1 i n x i x i 1. Note that kqk kp k. In addition, if P and Q are partition of [a, b], P Q is finer than both P and Q.


 Carol Cooper
 4 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Chpter 6 Integrtion In this chpter we define the integrl. Intuitively, it should be the re under curve. Not surprisingly, fter mny exmples, counter exmples, exceptions, generliztions, the concept of the integrl my seem strnge. And not surprisingly, there is more thn one wy to define the integrl. We strt with the Drboux integrl nd lter show it is equivlent to the Riemnn integrl. 6.. Drboux Integrl Throughout this chpter we ssume [, b] be closed, bounded intervl, nd tht the functions f : [, b] R under considertion re bounded. Definition 6.. Let [, b] be closed, bounded intervl. (i) A Prtition of [, b] is set of points P = {x, x, x 2,..., x n, x n } with = x < x < < x n = b. (ii) The norm of prtition is kp k = mx i n x i x i. (iii) A Refinement of P is prtition Q of [, b] such tht P Q. We sy Q is finer thn P. Note tht kqk kp k. In ddition, if P nd Q re prtition of [, b], P Q is finer thn both P nd Q. Definition 6.2. Let f : [, b] R be bounded. Set M j (f) = () The upperdrboux Sum of f over P is sup f(x) m j (f) = inf f(x). x j x x j x j x x j U(P, f) = M j (f)(x j x j ). j= 65
2 66 6. Integrtion (b) The lowerdrboux Sum of f over P is L(P, f) = m j (f)(x j x j ). j= The following lemm provides reltionship between the upper/lower Drboux sums nd prtitions. Lemm 6.3. Let P be ny prtition of [, b] nd Q be ny refinement of P. Then L(P, f) L(Q, f) U(Q, f) U(P, f). Proof. Let P = {x, x,..., x n }. By ssumption P Q. Let us suppose one point, z, hs been dded to P. Specificlly, suppose x j < z < x j for some j. Cll the new prtition P. Let M j (f) = sup{f(x) : x [x j, x j ]}, m j (f) = inf{f(x) : x [x j, x j ]}, β (f) = inf{f(x) : x [x j, z]}, β 2 (f) = inf{f(x) : x [z, x j ]}. Note m j β nd m j β 2 since m j is the infimum over lrger set. Moreover, we my write x j x j = (x j z) + (z x j ). Thus L(P, f) = m i (f)(x i x i ) = Xj m i (f)(x i x i ) + m j (f)(x j x j ) + i=j+ Xj m i (f)(x i x i ) + β (z x j ) + β 2 (x j z) + i=j+ = L(P, f) m i (f)(x i x i ) m i (f)(x i x i ) A similr rgument shows U(P, f) U(P, f). If Q contins points not in P, we repet the rgument (there cn only be finite number of dditionl points) to obtin L(P, f) L(Q, f) nd U(Q, f) U(P, f). The definition of the upper nd lower sums implies L(Q, f) U(Q, f), nd the inequlity follows. Corollry 6.4. We hve L(P, f) U(Q, f) for ny prtitions P nd Q of [, b]. Proof. Since P Q is refinement of both P nd Q, L(P, f) L(P Q, f) U(P Q, f) U(Q, f). We re redy to define the integrl. Definition 6.5. The function f : [, b] R is sid to be Drboux Integrble on [, b] if nd only if f is bounded nd, for ll ǫ >, there exists prtition, P, of [, b] such tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. In this cse we sy f R[, b] (the R stnds for Riemnn).
3 6.. Drboux Integrl 67 is. Note the definition of the existence of the integrl does not sy wht the integrl Definition 6.6. Let f : [, b] R be bounded. Set (i) (ii) f(x) dx = inf{u(p, f) P prtition of [, b]} f(x) dx = sup{l(p, f) P prtition of [, b]} If f(x) dx = f(x) dx, we sy the integrl of f is f(x) dx. You might wonder why the sup nd inf exist in the definition. Lemm 6.7. If f : [, b] R is bounded, then both exist. Moreover, f(x) dx f(x) dx. f(x) dx nd f(x) dx Proof. Recll tht L(P, f) U(Q, f) for ny prtitions P, Q of [, b]. Thus the numbers L(P, f) re bounded bove nd by the completeness xiom sup L(P, f) P exists. Similrly, U(Q, f) is bounded below by ny L(P, f), nd so inf U(P, f) P exist. Tking the supremum of the left side of the inequlity L(P, f) U(Q, f), we find f(x) dx U(Q, f). Tking the infimum of the right side provides the inequlity in the lemm. You might hope too tht f R[, b] implies R b f(x) dx exists. Theorem 6.8. Suppose f R[, b]. Then f(x) dx = f(x) dx. Proof. Since f R[, b], for ll ǫ >, there exists prtition of [, b] such tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. Thus Tht is, L(P, f) nd the result follows. f(x) dx f(x) dx f(x) dx U(P, f). f(x) dx U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ,
4 68 6. Integrtion Exmple 6.9. Prove the function f(x) = is in R[, ] nd find the integrl. x <, 2 x =. Proof. Let ǫ >. Set P = {, ǫ 2, }. Then M (f) = = m (f), nd M 2 (f) = 2, m 2 (f) = ( sketch of the function nd the prtition might be useful). Thus U(P, f) = ǫ ( ǫ 2 ) = + ǫ 2 L(P, f) = ǫ 2 + ( ǫ 2 ) =, nd hence U(P, f) L(P, f) = ǫ/2 < ǫ nd f R[, ]. or To find the integrl note which implies Z L(P, f) f(x) dx =. Z Z f(x) dx U(P, f) f(x) dx + ǫ 2 Exmple 6.. Show tht Dirichlet s function x Q, f(x) = x Q c. is not in R[, ]. Proof. To show function is not integrble we must show the existence of ǫ > such tht for ll prtitions of [, b], U(P, f) L(P, f) ǫ. Let ǫ = /2. For ny prtition of [, ] we hve M j (f) = nd m j (f) =. Thus U(P, f) L(P, f) = U(P, f) = (x j x j ) = ǫ nd f is not integrble. Integrble functions cn be complicted s the next exmple shows. j= Exmple 6.. Consider the function on [, ] x = n f(x) = x 6= n. Prove f R[, ]; i.e. f is Drboux integrble nd find the integrl.
5 6.. Drboux Integrl 69 Proof. Let ǫ >. By the Archimeden Property n n N exists so tht 2/ǫ < n. Tht is /n < ǫ/2. By the WellOrdering Property, minimum such n (gin clled n ) exists. Tht is, (6.) < ǫ n 2 n. We ssume, without loss of generlity, tht n > 2. Behold: Set P to be the prtition P =, + ǫ2 n 6, n ǫ2 6, n + ǫ2 6, n 2 ǫ2 6, n 2 + ǫ2 6,..., ǫ2 6, = {, x, x 2,..., x 2n 2, }. Before we check tht P is in fct prtition of [, ], we compute the upperdrboux sum. We hve, using (6.) nd /(n ) < 2/n (becuse n > 2), U(P, f) = + ǫ2 ǫ28 ǫ2 + (n 2) + n 6 6 = + (n ) ǫ 2 n 2 2 < ǫ (n ) n = ǫ 2 + 2(n ) < ǫ 2 + < ǫ n 2 + ǫ 2 = ǫ. Moreover, L(P, f) =. Thus, U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ nd f is Drboux Integrble provided P is prtition of [, ]. To show P is prtition, we need only check x < x 2 since the gps grow for incresing x i. Tht is, if x < x 2, the rest of the terms in the prtition re ordered. Here, x 2 x = n ǫ2 + ǫ2 n 2 = 6 n 6 2n (n ) 2. This is positive for n > 2, which we hve ssumed without loss of generlity. or To find the integrl note which implies Z L(P, f) f(x) dx =. Z Z f(x) dx U(P, f) f(x) dx ǫ
6 7 6. Integrtion 6.2. Chrcteriztions of The Integrl In this section we give five different equivlent chrcteriztions of the integrl. For given problem, one chrcteriztion my be esier to pply thn nother. Definition 6.2. Let P be ny prtition of [, b] nd f : [, b] R is bounded. The Riemnn Sum with respect to P is S(P, f) = f(t i )(x i x i ), where x i t i x i. Agin throughout f : [, b] R is bounded. We recll the definition of f R[.b] s the first (zeroth) chrcteriztion. The other chrcteriztions re stted s theorems. However, when we refer to the chrcteriztions we men the lterntive description of f R[, b] given in the chrcteriztion. Definition. f R[, b] if nd only if, for ll ǫ >, there exists prtition, P, of [, b] such tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. Chrcteriztion I. f R[, b] if nd only if f(x) dx = f(x) dx = f(x) dx. Chrcteriztion II. f R[, b] if nd only if, for ll ǫ >, there exists prtition, P ǫ, of [, b] such tht, for ny refinement P ǫ P, U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. Chrcteriztion III. f R[, b] if nd only if there exists I R such tht for ll ǫ > there exists prtition, P ǫ, of [, b] such tht, for ny refinement P ǫ P nd ny Riemnn sum S(P, f), we hve S(P, f) I < ǫ. In this cse I = Chrcteriztion IV. f R[, b] if nd only if there exists I R such tht I = lim S(P, f) = lim f(t i )(x i x i ). kp k kp k f(x) dx. Tht is, for ll ǫ > there exists δ > such tht, for ll prtitions, P, of [, b], kp k < δ implies S(P, f) I < ǫ. Agin I = f(x) dx. Chrcteriztion IV cn be tken s the definition of Riemnn integrl. Thus Chrcteriztion IV shows the Drboux nd Riemnn integrls re the sme.
7 6.2. Chrcteriztions of The Integrl 7 Theorem 6.3. Chrcteriztion I nd f R[.b] re equivlent. Proof. We showed in Theorem 6.8 f R[.b] implies Chrcteriztion I. Suppose f(x) dx = f(x) dx. By the properties of supremums nd infimums, given ny ǫ >, there exists prtitions P, P 2 of [, b] such tht Let P = P P 2. Then Tht is, f(x) dx ǫ 2 < L(P, f), f(x) dx + ǫ 2 > U(P 2, f). f(x) dx ǫ 2 < L(P, f) L(P, f) U(P, f) U(P 2, f) < U(P, f) L(P, f) < nd thus f R[, b]. = ǫ, f(x) dx + ǫ 2! f(x) dx ǫ 2 f(x) dx + ǫ 2. Theorem 6.4. Both Chrcteriztions III nd IV imply f R[.b]. In prticulr, if bounded function is Riemnn integrble, it is Drboux integrble. Proof. Suppose bounded function f stisfies Chrcteriztion III or IV. Let ǫ >. Then either prtition P ǫ = {x, x,..., x n } of [, b] exists or δ > exists such tht ny prtition of [, b] with kp k < δ implies f(t i )(x i x i ) I < ǫ/3 i=n for ll t i [x i, x i ], i =, n. We need to show U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. By the properties of supremum nd infimum, there exist t i nd s i such tht ǫ M i (f) 6(b ) < f(t ǫ i), m i (f) + 6(b ) > f(s i). This implies Thus U(P ǫ ) L(P ǫ ) = M i (f) m i (f) < f(t i ) f(s i ) + (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ) ǫ, ǫ 3(b ). ǫ (f(t i ) f(s i )(x i x i ) + (x i x i ) 3(b ) f(t i )(x i x i ) I + n I X f(s i )(x i x i ) + ǫ 3!
8 72 6. Integrtion nd f R[, b]. Next we show I = f(x) dx. Let ǫ >. Agin by the properties of supremum nd infimum there exists prtitions, P, P ǫ nd P 2 such tht L(P, f) > f(x) dx ǫ 3, S(P ǫ, f) I < ǫ 3, U(P 2, f) L(P 2, f) < ǫ 3. Set P = P P ǫ P 2. Then L(P, f) S(P, f) U(P, f) < L(P, f) + ǫ 3, or S(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ/3, nd I f(x) dx Since this is true for ll ǫ >, I = < ǫ. I S(P, f) + S(P, f) L(P, f) + L(P, f) f(x) dx. f(x) dx Theorem 6.5. f R[.b] implies Chrcteriztion III. Proof. Let ǫ > be given. By the properties of supremums nd infimums, given ny ǫ, the exists prtitions, P, P 2 of [, b] such tht f(x) dx ǫ 2 < L(P, f), Set P ǫ = P P 2. For ny refinement P ǫ P we hve Similrly Thus Tht is, f(x) dx + ǫ 2 > U(P 2, f). U(P, f) < U(P, f) + ǫ 2 U(P, f) + ǫ 2 < f(x) dx + ǫ. L(P, f) > f(x) dx ǫ. f(x) dx ǫ < L(P, f) S(P, f) U(P, f) < S(P, f) f(x) dx < ǫ f(x) dx + ǫ. for ny prtition P of [, b] with P ǫ P. This is Chrcteriztion III. The proof tht bounded function is Drboux integrble implies it is Riemnn integrble is much hrder. We first must relte the upper nd lower sums of given fixed prtition of [, b] to ny prtition with kp k smll.
9 6.2. Chrcteriztions of The Integrl 73 Lemm 6.6. f : [, b] R is bounded. Let P be ny prtition of [, b]. For ny ǫ > there exists δ >, such tht, for ny prtition P of [, b] with kp k < δ, U(P, f) U(P P, f) < ǫ. Proof. Since f is bounded, there exists M such tht f(x) M for ll x [.b]. Let ǫ >. Suppose the given prtition P = {x, x..., x n }. Set δ = ǫ/4nm. Let P be ny prtition of [, b] with kp k < δ ( sketch of the prtitions P nd P would be beneficil. In sketching the prtitions, think of P s much more refined thn P ). To sy more, suppose P = {y i }, nd P P = {x i } {y i } = {z i } with the {z i } ordered. For exmple, perhps the order might be {z i } = {, y, x, y 2, y 3, y 4, y 5,...}. In the event cell [z i, z i ] does not contin x i, then both U(P, f) nd U(P P, f) contin M i (f)(y i y i ) nd tht term cncels. So in our exmple the first few terms re U(P, f) U(P P, f) = sup f(x)(y ) + sup f(x)(y 2 y ) +... x y y x y 2 sup f(x)(y ) + sup f(x)(x y ) + sup f(x)(y 2 x ) +... x y y x x x x y 2 sup f(x)(y 2 y ) +... M y x y 2 (y 2 y ) + (y 3 y 2 ) +... < M2δ +..., where the like terms cncel, nd the remining terms in U(P P, f) re dropped. Thus, we see every occurrence of x i between two y i does not cncel nd leds to term from U(P, f) in the form sup f(x)(y i y i ) which cn by estimted y i x y i by M2δ. Since there re n terms in P (i.e. totl of n x i s), this cnnot hppen more thn n times, nd we hve U(P, f) U(P P, f) < 2nMδ = ǫ. Theorem 6.7. f R[.b] implies Chrcteriztion IV. Tht is, if bounded function is Drboux integrble, it is Riemnn integrble. Proof. With Lemm 6.6, the proof is lmost identicl to the proof of Theorem 6.5 (tht f R[, b] implies Chrcteriztion III). Let ǫ > be given nd P be chosen so tht U(P, f) < f(x) dx + ǫ 2. Set δ = ǫ/8nm nd let P be ny prtition of [, b] with kp k < δ. By the previous lemm U(P, f) < U(P P, f) + ǫ 2 U(P, f) + ǫ 2 < f(x) dx + ǫ, for ll prtitions of [, b] with kp k < δ.
10 74 6. Integrtion Similrly, there is δ 2 > such tht L(P, f) > f(x) dx ǫ for ll prtitions of [, b] with kp k < δ 2. Let δ = min{δ, δ 2 }. Then Tht is, f(x) dx ǫ < L(P, f) S(P, f) U(P, f) < S(P, f) f(x) dx < ǫ f(x) dx + ǫ. for ny prtition P of [, b] with kp k < δ. This is Chrcteriztion IV. Chrcteriztion II is resttement of the definition. It is designed to pper more like limit Algebr of Integrble Functions In this section we estblish some well known properties of integrls. The proofs in this section could be shortened by using Chrcteriztion IV in the previous section. This would involve using the Riemnn integrl insted of the Drboux integrl. In n effort to keep the exposition self contined s possible, we eschew use of the Riemnn integrl when prcticble. We strt with severl lemms which build towrd the expected lgebr involving integrls. Lemm 6.8. If f R[, b], f R[, b] nd (6.2) f dx = f dx. Proof. We estblished in the proof Theorem 2.4 tht sup I ( f) = inf(f). Moreover, inf I so tht ( f) = sup I (f). Let ǫ >. Since f R[, b], prtition P of [, b] exists U(P, f) L(P, f) = (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ) < ǫ. However, m i (f) = M i ( f) nd M i (f) = m i ( f). Thus ( m f ( f) + M i ( f))(x i x i ) < ǫ. This shows U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ nd estblishes f R[, b]. To find the integrls, we clculte f dx = f dx U(P, f) = L(P, f) U(P, f) + ǫ f dx + ǫ. I
11 6.3. Algebr of Integrble Functions 75 Similrly, f dx = f dx L(P, f) = U(P, f) L(P, f) ǫ Combining the two we conclude Z! b f dx f dx ǫ. Since ǫ > is rbitrry, (6.2) is estblished. f dx! < ǫ. Lemm 6.9. If f R[, b] nd c R, c f R[, b] nd (6.3) c f dx = c f dx. Proof. We first suppose c >. It is strightforwrd to show sup I (c f(x)) = c sup I (f(x)). Similrly, we see inf I (c f(x)) = c inf I (f(x)). Hence, for ny prtition P of [, b] U(P, c f) = c U(P, f) nd L(P, c f) = c L(P, f). Let ǫ >. Then prtition P of [, b] exists so tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ/c. Then nd so c f R[, b]. U(P, c f) L(P, c f) = c (U(P, f) L(P, f)) < ǫ To estblish the integrls we rgue s in the previous lemm. We clculte In the sme wy, we find c f dx = c f dx U(P, c f) = c U(P, f) < c (L(P, f) + ǫ/c ) c f dx + ǫ. c f dx L(P, c f) = c L(P, f) c U(P, f) ǫ c f dx ǫ. Combining these we find Tht is, c f dx ǫ Since ǫ > is rbitrry, (6.3) follows. c f dx c f dx + ǫ. c f dx c f dx < ǫ.
12 76 6. Integrtion If c <, then c >. We pply the bove nd the Lemm 6.8 to gin conclude c f R[, b] nd (6.3). Theorem 6.2. Suppose f, f 2 R[, b]. Then (i) for ny c, c 2 R, c f + c 2 f 2 R[.b] nd (c f + c 2 f 2 ) dx = c f dx + c 2 f 2 dx. (ii) If f (x) f 2 (x) for ll x [, b], then f (x) dx (iii) If m f(x) M for ll x [.b], (iv) If c (, b), m(b ) f(x) dx = Z c f 2 (x) dx. f(x) dx M(b ). f(x) dx + c f(x) dx. Proof. To prove (i) we first show f + f 2 R[, b]. Problem 2.5 shows, for ny prtition P of [, b], U(P, f + f 2 ) U(P, f ) + U(P, f 2 ) L(P, f + f 2 ) L(P, f ) + L(P, f 2 ). Let ǫ >. Then prtitions P nd P 2 of [, b] exist so tht U(P, f ) L(P, f ) < ǫ/2 nd U(P 2, f 2 ) L(P 2, f 2 ) < ǫ/2. Set P = P P 2. Then U(P, f + f 2 ) L(P, f + f 2 ) (U(P, f ) L(P, f )) + (U(P, f 2 ) L(P, f 2 )) < ǫ. This proves f + f 2 R[, b]. To find reltionship between the integrls we copy the ides of the previous two lemms. We hve A similr clcultion shows (f + f 2 ) dx U(P, f + f 2 ) U(P, f ) + U(P, f 2 ) < L(P, f ) + ǫ 2 + L(P, f 2) + ǫ 2 (f + f 2 ) dx > As before this shows (f + f 2 ) dx Since ǫ > is rbitrry, (6.4) (f + f 2 ) dx = f dx + f dx + f dx + f 2 dx + ǫ. f dx + f 2 dx ǫ. f 2 dx! f 2 dx. < ǫ.
13 6.3. Algebr of Integrble Functions 77 For rbitrry constnts c, c 2 R it follows from Lemm 6.9 tht c f R[, b] nd c 2 f 2 R[, b]. The bove shows c f + c 2 f 2 R[, b]. To estblish the integrl in (i), we pply (6.4) nd (6.3). To prove (ii) note tht L(P, f ) L(P, f 2 ) for ny prtition P of [, b]. Thus f (x) dx = f (x) dx f 2 (x) dx = f 2 (x) dx. To prove (iii) we ppel to the definition of f R[, b]. We note tht P = {, b} is prtition of [, b], nd L(P, f) = m(b ), U(P, f) = M(b ). Using the properties of prtitions given in Lemm 6.3, we hve for ny prtition, P of [, b] m(b ) L(P, f) f(x) dx U(P, f) M(b ). s required. Prt (iv) is left to the exercises (see Problem 6.9). Theorem 6.2. Suppose f R[, b]. Then f R[, b] nd (6.5) f(x) dx f(x) dx. Proof. We clim (6.6) M i ( f ) m i ( f ) M i (f) m i (f). Indeed, suppose x, y [x i, x i ]. If if f(x), f(y) f(x) f(y) = f(x) f(y) M i (f) m i (f); if f(x) f(y), then m i (f) nd f(x) f(y) = f(x) + f(y) M i (f) + M i (f) m i (f); if f(y) f(x), then, f(x) f(y) f(x) + f(y) M i (f) m i (f). In ll cses we see f(x) M i (f) m i (f)+ f(y). Tking the supremum of the left side M i ( f ) M i (f) m i (f)+ f(y). Then f(y) M i ( f ) M i (f)+m i (f). This implies m i ( f ) M i ( f ) M i (f)+m i (f), nd M i ( f ) m i ( f ) M i (f) m i (f). Let ǫ >. Then there exists prtition of [, b] such tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ. Inequlity (6.6) implies U(P, f ) L(P, f ) U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ, nd f R[, b]. Since f(x) f(x) f(x), Theorem 6.2, (ii) implies (6.5). Theorem Suppose f, g R[, b]. Then fg R[, b].
14 78 6. Integrtion Proof. Suppose f 2 R[, b] when f R[, b]. Then f(x)g(x) = (f(x) + g(x))2 f 2 (x) g 2 (x) 2 is in R[, b] by Theorem 6.2. To show f 2 R[, b], note tht M i (f 2 ) = (M i ( f )) 2 nd m i (f 2 ) = (m i ( f )) 2 (see Problem 2.6). Thus M i (f 2 ) m i (f 2 ) = (M i ( f )) 2 (m i ( f )) 2 = (M i ( f ) + m i ( f ))(M i ( f ) m i ( f )) 2M(M i ( f ) m i ( f )), where M is the bound on f. Since f R[, b], there exists prtition of [, b] such tht U(P, f ) L(P, f ) < ǫ/(2m) for ny ǫ >. Then U(P, f 2 ) L(P, f 2 ) 2M(U(P, f ) L(P, f )) < ǫ. This shows f 2 R[, b] Clsses of Integrble Functions We would like to chrcterize functions which re Riemnn integrble. mke some hedwy in tht direction. We cn Theorem If f : [, b] R is continuous (we sometimes write this f C[, b]), then f R[, b]. Proof. Since f C[, b], f is uniformly continuous (Theorem 4.4). Let ǫ >. Thus, there exists δ > such tht x, y [, b], x y < δ implies f(x) f(y) < ǫ/(b ). Let P be ny prtition of [, b] with kp k < δ. On nd subintervl [x i, x i ] there exists x m, x m [x i, x i ] (Theorem 4.26) such tht f(x M ) = M i (f) nd f(x m ) = m i (f). Since kp k < δ, x M x m < δ nd f(x M ) f(x m ) = M i (f) m i (f) < ǫ/(b ). Thus U(P, f) L(P, f) = < nd f R[, b]. (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ) ǫ b (x i x i ) = ǫ, Theorem If f : [, b] R is monotone, then f R[, b]. Proof. Suppose f is monotone incresing. Note f is bounded since f(x) f(b) for ll x [, b]. Let ǫ >. Choose δ > so tht (f(b) f())δ < ǫ. Choose
15 6.4. Clsses of Integrble Functions 79 prtition of [, b] so tht kp k < δ. Since f is incresing, m i (f) = f(x i ) nd M i (f) = f(x i ). Thus U(P, f) L(P, f) = (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ) < (M i (f) m i (f))δ = (f(b) f())δ < ǫ, nd f R[, b]. If f is decresing, then f is incresing, nd f R[, b]. By the lgebr of integrtion f R[, b]. Theorem Suppose f R[, b], nd g = f except t finite number of points. Then g R[, b], nd g(x) dx = f(x) dx. Proof. Suppose f differs from g t exctly one point in [, b], sy t z. Given ǫ > there exists prtition P of [, b] such tht U(P, f) L(P, f) < ǫ/2. We my ssume, by refining P if necessry, tht z is in P. Then Xj U(P, g) L(P, g) = (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ) +(M j (g) m j (g))(z x j ) + (M j+ (g) m j+ (g))(x j+ z ) + (M i (f) m i (f))(x i x i ). i=j+2 We note tht (though we do not need explicitly) nd M j (g) = mx{m j (f), g(z )}, M j+ (g) = mx{m j+ (f), g(z )}, m j (g) = min{m j (f), g(z )}, m j+ (g) = min{m j+ (f), g(z )}. The differences M j (g) m j (g) nd M j+ (g) m j+ (g) re therefore bounded. We cll the bound M. We my refine the prtition P, if necessry, so tht (M j (g) m j (g))(z x j ) + (M j+ (g) m j+ (g))(x j+ x ) M (z x j ) + (x j+ z ) < ǫ/2. It follows U(P, g) L(P, g) < ǫ nd g R[, b]. Next we show the integrls of f nd g re the sme. Agin by properties of supremum (Theorem 2.) there exist prtitions P nd P 2 of [, b] such tht U(P, f) < f(x) dx + ǫ 3, U(P 2, g) < g(x) dx + ǫ 3. Set P = P P 2. By refining P if necessry, s we did in computing U(P, g) L(P, g) bove, we my require U(P, f) U(P, g) < ǫ 3.
16 8 6. Integrtion Combining these we find f(x) dx g(x) dx < ǫ. f(x) dx U(P, f) + U(P, f) U(P, g) + U(P, g) g(x) dx Since ǫ > is rbitrry, we conclude R b g = R b f. If g differs from f on [, b] t m points, we mke sequence of functions g i, i m with g m = g, g differing from f t one point nd g i+ differing from g i t one point. We then iterte the bove proof m times to conclude R b f = R b g = R b g 2 = = R b g. While we will not hve time to develop the tools necessry to completely chrcterize which functions re Riemnn integrble, we stte the theorem here. Theorem A bounded function f is Riemnn integrble if nd only if it is continuous lmost everywhere. Here lmost everywhere mens in the sense of Lebesgue mesure. We will not discuss this further. However, the following corollry my be bit more pltble. It shows Theorem 6.25 remins vlid even if f differs from g t countble number of points. Corollry A bounded function f is Riemnn integrble if it is continuous everywhere except t countble number of points. We close with one more theorem  whose proof we leve to the exercises (see Problem 6.6). Theorem Suppose f is bounded on [, b] nd f is Riemnn integrble on every closed subintervl of (, b), then f R[, b]. Exmple Consider the function on [, ] x = n f(x) = x 6= n. Prove f R[, ] using three different methods. Proof. In Exmple 6. we proved directly tht f R[, b]. Note tht f is equl to the continuous function zero everywhere except t countble number of points. Corollry 6.27 pplies nd f R[, b]. Finlly, note on every subintervl of (, ) f is equl to zero everywhere except finite number of points. Thus by Theorem 6.25 f is integrble on every subintervl of (, ). Now Theorem 6.28 pplies nd f R[, b].
17 6.5. The Fundmentl of Clculus nd Derivtives of Integrls The Fundmentl of Clculus nd Derivtives of Integrls As you might expect there is reltion between integrls nd derivtives from your elementry clculus dys. In prticulr, one might expect the function defined by F (x) = Z x f(x) dx not only to be differentible but lso F (x) = f(x). In prticulr, given ny function f, we might expect R x f(x) dx to be n ntiderivtive of f. If you think this, the next exmples show you would be wrong. Exmple 6.3. Consider (yet gin) the function x = n f(x) = x 6= n, on [, ]. Set F (x) = Z x f(x) dx. We know from Exmple 6. tht F (x) =. Thus F is differentible, but F 6= f. Exmple 6.3. Consider the function x 2 sin(/x 2 ) < x F (x) = x =. One cn check tht F = f exists on [, ]. However, F is not bounded on [, ] nd R therefore not Riemnn integrble. Thus f hs n ntiderivtive, but F (x) 6= x f(x) dx. Exmple Consider the function x < f(x) = x on [, ]. As we sw Exmple 5.7, there is no function such tht F = f on [, ]. The function f does not hve n ntiderivtive. However, F (x) = R x f(s) ds mkes sense. On my wonder wht is the reltionship between F nd f in (6.7) in generl.we hve Theorem Let f be bounded on [, b] nd Riemnn integrble on [, b]. Set for x [, b]. Then (i) F is continuous on [, b] F (x) = Z x f(s) ds (ii) If f is continuous t x [, b], F (x ) = f(x )
18 82 6. Integrtion Proof. We re given M > exists such tht f(x) M for ll x [, b]. We pply the definition of continuity. Let ǫ > be given. Set δ = ǫ/m. If x, y [, b], x y nd x y < δ, then, using Theorem 6.2 (iii) nd (iv), Z y F (x) F (y) = f(s) ds < ǫ. x Z y x f(s) ds M x y Thus F is in fct Lipschitz on [, b] nd uniformly continuous there. Next, suppose f is continuous t x [, b]. Given ǫ >, choose δ > so tht x y < δ nd y [, b] implies f(y) f(x ) < ǫ/2. Then F (x ) F (y) R x f(x ) x y = f(s) ds R y f(s) ds f(x ) x y Z = x f(s) ds Z x f(x ) ds x y x y This implies F (x ) = f(x ). x y < ǫ. y Z x y y ǫ f(s) f(x ) ds < x y 2 x y The next version of the fundmentl theorem of clculus completely chrcterizes the nti derivtives of continuous functions. It lso vlidtes the reson so much effort ws mde in finding ntiderivtives in your elementry clculus clss. Theorem (Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus) Let f be continuous on [, b]. A function on [, b] stisfies (6.7) F (x) F () = for ll x [, b] if nd only if F = f. Z x f(s) ds Proof. Suppose F is defined by (6.7). Since f is continuous on [, b], Theorem 6.33 pplies nd we see F = f on [, b]. Conversely suppose F (x) = f(x) on [, b]. Set G(x) = Z x f(s) ds. Agin by Theorem 6.33, G (x) = f(x). Thus G (x) = F (x) on [, b]. Set H(x) = G(x) F (x) on [, b]. Then H is continuous nd differentible on [, b] nd H (x) = there. By the MenVlue Theorem H(x) = C (Theorem 5.5) for some rel constnt C. Thus G(x) = F (x) + C. However, we see G() = nd so C = F (). Tht is, s required. G(x) = Z x f(s) ds = F (x) F ()
19 6.5. The Fundmentl of Clculus nd Derivtives of Integrls 83 There is nother version of the Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus which requires Chrcteriztion IV. Theorem (Fundmentl Theorem of ClculusVersion II) Suppose F : [, b] R is differentible on [, b] nd F = f with f R[, b]. Then f(x) dx = F (b) F (). Proof. We pply Chrcteriztion IV. Let P be ny prtition of [, b]. If we pply the menvlue theorem to ech [x i, x i ], there exists t i [x i, x i ] such tht Thus f(t i )(x i x i ) = F (x i ) F (x i ). f(t i )(x i x i ) = F (b) f(). Let {P n } n N be ny sequence of prtitions of [, b] such tht kp n k s n, nd with the Riemnn sum constructed with t i s bove. Then, by the sequentil chrcteriztion of limits, Theorem 4.2, lim S(P n, f) = n f(x) dx = F (b) F (). We end this chpter with the (fmilir) chnge of vribles. Theorem Suppose g is differentible on [, b] nd g is Riemnn integrble on [, b]. If f is continuous on the rnge of g, then f(g(x))g (x) dx = Z g(b) g() f(t) dt. (Formlly obtined by setting t = g(x) nd dt = g (x)dx.) Exmple Before proceeding to the proof, we mke sure the nottion is understood. If we wnted to integrte Z + x dx, we would set t = + x = g(x), dt = dx, nd f(x) = x. Then Z Z 2 + x dx = t dt. Proof. Define F on the rnge of g to be F (x) = Z x g() Thus F (x) = f(x). By the chin rule, Theorem 5.6, (F g) (x) = F (g(x))g (x) = f(g(x))g (x) f.
20 84 6. Integrtion for ll x [, b]. By the fundmentl theorem of clculus f(g(x))g (x) dx = F g(b) F g() = F g(b) = Z g(b) g() f. Summry of Ides If we wnted conditions tht put us bck in n engineering world where functions re well behved nd the big theorems pply, we might consider the following theorem. Theorem Suppose I is closed, bounded intervl nd f : I R is continuously differentible on I. Then f is uniformly continuous on I. f is uniformly continuous on I. f hs minimum nd mximum. f enjoys the intermeditevlue property. If f injective, f is continuous nd differentible. The integrl of f exists nd my be evluted using the fundmentl theorem of clculus.
21 6.5. The Fundmentl of Clculus nd Derivtives of Integrls 85 The Completeness Axiom MonotoneConvergence Theorem NestedCell Theorem BolznoWeierstrss Theorem Unif.Cont. ExtremeVlue Thm Cuchy Thm Archimeden Principle Density of Q f cont f R(I) Rolle s Theorem MenVlue Theorem Cuchy MVT L Hôsiptl s Rule The big theorems of the course. We note tht the following re equivlent: () The completeness xiom. (2) Every Cuchy sequence of rel numbers converges. (3) Every bounded monotone sequence of rel numbers converges. (4) The BolznoWeierstrss theorem. (5) The nestedcell theorem.
22 86 6. Integrtion 6.6. Homework Exercise 6.. Let f(x) = c on [, b]. Show f R[, b] nd R b f(x) dx = c(b ). Exercise 6.2. Let f(x) = x = x >. Show tht f is Drboux integrble on [, ] nd find R f(x)dx. Exercise 6.3. Let x x Q f(x) = x Q c Show tht f is not Drboux integrble on [, ]. Exercise 6.4. x < f(x) = 2 x = < x 2 Show tht f is Drboux integrble on [, 2] nd find R 2 f dx. Exercise 6.5. (Thome s Function) Let x Q c f(x) = n x Q, x = m n x = Show tht f is Drboux integrble on [, ]. Exercise 6.6. Show the functions in Problems (6.), (6.2), nd (6.4) re integrble by pplying theorems. Exercise 6.7. Give exmples of functions f nd g with fg nd f integrble on some bounded closed intervl, but with neither f or g Drboux integrble on tht intervl. Exercise 6.8. Give exmples of function f : [, ] R nd g : [, ] R both Riemnn integrble on [, ] such tht f g is not Riemnn integrble on [, ]. So f, g R[, b] does not imply f g R[, b]. Hint: look t Problem 4.7. Exercise 6.9. Let < c < b, nd let f be defined on [, b]. Show tht f R[, b] if nd only if f R[, c] nd f R[c, b]. Moreover, R b f = R c f + R b c f. Exercise 6.. Suppose f R[, b]. Show tht f = lim c + Exercise 6.. Suppose lim S(f, P ) = I for some I R. Let {P n} n N be ny kp k sequence of prtitions such tht lim kp nk =. Show lim S(f, P n) = I. n n Exercise 6.2. Suppose f C[, b] nd f(x) for ll x [, b] with f not identiclly zero. Show tht R b f >. Exercise 6.3. Suppose f, g C[, b] nd R b f = R b g. Show tht f(c) = g(c) for some c [, b]. (For fun cn you supply physicl interprettion of this?) c f.
23 6.6. Homework 87 Exercise 6.4. Suppose f C[, b]. Show there is c [, b] such tht f(c) = b Exercise 6.5. (MenVlue Theorem for Integrls) Generlize the previous problem: Suppose f : [, b] R is continuous nd g : [, b] R is integrble on [, b] with R b g 6=. Moreover, suppose g(x) for ll x [, b]. Then, there exists c [, b] such tht f(x)g(x) dx = f(c) f. g(x) dx. Exercise 6.6. Prove Theorem Tht is, suppose f is bounded on [, b] nd f is Riemnn integrble on every closed subintervl of (, b), then f R[, b]. Use this to show the function sin f(x) = x < x x = is Riemnn integrble on [, ]. Exercise 6.7. Find with proof the following limits () i lim n n n. (2) lim n i + 2n. (3) lim n n iπ sin. 2n Exercise 6.8. We proved in Exmple 3.28 tht the sequence S n = n + + n n is monotone incresing nd bounded bove (you do not need to show this). We were not ble to find the limit then  now we cn. Find the limit (Hint: it is Riemnn sum). Exercise 6.9. Define Z x ln x = t dt for x >. Prove tht ln x is continuously differentible nd injective on (, ). We define the number e so tht ln e =. Prove tht e exists. Also show tht f(x) = e x is the continuous inverse of ln x. You need only pply pproprite theorems for this problem. Exercise 6.2. (integrtion by prts). Suppose u nd v re differentible functions on [, b] nd tht both u nd v re integrble on [, b]. Show tht both uv nd u v re Riemnn integrble on [, b]. Then prove tht Z uv = uv b b u v.
24 88 6. Integrtion Exercise 6.2. By considering the upper nd lower sums for R n ln x dx show lim n n! (n!) /n = nd lim nn n n = e. Exercise Suppose f C[, b] nd R x f = for ll x [, b]. Show f = on [, b]. Exercise Suppose f C[, b] nd R x f = R b f for ll x [, b]. Show f = x on [, b]. Exercise Suppose f C[, b] nd strictly positive on [, b]. F (x) = R x f is strictly incresing on [, b]. Exercise Compute d Z x 3 cos(t 2 ) dt. dx x 2 Exercise If f is Riemnn integrble on [, b], show R b f dx = lim Suppose f is given by x f(x) = < x Show tht c + R b c f dx. Compute F (x) = R x f dx nd F () using the fundmentl theorem of clculus. Recll f does not hve n ntiderivtive. Exercise Suppose f is continuous on [, ]. Define g n (x) = f(x n ) for n N. Prove tht lim n Z g n (x) dx = f(). Exercise We sy continuous function on R is periodic with period p > if f(x + p) = f(x) for ll x R. Show by exmple tht ntiderivtives of periodic functions need not be periodic while derivtives of continuously differentible periodic function re lwys periodic. Prove tht necessry nd sufficient condition for periodic function to hve periodic ntiderivtive is for f to hve zero verge over one period. Tht is, R p f(t) dt = is required. Exercise Let f be Riemnn integrble on [, ], where >. Prove the following. () If f is even, then R f dx = 2 R f dx. (b) If f is odd, then R f dx =. Exercise 6.3. Let f be continuous nd nonnegtive on [, ]. Define M = mx{f(x) x [, ]}. Show tht Z /n M = lim f dx n. n
25 6.6. Homework 89 Exercise 6.3. Suppose f is continuous on [, b] nd tht f(x)ϕ(x) dx = for ll continuous ϕ on [, b] with ϕ() = = ϕ(b). Then f(x) = on [, b]. Exercise Suppose f is continuous on [, b] nd tht f(x)ϕ (x) dx = for ll continuously differentible functions ϕ on [, b] with ϕ() = = ϕ(b). Then f(x) is constnt on [, b]. Exercise Suppose f : [, b] R is Riemnn integrble on [, b]. Show F (x) = R x f(t) dt stisfies the inequlity F (x) F (y) C x y for ll x [, b]. Then show F is uniformly continuous on [, b]. Clculte, justifying your steps, F (x) = R x f(t) dt, where t f(t) = < t 2 Exercise Show x f(x) = < x 2 is Riemnn integrble on [, 2], nd find F (x) = R x f(t) dt. Wht properties does F hve? Exercise Cler up the devstting Exmple.2 in Chpter one. A function f : [, ) R is clled uniformly Lipschitz  there exists M such tht f(x) f(y) M x y for ll x, y [, ). Now prove the following theorem. Theorem Suppose f : [, ) R is uniformly Lipschitz nd Z f(x) dx <. Then lim f(x) =. x Prove the theorem by proving the contrpositive. Tht is, negte lim f(x) = x, use the properties of f to show R f(x) dx =. Exercise Repet Problem 6.35 only ssume f is differentible on [, ) nd Z (f (x)) 2 dx <.
Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004
Advnced Clculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrls nd Integrbility Professor Dvid Levermore 17 October 2004 1. Definite Integrls In this section we revisit the definite integrl tht you were introduced to when
More informationThe Regulated and Riemann Integrals
Chpter 1 The Regulted nd Riemnn Integrls 1.1 Introduction We will consider severl different pproches to defining the definite integrl f(x) dx of function f(x). These definitions will ll ssign the sme vlue
More informationMath 554 Integration
Mth 554 Integrtion Hndout #9 4/12/96 Defn. A collection of n + 1 distinct points of the intervl [, b] P := {x 0 = < x 1 < < x i 1 < x i < < b =: x n } is clled prtition of the intervl. In this cse, we
More information7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions
7.2 Riemnn Integrble Functions Theorem 1. If f : [, b] R is step function, then f R[, b]. Theorem 2. If f : [, b] R is continuous on [, b], then f R[, b]. Theorem 3. If f : [, b] R is bounded nd continuous
More informationf(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all
3 Definite Integrl 3.1 Introduction In school one comes cross the definition of the integrl of rel vlued function defined on closed nd bounded intervl [, b] between the limits nd b, i.e., f(x)dx s the
More informationCalculus in R. Chapter Di erentiation
Chpter 3 Clculus in R 3.1 Di erentition Definition 3.1. Suppose U R is open. A function f : U! R is di erentible t x 2 U if there exists number m such tht lim y!0 pple f(x + y) f(x) my y =0. If f is di
More informationReview of Riemann Integral
1 Review of Riemnn Integrl In this chpter we review the definition of Riemnn integrl of bounded function f : [, b] R, nd point out its limittions so s to be convinced of the necessity of more generl integrl.
More informationUnit #9 : Definite Integral Properties; Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Unit #9 : Definite Integrl Properties; Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus Gols: Identify properties of definite integrls Define odd nd even functions, nd reltionship to integrl vlues Introduce the Fundmentl
More information1 The Riemann Integral
The Riemnn Integrl. An exmple leding to the notion of integrl (res) We know how to find (i.e. define) the re of rectngle (bse height), tringle ( (sum of res of tringles). But how do we find/define n re
More informationProperties of the Riemann Integral
Properties of the Riemnn Integrl Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University Februry 15, 2018 Outline 1 Some Infimum nd Supremum Properties 2
More informationPresentation Problems 5
Presenttion Problems 5 21355 A For these problems, ssume ll sets re subsets of R unless otherwise specified. 1. Let P nd Q be prtitions of [, b] such tht P Q. Then U(f, P ) U(f, Q) nd L(f, P ) L(f, Q).
More informationThe final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.
Mth 104: finl informtion The finl exm will tke plce on Fridy My 11th from 8m 11m in Evns room 60. The exm will cover ll prts of the course with equl weighting. It will cover Chpters 1 5, 7 15, 17 21, 23
More informationMATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 19: Riemann sums. Properties of integrals.
MATH 409 Advnced Clculus I Lecture 19: Riemnn sums. Properties of integrls. Drboux sums Let P = {x 0,x 1,...,x n } be prtition of n intervl [,b], where x 0 = < x 1 < < x n = b. Let f : [,b] R be bounded
More informationPrinciples of Real Analysis I Fall VI. Riemann Integration
21355 Principles of Rel Anlysis I Fll 2004 A. Definitions VI. Riemnn Integrtion Let, b R with < b be given. By prtition of [, b] we men finite set P [, b] with, b P. The set of ll prtitions of [, b] will
More informationHomework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.
Homework 4 (1) If f R[, b], show tht f 3 R[, b]. If f + (x) = mx{f(x), 0}, is f + R[, b]? Justify your nswer. (2) Let f be continuous function on [, b] tht is strictly positive except finitely mny points
More informationProperties of Integrals, Indefinite Integrals. Goals: Definition of the Definite Integral Integral Calculations using Antiderivatives
Block #6: Properties of Integrls, Indefinite Integrls Gols: Definition of the Definite Integrl Integrl Clcultions using Antiderivtives Properties of Integrls The Indefinite Integrl 1 Riemnn Sums  1 Riemnn
More informationThe HenstockKurzweil integral
fculteit Wiskunde en Ntuurwetenschppen The HenstockKurzweil integrl Bchelorthesis Mthemtics June 2014 Student: E. vn Dijk First supervisor: Dr. A.E. Sterk Second supervisor: Prof. dr. A. vn der Schft
More informationReview of Calculus, cont d
Jim Lmbers MAT 460 Fll Semester 200910 Lecture 3 Notes These notes correspond to Section 1.1 in the text. Review of Clculus, cont d Riemnn Sums nd the Definite Integrl There re mny cses in which some
More informationChapter 6. Riemann Integral
Introduction to Riemnn integrl Chpter 6. Riemnn Integrl WonKwng Prk Deprtment of Mthemtics, The College of Nturl Sciences Kookmin University Second semester, 2015 1 / 41 Introduction to Riemnn integrl
More informationINTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATION
INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATION 5.1 Ares nd Distnces Assume f(x) 0 on the intervl [, b]. Let A be the re under the grph of f(x). b We will obtin n pproximtion of A in the following three steps. STEP 1: Divide
More informationWeek 10: Riemann integral and its properties
Clculus nd Liner Algebr for Biomedicl Engineering Week 10: Riemnn integrl nd its properties H. Führ, Lehrstuhl A für Mthemtik, RWTH Achen, WS 07 Motivtion: Computing flow from flow rtes 1 We observe the
More informationWeek 7 Riemann Stieltjes Integration: Lectures 1921
Week 7 Riemnn Stieltjes Integrtion: Lectures 1921 Lecture 19 Throughout this section α will denote monotoniclly incresing function on n intervl [, b]. Let f be bounded function on [, b]. Let P = { = 0
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. III.1. Measurable functions. f 1 (
FUNDAMNTALS OF RAL ANALYSIS by Doğn Çömez III. MASURABL FUNCTIONS AND LBSGU INTGRAL III.. Mesurble functions Hving the Lebesgue mesure define, in this chpter, we will identify the collection of functions
More informationMath 61CM  Solutions to homework 9
Mth 61CM  Solutions to homework 9 Cédric De Groote November 30 th, 2018 Problem 1: Recll tht the left limit of function f t point c is defined s follows: lim f(x) = l x c if for ny > 0 there exists δ
More informationCalculus III Review Sheet
Clculus III Review Sheet 1 Definitions 1.1 Functions A function is f is incresing on n intervl if x y implies f(x) f(y), nd decresing if x y implies f(x) f(y). It is clled monotonic if it is either incresing
More informationMAT612REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL
MAT612REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL DR. RITU AGARWAL MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, JAIPUR, INDIA302017 Tble of Contents Contents Tble of Contents 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Prtition
More informationAppendix to Notes 8 (a)
Appendix to Notes 8 () 13 Comprison of the Riemnn nd Lebesgue integrls. Recll Let f : [, b] R be bounded. Let D be prtition of [, b] such tht Let D = { = x 0 < x 1
More informationW. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying
Vitli covers 1 Definition. A Vitli cover of set E R is set V of closed intervls with positive length so tht, for every δ > 0 nd every x E, there is some I V with λ(i ) < δ nd x I. 2 Lemm (Vitli covering)
More information7.2 The Definite Integral
7.2 The Definite Integrl the definite integrl In the previous section, it ws found tht if function f is continuous nd nonnegtive, then the re under the grph of f on [, b] is given by F (b) F (), where
More informationThe First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. If f(x) is continuous on [a, b] and F (x) is any antiderivative. f(x) dx = F (b) F (a).
The Fundmentl Theorems of Clculus Mth 4, Section 0, Spring 009 We now know enough bout definite integrls to give precise formultions of the Fundmentl Theorems of Clculus. We will lso look t some bsic emples
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation
Lecture 1: Introduction to integrtion theory nd bounded vrition Wht is this course bout? Integrtion theory. The first question you might hve is why there is nything you need to lern bout integrtion. You
More informationMAA 4212 Improper Integrals
Notes by Dvid Groisser, Copyright c 1995; revised 2002, 2009, 2014 MAA 4212 Improper Integrls The Riemnn integrl, while perfectly welldefined, is too restrictive for mny purposes; there re functions which
More informationMath 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions
Mth 360: A primitive integrl nd elementry functions D. DeTurck University of Pennsylvni October 16, 2017 D. DeTurck Mth 360 001 2017C: Integrl/functions 1 / 32 Setup for the integrl prtitions Definition:
More informationLecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)
Lecture 3 (5.3.2018) (trnslted nd slightly dpted from lecture notes by Mrtin Klzr) Riemnn integrl Now we define precisely the concept of the re, in prticulr, the re of figure U(, b, f) under the grph of
More informationRiemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)
Riemnn is the Mnn! (But Lebesgue my besgue to differ.) Leo Livshits My 2, 2008 1 For finite intervls in R We hve seen in clss tht every continuous function f : [, b] R hs the property tht for every ɛ >
More information1 The fundamental theorems of calculus.
The fundmentl theorems of clculus. The fundmentl theorems of clculus. Evluting definite integrls. The indefinite integrl new nme for ntiderivtive. Differentiting integrls. Tody we provide the connection
More informationMain topics for the First Midterm
Min topics for the First Midterm The Midterm will cover Section 1.8, Chpters 23, Sections 4.14.8, nd Sections 5.15.3 (essentilly ll of the mteril covered in clss). Be sure to know the results of the
More informationRiemann Sums and Riemann Integrals
Riemnn Sums nd Riemnn Integrls Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University August 26, 2013 Outline 1 Riemnn Sums 2 Riemnn Integrls 3 Properties
More informationLECTURE. INTEGRATION AND ANTIDERIVATIVE.
ANALYSIS FOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS LECTURE. INTEGRATION AND ANTIDERIVATIVE. ROTHSCHILD CAESARIA COURSE, 2015/6 1. Integrtion Historiclly, it ws the problem of computing res nd volumes, tht triggered development
More informationn f(x i ) x. i=1 In section 4.2, we defined the definite integral of f from x = a to x = b as n f(x i ) x; f(x) dx = lim i=1
The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus As we continue to study the re problem, let s think bck to wht we know bout computing res of regions enclosed by curves. If we wnt to find the re of the region below the
More informationRiemann Sums and Riemann Integrals
Riemnn Sums nd Riemnn Integrls Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University August 26, 203 Outline Riemnn Sums Riemnn Integrls Properties Abstrct
More informationLecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.
1 Introduction. Lecture 1. Functionl series. Pointwise nd uniform convergence. In this course we study mongst other things Fourier series. The Fourier series for periodic function f(x) with period 2π is
More informationF (x) dx = F (x)+c = u + C = du,
35. The Substitution Rule An indefinite integrl of the derivtive F (x) is the function F (x) itself. Let u = F (x), where u is new vrible defined s differentible function of x. Consider the differentil
More informationDefinite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU
Definite integrl Mthemtics FRDIS MENDELU Simon Fišnrová Brno 1 Motivtion  re under curve Suppose, for simplicity, tht y = f(x) is nonnegtive nd continuous function defined on [, b]. Wht is the re of the
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011
rxiv:1107.1996v1 [mth.ca] 11 Jul 2011 Existence nd computtion of Riemnn Stieltjes integrls through Riemnn integrls July, 2011 Rodrigo López Pouso Deprtmento de Análise Mtemátic Fcultde de Mtemátics, Universidde
More informationAdvanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015
Advnced Clculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor Dvid Levermore 11 December 2015 12. Sequences of Functions We now explore two notions of wht it mens for sequence of functions {f n
More informationIMPORTANT THEOREMS CHEAT SHEET
IMPORTANT THEOREMS CHEAT SHEET BY DOUGLAS DANE Howdy, I m Bronson s dog Dougls. Bronson is still complining bout the textbook so I thought if I kept list of the importnt results for you, he might stop.
More informationThe Banach algebra of functions of bounded variation and the pointwise Helly selection theorem
The Bnch lgebr of functions of bounded vrition nd the pointwise Helly selection theorem Jordn Bell jordn.bell@gmil.com Deprtment of Mthemtics, University of Toronto Jnury, 015 1 BV [, b] Let < b. For f
More informationReview on Integration (Secs ) Review: Sec Origins of Calculus. Riemann Sums. New functions from old ones.
Mth 20B Integrl Clculus Lecture Review on Integrtion (Secs. 5.  5.3) Remrks on the course. Slide Review: Sec. 5.5.3 Origins of Clculus. Riemnn Sums. New functions from old ones. A mthemticl description
More information11 An introduction to Riemann Integration
11 An introduction to Riemnn Integrtion The PROOFS of the stndrd lemms nd theorems concerning the Riemnn Integrl re NEB, nd you will not be sked to reproduce proofs of these in full in the exmintion in
More informationDefinite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU. Simona Fišnarová (Mendel University) Definite integral MENDELU 1 / 30
Definite integrl Mthemtics FRDIS MENDELU Simon Fišnrová (Mendel University) Definite integrl MENDELU / Motivtion  re under curve Suppose, for simplicity, tht y = f(x) is nonnegtive nd continuous function
More information1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove
This short collection of notes is intended to complement the textbook Anlisi Mtemtic 2 by Crl Mdern, published by Città Studi Editore, [M]. We refer to [M] for nottion nd the logicl stremline of the rguments.
More informationACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER /2019
ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS MATH00030 SEMESTER 208/209 DR. ANTHONY BROWN 7.. Introduction to Integrtion. 7. Integrl Clculus As ws the cse with the chpter on differentil
More informationMath 118: Honours Calculus II Winter, 2005 List of Theorems. L(P, f) U(Q, f). f exists for each ǫ > 0 there exists a partition P of [a, b] such that
Mth 118: Honours Clculus II Winter, 2005 List of Theorems Lemm 5.1 (Prtition Refinement): If P nd Q re prtitions of [, b] such tht Q P, then L(P, f) L(Q, f) U(Q, f) U(P, f). Lemm 5.2 (Upper Sums Bound
More informationMore Properties of the Riemann Integral
More Properties of the Riemnn Integrl Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologil Sienes nd Deprtment of Mthemtil Sienes Clemson University Februry 15, 2018 Outline More Riemnn Integrl Properties The Fundmentl
More informationAdvanced Calculus I (Math 4209) Martin Bohner
Advnced Clculus I (Mth 4209) Spring 2018 Lecture Notes Mrtin Bohner Version from My 4, 2018 Author ddress: Deprtment of Mthemtics nd Sttistics, Missouri University of Science nd Technology, Roll, Missouri
More informationChapters 4 & 5 Integrals & Applications
Contents Chpters 4 & 5 Integrls & Applictions Motivtion to Chpters 4 & 5 2 Chpter 4 3 Ares nd Distnces 3. VIDEO  Ares Under Functions............................................ 3.2 VIDEO  Applictions
More informationChapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?
Chpter 0. Wht is the Lebesgue integrl bout? The pln is to hve tutoril sheet ech week, most often on Fridy, (to be done during the clss) where you will try to get used to the ides introduced in the previous
More informationSOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set
SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 28 Nottion: N {, 2, 3,...}. (Tht is, N.. Let (X, M be mesurble spce with σfinite positive mesure µ. Prove tht there is finite positive mesure ν on (X, M such
More informationMath 1431 Section M TH 4:00 PM 6:00 PM Susan Wheeler Office Hours: Wed 6:00 7:00 PM Online ***NOTE LABS ARE MON AND WED
Mth 43 Section 4839 M TH 4: PM 6: PM Susn Wheeler swheeler@mth.uh.edu Office Hours: Wed 6: 7: PM Online ***NOTE LABS ARE MON AND WED t :3 PM to 3: pm ONLINE Approimting the re under curve given the type
More informationGoals: Determine how to calculate the area described by a function. Define the definite integral. Explore the relationship between the definite
Unit #8 : The Integrl Gols: Determine how to clculte the re described by function. Define the definite integrl. Eplore the reltionship between the definite integrl nd re. Eplore wys to estimte the definite
More information63. Representation of functions as power series Consider a power series. ( 1) n x 2n for all 1 < x < 1
3 9. SEQUENCES AND SERIES 63. Representtion of functions s power series Consider power series x 2 + x 4 x 6 + x 8 + = ( ) n x 2n It is geometric series with q = x 2 nd therefore it converges for ll q =
More informationA REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007
A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H Thoms Shores Deprtment of Mthemtics University of Nebrsk Spring 2007 Contents Rtes of Chnge nd Derivtives 1 Dierentils 4 Are nd Integrls 5 Multivrite Clculus
More informationf(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral
Improper Integrls Every time tht we hve evluted definite integrl such s f(x) dx, we hve mde two implicit ssumptions bout the integrl:. The intervl [, b] is finite, nd. f(x) is continuous on [, b]. If one
More informationChapter 6 Notes, Larson/Hostetler 3e
Contents 6. Antiderivtives nd the Rules of Integrtion.......................... 6. Are nd the Definite Integrl.................................. 6.. Are............................................ 6. Reimnn
More informationMA 124 January 18, Derivatives are. Integrals are.
MA 124 Jnury 18, 2018 Prof PB s oneminute introduction to clculus Derivtives re. Integrls re. In Clculus 1, we lern limits, derivtives, some pplictions of derivtives, indefinite integrls, definite integrls,
More informationTHE EXISTENCEUNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRSTORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.
THE EXISTENCEUNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRSTORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS RADON ROSBOROUGH https://intuitiveexplntionscom/picrdlindeloftheorem/ This document is proof of the existenceuniqueness theorem
More informationSYDE 112, LECTURES 3 & 4: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
SYDE 112, LECTURES & 4: The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus So fr we hve introduced two new concepts in this course: ntidifferentition nd Riemnn sums. It turns out tht these quntities re relted, but it is
More informationReview. April 12, Definition 1.2 (Closed Set). A set S is closed if it contains all of its limit points. S := S S
Review April 12, 2017 1 Definitions nd Some Theorems 1.1 Topology Definition 1.1 (Limit Point). Let S R nd x R. Then x is limit point of S if, for ll ɛ > 0, V ɛ (x) = (x ɛ, x + ɛ) contins n element s S
More informationReview of basic calculus
Review of bsic clculus This brief review reclls some of the most importnt concepts, definitions, nd theorems from bsic clculus. It is not intended to tech bsic clculus from scrtch. If ny of the items below
More informationMATH , Calculus 2, Fall 2018
MATH 362, 363 Clculus 2, Fll 28 The FUNdmentl Theorem of Clculus Sections 5.4 nd 5.5 This worksheet focuses on the most importnt theorem in clculus. In fct, the Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus (FTC is rgubly
More informationMATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 18: Darboux sums. The Riemann integral.
MATH 409 Advnced Clculus I Lecture 18: Drboux sums. The Riemnn integrl. Prtitions of n intervl Definition. A prtition of closed bounded intervl [, b] is finite subset P [,b] tht includes the endpoints
More informationOverview of Calculus I
Overview of Clculus I Prof. Jim Swift Northern Arizon University There re three key concepts in clculus: The limit, the derivtive, nd the integrl. You need to understnd the definitions of these three things,
More informationMath Advanced Calculus II
Mth 452  Advnced Clculus II Line Integrls nd Green s Theorem The min gol of this chpter is to prove Stoke s theorem, which is the multivrible version of the fundmentl theorem of clculus. We will be focused
More informationExam 2, Mathematics 4701, Section ETY6 6:05 pm 7:40 pm, March 31, 2016, IH1105 Instructor: Attila Máté 1
Exm, Mthemtics 471, Section ETY6 6:5 pm 7:4 pm, Mrch 1, 16, IH115 Instructor: Attil Máté 1 17 copies 1. ) Stte the usul sufficient condition for the fixedpoint itertion to converge when solving the eqution
More informationStuff You Need to Know From Calculus
Stuff You Need to Know From Clculus For the first time in the semester, the stuff we re doing is finlly going to look like clculus (with vector slnt, of course). This mens tht in order to succeed, you
More informationx = b a n x 2 e x dx. cdx = c(b a), where c is any constant. a b
CHAPTER 5. INTEGRALS 61 where nd x = b n x i = 1 (x i 1 + x i ) = midpoint of [x i 1, x i ]. Problem 168 (Exercise 1, pge 377). Use the Midpoint Rule with the n = 4 to pproximte 5 1 x e x dx. Some quick
More informationand that at t = 0 the object is at position 5. Find the position of the object at t = 2.
7.2 The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus 49 re mny, mny problems tht pper much different on the surfce but tht turn out to be the sme s these problems, in the sense tht when we try to pproimte solutions we
More informationMath& 152 Section Integration by Parts
Mth& 5 Section 7.  Integrtion by Prts Integrtion by prts is rule tht trnsforms the integrl of the product of two functions into other (idelly simpler) integrls. Recll from Clculus I tht given two differentible
More informationSections 5.2: The Definite Integral
Sections 5.2: The Definite Integrl In this section we shll formlize the ides from the lst section to functions in generl. We strt with forml definition.. The Definite Integrl Definition.. Suppose f(x)
More informationc n φ n (x), 0 < x < L, (1) n=1
SECTION : Fourier Series. MATH4. In section 4, we will study method clled Seprtion of Vribles for finding exct solutions to certin clss of prtil differentil equtions (PDEs. To do this, it will be necessry
More informationRiemann Integrals and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Riemnn Integrls nd the Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus Jmes K. Peterson Deprtment of Biologicl Sciences nd Deprtment of Mthemticl Sciences Clemson University September 16, 2013 Outline Grphing Riemnn Sums
More information1 The fundamental theorems of calculus.
The fundmentl theorems of clculus. The fundmentl theorems of clculus. Evluting definite integrls. The indefinite integrl new nme for ntiderivtive. Differentiting integrls. Theorem Suppose f is continuous
More informationThe Riemann Integral
Deprtment of Mthemtics King Sud University 20172018 Tble of contents 1 Antiderivtive Function nd Indefinite Integrls 2 3 4 5 Indefinite Integrls & Antiderivtive Function Definition Let f : I R be function
More informationODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution
Mth 22 Fll 213 Jerry Kzdn ODE: Existence nd Uniqueness of Solution The Fundmentl Theorem of Clculus tells us how to solve the ordinry differentil eqution (ODE) du = f(t) dt with initil condition u() =
More information1 Sets Functions and Relations Mathematical Induction Equivalence of Sets and Countability The Real Numbers...
Contents 1 Sets 1 1.1 Functions nd Reltions....................... 3 1.2 Mthemticl Induction....................... 5 1.3 Equivlence of Sets nd Countbility................ 6 1.4 The Rel Numbers..........................
More informationUNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE
UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE 1. Pointwise Convergence of Sequence Let E be set nd Y be metric spce. Consider functions f n : E Y for n = 1, 2,.... We sy tht the sequence
More informationDefinition of Continuity: The function f(x) is continuous at x = a if f(a) exists and lim
Mth 9 Course Summry/Study Guide Fll, 2005 [1] Limits Definition of Limit: We sy tht L is the limit of f(x) s x pproches if f(x) gets closer nd closer to L s x gets closer nd closer to. We write lim f(x)
More informationThe area under the graph of f and above the xaxis between a and b is denoted by. f(x) dx. π O
1 Section 5. The Definite Integrl Suppose tht function f is continuous nd positive over n intervl [, ]. y = f(x) x The re under the grph of f nd ove the xxis etween nd is denoted y f(x) dx nd clled the
More informationMath 1B, lecture 4: Error bounds for numerical methods
Mth B, lecture 4: Error bounds for numericl methods Nthn Pflueger 4 September 0 Introduction The five numericl methods descried in the previous lecture ll operte by the sme principle: they pproximte the
More information5.5 The Substitution Rule
5.5 The Substitution Rule Given the usefulness of the Fundmentl Theorem, we wnt some helpful methods for finding ntiderivtives. At the moment, if n ntiderivtive is not esily recognizble, then we re in
More informationImproper Integrals, and Differential Equations
Improper Integrls, nd Differentil Equtions October 22, 204 5.3 Improper Integrls Previously, we discussed how integrls correspond to res. More specificlly, we sid tht for function f(x), the region creted
More informationEuler, Ioachimescu and the trapezium rule. G.J.O. Jameson (Math. Gazette 96 (2012), )
Euler, Iochimescu nd the trpezium rule G.J.O. Jmeson (Mth. Gzette 96 (0), 36 4) The following results were estblished in recent Gzette rticle [, Theorems, 3, 4]. Given > 0 nd 0 < s
More informationFor a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral
Supplementry Notes for MM509 Topology II 2. The Riemnn Integrl Andrew Swnn For continuous function f : [; b]! R we wish to define the Riemnn integrl R b f (x) dx nd estblish some of its properties. This
More informationAbstract inner product spaces
WEEK 4 Abstrct inner product spces Definition An inner product spce is vector spce V over the rel field R equipped with rule for multiplying vectors, such tht the product of two vectors is sclr, nd the
More informationImproper Integrals. Type I Improper Integrals How do we evaluate an integral such as
Improper Integrls Two different types of integrls cn qulify s improper. The first type of improper integrl (which we will refer to s Type I) involves evluting n integrl over n infinite region. In the grph
More information4.4 Areas, Integrals and Antiderivatives
. res, integrls nd ntiderivtives 333. Ares, Integrls nd Antiderivtives This section explores properties of functions defined s res nd exmines some connections mong res, integrls nd ntiderivtives. In order
More informationThis is a short summary of Lebesgue integration theory, which will be used in the course.
3 Chpter 0 ntegrtion theory This is short summry of Lebesgue integrtion theory, which will be used in the course. Fct 0.1. Some subsets (= delmängder E R = (, re mesurble (= mätbr in the Lebesgue sense,
More informationa n = 1 58 a n+1 1 = 57a n + 1 a n = 56(a n 1) 57 so 0 a n+1 1, and the required result is true, by induction.
MAS221(21617) Exm Solutions 1. (i) A is () bounded bove if there exists K R so tht K for ll A ; (b) it is bounded below if there exists L R so tht L for ll A. e.g. the set { n; n N} is bounded bove (by
More informationIntegrals  Motivation
Integrls  Motivtion When we looked t function s rte of chnge If f(x) is liner, the nswer is esy slope If f(x) is nonliner, we hd to work hrd limits derivtive A relted question is the re under f(x) (but
More information