CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review
|
|
- Susanna Chase
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DATA COLLECTION, INTERPRETATION, & ANALYSIS TO GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FLOW CHART PRIOR INFORMATION Reconnaissance Topography Geology Hydrology Environment SITE EXPLORATION Geophysics Drilling and Coring Sampling In-situ Testing LABORATORY TESTING Index Properties Strength Stiffness/Compressibility Flow/Permeability THEORETICAL EVALUATIONS Constitutive Models Numerical Simulation Analytical Solutions INTERPRETED SOIL PARAMETERS Geostatic Stress State Strength: Drained & Undrained Cases Stiffness & Rate Effects Anisotropy, Dynamic Response, Rheology PRIOR EXPERIENCE Statistical Trends Empirical Correlations ANALYTICAL METHODS Elastic Theory Theorem of Plasticity Limit Equilibrium COLOR CODE: Blue: CIVE.3300 & CIVE.3330 Red: CIVE.4310 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Judgment Hand Calculations Computer Simulations Chart Solutions Experience GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTION Safe Feasible Economical NUMERICAL METHODS Finite Elements Boundary Elements Discrete Elements Finite Difference From Paul W. Mayne, PhD, P.E., Professor, Civil Engineering, GT
2 SOIL BORINGS DETERMINATION OF SOIL STRATIGRAPHY Figure 9-1. FHWA NHI Course Subsurface Investigations
3 SOIL PROFILE (EXAMPLE) Plan View (Boring Locations) Soil Profile (Cross-Section) Figure courtesy of FHWA
4 SOIL PROFILE (EXAMPLE) Boring Location Plan Figure 45. FHWA IF
5 SOIL PROFILE (EXAMPLE) Soil Profile Figure 46. FHWA IF
6 EXAMPLE INTERPRETATION SPT Given Data Provided: - Soil Stratigraphy - USCS Classification - Groundwater Table (@ Time of Testing) - SPT N Values (No Energy Measurements) - Drilling Method (HSA) - Date Started/Ended
7 CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS WHAT DO WE NEED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN? 1. Geostratigraphy: - Layering - Soil Types - Depth to Strata 2. Total and Effective Soil Stresses: - Soil Unit Weight ( or sat = t ) - GWT Location (u) 3. Shear Strength: - Effective Friction Angle ( ') - Effective Cohesion Intercept (c') - Unconfined Compressive Strength (q u ) - Undrained Shear Strength (S u ) 4. Stress State: - Maximum Past Pressure ( vm ). - Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR) - Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest (K o ) 5. Stiffness and Moduli: - Elastic Modulus (E) - Shear Modulus (G) - Poisson s Ratio (ν) - Compression Index (C c ) - Rebound Index (C R ) 6. Consistency: - Void Ratio (e) - Relative Density (D r ) 7. Flow Parameters: - Coefficient of Permeability (k) - Coefficient of Consolidation (c v, c h )
8 WHAT DO WE NEED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN Associated Laboratory Testing Standards 1. Geostratigraphy: - Classification [D422-63(2007)e2 (Withdrawn), D (2009) 1, D e1, D , D a] 2. Total and Effective Soil Stresses: - Soil Unit Weight ( ) D Moisture Content D Shear Strength: - Effective Friction Angle ( ') } - Effective Cohesion Intercept (c') D , - Undrained Shear Strength (S u ) D D Stress State: - Maximum Past Pressure ( vm ).} - Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR) - Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest (K o ) D
9 WHAT DO WE NEED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN Associated Laboratory Testing Standards 5. Stiffness and Moduli: - Elastic Modulus (E) - Shear Modulus (G) - Poisson s Ratio (ν) - Compression Index (C c ) - Rebound Index (C R ) 6. Consistency: - Void Ratio (e) - Relative Density (D r ) } D Flow Parameters: - Coefficient of Permeability (k) D (2006) (Withdrawn 2015), D Coefficient of Consolidation (c v, c h ) D
10 WHAT DO WE NEED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN Associated Laboratory Testing Standards Also see the following: D Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids D Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer D Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils for Geotechnical Purposes D a Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction D Practices for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples D Practice for X-Ray Radiography of Soil Samples
11 TESTING ACCREDITATION AGENCIES American Society of Testing and Materials Materials Testing Center AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory
12 COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION (V) FOR GEOTECHICAL PROPERTIES AND INSITU TESTS (after Duncan, 2000) Coefficient of Variation: A measure of dispersion of a probability distribution. Often expressed as the ratio of standard deviation ( ) to the mean ( ). Measured or Interpreted Parameter V (%) Unit Weight ( ) 3 to 7 Effective Friction Angle ( ') 2 to 13 Undrained Shear Strength (S u ) 13 to 40 Undrained Shear Ratio (S u / ' vo ) 5 to 15 SPT N Value 15 to 45 Electric CPT Tip Resistance (q t ) 5 to 15 after Table 52. FHWA IF Also see Chapter 8 Applying Judgment in Selecting Soil and Rock Properties for Design (FHWA IF ).
13 Geotechnical Property SIGNIFICANT DIGITS IN GEOTECHNICAL DATA Typical Units SI US Significant Digits Effective Particle Diameter mm In 2 or 3 Significant Digits Percent Passing (gradation) % % Nearest 0.1 or whole no. Atterberg Limits % % Nearest whole number Water Content % % Nearest 0.1 Unit Weight kn/m³ lb/ft³ 3 or 4 Significant Digits Relative Density % % Nearest 0.1 Hydraulic Head cm or m in or ft 3 Significant Digits Hydraulic Conductivity m/day ft/day 2 or 3 Significant Digits ASTM D : Standard Practice for Using Significant Digits in Geotechnical Data
14 SIGNIFICANT DIGITS IN GEOTECHNICAL DATA Geotechnical Property Typical Units SI US Significant Digits Stress kpa ksf 3 Significant Digits Friction Angle Degrees Degrees Nearest 0.1 Axial Strain % % 3 Significant Digits Cohesion kpa psi 2 Significant Digits ASTM D : Standard Practice for Using Significant Digits in Geotechnical Data
15 DATA PRESENTATION FIGURE EXAMPLE (POOR) Grain Size Distribution Data Typical Excel Default Graph Series
16 DATA PRESENTATION FIGURE EXAMPLE (GOOD) GRAVEL Coarse SAND Medium Fine SILT & CLAY 100 #4 #10 #30 #40 #60 #100 #200 Percent (%) Finer by Weight % Gravel = % Retained by #4 Sieve = 3% Atterberg Limits Test Results LL=60, PL = 10 D60 = 0.45mm D30 = 0.22mm D10 = 0.08mm % Fines (i.e. % Passing #200 Sieve) = 9% 0 #4 #10 #30 #40 #60 #100 # Particle Diameter (mm)
17 SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist: 1. Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM D ). 2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (ASTM D ). 3. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 4. Burmister Soil Identification System. 5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
18 SOIL GRAIN SIZES Soil Type USCS Symbol Grain Size Range (mm) USCS AASHTO USDA MIT Gravel G 76.2 to to 2 >2 >2 Sand S 4.75 to to to to 0.06 Silt M to 0.06 to Fines < to Clay C < < < Determined by Mechanical Analysis (i.e. Sieve) and Hydrometer Analysis (ASTM D (2007) Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils)
19 MECHANICAL SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422, D1140 AND AASHTO T88) #40 #10 3/8 in #200 Dry Clay (kaolin) Silt Medium-Coarse Sand Fine Gravel Medium Gravel Figure 7.1. from FHWA NHI
20 COMMONLY USED STANDARD SIEVE SIZES (ASTM E11-09e1) Sieve No. Opening (mm) Opening (in) Notes 3/4 in Gravel # # # # # # # # # # # # # Course Sand (#4 to #10) Medium Sand (#10 to #40) Fine Sand (#40 to #200) # # # Silt or Clay <#200
21 CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS PARTICLE ANGULARITY (ROUNDNESS) Definitions (from FHWA NHI ) Angular particles are those that have been freshly broken up and are characterized by jagged projections, sharp ridges, and flat surfaces. Subangular particles are those that have been weathered to the extent that the sharper points and ridges have been worn off. Subrounded particles are those that have been weathered to a further degree than subangular particles. Rounded particles are those on which all projections have been removed, with few irregularities in shape remaining. Well rounded particles are rounded particles in which the few remaining irregularities have been removed. Mitchell (1976) Fig FHWA NHI
22 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS (ASTM D442, D1140 & AASHTO T88) Based on the principle of sedimentation of soil grains in water s w Stokes Law: v D Where: v = Velocity s = soil particle density w = water density = water viscosity D = Diameter of soil particles 18 2 ASTM D152-H hydrometer Figure 2.5. Das FGE (2005).
23 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION RESULTS Figure 5. ASTM D Figure 2.6. Das FGE (2005).
24 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TERMS Key Particle Sizes (D = Diameter) D 60 = Diameter corresponding to 60% finer in the grain size distribution. D 30 = Diameter corresponding to 30% finer in the grain size distribution. D 10 = Diameter corresponding to 10% finer in the grain size distribution. Also known as Effective Size.
25 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TERMS Key Coefficients (C): C u = Coefficient of Uniformity (ASTM D2487) = D 60 /D 10 C c = Coefficient of Gradation = Coefficient of Curvature (ASTM D2487) = (D 30 ) 2 /(D 60 xd 10 )
26 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION -EXAMPLE UPDATE FIGURE!
27 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION -EXAMPLE Fine-Grained Soils Coarse-Grained Soils Percent Passing (by weight) CLAY SIZE SILT SIZE SAND SIZE GRAVEL Silica Sand Piedmont Silt Plastic Kaolin mm Grain Size (mm) Figure 7.2. from FHWA NHI Notice Axis Shift!
28 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION -EXAMPLE Multiple Samples of Same Soil from one site. Percent (%) Finer by Weight SAND GRAVEL Coarse Medium Fine #4 #10 #30 #40 #60 #100 #200 SILT & CLAY 0 #4 #10 #30 #40 #60 #100 # Particle Diameter (mm)
29 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION -EXAMPLE (from Hajduk et al., 2004)
30 SOIL PLASTICITY ATTERBERG LIMITS (a.k.a. w s ) (a.k.a. w p ) (a.k.a. w L ) Plasticity Index (PI) PI = LL - PL Range of water content over which soil remains plastic. Figure 2-5. FHWA NHI
31 SOIL PLASTICITY ATTERBERG LIMITS Liquid Limit Device Plastic Limit Device Figure 24. from FHWA IF ASTM D Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. Liquid Limit (LL or w L ) Test LL and PL photographs courtesy Prof. Reddy, UIC. Plastic Limit (PL or w P ) Test
32 ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID LIMIT ASTM D Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. Assemble components & soil. Mix soil & water. Fill LL Device ~2/3 high with wet soil. Cut groove with tool. Mix soil with more water. Repeat. Lift LL Device with constant rate. Count number of blows to close groove ½ inch. Photographs courtesy of Engineering Properties of Soils Based on Laboratory Testing Manual, Prof. Krishna Reddy, UIC, 2002.
33 ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID LIMIT Run 4 Tests 2 > 25 blows 2 < 25 blows. Plot Number of Blows (N) on Log Scale. LL is N=25 (Round to 1%) Example of Liquid Limit Data Plot
34 ATTERBERG LIMITS PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. Assemble components & soil. Mix soil & water. Run 4 Tests. Average water content for 4 tests = w P = PL Roll wet soil to ellipsoidal mass with hands. Roll on PL Device until 1/8 inch diameter roll is achieved. Photographs courtesy of Engineering Properties of Soils Based on Laboratory Testing Manual, Prof. Krishna Reddy, UIC, When soil crumbles when 1/8 inch diameter is achieved, you are at PL. Take water content.
35 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Divided into two broad categories: Coarse Grained Soils Gravels (G) and Sands (S) < 50% passing through #200 sieve (i.e. >50% retained on #200 sieve) Fine Grained Soils Silts (M) and Clays (C) 50% passing through #200 sieve
36 CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Uses 2 or 4 letter Group Symbols and Group Names Primary soil component first symbol 4 letter symbols either sands and gravels with 5% % Fines 12% or CL-ML on Casagrande Chart Need to know the following: Grain Size Distribution Percent Fines (i.e. particles finer than #200 sieve) Percent Sand Percent Gravel #4 and #200 sieves C c and C u from grain size analysis using D 10, D 30, D 60 Atterberg Limit Results (LL, PI)
37 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Example of 2 Group Symbol: SM Primary Component (Sand = S) Secondary Description (M = Silty) Primary Components G = Gravel S = Sand M = Silt C = Clay O = Organic Secondary Descriptions (Coarse Grained) M = Silty C = Clayey P = Poorly Graded (same relative grain size) W = Well Graded (different grain sizes) Secondary Descriptions (Fine Grained) L = Low Plasticity (Lean for Clay) H = High Plasticity (Fat for Clay, Elastic for Silt)
38 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Secondary Descriptions (Coarse Grained) M = Silty: > 12% fines, PI<4 or plots below A Line C = Clayey: > 12% fines, PI>7 and plots on or above A line P = Poorly Graded: < 5% fines, C u < 6 and/or 1>C c >3 W = Well Graded: < 5% fines, C u 6 and 1 C c 3
39 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES Three Types of Curves: Poorly Graded (P) Gap Graded Well Graded (W) Gap Graded Figure 2-3. from FHWA NHI
40 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) Secondary Descriptions (Fine Grained) L = Low Plasticity (Lean for Clay) (LL <50%) H = High Plasticity (Fat for Clay, Elastic for Silt) (LL 50%) (e.g. high quality pottery clay)
41 CASAGRANDE PLASTICITY CHART Figure 4. (ASTM D ).
42 CASAGRANDE PLASTICITY CHART SIGNIFICANCE OF ATTERBERG LIMITS I consider it essential that an experienced soils engineer should be able to judge the position of soils, from his territory, on a plasticity chart merely on the basis of his visual and manual examination of the soils. Arthur Casagrande (1959) Figure 2. (NAVFAC DM7.01).
43 USCS COARSE GRAINED SOILS (>50% RETAINED ON #200 SIEVE) Figure 3. ASTM D
44 USCS FINE GRAINED SOILS ( 50% PASSING #200 SIEVE) Figure 1. ASTM D
45 USCS CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE US44 EXPANSION, CARVER, MA Table 1. Sample 1 Grain Size Results (ASTM D422). Sieve No. Dia. (mm) % Passing ½ in # Table 2. Atterberg Limits Results (ASTM D4318). Sample LL PL # # # # # # REQUIRED: Determine the USCS Soil Classification based on the provided soil index testing.
46 USCS CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE
47 USCS CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE
48 USCS CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE Fines classify as MH
49 USCS CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE 88% Sand C u = 5.63 Fines = MH 3% Gravel ANSWER: SP-SM (Poorly Graded Sand with Silt) 9% Fines Figure 3. ASTM D
50 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) ORIGIN (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981): This system was originally developed by Hogentogler and Terzaghi in 1929 as the Public Roads Classification System. Afterwards, there are several revisions. The present AASHTO (1978) system is primarily based on the version in STANDARDS: AASHTO M (2003) Standard Specifications for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes. ASTM D Standard Practice for Classification of Soils and Soil- Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes.
51 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) Comprised of 8 Major Groups: Required Testing: A1 through A7 (with subgroups) Sieve Analysis and Atterberg Limits A8 (Organics) Subgroups determined from Group Index (GI) A1 to A3 A4 to A7 Granular Materials ( 35% passes #200 Sieve) Using LL and PI separates silty materials from clayey materials (only for A2 group) Silt-Clay Materials ( 36% passes #200 Sieve) Using LL and PI separates silty materials from clayey materials General Notes: A-1 materials are well graded, whereas A-3 soils are clean, poorly graded sands. A4 & A5 are generally silts, A6 & A7 are generally clays.
52 STEPS: CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) 1. Determine Grain Size Distribution (AASHTO T-11 & AASHTO T-27) 2. Determine Liquid Limit (AASHTO T-89) 3. Determine Plastic Limit (AASHTO T-90) 4. Classify Soil using Table 2 ASTM 3282 (Left to Right Method, Process of Elimination)
53 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) Go from Left to Right, Process of Elimination Table 2 from ASTM D Standard Practice for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes.
54 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO)
55 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) Group Index (GI): Empirical Formula used to evaluate soils in a group (i.e. subgroup) The first term is determined by the LL GI ( LL 40) 0.01( F 15)( PI 10) ( F 35) F 200 : % Passing #200 Sieve The second term is determined by the PI For Groups A-2-6 and A-2-7 GI 0.01(F )(PI 10) use the second term only In general, the rating for a pavement subgrade is inversely proportional to the group index, GI.
56 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO) Group Index (GI): Empirical Formula used to evaluate soils in a group (i.e. subgroup)
57 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) How does an engineer or geologist identify soils from borings, test pits, or other samples without index testing? ASTM D2488: Description and Identification of Soils (Visual Manual Procedure) Based on USCS (ASTM D2487) Apparatus: - Spatula or Pocket Knife - Small Test Tube (Optional) - Small Hand Lens (i.e. Magnifying Glass) (Optional) Courtesy of Soil Consultants Inc.
58 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 1: Obtain and Prepare Sample for Identification. Obtain sample representative of stratum via an appropriate, accepted, or standard procedure (e.g. D1452, D1587, D1586). D1452: Auger Borings D1586: SPT D1587: Undisturbed Maximum Particle Size 3in 1½in ¾in Min. Specimen Size (Dry Weight) 132 lb (60 kg) 18 lb (8 kg) 2.2 lb (1 kg) Sample retrieved from SPT Split Spoon is typically > 100 g ⅜ in 0.5 lb (200 g) #4 Sieve 0.25 lb (100 g)
59 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 2: Identify Color, Odor (if any), and Texture (coarse grained or fine grained) of Soil. See also Munsell and Humboldt (H-4368) Soil Color Charts.
60 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 3: Identify and Estimate Percentage of Major Soil Constituent. Soil Constituent Max Size Limits Min Familiar Example Boulder > 12in Basketball Cobbles 12in 3in Grapefruit Coarse Gravel 3 ¾in Oranges/Lemons Fine Gravel ¾in #4 (4.75mm) Grapes or Peas Coarse Sand #4 (4.75mm) #10 (2mm) Rock Salt Medium Sand #10 (2mm) #40 (0.42mm) Sugar, Table Salt Fine Sand #40 (0.42mm) #200 (0.075mm) Powdered Sugar Fines < #200 (0.075mm) Talcum Powder
61 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 4: Estimate Percentages of All Other Soil Constituents and Identify by the Following Terms (Estimate to nearest 5%). Term Percent by Weight Some 30% to 45% Little 15% to 25% Few 5% to 10% Trace < 5%
62 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5A: If Major Soil Constituent is Coarse Grained (< 50% Fines). Identify Particle Distribution Well Graded: Soil consists of particle sizes over a wide range. Example: GABC Poorly Graded: Soil consists of particles which are approximately all the same size. Example: Beach Sand Well Graded Poorly Graded
63 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5A: If Major Soil Constituent is Coarse Grained (< 50% Fines). Identify Angularity Smooth curved sides, no edges Rounded Subrounded Nearly plane sides but have well-rounded corners and edges Similar to angular but w/ rounded edges Sharp edges, relatively plane sides with unpolished surfaces Subangular Angular
64 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5A: If Major Soil Constituent is Coarse Grained (< 50% Fines). Identify Group Symbol and Name ASTM D2488 Figure 2
65 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5B: If Major Soil Constituent is Fine Grained ( 50% Fines). Determine Dry Strength: Mold material into minimum of three ½in diameter balls. Add water if necessary. Allow of material to dry in air, sun, or by artificial means as long as temperature does not exceed 60 C. Crush between fingers. Record dry strength as follows: Description None Low Medium High Very High Criteria Crumbles to powder with mere pressure of handling Crumbles with some finger pressure Crumbles with considerable finger pressure Cannot be broken with finger pressure. Can be broken between thumb and hard surface Cannot be broken between thumb and hard surface
66 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5B: If Major Soil Constituent is Fine Grained ( 50% Fines). Determine Dilatancy: Mold ball of material ½in in diameter with soft but not consistency. Add water as necessary. Smooth ball into palm of hand using spatula. Shake horizontally, striking hand with soil with free hand several times. Squeeze sample by closing hand or pinching. Note reactions. Reaction is speed of which water appears while shaking and disappears while squeezing. Description None Slow Rapid Criteria No visible change in specimen Water appears slowly on surface during shaking and does not disappear/disappears slowly upon squeezing Water appears quickly on the surface of the specimen during shaking and disappears quickly upon squeezing
67 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5B: If Major Soil Constituent is Fine Grained ( 50% Fines). Determine Toughness: Roll the samples from the dilatancy tests into a ⅛in diameter thread. Fold thread and reroll it repeatedly until the thread crumbles at a ⅛in diameter. This is the plastic limit. Knead material into lump until it crumbles. Note the pressure required roll the thread at the plastic limit and when material crumbles during kneading. Description Low Medium High Criteria Only slight pressure is required to roll the thread near the plastic limit. Thread and lump are weak and soft. Medium pressure is required to roll the thread near the plastic limit. Thread and lump have medium stiffness. Considerable pressure is required to roll the thread near the plastic limit. Thread and lump have very high stiffness.
68 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5B: If Major Soil Constituent is Fine Grained ( 50% Fines). Identify Plasticity: Soil Symbol Dry Strength Dilatancy Toughness ML None to Low Slow to Rapid Low or Thread cannot be formed CL Medium to High None to Slow Medium MH Low to Medium None to Slow Low to Medium CH High to Very High None High
69 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 5B: If Major Soil Constituent is Fine Grained ( 50% Fines). Identify Group Name and Symbol
70 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 6: Identify Moisture Content Description Dry Moist Wet Saturated Criteria Absence of Moisture, Dusty, Dry to Touch Damp but no visible moisture Soil is clearly wet; water is visible when sample is squeezed Water is easily visible and drains freely from sample
71 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 7A: Soil Classification Checklist: 1. Group Name 2. Group Symbol 3. Percent of cobbles or boulders, or both (by volume) 4. Percent gravel, sand, or fines, or all three (by dry weight) 5. Particle size range: Gravel fine, coarse Sand fine, medium, coarse 5. Particle Angularity 6. Particle Shape (not covered in lab) 7. Maximum Particle Size or Dimension 8. Hardness of coarse sand or larger particles (not covered in lab) 9. Plasticity of fines 10.Dry Strength 11.Dilatancy 12.Toughness
72 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 7A: Soil Classification Checklist: 13.Color 14.Odor 15.Moisture 16.Reaction with HCL (not covered in lab) For intact samples (not covered in lab) 18.Consistency 19.Structure 20.Cementation 21.Local Name 22.Geologic Interpretation 23.Additional Comments Too Much Information for Typical Boring Logs EXAMPLE: Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) About 60 % predominantly fine sand; about 25 % silty fines with low plasticity, low dry strength, rapid dilatancy, and low toughness; about 15 % fine, hard, subrounded gravel, a few gravel-size particles fractured with hammer blow; maximum size, 25 mm; no reaction with HCl (Note Field sample size smaller than recommended).
73 BORING LOG EXAMPLES Courtesy of gint.com Courtesy of Soil Consultants Inc.
74 VISUAL-MANUAL SOIL CLASSIFICATION (USCS) Step 7B: Material Description for SCDOT Boring Logs: a. Relative Density/Consistency b. Moisture Condition c. Color d. Angularity e. HCl Reaction f. Cementation g. Particle-Size Range h. Primary Soil Type (all capital letters) i. USCS Soil Designation j. AASHTO Soil Designation MUNSEL Color Chart Designation LL, PL, PI NMC %#200 Sieve
75 Apparent Density (Coarse Grained) or Consistency (Fine Grained) Based on N value Relative Density (Coarse Grained) Consistency (Fine Grained) Relative Density SPT N (blows/ft) D r (%) Consistency SPT N (blows/ft) Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense > Very Soft 0-2 Soft 3-4 Firm 5-8 Stiff 9-15 Very Stiff Hard > 30
76 CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS
CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)
CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2 Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) Outline of this Lecture 1. Particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 2. Soil classification
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationB-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationIntroduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II
Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II ground SIVA Dr. Attaullah Shah 1 Soil Formation Soil derives from Latin word Solum having same meanings as our modern world. From Geologist point
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering I CE 341
Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341 What do we learn in this course? Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering (1) Formation, Soil Composition, Type and Identification of Soils (2) Soil Structure and Fabric
More informationSOIL FORMATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. Soil Properties and Classification
SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS Soil Properties and Classification Soil Formation Soil Types Particle Size Analysis and Grading Characteristics Consistency Indices Engineering classification
More informationSolution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.
CE353 Soil Mechanics CE353 Lecture 5 Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory SOIL CLASSIFICATION Lecture 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Dr. Talat A Bader Dr. Talat Bader 2 Requirements of a soil Systems Why do we need
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationClay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009
Engineering: What's soil got to do with it? Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG crobinson@wtamu.edu, http://www.wtamu.edu/~crobinson, copyright 2009 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary soil, noun 1 : firm land
More informationSoil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.
Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive
More informationTable of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials
Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials 1.3 Scope of This Book 1.4 Historical Development of Geotechnical
More informationModule 1 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND OF REINFORCED SOIL (Lectures 1 to 4)
Module 1 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND OF REINFORCED SOIL (Lectures 1 to 4) Topics 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis 1.3 SIZE LIMITS FOR SOILS 1.4 WEIGHT-VOLUME
More informationGeotechnical Properties of Soil
Geotechnical Properties of Soil 1 Soil Texture Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05 mm is the approximate
More informationChapter I Basic Characteristics of Soils
Chapter I Basic Characteristics of Soils Outline 1. The Nature of Soils (section 1.1 Craig) 2. Soil Texture (section 1.1 Craig) 3. Grain Size and Grain Size Distribution (section 1.2 Craig) 4. Particle
More information4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)
4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4) 1 What is Consistency? Consistency is a term used to describe the degree of firmness of fine-grained soils (silt and clay). The consistency of fine grained
More informationAPPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests
APPENDIX F 1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS F 1 In-Situ Tests 1. SPT (1) Sand (Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996), = effective vertical stress = effective friction angle = atmosphere pressure (Shmertmann, 1975)
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationShear Strength of Soils
Shear Strength of Soils STRESSES IN A SOIL ELEMENT t s v Analyze Effective Stresses (s ) Load carried by Soil t Where: s H t t s H s = t f = s v = s H = t = s v Stresses in a Soil Element after Figure
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationChapter 6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION, CLASSIFICATION, AND LOGGING
Chapter 6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION, CLASSIFICATION, AND LOGGING Final SCDOT GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL August 2008 Table of Contents Section Page 6.1 Introduction...6-1 6.2 Soil Description and Classificiation...6-1
More informationManual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC
Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI-01-031 Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC Geotechnical Site Characterization July 2001 by Paul W. Mayne,
More informationChapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A
Chapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A 1.1 Introduction Geotechnical Engineer is concerned with predicting / controlling Failure/Stability Deformations Influence of water (Seepage etc.) Soil behavour
More informationCITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014
CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: 13-3-1.32 Contract No.: 11 TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 214 SUBJECT: Addendum No.1 This seventeen (17) page Addendum forms a
More informationCorrelation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification
Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, 39-50 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print version), 1792-9660 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2018 Correlation of unified and AASHTO classification
More informationSoil Properties - I. Amit Prashant. Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar. Short Course on. Geotechnical Aspects of Earthquake Engineering
Soil Properties - I Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Geotechnical Aspects of Earthquake Engineering 04 08 March, 2013 Regional Soil Deposits of India Alluvial deposits
More informationCPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual
CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual 2016 Rocscience Inc. Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Soil Parameter Interpretation... 5 3 Soil Profiling... 11 3.1 Non-Normalized SBT Charts... 11 3.2 Normalized
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationTikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department
Tikrit University SOIL CLASSIFICATION College of Engineering Civil engineering Department Soil Mechanics 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016 Classification of soil is the separation of soil into
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More informationPrinciples of Foundation Engineering 8th Edition Das SOLUTIONS MANUAL
Principles of Foundation Engineering 8th Edition SOLUTIONS MANUAL Full clear download (no formatting errors) at: https://testbankreal.com/download/principles-foundation-engineering- 8th-edition-das-solutions-manual/
More informationGeology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 8. Elementary Soil Mechanics (West, Ch. 7)
Geology 229 Engineering Geology Lecture 8 Elementary Soil Mechanics (West, Ch. 7) Outline of this Lecture 1. Introduction of soil properties 2. Index properties of soils Soil particles Phase relationship
More informationP.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E.
P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. gtv@gemeng.com GEOMECHANICS National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying http://www.ncees.org/ 3 STUDY REFERENCES Foundation Engineering;
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
06 Index properties Review Clay particle-water interaction Identification of clay minerals Sedimentation analysis Hydrometer analysis 0.995 20-40 Hydrometer is a device which is used to measure the specific
More informationSAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST
SAND By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST Definition Sand is a loose, fragmented, naturally-occurring material consisting of vary small particle (fine to medium
More informationTable 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.
Hatanaka and Uchida (1996); ' 20N 20 12N 20 ' 45 A lower bound for the above equation is given as; 12N 15 ' 45 Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation A Angularity 1) A (degrees) Rounded 0
More informationAlaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Alaska Field Guide for Soil Classification
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Alaska Field Guide for Soil Classification Table of Contents Preface... iii 1. Field Classification and Description of Soil Laboratory Classification...
More informationH.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE) Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09
More informationAPPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 529-2017 Template Version: C420170317 - RW APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Quality Engineering Valued Relationships KGS Group 2017 Industrial Street Rehabilitation
More informationNew WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1
88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR
More informationThe process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally
The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as sub surface investigation 2 1 For proper
More informationDr. Ravi Kant mittal. CE C361 Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engg. 1
Dr. Ravi Kant mittal Assistant Professor, BITS Pilani E- Mail: ravi.mittal@rediffmai.com ravimittal@bits-pilani.ac.in Mobile: 9887692025 CE C361 Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engg. 1 Contents Soil Formation
More informationClass Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530
Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530 1-1 General Information Lecturer: Scott A. Barnhill, P.E. Lecture Time: Thursday, 7:10 pm to 9:50 pm Classroom: Kaufmann, Room 224 Office Hour: I have
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationSoil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update
Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update P.K. Robertson Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc., Signal Hill, California, USA ABSTRACT: One of the most common applications of CPT results is to evaluate soil type
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationChapter 2. 53% v. 2.2 a. From Eqs. (2.11) and (2.12), it can be seen that, 2.67
Chapter 2 2.1 d. (87.5)(9.81) (1000)(0.05) 3 17.17 kn/m c. d 1 w 17.17 1 0.15 3 14.93 kn/m G a. Eq. (2.12): s w (2.68)(9.81). 14.93 ; e 0.76 1 e 1 e e 0.76 b. Eq. (2.6): n 0.43 1 e 1 0.76 Vw wgs (0.15)(2.68)
More informationSHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL
Soil Failure Criteria SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL Knowledge about the shear strength of soil important for the analysis of: Bearing capacity of foundations, Slope stability, Lateral pressure on retaining structures,
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More information8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.
8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.2. Some soils show a peak shear strength. Why and what type(s)
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationAssessment of accuracy in determining Atterberg limits for four Iraqi local soil laboratories
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Assessment of accuracy in determining Atterberg limits for four Iraqi local soil laboratories To cite this article: H O Abbas
More informationFebruary 16, 2015 File No Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710
February 16, 2015 File No. 20152738 Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc. 6051 N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Design Memorandum Fresno BPMP Scour Countermeasure
More informationGEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL PROPERTIES FOR WASIT GOVERNORATE
; www.jead.org Vol. 20, No.02, March 2016 ISSN 1813-7822 EVALUATION OF GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL PROPERTIES FOR WASIT GOVERNORATE *Hadeel Majid Hussein Assist Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, Al-Esra'a
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 4, 2011
Undrained response of mining sand with fines contents Thian S. Y, Lee C.Y Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia siawyin_thian@yahoo.com ABSTRACT This
More informationYOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)
Spring 2008 CIVE 462 HOMEWORK #1 1. Print out the syllabus. Read it. Write the grade percentages in the first page of your notes. 2. Go back to your 301 notes, internet, etc. and find the engineering definition
More informationGEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION
GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION Neil Anderson, Ph.D. Professor of Geology and Geophysics Richard W. Stephenson, P.E., Ph.D. Professor of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering University
More informationSOIL MECHANICS-01 LAB COPY INSTRUCTER: ENGR HALLEMA ATAULLAH PREPARED BY: KAMRAN KHAN PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A
PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A IVEN SOIL SAMPLE APPARARUS: 1) Pan 2) Electric balance 3) Electric oven MATERIALS: 1) Soil sample 2) Water RELATED CONCEPTS: Soil: It is an
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationCone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation
Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation Gregg uses a proprietary CPT interpretation and plotting software. The software takes the CPT data and performs basic interpretation in terms of soil behavior
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationSafe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal
Bulletin of the Department of Geology Bulletin of the Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 95 100 Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along
More informationSoils. Technical English - I 10 th week
Technical English - I 10 th week Soils Soil Mechanics is defined as the branch of engineering science which enables an engineer to know theoretically or experimentally the behavior of soil under the action
More informationSite Investigations and Geotechnical Risk For Underground Construction Greg Raines, PE
August 14, 2017 Site Investigations and Geotechnical Risk For Underground Construction Greg Raines, PE Gregory.Raines@Stantec.com Develop Preliminary Geologic / Geotech Conceptual Model for the Project
More informationCE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 5.2. Permeability III (Das, Ch. 6) Summary Soil Index Properties (Das, Ch. 2-6)
CE 40 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 5. Permeability III (Das, Ch. 6) Summary Soil Index Properties (Das, Ch. -6) Outline of this Lecture 1. Getting the in situ hydraulic conductivity 1.1 pumping
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More informationPage 4.1 Overview 4-3
Chapter 4 Contents Page 4.1 Overview 4-3 4.2 Soil Classification 4-3 4.2.1 Coarse Grained Soils 4-4 4.2.2 Fine-Grained Inorganic Soils 4-7 4.2.3 Organic Fine Grained Soils 4-7 4.2.4 Angularity 4-10 4.2.5
More informationTHE CROW CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL CENTER
THE CROW CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL CENTER STRATIGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION FORM INSTRUCTIONS Revised 2/2001 Please fill out a separate Stratigraphic Description Form for each stratum in a stratigraphic profile. Number
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,
More information3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,
More informationA. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2002-2003) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationGeology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2003-2004) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationDRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01
DILL HOLE # BH-BGC3-FN-0 Drill Method: Mud otary/coring Depth To ock (m): N/A Page of 7 eviewed by: AJB 0 GAVEL (GW) Fine to coarse, sandy, well graded, dense, max particle size = 30 mm, angular to subrounded,
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report S-38-50 (Four Holes Road) over I-26 Emergency Bridge Replacement Orangeburg County, South Carolina May 22, 2018 (Revision 1) SCDOT Project ID.: P037465 Terracon Project No. 73155050U
More informationpatersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01
patersongroup May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01 Hydro Ottawa Limited c/o Cresa Toronto 170 University Avenue, Suite 1 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3B3 Attention: Ms. Barbara Wright Consulting Engineers 154 Colonnade
More informationEnhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423
Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization SPT, VST, DMT, PMT, CHT, DHT, CPT Graduate Course CEE 6423 Paul W. Mayne, PhD, P.E. Professor, Geosystems Program Civil & Environmental Engineering
More informationThe Casagrande plasticity chart does it help or hinder the NZGS soil classification process?
Hind, K.J. (2017) The Casagrande plasticity chart does it help or hinder the NZGS soil classification process? Proc. 20 th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier The Casagrande
More informationAppendix E. Phase 2A Geotechnical Data
Appendix E Phase 2A Geotechnical Data Appendix E1 Geotechnical Testing of Sediment ApPENDIX El. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING OF SEDIMENT (Modified from Exponent, 20Q1c) E.I Introduction This appendix presents
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationGeotechnical Testing Methods I
Geotechnical Testing Methods I Ajanta Sachan Assistant Professor Civil Engineering IIT Gandhinagar Hiding World of Geotechnical Engg!! Foundations Shoring Tunneling Soil Exploration Geotechnical Engg Structures
More informationUnbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material
Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material Tuncer B. Edil University of Wisconsin-Madison Recycled Materials Resource Center RMRC Participant Job Description Which
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationThe attitude he maintains in his relation to the engineer is very well stated in his own words:
Su bsurface Soil Exploration, 53: 139 Foundation Engineering Geotechnical companies that have a history of experience in a given region usually have extensive boring logs and maps telling where the borings
More informationConventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods)
Conventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods) Ajanta Sachan Assistant Professor Civil Engineering IIT Gandhinagar Conventional Field Testing 1 Field Test: In-situ shear strength
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationFIGURES 200 200 200 SW 175TH AVE 350 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD SW FRIENDLY LN Area 64 SW ROY ROGERS RD 300 250 SW ONEILL CT SW LUKE LN SW LEEDING LN SW TUSCANY ST SW 164TH AVE SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD SW 164TH AVE
More informationGEOTECHNICAL TESTING OF SEDIMENT
ApPENDIX El. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING OF SEDIMENT (Modified from Exponent, 20Q1c) E.I Introduction This appendix presents information regarding geotechnical testing performed in 2000 on sediments in Onondaga
More informationThe CPT in unsaturated soils
The CPT in unsaturated soils Associate Professor Adrian Russell (UNSW) Mr David Reid (Golder Associates) Prof Nasser Khalili (UNSW) Dr Mohammad Pournaghiazar (UNSW) Dr Hongwei Yang (Uni of Hong Kong) Outline
More informationChapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad
Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad 2017-2016 Chapter Outlines Shear strength in soils Direct shear test Unconfined Compression Test Tri-axial Test Shear Strength The strength of a material is the
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationSci.Int (Lahore), 25(4), , 2013 ISSN ; CODEN: SINTE 8 531
Sci.Int (Lahore), 25(4),531-537, 2013 ISSN 1013-5316; CODEN: SINTE 8 531 PROFILING AND ZONING OF GEOTECHNICAL SUB-SOIL DATA USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Mahmood Ahmad*, Qaiser Iqbal and Fayaz Ahmad
More informationAppendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION JOB NUMBER: 3268.001 DATE: 10-14-13 BY: CC SITE 0 2000 1"=2000' VICINITY MAP CARGILL PARCEL HICKORY STREET AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE NEWARK, CALIFORNIA FOR
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationSOIL AND AGGREGATE FUNDAMENTALS STUDENT GUIDE AMRC April, 2006 AREA MANAGER ROADS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
AREA MANAGER ROADS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM AMRC 2011 SOIL AND AGGREGATE FUNDAMENTALS STUDENT GUIDE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY April, 2006 WPC #28013 07/09 2009 by British Columbia Institute of Technology
More informationMechanistic Investigation of Granular Base and Subbase Materials A Saskatchewan Case Study
Mechanistic Investigation of Granular Base and Subbase Materials A Saskatchewan Case Study Curtis Berthelot, P. Eng. Department of Civil and Geological Engineering University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More information