arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 19 Jan 2000

Transcription

1 UCD-HEP-99-4 Dec 999 Zee Neutrino Mass Mode in SUSY Framework Kingman Cheung and Otto C. W. Kong Department of Physics, University of Caifornia, Davis, CA 9566 USA Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei TAIWAN 59 arxiv:hep-ph/9938v 9 Jan 000 Abstract We study the Zee mode of neutrino mass in the framework of R-parity vioating supersymmetry. Within the matter contents of the minima supersymmetric standard mode, any one of the three right-handed septon coud be a suitabe candidate for the charged-singet scaar of the Zee mode, and one of the Higgs doubets provides the extra necessary vacuum expectation vaue. A combination of one biinear and two triinear R-parity vioating coupings then competes the mode. In this framework, we aso discuss other various contributions to neutrino masses and derive the conditions for the dominance of the contribution from the Zee mode, and hence maintain the successfuy Zee mass texture. However, this mode within the minima supersymmetric standard mode is shown to be ony marginay feasibe. More genera versions of supersymmetrization of the Zee mode are aso discussed. An exampe with extra Higgs doubets whie the septon, especiay the seectron, keeping the roe of the Zee scaar is particuary interesting. Typeset using REVTEX

2 I. INTRODUCTION Within the standard mode (SM), the V A nature of the weak interaction dictates zero mass for a three famiies of neutrinos. Discovery of neutrino mass(es) or osciation(s) wi certainy push for new physics. Evidence for neutrino osciations has been coected in a number of soar neutrino and atmospheric neutrino experiments. The most impressive resuts were the recent ν µ neutrino deficit and the asymmetric zenith-ange distribution observed by the Super-Kamiokande Coaboration []. The atmospheric neutrino deficit and zenith-ange distribution can be expained by the ν µ ν τ or ν µ ν s osciation (ν s is a sterie neutrino that has negigibe couping to W or Z boson and the former has a sighty better fit.) The osciation parameters with ν µ ν τ at 90% C.L. are [] m atm ( 6) 0 3 ev, sin θ atm > On the other hand, the soar neutrino deficit admits more than one soutions. With ν e ν τ the soutions at 95% C.L. are [] vacuum osciation: m so (5 8) 0 ev, sin θ so 0.6.0, sma ange MSW: m so (4 9) 0 6 ev, sin θ so (3.5 3) 0 3, arge ange MSW: m so (8 30) 0 6 ev, sin θ so The above two neutrino-mass differences can be accommodated by the three species of neutrinos that we know from the SM. There is aso another indication for neutrino osciation from the acceerator experiment LSND [3], which requires an osciation of ν µ into another neutrino with m LSND 0. ev,sin θ so To as we accommodate this data it requires an additiona species of neutrino beyond the usua neutrinos. Nevertheess, further evidence from the next round of neutrino experiments is required to confirm the neutrino mass and osciation. As neutrino is favored to be massive it is desirabe to understand the generation of neutrino masses from physics beyond the SM, especiay, to see if the new physics can give a neutrino mass pattern that can expain the atmospheric and soar neutrino data, and perhaps the LSND as we. An economica way to generate sma neutrino masses with a phenomenoogicay favorabe texture is given by the Zee mode [4 6], which generates masses via -oop diagrams. The mode consists of a charged gauge singet scaar h -, the Zee scaar, which coupes to epton doubets ψ Lj via the interaction f ij ( ψ α LiCψ β Lj) ǫαβ h, ()

3 where α,β are the SU() indices, i,j are the generation indices, C is the charge-conjugation matrix, and f ij are Yukawa coupings antisymmetric in i and j. Another ingredient of the Zee mode is an extra Higgs doubet (in addition to the one that gives masses to charged eptons) that deveops a vacuum expectation vaue (VEV) and thus provides mass mixing between the charged Higgs boson and the Zee scaar boson. The corresponding couping, together with the f ij s, enforces epton number vioation. The -oop mechanism for the Zee mode can be found in Fig.. A recent anaysis by Frampton and Gashow [5] (see aso Ref. [6]) showed that the Zee mass matrix of the foowing texture 0 m eµ m eτ m eµ 0 ǫ m eτ ǫ 0, () where ǫ is sma compared with m eµ and m eτ, is abe to provide a compatibe mass pattern that expains the atmospheric and soar neutrino data. The generic Zee mode guarantees the vanishing of the diagona eements, whie the suppression of the m µτ entry, here denoted by the sma parameter ǫ, has to be otherwise enforced. Moreover, m eµ m eτ is required to give the maxima mixing soution for the atmospheric neutrinos. We sha describe the features in more detai in the next section. So far the Zee mode is not embedded into any grand unified theories or supersymmetric modes. Here we anayze the embedding of the Zee mode into the minima supersymmetric standard mode(mssm) with minima extensions, namey, the R-parity vioation. The righthanded septons in SUSY have the right quantum number to pay the roe of the charged Zee scaar. The R-parity vioating λ-type coupings (λlle) coud provide the terms in Eq.(). It is aso easy to see that the R-parity vioating biinear µ-type coupings (µ i LH ) woud aow the second Higgs doubet H in SUSY to be the second ingredient of the Zee mode. So far so good. However, the SUSY framework dictates extra contributions to neutrino masses, which deviate from the texture of the Zee mass matrix of Eq. (). The major objective of this paper is to address the feasibiity of the embedding and to determine under what conditions coud one make a supersymmetric Zee mode within the R-parity vioating SUSY framework whie retaining the successfu favor of the former. We wi aso discuss briefy more generic versions of supersymmetric Zee mode. In R-parity vioating SUSY, there are three other sources for neutrino masses, in addition to the Zee mode contribution. They are (i) the tree-eve mixing with the higgsinos and gauginos, (ii) the one-oop diagram that invoves the usua mass mixing between the efthanded and right-handed septons proportiona to m (A E µtanβ), and (iii) the one-oop diagram that again invoves the mixing between the eft-handed and right-handed septons 3

4 but this time via the λ and µ i coupings. The first two contributions have been considered extensivey in iterature [8], but the ast one is identified here for the first time. Aso, we are the first one to identify the Zee mode contribution to the neutrino mass in the SUSY framework. Furthermore, we wi obtain the conditions for the Zee mode contribution to dominate over the contributions in(i) and(ii). The contribution in(iii) can actuay preserve the texture of the mass matrix of Eq. (). There are compications in choosing a favor basis when R-parity is broken. Actuay, the form and structure of the epton mass matrices under the co-existence of biinear and triinear R-parity vioating coupings are basis dependent. One has to be particuary carefu with a consistent choice of favor basis. Here we adopt the singe-vev parameterization [9] that provides an efficient framework for our study. The most important point to note here is that this parameterization impies a choice of favor basis under which a three sneutrinos have no VEV, without any input assumptions. A R-parity vioating coupings introduced beow are to be interpreted under this basis choice. The organization of the paper is as foows. In the next section, we describe the texture of the Zee mass matrix in Eq. (). In Sec. III, we cacuate entries in the 3 3 neutrino mass matrix from a the sources isted above. In Sec. IV, we derive the conditions for the contributions from the Zee mode and from (iii) above to be dominant. Sec. V. is devoted to discussions on more genera versions of supersymmetrization of the Zee mode. And we concude in Sec. VI. II. ZEE MASS MATRIX Here we briefy describe the basic features of the Zee mass matrix, as given in Eq.(). We first take ǫ = 0. The matrix can be diagonaized by the foowing transformation ν Le ν Lµ ν Lτ = 0 m eµ m m eµ m m eτ m m eτ m m eτ m m eµ m ν L ν L ν L3, (3) withtheeigenvauesm, m,0forν L,ν L,ν L3, respectivey, andm = m eµ +m eτ. Hence, the two massive states form a Dirac pair. The atmospheric mass-squared difference, m atm Thereisoneothertypeofcontribution fromagaugino/sneutrinooopwithneutrino-antineutrino mass spitting. The atter coud be a resut of R-parity vioation. This was discussed in Ref. [7]. This contribution depends on the R-parity vioating B-terms and basicay enters in the same entries in the neutrino mass matrix as the corresponding µ i terms, and thus suppementing the atter. We wi negect this type of contribution in this paper. 4

5 3 0 3 ev, is to be identified with m = m eµ+m eτ. The transition probabiities for ν Lµ are P νlµ ν Le = 0, ( ) ( meµ m eτ (m P νlµ ν Lτ = 4 sin eµ +m ) eτ)l m eµ +m eτ 4E. If m eµ m eτ, then sin θ atm. This mixing ange is exacty what is required in the atmospheric neutrino data. The neutrino mass matrix texture with ǫ = 0 can be caed the zeroth order Zee texture. It is the first thing to aim at in our supersymmetric mode discussions in the next section. If we choose a nonzero ǫ, but keep ǫ m eµ,eτ. Then after diagonaizing the matrix we have the foowing eigenvaues m ν = m eµ +m eτ +ǫ m eµm eτ m eµ +m eτ m ν = m eµ +m eτ +ǫ m eµm eτ m eµ +m eτ m ν3 = ǫ m eµm eτ m eµ +m eτ The mass-square difference between m and ν m can be fitted to the soar neutrino mass. ν For instance, one can take the arge ange MSW soution and requires.,, m eµ m eτ 4ǫ m eµ +m eτ = m so 0 5 ev, giving ǫ m eµ 5 0 3, where we have used m eµ m eτ. We wi see beow that in our supersymmetric mode the coupings that are required to generate the zeroth order Zee texture aso give rise to other contributions, which have to be kept sub-dominating in order to maintain the texture and hence the favor of the Zee mode. Even though these extra contributions might not be identified as the same entries as the ǫ parameter of Eq. (), i.e., appear in the diagona entries instead, they coud sti pay the same roe as to give a phenomenoogicay viabe first order resut for a modified Zee matrix. Hence, we wi not commit ourseves to the first order Zee matrix as given in Eq.(), but ony to its zeroth order form, namey with ǫ = 0. The first order perturbation is then aowed to come in through any matrix entry. It wi spit the mass square degeneracy of the Dirac pair simiar to the ǫ case above. For exampe, if the first order perturbation is given by a ǫ d appearing at the m ee entry, the resuting mass eigenvaues are modified to 5

6 m ν = m eµ +m eτ + ǫ d, m ν = m eµ +m eτ + ǫ d, m ν3 = 0. The mass-square difference between m ν and m ν can then be fitted to the soar neutrino data and we obtain ǫ d /m eµ 5 0 3, the same as above. If, on the other hand, ǫ d appears at the m µµ or m ττ entry, the soar neutrino data can sti be fitted and ǫ d /m eµ 0 is required. Once the zeroth order Zee texture for the atmospheric neutrino is fufied, it is straightforward to further impose the above condition for the soar neutrino. III. NEUTRINO MASS MATRIX First consider the superpotentia as given by { } W = ǫ αβ Yij U Qα i Hβ Uc j +YD ij Qα i Hβ Dc j +YE ij Lα i Hβ Ec j +µhα Hβ +λ ijkl α i Lβ jek c +µ il α i Hβ, where ǫ = ǫ =, i,j =,,3 are the generation indices. H = (h 0,h - ),H = (h +,h 0 ). Intheaboveequation, Q,L,U c,d c,e c,h, andh denotethequarkdoubet, eptondoubet, up-quark singet, down-quark singet, epton singet and the two Higgs doubet superfieds. Here we aow ony the R-parity vioation through the terms LLE c and LH with coefficients λ ijk (antisymmetric in i,j) and µ i, respectivey. The other R-parity vioating coupings are dropped as they are certainy beyond the minima framework needed for embedding the Zee mode. The soft SUSY breaking terms that are reevant to our study are (Y E A E ) ij Lα i H β Ẽj c +(λa λ ) ijk Lα i Lβ jẽc k +µbh α H β. Actuay, the(λa λ )-termsdo notcontribute because our choice ofbasis eiminates thevev s for L i s. This simpifies the anaysis without ose of generaity. We adopt the singe-vev parameterization, which uses the L i -basis such that the charged-epton Yukawa matrix Y E is diagona. The whoe (Y E A E )-term wi be taken as pre-dominanty diagona, namey (Y E A E ) ij Y E i AE i δ ij(no sum). This is just the common practice of suppressing off-diagona A-terms, favored by favor-changing neutra-current constraints. The tree-eve mixing among the higgsinos, gauginos, and neutrinos gives rise to a 7 7 neutra fermion mass matrix M N : (4) 6

7 M 0 g v / g v / M gv / gv / g v / gv / 0 µ µ µ µ 3 M N = g v / gv / µ µ 0 (m 0 ν ) (m 0 ν ) (m 0 ν ) µ 0 (m 0 ν) (m 0 ν) (m 0 ν) 3, (5) 0 0 µ 3 0 (m 0 ν ) 3 (m 0 ν ) 3 (m 0 ν ) 33 whose basis is ( i B, i W, h 0, h 0,ν Le,ν Lµ,ν Lτ ). Each of the charged-epton states deviates from its physica state as a resut of its mixing with higgsino/gaugino through the corresponding µ i -term [9]. However, we are interested ony in a region of the parameter space where the concerned deviations are negigibe, as aso discussed in Ref. [0]. Hence, we are effectivey in the basis of the physica charged-epton states, as indicated. In the above 7 7 matrix, the whoe ower-right 3 3 bock, (m 0 ν), is zero at tree-eve. They are induced via one-oop contributions to be discussed beow. One-oop contributions to the other zero entries are negected. We can write the mass matrix in the form of bock sub-matrices: M N = M ξt ξ m 0 ν (6) where M is the upper-eft 4 4 neutraino mass matrix, ξ is the 3 4 bock, and m 0 ν is the ower-right 3 3 neutrino bock in the 7 7 matrix. The resuting neutrino mass matrix after bock diagonaization is given by (m ν ) = ξm - ξ T +(m 0 ν). (7) The first term here corresponds to tree eve contributions, which are however see-saw suppressed. Before going into our best scenario anaysis, we wi sketch how the coupings, λ ijk s and µ i s, ead to the neutrino mass terms. Whie some of them have been studied in iterature, others are identified here for the first time. We do this from the perspectives of the supersymmetric Zee mode, but the resuts are quite genera. Our minimaistic strategy says that a λ ijk or a µ i shoud be taken as zero uness it is needed for the Zee mechanism to generate the neutrino mass terms m eµ and m eτ. Readers who find the extensive use of unspecified indices in the foowing discussions difficut to foow are suggested to match them with the resuts for the expicit exampes that we wi ist beow. We identify the foowing four neutrino-mass generation mechanisms. (i) Zee mechanism We show in Fig., the two Zee diagrams for the one-oop neutrino mass terms. The right-handed septon Rk is identified as the charged-singet boson of the Zee mode, and 7

8 its couping to epton fieds has the correct antisymmetric generation indices: see Eq. (). To compete the diagram the charged Higgs boson h - from the Higgs doubet H is on the other side of the oop and a Rk -h - mixing is needed at the top of the oop. Such a mixing is provided by a F-term of L k : µ k m k h - R k h 0 / h0, where h0 takes on its VEV, for a nonzero µ k. Thus, the neutrino mass term (m 0 ν) ij has a dependence, where m i s are the charged epton masses. (ii) LR septon mass mixing µ k m k λ ijk (m j m i ) (8) Another, we-studied, type of contributions comes from the one-oop diagram with two λ-couping vertices and the usua (A E µtanβ)-type LR septon mixing. Negecting the offdiagona entries in A E, the contribution to (m 0 ν) ij with the pair λ ik and λ jk is proportiona to [ (A E k µtanβ)+( δ k)(a E µtanβ) ] m k m λ ik λ jk. (9) Ony λ ijk s with a distinct indices (e.g. λ 3 ) fai to give contributions of this kind on its own. A nonzero λ ikk contributes to the diagona (m 0 ν ) ii. An iustration for the term is given in Fig.. With any two nonzero λ ijk s, this kind of contributions to the (m 0 ν ) entries, in particuar the diagona ones, cannot be avoided. (iii) LR septon mass mixing via R-parity vioating coupings This contribution is identified here for the first time. Whie the contributions to generation mixing in the usua (A E µtanβ)-type LR septon mixing via the off-diagona entries in A E are expected to be sma, there is another independent source of generation mixing in the LR septon-mass mixing, which may not foow the rue. The atter comes from a F-term of L i : µ i λ ijk Lj R k h 0, where h 0 takes on the VEV. This is simiar to the Rk -h - mixing in the Zee mode, except that this time we have a λ-type couping instead of the R-parity conserving Yukawa couping. This newy identified source of mixing resuts in constraints on the µ i λ ijk products, which is an interesting subject of epton-septon phenomenoogy studies. With a specific choice of a set of nonzero µ i s and λ s, this type of mixing gives rise to the off-diagona (m 0 ν ) ij terms ony and, therefore, of particuar interest to our perspectives of Zee mode. Taking the pair λ ik and λ jh for the fermion vertices and a F-term of L g providing a couping for the scaar vertex in the presence of a µ g and a λ ghk (see Fig. 3), a (m 0 ν ) ij term is generated and proportiona to µ g m λ ghk λ ik λ jh. (0) The proiferation of indices here is certainy difficut to keep track of. When we aow ony a singe nonzero λ at a time, the ony contribution comes from λ ijj but not from those with 8

9 distinct indices. Suppose we have nonzero λ ijj and µ j, they then give a contribution to the off-diagona (m 0 ν ) ij with a µ j m j λ 3 ijj dependence, which is obtained from expression (0) through the substitution: h = i and g = k = = j. It is easy to see that for a minima set of nonzero µ i and λ ijk required to generate the zeroth order Zee texture, this minima set aso contributes to the same neutrino mass terms via the new mechanism identified here. Hence, they are desirabe from the perspectives of keeping the Zee mass matrix texture. (iv) Tree-eve mixing Through gaugino/higgsino mixings, nonzero µ i s give tree-eve see-saw type contributions to (m ν ) ij proportiona to µ i µ j, i.e., through the first term in Eq.(7) instead of the second. With the contribution put in expicity, Eq.(7) then gives (m ν ) ij = v cos β (g M +g M ) µ [µm M v sinβcosβ (g M +g M )] µ iµ j +(m 0 ν ) ij. () A diagona (m ν ) kk term is aways present for a nonzero µ k as needed in the Zee mechanism. This contribution has no charged epton mass dependence. To eiminate these tree-eve terms requires either very stringent constraints on the parameter space or extra Higgs superfieds beyond the MSSM spectrum. We wi see that this is a major difficuty of the present MSSM formuation of supersymmetric Zee mode. From the above discussions, we concude that a minima set of R-parity vioating coupings needed to give the zeroth order Zee matrix is the foowing : { λ k, λ 3k, µ k }. As at east one of the two λ s has the form λ ikk ( λ kik ), a types of contributions that have been discussed above are there. We want to make the contribution from the Zee mechanism dominate over other contributions, or at east to make the diagona mass entries to (m ν ) subdominant. This necessariy requires sub-domination of the contributions from the tree-eve see-saw mechanism and from the (A E µtanβ)-type LR septon mixing. So, it is the Zee mechanism and the newy identified mechanism, which invove the interpay between the biinear µ i and triinear λ ijk R-parity vioating coupings, that are required to be the dominating ones. We wi discuss beow two iustrative scenarios: () λ, λ 3, and µ and () λ 3, λ 33, and µ 3. After the 7 7 matrix M N is bock diagonaized, the resuting 3 3 neutrino mass matrix (m ν ) of Eq.(7) or () is obtained in each of these scenarios. Scenario : λ, λ 3, and µ The resuting neutrino mass matrix for scenario is given by 9

10 C µ C m e m µ µ λ +C 3 m e µ λ C m e m τ µ λ 3 +C 3 m e µ λ 3 (m ν ) = C 4 m eλ C 4 m eλ λ 3, () C 4 m e λ 3 which is symmetric and we ony write down the upper triange. The C i s are given by where v cos β (g M +g M ) C = µ [µm M v sinβcosβ (g M +g M )], C = tanβ 6π vcosβ f(m h-,mẽ R ), C 3 = 6π vsinβ [ λ f(m µ L,M ẽ R )+λ 3 f(m τ L,M ẽ R ) ], C 4 = 6π (AE e µtanβ) f(m ẽ L,M ẽ R ), (3) f(x,y) = ( ) y x y og x. Scenario : λ 3, λ 33, and µ 3 For scenario, the neutrino mass matrix is given by (m ν ) = C 4 m τ λ 33 C m τ m µ µ 3λ 3 +C 5 m τ µ 3 λ 3 λ 33 C m3 τ µ 3λ 33 +C 5 m τ µ 3 λ , C µ 3 (4) where C 4 = 6π (AE τ µtanβ) f(m τ L,M τ R ), C = tanβ 6π vcosβ f(m h-,m τ R ), C 5 = 6π vsinβ f(m ẽ L,M τ R ). (5) Intheabove, wehavenegectedtermssuppressed bym e /m µ orm e /m τ. Thereisasoanother scenario, with {λ,λ 3,µ }, which is very simiar to this scenario. IV. CONDITIONS FOR MAINTAINING THE ZEE MASS TEXTURE In order to maintain the zeroth order Zee texture as discussed in Sec.II, we need m eµ and m eτ to dominate over the other entries. Moreover, we need m eµ m eτ Matm( 0

11 5 0 GeV). Here we give anestimate of the required conditions on the mode parameters, for a chosen minima set of R-parity vioating coupings, {λ k,λ 3k, µ k ; (with a specific k)}. Since we are interested ony in the absoute vaue of each term and so we wi drop negative signs wherever feasibe. We wi ook at each matrix entry in Eq.() and Eq.(4) carefuy. Scenario : Requiring the tree-eve gaugino/higgsino mixing contribution to m ee in Eq.() to be negigibe compared to m eµ, it gives µ cos β µ M ( 0 4 GeV ), (6) inwhich wehave assumed M 0.5M. Theconditionisratherstringent thatrequires either very sma µ, µ cosβ 0 4 GeV at M,µ O(00)GeV, or particuary arge gaugino mass(es). As pointed out in Ref. [9], the dependence on tanβ is very important here. The cosβ goes from order one to 0.0 in the domain of arge tanβ. Requiring the (A E k µtanβ) LR septon mixing contribution to be much smaer than m eµ, we have where we have used λ,λ 3 Max(M ẽ L,M ẽ R ) (A E e µtanβ) (3 0 GeV ), (7) [ f(m ẽl,m ẽ R ) ] Max(M ẽl,m ẽ R ). (8) The constraint in Eq. (7) is obviousy very weak. In fact, it can certainy be negected, especiay when other phenomenoogica constraints [6,] on λ s (as effective Zee coupings f ij of Eq.()) are taken into consideration. The reevant constraint here is given as λ M ẽ R 0 8 GeV, (9) from the tree-eve Zee-scaar mediated µ-decay []. The upper bound on λ is hence no better than 0.0 for MẽR at 00GeV. The corresponding constraint on λ 3 from τ-decay is definitey weaker, which has no reevance here as we wi see beow. Hence, the suppression needed for m µµ, m µτ, and m ττ of Eq.() is easy to obtain. The remaining question is if one can sti generate the right (order of) m eµ and m eτ when µ, λ and λ 3 satisfy the above constraints. Let us first ook at the m eµ entry. From Eq.(), m eµ has two contributions. The first one (the one with a C dependence) is from the authentic Zee mechanism. For this contribution to give the right m eµ vaue, it requires m eµ µ λ cos β Max(M h-,m ẽ R ) ( 0 0 GeV ) (5 0 GeV), (0)

12 or (µ cosβ) λ cos 3 β Max(M h-,m ẽ R ) (0.5GeV ). () Theright-handsideabovecannotbemuchsmaerthan0.0GeV, even atthemorefavorabe case of very arge tanβ. Given the above constraints in Eqs. (6) and (9), this is obviousy unreaistic. Even though the corresponding contribution (with a C dependence) to m eτ has a m τ /m µ enhancement and depends on λ 3 instead of λ, it is not much better than m eµ. For the second contribution (the one with a C 3 dependence), to give the right m eµ vaue, it requires m eµ µ [ λ 3 Max(M µ L,Mẽ R ) + λ 3λ Max(M τ L,Mẽ R ) ] (5 0 4 GeV ) (5 0 GeV). () A naive comparison with Eq.(0) above iustrates one important fact. Assuming a common scae for the scaar masses, the λ-couping(s) ony have to be arger than 0 3 for this second contribution to be arger than the first one. From Eqs.(7) and (9), such λ s are easiy admissibe. With λ λ 3 the corresponding contribution to m eτ has the same form as m eµ, with the interchange of λ with λ 3, and thus is of a simiar vaue. The condition in Eq. () then becomes (µ cosβ) λ i ( ) λ i Mẽ R cosβ (5 0 8 GeV ). (3) where we have taken MẽR to be the dominating mass among the scaars. The atter choice corresponds to the optima case because smaer scaar masses hep reducing the size of the λ i needed, whie on the other hand, in Eq.(9) arger MẽR reaxes the constraint on λ i. With Eqs. (6) and (9) taken into consideration, the resut ends up actuay no better than the best (arge tanβ) case of Eq.(0) above. Scenario : Here we foow our above anaysis for this more interesting scenario. Requiring the tree-eve gaugino/higgsino mixing contribution to be we beow m eµ gives µ 3 cos β µ M ( 0 4 GeV ). (4) This is basicay the same as in scenario, though it corresponds to m ττ instead. have For the (A E k µtanβ) LR septon mixing contribution to be much smaer than m eµ, we λ 33 Max(M τ L,M τ R ) (A E τ µtanβ) ( GeV ). (5) This corresponds to m ee. It tes us that λ 33 can hardy be much arger than 0 3. On the other hand, λ 3 is constrained differenty because it does not contribute to this type of neutrino mass term. The constraint that corresponds to Eq.(9), however, becomes

13 λ 3 M τ R 0 8 GeV, (6) which tes us that λ 3 can be as arge as order of 0.0 for scaar masses of order of O(00) GeV. Again both m eµ and m eτ have two terms. Let us ook at m eµ first. For the first term in m eµ (the one with a C dependence) in Eq. (4) to give the required vaue of atmospheric neutrino mass, we need or m eµ µ 3λ 3 cos β Max(M h-,m τ R ) (7 0 7 GeV ) (5 0 GeV), (7) (µ 3 cosβ) λ 3 cos 3 β Max(M h-,m τ R ) (7 0 5 GeV ). (8) This resut ooks reativey promising. If we take cosβ = 0.0, a the invoved scaar masses at 00GeV and λ 3 at the corresponding imiting 0.0 vaue, µ 3 cosβ has to be at GeV to fit the requirement. This means pushing for arger M (and M ) and µ vaues but may not be rued out. What about the corresponding first term in m eτ entry? The term has a λ 33 dependence in the pace of λ 3 with an extra enhancement of m τ /m µ, in comparison to m eµ. That is to say, requiring m eµ m eτ gives, in this case, λ 33 m µ m τ λ 3. (9) This gives a sma λ 33 easiy satisfying Eq.(5). The sma λ 33 aso suppresses the second terms in both m eµ and m eτ, the C 5 dependent terms in Eq. (4). Note that the above equation represents a kind of fine-tuned reation between the two coupings λ 33 and λ 3. More precisey, the vaue of λ 33 m τ has to be within a factor of.8 of that of λ 3m µ in order to fit sin θ atm. This feature is inherited directy from the origina Zee mode, as discussed in Ref. [6]. Nevertheess, it is difficut to motivate this reation from a theoretica point of view. Phenomenoogicay, the reation impies that λ 33 is two orders of magnitude smaer than λ 3, which indicates a strongy inverted hierarchy against the famiiar favor structure among quarks and charged eptons. Since the current experimenta bounds from the rare processes, such as µ,τ eγ, showed the usua hierarchica trend down the famiies, the reation in Eq. (9) says that once the constraints on the λ 3 are satisfied, λ 33 shoud be automaticay safe. This justifies our above statement that the τ-decay constraint anaogous to Eq.(9) and Eq.(6) have no reevancy here. Conversey, if λ 33 contributions to some rare processes are identified in the near future, it woud spe troube for the SUSY Zee mode discussed here. 3

14 Finay, we comment on whether it is feasibe to have an aternative situation in which the second (C 5 dependent) terms in m eµ and m eτ dominate over the first (C dependent) terms. The comparison between these two types of contributions is simiar to that of scenario, as can be easiy seen by comparing terms in Eqs.() and (4). As in scenario, we need to push λ 33 to the order of 0.0. This at the same time requires either a particuary arge M τl or some fine-tuned canceation between A E τ and µtanβ in order to fufi the condition in Eq. (5). Thus, it is unikey to have the second terms of m eµ and m eτ dominant over the first terms. To produce the neutrino mass matrix beyond the zeroth order Zee texture, the subdominating first order contributions are required to be substantiay smaer in order to fit the soar neutrino data. Here, it is obvious that it is difficut to further suppress the tree eve gaugino/higgsino mixing contribution to m ττ, which makes it even more difficut to get the scenario to work. Expicity, the requirement for the soar neutrino is µ 3 cos β µ M ( 0 6 GeV ), (30) foowing directy from the resut given in sec.ii [cf. Eq.(4)]. V. MORE GENERAL VERSIONS OF SUPERSYMMETRIC ZEE MODEL We have discussed in detai the minimaistic embedding of the Zee mode into the minima supersymmetric standard mode. The conditions for maintaining the Zee neutrino mass matrix texture is extremey stringent, if not impossibe. Here we discuss some more genera versions of supersymmetrization of the Zee mode. As mentioned in the introduction, an easy way to compete the Zee diagram without the µ i -type, biinear R-parity vioating, coupings is to introduce an additiona pair of Higgs doubet superfieds. Denoting them by H 3 and H 4, bearing the same quantum numbers as H and H respectivey, R-parity vioating terms of the form ǫ αβ λ H k Hα Hβ 3 Ec k can be introduced. With a trivia extension of notations (in Fig. with h 0 repaced by h0 3 ), we obtain a Zee diagram contribution to (m ν ) ij through λ ijk as foows : h 0 3 6π h 0 (m j m i ) λ ijk λ H ka H k f(mh-,m Rk ). (3) Herethesepton Rk keepstheroeofthezeescaar. WehavenegectedtheF-termobtainabe in the existence of biinear µ-terms between H 3 and H or H 4. At east one of them has to be there. When no L i H 3 E c j type R-parity conserving Yukawa coupings are aowed, the 4

15 ony surviving extra contribution to neutrino mass among those discussed is from the one corresponding to expression (9). Notice that the second Higgs doubet of the Zee mode, corresponding to H 3 here, is aso assumed not to have coupings of the form L i H 3 E c j. The condition for this LR septon mixing contribution to be beow the required m eµ woud be the same as discussed in the previous section. However, there is a new contribution to (m ν ) kk given by 6π h 0 3 h 0 m k (λ H k) A H k f(m h-,m Rk ), (3) which is obtained from Fig. with L repaced by h - and h 0 by h 0 3 (of course with different coupings at the vertices.) This is in fact a consequence of the fact that the term λ H k Hα Hβ 3 Ec k provides new mass mixings for the charged higgsinos and the charged eptons. Like the mixings induced by the µ i s, the new effect is see-saw suppressed; but unike the µ i s their magnitude may be ess severey constrained. Nevertheess, the essentia difference here is that unike the µ i terms the λ H k Hα Hβ 3 Ec k term does not contribute to the mixings between neutrinos and the gauginos and higgsinos on tree eve. We wi assume aso that the deviations of the charged-epton mass eigenstates resuted from the new mixing are negigibe. Beaching the assumption actuay does not cause too much troube though. Its main effect is simpy the modification of the numerica vaues of m i s used as the physica masses get extra contributions. Here, simiar to the above we are interested in ony the minima set of coupings {λ k, λ 3k, λ H k} with a specific k. For expression (3) to give the right vaue to m eµ, we need λ kλ H k Max(M h-,m Rk ) A H k h 0 h 0 3 (7 0 7 GeV ), (33) and simiary for m eτ, it requires λ 3k = m µ mτλ k. This condition is easy to satisfy, for exampe, when we take h0 3 = 0.. Next, we compare the expression (3) with (3). For h 0 (3) to dominate over (3), it requires λ k λ H k λ 3k λ H k h 0 3 h 0 m k m µ h 0 3 h 0 m k m τ,. (34) The most favorabe scenario under the context is obtained by taking k = where m k is just the m e. The above requirements are then easiy satisfied. In addition, the corresponding requirement for sub-domination of the LR septon mixing contribution discussed above is then the same as Eq. (7), and we aso have Eq. (9) from the tree-eve Zee-scaar induced muon decay. A these constraints can now be easiy satisfied. Hence, having such a supersymmetric Zee mode ooks very feasibe. 5

16 One may argue, foowing the spirit of the singe-vev parameterization, that H 3 may be arranged to have no VEV. That woud apparenty ki the scenario. However, we have an assumption above that there is no L i H 3 E c j term in the superpotentia, which is aso adopted in the origina Zee mode. Without the assumption we coud then switch H 3 and H around, and though the scenario is sti viabe it, however, becomes much more compicated to anayze. Furthermore, if H was the ony one with a VEV, h3 - shoud take over the roe of h - in Fig., and then the coupings of the h3 - to eptons coud not be taken diagona in genera. Studies of these more genera situations, together with more admissibe terms in the superpotentia invoving H 3, actuay worth more attention. This is however beyond the scope of the present paper. An aternative approach is to give up identifying the right-handed septon as the Zee scaar. One can introduce a vector-ike pair of Zee (singet) superfieds E Z and E c Z with the scaar component of the atter as the Zee scaar. A λ Z ijl i L j E c Z term takes the roe of the λ ijk above. The F-term of L k with nonzero µ k L k H and Yk ZL kh E c terms provides the mixing Z between the new Zee scaar and the h -. But the YZ k couping easiy messes up the identity of the physica charged eptons. It is cear then this is an even more compicated situation than the previous one, and has to be anayzed carefuy in a different framework. Finay, one can take the trivia supersymmetrization by taking both E Z and E c Z as we as H 3 and H 4. The restrictions on the parameter space of the reevant coupings are then unikey to have any interesting feature beyond that of the Zee mode itsef. It is interesting, however, to note that the coupings needed, L i L j E c and H Z H 3 E c, do not break R-parity at Z a, though the epton number is vioated. VI. CONCLUSIONS We have discussed the embedding of the Zee neutrino mass mode in the framework of R-parity vioating supersymmetry. It is a nontrivia supersymmetrization of the Zee mode in the sense that one or both of the extra scaar fieds of the Zee mode are identified within the minima supersymmetric SM spectrum. We have anayzed in detai the minima scheme where a right-handed septon pays the roe of the charged Zee scaar, with no extra Higgs doubet introduced. The λ ijk and µ i coupings in R-parity vioating supersymmetry are identified as the epton-number vioating coupings in the Zee mode. Nevertheess, the scheme aso introduces other types of contributions to neutrino masses. We have described in detai a these contributions and their genera forms. We have addressed and answered the question on the feasibiity of such a mode. For the minima scheme we iustrated that a set of R-parity vioating coupings given as {λ k, λ 3k, µ k } with a specific k competes the mode. The various contributions to neutrino masses are discussed and the conditions for maintaining the zeroth order Zee mass 6

17 texture and for fitting the experimenta neutrino osciation data are derived. The case with k = 3 has been shown to be marginay feasibe, though the constraints are very stringent. Here, the right-handed stau is the Zee scaar. The anaysis aso iustrates the interesting interpay between different coupings, and the reative strength of each type of contributions. In particuar, we have discussed two contributions both invoving the biinear R-parity vioating coupings µ k, and the triinear ones. Both contributions have not been discussed before and the Zee mechanism does correspond to one of them and the another one invoves a new source of LR septon mixing. We have aso discussed aternatives to the minima scheme. Among the aternatives, we have considered the interesting case with an extra pair of vector-ike Higgs superfieds. A λ H k couping for the superpotentia term H α H β 3 Ek c repaces µ k of the previous case. Constraints on this extended type of modes are much weaker, and so having a phenomenoogicay viabe mode of this type woud not be a probem. The best scenario in this case is for k =, namey taking the seectron as the Zee scaar. More detaied studies of such modes worth a serious effort. We hope to report on that in the future. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grants No. DE-FG03-9ER40674 and by the Davis Institute for High Energy Physics. OK wants to thank Darwin Chang for discussions, and coeagues at Academia Sinica, especiay Hai Yang Cheng, for support. 7

18 REFERENCES [] Y. Fukuda et a. (Super-K Co.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 56 (998); Phys. Lett. B467, 85 (999); Invited tak by Y. Totsuka (Super-K Co.) at the XVth Partices and Nucei Internationa Conference, PANIC99, Uppsaa, June 999. [] V. Barger, S. Pakvasa, T.J. Weier, and K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. D58, (998); J.N. Bahca, P.I. Krastev, and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D (998); M.C. Gonzaez-Garcia, P.C. de Hoanda, C. Peña-Garay, and J.W.F. Vae, FTUV/99-4, hep-ph/ [3] LSND Coaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 650 (995); ibid. 77, 308 (996); Phys. Rev. C58, 489 (998). [4] A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 93B, 389 (980). [5] P. Frampton and S. Gashow, Phys. Lett. B46,95 (999). [6] C. Jarskog, M. Matsuda, S. Skadhauge, and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B449, 40 (999). [7] Y. Grossman and H. Haber, hep-ph/ [8] For recent exampes emphasizing on fitting neutrino osciation data, see E. Chun, S. Kang, C. Kim, andu. Lee, Nuc. Phys. B544, 89 (999); A. Abada andm. Losada, hepph/990835; J. Romao, M. Diaz, M. Hirsch, W. Porod, and J. Vae, hep-ph/ ; and Ref [0]. References to earier works on neutrino mass from R-parity vioation can aso be found in the references isted in these papers. [9] M. Bisset, O. Kong, C. Macesanu, and L. Orr, Phys. Lett. B430, 74 (998); hepph/ [0] O. Kong, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 903 (999). [] S.T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. 5B, 40 (98); M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 807 (987); A. Yu. Smirnov and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. D55, 665 (997); G.C. McLaughin and J.N. Ng, TRI-PP-99-03, hep-ph/ [] Note that a major source of constraint from µ eγ in the genera Zee mode scenario is absent here as we have f 3 = 0. 8

19 FIGURES ~ R k - (h ) Zee o h µ k m k tan β - h ν λ ijk L m i L j j R j m j ν L j - h o h µ k m k tan β ~ R k - (h ) Zee ν L i m i R i m i L i λ ijk ν L j FIG.. The two Feynman diagrams for the Zee mechanism in the R-parity vioating SUSY framework. The origina charged singet boson h - Zee of the Zee mode is shown in parentheses. 9

20 ~ R k h o, (A k - µ tan β ) m k h o ~ L k ν L i λ ik L R λ jk ν L j ~ L h o h o, (A - µ tan β ) m ~ R ν L i λ ik R k L k λ jk ν L j FIG.. Theone-oopdiagramsforneutrinomassgeneratedbytheusuatermm (A E µtanβ) in LR septon mixing. 0

21 ~ R k µ g λ h o ghk ~ L h ν L i λ ik λ L jh ν R L j FIG. 3. The one-oop diagram for neutrino mass generated by the term h 0 µ g λ ghk Lh R k in the LR septon mixing.