Texas Coastal Bend District

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Texas Coastal Bend District"

Transcription

1 Texas Agricultural xtension Service The Texas A&M University System B-11(11) Texas rop nterprise Budgets Texas oastal Bend District Projected for 1995 Dr. Lawrence L. Falconer, District 11 xtension conomist-management The Texas Agricultural Rxtrnsion Service Zerie L. arpenter, Director The Texas A&M University System ollege Station, Texas

2 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February B-11 <lh GROSS INOM Description RN-OASTAL UP. DFIINY PMT. ORN orn, oastal Upland Texas oastal Bend District (11) 1995 Projected osts and Returns per Quantity Unit $ / Unit 750 bu bu Your stimate GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description Quantity Unit $ / Unit FRTILIZR ATRAZIN SOIL INSTIID FOLIAR IRON FOLIAR IRON Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y ST ASID Interest - O Borrowed Interest - Positive ash HARVST HARVST & HAUL HARVST VARIABL OST GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST TON thou gal gal gal Hour AR Dol Dol cwt SS-B-.33-ISSa-_-aS----.S_-: FIXD OST Description Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS Unit = Informaion pnsented is pnpand solely as a general guide aui is not mended to ncogmze or predict the costs and n turns jram any ime patieultrjam or ranch operation. These projections wen collected ad developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service a*! improved for publication l

3 Projections for Planning Purposes Only \'ot to be Used without Updating after February B-l 1 flh Date Stage Type Product Name Number Weight ash Landlord ; of of of per M o n - S h a r e 1ven Production Prod. Units I-lead ash ======== ================ ===== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 1a = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = a===i========= ===== =:======= : 07/0/95 HARVST A ORN-OASTAL 'JP c 33 07/0/95 HARVST A DFIINY PMT. ORN c 33 Date Stage Type Input Name Number ash Fixed Landlord of of of Non- o r _Share Production Input Units ash Vari. ======== ================ -3-3S3_3 ================'asflosnsaa a:ssabssasaaaa ====; b a s n a s s ;3 333B33 07/6/9 M DISKING 0FT /6/9 M DISKING 0FT /01/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW 100 /01/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW /15/9 FRTILIZR c V 33 11/15/9 M APPLY FRT 8 ROW 100 1/15/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW 100 1/15/9 ATRAZIN HRB /15/9 M APPLY HRBIID 100 0/16/95 M PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON 100 0/5/95 ORN 0 c V 0/5/95 M PLANTING 8R ORN 100 0/5/95 SOIL INSTIID FURADAN.150 c V 03/15/95 FOLIAR IRON /15/95 M APPLY IRON /0/95 M ULTIVAT 180 8R //95 FOLIAR IRON //95 M APPLY IRON 100 0/15/95 M ULTIVAT 180 8R /0/95 K ROPLAND 1.08 F /0/95 ST ASID UPLAND.0750 c V 07/5/95 HARVST G HARVST & HAUL ORN 00 c V 33 I1. Informaianpnsemedispnpaed^tyasagemralguuJeaulunamendri^^ lh.se projecttonswencolleatdaiddevelapedbystagmembenaft^

4 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February B-11.07/. GROSS INOM Description ORN-GULF OAST DFIINY PMT. RN orn, Gulf oast Texas oastal Bend District (11) 1995 Projected osts and Returns per Quantity Unit $ / Unit 750 bu bu Your stimate GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description FRTILIZR ATRAZIN SOIL INSTIID FOLIAR IRON FOLIAR IRON Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y Interest - O Borrowed Interest - Positive ash HARVST HARVST & HAUL HARVST VARIABL OST Quantity Unit --3SIS $ / Unit TON thou gal gal gal Hour Dol Dol cwt GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST FIXD OST Description S T A S I D O A S T Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS Unit AR S3=-_==333:_X3SS InjnrTnaianpnxemedispnpatdsohtyosagimralguukaulisnaintendtdioncogmseapndictthec^^ These pro/ectiatswen collected end developed bystaffmembenofthe Texas Agnculnirul xtension Service aid approved for publication l

5 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February 13, 1995 B-11 <!1> Date Stage Type Product Name Number Weight ash Landlord 3rea of of of per N o n - S h a r e ven Production Prod. Units Head ash Prod ======== ================ ===== ================!========= 3==33333Baa== aaaacsssaassa = = = = = s a a a a a a a =a==. 07/0/95 HARVST A ORN-GULF OAST M 07/0/95 HARVST A DFIINY PMT. ORN N Date Stage Type Input Name Number ash Fixed Landlord of of of Non- or Share Production Input Units ash Vari. ======== ================ ssaaa aaassasbaaaassos:a======== sssasaassasaa aaasa sis a a a s_======= 07/6/9 M DISKING 0FT /6/9 M DISKING 0 FT /01/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW 100 /01/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW /15/9 FRTILIZR c V 33 11/15/9 M APPLY FRT 8 ROW 100 1/15/9 M BDDING 180 8ROW 100 1/15/9 ATRAZIN HRB /15/9 M APPLY HRBIID 100 0/16/95 M PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON 100 0/5/95 ORN 0 c V 0/5/95 M PLANTING 8R ORN 100 0/5/95 SOIL INSTIID FURADAN.150 c V 03/15/95 FOLIAR IRON /15/95 M APPLY IRON /0/95 M ULTIVAT 180 8R 100 0//95 FOLIAR IRON 100 0//95 M APPLY IRON 100 0/15/95 M ULTIVAT 180 8R /0/95 K ROPLAND 1.08 F 07/0/95 ST ASID OAST.0750 F 07/5/95 HARVST G HARVST & HAUL ORN 00 c V 33 U. Informatim pnsented upnpaedsoulym a ininerolguide aula not intended M These projections wen collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service aui'^provedfor publication.

6 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Mot to be Used without Updating after February B-11 ( //. GROSS INOM Description OTTON LINT OTTON DFIINY PMT. OTTON GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description otton, Picker, Dryland, oastal Plain Texas oastal Bend (District 11; 1995 Projected osts and Returns per Q u a n t i t y U n i * Quantity ton ib. $ / Unit 0.7 U Unit $ / Unit Your stimate FRTILIZR HRBIID PR-M APAROL SOUTING INSTIID-FLA INSTIID-FLA INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y TON LBS. QT acre OZ OZ pint pint OZ. OZ Hour SO.75.50,75,50.75, HARVST DFOLIANTS 10 AR DFOLIANT APPL. 10 acre 30 3 PIK & MODUL cwt GINNING 650 LB HARVST Interest Interest - O Borrowed - Positive ash Dol. Dol VARIABL OST 6. GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST FIXD OST Description Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS Unit t=s=== Information pn.tented is pnpand solely as a general guide aui is not mended to ncogmze or predict the costs aui mums from aty one paiicultrjam or ranch operation These protections wen collected out developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service and approved far publication ll.5

7 Projections foi - Planning Purj ooses Onlv W to be Used without Updating after February fl- 11,U, Date Stage Type Product Name Number i Weight ~ash L.andlcrd 3reak of of of per Non- Share ven Production Prod. Units Head ash Prod. aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa ========================= =;============ aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa _taaaaaaa ===== 09//95 HARVST A DFIINY PMT. OTTON N 09//95 HARVST A OTTON N 09//95 HARVST A OTTON LINT N Date Stage Type Input Name Number ash Fixed Landlord of of of Non- o r S h a r e Production Input Units ash Vari. aaaaaaaa saaassaaaosssasa aaaaa saaanoaaaaaaaaaai.aaasaaaa ss..anaasaaasss aassa:s s s s a a s a a a a a a a 08/5/9 M SHRD STALKS 150 HP /01/9 M HISL 180HP /1/9 M DISKING 0FT 100 /16/9 M FILD ULTIVATOR 9 FT /16/9 FRTILIZR c V 5 11/16/9 M APPLY FRT 8 ROW /16/9 HRBIID PR-M INORP c V 11/16/9 M HRBIID APPL. DIS0 I.oooo 0/16/95 M PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON /01/95 OTTON 1800 c V 03/01/95 M PLANTING 8R OTN 1. 03/01/95 APAROL 100 c 0/01/95 G SOUTING 100 c V 0//95 M ULTIVAT 150 8R 100 0/15/95 G 100 c V 0/15/95 INSTIID-FLA HOPPRS 3. c V 0/5/95 G 100 c V 0/5/95 INSTIID-FLA HOPPRS 3. c V 05/08/95 M ULTIVAT 150 8R /15/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 05/15/95 PIX.500 c V 05/15/95 G 100 c V 05/19/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 05/19/95 G 100 c V 05/3/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 05/3/95 G 100 c V 06/13/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 06/13/95 G 100 c V 06/18/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 06/18/95 G 100 c V 06/3/95 PIX.500 c V 06/3/95 INSTIID-BOLL WORMS 00 c V 06/3/95 G 100 c V 06/8/95 G 100 c V 06/8/95 INSTIID-BOLL WVILS 100 c V 07/0/95 INSTIID-BOLL WORMS 00 c V 07/0/95 G 100 c V 08/05/95 HARVST DFOLIANTS PIKR 100 c V 08/05/95 HARVST G DFOLIANT APPL. 100 c V 08/0/95 HARVST G PIK & MODUL OTTON c V 09/01/95 HARVST G GINNING PIKR 6500 c V 5 09/15/95 K ROPLAND 100 F ll Information pnsentedis pnpaedsolely as a general guide auiis not intendedto recognize or predict the costs aid Mums from aiy one pattcultwform or nmch operation These projections wen collected out developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service and approved for publication

8 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February B-11,O, GROSS INOM Description TTON LINT OTTON DFIINY PMT. OTTON GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description otton, Stripper, Dryland, oastal PLain Texas oastal Bend (District 11) 1995 Projected osts and Returns per Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t ton Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t :otal Your stimate FRTILIZR HRBIID PR-M APAROL SOUTING INSTIID-FLA INSTIID-FLA INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y HARVST Interest Interest - O Borrowed - Positive ash TON LBS. QT acre OZ OZ pint pint OZ OZ Hour Dol. Dol ,50, ,76,50,50.75, ,3 HARVST DFOLIANTS 1,0 AR 9,.00 9.,U DFOLIANT APPL. 1.0 acre 3, 0 3.,00 STRIP & MODUL cwt.,0 37,.50 GINNING 65,0 LB VARIABL OST GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST FIXD OST Description =3B3S=333=3==3333n= aaaa=: Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS Unit =-_3=-_3==-J==-I Information pnxnted is pnpand solely as a general guide aui is not mended to recogmze or pndiatrm costs aid nntrmjromav one pattcula'jam or raichnperaiiiin These projections wen collected aui developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service aid (^provedfor publication l

9 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February B-11 <l!i Date Stage of Production Type of Prod. Product Name Number of Units Weight ash Landlord 3rea< p e r N o n - S h a r e v e n Head ash Prod. 09//95 HARVST 09//95 HARVST 09//95 HARVST A DFIINY PMT. A OTTON A OTTON LINT OTTON OOOO,0,0 5 N 5 N 5 N Date 08/5/9 09/01/9 09/1/9 /16/9 11/16/9 11/16/9 11/16/9 11/16/9 0/16/95 03/01/95 03/01/95 03/01/95 0/01/95 0//95 0/15/95 0/15/95 0/5/95 0/5/95 05/08/95 05/15/95 05/15/95 05/15/95 05/19/95 05/19/95 05/3/95 05/3/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/18/95 06/18/95 06/3/95 06/3/95 06/3/95 06/8/95 06/8/95 07/0/95 07/0/95 08/05/95 08/05/95 08/0/95 09/01/95 09/15/95 Stage of Production HARVST HARVST HARVST HARVST Type of Input aasass M M M M M M M M G M G ' G M G G G G G G G G G G G K Input Name SHRD STALKS HISL DISKING FILD ULTIVATOR FRTILIZR APPLY FRT HRBIID PR-M HRBIID APPL. PIKUP TRUK PLANTING APAROL SOUTING ULTIVAT INSTIID-FLA INSTIID-FLA ULTIVAT INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL PIX INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL DFOLIANTS DFOLIANT APPL. STRIP & MODUL GINNING ROPLAND 150 HP 180HP 0FT 9 FT ROW INORP. DIS0 3/ TON OTTON 8R OTN 150 8R HOPPRS HOPPRS ISO 8R WVILS WVILS WVILS WVILS WVILS WORMS WVILS WORMS STRIPPR OTTON STRIPPR Number of Units ,,0, ash Non- ash Fixed or Vari. Landlord Share 5 5,00 ll.8 Information pnsented is pnpaed solely as a general guide auiis not intended to ncogmze or pnaathecasuadntiam/remayampattcul&jamarrakhapenaiiin These projections wen collected aui developed by staff members of the Texas Agnadturd xtension Service ad qtproved for publication.

10 Projections for Planning Purposes Only \'ot to be Used without Updating after February B-11 tlh GROSS INOM Description DFIINY PMT. SORGHUM SORGHUM GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description Sorghum, Gulf oast Texas oastal Bend District (11) 1995 Projected osts and Returns per Quantity Unit 350 cwt cwt Quantity Unit $ / Unit $ / Unit Your stimate ATRAZIN FRTILIZR MIRONUTRINT SOIL INSTIID FOLIAR IRON FOLIAR IRON Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d HARVST HARVST & HAUL HARVST VARIABL OST TON gal gal gal gal Hour Dol cwt S S S S S 8 3 S S GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST FIXD OST Description ssaa _=_=s ss sas ss ss ss s sss= sssssss asss Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost To.tal of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS Unit asas a s ssmassss ss Information pnsented is pnpand solely as a general guide ad is not mended lo ncognize or predict the casts and Mums from aty om paltcularfirm or ranch operation these projections wen collected ad developed by staff memben oflhe Texas Agricultural xtension Service and improved for publication l 1.9

11 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Sot to be Used without Updating after February B-11 tlh Date Stage Type Product Name Number Weight ash Landlord 3re< of of of per Non- Share vei Production Prod. Units 1 lead ash Pro. ======== aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ===== = = = = = = = a a a a a.========= aaaaaaaaasaaa aaaa:========= aaaaa =aaaaaaa aaa: 07/15/95 HARVST A SORGHUM c 33 N 07/15/95 HARVST A DFIINY PMT. SORGHUM r 33 N Date Stage Type Input Name Number ash Fixed Landlord of of of Non- or Share Production Input Units ash Vari. saaaaaaa aaaoaassssaaaass a a a a a anaaaaassaaaaaasiaaaaaaaaa ============= aaaa:a a a m a s a s ia====== 08/16/9 M SHRD STALKS 150 HP /1/9 M DISKING 0FT /16/9 M BDDING 180 8R0W 100 /01/9 ATRAZIN HRB 100 c V /01/9 M APPLY HRBIID /11/9 FRTILIZR c V 33 11/11/9 M APPLY FRT 8 ROW /11/9 MIRONUTRINT ZIN.150 c V 33 01/16/95 M BDDING 180 8R0W /16/95 M PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON /05/95 SORGHUM 600 c V 03/05/95 M PLANTING 8R SORG /05/95 SOIL INSTIID FURADAN.150 c V 03/15/9S FOLIAR IRON /15/95 M APPLY IRON /1/95 M ULTIVAT 150 8R 100 0/15/95 M APPLY IRON 100 0/15/95 FOLIAR IRON 100 0/1/95 PPHARVST M ULTIVAT 150 8R /15/95 HARVST G HARVST & HAUL SORGHUM 3800 c V 07/15/95 HARVST K ROPLAND 100 F tnfiinmaionpnsentedispnpaedmhlyasagemrdguuhadismiintendedtoncogntaaprt^ l 1. Them projections wen collectedand developedbystaffmemben ofthe Texas Agytedtuntl xternum Service adapproved for publication.

12 GROSS INOM Description = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ============== SOYBANS GROSS Income VARIABL OST Description TRFLAN FRTILIZR FRTILIZR APPL. INOULANT FUSILAD LANNAT GRAMOXON DSSIANT APPL. Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d HARVST USTOM HARVST USTOM HAUL HARVST VARIABL OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only \'ot to be Used without Updating after February Soybeans, Gulf oast Texas oastal 3end (District Projected osts and Returns per Break-ven Price, Variable ost GROSS INOM minus VARIABL OST FIXD OST Description Machinery and quipment Land FIXD ost Q u a n t i t y U n i t 3 bu. S / Unit Break-ven Price, ost $ 6.3 J per bul. of SOYBANS of ALL ost NT PROJTD RTURNS tity 5 Unit $ / Unit s s s s s s a a a a a a a a a qt TON acre oz acre H o u r Dol acre 0 3 bu $ 3.7 per bu. of SOYBANS Unit S3 S^3S^S SSSSSSSaBSXS B-11 ( Your stimate Information pnsented is pnpand solely as a general gunk ad is not mended to ncogruze or predict the costs aid neums from aty one panada-form or ranch operation The* projections wen collected addevelopedby staffmembers ofthe Texas Agncdtund xtension Service and approved for publication ll.11

13 Projections for Planning Purposes Only B-i'! Sot to be Used without Updating after February i.'h Date Stage Tvoe Product Name Number 1 height ash Landlord Break of of of per Non Share ven Production Prod. Units 1Jead cash Prod. ======== aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ============== =aaaiaaaaaaaaa aaaaa a= = = = = = = a a a a a 08/1/95 HARVST A SOYBANS Y Sate Stage Type Input Name Number ash Fixed Landlord of of of Non- or Share Production Input Units ash Vari. aaaaaaaa ================ ===== aaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa.a = = = = = aaaaaaaa 08/15/9 M SHRD STALKS /15/9 M DISKING - TANDM 6 ROW /0/9 M FILD ULTIVATOR 6 ROW 100 /15/9 M BDDING 6 ROW /13/95 M HRBIID APPL /15/95 TRFLAN HRB c V 33 0/15/95 M PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON /15/95 M BDDING 6 ROW 100 0/01/95 FRTILIZR c V 33 0/01/95 G FRTILIZR APPL. 100 c V 33 0/01/95 SOYBANS 50 c V 0/01/95 M PLANTING 6 ROW 100 0/01/95 INOULANT SOYBAN 500 c V 0/0/95 M ULTIVAT 6 ROW /1/95 M ULTIVAT 6 ROW /0/95 FUSILAD.5 05/0/95 M HRBIID APPL /15/95 LANNAT /15/95 G /1/95 GRAMOXON /1/95 G DSSIANT APPL /1/95 HARVST G USTOM HARVST SOYBANS 100 c V 33 08/1/95 HARVST G USTOM HAUL SOYBANS 30 c V 33 08/1/95 K ROPLAND 100 F Information pnsented is pnpatd solely at a general guide ad is not intendedtorecogmze orpredict the casts ad nlunufrom an>onepaneutajam or raich operation l 1.1 These projecitorowencollectedaddeveloptdby staffmembenofthe TexmAgp^turd xzenstan Service ad ajprovedjar publication

14 rop Products Report rop Product Nar.e Price Unit Weight ash per of per Flow Unit Mes. Unit Row RN-OASTAL UP..00 bu ORN-GULF OAST.500 bu OTTON LINT OTTON ton 0 DFIINY PMT. ORN.5 bu DFIINY PMT. OTTON DFIINY FMT. SORGHUM.9 cwt. 0 1 DFIINY PMT. WHAT.9 bu GRAZING 800 AUM 00 GRAZING RGP 100 AUM 00 HAY 30 Roll HAY ALFALFA 90 ton 0 HAY OASTAL 30 Roll KLINGRASS PANUTS 30 cwt. 0 0 RI 1ST ROP LOAN 6300 cwt. 0 0 RI ND ROP LOAN 6300 cwt. 0 0 RI NHANMNT.5 cwt. 0 0 RI SUBSIDY.500 cwt. 0 0 SORGHUM.600 cwt. 0 1 SOYBANS 5 bu WATRMLON 6.5 cwt. 0 WHAT WINTR bu Information pnsented is pnpand solely as a general guide ad is not intended to ncognize or predict the costs and Mums fiom ary one paticularform or ranch operation These projections wen collected ad developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service adatprovedfor publication RSI

15 T r a c t o r s, I m p l e m e n t s a n d q u i p m e n t -.:s~...i.t.e line HcrseFwer Vseful life H r 5! S l, rue. Ir?e_nair.i.-.g '-.;«Hr cr Mi F - e l o n. '. ' n i t / H r r M l - A r. r. u a l V s e H r ; r M i. ;p««a Mi/hi Wia-.n.Ft) F i e i a i f f i c i e r. c y ' a p a c i t y A c / K r i P o w e r '. ' n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r u r r e n t L u c P r i c e S i Salvage Value << jrrent Market Value '3'. Lease Payment 'S. A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x i S ) Annual Insurance!S) n F a r m H i r e d L a b o r ( H r i Ott Farm Parts & Labor.3) n Farm Owner Labor ihri Annual Use Base.Hr or Mil R e p a i r o e f f i c i e n t» l Depreciation Factor #1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * Depreciation Factor # a p a c i t y 0 e f., a l c. i Fuel Use Def..alc.) R M a l c. : * 1, *! Lease alc..hour.year: description First Name Qualifying Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ' H r o r M i l Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Mi) A n n u a l U s e ( H r o r M i ) Speed (Mi/h) Width (Ft) F i e l d f fi c i e n c y ( * > a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (St Salvage Value (M urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment (?) A n n u a l L i c e n s e ( Ta x ( S ) Annual Insurance is) On Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts t Labor (S) On Farm Owner Labor!Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t» 1 Depreciation Factor *1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t» Depreciation Factor # a p a c i t y. D e f., a l c. ) Fuel Use (Def.,alc.) R M a l c. ( H I. # ) Lease alc. (Hour,Year! Description First Name Qualifying Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e. H r o r M i ) F u e l o n. ( U n i t / H r o r / M i ) A n n u a l U s e ( H r o r M i ) Speed (Mi/h) Width (Ft) F i e l d f f i c i e n c y (» ) a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (S) Salvage Value (*> urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment IS) A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x ( $ ) Annual Insurance (SI On Farm Hired Labor!Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor (S) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t D l Depreciation Factor #1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * Depreciation Factor # a p a c i t y! D e f., a l c. ) Fuel Use (Def.,alc.) R M a l c. :» 1,» ) Lease alc. (Hour,Year) :?actcr 130 HP ' :rac70? l:= h? L 00 TRATR!= ; hp Dl 1 rac*jr T9A R.0 HP HO L L 55 T?A"R : HP ot '. : _t z'. ;r. ::j:o 1 coo i' S » c c Tractor Self Propelled Imp1ement Implement Implement Implement OMBIN BDDR BDDR BDDR BDDR 75 HP RI 13.5 FT 18 FT 0 FT 5 FT S S l.l l.l c Implement Implement Implement Implement Implement Implement BLAD BROADAST R HISL HISL OMBIN ULTIPAKR DOZR 1 FT 0 FT PANUT SO S.S s l.l l.l S0S 17S D Information pnsented is pnpaed solely as a general guide ad is not intended to recognize orpndicl the casts ad Mums from a^ane panada-jam or ranch operation RS I 1. These projections wen collectedanddeveloped by staffmemben ofthe Texas Agricultural xtension Service adatprovedfar publication

16 .-.crj-iriwaj ->3t.-; -.p '. 3e_..: L l i t e H r : r M i rue. T,ce R e n a i r s i r. - j L. f e H r : r M i F u e l : r.. V n i t. ' H r ; r M i A n n u a l V s e H r : r M. 3peed Mi'h' Wut.T?f Fiela fficiency a p a c i t y A c H r P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r. j f c c r M u l t i p l i e r rrant List Price.S. ialvjqe value ' urrent Market Vi.ie 3 Lejse Piyme.-.t 3 A n n u a l L i c e n s e» Ta x 3 Annual Insurance 3, n F a r m H i r e d L a b o r H r : Off Farm Parts Labor Si n Farm Owner Labor.Hr" Ar.nual Use 3ase Hr or Mi' P e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t «1 epreciation Factor 1 Years wned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * Depreciation Factor * a p a c i t y '. D e f.. a l c. < Fuel Use Def..alc.I R M a l c..» 1. <. Lease alc..hour. Yean r "!p-.e=er.t l-o.a-sent I.r.p.ep.er.t VLTVATR V-TIVATOR ULTIVATOR 5 " L I S ". 3 0 Description Implement Implement :mplement Implement Implement Implement Implement First Name Qualifying Name Horsepower Rating Useful Life Fuel Type Remaining Life Fuel on. (Uni Annual Use Speed width Field fficiency apacity ;Hp) ;Hr or Mi) (Hr or Mil H r o r / M i l (Hr or Mil 'Mi/hi!Ftl P.I Ac/Hri P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (S) Salvage Value (U urrent Market Value isi Lease Payment (S) A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x ( S I Annual Insurance (SI On Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor (SI On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e f f i c i e n t» l Depreciation Factor Dl Years Owned R e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t» Depreciation Factor * a p a c i t y ( D e f.. a l c : Fuel Use (Def..alc! R M a l c.» l.» > Lease alc. 'Hour,Yean Description First Name Qualifying Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Mi) A n n u a l U s e! H r o r M i ) Speed!Mi/h) width (Ft) F i e l d f fi c i e n c y U > a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (9) Salvage Value (*) urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment ($) A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x ( $ ) Annual Insurance (S) n Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor '.SI On Farm Owner Labor (Hr> Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t # 1 Depreciation Factor #1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * Depreciation Factor» a p a c i t y ( D e f., a l c ) Fuel Use (Def.,alc.) R M a l c. l» l,» ) Lease alc. (Hour,Yeacl DIGGR PANUT S S ) s DISK DISK ROW 6 ROW OO DISK 3 ROW S L.l ISK jffset l.l S 1.»»j7 1) 6 L.3. DISK TANDM S r Q tent Implement Implement Implement Implement Implement TANDM DISK - TANDM DISK - TANDM DRILL DRILL FRT. SPRADR ROH FT 6 ROW FT 11 FT 0 FT ISO 0 SO S » 1.1 l.l l.l l.l Q c c s c.93 1 I c Information pnsentedis pnpand solely as a general guide ad is not intendedto recognise or predict thecostsandmumsfrom ary one pancuurform or ranch operation These projections wen collected ad developed by.staff members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service cad approved for publication RSI 13

17 r.c.eser.t.rit Sine. i..f/i.-. 7 Mame rsecc^er?at.r.; -VATR 3 FT -.?rw OSAIN ART HARROWS HRB. APPL r.air.ir.7 _i -Hr A.-.nuai Use 'Hr :.r Mi jpeed Mi _..' Wl-th Ft' F i e l. 1 ff i c i e n c y. * ' a p a c i t y A c - H r ' Piwet Vr.it-Multiplier Laoor Multiplier urrent List Price 'Si.Salvage Value urrent Market Value 3: Lease Payment 'Si Annual License Tax 3 Annual Insurance ;3> n Farm Hired Labor.Hri Off Farm Parts Labor tsi On Farm Owner Labor ihn Annual Use Base (Hr or Mil Repair oefficient *l Depreciation Factor Dl Years Owned Repair oefficient Depreciation Factor # a p a c i t y ; D e f., a l c. ) Fuel Use (Def..alci R M a l c.»!, * ) Lease alc. 'Hour,Year) Description First Name Qualifying Name Horsepower Rating <Hp) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r c r M i ) Fuel Type Remaining Life (Hr or Mi) Fuel on..unit/hr or /Mil Annual Use ( Hr or Mil Speed (Mi/h) width.ft) F i e l d f fi c i e n c y ( ) a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) Power Unit Multiplier Labor Multiplier urrent List Price (S) Salvage Value (U urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment IS) Annual License Tax (S) Annual Insurance (S) On Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor (S) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr or Ml) Repair oefficient *1 Depreciation Factor #1 Years Owned Repair oefficient # Depreciation Factor * a p a c i t y ( D e f., a l c I Fuel Use (ef.,alcl R M a l c. ( t l,» ) Lease alc. (Hour,Year) Description First Name Qualifying Name Horsepower Rating (Hpi U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type Remaining Life (Hr or Mi) Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Ml) Annual Use (Hr or Mi) Speed (Mi/h) width (Ft) F i e l d f fi c i e n c y ( * ) a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) Power Unit Multiplier Labor Multiplier urrent List Price ($) Salvage Value <%) urrent Market Value ($) Lease Payment <$> Annual License Tax (S) Annual Insurance <S) On Farm Hired Labor :Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor.$) On Farm Owner Labor.Hri Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) Repair oefficient *l Depreciation Factor Wl Years Owned Repair oefficient» Depreciation Factor * a p a c i t y > D e f., a l c ) Fuel Use (Def..alc) R M a l c. (» l,» ) Lease alc. (Hour,Yean Implement L l.l I 15 c t HRB. APPLIATOR 5 FT l.l Implement 9 0 L.l LAND PLAN Implement 0 L.l :o MOLDBOARD PLW l.l SO Implement LO D MOLBOARD PLOW 6 FT l.l Implement ;o 5":.85 PIKR WHLS 0 :ooo l.l 1. 19S c Implement 0. ) 6" l.l 070 L0 L0 L..S PLANTR 13.5 FT l.l S S c c c c c c c Implement Implement Implement Implement Implement Implement PLANTR PLANTR PLANTR PLANTR PLOW ROLLR 18 FT 0 FT 8 ROW PANUT LV 0 FT 0 SO S l.l l.l l.l l.l S0 IS63 80S.335 RSI Information pnsented is pnpatd solely as a general guide ad is not mended to recognize or predict the costs ad ntumsjrom ant one paticula-form or ranch operation These projections wen collected ad developed by staffmemben of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service and approved for publication

18 ".ri-. Vise 1-.J.. '.,.. "7 s'drr.e -. o r i e p c e r R a t.. - Useful Life Fuel Type Remaining lite Fuel an. Annual Us«Speed Wiith H r j r M i. : / H r o r ' M i l Hr cr Mil Mi. hi Ft. F i e l d f fi c i e n c y " a p a c i t y A c. P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r H r : L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price 5l Salvage Value ' urrent Market v»lue Si Lease?ayr.ent.*> A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x 3 1 Annual Insurance s. n F a r m H i r e d L a b o r. H r ) Off Farm Parts Lacor (Si On Farm Owner Laoor Hr) Annual Use 3ase :Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * 1 Depreciation Factor»1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t * Depreciation Factor * a p a c i t y. O e f., a l c : Fuel Use >0ef..alci a M a l c» l, * i L e a s e 3 i c H o u r, Ye a r ) Irsp.enier'.' LR Rr WIK = :w 5 LO i::o ::o coo L OOO L3 0 0 l.l l.l 1. L.l T.85 c Description Implement Implement quipment First Name Qualifying Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ' H p i U s e f u l L i f e '. H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r o r M i l Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Mil A n n u a l U s e ( H r o r M i ) Speed (Mi/h) Width (Ft) F i e l d f fi c i e n c y M a p a c i t y ( A c / H r ) P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (S) Salvage Value (*> urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment (S) A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x ( S ) Annual Insurance (S) On Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor (S) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t l l Depreciation Factor *1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t # Depreciation Factor 0 a p a c i t y : D e f.. a l c ) Fuel Use (Def.,alc.) R M a l c ( # 1, # ) Lease alc. (Hour,Year) Description First Name Qualifying Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type Remaining Life '.Hr or Mi) Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Mi) A n n u a l U s e i H r o r M i ) Speed (Mi/h) Width (Ft) F i e l d f f i c i e n c y (» ) a p a c i t y ( A c / H e ) P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price (3) Salvage Value It) urrent Market Value (S) Lease Payment (S) Annual License Tax. (S) Annual Insurance (S) On Farm Hired Labor (Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor (S) On Farm Owner Labor!Hrl Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi! Repair oefficient 111 Depreciation Factor»1 Years Owned R e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t» Depreciation Factor # a p a c i t y ( D e f., a l c. I Fuel Use (Def.,alc.I R M a l c! «1,» 1 L e a s e a l c ( H o u r, Y e a n SPRAYR HRB. 30 quipment l.l l.l STOK SPRAYR I.OO LOO L 5 L3 1.1 ;. 590 LO SWP MULHR ATTL QUIPMNT quipment S.O 80 l.l STOK TRAILR quipment 50 S0 SUPPL. FDR ISO ISO.5 1 quipment 30 L0G " I LV BOX T-A quipment I TAK 500 S00 Iquipment quipment )0. ".) L00 ' 0 57 l.l SAL quipment L. 070 L0 L955 L. 5 3U HUT I 1 VT. QUIPMNT I Information pnsented is pnpaed solely as a general guide adis not mended to ncognize orpndicl the costsadntums from aiyanepattada-jam or raich operation These projections wen collectedaddevelopedby staff'members of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service ad ajprovedfar publication RSI 1.5

19 Operating Input Resources Operating Input Price per Unit Unit of Measure ash Flow Row 1% PROTIN,D AMIN ALLOTMNT LAS ATRAZIN APAROL DFOLIANTS DFOLIANTS DSIANT FRROUS SULFAT FRTILIZR FRTILIZR FRTILIZR FRTILIZR FRTILIZR FRTILIZR FOLIAR IRON FUSILAD GRAMOXON GYPSUM HAY HRBIID PR-M INOULANT INSTIID INSTIID INSTIID INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-BOLL INSTIID-FLA LANNAT MARKTING MIRONUTRINT MISLLANOUS NITROGN PASTUR IMPROV. PHOSPHORUS PIX POTASSIUM PYRTHROID RANG UBS SALS OMMISSION SALT & MINRALS, ALFALFA -FORAG SORG ST ASID ST ASID SOIL INSTIID TRFLAN VT. MDIIN ZIN HLAT ZIN SULFAT HRB PIKR STRIPPR INORP. SOYBAN ALFALFA RI WVILS WORMS HOPPRS ZIN ALFALFA FRT FRT FRT INS RI BUFFLGR ORN OTTON HAYGRAZ KLIN OATS PANUT RI SORGHUM SOYBANS WHAT DRYLAND OAST UPLAND FURADAN HRB ,0,75, cwt. cwt QT AR AR qt. TON TON TON TON TON TON gal cwt. roll LBS. oz. pint OZ OZ head gal acre acre pint oz. cwt. thou lb bu. cwt. AR AR gal qt. head pint Information pnsentedis pnptred solely as a general guide adis not intended to recognize orpndicl the casts adntums fivmaiy one patieula-form or raxh operation RS I 1 These projections wen collected ad developed by staff memben of the Texas Agricultural xtension Service andqjpravedfor publication

20 Auto or Truck Resources :es:rip:i:n First..'a.T.e ;uaiif/ir,7 Naa-.e H o r s e p o w e r P a t m g H p ; U s e f u l L i f e H r o r M l ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e H r o r M i l F u e l o n. U n i t / H r o r M n A n n u a l U s e H r - c r M i ) Speed Mi/hi Width 'Ft) F i e l d f f i c i e n c y ' > a p a c i t y A c / K r i P o w e r U n i t M u l t i p l i e r L a b o r M u l t i p l i e r urrent List Price *3> Salvage Value ' urrent Market Value 3» Lease Payment Si A n n u a l L i c e n s e Ta x ' S i Annual insurance (Si O n F a r m H i r e d L a b o r H r ) Off Farm Parts Labor <S) On Farm Owner Labor ihr! Annual Use Base (Hr or Mi) R e p a i r o e ff i c i e n t» 1 Depreciation Factor HI Years Owned R e p a i r o e f fi c i e n t # Depreciation Factor» a p a c i t y ( D e f., a l c. ) Fuel Use idef.,alc) R M a l c. (» l, * i Lease alc. (Hour,Year) 3A 15 L ustom Operation Resources ustom Operation Price Unit ash per of Flow Unit Measure Row =--i--iaa==3 ======== aasbs5=3=xsa =aas BAGGING & TIS 13 bale BRUSH LARING 165 acre OMBINING GRASS.75 acre UST AIR FRT. RI 3 cwt. UST AIR HRB. RI 3.85 cwt. UST AIR INST. RI.50 cwt. UST AIR RI 3.0 cwt. USTOM BALING ALFALFA 5 ton USTOM BALING HAY 15.0 Roll USTOM HARVST SORGHUM 15. acre USTOM HARVST SOYBANS 0 acre USTOM HARVST WHAT acre USTOM HAUL FLAX.15 bu. USTOM HAUL HAY.0 bale USTOM HAUL PANUTS.0 cwt. USTOM HAUL SORGHUM.5 cwt. USTOM HAUL SOYBANS.06 bu. USTOM HAUL WATMLON 3.5 cwt. USTOM HAULING RI.30 cwt. USTOM HAULING WHAT.5 bu. USTOM PLANTING 5.08 acre USTOM SPRIGGING 50. acre DFOLIANT APPL. 3 acre DSSIANT APPL. 3 acre DRYING PANUTS 0 ton DRYING RI. 80 cwt. FRTILIZR APPL..75 acre FUNGIID APPL..75 acre GINNING 1.75 cwt. GINNING PIKR.075 LB. GINNING STRIPPR.088 LB. HAND HARVST 6 acre HARVST & HAUL ORN 0 cwt. HARVST & HAUL SORGHUM.55 cwt. HAULING OTTON.0 cwt HAULING & MKTNG. 15 head HRBIID APPL. 3 acre.50 MOW, RAK, BAL 9 bale PSTIID APPL. 3 acre PIK & MODUL OTTON 3 cwt. SOUTING acre STRIP & MODUL OTTON cwt. Information pnsented is pnpaed solely as a general gunk and is not intended to ncopuaapredmthecosuadnnatajromatyoneptwticula'jamarranchoptraion These protections wen collected ad developed by staffmembenofthe Texas Aptcutturd xtension Sennce ad atprovedfor publication RSI 1.7

21 Labor Resources Les.T.pt -rr-.."".--.r Lacor : trier Laccr I t r. e r L a c : r _.t-.*r lacsr :-..-.er Laocr First M*.T.e iua.ityi.-.^ Name ast rr /a_._e Wage Benefita Labor Type 3. Hr A,3) hand hceing 3 A HIRD LA9R 5. ~._ A livestock :a?cp A rr-at? LABOR OPPAT P LASR?IKUP 5.5 a Livestock Resources description _vestock.ivestock.ivestock First Name Qualifying Name Remaining Life Yr' urrent Market Val ue :Sl Salvage Value (. Insurance Rate ('I Annual Lease.S) alc Options IR.L.P! BF BULL I. 3F OW PURHAS F W RAISD BF HIFR RAISD I R HRS '00 50 I. Land Resources Description Land Land Land Land Land Land ASH-RNT ROPLAND LAND - ASH RNT LAND - ASH-RNT LAND HARG LAND HARG Qualifying Name KLINGR. WHATD FORAG RI Market Value!i 300 Property Tax :s/aci 15. Appreciation Rate 1 ) interest Rate { ', 3 Annual Lease.i App. alcuations (Y.N) N N N N N N Description Land Land First Name PASTUR PASTUR Qualifying Name OASTAL Market Value 'I Property Tax,3/Aci Appreciation Rate I Interest Rate H) Annual Lease!) S App. alcuations (Y,N) N N Perennial rop Resources Description Perennial rop Perennial rop Perennial rop Perennial rop Perennial rop Perennial rop First Name ALFALFA Qualifying Name DRYLAND Market Value () Property Tax () Remaining Life (Yr) 7 Salvage Value!«) Appreciation Rate (O Interest Rate ( ) 8 Annual Lease () App. alcuations!y,n) N BUFFL GRASS OASTAL BRMUDA OASTAL BRMUDA RGP KLINGRASS STABL. 967 KLINGRASS RGP Buildings or Improvements Resources Description B u i l d, o r I m p. B u i l d, o r I m p. B u i l d, o r I m p. B u i l d, o r I m p. B u i l d, o r I m p. First Name Qualifying Name F u e l - U t i l i t y o s t ( S / Y r ) Remaining Life (Yr) urrent Market Value (5) Salvage Value (i) P r o p e r t y T a x e s i S / Y r ) Annual Lease (S) O n F a r m H i r e d L a b o r ( H r ) Off Farm Parts Labor (3) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) L e a s e a l c ( A n n u a l ) FN S FN PANL WORKING ARA 5 Information pnsented is pnpand souty as a general guide ad is not Intended to recognize orpntact the costs ad Mums from aiy am parttcukwfarm or ranch operation RS I 1.8 These protections wen collected ad developed bystaff members of the Texas Agnadturd xtension Service ad^provedfor pebucattan,

22 Irrigation Resources escrict: ;e. Or.ait First Name 'ualifymg Name Horsepower Rating 'Hpi Fuel Type Fuel on..'.'nit.'hr or 'Mil 'Jsefuil Life (Hr) Remaining Life 'Hr) f fi c i e n c y I A ) Hired Labor per Set 'Hr) Owner Labor per Set Hr) Number of Sets urrent List Price (S) Salvage Percent!M urrent Market Value 'SI Lease Payment 'S) On Farm Hired Labor Hr) Off Farm Parts Labor IS) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr) R M ng. stimate M R M a l c (» 1.» > Lease alc (Hour,Year) Fuel Use ( Def., alc.) na 38.5 na.55 na SO I NG. 6ii na na na "LVMN Description Discharge Head Gear Drive Water Source First Name Qualifying Name Horsepower Rating (Hp) Fuel Type Fuel on. (Unit/Hr or /Ml) Usefull Life Remaining Life fficiency Hired Labor per Set Owner Labor per Set Number of Sets urrent List Price Salvage Percent urrent Market Value Lease Payment On Farm Hired Labor Off Farm Parts Labor ihr) (Hr) M (Hr) (Hr) (S) M (S) (S) (Hr) IS) On Farm Owner Labor (Hr) Annual Use Base (Hr) R M ng. stimate (1) R M a l c. ( # 1, - ) Lease alc. (Hour,Year) Fuel Use ( Def., alc.) D I S H A R G R I G H T A N G L W L L na na na na na na ISO 0 s I S Information presented is prepared souhj as a general guide ad is not intended to ncognze or predict the costs ad noons from ay am paticular jam or raxh operation These projections wen collected ad developed by staff members of the Texas Aptcdturdxunsian Service ad ai/woved for publication RSU.9

23 Machinery ost Report»-i;.r:e vj*ne '".t = "-»»«"» ««Van a.s xpen_es a.. r.xe_ xper.-!" i «T. -. j. "-el per. Oper. st;n?epair?epair Hourly eprec Annual ixes. xpenses Ma.-.aje. Input per. Mamt.. M a m t. Lease Lease I L~be Laoor ; 5f Ttzzx Larcr Insur. TRATR IOO HP s/hr :oo 1.: jo :. :3 -.::: : o.ccc \ -i. )>: 15 H? 3 ' Hr.7 o.coo o.ooo '. 300 o. ;;o.0 30 '..»* 3 )."o TRATR 150 HP 3, Hr.0 ;. oco ;. ;:o 1. j. 3 _ TRATR 10 HP 3 H r ;0 " V.. 39 TRATR : HP 3 H r ).:oo :. ooo TRATR 0 H? 3,Hr.13 j o.oco 7.S 0.1 ' HP s/hr OMBIN SI S/Hr OO o.ooo t9.30 3DR 13.5 FT S.'Hr O.OOO o.ooo '. 3DDR. FT 3/Hr O.OOO o.ooo L3.1 3DR 0 FT S/Hr DDR 5 FT S/Hr ; v ; > i o.ooo LAD DOZR S/Hr ooo BROADAST 3DR 3/Hr HISL 1 FT S/Hr HISL 0 FT S/Hr MBIN PANUT S/Hr o.ooo ULTIPAKR S/Hr 0.3S ULTIVATOR I ROW S/Hr '3.59 ULTIVATOR 13.3 FT S/Hr 'JLTIVATR 0 FT S/Hr o.ooo ULTIVATOR 5 FT S/Hr ULTIVATOR ROLLING S/Hr 0.S9 65 O ULTIVATOR-36 FILD S/Hr S DIGGR PANUT S/Hr o.ooo DISK ROW S/Hr "' DISK 6 ROW S/Hr DISK ROW S/Hr DISK OFFST S/Hr DISK TANDM 3/Hr 0.7JI a. 300 o.oco DISK - TANDM ROW S/Hr 0.30 o.ooo ,? DISK TANDM FT 3/Hr a DISK - TANDM 6 ROW S/Hr DRILL FT 3/Hr DRILL ll FT S/Hr FRT. SPRADR 0 FT S/Hr 01 0 FRT. SPRADR a ROW S/Hr FILD ULTIVATOR 9 FT S/Hr FILD ULTIVATOR 6 ROW S/Hr 0.85 o.ooo GRAIN ART S/Hr HARROWS S/Hr HRB. APPLIATOR 0 FT S/Hr S HRB. APPLIATOR 5 FT S/Hr 0.S78 S LAND PLAN S/Hr 0.S MOLDBOARD PLOW S/Hr S MOLDBOARD PLOW 6 F T S/Hr PIKR WHLS S/Hr PLANTR 13.5 FT S/Hr PLANTR 18 FT S/Hr 0.1S PLANTR 0 FT S/Hr S 0.38 I 3. " 6 0 PLANTR 8 ROW S/Hr 1.70S PLANTR PANUT S/Hr PLOW LV S/Hr 0.S ROLLR 0 FT S/Hr ROLLR ROW S/Hr ROP WIK S/Hr SHRDDR 13 FT S/Hr 1.5 S S 6.93 SPRAYR 13.5 FT S/Hr 0.5SS SPRAYR 0 FT S/Hr SPRAYR 5 FT S/Hr. 0.*» S SPRAYR HRB. S/Hr SWP MULHR S/Hr ATTL QUIPMNT S/Hr LV BOX T-A S/Hr SAL S/Hr SQUZ HUT S/Hr STOK SPRAYR S/Hr STOK TRAILR S/Hr SUPPL. FDR S/Hr l.soo 33. "".3 TAK S/Hr S.OOO S.137 VT. QUIPMNT S/Hr PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON S/Mi S S 0.3S 1S HP FRT. SPRADR 0 FT APPLY FRT HP FRT. SPRADR 9 RON BDDR 5 FT APPLY FRT 8 RON ISO HP SPRAYR 5 FT APPLY HRBIID S ISO HP SPRAYR S F T APPLY IRON S7 75 HP BDDR 1 3. S F T BDDING 13.5 FT ISO HP BDDR S F T BDDING ISO 9RW RSI!. Information pnsented is prepaed solely as a general guide ad is not intended to recognise or predict the costs ad ntums from ary one paticuliw farm or ramh operation These projections wen collected ad developed by staff members of dm Texas Agricultural xtension Service and approved for publication

24 TRATR 3R 3DDING TRATR 3DDR BDDING BDDR BDDING HISL HISL HISL HISL HISL HISL OMBIN OMBIN OMBIN OMBINING ULTIPAKR ULTIPAK ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR ULTIVAT ULTIVATOR-36 ULTIVATING-36 DIGGR DIG DISK DISK DISK - TANDM DISKING DISK - TANDM DISKING OISK DISKING DISK DISKING DISK DISKING lescur::e N ir>e DISK - TANDM DISKING - TANDM DRILL DRILL "5 HP 19 FT 13 FT 3/Ac 130 HP S F T 130 9ROW 15 HP 0 FT 6 ROW 15 HP 0 FT 75 HP 1 FT 1 FT 130 HP 0 FT 180HP 75 HP PANUT PANUTS RI RI 3/Ac 5/A 3/A 15 HP 0 HP 1 ROW 1 ROW ISO HP 5 FT ISO 8R 130 HP 5 FT 180 8R 75 HP 13.3 FT ROW 1S HP 0 FT 6 RON 75 HP ROLLING ROLLING ISO HP FILD FILD 75 HP PANUT PANUTS 0 HP ROH ROW 0 HP ROW ROH 150 HP 6 RON 0FT 15 HP 6 RON 6 RON 15 HP OFFST OFFST 75 HP TANDM TANDM 1S HP 6 ROH 6 ROH 0 HP FT 3/Ac per. > lar.ase..-ce 1acor OOO , SS S o.aas O.OOO S S6S 0.S S S S " V i r i a c i e x c e r. -S«S p e r. u t i m? epair Input per. > Mair.t. ii Firm OOO OO 3. ;oc o.ooo US S S Repair > M a i r. t. Laccr 3. OOO »»«_ Fixe-epre:. xpenses H o u r l y ' Lease nterest o.coo S1 S S S S S.68 Annua. Ti Lease zer.sz 30 O.OO O S O.OSO S S o.oas :-. 1. ) J S " ""se S " P S Information pnsented is pnpaedsolely as a general guide ad is not Mended to naipuze a pndta dm ca^ ad nturnsjrxmaty am patted^ form a raudi operatic These projections wen collected ad developed bystag'membenoj'dm Texas A&tcdturd xtension Seme* ad approved for publication. RSIlll

25 TRATR FILD VLTIVATR FILD ULTIVATOR i '»-.e. 3 H? 9 FT 3 A r 3/A 3 Ac ii y per. i a.-.a ;». icor..? ? v a n s c. e -. x p e r. u e a «3per. ust;.-n Repair Input per. i Mamt. Off Firm OO o.n- 0.3 aepair M a i r. t. Laser H r u r l y Lease » " r i x e i i x c e r. z e s eprec. -.terest di d. -.eaie '-- xej. 3. OO :., i. ). :-. >. ; - l FILD VLTIVATR FILD 'JLTIVATR 15 HP RW 6 RW S,A 3/Ac 3. Ac S 30 O.'IS OO \ o.ooo OO j TRATR HARROWS HARROWING 0 HP 3'Ac S.Ac 5/Ac o.ooo o.oco O.OO O.OO GRAIN ART HAULING 5 HP RI 3.'Ac 3.'A 3/A o.ooo S ' HRB. APPLIATOR H R B I I D A P P L. 15 HP 0 FT S TRATR DISK - TANDM SPRAYR H R B I I D A P P L. 130 HP 6 ROW 0 FT DIS S S PIKR WHLS PIKR WHLS 0 HP S S PIKUP TRUK PIKUP TRUK 3/ TON 3/ TON S/Ml S/mi S S LAND PLAN PLANING 15 HP LAND 3/Ac PLANTR PLANTING 0 HP 18 FT 1 ROW 3/Ac OS PLANTR PLANTING 75 HP 13.5 FT ROH S PLANTR PLANTING 15 HP 0 FT 6 ROH S SPRAYR PLANTR PLANTING ISO HP 5 FT 3 ROH 8R ORN S SS PLANTR SPRAYR PLANTING 150 HP 8 ROH 5 FT 3R OTN S PLANTR PLANTING 150 HP 8 ROH 3R SORG XI PLANTR PLANTING 75 HP PANUT PANUTS S S6.1S.077 MOLDBOARD PLOW PLOWING 75 HP S S SO 0.37 MOLDBOARD PLOW PLOWING 15 HP 6 F T 6 F T PLOW PLOWING 15 HP LV LVS S BLAD RBUILDING LV 75 HP DOZR S ROLLR ROLLING 0 HP 0 FT S9S 0.S9S ROLLR ROLLING ROP WIK ROP WIK 0 HP ROH RH 0 HP 15 HP BROADAST R ING BROADST SHRDDR SHRD STALKS 0 HP 13 FT S S S tnformaianpnsemedtspnpaedsolelyaiagemrdgmdeadisrunmerdtdtoncogmze orpndicl the costs ad Mums fromary am pattada jam or ranch operation RSI 1.1 These projections wen collectedaddevelopedby staffmembers ofthe Texas Agnodturdxtenocn Service ad otproved for publication

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell

More information

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK

More information

N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS

N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS

More information

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI. P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF

More information

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)

More information

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION

More information

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO

More information

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8

More information

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE

More information

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)

More information

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. ^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994

More information

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986. Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT 40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT

More information

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

PRODUCT NAHE DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER CASH FIXED LANDLORD

PRODUCT NAHE DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER CASH FIXED LANDLORD P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993. B-124K02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD.

More information

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based

More information

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. 3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G

More information

EAST TEXAS DISTRICT 9

EAST TEXAS DISTRICT 9 TEXAS DISTRIT 9 Texas Agricultural Extension Service The Texas A&M University System B-141(09) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Southeast Texas District Projected for 1994 Dr. Arthur R. Gerlow, District 9

More information

Background & Assumptions

Background & Assumptions EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS. MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6

More information

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0 42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E

More information

Unit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42

Unit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42 Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide 2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not

More information

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University

More information

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED) -33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE

More information

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT 12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS

More information

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE, COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC

More information

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,

More information

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual

More information

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns

More information

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.

More information

A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W

A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5

More information

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base

More information

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 J A R T a l s o c o n c l u d e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e i n t e n t o f N e l s o n s r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p l a n i s t o e n h a n c e c o n n e

More information

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms

Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms & RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012

More information

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment

More information

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets

Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns

More information

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local

More information

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE 22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and

More information

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online

More information

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

More information

T h e C S E T I P r o j e c t

T h e C S E T I P r o j e c t T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T

More information

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s A g la di ou s F. L. 462 E l ec tr on ic D ev el op me nt A i ng er A.W.S. 371 C. A. M. A l ex an de r 236 A d mi ni st ra ti on R. H. (M rs ) A n dr ew s P. V. 326 O p ti ca l Tr an sm is si on A p ps

More information

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing

More information

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was

More information

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and

More information

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS

COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA

More information

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:

More information

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS

COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 20, NUMBER OF UNITS

Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 20, NUMBER OF UNITS Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 0, 1990. B-14K05) DATE STAGE PRODUTION 05/05/90 FIRST UTTING 06//90 SEOND UTTING 07/15/90 THIRD UTTING 09/0/90 FOURTH

More information

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

=s ECONOMIC COSTS and RETURNS == Owner Budget by Stage. Quantity Unit $ / Unit Total

=s ECONOMIC COSTS and RETURNS == Owner Budget by Stage. Quantity Unit $ / Unit Total Date of Printing : 10/26/95 =s ECONOMIC COSTS and RETURNS == Owner Budget by Stage Cotton, Picker, Dryland, Coastal Plain Texas Coastal Bend (District 11) GROSS INCOME Description COTTON LINT COTTONSEED

More information

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"

More information

PRODUCT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS

PRODUCT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r A p r i l 0, 1 9 9 0. B-14K0) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTIO TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT

More information

Executive Committee and Officers ( )

Executive Committee and Officers ( ) Gifted and Talented International V o l u m e 2 4, N u m b e r 2, D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. G i f t e d a n d T a l e n t e d I n t e r n a t i o n a2 l 4 ( 2), D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. 1 T h e W o r

More information

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M

More information

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS

PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

CATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A. Ήχος Πα. to os se e e na aș te e e slă ă ă vi i i i i

CATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A. Ήχος Πα. to os se e e na aș te e e slă ă ă vi i i i i CATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A Ήχος α H ris to os s n ș t slă ă ă vi i i i i ți'l Hris to o os di in c ru u uri, în tâm pi i n ți i'l Hris

More information

Beechwood Music Department Staff

Beechwood Music Department Staff Beechwood Music Department Staff MRS SARAH KERSHAW - HEAD OF MUSIC S a ra h K e rs h a w t r a i n e d a t t h e R oy a l We ls h C o l le g e of M u s i c a n d D ra m a w h e re s h e ob t a i n e d

More information

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to

More information

Price Unit Weight Cash per of per Flow

Price Unit Weight Cash per of per Flow ROP PRODUTS REPORT pril 5, 1986 rop Product Name ORN OTTON LINT OTTONSEED DEFIIENY PMT. ORN DEFIIENY PMT. OTTON DEFIIENY PMT. SORGHUM FLX GRZING HY HY OSTL HY SORGHUM KLEINGRSS SEED PENUTS PIK DIVERSION

More information

I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o

I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o u l d a l w a y s b e t a k e n, i n c l u d f o l

More information

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80. c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc

More information

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY 62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E

More information

Seed Cotton Program Workshop

Seed Cotton Program Workshop Seed Cotton Program Workshop USDA FSA, LFBF, LSU AgCenter, Mississippi State University Extension Service Thursday, August 16, 2018 Oak Grove, LA Seed Cotton Program Workshop Program Overview and Farm

More information

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated

More information

C4.46 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990

C4.46 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L A B O R L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E (

More information

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines

More information

Solutions 1F and 2F. 1) correct 12) 2 8 = 4 13) Q = 22 4Q = 13 Q = 13/4 = 3 1/4. 2) correct R 6 S 9. 13) R 6 S -9 or 2) 1 YX YX.

Solutions 1F and 2F. 1) correct 12) 2 8 = 4 13) Q = 22 4Q = 13 Q = 13/4 = 3 1/4. 2) correct R 6 S 9. 13) R 6 S -9 or 2) 1 YX YX. F F ) ) ) 7 ) Q Q Q Q / / ) correct ) correct ) ) ) R S or R S ) ()P P P ) 0 ) ( 0 ) 0 ) 7) 7 ) A D C ) [ 0 7] 00 0 00 ) 7Q( ) ) A B( A B) ) ) ) 0 () () 0 Z() () Z ) [ 0 07C] 000 ) 0 70C 7 70C C 7/70 7/70

More information

F l a s h-b a s e d S S D s i n E n t e r p r i s e F l a s h-b a s e d S S D s ( S o-s ltiad t e D r i v e s ) a r e b e c o m i n g a n a t t r a c

F l a s h-b a s e d S S D s i n E n t e r p r i s e F l a s h-b a s e d S S D s ( S o-s ltiad t e D r i v e s ) a r e b e c o m i n g a n a t t r a c L i f e t i m e M a n a g e m e n t o f F l a-b s ah s e d S S D s U s i n g R e c o v e r-a y w a r e D y n a m i c T h r o t t l i n g S u n g j i n L e, e T a e j i n K i m, K y u n g h o, Kainmd J

More information