B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

Similar documents



DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Data Report

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming

CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Geotechnical Engineering Report

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.


3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

The attitude he maintains in his relation to the engineer is very well stated in his own words:

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

patersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

December 20, 2017 (Revised from December 15, 2017) Project No

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

Northern Colorado Geotech

Geotechnical Engineering Report

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS

Geotechnical Data Report

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Appendix J. Geological Investigation

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

GEOLOGIC/GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR TENTATIVE MAP LAVENIDA SUBDIVISION (APN # ) ORINDA, CALIFORNIA

Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3


CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

APÉNDICE F. Evaluación Geotécnica

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Jim Christal Rd B2 B1 B3

Geotechnical Properties of Soil

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

DYREGROV ROBINSON INC.

CONTENTS. 1. GeneralsG Field Investigation WorkG Laboratory Testing Work Surface Soil Description-- 7.

Project No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD

PERIODIC SAFETY FACTOR ASSESSMENT

Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal

H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)

EIGHT POINT WIND LLC

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

Technical Memorandum. Soil Borings

REPORT. Explorations and Geotechnical Engineering Services

APPENDIX A - PART 2 GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS

December 13, Washington County Public Works Department Myeron Road North Stillwater, MN Attn: Mr. Andrew Giesen

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

Geotechnical Investigation

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL PROPERTIES FOR WASIT GOVERNORATE

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

Transcription:

N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232 Office: 210.340.5004 Facsimile: 210.340.5009 TBPE Firm Registration F-654 AFA NOT TO SCALE Date: Reviewed By: AFA 09-22-2015 BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2

SOIL SYMBOL PROJECT: CLIENT: FIELD DATA DEPTH (FT) 2 SAMPLES Brooks Veterinary Clinic City Base Landing Road and Goliad Road San Antonio, Texas Brooks City Base San Antonio, Texas N: BLOWS/FT P: TONS/SQ FT T: TONS/SQ FT PERCENT RECOVERY/ ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION N=15 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 56 LABORATORY DATA ATTERBERG LIMITS (%) LIQUID LIMIT LL PLASTIC LIMIT PL 16 PLASTICITY INDEX PI 40 DRY DENSITY (POUNDS/CU FT) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (POUNDS/SQ IN) LOG OF BORING FAILURE STRAIN (%) CONFINING PRESSURE (POUNDS/SQ IN) MINUS NO. 200 SIEVE (%) PROJECT NO. BORING NO. DATE SURFACE ELEVATION DRILLING METHOD(S): Dry augered from 0 to 15 feet. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION: 115G1063.02 B-1 9/15/2015 Existing Grade. PAGE 1 OF 1 Subsurface water was not encountered during or upon completion of our drilling activities. DESCRIPTION OF STRATUM Layer 1 FAT CLAY (CH); dark brown; very stiff; with trace gravel and roots in the upper 2 feet N=23 4 6 N=28 47 14 33 Layer 2 LEAN CLAY (CL); dark brown to tan; hard; with interbedded calcium deposits 115G1063.02 - Brooks Veterinary Clinic - This Log is not valid if seperated from original report. 8 10 14 N=20 N=38 N=41 15 - becomes very stiff between 6½ and 8½ feet Boring Terminated at 15 feet. REMARKS The boring was backfilled with cuttings after completion of drilling activities. EXHIBIT 3

APPENDIX FIELD AND LABORATORY EXPLORATORY DRILLING PROGRAM LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM NOTES REGARDING SOIL AND ROCK

EXPLORATORY DRILLING PROGRAM A truck-mounted, drilling rig was used to drill the exploratory borings and to recover soil/rock samples during the drilling. Soil samples were obtained by pushing thin wall tube samplers ( Shelby tube ) or with a splitbarrel ( split-spoon ) sampler while performing the Standard Penetration Test ( SPT ). Rock samples were obtained by performing the SPT or coring. When a soil sample was recovered using a Shelby tube sampler, a pocket penetrometer test ( PPT ) or hand torvane ( TV ) was conducted and recorded on the applicable exploratory field log of boring ( field log ). When a soil/rock sample was recovered using a split-barrel sampler, the SPT N-value was recorded on the applicable field log. The SPT procedure consists of driving the split-barrel into the subsurface stratum with a 140-pound hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows ( N ) required to advance the splitspoon sampler the last inches during a normal 18-inch penetration is the SPT resistance value or N-value. These N-values are indicated on each applicable field log at the depths of occurrence. The samples were sealed and transported to the laboratory for testing and classification. Our field representative prepared the field logs as part of the drilling operations. The field logs included visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling, our field representative interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples, and recording the results of various tests (N-values, PPT, and TV) performed during drilling and sampling. Each field log included with this report represents our technical interpretation of the field log and includes modifications based on visual observations and testing of the samples in the laboratory. The scope of services for our geotechnical engineering services does not include addressing any environmental issues pertinent to the site. LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Samples retrieved during the field exploration were taken to the laboratory for further observation by one of our technical representatives, and they were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). At that time, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary and an applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine the physical (index) and engineering properties of the soil/rock. Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples and the test results are presented in this appendix. The laboratory test results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses, and the development of foundation and earthwork recommendations. Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the applicable ASTM or other accepted standards. The following tests were conducted: Moisture Content Atterberg Limits Amount of Material In-Soil Finer than the N o 200 Mesh (75-µm) Sieve Sample Disposal All samples were returned to our laboratory. Unless stated otherwise in this report or the Project contract, the samples not tested in the laboratory will be stored for a period of 30 days subsequent to submittal of this report and will be discarded after this period, unless other arrangements are made prior to the disposal period.

NOTES REGARDING SOIL AND ROCK GEOTECHNICAL SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SS: Split Barrel (Split Spoon) AG: Auger Sample, Grab Sample, or Bulk Sample ST: Thin-Walled Tube (Shelby tube) RC: Rock Coring Sample WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: Water Level Encountered While Drilling and Sampling. Water Level Measurement After Initial Water Level Encountered During Drilling and Sampling. DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2487). Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50 percent of their dry weight retained on a No. 200 sieve. The primary descriptors of these soils are: boulders, cobbles, gravel, or sand. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50 percent of their dry weight retained on a No. 200 sieve. These soils are principally described as clays if they are plastic (have binding/molding characteristics), and silts if they are slightly plastic or nonplastic. Fine-grained soils are defined on the basis of their consistency. Undrained Shear c u, psf CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value Blows Per Foot RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-Value Blows Per Foot Consistency Relative Density < 250 < 2 Very Soft 0 3 Very Loose 250 500 2-3 Soft 4 9 Loose 500 1,000 4-6 Medium Stiff 10 29 Medium Dense 1,000 2,000 7 - Stiff 30 49 Dense 2,000 4,000-26 Very Stiff 50+ Very Dense 4,000+ 26+ Hard RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Descriptive Terms Percent of Dry Weight Major Constituent of Soil Sample Particle Size Trace < 15 Boulders Over in. (300mm) With 15 29 Cobbles in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75 mm) Modifier > 30 Gravel 3 in. to No. 4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) Sand Silt or Clay No. 4 to No. 200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm) Passing No. 200 Sieve (0.075mm) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF CLAYS AND SILTS PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Descriptive Terms Percent of Dry Weight Term Plasticity Index (PI) Trace < 5 Non-plastic 0 With 5 Low 1-10 Modifier > Medium 11-30 High 30+ CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK WITH RESPECT TO STRENGTH Very Low Strength Low Strength Medium Strength High Strength Very High Strength RQD 18 72 ksf 72 288 ksf 288 1,152 ksf 1,152 4,608 ksf 4,608 18,432 ksf DESCRIPTION OF ROCK QUALITY 0 25 Very Poor 25 50 Poor 50 75 Fair 75 90 Good 90-100 Excellent