Performance of Coherent Binary Phase-Shift Keying (BPSK) with Costas-Loop Tracking in the Presence of Interference
|
|
- Cleopatra Harrell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TMO Progress Report November 15, 1999 Performance of Coherent Binary Phase-Shift Keying (BPSK) with Costas-Loop Tracking in the Presence of Interference M. K. Simon 1 The bit-error probability performance of coherent binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) in the presence of narrowband (tone) and wideband (modulated tone) is investigated. The impact of the interference on both the carrier-tracking loop (assumed to be a conventional Costas loop) and the data detection are considered both individually and in combination. It is shown that, for loop parameters of practical interest, the dominant effect is the degradation induced on the data-detection process, which, depending on the relative frequency offset between the interferer and the desired signal as well as their relative power ratio, can be quite significant. I. Introduction The tracking performance of a Costas-type loop and its impact on the data detection of digital modulations in a purely additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) environment are well documented in the literature [1 4]. When, in addition to the AWGN, co-channel interference [e.g., narrowband (unmodulated tone) or wideband (modulated tone)] is present, then additional degradation takes place both in the tracking performance of the loop and in the data-detection process itself. The severity of this degradation depends to a large extent on the strength (power) of the interferer as well as the spectral location (carrier frequency) of the interfering signal relative to that of the desired signal. Also important is the relative phase between the desired and interfering signals, which, in the absence of any side information, must be assumed unknown and, thus, can be modeled as being random with a uniform distribution. With these parameters in mind, we analyze in this article both the individual tracking and data-detection performances for binary phase-shift-keying (BPSK), including in addition the impact of the former on the latter. As is traditional, for the tracking performance of the loop, we describe performance in terms of the mean-square phase jitter whereas, for data detection, performance is measured by bit-error probability (BEP). The results will be expressed as functions of the ratio of interference to desired signal power and the normalized (by the bit rate) frequency separation between the interferer and desired signal carrier frequencies. The article will be structured into two major sections corresponding to the narrowband and wideband interferer cases. Each of these two sections will be divided into two subsections corresponding to the tracking performance of the loop and the data-detection performance of the matched-filter receiver, first assuming perfect tracking and then combined with the actual tracking loop itself. The tracking loop model 1 Communications Systems and Research Section. 1
2 used throughout will be a so-called I-Q Costas loop, which refers to a Costas loop with integrate-anddump (I&D) arm filters. To avoid additional complication, we shall assume perfect bit synchronization of these arm filter I&Ds, one of which also serves as the matched filter for data detection. II. Performance in the Presence of Narrowband Interference A. Tracking Performance of the Costas Loop Consider the BPSK receiver illustrated in Fig. 1, where the demodulation reference signal is provided by an I-Q Costas loop as shown. Input to this receiver is the sum of a desired signal, s s (t), and a narrowband (tone) interference signal, s I (t), which are mathematically modeled as s s (t) = m(t) sin (ω c t + θ s ) s I (t) = P I sin ((ω c + ω)t+θ I ) (1) where,ω c,θ s and P I,ω c + ω, θ I are, respectively, the power, radian carrier frequency, and phase of the desired and interference signals, and m (t) = a n p (t nt b ) () n= is the binary data modulation with {a n } an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sequence taking on equiprobable values ±1, and p (t) is a unit amplitude rectangular pulse of duration equal to the bit time, T b. Adding to s s (t) and s I (t) is the AWGN noise: n (t) = [N c (t) cos (ω c t + θ s ) N s (t) sin (ω c t + θ s )] (3) where N c (t) and N s (t) are in-phase (I) and quadrature-phase (Q) low-pass noise components that are independent and have single-sided power spectral density (PSD) N W/Hz. As such, the total received signal is then r (t) =s s (t)+s I (t)+n(t) (4) Demodulating r (t) with the I and Q reference signals derived by the loop produces the baseband signals: In this subsection, we shall first consider the ideal case, wherein the demodulation reference for data-detection purposes is assumed to be perfect.
3 e s (t ) (k +1)T b ( )dt ^ a k z s (t ) kt b r (t ) sin (w c t + q ^ s ) VCO LOOP FILTER F (s ) z (t ) 9 deg ^ cos (w c t + q s ) e c (t ) (k +1)T b ( )dt kt b z c (t ) Fig. 1. Block diagram of the I-Q Costas loop receiver. ε c (t) =r(t) cos (ω c t + ˆθ ) s = [ Ps m (t) N s (t)] sin φ s + N c (t) cos φ s + P I sin ( ωt + φ s + θ) ε s (t)=r(t) sin (ω c t + ˆθ ) s (5) = [ Ps m (t) N s (t)] cos φ s N c (t) sin φ s + P I cos ( ωt + φ s + θ) where φ s = θ s ˆθ s is the loop phase error and θ = θ I θ s is the phase difference between the desired and interference signals. After passing through the I and Q arm filters, we obtain the sample-and-hold values at the end of the kth bit interval: z s (t) = (k+1)tb ε s (t) dt = T b Ps a k cos φ s N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s kt b + T b {A ck cos (φ s + θ) A sk sin (φ s + θ)} (6) z c (t)= (k+1)tb ε c (t) dt = T b Ps a k sin φ s + N 1 cos φ s N sin φ s kt b + T b {A sk cos (φ s + θ)+a ck sin (φ s + θ)}, (k+1)t b t (k+)t b 3
4 where A sk = 1 (k+1)tb T b kt b A ck = 1 (k+1)tb T b kt b sin ωtdt = cos ωkt b cos ω (k +1)T b ωt b cos ωtdt = sin ωkt b + sin ω (k +1)T b ωt b (7) and N 1 and N are independent zero-mean Gaussian random variables with variance σ N 1 = σ N = N T b /. Defining the complex amplitude A k = A ck + ja sk = 1 (k+1)tb e j ωt dt = 1 T b T b kt b Tb e j ω(t+kt b) dt (8) then we can rewrite Eq. (6) as z s (t) = z c (t) = (k+1)tb kt b (k+1)tb kt b ε s (t) dt = T b Ps a k cos φ s N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s + T b Re {A k e j(φs+ θ)} { ε c (t) dt = T b Ps a k sin φ s + N 1 cos φ s N sin φ s + T b Im A k e j(φs+ θ)}, (9) (k +1)T b t (k+)t b Further note that 1 A k = T b Tb e j ω(t+ktb) dt = 1 T b Tb e j ωt dt = sin ωt b ωt b (1) which is independent of k. Multiplying the two I&D outputs produces the dynamic error signal in the loop, which is given by z (t) =z c (t)z s (t)= ( 1 Tb T b a k N + 1 N 1 ) N 1 sin φ s + 1 P IT b A k sin ( (φ s + θ+α k )) ( ) + Ps T b a k N N 1 cos φ s + P I Tb a k A k sin (φ s + θ+α k ) P I T b N A k sin (φ s + θ+α k )+ P I T b N 1 A k cos (φ s + θ+α k ) (11) 4
5 where α k = arg A k = tan 1 A sk (1) A ck Unlike A k, the argument α k is a function of the index of the bit interval, k. To see this, we first write A sk and A ck in terms of their values in the zeroth interval, namely, A s and A c,as A sk = 1 Tb T b A ck = 1 Tb T b sin ω (t + kt b ) dt = A s cos k ωt b + A c sin k ωt b cos ω (t + kt b ) dt = A c cos k ωt b A s sin k ωt b (13) where A s = 1 Tb T b A c = 1 Tb T b sin ωtdt = 1 cos ωt b ωt b cos ωtdt = sin ωt b ωt b (14) Then, 3 α k = arg A k = tan 1 A s cos k ωt b + A c sin k ωt b A c cos k ωt b A s sin k ωt b = tan 1 A sin (k ωt b + α ) A cos (k ωt b + α ) = k ωt b + α (15) where 1 Tb sin ωtdt ( ) = arg A = tan 1 T b 1 cos 1 = tan 1 ωtb = tan 1 Tb sin ωt cos ωtdt b T b α sin () sin (16) and we have further introduced the shorthand notation for normalized frequency offset, = ωt b =π ft b (17) As we shall soon see, the linear dependence of α k on k as exhibited in Eq. (15) is important in determining the effect of the interference on the loop s ability to lock. In particular, the behavior of the loop in the 3 Unless otherwise noted, all arctangent functions are assumed to be taken in the four-quadrant sense, i.e., tan 1 (X/Y )= (sgn X)(tan 1 [X/Y ]) P.V. + π([1 sgn X]/), where (tan 1 [X/Y ]) P.V. denotes the principal value (angle in first and fourth quadrants) of the arctangent of X divided by Y. 5
6 presence of tone interference is reminiscent of the false-lock behavior of Costas loops in the absence of interference 4 [5 8] in that the loop potentially can lock at frequencies other than that of the desired signal carrier. The signal component of the dynamic error signal (which results in the so-called loop S-curve) is the statistical and time average, i.e., the dc component of the expression in Eq. (11), where the statistical average is taken over both the noise components and the binary data sequence. Performing first the expectation results in g (φ s ; k) = z (t) = ( ) 1 Tb sin φ s + 1 P ITb sin () sin ( (φ s + θ+k + α )) (18) Now taking the time average (i.e., the average over the index k) of Eq. (18), we observe that the second term (the one due to the interference) will be zero except when is an integer multiple of π, i.e., = nπ, or, equivalently from Eq. (17), f = n T b (19) That is, if the tone interference occurs at integer multiples of half the data rate away from and either side of the desired signal carrier frequency, 5 then the loop S-curve may be affected by the interference. Otherwise, it will not. The S-curves corresponding to these scenarios are as follows. For f = n/(t b ), with g (φ s ) = z (t) = k For f n/(t b ), ( 1 Tb ( 1 Tb ( 1 Tb ) sin φ s + 1 ( P ITb nπ ) sin ( (φ s + θ+α )), n odd ) sin φ s, n even (n ) ) sin φ s + 1 P IT b sin ( (φ s + θ+α )), n = ( tan 1 πn ) sin = π sin πn, n odd α =, n even (n ), n = g (φ s ) = () (1) ( ) 1 z (t) = k Tb sin φ s () 4 M. K. Simon, False Lock Behavior of Costas Receivers, Appendix J of Integrated Source and Channel Encoded Digital Communication System Design Study, Final Report, Axiomatix Report R767-3, July 31, Note that for other data formats, e.g., Manchester coding, or pulse shapes, the frequencies and extent to which the interference affects the loop S-curve will be different, as was the case for the false-lock phenomena [6,8]. 6
7 which is the well-known result for a Costas-loop error signal in the absence of interference and in the true-lock condition. Also, note that the S-curve of Eq. () also occurs when the interference tone is located at an even integer multiple of half the data rate away from the desired signal carrier frequency. One of the quantities needed to evaluate the tracking performance of the loop is the slope of the S-curve at its lock point. Before differentiating Eq. () [or Eq. ()], we first combine the two terms of the S-curve for n odd and n = in Eq. (), which after some algebra results in ( ) 1 1 ( ) [ ( ) ] Tb P I P I cos θ + sin ( (φ s + β n )), n odd nπ nπ ( ) g (φ s )= 1 Tb sin φ s, n even (n ) ( ) 1 Tb 1+ P I cos θ + ( ) sin ( (φ s + β )), n = (3) where β n = 1 tan 1 1 tan 1 P ( I nπ 1 P I ( nπ P I sin θ 1+ P I cos θ ) sin θ ) cos θ, n odd, n = (4) Note that for n odd and n =, the loop locks with a static phase error, i.e., φ s = β n, whereas for n even or no interference, the loop locks at φ s =. Now letting φ l = φ s or φ l = φ s + β n as appropriate, then differentiating Eqs. () and () with respect to φ l and evaluating the result at φ l = gives ( ) [ ( ) ] T P I P I b 1 cos θ +, n odd nπ nπ K g = dg (φ s) φl = = φ T l b, n even (n ) Tb 1+ P ( ) ( ) I cos θ +, n = nπ (5) where the result for n even (n ) also holds for the case f (n/[t b ]). The next consideration is the effect of the noise terms contributed by the interference in Eq. (11) on the tracking performance of the loop. Since the loop tracks a φ s process, then, as in previous interference-free 7
8 analyses of Costas loops, we define the equivalent noise by N (t) = z (t) becomes noise terms, which from Eq. (11) N (t) = (N1 N + ) ( ) T b a k N sin φ s Ps T b a k N 1 N 1 N cos φ s + ( ) sin P I T b N sin (φ s + θ+α k ) ( ) sin P I T b N 1 cos (φ s + θ+α k ) (6) This noise process, N (t), is piecewise constant (over the duration of a data bit) and can be modeled as a delta-correlated process with triangular correlation function ( σn 1 τ ), τ T b R N (τ) =E{N(t)N(t+τ)}= T b (7), τ >T b where σ N is its variance, which after some algebraic manipulation is given by σ N = E { N (t) } = N T 3 b [ 1+ P ( ) ] I sin + N Tb (8) The equivalent flat PSD of N (t) is then [ N = R N (τ) dτ =σnt b =4 N Tb 4 1+ P I ( ) ] sin + N Tb 3 (9) Ignoring the variance of the data-dependent signal interference term, P I T b a k A k sin ( (φ s + θ)), in Eq. (11), 6 then the mean-squared phase jitter of the φ s process is computed from σ φ s = N B L K g (3) where B L is the single-sided loop noise bandwidth. Substituting Eqs. (5) and (9) in Eq. (3) gives the desired result, which can be expressed in the form ( ) σφ 1 s =4 ρ PLL S L (31) where ρ PLL = /N B L is the equivalent loop signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a phase-locked loop (PLL) and S L =4Kg/(P s N /N ) is a factor traditionally referred to as squaring loss that accounts for the nonlinear (relative to a linear loop such as the PLL) distortions produced in the error signal by the 6 This assumption is similar to ignoring the variance of the signal self-interference term (the difference between the signal signal term and its mean value), which only contributes at a very high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). 8
9 multiplication of the I and Q signal, interference, and noise terms. Substituting Eqs. (5) and (9) in the squaring-loss definition gives, for f = n/t b ( = nπ), S L = 1 P ( ) [ I P I cos θ + nπ 1+ P ( I nπ 1+ P I 1 ) + 1 ( ) + 1 nπ R d R d ( ) ] nπ, n odd, n even (n ) (3a) and, for f n/t b ( nπ), 1+ P I cos θ + ( ) 1+ P I + 1 R d, n = S L = 1 1+ P ( ) I sin + 1 R d (3b) where R d = T b /N = E b /N is the bit energy-to-noise ratio. Note that for no interference (P I = ), Eqs. (3a) and (3b) simplify to S L = 1 R d 1+ 1 = (33) 1+R d R d which is the well-known result for the squaring loss of an I-Q Costas loop [1 4]. Defining the effective loop SNR of the φ s process by ρ φs = 1 σ φ s = 1 4 ρ PLLS L = 1 4 ( Eb N )( 1 B L T b ) S L = 1 4 ( Eb N ) δs L (34) where δ is the reciprocal of the bit time-loop bandwidth product (typically a large number in standard applications), then it is customary to model the conditional (on the phase offset between the desired and interference signals) probability density function (PDF) of this process by a Tikhonov distribution, namely, p φs (φ s θ )= exp {ρ φ cos ( (φ s + β n ))}, φ s + β n π (35) πi (ρ φs ) where β n is determined from Eq. (4) for n integer and β n = for n noninteger. Also, in Eq. (35), I ( ) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind. In the next subsection, we shall discuss the impact of this noisy carrier demodulation reference on the average BEP of the BPSK receiver. 9
10 B. Average Bit-Error-Probability Performance of the Receiver As indicated in the introduction, we start out by considering the direct effect of the interference on the matched-filter output, assuming that the carrier-demodulation reference signal is perfect. So as not to duplicate our effort when we consider the case when the demodulation reference is derived from the Costas loop itself, we shall first evaluate the conditional (on the loop phase error, φ s ) BEP from which the result for a perfect carrier reference is obtained simply by setting φ s =. The matched filter in the I arm of the Costas loop serves as the data detector. We have already specified its sample-and-hold output value, z s (t), in Eq. (9), which for the arbitrarily selected zeroth bit interval k = becomes z s (t) =T b Ps a cos φ s + T b [ sin cos (φ s + θ) 1 cos ] sin (φ s + θ) N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s = T b Ps a cos φ s + T b sin cos (φ s + θ+α ) N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s, T b t T b (36) where α is defined in Eq. (16) and N = N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s is a zero-mean Gaussian noise process with variance σ = N T b /. Comparing this output to a zero threshold results in a decision on a. Assuming a = 1, the conditional probability of error is given by P b (E φ s, θ ) a=1 =Pr{z s (t)< a =1} = 1 erfc { Rd [cos φ s + ]} sin cos (φ s + θ+α ) (37a) Similarly, assuming a = 1, the conditional probability of error is given by P b (E φ s, θ ) a= 1 =Pr{z s (t) a = 1} = 1 erfc { Rd [cos φ s ]} sin cos (φ s + θ+α ) (37b) Thus, since the hypotheses a = 1 and a = 1 are equiprobable, then averaged over the data, the conditional BEP is P b (E φ s, θ )= 1 P b(e φ s, θ) a=1 + 1 P b (E φ s, θ ) a= 1 (38) Assuming a uniform distribution on θ, which is appropriate in the absence of any a priori information concerning the relative phase between the desired and interference signals, then for ideal carrier tracking, we set φ s = in Eq. (38), which gives 1
11 P b (E) ideal = 1 { [ π Rd erfc 1+ 8π π + 1 { [ π Rd erfc 1 8π π sin sin ]} cos ( θ + α ) d θ ]} cos ( θ + α ) d θ (39) This result is upper and lower bounded by Eq. (38) evaluated at the worst- and best-case values of θ, namely, θ worst = α θ best = α ± π (4) which results in P b (E) max = 1 4 erfc { Rd [1+ P b (E) min = 1 erfc { Rd } ]} { [ sin + 14 Rd erfc 1 ]} sin (41) When the demodulation reference is provided by the Costas loop itself, then there is an additional BEP degradation due to the impact of the noise and interference on the loop tracking performance. This can be evaluated by averaging the conditional BEP of Eq. (38) over both the uniform distribution on θ and the Tikhonov distribution on φ s obtained from Eq. (35), which gives P b (E) = 1 (π/) βn π P b (E φ s, θ )p φs (φ s θ ) d θdφ s π (π/) β n π = 1 (π/) βn { [ π Rd erfc cos φ s + 4π (π/) β n π sin ]} cos (φ s + θ+α ) exp {ρ φ s cos ( (φ s + β n ))} d θdφ s πi (ρ φs ) + 1 (π/) βn { [ π Rd erfc cos φ s 4π (π/) β n π sin ]} cos (φ s + θ+α ) exp {ρ φ s cos ( (φ s + β n ))} d θdφ s (4) πi (ρ φs ) and is the desired result. 11
12 III. Performance in the Presence of Wideband Interference A. Tracking Performance of the Costas Loop For the wideband interferer case, the received signal is again given by Eq. (4), where now s I (t) = P I m I (t) sin ((ω c + ω)t+θ I ) (43) with m I (t) = a np (t nt b τ) (44) n= denoting the interference modulation, which is independent of the desired signal modulation and whose data rate is assumed to be equal to that of the desired signal. Again, in Eq. (44), {a n} is an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sequence taking on equiprobable values ±1; p (t) is a unit amplitude rectangular pulse of duration T b ; and now τ denotes the time asynchronism of the interference with respect to the desired signal, which in the absence of any a priori information, is assumed to be uniformly distributed over a T b -second interval. Analogously to Eq. (5), the I and Q demodulator baseband outputs become ε c (t) =r(t) cos (ω c t + ˆθ ) s = [ Ps m (t) N s (t)] sin φ s + N c (t) cos φ s + P I m I (t) sin ( ωt + φ s + θ) ε s (t)=r(t) sin (ω c t + ˆθ ) s (45) = [ Ps m (t) N s (t)] cos φ s N c (t) sin φ s + P I m I (t) cos ( ωt + φ s + θ) After passing these signals through the I and Q I&Ds, the sample-and-hold values for the kth bit interval are still given by Eq. (9), where now A k = A ck + ja sk = 1 (k+1)tb a T np (t nt b τ)e j ωt dt b kt b n= = 1 Tb a T np (t +(k n)t b τ) cos ( ω (t + kt b )) dt b n= + j 1 Tb a T np (t +(k n)t b τ) sin ( ω (t + kt b )) dt (46) b n= Analogously to Eq. (13), the coefficients in Eq. (46) can be expressed in terms of ones that are independent of k, i.e., 1
13 A sk = A s cos k ωt b + A c sin k ωt b A ck = A c cos k ωt b A s sin k ωt b (47) where now 7 A c = 1 Tb T b n= a np (t +(k n)t b τ) cos ωtdt = 1 T b Tb A s = 1 Tb T b m= n= a mp (t mt b τ) cos ωtdt a np (t +(k n)t b τ) sin ωtdt (48) = 1 Tb a T mp (t mt b τ) sin ωtdt b m= which are clearly independent of k, the index of the desired signal s bit interval. Furthermore, A k = A ck + A sk = A c + A s (49) Letting ε = τ/t b, then for τ, Eq. (48) evaluates to A c = a sin (ε) 1 + a sin sin (ε) A s = a 1 cos (ε) 1 + a cos (ε) cos (5) Similar results in terms of a and a 1 would be obtained for τ. Substituting Eq. (5) in Eq. (49) and simplifying the trigonometry gives A k = ( ) ( sin (ε/) sin ( (1 ε) /) + ) [ (sin )( ) ( ) ] ( (1 ε) /) sin ( (1 + ε) /) sin ( (1 ε) /) + a a 1 (51) 7 Note that the data bit a m in the terms to the right of the second equality in Eq. (48) should really be a m+k. However, since {a m } represents an arbitrary doubly infinite random data sequence, then there is no loss in generality in replacing the sequence {a m+k } by {a m }. 13
14 Multiplying the two I&D outputs as before produces the dynamic error signal in the loop, which is still given by Eq. (11) with α k as in Eq. (15) and α = arg A = tan 1 A s (5) A c which by virtue of Eq. (48) is also independent of k. Thus, the conditions (frequency offsets) under which the loop S-curve is affected by the presence of wideband interference are identical to those for the narrowband interference case; in particular, the S-curve is now g (φ s ; k) = z (t) = = ( ) 1 Tb sin φ s + 1 { } P ITb E a A k sin ( (φ s + θ+k + α )) ( ) 1 Tb sin φ s + 1 P ITb A k α cos α sin ( (φ s + θ+k)) + 1 P IT b A k sin α α cos ( (φ s + θ+k)) (53) and the second and third terms contribute to the time-averaged S-curve, g (φ s )= g(φ s ;k) k, only when the condition of Eq. (19) is met. Using Eq. (5), the statistical averages A k cos α α and A k sin α α are obtained as [( )( ) A k α α sin α =A s A sin (ε) 1 cos (ε) c = ( sin + A k cos α α = A c A sα = )( sin (ε) cos (ε) cos )] = K s (ε; n) [ (sin (ε) ) ( sin + ) sin (ε) ( ) ( 1 cos (ε) cos (ε) cos ) ] = K c (ε; n) (54) which for f = n/t b ( = nπ) become 14
15 ( ) sin (nπε), n odd nπ ( )( K s (ε; n) = sin (nπε) sin ) (nπε/) 8, n even (n ) nπ nπ, n = K c (ε;n)= ( ) ( sin ε sin ) ( (nπε/) cos ) (nπε/) 4 4, n odd nπ nπ nπ ( ) ( sin (nπε) sin ) (nπε/) 8, n even (n ) nπ nπ ε +(1 ε), n = (55) Finally, conditioned on τ and θ, the time-averaged S-curves are given by g (φ s )= ( ) 1 Tb sin φ s + 1 P ITb K c (ε; n) sin ( (φ s + θ)) + 1 P IT b K s (ε; n) cos ( (φ s + θ)) = 1 K g sin ( (φ s + β n )) (56) with slope at the lock point [see Eq. (5)], K g =g (φ s )= T b 1+ P I [K c (ε;n) cos θ K s (ε; n) sin θ]+ ( ) (K s (ε;n)+k c (ε;n)) (57) where β n = 1 tan 1 P I [K c (ε; n) sin θ + K s (ε; n) cos θ] 1+ P I [K c (ε;n) cos θ K s (ε; n) sin θ] (58) When f n/t b, then the time-averaged S-curve is unaffected by the interference and, as before, is given by g (φ s )= ( ) [1/] Tb sin φs with slope K g = Tb. The equivalent noise perturbing the loop is obtained by analogy with Eq. (6) as N (t) = (N1 N + ) ( ) T b a k N sin φ s Ps T b a k N 1 N 1 N cos φ s + P I T b N A k sin (φ s + θ+α k ) P I T b N 1 A k cos (φ s + θ+α k ) (59) 15
16 which now has a variance σ N = E { N (t) } = N T 3 b [ 1+ P ] I A k +N P T b (6) s where, from Eq. (51), ( ) ( ) A k sin (ε/) sin ( (1 ε) /) = + (61) Thus, the mean-squared phase jitter is still given by Eq. (31), where now the squaring-loss factor is, for f = n/t b ( = nπ), 1+ P ( ) I ( [K c (ε;n) cos θ K s (ε; n) sin θ]+ K s (ε;n)+kc (ε;n) ) S L = [ (sin 1+ P ) ( ) ] I (nπε/) sin (nπ (1 ε) /) nπ/ nπ/ R d (6a) and, for f n/t b ( nπ), S L = 1+ P I 1 [ (sin ) ( ) ] (ε/) sin ( (1 ε) /) R d (6b) Note that, for τ = (ε= ) (synchronous interferer and desired user), the squaring loss of Eqs. (6a) and (6b) for the wideband interferer become identical to those for the narrowband (tone) interferer as given by Eqs. (3a) and (3b), respectively. Furthermore, because of the symmetry of the problem, replacing ε by ε in Eqs. (6a) and (6b) makes them, in addition, valid for ε<. B. Average Bit-Error-Probability Performance of the Receiver Once again, as indicated in the introduction, we start out by first evaluating the conditional (on the loop phase error, φ s ) BEP from which the result for a perfect carrier reference is obtained simply by setting φ s =. The matched filter in the I arm of the Costas loop serves as the data detector. We have already specified its sample-and-hold output value, z s (t), in Eq. (9), which, for the arbitrarily selected zeroth bit interval k =, becomes z s (t) =T b Ps a cos φ s + T b [A c cos (φ s + θ) A s sin (φ s + θ)] N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s, T b t T b (63) where N = N 1 sin φ s N cos φ s is again a zero-mean Gaussian noise process with variance σ = N T b /. Comparing this output to a zero threshold results in a decision on a. Assuming a = 1, the conditional probability of error is given by 16
17 P b (E φ s, θ, ε) a=1 = Pr {z s (t) < a =1} a,a 1 = 1 erfc { Rd [cos φ s + ]}a,a 1 A k cos (φ s + θ+α ) (64) where A k is determined from Eq. (51), and from Eqs. (5) and (5), α = tan 1 cos (ε) cos + a a 1 (1 cos (ε)) sin sin (ε)+a a 1 sin (ε) + π (1 sgn a ) (65) Noticing that A k depends only on the interference bit product a a 1 but that α depends both on the product a a 1 and on a itself, then Eq. (64) can be written as P b (E φ s, θ, ε) a=1 = 1 8 erfc { Rd [cos φ s erfc { Rd [cos φ s erfc { Rd [cos φ s A (1) k ( cos A ( 1) k A (1) k φ s + θ+α (1) ( cos ( cos ) ]} φ s + θ+α ( 1) φ s + θ+α (1) ) ]} ) ]} erfc { Rd [cos φ s A ( 1) k ( cos φ s + θ+α ( 1) ) ]} (66) where A (1) k A ( 1) k ( ) ( )( ) sin (ε/) sin ( (1 ε) /) sin ( (1 + ε) /) = + ( ) ( ) ( )( ) sin ( (1 ε) /) sin (ε/) sin ( (1 ε) /) sin ( (1 + ε) /) = + (67a) and α (1) α ( 1) 1 1 cos = tan sin 1 cos (ε) cos 1 = tan sin sin (ε) (67b) For f = n/t b ( = nπ), these quantities explicitly evaluate to 17
18 A (1) k A ( 1) k = = ( ), nπ n odd, n even (n ) 1, n = ( ), n odd nπ ( ) sin nπε/ 4, n even (n ) nπ/ (1 ε), n = (68a) and α (1) = α ( 1) = π, n odd, n even (n ), n = π + nπε, n odd ), n even (n ) ( 1 cos (nπε) π + tan 1 sin (nπε), n = (68b) Similarly to Eq. (64), for a = 1, the conditional probability of error is given by P b (E φ s, θ, ε) a= 1 = Pr {z s (t) a = 1} a,a 1 = 1 erfc { Rd [cos φ s ]}a,a 1 A k cos (φ s + θ+α ) (69) Thus, averaging over the equiprobable desired signal bits a = 1 and a = 1, the conditional BEP, P b (E φ s, θ, ε), is also given by Eq. (66). Again, for ε =, A (1) k = A ( 1) k = sin () α (1) = α ( 1) 1 1 cos = tan sin and Eq. (66) reduces to the previously obtained result [see the average of Eqs. (37a) and (37b)] for the tone interferer. 18
19 Considering first the case of ideal carrier tracking wherein we set φ s =, then averaging Eq. (66) over uniform distributions for θ and ε, we obtain the average BEP: P b (E) = 1 π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A (1) erfc 1+ k cos θ + α (1) dεd θ 16π π 1/ + 1 π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A ( 1) erfc 1+ k cos θ + α ( 1) dεd θ 16π π 1/ + 1 π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A (1) erfc 1 k cos θ + α (1) dεd θ 16π π 1/ + 1 π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A ( 1) erfc 1 k cos θ + α ( 1) dεd θ (7) 16π π 1/ Next, for the more realistic case when the demodulation reference is provided by the Costas loop itself, one requires as before an additional average of Eq. (66) over a Tikhonov distribution on φ s, analogous to Eq. (4). In particular, P b (E) = 1 (π/) βn π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A (1) erfc cos φ s + k cos φ s + θ+α (1) 16π (π/) β n π 1/ p φs (φ s θ, ε) dεd θdφ s + 1 (π/) βn π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A ( 1) erfc cos φ s + k cos φ s + θ+α ( 1) 16π (π/) β n π 1/ p φs (φ s θ, ε) dεd θdφ s + 1 (π/) βn π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A (1) erfc cos φ s k cos φ s + θ+α (1) 16π (π/) β n π 1/ p φs (φ s θ, ε) dεd θdφ s + 1 (π/) βn π { [ 1/ Rd ( ) ]} A ( 1) erfc cos φ s k cos φ s + θ+α ( 1) 16π (π/) β n π 1/ p φs (φ s θ, ε) dεd θdφ s (71) where p φs (φ s θ, ε) is characterized by Eq. (35) with ρ φs Eqs. (6a) and (6b) and β n is given by Eq. (58). determined from the squaring loss of 19
20 IV. Numerical Results Illustrated in Figs. (a) and (b) is the squaring-loss behavior of the Costas loop in the presence of narrowband (tone) interference corresponding, respectively, to the cases when ft b n/ and ft b = n/ and n is integer. The curves are plotted with the ratio of interference to desired signal power, P I /, and ft b as parameters. Also shown for comparison is the squaring-loss performance for no interference (P I / = ), which corresponds to the well-known result in Eq. (33). In the case of the former, i.e., ft b n/, we see that the squaring loss in db [as computed from Eq. (3b)] is always negative (implying a true loss or degradation in loop SNR), with the severity of this loss increasing as P I / increases and ft b becomes smaller (i.e., the frequency of the interfering tone approaches that of the desired signal). Alternately, as the interfering tone moves further and further outside the bandwidth of the desired signal modulation, its effect on loop tracking performance diminishes. In the case of the latter, i.e., ft b = n/, the potential effect of the interfering tone on the signal signal term (numerator) in the squaring loss (as per the same behavior in the false-lock problem) results in a somewhat different phenomenon. First of all, for n an even integer (not including n = ), the interferer has no effect on the signal signal term and, thus, the squaring-loss behavior is similar to that for the case of ft b n/ described above. However, when n is an odd integer or n = (i.e., the interfering tone falls exactly on the desired signal carrier frequency), then the signal signal term is affected [see Eq. (3a)] and, furthermore, depends on the phase difference, θ, between the interferer and desired signal. The worst squaring loss for these two cases corresponds to θ = or θ = π for n an odd integer and θ = π/ for n =. [Of course, one should remember that, in a true situation, θ is a uniformly distributed parameter and, thus, the effect of the loop s ability to track on the average error-probability performance would be obtained by averaging over this parameter see Eq. (4).] The curves plotted in Fig. (b) correspond to this worst-case value of θ. Interestingly enough, we observe that, when the interference-to-desired-signal-power ratio is sufficiently large and the tone occurs at the desired signal carrier frequency (i.e., n = ), the squaring loss in fact becomes a gain! The reasoning behind this is that a Costas loop is quite capable (moreover it prefers this to a modulated tone) of tracking a pure tone when it occurs at the correct frequency. Thus, in this situation, the additional power provided by the interfering signal at the desired signal carrier frequency aids the loop s ability to track. In fact, if this interfering tone becomes sufficiently large (in power) relative to the desired signal, the loop will instead track the tone. Even if the interfering tone is not at the desired signal carrier frequency but is in fact offset from it by an odd half integer multiple of the data rate, then analogously to the false-lock problem, a dc component is produced at the error-signal point in the loop and again this additional error-signal voltage can contribute a positive effect on the loop s ability to track. This can be observed in Fig. (b) by comparing the squaring-loss curves corresponding to ft b =.5 for P I / =. and P I / =4.. For small values of P I /, the loop will always exhibit a squaring loss. Figure 3 illustrates the average BEP in the presence of narrowband interference for the case when the carrier tracking is assumed to be perfect and is computed from Eq. (39). The interference-to-desiredsignal-power ratio is held fixed at P I / =1., whereas the relative frequency offset between the two signals is varied. Also shown is the curve corresponding to zero interference, P I / =, which corresponds to the ideal BEP performance of PSK, i.e., P b (E) =1/ erfc R d. The results in this figure illustrate the importance of the frequency location of the tone relative to that of the desired signal. In particular, when the tone is close (in frequency) to the desired signal, then it has a major impact on the BEP performance, whereas its effect is considerably reduced when it is further out in the signal spectrum. Also, note that the performance for ft b =1. is better than that for ft b =1.5, which reflects the sin x/x behavior (between the first and second nulls of this function) of the BEP on the parameter ft b [see Eq. (39)]. Finally, when the interfering tone occurs at integer values of the data rate away from the desired signal carrier frequency, i.e., ft b is integer (n is even), then sin () / () = sin nπ/nπ =, whereupon from Eq. (39), the interferer has no effect and the performance is given by the zero interference curve.
21 . (a) P I / =. Df T b =.6, P I / =. -. Df T b =.6, P I / = 4. S L, db -4. Df T b =.4, P I / =. Df T b =., P I / =. -6. Df T b =.4, P I / = Df T b =., P I / = R d = T b / N, db 5 (b) Df T b =., P I / = 4. Df T b = 1.5, P I / =. P I / =. -5 Df T b = 1.5, P I / = 4. S L, db Df T b =., P I / =. -1 Df T b =.5, P I / = Df T b =.5, P I / = R d = T b / N, db Fig.. Squaring loss versus bit SNR in the presence of narrowband (tone) interference: (a) Df T b ¹ n / and (b) Df T b = n / (n integer). 1
22 1 1-1 P I / = 1. Df T b = P b (E ) P I / = R d = T b / N, db Fig. 3. Average bit-error probability versus bit SNR in the presence of narrowband (tone) interference (perfect carrier synchronization assumed). Figure 4 is the companion to Fig. 3 when the carrier-phase tracking is provided by the Costas loop as per the discussion in Subsection.A. A value of δ = 1 [see Eq. (34)] has been chosen for all of the curves. Even for this relatively small value for the reciprocal of the bit time-loop bandwidth product (typical values of practical systems are in the hundreds), the degradation due to the Costas-loop tracking relative to an ideal phase-coherent demodulation reference is very small and hardly noticeable on the graphs themselves (the raw data that generated these curves show the small difference). Thus, we conclude that the dominant effect of the interferer on average BEP is that produced on the data detector itself rather than on the phase tracking loop. For wideband interference, Fig. 5 is the analogous plot to Fig. 3. Comparing these two figures, we observe that the wideband interferer has a more deleterious effect on performance than that produced by the narrowband interferer. We further note in Fig. 5 that, unlike the tone interference case, when the center frequency of the interferer occurs at integer values of the data rate away from the desired signal carrier frequency, i.e., ft b is an integer (n is even), the interferer indeed still has an effect on the BEP performance of the receiver. The reason for this can be gleaned from Eqs. (7) and (71) in combination from Eq. (68a), where we observe that the interference degradation is not simply a sin x/x function dependent only on ft b (or equivalently ), but rather depends on the combination of and the normalized time offset, ε, between the desired and interfering signals. Thus, only when the two signals are perfectly time aligned (i.e., ε = ) does the interference effect disappear. Finally, when the carrier synchronization is provided by the I-Q Costas loop, then analogous to what was true for the narrowband interferer case, the additional degradation due to such nonideal tracking is again very small. As such, we shall not show the numerical plots for this case since, as was true for Fig. 4 relative to Fig. 3, the effect would be hardly noticeable on the graphs themselves. Thus, we once again conclude that the dominant effect of the interferer on average BEP is that produced on the data detector itself rather than on the phase tracking loop.
23 1 P I / = 1. Df T b = P b (E ) P I / = R d = T b / N, db Fig. 4. Average bit-error probability versus bit SNR in the presence of narrowband (tone) interference (carrier synchronization provided by a Costas loop); d = 1/B L T B = 1. 1 Df T b =. P I / = P b (E ) P I / = R d = T b / N, db Fig. 5. Average bit-error probability versus bit SNR in the presence of wideband interference (perfect carrier synchronization assumed)
24 References [1] W. C. Lindsey and M. K. Simon, Optimum Design and Performance of Suppressed Carrier Receivers with Costas Loop Tracking, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-5, no., pp. 15 7, February [] W. C. Lindsey and M. K. Simon,Telecommunication Systems Engineering, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., [3] J. H. Yuen, ed., Deep Space Telecommunications Systems Engineering, New York: Plenum Press, [4] J. K. Holmes, Coherent Spread Spectrum Systems, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., [5] G. Hedin, J. K. Holmes, W. C. Lindsey, and K. T. Woo, Theory of False Lock in Costas Loops, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-6, no. 1, pp. 1 1, January [6] M. K. Simon, The False Lock Performance of Polarity-Type Costas Loops with Manchester Coded Input, Proceedings of the 1977 National Telecommunications Conference, Los Angeles, California, pp. 3:1-1 3:1-5, [7] G. Hedin, J. K. Holmes, W. C. Lindsey, and K. T. Woo, False Lock Phenomenon in Costas and Squaring Loops, Proceedings of the 1977 National Telecommunications Conference, Los Angeles, California, pp. 34:4-1 34:4-6, [8] M. K. Simon, False Lock Performance of I-Q Costas Loops for Pulse-Shaped Binary Phase Shift Keying, The Telecommunications and Data Acquisition Progress Report 4-131, July September 1997, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, pp. 1 8, November 15, report/4-131/131c.pdf 4
Residual Versus Suppressed-Carrier Coherent Communications
TDA Progress Report -7 November 5, 996 Residual Versus Suppressed-Carrier Coherent Communications M. K. Simon and S. Million Communications and Systems Research Section This article addresses the issue
More informationDirect-Sequence Spread-Spectrum
Chapter 3 Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum In this chapter we consider direct-sequence spread-spectrum systems. Unlike frequency-hopping, a direct-sequence signal occupies the entire bandwidth continuously.
More informationCarrier Synchronization
Chapter 8 Carrier Synchronization Marvin K. Simon and Jon Hamkins Traditionally, carrier synchronization (sync) techniques have been developed assuming that the modulation format and signal constellation
More informationPerformance Analysis of Spread Spectrum CDMA systems
1 Performance Analysis of Spread Spectrum CDMA systems 16:33:546 Wireless Communication Technologies Spring 5 Instructor: Dr. Narayan Mandayam Summary by Liang Xiao lxiao@winlab.rutgers.edu WINLAB, Department
More informationA First Course in Digital Communications
A First Course in Digital Communications Ha H. Nguyen and E. Shwedyk February 9 A First Course in Digital Communications 1/46 Introduction There are benefits to be gained when M-ary (M = 4 signaling methods
More informationEE4512 Analog and Digital Communications Chapter 4. Chapter 4 Receiver Design
Chapter 4 Receiver Design Chapter 4 Receiver Design Probability of Bit Error Pages 124-149 149 Probability of Bit Error The low pass filtered and sampled PAM signal results in an expression for the probability
More informationDigital Band-pass Modulation PROF. MICHAEL TSAI 2011/11/10
Digital Band-pass Modulation PROF. MICHAEL TSAI 211/11/1 Band-pass Signal Representation a t g t General form: 2πf c t + φ t g t = a t cos 2πf c t + φ t Envelope Phase Envelope is always non-negative,
More informationTracking of Spread Spectrum Signals
Chapter 7 Tracking of Spread Spectrum Signals 7. Introduction As discussed in the last chapter, there are two parts to the synchronization process. The first stage is often termed acquisition and typically
More informationDigital Transmission Methods S
Digital ransmission ethods S-7.5 Second Exercise Session Hypothesis esting Decision aking Gram-Schmidt method Detection.K.K. Communication Laboratory 5//6 Konstantinos.koufos@tkk.fi Exercise We assume
More informationSymbol Synchronization
Chapter 10 Symbol Synchronization Marvin K. Simon As we have seen in other chapters, the operation and performance of various receiver functions can be quite sensitive to knowledge of the timing data transition
More informationDigital Communications
Digital Communications Chapter 5 Carrier and Symbol Synchronization Po-Ning Chen, Professor Institute of Communications Engineering National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan Digital Communications Ver 218.7.26
More informationThis examination consists of 11 pages. Please check that you have a complete copy. Time: 2.5 hrs INSTRUCTIONS
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering EECE 564 Detection and Estimation of Signals in Noise Final Examination 6 December 2006 This examination consists of
More informationECE 564/645 - Digital Communications, Spring 2018 Homework #2 Due: March 19 (In Lecture)
ECE 564/645 - Digital Communications, Spring 018 Homework # Due: March 19 (In Lecture) 1. Consider a binary communication system over a 1-dimensional vector channel where message m 1 is sent by signaling
More informationReview of Doppler Spread The response to exp[2πift] is ĥ(f, t) exp[2πift]. ĥ(f, t) = β j exp[ 2πifτ j (t)] = exp[2πid j t 2πifτ o j ]
Review of Doppler Spread The response to exp[2πift] is ĥ(f, t) exp[2πift]. ĥ(f, t) = β exp[ 2πifτ (t)] = exp[2πid t 2πifτ o ] Define D = max D min D ; The fading at f is ĥ(f, t) = 1 T coh = 2D exp[2πi(d
More informationLECTURE 3 CMOS PHASE LOCKED LOOPS
Lecture 03 (8/9/18) Page 3-1 LECTURE 3 CMOS PHASE LOCKED LOOPS Topics The acquisition process unlocked state Noise in linear PLLs Organization: Systems Perspective Types of PLLs and PLL Measurements PLL
More informationPrinciples of Communications
Principles of Communications Chapter V: Representation and Transmission of Baseband Digital Signal Yongchao Wang Email: ychwang@mail.xidian.edu.cn Xidian University State Key Lab. on ISN November 18, 2012
More informationComputation of Bit-Error Rate of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection M-Ary PSK With Gray Code in BFWA Systems
Computation of Bit-Error Rate of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection M-Ary PSK With Gray Code in BFWA Systems Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Basrah University Basrah Iraq,
More informationSynchronization of Spread Spectrum Signals
Chapter 6 Synchronization of Spread Spectrum Signals 6. Introduction All digital communication systems must perform synchronization. Synchronization is the process of aligning any locally generated reference
More informationMATHEMATICAL TOOLS FOR DIGITAL TRANSMISSION ANALYSIS
ch03.qxd 1/9/03 09:14 AM Page 35 CHAPTER 3 MATHEMATICAL TOOLS FOR DIGITAL TRANSMISSION ANALYSIS 3.1 INTRODUCTION The study of digital wireless transmission is in large measure the study of (a) the conversion
More informationa) Find the compact (i.e. smallest) basis set required to ensure sufficient statistics.
Digital Modulation and Coding Tutorial-1 1. Consider the signal set shown below in Fig.1 a) Find the compact (i.e. smallest) basis set required to ensure sufficient statistics. b) What is the minimum Euclidean
More informationCHAPTER 14. Based on the info about the scattering function we know that the multipath spread is T m =1ms, and the Doppler spread is B d =0.2 Hz.
CHAPTER 4 Problem 4. : Based on the info about the scattering function we know that the multipath spread is T m =ms, and the Doppler spread is B d =. Hz. (a) (i) T m = 3 sec (ii) B d =. Hz (iii) ( t) c
More informationMulti User Detection I
January 12, 2005 Outline Overview Multiple Access Communication Motivation: What is MU Detection? Overview of DS/CDMA systems Concept and Codes used in CDMA CDMA Channels Models Synchronous and Asynchronous
More informationCorrelator I. Basics. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 Digitization Sampling. D. Anish Roshi
Chapter 8 Correlator I. Basics D. Anish Roshi 8.1 Introduction A radio interferometer measures the mutual coherence function of the electric field due to a given source brightness distribution in the sky.
More informationCarrier and Timing Synchronization in Digital Modems
Carrier and Timing Synchronization in Digital Modems Synchronization-3 Carrier Phase Lock fred harris 21-21 June, 218 Locking to Carrier of Modulated Signal with Suppressed Carrier 2 How Can One Lock to
More informationEE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 13. Multi-antenna Techniques
EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications Week 13 Multi-antenna Techniques 1 Diversity Methods Diversity combats fading by providing the receiver with multiple uncorrelated replicas of the same information
More informationLIKELIHOOD RECEIVER FOR FH-MFSK MOBILE RADIO*
LIKELIHOOD RECEIVER FOR FH-MFSK MOBILE RADIO* Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Viswanathan, R.; S.C. Gupta Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference
More informationAnalog Electronics 2 ICS905
Analog Electronics 2 ICS905 G. Rodriguez-Guisantes Dépt. COMELEC http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/ rodrigez/ens/cycle_master/ November 2016 2/ 67 Schedule Radio channel characteristics ; Analysis and
More informationANALYSIS OF A PARTIAL DECORRELATOR IN A MULTI-CELL DS/CDMA SYSTEM
ANAYSIS OF A PARTIA DECORREATOR IN A MUTI-CE DS/CDMA SYSTEM Mohammad Saquib ECE Department, SU Baton Rouge, A 70803-590 e-mail: saquib@winlab.rutgers.edu Roy Yates WINAB, Rutgers University Piscataway
More informationThe Performance of Quaternary Amplitude Modulation with Quaternary Spreading in the Presence of Interfering Signals
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 1-015 The Performance of Quaternary Amplitude Modulation with Quaternary Spreading in the Presence of Interfering Signals Allison Manhard Clemson University,
More information5. Pilot Aided Modulations. In flat fading, if we have a good channel estimate of the complex gain gt, ( ) then we can perform coherent detection.
5. Pilot Aided Modulations In flat fading, if we have a good channel estimate of the complex gain gt, ( ) then we can perform coherent detection. Obtaining a good estimate is difficult. As we have seen,
More information392D: Coding for the AWGN Channel Wednesday, January 24, 2007 Stanford, Winter 2007 Handout #6. Problem Set 2 Solutions
392D: Coding for the AWGN Channel Wednesday, January 24, 2007 Stanford, Winter 2007 Handout #6 Problem Set 2 Solutions Problem 2.1 (Cartesian-product constellations) (a) Show that if A is a K-fold Cartesian
More informationω 0 = 2π/T 0 is called the fundamental angular frequency and ω 2 = 2ω 0 is called the
he ime-frequency Concept []. Review of Fourier Series Consider the following set of time functions {3A sin t, A sin t}. We can represent these functions in different ways by plotting the amplitude versus
More informationParameter Estimation
1 / 44 Parameter Estimation Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay October 25, 2012 Motivation System Model used to Derive
More informationStochastic Processes. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno
Stochastic Processes M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno 1 Outline Stochastic (random) processes. Autocorrelation. Crosscorrelation. Spectral density function.
More informationDetecting Parametric Signals in Noise Having Exactly Known Pdf/Pmf
Detecting Parametric Signals in Noise Having Exactly Known Pdf/Pmf Reading: Ch. 5 in Kay-II. (Part of) Ch. III.B in Poor. EE 527, Detection and Estimation Theory, # 5c Detecting Parametric Signals in Noise
More informationThis examination consists of 10 pages. Please check that you have a complete copy. Time: 2.5 hrs INSTRUCTIONS
THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering EECE 564 Detection and Estimation of Signals in Noise Final Examination 08 December 2009 This examination consists of
More informationDigital Communications
Digital Communications Chapter 9 Digital Communications Through Band-Limited Channels Po-Ning Chen, Professor Institute of Communications Engineering National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan Digital Communications:
More informationDigital Communications: A Discrete-Time Approach M. Rice. Errata. Page xiii, first paragraph, bare witness should be bear witness
Digital Communications: A Discrete-Time Approach M. Rice Errata Foreword Page xiii, first paragraph, bare witness should be bear witness Page xxi, last paragraph, You know who you. should be You know who
More informationExample: Bipolar NRZ (non-return-to-zero) signaling
Baseand Data Transmission Data are sent without using a carrier signal Example: Bipolar NRZ (non-return-to-zero signaling is represented y is represented y T A -A T : it duration is represented y BT. Passand
More informationChapter 4 Code Tracking Loops
Chapter 4 Code Tracking Loops 4- Optimum Tracking of Wideband Signals A tracking loop making use of this optimum discriminator is illustrated in Figure 4-1. 4- Optimum Tracking of Wideband Signals 4.3
More informationEE 230 Lecture 40. Data Converters. Amplitude Quantization. Quantization Noise
EE 230 Lecture 40 Data Converters Amplitude Quantization Quantization Noise Review from Last Time: Time Quantization Typical ADC Environment Review from Last Time: Time Quantization Analog Signal Reconstruction
More informationEE5713 : Advanced Digital Communications
EE5713 : Advanced Digital Communications Week 12, 13: Inter Symbol Interference (ISI) Nyquist Criteria for ISI Pulse Shaping and Raised-Cosine Filter Eye Pattern Equalization (On Board) 20-May-15 Muhammad
More informationConsider a 2-D constellation, suppose that basis signals =cosine and sine. Each constellation symbol corresponds to a vector with two real components
TUTORIAL ON DIGITAL MODULATIONS Part 3: 4-PSK [2--26] Roberto Garello, Politecnico di Torino Free download (for personal use only) at: www.tlc.polito.it/garello Quadrature modulation Consider a 2-D constellation,
More informationChapter 2 Signal Processing at Receivers: Detection Theory
Chapter Signal Processing at Receivers: Detection Theory As an application of the statistical hypothesis testing, signal detection plays a key role in signal processing at receivers of wireless communication
More informationTiming Recovery at Low SNR Cramer-Rao bound, and outperforming the PLL
T F T I G E O R G A I N S T I T U T E O H E O F E A L P R O G R ESS S A N D 1 8 8 5 S E R V L O G Y I C E E C H N O Timing Recovery at Low SNR Cramer-Rao bound, and outperforming the PLL Aravind R. Nayak
More informationA Family of Nyquist Filters Based on Generalized Raised-Cosine Spectra
Proc. Biennial Symp. Commun. (Kingston, Ont.), pp. 3-35, June 99 A Family of Nyquist Filters Based on Generalized Raised-Cosine Spectra Nader Sheikholeslami Peter Kabal Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationSNR i = 2E b 6N 3. Where
Correlation Properties Of Binary Sequences Generated By The Logistic Map-Application To DS-CDMA *ZOUHAIR BEN JEMAA, **SAFYA BELGHITH *EPFL DSC LANOS ELE 5, 05 LAUSANNE **LABORATOIRE SYSCOM ENIT, 002 TUNIS
More informationCopyright license. Exchanging Information with the Stars. The goal. Some challenges
Copyright license Exchanging Information with the Stars David G Messerschmitt Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley messer@eecs.berkeley.edu Talk
More informationEs e j4φ +4N n. 16 KE s /N 0. σ 2ˆφ4 1 γ s. p(φ e )= exp 1 ( 2πσ φ b cos N 2 φ e 0
Problem 6.15 : he received signal-plus-noise vector at the output of the matched filter may be represented as (see (5-2-63) for example) : r n = E s e j(θn φ) + N n where θ n =0,π/2,π,3π/2 for QPSK, and
More informationMultiuser Detection. Summary for EECS Graduate Seminar in Communications. Benjamin Vigoda
Multiuser Detection Summary for 6.975 EECS Graduate Seminar in Communications Benjamin Vigoda The multiuser detection problem applies when we are sending data on the uplink channel from a handset to a
More informationReceived Signal, Interference and Noise
Optimum Combining Maximum ratio combining (MRC) maximizes the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and is the optimal combining method in a maximum likelihood sense for channels where the additive impairment
More informationUTA EE5362 PhD Diagnosis Exam (Spring 2011)
EE5362 Spring 2 PhD Diagnosis Exam ID: UTA EE5362 PhD Diagnosis Exam (Spring 2) Instructions: Verify that your exam contains pages (including the cover shee. Some space is provided for you to show your
More information5 Analog carrier modulation with noise
5 Analog carrier modulation with noise 5. Noisy receiver model Assume that the modulated signal x(t) is passed through an additive White Gaussian noise channel. A noisy receiver model is illustrated in
More informationINFORMATION PROCESSING ABILITY OF BINARY DETECTORS AND BLOCK DECODERS. Michael A. Lexa and Don H. Johnson
INFORMATION PROCESSING ABILITY OF BINARY DETECTORS AND BLOCK DECODERS Michael A. Lexa and Don H. Johnson Rice University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Houston, TX 775-892 amlexa@rice.edu,
More informationModulation & Coding for the Gaussian Channel
Modulation & Coding for the Gaussian Channel Trivandrum School on Communication, Coding & Networking January 27 30, 2017 Lakshmi Prasad Natarajan Dept. of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology
More informationEE401: Advanced Communication Theory
EE401: Advanced Communication Theory Professor A. Manikas Chair of Communications and Array Processing Imperial College London Introductory Concepts Prof. A. Manikas (Imperial College) EE.401: Introductory
More informationWireless Communication Technologies 16:332:559 (Advanced Topics in Communications) Lecture #17 and #18 (April 1, April 3, 2002)
Wireless Communication echnologies Lecture 7 & 8 Wireless Communication echnologies 6:33:559 (Advanced opics in Communications) Lecture #7 and #8 (April, April 3, ) Instructor rof. arayan Mandayam Summarized
More informationLECTURE 16 AND 17. Digital signaling on frequency selective fading channels. Notes Prepared by: Abhishek Sood
ECE559:WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LECTURE 16 AND 17 Digital signaling on frequency selective fading channels 1 OUTLINE Notes Prepared by: Abhishek Sood In section 2 we discuss the receiver design
More informationDesign of MMSE Multiuser Detectors using Random Matrix Techniques
Design of MMSE Multiuser Detectors using Random Matrix Techniques Linbo Li and Antonia M Tulino and Sergio Verdú Department of Electrical Engineering Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 08544 Email:
More informationImproved Detected Data Processing for Decision-Directed Tracking of MIMO Channels
Improved Detected Data Processing for Decision-Directed Tracking of MIMO Channels Emna Eitel and Joachim Speidel Institute of Telecommunications, University of Stuttgart, Germany Abstract This paper addresses
More informationFigure 1.1 (a) Model of a communication system, and (b) signal processing functions.
. Introduction to Signals and Operations Model of a Communication System [] Figure. (a) Model of a communication system, and (b) signal processing functions. Classification of Signals. Continuous-time
More informationSquare Root Raised Cosine Filter
Wireless Information Transmission System Lab. Square Root Raised Cosine Filter Institute of Communications Engineering National Sun Yat-sen University Introduction We consider the problem of signal design
More informationECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 3. Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process
1 ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Week 3 Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process 2 Multipath-Fading Mechanism local scatterers mobile subscriber base station
More informationthat efficiently utilizes the total available channel bandwidth W.
Signal Design for Band-Limited Channels Wireless Information Transmission System Lab. Institute of Communications Engineering g National Sun Yat-sen University Introduction We consider the problem of signal
More informationEE456 Digital Communications
EE456 Digital Communications Professor Ha Nguyen September 5 EE456 Digital Communications Block Diagram of Binary Communication Systems m ( t { b k } b k = s( t b = s ( t k m ˆ ( t { bˆ } k r( t Bits in
More informationLecture 12. Block Diagram
Lecture 12 Goals Be able to encode using a linear block code Be able to decode a linear block code received over a binary symmetric channel or an additive white Gaussian channel XII-1 Block Diagram Data
More informationDiversity Performance of a Practical Non-Coherent Detect-and-Forward Receiver
Diversity Performance of a Practical Non-Coherent Detect-and-Forward Receiver Michael R. Souryal and Huiqing You National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Network Technologies Division Gaithersburg,
More informationWHITEPAPER: ACHIEVING THE CRAMER-RAO LOWER BOUND IN GPS TIME-OF-ARRIVAL ESTIMATION, A FREQUENCY DOMAIN WEIGHTED LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATOR APPROACH
WHITEPAPER: ACHIEVING THE CRAMER-RAO LOWER BOUND IN GPS TIME-OF-ARRIVAL ESTIMATION, A FREQUENCY DOMAIN WEIGHTED LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATOR APPROACH KENNETH M PESYNA, JR AND TODD E HUMPHREYS THE UNIVERSITY
More informationCommunication Theory Summary of Important Definitions and Results
Signal and system theory Convolution of signals x(t) h(t) = y(t): Fourier Transform: Communication Theory Summary of Important Definitions and Results X(ω) = X(ω) = y(t) = X(ω) = j x(t) e jωt dt, 0 Properties
More informationWeiyao Lin. Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Chapter 5: Digital Transmission through Baseband slchannels Textbook: Ch
Principles of Communications Weiyao Lin Shanghai Jiao Tong University Chapter 5: Digital Transmission through Baseband slchannels Textbook: Ch 10.1-10.5 2009/2010 Meixia Tao @ SJTU 1 Topics to be Covered
More informationTime-Delay Estimation *
OpenStax-CNX module: m1143 1 Time-Delay stimation * Don Johnson This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 1. An important signal parameter estimation
More informationX b s t w t t dt b E ( ) t dt
Consider the following correlator receiver architecture: T dt X si () t S xt () * () t Wt () T dt X Suppose s (t) is sent, then * () t t T T T X s t w t t dt E t t dt w t dt E W t t T T T X s t w t t dt
More informationMatrix power converters: spectra and stability
Matrix power converters: spectra and stability Stephen Cox School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham supported by EPSRC grant number EP/E018580/1 Making It Real Seminar, Bristol 2009 Stephen
More informationIterative Timing Recovery
Iterative Timing Recovery John R. Barry School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech Atlanta, Georgia U.S.A. barry@ece.gatech.edu 0 Outline Timing Recovery Tutorial Problem statement TED:
More informationDigital Modulation 1
Digital Modulation 1 Lecture Notes Ingmar Land and Bernard H. Fleury Navigation and Communications () Department of Electronic Systems Aalborg University, DK Version: February 5, 27 i Contents I Basic
More informationOptimal Placement of Training Symbols for Frequency Acquisition: A Cramér-Rao Bound Approach
1 Optimal Placement of Training Symbols for Frequency Acquisition: A Cramér-Rao Bound Approach Aravind R. Nayak, Member, IEEE, John R. Barry, Senior Member, IEEE, and Steven W. McLaughlin, Senior Member,
More informationS f s t j ft dt. S f s t j ft dt S f. s t = S f j ft df = ( ) ( ) exp( 2π
Reconfigurable stepped-frequency GPR prototype for civil-engineering and archaeological prospection, developed at the National Research Council of Italy. Examples of application and case studies. Raffaele
More informationChapter 4 The Fourier Series and Fourier Transform
Chapter 4 The Fourier Series and Fourier Transform Representation of Signals in Terms of Frequency Components Consider the CT signal defined by N xt () = Acos( ω t+ θ ), t k = 1 k k k The frequencies `present
More informationA Systematic Description of Source Significance Information
A Systematic Description of Source Significance Information Norbert Goertz Institute for Digital Communications School of Engineering and Electronics The University of Edinburgh Mayfield Rd., Edinburgh
More informationINFLUENCE OF THE SPECTRAL IMAGE COMPONENT ON THE AMPLITUDE AND PHASE ESTIMATORS PROVIDED BY THE INTERPOLATED DFT METHOD
THE PUBLISHING HOUSE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, Series A, OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY Volume 9, Number 2/208, pp. 377 384 INFLUENCE OF THE SPECTRAL IMAGE COMPONENT ON THE AMPLITUDE AND PHASE ESTIMATORS
More informationSignal Design for Band-Limited Channels
Wireless Information Transmission System Lab. Signal Design for Band-Limited Channels Institute of Communications Engineering National Sun Yat-sen University Introduction We consider the problem of signal
More informationTECHNICAL RESEARCH REPORT
TECHNICAL RESEARCH REPORT On the True Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for the DA Joint Estimation of Carrier Phase and Timing Offsets by Y. Jiang, F.W. Sun and John S. Baras CSHCN T.R. 000-14 (ISR T.R. 000-36)
More informationChapter 2 Random Processes
Chapter 2 Random Processes 21 Introduction We saw in Section 111 on page 10 that many systems are best studied using the concept of random variables where the outcome of a random experiment was associated
More informationDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS. IAGlover and P M Grant. Prentice Hall 1997 PROBLEM SOLUTIONS CHAPTER 6
DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS IAGlover and P M Grant Prentice Hall 997 PROBLEM SOLUTIONS CHAPTER 6 6. P e erf V σ erf. 5 +. 5 0.705 [ erf (. 009)] [ 0. 999 979 ]. 0 0 5 The optimum DC level is zero. For equiprobable
More informationMotivation for CDR: Deserializer (1)
Motivation for CDR: Deserializer (1) Input data 1:2 DMUX 1:2 DMUX channel 1:2 DMUX Input clock 2 2 If input data were accompanied by a well-synchronized clock, deserialization could be done directly. EECS
More informationAdvanced 3 G and 4 G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Advanced 3 G and 4 G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture - 19 Multi-User CDMA Uplink and Asynchronous CDMA
More informationSimulation studies of the standard and new algorithms show that a signicant improvement in tracking
An Extended Kalman Filter for Demodulation of Polynomial Phase Signals Peter J. Kootsookos y and Joanna M. Spanjaard z Sept. 11, 1997 Abstract This letter presents a new formulation of the extended Kalman
More informationApproximate Minimum Bit-Error Rate Multiuser Detection
Approximate Minimum Bit-Error Rate Multiuser Detection Chen-Chu Yeh, Renato R. opes, and John R. Barry School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0250
More informationEE303: Communication Systems
EE303: Communication Systems Professor A. Manikas Chair of Communications and Array Processing Imperial College London Introductory Concepts Prof. A. Manikas (Imperial College) EE303: Introductory Concepts
More informationEE 505 Lecture 10. Spectral Characterization. Part 2 of 2
EE 505 Lecture 10 Spectral Characterization Part 2 of 2 Review from last lecture Spectral Analysis If f(t) is periodic f(t) alternately f(t) = = A A ( kω t + ) 0 + Aksin θk k= 1 0 + a ksin t k= 1 k= 1
More informationData-aided and blind synchronization
PHYDYAS Review Meeting 2009-03-02 Data-aided and blind synchronization Mario Tanda Università di Napoli Federico II Dipartimento di Ingegneria Biomedica, Elettronicae delle Telecomunicazioni Via Claudio
More informationA.1 THE SAMPLED TIME DOMAIN AND THE Z TRANSFORM. 0 δ(t)dt = 1, (A.1) δ(t)dt =
APPENDIX A THE Z TRANSFORM One of the most useful techniques in engineering or scientific analysis is transforming a problem from the time domain to the frequency domain ( 3). Using a Fourier or Laplace
More informationSummary: SER formulation. Binary antipodal constellation. Generic binary constellation. Constellation gain. 2D constellations
TUTORIAL ON DIGITAL MODULATIONS Part 8a: Error probability A [2011-01-07] 07] Roberto Garello, Politecnico di Torino Free download (for personal use only) at: www.tlc.polito.it/garello 1 Part 8a: Error
More informationEffect of Multipath Propagation on the Noise Performance of Zero Crossing Digital Phase Locked Loop
International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering. ISSN 0974-2166 Volume 9, Number 2 (2016), pp. 97-104 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Effect of Multipath
More informationCarrier frequency estimation. ELEC-E5410 Signal processing for communications
Carrier frequency estimation ELEC-E54 Signal processing for communications Contents. Basic system assumptions. Data-aided DA: Maximum-lielihood ML estimation of carrier frequency 3. Data-aided: Practical
More informationIssues with sampling time and jitter in Annex 93A. Adam Healey IEEE P802.3bj Task Force May 2013
Issues with sampling time and jitter in Annex 93A Adam Healey IEEE P802.3bj Task Force May 2013 Part 1: Jitter (comment #157) 2 Treatment of jitter in COM Draft 2.0 h (0) (t s ) slope h(0) (t s ) 1 UI
More informationEE4304 C-term 2007: Lecture 17 Supplemental Slides
EE434 C-term 27: Lecture 17 Supplemental Slides D. Richard Brown III Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering February 5, 27 Geometric Representation: Optimal
More information2. SPECTRAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
2. SPECTRAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO STOCHASTIC PROCESSES 2.0 THEOREM OF WIENER- KHINTCHINE An important technique in the study of deterministic signals consists in using harmonic functions to gain the spectral
More informationLOPE3202: Communication Systems 10/18/2017 2
By Lecturer Ahmed Wael Academic Year 2017-2018 LOPE3202: Communication Systems 10/18/2017 We need tools to build any communication system. Mathematics is our premium tool to do work with signals and systems.
More informationUpper Bounds for the Average Error Probability of a Time-Hopping Wideband System
Upper Bounds for the Average Error Probability of a Time-Hopping Wideband System Aravind Kailas UMTS Systems Performance Team QUALCOMM Inc San Diego, CA 911 Email: akailas@qualcommcom John A Gubner Department
More information