High Bicoid levels render the terminal system dispensable for Drosophila head development

Transcription

1 Development 127, (2000) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 DEV High Bicoid levels render the terminal system dispensable for Drosophila head development Valérie Schaeffer 1, *, Darrell Killian 1, Claude Desplan 1, and Ernst A. Wimmer 2 1 Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York NY USA 2 Lehrstuhl Genetik, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany *Present address: EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, Germany Author for correspondence ( claude.desplan@nyu.edu) Accepted 26 June; published on WWW 22 August 2000 SUMMARY In Drosophila, the gradient of the Bicoid (Bcd) morphogen organizes the anteroposterior axis while the ends of the embryo are patterned by the maternal terminal system. At the posterior pole, expression of terminal gap genes is mediated by the local activation of the Torso receptor tyrosine kinase (Tor). At the anterior, terminal gap genes are also activated by the Tor pathway but Bcd contributes to their activation. Here we present evidence that Tor and Bcd act independently on common target genes in an additive manner. Furthermore, we show that the terminal maternal system is not required for proper head development, since high levels of Bcd activity can functionally rescue the lack of terminal system activity at the anterior pole. This observation is consistent with a recent evolution of an anterior morphogenetic center consisting of Bcd and anterior Tor function. Key words: bicoid, Morphogen, torso, Terminal system, Patterning, Drosophila INTRODUCTION The establishment of the Drosophila basic body plan is directed along the anteroposterior axis by three sets of maternal genes: the anterior, posterior and terminal systems (reviewed in St Johnston and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1992). The anterior and posterior systems depend on localized mrnas, such as bicoid (bcd) and nanos, whereas the terminal system requires the localized generation of an extracellular ligand that activates the receptor tyrosine kinase Torso (Tor) (Klingler et al., 1988; Sprenger and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1992; Casanova and Struhl, 1993). The torsolike (tsl) gene is expressed and required in somatic follicle cells at each end of the maturing oocyte, and is involved in generating the localized terminal signal (Stevens et al., 1990; Savant-Bhonsale and Montell, 1993; Martin et al., 1994). The trunk gene is required in the female germline and is likely to encode the extracellular Tor ligand (Casanova et al., 1995). Mutations in any of these three genes cause identical phenotypes that affect both ends of the embryo: lack of the most anterior structures (labrum, dorsal bridge) and of all structures posterior to the seventh abdominal segment (A7) (Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1986a; Klingler et al., 1988; Stevens et al., 1990). Ligand-bound Tor acts through the Ras/Raf pathway to activate the Rolled MAP kinase (MAPK) (reviewed in Perrimon and Desplan, 1994), and results in the expression of zygotic target genes, such as huckebein (hkb) and tailless (tll), at both poles of the embryo (Pignoni et al., 1990; Brönner et al., 1994). However, the genetic analysis of these target genes (Weigel et al., 1990), the analysis of the regulatory region of tll (Rudolph et al., 1997), and the isolation of posteriorly restricted, terminal system-dependent genes (Kispert et al., 1994; Vorbrüggen et al., 1997) all indicate major differences in the response to the terminal system between the anterior and the posterior poles. Such differences in the patterning function of the terminal system are expected as, in many short-germband insects, the anteriormost parts of the oocyte give rise to extraembryonic membranes and are probably dispensable for pattern formation (Sander, 1994). At the anterior of the Drosophila embryo, the terminal system acts in the presence of the morphogens Bcd and Hunchback (Hb), which are absent in the posterior half of the early embryo. While no interactions between Hb and the terminal system have been described so far, several influences of the terminal system on the function of Bcd have been identified. bcd mrna is localized to the anterior pole (Berleth et al., 1988) and a gradient of Bcd forms by diffusion of the translated protein (Driever and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1988). The homeodomain-containing transcription factor Bcd (Berleth et al., 1988) then regulates target genes like the gap genes hunchback (hb) and orthodenticle (otd) in a concentrationdependent manner (Driever et al., 1989; Struhl et al., 1989) and acts as a translational repressor of the posterior gene caudal (Dubnau and Struhl, 1996; Rivera-Pomar et al., 1996; Chan and Struhl, 1997). Complete lack of bcd activity results in the loss of head and thorax, which are replaced by posterior terminal structures, whereas hypomorphic bcd alleles, similar to terminal mutants, only lack labrum and dorsal bridge (Frohnhöfer and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1986).

2 3994 V. Schaeffer and others Identical phenotypes are also caused by mutations in the genes exuperantia (exu) and swallow, which lead to a failure of proper anterior localization of the bcd mrna, resulting in reduction of bcd activity (Frohnhöfer and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1987). Thus, lack of terminal system activity and hypomorphic bcd situations cause very similar anterior phenotypes, which suggests that the anterior and terminal maternal systems are linked or share common targets. There are several interactions between the terminal system and Bcd. First, most Bcd target genes that are expressed as an anterior cap in the early syncytial embryo later retract from the tip of the embryo (Ronchi et al., 1993). This retraction depends on the terminal system and appears to be important for the correct development of the anterior regions of the embryo (Janody et al., 2000b). In this respect, it is interesting to note that Bcd is phosphorylated in a tor-dependent manner, possibly indicating a direct modification of Bcd activity by the tor pathway (Ronchi et al., 1993). However, this modification does not appear to be involved in the downregulation of Bcd activity at the pole (Janody et al., 2000a). Although this observation suggests a negative interaction between Tor and Bcd, analysis of the regulation of several bcd-dependent head gap genes reveals that tor activity can also act positively in potentiating the activator function of Bcd (Grossniklaus et al., 1994; Wimmer et al., 1995; Gao et al., 1996). As mentioned above, tor, weak bcd and exu mutants have very similar phenotypes. However, tor exu double mutants exhibit a strong enhancement of the anterior phenotype with almost no head structures left, arguing that the terminal and the anterior systems function by additive pathways (Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1986b). These additive but independent activities of the terminal and anterior systems are also revealed by the analysis of hkb regulation, as either tor or bcd activity alone can activate hkb, while both activities together enhance hkb expression at the anterior pole (Brönner and Jäckle, 1996). hkb is not expressed in tor, bcd double mutants. Therefore, hkb behaves as a common target gene that can be activated independently by either the terminal or the anterior maternal system. Here, we present further evidence that tor and bcd act on common target genes independently in an additive manner. Moreover, we show that the terminal maternal system is not required for proper head development, as high levels of Bcd can functionally rescue the lack of terminal system activity at the anterior pole. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bcd deletion constructs and transgenic fly lines Bcd A and Bcd QAC transgenic lines were described previously (Schaeffer et al., 2000). The lines with the strongest rescue ability were chosen for further analysis. We used an X-chromosome carrying two wild-type bcd rescue constructs (bcd +5 bcd +8, gift from W. Driever) for the rescue experiment with the tsl 4 and trk alleles. The rescue experiment with the tor RX allele used a line carrying two wildtype bcd rescue constructs on the third chromosome (tor RX ; BB 6+10 line, gift from G. Struhl). Whole-mount in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and cuticular preparations Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes for in situ hybridization were prepared as described in Schaeffer et al. (1999). The hb probe was prepared from a 2 kb fragment of the hb gene (gift from Steve Small) linearized by BamHI and transcribed by T7. The lacz probe was prepared from a 2 kb fragment of the lacz gene (gift from Jessica Treisman) linearized by PstI and transcribed by T3. The hkb probe was prepared from a 1.8 kb fragment of the hkb gene (gift from Ronald Kühnlein) linearized by EcoRI and transcribed by T7. In situ hybridization on whole-mount embryos were performed as originally described (Tautz and Pfeifle, 1989) with adaptation from M. Klingler. Prehybridization and hybridization were performed at 70 C at ph 5. Embryos were mounted either in methyl salicilate: Canada balsam (1:2) or Aqua-Mount (Lerner Laboratories) and photographed using Nomarski optics. Cuticular preparations were performed as previously described in Nüsslein-Volhard et al. (1984). The rabbit-anti-bcd antibody (a gift from Gary Struhl) was used 1:1000 and revealed by goat-anti-rabbit biotinylated antibody (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories) used 1:500 followed by a diaminobenzidine revelation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION tor mutants do not affect the rescue potential of a truncated Bcd protein The terminal maternal system directly modifies Bcd by phosphorylation at several MAPK sites in a Ser/Thr (S/T)-rich region located between the homeodomain and the identified transcriptional activation domains (Ronchi et al., 1993; Janody et al., 2000a). A deletion variant of Bcd that lacks all these activation domains but still contains the S/T-rich region (Bcd QAC) is able to rescue to viability bcd loss-of-function mutants (Schaeffer et al., 1999). Hence, it is conceivable that the ability of the tor pathway to create negative charges through phosphorylation of this region of Bcd might result in an acidicrich transcriptional activation domain that compensates for the loss of all the other activation domains. If this were the case, then the transcriptional activity of the Bcd QAC deletion variant should be highly dependent on tor function. To test this hypothesis, we assayed the ability of a Bcd QAC transgene to rescue the bcd phenotype in embryos derived from bcd tsl double mutant mothers. Bcd QAC rescues the bcd phenotype of the bcd tsl double mutant similarly to a wild-type bcd transgene, resulting in a tsl only phenotype (Fig. 1A-C). Since Bcd QAC is functionally independent of the tor pathway, we concluded that the terminal system is not responsible for its activation potential. This result is also consistent with the notion that, in transient transfection experiments and transgenic studies, Bcd transcriptional activity is not significantly modified by mutations of the putative MAPK consensus sites (Janody et al., 2000a; Niessing et al., 1999). Thus, the described direct modification of Bcd by the tor pathway does not appear to be necessary for its function. Bcd is not a direct target of the terminal system tor function is necessary to allow a normal expression pattern of most Bcd target genes: many Bcd target genes such as otd are expressed in a reduced anterior domain in tor mutants (Gao et al., 1996). Furthermore, the expression domain of these genes is expanded in tor gain-of-function backgrounds, again suggesting that the tor pathway potentiates Bcd function. This effect could be direct, as Bcd transcriptional activity might be enhanced by direct modification of the protein (for instance by

3 High levels of Bcd rescue anterior Tor function 3995 Fig. 1. Truncated Bcd variant rescues the bcd phenotype in absence of terminal system. (A) A wild-type bcd construct completely rescues the bcd E1 phenotype. (B) A wild-type bcd construct rescues the bcd phenotype of an embryo from bcd E1 tsl 1 background and produces a classical terminal phenotype: the embryo lacks the labrum and the dorsal bridge (arrowhead) as well as all structures posterior to the seventh abdominal segment (A7) including anal plates, tuft, spiracles and Filzkörper. (C) Deletion of the QAC domains of Bcd does not affect the ability of Bcd to rescue the bcd E1 phenotype in the absence of the terminal maternal system activity, since a typical terminal system phenotype is detected when rescuing the bcd E1 tsl 1 double mutant. In all panels, anterior is to the left and dorsal is up. phosphorylation). Alternatively, the effect might be indirect as most Bcd target promoters might also be responsive to Tor through distinct elements. A direct effect should be detectable with simply organized Bcd target promoters that only contain Bcd-response elements and no Tor-response elements. The proximal hb promoter (P2) resembles such a simple Bcd-response element, which uses activators to set an expression border without the assistance of repressors (Driever and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1989; Struhl et al., 1989; Simpson-Brose et al., 1994; Wimmer et al., 2000). We could show that the hb P2 promoter is not directly responsive to the terminal pathway as, in the absence of Tor activity, the posterior border of hb expression moves only very slightly towards the anterior (Fig. 2A,B) and, in tor gain-of-function embryos (tor 4021 ; Klingler et al., 1988), the posterior expression border does not respond significantly to ubiquitously activated Tor (Fig. 2C). However, the hb P2 promoter is still 300 bp long and might contain elements that are not well defined, and the hb pattern is very dynamic. Therefore, we used in addition an artificial Bcd responder gene whose promoter elements are all known. This promoter contains only Bcd and Hb binding sites (Bcd3Hb3-LacZ; Simpson-Brose et al., 1994), and its expression is reminiscent of the hb P2 promoter, with an anterior cap expression domain from 100% to 65% EL (Fig. 2D; Simpson-Brose et al., 1994). If Bcd were a direct target of Fig. 2. Expression of hb and an artificial Bcd responder gene in terminal mutants. (A) hb is normally transcribed in a broad anterior domain as well as in a more restricted posterior domain. (B) In the absence of tsl activity, the posterior border of hb expression moves very slightly (1.7% EL) towards the anterior while the posterior domain disappears completely. (C) In a tor 4021 background, the posterior expression border of the anterior domain is not modified as compared to the wild-type situation while the posterior hb stripe is dramatically expanded. (D) An artificial Bcd responder gene (Bcd3Hb3-lacZ) mediates an anterior cap expression domain form 100%-65% EL, as seen with lacz mrna expression. (E) This expression pattern is not modified in a Tor 4021 background. Tor, the posterior border of the reporter gene expression domain should move in response to a tor gain-of-function allele. However, the expression pattern does not change in a tor 4021 background (Fig. 2E). This argues for a Bcd activator function that is not under direct control of the terminal system. Thus, Bcd and Tor seem to be part of two independent pathways, which share common target genes. Rescue of the anterior terminal phenotype by a bcd transgene When we assayed a complete series of Bcd deletion variants (Schaeffer et al., 1999) for their ability to rescue the bcd lossof-function phenotype in the absence of terminal system activity, we found one transgenic line that not only rescued the bcd phenotype but also the anterior part of the tsl phenotype (labrum and dorsal bridge), resulting in a posterior terminal mutant phenotype only (Fig. 3A). This particular transgenic

4 3996 V. Schaeffer and others line carried a bcd variant that deletes an alanine-rich domain (Bcd A) and had previously been shown to activate the bcd target gene hb in a widely enlarged expression domain (Schaeffer et al., 1999). Using Bcd immunostaining, we could show that this transgenic line exhibits levels of Bcd that are approximately 2- to 3-fold higher than wild type (Fig. 3B,C). Since other Bcd A lines did not exhibit the same ability to rescue the tsl phenotype, we concluded that the higher expression level of this particular line rather than the lack of a specific negative protein element (alanine-rich domain) is responsible for overcoming the requirement for the terminal pathway at the anterior. High expression levels of Bcd are able to rescue the anterior terminal phenotype To further address whether high levels of bcd activity are sufficient to rescue the anterior terminal system phenotype or, if only a particular Bcd deletion variant is capable thereof, we tested the ability of increased doses of wild-type bcd transgenes to rescue several terminal mutant backgrounds. Since the previous experiments were performed with the tsl 1 allele, which might only represent a strong hypomorphic allele rather than a null, we included another tsl mutant, tsl 4, that is among the strongest in the allelic series, as well as null mutant alleles of the terminal genes trk and tor. To increase the Bcd expression level, we used flies containing an X chromosome or a third chromosome each carrying two wild-type bcd rescue constructs (bcd +5 bcd +8 ; W. Driever, personal communication and BB 6+10, Struhl et al., 1989), which allowed us to obtain flies carrying up to six copies of bcd. The phenotypes of all Fig. 3. Highly expressed Bcd deletion variant rescues terminal system phenotype. (A) A transgenic Bcd A line promotes the rescue of the anterior terminal phenotype: all structures posterior to the seventh abdominal segment (A7) are missing while the labrum and the dorsal bridge (arrowhead) are recovered. Immunostaining for Bcd in (B) a wild-type embryo, and (C) an embryo from a female homozygous for bcd E1 with two copies of the rescuing Bcd A line, showing that this line mediates two to three times higher Bcd levels than wild type. terminal mutants (tsl, trk or tor) are similar: lack of labrum and dorsal bridge in the anterior and deletion of all structures posterior to A7 (Fig. 4A,B; data not shown). Four copies of the bcd gene were able to rescue anterior structures including labrum and dorsal bridge in about 40% of all (80% of analyzable) embryos derived from a tsl 4 mutant background, while the posterior terminal phenotype was unaffected (Fig. 4C,D). Six copies of bcd were necessary to obtain the same anterior rescue in about 15% of all (55% of analyzable) embryos derived from trk mutants (Fig. 4E,F) and in about 5% of all (45% of analyzable) embryos derived from tor mutants (Fig. 4G,H). However, not all embryos with rescued labrum and dorsal bridge had a perfectly aligned head skeleton. This might be due to incomplete rescue, but it could also be due to Bcd-mediated overexpression of hb at the anterior pole, which results in terminal-like phenotypes (Janody et al., 2000b). Actually 50%, 70% or 85% of the head cuticles of tsl, trk or tor, respectively, could not be analyzed for rescue due to severe anterior defects, which seemed more severe than normal terminal phenotypes. Nonetheless, some of the rescued embryos (less than 2%) were able to hatch and move around, which suggests complete anterior rescue. These probably represent embryos where just enough Bcd was present to overcome the lack of the terminal system but not too much to induce the phenotype due to high ectopic expression of hb. All larvae died within 2 hours, likely due to the posterior terminal defects. It should be noted that very few embryos exhibited the type of abdominal segment fusions that have been described for embryos derived from mothers carrying excess copies of the bcd gene (Busturia and Lawrence, 1994). This might be due to the lack of terminal system function at the posterior pole in our experiments. Since no tail is made, there is probably more space for fate-map shifts towards the posterior, resulting in the correct establishment of abdominal segments A1 to A6. The rescue of the anterior terminal phenotype by high levels of bcd further indicates that the major role of the anterior terminal system is the potentiation of Bcd activity. High-level Bcd activity restores hkb expression levels In the posterior region of the embryo, the tor pathway activates the zygotic effectors tll and hkb, which are sufficient to specify the most posterior anlagen and the gut of the larva (Weigel et al., 1990). At the anterior, the function of the terminal system is more difficult to interpret and, in tor mutants, hkb expression is only reduced. It actually requires bcd tsl double mutants to lose all anterior hkb expression (Brönner and Jäckle, 1996), which indicates additive functions of the anterior and terminal systems on this common target gene. hkb seems particularly interesting in this context, as its function is required for the formation of the labrum (Schmidt-Ott et al., 1994): Reduction of hkb expression, as observed in terminal mutant background (Fig. 5A,B; Brönner and Jäckle, 1996) leads to the deletion of this particular structure. Therefore, we asked whether the rescue of anterior structures (e.g. the labrum) mediated by high levels of Bcd in terminal system mutants was correlated with the restoration of the hkb expression pattern. Expression of hkb is first detected in the terminal regions (anterior and posterior) of the syncytial blastoderm (Fig. 5A). In terminal mutant embryos, the posterior domain is absent, whereas the anterior domain is

5 High levels of Bcd rescue anterior Tor function 3997 Fig. 4. Rescue of terminal group mutant phenotypes by increased bcd copy number. (A,B) Embryo from a tsl 4 mother in a wild-type bcd situation; (C,D) embryo from a tsl 4 mother with four copies of wild-type bcd; (E,F) embryo from a trk mother with six copies of wild-type bcd; (G,H) embryo from a tor RX mother with six copies of wild-type bcd. (B,D,F,H) Enlargements from the respective left panels. All the embryos bear the posterior terminal phenotype (A,C,E,G, open arrows). The anterior terminal phenotype is shown in B: the labrum and the dorsal bridge (arrowhead) are missing. (D,F,H) Rescue of the labrum (arrows) and the dorsal bridge (arrowheads) is achieved by higher doses of bcd. reduced (Fig. 5B). In a tsl background with four or six copies of bcd, however, hkb expression extends further towards the posterior (Fig. 5C,D). Hence, the level of hkb expression could be regained by increasing the levels of Bcd in a terminal system mutant, even though its exact expression domain could not be restored (compare Fig. 5A with D). It is likely that fatemap shifts are able to absorb the slightly changed expression domain of hkb. This suggests that the lack of terminal system activity at the anterior can simply be overcome by another system through enhancement of transcriptional activation of common target genes. Tor has been shown to antagonize Grouchomediated repression of genes such as hkb and tll (Paroush et al., 1997), probably by acting on the HMG-box transcription factor Capicua (Jimenez et al., 2000). Therefore, it is likely that Tor enhances Bcd activity by derepression, i.e. the inactivation of potential repressors of Bcd target genes, and thereby rendering any transcriptional activator more potent. As the cis-regulatory control regions of most developmental genes comprise both repressor and activator sites, the inactivation of potential repressors should lead to enhanced expression, or enlarged expression domains, as observed for several bcd target genes in a tor gain-of-function background (Grossniklaus et al., 1994; Wimmer et al., 1995; Gao et al., 1996). No need for evolutionary conservation of an anterior morphogenetic center As bcd and tor appear to function independently of each other, it is conceivable that anterior tor activity could also enhance the function of other transcriptional activators through derepression. Therefore, in long-germband insects that might lack a true bcd homolog, the anterior terminal system could also assist other activators, like homologs of Otd or Hb. Moreover, the fact that, in certain situations in the Drosophila embryo, anterior Tor activity can be dispensable for proper head development, is consistent with the observation that a posterior morphogenetic center is more frequently found in insects than an anterior center. Although flies accumulate bcd mrna and tor activity at the anterior pole of the egg, this Fig. 5. Anterior hkb mrna pattern in terminal mutants rescued by increased bcd. (A) In wild types, mrna expression of hkb is first detected in the terminal regions (anterior and posterior) of the syncytial blastoderm. (B) The anterior cap retracts towards the anterior by 2% in a tsl 4 background whereas the posterior domain disappears completely. (C) The anterior domain extends towards the posterior by 2.5% in a tsl 4 background with four bcd copies, (D) and by 7% in a tsl 4 background with six bcd copies.

6 3998 V. Schaeffer and others might not be useful for most short-germband insects as their embryos develop in the posterior part of the egg. In this case, the anterior of the embryo is far away from the anterior of the egg and the morphogenetic role of bcd and tor would not be effective in patterning the head. In Tribolium castaneum, an intermediate-germband beetle, the activity of the terminal system is conserved at the anterior of the embryo, but it does not appear to have a specific function for pattern formation (Schröder et al., 2000). Correspondingly, the tll homolog of Tribolium is only expressed at the posterior pole of the embryo (Schröder et al., 2000). This is in contrast to Drosophila, where tll is expressed at both poles of the early embryo (Pignoni et al., 1990). Moreover, in spite of arguments supporting the presence of a bcd-like function in Tribolium (Wolff et al., 1998), no bcd homologous gene has been identified outside higher diptera (Schröder and Sander, 1993; Stauber et al., 1999) notwithstanding its homeodomain and its location in the Hox cluster (Berleth et al., 1988). It is therefore reasonable to assume that an anterior morphogenetic center consisting of Bcd and anterior Tor activity is not a general feature of insects. We acknowledge the members of the Desplan laboratory for their constant support during this work, in particular, Terry Turner for her technical assistance. We thank W. Driever, R. Kühnlein, S. Small, G. Struhl and J. Treisman for fly stocks and plasmids. We also thank Nathalie Dostatni for important comments and discussion on the experiments and Matthieu Schaeffer for his help as a summer student. V. S. thanks Christine Dambly-Chaudière for her constant support and encouragement. V. S. was supported by a fellowship from the French Ministère de la Recherche and E. A. W. by a fellowship from HFSPO. This work was initiated with support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Rockefeller University. It was then supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation NSF IBN REFERENCES Berleth, T., Burri, M., Thoma, G., Bopp, D., Richstein, S., Frigerio, G., Noll, M. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1988). The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 7, Brönner, G., Chu-LaGraff, Q., Doe, C. Q., Cohen, B., Weigel, D., Taubert, H. and Jäckle, H. (1994). Sp1/egr-like zinc-finger protein required for endoderm specification and germ-layer formation in Drosophila. Nature 369, Brönner, G. and Jäckle, H. (1996). Regulation and function of the terminal gap gene huckebein in the Drosophila blastoderm. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 40, Busturia, A. and Lawrence, P. A. (1994). Regulation of cell number in Drosophila. Nature 370, Casanova, J., Furriols, M., McCormick, C. A. and Struhl, G. (1995). Similarities between trunk and spätzle, putative extracellular ligands specifying body pattern in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 9, Casanova, J. and Struhl, G. (1993). The torso receptor localizes as well as transduces the spatial signal specifying terminal body pattern in Drosophila. Nature 362, Chan, S. K. and Struhl, G. (1997). Sequence-specific RNA binding by bicoid. Nature 388, 634. Driever, W. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1988). A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 54, Driever, W. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1989). The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 337, Driever, W., Thoma, G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1989). Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, Dubnau, J. and Struhl, G. (1996). RNA recognition and translational regulation by a homeodomain protein. Nature 379, Frohnhöfer, H. G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1986). Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid. Nature 324, Frohnhöfer, H. G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1987). Maternal genes required for the anterior localization of bicoid activity in the embryo of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1, Gao, Q., Wang, Y. and Finkelstein, R. (1996). Orthodenticle regulation during embryonic head development in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 56, Grossniklaus, U., Cadigan, K. M. and Gehring, W. J. (1994). Three maternal coordinate systems cooperate in the patterning of the Drosophila head. Development 120, Janody, F., Sturny, R., Catala, F., Desplan, C. and Dostatni, N. (2000a). Phosphorylation of Bicoid on MAP-kinase sites: Contribution to its interaction with the torso pathway. Development 127, Janody, F., Reischl, J. and Dostatni, N. (2000b). Persistence of the Hunchback morphogen at the anterior pole of the Drosophila blastoderm impairs terminal development. Development 97, Jimenez, G., Guichet, A., Ephrussi, A. and Casanova. J. (2000). Relief of gene repression by Torso RTK signaling: role of capicua in Drosophila terminal and dorso-ventral patterning. Genes Dev. 14, Kispert, A., Herrmann, B. G., Leptin, M. and Reuter, R. (1994). Homologs of the mouse Brachyury gene are involved in the specification of posterior terminal structures in Drosophila, Tribolium, and Locusta. Genes Dev. 8, Klingler, M., Erdelyi, M., Szabad, J. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1988). Function of torso in determining the terminal anlagen of the Drosophila embryo. Nature 335, Martin, J. R., Raibaud, A. and Ollo, R. (1994). Terminal pattern elements in Drosophila embryo induced by the torso-like protein. Nature 367, Niessing, D., Dostatni, N., Jäckle, H. and Rivera-Pomar, R. (1999). Sequence interval within the PEST motif of bicoid is important for translational repression of caudal mrna in the anterior region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 18, Nüsslein-Volhard, C., Wieschaus, E. and Kluding, H. (1984). Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster I Zygotic loci on the second chromosome. Roux s Arch. Dev. Biol. 193, Paroush, Z., Wainwright, S. M. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (1997). Torso signalling regulates terminal patterning in Drosophila by antagonising Groucho-mediated repression. Development 124, Perrimon, N. and Desplan, C. (1994). Signal transduction in the early Drosophila embryo: when genetics meets biochemistry. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, Pignoni, F., Baldarelli, R. M., Steingrimsson, E., Diaz, R. J., Patapoutian, A., Merriam, J. R. and Lengyel, J. A. (1990). The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily. Cell 62, Rivera-Pomar, R., Niessing, D., Schmidt-Ott, U., Gehring, W. J. and Jäckle, H. (1996). RNA binding and translational suppression by bicoid. Nature 379, Ronchi, E., Treisman, J., Dostatni, N., Struhl, G. and Desplan, C. (1993). Down-regulation of the Drosophila morphogen bicoid by the torso receptormediated signal transduction cascade. Cell 74, Rudolph, K. M., Liaw, G. J., Daniel, A., Green, P., Courey, A. J., Hartenstein, V. and Lengyel, J. A. (1997). Complex regulatory region mediating tailless expression in early embryonic patterning and brain development. Development 124, Sander, K. (1994). The evolution of insect patterning mechanisms: a survey of progress and problems in comparative embryology. Development 120 Supplement, Savant-Bhonsale, S. and Montell, D. J. (1993). torso-like encodes the localized determinant of Drosophila terminal pattern formation. Genes Dev. 7, Schaeffer, V., Janody, F., Loss, C., Desplan, C. and Wimmer, E. A. (1999). Bicoid functions without its TATA-binding protein-associated factor interaction domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, Schmidt-Ott, U., Gonzalez-Gaitan, M., Jäckle, H. and Technau, G. M. (1994). Number, identity, and sequence of the Drosophila head segments as revealed by neural elements and their deletion patterns in mutants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, Schröder, R., Eckert, C., Wolff, C. and Tautz, D. (2000). Conserved and

7 High levels of Bcd rescue anterior Tor function 3999 divergent aspects of terminal patterning in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, Schröder, R. and Sander, K. (1993). A comparison of transplantable bicoid activity and partial bicoid homeobox sequences in several Drosophila and blowfly species (Calliphoridae). Roux s Arch. Dev. Biol. 203, Schüpbach, T. and Wieschaus, E. (1986a). Germline autonomy of maternaleffect mutations altering the embryonic body pattern of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 113, Schüpbach, T. and Wieschaus, E. (1986b). Maternal-effect mutations altering the anterior-posterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. Roux s Arch. Dev. Biol. 195, Simpson-Brose, M., Treisman, J. and Desplan, C. (1994). Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila. Cell 78, Sprenger, F. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1992). Torso receptor activity is regulated by a diffusible ligand produced at the extracellular terminal regions of the Drosophila egg. Cell 71, St Johnston, D. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1992). The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 68, Stauber, M., Jäckle, H. and Schmidt-Ott, U. (1999). The anterior determinant bicoid of Drosophila is a derived Hox class 3 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, Stevens, L. M., Frohnhöfer, H. G., Klingler, M. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1990). Localized requirement for torso-like expression in follicle cells for development of terminal anlagen of the Drosophila embryo. Nature 346, Struhl, G., Struhl, K. and Macdonald, P. M. (1989). The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator. Cell 57, Tautz, D. and Pfeifle, C. (1989). A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98, Vorbrüggen, G., Constien, R., Zilian, O., Wimmer, E. A., Dowe, G., Taubert, H., Noll, M. and Jäckle, H. (1997). Embryonic expression and characterization of a Ptx1 homolog in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 68, Weigel, D., Jürgens, G., Klingler, M. and Jäckle, H. (1990). Two gap genes mediate maternal terminal pattern information in Drosophila. Science 248, Wimmer, E., Carleton, A., Harjes, P., Turner, T. and Desplan, C. (2000). bicoid-independent formation of thoracic segments in Drosophila. Science in press. Wimmer, E. A., Simpson-Brose, M., Cohen, S. M., Desplan, C. and Jäckle, H. (1995). Trans- and cis-acting requirements for blastodermal expression of the head gap gene buttonhead. Mech. Dev. 53, Wolff, C., Schröder, R., Schulz, C., Tautz, D. and Klingler, M. (1998). Regulation of the Tribolium homologues of caudal and hunchback in Drosophila: evidence for maternal gradient systems in a short germ embryo. Development 125,