Cumulative weight retained

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Cumulative weight retained"

Bryce Eaton
5 years ago
Views:

1 A sample of 1000 g of soil from a site was performed sieve analysis. The weights of soil collected on each sieve are presented in the tabular entry. Find effective diameter, D 30, D 60 and coefficients of uniformity and curvature. IS sieve number Sieve size (mm) Weight of Soil on each sieve (g) Cumulative weight retained % Cumulative weight retained % Finer Receiver Total 1000 Fig. 8 : Particle size distribution curve

2 c) Sedimentation Analysis It is also called wet analysis and is applicable for fine grained soils The analysis is based on Stoke s law which states that the velocity at which soil particles settle in a suspension depend on shape, size and weight of particles. Assuming spherical particles and same density, v D 2 v 1 D 2 s 1 2 (G 1) D Here, v = Terminal velocity of sinking soil particle D = Diameter of soil particle γ s = Unit weight of soil solids γ w = Unit weight of water G = Specific Gravity of Soil Solids η = Viscosity of water The particles are assumed to settle independent of each other and without the interference of wall of container. Based on the velocity of settlement, the diameter of soil particles may be computed. For the purpose of evaluating velocity of settlement of soil particles, hydrometer analysis is performed. d) Hydrometer analysis A hydrometer is a device made of glass, consisting of a bulb with calibrated weight and stem with calibrated readings such that when placed in pure water it floats at a level giving reading If it floats in a denser fluid, the readings are greater than 1 (up to 1.030).

3 Fig. 9 : Determination of grain size distribution from Hydrometer test Effective depth He of hydrometer depends on volume of hydrometer (V h ), height of bulb (h), cross sectional area of jar (A) and hydrometer reading (R h ). Height above the ease of the stem (H) is a function of R h. H e is given by, H H 1 (h V h ) e 2 A. Hence, calibration curve for hydrometer is prepared prior to the test as shown. Fig. 10 : Determination of grain size distribution from Hydrometer test

Fig. 11 : Determination of grain size distribution from Hydrometer test e) Correction for Hydrometer reading The recorded hydrometer depending in the situation.

Rh is taken to upper meniscus and correction is applied. The correction is always positive. C t : Correction for temperature Hydrometer is calibrated at 27oC.

4 Fig. 11 : Determination of grain size distribution from Hydrometer test e) Correction for Hydrometer reading The recorded hydrometer depending in the situation. reading may require the following corrections C m : Correction for meniscus The solution containing soil will be opaque. Hence, it is difficult to obtain reading corresponding to lower meniscus. Rh is taken to upper meniscus and correction is applied. The correction is always positive. C t : Correction for temperature Hydrometer is calibrated at 27oC. If the laboratory temperature is higher, the liquid will be less viscous and hydrometer sinks more. Rh will be less than actual needing positive correction. Similarly, low laboratory temperature requires negative correction. C d : Correction for dispersing agent A dispersing agent is added to water to disperse the soil particles and allow them to settle individually. Dispersing agent increases the density of water and hydrometer floats higher. Therefore the correction is always negative. Hence, corrected hydrometer reading R R h C m C t C d

5 Here, R h is the observed hydrometer reading. The three corrections are known as composite correction (C). R R h C R h C m C t C d Here, C C m C t C d From the hydrometer reading R, diameter D of soil particle and corresponding percentage finer are computed. Limitations of Hydrometer Analysis Assumption Sphere particle Single particle Many particles in the suspension Terminal velocity Reality Platy particle (clay particle) as D 0.005mm (No interference between particles & wall) Known specific gravity of particles Average results of all the minerals in the particles, including the adsorbed water films. A soil sample of particle size ranging from mm to mm is put on top of the water surface in a tank. Depth of water in the tank is 3 m. Estimate the time required for the first particle and also the entire sample to reach the bottom of tank. Assume μ = 0.01 poise and G = 2.7 Note: μ = Absolute viscosity (Poise) 1 Poise = 1 N-s/m 2 /g = 1 N/m-s Viscosity η = μ/g 1 N/m-s/9.8 m/s 2 = N-s/m 2 Data μ = 0.01 Poise η = N-s/m 2 = 1.02X10-6 kn-s/m 2 G = 2.7 γ ω = 9.8 kn/m 3 First particle to settle has diameter mm Velocity v = X 10-3 m/s In a tank of water depth 3 m, time taken for settling = s Last particle to settle has diameter mm Velocity v = 8.17 X 10-6 m/s

In a tank of water depth 3 m, time taken for settling =

4 Consistency Limits v 1 D 2 (G 1) 18 Engineering

stiff, medium stiff, soft, very soft with increasing

Atterberg, a Swedish agriculturist in 1911 observed four

6 In a tank of water depth 3 m, time taken for settling = s Consistency Limits v 1 D 2 (G 1) 18 Engineering Characterization of Soils Consistency is the relative ease with which soil can be deformed. It is applicable to fine grained soils whose consistency depends on water content. Relative consistency can be expressed as very stiff, stiff, medium stiff, soft, very soft with increasing water content. Atterberg, a Swedish agriculturist in 1911 observed four states of consistency, namely, Liquid state, Plastic state, Semi solid state and Solid state in clayey soil with changing water content. He set arbitrary limits for these states called consistency or atterberg limits.

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department Tikrit University SOIL CLASSIFICATION College of Engineering Civil engineering Department Soil Mechanics 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016 Classification of soil is the separation of soil into