Chapter 4 Evaluating a potential interaction between deltex and git in Drosophila: genetic interaction, gene overexpression and cell biology assays.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Chapter 4 Evaluating a potential interaction between deltex and git in Drosophila: genetic interaction, gene overexpression and cell biology assays."

Transcription

1 Evaluating a potential interaction between deltex and git in Drosophila: genetic interaction, gene overexpression and cell biology assays. The data described in chapter 3 presented evidence that endogenous dx is required for proper myogenesis in the fly embryo. The data also showed that overexpression of dx or overexpression of the dominant-negative form dx ΔPRM in the embryonic mesoderm affect various aspects of muscle development in the embryo and lead to pupal lethality. In this chapter, evidence for a potential interaction between dx and another fly gene, git, is presented and assessment of the interaction between these two genes was based on the type of embryonic muscle phenotypes, pupal lethality and adult phenotypes produced in various genetic combinations. An interaction between Dx and GIT was first reported in a yeast two-hybrid system designed to identify a genome-wide protein interaction map for Drosophila (Giot et al., 2003). GIT belongs to a family of scaffolding proteins that were first identified in mammals (Premont et al., 1998). GIT proteins have a complex domain structure and appear to have important functions in the control of focal adhesion disassembly, cytoskeletal dynamics, cell migration and membrane trafficking between the plasma membrane and recycling endosomes (Manabe et al., 2002 ). GIT comprises an aminoterminal zinc finger-like motif, a N-terminal Arf-GAP domain for converting active Arf- 68

2 GTP to inactive Arf-GDP, ankyrin repeats for protein-protein interaction, a Spa2- homology domain which binds FAK and PIX, a coiled-coil domain and a conserved carboxyl-terminal region that interacts with paxillin and links GIT to the focal adhesion complex (Hoefen et al., 2006). In Drosophila, there is a single GIT homologue, dgit (FLYBASE:FBgn ). dgit mutants were isolated in our laboratory and it was shown that dgit is expressed in embryonic muscles and localizes to muscle attachment sites (Bahri et al., unpublished). dgit mutants are semi-lethal and result in muscle defects in the embryo as well as adult phenotypes such as ectopic bristles and defective wings (Bahri et al., unpublished). In this chapter, I present evidence that dx and dgit interact genetically in a positive manner to affect adult phenotypes such as wing posture and bristle number, suggesting that Dx and GIT may act in the same genetic pathway to affect these adult structures. In addition, the data from overexpression experiments showed that Dx and GIT may also interact in a negative manner where GIT counteracts Dxoverexpression effects in embryonic muscles and fly development Genetic interaction between dx and dgit mutant alleles C 4.1A. Genetic interaction between dx and dgit Genetic interaction between two genes is generally characterized by the phenotypic analysis of animals lacking either, one copy of each of the two genes, lacking two copies of one gene and one copy of the other gene, or lacking two copies of both genes. To test if dx genetically interacts with git, virgin female flies homozygous for dx 152 null allele were crossed to male flies homozygous for dgit 21C and their male and female progenies were collected and phenotypically scored (Fig. 4.1A.1). All male progeny from 69

3 this cross lack both copies of dx and only one copy of git (dx 152 /y git 21C /) while all female progeny lacks only one copy of dx and one copy of git (dx 152 / git 21C /). Should there be an interaction between dx and git, phenotypes in the progenies would be expected. Indeed, a new wing phenotype (that was not seen in the parents) was observed in 80% of the male progeny (Fig. 4.1A.2 Table 4.1A.1), suggesting that dx and git genetically interact the male wings were held-out at 45 degrees from their body axis while control males which lacked both copies of dx but still had both copies of git intact did not show defective wing posture, indicating that the wing posture phenotype was due to the removal of both copies of dx and one copy of git. In contrast to the male progeny, the wing posture of the female progeny (which lack only one copy of dx and one copy of git) was normal, again suggesting that both copies of dx and one copy of git have to be removed in order for the held-out wing phenotype to be expressed. Mutations causing held-out wings have previously been isolated and characterized as affecting muscles that function in wing retraction during rest-phase of the adult fly (Baehrecke, 1997 Soanes and Bell, 1999). Similarly, the held-out wing phenotypes in dx 152 /y git 21C / males may be caused by muscle defects. The data from this experiment showed that dx and git genetically interact with each other and suggest that Dx and GIT may be working together (directly or indirectly) in a genetic pathway that probably affect adult muscles and consequently wing posture. Alternatively, the complete removal of Dx 70

4 Genetic cross between deltex and git mutants: dx 152 dx 152 X y git 21c git 21c dx 152 y git 21c & dx 152 git 21c 80% males having held-out wings Figure 4.1A.1. Genetic interaction between dx 152 and git 21C. The diagram shows a genetic interaction cross between homozygous dx 152 mutant females and homozygous git 21c mutant males. 80% of the male progeny have held-out wing phenotypes, but the female progeny was largely normal. Held-out wing Vein Genotypes phenotypes Defects dx 152 /y dgit 21c / / (interaction males) 80% (n=133) 100% (n=133) dx 152 /y/ / (control1 males) 0% (n=100) 100% (n=100) /y dgit 21c / / (control2 males) 0% (n=100) 0% (n=100) dx 152 / dgit 21c / / (interaction females) 0% (n=126) 0% (n=126) dx 152 / / / (control1 females) 0% (n=100) 0% (n=100) / dgit 21c / / (control2 females) 0% (n=100) 0% (n=100) n = number of adult flies Table 4.1A.1. Phenotypes of dx 152 /git 21C transheterozygous flies. 80% of interaction males lacking both copies of dx and one copy of git exhibit a held-out wing phenotype but controls or interaction females do not show this phenotype the 100% delta vein defect associated with dx 152 males was not modified by the removal of one copy of git. Percentages of wing phenotypes were calculated as follows: number of flies with wing defects / total number of flies x

5 A B Figure 4.1A.2. Held-out wing phenotype in dx 152 /git 21C interaction. Panel A shows males of the genotype dx 152 /y dgit 21c / displaying held-out wing phenotypes panel B shows wt control flies with normal wing postures. 72

6 may weaken the male flies and make them sensitive to additional mutations (like in the case of removal of one copy of git) and hence additional reduction of git by half in dx 152 mutant males now produces new phenotypes that were not observed in dx 152 mutant males alone. 1 21C 4.1B. Genetic interaction between dx and dgit Instead of dx 152, the dx 1 allele was used in another genetic interaction cross with git 21C (Fig. 4.1B.1). 47% of female progeny (dx 1 / git 21C /) lacking one copy of dx and one copy of git and 15% of male progeny (dx 1 /y git 21C /) obtained from this, displayed ectopic bristles on their scutella (posterior sections of adult thorax Fig. 4.1B.2) it is not clear why transheterozygous females showed higher frequency of bristle phenotypes than the males, probably due to the nature of the dx 1 allele the molecular defect in dx 1 has not been yet determined. wt flies normally have 4 mechanosensory bristles on their scutella, while the transheterozygous flies often showed six or more mechanosensory bristles (Fig. 4.1B.2). The ectopic bristles in these animals were associated with ectopic sockets, suggesting that they are probably complete organs and not a result of cell fate transformation in the same organ (for example a socket cell taking the fate of a hair cell) a mechanosensory organ is normally made of an exterior hair cell, an exterior socket cell, and interior neuron and support cells (Walker et al., 2000). Interestingly, homozygous git 21C flies have been shown to display a similar ectopic mechanosensory bristle phenotype (Bahri et al., unpublished). Since the bristle phenotype was observed in animals lacking one copy of dx and one copy of git in the interaction cross, this may 73

7 indicate that Dx and GIT act in the same genetic pathway to affect bristle number. Control flies lacking only one copy of dx or control flies lacking Genetic cross between deltex and git mutants: dx 1 dx 1 X y git 21c git 21c git 21c git 21c dx 1 dx & 1 y 15% males and 47% females having ectopic bristles Figure 4.1B.1. Genetic interaction between dx 1 and git 21C. The diagram shows a genetic interaction cross between homozygous dx 1 mutant females and homozygous git 21c mutant males. 15% (n=20) of the male progeny and 47% (n=36) of the female progeny display ectopic bristle phenotypes on their scutella. A B SC SC 74

8 Figure 4.1B.2. Ectopic bristle phenotype in dx 1 / dgit 21c interaction experiment. A shows a female of the genotype dx 1 / dgit 21c / with ectopic bristle phenotype on its scutellum (arrows) B shows a rescued female of the genotype dx 1 / dgit 21c /su(dx) with normal bristle phenotype on its scutellum (arrow) SC: scutellum. only one copy of git did not show the ectopic bristle phenotype, suggesting that this phenotype is due to the simultaneous removal of one copy of dx and one copy of git in the same animal. To determine whether this interaction is specific to dx, I made use of the available fly line dx 1 / dx 1 Su(dx)/Su(dx) Su(dx) is known to suppress the dx phenotypes (Matsuno et al., 2002). This line was used to repeat the genetic interaction cross with git 21C females and the female progeny of the genotype dx 1 / Su(dx)/git 21C were inspected. These females did not show ectopic bristles on their scutella (Fig. 4.1B.2B) indicating that Su(dx) is suppressing the dx 1 / git 21C interaction bristle phenotype. The data also suggests that the ectopic bristle phenotype is due to the interaction between dx 1 and git 21C. It is interesting to note that the adult phenotypes observed in the interaction experiment between git and dx 1 were different from those observed in the interaction experiment between git and dx 152, suggesting that dx 1 and dx 152 alleles behave differently for example dx 1 heterozygous females that lack one copy of git display ectopic bristles (47%, n = 36) whereas dx 152 heterozygous females that lack one copy of git do show this phenotype but at a lower frequency ( 4.5%, n = 62) similarly, dx 1 hemizygous males that lack one copy of git display ectopic bristles (15%, n =20 ) whereas dx 152 hemizygous males that lack one copy of git rarely show this phenotype (1%, n = 85). In addition, dx 152 hemizygous males that lack one copy of git display wing posture defect whereas dx 1 hemizygous males that lack one copy of git do not show this phenotype. This qualitative difference between dx 152 and dx 1 alleles is also corroborated with the immunostaining 75

9 results described in the previous chapter the immunostaining data showed that dx 152 is null (as expected from published reports) whereas dx 1 still encodes a Dx form that, unlike Dx, can localize primarily to muscle attachment sites (see chapter 3 Section 3.3). The molecular lesion in dx 1 has not yet been determined and it will be interesting to map it in the future Genetic interaction between dx and git in overexpression assays 4.2A. Pupal lethality associated with Dx-overexression under mesodermal driver was suppressed by GIT overexpression The data described in chapter 3 showed that mesodermal overexpression of Dx causes 100% pupal lethality. In order to test for interaction between Dx and GIT, Dx was overexpressed together with GIT under 24bgal4 in the same animal and the extent of pupal lethality was scored (Fig. 4.2A.1 Table 4.2A.1)). In this experiment, 22% of the animals that are simultaneously overexpressing one copy of dx and one copy of git hatched from their pupal cases and looked normal (Fig. 4.2A.1 Table 4.2A.1), while few of them hatched half-way and remained stuck in their pupal cases (3%, Fig. 4.2A.2C) the rest of the animals from this experiment did not hatch and died as pupaes. The data from this experiment suggested that overexpression of GIT may antagonize the toxic effect of Dx overexpression and partially rescue the pupal lethality associated with Dx overexpression alone. The half-way hatching phenotype observed in the rescue experiment may be indicative of muscle defects, as it is generally thought that adults that 76

10 display such hatching phenotypes are too weak to be able to push themselves out of the pupal case. Overexpression of deltex in combination with git using 24bgal4 driver: 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp X y uas- dx-gst uas- dx-gst & uas- dx-gst 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp uas- dx-gst 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp y 22% of pupae hatch into adults. Figure 4.2A.1: Suppression of pupal lethality associated with Dx overexpression by GIT overexpression. The diagram shows a genetic interaction cross between homozygous uas-dx-gst males and homozygous 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp females. 22% of the pupal progeny carrying one copy of each of the dx and git transgenes and one copy of mesodermal driver hatched to adults. 77

11 % Genotypes Viability / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4/ 0 % (n=585) / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4-uas-gitfl-gfp/ (rescue) 21.3% (n=544) / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4-uas-gitshdc-gfp/ 0.6% (n=313) / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4-uas-gitshd -gfp / 3.9% (n=284) / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4-uas-gitc-gfp / 3.6% (n=212) n = total number of pupae counted Table 4.2A.1. GIT full length but not GIT domains significantly suppressed the pupal lethality of Dx-overexpression. None of the pupae hatched to adults when Dx was overexpressed under 24bgal4 mesodermal driver (/ uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4 /) 21.3% of pupae hatched to adults when GIT was overexpressed together with Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4-uas-gitflgfp /) no significant rescue of pupal lethality was obtained when individual GIT domains were used in the overexpression assay (<4% viability). Percentages were calculated as follows: number of hatched flies / total number of pupae x

12 A B C D Figure 4.2A.2. Suppression of pupal lethality of Dx overexpression by GIT overexpression. dx-overexpression lethal phenotype under the influence of 24bgal4 mesodermal driver is simultaneously rescued by git-overexpression. Pupal lethality is partially rescued in progenies of the genotype / uas-dx-gst / 24bgal4-uasgitflgfp/ Panels A (normally hatched control wt fly), B (normally hatched rescued female fly of the genotype / uas-dx-gst / 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/) and C (a partially rescued / uas-dx-gst / 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/ female fly that partially hatched but remains stuck to its pupal case) are shown panel D is the same female fly shown in C after being forcibly removed from its pupal case. 79

13 I have also made use of available transgenic fly lines (generated by Bahri et al., unpublished) which carry different GIT domains (N-terminal, middle and C-terminal domains) on UAS-constructs. To express each of the different GIT domains in combination with the transgene uas-dx-gst, genetic crosses between homozygous males of the genotype /y uas-dx-gst / uas-dx-gst / and homozygous females of the genotype / / 24bgal4-uas-git-domain-gfp / 24bgal4-uas-git-domain-gfp were performed and their progeny carrying one copy of each transgene and one copy of driver were scored for pupal lethality (Table 4.2A.1). No significant rescue of pupal lethality (only %) was observed in this experiment, suggesting that all the domains of GIT have to be present in order to significantly rescue the toxic effects of Dx overexpression. The low percentage ( %) of adults hatching in the presence of constructs expressing different domains of GIT may be due to the possibility that some of the GAL4 in these animals would be used to drive uas-git-domain and consequently less of it is available to drive uas-dx in this scenario, a lower expression level of uas-dx would be expected. 4.2B. Embryonic muscle defects associated with Dx overexpression under mesodermal driver are suppressed by GIT overexpression The data presented in chapter 3 showed that mesodermal overexpression of Dx leads to muscle defects in the embryo. Muscles in embryos carrying one copy of uas-dx 80

14 and one copy of the uas-git transgene driven by the mesodermal driver were inspected and their phenotypes were scored and compared to embryos overexpressing the uas-dx transgene alone (Fig. 4.2B1 Table 4.2B.1). Expression of GIT together with Dx caused an evident reduction (from 8.7% to 1.6%) in the percentage of missing lateral transverse (LT) muscle phenotype that was associated with Dx overexpression alone. In addition, the muscle guidance phenotype of ventral oblique muscles associated with Dx overexpression (Fig. 4.2B.1B) was also considerably rescued by simultaneous expression of GIT (from 15% to 3.3% Table 4.2B.1 Fig. 4.2B.1C). The data suggests that overexpression of GIT may counteract the toxic effect of Dx overexpression in the embryonic mesoderm. 81

15 A A B C VM VM VO5 VM Figure 4.2B.1. Suppression of muscle phenotype associated with Dx overexpression by GIT overexpression. Ventral views of MHC-stained late stage embryos from wt control (A), Dx overexpressing (B, / uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4 /) and rescued (C, / uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4-uas-gitflgfp /) are shown mesodermal overexpression of GIT together with Dx (C) partially rescues the muscle guidance phenotype of ventral oblique muscles seen in overexpression of Dx alone (B, arrow). VM: ventral midline (arrowhead). All embryos are oriented anterior is to the left. VOs LTs VOs Genotypes Defective Guidance shape Missing defects / uas-dx-gst/ 24bgal4/ 4.3% (n=161) 8.7% (n=151) 15% (n=161) / uas-dx-gst / 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/ (rescued) 1.1% (n=183) 1.6% (n=183) 3.3% (n=183) n = number of hemisegments Table 4.2B.1. Suppression of muscle phenotypes associated with Dx overexpression by GIT overexpression. Percentages of embryonic muscles defects associated with mesodermal overexpression of Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4 /) are decreased by simultaneous overexpression of GIT together with Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4-uasgitflgfp /). Percentage of muscle defects were calculated as follows: number of hemisegments with muscle defects/total number of hemisegments x

16 4.2C. Pupal lethality and wing notching phenotypes associated with Dxoverexression under epithelial driver are suppressed by overexpression of GIT In order to further characterize the interaction between dx and git in overexpression studies, a 32bgal4 epithelial driver was used this epithelial driver is known to expresses GAL4 in imaginal discs of larvae which give rise to adult structures such as wings later in development. To examine the phenotypes of Dx overexpression under the control of the epithelial driver, flies carrying two copies of uas-dx-gst transgene were crossed to flies carrying two copies of 32bgal4 driver and their progenies carrying one copy of transgene and one copy of driver were collected and scored for pupal lethality and adult phenotypes (Fig. 4.2C.1 Table 4.2C.1 Table 4.2C.2). In this overexpression experiment, 94.4% pupal lethality (pupal lethality here refers to unhatched and half-way hatched pupae) was observed in the progeny carrying one copy of transgene and one copy of driver (Table 4.2C.1). All flies that completely hatched from this experiment were females and no progeny males were survived to adulthood. In addition, the hatched females exhibited loss of tissues from their posterior-wing margin (Fig. 4.2C.1A). Simultaneous overexpression of GIT and Dx under the 32bgal4 epithelial driver partially rescued the pupal lethal phenotype observed with Dx overexpression alone (Table 4.2C.1). Furthermore, the wings of the completely hatched flies were also normal and did not show the loss of tissue phenotype that was observed in Dx overxpression 83

17 A B Figure 4.2C.1. Suppression of notched wing phenotype associated with epithelial overexpression of Dx by GIT overexpression. Panel A is a / uas-dx-gst /32bgal4 / female showing a notched wing phenotype on the posterior-wing margin (arrows) and panel B is a / uas-dx-gst / 32bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/ rescued female fly with a normal posterior wing margin (arrows). Genotypes / uas-dx-gst/ 32bgal4/ / uas-dx-gst / 32bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/ n = total number of pupae % Viability 5 % (n=402) 52.5% (n=463) Table 4.2C.1. Suppression of pupal lethality phenotype associated with Dx epithelial overexpression by GIT overexpression. The percentage of viable flies associated with epithelial overexpression of Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 32bgal4 /) is significantly increased (from 5.6% to 52.5%) by simultaneous overexpression of GIT together with Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 32bgal4-uas-gitflgfp /). Percentages were calculated as follows: number of hatched flies / total number of pupae x

18 % Genotypes posterior wing margin defects / uas-dx-gst/ 32bgal4/ 93.3% (n=30) / uas-dx-gst/ 32bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/ (rescued) 0% (n=100) n = number of wings Table 4.2C.2. Suppression of notched wing phenotype associated with epithelial overexpression of Dx by GIT overexpression. Overexpression of Dx alone under 32bgal4 epithelial driver (/ uas-dx-gst /32bgal4 /) resulted in 93% of female wings showing notched (loss of tissue) phenotype at their posterior margin overexpression of GIT together with Dx (/ uas-dx-gst / 32bgal4-uas-gitflgfp/) completely rescued this phenotype. Percentages were calculated as follows: number of notched female wings / total number of female wings x

19 alone (Fig. 4.2C.1 Table 4.2C.2). The data suggests that overexpression of GIT under the epithelial driver may antagonize the toxic effect of Dx overexpression, again similar to the suppression effect observed when overexpression of GIT and Dx was done using the 24bgal4 mesodermal driver (see section2 4.2A and 4.2B). 4.2D. Pupal lethality associated with dominant-negative Dx-ΔPRM overexpression under mesodermal driver is not suppressed by GIT overexpression The data described in sections 4.2A-4.2C suggested that Dx and GIT may have antagonistic effects on each others function in the overexpression assay. Based on this result, we deduced that if dominant-negative Dx-ΔPRM was used (instead of Dx) in the overexpression assay together with GIT, GIT would be expected to enhance the lethal phenotype of Dx-ΔPRM overexpression. To test this prediction, flies homozygous for uas-dx ΔPRM and flies homozygous for 24bgal,uas-gitflgfp were mated and the extent of pupal lethality in their progeny carrying one copy of driver and one copy of each of the transgenes was scored (Fig. 4.2D.1 Table 4.2D.1). The results in Table 4.2D.1 show that the overexpression of GIT together with Dx-ΔPRM did not significantly modify the pupal lethal phenotype associated with Dx-ΔPRM overexpression alone (85.3% as compared to 90.4% lethality with Dx alone). The data suggests that GIT does not interact with Dx- ΔPRM in the overexpression assay. A plausible deduction from this experiment is that the proline-rich motif (deleted in Dx-ΔPRM) may be required to mediate the antagonistic 86

20 effect of GIT on Dx. Alternatively, Dx-ΔPRM may be acting on new mesodermal targets (other than just endogenous Dx) which are not sensitive to the action of GIT. Overexpression of dominant negative dx ΔPRM in combination with git using 24bgal4 driver: 24bgal4-uas-gitfl-gfp 24bgal4-uas-gitfl-gfp X y uas- dx ΔPRM -gst uas- dx ΔPRM -gst & uas- dx ΔPRM -gst 24bgal4-uas-gitfl-gfp uas- dx ΔPRM -gst 24bgal4-uas-gitfl-gfp y 80% pupal lethal Figure 4.2D.1. Genetic interaction cross between homozygous uas-dx deltaprm -gst males and homozygous 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp females. % Genotypes Lethality / uas-dx ΔPRM -gst / 24bgal4 / 91.4% (n=292) / uas-dx ΔPRM -gst / 24bgal4-uas-gitflgfp / 85.3% (n=476) n = total number of pupae counted Table 4.2D.1. GIT does not significantly suppress Dx-ΔPRM lethal phenotype in the mesodermal overexpression assay. Overexpression of Dx-ΔPRM alone (/ uas-dxgst / 24Bgal4 /) was 90.4% pupal lethal and overexpression of GIT together with Dx- ΔPRM (/ uas-dx-gst / 24Bgal4gitflgfp /) did not significantly modify this 87

21 phenotype (~ 5%). Percentages were calculated as follows: number of hatched flies / total number of pupae x Subcelular localization of Dx and GIT proteins in embryonic muscles are not interdependent The results described in chapter 3 showed that endogenous Dx is mainly localized to the cytoplasm in embryonic muscles with very weak localization at muscle attachment sites upon overexpression. Interestingly, one of the alleles of dx, dx 1, was also found to code for a protein that localizes primarily to muscle attachment sites (see chapter 3), suggesting that Dx may contain protein sequences that permit such localization. GIT has also been found to localize to muscle attachment sites (Bahri et al., unpublished). In order to determine whether Dx and GIT subcellular localizations in embryonic muscles are dependent on each other, homozygous mutant embryos from the dx 152 null allele and homozygous mutant embryos from the git 21C allele were double stained with anti-dx / anti-mhc and anti-git / anti-mhc respectively (Fig ). The staining results showed that GIT localization to muscle attachments was not affected in dx mutants (Fig B) and that Dx cytoplasmic localization in muscles was also not affected in git mutants (Fig E). The data indicates that GIT and Dx subcellular localizations in embryonic muscles are not dependent on each other. 88

22 A Anti-MHC B Anti-GIT C Merged * VLs dx 152 Anti-MHC Anti-Dx D E F Merged * VLs dgit 21c Figure GIT and Dx localizations in embryonic muscles are not interdependent. Panels A-C show the ventro-lateral view of a late stage dx 152 mutant embryo double stained with anti-mhc (A, red) and anti-git (B, green) C is a merged image of A and B it shows that GIT at the muscle attachments (B, arrows) is not affected by the dx mutation. Panels D-F show the ventro-lateral view of a late stage git 21C mutant embryo double-stained with anti-mhc (D, red) and anti-dx (E, green) F is a merged image of D and E it shows that Dx cytoplasmic localization in the muscle (E, arrow) is not affected by the git mutation. All embryos are oriented anterior is to the left and dorsal is up. 89

Supplementary Materials for

Supplementary Materials for www.sciencesignaling.org/cgi/content/full/6/301/ra98/dc1 Supplementary Materials for Regulation of Epithelial Morphogenesis by the G Protein Coupled Receptor Mist and Its Ligand Fog Alyssa J. Manning,

More information

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Overexpression of YFP::GPR-1 in the germline.

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Overexpression of YFP::GPR-1 in the germline. Supplementary Figure 1 Overexpression of YFP::GPR-1 in the germline. The pie-1 promoter and 3 utr were used to express yfp::gpr-1 in the germline. Expression levels from the yfp::gpr-1(cai 1.0)-expressing

More information

Midterm 1. Average score: 74.4 Median score: 77

Midterm 1. Average score: 74.4 Median score: 77 Midterm 1 Average score: 74.4 Median score: 77 NAME: TA (circle one) Jody Westbrook or Jessica Piel Section (circle one) Tue Wed Thur MCB 141 First Midterm Feb. 21, 2008 Only answer 4 of these 5 problems.

More information

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 19, 2009

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 19, 2009 Write your name and student ID# on EVERY PAGE of your exam MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 19, 2009 Circle the name of your TA Jessica Lyons Alberto Stolfi Question #1 Question #2 Question #3 Question #4 TOTAL

More information

Solutions to Problem Set 4

Solutions to Problem Set 4 Question 1 Solutions to 7.014 Problem Set 4 Because you have not read much scientific literature, you decide to study the genetics of garden peas. You have two pure breeding pea strains. One that is tall

More information

Chapter 18 Lecture. Concepts of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Developmental Genetics

Chapter 18 Lecture. Concepts of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Developmental Genetics Chapter 18 Lecture Concepts of Genetics Tenth Edition Developmental Genetics Chapter Contents 18.1 Differentiated States Develop from Coordinated Programs of Gene Expression 18.2 Evolutionary Conservation

More information

allosteric cis-acting DNA element coding strand dominant constitutive mutation coordinate regulation of genes denatured

allosteric cis-acting DNA element coding strand dominant constitutive mutation coordinate regulation of genes denatured A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV allosteric cis-acting DNA element coding strand codominant constitutive mutation coordinate

More information

Suppression of the rbf null mutants by a de2f1 allele that lacks transactivation domain

Suppression of the rbf null mutants by a de2f1 allele that lacks transactivation domain Development 127, 367-379 (2000) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 DEV5342 367 Suppression of the rbf null mutants by a de2f1 allele that lacks transactivation domain Wei Du

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Discussion Rationale for using maternal ythdf2 -/- mutants as study subject To study the genetic basis of the embryonic developmental delay that we observed, we crossed fish with different

More information

Supplementary Figure 1. Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.3848

Supplementary Figure 1. Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.3848 Supplementary Figure 1 Phenotypes and epigenetic properties of Fab2L flies. A- Phenotypic classification based on eye pigment levels in Fab2L male (orange bars) and female (yellow bars) flies (n>150).

More information

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2717

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2717 Supplementary Fig. 1. Dendrite length is not secondary to body length. Dendrite growth proceeds independently of the rate of body growth and decreases in rate in adults. n 20 on dendrite measurement, n

More information

(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!)

(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!) POPULATION GENETICS AND MICROEVOLUTIONARY THEORY FINAL EXAMINATION (Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!) 1. Briefly define (5 points each): a) Average

More information

Unicellular: Cells change function in response to a temporal plan, such as the cell cycle.

Unicellular: Cells change function in response to a temporal plan, such as the cell cycle. Spatial organization is a key difference between unicellular organisms and metazoans Unicellular: Cells change function in response to a temporal plan, such as the cell cycle. Cells differentiate as a

More information

1. Draw, label and describe the structure of DNA and RNA including bonding mechanisms.

1. Draw, label and describe the structure of DNA and RNA including bonding mechanisms. Practicing Biology BIG IDEA 3.A 1. Draw, label and describe the structure of DNA and RNA including bonding mechanisms. 2. Using at least 2 well-known experiments, describe which features of DNA and RNA

More information

Baz, Par-6 and apkc are not required for axon or dendrite specification in Drosophila

Baz, Par-6 and apkc are not required for axon or dendrite specification in Drosophila Baz, Par-6 and apkc are not required for axon or dendrite specification in Drosophila Melissa M. Rolls and Chris Q. Doe, Inst. Neurosci and Inst. Mol. Biol., HHMI, Univ. Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 Correspondence

More information

Lecture 7. Development of the Fruit Fly Drosophila

Lecture 7. Development of the Fruit Fly Drosophila BIOLOGY 205/SECTION 7 DEVELOPMENT- LILJEGREN Lecture 7 Development of the Fruit Fly Drosophila 1. The fruit fly- a highly successful, specialized organism a. Quick life cycle includes three larval stages

More information

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Today s Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Today s Nobel Prize in Chemistry In the news: High-throughput sequencing using Solexa/Illumina technology The copy number of each fetal chromosome can be determined by direct sequencing of DNA in cell-free plasma from pregnant women Confession:

More information

3/4/2015. Review. Phenotype

3/4/2015. Review. Phenotype Review Phenotype 1 Genes Crossing Over Frequency cn cinnabar eyes Cy curly wings L lobe eyes pr purple eyes sm smooth abdomen pr - L 9% Cy - L 33% sm - pr 19% cn - pr 2% Cy - sm 43% cn - sm 17% Polygenic

More information

Bypass and interaction suppressors; pathway analysis

Bypass and interaction suppressors; pathway analysis Bypass and interaction suppressors; pathway analysis The isolation of extragenic suppressors is a powerful tool for identifying genes that encode proteins that function in the same process as a gene of

More information

Reading: Chapter 5, pp ; Reference chapter D, pp Problem set F

Reading: Chapter 5, pp ; Reference chapter D, pp Problem set F Mosaic Analysis Reading: Chapter 5, pp140-141; Reference chapter D, pp820-823 Problem set F Twin spots in Drosophila Although segregation and recombination in mitosis do not occur at the same frequency

More information

Varicose and cheerio collaborate with pebble to mediate semaphorin-1a reverse signaling in Drosophila

Varicose and cheerio collaborate with pebble to mediate semaphorin-1a reverse signaling in Drosophila Varicose and cheerio collaborate with pebble to mediate semaphorin-1a reverse signaling in Drosophila Sangyun Jeong a,1, Da-som Yang a, Young Gi Hong a, Sarah P. Mitchell b,c, Matthew P. rown b,c, and

More information

Phenotypic Plasticity in Drosophila Pigmentation Caused by Temperature Sensitivity of a Chromatin Regulator Network

Phenotypic Plasticity in Drosophila Pigmentation Caused by Temperature Sensitivity of a Chromatin Regulator Network Phenotypic Plasticity in Drosophila Pigmentation Caused by Temperature Sensitivity of a Chromatin Regulator Network Jean-Michel Gibert 1*, Frédérique Peronnet 2, Christian Schlötterer 1,3 1 Institut für

More information

Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos

Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos Development 130, August 2003 Camilla W. Larsen, Elizabeth Hirst, Cyrille Alexandre and Jean Paul Vincent 1. Introduction: - Segment boundary formation:

More information

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Axis Specification in Drosophila Developmental Biology Biology 4361 Axis Specification in Drosophila November 6, 2007 Axis Specification in Drosophila Fertilization Superficial cleavage Gastrulation Drosophila body plan Oocyte formation

More information

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2662

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2662 Supplementary Figure 1 Atlastin phylogeny and homology. (a) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 18 Atlastin-1 sequences using the program Quicktree. Numbers at internal nodes correspond to bootstrap

More information

The phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype.

The phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype. Series 2: Cross Diagrams - Complementation There are two alleles for each trait in a diploid organism In C. elegans gene symbols are ALWAYS italicized. To represent two different genes on the same chromosome:

More information

TGF-β/BMP superfamily members, Gbb-60A and Dpp, cooperate to provide pattern information and establish cell identity in the Drosophila wing

TGF-β/BMP superfamily members, Gbb-60A and Dpp, cooperate to provide pattern information and establish cell identity in the Drosophila wing Development 125, 2723-2734 (1998) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 1998 DEV5189 2723 TGF-β/BMP superfamily members, Gbb-60A and Dpp, cooperate to provide pattern information and

More information

Drosophila. The wingless signalling pathway and the patterning of the wing margin in. Juan Pablo Couso*, Sarah A. Bishop and Alfonso Martinez Arias

Drosophila. The wingless signalling pathway and the patterning of the wing margin in. Juan Pablo Couso*, Sarah A. Bishop and Alfonso Martinez Arias Development 120, 621-636 (1994) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 1994 621 The wingless signalling pathway and the patterning of the wing margin in Drosophila Juan Pablo Couso*,

More information

BILD7: Problem Set. 2. What did Chargaff discover and why was this important?

BILD7: Problem Set. 2. What did Chargaff discover and why was this important? BILD7: Problem Set 1. What is the general structure of DNA? 2. What did Chargaff discover and why was this important? 3. What was the major contribution of Rosalind Franklin? 4. How did solving the structure

More information

Genetic Lab 3. Drosophila Fly

Genetic Lab 3. Drosophila Fly Genetic Lab 3 Drosophila Fly An Introduction to fruit or vinegar fly Drosophila Melanogaster Is a small (about 3mm long), common fly found near unripe and rotted fruit, so that it called fruit or vinegar

More information

Two Frizzled Planar Cell Polarity Signals in the Drosophila Wing Are Differentially Organized by the Fat/Dachsous Pathway

Two Frizzled Planar Cell Polarity Signals in the Drosophila Wing Are Differentially Organized by the Fat/Dachsous Pathway Two Frizzled Planar Cell Polarity Signals in the Drosophila Wing Are Differentially Organized by the Fat/Dachsous Pathway Justin Hogan, Meagan Valentine, Chris Cox, Kristy Doyle, Simon Collier* Department

More information

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Axis Specification in Drosophila Developmental Biology Biology 4361 Axis Specification in Drosophila November 2, 2006 Axis Specification in Drosophila Fertilization Superficial cleavage Gastrulation Drosophila body plan Oocyte formation

More information

1. Ch 6. #17 In sweet peas, the synthesis of purple anthocyanin pigment in the petals is controlled by two genes, B and D.

1. Ch 6. #17 In sweet peas, the synthesis of purple anthocyanin pigment in the petals is controlled by two genes, B and D. Day 11 Tutorial Answers for BIOL 234 section 921 summer 2014 students ONLY J. Klenz L. McDonnell Not for sale or duplication. Learning Goals: Given the functions of two or more gene products that control

More information

Genetics 275 Notes Week 7

Genetics 275 Notes Week 7 Cytoplasmic Inheritance Genetics 275 Notes Week 7 Criteriafor recognition of cytoplasmic inheritance: 1. Reciprocal crosses give different results -mainly due to the fact that the female parent contributes

More information

Developmental Biology

Developmental Biology Developmental Biology 325 (2009) 15 23 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/developmentalbiology The Drosophila homologue of Arf-GAP GIT1,

More information

A complementation test would be done by crossing the haploid strains and scoring the phenotype in the diploids.

A complementation test would be done by crossing the haploid strains and scoring the phenotype in the diploids. Problem set H answers 1. To study DNA repair mechanisms, geneticists isolated yeast mutants that were sensitive to various types of radiation; for example, mutants that were more sensitive to UV light.

More information

Drosophila Life Cycle

Drosophila Life Cycle Drosophila Life Cycle 1 Early Drosophila Cleavage Nuclei migrate to periphery after 10 nuclear divisions. Cellularization occurs when plasma membrane folds in to divide nuclei into cells. Drosophila Superficial

More information

Homeotic genes in flies. Sem 9.3.B.6 Animal Science

Homeotic genes in flies. Sem 9.3.B.6 Animal Science Homeotic genes in flies Sem 9.3.B.6 Animal Science So far We have seen that identities of each segment is determined by various regulators of segment polarity genes In arthopods, and in flies, each segment

More information

The Control of Semaphorin-1a-Mediated Reverse Signaling by Opposing Pebble and RhoGAPp190 Functions in Drosophila

The Control of Semaphorin-1a-Mediated Reverse Signaling by Opposing Pebble and RhoGAPp190 Functions in Drosophila Article The Control of Semaphorin-1a-Mediated Reverse Signaling by Opposing Pebble and RhoGAPp190 Functions in Drosophila Sangyun Jeong, 1 Katarina Juhaszova, 1 and Alex L. Kolodkin 1, 1 Solomon H. Snyder

More information

Fig. S1. Expression pattern of moody-gal4 in third instar. Maximum projection illustrating a dissected moody-gal4>ngfp L3 larva stained for Repo

Fig. S1. Expression pattern of moody-gal4 in third instar. Maximum projection illustrating a dissected moody-gal4>ngfp L3 larva stained for Repo Fig. S1. Expression pattern of moody-gal4 in third instar. Maximum projection illustrating a dissected moody-gal4>ngfp L3 larva stained for Repo (magenta), Fas2 (blue) and GFP (green) in overview (A) and

More information

Unit 7 Genetics. Meiosis

Unit 7 Genetics. Meiosis NAME: 1 Unit 7 Genetics 1. Gregor Mendel- was responsible for our 2. What organism did Mendel study? 3. Mendel stated that physical traits were inherited as 4. Today we know that particles are actually

More information

Chapter 11. Development: Differentiation and Determination

Chapter 11. Development: Differentiation and Determination KAP Biology Dept Kenyon College Differential gene expression and development Mechanisms of cellular determination Induction Pattern formation Chapter 11. Development: Differentiation and Determination

More information

Chromosome Chr Duplica Duplic t a ion Pixley

Chromosome Chr Duplica Duplic t a ion Pixley Chromosome Duplication Pixley Figure 4-6 Molecular Biology of the Cell ( Garland Science 2008) Figure 4-72 Molecular Biology of the Cell ( Garland Science 2008) Interphase During mitosis (cell division),

More information

Time allowed: 2 hours Answer ALL questions in Section A, ALL PARTS of the question in Section B and ONE question from Section C.

Time allowed: 2 hours Answer ALL questions in Section A, ALL PARTS of the question in Section B and ONE question from Section C. UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA School of Biological Sciences Main Series UG Examination 2017-2018 GENETICS BIO-5009A Time allowed: 2 hours Answer ALL questions in Section A, ALL PARTS of the question in Section

More information

Mutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution

Mutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution Mutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution 15.2 Intro In biology, evolution refers specifically to changes in the genetic makeup of populations over time.

More information

Constructing a Pedigree

Constructing a Pedigree Constructing a Pedigree Use the appropriate symbols: Unaffected Male Unaffected Female Affected Male Affected Female Male carrier of trait Mating of Offspring 2. Label each generation down the left hand

More information

Supplementary Materials for

Supplementary Materials for www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1244624/dc1 Supplementary Materials for Cytoneme-Mediated Contact-Dependent Transport of the Drosophila Decapentaplegic Signaling Protein Sougata Roy, Hai Huang,

More information

MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC PATTERN FORMATION

MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC PATTERN FORMATION MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC PATTERN FORMATION Drosophila is the best understood of all developmental systems, especially at the genetic level, and although it is an invertebrate it has had an enormous

More information

CHROMOSOMAL BASIS OF INHERITANCE

CHROMOSOMAL BASIS OF INHERITANCE CHROMOSOMAL BASIS OF INHERITANCE The fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has been widely used for the study of eukaryote genetics because of several features: short generation time (two weeks) prolific

More information

The Drosophila neurogenic gene big brain, which encodes a membraneassociated protein, acts cell autonomously and can act synergistically with

The Drosophila neurogenic gene big brain, which encodes a membraneassociated protein, acts cell autonomously and can act synergistically with Development 124, 3881-3893 (1997) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 1997 DEV8422 3881 The Drosophila neurogenic gene big brain, which encodes a membraneassociated protein, acts

More information

BIS &003 Answers to Assigned Problems May 23, Week /18.6 How would you distinguish between an enhancer and a promoter?

BIS &003 Answers to Assigned Problems May 23, Week /18.6 How would you distinguish between an enhancer and a promoter? Week 9 Study Questions from the textbook: 6 th Edition: Chapter 19-19.6, 19.7, 19.15, 19.17 OR 7 th Edition: Chapter 18-18.6 18.7, 18.15, 18.17 19.6/18.6 How would you distinguish between an enhancer and

More information

DETERMINING THE DIFFERENTIAL ROLES OF THE DOCK FAMILY OF GEFS IN DROSOPHILA DEVELOPMENT

DETERMINING THE DIFFERENTIAL ROLES OF THE DOCK FAMILY OF GEFS IN DROSOPHILA DEVELOPMENT DETERMINING THE DIFFERENTIAL ROLES OF THE DOCK FAMILY OF GEFS IN DROSOPHILA DEVELOPMENT A DISSERTATION IN Cell Biology & Biophysics and Molecular Biology & Biochemistry Presented to the Faculty of the

More information

S Phase Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues

S Phase Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues S Phase Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues Jean M. Davidson 1, Robert J. Duronio 1,2,3 * 1 Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel

More information

Objectives. Announcements. Comparison of mitosis and meiosis

Objectives. Announcements. Comparison of mitosis and meiosis Announcements Colloquium sessions for which you can get credit posted on web site: Feb 20, 27 Mar 6, 13, 20 Apr 17, 24 May 15. Review study CD that came with text for lab this week (especially mitosis

More information

BIOLOGY 321. Answers to text questions th edition: Chapter 2

BIOLOGY 321. Answers to text questions th edition: Chapter 2 BIOLOGY 321 SPRING 2013 10 TH EDITION OF GRIFFITHS ANSWERS TO ASSIGNMENT SET #1 I have made every effort to prevent errors from creeping into these answer sheets. But, if you spot a mistake, please send

More information

Distinct functions of the leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins Capricious and Tartan in the Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis

Distinct functions of the leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins Capricious and Tartan in the Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis Developmental Biology 296 (2006) 253 264 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Distinct functions of the leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins Capricious and Tartan in the Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis

More information

Wingless transduction by the Frizzled and Frizzled2 proteins of Drosophila

Wingless transduction by the Frizzled and Frizzled2 proteins of Drosophila Development 126, 5441-5452 (1999) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 DEV7755 5441 Wingless transduction by the Frizzled and Frizzled2 proteins of Drosophila Chiann-mun Chen

More information

Developmental Biology 3230 Midterm Exam 1 March 2006

Developmental Biology 3230 Midterm Exam 1 March 2006 Name Developmental Biology 3230 Midterm Exam 1 March 2006 1. (20pts) Regeneration occurs to some degree to most metazoans. When you remove the head of a hydra a new one regenerates. Graph the inhibitor

More information

IN the Drosophila ventral nerve cord, there are 20

IN the Drosophila ventral nerve cord, there are 20 Copyright Ó 2007 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.075085 Regulation of Axon Guidance by Slit and Netrin Signaling in the Drosophila Ventral Nerve Cord Krishna Moorthi Bhat,

More information

PRACTICE EXAM. 20 pts: 1. With the aid of a diagram, indicate how initial dorsal-ventral polarity is created in fruit fly and frog embryos.

PRACTICE EXAM. 20 pts: 1. With the aid of a diagram, indicate how initial dorsal-ventral polarity is created in fruit fly and frog embryos. PRACTICE EXAM 20 pts: 1. With the aid of a diagram, indicate how initial dorsal-ventral polarity is created in fruit fly and frog embryos. No Low [] Fly Embryo Embryo Non-neural Genes Neuroectoderm Genes

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/ncb3267 Supplementary Figure 1 A group of genes required for formation or orientation of annular F-actin bundles and aecm ridges: RNAi phenotypes and their validation by standard mutations.

More information

Q2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus. Q8 (Biology) (4.6)

Q2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus. Q8 (Biology) (4.6) Q1 (4.6) What is variation? Q2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus Q3 (4.6) What are genes? Q4 (4.6) What sort of reproduction produces genetically

More information

RACK-1 Acts with Rac GTPase Signaling and UNC-115/ ablim in Caenorhabditis elegans Axon Pathfinding and Cell Migration

RACK-1 Acts with Rac GTPase Signaling and UNC-115/ ablim in Caenorhabditis elegans Axon Pathfinding and Cell Migration RACK-1 Acts with Rac GTPase Signaling and UNC-115/ ablim in Caenorhabditis elegans Axon Pathfinding and Cell Migration Rafael S. Demarco, Erik A. Lundquist* Programs in Genetics and Molecular, Cellular,

More information

The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance

The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance Mitosis and meiosis were first described in the late 800s. The chromosome theory of inheritance states: Mendelian genes have specific loci (positions) on chromosomes.

More information

1. What are the three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb? 2. What embryonic regions contribute to the developing limb bud?

1. What are the three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb? 2. What embryonic regions contribute to the developing limb bud? Study Questions - Lecture 17 & 18 1. What are the three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb? The three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb are the proximal stylopod, zeugopod, and

More information

The foraging locus: behavioral tests for normal muscle movement in rover and sitter Drosophila melanogaster larvae

The foraging locus: behavioral tests for normal muscle movement in rover and sitter Drosophila melanogaster larvae Genetica 85: 205-209, 1992. 0 1992 Kluwer Acadernic Publishers. Primed in the Nerhrrlands. The foraging locus: behavioral tests for normal muscle movement in rover and sitter Drosophila melanogaster larvae

More information

Developmental Biology

Developmental Biology Developmental Biology 359 (2011) 176 189 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/developmentalbiology Moleskin is essential for the formation

More information

Developmental genetics: finding the genes that regulate development

Developmental genetics: finding the genes that regulate development Developmental Biology BY1101 P. Murphy Lecture 9 Developmental genetics: finding the genes that regulate development Introduction The application of genetic analysis and DNA technology to the study of

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Medical Sciences Commons

Follow this and additional works at:   Part of the Medical Sciences Commons Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Master s Theses Student Theses 2010 The overexpression of homeotic complex gene Ultrabithorax in the post-embryonic neuronal lineages of the ventral nervous

More information

Attractive and repulsive functions of Slit are mediated by different receptors in the Drosophila trachea

Attractive and repulsive functions of Slit are mediated by different receptors in the Drosophila trachea Development 129, 4941-4951 (2002) Printed in Great Britain The Company of Biologists Limited 2002 DEV7966 4941 Attractive and repulsive functions of Slit are mediated by different receptors in the Drosophila

More information

Drosophila Plexin B is a Sema-2a receptor required for axon guidance

Drosophila Plexin B is a Sema-2a receptor required for axon guidance RESEARCH ARTICLE 2125 Development 133, 2125-2135 (2006) doi:10.1242/dev.02380 Drosophila Plexin B is a Sema-2a receptor required for axon guidance Joseph C. Ayoob 1, Jonathan R. Terman 1,2 and Alex L.

More information

Principles of Experimental Embryology

Principles of Experimental Embryology Biology 4361 Developmental Biology Principles of Experimental Embryology September 19, 2006 Major Research Questions How do forces outside the embryo affect its development? (Environmental Developmental

More information

Report. Functional Diversity of Robo Receptor Immunoglobulin Domains Promotes Distinct Axon Guidance Decisions

Report. Functional Diversity of Robo Receptor Immunoglobulin Domains Promotes Distinct Axon Guidance Decisions Current Biology 20, 567 572, March 23, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.021 Functional Diversity of Robo Receptor Immunoglobulin Domains Promotes Distinct Axon Guidance

More information

Natural Selection. Population Dynamics. The Origins of Genetic Variation. The Origins of Genetic Variation. Intergenerational Mutation Rate

Natural Selection. Population Dynamics. The Origins of Genetic Variation. The Origins of Genetic Variation. Intergenerational Mutation Rate Natural Selection Population Dynamics Humans, Sickle-cell Disease, and Malaria How does a population of humans become resistant to malaria? Overproduction Environmental pressure/competition Pre-existing

More information

Development of Drosophila

Development of Drosophila Development of Drosophila Hand-out CBT Chapter 2 Wolpert, 5 th edition March 2018 Introduction 6. Introduction Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly, is found in all warm countries. In cooler regions,

More information

Drosophila Spastin Regulates Synaptic Microtubule Networks and Is Required for Normal Motor Function

Drosophila Spastin Regulates Synaptic Microtubule Networks and Is Required for Normal Motor Function Drosophila Spastin Regulates Synaptic Microtubule Networks and Is Required for Normal Motor Function Nina Tang Sherwood 1, Qi Sun 1 1, Mingshan Xue 2 2, Bing Zhang 2, Kai Zinn 1 * Open access, freely available

More information

Lab I: Three-Point Mapping in Drosophila melanogaster

Lab I: Three-Point Mapping in Drosophila melanogaster Lab I: Three-Point Mapping in Drosophila melanogaster Makuo Aneke Partner: Christina Hwang BIO 365-004: Genetics with Laboratory TA: Dr. Hongmei Ma February 18, 2016 Abstract The purpose of this experiment

More information

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Axis Specification in Drosophila Developmental Biology Biology 4361 Axis Specification in Drosophila July 9, 2008 Drosophila Development Overview Fertilization Cleavage Gastrulation Drosophila body plan Oocyte formation Genetic control

More information

Overexpression of Cysteine-String Proteins in Drosophila Reveals Interactions with Syntaxin

Overexpression of Cysteine-String Proteins in Drosophila Reveals Interactions with Syntaxin The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 1999, 19(23):10270 10279 Overexpression of Cysteine-String Proteins in Drosophila Reveals Interactions with Syntaxin Zhiping Nie, Ravi Ranjan, Julia J. Wenniger,

More information

The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance

The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance Neuron, Vol. 20, 207 220, February, 1998, Copyright 1998 by Cell Press The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance Hung-Hsiang Yu, Houmam H.

More information

Crk-associated substrate (Cas) signaling protein functions with integrins to specify axon guidance during development

Crk-associated substrate (Cas) signaling protein functions with integrins to specify axon guidance during development RESEARCH ARTICLE 2337 Development 134, 2337-2347 (2007) doi:10.1242/dev.004242 Crk-associated substrate (Cas) signaling protein functions with integrins to specify axon guidance during development Zhiyu

More information

Caenorhabditis elegans

Caenorhabditis elegans Caenorhabditis elegans Why C. elegans? Sea urchins have told us much about embryogenesis. They are suited well for study in the lab; however, they do not tell us much about the genetics involved in embryogenesis.

More information

BS 50 Genetics and Genomics Week of Oct 3 Additional Practice Problems for Section. A/a ; B/B ; d/d X A/a ; b/b ; D/d

BS 50 Genetics and Genomics Week of Oct 3 Additional Practice Problems for Section. A/a ; B/B ; d/d X A/a ; b/b ; D/d BS 50 Genetics and Genomics Week of Oct 3 Additional Practice Problems for Section 1. In the following cross, all genes are on separate chromosomes. A is dominant to a, B is dominant to b and D is dominant

More information

Genetic characterization of the Drosophila homologue of coronin

Genetic characterization of the Drosophila homologue of coronin Research Article 1911 Genetic characterization of the Drosophila homologue of coronin V. Bharathi, S. K. Pallavi, R. Bajpai, B. S. Emerald and L. S. Shashidhara* Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology,

More information

Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila

Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila Cell, Vol. 96, 785 794, March 19, 1999, Copyright 1999 by Cell Press Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila Thomas Kidd, Kimberly S. Bland, and Corey S. Goodman* Howard Hughes

More information

!!!!!!!! DB3230 Midterm 2 12/13/2013 Name:

!!!!!!!! DB3230 Midterm 2 12/13/2013 Name: 1. (10 pts) Draw or describe the fate map of a late blastula stage sea urchin embryo. Draw or describe the corresponding fate map of the pluteus stage larva. Describe the sequence of gastrulation events

More information

C. elegans Dynamin Mediates the Signaling of Phagocytic Receptor CED-1 for the Engulfment and Degradation of Apoptotic Cells

C. elegans Dynamin Mediates the Signaling of Phagocytic Receptor CED-1 for the Engulfment and Degradation of Apoptotic Cells Developmental Cell 10, 743 757, June, 2006 ª2006 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.007 C. elegans Dynamin Mediates the Signaling of Phagocytic Receptor CED-1 for the Engulfment and Degradation

More information

Abl Kinase Inhibits the Engulfment of Apoptotic [corrected] Cells in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abl Kinase Inhibits the Engulfment of Apoptotic [corrected] Cells in Caenorhabditis elegans Abl Kinase Inhibits the Engulfment of Apoptotic [corrected] Cells in Caenorhabditis elegans The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story

More information

purpose of this Chapter is to highlight some problems that will likely provide new

purpose of this Chapter is to highlight some problems that will likely provide new 119 Chapter 6 Future Directions Besides our contributions discussed in previous chapters to the problem of developmental pattern formation, this work has also brought new questions that remain unanswered.

More information

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 14, 2012

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 14, 2012 Write your name and student ID# on EVERY PAGE of your exam MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 14, 2012 Question #1 Question #2 Question #3 Question #4 BONUS / 28 pts / 27 pts / 25 pts / 20 pts / 1 pt TOTAL / 100 pts

More information

Systematic Screening of Drosophila Deficiency Mutations for Embryonic Phenotypes and Orphan Receptor Ligands

Systematic Screening of Drosophila Deficiency Mutations for Embryonic Phenotypes and Orphan Receptor Ligands Systematic Screening of Drosophila Deficiency Mutations for Embryonic Phenotypes and Orphan Receptor Ligands Ashley P. Wright 1, A. Nicole Fox 1, Karl G. Johnson 2, Kai Zinn 1 * 1 Division of Biology,

More information

Unit 3 - Molecular Biology & Genetics - Review Packet

Unit 3 - Molecular Biology & Genetics - Review Packet Name Date Hour Unit 3 - Molecular Biology & Genetics - Review Packet True / False Questions - Indicate True or False for the following statements. 1. Eye color, hair color and the shape of your ears can

More information

Cell Cell Communication in Development

Cell Cell Communication in Development Biology 4361 Developmental Biology Cell Cell Communication in Development June 25, 2008 Cell Cell Communication Concepts Cells in developing organisms develop in the context of their environment, including

More information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information Supplementary Information Supplementary Figure 1. JAK/STAT in early wing development (a-f) Wing primordia of second instar larvae of the indicated genotypes labeled to visualize expression of upd mrna

More information

Serrate and wingless cooperate to induce vestigial gene expression and wing formation in Drosophila

Serrate and wingless cooperate to induce vestigial gene expression and wing formation in Drosophila Serrate and wingless cooperate to induce vestigial gene expression and wing formation in Drosophila J.P. Couso*t, E. Knust* and A. Martinez Arias* *Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing

More information

Genes, Development, and Evolution

Genes, Development, and Evolution 14 Genes, Development, and Evolution Chapter 14 Genes, Development, and Evolution Key Concepts 14.1 Development Involves Distinct but Overlapping Processes 14.2 Changes in Gene Expression Underlie Cell

More information

Figure S1. Programmed cell death in the AB lineage occurs in temporally distinct

Figure S1. Programmed cell death in the AB lineage occurs in temporally distinct SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Figure S1. Programmed cell death in the AB lineage occurs in temporally distinct waves. (A) A representative sub-lineage (ABala) of the C. elegans lineage tree (adapted from

More information

Wan-Ju Liu 1,2, John S Reece-Hoyes 3, Albertha JM Walhout 3 and David M Eisenmann 1*

Wan-Ju Liu 1,2, John S Reece-Hoyes 3, Albertha JM Walhout 3 and David M Eisenmann 1* Liu et al. BMC Developmental Biology 2014, 14:17 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Multiple transcription factors directly regulate Hox gene lin-39 expression in ventral hypodermal cells of the C. elegans embryo

More information

Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotype of the HI strain.

Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotype of the HI strain. Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotype of the HI strain. (A) Phenotype of the HI and wild type plant after flowering (~1month). Wild type plant is tall with well elongated inflorescence. All four HI plants

More information

F1 Parent Cell R R. Name Period. Concept 15.1 Mendelian inheritance has its physical basis in the behavior of chromosomes

F1 Parent Cell R R. Name Period. Concept 15.1 Mendelian inheritance has its physical basis in the behavior of chromosomes Name Period Concept 15.1 Mendelian inheritance has its physical basis in the behavior of chromosomes 1. What is the chromosome theory of inheritance? 2. Explain the law of segregation. Use two different

More information