JRA EURISOL WP14. WP leader: Yorick Blumenfeld (IN2P3-IPNO) Deputy WP leader: Fredrik Wenander (CERN) Presented by Manssour Fadil (GANIL)

Transcription

1 JRA EURISOL WP14 WP leader: Yorick Blumenfeld (IN2P3-IPNO) Deputy WP leader: Fredrik Wenander (CERN) Presented by Manssour Fadil (GANIL)

2 Participants and Management Participants: CERN, GANIL, HIL Warsaw, IFJ Krakow, IN2P3 IPNO, INFN LNL. Steering committee: WP leader + 1 representative per participant Alberto Andrighetto (INFN LNL Legnaro) Piotr Bednarczyk (IFJ Krakow) Yorick Blumenfeld (IN2P3-IPNO, WP leader) Manssour Fadil (GANIL) Przemysław Gmaj (HIL Warsaw) Maher Cheikh Mhamed (IN2P3-IPNO) Fredrik Wenander (CERN, deputy WP leader) Total EC budget: 640 K

3 Objectives and Structure EURISOL concept defined during EURISOL DS ( ) : NuPECC LRP priority JRA includes R&D Necessary for future EURISOL which will enhance output of ENSAR2 ISOL facilities, in particular SPIRAL & SPIRAL2, HIE-ISOLDE, SPES and ALTO. Includes 3 tasks: ICBT: Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques Beamlab: Development of chemically reactive nuclear beams CRIBE: Chart of Radioactive Ion Beams in Europe

4 Deliverables and Milestones Milestones MS14.1: Experiments to find the optimal breeder configuration (ICBT; Month 24) MS14.2: Nuclear data of produced beams (CRIBE; Month 36) Deliverables D14.1: Report on performances of the EBIS debuncher (ICBT; Month 24) D 14.2: Report on R&D on radioactive plasma ion sources ( Beamlab; Month 36) D14.3: Conceptual design report of a new generation charge breeder (ICBT; Month 36) D14.4: New targets, ion sources and beams (Beamlab; Month 48) D14.5: Chart of Beams (CRIBE; Month 48) Note that the task STUC (StrUcturing the Community) originally in the JRA application has been moved to the NUSPRASEN network.

5 ICBT (Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques) Task leader: Fredrik Wenander (CERN) Participants: CERN, GANIL, HIL Warsaw Budget: 276 K scientific objective : The aim is to perform very fast charge breeding, production of fully stripped ions and cw beams using Electron Beam Ion Breeders and to improve the efficiency of ECR ion source breeders.

6 ICBT (Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques) F. Wenander A. Shornikov P. Delahaye P. Gmaj EBIS electron gun development Paul trap for highly charged ions Tests on ECRIS Higher charge state Faster charge breeding CW beams out of EBIS/T Higher efficiency Less stable contaminants

7 CERN # Faster breeding requires higher electron current density # Higher charge states requires higher electron beam energy Try two different electron gun designs MEDeGUN CERN development to be tested at TwinEBIS 2 T test-bench HEC 2 BNL design, CERN collaboration tests at BNL until summer 2016 TwinEBIS cathode anode electron beam High current, high compression Brillouin gun Based on the tests, design a charge breeder for EURISOL ICBT Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques

8 DC Focusing electrodes DC RF Focusing electrodes A Paul trap for debunching the EBIS beams Incoming beam Ion signal ICBT program: 1. Further optimization 2. Tests with n+ ions at GANIL 3. Possibly test with n+ from TwinEBIS ~400 µs Time Slow REXEBIS 6 ms EBIS beam debuncher???? EBIS beam debuncher ICBT goal CW (with +-20% fluctuations) ICBT Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques

9 HIL Warsaw Beam purity - use rotatational hexapole to sweep the loss cones over the plasma chamber wall. Efficiency - try non-axial injection of 1+ ions to study the impact of the injection energy and time-of-flight inside the plasma on the 1+ ion capture and breeding efficiency. Setup the experiments will be conducted on a for this purpose modified ECRIS test bench at HIL. Inner rod ICBT Innovative Charge Breeding Techniques MW coupling perpendicularly to the drawing (TE 10 TEM) Hexapole For more information about ICBT task : Fredrik.Wenander@cern.ch

10 Beamlab Task Leader: Maher Cheikh Mhamed (IN2P3 IPNO) Participants: CERN, GANIL, IFJ Krakow, IN2P3 IPNO; INFN LNL EC budget: 324 K Main Scientific Objective : To produce nuclear beams which are challenging because of chemical reactivity of the nucleus element

11 Beamlab Beamlab includes 4 subtasks : Subtask #1: Efficient ion sources for difficult ISOL beams Works will focus on the plasma ion source behavior as a function of the injected vapors and optimization of key parameters of such ion sources Deputy coordinator: GANIL Involved partners: CERN, INFN, IPNO Subtask #2: Material compatibility in reactive gas atmospheres Works will focus on: Studies of the surface of material involved in the Target-Ion sources components Studies on material and physicochemical properties as a function of the temperatures obtained during the operation of the Target-ion source unit. Deputy coordinator: INFN Involved partners: GANIL, IJF PAN, IPNO

12 Beamlab Subtask #3: New molecular beams Developments will be focused on the production of molecule beams : from hydride, by fluorination, by creating a volatile sulphide compound and creation of transition metal polycarbonyl complexes molecules Deputy coordinator: CERN Involved partners: GANIL, INFN, IPNO Subtask #4: Specific targets designs for non-volatile elements Works will focus on : - Optimization of the target configuration - Development of targets to catch the recoil fragments in a reactive gas - Development of Light targets for the production of refractory beams Deputy coordinator: IPNO Involved partners: CERN, GANIL, INFN, IPNO

13 Beamlab Task budget CERN GANIL IFJ PAN INFN IPNO Post-Doc position 100 k 50 k 89 k Consumables 10 k 35 k 21 k Tavel costs 2 k 10 k 3 k 4 k Total per Lab 112 k 45 k 21 k 53 k 93 k TOTAL 324 k To achieve all the required subtasks the partners will use the experimental setups and resources available at their facilities For more information about Beamlab task : cheikh@ipno.in2p3.fr

14 CRIBE (Chart of Radioactive Ion Beams in Europe) Task leader: Manssour Fadil (GANIL) Participants: GANIL, IFJ Krakow EC budget (incl. Overheads): 32 K Two objectives of this task : 1. Collection of available nuclear data about RIBs in european nuclear facilities 2. Development of a chart of beams concerning all RIBs produced in european nuclear facilities Working team : GANIL : M. Fadil, L. Fortin, M. Lewitowicz, N. Ménard IFJ Krakow : P. Bednarczyck, B. Fornal, A. Maj

15 CRIBE (Chart of Radioactive Ion Beams in Europe) We plan seven stages of this work: 1. Development of a protocol to standardize and select available radioactive ion beams. 2. Collection of RIB nuclear data concerning different European facilities. 3. Technical development of the chart of beams. 4. Preparation (conversion) of different nuclear data to formats adapted to the chart of beams. 5. Validation of prepared nuclear data. 6. Publication of the chart of beam on the dedicated website (EURISOL or NuPECC website for example). 7. Make information available to interested industries.

16 CRIBE (Chart of Radioactive Ion Beams in Europe) List of facilities (which may be extended) : Alto, IPN/Orsay (France) CCB, IFJ PAN Krakow (Poland) GANIL (France) GSI (Germany) ISOLDE (HIE-ISOLDE) (CERN/Swiss) Jyvaskyla University (Finland) LNL, INFN (Italy) LNS, INFN (Italy) SLCJ, University of Warsaw (Poland)

17 CRIBE (Chart of Radioactive Ion Beams in Europe) Examples of charts of beams developped by GANIL : For more information about CRIBE task : fadil@ganil.fr

18 Manpower table (in man-months) Part/Task ICBT EU ICBT Provided Beamlab EU Beamlab Provided CRIBE EU CRIBE Provided Manage ment Provided Total CERN GANIL HIL- Warsaw IFJ-Krakow CNRS INFN Total

19 Financial table Participant Country (A) Direct personnel costs/ (B) Other direct costs/ (C)Direct costs of subcontracting/ (D) Direct costs of providing financial support to third parties/ (E) Costs of inkind contribution s not used on the beneficiary s premises/ (F) Indirect Costs / (G) Special unit costs covering direct & indirect costs/ (H) Total estimated eligible costs/ (I) Reimburse ment rate (%) (J) Max grant/ (H*I) (K) Requested grant / CERN Int 80 40,8 30, % CNRS FR 71,2 9,6 20, % GANIL FR 128,8 89,6 54, % HIL- PL 24 2,4 6, % Warsaw IFJ- PL 0 23,2 5, % Krakow INFN I 40 2,4 10, % (G) Special unit costs covering direct & indirect costs/