January 22, Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress Street Tucson, AZ Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor. Dear Mr.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "January 22, Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress Street Tucson, AZ Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor. Dear Mr."

Transcription

1 January 22, 2015 Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress Street Tucson, AZ Attn: Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor Dear Mr. Upchurch: In your letter dated January 16, 2015, you requested that Hudbay share any additional information with you that you should have in preparation of the SBA or SIR. Late last week, I was able to share water quality and water level data that we continue to collect and today I have shared the link for Ranid ( ) and Bat ( ) survey reports for the years indicated. As you know, Rosemont installed two of the surface water monitoring locations in Davidson and Barrel Canyons on private property. Over the past two years, monthly reports have been produced for these monitoring systems. Hudbay will continue to monitor these locations and produce these reports. It appears that the most interesting and useful information that these stations provide at this time is associated with the annual rainfall and flow data measured at the stations. I have attached the December 2013 and December 2014 reports but can share any of the other information if your specialists believe the other information would be useful. As you can see from the 2014 report, one of the stations has a monitoring probe that may be failing and we believe there may be a maintenance issue with the Davidson Canyon wells. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you would like to see some of the other station reports. Sincerely, Katherine Ann Arnold, P.E. Director of Environment Attachment: Water and Earth Technology December Reports for Monitoring Stations in Davidson and Barrel Canyons December 2013 and December 2014 cc: Mindy Vogel, Coronado National Forest Melissa Polm, SWCA Doc. No. 007/ Arizona Business Unit 2450 W. Ruthrauff Road, Suite 180 P.O. Box Tucson, Arizona hudbayminerals.com Page 1 of 1

2 Analysis of Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon Instrumentation Data December 1, 2013 December 31, 2013 Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company 1/6/2014 This document describes the environmental monitoring data that were received from the Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon instrumentation stations. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of data that were received and any QA/QC operations that were performed. Additional plots and reports can be developed upon request. However, detailed analysis of processes that drive changes in data values are beyond the scope of this task. Introduction During December 2012, Water and Earth Technologies, Inc. (WET) staff installed two combined groundwater and surface water instrumentation stations. One station is located in Barrel Canyon just upstream of the SR 83 Bridge and one station is located in Davidson Canyon downstream of the Davidson Dike, downstream of the confluence with Barrel Canyon. The Davidson Canyon station was activated on December 20, 2012 at 10:15am. The Barrel Canyon station was activated on December 21, 2012 at 2:26pm. Plots of all December 2013 raw data are presented in the Appendix of this report. USGS style precipitation and discharge reports are also provided in the Appendix. Year to date plots of cumulative precipitation, peak daily discharge and well elevations are also included in the Appendix. Items of Note or Concern There were two small precipitation events during December. No surface flow was measured and no ISCO sampling was triggered. These events are summarized in Table 1. On 12/19, the Novastar data receiving process was restarted. A short delay in data availability occurred, but no data were lost. This restart was related to a software update, not a satellite constellation connectivity issue. Table 1. December 2013 Hydrologic Event Summary Station Number of Number of Surfacewater Flow Events Sampling Events Number of ISCO Precipitation Events Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 1 of 20

3 Precipitation Two small precipitation events were measured at Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon during December These events occurred on 12/5 7/2013 (Barrel Canyon 0.24 inches and Davidson Canyon 0.28 inches) and 12/20 22/2013 (Barrel Canyon 0.32 inches and Davidson Canyon 0.32 inches). The monthly measured precipitation and the annual cumulative precipitation are presented below in Table 2. The 2013 monthly and annual totals for each station are presented in the precipitation reports at the end of the Appendix. The precipitation plot in the Appendix presents the annual cumulative precipitation. Table Annual Cumulative Precipitation Measured Station Precipitation Measured During December 2013 (inches) 2013 Annual Cumulative Precipitation as of December 31, 2013 (inches) Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon Davidson Canyon precipitation not measured during 8/26/ :00 09/04/ :23:00. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 2 of 20

4 Stream Flow No stream flow events or ISCO sampling events occurred during December The list of all 2013 events presented in Table 3 and Table 4. The days in 2013 where streamflow occurred in Barrel or Davidson Canyons is presented in Table 5. Table 3. Barrel Canyon Peak Stage and Peak Discharge for Storms During Date of Storm Barrel Canyon Peak Stage Barrel Canyon Rated Discharge (cfs) (feet) 7/16/ : (reported as 0.00) 7/20/ : /22/ : /23/ : /25/ : /08/ :15: /09/ :00: /09/ :15: /23/ :45: Measured by PT at sub surface location Table 4. Davidson Canyon Stage and Discharge for Storms During Date of Storm Davidson Canyon Peak Stage Davidson Canyon Rated Discharge (cfs) (feet) 8/24/ : /09/ :00: /09/ :00: Time of discharge indicated by ISCO trigger 2 Estimated by post storm high water mark measurement 3 Measured by the PT in the alternate location above the channel bed Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 3 of 20

5 Table 5. Days of Streamflow Occurrence During Station Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon Days Where Streamflow In Channel Occurred at the Station Dates in 2013 Total Number of Days in /16/2013, 7/20/2013 7/21/2013, 08/22/ /01/2013, 23 09/08/ /14/2013, 11/23/ /24/2013 8/24/2013, 09/09/ During December, the stream PT at Barrel Canyon was located 1.66 feet below the stream bed. The two small precipitation events that occurred during December caused stream bed seepage and resulted in small increases in hydraulic head above the Barrel sub surface PT installation. No surface flow was measured. The Davidson Canyon stream PT was located at the alternate installation location 0.39 feet above the stream bed. The alternate installation location resulted in some noise in the Davidson Canyon PT stage data during the warm times of the year. During December, no noise was measured. The locations of the stream PTs are presented in Table 6. Table 6 also includes the minimum stage, as measured by the PT, where the lower float switch is activated triggering the ISCO sampler. Table 6. Location of Stream Pressure Transducers. Station Date Range Barrel Canyon 1 12/21/ /31/ /20/2012 9/3/2013 Davidson Canyon 2 9/4/ /31/2013 Stream PT location 1.66 feet below stream bed 1.63 feet below stream bed 0.39 feet above stream bed Minimum Stream Stage to Trigger ISCO Sampler by Lower Float Switch Approximate Stage as Stage Above Measured by PT Deepest Point in Channel feet 0.75 feet 2.33 feet 0.70 feet 0.31 feet 0.70 feet 1 The original installation location 2 Davidson Canyon Stream PT was placed in the above stream bed location on 9/4/ As measured during installation in December 2012 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 4 of 20

6 Float Switches and ISCO Sampler No ISCO sampling events occurred during December. The ISCO sampling events for 2013 are presented in Table 7. Table 7. ISCO Sampling Events During Station ISCO Trigger Time Float Switch Trigger Times 8/22/ :48 Lower float switch 14:48, 15:02, 15:40 8/23/ :04 Lower float switch 23:04 Upper float switch 23:15. Barrel Canyon 09/08/ :09:00 (float switch stuck on until 09/17/ :49:00) Lower float switch 14:09, 14:22 Upper float switch 16:58:00 Davidson Canyon 8/24/2013 at 00:09 Lower float switch 00:09 09/09/ :38:00 Lower float switch 07:38 (float switch stuck on until 09/17/ :34:00) Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 5 of 20

7 Well Stage 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon alluvial and bedrock wells and Davidson Canyon alluvial and bedrock wells were received during December The two small precipitation events caused small increases in alluvial water level on 12/5 6/2013 and 12/20 21/2013 only at Barrel Canyon. Even with two small increases, the Barrel Canyon alluvial well showed an overall decrease of 0.39 feet during December. The Davidson Canyon alluvial well showed a steady increase of 0.47 feet over the month. The Barrel Canyon bedrock well showed a small, steady decrease of 0.14 feet over the month. The Davidson Canyon bedrock well showed a steady increase of 1.31 feet over the month. The current locations of the PTs for each well are presented in Table 8, below. Plots of raw PT data, water surface elevations and depth to groundwater are presented in the Appendix. Table 8. Location of PTs at Groundwater Wells as of December 31, 2013 Station Measurement Date PT location for Alluvial Well Depth below the channel bed (feet) Elevation (feet above mean sea level) Measurement Date PT location for Bedrock Well Depth below the channel bed (feet) Elevation (feet above mean sea level) Barrel Canyon 4/8/ /14/ Davidson Canyon 4/9/ /9/ Note: For depth below channel bed, scour or deposition can change the bed elevation at wells through time. Well Temperature Data for well temperatures, recorded at 15 minute intervals, were received for the alluvial and bedrock wells during the month. The precipitation events may have influenced the alluvial groundwater temperatures slightly. The Barrel alluvial well demonstrated non constant decreases during the month, with larger changes in temperature around 12/5 and 12/20, the times of the precipitations events. The Barrel Canyon alluvial well temperature decreased 5.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during December, from 65.1 degrees F to 59.6 degrees F. The Barrel Canyon bedrock well PT measured constant temperatures of 68.6 degrees F during December. The Davidson Canyon alluvial well temperature decreased 0.1 degrees F, from 70.0 degrees F to 69.9 degrees F. The Davidson Canyon bedrock well temperature decreased 2.4 degrees F, from 70.8 degrees F to 68.4 degrees F during December. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 6 of 20

8 Soil Temperature The soil sensors are numbered 1 through 4, where sensor 1 is 1 foot below the channel bed surface. Sensor numbers increase with depth. Barrel Canyon sensors are located at 1 foot, 2 feet, 3 feet and 4 feet below the surface, Davidson Canyon sensors are located at 1 foot, 3 feet, 5 feet and 10 feet below the surface. 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon soil temperature were received during the month. Near surface soil diurnal temperature fluctuations are seen in the data. Soil temperature decreases are associated with the two December precipitation events. Larger daily fluctuations and precipitation influences were observed at the surface and less influences at locations further down in the soil column. Soil Moisture 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyons soil moisture were received during the month. Small fluctuations in moisture throughout most days are seen in the data, as expected. Sensors, which are located in saturated soil display moisture of about 50%. The two December precipitation events did not greatly influence soil moisture at the two stations. At Barrel Canyon, a small increase in surface soil moisture occurred in the first part of December. For sensors further from the surface, nearly constant soil moisture occurred. At Davidson Canyon, the soil moisture at all levels remained nearly constant during the month. Soil Conductivity 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon soil conductivity were received during the month. The soil conductivity data showed small fluctuations throughout most days; the two precipitation events did not greatly influence changes in soil conductivity. At Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon, soil conductivities showed no overall change during the month. Soil conductivities at different soil horizons remained nearly constant. Battery Voltage Hourly data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon battery voltage were received during the month. Sinusoidal changes in voltage seen because of changes in sun incidence angle on the solar panel. Some day to day variations caused by changes in cloud cover can be seen in the data. The range of voltage is maintained between 12.7 and 14.3 volts. Voltages greater than 11.2 volts will keep the station operating normally. These data show that the voltage regulators, batteries and solar panels are functioning properly. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 7 of 20

9 Action Items Data will continue to be observed and QA/QC ed on a daily basis. The satellite data transmission delay issue will continue to be checked for daily Conclusion Both stations are operating well. All sensors are in place and functioning properly. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 8 of 20

10 APPENDIX December 2013 Plots, Precipitation and Discharge Reports Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 9 of 20

11 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 10 of 20

12 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 11 of 20

13 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 12 of 20

14 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 13 of 20

15 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 14 of 20

16 PRECIPITATION REPORT Station Number: Name: Barrel Canyon above SR83 Bridge LOCATION.-- Lat N Lon W DRAINAGE AREA.-- N/A DAILY TOTAL VALUES OF PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2013 TO DECEMBER 2013 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL MAX MIN CAL YR 2013 TOTAL MAX 1.97 MIN 0.00 NOTE: EACH TABLE VALUE CALCULATED USING RAW DATA USING 5 DECIMAL PLACES PRECISION TOTALS USING PRECISION PRESENTED IN THE TABLE MAY NOT ADD CORRECTLY. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 15 of 20

17 PRECIPITATION REPORT Station Number: Name: Davidson Canyon below Davidson Dike LOCATION.-- Lat N Lon W DRAINAGE AREA.-- N/A DAILY TOTAL VALUES OF PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2013 TO DECEMBER 2013 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL MAX MIN CAL YR 2013 TOTAL MAX 1.73 MIN 0.00 NOTE: EACH TABLE VALUE CALCULATED USING RAW DATA USING 5 DECIMAL PLACES PRECISION TOTALS USING PRECISION PRESENTED IN THE TABLE MAY NOT ADD CORRECTLY. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 16 of 20

18 DISCHARGE REPORT Station Number: Name: Barrel Canyon above SR83 Bridge LOCATION.-- Lat Long DRAINAGE AREA.-- N/A MEAN DAILY VALUES OF DISCHARGE, IN CFS, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2013 TO DECEMBER 2013 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN MAX MIN CAL YR 2013 MEAN 0.03 MAX 4.25 MIN 0.00 INST MAX INST MAX TIME 09/09/ :15:00 Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 17 of 20

19 DISCHARGE REPORT Station Number: Name: Davidson Canyon below Davidson Dike LOCATION.-- Lat Long DRAINAGE AREA.-- N/A MEAN DAILY VALUES OF DISCHARGE, IN CFS, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2013 TO DECEMBER 2013 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN MAX MIN CAL YR 2013 MEAN 0.03 MAX MIN 0.00 INST MAX INST MAX TIME 9/9/2013 6:00:00 PM Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 18 of 20

20 Annual Plots through December 31, 2013 Davidson Canyon station offline 8/26 9/4/2013, no data measured. Note: a flow event at Davidson Canyon on 8/24/2013 was indicated by the ISCO trigger, but not measured by the PT. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 19 of 20

21 Barrel Bedrock PT removed for well testing 4/8 5/14/2013, no data measured. Davidson Canyon station offline 8/26 9/4/2013, no data measured. Davidson Canyon Bedrock Well pump test 11/4 11/13/2013, data flagged as maintenance and not plotted. Data Analysis for December 2013 Page 20 of 20

22 Analysis of Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon Instrumentation Data December 1, 2014 December 31, 2014 With Calendar Year 2014 Analysis Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company 1/22/2015 This document describes the environmental monitoring data that were received from the Barrel Canyon (BC 2) and Davidson Canyon (DC 3) instrumentation stations. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of data that were received and any QA/QC operations that were performed. Additional graphs and reports can be developed upon request. However, detailed analysis of processes that drive changes in data values are beyond the scope of this task. Introduction During December 2012, Water and Earth Technologies, Inc. (WET) staff installed two combined groundwater and surface water instrumentation stations. One station is located in Barrel Canyon 0.28 miles upstream of the SR 83 Bridge and one station is located in Davidson Canyon downstream of the Davidson Dike, approximately 2.5 river miles downstream of the confluence with Barrel Canyon. The Davidson Canyon station was activated on December 20, 2012 at 10:15am. The Barrel Canyon station was activated on December 21, 2012 at 2:26pm. Graphs of all December 2014 raw data are presented in the Appendix of this report. Precipitation and stream discharge reports are also provided in the Appendix. Year to date graphs of cumulative precipitation, peak daily discharge, well elevations and soil conditions are also included in the Appendix. Items of Note or Concern Davidson Canyon soil sensor #4, installed 10 feet below the channel bed, may be failing. Data shifts were observed in moisture and conductivity on 10/10/2014. Very little change in the data was observed during December. The moisture and conductivity continue to be out of range; the temperature appears to be reporting accurately. Page 1 of 31

23 There were five (5) precipitation events, no streamflow events and no ISCO sampling events measured during December. These events are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. December 2014 Hydrologic Event Summary Station Number of Number of Surfacewater Flow Events Sampling Events Number of ISCO Precipitation Events Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon There were no (0) satellite transmission no report alarm during December. There were no well pumping tests performed in December. Page 2 of 31

24 Precipitation There were five (5) precipitation events measured at each station during December. The monthly measured precipitation and the annual cumulative precipitation are presented below in Table 2 and Table 3. Comparison with 2013 measured total precipitation is also presented. The 2014 monthly and annual totals for each station are also presented in the precipitation reports at the end of the Appendix. The precipitation graph in the Appendix presents the annual cumulative precipitation. Table Annual Cumulative Precipitation Measured Station Precipitation Measured During December 2014 (inches) Measured 2014 Total Precipitation as of December 31, 2014 (inches) Comparison: Measured 2013 Total Precipitation (inches) Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon Table Monthly Precipitation Measured Month Barrel Canyon (inches) Davidson Canyon (inches) January February March April May June July August September October November December Year To Date Each table value calculated using raw data with 5 decimal places precision. Totals using precision presented in the table may not add correctly. Page 3 of 31

25 Precipitation events with greater than 0.5 inches measured precipitation in 24 hours are of interest for the stormwater monitoring permit reporting. Days when this occurred during 2013 and 2014 is presented in Table 4. Plots of annual 24 hour rainfall total are also presented in the Appendix (2013 plots are included at the very end of the Appendix). Table and 2014 Days of Greater than 0.5 Inches of Measured Precipitation in 24 Hours Station Barrel Canyon 2013 End of storm dates for storms greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. 07/11/13 07/16/13 07/20/13 08/23/13 08/25/13 09/08/13 09/09/13 11/23/ End of storm dates for storms greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. 03/01/14 07/06/14 07/09/14 07/13/14 08/01/14 08/19/14 09/17/14 09/18/14 09/20/14 10/08/14 Davidson Canyon 8 days in /21/13 06/14/13 08/02/13 08/23/13 09/09/13 11/23/13 6 days in days in /01/14 07/05/14 08/01/14 09/08/14 09/12/14 09/17/14 09/20/14 09/21/14 10/08/14 9 days in 2014 Page 4 of 31

26 Stream Flow No (0) streamflow events were measured during December 2014 at the Barrel station and none (0) were measured at the Davidson station. No (0) ISCO sampling events occurred during December All 2014 events are presented in Table 5 and Table 6. The days in 2014 where streamflow occurred in Barrel or Davidson Canyons are presented in Table 7. The total annual volume of measured streamflow is presented in Table 8. Note that the discharge reports presented in the appendix show mean daily streamflow. The instantaneous maximums are included at the bottom of the reports. Table 5. Barrel Canyon Peak Stage and Peak Discharge for Storms during Date of Storm Barrel Canyon Measured Peak Stage (feet) Barrel Canyon Rated Peak Discharge (cfs) 3/1 2/ at 3/2 04: /6/ at 14: /7/ at 15: /9/ at 18: /13/ at 19: /14/ at 14: /27/ at 23: /01/ at 20: /15/ at 9: /16/ at 23: /19/ at19: /6/ at 13: /8/ at 13: /18/ at 0: /20/ at 11: Note: a change of rating for the gage after 9/20/2014 at 11:45 caused no surface flow to be estimated for 10/9/2014, previously indicated in October 2014 data analysis report to have surface flow. Also, this update DID NOT influence the calculation of the peak discharge on 9/20/2014. Table 6. Davidson Canyon Stage and Discharge for Storms during Date of Storm Davidson Canyon Measured Peak Stage (feet) Davidson Canyon Rated Peak Discharge (cfs) 7/9/ at 19: /28/ at 1: /1/ at 20: /19/ at 20: /8/ at 12: /12/ at 21: /20/ at 11: Page 5 of 31

27 Table 7. Days of Streamflow Occurrence during Days Where Streamflow In Channel Occurred at the Station 1 Station Dates in 2014 Total Number of Days in /1, 3/2, 7/6, 7/7, 7/9, 7/10, Barrel 7/13 7/19, 7/27 7/29, 8/1 8/5, Mar: 2, July: 14, Aug: 18, Sep: 13, Total: 47 Canyon 8/15 8/27, 9/6 9/10, 9/17 9/24 2 Davidson 7/9, 7/28, 8/1, 8/19, 9/8, 9/12, 9/20, Jul: 2, Aug: 2, Sep: 4, Total: 8 Canyon 9/21 1 Following runoff events, water often ponds near the Barrel station. This ponded water and/or saturated channel bed material is often measured as very low streamflow discharges. 2 A change of rating for the gage after 9/20/2014 at 11:45 caused no surface flow to be estimated for 10/8 10/2014, previously indicated in October 2014 data analysis report to have surface flow. Table 8. Total Volume of Measured Streamflow as of December 31, Station Total Volume of 2014 Measured Comparison: Total Volume of 2013 Measured Streamflow (AF) Streamflow (AF) Barrel Canyon 0.19 March July August September total July Davidson August Canyon September total 1 A change of rating for the gage after 9/20/2014 at 11:45 caused no surface flow to be estimated for 10/8 10/2014, previously indicated in October 2014 data analysis report to have surface flow. 2 Discharge during 8/24/2013 not measured by PT and not included in volume calculation. During December, the stream PT at Barrel Canyon was located 1.99 feet below the stream bed. Any PT measurement above 1.99 feet indicates surface flow in the channel. The Davidson Canyon stream PT was located at the alternate installation location 0.39 feet above the stream bed during December. The Davidson PT demonstrated some noise in the level data earlier in the summer. The PT data can be small positive values even when there is no stage above the PT. This noise in the data, caused by extreme temperature is more common during the warm times of the year and has recently reported values feet during warm summer conditions. To filter out the noise from the real surface flow, the rating for the Davidson Canyon stream PT is computing discharge when the PT stage is only greater than 0.07 ft. During the cooler month of December zero stage values of feet were reported. Table 9 below presents the stream PT locations and the minimum stage, as measured by the PT, where the lower float switch would be activated triggering the ISCO sampler. The monthly stream stage plots show the PT stage measurement for the location of the stream bed for the Barrel and the upper and lower float switch stage values at both stations. Page 6 of 31

28 Table 9. Location of Stream Pressure Transducers. Station Barrel Canyon Davidson Canyon Date Range 12/21/2012 9/20/2014 9/20/2014 present 12/20/2012 9/3/2013 9/4/2013 present 1 The original installation location 2 Location moved to the above stream installation on 9/4/ As measured during installation in December As measured during channel bed re survey in October 2014 Stream PT location 1.66 feet below stream bed feet below stream bed feet below stream bed feet above stream bed 2 Minimum Stream Stage to Trigger ISCO Sampler by Lower Float Switch Approximate Stage as Stage Above Measured by PT Deepest Point in Channel 2.41 feet 0.75 feet feet 0.42 feet feet 0.70 feet feet 0.70 feet 3 The peak discharge values at the Rosemont Barrel station were compared with the peak values measured at the USGS station in Barrel Canyon. The USGS gage BARREL CANYON NEAR SONOITA, AZ is 0.28 miles downstream of the Rosemont Barrel station, with no large intervening inflows or withdrawals. Discharge measurements between the two gages should be nearly equivalent (reach gain between the gages is probably small). Peak measured discharges could vary based on measurement times. Both gages report data with 15 minute resolution, so there is a possibility of missing the exact peak of a short runoff event. The surface runoff event observed in December at the Rosemont Barrel Canyon station was very small, but there was not report of discharge at the USGS station. The peak discharges at the USGS gage for the 2014 storms are presented in Table 10. Page 7 of 31

29 Table 10. Barrel Canyon Peak Discharges as measured by Rosemont and USGS gage Date and time of Storm Rosemont Barrel Canyon Station BC 2 Rated Peak Discharge (cfs) USGS Gage Peak Discharge (cfs) 3/2/ : /6/ : /7/ : /9/ : /13/ : /14/ : /27/ : /1/ : /15/2014 9: /19/ : /6/ : /20/ : Note: a change of rating for the Rosemont BC 2 gage after 9/20/2014 at 11:45 caused no surface flow to be estimated for 10/9/2014, previously indicated to have a small surface flow. There are differences between the USGS peak values and the Rosemont gage peak values. Both the USGS gage and the Rosemont gage use stage discharge relationships to estimate discharge as a function of measured stage. The discharge values at the Rosemont gage are computed through the hydraulic stage discharge rating, which is based on the physical survey of the channel at the time of installation on 12/2012 and hydraulic modeling in HEC RAS. Based on observations, the channel shape has changed slightly since 12/2012 due to storm scour and sediment deposition. It is possible that the stage discharge relationship in the channel has changed slightly since installation. The location of the USGS gage at the concrete bridge opening with an apron may provide a better rated cross section, because the cross section is less likely to change (although sedimentation can occur on top of the concrete apron) and the concrete provides a uniform bed slope. Measured hydrographs from the Rosemont station at Barrel and the USGS Barrel station have been compared as part of the rating adjustment. Many events are characterized nearly identically between the two gages. However for some events, there are some differences in flow magnitude, which vary from event to event with no overall bias. In general, the timing of the start of events and magnitude and duration of events compare well between the two gages. More detailed comparison of discharge hydrographs and total volume of discharge will be performed as part of the 401 surface flow modeling. Given the nature of the wash and the infrequency of events, discharge measurements with a flowmeter are very difficult. Discharge measurements, in available, are useful to ground truth hydraulic ratings. The USGS has not performed a manual discharge measurement at this gage since 9/11/2012, see Page 8 of 31

30 Float Switches and ISCO Sampler No (0) ISCO sampling events occurred during December. The ISCO sampling events for 2014 are presented in Table 11. Table 11. ISCO Sampling Events during Station ISCO Trigger Time Float Switch Trigger Times Barrel Canyon 7/6/ :33 14:45 7/7/ :09 16:30 7/13/ :16 19:30 7/27/ :34 7/28/ :22 8/1/ :36 8/2/2014 7:36 8/19/ :36 8/20/ :01 9/6/ :20 9/8/ :38 9/20/ :41 9/23/ :05 1 7/6/ :33 14:45 1 7/7/ :09 16:30 2 7/13/ :16 19:30 1,2 7/27/ :34 7/28/ :22 2 8/1/ :36 8/2/2014 7:36 2 8/19/ :36 8/20/ :01 1 9/6/ :20 9/8/ :38 1 9/20/ :41 9/23/ :05 2 9/20/ :02 9/23/ :00 Davidson Canyon 7/28/ :59 01:08 8/1/ :00 8/2/2014 8:45 8/19/ :42 8/20/ :30 9/8/ :22 14:30 9/12/ :26 21:30 9/20/ :42 9/23/ :17 1 7/28/ :59 01:08 1 8/1/ :00 8/2/2014 8:45 2 8/1/ :00 8/1/ :05 1,2 8/19/ :42 8/20/ :30 2 9/8/ :22 14:30 1 9/12/ :26 21:30 1 9/20/ :42 9/23/ :17 2 9/20/ :49 11:00 Well Stage 15 minute data for groundwater levels in the Barrel Canyon alluvial and bedrock wells and Davidson Canyon alluvial and bedrock wells were received during December There were five (5) precipitation events measured during the month, although these did not directly influence groundwater levels. No pump tests (or pumped well sampling) occurred during this month. Groundwater levels in the Barrel Canyon alluvial well showed a decrease of 0.40 feet during the month. The groundwater levels in the Davidson Canyon alluvial well showed a small increase of 0.24 feet over the month. The Barrel Canyon bedrock well PT continued to show nearly constant level during the month, but with varying degrees of diurnal fluctuations in water level, with daily variations ranging up to 0.12 feet recorded during the month. Groundwater levels in the Barrel Canyon bedrock well showed a small decrease of 0.15 feet during the month. Groundwater levels in the Davidson Canyon bedrock well showed an increase of 0.63 feet over the month. Page 9 of 31

31 The current locations of the PTs for each well are presented in Table 12, below. Graphs of raw PT data, water surface elevations and depth to groundwater are presented in the Appendix. Table 12. Location of PTs at Groundwater Wells as of December 31, 2014 Station PT location for Alluvial Well Depth Elevation below (feet Measurement the above Date channel mean bed sea level) (feet) Change in elevation (feet above mean sea level) PT location for Bedrock Well Depth Elevation below (feet Measurement the above Date channel mean bed sea (feet) level) Change in elevation (feet above mean sea level) Barrel Canyon 4/8/ /14/ Davidson Canyon 4/9/ /9/ Barrel Canyon 5/14/ /14/ Davidson Canyon 5/14/ /14/ Note: For depth below channel bed, scour or deposition can change the bed elevation at wells through time. Due to movement of well casings, the casing or PVC top elevations may change over time. Exact PT elevation inside the wells can change slightly due to removal and re installation during maintenance, well pumping or sampling. Well Temperature Data for well temperatures, recorded at 15 minute intervals, were received for the alluvial and bedrock wells during the month. There were five (5) precipitation events measured during December, these did not appear to directly influence well temperatures. The Barrel Canyon alluvial well temperature decreased 4.4 degrees F during December, from 66.4 degrees F to 62.0 degrees F. The Barrel Canyon bedrock well PT measured constant temperatures of 68.6 degrees F during December. The Davidson Canyon alluvial well temperature decreased 0.1 degrees F, from 70.7 degrees F to 70.6 degrees F. The Davidson Canyon bedrock well temperature decreased 2.1 degrees F from 70.8 degrees F to 68.7 degrees F during December. Page 10 of 31

32 Soil Temperature The soil sensors are numbered 1 through 4, where sensor 1 is 1 foot below the channel bed surface. Sensor numbers increase with depth. Barrel Canyon sensors are located at 1 foot, 2 feet, 3 feet and 4 feet below the surface, Davidson Canyon sensors are located at 1 foot, 3 feet, 5 feet and 10 feet below the surface. 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon soil temperature were received during the month. Near surface soil diurnal temperature fluctuations are seen in the data. Temperatures in deeper soil horizons fluctuated less. The influence of changing weather and small precipitation events on soil temperatures are evident; only small, steady soil temperature decreases are seen with small changes in the diurnal signal of temperature during the month. Soil Moisture 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyons soil moisture were received during the month. Small fluctuations in moisture throughout most days are seen in the data, as expected. Sensors, which are located in saturated soil display moisture of about 50%. Most sensors showed constant, near saturation values. The small precipitation events during December did not impact soil moisture much. Davidson Canyon Soil sensor 4 may be showing signs of failure. This sensor, located 10 feet below the surface was installed in saturated soil and has recorded at or near saturation conditions since that day. On 10/10 at 13:30, data for soil moisture and conductivity shifted dramatically. Temperature appeared to be un altered. Soil moisture changed from 55% to 218% (out of the realistic range). This sensor has continued to return out of range values during December. Even with raw data out of realistic bounds, this sensor has reported small changes in moisture during the month. A constant could be added to the raw data value at the base station. This shift adjustment would remove this erroneous step change from the resulting data. Page 11 of 31

33 Soil Conductivity 15 minute data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon soil conductivity were received during the month. In general, the soil conductivity data showed small fluctuations throughout most days. Following the moisture response, most sensors showed constant values during the month. The small precipitation events during December did not impact soil conductivity much. Davidson Canyon Soil sensor 4 may be showing signs of failure. This sensor, located 10 feet below the surface was installed in saturated soil. On 10/10 at 13:30, data for soil moisture and conductivity shifted dramatically. Temperature appeared to be un altered. Soil water conductivity changed from S/cm to 0.18 S/cm (out of the realistic range). Even with raw data out of realistic bounds, this sensor has reported small changes in conductivity during the month. A constant could be added to the raw data value at the base station. This shift adjustment would remove this erroneous step change from the resulting data. Battery Voltage Hourly data for Barrel Canyon and Davidson Canyon battery voltage were received during the month. Sinusoidal changes in voltage seen because of changes in sun incidence angle on the solar panel. Some day to day variations caused by changes in cloud cover can be seen in the data. The range of voltage was maintained between 12.7 and 14.5 volts during the month. Voltages greater than 11.2 volts will keep the station operating normally. These data show that the voltage regulators, batteries and solar panels are functioning properly. Action Items Data will continue to be observed and QA/QC ed on a daily basis. The satellite data transmission delay issue will continue to be checked for daily. The soil sensors can not be re calibrated nor serviced in the field. If Davidson Canyon soil sensor 4 is in fact failing, it cannot be repaired. Another sensor could be installed, but because of the nature of the layered soil pit installation, the installation of remaining soil sensors would be disrupted. Conclusion With the exception of Davidson Canyon soil sensor 4, both stations are operating well. All sensors are in place and functioning properly. Page 12 of 31

34 APPENDIX December 2014 Graphs valid data only plotted Precipitation Page 13 of 31

35 Barrel Stage, Discharge and ISCO Sampling Triggers Page 14 of 31

36 Davidson Stage, Discharge and ISCO Sampling Triggers Page 15 of 31

37 Groundwater Level, Elevation and Temperature Page 16 of 31

38 Individual Stations Groundwater Level Page 17 of 31

39 Soil Temperature Page 18 of 31

40 Soil Moisture Davidson Canyon Soil Sensor 4 is showing signs of failure. Value is out of range and not plotted. Page 19 of 31

41 Soil Conductivity Davidson Canyon Soil Sensor 4 is showing signs of failure. Value is out of range and not plotted. Battery Voltage Page 20 of 31

42 Precipitation and Discharge Reports PRECIPITATION REPORT Station Number: Name: Barrel Canyon above SR83 Bridge LOCATION.-- Lat N Lon W DRAINAGE AREA Sq. Miles DAILY TOTAL VALUES OF PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2014 TO DECEMBER 2014 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL MAX MIN CAL YR 2015 TOTAL MAX 1.22 MIN 0.00 NOTE: EACH TABLE VALUE CALCULATED USING RAW DATA USING 5 DECIMAL PLACES PRECISION TOTALS USING PRECISION PRESENTED IN THE TABLE MAY NOT ADD CORRECTLY. Page 21 of 31

43 PRECIPITATION REPORT Station Number: Name: Davidson Canyon below Davidson Dike LOCATION.-- Lat N Lon W DRAINAGE AREA Sq. Miles DAILY TOTAL VALUES OF PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES, CALENDAR YEAR JANUARY 2014 TO DECEMBER 2014 DAY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL MAX MIN CAL YR 2014 TOTAL MAX 1.49 MIN 0.00 NOTE: EACH TABLE VALUE CALCULATED USING RAW DATA USING 5 DECIMAL PLACES PRECISION TOTALS USING PRECISION PRESENTED IN THE TABLE MAY NOT ADD CORRECTLY. Page 22 of 31

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA Independent Science Review Panel Conceptual Model of Watershed Hydrology, Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions and Stream Ecology for the Russian River Watershed Appendices A-1 APPENDIX A A-2 REDWOOD

More information

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject: Memo Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject: Kevin Stewart Markus Ritsch 2010 Annual Legacy ALERT Data Analysis Summary Report I. Executive Summary The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (District)

More information

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data Jackson County 2013 Weather Data 61 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Doug Mayo Jackson County Extension Director 1952-2008 Rainfall Data

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES Memorandum To: David Thompson From: John Haapala CC: Dan McDonald Bob Montgomery Date: February 24, 2003 File #: 1003551 Re: Lake Wenatchee Historic Water Levels, Operation Model, and Flood Operation This

More information

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget Regents Earth Science Unit 6: Water Cycle & Climate Name: Lab # Stream Discharge and the Water Budget Introduction: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) measures and publishes values for the daily

More information

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report Developed in partnership with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board S. Jerrod

More information

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed David Bosch USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA Jeff Arnold ARS Temple, TX and Peter Allen Baylor University, TX SEWRU Objectives 1. Project changes

More information

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows (1970-2010) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing 1.0 Objective Using available data, develop a daily time series

More information

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith:

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith: February 1, 1 Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority 8 E County Road 1 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith: The Illinois State Water Survey (ISWS), under contract to the Imperial Valley

More information

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and 2001-2002 Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities Phoenix Tucson Flagstaff Avg. 2001-2002 Avg. 2001-2002 Avg. 2001-2002 October 0.7 0.0

More information

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED 1.0 Introduction The Sg. Lui watershed is the upper part of Langat River Basin, in the state of Selangor which located approximately 20

More information

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Doug Mayo Jackson County Extension Director 1952-2008 Rainfall Data

More information

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data Jackson County 2014 Weather Data 62 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Doug Mayo Jackson County Extension Director 1952-2008 Rainfall Data

More information

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY 3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY 3.1 INTRODUCTION To enable seasonal storage and release of water from Lake Wenatchee, an impoundment structure would need to be constructed on the lake outlet channel. The structure

More information

2015 Fall Conditions Report

2015 Fall Conditions Report 2015 Fall Conditions Report Prepared by: Hydrologic Forecast Centre Date: December 21 st, 2015 Table of Contents Table of Figures... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 BACKGROUND... 2 SUMMER AND FALL PRECIPITATION...

More information

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC This threat overview relies on projections of future climate change in the Mekong Basin for the period 2045-2069 compared to a baseline of 1980-2005.

More information

Three main areas of work:

Three main areas of work: Task 2: Climate Information 1 Task 2: Climate Information Three main areas of work: Collect historical and projected weather and climate data Conduct storm surge and wave modeling, sea-level rise (SLR)

More information

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Bryan County The Climate of Bryan County Bryan County is part of the Crosstimbers throughout most of the county. The extreme eastern portions of Bryan County are part of the Cypress Swamp and Forest. Average annual

More information

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam Public Workshop May 25, 2016 Sacramento Library Galleria 828 I Street, Sacramento, CA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

More information

Appendix C Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Memorandum

Appendix C Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Memorandum Texas Custodial Trust 2301 West Paisano Drive El Paso, Texas 79922 Appendix C Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Memorandum 6835001 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 410 N. 44 th Street, Suite 1000 Phoenix,

More information

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION This chapter contains the calibration procedure and data used for the LSC existing conditions model. The goal of the calibration effort was to develop a hydraulic

More information

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Marshall County The Climate of Marshall County Marshall County is part of the Crosstimbers. This region is a transition region from the Central Great Plains to the more irregular terrain of southeastern Oklahoma. Average

More information

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Payne County The Climate of Payne County Payne County is part of the Central Great Plains in the west, encompassing some of the best agricultural land in Oklahoma. Payne County is also part of the Crosstimbers in the

More information

The Climate of Murray County

The Climate of Murray County The Climate of Murray County Murray County is part of the Crosstimbers. This region is a transition between prairies and the mountains of southeastern Oklahoma. Average annual precipitation ranges from

More information

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ascension Island Observatory Monthly Magnetic Bulletin December 2008 08/12/AS Crown copyright; Ordnance Survey ASCENSION ISLAND OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA 1. Introduction Ascension

More information

The Climate of Pontotoc County

The Climate of Pontotoc County The Climate of Pontotoc County Pontotoc County is part of the Crosstimbers. This region is a transition region from the Central Great Plains to the more irregular terrain of southeast Oklahoma. Average

More information

The Climate of Haskell County

The Climate of Haskell County The Climate of Haskell County Haskell County is part of the Hardwood Forest. The Hardwood Forest is characterized by its irregular landscape and the largest lake in Oklahoma, Lake Eufaula. Average annual

More information

The Climate of Texas County

The Climate of Texas County The Climate of Texas County Texas County is part of the Western High Plains in the north and west and the Southwestern Tablelands in the east. The Western High Plains are characterized by abundant cropland

More information

Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield

Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield 13 Years of Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture Data Collection September 2000 September 2013 Soil Climate Analysis Network

More information

January 25, Summary

January 25, Summary January 25, 2013 Summary Precipitation since the December 17, 2012, Drought Update has been slightly below average in parts of central and northern Illinois and above average in southern Illinois. Soil

More information

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Kiowa County The Climate of Kiowa County Kiowa County is part of the Central Great Plains, encompassing some of the best agricultural land in Oklahoma. Average annual precipitation ranges from about 24 inches in northwestern

More information

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Seminole County The Climate of Seminole County Seminole County is part of the Crosstimbers. This region is a transition region from the Central Great Plains to the more irregular terrain of southeastern Oklahoma. Average

More information

Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho

Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho Nov 7, 2007 DRAFT Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho Wendell Tangborn and Birbal Rana HyMet Inc. Vashon Island, WA Abstract An estimated 8 MAF (million acre-feet)

More information

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Drought in Southeast Colorado Drought in Southeast Colorado Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss http://climate.atmos.colostate.edu 1 Historical Perspective on Drought Tourism

More information

PH YSIC A L PROPERT IE S TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

PH YSIC A L PROPERT IE S TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU PH YSIC A L PROPERT IE S 8 Lake surface level Daily since 1900 Lake surface level varies throughout the year. Lake level rises due to high stream inflow, groundwater inflow and precipitation directly onto

More information

The Climate of Grady County

The Climate of Grady County The Climate of Grady County Grady County is part of the Central Great Plains, encompassing some of the best agricultural land in Oklahoma. Average annual precipitation ranges from about 33 inches in northern

More information

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Doug Mayo Jackson County Extension Director 1952-2008 Rainfall Data

More information

NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama

NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama There are three commonly described types of Drought: Meteorological drought

More information

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake Prepared by: Allan Chapman, MSc, PGeo Hydrologist, Chapman Geoscience Ltd., and Former Head, BC River Forecast Centre Victoria

More information

Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011

Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011 Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011 Prepared for: GHD Inc. 194 Hernan Cortez Avenue 2nd Floor, Ste. 203 Hagatna, Guam 96910 January 2012 DNV Renewables

More information

PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER

PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER Ronald F. Reed, P.E. Member, ASCE rreed@reed-engineering.com Reed Engineering Group, Ltd. 2424 Stutz, Suite 4 Dallas, Texas 723 214-3-6 Abstract

More information

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Illinois State Water Survey Division Illinois State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION SWS Miscellaneous Publication 108 SEDIMENT YIELD AND ACCUMULATION IN THE LOWER CACHE RIVER by Misganaw Demissie Champaign, Illinois June 1989

More information

Hydrologic Monitoring Station Information Summary. December Brannon J. Ketcham Hydrologist

Hydrologic Monitoring Station Information Summary. December Brannon J. Ketcham Hydrologist Hydrologic Monitoring Station Information Summary December 1998 Brannon J. Ketcham Hydrologist National Park Service Coho and Steelhead Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Introduction Hydrologic

More information

Monitoring of Stream Flows and Playa Run-on in Dixie Valley for Water Years 2009, 2010 and 2011

Monitoring of Stream Flows and Playa Run-on in Dixie Valley for Water Years 2009, 2010 and 2011 Monitoring of Stream Flows and Playa Run-on in Dixie Valley for Water Years 2009, 2010 and 2011 Prepared by: Interflow Hydrology, Inc., Truckee, CA & Mahannah & Associates, LLC, Reno, NV 1 Monitoring of

More information

Scarborough Tide Gauge

Scarborough Tide Gauge Tide Gauge Location OS: 504898E 488622N WGS84: Latitude: 54 16' 56.990"N Longitude: 00 23' 25.0279"W Instrument Valeport 740 (Druck Pressure Transducer) Benchmarks Benchmark Description TGBM = 4.18m above

More information

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2 Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins Stetson Engineers Inc. January 26, 2011 1.0 Introduction Achieving

More information

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard, Waterloo ON N2L 0A4 November 14, 2017 File: 161413228/10 Attention: Mr. Michael Witmer, BES, MPA, MCIP, RPP City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph ON N1H

More information

SOUTH MOUNTAIN WEATHER STATION: REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 (APRIL JUNE) 2011

SOUTH MOUNTAIN WEATHER STATION: REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 (APRIL JUNE) 2011 SOUTH MOUNTAIN WEATHER STATION: REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 (APRIL JUNE) 2011 Prepared for ESTANCIA BASIN WATERSHED HEALTH, RESTORATION AND MONITORING STEERING COMMITTEE c/o CLAUNCH-PINTO SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION

More information

Typical Hydrologic Period Report (Final)

Typical Hydrologic Period Report (Final) (DELCORA) (Final) November 2015 (Updated April 2016) CSO Long-Term Control Plant Update REVISION CONTROL REV. NO. DATE ISSUED PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES 1 4/26/16 Greeley and Hansen Pg. 1-3,

More information

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan The Dworshak reservoir, a project operated by the Army Corps

More information

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level. Tide Gauge Location OS: 616895E 169377N WGS84: Latitude: 51 o 22.919196 N Longitude: 01 o 6.9335907 E Instrument Type Etrometa Step Gauge Benchmarks Benchmark TGBM = 5.524m above Ordnance Datum Newlyn

More information

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2. PHYSICAL SETTING Lassen County is a topographically diverse area at the confluence of the Cascade Range, Modoc Plateau, Sierra Nevada and Basin and Range geologic provinces.

More information

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD 9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD 9.1. Introduction Due to the size of Watana Dam and the economic importance of the Project to the Railbelt, the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

More information

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level. Tide Gauge Location OS: 616895E 169377N WGS84: Latitude: 51 o 22.919196 N Longitude: 01 o 6.9335907 E Instrument Type Etrometa Step Gauge Benchmarks Benchmark TGBM = 5.524m above Ordnance Datum Newlyn

More information

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering For presentation at Workshop on Regional Climate Research NCAR

More information

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss http://climate.atmos.colostate.edu How we got into this drought! Fort

More information

Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin

Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin 2017 Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin Prepared by Operations Staff June 2018 Hydrologic Highlights Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin Annual Report 2017 At the start of

More information

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION Aregai Tecle Professor of Hydrology Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ Acknowledgement Many thanks to my research team mates and Elisabeth

More information

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario by Trevor Dickinson & Ramesh Rudra, Water Resources Engineering University of Guelph Acknowledgements

More information

2 Groundwater Basin Monitoring

2 Groundwater Basin Monitoring Zone 7 Water Agency 2 Groundwater Basin Monitoring Programs 2.1 Climatological Monitoring 2 Groundwater Basin Monitoring Programs This section describes Zone 7's Climatological Monitoring Program which

More information

Riverine Modeling Proof of Concept

Riverine Modeling Proof of Concept Technical Team Meeting Riverine Modeling Proof of Concept Version 2 HEC-RAS Open-water Flow Routing Model April 15-17, 2014 Prepared by R2 Resource Consultants, Brailey Hydrologic, Geovera, Tetra Tech,

More information

Water Temperature Monitoring of the Klamath River Mainstem

Water Temperature Monitoring of the Klamath River Mainstem Water Temperature Monitoring of the Klamath River Mainstem Progress Report #3 Prepared by Robert Rohde and Leaf Hillman with assistance provided by Susan Smith and William Tripp Karuk Tribe of California

More information

Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio

Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio Final Report COMET Partner's Project University: Name of University Researcher Preparing Report: University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Hongjie Xie National Weather Service Office: Name of National Weather

More information

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Missouri River Basin Water Management Missouri River Basin Water Management US Army Corps of Engineers Missouri River Navigator s Meeting February 12, 2014 Bill Doan, P.E. Missouri River Basin Water Management US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 6 Feet Lat: 37 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3)

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 2 Feet Lat: 37 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3)

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 13 Feet Lat: 36 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 1,14 Feet Lat: 36 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of

More information

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven WIND DATA REPORT Vinalhaven July 1, 2004 September 30, 2004 Prepared for Fox Islands Electric Cooperative By Melissa L. Ray Anthony L. Rogers April 4, 2005 Renewable Energy Research Laboratory 160 Governors

More information

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model Pajaro River Watershed Study in association with Technical Memorandum No. 1.2.9 Sediment Model Task: Development of Sediment Model To: PRWFPA Staff Working Group Prepared by: Gregory Morris and Elsie Parrilla

More information

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR AIR AND NOISE SAMPLING DAYS AT MMR Monthly Normals and Extremes for Honolulu International Airport Table G7-1 MMR RAWS Station Hourly Data Tables

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: LAX Elevation: 1 Feet Lat: 33 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: TOA Elevation: 11 Feet Lat: 33 2W Temperature ( F) Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number

More information

MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER

MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER CABIN AND TWIN CREEK EXPERIMENTS 1962-1987 MARMOT CREEK SUBBASINS Subbasin Drainage Treatment Area (ha) (completion date) Cabin Creek 212 (50%)* Commercial

More information

NRC Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA) Jan 29-31, Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc.

NRC Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA) Jan 29-31, Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc. Stochastic Event Flood Model (SEFM) Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods A Hydrological Tool for Analysis of Extreme Floods Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc. Olympia, WA NRC Workshop

More information

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Port Stanley Observatory Monthly Magnetic Bulletin December 2007 07/12/PS Jason Islands a ar C West Falkland Kin gg eor ge B Port Salavador ay Weddell Island Mount Osborne So

More information

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update Participating Agencies 255 255 255 237 237 237 0 0 0 217 217 217 163 163 163 200 200 200 131 132 122 239 65 53 80 119 27 National Oceanic and Atmospheric

More information

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 8

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 8 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 8 Lake surface level Daily since 1900 Lake surface level varies throughout the year. Lake level rises due to high stream inflow, groundwater inflow, and precipitation directly onto

More information

Technical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No:

Technical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No: Technical Memorandum 6500 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon, 97239 Tel: 503-244-7005 Fax: 503-244-9095 Prepared for: Project Title: City of Salem, Oregon City of Salem, Stormwater Management

More information

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer July 7, 214 Subject: Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 197 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer Background: Flooding in 214 has resulted in the highest water levels on Namakan Lake since 1968, and

More information

2003 Moisture Outlook

2003 Moisture Outlook 2003 Moisture Outlook Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss http://climate.atmos.colostate.edu Through 1999 Through 1999 Fort Collins Total Water

More information

WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005

WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005 WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005 Prepared on July 12, 2005 For Bob Lynette 212 Jamestown Beach Lane Sequim WA 98382 By John Wade Wind Consultant LLC 2575 NE 32 nd Ave Portland OR 97212

More information

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer Mike Crimmins Assoc. Professor/Extension Specialist Dept. of Soil, Water, & Environmental Science The University of Arizona Yes, another climate tool for

More information

2 Precipitation and Evaporation

2 Precipitation and Evaporation Zone 7 Water Agency 2.1 Program Description 2 Precipitation and Evaporation This section describes Zone 7's Climatological Monitoring Program which tracks rainfall and evaporation in the Valley. Zone 7

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 46175 Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: 3L3 Elevation: 1 Feet Lat: 33 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1)

More information

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 42713 Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: -3 Feet Lat: 32 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1)

More information

8.1 Attachment 1: Ambient Weather Conditions at Jervoise Bay, Cockburn Sound

8.1 Attachment 1: Ambient Weather Conditions at Jervoise Bay, Cockburn Sound 8.1 Attachment 1: Ambient Weather Conditions at Jervoise Bay, Cockburn Sound Cockburn Sound is 20km south of the Perth-Fremantle area and has two features that are unique along Perth s metropolitan coast

More information

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events Drought Characterization Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events Extreme Precipitation Events During the Drought For the drought years (1999-2005) daily precipitation data was analyzed to find extreme

More information

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA Project No. 432301 India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA Numerical Modelling Studies 04 th June 2018 For Build Inc. Report Title: India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

More information

Bushkill Creek 3 rd Street Dam Removal Analysis

Bushkill Creek 3 rd Street Dam Removal Analysis Bushkill Creek 3 rd Street Dam Removal Analysis HEC HMS Runoff and Routing Model Stephen Beavan, Melanie DeFazio, David Gold, Peter Mara and Dan Moran CE 421: Hydrology Fall 2010 December 15, 2010 Contents

More information

Water Supply Forecast - THE DALLES http://www.nwrfc.noaa.gov/water_supply/ws_forecasts.php?id=tdao3 Page 1 of 1 3/7/2013 Close Archive Data/Normals Rankings Adjustments Verification Verify All Years Help

More information

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven WIND DATA REPORT Vinalhaven April 1, 2004 June 30, 2004 Prepared for Fox Islands Electric Cooperative By Melissa L. Ray Anthony L. Rogers April 4, 2005 Renewable Energy Research Laboratory 160 Governors

More information

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center, CSU Mike Gillespie Snow Survey Division, USDA, NRCS Presented at the 28 th Annual AGU Hydrology Days, March 26, 2008,

More information

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska Know how. Know now. EC733 Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska Suat Irmak, Extension Soil and Water Resources and Irrigation Specialist Kari E. Skaggs, Research Associate, Biological

More information

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois SWS Miscellaneous Publication 98-5 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois 1901-1990 by Audrey A. Bryan and Wayne Armstrong Illinois

More information

Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse

Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse Martijn Booij University of Twente,, The Netherlands m.j.booij booij@utwente.nlnl 2003 in the Meuse basin Model appropriateness Appropriate model

More information

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda WATER AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION 308 Nelson Avenue, Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (530) 538-4343 Fax: (530) 538-3807 www.buttecounty.net/waterandresource bcwater@buttecounty.net Paul Gosselin, Director

More information

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011 Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011 -Assessment of current water conditions - Precipitation Forecast - Recommendations for Drought Monitor Upper Colorado Normal Precipitation Upper Colorado

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.

More information

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015 Great Lakes Update Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) monitors the water levels of each of the Great Lakes. This report provides a summary of the Great

More information