Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam"

Transcription

1 Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam June 2012 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Attn: Evan Rothblatt, NTPEP erothblatt@aashto.org Submitted by: TRI/Environmental, Inc Bee Caves Road Austin, TX C. Joel Sprague Project Manager

2 June 30, 2012 Mr. Evan Rothblatt AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Subject: Large-scale Slope Testing over Loam of US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, manufactured in Willacoochee, GA Dear Mr. Rothblatt: This letter report presents the results for large-scale slope erosion tests performed on US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, rolled erosion control product (RECP), over loam. Included are data developed for target rainfall intensities from 2 to 6 in/hr (5 to 15 cm/hr). All testing work was performed in general accordance with the ASTM D 6459, Standard Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Performance in Protecting Hillslopes from Rainfall-Induced Erosion. Generated results were used to develop the following general cover factor (C-Factor) for the tested material: C-Factor US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket & 1.2 staples/sy = for cumulative R-Factor < 231; Eqn: C = R R R TRI is pleased to present this final report. Please feel free to call if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information. Sincerely, C. Joel Sprague, P.E. Senior Engineer Geosynthetics Services Division Cc: Sam Allen, Jarrett Nelson - TRI

3 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, SLOPE TESTING REPORT US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam TESTING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES Overview of Test and Apparatus TRI/Environmental, Inc.'s (TRI's) large-scale slope erosion testing facility is located at the Denver Downs Research Farm in Anderson, SC. Testing oversight is provided by C. Joel Sprague, P.E. The large-scale testing reported herein was performed in accordance with ASTM D 6459, on 3:1 slopes using loamy soil test plots measuring 40 ft long 8 ft wide. The simulated rainfall was produced by ten rain trees arranged around the perimeter of each test slope. Each rain tree has four sprinkler heads atop a 15 ft riser pipe. The rainfall system has been calibrated prior to testing to determine the number of sprinkler heads and associated pressure settings necessary to achieve target rainfall intensities and drop sizes. The target rainfall intensities are 2, 4, and 6 in/hr and are applied in sequence for 20 minutes each. Three replicate test slopes covered by the same rolled erosion control product (RECP) submitted were tested. The erosion resistance provided by the product tested is obtained by comparing the protected slope results to control (bare soil) results. Tables and graphs of rainfall versus soil loss are generated from the accumulated data. Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) The following information and inde properties were determined from the supplied products. Table 1. Tested Product Information & Inde Properties Product Information and Inde Property / Test Units Sampled Product Product Identification - US-2S Manufacturer - US Erosion Control Products Manufacturing Plant Location - Willacoochee, GA Lot numbers of samples - # , # , # Fiber - Wheat Straw Netting Openings in (appro) Stitching Spacing in 1.5 (appro) Tensile Strength MD XD (ASTM D 6818)* lb/in Tensile Elongation MD XD (ASTM D 6818)* % Thickness (ASTM D 6525)* mils 410 Light Penetration (ASTM D 6567)* % cover 90.8 Water Absorption (ASTM D 1117 & ECTC-TASC 00197)* % Wt Change 438 Mass / Unit Area (ASTM D 6475)* oz/sy 8.38 * Values from Independent Testing of Randomly Sampled Product

4 Test Soil US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, The test soil used in the test plots had the following characteristics. Table 2. TRI-Loam Characteristics Soil Characteristic Test Method Value % Gravel 0 % Sand 45 ASTM D 422 % Silt 35 % Clay 20 Liquid Limit, % 41 ASTM D 4318 Plasticity Inde, % 8 Soil Classification USDA Loam Soil Classification USCS Sandy silty clay (ML-CL) Preparation of the Test Slopes The test slopes undergo a standard preparation procedure prior to each slope test. First, any rills or depressions resulting from previous testing are filled in with test soil and subject to heavy compaction. The entire test plot is then tilled to a depth not less than four inches. The test slope is then raked to create a slope that is smooth both side-to-side and top-to-bottom. Finally, a steel drum roller is rolled down-and-up the slope 3 times proceeding from one side of the plot to the other. The submitted erosion control product is then installed as directed by the client. Installation of Erosion Control Product on Test Slopes As noted, the submitted erosion control product was installed as directed by the client. For the tests reported herein, the RECP was anchored with 6-inch staples at 1.2 staples per square yard. Specific Test Procedure Immediately prior to testing, rain gauges are placed at the quarter points (i.e. 10, 20, 30 ft) on the slope. The slope is then eposed to sequential 20-minute rainfalls having target intensities of 2, 4, and 6 inches per hour. All runoff is collected during the testing. Additionally, periodic sediment concentration grab samples are taken and runoff rate measurements are made. Between rainfall intensities, the rainfall is stopped and rainfall depth is read in the three rain gauges, valves are adjusted to facilitate the subsequent rainfall intensity, and empty collection vessels are positioned to collect subsequent runoff. After allowing for sediments to settle, water is decanted from the collected runoff. The remaining solids are used to determine bulk soil loss. Bulk soil loss is measured by drying all collected sediments.

5 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, Figure 2. Typical Sampling Figure 1. Rainfall Testing Facility (set up for a control run) Figure 3. Typical Control Result Pictures of slopes prepared for testing are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Typical Prepared Soil Slope & RECP Installation Pictures of the eroded slopes are shown in Figures 5 thru 7.

6 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, Figure 5a. Test Slope #1 Start of the 2 in/hr Event Figure 5b. Test Slope #1 End of the 4 in/hr Event Figure 5c. Test Slope #1 End of 6 in/hr Even Figure 5d. Test Slope #1 RECP Removed (typical) Figure 6a. Test Slope #2 Start of the 2 in/hr Event Figure 6b. Test Slope #2 End of the 4 in/hr Event

7 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, Figure 6c. Test Slope #2 End of 6 in/hr Event Figure 6d. Test Slope #2 RECP Removed (typical) Figure 7a. Test Slope #3 Start of 2 in/hr Event Figure 7b. Test Slope #3 End of the 4 in/hr Event Figure 7c. Test Slope #3 End of 6 in/hr Event Figure 7d. Test Slope #3 RECP Removed (typical)

8 TEST RESULTS US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, The Cover Management (C) Factor from the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) of the USDA-ARS Agricultural handbook 703 is the reported performance measure for slopes determined from this testing. The C-Factor and R-Factor reported herein are related through RUSLE by the following relationship: A = R K LS C P where: A = the computed soil loss in tons per acre (measured/calculated from test); R = the rainfall erosion inde (measured/calculated from test); K = the erodibility of the soil (calculated from test see Figure 9); LS = the topographic factor (2.78 for 8 40 ft slope); C = the cover factor = ratio of protect soil loss to control soil loss (1.0 for control); and P = the practice factor (1.0 for all test slopes). Total soil loss and the associated rainfall depth measured during the testing are the principle data used to determine the C Factor. The cumulative C-Factors shown in Table 3 are the ratio of the soil loss from the protected condition at a calculated cumulative R-Factor divided by the cumulative soil loss from the control plot (Figure 9) at that same R-Factor. In all cases, the soil loss and associated rainfall data for both protected and control conditions are used to develop a normalized cumulative graph of R-Factor versus C-Factor (R factor = total kinetic energy of the storm (E) times its maimum 30-minute Intensity (I)). The maimum average normalized cumulative R-Factor calculated for the target test events: 2 in/hr for 20 minutes + 4 in/hr for 20 minutes + 6 in/hr for 20 minutes, is R = 231. The C-Factor associated with this normalized maimum average result is the reported performance value. This facilitates product-to-product comparison of test results at a common point of the storm event. Graphs of R-Factor versus C-Factor for the protected condition and Soil Loss versus R-Factor for the control condition are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. Figure 8 includes the best regression line fit to the test data to facilitate the determination of the C-factor. Figure 8 additionally allows users of this report to evaluate performance at other points in the model storm by selecting the R factor (and the corresponding C Factor) that may fit local conditions. According to the test procedure ASTM D6459, a test may be stopped in the event of catastrophic soil loss, as determined by the lab. AASHTO NTPEP ECP Panel has determined this practice places an undue amount of subjectivity into the test. In lieu of stopping the test, the test is run to completion. The runoff and sediment loss just prior to catastrophic failure is separated from that occurring after. This additional point is used in the creating of the Soil Loss verses R Factor Graph. The tests reported herein did not eperience catastrophic slope failure. Linear (R 2 =0.96), power (R 2 = 0.89), and polynomial (R 2 = 0.99) fits were evaluated. The overall C-Factor information shown in Table 4 is derived from Figure 8 which relates the C- Factors and associated R-Factors given in Table 3.

9 C-Factor US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, Table 3. Summary Data Table Protected Slopes Slope # & Product 1 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket 2 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket 3 US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket Test # (run # - target intensity) Intensity (in/hr) Runoff (gallons) Cumm. R-Factor Cumm. Soil Soil Loss Loss (lbs/plot/event) (Tons/Acre) Control Soil Loss at Cumm. R-Factor (Tons/Acre) Cumm. C-Factor Table 4. Overall C-Factor Product C-Factor Calculation US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket & 1.2 staples/sy C = R R R C-Factor vs. R-Factor 1.2 staples/sy on TRI-Loam; 3:1 Slope) C = R R R C R=231 = in/hr: R = y = R² = R-Factor Figure 8. R-Factor vs. C-Factor Tested Product

10 Soil Loss (T/A) US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, From RUSLE: A = R K LS C P For Control: LS = 2.78; P = 1.0; C = 1.0 K = (A/R) / 2.78 = m / 2.78 K = / 2.78 = Soil Loss vs RUSLE R (Control Testing of TRI-Loam; 3:1 Slope) y = R² = RUSLE R (US Customary Units) The cummulative R- Factor calculated for the following events: 2 in/hr for 20 min + 4 in/hr for 20 min + 6 in/hr for 20 min, is R = 231 and the associated soil loss is 54.2 tons/acre Figure 9. R-Factor vs. Soil Loss Control Tests Slope 1-10/29/09 Slope 2-8/17/09 Slope 3-10/29/09 Slope 1-4/16/10 Slope 2-4/16/10 Slope 3-4/8/10 Slope 1-4/21/10 Slope 2-4/23/10 Slope 3-4/23/10 Slope 1-8/6/10 Slope 2-8/6/10 Slope 3-8/6/10 Slope 1-11/3/10 Slope 2-11/3/10 Slope 3-11/3/10 Slope 3-3/22/11 Slope 1-6/16/11 Slope 2-6/16/11 Slope 3-6/16/11 Slope 1-12/15/11 Slope 2-12/15/11 Slope 3-12/16/11 Slope 1-1/25/12 Slope 2-1/25/12 Slope 3-1/25/12 Slope 1-4/30/12 Slope 2-4/30/12 Slope 3-4/30/12 all slopes Linear (all slopes)

11 US-2S, Double Net StrawBlanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, 2012 Appendi APPENDIX A RECORDED DATA Test Record Sheets Sediment Concentration Data Runoff Data Soil Moisture Content Soil Loss Tables

12 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #1 Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: 11:10 AM End Rain: 11:30 AM 1 11:13 X Sampling interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 11:30 AM 2 11:16 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :19 X Product: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 11:22 X Roll#: Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 11:25 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 11:28 X w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) 7 Set system pressure to 16 d = 17 mm X psi. 8 i = 2.01 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 A B P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi C D P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi E F P = 9 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 P = 9 psi G # Time gal, sec X H P = 9 psi 2 X 3 P = 9 psi I 4 X 5 X J P = 9 psi 6 X 7 X 8 d = 19 mm 9 i = in/hr Temp. 82 deg 10 w c3 = 18.1% Hum. 87 % 11 d = 17 in 10 i = 2.01 in/hr Average Depth: 0.70 in. 13 w c2 = 17.3% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.09 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 1 gal collected

13 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #1 Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: Sampling 11:36 AM End Rain: 11:56 AM 1 11:38 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 11:59 AM 2 11:40 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :42 X Product: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 11:44 X Roll#: Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 11:46 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 11:48 X w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) Set system pressure to :50 X d = 33 mm X X psi. 8 11:52 X i = 3.90 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 11:54 X A 10 11:56 X X 11 B P = 9 psi X 10 X 13 X P = 9 psi C 14 X 15 D P = 9 psi X 10 X 13 X P = 9 psi E 14 X 15 F P = 9 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 P = 9 psi G # Time gal, sec X X H P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi I X X X J P = 9 psi X X X d = 35 mm i = 4.13 in/hr Temp. 85 deg w c3 = 18.1% Hum. 88 % 11 d = 35 mm 10 i = 4.13 in/hr Average Depth: 1.35 in. 13 w c2 = 17.3% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.06 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 120 gal collected

14 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #1 Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: 12:03 PM End Rain: 12:23 PM 1 12:05 X Sampling interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 12:28 PM 2 12:07 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :09 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 12:11 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 12:13 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 12:15 X w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) Set system pressure to :17 X d = 51 mm X X X psi. 8 12:19 X i = 6.02 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 12:21 X A 10 12:23 X X 11 B P = 9 psi X 10 X X 13 X P = 9 psi C 14 X X 15 D P = 9 psi X 10 X X 13 X P = 9 psi E 14 X X 15 F P = 9 psi X X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 X P = 9 psi G # Time Gallon, sec X X H P = 9 psi X X X X P = 9 psi I X X X X J P = 9 psi X X X d = 52 mm i = 6.14 in/hr Temp. 79 deg w c3 = 18.1% Hum. 88 % 11 d = 52 mm 10 i = 6.14 in/hr Average Depth: 2.03 in. 13 w c2 = 17.3% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.10 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 225 gal collected

15 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #2 Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: 12:30 PM End Rain: 12:50 PM 1 12:33 X Sampling interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 12:52 PM 2 12:36 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :39 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 12:42 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 12:45 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 12:48 X w c1 = 19.7% (circle "" for open valves) 7 Set system pressure to 16 d = 17 mm X psi. 8 i = 2.01 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 A X P = 9 psi B C P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi D E P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi F Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 G P = 9 psi # Time Gallon, sec X P = 9 psi H X I P = 9 psi 4 X 5 P = 9 psi J X 6 X 7 X 8 d = 20 mm 9 i = 2.36 in/hr Temp. 81 deg 10 w c2 = 17.3% Hum. 89 % 11 d = 17 mm 10 i = 2.01 in/hr Average Depth: 0.71 in. 13 w c3 = 20.6% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.13 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze from the. Appro 4 gal collected

16 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #2 Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: 12:55 PM End Rain: 1:15 PM 1 12:57 X Sampling interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 1:19 PM 2 12:59 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :01 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 13:03 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 13:05 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 13:07 X w c1 = 19.7% X X Set system pressure to :09 X d = 38 mm P = 9 psi psi. 8 13:11 X i = 4.49 in/hr A 9 13:13 X X 10 13:15 X X P = 9 psi B 11 X 10 C P = 9 psi X 13 X 14 X P = 9 psi D 15 X 10 E P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi F 15 X G P = 9 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 X # Time Gallon, sec P = 9 psi H X X I P = 9 psi X X X P = 9 psi J X X X d = 36 mm i = 4.25 in/hr w c2 = 17.3% Temp. 81 deg d = 30 mm Hum. 89 % 11 i = 3.54 in/hr 10 w c3 = 20.6% Average Depth: 1.36 in. 13 Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.09 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro. 138 gal collected

17 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #2 Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: Sampling 1:19 PM End Rain: 1:39 PM 1 13:21 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 1:42 PM 2 13:23 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :25 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 13:27 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 13:29 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 13:31 X w c1 = 19.7% (circle "" for open valves) Set system pressure to :33 X d = 52 mm X X X psi. 8 13:35 X i = 6.14 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 13:37 X A 10 13:39 X X 11 X P = 9 psi B 10 X X 13 C P = 9 psi X 14 X X 15 X P = 9 psi D 10 X X 13 E P = 9 psi X 14 X X 15 X P = 9 psi F X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 G P = 9 psi X # Time Gallon, sec X X P = 9 psi H X X X X I P = 9 psi X X X X P = 9 psi J X X X d = 51 mm i = 6.02 in/hr Temp. 81 deg w c2 = 17.3% Hum. 87 % 11 d = 50 mm 10 i = 5.91 in/hr Average Depth: 2.01 in. 13 w c3 = 20.6% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.02 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 215 gal collected

18 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #3 Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time X Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: 1:48 PM End Rain: 2:08 PM 1 13:51 X Sampling interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 2:09 PM 2 13:54 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :57 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 14:00 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 14:03 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 14:06 X w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) 7 Set system pressure to 16 d = mm X psi. 8 i = 2.01 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 A B P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi C D P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi E F P = 9 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 P = 9 psi G # Time Gallon, sec X H P = 9 psi X 3 P = 9 psi I 4 X 5 X J P = 9 psi 6 X 7 X 8 d = mm 9 i = 2.01 in/hr * Temp. 83 deg 10 w c3 = 19.1% Hum. 84 % 11 d = mm 10 i = 2.24 in/hr Average Depth: 0.70 in. 13 w c2 = 21.2% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.09 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze from the. Appro 2 gal collected. 15

19 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #3 Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: Sampling 2:13 PM End Rain: 2:33 PM 1 14:15 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 2:36 PM 2 14:17 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :19 X Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 14:21 X Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 14:23 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 14:25 X w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) Set system pressure to :27 X d = 31 mm X X psi. 8 14:29 X i = 3.66 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 14:31 X A 10 14:33 X X 11 B P = 9 psi X 10 X 13 X P = 9 psi C 14 X 15 D P = 9 psi X 10 X 13 X P = 9 psi E 14 X 15 F P = 9 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 P = 9 psi G # Time Gallon, sec X X H P = 9 psi X X P = 9 psi I X X X J P = 9 psi X X X d = 33 mm i = 3.90 in/hr Temp. 84 deg w c3 = 19.1% Hum. 85 % 11 d = 39 mm 10 i = 4.61 in/hr Average Depth: 1.35 in. 13 w c2 = 21.2% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.06 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 130 gal collected. 15

20 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing SLOPE #3 Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Date: 11-Jun-12 Start Rain: Sampling 2:41 PM End Rain: 3:01 PM 1 14:43 interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 3:05 PM 2 14:45 Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :47 Product: Roll#: US-2S Descr:. Double Net Straw Blanket 4 14:49 Anchors: 6 in Staples Anchorage: 1.2 / sy 5 14:51 TOP OF SLOPE 6 14:53 w c1 = 19.5% (circle "" for open valves) Set system pressure to :55 d = 51 mm X X X psi. 8 14:57 i = 6.02 in/hr P = 9 psi 9 14:59 A 10 15:01 X 11 B P = 9 psi X 10 X X 13 X P = 9 psi C 14 X X 15 D P = 9 psi X 10 X X 13 X P = 9 psi E 14 X X 15 F P = 9 psi X X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 X P = 9 psi G # Time Gallon, sec X X H P = 9 psi X X X X P = 9 psi I X X X X J P = 9 psi X X X d = 53 mm i = 6.26 in/hr Temp. 84 deg w c3 = 19.1% Hum. 87 % 11 d = 52 mm 10 i = 6.14 in/hr Average Depth: 2.05 in. 13 w c2 = 21.2% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.14 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Appro 250 gal collected

21 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #1 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Collected Water Wt., g Total Collected Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.09 in/hr avg 11-Jun AVG = in/hr avg 0.00 Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = Total Solids Lost: 12.41

22 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #2 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Collected Water Wt., g Total Collected Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.13 in/hr avg 11-Jun AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = Total Solids Lost: 13.66

23 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #3 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Collected Water Wt., g Total Collected Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.09 in/hr avg 11-Jun AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: Jun AVG = Total Solids Lost: 13.59

24 11-Jun-12 Slope #1 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associated Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 4.06 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 6.10 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro)

25 11-Jun-12 Slope #2 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associate d Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 4.09 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 6.02 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro)

26 11-Jun-12 Slope #3 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associated Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 4.06 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro) 6.14 in/hr end Total Collected Runoff (appro)

27 WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION Run #: Slope No. SLOPE #1 SLOPE #2 SLOPE #3 Test Date: 11-Jun Jun Jun-12 Avg Moisture Content: 18.28% 19.22% 19.92% Location T-1 T-2 T-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 19.5% 19.7% 19.5% Location M-1 M-2 M-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 18.1% 17.3% 19.1% Location B-1 B-2 B-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 17.3% 20.6% 21.2%

28 SLOPE #1 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.12 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.6 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 13.1 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.5 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Add'l Soil Collected after Major Slumping Not Applicable

29 SLOPE #2 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.13 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.95 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 13.9 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.5 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Add'l Soil Collected after Major Slumping Collected Sediments, gal Not Applicable

30 SLOPE #3 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.15 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 0.88 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.1 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Collected Typ. TSS in Decanted Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Collected Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb 13.7 Runoff, Wt. Of pan, lb 0.5 lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Collected Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Collected Sediments, lbs Add'l Soil Collected after Major Slumping Not Applicable

31 US-2S, Double Net StrawBlanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, 2012 Appendi APPENDIX B TEST SOIL Test Soil Grain Size Distribution Curve Compaction Curves Field Compaction Verification

32 Percent Finer December Plasticity (ASTM D 4318) Liquid Limit: 30 Plastic Limit: 22 Plastic Inde: 8 Soil classifies as a silty sand (SM) in accordance with ASTM D 2487 DDRF ASTM D 6459 Blended Test Soil ASTM D 6459 Target Loam Range Particle Size (mm) Corporate Laboratory: 9063 Bee Caves Road, Austin, TX / TEST / / sallen@tri-env.com Denver Downs Research Facility: 4915 Clemson Blvd., Anderson, SC / / jsprague@tri-env.com

33 Proctor Compaction Test 120 Project: TRI-DDRF 115 Sample No.: DDRF Test Soil - January 2010 TRI Log No.: E Dry Density (pcf) Test Method: ASTM D Method A Maimum Dry Density (pcf): 98.7 Optimum Moisture Content (%): Moisture Content (%) Cheng-Wei Chen, 02/03/10 Quality Review/Date Tested by: Tamika Walker The testing herein is based upon accepted industry practice as well as the test method listed. Test results reported herein do not apply to samples other than those tested. TRI neither accepts responsibility for nor makes claim as to the final use and purpose of the material. TRI observes and maintains client confidentiality. TRI limits reproduction of this report, ecept in full, without prior approval of TRI Bee Caves Road Austin, TX (512) (512) TEST

34 Compaction Worksheet ASTM D 1556 Calibration Date: 8/16/2009 Sand Used: Pool Filter Sand Volume Measure: Liquid Volume, V m (cm 3 ): 425 Wt. of Sand to Fill Known Volume: Total Wt (g) Pan Wt (g) Net Wt (g) Trial #1 (g) Trial #2 (g) Trial #3 (g) W a (g) Density of Sand, ɣ sand (g/cm 3 ) = W a / V m = 1.53 Wt. of Sand to Fill Cone: Total Wt (g) Cone Wt (g) Net Wt (g) Trial #1 (g) Trial #2 (g) Trial #3 (g) Wt. of Sand in Cone (g): Field Data Date: 11/4/2009 Soil Data: Wt. of Wet Soil + Pan (g) Wt. of Dry Soil + Pan (g) Wt. of Pan (g) 14.5 Wt. of Wet Soil, W' (g) Wt. of Dry Soil (g) Wt. of Water (g) Water Content, w (%) Volume Data: Sand Used: Pool Filter Sand Unit Wt. of Sand, ɣ sand (g/cm 3 ) = 1.53 Wt. of Jug & Cone Before (g) = Wt. of Jug & Cone After (g) = Wt. of Sand Used (g) = Wt. of Sand in Cone (g) = Wt. of Sand in Hole, W (g) = Volume of hole, V h (cm 3 ) = W / ɣ sand = Density Calculation: Wet density, ɣ wet = W' / V h (kn/m 3 ) = 1.83 Wet density, ɣ wet = W' / V h (lb/ft 3 ) = Dry density, ɣ dry = ɣ wet / [1 + w] (kn/m 3 ) = 1.54 Wet density, ɣ wet = W' / V h (lb/ft 3 ) = Ma Std. Proctor Dry density (kn/m 3 ) = Opt. Moisture via Std. Proctor density (%) = Compaction as % of Std. Proctor = 92.3%

35 US-2S, Double Net StrawBlanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, 2012 Appendi APPENDIX C RAINFALL DATA Raindrop Size Distribution Rainfall Calibration

36 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 2 in/hr Date: 5-Aug-11 Start Time: 8:10 AM End Time: 8:25 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X P = 9 psi A d = 12 mm 1 2 d = 12 mm X P = 9 psi i = 1.89 in/hr B i = 1.89 in/hr d = 14 mm 3 4 d = 13 mm i = 2.20 in/hr C i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 14 mm 5 6 d = 14 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.20 in/hr D i = 2.20 in/hr d = 14 mm 7 8 d = 15 mm i = 2.20 in/hr E i = 2.36 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 15 mm 9 10 d = 14 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.36 in/hr F i = 2.20 in/hr d = 14 mm d = 14 mm i = 2.20 in/hr G i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 13 mm d = 14 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr H i = 2.20 in/hr X d = 12 mm d = 13 mm i = 1.89 in/hr I i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 11 mm d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 1.73 in/hr J i = 2.05 in/hr X d = 11 mm d = 11 mm i = 1.73 in/hr i = 1.73 in/hr Bottom Catch: 74 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 2.07 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 92

37 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 4 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 4:30 AM End Time: 4:45 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X P = 9 psi A X d = 24 mm 1 2 d = 24 mm X P = 9 psi i = 3.78 in/hr B i = 3.78 in/hr d = 25 mm 3 4 d = 25 mm X i = 3.94 in/hr C i = 3.94 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 26 mm 5 6 d = 24 mm X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr D i = 3.78 in/hr d = 25 mm 7 8 d = 26 mm X i = 3.94 in/hr E i = 4.09 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 27 mm 9 10 d = 27 mm P = 9 psi i = 4.25 in/hr F i = 4.25 in/hr X d = 25 mm d = 28 mm X i = 3.94 in/hr G i = 4.41 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 25 mm d = 26 mm X P = 9 psi i = 3.94 in/hr H i = 4.09 in/hr X X d = 24 mm d = 27 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr I i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 26 mm d = 25 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr J i = 3.94 in/hr X X d = 24 mm d = 24 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr i = 3.78 in/hr Bottom Catch: 232 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 3.99 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 96

38 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 6 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 4:10 PM End Time: 4:25 PM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X P = 9 psi A X d = 36 mm 1 2 d = 38 mm X P = 9 psi i = 5.67 in/hr B i = 5.98 in/hr X d = 38 mm 3 4 d = 37 mm X i = 5.98 in/hr C i = 5.83 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 40 mm 5 6 d = 37 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.30 in/hr D i = 5.83 in/hr X d = 43 mm 7 8 d = 39 mm X i = 6.77 in/hr E i = 6.14 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 42 mm 9 10 d = 41 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.61 in/hr F i = 6.46 in/hr X d = 41 mm d = 38 mm i = 6.46 in/hr G i = 5.98 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 37 mm d = 40 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.83 in/hr H i = 6.30 in/hr X X d = 38 mm d = 39 mm X X i = 5.98 in/hr I i = 6.14 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 36 mm d = 38 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.67 in/hr J i = 5.98 in/hr X X d = 34 mm d = 37 mm X i = 5.35 in/hr i = 5.83 in/hr Bottom Catch: 232 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 6.06 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 95

39 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 2 - Target 2 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 2:05 PM End Time: 2:20 PM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X P = 9 psi A d = 11 mm 1 2 d = 11 mm i = 1.73 in/hr B i = 1.73 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 11 mm 3 4 d = 13 mm X P = 9 psi i = 1.73 in/hr C i = 2.05 in/hr d = 13 mm 5 6 d = 13 mm i = 2.05 in/hr D i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 14 mm 7 8 d = 14 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.20 in/hr E i = 2.20 in/hr d = 15 mm 9 10 d = 15 mm i = 2.36 in/hr F i = 2.36 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 15 mm d = 15 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.36 in/hr G i = 2.36 in/hr X d = 15 mm d = 14 mm i = 2.36 in/hr H i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 13 mm d = 13 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr I i = 2.05 in/hr X d = 13 mm d = 12 mm X i = 2.05 in/hr J i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 12 mm d = 11 mm X i = 1.89 in/hr i = 1.73 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 77 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 2.07 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 91

40 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 2 - Target 4 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 1:40 PM End Time: 1:55 PM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X P = 9 psi A d = 21 mm 1 2 d = 23 mm X i = 3.31 in/hr B i = 3.62 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 24 mm 3 4 d = 25 mm X P = 9 psi i = 3.78 in/hr C i = 3.94 in/hr d = 26 mm 5 6 d = 27 mm X i = 4.09 in/hr D i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 25 mm 7 8 d = 26 mm X P = 9 psi i = 3.94 in/hr E i = 4.09 in/hr d = 27 mm 9 10 d = 27 mm i = 4.25 in/hr F i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 26 mm d = 28 mm X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr G i = 4.41 in/hr X X d = 27 mm d = 28 mm X i = 4.25 in/hr H i = 4.41 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 26 mm d = 27 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr I i = 4.25 in/hr X X d = 25 mm d = 25 mm X i = 3.94 in/hr J i = 3.94 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 24 mm d = 24 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr i = 3.78 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 153 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 4.02 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 95

41 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 2 - Target 6 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 12:30 PM End Time: 12:45 PM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X P = 9 psi A d = 34 mm d = 35 mm X 1 2 i = 5.35 in/hr B i = 5.51 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 34 mm d = 37 mm X 3 4 X P = 9 psi i = 5.35 in/hr C i = 5.83 in/hr X d = 37 mm d = 40 mm X 5 6 i = 5.83 in/hr D i = 6.30 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 38 mm d = 41 mm X 7 8 X P = 9 psi i = 5.98 in/hr E i = 6.46 in/hr X d = 38 mm d = 41 mm 9 10 i = 5.98 in/hr F i = 6.46 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 41 mm d = 40 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.46 in/hr G i = 6.30 in/hr X X d = 41 mm d = 40 mm X i = 6.46 in/hr H i = 6.30 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 40 mm d = 39 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.30 in/hr I i = 6.14 in/hr X X d = 38 mm d = 37 mm X X i = 5.98 in/hr J i = 5.83 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 37 mm d = 34 mm X i = 5.83 in/hr i = 5.35 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 232 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: 38.1 mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 6.00 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 95

42 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 3 - Target 2 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 9:45 AM End Time: 10:00 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X P = 9 psi A d = 10 mm 1 2 d = 11 mm X i = 1.57 in/hr B i = 1.73 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 12 mm 3 4 d = 11 mm X P = 9 psi i = 1.89 in/hr C i = 1.73 in/hr d = 13 mm 5 6 d = 12 mm i = 2.05 in/hr D i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 14 mm 7 8 d = 12 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.20 in/hr E i = 1.89 in/hr d = 15 mm 9 10 d = 14 mm i = 2.36 in/hr F i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 16 mm d = 15 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.52 in/hr G i = 2.36 in/hr X d = 15 mm d = 13 mm i = 2.36 in/hr H i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 13 mm d = 13 mm X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr I i = 2.05 in/hr X d = 13 mm d = 13 mm X i = 2.05 in/hr J i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 11 mm d = 11 mm X i = 1.73 in/hr i = 1.73 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 78 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 2.02 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 90

43 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 3 - Target 4 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 9:12 AM End Time: 9:27 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X P = 9 psi A d = 23 mm 1 2 d = 24 mm X i = 3.62 in/hr B i = 3.78 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 22 mm 3 4 d = 26 mm X P = 9 psi i = 3.46 in/hr C i = 4.09 in/hr d = 24 mm 5 6 d = 27 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr D i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 28 mm 7 8 d = 26 mm X P = 9 psi i = 4.41 in/hr E i = 4.09 in/hr d = 28 mm 9 10 d = 28 mm i = 4.41 in/hr F i = 4.41 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 27 mm d = 27 mm X P = 9 psi i = 4.25 in/hr G i = 4.25 in/hr X X d = 27 mm d = 25 mm X i = 4.25 in/hr H i = 3.94 in/hr P = 9 psi d = 26 mm d = 25 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr I i = 3.94 in/hr X X d = 24 mm d = 24 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr J i = 3.78 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 23 mm d = 24 mm X i = 3.62 in/hr i = 3.78 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 160 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: 25.4 mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 4.00 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 94

44 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 3 - Target 6 in/hr Date: 4-Aug-11 Start Time: 8:34 AM End Time: 8:49 AM Test Time: min. (circle "" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X P = 9 psi A d = 33 mm 1 2 d = 36 mm X i = 5.20 in/hr B i = 5.67 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 37 mm 3 4 d = 38 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.83 in/hr C i = 5.98 in/hr X d = 37 mm 5 6 d = 40 mm X i = 5.83 in/hr D i = 6.30 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 39 mm 7 8 d = 39 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.14 in/hr E i = 6.14 in/hr X d = 41 mm 9 10 d = 40 mm i = 6.46 in/hr F i = 6.30 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 40 mm d = 40 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.30 in/hr G i = 6.30 in/hr X X d = 40 mm d = 41 mm X i = 6.30 in/hr H i = 6.46 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 41 mm d = 38 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 6.46 in/hr I i = 5.98 in/hr X X d = 38 mm d = 36 mm X X i = 5.98 in/hr J i = 5.67 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 37 mm d = 35 mm X i = 5.83 in/hr i = 5.51 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 239 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: 38.3 mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 6.03 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 95

45 % of Raindrops by Mass Raindrop Size Distribution August mm mm mm mm mm Rainfall Intensity, in/hr Target raindrop size and distribution (no more than 10 % greater than 6 mm (0.24 in.) and no more than 10 % smaller than 1 mm (0.04 in.)).

46 APPENDIX D ANCHORAGE PATTERN US-2S, Double Net StrawBlanket, over Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP June 30, 2012 Appendi

47 5 ft 4 ft 1.2 staples/sy

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam January 2014 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam February 2010 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street,

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam June 2014 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam November 2016 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam December 2009 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C. 20001 Attn:

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam May 2015 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam December 2009 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C. 20001 Attn:

More information

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) of SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load February 2010 Submitted to: SedCatch Environmental Products 8380 Point O

More information

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) of SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load February 2010 Submitted to: SedCatch Environmental Products 8380 Point

More information

EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS

EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS Presented at IECA 2014, Nashville, TN C. Joel Sprague, P.E. TRI/Environmental, Inc. PO Box 9192, Greenville, SC 29604 Phone: 864/242-2220; Fax: 864/242-3107; jsprague@tri-env.com

More information

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized? Jerald S. Fifield, Ph.D. CISEC HydroDynamics Incorporated Parker, CO 303-841-0377 Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? Soil particles deposited or suspended in water or air The process of depositing

More information

Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory

Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory Objective: To better understand the process of rill erosion and to understand the interaction between flow rate, sediment yield, slope, and a soil additive.

More information

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids Concrete Sustainability Conference April 14 th 2010, Tempe, AZ Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological l Performance and Suspended Solids Discharge Luis A. Mata,

More information

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap 3.12 Sediment Control Description: A stone outlet sediment trap is a small detention area formed by placing a stone embankment with an integral stone filter outlet across a drainage swale for the purpose

More information

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods SAWS TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Philip Handley Supervisor-Resource Protection & Compliance August 25, 2014 TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Soil Common term: Dirt Common

More information

Erosion and Sedimentation Basics

Erosion and Sedimentation Basics Erosion and Sedimentation Basics Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District G.W. Bates, PE, CPESC Outline: 1. Terms & Concepts 2. Causes of Erosion 3. The Erosion/Sedimentation Process 4. Erosion

More information

Project: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major

More information

Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing

Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing Prepared for Soil Retention Products, Inc. Prepared by Michael D. Turner Amanda L. Cox Christopher I. Thornton March 2011 Colorado State University

More information

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG   copyright 2009 Engineering: What's soil got to do with it? Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG crobinson@wtamu.edu, http://www.wtamu.edu/~crobinson, copyright 2009 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary soil, noun 1 : firm land

More information

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological and Water Resources County Geologic Atlas Program March 2014 Version 2.1 I.

More information

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No January 17, 2018 Mr. Michael Malone 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Project No. 0337367 Environmental Resources Management CityCentre Four 840 West Sam Houston Pkwy N. Suite 600 Houston, Texas

More information

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# ) www.fixmylake.com 18029 83 rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55311 mail@freshwatersci.com (651) 336-8696 2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (#86-0023) Prepared

More information

Erosion. changing landforms. Purpose. Process Skills. Background. Time 1 1 ½ hours Grouping Pairs, small groups, or class.

Erosion. changing landforms. Purpose. Process Skills. Background. Time 1 1 ½ hours Grouping Pairs, small groups, or class. Purpose To demonstrate how several factors affect the rate of erosion. Process Skills Observe, Measure, Collect data, Interpret data, Form a hypothesis, Make a model, Identify and control variables, Draw

More information

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS Michelle G. Holloway, Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688. E-mail: MLG@jaguar1.usouthal.edu. Sediment is the number one pollutant in Dog

More information

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1 OCD59 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1 MODULE NO: CIE4009 Date: Saturday 14 January

More information

Sprinkler Irrigation

Sprinkler Irrigation Sprinkler Irrigation Definition Pressurized irrigation through devices called sprinklers Sprinklers are usually located on pipes called laterals Water is discharged into the air and hopefully infiltrates

More information

**Temporary Erosion Control**

**Temporary Erosion Control** Construction operations And methods **Temporary Erosion Control** The test will more than likely just have a basic word problem dealing with Erosion control, if it has anything on the test. So just review,

More information

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway. Sediment Trap SC-15 Source: Caltrans Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual, 2003. Description A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff

More information

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS T E C H N O L O G I E S PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT FOR Southern Manufacturing Division of Accord Industries IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (HIGH VELOCITY HURRICANE ZONES)

More information

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9

More information

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin

More information

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties Mineral Aggregate Properties Introduction In this lab module several characteristics of aggregates are determined. Tests will be conducted on both coarse and fine aggregates. The results of some of these

More information

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx 2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt

More information

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610) Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610) 696-4150 www.thcahill.com Goals and Challenges for Manual State Stormwater Policy More Widespread

More information

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity

More information

Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology. G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney

Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology. G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory Soil Pipeflow & Internal Erosion Impacts

More information

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS A worksheet provides the designer a representation of a measure that allows for input of specific design criteria. The plan designer will be required to assess field conditions

More information

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr. CE353 Soil Mechanics CE353 Lecture 5 Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory SOIL CLASSIFICATION Lecture 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Dr. Talat A Bader Dr. Talat Bader 2 Requirements of a soil Systems Why do we need

More information

International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research

International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research EVALUATION OF THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF RUNOFF WATER FROM A STRAWBERRY RANCH SLOPING GROUND DURING WINTER STORM EVENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST Gerardo Spinelli 1*, Sacha Lozano 1, Ben Burgoa

More information

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH 1 UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH B. ENG (HONS.) CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG 1 UNIVERSITI

More information

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University The BMP worked fine until last week when it rained! Turbidity Best Management Practices

More information

Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio

Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio Mitchell W. Weber, P.G. Gannett Fleming Engineers & Architects, P.C. Greg Bachman, P.E., P.S. County of Summit Engineer Robert

More information

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate Report No.: E3490.01-106-31 Report Date: 07/13/15 Test Record Retention Date: 06/18/19

More information

6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why?

6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why? NAME date ROY G BIV Water Cycle and Water Movement in the Ground Test 5. 6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why? 7. Circle the correct answer: SINK A retains more

More information

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility Zhong Wu, Ph.D., P.E. Zhongjie Zhang, Bill King Louay Mohammad Outline Background Objectives

More information

Land and Water Summative Assessment. Name Date

Land and Water Summative Assessment. Name Date Land and Water Summative Assessment Name Date Read each question carefully and select the best answer. 1. Abby built a model to study how rain changes the land. She shaped the land into single, smooth

More information

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills Information Sheet 6660.0 January 2017 The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills For over 50 years Rotary Kiln produced Expanded Shale, Clay & Slate

More information

Dr. L. I. N. de Silva. Student Name Registration Number: Assessed By: Lecturers Remarks

Dr. L. I. N. de Silva. Student Name Registration Number: Assessed By: Lecturers Remarks Module - CE 2042 Soil Mechanics and Geology-1 Assignment Tests for Particle Size Distribution Analysis Marks 10% Learning Ability to conduct particle size distribution analysis of soils Outcome Ability

More information

@Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries.

@Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries. SKAPS INDUSTRIES 571 Industrial Pkwy, Commerce, GA 30529 Phone: (706) 336 7000 Fax: (706) 336 7007 E Mail: contact@skaps.com SKAPS GEOCOMPOSITE DROP IN SPECIFICATIONS @Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries www.skaps.com

More information

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H SYMBOL SOURCE 8 9 1 SOIL DATA NATURAL SAMPLE DEPTH WATER PLASTIC LIQUID PLASTICITY NO. CONTENT LIMIT LIMIT INDEX (%) (%) (%) (%) Client: County of Berthoud Project: Project No.: Boring B-2 S-1-5' 6.2 8

More information

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Materials. Use materials meeting the following. 208.01 Section 208. SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 208.01 Description. Install and maintain erosion and sedimentation controls to minimize soil erosion and to control sedimentation from affecting

More information

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed. Sediment Trap SE-3 Objectives EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TR Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control

More information

Sediment and Erosion Design Guide

Sediment and Erosion Design Guide Sediment and Erosion Design Guide Sediment Transport & Bulking Factors Goals of this Session Review key principals Review basic relationships and available tools Review bulking factor relationships Purposes

More information

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, 39-50 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print version), 1792-9660 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2018 Correlation of unified and AASHTO classification

More information

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations A ampere AASHTO American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials ABS (%) Percent of Absorbed Moisture Abs. Vol. Absolute

More information

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS A ampere American Association of State AASHTO Highway & Transportation Officials ABS (%) Percent of Absorbed Moisture Abs. Vol. Absolute Volume ACI American Concrete Institute

More information

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.2. Some soils show a peak shear strength. Why and what type(s)

More information

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232

More information

Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010

Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010 Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010 Mr. Jimmy H. Allen Leading Edge Group, Inc. 33 Lynn Batts Lane, Suite #4204 San Antonio, TX 78218 Subject: SwRI Final Report Project 18122.07.003.50cal and

More information

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -

More information

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility Zhong Wu, Ph.D., P.E. Louisiana Transportation Research Center 2007 Transportation Engineering

More information

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2 Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) Outline of this Lecture 1. Particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 2. Soil classification

More information

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans

More information

Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files. for CLIGEN versions as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan).

Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files. for CLIGEN versions as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan). Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files for CLIGEN versions 4.1-5.1 as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan). updated 12/11/2008 - Jim Frankenberger These files are also known as CLIGEN state files

More information

Agry 465 Exam October 18, 2006 (100 points) (9 pages)

Agry 465 Exam October 18, 2006 (100 points) (9 pages) Agry 465 Exam October 18, 2006 (100 points) (9 pages) Name (4) 1. In each of the following pairs of soils, indicate which one would have the greatest volumetric heat capacity, and which would have the

More information

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4) 4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4) 1 What is Consistency? Consistency is a term used to describe the degree of firmness of fine-grained soils (silt and clay). The consistency of fine grained

More information

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E.

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. gtv@gemeng.com GEOMECHANICS National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying http://www.ncees.org/ 3 STUDY REFERENCES Foundation Engineering;

More information

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Bryan County The Climate of Bryan County Bryan County is part of the Crosstimbers throughout most of the county. The extreme eastern portions of Bryan County are part of the Cypress Swamp and Forest. Average annual

More information

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT COMPLIANCE TESTING INFORMATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION: TESTING CERTIFICATION: Test Laboratory: United States Test Laboratory, LLC Report Number: 06N074 Laboratory Representative: Richard W. Mouser Witnessed

More information

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources Sediment Control Practices John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources Practices Treat the Largest Soil Particles Sand Sand Silt Clay Treated Untreated Settleable

More information

Basic Math Concepts for Water and Wastewater Operators. Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Basic Math Concepts for Water and Wastewater Operators. Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. Basic Math Concepts for Water and Wastewater Operators Topics Hierarchy of operations Manipulating equations Unit/dimensional analysis and conversion factors Electricity Temperature Geometry Flow hydraulics

More information

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1 Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2002-2003) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating

More information

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Kiowa County The Climate of Kiowa County Kiowa County is part of the Central Great Plains, encompassing some of the best agricultural land in Oklahoma. Average annual precipitation ranges from about 24 inches in northwestern

More information

Geotechnical Investigation

Geotechnical Investigation Geotechnical Investigation Slope Stability Analysis for the Existing Slope Southwest of the Proposed Condo Developments 50 Ann Street, Bolton, Ontario Prepared For: Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited GeoPro

More information

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2003-2004) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating

More information

Quantifying Effective Rain in Landscape Irrigation Water Management

Quantifying Effective Rain in Landscape Irrigation Water Management Quantifying Effective Rain in Landscape Irrigation Water Management 20 October 2009 Steven E. Moore Irrisoft, Inc. PO Box 6266 North Logan, Utah 84321 smoore@irrisoft.net Abstract Climatologically based

More information

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL

More information

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 475910 476000 476090 476180 476270 476360 105 16' 21'' W 476450 476540 476630 476720 476810 4453350 4453440 4453260 4453350 4453170 4453260 4453080 4453170 4453080 475820 475910 4452990 476000 476090 476180

More information

SAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST

SAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST SAND By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST Definition Sand is a loose, fragmented, naturally-occurring material consisting of vary small particle (fine to medium

More information

Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture 04 Soil Erosion - Mechanics Hello friends

More information

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module - 4

More information

Appendix E. Phase 2A Geotechnical Data

Appendix E. Phase 2A Geotechnical Data Appendix E Phase 2A Geotechnical Data Appendix E1 Geotechnical Testing of Sediment ApPENDIX El. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING OF SEDIMENT (Modified from Exponent, 20Q1c) E.I Introduction This appendix presents

More information

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE The properties of the aggregates affect both the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. It is crucial to know the properties of the aggregates to be used in the making

More information

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT Prepared by: PAULUS, SOKOLOWSKI & SARTOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Methodology

More information

Application of SWAT Model to Estimate the Runoff and Sediment Load from the Right Bank Valleys of Mosul Dam Reservoir

Application of SWAT Model to Estimate the Runoff and Sediment Load from the Right Bank Valleys of Mosul Dam Reservoir Application of SWAT Model to Estimate the Runoff and Sediment Load from the Right Bank Valleys of Mosul Dam Reservoir Dr Mohammad Ezeel Deen Prof. Nadhir Al-Ansari Prof Sven Knutsson Figure 1.Map of Iraq

More information

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions Introduction: Soil erosion and sediment deposition from farmlands can contribute to degraded surface water quality. Sediment delivery

More information

TESTING PROTOCAL. Via & US Mail. April 30, 2010

TESTING PROTOCAL. Via  & US Mail. April 30, 2010 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 330 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, Illinois 60062 847.272.7400 tel 847.291.5189 fax www.wje.com Via Email & US Mail General Manager 318 West Washington Street Valders

More information

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska. Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,

More information

Photo 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking

More information

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E. Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E. Research Civil Engineer/Regional Technical Specialist Memphis District August 24, 2010 Objectives Where we have been (recap of situation and what s

More information

Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments

Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments A) Example Project Assignment on Slope and Swale Design North America Green Software Example (Erosion Control Materials Design Software) The following

More information

Provide sediment tubes for ditch check and Type A inlet structure filter applications that meet the minimum performance requirements of Table 1.

Provide sediment tubes for ditch check and Type A inlet structure filter applications that meet the minimum performance requirements of Table 1. Supplemental Technical Specification for SEDIMENT TUBES SCDOT Designation: SC-M-815-1 (03/08) 1.0 Sediment Tubes This Supplemental Specification replaces sections 815.1.1.2, 815.2.3, 815.4.5, 815.5, and

More information

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142

More information

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS Mount Prospect MHG PROJECT No. 2011.173.11 November 6, 2014 Prepared for: Piney Meetinghouse Investments c/o Mr. Dennis Fling 14801 Clopper Road Boyds, MD 20841 (301)

More information

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet Board Meeting Date: Agenda Item Type: Consent Agenda: Public Hearing: Regular Agenda: Presentation Time (est): Submitting Person: Phone Number/Ext:

More information

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 2251 / SOIL MECHANICS SEMESTER: IV UNIT 1- INTRODUCTION PART - A (2 marks) 1. Distinguish between Residual and Transported soil. (AUC May/June 2012)

More information

SECTION AGGREGATE OR GRANULAR SUBBASE

SECTION AGGREGATE OR GRANULAR SUBBASE SECTION 02230 AGGREGATE OR GRANULAR SUBBASE PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Aggregate or granular subbase as shown on the drawings. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01400 Quality Requirements.

More information

Geology Chapter Teacher Sheet. Activity #3: Determining the Percolation Rate of Soil

Geology Chapter Teacher Sheet. Activity #3: Determining the Percolation Rate of Soil Geology Chapter Teacher Sheet Activity #3: Determining the Percolation Rate of Soil Adapted from The Percolation Rate of a Soil, CurriculumResources for Earth Science Teachers, Maine Department of Conservation.

More information

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 S.E. MONTEREY ROAD STUART, FL 34996 DOUG SMITH Commissioner, District ED FIELDING Commissioner, District ANNE SCOTT Commissioner, District 3 SARAH HEARD Commissioner,

More information