arxiv: v5 [physics.optics] 11 Feb 2015

Transcription

1 Eletromagneti momentum and the energy momentum tensor in a linear medium with magneti and dieletri properties Mihael E. Crenshaw US Army Aviation and Missile Researh, Development, and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898, USA (Dated: February 1, 015) arxiv: v5 [physis.optis] 11 Feb 015 In a ontinuum setting, the energy momentum tensor embodies the relations between onservation of energy, onservation of linear momentum, and onservation of angular momentum. The welldefined total energy and the well-defined total momentum in a thermodynamially losed system with omplete equations of motion are used to onstrut the total energy momentum tensor for a stationary simple linear material with both magneti and dieletri properties illuminated by a quasimonohromati pulse of light through a gradient-index antirefletion oating. The perplexing issues surrounding the Abraham and Minkowski momentums are bypassed by working entirely with onservation priniples, the total energy, and the total momentum. We derive eletromagneti ontinuity equations and equations of motion for the marosopi fields based on the material fourdivergene of the traeless, symmetri total energy momentum tensor. We identify ontraditions between the marosopi Maxwell equations and the ontinuum form of the onservation priniples. We resolve the ontraditions, whih are the atual fundamental issues underlying the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy, by onstruting a unified version of ontinuum eletrodynamis that is based on establishing onsisteny between the three-dimensional Maxwell equations for marosopi fields, the eletromagneti ontinuity equations, the four-divergene of the total energy momentum tensor, and a four-dimensional tensor formulation of eletrodynamis for marosopi fields in a simple linear medium. orresponding author: Mihael Crenshaw, mihael.e.renshaw4.iv@mail.mil phone: , fax: I. INTRODUCTION The resolution of the Abraham Minkowski momentum ontroversy for the eletromagneti momentum and the energy momentum tensor in a linear medium is multifaeted, omplex, and nuaned. It is not suffiient to simply derive an eletromagneti momentum or energy momentum tensor from the marosopi Maxwell equations, that muh is apparent from any examination of the sientifi literature as the shortomings of the Abraham momentum [1] and the Minkowski momentum [] are onsiderable. For deades, however, there has been a general onsensus in the sientifi literature that the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy is resolved [3 13]: The Abraham and Minkowski momentum formulas apply to open systems and eah momentum an be supplemented by another omponent of momentum to form the total momentum [14, 15]. Beause only the total momentum of a thermodynamially losed field/matter system is physially meaningful in this paradigm, the total momentum an be separated into field omponents, suh as the Abraham and Minkoswski momentums, and matter omponents in an arbitrary manner. Although this sophism is ultimately inorret [16], it emphasizes the importane of working with the onserved forms of total energy and total momentum in order to avoid the ambiguous definitions of field and material momentums in unlosed physial systems with inomplete equations of motion [15 19]. In this artile, we arefully define a thermodynamially losed ontinuum eletrodynami system with omplete equations of motion ontaining a stationary simple linear medium illuminated by a plane quasimonohromati eletromagneti pulse through a gradient-index antirefletion oating and identify the onserved total energy and the onserved total momentum, thereby extending our previous work [17 19] on dieletris to a medium with both magneti and dieletri properties. Assuming the validity of the marosopi Maxwell Heaviside equations, the total momentum in a simple linear medium is found using the law of onservation of linear momentum. We then populate the total energy momentum tensor with the densities of the onserved energy and momentum using the uniqueness property that ertain elements of the tensor orrespond to elements of the four-momentum. We prove that the uniqueness property diretly ontradits the property that the four-divergene of the energy momentum tensor generates ontinuity equations [19]. We retain the uniqueness property and reast the four-divergene of the energy momentum tensor in terms of a material four-divergene operator whose time-like oordinate depends on the refrative index [17 0]. One the elements and properties of the energy momentum tensor are defined, we derive the ontinuity equation for the total energy. The total energy ontinuity equation is a mixed seond-order differential equation that we write as first-order equations of motion for the marosopi fields. These equations are mathematially equivalent to the marosopi Maxwell Heaviside equations in that they an be transformed into one another using vetor identities [1, ]. It is not that simple. These results are suffiient for a simple dieletri medium with µ = 1 and the equations

2 of motion for the marosopi fields appear in Refs. [17 19]. However, in the more general linear medium onsidered here, the momentum ontinuity equation that is derived from the equations of motion for the marosopi fields is not onsistent with an energy momentum tensor formalism. In order to resolve this seond ontradition, we onsider a quasimonohromati light pulse traversing a medium onsisting of noninterating partiles and show that the linear index of refration n is n = 1 + ξ e + ξ m, where ξ e = χ e / is the renormalized eletri suseptibility and ξ m = χ m / is the renormalized magneti suseptibility. Then the set of equations of motion for marosopi fields that is onsistent with the four-dimensional formulation of the energy and momentum onservation priniples for eletrodynamis in the ontinuum limit of a linear medium is: n B = Π n n Π (1.1) n Π = B (1.) B = 0 (1.3) Π = n n Π (1.4) where B = A and Π = (n/) A/. While a permittivity ε and a permeability µ an still be defined, the nonlinear disjuntion of the linear refrative index n = εµ is no longer relevant. In a ontinuum setting, the total energy momentum tensor defines the relations between the three most important priniples of physis: onservation of energy, onservation of linear momentum, and onservation of angular momentum. The inonsisteny between the marosopi Maxwell equations and the four-dimensional energy momentum formalism of ontinuum eletrodynamis is the true and fundamental issue of the Abraham Minkowski momentum dilemma. It would be easy to dismiss our results as ontrary to the marosopi Maxwell equations, equations that have the status of physial laws. However to do so would be to ignore ontraditions between the marosopi Maxwell equations and the ontinuum form of the onservation laws. This is not the first time that established physial laws had to be modified when they onflited with other fundamental physial priniples: Maxwell s modifiation of the Ampère Law is a partiularly apt example from sientifi history. II. THE TOTAL ENERGY AND THE TOTAL MOMENTUM A physial theory is an abstrat mathematial desription of some portion of a real-world physial proess. The theoretial desription is useful to the extent that there are orrespondenes between a subset of the theory and a subset of the behavior of the real-world system [3]. Real materials are really ompliated and we must arefully define the material properties and boundary onditions in order to insure that the mathematial desription ontains the most important harateristis while exluding the less signifiant details. We define a simple linear material as an isotropi and homogeneous medium that has a linear magneti response and a linear dieletri response to an eletromagneti field that is tuned suffiiently far from any material resonanes that absorption and dispersion are negligible. Eletrostritive effets and magnetostritive effets are also taken as being negligible [9]. Lest there be any doubt about the use of the simple dieletri model that we desribed, we note that simplified physial models, like elasti ollisions, inertial referene frames, weightless and rigid rods, simple harmoni osillators, fritionless bearings, plane waves, the vauum, and many others, have no existene in the real world but are nonetheless essential to the progress of theoretial physis. We are not dealing with any real material, but the idealization of a simple linear material is neessary in order to develop the foundational onepts in a lear, onise, onvining, and inontrovertible manner. In partiular, temporal dispersion is inonsequential for the arbitrarily long quasimonohromati eletromagneti field that is onsidered here. A retangular prism of the simple linear material in free spae is illuminated by a quasimonohromati pulse of radiation at normal inidene in the plane-wave limit. This system is thermodynamially losed with a onserved total energy and a onserved total momentum but we also require a omplete set of equations of motion in order to obtain well-defined quantities for the total energy and total momentum. There are various formulations of the eletrodynamis of uniformly moving media, but a omplete treatment of ontinuum eletrodynamis in moving media is far from settled [8]. We also have to reognize that the material is aelerating due to a radiation surfae pressure that an be attributed to the partial refletion of the inident radiation. In this work, the prism of material is overed

3 with a thin gradient-index antirefletion oating, not an interferene antirefletion oating, that makes refletions and the aeleration from radiation surfae pressure negligible allowing the material to be regarded as stationary in the laboratory frame of referene. The assumption of a rare vapor, by Gordon [13] for example, aomplishes the same purpose of making refletions negligible, but then requires justifiation to apply the results to a material with a non-perturbative index of refration. There is nothing unusual, mysterious, nefarious, or onfusing about the onditions desribed above beause the use of a gradient-index antirefletion oating on a homogeneous linear material is required, and has always been required, for a rigorous appliation of the Maxwell equations to solids. Still, Maxwell s equations are almost always applied to moving and aelerating materials without adequate justifiation. That is not to say that the use of the marosopi Maxwell equations annot be justified in most ases, but it is espeially important to justify the use of the marosopi Maxwell equations when invoking onservation properties. Classial ontinuum eletrodynamis is founded on the marosopi Maxwell equations, so that is where we start our work. The ommon marosopi Maxwell Heaviside equations E = µ H 3 (.1) H = ε E (.) B = 0 (.3) εe = 0 (.4) are the omplete equations of motion for the marosopi fields in a stationary simple linear medium. Here, E is the eletri field, B is the magneti field, H = B/µ is the auxiliary magneti field, ε is the eletri permittivity, µ is the magneti permeability, and is the speed of light in the vauum. The medium is expliitly required to be stationary beause the marosopi Maxwell Heaviside equations, Eqs. (.1) (.4), are not omplete for moving or aelerating materials. The eletri and magneti fields an be defined in terms of the vetor potential in the usual manner as E = 1 A (.5) B = A, (.6) working in the Coulomb gauge. Then, the propagation of an eletromagneti field through free-spae and into a simple linear medium is desribed by the wave equation, ( A) + n A = µ ( A), (.7) µ assuming the validity of the marosopi Maxwell Heaviside equations, Eqs. (.1) (.4). Here, n(r) = µε is the spatially slowly varying linear refrative index. The spatial variation of the index and permeability is limited to a narrow transition region in whih these quantities hange gradually from the vauum values to the nominal material properties. We write the vetor potential in terms of a slowly varying envelope funtion and a arrier wave as A(r, t) = 1 (Ã(r, t)e i(ω d t k d r) + à (r, t)e i(ω dt k d r) ), (.8) where à is a slowly varying funtion of r and t, k d = (nω d /)ê k is the wave vetor that is assoiated with the enter frequeny of the field ω d, and ê k is a unit vetor in the diretion of propagation. Figure 1 shows a one-dimensional representation of the slowly varying amplitude of the plane inident field Ãi(z) = (Ã(z, t 0 ) à (z, t 0 )) 1/ about to enter the simple linear medium with index n = and permeability µ = 1. through a gradient-index antirefletion oating. The gradient that has been applied to the index has also been applied to the permeability as a matter of onveniene. Figure presents a time-domain numerial solution of the wave equation at a later time t 1 when the refrated field Ãt(z) = (Ã(z, t 1 ) à (z, t 1 )) 1/ is entirely inside the medium. The pulse has not propagated as far as it would have propagated in the vauum due to the redued speed of light /n in the material. In addition, the spatial extent of the refrated pulse in the medium is w t = w i /n in terms of the width w i of the inidene pulse due to the redued speed of light. As shown in Fig., the amplitude of the refrated field

4 index profile n-1 (no units) distane (arb. units) FIG. 1: Inident field (amplitude arbitrary) just before it enters the linear medium n-1 (no units) distane (arb. units) FIG. : Refrated field entirely within the linear medium. is Ãt = µ/nãi, that is, the amplitude of the inident field saled by µ/n. Using these relations we an onstrut the temporally invariant quantity U total = n ( n ω d µ à ) ( n µ ) ω d à dv (.9) and note that U total is onserved when the integration is performed over a region V that ontains all of the eletromagneti field that is present in the system. In that ase, the region of integration V is extended to all spae,. The pulse that is used in Fig. 1 has a generally retangular shape in order to failitate a graphial interpretation of pulse width and integration under the field envelope. It an be shown by additional numerial solutions of the wave equation that the relations desribed above are quite general in terms of the permeability and the refrative index, as well as the shape and amplitude of a quasimonohromati field. For a stationary linear medium, the total energy is the eletromagneti energy. Although a material may possess many forms of energy, we intend total energy to mean all of the energy that impats the dynamis or eletrodynamis of the model system with the speified onditions. In partiular, kineti energy is exepted by the requirement for the material to remain stationary. We assume that the eletromagneti energy density for a stationary simple linear medium is ρ e = 1 1 ( n E + B ) dv, (.10) µ

5 as inferred from the Poynting theorem. Again extending the region of integration V that ontains all fields present to integration over all spae, the eletromagneti energy, 1 1 ( U e = ρ e dv = n E + B ) dv, (.11) µ is the total energy of the losed system ontaining a stationary simple linear medium illuminated by a quasimonohromati pulse of light. Using Eqs. (.5) and (.6) to eliminate the eletri and magneti fields in Eq. (.11), we obtain the energy formula ( (n ) ) 1 1 A U e = + ( A) dv. (.1) µ Employing the expression for the vetor potential in terms of slowly varying envelope funtions and arrier waves, Eq. (.8), results in ω ) d U e = (ÃÃ n 4µ Ã e i(ω d k d z)t +.. dv. (.13) Applying a time average allows the double frequeny terms to be negleted and shows the equality of Eqs. (.9) and (.1), ωd U e = n µ Ã dv = U total. (.14) We have theoretial onfirmation that our numerial U total, Eq. (.9), is the total energy of the system and that it is onserved. More importantly, we have an interpretation of the ontinuum eletrodynami energy formula, Eq. (.11), in term of what happens to the shape and amplitude of the eletromagneti field as it propagates into the medium. In the first half of the last entury, there was an ongoing theoretial and experimental effort devoted to determining the orret desription of the momentum of light propagating through a linear medium [3 7]. At various times, the issue was resolved in favor of the Abraham momentum G A = E H dv (.15) and at other times the momentum was found to be the Minkowski momentum D B G M = dv. (.16) Sine Penfield and Haus [8] showed, in 1967, that neither the Abraham momentum nor the Minkowski momentum is the total momentum, the resolution of the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy has been that the momentum for an arbitrary or unspeified field subsystem must be supplemented by an appropriate material momentum to obtain the total momentum [3 15]. Then, it must be demonstrated that the total momentum, so onstruted, is atually onserved in a thermodynamially losed system, as that is usually not the ase. Although ontinuity equations are often alled onservation laws, the derivation of a result that has the outward appearane of a ontinuity equation is not suffiient to prove onservation. Given the arbitrariness of the field momentum and the model dependene of the material momentum that go into a onstrution of the total momentum, the only onvining way to determine the total momentum is by the appliation of onservation priniples. Then onservation of the total energy is all that is needed to prove that the total momentum [13, 17 19] G total = 1 µ ne B dv = ne H dv (.17) is onserved in our losed system. In the limit of slowly varying plane waves, we have the onserved vetor quantity ωd G total = n µ 3 Ã dve k = U total e k (.18) that is equal to the onserved total energy, Eq. (.14), divided by a onstant fator of and multiplied by a unit vetor e k. In addition to being onserved, the total momentum, Eq. (.17), is unique. There an be no other non-trivial 5

6 onserved marosopi momentum in terms of the vetor produt of eletri and magneti fields in our model system beause these would ontain different ombinations of the material properties. The momentum formula, Eq. (.17), was originally derived for a dieletri in 1973 by Gordon [13] who ombined the Abraham momentum for the field with a material momentum that was obtained from integrating the Lorentz fore on the mirosopi onstituents of matter. Although, Gordon s derivation is inorret and inomplete [16], onservation of the total momentum is definitive and the Gordon momentum is uniquely onserved in a thermodynamially losed ontinuum eletrodynami system ontaining a stationary simple linear medium. The Gordon momentum is atually omposed of the momentum of the eletri, magneti, and polarization fields [16]. We an assoiate the polarization field with the material, but apart from a semanti artifie, the momentum, like the energy, is entirely eletromagneti in nature. 6 III. TOTAL ENERGY MOMENTUM TENSOR A tensor is a very speial mathematial objet and a total energy momentum tensor is subjet to even more stringent onditions. Any four ontinuity equations, or equations that have the outward appearane of being ontinuity equations, an be ombined using linear algebra to form a matrix differential equation. Hene, the proliferation of matries that have been purported to be the energy momentum tensor for a system ontaining an eletromagneti pulse and a linear medium. In this setion, we onstrut the unique total energy momentum tensor and the tensor ontinuity equation for a stationary simple linear medium using the onservation, symmetry, trae, and divergene onditions that must be satisfied. For an unimpeded (fore-free) flow, onservation of the omponents of the total four-momentum (U, G) [4] U = T 00 dv (3.1) G i = 1 T i0 dv (3.) uniquely determines the first olumn of the total energy momentum tensor. We use the onvention that Roman indies from the middle of the alphabet, like i, run from 1 to 3 and Greek indies belong to {0, 1,, 3}. As in Setion II, the region of integration has been extended to all-spae,. Conservation of angular momentum in a losed system imposes the diagonal symmetry ondition [4] T αβ = T βα (3.3) and uniquely determines the first row of the total energy momentum tensor based on the uniqueness of the first olumn. Applying the onservation of the total energy and total momentum, we an onstrut the total energy momentum tensor T αβ = (n E + B )/(µ) (ne H) 1 (ne H) (ne H) 3 (ne H) 1 W 11 W 1 W 13 (ne H) W 1 W W 3 (ne H) 3 W 31 W 3 W 33 (3.4) from elements that are obtained by equating Eq. (.11) to Eq. (3.1) and equating Eq. (.17) to Eq. (3.). The elements of the Maxwell stress-tensor W are yet to be speified. Our approah here is very different from the usual tehnique of onstruting the energy momentum tensor from the eletromagneti ontinuity equations. The energy ontinuity equation is known to be given by Poynting s theorem However if we use Poynting s theorem and the tensor energy ontinuity law 1 ρ e + (E H) = 0. (3.5) β T 0β = 0 (3.6) to populate the first row of the energy momentum tensor, then Eq. (3.) beomes G i = 1 (E H) i dv (3.7)

7 by symmetry, Eq. (3.3). This result is ontraindiated beause G = 1 ωd n µ Ã e k dv = U total n e k (3.8) is not temporally invariant as the pulse travels from the vauum into the medium. The pratie has been to ignore the ondition that the omponents of the four-momentum, Eqs. (3.1) and (3.), be onserved and use the omponents of the Poynting vetor, along with the eletromagneti energy density, to populate the first row of the energy momentum tensor using the tensor energy ontinuity law, Eq. (3.6). We regard the onservation properties of the total energy momentum tensor as fundamental and these onservation properties onlusively establish Eq. (3.4) as the form of the energy momentum tensor. Applying the tensor ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.6), to the energy momentum tensor, Eq. (3.4), we obtain an energy ontinuity equation 1 ρ e + (ne H) = 0 (3.9) that is inonsistent with the Poynting theorem, Eq. (3.5). In the limit of slowly varying plane waves, we obtain an obvious ontradition ( ) ( ) n ωd µ 3 Ã Ã +.. n3 ωd µ 3 Ã Ã +.. = 0 (3.10) from the energy ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.9). We have identified the essential ontradition of the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy: Absent the uniqueness that aompanies onservation of total energy and total momentum, the omponents of the first row and olumn of the energy momentum tensor are essentially arbitrary thereby rendering the energy momentum tensor meaningless. Yet, the energy ontinuity equation that is obtained from the four-divergene of an energy momentum tensor that is populated with the densities of the onserved energy and momentum quantities is demonstrably false. We are at an impasse with the existing theory that requires two ontraditory onditions to be satisfied [19]. The resolution of this ontradition annot be found within the formal system of ontinuum eletrodynamis as it urrently exists. Therefore we make an ansatz, based on the redued speed of light in the medium, /n, that the ontinuity equations are generated by where β is the material four-divergene operator [17 0] ( n β =, x, y, ) z β T αβ = f α, (3.11). (3.1) The ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.11), is generalized in a form that allows a soure/sink f α of energy and the omponents of momentum [18]. Referene [5] provides a solid theoretial justifiation for the ansatz of Eqs. (3.11) and (3.1). Applying the tensor ontinuity law, Eq. (3.11), to the energy momentum tensor, Eq. (3.4), we obtain the energy ontinuity equation n ρ e + (ne H) = f 0. (3.13) Now, let us re-onsider the Poynting theorem. We multiply Poynting s theorem, Eq. (3.5), by n and use a vetor identity to ommute the index of refration with the divergene operator to obtain [17] n ρ e n + (ne H) = (ne H). (3.14) n The two energy ontinuity equations, Eqs. (3.13) and (3.14), are equal if we identify the soure/sink of energy as f 0 = n n (ne H). (3.15) Then an inhomogeneity in the index of refration, n 0, is assoiated with work done by the field on the material or work done on the field by the interation with the material [18]. Obviously, the gradient of the index of refration in our anti-refletion oating must be suffiiently small that the work done is perturbative. 7

8 The Poynting s theorem that is found in Eq. (3.14) is a mixed seond-order vetor differential equation. It an be separated into mixed first-order vetor differential equations for the marosopi eletri and magneti fields n B n = ne + ne (3.16) n n ne = µ H. (3.17) The remaining task is to show that the material four-divergene of the energy momentum tensor is a faithful representation of the eletromagneti ontinuity equations. We multiply Eq. (3.16) by H and multiply Eq. (3.17) by ne. The resulting equations are summed to produe an energy ontinuity equation n ρ e n + (ne H) = (ne H) (3.18) n that is preisely the same as Eq. (3.14). To obtain the total momentum ontinuity equation, we substitute Eqs. (3.16) and (3.17) into the material timelike derivative of the total momentum density 8 n g total = 1 n ne µ B + ne 1 n B µ (3.19) where the momentum density g total is the integrand of Eq. (.17). The momentum ontinuity equation is [ n g total = 1 ( ne) ne µ + µ ( H) H + n ( n (ne) ne n ) ] ne. (3.0) n For a dieletri medium, µ = 1, we are done and this ase was treated in Refs. [17 19]. However, if µ 1 then the momentum ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.0), is not expressible as part of the tensor ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.11), without additional transformations. There is a sientifi reord of algebrai transformations of the energy and momentum ontinuity equations. Abraham [1] was apparently the first to pursue this approah, deriving a variant form of the ontinuity equation for the Minkowski momentum in whih the time-derivative of the Minkowski momentum is split into the temporal derivative of the Abraham momentum and a fititious Abraham fore. Kinsler, Favaro, and MCall [1] disuss various transformations of Poynting s theorem and the resulting differenes in the way various physial proesses are expressed. Frias and Smolyakov [] did the same for transformations of the momentum ontinuity equation. It appears to have gone unreognized, however, that the different expression of physial proesses in the eletromagneti ontinuity equations has to arry over into the Maxwell equations of motion for the marosopi fields, Eqs. (3.16) and (3.17). Speifially, the energy and momentum ontinuity equations are omponents of the tensor ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.11), and annot be separately transformed. We ould, for example, ommute the magneti permeability with the url operator in the Maxwell Ampère Law, Eq. (3.17), in order to allow the momentum ontinuity law, Eq. (3.0) to be expressed in the form of a ontinuity equation. However, the resulting energy ontinuity law would run afoul of the uniqueness ondition on the elements of the first olumn of the energy momentum tensor. The total energy momentum tensor, Eq. (3.4), was onstruted using onservation priniples and it is inarguably orret as long as the formula for the energy, Eq. (.11), is orret. For a linear medium with a full or partial magneti response, however, we have demonstrated that the ontinuity equations, Eqs. (3.18) and (3.0), that were onstruted from the field equations, Eq. (3.16) and (3.17), are not onsistent with the tensor ontinuity equation, Eq. (3.11). Again, we are onfronted with a situation of ontradition that we annot derive our way out of and we must justify a orretion based on an analysis of the physial model. IV. THE LINEAR INDEX OF REFRACTION Consider a retangular volume of spae V = Ad, where A is the ross-setional area perpendiular to the diretion of an inident eletromagneti pulse of radiation in the plane-wave limit. The volume is separated into halves by a

9 thin transparent barrier at d/. Half of the volume is filled with a vapor with refrative index n 1 and the other half of the volume is filled with a vapor with refrative index n. We define a material variable ξ i = n i 1. Then the time that it takes a light pulse to traverse the volume is (ξ 1 + ξ )d/() greater than the time it takes light to travel the same distane in a vauum. Note that refletions do not affet the time-of-flight of the pulse, only the amount of light that is transmitted. The time-of-flight of the light pulse does not hange when the barrier is removed. The atoms of eah vapor are noninterating and there is no physial proess that would affet the time-of-flight of the light pulse as the two speies of atoms diffuse into eah other. Generalizing to an arbitrary number of omponents, s, the linear refrative index of a mixture of vapors obeys a superposition priniple n = 1 + s ξ k. (4.1) As long as the atoms are noninterating, the superposition priniple holds whether the vapors are omposed of atoms that behave as eletri dipoles, magneti dipoles, or as a mixture of both. That is, n = 1 + k=1 p ξ i + i=1 q ξ j (4.) for p dieletri omponents and q magneti omponents. Then, n = 1 + ξ e + ξ m, where ξ e = χ e / is the renormalized eletri suseptibility and ξ m = χ m / is the renormalized magneti suseptibility. It should be noted that this is not the first time that the refrative index was derived as a linear superposition of the eletri and magneti dipole densities [6]. It is also ommon in the literature to invoke the low-density limit so that n = 1 + ξ e + ξ m an be used in plae of n = (1 + χ e )(1 + χ m ), Ref. [13], for example [16]. Near-dipole dipole interations [7], and other interations between atoms, require a more detailed and model-dependent treatment that is outside the sope of the urrent work. Now that the linear refrative index is truly linear, we an regard the permittivity and permeability as anahronisms. The refrative index arries the material effets and we an eliminate the permeability and permittivity from the equations of motion for the marosopi fields, Eqs. (3.16) and (3.17), suh that j=1 n B = Π n n Π (4.3) n Π = B, (4.4) where Π = (n/) A/. The equations of motion for the marosopi fields, Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4), an be ombined in the usual manner to write an energy ontinuity equation [ n 1 ( Π + B )] + (B Π) = n (B Π) (4.5) n in terms of a total energy density a total momentum density and a power density ρ total = 1 ( Π + B ), (4.6) g total = B Π p total = n n, (4.7) (B Π). (4.8) Substituting Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4) into the material timelike derivative of the total momentum, Eq. (4.7), the momentum ontinuity equation beomes n g total + 1 W = 1 n n Π, (4.9) 9

10 10 where the Maxwell stress-tensor W is We an onstrut the total energy momentum tensor T αβ = W ij = Π i Π j B i B j + 1 (Π + B )δ ij. (4.10) (Π + B )/ (B Π) 1 (B Π) (B Π) 3 (B Π) 1 W 11 W 1 W 13 (B Π) W 1 W W 3 (B Π) 3 W 31 W 3 W 33 (4.11) from the homogeneous part of the new eletromagneti ontinuity equations, Eqs. (4.5) and (4.9). The total energy momentum tensor, Eq. (4.11), is entirely eletromagneti in harater [16] and there is no need for a supplemental dust energy momentum tensor for the movement of the material [3]. The Maxwell Ampère Law, Eq. (4.4), an be written in terms of the vetor potential as a wave equation ( A) + n A = 0, (4.1) without the inhomogeneous part found in Eq. (.7). We also orret the eletromagneti, or total, energy, Eq. (.11), 1 ( U e = ρ e dv = Π + B ) dv, (4.13) and the total momentum, Eq. (.17), G total = B Π dv (4.14) using the total energy density, Eq. (4.6), and the total momentum density, Eq. (4.7). The {E, D, B, H} paradigm of lassial ontinuum eletrodynamis is altogether broken. That muh was obvious from the onservation of the Gordon form of momentum in Refs. [13] and [17], also in Eq. (.17). The Abraham and Minkowski momentums are expressible solely in terms of the {E, D, B, H} fields, while the Gordon momentum depends on the magneti field B and the peuliar marosopi field Π = ne. This is likely a ontributing fator to the longevity of the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy. The marosopi field equations, Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4), depend only on the fields Π and B. Consequently, ontinuum eletrodynamis an be reformulated in terms of a single pair of fields {Π, B} and a single field-strength tensor [5] 0 Π x Π y Π z F αβ Π = x 0 B z B y Π y B z 0 B. (4.15) x Π z B y B x 0 Having eliminated ε and µ, the fields Π and B are measurable in the same units, thereby ompleting the unifiation of eletriity and magnetism that was begun by Maxwell. The redution to a single pair of fields and a single field-strength tensor is an exquisite simplifiation of ontinuum eletrodynamis. The hanges to the theoretial treatment of eletromagneti fields in linear media that have been presented here are stunning and it is ustomary to propose experiments that would validate unordinary theoretial results. However, the existing experimental reord related to the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy is an indiation of serious tehnial and oneptual diffiulties in the measurement of ontinuum eletrodynami phenomena related to marosopi fields inside materials, fields that annot be measured diretly. On the other hand, the renormalization of time t = t/n in a linear medium is relatively easy to measure. An open optial avity, or free-spae stolon, is a lok that tiks one for every round-trip of a light pulse and that tiks more slowly when it is immersed in a dieletri fluid. V. CONCLUSION The Maxwell equations are widely reognized as one of the most suessful theoretial treatments of our physial world, ever. Then, the persistent inability to adequately address an important issue in a simple ontinuous linear medium using the marosopi Maxwell theory should be seriously disturbing. Instead the Abraham Minkowski

11 ontroversy has been treated as a tautologial uriosity in whih some momentum quantity is supplemented by another momentum quantity, as long as the orret total momentum is ahieved [3, 7]. In the ontext of the open systems typially used in the treatment of ontinuum eletrodynamis, the Abraham Minkowski ontroversy, whih is well-posed as a onservation issue, beomes ill-posed and diffiult to treat rigorously [15]. The resolution of the Abraham Minkowski dilemma in terms of a self-onsistent four-dimensional treatment of ontinuum eletrodynamis in a thermodynamially losed system based on the energy and momentum onservation properties of the total energy momentum tensor fores us to onfront a ontradition in the Maxwell formulation of lassial ontinuum eletrodynamis. This ontradition is not a minor issue as it resides at the very heart of the relations between energy and momentum. The ontradition is resolved by onstruting a unified version of ontinuum eletrodynamis that is based on establishing onsisteny between the equations of motion for marosopi fields, the ontinuity equations, the energy momentum tensor, and the field-strength tensor for a thermodynamially losed system with omplete equations of motion. Like Newtonian dynamis is a low-veloity limit of Einstein relativity, Maxwellian marosopi eletrodynamis must be realizable in some limit of the more omplete theory. Indeed that is the ase. Natural materials are predominately dieletri or predominately magneti. Fields inside materials annot be measured diretly and the two theories yield idential observable results for a given refrative index n for materials that an be haraterized as either dieletri or magneti, but not as a ombination of both. 11 [1] M. Abraham, Rend. Cir. Mat. Palermo 8, 1 (1909). [] H. Minkowski, Nathes. Ged. Wiss. Göttingen 53 (1908). [3] R. N. C. Pfeifer, T. A. Nieminen, N. R. Hekenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, (007). [4] P. W. Milonni and R. W. Boyd, Adv. Opt. Photon., (010). [5] B. A. Kemp, J. Appl. Phys. 109, (011). [6] C. Baxter and R. Loudon, J. Mod. Opt. 57, (010). [7] S. M. Barnett and R. Loudon, Phil. Trans. R. So. A 368, (010). [8] P. Penfield, Jr. and H. A. Haus, Eletrodynamis of Moving Media (MIT Press, 1967). [9] Z. Mikura, Phys. Rev. A 13, (1976). [10] D. F. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A 44, (1991). [11] S. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (010). [1] Y. N. Obukhov, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 17, 830 (008). [13] J. P. Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 8, 14-1 (1973). [14] I. Brevik, Phys. Rep 5, (1979). [15] M. Kranyš, Int. J. Engng. Si. 0, (198). [16] M. E. Crenshaw, Annals of Physis 338, (013). [17] M. E. Crenshaw and T. B. Bahder, Opt. Commun. 84, (011). [18] M. E. Crenshaw and T. B. Bahder, Opt. Commun. 85, (01). [19] M. E. Crenshaw, Pro. SPIE 8458, Optial Trapping and Optial Miromanipulation IX, (01). [0] F. Ravndal, arxiv: v3 (008). [1] P. Kinsler, A. Favaro, and M. W. MCall, European J. Phys. 30, 983 (009). [] W. Frias and A. I. Smolyakov, Phys. Rev. E 85, (01). [3] W. Rindler, Introdution to Speial Relativity (Oxford, New York, 198). [4] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Eletrodynamis of Continuous Media (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1960). [5] M. E. Crenshaw, arxiv: (013). [6] D. W. Ward, K. A. Nelson, and K. J. Webb, New J. Phys. 7, 13 (005). [7] Y. Ben-Aryeh, C. M. Bowden, and J. C. Englund, Phys. Rev. A 34, 3917 (1986).