Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Similar documents



B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT


APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS


Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

Geotechnical Data Report

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

GEOLOGIC/GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR TENTATIVE MAP LAVENIDA SUBDIVISION (APN # ) ORINDA, CALIFORNIA

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

UAS Student Residence

SOIL FORMATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. Soil Properties and Classification

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Parsons APPENDIX A BORING LOGS AND DEVELOPMENT LOG

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

Geotechnical Data Report

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

WELL NUMBER 14-BW03 PAGE 1 OF 5

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

Dry Muliwai Sample Location Map

The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally

DATE: 5/17/2012. LOGGED BY: Geoff Richards. COMPANY: Tetra Tech EM, Inc. DRILL FOREMAN: Walter

BR-01 PAINT BRIDGE NO. 55 C GENERAL PLAN 720'-0" VC 605'-0" VC 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

PLATE 6 FEB G r o v e l a n d F l o o d w a l l - B o r e h o l e M a p. Legend. Groveland Floodwall Boreholes. Contour Lines.

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT ROPOSED COMMERCIAL/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 7967, & 8015 BEVERLY BOULEVARD

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.

APPENDIX B: BORING LOGS

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

VOLUME III GEOLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY & GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CAPITAL REGION RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE

DYREGROV ROBINSON INC.

February 16, 2015 File No Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710

Technical Memorandum. Soil Borings

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Log of Monitoring Well D58B

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review

LEGEND ODOT CLASS A-3. A-3a. A-4a. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW

May 8, Mr. Jeff Dingman Abundant Land Partners LLC P.O. Box 471 Genoa, Nevada 89411

Project No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD

Geotechnical Investigation

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

Appendix J. Geological Investigation

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

December 13, Washington County Public Works Department Myeron Road North Stillwater, MN Attn: Mr. Andrew Giesen

patersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01

Soils. Technical English - I 10 th week

Appendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note

PARQUE COLON AGUADILLA (LAND PROPERTY OF MUNICIPIO AGUADA) LOT PROPERTY OF SUNC. ESTEVEZ BW-1 BW-5 BW-2 DB1 BW-3 DB2 BW-4 DB3 GWS-1

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.

CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents

Geotechnical Engineering Report


Appendix F4.11 Geologic Unit Summaries, Hazard Areas, and Boring Locations

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL PROPERTIES FOR WASIT GOVERNORATE

Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report

FINAL REPORT, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, NORTHWEST RIVER BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION, TERRA NOVA NATIONAL PARK, NL. File No:

Northern Colorado Geotech

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

Geotechnical Data Report

Transcription:

Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense, dark brown silty SAND with organics, moist [TOPSOIL]. Loose to medium dense, light-brown, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles [WEATHERED TILL] Probed at 2 feet, medium dense Very dense, gray, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel [VASHON TILL] Test Pit TP-6 terminated at 8 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-7 PanGEO, Inc.

PROJECT LOCATION SE GRAND RIDGE DRIVE GEOLOGIC UNITS Qls Landslide deposits Qgi Ice-contact deposits, melt-out, ablation, or flow tills Qgog Outwash gravel deposits, undivided Qgt v Vashon lodgment till Qga v Advance outwash deposits Qgl v Advance glaciolacustrine deposits 1000 0 1000 2000 Evt t Tukwila Formation, tuff Approximate Scale: 1" = 2000' I N C O R P O R A T E D Proposd Residence 271xx SE Grand Ridge Drive King County, Washington NOTES 1. Derived from the Geologic Map of Fall City 7.5-minute quadrangle, King County, WA (Dragovic, J.D, et. al. 2007) 2. Detailed descriptions of the geologic units can be found in the text of the report. 3. Only the applicable geologic units are listed. GEOLOGIC MAP 16-218 3

APPENDIX A SUMMARY TEST PIT LOGS

LOG KEY 09-118 LOG.GPJ PANGEO.GDT 11/12/13 Density Very Loose Loose Med. Dense Dense Very Dense RELATIVE DENSITY / CONSISTENCY SAND / GRAVEL SILT / CLAY SPT N-values <4 4 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 50 >50 Gravel 50% or more of the coarse fraction retained on the #4 sieve. Use dual symbols (eg. GP-GM) for 5% to 12% fines. Sand 50% or more of the coarse fraction passing the #4 sieve. Use dual symbols (eg. SP-SM) for 5% to 12% fines. Silt and Clay 50%or more passing #200 sieve Notes: Layered: Highly Organic Soils Approx. Relative Density (%) <15 15-35 35-65 65-85 85-100 GRAVEL (<5% fines) GRAVEL (>12% fines) SAND (<5% fines) SAND (>12% fines) Liquid Limit < 50 Liquid Limit > 50 Units of material distinguished by color and/or composition from material units above and below Laminated: Layers of soil typically 0.05 to 1mm thick, max. 1 cm Lens: Layer of soil that pinches out laterally Interlayered: Alternating layers of differing soil material Pocket: Erratic, discontinuous deposit of limited extent Homogeneous: Soil with uniform color and composition throughout SPT N-values <2 2 to 4 4 to 8 8 to 15 15 to 30 >30 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT Approx. Undrained Shear Strength (psf) GROUP DESCRIPTIONS Fissured: Slickensided: Blocky: Disrupted: Scattered: Numerous: Breaks along defined planes Fracture planes that are polished or glossy Angular soil lumps that resist breakdown Soil that is broken and mixed Less than one per foot More than one per foot Angle between bedding plane and a plane normal to core axis #4 to #10 sieve (4.5 to 2.0 mm) #10 to #40 sieve (2.0 to 0.42 mm) #40 to #200 sieve (0.42 to 0.074 mm) 0.074 to 0.002 mm <0.002 mm <250 250-500 500-1000 1000-2000 2000-4000 COMPONENT DEFINITIONS COMPONENT SIZE / SIEVE RANGE COMPONENT SIZE / SIEVE RANGE Boulder: Cobbles: Gravel >4000 1. Soil exploration logs contain material descriptions based on visual observation and field tests using a system modified from the Uniform Soil Classification System (USCS). Where necessary laboratory tests have been conducted (as noted in the "Other Tests" column), unit descriptions may include a classification. Please refer to the discussions in the report text for a more complete description of the subsurface conditions. 2. The graphic symbols given above are not inclusive of all symbols that may appear on the borehole logs. Other symbols may be used where field observations indicated mixed soil constituents or dual constituent materials. Coarse Gravel: Fine Gravel: Phone: 206.262.0370 > 12 inches 3 to 12 inches 3 to 3/4 inches 3/4 inches to #4 sieve Consistency Very Soft Soft Med. Stiff Stiff Very Stiff Hard Sand Silt Clay BCN: Coarse Sand: Medium Sand: Well-graded GRAVEL Poorly-graded GRAVEL Silty GRAVEL Clayey GRAVEL Well-graded SAND Poorly-graded SAND Silty SAND Clayey SAND SILT Lean CLAY Organic SILT or CLAY Elastic SILT Fat CLAY Organic SILT or CLAY PEAT DESCRIPTIONS OF SOIL STRUCTURES Fine Sand: Terms and Symbols for Boring and Test Pit Logs TEST SYMBOLS for In Situ and Laboratory Tests listed in "Other Tests" column. ATT Comp Con DD DS %F GS Perm PP SYMBOLS Sample/In Situ test types and intervals 2-inch OD Split Spoon, SPT (140-lb. hammer, 30" drop) 3.25-inch OD Spilt Spoon (300-lb hammer, 30" drop) Non-standard penetration test (see boring log for details) Thin wall (Shelby) tube Grab Rock core Vane Shear MONITORING WELL Groundwater Level at time of drilling (ATD) Static Groundwater Level Cement / Concrete Seal Bentonite grout / seal Silica sand backfill Slotted tip Slough Bottom of Boring MOISTURE CONTENT Dry Moist Wet R SG TV TXC UCC Atterberg Limit Test Compaction Tests Consolidation Dry Density Direct Shear Fines Content Grain Size Permeability Pocket Penetrometer R-value Specific Gravity Torvane Triaxial Compression Unconfined Compression Dusty, dry to the touch Damp but no visible water Visible free water Figure A-1

Test Pit No. TP-1 Location: Latitude 47.543136, Longitude -121.980693 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,128 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1 1 3 SM 3 6 SM Very loose, dark brown silty SAND with organics, dry [TOPSOIL]. Loose to medium dense, brown, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and cobbles, dry to moist [WEATHERED TILL]. Gravel and cobbles are well-rounded Tree roots to a depth of 24 inches Dense to very dense, light brown, silty SAND with gravel, moist [VASHON TILL] Probed 1 to 2 inches at 4 feet Gravel is socketed Test Pit TP-1: View of spoils pile during excavation. Test Pit TP-1: View of south side of pit. Test Pit is about six feet deep. Test Pit TP-1 terminated at 6 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-2 PanGEO, Inc.

Test Pit No. TP-2 Location: Latitude 47.543299, Longitude -121.980635 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,122 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1½ 1½ 4 SM 4 8 SM Loose, dark brown silty SAND with organics, moist [TOPSOIL]. Loose to medium dense, light brown, silty fine to medium SAND, some gravel, moist [WEATHERED TILL]. Gravel and cobbles are sub-rounded to well-rounded. Probed at 3 feet below grade, becoming dense to very dense. Dense to very dense, gray, silty SAND with gravel, moist [VASHON TILL] Socketed gravel Test Pit TP-2: Sample of unweathered till collected from about four feet below grade. Test Pit TP-2: View of north side of test pit at four feet in depth. Test Pit TP-2 terminated at 8 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-3 PanGEO, Inc.

Test Pit No. TP-3 Location: Latitude 47.543450, Longitude -121.980383 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1126 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 0.70 0.67 4 ML 4 8 SM Loose, dark brown silty SAND with organics, moist [TOPSOIL]. Loose to medium dense, light brown/buff sandy SILT, trace to some gravel, moist [WEATHERED TILL]. Silt is non-plastic Probed at 3 feet below grade, becoming dense. Dense to very dense, gray, silty fine to medium SAND with gravel and few cobbles [VASHON TILL]. Test Pit TP-3: View of spoils pile from Test Pit TP-3. Test Pit TP-3: View of east side of Test Pit TP-3 at approximately 8 feet deep. Test Pit TP-3 terminated at 8 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-4 PanGEO, Inc.

Test Pit No. TP-4 Location: Latitude 47.543398, Longitude -121.980403 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1126 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 0.7 0.7 4 ML 4 8 SM Loose, dark brown silty SAND with organics, moist [TOPSOIL]. Loose to medium dense, light brown/buff, sandy SILT, trace to some gravel, moist [WEATHERED TILL]. Silt is non-plastic Dense to very dense, gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel [VASHON TILL]. Test Pit TP-4: View of spoils pile after completion of Test Pit TP-4. Test Pit TP-4: View of east side of Test Pit TP-4 at eight feet deep. Test Pit TP-4 terminated at 8 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-5 PanGEO, Inc.

Test Pit No. TP-5 Location: Latitude 47.543212, Longitude -121.980384 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,128 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1 1 5 SM 5 9 SM Loose, dark brown silty SAND with organics, moist [TOPSOIL]. Medium dense, brown, silty SAND with gravel and cobbles [WEATHERED TILL]. Gravel and cobbles well-rounded Dense to very dense, brown, silty SAND with gravel and cobbles, moist [VASHON TILL]. Test Pit TP-5: View of unweathered Vashon till soils collected from 6 feet below grade. Test Pit TP-5: View of northwest side of test pit at 9 feet deep. Test Pit TP-5 terminated at 9 feet below grade. 16-218 Test Pit Logs Figure A-6 PanGEO, Inc.