HDD PA-LA SR (S-K34, S-K35, PEM-K32)

Similar documents
HDD PA-IN RD (W-N57 and W-N56)

HDD PA-HU WX (MP-140)

HDD PA-YO RR (S-A22)

HDD PA-CH RD (W-Q76, S-Q83, W-Q77, and S-Q86)

HDD PA-CH RR (W-K18, W-K21, and AMTRAK railway)

HDD PA-YO RR (S-A22)

HDD PA-CH RD (Devon Drive, Biddle Drive, and Shoen Road)

Attachment A HDD Table York County

HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL ANALYSIS HORSE VALLEY ROAD CROSSING PADEP SECTION 105 PERMIT NO. E PA-PE RD & PA-PE-0002.


APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION


B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Geotechnical Data Report

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

LEGEND ODOT CLASS A-3. A-3a. A-4a. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW

Project No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming


HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL ANALYSIS ARCH BISHOP/SOUTH CHESTER ROAD CROSSING PADEP SECTION 105 PERMIT NO.: E PA-CH-0421.

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

Geotechnical Data Report

LEGEND ODOT CLASS. A-4b. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL WEATHERED SANDSTONE VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.

Horizontal Directional Drilling: An Approach to Design and Construction. Presenter: John Briand, PE Co-Author: Danielle Neamtu, PE

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

PLATE 6 FEB G r o v e l a n d F l o o d w a l l - B o r e h o l e M a p. Legend. Groveland Floodwall Boreholes. Contour Lines.

Geotechnical Data Report

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Geotechnical Engineering Report

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.


HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL ANALYSIS VALLEY ROAD CROSSING PADEP SECTION 105 PERMIT NO. E PA-DE RD and PA-DE-0046.

Northern Colorado Geotech

APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Log of Monitoring Well D58B

REPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO. Prepared for:

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL ANALYSIS AUGHWICK CREEK CROSSING PADEP SECTION 105 PERMIT NO.S: PA-HU WX & PA-HU WX-16 (SPLP HDD#

Geotechnical Engineering Report

CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.

Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY


Attachment B. Grain Size Distribution Curves

Geotechnical Investigation

Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

UAS Student Residence

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

APÉNDICE F. Evaluación Geotécnica

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

BRIDGE FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

APPENDIX B: BORING LOGS

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

PARQUE COLON AGUADILLA (LAND PROPERTY OF MUNICIPIO AGUADA) LOT PROPERTY OF SUNC. ESTEVEZ BW-1 BW-5 BW-2 DB1 BW-3 DB2 BW-4 DB3 GWS-1

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No

Fauquier County Cedar Lee Middle School Safety Routes to School Bealeton, Virginia

February 16, 2015 File No Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No.

REPORT. Explorations and Geotechnical Engineering Services

Transcription:

HDD PA-LA-0004.0000-SR (S-K34, S-K35, PEM-K32) Given the design, the threat of inadvertent return has been reduced to the maximum extent practicable and in this case that threat is considered to be low. Implementing this design, along with adherence to the Pennsylvania Pipeline Project Inadvertent Return Contingency Plan will ensure inadvertent impacts, if they were to occur, are also minimized to the maximum extent. The drill will enter/exit 368 feet from the western edge of Stream K34 (S-K34) and enter/exit 1,080 feet from the eastern edge. The drill will enter/exit 1,220 feet from the western edge of Stream K35 (S-K35) and enter/exit 230 feet from the eastern edge. The Grassy Wetland K32 (PEM-K32) crosses the drill in two different locations with a non-wetland field in between. The drill will enter/exit 270 feet from the westernmost edge of the western crossing of PEM-K32 and enter/exit 780 feet from the eastern edge of the western crossing. The drill will enter/exit 1,040 feet from the western edge of the eastern crossing and enter/exit 160 feet from the eastern edge. The drill will cross 30 feet below the streams (S-K34 and S-K35) and will range from 20 feet to 45 feet below the wetland. The geotechnical results, as well as other data points, were used to determine the entry/exit angles, and depths to pass through the best substrates while maintaining pipe integrity (e.g., no large bends). According to the geotechnical report the primary substrates being drilled through are fine to medium sands with silty clays (down to 30 feet) and medium to course sand below that. Based on the geotechnical reports and the drill profile minimal inadvertent returns are expected.

PA-LA-0004.0000 PROPOSED 16" PIPELINE 14+00 14+20 13+00 12+00 11+00 1 9+00 7+00 8+00 SUNOCO EASEMENT LIMITS - NOT LOD 6+00 5+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 GEOTECH SB-02 HDD PULLBACK AL ONG ROW CLAY TOWNSHIP WEST COCALICO TOWNSHIP N40.280777 W76.210984 150 PEM WETLANDS PSS WETLANDS PLAN VIEW FEET -NG EL. 505' 14+40, 157' LT 14+20 EL.504' GEOTECH SB-02 6+30, 74' LT 600 -GROUNDWATER (19.0') CL STREAM S-K34 3+39 -SC (0.3' - 30.0') -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.3') 0+72, 120' RT EL.522' -NG EL. 519' COCALICO CREEK S-K35 11+93 PROFILE VIEW LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA - CLAY/WEST COCALICO TOWNSHIP S3-0111 PFO WETLANDS 75 LEGEND 0 PA-LA-0004.0001 PERMANENT ROW TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROW TEMPORARY WORKSPACE TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD PERMANENT ACCESS ROAD SPOIL SPACE ONLY PROPOSED HDD PROPOSED 20" PIPELINE PROPOSED 16" PIPELINE HDD ENTRY-EXIT 75 N40.280895 W76.205897 PROPOSED 20" PIPELINE 10 DEPTH EL. 489' 10 GRADE GEOTECH SB-02 500 18' -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.4') -SM (0.4' - 6.5') -GROUNDWATER (5.0') -CL (6.5' - 11.5') 201' STA. 1+98 EL. 487' 400 R=2000' L=347' S=349' -SM (11.5' - 29.1') STA. 13+26 EL. 487' STA. 9+79 EL. 457' STA. 5+37 EL. 457' R=2000' L=347' S=349' 442' -ML (0.2' - 21.5') -SM (21.5' - 26.0') -ML (26.0' - 30.0') 600 DEPTH EL. 475' 550 NOTE: REFER TO TEST BORING LOG S3-0111 FOR COMPLETE SOIL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 500 31' 29' -NG EL. 502' -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.4') -GROUNDWATER (8.0') 450 95' 400 -CL (29.1' - 31.5') 350 300-1+00 -SM (31.5' - 66.0') 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 1 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 300 15+00 -ML (66.0' - 71.0') DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY DEPTH OF ALL EXITING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. 2. THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITIES SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 10 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE UTILITY TO OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED PIPELINE. 3. DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFR 49 195 & ASME B31.4 4. CROSSING PIPE SPECIFICATION: HDD HORZ. LENGTH (L=): 1420' HDD PIPE LENGTH (S=): 1436' 20" x 0.456" W.T., X-65, API5L, PSL2, ERW, BFW COATING: 14-16 MILS FBE WITH 30-35 MIL ARO (POWERCRETE R95) -SM (71.0' - 73.5') DEPTH EL. 429' NOTE: REFER TO TEST BORING LOG S3-0111 FOR COMPLETE SOIL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION NOTES REF. DRAWING 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE IN LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE. ALL MSL ELEVATIONS ARE NAD83 ES-4.05 2. STATIONING IS BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. SHEET 3 3. ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUNOCO PIPELINE, LP ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF FOREIGN UTILITIES SHOWN IN PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS FURNISHED WITHOUT LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUNOCO PIPELINE, LP, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THEREIN. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES. CONTACT ONE CALL AT 811 PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5. SUNOCO EMERGENCY HOTLINE NUMBER IS #1-800-786-7440. DWG NO 5. 6. 7. INTERNAL DESIGN PRESSURE 1480 PSIG (SEAM FACTOR 1.0, DESIGH FACTOR 0.50). INSTALLATION METHOD: HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL (HDD). PIPELINE WARNING MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL ROAD, RAILWAY, AND STREAM CROSSINGS. 8. CARRIER PIPE NOT ENCASED. 9. PIPE / AMBIENT TEMPERATURE MUST BE NO LESS THAN 30 F DURING PULLBACK WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 10. CONDUCT 4-HOUR PRE-INSTALLATION HYDROTEST OF HDD PIPE STRING TO MINIMUM 1850 PSIG. 11. SEE SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT ESRI WEBMAP FOR ACCESS ROAD ALIGNMENT. REVISIONS TO ES-4.05 EROSION & SEDIMENT PLAN EP2 REVISED PER PADEP COMMENTS RECEIVED 09-06-16 DLM 09/30/16 RMB 09/30/16 AAW 09/30/16 TO SHEET 3 AERIAL SITE PLAN EP1 REVISED PER PADEP COMMENTS JTW 05/18/16 RMB 05/18/16 AAW 05/18/16 MRS 02/26/16 RMB 02/26/16 AAW 02/26/16 EP C DWG NO DESCRIPTION ADDED GEOTECH INFO MRS 09/23/15 RMB 09/23/15 AAW 09/23/15 B ISSUED FOR BID MRS 07/31/15 RMB 07/31/15 AAW 07/31/15 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW JVA 04/15/15 RMB 04/15/15 AAW 04/15/15 BY NO. DESCRIPTION CHK APP 12. 13. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.'S HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL INADVERTENT RETURN CONTINGENCY PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT ALL TIMES. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.'S EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT ALL TIMES. Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P. 20-INCH HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL WETLAND K32 & S-K35 PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT 1"=150' PA-LA-0004.0000-SR

PA-LA-0004.0000 SUNOCO EASEMENT LIMITS - NOT LOD 14+00 14+20 13+00 12+00 11+00 1 9+00 8+00 7+00 6+00 5+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 PROPOSED 16" PIPELINE HDD PULLBACK AL ONG ROW CLAY TOWNSHIP WEST COCALICO TOWNSHIP N40.280831 W76.211058 150 LEGEND PERMANENT ROW TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROW TEMPORARY WORKSPACE TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD PERMANENT ACCESS ROAD SPOIL SPACE ONLY PROPOSED HDD PROPOSED 20" PIPELINE PROPOSED 16" PIPELINE HDD ENTRY-EXIT PEM WETLANDS PSS WETLANDS PLAN VIEW FEET -NG EL. 505' 14+20 EL.503' 14+60, 137' LT 600 -GROUNDWATER (19.0') CL STREAM S-K34 3+29 -SC (0.3' - 30.0') -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.3') 0+92, 140' RT EL.522' -NG EL. 519' PROFILE VIEW LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA - CLAY/WEST COCALICO TOWNSHIP S3-0111-16 PFO WETLANDS COCALICO CREEK S-K35 12+13 75 N40.280948 W76.205971 0 PA-LA-0004.0001 75 PROPOSED 20" PIPELINE -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.4') -GROUNDWATER (8.0') -ML (0.2' - 21.5') -SM (21.5' - 26.0') 10 DEPTH EL. 489' 10 GRADE GEOTECH SB-02 500 29' -NG EL. 502' -TOPSOIL (0' - 0.4') -SM (0.4' - 6.5') -GROUNDWATER (5.0') -CL (6.5' - 11.5') 239' STA. 2+36 EL. 481' DEPTH EL. 475' 550 NOTE: REFER TO TEST BORING LOG S3-0111 FOR COMPLETE SOIL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 500 31' 45' -ML (26.0' - 30.0') 600 450 STA. 5+13 EL. 457' R=1600' L=278' S=279' 400 -SM (11.5' - 29.1') STA. 10+14 EL. 457' R=1600' L=278' S=279' 501' STA. 12+92 EL. 481' 130' 400 -CL (29.1' - 31.5') 350 300-1+00 -SM (31.5' - 66.0') 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 1 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 300 15+00 -ML (66.0' - 71.0') DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY DEPTH OF ALL EXITING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. 2. THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITIES SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 10 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE UTILITY TO OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED PIPELINE. 3. DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFR 49 195 & ASME B31.4 4. CROSSING PIPE SPECIFICATION: HDD HORZ. LENGTH (L=): 1420' HDD PIPE LENGTH (S=): 1428' 16" x 0.438" W.T., X-70, API5L, PSL2, ERW, BFW COATING: 14-16 MILS FBE WITH 30-35 MIL ARO (POWERCRETE R95) -SM (71.0' - 73.5') DEPTH EL. 429' NOTE: REFER TO TEST BORING LOG S3-0111 FOR COMPLETE SOIL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION NOTES REF. DRAWING 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE IN LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE. ALL MSL ELEVATIONS ARE NAD83 ES-4.05 2. STATIONING IS BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. SHEET 3 3. ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUNOCO PIPELINE, LP ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF FOREIGN UTILITIES SHOWN IN PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS FURNISHED WITHOUT LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND SUNOCO PIPELINE, LP, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THEREIN. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES. CONTACT ONE CALL AT 811 PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5. SUNOCO EMERGENCY HOTLINE NUMBER IS #1-800-786-7440. DWG NO TO ES-4.05 EROSION & SEDIMENT PLAN TO SHEET 3 AERIAL SITE PLAN DESCRIPTION INTERNAL DESIGN PRESSURE 1480 PSIG (SEAM FACTOR 1.0, DESIGH FACTOR 0.50). INSTALLATION METHOD: HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL (HDD). PIPELINE WARNING MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL ROAD, RAILWAY, AND STREAM CROSSINGS. 8. CARRIER PIPE NOT ENCASED. 9. PIPE / AMBIENT TEMPERATURE MUST BE NO LESS THAN 30 F DURING PULLBACK WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 10. CONDUCT 4-HOUR PRE-INSTALLATION HYDROTEST OF HDD PIPE STRING TO MINIMUM 1850 PSIG. 11. SEE SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT ESRI WEBMAP FOR ACCESS ROAD ALIGNMENT. REVISIONS EP2 REVISED PER PADEP COMMENTS RECEIVED 09-06-16 MRS 10/07/16 RMB 10/07/16 AAW 10/07/16 EP1 REVISED PER PADEP COMMENTS JTW RMB 05/18/16 AAW 05/18/16 EP DWG NO 5. 6. 7. 05/18/16 MRS 02/26/16 RMB 02/26/16 AAW 02/26/16 09/24/15 AAW 09/24/15 RMB 08/31/15 AAW 08/31/15 B ADDED GEOTECH INFO MRS 09/24/15 RMB A ISSUED FOR BID MRS 08/31/15 NO. DESCRIPTION BY CHK APP 12. 13. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.'S HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL INADVERTENT RETURN CONTINGENCY PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT ALL TIMES. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P.'S EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT ALL TIMES. Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. SUNOCO PIPELINE, L.P. 16-INCH HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL WETLAND K32 & S-K35 PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT 1"=150' PA-LA-0004.0000-SR-16

TB 02 LEGEND: Geotechnical Soil Boring (SB) Locations GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOCATIONS HDD S3 0111 WETLAND K32 LANCASTER COUNTY, CLAY TOWNSHIP AND LANCASTER COUNTY, WEST COCALICO TOWNSHIP, PA SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT

TETRA TECH 240 Continental Drive, Suite 200 Newark, Delaware 19713 302.738.7551 fax: 302.454.5988 Project Name: SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT Project No.: 103IP3406 Project Location: PINTAIL DRIVE, MIDDLE CREEK WILDLIFE MAMAGEMENT AREA, DENVER, PA Page 1 of 1 HDD No.: S3-0111 Dates(s) Drilled: 05-06-15 Inspector: E. WATT Boring No.: SB-01 Drilling Method: SPT - ASTM D1586 Driller: S. HOFFER Drilling Contractor: HAD DRILLING Groundwater Depth (ft): 19.0 Total Depth (ft): 30.0 Boring Location Coordinates: 40 16' 49.644" N 76 12' 38.503" W Sample Sample Depth (ft) Strata Depth (ft) Strata Description of Materials 6" Increment Blows * No. N From To From To (USCS) Recov. (in) TEST BORING LOG 0.0 0.3 TOPSOIL (4") 1 3.0 5.0 0.3 22 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILTY CLAY, 7 10 10 12 20 TRACE FINE GRAVEL. 2 8.0 9.4 17 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILTY CLAY, 4 18 50/5" >50 TRACE FINE GRAVEL. TRACE CONGLOMERATE MATRIX. 3 13.0 13.8 4 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILTY CLAY, 38 50/3" >50 TRACE FINE GRAVEL. TRACE CONGLOMERATE MATRIX. SC 4 18.0 20.0 7 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILTY CLAY, 4 3 6 11 9 TRACE FINE GRAVEL. (USCS: SC). 5 23.0 23.5 6 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND AND SILTY CLAY, WITH A 50/6" >50 LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. 6 28.0 28.5 5 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILTY CLAY, 50/6" 0 30.0 WITH A LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. AUGERED TO 30'. CAVED AT 26', WATER LEVEL ON CAVE AT 19'. BORING WAS RELOCATED WEST FROM INTENDED LOCATION TO KEEP OUT OF WINTER WHEAT FIELD (PER LO REQUEST). Notes/Comments: Pocket Pentrometer Testing Strata (USCS) Designations are approximated based on visual review, except where indicated in Description of Materials. * Number of blows of 140 lb. Hammer dropped 30 in. required to drive 2 in. split-spoon sampler in 6 in. increments. N: Number of blows to drive spoon from 6" to 18" interval.

TETRA TECH 240 Continental Drive, Suite 200 Newark, Delaware 19713 302.738.7551 fax: 302.454.5988 Project Name: SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT Project No.: 103IP3406 Project Location: PINTAIL DRIVE, MIDDLE CREEK WILDLIFE MAMAGEMENT AREA, DENVER, PA Page 1 of 1 HDD No.: S3-0111 Dates(s) Drilled: 05-06-15 Inspector: E. WATT Boring No.: SB-02 Drilling Method: SPT - ASTM D1586 Driller: S. HOFFER Drilling Contractor: HAD DRILLING Groundwater Depth (ft): 5.0 Total Depth (ft): 75.0 Boring Location Coordinates: 40 16' 51.722" N 76 12' 31.379" W Sample Sample Depth (ft) Strata Depth (ft) Strata No. From To From To (USCS) Recov. (in) TEST BORING LOG Description of Materials 6" Increment Blows * N 0.0 0.4 TOPSOIL (5") 1 3.0 5.0 0.4 16 SM REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILT, TRACE 5 14 8 9 22 6.5 FINE GRAVEL. 2 8.0 10.0 6.5 12 CL REDDISH BROWN SILTY CLAY AND FINE SAND (USCS: CL) 3 11 15 15 26 11.5 3 13.0 14.5 11.5 16 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILT, TRACE 18 28 50/5" >50 FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX) 4 18.0 18.6 5 SM REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME SILT, TRACE 30 50/1" >50 FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX) 5 23.0 24.3 16 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILT, TRACE 4 35 50/4" >50 29.1 FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX) 6 28.0 30.0 29.1 24 CL REDDISH BROWN MICACEOUS SILT CLAY, TRACE FINE SAND 14 35 37 50 72 31.5 (USCS: CL). 7 33.0 33.8 31.5 9 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILT, AND 23 50/4" >50 WITH A LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. 8 38.0 38.8 10 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILT, AND 6 50/4" >50 WITH A LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. 9 43.0 43.1 <1 REDDISH BROWN WEATHERED CONGLOMERATE. 50/1" >50 10 48.0 48.9 5 REDDISH BROWN WEATHERED CONGLOMERATE. SM 6 50/5" >50 11 53.0 53.4 5 REDDISH BROWN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND WITH SOME SILT, WITH 50/5" >50 A LITTLE F-C GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX). 12 58.0 58.8 9 REDDISH BROWN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND WITH SOME SILT, WITH 17 50/3" >50 A LITTLE F-C GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX). (USCS: SM) 13 63.0 63.5 6 REDDISH BROWN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND WITH SOME SILT, WITH 50/6" >50 66.0 A LITTLE F-C GRAVEL (SOME CONGLOMERATE MATRIX). 14 68.0 68.4 66.0 3 ML REDDISH BROWN MICACEOUS SLIGHTLY WEATHERED SILTSTONE. 50/5" >50 71.0 15 73.0 73.5 71.0 6 REDDISH BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A LITTLE SILT, AND SM 50/6" >50 73.5 WITH A LITTLE FINE GRAVEL. Notes/Comments: Pocket Pentrometer Testing WET ON SPOON AT 5'. CAVED AT 51', WATER LEVEL ON CAVE AT 3'. Strata (USCS) Designations are approximated based on visual review, except where indicated in Description of Materials. * Number of blows of 140 lb. Hammer dropped 30 in. required to drive 2 in. split-spoon sampler in 6 in. increments. N: Number of blows to drive spoon from 6" to 18" interval.

TETRA TECH 240 Continental Drive, Suite 200 Newark, Delaware 19713 302.738.7551 fax: 302.454.5988 Project Name: SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT Project No.: 103IP3406 Project Location: S. COCLICO ROAD, DENVER, PA Page 1 of 1 HDD No.: S3-0111 Dates(s) Drilled: 12-16-14 Inspector: E. WATT Boring No.: SB-03 Drilling Method: SPT - ASTM D1586 Driller: S. HOFFER Drilling Contractor: HAD DRILLING Groundwater Depth (ft): SEE BELOW Total Depth (ft): 30.0 Boring Location Coordinates: 40 16' 52.781" N 76 12' 20.970" W Sample Sample Depth (ft) Strata Depth (ft) Strata No. From To From To (USCS) Recov. (in) TEST BORING LOG Description of Materials 6" Increment Blows * N 0.0 0.2 TOPSOIL (2") 1 3.0 5.0 0.2 14 MOTTLED BROWN AND ORANGE BROWN CLAYEY SILT WITH A LITTLE 1 5 7 10 12 FINE SAND (USCS: ML). 2 8.0 10.0 19 REDDISH BROWN MICACEOUS CLAYEY SILT AND FINE SAND. 4 6 13 20 19 ML 3 13.0 15.0 24 REDDISH BROWN CLAYEY SILT WITH A LITTLE FINE SAND 2 11 16 30 27 (USCS: ML). 4 18.0 19.9 18 REDDISH BROWN CLAYEY SILT AND FINE SAND. 3 21 28 50/5" 49 21.5 5 23.0 23.8 21.5 9 SM REDDISH BROWN MICACEOUS FINE SAND WITH SOME CLAYEY SILT. 5 50/4" >50 26.0 6 28.0 30.0 26.0 14 ML REDDISH BROWN CLAYEY SILT WITH A LITTLE FINE SAND. 2 14 36 40 50 30.0 WET ON SPOON AT 16'. WATER LEVEL THROUGH AUGERS AT 4'. CAVED AT 28.5', WATER LEVEL ON CAVE AT 8'. Notes/Comments: Pocket Pentrometer Testing DR: DECOMPOSED ROCK Strata (USCS) Designations are approximated based on visual review, except where indicated in Description of Materials. * Number of blows of 140 lb. Hammer dropped 30 in. required to drive 2 in. split-spoon sampler in 6 in. increments. N: Number of blows to drive spoon from 6" to 18" interval.

GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING SUMMARY SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT HDD S3-0111 WETLAND K32 Test Water Percent Atterburg Limits (ASTM D4318) USCS HDD Boring Sample Depth of Sample (ft.) Content, % Silts/Clays, % Liquid Plastic Plasticity Classif. No. No. No. From To (ASTM D2216) (ASTM D1140) Limit, % Limit, % Index, % (ASTM D2487) 2 8.0 9.4 7.5 35.0 - - - - 3 13.0 13.8 6.6 32.5 - - - - SB-01 4 18.0 20.0 12.9 38.0 31 16 15 SC 5 23.0 23.5 6.3 40.4 - - - - 6 28.0 28.5 8.9 20.2 - - - - 2 8.0 10.0 15.8 67.5 28 18 10 CL 3 13.0 14.5 11.4 22.7 - - - - 5 23.0 24.3 11.9 17.8 - - - - 6 28.0 30.0 12.0 91.8 38 21 17 CL 7 33.0 33.8 16.9 17.7 - - - - S3-0111 SB-02 11 53.0 53.4 10.9 25.4 - - - - 12 58.0 58.8 12.0 31.1 31 24 7 SM 14 68.0 68.4 6.1 73.4 - - - - 15 73.0 73.5 13.6 20.2 - - - - 1 3.0 5.0 20.1 78.7 39 27 12 ML 2 8.0 10.0 15.3 53.1 - - - - SB-03 3 13.0 15.0 17.9 82.0 26 26 NP ML 4 18.0 19.9 10.1 61.1 - - - - 5 23.0 23.8 14.2 32.5 - - - - 6 28.0 30.0 17.5 82.2 - - - - Notes: 1) Sample depths based on feet below grade at time of exploration. Tetra Tech Newark, Delaware

REGIONAL GEOLOGY SUMMARY SUNOCO PENNSYLVANIA PIPELINE PROJECT HDD S3 0111 HDD No. NAME BORING NO. REGIONAL GEOLOGY DESCRIPTION GENERAL TOPOGRAPHIC SETTING BEDROCK FORMATION GENERAL ROCK TYPE APPROX MAX FM THICKNESS (FT) DEPTH TO ROCK (Ft bgs) based on nearby well drilling logs NOTES / COMMENTS S3 0111 Wetland K32 SB 01 SB 02 SB 03 Hammer Creek Formation Gray and pale red, fine to coarse grained quartzose sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone, interbeds of red shale and quartz conglomerate Level to very gently rolling Hammer Creek Fm sandstone with quartz pebble conglomerate 9,360 20 35 Yields 8 22 gpm Note : Source of well log data http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/groundwater/pagwis/records/index.htm. All other sources as referenced in comments section. Tetra Tech, Inc. Newark, Delaware

FIELD DESCRIPTION AND LOGGING SYSTEM FOR SOIL EXPLORATION GRANULAR SOILS (Sand, Gravel & Combinations) Density Very Loose Loose 6 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 N (blows)* 5 or less Dense 31to 50 Very Dense 51 or more Relative Proportions Description Term Percent Trace 1-10 Little 11-20 Some 21-35 And 36-50 Particle Size Identification Boulders 8 in. diameter or more Cobbles 3 to 8 in. diameter Gravel Coarse (C) 3 in. to ¾ in. sieve Fine (F) ¾ in. to No. 4 sieve Sand Coarse (C) No. 4 to No. 10 sieve (4.75mm-2.00mm) Medium (M) No. 10 to No. 40 sieve (2.00mm 0.425mm) Fine (F) No. 40 to No. 200 sieve (0.425 0.074mm) Silt/Clay Less Than a No. 200 sieve (<0.074mm) COHESIVE SOILS (Silt, Clay & Combinations) Consistency Very Soft Soft 4 to 5 Medium Stiff 6 to 10 Stiff 11 to 15 N (blows)* 3 or less Very Stiff 16 to 30 Hard 31 or more Plasticity Degree of Plasticity Plasticity Index None to Slight 0-4 Slight 5-7 Medium 8-22 High to Very High > 22 ROCK (Rock Cores) Rock Quality Designation (RQD), % Rock Quality Descripti on 0-25 Very Poor 25-50 Poor 50-75 Fair 75-90 Good 90-100 Excellent *N - Standard Penetration Resistance. Driving a 2.0" O.D., 1-3/8" I.D. sampler a distance of 18 inches into undisturbed soil with a 140 pound hammer free falling a distance of 30.0 inches. The number of hammer blows to drive the sampler through each 6 inch interval is recorded; the number of blows required to drive the sampler through the final 12 inch interval is termed the Standard Penetration Resistance (SPR) N-value. For example, blow counts of 6/8/9 (through three 6-inch intervals) results in an SPR N-value of 17 (8+9). Groundwater observations were made at the times indicated. Groundwater elevations fluctuate throughout a given year, depending on actual field porosity and variations in seasonal and annual precipitation.