arxiv:math/ v3 [math.ac] 27 Sep 2004

Transcription

1 September 8, 2004 Never shoot, Never hit arxiv:math/ v3 [math.ac] 27 Sep 2004 ON THE JACOBIAN CONJECTURE SUSUMU ODA Department of Mathematics Faculty of Education Kochi University Akebono-cho, Kochi JAPAN Abstract. The Jacobian Conjecture can be generalized and is established : Let S be a polynomial ring over a field of characteristic zero in finitely may variables. Let T be an unramified, finitely generated extension of S with T = k. Then T = S. The Jacobian Conjecture is the following : If f 1,, f n be elements in a polynomial ring k[x 1,, X n ] over a field k of characteristic zero such that det( f i / X j ) is a nonzero constant, then k[f 1,, f n ] = k[x 1,, X n ]. To prove the Jacobian Conjecture, we treat a more general case. More precisely, we show the following result: Let k be a algebraically closed field of charactersitic zero, let S be a polynomial ring over k of finite variables and let T be an unramified, finitely generated extension domain of S with T = k. Then T = S Mathematics Subject Classification : Primary 13C25, Secondary 15A18 Key words and phrases: unramified, etale, polynomial rings 1

2 2 SUSUMU ODA Throughout this paper, all fields, rings and algebras are assumed to be commutative with unity. For a ring R, R denotes the set of units of R and K(R) the total quotient ring. Spec(R) denotes the affine scheme defined by R or merely the set of all prime ideals of R and Ht 1 (R) denotes the set of all prime ideals of height one. Our general reference for unexplained technical terms is [9]. 1. Preliminaries Definition. Let f : A B be a ring-homomorphism of finite type of locally Noetherian rings. The homomorphism f is called unramified if PB P = (P A)B P and k(p) = B P /PB P is a finite separable field extension of k(p P) = A P P /(P A)A P A for all prime ideal P of B. The homomorphism f is called etale if f is unramified and flat. Proposition 1.1. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero and let B be a polynomial ring k[y 1,...,Y n ]. Let L be a finite Galois extension of the quotient field of B and let D be an integral closure of B in L. If D is etale over B then D = B. Proof. We may assume that k = C, the field of complex numbers by Lefschetz Principle (cf.[4, p.290]). The extension D/B is etale and finite, and so Max(D) Max(B) = C n is a (connected) covering. Since C n is simply connected, we have D = B. (An algebraic proof of the simple connectivity of k n is seen in [14].) Recall the following well-known results, which are required for proving Theorem 2.1 below. Lemma A ([9,(21.D)]). Let (A, m, k) and (B, n, k ) be Noetherian local rings and

3 On The Jacobian Conjecture 3 φ : A B a local homomorphism (i.e., φ(m) n ). If dim B = dim A+dim B A k holds and if A and B A k = B/mB are regular, then B is flat over A and regular. Proof. If { x 1,...,x r } is a regular system of parameters of A and if y 1,...,y s n are such that their images form a regular system of parameters of B/mB, then { ϕ(x 1 ),...,ϕ(x r ), y 1,...,y s } generates n. and r + s = dim B. Hence B is regular. To show flatness, we have only to prove Tor A 1 (k, B) = 0. The Koszul complex K (x 1,...,x r ; A) is a free resolution of the A-module k. So we have Tor A 1 (k, B) = H 1(K (x 1,...,x r ; A) A B) = H 1 (K (x 1,..., x r ; B)). Since the sequence ϕ(x 1 ),...,ϕ(x r ) is a part of a regular system of parameters of B, it is a B-regular sequence. Thus H i (K (x 1,...,x r ; B)) = 0 for all i > 0. Corollary A.1. Let k be a field and let R = k[x 1,...,X n ] be a polynomial ring. Let S be a finitely generated ring-extension of R. If S is unramified over R, then S is etale over R. Proof. We have only to show that S is flat over R. Take P Spec(S) and put p = P R. Then R p S P is a local homomorphism. Since S P is unramified over R p, we have dim S P = dim R p and S P Rp k(p) = S P /PS P = k(p) is a field. So by Lemma A, S P is flat over R p. Therefore S is flat over R by [5,p.91]. Example. Let k be a field of characteristic p > 0 and let S ( = k[x] ) be a polynomial f ring. Let f = X + X p S. Then the Jacobian matrix is invertible. So X k[f] k[x] is finite and unramified. Thus k[f] k[x] is etale by Corollary A.1. Indeed, it is easy to see that k[x] = k[f] Xk[f] X p 1 k[f] as a k[f]-module, which implies that k[x] is free over k[f]. Lemma B ([2,Chap.V, Theorem 5.1]). Let A be a Noetherian ring and B an A-algebra of finite type. If B is flat over A, then the canonical map Spec(B) Spec(A) is an open map. Lemma C ([10, p.51,theorem 3 ]). Let k be a field and let V be a k-affine variety defined by a k-affine ring R (which means a finitely generated algebra over

4 4 SUSUMU ODA k) and let F be a closed subset of V defined by an ideal I of R. If the variety V \ F is k-affine, then F is pure of codimension one. Lemma D([16,Theorem 9, 4, Chap.V]). Let k be a field, let R be a k-affine domain and let L be a finite algebraic field extension of K(R). Let R L denote the integral closure of R in L. Then R L is a module finite type over R. Lemma E([12, Ch.IV,Corollary 2])(Zariski s Main Theorem). Let A be an integral domain and let B be an A-algebra of finite type which is quasi-finite over A. Let A be the integral closure of A in B. Then the canonical morphism Spec(B) Spec(A) is an open immersion. Lemma F([3, Corollary 7.10]). Let k be a field, A a finitely generated k- algebra. Let M be a maximal ideal of A. Then the field A/M is a finite algebraic extension of k. In particular, if k is algebraically closed then A/M = k. Lemma G ([2,VI(3.5)]). Let f : A B and g : B C be ring-homomorphisms of finite type of locally Noetherian rings. (i) Any immersion a f : Spec(B) Spec(A) is unramified. (ii) The composition g f of unramified homomorphims f and g is unramified. (iii) If g f is an unramified homomorphism, then g is an unramified homomorphism. Lemma H ([2,VI(4.7)]). Let f : A B and g : B C be ring-homomorphisms of finite type of locally Noetherian rings. B (resp. C) is considered to be an A- algebra by f (resp. g f). (i) The composition g f of etale homomorphisms f and g is etale. (ii) Any base-extension f A 1 C : C = A A C B A C of an etale homomorphism f is etale. (iii) If g f : A B C is an etale homomorphism and if f is an unramified homomorphism, then g is etale.

5 On The Jacobian Conjecture 5 Corollary H.1. Let R be a ring and let B C and D E be etale R- algebra homomorphisms. Then the homomorphism B R D C R E is an etale homomorphism. Proof. The homomorphism B R D B R E C R E is given by copmposite of base-extensions. So by Lemma H, this composite homomorphism is etale. Lemma I ([11,(41.1)])(Purity of branch loci). Let R be a regular ring and let A be a normal ring which is a finite extension of R. Assume that K(A) is finite separable extension of K(R). If A P is unramified over R P R for all P Ht 1 (A)(= {Q Spec(A) ht(q) = 1}), then A is unramified over R. Lemma J ([17,(1.3.10)]). Let S be a scheme and let (X, f) and (Y, g) be S-schemes. For a scheme Z, Z denotes its underlying topological space. Let p : X S Y X and q : X S Y Y be projections. Then the map of topological spaces p S q : X S Y X S Y is a surjective map. Proof. Let x X, y Y be points such that f(x) = g(y) = s S. Then the residue class fields k(x) and k(y) are the extension-fields of k(s). Let K denote an extension-field of k(s) containing two fields which are isomorphic to k(x) and k(y). Such field K is certainly exists. For instance, we have only to consider the field k(x) k(s) k(y)/m, where m is a maximal ideal of k(x) k(s) k(y). Let x K : i x Spec(K) Spec(k(x)) Spec(O X,x ) X, where ix is the canonical immersion as topological spaces and the identity i x (O X) = O X,x as structure sheaves. Let y K be the one similarly defined as x K. By the construction of x K, y K, we have f x K = g y K. Thus there exists a S-morphism z K : Spec(K) X S Y such that p z K = x K, q z K = y K. Since Spec(K) consists of a single point, putting its image = z, we have p(z) = x, q(z) = y. Therefore the map of topological spaces p S q : X S Y X S Y is surjective.

6 6 SUSUMU ODA Remark 1.1. Let k be a field, let S = k[y 1,..., Y n ] be a polynomial ring over k and let L be a finite Galois extension field of K(S) with Galois group G = { σ 1 = 1, σ 2,...,σ l }. Let T be a finitely generated, flat extension of S contained in L with T = k. Put T σ i = σ i (T) L. Let T := T σ 1 S S T σ l, which has the natural T-algebra structure by T S S S S S T σ 1 S S T σ l = T. Take p Ht 1 (S). Then p is a principal ideal of S and so pt σi T σ i ( σ i G) because T = k. Let P be a minimal prime divisor of pt. Then P σ i Spec(T σ i ) and P σ i S = p because S T is flat. Then the element (P σ 1,...,P σ l ) Spec(T σ 1 ) Spec(S) Spec(S) Spec(T σ l ) is an image of some element Q in Spec( T) because the canonical map Spec( T) = Spec(T σ 1 S S T σ l ) Spec(T σ 1 ) Spec(S) Spec(S) Spec(T σ l ) is surjective by Lemma J. The map Spec( T) projection Spec(T) Spec(S) yields that Q T = P and P S = p. Thus Q S = p. Therefore p T T for all p Ht 1 (S). Lemma K. Let S be an integral domain and let R, R 1,..., R n be extensions of S. Let E be the integral closure of S in R and let E i be the integral closure of S in R i. If R φ φ E R 1 R n is an S-isomorphism, then E E 1 E n. Proof. Put E 0 = E 1 E n R 1 R n. Let α = (a 1,...,a n ) E 0. Then (0,...,0, a i, 0,..., 0) (1 i n) is integral over S, so that α = (a 1, 0,...,0) + (0, a 2, 0,..., 0) + + (0,...,0, a n ) is integral over S. Hence φ 1 (α) E. It follows that φ(e) E 0. Conversely, take β E R φ R 1 R n. Then φ(β) = (b 1,...,b n ), (b i R i ). Since β is integral over S, so is φ(β), which implies that each b i (1 i n) is integral over S, that is, b i E i (1 i n). Thus φ E φ(e) E 0. Therefore E E 1 E n.

7 On The Jacobian Conjecture 7 The following is our main theorem. 2. Main Result Theorem 2.1. Let k be a algebraically closed field of charactersitic zero, let S be a polynomial ring over k of finitely many variables and let T be an unramified, finitely generated extension domain of S with T = k. Then T = S. Proof. (1) Let K( ) denote the quotient field of ( ). There exists a minimal finite Galois extension L of K(S) containing T because K(T)/K(S) is a finite algebraic extension. Let G be the Galois group G(L/K(S)). Put G = { σ 1 = 1, σ 2,...,σ l }, where σ i σ j if i j. Put T σ := σ(t) ( σ G) and put D := S[ σ G T σ ] = S[ l i=1 T σ i ] L. Then K(D) = L since L is a minimal Galois extension of K(S) containing K(T). Since Spec(T) Spec(S) is etale (Corollary A.1 or [4, p.296]), so is Spec(T σ ) Spec(S) for each σ G. Put T # := T σ 1 S S T σ l, which has the natural T-algebra structure by T = T S S S S S T σ 1 S S T σ l = T #. This homomorphism is etale by Corollary H.1 because S T is etale. Let ψ : T # = T σ 1 S S T σ l L be an S-algebra homomorphism sending a σ 1 1 a σ l l to a σ 1 1 a σ l l (a i T). Then D = Im(ψ ) = S[ σ G T σ ] L. Since Spec(T) Spec(S) is etale, the canonical morphism Spec(T # ) = Spec(T σ 1 S S T σ l ) Spec(T σ 1 S S S S S) = Spec(T) is etale, and the natural surjection ψ : T # = T σ 1 S S T σ l D is unramified by Lemma G(i)(or [2,VI(3.5)]). So [T D] = [T T # D] is unramified by Lemma G(ii) because etale is flat and unramified. Moreover S T D is also unramified. Since T and D are unramified over S, both T and D are etale over S and both T and D are regular by Corollary A.1. Let I := Kerψ. So a ψ : Spec(D) = V (I) Spec(T # ) is a closed immersion. Since [T T # D] = [T D] is etale, so is ψ : T # D by Lemma H(iii)

8 8 SUSUMU ODA (or [2,VI(4.7)]). It follows that Spec(D) Spec(T # ) is a closed immersion and an open map because a flat morphism is an open map by Lemma B. Thus Spec(D) = V (I) Spec(T # ) is a connected component of Spec(T # ). So we have seen that the natural S-homomorphism T T # D is etale and that Spec(D) is a connected component of Spec(T # ). Note that T # is reduced because T # is unramified over S, and that dims = dim T = dim D because S, T and D are all k-affine domains with the same transcendence degree over k. Let (0) = s i=1 P i be an irredundant primary decomposition in T #. Since T T # is flat, the GD-theorem [9,(5.D)](or Lemma B) holds for this homomorphism T T #. In the decomposition (0) = s i=1 P i, each P i is a minimal prime divisor of (0), so we have T P i = (0) for all i = 1,..., s. Note that S T σ i is unramified and hence that T # is reduced. The P i s are all prime ideals of T #. Note that I is a prime ideal of T # and that dims = dim T = dim T σ = dim D for each σ G. Thus there exists j, say j = 1, such that I = P 1. In this case, P 1 + s i=2 P i = T # and T # /P 1 = D L as T-algebra. Note that T is considered to be a subring of T # by the canonical injective homomorphisms i : T = T S S S S S T # and that [T T # T # /P 1 = D] = [T D]. Putting C = T # / s i=2 P i, we have T # Φ T # /P 1 T # / s i=2 P i = D C. The ring D is considered a T-algebra naturally and D = T T # /P 1. Similarly we can see that P i +P j = T # for any i j. So consider T # /P j instead of D, we have a direct product decomposition: Φ : T # = T # /P 1 T # /P s. Note that Φ is a T-algebra homomorphism and that each T # /P i is regular (and hence normal). T (2) Now we claim that ad D ( a S \ S ) (#). Note first that for all p Ht 1 (S), pt T by because p is principal and = k, and hence that pt σ T σ for all σ G. Thus pt # T # for all p Ht 1 (S) by Remark 1.1. Since S T # is flat (see (1)), any non-zeto element of S is not a zero-divisor on T #. Moreover we may assume that s 2. In fact, if not then T # = D, and trivially ad D.

9 On The Jacobian Conjecture 9 Suppose that a S is a prime element and that ad = D. Put p = as. Then at # +P 1 = T # and P 2 P s = T # (P 2 P s ) = (at # +P 1 )(P 2 P s ) = ap 2 P s because P 1 P s = (0). That is, ap 2 P s = P 2 P s ( ). Let E # be the integral closure of S in T #. Then Spec(T # ) Spec(E # ) is an open immersion by Lemma E. Since T # = T # /P 1 T # /P s, we have E # = s E # 1 E # s by Lemma K, where E # i is the integral closure of S in K(T # /P i ) (and hence in T # /P i ) (1 i s). Since E # /(P i E # ) is integral over S, we have E # /(P i E # ) E # i (1 i s). Consider the canonical S- homomorphism E # i E E # # /(P 1 E # ) E # /(P s E # ). Then Ker(i E #) = P 1 P s E # = (0), which shows that i E # is injective. It is easy to see that E # i E E # # /(P 1 E # ) E # /(P s E # ) E # 1 E s # is the S- isomorphism Φ E #. Thus E # i = E # /(P i E # ) (1 i s). Hence E # Φ E# E # /(P 1 E # ) E # /(P s E # ). So (P i E # ) + (P j E # ) = E # for i j, and ae # P i = a(e # P i ) (1 i s) because a is not a zero-divisor on T #. For each i, E # /(P i E # ) is a finitely generated S-module by Lemma D, so that E # is finite over S. From ( ), we have (P 2 E # ) (P s E # ) = (P 2 E # ) (P s E # ) = P 2 P s E # = (P 2 P s ) E # = a(p 2 P s ) E # ae # (P 2 P s ) E # = ae # ((P 2 E # ) (P s E # )) = a((p 2 E # ) (P s E # )) = a(p 2 E # ) (P s E # ) (P 2 E # ) (P s E # ). Thus we have (P 2 E # ) (P s E # ) = a((p 2 E # ) (P s E # )). Since E # is a finite S-module, each P i E # (2 i s) is a finite S-module. Hence there existe b S such that (1 + ab)(p 2 E # ) (P s E # ) = 0. So since (1 + ab)(p 2 E # ) (P s E # ) P 1 E # and 1 + ab P 1, we have P i E # P 1 E # (2 i s). Since these are of height zero, P i E # = P 1 E #, which is a contradiction. Hence (#) has been proved. (3) Let E be the integral closure of S in L. Then E D because D is regular (hence normal) and E is an k-affine domain (Lemma D). For any σ

10 10 SUSUMU ODA G = G(L/K(S)), E σ D because E σ is integral over S and D is normal with K(E) = L. Hence E σ = E for any σ G. Note that both D and E have the quotient field L. Zarisiki s Main Theorem(Lemma E) yields the decomposition: i Spec(D) Spec(E) Spec(S), where i is an open immersion and π is integral(finite). We identify Spec(D) Spec(E) as open subset and D P = E P E (P Spec(D)). Let Q Ht 1 (E) with Q S = p = as. Then Q is a prime divisor of ae. Since ad D by (#) in (2), there exists P Ht 1 (D) such that P S = p. Hence there exists σ G such that Q = (P E) σ becasue any minimal divisor of ae is (P E) σ for some σ G ([9,(5.E)]), noting that E is a Galois extension of S. Since D P = E P E is unramified over S P S = S p, E Q = E (P E) σ = E(P E) is unramified over S p. Hence E is unramified over S by Lemma I. By Corollary A.1, E is finite etale over S. So Proposition 1.1 implies that E = S. In particular, L = K(D) = K(E) = K(S) and hence K(T) = K(S). Since S T is birational etale, Spec(T) Spec(S) is an open immersion by Lemma E. Let J be an ideal of S such that V (J) = Spec(S) \ Spec(T). Suppose that J S. Then V (J) is pure of codimension one by Lemma C. Hence J is a principal ideal as because S is a UFD. Since JT = at = T, a is a unit in T. But T = k implies that a k and hence that J = S, a contradiction. Hence V (J) =, that is, T = S. Q.E.D. π 3. The Jacobian Conjecture The Jacobian conjecture has been settled affirmatively in several cases. For example, Case(1) k(x 1,...,X n ) is a Galois extension of k(f 1,...,f n ) (cf. [4],[6] and [15]); Case(2) deg f i 2 for all i (cf. [13] and [14]); Case(3) k[x 1,...,X n ] is integral over k[f 1,...,f n ]. (cf. [4]). A general reference for the Jacobian Conjecture is [4].

11 On The Jacobian Conjecture 11 Remark 3.1. (1) In order to prove Theorem 3.2, we have only to show that the inclusion k[f 1,...,f n ] k[x 1,...,X n ] is surjective. For this it suffices that k [f 1,...,f n ] k [X 1,...,X n ] is surjective, where k denotes an algebraic closure of k. Indeed, once we proved k [f 1,...,f n ] = k [X 1,..., X n ], we can write for each i = 1,...,n: X i = F i (f 1,...,f n ), where F i (Y 1,...,Y n ) k [Y 1,...,Y n ], a polynomial ring in Y i. Let L be an intermediate field between k and k which contains all the coefficients of F i and is a finite Galois extension of k. Let G = G(L/k) be its Galois group and put m = #G. Then G acts on a polynomial ring L[X 1,...,X n ] such that X g i = X i for all i and all g G that is, G acts on coefficients of an element in L[X 1,...,X n ]. Hence mx i = g G X g i = g G F g i (fg 1,...,fg n ) = F g i (f 1,..., f n ). g G Since g G F g i (Y 1,...,Y n ) k[y 1,...,Y n ], it follows that g G F g i (f 1,...,f n ) k[f 1,...,f n ]. Therefore X i k[f 1,..., f n ] because L has a characteristic zero. So we may assume that k is algebraically closed. (2) Let k be a field, let k[x 1,...,X ( n ] denote ) a polynomial ring and let f 1,...,f n fi k[x 1,...,X n ]. If the Jacobian det k (= k \(0)), then the k[x 1,...,X n ] X i is unramified over the subring k[f 1,...,f n ]. Consequently f 1,...,f n is algebraically independent over k. In fact, put T = k[x 1,...,X n ] and S = k[f 1,...,f n ]( T). We have an exact sequence by [9, (26.H)] : v Ω S/k S T Ω T/k Ω T/S 0, where n f i v(df i 1) = dx j (1 i n). X j=1 j ( ) fi So det k implies that v is an isomorphism. Thus Ω T/S = 0 and hence X j T is unramified over S by [2, VI,(3.3)] or [9]. Moreover K(T) is algebraic over K(S), which means that f 1,..., f n are algebraically independent over k.

12 12 SUSUMU ODA As a result of Theorem 2.1, we have the following. Theorem 3.2 (The Jacobian Conjecture). Let k be a field of characteristic zero, let k[x 1,..., X n ] be a polynomial ring over k, and let f 1,..., f n be elements in k[x 1,...,X n ]. If the Jacobian matrix ( f i / X j ) is invertible, then k[x 1,...,X n ] = k[f 1,...,f n ]. 4. Generalization of The Jacobian Conjecture The Jacobian Conjecture (Theorem 3.2) can be generalized as follows. Theorem 4.1. Let A be an integral domain whose quotient field K(A) is of characteristic zero. Let f 1,...,f n be elements of a polynomial ring A[X 1,...,X n ] such that the Jacobian determinant det( f i / X j ) is a unit in A. Then A[X 1,...,X n ] = A[f 1,...,f n ]. Proof. It suffices to prove X 1,...,X n A[f 1,...,f n ]. We have K(A)[X 1,...,X n ] = K(A)[f 1,...,f n ] by Theorem 3.2. Hence X 1 = c i1 i n f i 1 1 fn in with c i1 i n K(A). If we set f i = a i1 X a in X n + (higher degree terms), a ij A, then the assumption implies that the determinant of a matrix (a ij ) is a unit in A. Let Y i = a i1 X a in X n (1 i n). Then A[X 1,...,X n ] = A[Y 1,...,Y n ] and f i = Y i + (higher degree terms). So to prove the assertion, we can assume that without loss of generality the linear parts of f 1,...,f n are X 1,...,X n, respectively. Now we introduce a linear order in the set {(i 1,..., i n ) i k Z} of lattice points in R n (where R denotes the field of real numbers) in the way : (i 1,...,i n ) > (j 1,..., j n ) if (1) i i n > j j n or (2) i i k > j j k and i i k+1 = j j k+1,......, i i n = j j n. We shall show that every c i1...i n is in A by induction on the linear

13 On The Jacobian Conjecture 13 order just defined. Assume that every c j1...j n with (j 1,...,j n ) < (i 1,...,i n ) is in A. Then the coefficients of the polynomial cj1 j n f j 1 1 fjn n are in A, where the summation ranges over (j 1,...,j n ) (i 1,..., i n ). In this polynomial, the term X i 1 1 X in n appears once with the coefficient c i 1...i n. Hence c i1...i n must be an element of A. So X 1 is in A[f 1,...,f n ]. Similarly X 2,...,X n are in A[f 1,..., f n ] and the assertion is proved completely. Corollary 4.2. (Keller s Problem) Let f 1,...,f n be elements of a polynomial ring Z[X 1,...,X n ] over Z, the ring of integers. If the Jacobian determinant det( f i / X j ) is equal to either ±1, then Z[X 1,...,X n ] = Z[f 1,...,f n ]. References [1] S.Abhyankar, Expansion technique in algebraic geometry, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Springer-Verlag (1977). [2] A.Altman and S.Kleiman, Introduction to Grothendieck duality theory, Lecture Notes in Math. 146, Springer-Verlag (1970). [3] M.F.Atiyah and L.G.MacDonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley, London (1969). [4] H.Bass, E.H.Connel and D.Wright, The Jacobian conjecture, Bull. A.M.S., 7(2) (1982), [5] N.Bourbaki, Commutative Algebra, translated from the French, Herman, Paris; Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1972). [6] L.A.Campbell, A condition for a polynomial map to be invertible, Math. Ann., 205 (1973), [7] E.Kunz, Introduction to Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Birkhauser (1985). [8] O.H.Keller, Gamze Cremona-Transformationen, Monatsheft fur Math. und Phys., Vol. 47 (1939), [9] H.Matsumura, Commutative Algebra, Benjamin, New York (1970). [10] M.Nagata, Lectures on The Fourteenth Problem of Hilbert, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay (1965). [11] M.Nagata, Local Rings, Interscience (1962). [12] M.Raynaud, Anneaux Locaux Henséliens, Lecture Notes in Math. 169, Springer-Verlag (1970). [13] S.Oda and K.Yoshida, A short proof of the Jacobian conjecture in the case of degree 2, C.R. Math. Rep., Acad. Sci. Canada, Vol.V (1983), [14] S.Wang, On the Jacobian conjecture, J. Algebra 65 (1980), [15] D.Wright, On the Jacobian conjecture, Illinois J. Math., 25 (1981), [16] O.Zariski and P.Samuel, Commutative Algebra, Vol. I GTM 28, Springer-Verlag (1979). [17] M.Nagata, M.Miyanish and M.Maruyama : Abstract Algebraic Geometry, (in Japanese), Kyoritsu-shuppan (1972).