arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 1 Jan 2019

Transcription

1 Interactions of Astrophysica Neutrinos with Dark Matter: A mode buiding perspective Sujata Pandey, Siddhartha Karmakar and Subhendu Rakshit Discipine of Physics, Indian Institute of Technoogy Indore, Khandwa Road, Simro, Indore , India arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 1 Jan 2019 Abstract We expore the possibiity that high energy astrophysica neutrinos can interact with the dark matter on their way to Earth. Keeping in mind that new physics might eave its signature at such energies, we have considered a possibe topoogies for effective interactions between neutrino and dark matter. Buiding modes, that give rise to a significant fux suppression of astrophysica neutrinos at Earth, is rather difficut. We present a Z -mediated mode in this context. Encompassing a arge variety of modes, a wide range of dark matter masses from ev up to a TeV, this study aims at highighting the chaenges one encounters in such a mode buiding endeavour after satisfying various cosmoogica constraints, coider search imits and eectroweak precision measurements. E-mai: phd @iiti.ac.in E-mai: phd @iiti.ac.in E-mai: rakshit@iiti.ac.in 1

2 I. INTRODUCTION IceCube has been to designed to detect high energy astrophysica neutrinos of extragaactic origin. Beyond neutrino energies of 20 TeV the background of atmospheric neutrinos get diminished and the neutrinos of higher energies are attributed to extragaactic sources [1]. However, there is a paucity of high energy neutrino events observed at IceCube for neutrino energies greater than 400 TeV [2]. There are a few events around 1 PeV or higher, whose origin perhaps can be described by the decay or annihiation of very heavy new partices [3 10] or even without the hep of any new physics [11 13]. In the framework of standard astrophysics, high energy cosmic rays of energies up to ev have been observed, which eads to the prediction of the existence of neutrinos of such high energies as we [14 16]. In this context, it is worth exporing whether the fux of such neutrinos can get atered due to their interactions with DM partices. However, it is chaenging to buid such modes given the reic abundance of dark matter. Few such attempts have been made in iterature but these modes aso suffer from cosmoogica and coider constraints. Hence, in this paper, we take a mode buiding perspective to encompass a arge canvas of such interactions that can ead to appreciabe fux suppression at IceCube. In presence of neutrino-dm interaction, the fux of astrophysica neutrinos passing through isotropic DM background is attenuated by a factor exp( nσl). Here n denotes number density of DM partices, L is the distance traversed by the neutrinos in the DM background and σ represents the cross-section of neutrino-dm interaction. The neutrino-dm interaction can produce appreciabe fux suppression ony when the number of interactions given by nσl is O(1). For ower masses of DM, the number density is significant. But the cross-section depends on both the structure of the neutrino-dm interaction vertex and the DM mass. The neutrino-dm cross-section might increase with DM mass for some particuar interactions. Hence, it is essentiay the interpay between DM number density and the nature of the neutrino-dm interaction, which determines whether a mode eads to a significant fux suppression. As a pre-fiter to identify such cases we impose the criteria that the interactions must ead to at east 1% suppression of the incoming neutrino fux. For the rest of the paper, a fux suppression of ess than 1% has been addressed as not significant. Whie checking an interaction against this criteria, we consider the entire energy 2

3 range of the astrophysica neutrinos. If an interaction eads to 1% change in neutrino fux after considering the reevant coider and cosmoogica constraints in any part of this entire energy range, it passes this empirica criteria. We expore a arge range of DM mass ranging from sub-ev regimes to WIMP scenarios. In the case of sub-ev DM, we investigate the utraight scaar DM which can exist as a Bose-Einstein condensate in the present Universe. In genera, various aspects of the neutrino-dm interactions have been addressed in the iterature [17 25]. The interaction of astrophysica neutrinos with cosmic neutrino background can ead to a change in the fux of such neutrinos as we [26 34]. But it is possibe that the dark matter number density is quite arge compared to the number density of the reic neutrinos, eading to more suppression of the astrophysica neutrino fux. To expore arge categories of modes with neutrino-dm interactions, we take into account the renormaisabe as we as the non-renormaisabe modes. In case of non-renormaisabe modes, we consider neutrino-dm effective interactions up to dimension-eight. However, it is noteworthy that for a wide range of DM mass the centre-of-mass energy of the neutrino- DM scattering can be such that the effective interaction scae can be considered to be as ow as 10 MeV. We discuss reevant coider constraints on both the effective interactions and renormaisabe modes. We consider therma DM candidates with masses ranging in MeV TeV range as we as non-therma utraight DM with sub-ev masses. For the therma DM candidates, we demonstrate the interpay between constraints from reic density, coisiona damping and the effective number of ight neutrinos on the respective parameter space. Ony for a few types of interactions, one can obtain significant fux suppressions. For the renormaisabe interaction eading to fux suppression, we present a UV-compete mode taking into account anomay canceation, coider constraints and precision bounds. In Sec. II we discuss the nature of the DM candidates that might ead to fux suppression of neutrinos. In Sec. III we present the non-renormaisabe modes, i.e., the effective neutrino- DM interactions categorised into four topoogies. In Sec. IV we present three renormaisabe neutrino-dm interactions and the corresponding cross-sections in case of therma as we as non-therma utraight scaar DM. In Sec. V we present a UV-compete mode mediated by a ight Z which eads to a significant fux suppression. Finay in Sec. VI we summarise our key findings and eventuay concude. 3

4 II. DARK MATTER CANDIDATES In this section, we systematicay narrow down the set of DM candidates we are interested in considering a few cosmoogica and phenomenoogica arguments. The Lambda cod dark matter (ΛCDM) mode expains the anisotropies of cosmic microwave background (CMB) quite we. The weaky interacting massive partices (WIMP) are interesting candidates of CDM, mosty because they appear in we-motivated BSM theories of partice physics. Nevertheess, CDM with sub-gev masses are aso aowed. The most stringent ower bound on the mass of CDM comes from the effective number of neutrinos (N eff ) impied by the CMB measurements from the Panck sateite. For compex and rea scaar DM as we as Dirac and Majorana fermion DM, this ower bound comes out to be 10 MeV [17, 18]. Therma DM with masses ower than 10 MeV are considered hot and warm DM candidates and are aowed to make up ony a negigibe fraction of the tota dark matter abundance [35]. The utraight non-therma Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) dark matter with mass ev is aso a viabe cod dark matter candidate [36]. In the rest of this paper, uness mentioned otherwise, by utraight DM we refer to the non-therma utraight BEC DM. Numerica simuations with the ΛCDM mode show a few tensions with cosmoogica observations at sma, i.e., gaactic scaes [37 39]. It predicts too many sub-haos of DM in the vicinity of a gaactic DM hao, thus predicting the existence of many sateite gaaxies which have not been observed. This is known as the missing sateite probem [40]. It aso predicts a cusp nature in the gaactic rotationa curves, i.e., a density profie that is proportiona to r 1 near the centre, with r being the radia distance from the centre of a gaaxy. On the contrary, the observed rotationa curves show a core, i.e., a constant nature. This is known as the cusp/core probem [41]. Utraight scaar DM provides an expanation to such sma-scae cosmoogica probems. In such modes, at sma scaes, the quantum pressure of utraight bosons prevent the overproduction of sub-haos and dwarf sateite gaaxies [42 44]. Aso, choosing suitabe boundary condition whie soving the Schrödinger equation for the evoution of utraight DM wavefunction can aeviate the cusp/core probem [42, 45 47], making utraight scaar an interesting, even preferabe aternative to WIMP. Utraight DM form BEC at an eary epoch and acts ike a cod species in spite of their tiny masses [48]. 4

5 Numerous searches of these kinds for DM are underway, namey ADMX [49], CARRACK [50] etc. It has been recenty proposed that gravitationa waves can serve as a probe of utraight BEC DM as we [51]. But the utraight fermionic dark matter is not a viabe candidate for CDM, because it can not form such a condensate and is, therefore hot. The case of utraight vector dark matter aso has been studied in the iterature [52]. The scaar DM can transform under SU(2) L as a part of any mutipet. In the case of a doubet or higher representations, the DM candidate aong with other degrees of freedom in the dark sector coupe with W ±, Z bosons at the tree eve. This eads to stringent bounds on their masses as ight DM candidates can heaviy contribute to the decay width of SM gauge bosons, and hence, are rued out from the precision experiments. Moreover, Higgs-porta WIMP DM candidates with m DM m h /2 are strongy constrained from the Higgs invisibe decay width as we. The faiure of detecting DM partices in coider searches and the direct DM detection experiments rue out a vast range of parameter space for WIMPs. In ight of current LUX and XENON data, amongst ow WIMP DM masses, ony a narrow mass range near the Higgs funne region, i.e., m DM 62 GeV, survives [53 55]. As auded to earier, the utraight scaar DM can transform ony as a singet under SU(2) L because of its tiny mass. We investigate the scenarios of scaar dark matter, both therma and utraight, as possibe candidates to cause fux suppression of the high energy astrophysica neutrinos. Such a suppression depends on the ength of the path the neutrino traves in the isotropic DM background and the mean free path of neutrinos, which depends on the cross-section of neutrino-dm interaction and the number density of DM partices. We take the ength traversed by neutrinos to be 200 Mpc, the distance from the nearest group of quasars [56], which yieds a conservative estimate for the fux suppression. Moreover, we consider the density of the isotropic DM background to be GeV cm 3 [57]. Comparaby, in the case of WIMP DM, the number density is much smaer, making it interesting to investigate whether the cross-section of neutrino-dm interaction in these cases can be arge enough to compensate for the smaness of DM number density. This issue wi be addressed in a greater detai in Sec. IV. 5

6 III. EFFECTIVE INTERACTIONS In order to exhaust the set of higher dimensiona effective interactions contributing to the process of neutrino scattering off scaar DM partices, we consider four topoogies of diagrams representing a the possibiities as depicted in fig. 1. Topoogy I represents a contact type of interaction. In case of topoogies II, III, and IV we consider higher dimensiona interaction in one of the vertices whie the neutrino-dm interaction is mediated by either a vector, a scaar or a fermion, whenever appropriate. ν ν DM DM effective interactions can arise from higher dimensiona gauge-invariant interactions as we. In this case, the bounds on such interactions may be more restrictive than the case where the mediators are ight and hence, are parts of the ow energy spectrum. In genera ow energy neutrino-dm effective interactions need not refect expicit gauge invariance. We discuss the bounds on the effective interactions based on LEP monophoton searches and the measurement of the Z decay width. The detais of our impementation of these two bounds are as foows: Bounds from LEP monophoton searches For expicity gauge-invariant effective interactions, ν ν DM DM interactions come aong with + DM DM interactions. e + e DM DM interactions can be constrained from the channe e + e γ + E/ T using FEMC data at DELPHI detector in LEP for 190 GeV s 209 GeV. To extract a conservative estimate on the interaction, we assume that the new contribution saturates the error in the measurement of the cross-section 1.71 ± 0.14 pb at 1σ [58]. By the same token, we consider ony one effective interaction at a time. The corresponding kinematic cuts on the photon at the fina state were imposed in accordance with the FEMC detector: 20.4 E γ (in GeV) 91.8, 12 θ γ 32 and 148 θ γ 168. Here E γ stands for the energy of the outgoing photon and θ γ is its ange with the beam axis. We use FeynRues [59], CacHEP [60] and MadGraph [61] for computations. Athough here we considered gauge-invariant interactions, ν ν DM DM interactions can be directy constrained from the monophoton searches due to the existence of the channe e + e γν ν DM DM via a Z boson. But such bounds are generay weaker than the bounds obtained from Z decay which we are going to consider next. 6

7 µ + µ DM DM interactions can contribute to the muon decay width which is measured with an error of 10 4 %. However, the partia decay width of the muon via µ ν µ e ν e DM DM channe is negigibe compared to the error. Hence, these interactions are essentiay unbounded from such considerations. The percentage error in the decay width for tauon is even arger and hence, the same is true for τ + τ DM DM interactions. Bounds from the eptonic decay modes of the Z-boson The effective ν ν DM DM interactions can be constrained from the invisibe decay width of the Z boson which is measured to be Γ(Z inv) = 0.48 ± GeV [57]. When the gauge-invariant forms of such effective interactions are taken into account, + DM DM interactions may be constrained from the experimenta error in the partia decay width of the channe Z + : Γ(Z + ) 0.176, 0.256, MeV for = e, µ, τ at 1σ [57]. To extract conservative upper imits on the strength of such interactions, one can saturate this error with the partia decay width Γ(Z + DM DM). If such interactions are mediated by some partice, say a ight Z, then a stringent bound can be obtained by saturating Γ(Z + ) with Γ(Z + Z ). Simiar considerations hod true for Z ν ν DM DM mediated by a Z. We note in passing that such constraints from Z decay measurements are particuary interesting for ight DM candidates. A. Topoogy I In this subsection effective interactions up to dimension 8 have been considered which can give rise to neutrino-dm scattering. The phase space factor for the interaction of the high energy neutrinos with DM can be found in appendix A A six-dimensiona interaction term eading to neutrino-dm scattering can be written as, L c(1) Λ ( νi / ν)(φ Φ), (3.1) 2 where ν is SM neutrino, Φ is the scaar DM and Λ is the effective interaction scae. Now, for this interaction, the constraint from Z invisibe decay reads c (1) /Λ 2 < GeV 2. The bounds from the measurements of the channe Z + are de- 7

8 (a) (b) (c) (d) FIG. 1. Topoogies of effective neutrino-dm interactions. Fig. (a), (b), (c) and (d) represent topoogy I, II, III and IV respectivey. pendent on the epton favours, and are found to be: c (1) e /Λ GeV 2, c (1) µ /Λ GeV 2 and c (1) τ /Λ GeV 2. The gauge-invariant form of this effective interaction eads to a five-point vertex of ν νφφz, which in turn eads to a new four-body decay channe of the Z boson. Due to the existence of such a vertex, the bound on this interaction from the Z decay width reads c (1) /Λ GeV 2. The eectron-dm effective interactions can be further constrained from the measurements of e + e γ + E/ T, eading to c (1) /Λ GeV 2. It can be seen that for e the effective interaction with eectrons, the bound from the measurement of the crosssection in the channe e + e γ + E/ T can be quite stringent even compared to the bounds coming from the Z decay width. Among a the constraints pertaining to such different considerations, if one assumes the east stringent bound, the interaction sti eads to ony 1% fux suppression. The renormaisabe mode discussed in Sec. IV A 1 is one of the scenarios that eads to the effective interaction as in eq. (3.1). 2. Another six-dimensiona interaction is given as: L c(2) Λ 2 ( νγµ ν)(φ µ Φ Φ µ Φ ). (3.2) 8

9 The constraint from the measurement of the decay width in the Z inv channe reads c (2) /Λ 2 < GeV 2 for ight DM. The bounds on the gauge-invariant form of the interaction in eq. (3.2) from the measurement of Z + reads c (2) e /Λ 2 < GeV 2, c (2) µ /Λ 2 < GeV 2 and c (2) /Λ 2 < GeV 2. The bound from the channe e + e γ + E/ T reads c (2) /Λ GeV 2. Even with the vaue c (2) /Λ GeV 2, such an effective interaction does not give rise to an appreciabe fux suppression due to the structure of the vertex. e τ 3. Another five dimensiona effective Lagrangian for the neutrino-dm four-point interaction is given by: L c(3) Λ ν c ν Φ Φ. (3.3) The above interaction gives rise to neutrino mass at the oop-eve which is proportiona to m 2 DM. This, in turn, eads to a bound on the effective interaction due to the smaness of neutrino mass, c (3) Λ 16π2 m ν m 2 DM ( 1 ev ) 2 ( 1.6π 2 mν ) ev 1, (3.4) m DM 0.1 ev up to a factor of O(1). In the utraight regime mass of DM 1 ev. Hence eq. (3.4) does not ead to any usefu constraint on c (3) /Λ. The constraint from invisibe Z decay on this interaction reads c (3) /Λ 0.5 GeV 1, independent of neutrino favour. The gauge-invariant form of this interaction does not contain additiona vertices invoving the charged eptons and hence eads to no further constraints. For such a vaue of couping, there can be a significant fux suppression for the entire range of utraight DM mass, independent of the energy of the incoming neutrino as shown in fig. 2. In passing, we note that the interaction can be written in a gauge-invariant manner at the tree-eve ony when, a SU(2) L tripet with hypercharge Y = 2, is introduced. The resuting gauge-invariant term goes as (c (3) /Λ 2 )( L c L)Φ Φ. When obtains a vacuum expectation vaue v, the above interaction represents an effective interaction between neutrinos and DM as in eq. (3.3). Such an interaction can arise from the mediation of another scaar tripet with mass Λ. The LEP constraint on the mass of the neutra scaar other than the SM-ike Higgs, arising from such a Higgs tripet reads 9

10 m 72 GeV [62]. Furthermore, theoretica bounds, constraints from T -parameter and Higgs signa strength in the diphoton channe dictate that m 150 GeV [63] for v 1 GeV. For smaer vaues of v, such as v 10 4 GeV, the bound can be even stronger, m 330 GeV. Moreover, the corresponding Wison coefficient shoud be perturbative, c (3) 4π. These two facts together ead to c (3) /Λ GeV 2 for Λ m 150 GeV. Such vaues of c (3) /Λ 2 are rather sma to ead to any significant fux suppression. Whie this is true for a tree-eve generation of this interaction via a tripet scaar exchange, such interactions can be generated at the oop-eve or by some new dynamics. The renormaisabe case corresponding to the effective interaction in eq. (3.3) is discussed in greater detai in Sec. IV C 2 and Sec. IV B σ (cm 2 ) DM mass ( ev ) FIG. 2. Cross-section vs. mass of DM. Bue ine represents cross-section for m ν = 0.1 ev, c (3) /Λ = 0.5 GeV 1 for interaction (3) under Topoogy I. Grey ine represents the required cross-section to induce 1% suppression of incoming fux. 4. There can aso be a dimension-seven effective interaction vertex for neutrino-dm scattering: L c(4) Λ ( ν c σ µν ν)( 3 µ Φ ν Φ ν Φ µ Φ). (3.5) Bound on this interaction comes from invisibe Z decay width and reads c (4) /Λ GeV 3. There is no counterpart of such an interaction invoving the charged eptons. Thus the gauge-invariant form of this vertex does not invite any tighter 10

11 bounds. Such a bound dictates that this interaction does not ead to any considerabe fux suppression. 5. Another seven-dimensiona interaction can be given as: L c(5) Λ 3 µ ( ν c ν) µ (Φ Φ). (3.6) From invisibe Z decay width the constraint on the couping reads c (5) /Λ GeV 3. The measurement of Z + or LEP monophoton searches does not invite any further constraint on this interaction due to the same reasons as in case of eq. (3.3) and (3.5). Due to such a constraint, no significant fux suppression can take pace in presence of this interaction. 6. Another neutrino-dm interaction of dim-8 can be written as foows: L c(6) Λ 4 ( ν µ γ ν ν)( µ Φ ν Φ ν Φ µ Φ). (3.7) The couping c (6) /Λ 4 of interaction given by eq. (3.7) is constrained from invisibe Z decay width as c (6) /Λ GeV 4. The constraint on the gauge-invariant form of this interaction reads c (6) /Λ GeV 4, which is simiar for a three charged eptons. The gauge-invariant form of the above effective interaction aso gives rise to five-point vertices invoving the Z boson. These ead to bounds from the observations of Z inv and Z + which read c (6) /Λ GeV 4 and c (6) /Λ GeV 4 respectivey. The bound from the process e + e γφ Φ reads c (6) e /Λ GeV 4. Even with the east stringent constraint among the different considerations stated above, such an interaction does not ead to any significant fux suppression of the astrophysica neutrinos. B. Topoogy II 1. We consider a vector mediator Z, with coupings to neutrinos and DM given by: L c(7) Λ 2 ( µ Φ ν Φ ν Φ µ Φ)Z µν + f i ν i γ µ P L ν i Z µ. (3.8) 11

12 This interaction has the same form of interaction as in eq (3.7) of Topoogy I. Bound on this interaction from invisibe Z decay reads f c (7) /Λ GeV 2. The constraints on the gauge-invariant form of such interactions are f e c (7) e /Λ GeV 2, f µ c (7) µ /Λ 2 f τ c (7) τ /Λ GeV 2. The bound on the process e + e γφ Φ reads f e c (7) e /Λ GeV 2. For this interaction, the ΦΦ Z vertex from eq. (3.8) takes the form, i c(7) Λ (p 2.p 2 4 m 2 DM)(p 2 + p 4 ) µ Z µ i c(7) Λ m DM(E 2 4 m DM )(p 2 + p 4 ) µ Z µ, where p 2 and p 4 are the four-momenta of the incoming and outgoing DM respectivey. ( ) In ight of the constraints from Z decay, the factor c (7) m DM (E 4 m DM )/Λ 2 is much smaer than unity when the dark matter is utraight, i.e., m DM 1 ev and incoming neutrino energy 1 PeV. The rest of the Lagrangian is identica to the renomaisabe vector-mediated process discussed in Sec. IV C 3 and Sec. IV B. Further the charged counterpart of the second term in eq. (3.8) contributes to g 2 of charged eptons and aso eads to new three-body decay channes of τ. As mentioned in Sec. IV A 3, the bounds on the these coupings read f e 10 5, f µ 10 6 and f τ 10 2 for m Z 10 MeV. So among the constraints from different considerations, even the east stringent one ensures that no significant fux suppression takes pace with this interaction in case of utraight DM. 2. Consider a scaar mediator with a momentum-dependent couping with DM, L c(8) Λ µ Φ 2 µ + f ν c ν. (3.9) Here can be reaised as the neutra component of a SU(2) L -tripet scaar with Y = 2. A Majorana neutrino mass term with m ν = f v aso exists aong with the second term of eq. (3.9), where v is the vev of the neutra component of the tripet scaar. The measurement of the T -parameter dictates, v 4 GeV [57]. For v 1 GeV, the smaness of neutrino mass constrains the couping f at O(10 11 ). The mass of the physica scaar is constrained to be m 150 GeV [63] for v 1 GeV. For f O(10 11 ) and m 150 GeV, such an interaction does not give rise to an appreciabe fux suppression for utraight DM. 12

13 C. Topoogy III We consider the vector boson Z mediating the neutrino-dm interaction, with a renormaisabe vectorike couping with the DM, but a non-renormaisabe dipoe-type interaction in the ννz vertex. The interaction terms are given as, L C 1 (Φ µ Φ Φ µ Φ )Z µ + c(9) Λ ( ν c σ µν P L ν)z µν. (3.10) This interaction can be constrained from the measurement of the invisibe decay width of Z. The favour-independent bound on the coefficient c (9) reads, c (9) /Λ GeV 1. The interactions in eq. (3.10) can be reaised as the renormaisabe description of the effective Lagrangian as mentioned in eq. (3.5). From fig. 3 it can be seen that, for m Z = 5, 10 MeV, such an interaction eads to a significant fux suppression of neutrinos with energy 1 PeV for DM mass in the range ev and ev respectivey. σ (cm 2 ) Energy (ev ) (a) σ (cm 2 ) DM mass ( ev ) (b) FIG. 3. (a) Cross-section vs. incoming neutrino energy. (b) Cross-section vs. mass of DM. Grey ine represents the required cross-section to induce 1% suppression of incoming fux. The dashed and soid bue ines represent cross-sections for m Z = 5, 10 MeV respectivey, (a) with m DM = 0.5 ev and (b) with E ν = 1 PeV. In both pots, c (9) /Λ = GeV 1 and C 1 = 1. 13

14 D. Topoogy IV We consider the fermionic fied F L,R mediating the neutrino-dm interaction with L c(10) Λ LF 2 R Φ H 2 + C L LFR Φ + h.c. (3.11) In eq. (3.11), after the Higgs H acquires vacuum expectation vaue (vev), the first term reduces to the second term up to a further suppression of (v 2 /Λ 2 ). Foowing the discussion in Sec. IV A 1, such interactions do not ead to a significant fux suppression. Effective interactions with therma DM So far we have mentioned the constraints on severa neutrino-dm interactions in case of utraight DM and whether such interactions can ead to any significant fux suppression. Here we discuss such effective interactions of neutrinos with therma DM with mass m DM 10 MeV. In case of therma DM, bounds on the effective interactions considered above can come from the measurement of the reic density of DM, coisiona damping and the measurement of the effective number of neutrinos, discussed in detai in Sec. IV B. As mentioned earier, the case of therma DM becomes interesting in cases where the cross-section of neutrino-dm scattering increase with DM mass. For exampe, in topoogy II with the interaction given by eq. (3.8), ( ) the neutrino-dm scattering cross-section is proportiona to c (7) m DM (E 4 m DM )/Λ 2 which increases with DM mass. However, considering the bound on c (7) /Λ 2 from Z decay, the reic density and thus the number density of the DM with such an interaction comes out to be quite sma, eading to no significant fux suppression. The foowing argument hods for a effective interactions considered in this paper for neutrino interactions with therma DM. The thermay-averaged DM annihiation cross-section is given by σv th (1/Λ 2 )(m 2 DM /Λ2 ) d, where d = 0, 1, 2, 3 for five-, six-, seven- and eight-dimensiona effective interactions respectivey. In order to have sufficient number density, the DM shoud account for the entire reic density, i.e., σv th cm 3 s 1. To compy with the measured reic density, the required vaues of Λ come out to be rather arge eading to sma cross section. 14

15 IV. THE RENORMALISABLE MODELS A. Description of the modes Here we have considered three cases of neutrinos interacting with scaar dark matter at the tree-eve via a fermion, a vector, and a scaar mediator. 1. Fermion-mediated process In this case, the Lagrangian which governs the interaction between neutrinos and DM is given by: L (C L LFR + C R R F L )Φ + h.c. (4.1) Here L and R stand for SM epton doubet and singet respectivey. F L,R are the mediator fermions. As it was discussed earier, a scaar DM of utraight nature can ony transform as a singet under the SM gauge group. So, the new fermions F L and F R shoud transform as singets and doubets under SU(2) L respectivey. In such cases, the LEP search for exotic fermions with eectroweak couping ead to the bound on the masses of these fermions as, m F 100 GeV [64]. A scaar DM candidate can be both sef-conjugate and non-sefconjugate. The stabiity of such DM can be ensured by imposing a discrete symmetry, for exampe, a Z 2 -symmetry. continuous symmetry as we. A non-sef-conjugate DM can be stabiised by imposing a For sef-conjugate DM, the neutrino-dm interaction takes pace via s- and u-channe processes and such contributions tend to cance each other in the imit s, u m 2 F [36]. In contrary, for non-sef-conjugate DM the process is mediated ony via the u-channe and eads to a arger cross-section compared to the former case. In this paper, we ony concentrate on the non-sef-conjugate DM in this scenario. Such interactions contribute to the anomaous magnetic moment, δa g 2, of the charged SM eptons, which in turn constrains the vaue of the coefficients C L,R. The contribution of the interaction in eq. (4.1) to the anomaous dipoe moment of SM charged epton of favour is given by [65]: δa = m2 32π dx (C L + C R ) 2 (x 2 x 3 + x 2 m F m ) + (C L C R ) 2 (x 2 x 3 x 2 m F m ) m 2 x2 + (m 2 F m2 )x + m2 DM (1 x), (4.2) 15

16 where m is the mass of the corresponding charged epton. In the imit m DM m m F, the anomaous contribution due to new interaction reduces to, δa C LC R m 16π 2 m F. (4.3) For eectron and muon the bound on the ratio (C L C R /16π 2 m F ) reads GeV 1 and GeV 1 respectivey. There is no such bound for the tauon. (a) (b) (c) FIG. 4. Renormaisabe cases of neutrino-dm scattering with (a) fermion, (b) scaar and (c) vector mediator. 2. Scaar-mediated process The Lagrangian for the scaar-mediated neutrino-dm interaction can be written as: L f Lc L + g Φ Φ 2, (4.4) where L are the SM epton doubets and is the SU(2) L -tripet with hypercharge Y = 2. When acquires a vev v, the first term in eq. (4.4) eads to a non-zero neutrino mass m ν f v. For v 1 GeV and mass of the neutrino m ν 0.1 ev the constraint on the couping f reads f < The second term in eq. (4.4) contributes to DM mass m 2 DM g v 2. In case the DM mass is soey generated from such a term, the upper bound on v dictated by the measurement of ρ-parameter, impies a ower bound on g. mass term for DM might aso arise from some other mechanisms, for exampe, by vacuum misaignment in case of utraight DM. In such a scenario, for a particuar vaue of m DM and v there exists an upper bound on the vaue of g. 16 The

17 The ower bound on the mass of the heavy CP-even neutra scaar arising from the SU(2)- tripet is m 150 GeV for v 1 GeV [63], which comes from the theoretica criteria such as perturbativity, stabiity and unitarity, as we as the measurement of the ρ-parameter and h γγ. 3. Light Z -mediated process The interaction of a scaar DM with a new gauge boson Z is given by the Lagrangian, L f Lγ µ P L LZ µ + ig (Φ µ Φ Φ µ Φ )Z µ. (4.5) Here, f are the coupings of the = e, µ, τ kind of neutrinos with the new boson Z, whie g is the couping between the dark matter and the mediator. f can be constrained from the g 2 measurements. Due to the same reason as in the fermion-mediated case, the couping of Z with τ-favoured neutrinos is not constrained from g 2 measurements. Constraints for this case from the decay width of Z boson wi be discussed in Sec V. For the mass of the SM charged epton, m and the boson, m Z, the anomaous contribution to the g 2 takes the form [65]: δa f 2 m 2 12π 2 m 2 Z. (4.6) We have considered vector-ike couping between the Z and charged eptons. For eectrons and muons we find the constraints on coupings-to-mediator mass ratio to be rather strong [57], f e m Z MeV, f µ m Z MeV. (4.7) From the measurement of N eff the ower bound on the mass of a ight Z interacting with SM neutrinos at the time of nuceosynthesis reads m Z 5 MeV [66]. B. Therma Reic Dark Matter In this scenario, the DM is initiay in therma equiibrium with other SM partices via its interactions with the neutrinos. For modes with therma dark matter interacting with neutrinos, three key constraints come from the measurement of the reic density of DM, 17

18 coisiona damping and the measurement of the effective number of neutrinos. These three constraints are briefy discussed beow. Reic density If the DM is therma in nature, its reic density is set by the chemica freeze-out of this partice from the rest of the primordia pasma. The observed vaue of DM reic density is Ω DM h [57], which corresponds to the annihiation cross-section of the DM into neutrinos σv th cm 3 s 1. In order to ensure that the DM does not overcose the Universe, we impose Coisiona damping σv th cm 3 s 1. (4.8) Neutrino-DM scattering can change the observed CMB as we as the structure formation. In presence of such interactions, neutrinos scatter off DM, thereby erasing sma scae density perturbations, which in turn suppresses the matter power spectrum and disrupts arge scae structure formation. The cross-section of such interactions are constrained by the CMB measurements from Panck and Lyman-α observations as [19, 20], σ e < ( mdm )( T ) 0 2cm 2. (4.9) MeV ev Effective number of neutrinos In standard cosmoogy, neutrinos are decouped from the rest of the SM partices at a temperature T dec 2.3 MeV and the effective number of neutrinos is evauated to be N eff = [67]. For therma DM in equiibrium with the neutrinos even beow T dec, entropy transfer takes pace from dark sector to the neutrinos, which eads to the bound m DM 10 MeV from the measurement of N eff. It can be understood as foows. In presence of n species with therma equiibrium with neutrinos, the change in N eff is encoded as [17], ( 4 ) 4/3 ( Tν ) 4 [ N eff = N ν + 11 T γ n i=1 ( mi )] I, (4.10) T ν where, T ν T γ = [( g ) ν g γ T dec g γ g ν ] 1/3. (4.11) 18

19 Here, the effective number of reativistic degrees of freedom in therma equiibrium with neutrinos is given as gν = 14 ( N ν + 8 n i=1 g i 2 F ( mi T ν )). (4.12) In eqs. (4.10) and (4.12), i = 1,.., n denotes the number of species in therma equiibrium with neutrinos, g i = 7/8 (1) for fermions (bosons) and the functions I(m i /T ν ) and F (m i /T ν ) can be found in ref. [17]. For a DM in therma equiibrium with neutrinos and m DM < 10 MeV, the contribution of F (m DM /T ν ) to (T ν /T γ ) is quite arge, and such vaues of DM mass can be rued out from N eff = 3.15 ± 0.23 [68], obtained from the CMB measurements. We impement the above constraints in cases of the renormaisabe modes discussed in Sec IV. We present the thermay-averaged annihiation cross-section σv th and the crosssection for eastic neutrino-dm scattering σ e for the respective modes in tabe I. The notations for the coupings and masses foow that of Sec IV. In the expressions of σv th, p cm can be further simpified as m DM v r where v r 10 3 c is the viria veocity of DM in the gaactic hao [18]. In the expressions of σ e, E ν represents the energy of the incoming reic neutrinos which can be roughy taken as the CMB temperature of the present Universe. Two of the three renormaisabe interactions discussed in this paper, namey the cases of fermion and vector mediators have been discussed in the iterature in ight of the cosmoogica constraints, i.e., reic density, coisiona damping and N eff [18]. For a particuar DM mass, the annihiation cross-section decreases with increasing mediator mass. Thus, in order for the DM to not overcose the Universe, there exists an upper bound to the mediator mass for a particuar vaue of m DM. With mediator mass ess than such an upper bound, the reic density of the DM is smaer compared to the observed reic density, eading to a smaer number density. Fermion-mediated Scaar-mediated Vector-mediated σv th CL 4 p 2 cm 12π(m 2 DM +m2 F )2 g 2 f 2 2m 2 DM +p2 cm 32πm 2 DM (m2 4m2 DM )2 g 2 f 2 p 2 cm 3π(m 2 Z 4m2 DM )2 σ e CL 4 Eν 2 8π(m 2 DM m2 F )2 g 2 f 2 E2 ν 8πm 2 DM m4 g 2 f 2 E 2 ν 2πm 4 Z TABLE I. Thermay averaged DM annihiation cross-section and the cross-section for neutrino-dm eastic scattering for therma DM. As discussed earier, the measurement of N eff paces a ower bound on DM mass m DM 19

20 10 MeV. DM number density is proportiona to the reic abundance and inversey proportiona to the DM mass. Thus the most optimistic scenario in context of fux suppression is when m DM = 10 MeV and the masses of the mediators are chosen in such a way that those correspond to the entire reic density in fig. 5. Such a choice eads to the maximum DM number density whie satisfying the constraint of reic density and N eff. As it can be seen from fig. 5, such vaues of mediator and DM mass satisfies the constraint from coisiona damping as we. For exampe, as fig. 5(a) suggests, m DM 10 MeV and m F 2 GeV correspond to the upper boundary of the bue region, which represents the point of highest reic abundance. Simiary for the scaar and vector mediated case, the vaues of mediator masses come out to be 20 MeV and 1 GeV respectivey for m DM 10 MeV. With the above-mentioned vaues of the DM and mediator masses, the neutrino-dm scattering cross-section for the entire range of energy of astrophysica neutrinos fa short of the cross-section required to produce 1% fux suppression, by many orders of magnitude. The key reason behind this ies in the fact that for the range of aowed DM mass, corresponding number density is quite sma and the neutrino-dm scattering cross-section cannot compensate for that. The cross-section in the fermion and scaar mediated cases decrease with energy in the reevant energy range. Such a fa in cross-section is much more faster in the scaar case compared to the fermion one. Though in the vector-mediated case the cross-section remains amost constant in the entire energy range under consideration. The cross-section in the fermion, scaar and vector-mediated cases are respectivey , and 10 7 orders smaer than the required cross-section in the energy range of 20 TeV - 10 PeV. Thus we concude that the three renormaisabe interactions stated above do not ead to any significant fux suppression of astrophysica neutrinos in case of cod therma dark matter. C. Utraight Scaar Dark Matter Here we consider the DM to be an utraight BEC scaar with mass ev. The centre-of-mass energy for the neutrino-dm interaction in this case aways ies between O(10 3 ) ev to O(10) MeV for incoming neutrino of energy O(10) PeV depending on DM mass. We consider beow the modes described in Sec. IV to cacuate the cross-section of neutrino-dm interaction and compare those to the cross-section required for a fux suppres- 20

21 (a) (b) (c) FIG. 5. Mass of the mediator vs. mass of DM for (a) fermion-mediated, (b) scaar-mediated and (c) vector-mediated neutrino-dm interactions. The bue and pink regions are aowed from reic density of DM and coisiona damping respectivey. The region at the eft side of the vertica back ine is rued out from the constraint coming from N eff. sion at IceCube. 1. Fermion-mediated process σ(cm 2 ) Energy (ev) σ (cm 2 ) DM mass (ev) (a) (b) FIG. 6. Fermion-mediated neutrino-dm scattering. (a) Cross-section vs. incoming neutrino energy. Green and bue ines represent cross-sections for m ν = 10 2, 10 5 ev respectivey with m F = 10 GeV. Red and orange ines represent cross-sections for m ν = 10 2, 10 5 ev respectivey with m F = 100 GeV. Here C L = 0.88, m DM = ev. (b) Cross-section vs. mass of DM. Green and red ines represent m F = 10, 100 GeV respectivey for m ν = 10 2 ev. Here C L = 0.88, E ν = 1 PeV. Grey ine represents the required cross-section to induce 1% suppression of incoming neutrino fux. 21

22 The cross-section for neutrino-dm scattering through a fermionic mediator in case of utraight scaar DM is given as σ C4 L (m2 ν + 4m DM E ν ), 16πm 4 F where m ν, E ν are the mass and energy of the incoming neutrino respectivey, m DM is the mass of the utraight DM, and m F is the mass of the heavy fermionic mediator. As the mass of the DM is quite sma, at ower neutrino energies m 2 ν > m DM E ν and hence, the cross-section remains constant. As the energy increases, the m DM E ν dominant and eventuay, the cross-section increases with energy. term becomes more Such an interaction has been studied in iterature in case of utraight DM [21]. This anaysis was improved with the consideration of non-zero neutrino mass in ref. [22]. For exampe, from fig. 6(a) it can be seen that the cross-section for m ν 10 2 ev is arger compared to that for m ν 10 5 ev. In fig. 6(b), with m ν 10 2 ev, it is shown that no significant fux suppression takes pace for a DM heavier than ev for m F 10 GeV. However, it has been shown that the quantum pressure of the partices of mass ev suppresses the density fuctuations reevant at sma scaes 0.1 Mpc, which is disfavoured by the Lyman-α observations of the intergaactic medium [69, 70]. Aso, the constraint on the mass of such a mediator fermion, which coupes to the Z boson with a couping of the order of eectroweak couping, reads m F 100 GeV [64]. These facts together suggest that m DM ev and m F 10 GeV, as considered in ref. [22], are in tension with Lyman-α observations and LEP searches for exotic fermions respectivey. If we consider m ν = 0.1 ev aong with m F = 100 GeV, it eads to a arger cross-section compared to that with m ν = 0.01 ev, which is sti smaer compared to the cross-section required to induce a significant fux suppression. Thus, taking into account such constraints, the interaction in eq. (4.1) does not ead to any appreciabe fux suppression in case of utraight DM. 2. Scaar-mediated process As mentioned in Sec. IV A 2, the bound on the couping of a scaar mediator with neutrinos is quite stringent, f v 0.1 ev. Moreover, the mass of such a mediator are constrained as m 150 GeV [63]. In this case, the cross-section of neutrino-dm scattering is 22

23 10-30 σ (cm 2 ) DM mass ( ev ) FIG. 7. Cross-section vs. mass of DM in scaar-mediated neutrino-dm scattering. The bue and grey ines represent the cross-section with scaar mediator and the same required to induce 1% suppression of incoming fux respectivey. Here, energy of incoming neutrino E ν = 1 PeV, mediator mass m = 200 GeV and f g v = 0.1 ev. independent of the DM as we as the neutrino mass for neutrino energies under consideration. As fig. 7 suggests, the neutrino-dm cross-section in this case never reaches the vaue of cross-section required to induce a significant suppression of the astrophysica neutrino fux for m DM ev. As mentioned earier, DM of mass smaer than ev are disfavoured from Lyman-α observations. 3. Vector-mediated process As it has been discussed in Sec. IV A 3, the coupings of eectron and muon-favoured neutrinos to the Z are highy constrained, O( ). However, as it wi be discussed in Sec. V, for the tau-neutrinos such a couping is ess constrained, O(10 2 ). From fig. 8(a) it can be seen that, in presence of such an interaction, an appreciabe fux suppression can take pace for E ν 10 TeV, with m Z = 10 MeV, g f = 10 3 and m DM = 10 6 ev. Instead, if we fix E ν = 1 PeV, it can be seen from fig. 8(b) that the entire range of DM mass in the utraight regime, i.e., ev to 1 ev, can ead to an appreciabe fux suppression. In the next section, we present a UV-compete mode that can provide such a couping between the mediator and neutrinos in order to obtain a cross-section which eads to an appreciabe fux suppression. 23

24 σ (cm 2 ) σ (cm 2 ) Energy (ev ) DM mass ( ev ) (a) (b) FIG. 8. Vector-mediated neutrino-dm scattering. (a) Cross-section vs. incoming neutrino energy. (b) Cross-section vs. mass of DM. Bue and grey ines represent the cacuated cross-section and required cross-section to induce 1% suppression of incoming fux respectivey. Here, the mediator mass m Z = 10 MeV, and the coupings g f = For (a), m DM = 10 6 ev and for (b), the energy of incoming neutrino E ν = 1 PeV. In the standard cosmoogy neutrinos thermay decoupe from eectrons, and thus from photons, near T dec 1 MeV. Utraight DM with mass m DM forms a Bose-Einstein condensate beow a critica temperature T c = / ( (m DM (ev)) 1/3 a ) ev, where a is the scae factor of the particuar epoch [71]. When the temperature of the Universe is T T dec, T c 480 MeV for m DM 10 6 ev, i.e., the utraight DM exists as a BEC. In order to check whether the benchmark scenario presented in fig. 8(a) eads to ate kinetic decouping of neutrinos, we verify if n ν (T dec ) σ ν DM v ν < H(T dec ). Here, n ν (T ) and H(T ) are the density of reic neutrinos and the Hubbe rate at temperature T respectivey, H(T dec ) π g eff 90 T 2 dec M P ev. n ν 0.091T 3 dec cm 3. (4.13) For m DM 10 6 ev, mediator mass m Z 10 MeV and neutrino-dm couping g f 10 3, σ ν DM cm 2. Thus, at T T dec, n ν σ ν DM v ν ev H(T ) with v ν c. This refects that the neutrino-dm interaction in our benchmark scenario does not cause ate kinetic decouping of neutrinos. However, as fig. 8(b) suggests, for a particuar neutrino energy the neutrino-dm cross-section is sizabe for higher vaues of m DM, that can ead to ate neutrino decouping and we do not consider such vaues of m DM. It was aso 24

25 pointed out that a strong neutrino-dm interaction can degrade the energies of neutrinos emitted from core coapse Supernovae and scatter those off by an significant amount to not be seen at the detectors [72 74]. This imposes the foowing constraint on the neutrino-dm cross-section [17, 74]: σ ν DM cm 2 (m DM /MeV) for E ν T SN 30 MeV. It can seen from fig. 8(a) that such a constraint is comfortaby satisfied in our benchmark scenario. V. A UV-COMPLETE MODEL FOR VECTOR-MEDIATED ULTRALIGHT SCALAR DM Here we present a UV-compete scenario which accommodates an utraight scaar DM as we as a Z with mass O(10) MeV. The Z mediates the interaction between the DM and neutrinos. The couping of such a Z with the first two generations of neutrinos cannot be significant because of the stringent constraints on the coupings of the Z with eectron and the muon. As it was discussed in Sec. IV A 3, those coupings have to be O( ) for m Z 10 MeV. Thus, ony the coupings to the third generation of eptons can be sizabe. However, the couping of the Z with the b-quark is aso constrained from the invisibe decay width of Υ. The bound from such invisibe decay width dictates g Φ g b , where g Φ and g b stand for Z couping with DM and the b-quarks respectivey [75]. Thus we construct a mode such that the Z coupes ony to the third generation of eptons among the SM partices. The Z boson is reaised as the gauge boson corresponding to a U(1) gauge group, which gets broken at O(10) MeV due to the vev of the rea component of a compex scaar ϕ transforming under the U(1). As the third generation of SM eptons are aso charged under U(1), in order to cance the chira anomaies it is necessary to incude another generation of heavy chira fermions to the spectrum [76]. The canceation of chira anomaies in presence of the fourth generation of chira fermions under SU(3) c SU(2) L U(1) Y U(1) is discussed in appendix B. If the exotic fermions obtain masses from the vev of the scaar ϕ which is aso responsibe for the mass of Z, the mass of the exotic fermion is reated to the gauge 25

26 couping of U(1) in the foowing manner [27, 77], ( mz )( )( 1 m exotic 100 GeV 10 MeV g Z Y ϕ ). (5.1) Here, g Z is gauge couping of U(1) and Y ϕ is the U(1) charge of the scaar ϕ. It is cear from eq. (5.1) that, in order to satisfy the coider search imit on the masses of exotic eptons 100 GeV, the gauge couping of Z has to be rather sma. Such a constraint can be avoided if the exotic fermions obtain masses from a scaar other than ϕ. This scaar cannot be reaised as the SM Higgs, because then the effect of the heavy fourth generation fermions do not decoupe in the oop-mediated processes ike gg h, h γγ etc. To evade both these constraints we consider that the exotic fermions get mass from a second Higgs doubet. ψ SU(3) c SU(2) L U(1) Y U(1) Z 2 Q 3 2 1/6 0 + u R 3 1 2/3 0 + d R 3 1 1/3 0 + L e, L µ 1 2 1/2 0 + e R, µ R L τ 1 2 1/2 1 + τ R L / R Q /6 0 + u 4R 3 1 2/3 0 d 4R 3 1 1/3 0 Φ /2 0 Φ /2 0 + ϕ Y ϕ + ν R Φ Y Φ TABLE II. Quantum numbers of the partices in the mode. 26

27 In order to avoid Higgs-mediated favour-changing neutra current at the tree-eve, it is necessary to ensure that no singe type of fermion obtains mass from both the doubets Φ 1,2. Hence, we impose a Z 2 -symmetry to secure the above arrangement under which the fieds transform as it is mentioned in tabe II. After eectroweak symmetry breaking, the spectrum of physica states of this mode wi contain two neutra CP-even scaars h and H, a charged scaar H ±, and a pseudoscaar A. The Yukawa sector of this mode ooks ike, with, L Yukawa m f v (ζf h ffh + ζ f H ffh + ζ f A ffa), (5.2) ζ SM h = cos α/ sin β, ζ SM H = sin α/ sin β, ζ SM A = cot β, ζ χ h = sin α/ cos β, ζχ H = cos α/ cos β, ζχ A = tan β. (5.3) Here, ζ SM i and ζ χ i are the couping mutipiers of the SM and exotic fermions to the neutra scaars i h, H, A respectivey. It can be seen that the coupings of the Higgses with SM fermions in this mode are the same as in a Type-I 2HDM. α is the mixing ange between the neutra CP-even Higgses and β quantifies the ratio of the vevs of the two doubets, tan β = v 2 /v 1. The couping of the SM-ike Higgs to the exotic fermions tend to zero as α 0. Moreover, the Higgs signa strength measurements dictate cos(β α) 0.45 at 95% CL [78, 79]. So, the aowed vaues of tan β for our mode are tan β 1.96 aong with α 0. The partice content of our mode aong with their charges under the SM gauge group as we as U(1) and Z 2 are given in tabe II. Chira fourth generation fermions can aso be reaised in a Type-II 2HDM in the wrong-sign Yukawa imit [80]. The Z τ τ interaction in our mode eads to a new four-body decay channe of τ and threebody decay channes for Z and W ±. We consider that the effect of these new interactions must be such that their contribution to the respective decay processes must be within the errors of the measured decay widths at 1σ eve. This eads to an upper bound on the aowed vaue of the couping g τ which is enisted in tabe III. If we choose the new symmetry to be a SU(2) instead of U(1), then in addition to Z we woud have W ± in the spectrum. But the existence of a charged vector boson of mass O(10) MeV opens up a new two-body decay channe for τ. Such decay processes are highy constrained, thus making the couping of Z to ν τ rather sma. 27