Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control Using Synthetic Jets
|
|
- Jesse Farmer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control Using Synthetic Jets Jonathan Muse, Andrew Tchieu, Ali Kutay, Rajeev Chandramohan, Anthony Calise, and Anthony Leonard Department of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology August 20, /47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
2 Overview 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
3 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
4 Introduction Introduction Aerodynamic flow control. Enable highly-maneuverable flight for small UAVs (e.g., in confined spaces). No moving control surfaces. Maneuver on convective time scale (Dragon Eye scales: 20 m/s, c 30cm, tconv = 15 msec) Flight dynamics and flow dynamics are coupled. Flow develops forces and moments on convective time scales. Flow state is affected by both vehicle dynamics and actuation. 4/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
5 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
6 Experiment Diagram Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 6/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
7 Traverse Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 7/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
8 Force Control Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators Purpose: Simulation of longitudinal free flight in a wind tunnel. A force control technique was developed to accomplish this. Force control maintains prescribed force/moment on model. Removes effect of gravity. Hides traverse nonlinearities from model. Applies prescribed force commands to the traverse. Feedback of wing states alters dynamics of flying model. Force is applied by regulating the deflection of the springs in the traverse. Moment applied via torque motor. 8/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
9 Traverse Mechanism Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators Inner loop PID control laws regulate the carriage positions. Force control law commands accelerations to the carriages. Allows regulation of the spring deflection on the airfoil. 9/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
10 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators Wing Model 1m span NACA 4415 wing section Chord length is 457 mm. Modular and comprised of interchangeable spanwise segments for sensors. Includes module of a circumferential array of 70 static pressure ports located at mid-span. Several modules of high-frequency integrated pressure sensors for measurements of instantaneous pressure. 10/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
11 Wing Section Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 11/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
12 Flow Control Actuators Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators Synthetic jet type actuators. Array of jets mounted on trailing edge of wing. Actuators are amplitude modulated. Characteristic actuation rise time O(2-3tconv). Usable control authority up to 30 Hz in pitch. 12/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
13 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators Hybrid actuators on opposite sides of the trailing edge allow CM to be varied bidirectionally without moving surfaces. Manipulates concentrations of trapped vorticity. PS actuator increases C M (nose-up). SS actuator decreases C M (nose-down). Significant changes in C M with minimal lift and drag penalty Changes in actuator C µ allow aerodynamic performance to be continuously varied 13/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
14 System, Concept Introduction Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 14/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
15 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
16 Static Actuator Model of the Wing Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s The effect of an actuator is modeled as a static moment actuator. The lift and moment can be modeled as L = QS (C L0 + C Lα α + C L α α) ( ) M = QS c C M0 + C Mα α + c 2V C M α α + C Mδa δ a Modeling leads to a system model of the form ẏ y ÿ α = 0 a 2,2 a 2,3 a 2,4 ẏ α + α 0 a 4,2 a 4,3 a 4,4 α b f,4 δ a 16/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
17 Concept of Vortex Model Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s y U ẏ θ M(a) Γ 1 Γ 2... Γ i c c a ξ 2... ξ i 2 ξ 1 Constant Strength Vortices x Control Vortex, Γ C, ξ C Nascent Vortex 17/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
18 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s From our previous work, we obtained the following lift and moment relations L = ρπ( c2 4 ÿ + Ucẏ) + ρπ [ ac 2 ρuc 2 N i=1 4 θ + U(a + c 2 )c θ + ( Uc 2 Γ i ξ 2 i c 2 /4 + ρuγ C ] 4 + U 2 c)θ and M(a) = al + ρπuc2 4 ẏ + ρπ + ρuc2 8 N i=1 [ c 4 θ ] 128 Uac2 4 θ U2 c 2 4 θ Γ i ξ 2 i c 2 /4 + ρuγ C ξ C 18/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
19 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s The shed vortex positions, ξ i, were given by dξ 1 = U (ξ2 1 c2 /4) dγ 1 dt ξ 1 Γ 1 dt dξ i = U (i 2) dt The vortex strengths, Γ i, were defined by ( ) ξ 1 c/2 N ξ i + c/2 Γ 1 = Γ 0 + ξ 1 + c/2 ξ i c/2 Γ i = Constant i=2 19/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
20 Corrections for Thickness and Camber Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Corrections needed for accurate simulation. Corrections based on NASA legacy data. Effect of thickness and camber is to translate lift and moment curves. Lift changes as ( ) 1 L = L + 2 ρu2 c C L,0 Moment changes as ( ) 1 ( M = M 2 ρu2 c 2 C M,0 + a c ) ( ) ρu2 c C L,0 In our experiments, the c.g. is close to quarter chord and M simplifies since ( a c 4) 0 20/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
21 Linear Model Development Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Vortex model captures dynamics that are negligible on time scales of rigid body dynamics. We define a characteristic circulation as Γ W = c N i=1 Γ i ξ 2 i c 2 /4 We consider the lift and moment generated when impulsively started from rest dγ w /dt = 0. Only a single vortex is created. 21/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
22 Linear Model Development (cont.) Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s This gives the lift as L = ρu ( Γ 0 1 ) 2 Γ W At t = t 0, Γ W Γ 0. When t, Lift terms should disappear as wake vortices move downstream. To model as linear, we propose the following model dγ W = dγ 0 βγ W dt dt where β is a constant and the initial condition of the differential is Γ W (t 0 ) = Γ 0 (t 0 ) 22/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
23 The Linear Model Introduction Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s This induces an exponential rise in lift (1 e βt ) for a constant Γ 0. This is contrary to the classical square root type growth for lift. This is contrary to the decay in lift that is geometric at best. One can compute the best fit for β at a given t. Hence, the linearized characteristic circulation is ( ( Γ W + βγ W = πc ÿ + a + c ) θ + U θ 4) with an initial condition of ( ( Γ W (t 0 ) = πc ÿ + a + c θ + U θ) 4) t=t 0 23/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
24 Linear Lift/Moment Relationships Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s The lift and moment expressions simplify to: ( ) ( ) c 2 1 L = ρπ 4 ÿ + Ucẏ ρu 2 Γ W + Γ C [ ( ) ] ac 2 ρπ 4 θ ( + U a + c ) Uc c θ U2 c θ and [ M = al + ρπuc2 Uac 2 ẏ + ρπ θ + U2 c 2 ] θ ac2 128 θ ( c ) + ρu 8 Γ W Γ C ξ C The above equations include added mass, quasi-steady lift, lift due to wake, and control terms. 24/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
25 Coupled Model Assumptions Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Assume the rigid body dynamics are given by U mÿ + b y ẏ + k y y = L I θ + b θ θ + k θ θ = M(a) b y k y L is the lift. M(a) is the moment about the location a. Γ C, ξ C ξ 1 Neglect thickness and camber corrections for control design purposes. b θ k θ Γ /47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
26 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Redefining Lift and Moment as Matrix Equations The Linear Vortex Model can be written as ẋ = Ax + BΓ C where x = [y θ ẏ θ Γw ] T. How does Γ C relate to the physical world? Γ C can be related to applied moment as Γ C (u f, θ) = 1 2 Uc ( a + ξc c ) C M (u f, θ) C M (u f, θ) is determined from static experimental data. Hence, the model becomes nonlinear! Luckily, Γ C (u f, θ) is invertible for fixed θ. 26/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
27 s Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s The vortex model is nonlinear. Γ C (u f, θ) is invertible for fixed θ We employ an inversion technique to make the control design effectively linear. C C 1, u ẋ=a x B C, x Inversion of Γ C (u f, θ) is pre-computed in a lookup table. Now, one can use standard linear analysis tools to develop control laws based on the static actuator model and the vortex model. 27/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
28 Linear Control Law Design Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Defining the tracking error e = y r We must design a control law to ensure e(t) 0 as t Using a modified robust servomechanism LQR like formulation, feedback gains, K e and K x, are computed. Results in a control law of the form t u = K e e(τ)dτ K x x + Zr 0 28/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
29 Nominal Control Architecture Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Robust Servo LQR with feedforward element 29/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
30 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Avoiding State Estimation for Vortex Control Law State feedback is not possible for vortex model. Aerodynamic state is unmeasurable. We modify the nominal vortex design using projective control. Augmenting the model dynamics with the control law dynamics, the closed loop system is given by [ ] [ ] [ ] [ e 0 C e 1 = ẋ BK e Ā BK + X x BZ y = [ 0 C ] [ ] e x where C is a matrix that multiplied by x gives the position. ] r 30/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
31 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s Avoiding State Estimation for Vortex Control Law We can retain all but one of the closed loop eigenvalues. Let K = [K e K x ] and X y be the eigenvectors corresponding to the closed loop eigenvalues we wish to retain. The required output feedback gain is given by ( ) 1 K = KX y C measured X y where C measured corresponds to the rigid body states of x. New Output Feedback Vortex Control Law [ e u = K y measured ] + Zr 31/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
32 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
33 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection We assume that our plant can be expressed as ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + BΛ [Γ C (t) + f (x, Γ C )] y(t) = Cx(t) The nominal control law can be expressed as Γ C,n = K y y + K r r Assuming f (x, Γ C ) = 0, we form the desired behavior ẋ m (t) = A m x m (t) + B m r y m (t) = Cx m (t) where A m = A BK r is Hurwitz and B m = BK r. 33/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
34 Approximating System Uncertainty Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection We want to design an adaptive signal Γ C,ad to approximately cancel the modeling error f (x, Γ C ). The total control effort becomes Γ C (t) = Γ C,n (t) Γ C,ad (t) We will try to approximate Λf (x, Γ C ) with a SHL neural network Λf (x, u) = W T σ(v T η(t)) + ɛ(x, u), (x, u) D x D u where ɛ, W, and V are unknown but bounded. We reconstruct the nonlinearity via delayed values of system outputs and inputs as inputs to the neural network (η(t)). 34/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
35 Error Observer Introduction Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection Since all of the states are not observable, we need an error observer. ξ = A m ξ + L(y y ξ y m ) y ξ = Cξ where à = A m LC is Hurwitz and satisfies the following Lyapunov equation à T P + Pà = Q, Q = Q T > 0, Q R nxn The observer allows us to estimate the error state, x m x, of the system. 35/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
36 Adaptive Weight Update Laws Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection The adaptive update laws are ( ] Ŵ (t) = Γ W Proj [Ŵ (t), σ ˆV (t), η(t)) ξ(t) T PB [ ˆV (t) = Γ V Proj ˆV (t), η(t)ξ T PBH (Ŵ (t), ˆV (t), η(t))] [ δλ ˆ T (t) = Γ δ Proj δλ ˆ T ] (t), u(t)ξ T (t)pb where ( ) ( ) ( ) σ ˆV (t), η(t) = σ ˆV (t) T η(t) σ ˆV (t), η(t) ˆV T (t)η(t) ) H (Ŵ (t), ˆV ( ) (t), η(t) = Ŵ T (t) σ ˆV (t), η(t) These laws use parameter projection. See the paper for additional details. 36/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
37 Compensating for Saturation Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection Hedged reference model ẋ m = A m x m + B m r + B h Γ C,h Scheduled Control Hedging Gain Map for Hedging C, desired C 1, u achieved Gain Scheduled C, desired C, achieved+ C, h + - Γ C Maximum Γ C Minimum Γ C θ (deg) 37/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
38 System Conceptual Review Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 38/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
39 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Wind Tunnel Traverse Wing and Actuators 3 Actuation Modeled as a Static Device Linear Vortex Model Coupled Vortex/Rigid Body Model s 4 Plant Dynamics/Reference Behavior Adaptive Control Implementation Saturation Protection 5 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments
40 Model Validation Introduction Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Static actuator model parameters were determined from static tests. Γ C map was determined from static pitching moment measurements. Measured Γ C (u f, θ) Saturated Γ 1 C (u f, θ) Γ C Control Voltage (%) Pitch Angle (deg) 20 Control Voltage (%) Pitch Angle (deg) Γ C Saturation of Γ C ensures invertability. 40/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
41 Model Validation Introduction Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Experiment response to open loop actuator excitation has been compared with simulation results. Flow Control Input Voltage Experiment 10 Simulation Pitch Response Comparison 20 Experiment Simulation u f (V) 0 α (deg) Time(s) Time(s) The vortex ROM performs significantly better than the static actuator model. 41/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
42 Torque Motor Case Introduction Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Lets look at the flight response using a torque motor for actuation. This indicates that the experiment is closely representing a free flying wing. 42/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
43 Control Law Comparisons Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Square Wave Tracking: 5 Linear Model Failure 5 Vortex Model Failure Plunge (cm) 0 Plunge (cm) Pitch (deg) Pitch (deg) Control (%) Control (%) Time Time Command Adaptive Control Law Static Actuator Vortex ROM 43/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
44 Rise Time Stability Barrier Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Rise time: 10% 90% Static actuator limit: 0.31 sec Linear vortex model limit: 0.19 sec Plunge Position (m) Vortex Model Stability Barrier Static Actuator Stability Barrier Time (s) 44/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
45 Disturbance Rejection Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments 45/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
46 Conclusions Introduction Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Demonstrated closed loop longitudinal control of a wing model using synthetic jet type actuation. As the wing moves faster, the actuators can no longer be considered static. Simple vortex model developed to allow linear control designs to reach higher bandwidth. Unmodeled dynamics destabilize linear control designs at a high enough bandwidth. Adaptive control is able to deal with unmodelled dynamics and maintain stability. 46/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
47 Determining Model Parameters Model Validation Closed Loop Experiments Questions? 47/47 Jonathan Muse Vortex Model Based Adaptive Flight Control
Validation of a Low-Order Model for Closed-Loop Flow Control Enable Flight
Validation of a Low-Order Model for Closed-Loop Flow Control Enable Flight Andrew A. Tchieu and Anthony Leonard California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 95, USA Ali T. Kutay, Jonathan A. Muse,
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationControl System Design
ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and Discrete-Time Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationAdaptive Control with a Nested Saturation Reference Model
Adaptive Control with a Nested Saturation Reference Model Suresh K Kannan and Eric N Johnson School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 3332 This paper introduces a neural
More informationCHAPTER 1. Introduction
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Linear geometric control theory was initiated in the beginning of the 1970 s, see for example, [1, 7]. A good summary of the subject is the book by Wonham [17]. The term geometric
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationLYAPUNOV-BASED CONTROL OF LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATIONS IN UNCERTAIN AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
LYAPUNOV-BASED CONTROL OF LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATIONS IN UNCERTAIN AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS By BRENDAN BIALY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationIntegral action in state feedback control
Automatic Control 1 in state feedback control Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 1 Academic year 21-211 1 /
More informationFLIGHT DYNAMICS. Robert F. Stengel. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford
FLIGHT DYNAMICS Robert F. Stengel Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford Preface XV Chapter One Introduction 1 1.1 ELEMENTS OF THE AIRPLANE 1 Airframe Components 1 Propulsion Systems 4 1.2 REPRESENTATIVE
More informationAE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles
AE 430 - Stability and ontrol of Aerospace Vehicles Static/Dynamic Stability Longitudinal Static Stability Static Stability We begin ith the concept of Equilibrium (Trim). Equilibrium is a state of an
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationAeroelastic Gust Response
Aeroelastic Gust Response Civil Transport Aircraft - xxx Presented By: Fausto Gill Di Vincenzo 04-06-2012 What is Aeroelasticity? Aeroelasticity studies the effect of aerodynamic loads on flexible structures,
More informationA SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN
A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN ROBBIE BUNGE 1. Introduction The longitudinal dynamics of fixed-wing aircraft are a case in which classical
More informationA Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot
A Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot Taylor S. Clawson, Sawyer B. Fuller Robert J. Wood, Silvia Ferrari American Control Conference Seattle, WA May 25, 2016
More informationChapter 4 The Equations of Motion
Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion Flight Mechanics and Control AEM 4303 Bérénice Mettler University of Minnesota Feb. 20-27, 2013 (v. 2/26/13) Bérénice Mettler (University of Minnesota) Chapter 4 The Equations
More informationSeveral Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control
Several Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control Nakwan Kim Postdoctoral Fellow School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 333 5 Anthony J. Calise Professor
More informationAeroelasticity. Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7
Aeroelasticity Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity G. Dimitriadis AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7 1 Non-sinusoidal motion Theodorsen analysis requires that
More informationApril 15, 2011 Sample Quiz and Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9
April 15, 2011 Sample Quiz Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9 These pages include virtually all Quiz, Midterm, Final Examination questions I have used in M&AE 5070 over the years. Note that some
More informationME 597: AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOTICS SECTION 4 CONTROL. Prof. Steven Waslander
ME 597: AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOTICS SECTION 4 CONTROL Prof. Steven Waslander COMPONENTS Mission Planning Mission Mapping Mission Autonomy Path Planning Mapping Environmental Autonomy Control Estimation
More informationWhat is flight dynamics? AE540: Flight Dynamics and Control I. What is flight control? Is the study of aircraft motion and its characteristics.
KING FAHD UNIVERSITY Department of Aerospace Engineering AE540: Flight Dynamics and Control I Instructor Dr. Ayman Hamdy Kassem What is flight dynamics? Is the study of aircraft motion and its characteristics.
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II 1/67
1/67 ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II State Variable Models for Dynamic Systems u 1 u 2 u ṙ. Internal Variables x 1, x 2 x n y 1 y 2. y m Figure
More informationLecture #AC 3. Aircraft Lateral Dynamics. Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes
Lecture #AC 3 Aircraft Lateral Dynamics Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow 1 Spring 2003 16.61 AC 3 2 Aircraft Lateral Dynamics Using a procedure similar to the longitudinal
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More informationClosed Loop Control of a Wing's Lift for 'Gust' Suppression
Closed Loop Control of a Wing's Lift for 'Gust' Suppression Wesley Kerstens 1 and David Williams 2 Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 60616 Jens Pfeiffer 3 and Rudibert King 4 Technische Universität
More informationAdaptive Control of Hypersonic Vehicles in Presence of Aerodynamic and Center of Gravity Uncertainties
Control of Hypersonic Vehicles in Presence of Aerodynamic and Center of Gravity Uncertainties Amith Somanath and Anuradha Annaswamy Abstract The paper proposes a new class of adaptive controllers that
More informationAerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics Principal Investigator: Mike Bragg Eric Loth Post Doc s: Graduate Students: Undergraduate Students: Sam Lee Jason Merret Kishwar Hossain Edward Whalen Chris Lamarre Leia
More informationAdaptive Augmentation of a Fighter Aircraft Autopilot Using a Nonlinear Reference Model
Proceedings of the EuroGNC 13, 2nd CEAS Specialist Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, April -12, 13 Adaptive Augmentation of a Fighter
More informationAFRL MACCCS Review. Adaptive Control of the Generic Hypersonic Vehicle
AFRL MACCCS Review of the Generic Hypersonic Vehicle PI: Active- Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 19, 2012, MIT AACL 1/38 Our Team MIT Team
More informationState-Space Representation of Unsteady Aerodynamic Models
State-Space Representation of Unsteady Aerodynamic Models -./,1231-44567 &! %! $! #! "! x α α k+1 A ERA x = 1 t α 1 α x C L (k t) = C ERA C Lα C L α α α ERA Model fast dynamics k + B ERA t quasi-steady
More informationProblem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)
Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%) Consider the kinematic equations: Figure 1: NTNU s research vessel, R/V Gunnerus, and Nomoto model: T ṙ + r = Kδ (1) with T = 22.0 s and K = 0.1 s 1.
More informationDesign and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 15-18 August 25, San Francisco, California AIAA 25-62 Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite
More informationThe Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems
The Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems A Case Study in Control of Hypersonic Vehicles Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University Outline q Issues
More informationDesign of a Morphing Wing : Modeling and Experiments
Design of a Morphing Wing : Modeling and Experiments Manoranjan Majji, Othon K. Rediniotis and John L. Junkins Texas A& M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3141, United States This paper details the
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationActive Control of Turbulence and Fluid- Structure Interactions
Bonjour! Active Control of Turbulence and Fluid- Structure Interactions Yu Zhou Institute for Turbulence-Noise-Vibration Interaction and Control Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology
More informationExperimental Study on Flow Control Characteristics of Synthetic Jets over a Blended Wing Body Configuration
Experimental Study on Flow Control Characteristics of Synthetic Jets over a Blended Wing Body Configuration Byunghyun Lee 1), Minhee Kim 1), Chongam Kim 1), Taewhan Cho 2), Seol Lim 3), and Kyoung Jin
More informationFundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics
David G. Hull Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics With 125 Figures and 25 Tables y Springer Introduction to Airplane Flight Mechanics 1 1.1 Airframe Anatomy 2 1.2 Engine Anatomy 5 1.3 Equations of
More information28TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES
8 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF O THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES AUTOPILOT DESIGN FOR AN AGILE MISSILE USING L ADAPTIVE BACKSTEPPING CONTROL Chang-Hun Lee*, Min-Jea Tahk* **, and Byung-Eul Jun*** *KAIST, **KAIST,
More informationH 2 Adaptive Control. Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan. WeA03.4
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, 1 WeA3. H Adaptive Control Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan Abstract Model reference adaptive
More informationADAPTIVE NEURAL NETWORK CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR BLENDED-WING UAV WITH COMPLEX DAMAGE
ADAPTIVE NEURAL NETWORK CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR BLENDED-WING UAV WITH COMPLEX DAMAGE Kijoon Kim*, Jongmin Ahn**, Seungkeun Kim*, Jinyoung Suk* *Chungnam National University, **Agency for Defense and Development
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL
24 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL MR Soltani*, Ali R Davari** *Associate Professor, **PhD Student
More informationCOMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE
COMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE B.R. Andrievsky, A.L. Fradkov Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering of Russian Academy of Sciences 61, Bolshoy av., V.O., 199178 Saint Petersburg,
More informationDERIVATIVE FREE OUTPUT FEEDBACK ADAPTIVE CONTROL
DERIVATIVE FREE OUTPUT FEEDBACK ADAPTIVE CONTROL Tansel YUCELEN, * Kilsoo KIM, and Anthony J. CALISE Georgia Institute of Technology, Yucelen Atlanta, * GA 30332, USA * tansel@gatech.edu AIAA Guidance,
More informationAutomatic Control II Computer exercise 3. LQG Design
Uppsala University Information Technology Systems and Control HN,FS,KN 2000-10 Last revised by HR August 16, 2017 Automatic Control II Computer exercise 3 LQG Design Preparations: Read Chapters 5 and 9
More informationChapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1
Chapter 1 Lecture 2 Introduction 2 Topics 1.4 Equilibrium of airplane 1.5 Number of equations of motion for airplane in flight 1.5.1 Degrees of freedom 1.5.2 Degrees of freedom for a rigid airplane 1.6
More informationOn Practical Applications of Active Disturbance Rejection Control
2010 Chinese Control Conference On Practical Applications of Active Disturbance Rejection Control Qing Zheng Gannon University Zhiqiang Gao Cleveland State University Outline Ø Introduction Ø Active Disturbance
More informationAcceleration Feedback
Acceleration Feedback Mechanical Engineer Modeling & Simulation Electro- Mechanics Electrical- Electronics Engineer Sensors Actuators Computer Systems Engineer Embedded Control Controls Engineer Mechatronic
More informationRobust Nonlinear Design of Three Axes Missile Autopilot via Feedback Linearization
Robust Nonlinear Design of Three Axes Missile Autopilot via Feedback Linearization Abhijit Das, Ranajit Das and Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay, Amit Patra 1 1 Abstract The nonlinearity and coupling of the missile
More informationsc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11
sc46 - Control Systems Design Q Sem Ac Yr / Mock Exam originally given November 5 9 Notes: Please be reminded that only an A4 paper with formulas may be used during the exam no other material is to be
More informationGiven a stream function for a cylinder in a uniform flow with circulation: a) Sketch the flow pattern in terms of streamlines.
Question Given a stream function for a cylinder in a uniform flow with circulation: R Γ r ψ = U r sinθ + ln r π R a) Sketch the flow pattern in terms of streamlines. b) Derive an expression for the angular
More informationME 132, Dynamic Systems and Feedback. Class Notes. Spring Instructor: Prof. A Packard
ME 132, Dynamic Systems and Feedback Class Notes by Andrew Packard, Kameshwar Poolla & Roberto Horowitz Spring 2005 Instructor: Prof. A Packard Department of Mechanical Engineering University of California
More informationMEAM 510 Fall 2011 Bruce D. Kothmann
Balancing g Robot Control MEAM 510 Fall 2011 Bruce D. Kothmann Agenda Bruce s Controls Resume Simple Mechanics (Statics & Dynamics) of the Balancing Robot Basic Ideas About Feedback & Stability Effects
More informationWind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity
Wind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity Ahmad Faris R.Razaami School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School of Aerospace
More informationImprovement of flight regarding safety and comfort
Prediction of the aeroelastic behavior An application to wind-tunnel models Mickaël Roucou Royal Institute of Technology KTH - Stockholm, Sweden Department of Aerospace and Vehicle Engineering Email: roucou@kth.se
More informationIntroduction to Flight Dynamics
Chapter 1 Introduction to Flight Dynamics Flight dynamics deals principally with the response of aerospace vehicles to perturbations in their flight environments and to control inputs. In order to understand
More informationCoordinated Tracking Control of Multiple Laboratory Helicopters: Centralized and De-Centralized Design Approaches
Coordinated Tracking Control of Multiple Laboratory Helicopters: Centralized and De-Centralized Design Approaches Hugh H. T. Liu University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T6, Canada Sebastian Nowotny
More informationNear-Hover Dynamics and Attitude Stabilization of an Insect Model
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 21 WeA1.4 Near-Hover Dynamics and Attitude Stabilization of an Insect Model B. Cheng and X. Deng Abstract In this paper,
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationHELICOPTERS radiate noise over a large frequency
596 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 7, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 1999 Feedback Attenuation and Adaptive Cancellation of Blade Vortex Interaction on a Helicopter Blade Element Kartik B. Ariyur
More informationIntroduction to Aeronautics
Introduction to Aeronautics ARO 101 Sections 03 & 04 Sep 30, 2015 thru Dec 9, 2015 Instructor: Raymond A. Hudson Week #8 Lecture Material 1 Topics For Week #8 Airfoil Geometry & Nomenclature Identify the
More informationVariable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection. Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University
Variable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Linear Tracking & Disturbance Rejection Variable Structure
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationStability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments
Stability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments The lifting surfaces of a vehicle generally include the wings, the horizontal and vertical tail, and other surfaces such
More informationDrag (2) Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag
Drag () Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag Outline Nomenclature and Concepts Farfield Drag Analysis Induced Drag Multiple Lifting Surfaces Zero Lift Drag :Friction and Form Drag Supersonic
More informationAdaptive Trim and Trajectory Following for a Tilt-Rotor Tricopter Ahmad Ansari, Anna Prach, and Dennis S. Bernstein
7 American Control Conference Sheraton Seattle Hotel May 4 6, 7, Seattle, USA Adaptive Trim and Trajectory Following for a Tilt-Rotor Tricopter Ahmad Ansari, Anna Prach, and Dennis S. Bernstein Abstract
More informationSPC Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30
SPC 307 - Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30 1. The maximum velocity at which an aircraft can cruise occurs when the thrust available with the engines operating with the
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
More informationVideo 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh
Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh Robo3x-1.1 1 The Purpose of Control Input/Stimulus/ Disturbance System or Plant Output/ Response Understand the Black Box Evaluate the Performance Change the Behavior
More informationMechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY
Mechanics of Flight Warren F. Phillips Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgments xi xiii 1. Overview of Aerodynamics
More informationMAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009
MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009 Please read through the entire homework set before beginning. Also, please label clearly your answers and summarize your findings as concisely as possible.
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationMEAM 510 Fall 2012 Bruce D. Kothmann
Balancing g Robot Control MEAM 510 Fall 2012 Bruce D. Kothmann Agenda Bruce s Controls Resume Simple Mechanics (Statics & Dynamics) of the Balancing Robot Basic Ideas About Feedback & Stability Effects
More informationComputer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control
Computer Problem 1: SIE 39 - Guidance, Navigation, and Control Roger Skjetne March 12, 23 1 Problem 1 (DSRV) We have the model: m Zẇ Z q ẇ Mẇ I y M q q + ẋ U cos θ + w sin θ ż U sin θ + w cos θ θ q Zw
More informationACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL ON A SLATLESS 2D HIGH-LIFT WING SECTION
26th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL ON A SLATLESS 2D HIGH-LIFT WING SECTION F. Haucke, I. Peltzer, W. Nitsche Chair for Aerodynamics Department of Aeronautics
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationLecture AC-1. Aircraft Dynamics. Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow
Lecture AC-1 Aircraft Dynamics Copy right 23 by Jon at h an H ow 1 Spring 23 16.61 AC 1 2 Aircraft Dynamics First note that it is possible to develop a very good approximation of a key motion of an aircraft
More informationMATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 1: Introduction Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, July 21, 2012
MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 1: Introduction Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, July 21, 2012 Unit Outline Introduction to the course: Course goals, assessment, etc... What is Control Theory A bit of jargon,
More informationRegulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii
Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii Hua Zhong and Lucy Y. Pao Abstract A tape system is time-varying as tape winds from one reel to the other. The variations in reel radii consist
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationAero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP
Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP August 8, 213 Kevin W. Reynolds Intelligent Systems Division, Code TI NASA Ames Research Center Our Introduction To OpenVSP Overview! Motivation and Background!
More informationA Light Weight Rotary Double Pendulum: Maximizing the Domain of Attraction
A Light Weight Rotary Double Pendulum: Maximizing the Domain of Attraction R. W. Brockett* and Hongyi Li* Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge, MA 38, USA {brockett, hongyi}@hrl.harvard.edu
More informationControl Systems! Copyright 2017 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only.
Control Systems Robert Stengel Robotics and Intelligent Systems MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Analog vs. digital systems Continuous- and Discretetime Dynamic Models Frequency Response Transfer Functions
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationTrajectory Planning, Setpoint Generation and Feedforward for Motion Systems
2 Trajectory Planning, Setpoint Generation and Feedforward for Motion Systems Paul Lambrechts Digital Motion Control (4K4), 23 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Control Systems Technology Group /42 2
More informationELEC4631 s Lecture 2: Dynamic Control Systems 7 March Overview of dynamic control systems
ELEC4631 s Lecture 2: Dynamic Control Systems 7 March 2011 Overview of dynamic control systems Goals of Controller design Autonomous dynamic systems Linear Multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems Bat flight
More informationSchool of Engineering Faculty of Built Environment, Engineering, Technology & Design
Module Name and Code : ENG60803 Real Time Instrumentation Semester and Year : Semester 5/6, Year 3 Lecture Number/ Week : Lecture 3, Week 3 Learning Outcome (s) : LO5 Module Co-ordinator/Tutor : Dr. Phang
More informationRobot Dynamics - Rotary Wing UAS: Control of a Quadrotor
Robot Dynamics Rotary Wing AS: Control of a Quadrotor 5-85- V Marco Hutter, Roland Siegwart and Thomas Stastny Robot Dynamics - Rotary Wing AS: Control of a Quadrotor 7..6 Contents Rotary Wing AS. Introduction
More informationBernoulli's equation: 1 p h t p t. near the far from plate the plate. p u
UNSTEADY FLOW let s re-visit the Kutta condition when the flow is unsteady: p u p l Bernoulli's equation: 2 φ v 1 + + = () = + p h t p t 2 2 near the far from plate the plate as a statement of the Kutta
More informationCourse Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane
More informationAircraft Maneuver Regulation: a Receding Horizon Backstepping Approach
Aircraft Maneuver Regulation: a Receding Horizon Backstepping Approach Giuseppe Notarstefano and Ruggero Frezza Abstract Coordinated flight is a nonholonomic constraint that implies no sideslip of an aircraft.
More informationReview: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control
Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control Goal: understand the difference between open-loop and closed-loop (feedback)
More informationAdaptive Linear Quadratic Gaussian Optimal Control Modification for Flutter Suppression of Adaptive Wing
Adaptive Linear Quadratic Gaussian Optimal Control Modification for Flutter Suppression of Adaptive Wing Nhan T. Nguyen NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 9435 Sean Swei NASA Ames Research Center,
More informationPlan of the Lecture. Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control
Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic:
More informationNeural Networks Lecture 10: Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) Using Neural Networks
Neural Networks Lecture 10: Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) Using Neural Networks H.A. Talebi Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Winter 2011.
More information