arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Aug 2001

Transcription

1 Sneutrino-induced ike sign diepton signa with conserved R-parity St. Kob, M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and O. Panea arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Aug 2001 Istituto Nazionae di Fisica Nuceare, Sezione di Perugia, Via A. Pascoi, I Perugia, Itay Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Highfied, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Engand Max-Panck-Institut für Kernphysik, P.O , D Heideberg, Germany Abstract Lepton number vioation coud be manifest in the sneutrino sector of supersymmetric extensions of the standard mode with conserved R-parity. Then sneutrinos decay party into the wrong sign charged epton fina state, if kinematicay accessibe. In sneutrino pair production or associated singe sneutrino production, the signa then is a ike sign diepton fina state. Under favourabe circumstances, such a signa coud be visibe at the LHC or a next generation inear coider for a reative sneutrino mass-spitting of order O(0.001) and sneutrino width of order O(1 GeV). On the other hand, the ike sign diepton event rate at the TEVATRON is probaby too sma to be observabe. 1 Introduction Recenty there has been specia interest in the bosonic counterpart of the neutrino appearing in supersymmetric (SUSY) extensions of the Standard Mode [1], the sneutrino. This is due to the intimate reation of neutrino and sneutrino properties as regards the vioation of the epton number L: either both neutrino and sneutrino vioate L or both do not [2, 3]. If L is vioated, the sneutrino states in one generation exhibit a mass-spitting m=m 1 -m 2, independent of the precise mechanism which generates L vioation in the sneutrino sector. The masses m 1,2 correspond to the mass states ν N, N=1,2 (without mixing in generation space, denotes generation) which (in the effective ow-energy theory) are the physica states instead of the weak interaction states ν L (), ν L () (degenerate in mass in the absence of L vioation) [2, 3]. For the masses m 1,2 the reation m 1,2 =m± m/2 hods, where m=(m 1 +m 2 )/2 is the average sneutrino mass. Exampes for the generation of a mass-spitting in the ight sneutrino sector incude the SUSY sea-saw mechanism [3] and biinear R-parity vioating modes [4]. In the sea-saw picture, beow the eectroweak symmetry breaking scae L vioation is transferred from SU(2) L singet sneutrinos to the ight sneutrino sector. In modes with biinear R-parity breaking SU(2) L doubet sneutrinos mix with the Higgs sector and automaticay vioate L. The amount of L-vioation (or equivaenty m) is restricted by the kinematica upper imits on neutrino masses and neutrinoess doube beta decay [5, 6]: the imit on m is very stringent for the first generation, but eaves room for appreciabe L vioation for the second and third generation (see the more detaied discussion in section 5). For exampe, the SUSY inverse of 0νββ coud be observabe at a future 1

2 muon coider [7]. If the eectroweak phase transition is weaky first or second order, a generation independent constraint on the mass spitting is set by baryogenesis [8]. A mass spitting aso impies that the ightest sneutrino state may become the ightest supersymmetric partice (LSP) and - if its mass is around 70 GeV - a candidate for the cod dark matter in the universe [9]. This case shoud be easiy discernabe at a future epton coider faciity [10]. In the absence of L vioation the sneutrino cannot account for the cod dark matter in the universe [11, 12]. In coider experiments, L vioation in the sneutrino sector coud manifest itsef by a wrong sign epton stemming from the decay of a sneutrino in a epton and a chargino [5, 3]: the eectric charge of the epton produced in the decay of sneutrinos (assumed heavier than charginos) ν N ± χ (1) may be of the wrong sign compared to the L-conserving case. In sneutrino pair production or associated singe sneutrino production mechanisms the signa fina state then contains a pair of ike sign eptons (ike sign diepton or LSD). In the foowing, the LSD wi be used as a signa for sneutrino-induced L vioation and its cross section at proton and eectron coiders wi be estimated for different sneutrino production mechanisms under the assumption that R-parity is conserved. The LSD in a R-parity vioating scenario (without sneutrino L vioation) has been considered in ref. [13]. In view of the constraints on the mass-spitting mentioned above the discussion wi be focussed on L-vioation in the second and third generation. The most obvious channe for sneutrino production is pair production: f f ν 1 ν2 in the L-vioating case or ff ν L() ν L () in the L-conserving case. Here f stands for either eptons or quarks. At the TEVATRON (LHC) the pair production cross section for a 100 GeV sneutrino is around 30 fb (200 fb) [14], but drops quicky for arger vaues of the sneutrino mass: for a 300 GeV sneutrino the cross section is 0.03 fb (3 fb). On the other hand, at a future eectron positron Linear Coider (LC) [15] or at an accompanying eectron-photon coider [16] the avaiabe energy in the center of mass system (c.m.s.) may be substantiay smaer than at the LHC and the sneutrino pair production may be not avaiabe. In this case singe sneutrino production has to be considered in order to gain some insight into the sneutrino properties. Exampes of processes, where a singe sneutrino of any favour is produced at the LC or an accompanying eectron-photon coider are: e + e ν N ± χ k (2) e + γ ν N ν + (3) e + e ν N W ±, (4) where k=1,2 and χ ± 2 is the ighter of the two chargino states. In R-parity vioating frameworks, in addition to the mechanisms Eqs. (1) singe sneutrinos may be produced in resonances or in two body fina states both at hadron or epton coiders [13, 17]. The processes in Eqs. (2,3) can be regarded as the eptonic SUSY anaogues of singe top-quark production [18] in the SM. It shoud aso be recaed that sneutrinos can in addition be produced with accompanying neutrinos and neutrainos, e.g. by the process e + e ν Nν χ 0 k, resuting in a fina state very difficut to observe or not observabe at a. Hence this possibiity wi not be considered further. As the aim of this work is argey exporatory the attention is focussed on the vaue of tota cross sections which are estimated at the energies the TEVATRON, LHC and a future e + e inear coider (LC). Kinematic cuts, which may be specific of the particuar detector and/or experiment are not incuded. These can ony 2

3 be impemented in a reaistic MonteCaro simuation of the signa with a parae detaied study of the background which is however beyond the scope of this work. Nonetheess in order to have an idea of the observabiity of such phenomena the estimated tota cross sections are compared to the (prospected) annua integrated uminosities of the TEVATRON, LHC and LC. The TEVATRON uminosity at s=1.8 TeV is L =2fb 1, the LHC uminosity at s=14 TeV is expected to be L =10fb 1-100fb 1, and the projected uminosity of the TESLA LC project is [19] L =300 fb 1 at s=500 GeV, and L =500 fb 1 at s=800 GeV. It is aso expected that the LC wi be abe to operate in the eectron-photon (e γ), photon-photon (γγ) and eectron-eectron (e e ) modes with uminosities comparabe to that of the underying e + e machine (even higher in the case of the γγ mode) [20]. The outine of this note is as foows: In the next section we start with an estimation of the LSD via sneutrino pair production at the TEVATRON, the LHC and the LC. In section 3 the LSD produced in the reaction of Eq. (2) is presented and in section 4 the LSD triggered by the process in Eq. (3) wi be considered. Since the reaction in Eq. (4) produces a more difficut signature due to the additiona W boson in the fina state it wi not be anaysed. In section 5 the resuts are compared to ow-energy constraints on m and section 6 contains the concusions. 2 The LSD in sneutrino pair production at TEVA- TRON, LHC and LC The graph contributing to the LSD generated by the Dre-Yan sneutrino pair production mechanism is depicted in Fig. 1 and its ampitude is given expicitey in appendix A, Eq. (23). The LSD is induced by the L-vioating sneutrino propagator [2] 0 T[ ν(x) ν(y)] 0 = d 4 [ k 1 (2π) 4 e ik(x y) m 2 1 k2 im 1 Γ 1 1 m 2 2 k2 im 2 Γ 2 where Γ N is the tota width of sneutrino mass state N. In the sma width approximation 1/(x 2 + ǫ 2 ) πδ(x)/ǫ (for ǫ x) the LSD cross section becomes σ LSD = σ( ν 1 ν 2 ) ξ pair Γ 1(χ ± ) Γ 1 Γ 2 (χ ± ) Γ 2, (6) where Γ N (χ ± ) is the partia width of sneutrino mass state N into chargino fina states. The effect of L vioation in sneutrino pair production is measured by the factor ξ pair = 1 2m 1 Γ 1 m 2 Γ 2 (m 1 Γ 1 m 2 Γ 2 + ( m 2 ) 2 ) m 2 1 Γ2 1 m2 2 Γ2 2 + [( m2 ) 2 + m 2 1 Γ2 1 ] [( m2 ) 2 + m 2 2 Γ2 2 ], 0 ξ < 1. (7) The factor ξ pair is potted in Fig. 4 for two sets of sampe parameters defined in Tabe 1 and for different vaues of m as a function of the reative mass-spitting ], (5) R := m m : (8) ξ pair is of order O(1) for R O(0.01) for moderate vaues of m, whereas, for arge m, ξ pair is of order O(1) ony if R is of order O(0.1). Integrating over the parton distribution functions, the cross section in Eq. (6) to be expected at the TEVATRON and at the LHC is potted in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. (our resuts for the bare pair production cross section coincide with the resuts of ref. [14]). 3

4 The tota sneutrino width is estimated taking into account ony two body decay modes ν 1,2 ± χ j, ν 1,2 νχ 0 j. (9) since it is assumed that the sneutrino is heavier than the ighter chargino. For the parameters chosen in Tabe 1 the difference between the average sneutrino mass and the charged septon mass is smaer than the mass of the weak gauge bosons. However, for a arge mass-spitting the heavier sneutrino may decay as ν 1 ± + W. Since the charged septon usuay decays with a arge branching fraction into a neutraino-epton fina state, the L-vioating signa woud be sighty enhanced. The fina state charginos decay themseves mainy into the LSP neutraino and a fermion pair (to a sma fraction charginos decay into four-fermion fina states via guinos or non-lsp neutrainos, see the detaied discussion in ref. [23]). Therefore the signa fina states are LSD ± E/, LSD ± jets + E/, LSD ± + 4 jets + E/. (10) That is, if both charginos decay into eptons the fina state may be an exotic doube LSD, e.g. τ τ e + µ +. In the SM, a LSD is produced in the decays of tt, bb, WW, WZ and ZZ pairs or a singy produced t, c.f. the discussion in ref. [13]. The LSD in such events is, apart from a LSD in ZZ production, aways accompanied by jets, therefore the purey eptonic fina states in Eq. (10) remain unaffected by such a background. The background from the decays of ZZ pairs into four charged eptons of same generation is vetoed by requiring E/ > 2m LSP. As regards the semihadronic fina states, provided that the veocity of the decaying sneutrinos is arge enough, the background event topoogy differs from the signa topoogy: hadron pairs decay into an odd number of jets on each side, whie the number of jets in hadronic chargino decays is even; the LSD in the decays of a WW pair is accompanied by four jets on one side, the LSD in a semihadronic decay of a ZZ pair contains four jets on one and two jets on the other side, and the LSD in the decay of WZ is accompanied by one singe epton. Conceivabe SUSY background stems from decaying squark or gaugino pairs (in anaogy to the SM background mentioned above) and decaying septon pairs. Here the LSD in decays of non-lsp neutrainos into two charged epton pairs may be eiminated rejecting events containing four same-generation charged eptons. The LSD in the decay of a septon pair is accompanied by a one-sided epton pair in contrast to a singe epton in the signa fina state. In respect to semi-hadronic LSD production channes, the same remarks as in the SM case appy. It therefore may be concuded that the signa is virtuay background-free. At the TEVATRON, even in favourabe circumstances the LSD cross section (Eq. 6)for the parameter sets chosen is, at most, of order O(0.1 fb), see Fig. 5. Note that for arge vaues of R and sma m the LSD cross section drops to zero since the ighter sneutrino cannot decay into the wrong sign charged epton fina state. Hence the resuting event rate at TEVATRON is ess than one event per year and detecting a sneutrino-induced LSD seems to be virtuay impossibe. Given the arger pp c.m.s. energy and uminosity the prospects of detecting a sneutrino-induced LSD certainy seem much brighter at the LHC. Since the LSD is virtuay background-free, one LSD event per year coud be sufficient for detecting the effect. This in turn impies that for a LHC-uminosity of L =10fb 1 (L =100fb 1 ) a cross-section of 0.1fb (0.01fb) yieds an observabe LSD signa. Therefore for m not much arger than 200 GeV the LSD is observabe (for both projected uminosities) for R being of order O(10 3 ), see Fig. 6. Even for m as arge as 600 GeV the LSD coud be visibe if L =100fb 1 and R being of order O(0.01) (without L vioation the LHC may search for septons not much arger than 4

5 350 GeV [14]). In section 5 the range of R yieding an observabe LSD signa is compared with the imits on m from neutrino masses. Finay, at a LC with a c.m.s. energy of 500 GeV (800 GeV) and for m not much arger than 220 GeV (300 GeV), the LSD cross section is of order O(0.01 fb) (yieding an annua event rate of order O(few/year)) for R of order O(10 3 ), see Fig. 7. In section 5 the range of R yieding an observabe LSD signa at the LHC and LC is compared with the imits on m from neutrino masses. 3 The LSD in the reaction e + e χ ± ν N, = µ, τ The Feynman graphs contributing to this reaction are depicted in Fig. 2 if the favour of the fina state sneutrino is either =µ or =τ. If =e, then further contributions simiar to those examined in [21] (repacing the proton with an eectron) have to be taken into account. The resuting cross section can be written as σ tot = III k,=i;k σ (k,) (11) where e.g. σ I,II is the contribution from the interference of s-channe gauge boson exchange (Fig. 2-I) and t-channe sneutrino exchange (Fig. 2-II). The expicit expressions of the various contributions are isted in appendix B. Since the graph in Fig. 2-III contains the derivative couping of the Z 0 to the sneutrinos (see the previous section), its contribution is β-suppressed beow the threshod of sneutrino pair production. For the sneutrino mass range considered in this section it is therefore aways much smaer than the modes in Figs. 2-I and 2-II and in the foowing it is negected. The three-partice phase space integra of graphs can be spit into two twopartice phase space integras (see e.g. ref. [22]), so that the phase space integras reative to the contributions in Fig. 2-I and 2-II (and their interference) can be evauated anayticay up to the integration over Q 2 to be integrated numericay, where Q is the sum of the epton and sneutrino impuses. We have checked, that using the sma width approximation the three body cross sections σ (III,III) and σ (I,I)+(II,II)+(I,II) simpify in factorised expressions of the sneutrino and chargino pair production times the corresponding sneutrino and chargino partia decay width if kinematicay aowed. If the fina state sneutrino is ighter than at east one of the charginos, the cross section depends very sensitivey on the chargino width. However, in what foows the sneutrino wi taken to be heavier than both charginos and their width wi be negected. In Fig. 8 the cross section Eq. (11) is potted for the L-conserving case in terms of the fina state sneutrino mass for two sets of SUSY parameters µ, M 2, tan β (µ is the Higgs mixing parameter, M 2 is the gaugino mass associated to SU(2) L, and tanβ is the ratio of the vacuum expectation vaues of the two Higgs doubets) defined in Tabe 1 and for beam energies s=500 GeV and s=800 GeV. In the foowing the unification condition in a minima supergravity (msugra) mode M 1 =(5/3)M 2 tan 2 Θ W is assumed uness stated otherwise. In the sneutrio mass region where sneutrino pair production is kinematicay excuded the cross section is of order O(0.1 fb) or ess. In order to estimate the cross section for the LSD, we use the L-vioating propagator Eq. (5) and again appy the sma width approximation. The cross section Eq. (11) becomes: [ σ LSD = ξ singe σ tot ( ν 1 ) Γ 1(χ ± ) Θ(m 2 1 s )Θ( s + m 2 Γ 1) + 1 5

6 σ tot ( ν 2 ) Γ 2(χ ± ] ) Θ(m 2 2 Γ s )Θ( s + m 2 2 ) 2, (12) where s + = s m χ2 m, s = m χ1 + m. The definition of s impies that the ight sneutrino state contributes ony if it is heavier than both charginos. Otherwise the ight sneutrino may be produced by the decays of a rea chargino and the width has to be taken into account (see the comment above). The L-vioating factor ξ singe measures the effect of L vioation in singe sneutrino production and is defined as ξ singe 2m 1 Γ 1 m 2 Γ 2 = 1 ( m 2 ) 2 + m 2 1 Γ2 1 + m2 2 Γ2 2, 0 ξ < 1. (13) The behaviour of ξ singe in dependence on R is iustrated in Fig. 9. For the parameters chosen ξ singe is of order O(1) for R being of order O(0.1). The LSD signa fina states in singe sneutrino production are the same as in pair production isted in Eq. (10), though the topoogy is different: the LSD epton pair is one-sided, whereas in pair production it is back to back. Conceivabe SM and SUSY background sources are the same as in sneutrino production, and in prinicpe the same remarks concerning their suppression appy. However, the one-sidedness of the LSD in singe sneutrino production is not inherent to any of the SM or SUSY background sources and itsef provides a powerfu criterium to distinct signa from background. Therefore again it seems reasonabe to concude that the signa is virtuay background-free and we assume that an event rate of order O(1/year) is sufficient to detect the effect so that for an integrated uminosity of order O(few 100 fb 1 ) a cross section as sma as O(0.01 fb) coud be measured. In Fig. 10 the cross section for the L-vioating signa is potted versus the reative sneutrino mass-spitting R for the parameter sets as defined in Tabe 1 and for different vaues of the average sneutrino mass m. The dominant contribution comes aways from the ighter sneutrino state, and in extending the amount of L-vioation it has been made sure that the ighter sneutrino is sufficienty heavy so that the widths of both charginos may be safey negected. In the cases (m=275 GeV; s=500 GeV; set A) and (m=450 GeV; s=800 GeV; sets A and B) a reative mass-spitting m/m of order O(0.01) is sufficient to produce an L-vioating cross section of order O(0.01 fb). For the remaining cases (m=350 GeV; s=500 GeV; set A) and (m=600 GeV; s=800 GeV; sets A and B) the reative mass-spitting has to be one or two orders of magnitude arger in order to produce a visibe signa. The range of R yieding an observabe LSD signa is compared to the ow energy imits on m in section 5. 4 The LSD in the reaction e + γ ν N + ν e,, ( = µ, τ) In eectron-photon coisions µ- and τ-sneutrinos are necessariy produced by graphs at east of order three in perturbation theory. The dominant contributions to higher generation sneutrino production at an eectron-photon coider are the ones depicted in Fig. 3, which, as mentioned above, are the eptonic SUSY equivaents to singe top-quark production in the SM at an eectron-photon faciity [18] (the conventions adopted in this section foow cosey those of [18]). For the production of first generation septon pairs additiona contributions have to be taken into account, repacing for exampe in Fig. 3-III the W-boson by a chargino and interchange the sneutrino and the neutrino, and simiary for the remaining contributions. The 6

7 reevant SUSY interaction Lagrangian are [1]: L W ν = ig 2 W + µ ( ν,l µ L ) + h.c., L γ = iea µ L,R µ L,R, L γw ν = g 2 ea µ L ν,l W + µ + h.c.. (14) The gauge invariant ampitude consists of four terms and can be written as M = ieg2 2 IV Tµ i ǫµ (p g ). (15) i=i The various contributions are isted in Appendix C. Here it is not possibe to factorize the phase space integra into two two-partice integrations as it was done in the previous section so that the phase space integration is performed numericay using the VEGAS [24] code. Foowing [25], in the frame p ν = p the tota cross section is given by σ tot (s) = π 4 (m ν N s +m ) 2 ds 2 0 (s s 2) dt 1 d cosθ dφλ 1/2 (s 2, m 2 ν, m 2 ) N M 2, s 2 (16) where s 2 = (p + p ν N) 2 and t 1 = (p e p ν ) 2. The expicit parameterization of the individua four-vectors in terms of the invariants s 2, t 1 and the poar anges of p is given in appendix D. However the eγ option of a LC wi be reaized producing high energy photons through Compton-backscattering of a ow energy aser beam with an high energy positron beam [16]. Thus the resuting photons are not monochromatic and one has to fod the cross section of any eγ process over a photon energy spectrum. It is expected that a photon coider wi operate at uminosities very cose to that of the e + e machine. In terms of the variabes x = 4E e +E Laser m 2 e 2(1 + 2), y = E γ E e + the photon energy spectrum is given by [26] Here the factor P(y) = 1 N [ 1 y y 4y x(1 y) + 4y 2 x 2 (1 y) 2 ]. (17) N = x + 7 2x(1 + x) + 1 2x(1 + x) 2 + (1 4 x 8 )n(1 + x) x2 normaizes P(y)dy to unity. The resuting cross section appying Eq. (17) is σ = x(x+1) (m ν N +m ) 2 /s P(y) σ tot (ys) dy. (18) 7

8 where σ tot is defined in Eq. (16). Assuming the msugra reations for the septon masses [27] m 2 ν L = M m 2 g cos2βm2 Z m 2 L = M m2 g cos2βm2 Z (2 sin2 Θ W 1) The cross section Eq. (16) is potted in Fig. 11 for the parameters defined in Tabe 1 and for two different vaues of the center-of-mass energy of the e + e -pair (x was set to its maximum). The cross section is of order O(0.1 fb) at s=800 GeV and M 0 masses of order O(100 GeV). For a more reaistic center of mass energy of 500 GeV the resuting cross sections are about an order of magnitude smaer. With uminosities as those projected for a LC of severa cm 2 s 1 one produces severa tens of singe sneutrino events per year. The process e + γ ν N + ν e, ( = µ, τ) can aso be expoited at e + e coiders. Here infact by taking the photon to be virtua the diagrams of Fig. 3 can be attached to the eectron current thus describing septon associated singe sneutrino production at e + e coiders The fu process invoving virtua photons (with possiby other diagrams) due to the fact that the photon is massess (its propagator gives a factor Q 4 in the squared ampitude if Q is the virtua photon momentum) is dominated by sma vaues of Q i.e. quasi rea photons and the fu e + e process is approximated by foding the cross section of Eq. (16) with a photon distribution function f γ (x). This is the so-caed equivaent photon (Weiszäcker-Wiiams) approximation (E.P.A) which, quite generay, for any scattering process invoving a charged partice in the initia state that interacts via a virtua photon, consist in approximating the fu process by defining a distribution function for the photon in the eectron of energy E. The Weiszäcker-Wiiams spectrum is given by [28] f γ (x) = α π og ( E m e ) 1 + (1 x) 2 and f γ (x) is interpreted as the photon distribution of an eectron of energy E i.e. the probabiity that an eectron of energy E radiates a quasi-rea photon in the forward direction with energy E γ = xe. The cross section at the e + e machine is estimated using the foowing formua: x σ = 1 (m ν N +m ) 2 /s f γ (x) σ tot (xs) dx. (19) Some exampes of the resuts empoying Eq. (19) for the production of second and third generation singe sneutrinos are shown in Fig. 11. Again, for pausibe vaues of septon masses and center-of-mass energies the resuting tota cross sections are of the order of O(0.1f b). Therefore, as in the production of first generation sneutrinos (see ref. [29]) the production of second and third generation sneutrinos at an e + e coider through the eγ subprocess appears to be at observabe rates provided that the LC wi operate at the prospected uminosities of severa cm 2 s 1. Appying the procedure of the previous section, it is possibe to estimate the rate of wrong charged epton events coming from L-vioating sneutrino decays. If the initia state epton is a positron, the signa fina states are (assuming the fina state eptons being not too soft) LSD + + χ + E/ (for + + χ 0 ), (20) + + χ + χ + + E/ (for + χ + ν ), (21) 8

9 and the possibe chargino decay modes have been mentioned in section 2. In the SM the second or third generation LSD in Eq. (20) may be produced in e-γ-coisions in at east 7th order of perturbation theory in the decay chain of a top-bottom fina state (with additiona CKM suppression). The rate of such a process is negigibe even compared to the very ow signa rate. The wrong charged sign epton in Eq. (21) may be mimicked by the production of a Z 0 -e + pair (the Z 0 decaying into s), when the charginos to a arge fraction decay into the + ν χ 0 fina state. The same reasoning hods for the SUSY background: e.g. the fina state containing two charginos may be reproduced by the decays of a seectron and a non-lsp neutraino e + γ ẽ + χ 0, ẽ + χ + ν e, χ 0 χ + ν. If the decays to a arge fraction directy into the LSP (thus producing a + + fina state) the background may be eiminated discarding events with ony one + in the fina state. In the opposite case, a detaied anaysis of the anguar and energy distribution of the fina state partices is required. The resuting cross section for the LSD signa and the wrong sign charged epton signa is potted in Fig. 12 for different combinations of parameters. In the exampes chosen, for a moderate ratio R 10 2 the L-vioating signa may be observabe ony if both septons and charginos are ight (M 0 M 2 µ 100 GeV ). For higher masses an appreciabe signa is reached ony for a arge amount of L-vioation. Note that in msugra the SU(2) L -doubet charged septons are sighty heavier than the SU(2) L -doubet sneutrinos. This fact renders the process discussed here ess favourabe than the process discussed in the previous section. Larger cross sections for singe µ- and τ-sneutrino production may be possibe in scenarios where charged septons are aowed to be (consideraby) ighter than the sneutrinos. Two exampes shown in Fig. 13 iustrate this fact. For the parameters chosen, L-vioating cross sections of order O(0.01 fb) can be obtained for R 0.01 for higher vaues of m in respect to the msugra case in Fig. 12. In the next section the range of R rendering an observabe L-vioating signa is compared to the ow-energy constraints on m. 5 Observabiity of the LSD SIGNAL in view of ow energy constraints on m The resuts for the LSD signa obtained in the previous sections shoud be compared to the ow-energy imits on the sneutrino mass-spitting. The most stringent bounds on m come from the smaness of neutrino masses: oops containing L-vioating sneutrinos and neutrainos contribute to the Majorana neutrino mass matrix M LL mixing the SU(2) L doubet fieds [5, 6, 3]. In ref. [6] a scan over a arge range of the SUSY parameter space has been carried out and the foowing absoute imit has been derived from the upper imits on neutrino masses: m() < 156 mexp ν () 1 ev kev, (22) where m has been set to 100 GeV. Higher vaues for m resut in ess stringent bounds. This in turn impies that: (i) a reative mass-spitting R 10 2 (yieding observabe LSD event rates in sneutrino pair production at the LHC and a LC and in singe sneutrino production at a LC) is compatibe with a neutrino mass of order O(10keV) and (ii) R being of order O(10 3 ) (yieding observabe LSD event rates in sneutrino pair production at the LHC and a LC) is compatibe with a neutrino mass of order O(1 kev). It is interesting to note that a neutrino with a mass of order 9

10 O(1 kev) coud provide warm dark matter without overcosing the universe [30]. The current kinematica imits on neutrino masses are [31] m exp ν (e) < 3 ev, m exp ν (µ) < 190 kev, m exp ν (τ) < 18.2 MeV, i.e. the kinematica imits eave room for an observabe sneutrino mass-spitting in LSD events in the second and third generation. On the other hand, the imit on the m ee entry of M LL from the Heideberg- Moscow 0νββ-decay experiment [32] together with the preiminary resuts of neutrino osciation experiments (for a recent overview see e.g. [33]) impy that a entries of M LL shoud satisfy m ij < 2.5 ev [34]. If the osciation soution (requiring mass-squared differences between the neutrino states of order O(1 ev 2 ) or ess) wi be confirmed both for the atmospheric and for the soar neutrino probem, sneutrino-induced L vioation wi not be directy visibe for sneutrino decay widths of order O(1 GeV). If, on the other hand, the osciation soution to one or both of the neutrino probems are not confirmed, severa entries of M LL are no onger required to be sma, and neutrinos coud sti be much heavier than currenty accepted. Furthermore, it has been pointed out in ref. [3] that sneutrino osciations coud be observabe even for neutrino masses of order O(1 ev) provided that the tota decay widths of the sneutrino mass states are very sma. In the approach taken here this means that ξ is of order O(1) for very sma vaues of m. As an exampe, this fact is iustrated for associated sneutrino production at a future LC: for a neutrino mass of 1 ev (corresponding to m=156 kev) the L-vioating cross section for set A and s=500 GeV is of order O(0.01 fb) provided that the sneutrino widths are of order O(1 MeV), see Fig. 14 where the sneutrino width has been varied freey. Such tiny sneutrino widths are conceivabe for a sma mass difference of sneutrinos in respect to the ighter chargino and the LSP neutraino (sti it has to made sure that the fina state eptons are not too soft to be detectabe). This is usuay impossibe in a msugra context, where the LSP is consideraby ighter than the ighter chargino, but in a more genera context may we be possibe. If e.g. M 1 = M 2, it is aways possibe to find regions in the SUSY parameter space where the sneutrino width becomes very sma and L vioation may be directy visibe. 6 Concusions In concusion, L vioation in the sneutrino sector of supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Mode may manifest itsef by decays of sneutrinos into fina states containing a ike sign diepton. Since the LSD signa is virtuay background-free even very sma event rates of order O(1/year) coud be observabe at hadron, eectron or eectron-photon coider faciities. At the LHC or a future eectron inear coider (LC) with a c.m.s. energy of 800 GeV, an observabe LSD is triggered in sneutrino pair production for a reative mass-spitting R being of order O(10 3 ) if the average mass of the two sneutrino mass states m is not much arger than 400 GeV. At a LC with a c.m.s. energy of 500 GeV the LSD is observabe for R being of order O(10 3 ) if m < 220 GeV. At the TEVATRON, the LSD event rate is ess than one per year for reaistic SUSY parameters and therefore virtuay not observabe. If m is arger than the c.m.s. energy avaiabe (e.g. at 500 GeV next inear coider), sneutrino pair production is excuded and associated singe sneutrino production has to be considered in future coider faciities such as a LC or an eectron-photon machine. For chargino-associated singe sneutrino prodution at a LC, under favourabe cirumstances (arge branching fraction of the chargino-epton decay channe and a reative ow average sneutrino mass) one may expect about 10

11 ten LSD events per year for R being of order O(0.01). Under unfavourabe circumstances ess than one LSD event per year is expected. Then an appreciabe event rate is possibe ony for R being of order O(1). For charged septon associated sneutrino production at an eectron-photon coider, in msugra modes the event rate of the LSD or the wrong charged epton signa is very ow for reaistic septon masses and R being of order O(0.01). In order to produce a detectabe event rate R must be cose to one. If the charged septon is consideraby ighter than the average sneutrino mass, an observabe event rate is possibe for moderate vaues of the mass-spitting. L vioation in the sneutrino sector induces radiative contributions to the efthanded Majorana mass-matrix M LL : R being of order O(10 3 ) corresponds to a neutrino mass of order O(1 kev), R being of order O(10 2 ) corresponds to a neutrino mass of order O(10 kev). Such an amount of L vioation is compatibe with the kinematica imits on second and third generation neutrino, but not compatibe with the imits on the entries of M LL from the neutrinoess doube beta decay combined with the osciation soution to the soar and atmospheric neutrino probems. Acknowedgments O. P. woud ike to thank the Max-Pank-Institut für Kernphysik, for the very warm hospitaity during his stay in Heideberg. The work of St. K. was in part supported by a Marie Curie Individua Feowship (European Union), under contract N. HPMF-CT A LSD in sneutrino pair production The ampitude for the LSD in sneutrino pair production at a hadron coider is (see Fig. 1) g 4 T fi = 4 cos 3 V i1 V i 1 D Z (s) 2 (p 34 p 12 ) j quark j ep i j ep i Θ W (D 1 (s 34 )D 2 (s 12 ) D 1 (s 12 )D 2 (s 34 )). (23) Here j are the quark and epton currents and propagator factors are denoted as D(x) = (m 2 x iγm) 1. The invariants are s 12 = p 2 12 = (p i + p ) 2, s 34 = p 2 34 = (p i + p )2 an V is the chargino mixing matrix. Note that Eq. (23) refects the off-diagonaity of the sneutrino-z vertex. B Contributions to e + e χ ± ν N, = µ, τ In the foowing individua contributions to the cross section for the reaction e + e χ ± ν N (Fig. 2) are isted for = µ, τ. For = e further contributions have to be taken into account. The contribution of the Higgs exchange diagram has been negected since it is proportiona to the eectron mass. The index i corresponds to the fina state chargino (for obtaining numerica resuts ony production of the ighter chargino was considered), the indices j, j correspond to exchanged charginos. V, V stands for either γ or Z 0 and N is the index for the heavier (N=1) or ighter (N=2) sneutrino mass states. m D is the usua L-conserving sneutrino mass. The modification of the sneutrino propagator in the presence of L vioation has been negected. Propagator factors 1/ [ (M 2 X) 2 + M 2 ΓM] 2 are denoted by P(M, X). The integration imits of Q 2 = (p m ν + p N ) 2 are Q 2 max,min = ( s m i ) 2, (m + m ν N) 2 11

12 uness noted otherwise. The tota cross section is a sum of the contributions depicted in Fig. 2 and their interferences. The interference between 2-III and the other graphs is negected since in the numerica exampes dispayed in Tabe 1 the contribution of 2-III is much smaer than the contribution from both 2-I and 2-II. The contribution from (t-channe) sneutrino-exchange shown in Fig. 2-I is defined as σ (I,I) i = 1 1 g 6 V i 2 V j 2 V j 2 1 2s 4 128π 3 dq 2 λ 1/2 (1, m2 Q 2, m νn Q 2 )P(m j, Q 2 ) j,j P(m j, Q 2 )(Q 2 + m 2 m 2 ν N )((m 2 j Q 2 )(m 2 j Q2 ) + m j m j Γ j Γ j ) [λ 1/2 ( Q2 s, m2 i s, 1)( s (2m2 ν N (Q 2 m 2 ν N ] m 2 i Q2 )nf(q 2 ), (Q2 m2 )(m 2 ν N i m2 ν ) N )(m 2 i m2 ν ) + m 2 ν N N s ) where as usua λ(a, b, c)=a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + 2ab + 2ac + 2bc and the function F(Q 2 ) is defined as F(Q 2 ) = (m 2 i m 2 D (Q2 m 2 i s) λ1/2 (Q 2, m 2 i,s)) (m 2 i m2 D (Q2 m 2 i s) 1 2 λ1/2 (Q 2, m 2 i, s)) 1. The contribution from (s-channe) gauge-boson-exchange depicted in Fig. 2-II is defined as σ (II,II) i = 1 1 g 2 V j1 V j 1(gV L 2s 4 gl V + gr V gr V ) 1 32π 3 dq 2 λ 1/2 (1, m2 m2 Q 2, ν N Q 2 ) j,j V,V (Q 2 + m 2 m2 ν N )λ 1/2 (1, m2 s, Q2 s )P(V, s)p(v, s)p(j, Q 2 )P(j, Q 2 ) { 1 G(Q 2 ) 3 s2[ λ(1, m2 i s, Q2 s ) + (1 + m2 i s + Q2 s 2(m2 i Q2 ) 2 ] s 2 ) [ ] Q 2 (O L ji ) V (O L j i) + m j m j (O R ji ) V (O R j i) V [ ]} + 2Q 2 s m j m i (O L ji ) V (O R j i) V + m j m i(o R ji ) V (O L j i) V, where the function G(Q 2 ) is given by [ G(Q 2 ) = (m 2 V s){(m 2 V s)a m V Γ V b} ] + m V Γ V {m V Γ V a + (m 2 V s)b} ; a = (m 2 j Q 2 )(m 2 j Q2 ) + m j m j Γ j Γ j b = m j Γ j (m 2 j Q2 ) m j Γ j (m 2 j Q2 ). The epton-gauge boson coupings g L,R V are gz L = g ( 1 0 cosθ W 2 sin2 Θ W ), gz R = g ( sin 2 Θ 0 W ) cosθ W g L γ = g R γ = e, 12

13 and the gauge boson-chargino coupings (O L,R ij ) V are (O L ij ) Z 0 = (O R ij ) Z 0 = (O L ij ) γ g cosθ W ( V i1 V j1 1 2 V i2v j2 + δ ij sin 2 Θ W ) g cosθ W ( U i1u j1 1 2 U i2u j2 + δ ij sin 2 Θ W ) = (O R ij ) γ = eδ ij (Note that (O L,R ij ) V = (O L,R ji ) V ). The interference between sneutrino and gauge boson graphs is σ (I,II) i = 1 1 g 4 V i1 2 V j s 4 32π 3 dq 2 (Q 2 + m 2 m2 ν )λ 1/2( ) 1, m2 N j,j s, Q2 s [ ] P(j, Q 2 )P(j, Q 2 )P(V, s) {(m 2 V s) (m 2 j Q2 )(m 2 j Q2 ) + m j m j Γ j Γ j [ ]} m V Γ V (m 2 j Q2 )m j Γ j (m 2 j Q2 )m j Γ j { m i m j (O R ij ) V ( nf(q 2 )) + 1 L 2 (O ij ) V [λ 1/2( Q 2 ) s, m2 i s, 1 ( 1 2 (Q2 + m 2 i s) m2 D ) 1 ]} s (Q2 m 2 D )(m2 i m2 D )nf(q2 ) and the function F(Q 2 ) has been defined above. The contribution from the doube sneutrino graph is σ (III,III) i = s 4 (2π) 5 8 V i1 2 g6 π 2 c 2 W 3 s2 dq 2 P(m Z 0, s)p(m ν N, Q 2 ) λ 1/2( 1, Q2 m2 ) s, ν N λ 1/2( 1, m2 s Q 2, m2 ) χ i Q 2 (Q 2 m 2 χ i m 2 ) [ 1 2m 2 ν N 2 Q2 s s 1 ( 2 λ 1, Q2 m2 ) (m 2 ν Q 2 ) 2 ] s, ν N + N s s 2. The integration imits are Q 2 min = (m + m χi ) 2 and Q 2 max = ( s m ν N) 2. Note that N N due to the off-diagonaity of the Z 0 ν 1 ν2 vertex. C Contributions to e + γ ν N + ν e, = µ, τ The indivua ampitudes of the graphs shown in Fig. 3 are given by µ = D(s 2 )D(t 1 )j α (p ) β (g βν Qβ Q ν )S µνα, T (I) T (II) m 2 W µ = D(s 2 )(p ) α (g αν Qα Q ν (p/ g + p/ e ) )v(p e )γ µ γ ν P L v(p ν ), s T (III) m 2 W µ = D(t 1 )j µ, 1 µ = D(t 1 ) m 2 K 2jα [K µ K α + (p ν N) α (K p ) µ (p ) µ K α ]. T (IV ) The sum of the first and the third contribution can be simpified to give (T (I) + T (III) ) µ = D(s 2 )D(t 1 )j α p β 2(g αβp µ + g µα (p g ) β g µβ (p g ) α ) + D(s 2 ) 1 s pα v(p e )γ µ (p/ g + p/ e )γ α P L v(p ν ). 13

14 Here we have defined p = p p ν N, K = p g p, Q = p + p ν N, P = p e p ν, t 1 = P 2, s 2 = Q 2, j α = v(p e )γ α P L v(p ν ), S µνα = g αν (P + Q) µ + g µα (P p g ) ν + g µν (Q + p g ) α, D(s 2 ) = (m 2 W s 2 + iγ W m W ) 1, D(t 1 ) = (m 2 W t 1) 1. Repacing in [18] the quark charges e t, e b by 0, 1 respectivey and the quark current J µ quark by pµ = p p ν N (stemming from the derivative W ν couping) eads to the equivaent expressions of the ampitudes T (III) λ, T (IV) λ in [18]. A subtety known from scaar eectrodynamics arises in the cacuation of the time ordered product of the propagators of the exchanged scaar fieds. Here the additiona contribution from taking the partia derivatives out of the time ordered product is canceed by the Wγ ν four point vertex. D Four-vector parametrization in terms of two invariants and two anges In order to carry out the numerica phase space integration in the process eγ + ν Nν e foowing [25] the four-vectors in the process can be parametrized in terms of two invariants (see appendix C) and one soid ange as p γ = s s [ 2 2 sin 2 Θ + (cosθ + s 2 t 1 ) 2] 1/2 s 2 s s 2 sin Θ s s 2 2 s 2 0 s s [ 2 2 cosθ s 2 t ] 1 s 2 s s 2, p e = s 2 t 1 2 s 0 0 s 2 t 1 2 s, p ν = p ν N = s s 2 2 s 2 sin Θ s s 2 2 s 2 0 cosθ s s 2 2 s 2 [ m 2 ν N λ(s 2, m 2 ν + N, p =, m 2 ) 4s 2 ] 1/2 p 3 [ λ(s 2, m 2 ν, m 2 ) ] m 2 + N 1/2 4s 2 λ(s 2, m 2 ν 1/2, m N 2 ) 2 sinθ cosφ s 2 λ(s 2, m 2 ν 1/2, m N 2 ) 2 sin θ sin φ s 2 λ(s 2, m 2 ν 1/2, m N 2 ) 2 cosθ s 2, cosθ = (s s 2)(s 2 t 1 ) 2s 2 (s s 2 t 1 ) (s 2 t 1 )(s s 2 ). References [1] H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rep. 117 (1985)

15 [2] M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and S. Kovaenko, Phys. Lett. B 398 (1997) 311. [3] Y. Grossmann and H.E. Haber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) [4] Y. Grossman and H.E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) [5] M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and S. Kovaenko, Phys. Lett. B 403 (1997) 291. [6] M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and S. Kovaenko, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) [7] M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus, St. Kob and S. Kovaenko, Phys. Rev D 57 (1998) [8] H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus, St. Kob and V.A. Kuzmin, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) [9] L.J. Ha, T. Moroi and H. Murayama, Phys. Lett. B 424 (1998) 305. [10] St. Kob, M. Hirsch, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and O. Panea, Phys. Lett. B 478 (2000) 262. [11] L.E. Ibáñez, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 160; J.S. Hagein, G.L. Kane and S. Raby, Nuc. Phys. B 241 (1984) 638. [12] T. Fak, K.A. Oive and M. Srednicki Phys. Lett. B 339 (1994) 248. [13] H. Dreiner, P. Richardson and M.H. Seymour, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) [14] H. Baer, C. Chen and F. Paige, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3283; F. de Aguia and L. Ameteer, Phys. Lett. B 261 (1991) 326. [15] H. Murayama and M.E. Peskin, Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Sci. 46 (1996) 533. [16] I. Ginzburg, G. Kotin, V. Serbo and V. Tenov, Nuc. Instrum. and Meth. 205 (1983) 47; I. Ginzburg, G. Kotin, S. Panfi, V. Serbo and V. Tenov, Nuc. Instrum. and Meth. 219 (1984) 5. [17] M. Chembtob and G. Moreau, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) ; J. Kainowski, R. Rück, H. Spiesberger and P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 414 (1997) 297. [18] O. Panea, G. Pancheri and Y.N. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 241. [19] A. Wagner, Nuc. Phys. B (Proc. Supp.) 79, (1999) Cern Courier, , No.5, [20] V. Tenov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, (2000). [21] T. Wöhrmann and H. Fraas, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 78. [22] V. Barger and R. Phiips, Coider Physics (Addison-Wesey, Redwood City, CA, 1987). [23] A. Bart, H. Fraas and W. Majoretto, Z. Phys. C 30 (1986) 441. [24] G. P. Lepage, J. Comput. Phys. 27, 192 (1978). [25] E. Bycking and K. Kajantie, Partice Kinematics (John Wiey, 1973). [26] A. Ghosa, A. Kundu and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998)

16 [27] J. Eis, G.L. Fogi and E. Lisi, Nuc. Phys. B 393 (1993) 3. [28] E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 29 (1924) 315; C. Weiszäcker and E. Wiiams, Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 612; H. Terazawa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45 (1973) 615; P. Kesser, Acta Physica Austriaca, 41 (1975) [29] S. Hessebach and H. Fraas, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) [30] G.F. Giudice et a., hep-ph/ [31] D.E. Groom et a., Europ. Phys. J. C 15 (2000) 1. [32] L. Baudis et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 41. [33] See taks at Neutrino 2000, [34] G. Bhattacharyya, H.V. Kapdor-Keingrothaus and H. Päs, Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999)

17 Tabe 1: Parameters used for numerica resuts assuming a gravity mediated GUT scheme. V (N) is the chargino (neutraino) mixing matrix. Set A: µ = 100 GeV, M 2 = 100 GeV, tan β = 2 m χ + 1 = GeV m χ + 2 = GeV V (1, 1) = 0.89 V (1, 2) = 0.44 m χ 0 1 = GeV m χ 0 2 = GeV m χ 0 3 = 86.2 GeV m χ 0 4 = 54.8 GeV N(1, 1) = 0.20 N(2, 1) = 0.21 N(3, 1) = 0.11 N(4, 1) = 0.95 N(1, 2) = 0.78 N(2, 2) = 0.30 N(3, 2) = 0.51 N(4, 2) = 0.18 m χ + 1 Set B: µ = 200 GeV, M 2 = 200 GeV, tan β = 35 = GeV m χ + = GeV V (1, 1) = 0.80 V (1, 2) = m χ 0 1 = GeV m χ 0 2 = GeV m χ 0 3 = GeV m χ 0 4 = 94.3 GeV N(1, 1) = 0.15 N(2, 1) = 0.10 N(3, 1) = 0.30 N(4, 1) = 0.93 N(1, 2) = 0.70 N(2, 2) = 0.14 N(3, 2) = 0.69 N(4, 2) =

18 Figure 1: Like Sign Diepton via Dre-Yan sneutrino pair production at an eectron or proton coider (for e ). Figure 2: Contributions to e + e ν N χ + i more graphs contribute). where N=1,2 and =µ, τ (for =e Figure 3: Contributions to e + γ ν N + ν e. These are the eptonic anaogs to singe top production in the SM. Graph II containing a four point vertex has no SM-counterpart. Figure 4: The L vioating prefactor ξ pair in sneutrino pair production defined in Eq. (7). The soid ines correspond to parameter set A and (from eft to right) m=120 GeV, 170 GeV, 220 GeV, 300 GeV, 390 GeV; the dashed ines correspond to parameter set B and (from eft to right) m=170 GeV, 220 GeV, 300 GeV, 390 GeV. The parameter sets A and B are defined in Tabe 1. Figure 5: LSD cross section at TEVATRON: m=120 GeV, set A (soid ine); m=170 GeV, set A (dashed ine); m=220 GeV, set A (dot-dashed ine); m=170 GeV, set B (doube-dot dashed ine); m=220 GeV, set B (doube-dash dotted ine). The parameter sets A and B are defined in Tabe 1. Figure 6: LSD cross section at LHC for the parameter sets A (eft) and B (right) defined in Tabe 1 for the parameters m=120 GeV, set A (soid ine); m=170 GeV, set B (soid ine); m=200 GeV, sets A and B (dashed ines); m=400 GeV, sets A and B (dot-dashed ines); m=600 GeV, sets A and B (doube dot-dashed ines). Figure 7: LSD cross section in sneutrino pair production at a LC (=µ, τ) for the parameters: m=120 GeV, set A, s=500 GeV (soid ine); m=170 GeV, set A, s=500 GeV (dashed ine); m=220 GeV, set A, s=500 GeV (dot-dashed ine); m=170 GeV, set B, s=500 GeV (soid ine); m=220 GeV, set B, s=500 GeV (dashed ine); m=120 GeV, set A, s=800 GeV (soid ine); m=220 GeV, set A, s=800 GeV (dashed ine); m=300 GeV, set A, s=800 GeV (dot-dashed ine); m=390 GeV, set A, s=800 GeV (doube dot-dashed ine); m=170 GeV, set B, s=800 GeV (soid ine); m=220 GeV, set B, s=800 GeV (dashed ine); m=300 GeV, set B, s=800 GeV (dot-dashed ine); m=390 GeV, set B, s=800 GeV (doube dot-dashed ine). The parameter sets A and B are defined in Tabe 1. Figure 8: Cross section for chargino-associated sneutrino production depicted in Fig. 2-I and 2-II as a function of the sneutrino mass. The curves correspond to the parameters ( s=500 GeV; parameter set A; ower soid ine); ( s=800 GeV; set A; upper soid ine); ( s=500 GeV; set B; ower dashed ine); ( s=800 GeV; set A; upper dashed ine). The parameter sets A and B have been defined in Tabe 1. The sneutrino has been taken to be heavier than the charginos, otherwise the production of two rea charginos is aowed and the chargino width must be taken into account. Figure 9: The L-vioating parameter in singe sneutrino production ξ singe defined in Eq. (13). The varius curves refer to the parameters used in Fig. 10 with the same notation. 18

19 Figure 10: Cross section for LSD stemming from the chargino-associated sneutrino production depicted in Fig. 2-I and 2-II. The curves correspond to the parameters s =500 GeV, m=275 GeV (parameter set A, upper soid ine); s =500 GeV, m=350 GeV (set A, ower soid ine); s =800 GeV, m=450 GeV (set A, upper dashed ine); s =800 GeV, m=600 GeV (set A, ower dashed ine); s =800 GeV, m=450 GeV (set B, upper dotted ine); s =800 GeV, m=600 GeV (set B, ower dotted ine). The parameter sets A and B have been defined in Tabe 1. Figure 11: cross section for e + γ ν N + ν e in a msugra scenario as a function of the common scaar mass M 0, appying the backscattering process (B.S.) Eq. (18) and the equivaent photon approximation (E.P.A) Eq. (19). The curves correspond to the parameters ( s=800 GeV, parameter set A; E.P.S.; upper soid ine); ( s=500 GeV, set A; E.P.S.; ower soid ine); ( s=800 GeV, set B; E.P.S.; upper ongdashed ine); ( s=500 GeV, set B; E.P.S.; ower ong-dashed ine); ( s=800 GeV, set A; B.S.; upper dashed ine); ( s=500 GeV, set A; B.S.; ower dashed ine); ( s=800 GeV, set B; B.S.; upper dotted ine); ( s=500 GeV, set B; B.S.; ower dotted ine). The parameter sets A and B have been defined in Tabe 1 (the center of mass energy refers to the eectron-positron beam). Figure 12: cross section for the wrong sign charged epton signa stemming from e + γ ν N + ν e (in a msugra scenario) as a function of the ratio m/m appying the backscattering process (B.S.) Eq. (18) and the equivaent photon approximation (E.P.A) Eq. (19). The curves correspond to ( s=500 GeV, M 0 =100 GeV; parameter set A; E.P.S.; upper soid ine); ( s=500 GeV, M 0 =100 GeV; set A; B.S.; ower soid ine); ( s=800 GeV, M 0 =300 GeV; set A; E.P.S; upper dashed ine); ( s=800 GeV, M 0 =300 GeV; set A; B.S.; ower dashed ine); ( s=800 GeV, M 0 =300 GeV; set B; E.P.S; upper dotted ine); ( s=800 GeV, M 0 =300 GeV; set B; B.S.; ower dotted ine). The parameter sets A and B have been defined in Tabe 1. For M 0 =100 GeV the data is cut off where the ighter sneutrino becomes ighter than the LSP, the bump corresponds to the vaue of m where the heavier sneutrino is not produced any more. Figure 13: cross section for the wrong sign charged epton signa stemming from e + γ ν N + ν e as a function of the ratio m/m appying the backscattering process (B.S.) Eq. (18). No msugra conditions were assumed. The curves correspond to ( s=500 GeV, m=200 GeV; m =100 GeV; parameter set A; B.S.; soid ine); ( s=800 GeV, m=300 GeV; m =200 GeV; parameter set A; B.S.; dashed ine); The parameter set A has been defined in Tabe 1. Figure 14: Cross section of the LSD signa in singe sneutrino production at an eectron coider Eq. (12) for the case of a very sma common sneutrino width Γ :=Γ 1 =Γ 2 = Γ 1 (χ ± )= Γ 2 (χ ± ) and for the and for the parameters (set A; s=500 GeV; m=275 GeV) in dependence of m (in GeV). The soid ine corresponds to Γ=10 MeV, the dashed ine corresponds to Γ=1 MeV and the dot-dashed ine to Γ=100 kev. For a neutrino mass of order O(1 ev) ( m 200 kev = GeV, see Eq. 22) the LSD is of order O(0.01 fb) (dashed ine). 19

20 Õ Õ ¼ ½¾ ¾½ µ ÄË ¼ º ½ ÃÓÐ Ø Ðº ÈÝ Ð ÊÚÛ

21 Áµ ÁÁµ ¼ ¾ ¾ Æ Æ ÁÁÁµ ¼ ½¾ ¾½ ¾ º ¾ ÃÓÐ Ø Ðº ÈÝ Ð ÊÚÛ

22 Áµ ÁÁµ Ï Ä Ï Ä Ï Æ Æ ÁÁÁµ Áε Ä Ä Ï Æ Æ Ï º ÃÓÐ Ø Ðº ÈÝ Ð ÊÚÛ

23 Fig. 4 Kob et a. Physica Review D ξ pair _ m / m

24 Fig. 5 Kob et a. Physica Review D σ (fb) _ m / m

25 Fig. 6 Kob et a. Physica Review D Set A Set B σ (fb) m / m _

26 Fig. 7 Kob et a. Physica review D 10 0 S = 500 GeV ; Set A S = 500 GeV ; Set B σ (fb) S = 800 GeV ; Set A S = 800 GeV ; Set B σ (fb) m / m _ m / m _ 10-3

27 Fig. 8 Kob et a. Physica Review D σ (fb) m D (GeV)

28 Fig. 9 Kob et a. Physica Review D ξ singe _ m / m

29 Fig. 10 Kob et a. Physica Review D σ (fb) _ m / m