbabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract
Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling Arun Kumar Pati Quantum Optics and Information Group, SEECS, Dean Street, University of Wales, Bangor LL 57 IUT, UK (August 5, 999) Abstract
More informationABSTRACT TRIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT IN QUANTUM OPEN SYSTEMS. by Habtom G. Woldekristos
ABSTRACT TRIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT IN QUANTUM OPEN SYSTEMS by Habtom G. Woldekristos We investigate entanglement in an open quantum system, specifically in bipartite and tripartite systems of two dimensions
More informationINSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner
i f INSTITUT FOURIER Quantum correlations and Geometry Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier et Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Grenoble Outlines Entangled and non-classical
More informationBorromean Entanglement Revisited
Borromean Entanglement Revisited Ayumu SUGITA Abstract An interesting analogy between quantum entangled states and topological links was suggested by Aravind. In particular, he emphasized a connection
More informationIs Entanglement Sufficient to Enable Quantum Speedup?
arxiv:107.536v3 [quant-ph] 14 Sep 01 Is Entanglement Sufficient to Enable Quantum Speedup? 1 Introduction The mere fact that a quantum computer realises an entangled state is ususally concluded to be insufficient
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006
Ph 9/CS 9 Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 006. Fidelity We saw in Exercise. that the trace norm ρ ρ tr provides a useful measure of the distinguishability of the states ρ and ρ. Another useful measure
More informationDetection of photonic Bell states
LECTURE 3 Detection of photonic Bell states d a c Beam-splitter transformation: b ˆB ˆB EXERCISE 10: Derive these three relations V a H a ˆB Detection: or V b H b or Two photons detected in H a, H b, V
More informationLecture 11 September 30, 2015
PHYS 7895: Quantum Information Theory Fall 015 Lecture 11 September 30, 015 Prof. Mark M. Wilde Scribe: Mark M. Wilde This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
More informationSome Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels
Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels arxiv:quant-ph/0303141v3 16 Apr 003 Mary Beth Ruskai Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts 0155 USA marybeth.ruskai@tufts.edu
More informationMaximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement
Maximal vectors in Hilbert space and quantum entanglement William Arveson arveson@math.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley Summer 2008 arxiv:0712.4163 arxiv:0801.2531 arxiv:0804.1140 Overview Quantum Information
More informationCharacterization of Bipartite Entanglement
Characterization of Bipartite Entanglement Werner Vogel and Jan Sperling University of Rostock Germany Paraty, September 2009 Paraty, September 2009 UNIVERSITÄT ROSTOCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK 1 Table of Contents
More informationQUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING THEOREM p.1/36
QUANTUM INFORMATION - THE NO-HIDING THEOREM Arun K Pati akpati@iopb.res.in Instititute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751005, Orissa, INDIA and Th. P. D, BARC, Mumbai-400085, India QUANTUM INFORMATION -THE NO-HIDING
More informationQuantum Correlations as Necessary Precondition for Secure Communication
Quantum Correlations as Necessary Precondition for Secure Communication Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217903 (2004) quant-ph/0307151 Marcos Curty 1, Maciej Lewenstein 2, Norbert Lütkenhaus 1 1 Institut für Theoretische
More informationA completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension
isibang/ms/2006/6 March 28th, 2006 http://www.isibang.ac.in/ statmath/eprints A completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension B. V. Rajarama Bhat Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore Centre 8th
More informationEntanglement and Quantum Logical Gates. Part I.
DOI 0.007/s0773-05-668- Entanglement and Quantum Logical Gates. Part I. H. Freytes R. Giuntini R. Leporini G. Sergioli Received: 4 December 04 / Accepted: April 05 Springer Science+Business Media New York
More informationMultilinear Singular Value Decomposition for Two Qubits
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 10(S) August: 69 83 (2016) Special Issue: The 7 th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics (ICREM7) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL
More informationQubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable,
Qubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable, A qubit: a sphere of values, which is spanned in projective sense by two quantum
More informationNon-Completely Positive Maps: Properties and Applications
Non-Completely Positive Maps: Properties and Applications By Christopher Wood A thesis submitted to Macquarie University in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours Department
More information. Here we are using the standard inner-product over C k to define orthogonality. Recall that the inner-product of two vectors φ = i α i.
CS 94- Hilbert Spaces, Tensor Products, Quantum Gates, Bell States 1//07 Spring 007 Lecture 01 Hilbert Spaces Consider a discrete quantum system that has k distinguishable states (eg k distinct energy
More informationDECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS
DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS SCOTT HOTTOVY Abstract. Quantum networks are used to transmit and process information by using the phenomena of quantum mechanics.
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 12 Nov 1999
Construction of quantum states with bound entanglement arxiv:quant-ph/9911056v1 12 Nov 1999 Dagmar Bruß 1 and Asher Peres 2 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
More informationQuantum information and quantum computing
Middle East Technical University, Department of Physics January 7, 009 Outline Measurement 1 Measurement 3 Single qubit gates Multiple qubit gates 4 Distinguishability 5 What s measurement? Quantum measurement
More informationBONA FIDE MEASURES OF NON-CLASSICAL CORRELATIONS
BON FIDE MESURES OF NON-CLSSICL CORRELTIONS New J. Phys. 16, 073010 (2014). De Pasquale in collaboration with. Farace, L. Rigovacca and V. Giovannetti Outline MIN IDE: Introduction of measures of non-classical
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2005
Negativity and Concurrence for two qutrits arxiv:quant-ph/57263v 27 Jul 25 Suranjana Rai and Jagdish R. Luthra ( ) Raitech, Tuscaloosa, AL 3545 ( ) Departamento de Física, Universidad de los Andes, A.A.
More informationTrivariate analysis of two qubit symmetric separable state
Pramana J. Phys. (8) 9:4 https://doi.org/.7/s4-8-598-x Indian Academy of Sciences Trivariate analysis of two qubit symmetric separable state SPSUMA and SWARNAMALA SIRSI Department of Physics, Yuvaraa s
More informationVolume of the set of separable states
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 58, NUMBER 2 AUGUST 998 Volume of the set of separable states Karol Życzkowski* Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 2742 Paweł Horodecki
More informationInformation quantique, calcul quantique :
Séminaire LARIS, 8 juillet 2014. Information quantique, calcul quantique : des rudiments à la recherche (en 45min!). François Chapeau-Blondeau LARIS, Université d Angers, France. 1/25 Motivations pour
More information2. Introduction to quantum mechanics
2. Introduction to quantum mechanics 2.1 Linear algebra Dirac notation Complex conjugate Vector/ket Dual vector/bra Inner product/bracket Tensor product Complex conj. matrix Transpose of matrix Hermitian
More informationExperimental Implementation of a Quantum Game
Experimental Implementation of a Quantum Game Diplomarbeit an der Fakultät für Physik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Arbeitsgruppe Prof. Dr. Harald Weinfurter Carsten Schuck 22. Juli 2003 Erstgutachter:
More informationOn the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement
On the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement by Eric Webster A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics
More informationQuantum Teleportation Pt. 3
Quantum Teleportation Pt. 3 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University March 7, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Quantum Teleportation Pt. 3 March 7, 2017 1 / 9 A Bit of History on Teleportation
More informationA Course in Quantum Information Theory
A Course in Quantum Information Theory Ofer Shayevitz Spring 2007 Based on lectures given at the Tel Aviv University Edited by Anatoly Khina Version compiled January 9, 2010 Contents 1 Preliminaries 3
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Apr 1998
On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states Karol Życzkowski Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 USA Pawe l Horodecki Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 5 Mar 2010
Low rank extremal PPT states and unextendible product bases arxiv:1003.1221v1 [quant-ph] 5 Mar 2010 Jon Magne Leinaas a, Jan Myrheim b and Per Øyvind Sollid a (a) Department of Physics,University of Oslo,
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 27 Oct 2014
Entangled Entanglement: The Geometry of GHZ States Gabriele Uchida, 1 Reinhold A. Bertlmann, and Beatrix C. Hiesmayr, 3 1 University of Vienna, Faculty of Computer Science, Währinger Strasse 9, 1090 Vienna,
More informationCS286.2 Lecture 15: Tsirelson s characterization of XOR games
CS86. Lecture 5: Tsirelson s characterization of XOR games Scribe: Zeyu Guo We first recall the notion of quantum multi-player games: a quantum k-player game involves a verifier V and k players P,...,
More information