Joint work with Milen Yakimov. Kent Vashaw. November 19, Louisiana State University Prime Spectra of 2-Categories.

Transcription

1 Joint work with Milen Yakimov Louisiana State University November 19, 2016

2 Overview 1 2 3

3 A 2-category is a category enriched over the category small categories. So a 2-category T has: Objects, denoted by A 1, A 2 etc; 1-morphisms between objects, denoted f, g, h, etc; set 1-morphisms from A 1 to A 2 denoted T (A 1, A 2 ); 2-morphisms between 1-morphisms, denoted α, β, γ, etc; set 2-morphisms from f to g denoted T (f, g).

4 Composition 1-morphisms: f g A 1 A2 A3. Vertical composition 2-morphisms α β: f α A 1 A 2 g β h Horizontal composition 2-morphisms α 2 α 1 : f 1 f 2 A 1 α 1 A 2 α 2 A 3 g 1 g 2

5 (α 1 β 1 ) (α 2 β 2 ) = (α 1 α 2 ) (β 1 β 2 ): f 1 f 2 α 1 A 1 g 1 A 2 A 2 g 2 A 3 β 1 h 1 h 2 f 1 f 2 α 2 β 2 A 1 A 2 A 3 g 1 g 2 A 1 A 2 A 3 α 1 α 2 g 1 g 2 β 1 β 2 h 1 h 2

6 Exact categories A 1-category is called exact if: It is additive; It has a set distinguished short exact sequences A 1 A 2 A 3. that obey some axioms.

7 Exact categories Some exact 1-categories: An additive category with short exact sequences defined by A 1 A 1 A 3 A 3 ; Abelian categories with traditional short exact sequences (ker g = im f ); Full subcategories abelian categories closed under extension. A 2-category T is exact if each set T (A, B) is itself an exact 1-category.

8 Grothendieck group Suppose C is an exact 1-category. Then the Grothendieck group C, denoted K 0 (C), is defined by: Take the free abelian group on objects C; For every exact sequence 0 A 1 A 2 A 3 0, quotient by the relation [A 1 ] + [A 3 ] = [A 2 ].

9 Grothendieck group Suppose T is an exact 2-category. Then the Grothendieck group T, denoted K 0 (T ) is defined as the 1-category with: Objects the same as T ; Set morphisms from X to Y given by K 0 (T (X, Y )), the Grothendieck group the 1-category T (X, Y ). Composition morphisms induced from composition morphisms in T.

10 Positive part the Grothendieck group The positive part the Grothendieck group an exact 1-category C, denoted K 0 (C) +, is defined as the subset K 0 (C) forming a monoid under addition generated by the indecomposable objects. In other words, while the Grothendieck group has all elements the form λ i [b i ], λ i Z, i the positive part the Grothendieck group has elements the form λ i [b i ], λ i N. i

11 Positive part the Grothendieck group The positive part the Grothendieck group an exact 2-category T, denoted K 0 (T ) +, has the same objects as T, with hom spaces K 0 (T ) + (X, Y ) defined by K 0 (T (X, Y )) +.

12 Strong categorification Let A an algebra with orthogonal idempotents e i with 1 = e 1 + e e n. A = e i Ae j. Consider A as a category: an object for each e i, set morphisms from i to j given by e i Ae j. Composition morphisms given by multiplication.

13 Strong categorification T view as an algebra K 0 (T ) A

14 Strong categorification We call B + a Z + -ring if B + has a basis (as a monoid) {b i } with relations b i b j = m k i,j b k where all coefficients are positive. Elements are all positive linear combinations basis elements, multiplication is extended from basis elements. So we can view Grothendieck groups 2-categories as Z-algebras, and positive Grothendieck groups as Z + -rings.

15 Ideals Let T be an exact 2-category where composition 1-morphisms is an exact bifunctor. We call I a thick ideal T if: I is a full subcategory T such that if in T (X, Y ) we have an exact sequence 1-morphisms 0 f 1 f 2 f 3 0, then f 2 is in I if and only if f 1 and f 2 are in I; I is an ideal: if f (X, Y ) is I and g T (Y, Z) then g f I; and if h T (W, X ) then f h I.

16 Ideals Suppose M is any subset 1-morphisms and 2-morphisms a 2-category T. Then we define the thick ideal generated by M, denoted M, to be the smallest thick ideal that contains M, which is the intersection all thick ideals containing M. Suppose B + is a Z + -ring. Then I B + is a thick ideal if a + b is in I if and only if a and b are in I, and we also have that if i is in I, then ai and ia are in I for every a B +.

17 Prime and completely prime ideals We call P a prime T if P is a thick ideal T such that if I and J are thick ideals in T, then if I J P, then either I P or J P. We call I completely prime if it is a thick ideal such that f g I implies either f I or g I. The set all primes P a 2-category T is called the spectrum T and is denoted Spec(T ).

18 Prime and completely prime ideals Suppose B + is a Z + -ring. Then we call P a prime if P is a thick ideal, and IJ P implies I or J is in P for all thick ideals I and J.

19 General results We obtain many results with respect to Spec(T ) that correspond to the prime noncommutative rings. Theorem A thick ideal P is prime if and only if: for all 1-morphisms m, n T with m T n P, either m P or n P. This corresponds to the result in the classical : Theorem An ideal P a ring R is prime if and only if: for all x, y R, if xry P then x or y is in P.

20 General results Theorem A thick ideal P is prime if and only if: for all thick ideals I, J properly containing P, we have that I J P. Theorem Every maximal thick ideal is prime. Theorem The spectrum an exact 2-category T is nonempty.

21 Relationship between the Lemma There is a bijection between Spec(T ) and Spec(K 0 (T ) + ). Let T be a categorification A. Consider the map φ : Spec(K 0 (T ) + ) Ideals(K 0 (T )) = A defined by φ(p) = {x y : x, y P}. Lemma In general, φ is not a map Spec(K 0 (T ) + ) Spec(K 0 (T )). Example: let H be a Hopf algebra, T be the category finitely generated H-modules. Then {0} is completely prime in K 0 (T ) + but not in K 0 (T ).

22 Relationship between the Spec(T ) φ Spec(K 0 (T ) + ) Ideals(K 0 (T )) Lemma Let T be a categorification A. If φ(p) is a prime in K 0 (T ), and P is the prime in T corresponding to P, then A/φ(P) is categorified by the Serre quotient T /P.

23 Coordinate rings Richardson Suppose G is a connected simple Lie group, B ± opposite Borel subgroups, and W the Weyl group. Then the Richardson variety u and w W is R u,w = B ub + B + wb + G/B +. Individually, B ub + and B + wb + are called Schubert cells.

24 Coordinate rings Richardson Theorem (Yakimov) G/B + = u w u,w W R u,w. Richardson : Representation (Richardson, Kazhdan, Lusztig, Postnikov); Total positivity (Lusztig); Poisson geometry (Brown, Goodearl, and Yakimov); Algebraic geometry (Knutson, Lam, Speyer); Cluster algebras (Leclerc).

25 Coordinate rings Richardson We restrict to u = 1 for simplicity. Let U q (n + ) denote the subset U q (g) generated by the E i Chevalley generators. Theorem (Yakimov) If T is a maximal torus G, then T acts on U q (n + ) via an algebra automorphism. The T -invariant prime ideals are parametrized by elements W. Theorem (Yakimov) U q (n + )/I w is a quantization the coordinate ring C[R 1,w ].

26 Coordinate rings Richardson We want to produce a categorification U q (n + )/I w. Theorem (Khovanov and Lauda) There exists a categorification U + U q (n + ) that is a tensor category modules KLR-algebras.

27 Current work Spec(U + ) φ Spec(U q (n + ) + ) Ideals(U q (n + )) We are currently working on showing that I w is a prime in Spec(U q (n + )) corresponding to a prime in Spec(U q (n + ) + ). Then if I w is the prime in Spec(U + ) corresponding to I w, then U + /I w will categorify quantization the coordinate ring the Richardson variety.

28 Conclusion Thanks for listening!