Paloma Abad LÓPEZ, Emilio; SÁNCHEZ, Alejandra; RODRÍGUEZ, Antonio F; SOTERES, Carolina. September 17

Transcription

1 Paloma Abad LÓPEZ, Emilio; SÁNCHEZ, Alejandra; RODRÍGUEZ, Antonio F; SOTERES, Carolina 1

2 We know Directive 2007/2/EC requires Member States to monitor the implementation and use of their infrastructures for spatial information to report on the implementation of that Directive. Member States should establish: a list of the spatial data sets and spatial data services corresponding to the themes listed in Annexes I, II and III to Directive 2007/2/EC and of the network services grouped by service type 2

3 Monitoring is a powerful tool for INSPIRE: To know the status of the implementation A very interesting overview of the situation of geographic data in our country is obtained. To identify responsible for SDS To identify gaps and overlapping To coordinate the different agents involved To plan the use of the resources To find resources 3

4 To identify the Organizations responsible for the production of official data in each one of the INSPIRE themes SDI of Spain 8 Ministries 17 Autonomous communities SDI Local 4

5 How many spatial data sets are part of the INSPIRE infrastructure? How many of them have metadata? How many of them have compliant metadata? How many of them are discoverable? How many of them are in conformity with INSPIRE? How many of them can be viewed and downloaded? Is necessary to have on overview on the status of the different components of the INSPIRE infrastructure at a certain point in time, but also to monitor its development through time 5

6 In accordance with article 1 of the Directive the identification of the data sets should have been based on the requirements of spatial data for implementation, monitoring assessment and reporting in the various legal acts of the environmental acquis. Extracted from the preliminary documentation for the bilateral meeting between DG ENV and Spain 6

7 Monitoring Indicators What SDS should be on the list? - One SDS for theme at mayor level and national coverage? - there will be 34 SDS - For example: - Transport Network 1:5.000 of Spain - One SDS for theme and scale? - For instance, 6 scales: 1:1M, 1: , 1: , 1:25.000, 1: and 1: there will be 34 x 6 = 204 SDS 7

8 Monitoring Indicators How many SDS should be on the list? - The spatial objects at mayor level and national coverage: - Administrative units has 6 features for theme: - Administrative Units: Administrative Boundary, Administrative Unit, Condominium - Maritime Units: Baseline, Maritime Boundary, Maritime Zone -..There will be 372 features reported 8

9 Monitoring Indicators - The option in Spain was all SDS of all themes, all scales, all levels and all organizations? - It was the method used in the last years monitoring. Year Total SDS Total SDS/Year national nodes 17 regional nodes

10 Monitoring Indicators - This list of SDS were different each year, it depends on the requirements of each year, so SDS of a year aren t same as SDS another year. Year Total SDS The list of SDS isn t established, because the requirement has been different each year. 2. Priority SDS missing 3. Some Spatial Data Sets regional don t cover all territory 4. The detail of SDS aren t the same 10

11 Monitoring Indicators 5. Some responsible for SDS didn t know how to sort their SDS and have troubles doing conformance the SDS Street furniture Jellyfish watching Production of molluscs zones House Forest Inventory Pharmacies III.5 - Human health and safety III.6 - Utility and governmental services III.7 - Environmental monitoring facilities III.11 - Area management / Restriction / Regulation zones and reporting units III.19 - Species distribution 11

12 Monitoring Indicators 6. The most of Data sets on the list aren t conformant Year Total SDS % Conformity, DSi % % % % % % ,81% 12

13 This situation give a correct idea of the real status of the overall infrastructure. Spain hadn t identified their spatial data relevant to environmental policies 80% of SDS have metadata and access through discovery service. SDS isn t in conformity with the implementing rules on data specifications (1.81%) Conformity of network services was 16,81% the accessibility of spatial data sets was 26,12% 13

14 Spain has draw up an Action Plan. the main concern is the involvement of the environmental community in the implementation of the INSPIRE Directive the involvement of national representatives and other relevant stakeholders related to environmental activities. find priority environmental data. Which are the sectors of stakeholders are still missing to contribute to the implementation of INSPIRE? To report SDS with national cover The conformity of all SDS for annex I will be 100% in November

15 This Action Plan has also establishes All metadata: 100% compliant by end of 15 th may of 2016 accessible through the same discovery services All SDS annex I will be 100% conformity by end of November 2017 At least, one INSPIRE compliant spatial dataset at national level To remove perceptions that the organizations have the complexity of INSPIRE implementation Annex I 15

16 Spain has defined the list at the national level, taking into account all the data custodians that provide data sets or services that can contribute to the infrastructure of INSPIRE Number of SDS Decrease of SDS Annex I Annex II Annex III All SDS for all Annexes

17 To increase the conformity of metadata and SDS and the accessibility of SDS Number of SDS for all Annexes % of SDS that has metadata 96% 100% % of SDS that has conformant metadata 84,4% 100% Accessibility of spatial data sets through - view services - download services Total: 29,12% /1435 (73,37%) - 425/1435 (29,61%) Total: 62,36% - 260/279 (93,18%) - 188/279 (67,38%) 17

18 Number of SDS for all Annexes Conformity of SDS for Annex I 18/305 (5,9%) 18/48 (37,5%) Conformity of SDS for Annex II 3/220 (1,36%) 5/22 (22,72%) Conformity of SDS for Annex III 5/910 (0,54%) 5/209 (2,39%) Conformity of SDS for all annexes 26/1435 (1,81%) 28/279 (10,03%) 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% % 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2016 Annex I Annex II Annex III

19 Number of services % of Service that have metadata 92,8% 100% % of Services that have conformant 73,4% 100% metadata % of Conformity of network services 16,81% 12,74% 19

20 Where are these SDS and services? Official Catalogue of INSPIRE Dataset and Services (CODSI) There are SDS and services according to Action Plan CSW CSW INSPIRE official monitoring dashboards: tool to register and evaluate the level of INSPIRE conformance of a set of INSPIRE services of a country. Export the XML based on harvested record. 20

21 The next step Action Plan 1. To continue setting the list SD and service Finalize list of priority data set and to help identify needs to environment SDS Identify SDS with national coverage 2. To meet the deadline of Inspire Directive SDS for annex I: November 2017 SDS for annex II and III: To coordinate the responsible for SDS The last questions, Is this Action Plan similar to another action plans from others countries? 21

22 22