arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 18 Apr 2008

Transcription

1 Entanged maxima mixings in U PMNS = U U ν, and a connection to compex mass textures Svenja Niehage a, Water Winter b arxiv: v [hep-ph] 18 Apr 008 Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universität Würzburg, D Würzburg, Germany Abstract We discuss two different configurations of U PMNS = U U ν with maxima mixings in both U and U ν. The non-maxima mixing anges are assumed to be sma, which means that they can be expanded in. Since we are particuary interested in the impications for CP vioation, we fuy take into account compex phases. We demonstrate that one possibiity eads to intrinsicay arge sin θ 13 and strong deviations from maxima mixings. The other possibiity is genericay cose to tri-bimaxima mixing, and aows for arge CP vioation. We demonstrate how the determination of the θ 3 octant and the precision measurement of δ CP coud discriminate among different quaitative sub-cases. In order to constrain the unphysica and observabe phases even further, we reate our configurations to compex mass matrix textures. In particuar, we focus on phase patterns which coud be generated by powers of a singe compex quantity η θ C exp(i Φ), which can be motivated by Froggatt- Niesen-ike modes. For exampe, it turns out that in a of the discussed cases, one of the Majorana phases is proportiona to Φ to eading order. In the entire study, we encounter three different casses of sum rues, which we systematicay cassify. a Emai: svenja.niehage@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de b Emai: winter@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de

2 1 Introduction For Majorana neutrinos and the effective 3 3-case, the neutrino mass matrix can be diagonaized by (here, we cosey foow Refs. [1 3]) M Maj ν and the charged epton mass matrix by = U ν M diag ν U T ν, (1) M = U M diag U, () where U ν, U, and U are genera unitary matrices. The (rea) eigenvaues can be written as M diag = diag(m e, m µ, m τ ) and Mν diag = diag(m 1, m, m 3 ), and are, except from the absoute neutrino mass scae, experimentay known. The neutrino mixing matrix U PMNS is generated as a product of two matrices U and U ν which enter the charged current interaction Lagrangian, i.e., U PMNS = U U ν. Therefore, U PMNS describes the reative rotation between the charged epton U and the neutrino mixing U ν matrices, which turn the eft-handed fieds into the respective mass bases. Note that the mass matrix entries usuay emerge as a product of the reevant Yukawa coupings and the vacuum expectation vaue of the Higgs. Whie the physica observabes in U PMNS are independent of the basis used for Eqs. (1) and (), theoretica modes often use the structure of the mass matrices as a starting point. These structures are often caed textures. They are obviousy basis dependent, and often predicted within a more genera theoretica framework. For exampe, masses for quarks and eptons may arise from higher-dimension terms via the Froggatt-Niesen mechanism [4] in combination with a favor symmetry: L eff K ij H η n ij Ψi L Ψ j R + h.c.. (3) In this case, η is a sma parameter η = v/m F which contros the favor symmetry breaking. Here v are universa VEVs of SM (Standard Mode) singet scaar favons that break the favor symmetry, and M F refers to the mass of super-heavy fermions, which are charged under the favor symmetry. The SM fermions are given by the Ψ s, and K ij are order unity (compex) numbers. The integer powers n ij are soey determined by the quantum numbers of the fermions under the favor symmetry (see, e.g., Refs. [3,5]), and the order one coefficients K ij can be used to fit a particuar texture to data. Obviousy, the neutrino and charged epton mass matrices in Eq. (1) and Eq. () are then, to a first approximation, described by the powers M ij ηij n, and U or U ν wi, in genera, not be diagona. Therefore, arge mixings may come from either the charged epton or neutrino sector, as it has, for instance, been discussed in Refs. [6 1]. In this study, however, we discuss arge mixing anges in both U and U ν, which ead to entanged maxima mixings (see aso Ref. [13]). In addition, it is obvious from Eqs. (1) and () that if Mν Maj and M are both rea, then U PMNS wi be rea and there wi be no eptonic CP vioation. Therefore, we study the fu compex case. Entanged maxima mixings. In the first part of the study (cf., Sec. 3), we use the 1

3 standard parameterization for a CKM-ike matrix c 1 c 13 s 1 c 13 s 13 e ib δ Û = s 1 c 3 c 1 s 3 s 13 e ib δ c 1 c 3 s 1 s 3 s 13 e ib δ s 3 c 13 (4) s 1 s 3 c 1 c 3 s 13 e ib δ c 1 s 3 s 1 c 3 s 13 e ib δ c 3 c 13 for both U and U ν, where s ij = sin θ ij and c ij = cos θ ij. We adopt the purey phenomenoogica point of view that a number of mixing anges in U and U ν are maxima, and the others are sma. The maxima mixing anges are assumed to be exacty maxima because they might be generated by a symmetry, and the sma mixing anges are assumed to be O(θ C ), which aows us to expand in them. We ca a particuar combination of maxima and sma mixing anges a configuration. We study two of these configurations in Sec. 3, where the stars refer to the sma mixing anges: Configuration 1 with three max. mixing anges (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ) Configuration with two max. mixing anges (θ1, θ13, θ3, θ1, ν θ13, ν θ3) ν = (,, π, π,, ) 4 4 As we wi demonstrate, both of these configurations ead to vaid impementations of U PMNS. We wi use the currenty aowed ranges for the observabes to constrain the reationship between unphysica mixing anges and phases, and we wi derive sum rues reating the observabes. Connection to quark sector and compex mass matrices. In order to estabish a connection between the quark and epton sectors, quark-epton compementarity (QLC) [14 17] has been proposed as a possibiity to account for the differences between the quark and epton mixings. In QLC, the quark and epton mixing anges are connected by QLC reations such as θ 1 + θ C π/4. (5) Sum rues such as Eq. (5) do not ony incude observabes from the epton sector, but aso the Cabibbo ange. They can be obtained if the mixing among the neutrinos and among the charged eptons is described by maxima or CKM-ike mixing anges, such as in U PMNS V CKM U bimax or simiar constructions [1, 11, 18 1]. Instead of reying on specia cases, extended quark-epton compementarity (EQLC) [] is based on the hypothesis that a mixing anges can ony be from the set {π/4, ǫ, ǫ,...} with ǫ θ C. 1 Quite naturay, entanged maxima mixing configurations emerge from this assumption. In addition, it is a nice feature of EQLC to predict the textures of the charged epton and neutrino mass matrices to be of the form M ij ǫ n ij with n ij {0, 1,,...}, which aows for a direct connection to the Froggatt-Niesen mechanism. Therefore, compared to many other approaches which focus on either the mixings or the hierarchies, EQLC aims to describe both the mixings and hierarchies. EQLC has successfuy been appied to the see-saw mechanism [3], and the effective 3 3 case has been extended to compex mass matrices [7]. For the seesaw case and rea η = ǫ θ C, a systematic connection to discrete favor symmetries has been estabished in Ref. [8], and a connection to SU(5) GUTs was studied in Ref. [9]. 1 Other parameterizations of U PMNS as a function of θ C were, for instance, discussed in Refs. [ 6].

4 In the second part of this study (cf., Sec. 4), we extend the texture concept of Refs. [,3,7] to the compex case. Simiar to Ref. [], we parameterize the sma mixing anges O(ǫ) by powers of ǫ θ C, i.e., ǫ, ǫ, and 0. Here we assume that higher powers than two in the neutrino sector are absorbed in the current measurement precision, and we approximate these by zero. We then define a texture by the eading orders in ǫ in the individua matrix entries, which are determined by the first non-vanishing coefficients. Compared to earier works, we do not ony use the absoute vaues of the eading order entries ǫ n, but aso their phases nφ (except from a goba phase, which can be removed for each matrix). This means that the eading order entry is given by η n = ǫ n exp(inφ). For exampe, a texture may then read for the choice Φ = π/ as M Maj ν η η η η η 0 η 0 1 = ǫ e i π ǫ e i π ǫ e iπ ǫ e i π ǫ e i π 0 ǫ e iπ 0 1, (6) where a 0 corresponds to O(ǫ 3 ) with an undefined phase. Note that in Froggatt-Niesenike (FN) modes, one needs (at east) two standard mode singet favon fieds with different U(1) FN charges in order to produce CP vioation, because for one fieds the phase can be gauged away (see, e.g., Refs. [30 3]). In this case, for patterns, such as in Eq. (6), it is required that one fied dominate for mid hierarchies, such as the neutrino mass hierarchy. For exampe, one may have two different hierarchica VEVs, or two identica VEVs with very different U(1) FN charges. In these cases, the neutrino mass matrix wi be dominated by one fied, but the other fied can be present in the charged epton and quark mass matrices (or in the texture zeros; cf., Eq. (6)). The phase Φ wi then be the reative phase between the two VEVs of the fieds. In addition, the order one coefficients are assumed to be rea (and positive), cf., Eq. (3). The advantage of a texture definition such as Eq. (6) is quite obvious: The condition to reproduce the correct powers of the phases in the texture eads to impications for the unphysica phases and the observabes. In Sec. 4, we study this condition in combination with the configurations from Sec. 3, its effect on CP vioation, and the emerging connection between the quark and epton sectors via ǫ θ C. Before we present our anaysis in Secs. 3 and 4, we summarize in Sec. our notation and method. After our anaysis, we summarize our resuts in Sec. 5. Notation and method In this section, we carify our notation and describe some detais of our method used in the foowing sections..1 Sum rues Throughout this study, we wi encounter a number of different sum rues depending on the configuration studied and input used. In order to quaify as a sum rue, we require either a simpe, testabe connection among observabes, which can be used to fasify our mode (sum rue types I and II), or a simpe reationship among observabes and one unphysica quantity which aows for a straightforward extraction of this unphysica quantity (sum rue 3

5 type III). In addition, we require that there be ony bare anges in our sum rues, i.e., that a trigonometric functions of the anges be expanded. For a systematic approach, we cassify the sum rues according to the foowing scheme (with some exampes from this study): Type I sum rues (epton sector sum rues) Sum rues reating epton sector observabes ony; no unphysica quantities or mode parameters are present in these sum rues. Exampe (cf., Sec. 3..1): θ θ 13 π 4. This type of sum rues can be used to fasify our mode if a of the contributing observabes (at east two) are measured. It can be anaogousy transated in to the quark sector. Type II sum rues (QLC-type sum rues) Sum rues reating epton and quark sector observabes; no unphysica quantities or mode parameters are present in these sum rues (see, e.g., Refs. [17,8,33]). Exampe (cf., Sec. 4.3.): θ θ C π 4. This type of sum rues can be used to fasify our mode if a of the contributing observabes (at east one from the epton sector) are measured Type III sum rues (observabe-mode sum rues) Sum rues reating observabes from one or both sectors to unphysica quantities or mode parameters. We distinguish two types: Type IIIa sum rues reate observabes to unphysica parameters, such as the mixing anges or phases in U or U ν (see, e.g., Refs. [13,0]). Exampe (cf., Sec. 4.3.): θ cosδ θ C π 4. Type IIIb sum rues reate observabes to mode parameters, such as the phase Φ introduced just before Eq. (6). Exampe (cf., Sec ): sin δ CP θ C sin Φ. These sum rues can be used to obtain (mode-dependent) information on the unphysica quantities or mode parameters if a of the contributing observabes (at east one from the epton sector) are measured.. Parameterization of the mixing matrices Let us now give some detais on the parameterization of our mixing matrices. A genera unitary 3 3 matrix U unitary can be written as U unitary = Γ diag ( 1, e i bϕ 1, e ) i bϕ Û diag( e ibα 1, e ibα, 1 ) = Γ D Û K, (7) 4

6 where the phases ϕ 1, ϕ, α 1, and α, take their vaues in the interva [0, π], Γ is a goba phase factor, and Û is the (CKM-ike) standard parameterization in Eq. (4). We then obtain the PMNS mixing matrix from the charged current interaction Lagrangian as U PMNS = U U ν = K Û D D νûν K ν = Û DÛν K ν. (8) Note that we have aready ignored an unphysica overa phase in U PMNS. Furthermore, as the ast step, we have rotated away K by re-phasing the charged epton fieds, and we have defined D = D D ν. We define the remaining phases by D = diag(1, e iϕ 1, e iϕ ) and K ν = diag(e iα 1, e iα, 1). The effect of the phases in D has, for exampe, been discussed in Ref. [13]. The PMNS matrix in Eq. (8) can, physics-wise equivaenty, be directy written as U PMNS = U U ν = Û diag(eiφ 1, e iφ, 1), (9) where Û is a CKM-ike matrix that is on the form as in Eq. (4), and the phases φ 1 and φ are the Majorana phases. The CKM-ike matrix Û in Eq. (9) is described by the soar ange θ 1, the reactor ange θ 13, the atmospheric ange θ 3, and one Dirac CP-phase δ, which we identify in the standard parameterization of Eq. (4) by using ˆθ ij θ ij and δ δ. Note that we have used U = Û, and that we wi use U = D Û K = Û K in Eq. (), i.e., in a cases, D = 1, K = 1, and D = 1. Consequenty, D = D ν in Eq. (8). With these restrictions, the set of parameters (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, δ, θ ν 1, θ ν 13, θ ν 3, δ ν, ϕ 1, ϕ, α 1, α ) (10) fuy determines Eqs. (1) and (8). For our configurations, we wi ater on fix some of the θ ij s to π/4, and assume the other θ ij s to be sma. For the phases, we initiay do not make any specia assumptions. If one is interested in the specific form of the charged epton mass matrix Eq. (), one needs to specify the set of parameters as we. (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, δ, α 1, α ) (11).3 Cacuation of observabes by re-phasing invariants As soon as U PMNS is computed from a set of parameters Eq. (10) used in Eq. (8), one can extract the physica observabes by using re-phasing invariants (see, e.g., Ref. [34]). We choose the three quadratic re-phasing invariants U 13, U 3 and U 1 to determine the This restriction neither affects Eq. (8) and its fit to data, nor constrains the effective neutrino mass matrix Eq. (1). In addition, the constraint K = 1 does not change Eq. () because it ony appears a a product with K. However, the choices D = D = 1, which are mutipied to Eq. () from the outside, imit the set of aowed phases in M. One shoud keep this additiona degree of freedom in mind when one interprets our exampes for possibe M. 5

7 three anges θ 13, θ 3 and θ 1 as foows: sin θ 13 = U 13 (1) sin θ 3 = U 3 1 U 13 (13) sin θ 1 = U 1 1 U 13. (14) The observabe phases δ CP and the two Majorana phases φ 1 and φ are determined with the quadratic invariant U and these CP-odd quartic invariants: the Jarskog invariant J = Im(U U 11 U 1 U 1 ) [35], (U 13U 11 ), and (U 13 U 1 ). The two foowing equations determine δ CP and its sign: J =c 1 c 3 c 13s 3 s 13 s 1 sin δ CP, U =c 1 c 3 + s 1 s 3 s 13 c 1c 3 s 1 s 3 s 13 cosδ CP. Since in our definition of the Majorana phases (in Eq. (9)) physica quantities depend ony on φ 1 and φ, we ony determine their doube vaues as (15) φ 1 = arg((u 13 U 11) ) δ CP, φ = arg((u 13 U 1 ) ) δ CP. (16).4 Consistency check with data As the ast step, we wi compare the extracted observabes to data in order to check potentia constraints on the unphysica quantities. Whenever we make quantitative estimates, we wi use the foowing numbers [36]: sin θ (3σ), sin θ 1 = 0.3 ± 9% (1σ), 0.4 sin θ (3σ), sin θ 3 = 0.5 ± 16% (1σ), 0.34 sin θ (3σ). (17) We choose the 3σ aowed ranges, uness expicitey mentioned otherwise. Simiar to Ref. [], our criterion for compatibiity with current data for parameter space scans is that ( sin ) ( θ sin ) θ S , sin θ (18) This seector corresponds to compatibiity at the 3σ confidence eve (cf., Eq. (17)) with a Gaussian χ estimate for sin θ 1 and sin θ 3 ( d.o.f.), and a hard cut for sin θ Entanged maxima mixing configurations In this section, we discuss two different configurations with maxima mixing anges in both U and U ν, where the stars denote sma mixing anges O(θ C ): 6

8 (θ1, θ13, θ3, # θ1 ν, θν 13, θν 3 ) Distribution of observabes sin Θ 1 sin Θ 3 sin Θ 13 CP #1 (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ) Π Π 3 Π Π sin Θ 1 sin Θ 3 sin Θ 13 CP # (,, π, π,, ) Π Π 3 Π Π Figure 1: Distribution of observabes for configurations #1 and #, where ony reaizations passing Eq. (18) have been aowed. These distributions have been generated with a reevant phases uniformy varied between 0 and π, and a non-maxima anges uniformy varied between 0 and 0. θ C (16 steps each). At this stage, there is no information on the Majorana phases if one assumes a uniform distribution of α 1 and α (phases in K). 1. Three maxima mixing anges: (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ). Two maxima mixing anges: (θ1, θ13, θ3, θ1, ν θ13, ν θ3) ν = (,, π, π,, ) 4 4 Since the sma mixing anges are O(θ C ), we can use them for expansions. As described in Sec., we compute the observabes using invariants, and we discuss the effects from the current bounds. Where appicabe, we wi discuss different impementations for the sma mixing anges. Note that, at this point, we do not assume specific vaues for the sma mixing anges, such as powers of θ C. Therefore, there wi not be any connection to the quark sector yet. However, our concusions wi be ess mode-dependent than the ones from the foowing section. We show in Fig. 1 the distributions of the observabes for the two configurations, where ony reaizations passing Eq. (18) (compatibe with current bounds) have been aowed. The phases have been uniformy varied between 0 and π and the sma mixing anges between 0 and 0. θ C. Obviousy, configuration 1 prefers sin θ 1 cose to the current best-fit vaue, sma sin θ 3 beow maxima mixing, arge sin θ 13 cose to the current bound, and δ CP cose to 0. Configuration prefers arge sin θ 1 above the current best-fit vaue, sin θ 3 cose to maxima mixing, sma sin θ 13 and no specific δ CP s. For the Majorana phases, we do not obtain any constraints yet. In the foowing two subsections we discuss the two configurations anayticay and demonstrate that we recover the resuts from this figure. However, we wi observe different sub-cases contributing to the resut in Fig. 1. In addition, we wi demonstrate how the tri-bimaxima case can be constructed for configuration. 7

9 3.1 Three maxima mixing anges: (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ) This configuration is given by three maxima mixing anges, one in the neutrino sector, θ ν 13, and two in the charged epton sector, θ 13 and θ 3. Note again that the other mixings anges θ 1, θν 1, and θν 3 are assumed to be sma, i.e., O(θ C), which means that we can use them for expansions. For the sake of simpicity, it is convenient to use some phase re-definitions for this configuration: χ δ ϕ 1, β δ δ ν ϕ, γ ϕ 1 ϕ. (19) With these re-definitions, we expand sin θ 13 to first order as 3 sin θ 13 = cos β + θ 1 + θ ν 3 ( ) 1 cos (δ β) cos δ + 4 ( ) (0) 1 4 cosγ cos (γ β) + O(θ k 4 ). Here the symbo θk stands for a sma mixing anges and combinations thereof, such as θ 1 θν 3 and (θν 3 ). Obviousy, the zeroth order term in this expansion is given by 3/8 cos β/4, which means that sin θ 13 is expected to be arge. From Eq. (17), however, we know that sin θ , which eads to cosβ 0.95 to zeroth order. The accumuation towards arge sin θ 13 can be ceary seen in Fig. 1, upper sin θ 13 pane. However, vaues smaer than the zeroth order minima vaue 3/8 /4 0.0 are aowed as we, which come from the higher order contributions in Eq. (0). Note that θ1 ν does not contribute to the first order corrections. The atmospheric mixing ange is given by sin θ 3 = 5 + cosβ + (5 + cosβ) θ 1 4 (5 + cosβ) θν 3 ( 4 cos (δ β) + cosδ + cos (δ + β) ) cos (β δ ) ( 4 cosγ + cos (γ β) + ) cos (β + γ) + O(θk). This impies that to zeroth order, we have sin θ 3 = /(5 + cosβ). Since we have a ower bound for cos β from the sin θ 13 upper bound, sin θ 3 must be smaer than maxima mixing. From the zeroth order constraint on cos β, we obtain sin θ to zeroth order, which is beow the aowed range for sin θ 3 in Eq. (17). Therefore, one has to incude higher order corrections such that sin θ 3 is shifted up into the aowed range. Nevertheess, 3 In the foowing, we wi expand the observabes to the minimum order for which we recover the main quaitative features. For exampe, if the zeroth order vanishes, or the terms from different orders are numericay comparabe, we wi incude higher orders. (1) 8

10 it wi stay on the ower edge of the aowed range (cf., Fig. 1, upper sin θ 3 pane), which makes this configuration easiy testabe in future experiments. As the third observabe, the soar mixing ange is determined by sin θ 1 = 5 + cosβ 8 + (5 + cosβ) θ 1 4 (5 + cosβ) θν cosβ θν 1 ( cos (δ β) + ) cosδ + cos (δ + β) ( 4 cosγ + cos (γ β) + ) cos (β + γ) ( cosχ + ) cos (χ β) + O(θk ) To zeroth order, sin θ 1 = /(5 + cosβ) = sin θ 3. Together with the cosβ 0.95 constraint to zeroth order, this impies that sin θ 1 /(5 + ) 0.6 coincides very we with its current best-fit vaue (see aso Fig. 1, upper sin θ 1 pane). For the sake of simpicity, we just show the zeroth order contribution for sin δ CP and cos δ CP : sin δ CP () (5 + cosβ) sinβ = ( 3 + O(θ k ) (3) cosβ)( cosβ) cosδ CP = cosβ + cos β 6 4 cosβ(3 + cosβ) + O(θ k ). (4) Because cosβ has to be arge (and β therefore has to be sma), sin δ CP is sma and cosδ CP is positive, i.e., δ CP is cose to zero. Furthermore, sin δ CP has aways the opposite sign of sin β. To zeroth order in the sma mixing anges, δ CP π/3, which means that maxima CP vioation requires higher order corrections (cf., Fig. 1, upper δ CP pane). In summary, configuration 1 is characterized by arge sin θ 13, strong deviations from maxima atmospheric mixing into the first octant, sin θ 1 cose to its current best-fit vaue, and δ CP cose to 0. Therefore, future improved bounds on sin θ 13 and an improved precision for sin θ 3 can easiy test this configuration. Note that this configuration does not ook compatibe with the tri-bimaxima mixing idea since sin θ 13 is intrinsicay arge and sin θ 3 strongy deviates from maxima mixing. Our procedure has been particuary simpe in this case: We have expanded the observabes in the sma mixing anges, and we have discussed the impications of the current bounds on the unphysica quantities and observabes. For exampe, we have found from the sin θ 13 bound that cos β = cos(δ δ ν φ ) has to be cose to one, and we have used this knowedge for the other observabes. The next exampe wi be more sophisticated in the sense that there are more quaitative sub-cases. 3. Two maxima mixing anges: (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (,, π, π,, ) 4 4 This configuration is characterized by one arge mixing in each the neutrino and charged epton sectors, namey θ 3 and θ ν 1. The sma mixing anges θ 1, θ 13, θ ν 13 and θ ν 3 are, except 9

11 from sin θ 13, expanded up to second order. Since there is one more sma mixing ange than before, there is naturay more freedom invoved in this case. Again, we start the discussion of the observabes with sin θ 13, which we expand to third order as 4 sin θ 13 = 1 θ θ 13 + θν 13 cosδ θ 1 θ 13 + cos (ϕ + δ ν ) θ 1 θν 13 cos (ϕ δ + δ ν ) θ 13θ ν 13 6 cos(ϕ 1 ϕ ) θ 1 θ ν 3) 1 sin δ sin (ϕ 1 ϕ ) θ 1θ 13θ ν cos (ϕ 1 ϕ ) θ 13 θ ν 3 6 cos (δ ν + ϕ 1 ) θ 1θ ν 13θ ν 3 6 cos (δ ν + ϕ 1 δ ) θ 13θ ν 13θ ν 3 + O(θ 4 k). (5) Since sin θ 13 is zero to zeroth and first order, it is intrinsicay sma compared to configuration 1 (cf., Fig. 1, ower sin θ 13 pane). However, if the sma anges are chosen comparativey arge, it is possibe to generate a sin θ 13 cose to the current bound. There is aready one important quaitative difference observabe at this pace, which is different from configuration 1: If a sma mixing anges are zero, δ CP is not defined. This means that we wi need to distinguish different cases determined by the non-vanishing sma mixing anges. The soar mixing ange is given by sin θ 1 = 1 1 cos (δ ϕ 1 ) θ 13 1 cosϕ 1 θ 1 1 cos ϕ θ 1 θν cos (δ ϕ ) θ 13 θν 3 + O(θ3 k ), (6) which is maxima to zeroth order. Therefore, in order to satisfy the bounds on sin θ 1 in Eq. (17), at east one of the two sma charged epton anges θ1 or θ 13 has to be moderatey arge. Nevertheess, sin θ 1 cose to its best-fit vaue wi require some tuning of the phases (cf., Fig. 1, ower sin θ 1 pane). Note that once θ1 or θ13 is non-vanishing, an exacty vanishing sin θ 13 in Eq. (5) wi aso require some tuning. We expand sin θ 3 to second order in the sma anges: sin θ 3 = 1 cos (ϕ 1 ϕ ) θ ν θ θ cos δ θ 13 θ 1 1 cos (δ δ ν ϕ ) θ 13 θν 13 1 cos (δ ν + ϕ ) θ 1 θν 13 + O(θ3 k ). (7) Obviousy, sin θ 3 is to zeroth order given by its best-fit vaue maxima mixing, and sin θ 1 and sin θ 3 are identica to zeroth order. Therefore, we do not obtain additiona constraints from Eq. (17). However, we wi see that the higher order contributions ead to interesting observations for deviations from maxima mixing and the θ 3 octant. 4 We expand sin θ 13 to the third order in the sma mixing anges because the eading contributions come from the second order terms, and the coefficients of the third order terms are comparativey arge. 10

12 As indicated above, we cannot cacuate δ CP as a expansion in the sma anges without further assumptions. If a of the contributing sma anges are zero, sin θ 13 wi be zero, and hence δ CP wi not be defined. In addition, at east one of the two anges θ1 and θ 13 has to be sufficienty arge to move sin θ 1 in the currenty aowed range. Therefore, we choose three different sets of sma anges: a sma anges zero except θ1, a sma anges zero except θ13, and θ 1 = θ 13 = θ3 ν with θν 13 = 0. The third case wi aow us to construct tri-bimaxima mixing. In the foowing, we expand the observabe mixing anges to second order and the observabe phases to first order Non-vanishing θ 1, and θ 13 = θν 13 = θν 3 = 0 In this case, we have sin θ 13 = 1 (θ 1 ), (8) sin θ 1 = 1 1 cosϕ 1 θ 1, (9) sin θ 3 = (θ 1), (30) sin δ CP = sin ϕ 1, cos δ CP = cosϕ 1. (31) In Eq. (9), we have to choose the product cosϕ 1 θ1 positive and moderatey arge in order to be within the aowed range for sin θ 1. This impies a significant deviation of sin θ 13 from zero, and of sin θ 3 from maxima mixing. Note that δ CP is given by δ CP = π ϕ 1, and that cosϕ 1 is constrained by the bound on sin θ 1 (cf., Eq. (17)) by cosϕ 1 /(10 θ1 ). Therefore, δ CP tends to be cose to π, and maxima CP vioation is forbidden because of cosϕ 1 > 0. Simiary, from θ1 /(10 cosϕ 1 ) /10, we obtain a ower bound sin θ This bound ies within the range of upcoming reactor experiments, such as Doube Chooz (see, e.g., Refs. [37,38]). As the next step, we can eiminate θ 1 in order to estabish reationships among the physica observabes. Such reationships are type I sum rues according to our definition: θ θ 13 π 4, (3) θ 1 cosδ CP θ 13 π 4. (33) The deviation from maxima mixing described by Eq. (3), which can be as arge as 3% from the sin θ 13 upper bound in Eq. (17), is on the edge of future experiments (see, e.g., Ref. [39]). In Eq. (33), the observabes θ 1, θ 13, and δ CP are reated. Obviousy, this subcase wi be chaenged for either better θ 13 bounds, or a detection of θ 13 > 0 together with cosδ CP > 0. 11

13 3.. Non-vanishing θ 13, and θ 1 = θν 13 = θν 3 = 0 Here we find sin θ 13 = 1 (θ 13 ), (34) sin θ 1 = 1 1 cos (δ ϕ 1 )θ 13, (35) sin θ 3 = (θ 13), (36) sin δ CP =sin (δ ϕ 1 ), cos δ CP = cos (δ ϕ 1 ). (37) Obviousy, we recover the same structure as in the previous sub-case with θ 13 θ 1 and δ ϕ 1 ϕ 1. The main differences can be easiy seen in the type I sum rues θ 3 1 θ 13 π 4, (38) θ 1 + cos δ CP θ 13 π 4. (39) Compared to Eq. (3), θ 3 is now in the second octant, i.e., the deviation from maxima mixing is positive instead of negative. The difference between these two cases shoud now be measurabe by future experiments, because it is twice as big as the deviation from maxima mixing. In addition, this comparison motivates a precision octant measurement, which coud discriminate which of θ 1 and θ 13 dominates in this framework. Compared to Eq. (33), δ CP is now ocated at around 0 instead of π. This means that even if no CP vioation is found in future experiments, it is interesting to distinguish these CP-conserving vaues (see, e.g., Ref. [40] for precision measurements of δ CP ) Large CP vioation or tri-bimaxima mixing Here we discuss the case X θ 1 = θ 13 = θ ν 3 and θν 13 = 0, i.e., (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (X, X, π 4, π 4, 0, X ), in order to construct maxima CP vioation or the tri-bimaxima case. For the observabes, we find sin θ 13 =X ( 1 cosδ ), (40) sin θ 1 = 1 1 X ( cos (δ ϕ 1 ) + cosϕ 1 ), (41) sin θ 3 = 1 ( 1 + ( cos δ + cos(ϕ 1 ϕ ) ) X ), (4) sin δ CP = sin (δ ϕ 1 ) + sin ϕ 1 cosδ, cosδ CP = cos (δ ϕ 1 ) cos ϕ 1 cosδ. (43) In comparison to the previous cases, we can have a vanishing sin θ 13 here. Furthermore, sin θ 13 and sin θ 3 depend on the phase δ. Except from that, the structure of the equations 1

14 Mixing ange case (θ1,θ 13,θ 3,θν 1,θν 13,θν 3 ) Observabe (Y,0, π 4, π 4,0,0) (0,Y, π 4, π 4,0,0) (X,X, π 4, π 4,0,X ) θ 1 π/4 + cos δ CP θ 13 π/4 cos δ CP θ 13 Any in currenty aowed range θ 3 π/4 θ13 / π/4 + θ 13 / Around maxima mixing θ Any in currenty aowed range δ CP π 0 sin δ CP 0.4 (if θ 13 > 0) Tabe 1: Type I sum rues or approximative vaues/ranges for the observabes δ CP, θ 13, θ 3 and θ 1 for the three sub-cases cases of configuration (cf., Secs. 3..1, 3..1, and 3..3). The ange Y refers to a mixing ange in the range /10 Y θ C, whereas the ange X ies within the range /0 X θ C. The conditions for the ast coumn are much weaker than in the other two cases, because the dependence on three unphysica phases aows for more freedom. is simiar to those of Secs and 3... For X, we obtain from Eqs. (17) and (41) the constraint X / Let us now focus on the possibiity of maxima CP vioation, which was excuded in the previous cases. For maxima CP vioation, cosδ CP = 0, and we obtain from Eq. (43) tan ϕ 1 = (1 cosδ )/ sin δ. Using this condition in Eq. (40) and Eq. (41), one can show that sin θ 1 and sin θ 13 are compatibe with their currenty aowed ranges. For CP conservation, however, we obtain from sin δ CP = 0 in Eq. (43) the condition tanϕ 1 = sin δ /(cosδ 1), which is incompatibe with the sin θ 1 aowed range. Therefore, CP conservation is excuded, and maxima CP vioation is possibe. More specificay, one can show that sin δ CP 0.4 for X θ C, i.e., δ CP π/8 for cosδ CP > 0. This impies that a future experiment wi find the CP vioation if the fraction of δ CP, for which CP vioation can be discovered, is about 75%. A neutrino factory woud find such a CP vioation for sin θ (see, e.g., Fig. 3 in Ref. [41]). We can construct tri-bimaxima mixing with this set of assumptions. For exacty tribimaxima mixing, the foowing equations have to be fufied: sin θ 1 = 1/3, sin θ 13 = 0, and sin θ 3 = 1/. From Eq. (40), we first of a obtain δ = 0. Therefore, Eqs. (41) and (4) simpify to sin θ 1 = 1 cosϕ 1 X =! 1 (44) 3 sin θ 3 = 1 ( ) 1 + X cos (ϕ! 1 ϕ ) = 1. (45) Eiminating ϕ 1, the condition for tri-bimaxima mixing is then given in terms of ϕ and X as cos ( π 3 ± ϕ ) X = 1 6. (46) This condition can be fufied, for instance, for ϕ = π/3 and X = 1/(6 ). This means that tri-bimaxima mixing can be constructed within configuration. Note that we have ony expanded the sma mixing anges to second order, which means that higher order corrections wi act as sma deviations from tri-bimaxima mixing. In addition, note that δ CP is, of course, not defined if sin θ 13 is exacty zero. 13

15 Φ Φ (θ1,θ 13,θ 3,δ,θ1 ν,θν 13,θν 3, (θ1,θ 13,θ 3, δν,ϕ 1,ϕ,α 1,α ) # θ1 ν,θν 13,θν 3 ) T ν Maj (range) Obs.: (s 1,s 13,s 3,δ CP,φ 1,φ ) 1a (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ) 1b a (,, π 4, π 4,, ) b η η 1 η η η 1 η 1 η η η η η 0 η 0 1 η η η η η η η η 1 π [0, π) (ǫ, π 4, π 4,0,0, π 4,0,0,0,0,0,0.79) Obs.: (0.9,0.03,0.5,0,0,3.9) [0,.5], [3.8, π) π (0, π 4, π 4,0,ǫ, π 4,ǫ,0,1.57,0,0,.4) Obs.: (0.30, 0.03, 0.6, 1.0, 5.9, 0.70) π 3 (0, π 4, π 4,0,ǫ, π 4,ǫ,3.1,5.,3.1,0,.1) Obs.: (0.9, 0.04, 0.31, 0.39, 3.1, 1.1) π [0, π) (ǫ,0, π 4,0, π 4,ǫ,0,0,0,3.1,0,0.79) Obs.: (0.36, 0.01, 0.50, 3.1, 0, 0.79) π [0, π) (ǫ,ǫ, π 4,4.7, π 4,ǫ,0,1.6,0,3.1,0, 0.79) Obs.: (0.36, 0.0, 0.47,.8, 0.15, 0.65) Tabe : Possibe textures for our two configurations if the sma mixing anges ( * ) are chosen from the set {ǫ, ǫ, 0} with ǫ = 0. θ C. Note that one configuration may aow for different textures depending on the choices of the sma mixing anges. The parameter η = η exp(iφ) = ǫ exp(iφ). The first coumn # refers to the texture number, the second to the configuration, the third to the texture Tν Maj, the fourth to the possibe phase range for Φ (derived from the current sin θ 13 bound). The ast two coumns represent a possibe impementation for each texture, i.e., specific choices of Φ, the mixing anges and phases consistent with data. This impementation incudes the parameters used in Eq. (8) (first row), we we as the corresponding observabes (second row, where s ij = sin θ ij ). Note that texture (or ange) zeros correspond to O(ǫ 3 ) in this tabe. We summarize the three specia cases discussed for configuration in Tabe 1. These three cases can be easiy distinguished: If sin θ 13 is much smaer than 0.01, we have the third case. If sin θ 13 is arge, we can use δ CP to disentange a three cases. In addition, the θ 3 octant coud be used to discriminate between the first and second case. 4 Introducing mass matrix structure In the preceding section, we have not made any specia assumptions for the sma mixing anges in our configurations. In this section, we extend the preceding discussion by two additiona aspects: We assume that the sma mixings anges θ ν ij, θ ij in our configurations, which we have denoted by stars, can ony come from the set {ǫ, ǫ, 0}, where ǫ θ C. 14

16 We discuss our configurations together with specific mass textures of the form of Eq. (6) for Mν Maj. This means that we incude the form of specific mass matrices in the discussion, and that the individua texture entries can ony be T ij = η n ij = ǫ n ij exp(in ij Φ) (47) with n ij {0, 1,,...} and an arbitrary but fixed phase Φ. The first aspect estabishes, simiar to EQLC, a phenomenoogica connection to the quark sector. Therefore, we wi obtain sum rues incuding the Cabibbo ange. The second aspect wi constraint the physica observabes and, especiay, the Dirac and Majorana phases. In many cases, we wi derive a reationship to the phase Φ. Of course, both of these aspects introduce more mode-dependence than in the preceding section. However, we wi aso obtain stronger constraints from the textures. We ist the textures which we wi study in this section together with the corresponding configurations in Tabe. These textures have been found in Ref. [7] as vaid patters which can be fit to data by appropriate choices of the order one coefficients. We give in the ast coumn one possibe set of parameters corresponding to Eq. (10), which aows for a fu construction of Mν Maj incuding order one coefficients for the Φ given in the second-ast coumn (cf., Sec. ). In addition, for this set of parameters, the observabes are given in the ast coumn (second rows). The effective 3 3 Majorana texture is computed from Eq. (1) assuming a norma neutrino mass hierarchy of the form m 1 : m : m 3 = ǫ : ǫ : 1. We wi demonstrate that the shown textures can satisfy our constraint in Eq. (47) for the Φ ranges given in the tabe (fourth coumn). Note that for one configuration, there can be more possibe textures, depending on the choices of the sma mixing anges. Simiary, for one texture, there can be many vaid sets of parameters, depending on the sma mixing anges and phases used. This section is organizes as foows: In Sec. 4.1, we define our concept of a texture, and we iustrate how additiona constraints can be obtained from assuming a specific texture. In Secs. 4. and 4.3 we then discuss the resuts for configurations 1 and, respectivey. Occasionay, we wi focus on the main quaitative cases. We demonstrate in App. A, that these cases describe a parameter space scan of a possibiities very we. Note that we show in Fig. 3 in App. A the distributions of observabes for the different textures and different specific Φ. This figure may aso be used in parae to reading the present section to understand the key features of the anaytica formuas for the individua discussed cases. 4.1 Additiona constraints from textures Before we come to the resuts of this section, et us carify our definition of a texture, and how we derive the additiona constraints coming from Eq. (47). First of a, we refer to the effective Majorana neutrino matrix entries as (Mν Maj ) ij, whereas the texture entries are referred to as T ij. In order to obtain the texture entries, we expand (M Maj ν ) ij = M (0) ij + M (1) ij ǫ + M () ij ǫ + O(ǫ 3 ), (48) 15

17 with ǫ θ C rea, which means that the M (k) ij s are compex numbers. Let the first nonvanishing coefficient for any i, j be M (n ij) ij, i.e., M (n ij) ij Then, if Eq. (47) hods, the eading order term can be written as > 0 and M (r) ij = 0 for a r < n ij. M (n ij) ij ǫ n ij = e iπ M K ij η n ij = e iπ M K ij ( ǫ n ij e iφn ij) e iπ M K ij T ij (49) with K ij > 0, rea, and order unity, Π a goba phase independent of i and j, and M the absoute neutrino mass scae. Therefore, the texture entry T ij is defined as T ij η n ij. The matrix is therefore determined by the texture entries T ij except from a goba phase (which can be absorbed in the fied definitions), the absoute neutrino mass scae, rea order one coefficients K ij, and higher order corrections. 5 If a M (k) ij = 0 for 0 k, we use a texture zero with an undefined phase. This cutoff can be motivated by the current measurement precision, which does not aow for the discrimination of higher order terms. Consequenty, we ony choose vaues ǫ, ǫ, and 0 for the sma mixing anges, where the zero refers to mixing anges O(ǫ 3 ). 6 As the next step, et us iustrate how we obtain additiona constraints from the textures. For a given configuration, we compute (Mν Maj ) ij in Eq. (1) using Mν diag (ǫ, ǫ, 1) and U ν from the respective configuration. We appy Eq. (48) to (Mν Maj ) ij and identify the eading order term. Then we obtain the texture entry T ij from Eq. (49) by negecting M K ij (we keep the goba phase to expicitey eiminate one of the phases). We refer to this texture extraction mechanism as (Mν Maj ) ij e iπ T ij. The texture entry T ij has then to be matched to the corresponding texture in Tabe, which eads to additiona constraints for the neutrino parameters. These constraints may in some cases depend on Φ. Note that not a of the neutrino parameters can be constrained by this procedure, and that the charged epton parameters in U remain untouched. One coud extend this procedure to the charged epton sector with corresponding textures, but this woud be way more compicated because of the additiona freedom coming from U in Eq. (). In addition, in Froggatt-Niesen-ike modes, a second fied coud be present in the charged epton mass matrix in order to produce the stronger hierarchy. Let us iustrate the texture extraction with severa quaitativey different exampes from configuration 1 (the exampes hod for both textures 1a and 1b). First of a, we compute (Mν Maj ) ij from Eq. (1), and expand it according to Eq. (48). For the 11-eement, it is sufficient to expand to zeroth order as (M Maj ν ) 11 = 1 e iδν + O(ǫ) e iπ T 11 = e iπ 1, (50) where the 1 on the right is the 11-texture entry T 11 from Tabe. Therefore, we can fix the goba phase as Π = δ ν, and we do not obtain any conditions for the anges. Simiar 5 Here the underying assumption is that the compex phases in Mν Maj, and therefore the observabes, are to eading order determined by η nij (cf., Eq. (3)). However, higher order corrections are used in Refs. [,3,7] to fit the data, which means that they need to be absorbed in the eading order one coefficients K ij. In the compex case, these higher order corrections can have compex coefficients, which means that the eading order K ij s are, in practice, not rea but ony sufficienty rea. One can show that sufficienty rea means that arg(k ij ) θ C 1. Our concusions for the phases wi therefore ony hod up to this precision. 6 In some cases, we wi use expansions up to the third order if there are no zeroth and first order terms. In this case, the contributions of the third order terms coud be sizeabe. 16

18 Cond. Texture 1a Texture 1b Texture a Texture b 1 ϕ + δ ν = 0 ϕ + δ ν = 0 ϕ 1 = 0 ϕ 1 = 0 (α + ϕ 1 + δ ν ) = Φ (α + ϕ 1 + δ ν ) = Φ (α ϕ ) = Φ (α ϕ ) = Φ 3 θ1 ν = O(ǫ ) ϕ 1 + δ ν = Φ Φ = δ ν ϕ Φ = δ ν ϕ 4 θ3 ν = O(ǫ3 ) θ3 ν = ǫ θν 13 = ǫ θ13 ν = ǫ 5 θ3 ν = O(ǫ 3 ) θ3 ν = ǫ (for a Φ) or θ3 ν = O(ǫ3 ) (for Φ in { π, 3π }) Tabe 3: Compete set of additiona constraints obtained from the textures in Tabe. The first coumn refers to the condition number, the other coumns to the different textures. For texture b and θ ν 3 = ǫ, another non-trivia reationship ϕ = f(φ) can be derived, which can be simpified as ϕ Φ. to that, we wi aways choose a texture entry T ij = 1 to fix the goba phase. We then expand the eement (Mν Maj ) to first order as (M Maj ν ) = e i(α +ϕ 1 ) ǫ + O(ǫ ) e iπ T = e iπ ǫ e iφ. (51) Here the ǫ comes from the diagona neutrino mass matrix Mν diag. Again, we obtain no condition for the anges, but ony for the phases: (α +ϕ 1 ) = Π+Φ, or (α +ϕ 1 +δ ν ) = Φ. It reates a combination of unphysica phases to the mode parameter Φ. The next eement (M Maj ν ) 1 is, to second order, given by (Mν Maj ) 1 = 1 ei(ϕ 1 δ ν) θ3 ν + 1 e i(α +ϕ 1 ) θ1 ν ǫ + O(ǫ 3 ) { T 1 = 0 e iπ T 1 = e iπ η This exampe nicey demonstrates the appearance of a mixed θ1 ν ǫ-term, where the ǫ comes from the neutrino mass hierarchy Mν diag = (ǫ, ǫ, 1). Compared to the previous section, where we assumed the sma mixing anges to be O(ǫ) in order to expand in them, we now have a discrete set of possibiities θij, ν θij {ǫ, ǫ, 0}. In the expansion Eq. (48), however, the order of θij ν is not specified without additiona assumptions. Therefore, the initia expansion wi contain ǫ s as we as θij s. ν For texture 1a, T 1 is zero, which means that a terms of the order ower than ǫ 3 have to vanish. Therefore, we have to choose θ3 ν = O(ǫ3 ) and θ1 ν = O(ǫ ) as that they ony appear in combinations O(ǫ 3 ). For texture 1b, T 1 is η, which means that (Mν Maj ) 1 must have a non-vanishing first order term. That can ony come from θ3 ν = ǫ because θν 1 = O(ǫ). For the phases, we obtain in this case ϕ 1 δ ν = Π + Φ, or ϕ 1 + δ ν = Φ. We cacuate the conditions on the anges and the phases for the other matrix eements and textures in the same way. The compete ist of resuts are given in Tabe 3. Note that we do not use canceations of terms to derive these constraints. For exampe, in Eq. (5), one may as we choose θ ν 3 = ǫ, θν 1 = ǫ/, and appropriate phases to cance the two terms and have T 1 = 0. In this case, θ ν 1 is not chosen from the set {ǫ, ǫ, 0}, but is ony of the order ǫ. However, as a consequence, the conditions derived from this choice woud not be stabe under the variation of the anges by order one coefficients. For our choices, the anges 17 (1a) (1b) (5)

19 and the mass hierarchy entries can be varied by order one coefficients, and therefore, our conditions are stabe. Conversey, a variation of the order one coefficients in the textures does not change our concusions as ong as the phases of these variations are O(θ C ). This stabiity wi hod unti we use a specific ǫ = 0. for numerica estimates, or we repace ǫ θ C to derive type II (or type III) sum rues. As the fina step of our procedure, we wi use the constraints from Tabe 3 in addition to the resuts from Sec. 3 in order to compute the observabes, where we wi focus on the main differences compared to Sec. 3. Furthermore, we wi discuss the impications of the experimenta bounds. Note that there can be neutrino parameters, charged epton parameters, ǫ, and Φ be present in the expansions. 4. Three maxima mixing anges: (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (, π 4, π 4,, π 4, ) We now discuss configuration 1, for which the observabe mixing anges are determined by Eqs. (0)-(), and additiona constraints from the textures are given in Tabe 3 (first and second coumn). From condition 1 in Tabe 3, we obtain with Eq. (19) that β = δ for both textures 1a and 1b. In Sec. 3.1 we have earned that cosβ has to be arge to satisfy the sin θ 13 bound, which means that δ has to be sma. Therefore, we expand the observabes in this section not ony in the sma anges, but aso in δ. In the foowing, the equations abeed with 1a (and the corresponding equation numbers) beong to texture 1a, and those with 1b to texture 1b. After inserting the constraints, we use Eq. (19) to return to the phases δ ν, ϕ 1, and ϕ. As the first observabe, sin θ 13 is given by: (sin θ 13 ) 1a = 1 (3 + θ 1 8 ( ) + ) δ + O(ξ 3 ), θ1 = O(ǫ ) (53a) (sin θ 13 ) 1b = 1 ( 8 (3 ǫ ( 1) cos Φ + ) δ sin Φ + θ1 ( )(53b) + ǫ 4 cos Φθ 1 ǫ + δ + ( 1) θ 1 ) + O(ξ 3 ) where ξ n stands for any nth order combinations of ǫ, and δ, and θ k (any of the sma mixing anges). In Eq. (53a) for texture 1a, note that if θ1 = ǫ, sin θ 13 is above the current bound. This means that θ1 has to be of second order in ǫ. In comparison to Sec. 3.1, we obtain a ower imit sin θ , which is within the reach of upcoming reactor and superbeam experiments. In Eq. (53b) for texture 1b, the most important difference compared to Eq. (53a) is the dependence on the mode parameter Φ. From the sin θ 13 bound in Eq. (17), Φ cannot assume a possibe vaues. The forbidden range for Φ depends on the choice for θ1 if arbitrary (but sma) δ s are aowed (to a orders in ǫ): Φ / [1.1, 5.] for θ 1 = ǫ, Φ / [.1, 4.] for θ 1 = ǫ, (54) Φ / [.5, 3.8] for θ 1 = 0. Let us next discuss the Majorana phases, which are very interesting in this case. In Sec. 3.1, we have aowed for any phases in K ν (cf., Eq. (8)), which means that there were no constraints for the Majorana phases. From Eq. (1), however, we can read off that the Majorana 18

20 phases wi affect the texture because they appear in the inside of the mixing matrix. We expand φ 1 to zeroth order in ξ as (φ 1 ) 1a,1b = (α 1 + δ ν ) + O(ξ). (55) Obviousy, aready the zeroth order is dependent on the unconstrained phase α 1, which means that φ 1 can assume any vaue as we. Therefore, neither for texture 1a nor for texture 1b there is any restriction for φ 1. Here we can easiy demonstrate why α 1 is not constrained. If we re-write Eq. (1) as M Maj ν ( = diag 1, e iϕ 1, e iϕ ) Ûν diag ( ǫ e iα 1, ǫ e iα, 1 ) ( ÛT ν diag 1, e iϕ 1, e iϕ ), (56) we observe that α 1 aways appears as a product with ǫ. Since the textures 1a and 1b do not have entries η, we do not obtain a constraint on α 1. The second Majorana phase φ reads to first order in ξ (φ ) 1a = Φ + O(ξ ), (57a) ( (φ ) 1b = Φ 4 ) sin ϕ 1 θ1 ν + ( ) ( sin Φ ǫ δ 6 4 ) + O(ξ ). (57b) Therefore, we obtain the type IIIb sum rue φ Φ (58) to zeroth order for both textures. Maxima CP vioation is then obtained for Φ = π/ or 3π/. For sin θ 3, we obtain (sin θ 3 ) 1a = (sin θ 3 ) 1b = O(ξ ) (59a) ( (6 7 ) ) θ1 89 ( ) cos Φǫ + O(ξ ) (59b) As aready discussed in Sec. 3.1, sin θ to zeroth order, which is very sma within the currenty aowed range. For texture 1a, no first order term survives, which puts the texture under tension even for the currenty aowed θ 3 range. However, for texture 1b, there are two first order contributions. The first one, which is proportiona to θ1, is aways negative, which means that a sma θ1 is preferred in order to stay within the currenty aowed range. The second contribution proportiona to ǫ is positive for cos Φ < 0, which means that it can be used to obtain higher vaues of sin θ 3. For both sin θ 1 and δ CP, we do not find very interesting noveties compared to Sec The soar mixing ange sin θ 1 ies very we within the currenty aowed region. The Dirac 19

21 CP phase δ CP is restricted to a range cose to zero. Simiar to the other mixing anges above, sin θ 1 and δ CP for texture 1b acquire some dependence on Φ which is not present for texture 1a. For detais, see App. A. In summary, we find for configuration 1 in combination with the textures 1a and 1b that the magnitude of the mixing anges sin θ 13, sin θ 3, and sin θ 1 depends on the contro parameter Φ for texture 1b, but not very much for texture 1a. However, we have obtained a ower bound for sin θ 13 for texture 1a. In addition, we obtain new constraints for the Majorana CP phase φ in both cases. 4.3 Two maxima mixing anges: (θ 1, θ 13, θ 3, θν 1, θν 13, θν 3 ) = (,, π, π,, ) 4 4 Here we discuss configuration, for which the observabe mixing anges are determined by Eqs. (5)-(7), and additiona constraints from the textures are given in Tabe 3 (fourth and fifth coumn). From the discussion in Sec. 3., we have earned that sin θ 13 is zero if a of the sma mixing anges are chosen to be zero, which means that δ CP can ony be cacuated for specific assumptions for the sma mixing anges. In addition, sin θ 1 tends to be too arge (cose to maxima) for this configuration. Therefore, we focus on the imitations from sin θ 1 first, and then study different cases for the sma mixing anges and their consequences for eptonic CP vioation. From Eq. (6), we obtain for both textures (sin θ 1 ) a,b = 1 1 cosδ θ 13 1 θ 1 + O(ǫ 3 ). (60) We read off from this equation that at east one of the two anges θ1 and θ13 has to be of size ǫ, since otherwise sin θ 1 vioates its currenty aowed range (cf., Eq. (17)). The choices for θ1 and θ 13 can ony be (θ 1, θ 13 ) {(ǫ, 0), (ǫ, ǫ ), (0, ǫ), (ǫ, ǫ), (ǫ, ǫ)} from our aowed set of mixing anges. There are then ony two sma mixing anges remaining: θ13 ν and θ3 ν. For θν 13, we now have θν 13 = ǫ (a) or ǫ (b) from Tabe 3. Therefore, we cannot use θ13 ν = 0, as we have done in the sub-cases we studied Sec. 3., which means that our sub-cases wi be different in this section, and wi incude additiona terms. Furthermore, we fuy incude θ3 ν in our discussion, since it turns out that θν 3 wi ony be reevant for sin θ 3. From Eq. (60), we aready observe that not every vaue for δ can be chosen if θ13 is used to obtain a sin θ 1 within the currenty aowed range. As we wi discuss beow, Φ pays a simiar roe especiay for sin θ 13. Therefore, we wi obtain non-trivia constraints in the Φ-δ pane from the currenty aowed ranges, which wi depend on the choices for θ1 and θ13. We show these aowed regions in the Φ-δ pane in Fig. for texture a (eft coumn) and texture b (right coumn) as shaded areas. The different rows correspond to the different (θ1, θ 13 ) sub-cases, as given in the pane captions. The dashed curves in the upper two rows represent the perturbed cases (θ1, θ 13 ) = (ǫ, ǫ ) and (ǫ, ǫ), respectivey. Obviousy, the deviations from the main cases (ǫ, 0) and (0, ǫ) are sma. Therefore, we focus on the three cases (θ1, θ 13 ) {(ǫ, 0), (0, ǫ), (ǫ, ǫ)}. We discuss the impact of incuding the perturbed cases in App. A. 0