INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT"

Transcription

1 Prepared for Boulder Valley School District 6500 E. Arapahoe Avenue Boulder, Colorado Prepared by Ramboll Environ US Corporation Date June, 207 Project Number 24309A IOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: ARAPAHOE RIDGE HIGH SHOOL Ramboll Environ T F

2 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge CONTENTS PROJECT SUMMARY. INTRODUCTION 4 2. METHODOLOGY 4 2. Ambient Indoor Air Quality Sampling Locations Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Sample Collection Laboratory Analysis Direct Reading Estimates of VOCs 5 3. STAARDS & GUIDELINES 6 4. RESULTS 6 4. Summa Canisters PID Instantaneous Measurements 8 5. COLUSIONS 8 TABLES Table 3: Table 5: Summa Canister Sample Locations EPA Region 8 RSL Exceedance Locations FIGURES Figure : Figure 2: Figure 3: Sample Locations NAME NAME APPEICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: VOC Indoor Air Monitoring Tables Maps Laboratory

3 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge of 7 PROJECT SUMMARY Ramboll Environ US Corporation (Ramboll Environ) was retained by Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) to perform an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) assessment at Arapahoe Ridge High School (Arapahoe) located at 6600 Arapahoe Road in Boulder, Boulder County Colorado. The assessment was conducted on April 20, 207. This Project Summary provides an overview of the approach, results and conclusions. More detailed discussion and supporting documents are provided in the report. Arapahoe is a multipurpose building that includes vocational training programs, a print shop, classrooms, offices and early childhood education. The vocational programs include cosmetology, auto mechanics and collision repair. It was reported that staff had expressed concern that chemical use in the vocational classes and print shop may have diminished air quality within the building resulting in adverse health effects. Xylene was reported to be a specific chemical of concern (COC). The results of this assessment revealed that the risk of adverse health outcomes to building occupants from exposure to chemicals originating from the vocational activities is negligible. Airborne concentrations of xylene (including o, p/m isomers) were below the most conservative health risk criteria in all traditional classrooms and corridors included in this assessment. Approach The IAQ assessment included collection of air samples from sixteen locations. Locations included the vocational areas, classrooms and offices where concerns had been reported and corridors near the vocational areas. Four of the locations were selected as comparison sites to evaluate background conditions. These included two samples collected outdoors (roof top and ground level) and two rooms located in the building but not in the vicinity of vocational classes (conference room and early childhood). On the day of the assessment all of the vocational classrooms were in session including hair & nails in cosmetology, painting in collision repair, and document production in the print shop. Samples were collected using evacuated Summa air canisters over an approximately an 8 hour duration and were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). There are currently no regulatory limits for acceptable levels of chemicals in air in a school environment. Arapahoe is unique in that it contains vocational programs where occupational exposure limits may be appropriate for comparison (for staff) and it includes sensitive receptors (children) where Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) screening levels may be more appropriate. In order to evaluate risk of adverse health outcomes data was reviewed as follows: ) were compared to occupational exposure limits (OELs). These include the Occupational Safety and Health Administration s (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). These levels are for working adults. 2) Data was then evaluated for any chemical that exceeded the EPA s Regional Screening Levels (RSL). RSLs are conservative values that are designed to protect sensitive individuals from long term chronic exposures and are screening level values. The RSLs assume exposure durations for more than 350 days/year, 24 hours/day for over 20 years, far more exposure time than would be expected working in or attending a school. These levels have built in protection factors and exceedance of these limits should not be construed or implied to be an unsafe condition. It is not unusual or abnormal to find some chemicals exceeding these values in any indoor environment. 3) A list of chemicals was created that includes those that exceeded the RSL and were found in vocational programs or the print shop and in other areas of the school. These are chemicals that

4 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 2 of 7 may have migrated from the vocational areas/print shop to other areas of the building. These chemicals were evaluated for potential risk to building occupants at the measured concentration. There were two chemicals that exceeded the RSLs and were found in both vocational areas and other locations in the building. Isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol) levels exceeded the RSL in cosmetology (hair and nails), Office 228 and early childhood room 7 (an indoor control location). Levels in the early childhood and office were very low, 0.04 and 0.2 parts per million (ppm) respectively. Isopropyl alcohol is a common chemical and can be found in disinfectants, including hand sanitizer. Levels measured in Arapahoe would not be a concern.,2,4 trimethylbenzene was detected in the print shop, collision repair and in the corridor near collision repair. The concentration in the corridor was ppm. This is very low and would not be considered a health concern. Three chemicals were identified above the RSL in the corridor near auto mechanics. The chemicals included naphthalene, hexachlorobutadiene, and,2,4 trichlorobenzene. These chemicals did not exceed the RSL in the air samples collected in auto mechanics but may have originated from activities in these rooms. Each of these chemicals were in concentrations less than 0.00 ppm (equivalent to less than part per billion) and exposure duration in corridors would be relatively short duration compared to classrooms and the RSL criteria. The identification of these chemicals at very low levels in a corridor would not be a health risk. The highest concentrations of chemicals were measured in the vocational areas where tasks such as nails, hair, printing and auto painting were being performed. This finding would be expected. Conclusions of this assessment found that the risk of adverse health outcomes to building occupants from exposure to chemicals originating from vocational activities and the print shop is negligible. Airborne concentrations of xylene (including o, p/m isomers) were below the most conservative health risk criteria in all traditional classroom and corridors included in this assessment. The highest measured concentrations of chemicals were found in the rooms where vocational activities were taking place. This finding would be expected. The measured levels did not indicate that occupational exposure limits would be exceeded, however, personal, sampling would be required to verify. In general, there are two separate ways to assess air quality and exposure: ) Indoor air quality for those who do not directly work with chemicals and would not expect exposure as part of their normal work day or exposure to children who are not in vocational programs. 2) Occupational exposure to chemicals for those who directly use the products as part of their work assignment or tasks in vocational classrooms. These exposures are anticipated to be higher and samples are collected from devices worn by individuals when performing work/tasks with the target chemicals.

5 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 3 of 7 This study was designed to evaluate indoor air quality in the context described in # above. Development of a risk assessment and sampling plan for #2 above is being performed as a separate phase/project.

6 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 4 of 7. INTRODUCTION Ramboll Environ US Corporation (Ramboll Environ) was retained by Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) to perform an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) assessment at Arapahoe Ridge High School (Arapahoe) located at 6600 Arapahoe Road in Boulder, Colorado. Samples were collected on April 20, 207. The assessment was conducted by Mr. Robert Rottersman, MS, CIH, Principal and Mr. Joel Krech, Associate with Ramboll Environ. Arapahoe is unique in that it is a multipurpose building that includes vocational training programs, a print shop, traditional classrooms, offices and early childhood education. The vocational programs include cosmetology, auto mechanics and collision repair. It was reported that staff had expressed concern that chemical use in the vocational classes and print shop may have diminished air quality within the building resulting in adverse health effects. Xylene was reported to be a specific chemical of concern (COC). 2. METHODOLOGY 2. Ambient Indoor Air Quality Ambient IAQ relates to chemical concentrations in air throughout the building originating from vocational educational programs such as auto body, auto repair, cosmetology and the print shop. These are airborne levels of contaminants that occupants not directly involved with the vocational activities might be exposed to. In general, exposure guidelines for IAQ are designed to protect the general population, including sensitive receptors including children. This differs from occupational exposures that are chemical exposure expected to occur to individuals who are working directly with chemicals and are assumed to be adults who are healthy enough to perform work related tasks. 2.2 Sampling Locations Samples were collected from sixteen different locations in, or around, Arapahoe using Summa canisters. The Summa canisters were equipped with a flow control device that allowed the samples to be collected over an 8hour period. Mr. Rottersman, in conjunction with BSVD personnel, determined the planned sampling locations based on the building s heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, air flow patterns, locations of occupant concerns and locations of chemical use in vocational classrooms. Focus was placed on the source areas (e.g., cosmetology and auto repair) and the movement of air throughout the building to nonsource areas. Two samples were placed each at outdoor areas and classrooms (indoor control) that were not in the vicinity and on different ventilation systems than vocational areas. The roof top outdoor sample was positioned between the exhaust from the collision repair paint booth and the outside air intake of the roof top air handling unit. Sample placement is depicted on Figure through Figure 3 in Appendix B and listed below.

7 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 5 of 7 Table 3.: Summa Canister Sample Locations Canister ID Location and Room Number Comments 204 Conference Room 005 Indoor Control 38 Early Childhood 7 Indoor Control 97 Cosmetology Hair Cosmetology Nails Office Math Classroom Science Lab Corridor 347 & 360 Corridor Intersection 89 Criminal Justice Auto Mechanics Auto Mechanics Corridor 306 Near Collision Repair 60 Collision Repair Print Shop Roof Intake Outdoors Outdoor Control 77 Main Entrance Outdoors Outdoor Control 2.3 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Sample Collection Whole air samples for VOCs were collected using 2.6liter evacuated Summa canisters. Canisters and flow control devices were provided by the laboratory. Verification of canister cleanliness is provided in the Alpha Analytical report included in Appendix C. The sampling procedure included placing a canister in the area to be sampled, ideally away from walls and obstructions with the inlet approximately 4 to 5 feet above the floor. The steel cap was removed and a flow control valve was attached to the inlet. The valve was opened and initial reading from the pressure gauge recorded. Canisters were deployed between 06:50 and 07:59 on the morning of April 20, 207. The flow control devices were set to an air flow of approximately liters of air per minute (lpm) so that the canisters would be filled after approximately 8hours. The canisters were monitored throughout the day by observing the pressure gauge readings. After approximately 8 hours, the final pressure was recorded, valves were closed, flow control devices removed and the steel caps replaced. The canisters were shipped via overnight to Alpha Analytical, located in Mansfield, Massachusetts for analysis using the applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for each specific VOC and EPA TO5 for any tentatively identified compounds (TICs). 2.4 Laboratory Analysis Each of the 6, 8hour samples were analyzed for a total of 67 VOCs including the chemicals originally requested by the school district: acetone, acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, benzene, ethanol, ethylbenzene, isopropyl alcohol, m, pxylene, oxylene, nhexane, styrene & toluene. The laboratory screened the samples and reported any tentatively identified compounds (TICs) for chemicals that were detected using the EPA TO5 method but are not specifically requested in the analysis. 2.5 Direct Reading Estimates of VOCs Direct readings of total VOC concentrations were made at 4 locations within Arapahoe, in both the morning and afternoon. Readings were made using a ppbrae 3000 photoionization detector (PID) with capability of measuring in the part per billion (ppb) range.

8 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 6 of 7 3. STAARDS & GUIDELINES There are currently no regulatory limits for levels of chemicals in air in a school environment. Arapahoe is unique in that it contains vocational programs where OELs may be appropriate for comparison (for staff) and it includes sensitive receptors (children) where EPA screening levels may be more appropriate. Detected concentrations in each Summa canister sample were compared to the Regional Screening Level (RSL) Table dated May 206 published by the EPA Region 8. A target hazard quotient (THQ) of 0. was used due to the multiple contaminants of concern. A target cancer risk factor of E6 was used, which is typically used for the general population. These are conservative values that are designed to protect sensitive individuals from long term chronic exposures. They typically assume exposure for more than 350 days/year, 24 hours/day for over 20 years. Much more time than even the most ambitious student or staff member would spend in a school building. These levels have built in protection factors and exceedance of these limits should not be construed or implied to be an unsafe condition. More information regarding the RSLs can be found at: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) are provided for reference. These are regulatory limits that cannot be exceeded for occupational exposures but would not be appropriate for sensitive populations. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) are also provided for reference. Like the PELs, these are occupational limits and would be appropriate for evaluating exposure to working adults, not children. Unlike the PELs, the TLVs are not enforceable as legal standards but are updated annually. Note that both the PELs and TLVs are based on personal samples. This project used stationary area samples that cannot be directly compared to PELs and TLVs for compliance purposes. 4. RESULTS 4. Summa Canisters Laboratory results of the VOC Indoor Air Monitoring can be found in Appendix C. The consolidated and full results tables located in Appendix A Summarize the results of the VOC indoor air monitoring. All chemicals that were above measurable concentrations (exceeded the limit of detection) are provided in the full table and compared to EPA RSLs, OSHA PELs, and ACGIH TLVs. The consolidated table includes only chemicals with results above the RSLs. It is important to note that all results were well below occupational exposure limits. Data was also reviewed more closely for any chemical that exceeded the EPA s RSL. These chemicals are listed in the table below. The use of RSLs is for data screening only. RSLs are conservative values that are designed to protect sensitive individuals from long term chronic exposures. This includes exposure durations for more than 350 days/year, 24 hours/day for over 20 years, far more than would occur in a school environment. These levels have built in protection factors and exceedance of these limits should not be construed or implied to be an unsafe condition. It is not unusual or abnormal to find some chemicals exceeding these values in any indoor environment. A list of detected contaminates that exceed EPA Region 8 RSLs is as follows:

9 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 7 of 7 Table 5.: EPA Region 8 RSL Exceedance Locations Canister ID Location Comments EPA RSL Exceedances 204 Conference Room 005 Control None identified 38 Early Childhood 7 Control Isopropanol 97 Cosmetology Hair 27 Isopropanol 2200 Cosmetology Nails 206 Ethyl Acetate Isopropanol 2303 Office 228 Isopropanol 224 Math Classroom 368 Acetaldehyde 2346 Science Lab 359 Acetaldehyde 2243 Corridor 347 & 360 Corridor Intersection Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene,2,4Trichlorobenzene 89 Criminal Justice 377 None identified 2358 Auto Mechanics 383 Benzene 454 Auto Mechanics 392 Benzene 205 Corridor 306 Near Collision Repair Acetaldehyde,2,4Trimethylbenzene 60 Collision Repair 337 Benzene Ethylbenzene p/mxylene,2,4trimethylbenzene 2732 Print Shop 303 Acetaldehyde,2,4Trimethylbenzene 98 Roof Intake Outdoors Control None identified 77 Main Entrance Outdoors Control Ethyl Acetate Methylene chloride The list of chemicals in the table includes those that exceeded the RSL and were found in vocational rooms or the print shop and in other areas of the school. These are chemicals that may have migrated from the vocational areas/print shop to other areas of the building. These chemicals were evaluated for potential risk to building occupants at the measured concentrations. There were two chemicals that exceeded the RSLs and were found in both vocational areas and other locations in the building. Isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol) levels exceeded the RSL in cosmetology (hair and nails), Office 228 and early childhood room 7 (an indoor control location). Levels in the early childhood and office were very low, 0.04 and 0.2 parts per million (ppm) respectively. Isopropyl alcohol is a common chemical and can be found in disinfectants, including hand sanitizer. Levels measured in Arapahoe would not be a concern.,2,4 trimethylbenzene was detected in the print shop, collision repair and in the corridor near collision repair. The concentration in the corridor was ppm. This is very low and would not be considered a health concern. Three chemicals were identified above the RSL in the corridor near auto mechanics. The chemicals included naphthalene, hexachlorobutadiene, and,2,4 trichlorobenzene. These chemicals did not exceed the RSL in the air samples collected in auto mechanics but may have originated from activities in these rooms. Each of these chemicals were in concentrations less than 0.00 ppm (equivalent to less than part per billion) and exposure duration in corridors would be relatively short duration compared to classrooms and the RSL criteria. The identification of these chemicals at very low levels in a corridor would not be a health risk.

10 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge 8 of 7 The highest concentrations of chemicals were measured in the vocational areas where tasks such as nails, hair, printing and auto painting were being performed. This finding would be expected. 4.2 PID Instantaneous Measurements The PID readings are considered point in time estimates of VOC concentrations. They cannot differentiate between compounds and assume all VOCs have the same molecular weight, which is not the case. Therefore these readings should be viewed as screening measurements and not for exposure assessment. The PID readings from the morning and afternoon are depicted on Figure through Figure 3. The afternoon measurements were taken in coordination with the vocational classes, cosmetology and auto body were both in session. In general, VOC readings throughout the school were low with total levels less than 0.5 ppm in all areas outside of vocational rooms and the print shop. Most measurements had concentrations less than 0. ppm. Concentrations increased in the afternoon when the vocational programs were more active. This finding would be expected. 5. COLUSIONS of this assessment found that the risk of adverse health outcomes to building occupants from exposure to chemicals originating from vocational activities and the print shop is negligible. Airborne concentrations of xylene (including o, p/m isomers) were below the most conservative health risk criteria in all traditional classroom and corridors included in this assessment. The highest measured concentrations of chemicals were found in the rooms where vocational activities were taking place. This finding would be expected. The measured levels did not indicate that occupational exposure limits would be exceeded, however, personal, sampling would be required to verify. In general, there are two separate ways to assess air quality and exposure: 3) Indoor air quality for those who do not directly work with chemicals and would not expect exposure as part of their normal work day or exposure to children who are not in vocational programs. 4) Occupational exposure to chemicals for those who directly use the products as part of their work assignment or tasks in vocational classrooms. These exposures are anticipated to be higher and samples are collected from devices worn by individuals when performing work/tasks with the target chemicals. This study was designed to evaluate indoor air quality in the context described in # above. Development of a risk assessment and sampling plan for #2 above is being performed as a separate phase/project.

11 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge APPEIX A DATA TABLES (full data table is provided as a separate excel file due to size)

12 Boulder Valley School District: Arapahoe Campus Indoor Air Regional Screening Limit Exceedances Ramboll Environ Project No: B s 206 EPA Region 8 RSLs (THQ = 0.) /20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 4/20/207 Carcinogenic SL Noncarcinogenic SL Cosmetology Near Auto Near Collision TR=E 06 HI=0. Conference Room Early Childhood Cosmetology Hair Office Math Classroom Science Lab Criminal Justice Auto Mechanics Auto Mechanics Nails Mechanics Repair Collision Repair Print Shop Outdoors Outdoors (ug/m 3 ) (ug/m 3 ) Corridor Room 005 Room 7 Room 27 Room 206 Room 228 Room 368 Room & 360 Room 377 Room 383 Room 392 Corridor 306 Room 337 Room 303 Roof Intake Main Entrance VOCs (µg/m 3 ) Acetaldehyde Benzene <RSL Ethyl Acetate 3 29 <RSL 64. Ethylbenzene <RSL <RSL 8.4 <RSL <RSL Hexachlorobutadiene iso Propyl Alcohol (Isopropanol) 88 <RSL D 605 D 474 <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL Methylene chloride <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL 290 Naphthalene p/m Xylene 44 <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL 59.9 <RSL <RSL,2,4 Trichlorobenzene ,2,4 Trimethylbenzene 3. <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL <RSL Notes THQ = Target Hazardous Quotient TR = Target Risk HI = Hazardous Index VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds µg/m 3 = micrograms per cubic meter Bold = exceeds EPA SL <RSL = below Regional Screening Limits = below detection limits D = Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of calibration curve and/or linear range of the intrument. Concentration of analyte was quantified from diluted analysis Target Hazardous Quotient (THQ) of 0. for Composite Worker Air from EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs), updated May /9/207 P:\Boulder County Schools\Arapahoe Ridge School\Lab Data\BVSD Indoor Air Monitoring

13 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge APPEIX B MAPS

14 Legend ## ## Morning PID Reading (ppb) Afternoon PID Reading (ppb) Ambient Air Sample Location PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: DATE: Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge High School April 20th 207 VOC Testing First Floor 4/2/207 PROJECT NO.: B 4/24/207 P:\Boulder County Schools\Arapahoe Ridge School\Visio\Ambient Air First Floor_ vsdx FIGURE No.:

15 Legend ## Morning PID Reading (ppb) ## Afternoon PID Reading (ppb) Ambient Air Sample Location PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: DATE: 4/2/207 PROJECT NO.: B Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge High School April 20 th 207 VOC Testing Second Floor North FIGURE No.: 2 4/24/207 P:\Boulder County Schools\Arapahoe Ridge School\Visio\Ambient Air Second Floor North_ vsdx

16 Legend ## ## Morning PID Reading (ppb) Afternoon PID Reading (ppb) Ambient Air Sample Location PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: DATE: Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge High School April 20th 207 VOC Testing Second Floor South 4/2/207 PROJECT NO.: B 4/24/207 P:\Boulder County Schools\Arapahoe Ridge School\Visio\Ambient Air Second Floor South_ vsdx FIGURE No.: 3

17 Indoor Air Quality Assessment Boulder Valley School District Arapahoe Ridge APPEIX C ANALYTICAL LABORATORY RESULTS

18 Serial_No:05075:29 ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: ATTN: Phone: L72659 Ramboll Environ 333 West Wacker Drive Suite 2700 Chicago, IL Robert Rottersman (32) B 05/0/7 The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical. This report/data package is paginated and should be reproduced only in its entirety. Alpha Analytical holds no responsibility for results and/or data that are not consistent with the original. Certifications & Approvals: MA (MMA030), NH NELAP (2062), NELAP (MA05), CT (PH04), FL (E8784), IL (20008), LA (85084), ME (MA00030), MD (350), NY (627), (685), OH (CL06), PA ( ), RI (LAO00299), TX (T ), VT (VT005), VA (46094), WA (C954), US Army Corps of Engineers, USDA (Permit #P ), USFWS (Permit #LE206964). 320 Forbes Boulevard, Mansfield, MA (Fax) Page of 00

19 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Alpha Sample ID Client ID Matrix Sample Location Collection Date/Time Receive Date L AIR 04/20/7 5:39 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 4:56 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:04 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:05 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:0 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:0 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:09 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:2 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:5 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:22 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:9 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:24 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:26 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:33 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:46 04/2/7 L AIR 04/20/7 5:47 04/2/7 Page 2 of 00

20 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Case Narrative The samples were received in accordance with the Chain of Custody and no significant deviations were encountered during the preparation or analysis unless otherwise noted. Sample Receipt, Container Information, and the Chain of Custody are located at the back of the report. contained within this report relate only to the samples submitted under this Alpha Lab Number and meet NELAP requirements for all NELAP accredited parameters unless otherwise noted in the following narrative. The data presented in this report is organized by parameter (i.e. VOC, SVOC, etc.). Sample specific Quality Control data (i.e. Surrogate Spike Recovery) is reported at the end of the target analyte list for each individual sample, followed by the Laboratory Batch Quality Control at the end of each parameter. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs), if requested, are reported for compounds identified to be present and are not part of the method/program Target Compound List, even if only a subset of the TCL are being reported. If a sample was reanalyzed or reextracted due to a required quality control corrective action and if both sets of data are reported, the Laboratory ID of the reanalysis or reextraction is designated with an "R" or "RE", respectively. When multiple Batch Quality Control elements are reported (e.g. more than one LCS), the associated samples for each element are noted in the grey shaded header line of each data table. Any Laboratory Batch, Sample Specific % recovery or RPD value that is outside the listed Acceptance Criteria is bolded in the report. All specific QC information is also incorporated in the Data Usability format of our Data Merger tool where it can be reviewed along with any associated usability implications. Soil/sediments, solids and tissues are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Definitions of all data qualifiers and acronyms used in this report are provided in the Glossary located at the back of the report. In reference to questions H (CAM) or 4 (RCP) when "NO" is checked, the performance criteria for CAM and RCP methods allow for some quality control failures to occur and still be within method compliance. In these instances the specific failure is not narrated but noted in the associated QC table. The information is also incorporated in the Data Usability format of our Data Merger tool where it can be reviewed along with any associated usability implications. Please see the associated ADEx data file for a comparison of laboratory reporting limits that were achieved with the regulatory Numerical Standards requested on the Chain of Custody. HOLD POLICY For samples submitted on hold, Alpha's policy is to hold samples (with the exception of Air canisters) free of charge for 2 calendar days from the date the project is completed. After 2 calendar days, we will dispose of all samples submitted including those put on hold unless you have contacted your Client Service Representative and made arrangements for Alpha to continue to hold the samples. Air canisters will be disposed after 3 business days from the date the project is completed. Please contact Client Services at with any questions. Page 3 of 00

21 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Case Narrative (continued) Volatile Organics in Air Canisters were released from the laboratory on April 9, 207. The canister certification results are provided as an addendum. L and 04: The samples were diluted and reanalyzed to quantify the results within the calibration range. The result(s) should be considered estimated, and are qualified with an E flag, for any compound(s) that exceeded the calibration range in the initial analysis. The reanalysis was performed only for the compound(s) that exceeded the calibration range. L and The presence of Acetone could not be determined in these samples due to a nontarget compound interfering with the identification and quantification of this compound. The WG99875 Laboratory Duplicate RPD, performed on L , is above the acceptance criteria for methylene chloride (38%); however, the sample and duplicate results are less than five times the reporting limit therefore no further action is required. I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete. This certificate of analysis is not complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages of this report. Authorized Signature: Title: Technical Director/Representative Date: 05/0/7 Page 4 of 00

22 Serial_No:05075:29 AIR Page 5 of 00

23 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 6:3 MB 04/20/7 5:39 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane.2 isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 6 of 00

24 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:39 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 7 of 00

25 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:39 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL unknown siloxane 8.2 J Nonanal. Unknown 2.2 J Methyl Alcohol.7 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl 8.2 Silanol, Trimethyl 3.6 Page 8 of 00

26 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:39 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 9 of 00

27 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 6:46 MB 04/20/7 4:56 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 0 of 00

28 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 4:56 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page of 00

29 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 4:56 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Methyl Alcohol.2 unknown siloxane 3.0 J Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl 2.5 Decanal.3 Unknown.3 J unknown siloxane.4 J Nonanal.7 Silanol, Trimethyl 2.5 Page 2 of 00

30 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 4:56 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 3 of 00

31 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 7:52 MB 04/20/7 5:04 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol E,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 4 of 00

32 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:04 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 5 of 00

33 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:04 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Methyl Alcohol.3 unknown siloxane 0 J Limonene.8 Isobutane 2.2 Nonanal.6 Unknown 4.8 J Page 6 of 00

34 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:04 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 7 of 00

35 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/28/7 0:30 RY D 04/20/7 5:04 04/2/7 isopropyl Alcohol Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 8 of 00

36 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 8: MB 04/20/7 5:05 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone E Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol E,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride.74 3Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 9 of 00

37 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:05 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 20 of 00

38 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:05 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Acetic acid, butyl ester 8 npropyl Acetate 3.0 Limonene.3 unknown siloxane 3.2 J Methyl Alcohol.3 Silanol, Trimethyl 0 Acetic acid, methylethyl....6 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl. Unknown.4 J Nonanal 2.0 Page 2 of 00

39 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:05 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 22 of 00

40 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/28/7 02:00 RY D 04/20/7 5:05 04/2/7 Acetone isopropyl Alcohol Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 23 of 00

41 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 8:58 MB 04/20/7 5:0 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 24 of 00

42 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:0 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page of 00

43 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:0 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Nonanal.3 Silanol, Trimethyl.7 unknown siloxane 2.2 J Methyl Alcohol.4 Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 26 of 00

44 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 9:3 MB 04/20/7 5:0 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 27 of 00

45 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:0 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 28 of 00

46 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:0 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Methyl Alcohol 2. unknown siloxane 2.4 J Silanol, Trimethyl 2.7 Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 29 of 00

47 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 20:03 MB 04/20/7 5:09 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 30 of 00

48 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:09 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 3 of 00

49 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:09 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Silanol, Trimethyl 3.3 Unknown.2 J unknown siloxane 35 J Methyl Alcohol 2.6 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl.6 Dodecane (C2).5 Page 32 of 00

50 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:09 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 33 of 00

51 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 20:36 MB 04/20/7 5:2 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 34 of 00

52 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:2 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 35 of 00

53 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:2 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene Naphthalene Hexachlorobutadiene Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Unknown. J Limonene.0 unknown siloxane.4 J Nonanal. Naphthalene, 2methyl.9 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl.9 Methyl Alcohol.8 Naphthalene, methyl 2.4 Silanol, Trimethyl 5 Unknown 2.9 J Page 36 of 00

54 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:2 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 37 of 00

55 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 2:09 MB 04/20/7 5:5 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 38 of 00

56 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:5 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 39 of 00

57 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:5 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Isobutane.4 Nonanal. Limonene.9 Methyl Alcohol.7 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl 3.8 unknown siloxane 4.2 J Silanol, Trimethyl.5 Unknown 2.2 J Page 40 of 00

58 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:5 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 4 of 00

59 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 2:42 MB 04/20/7 5:22 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 42 of 00

60 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:22 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 43 of 00

61 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:22 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Pentane 4. Butane, 2Methyl Pentane, 2methyl 3.4 Butane 4.0 Pentane, 3methyl.8 Undecane 2.9 Methyl Alcohol 2.7 Hexane, 3methyl 5.4 Hexane, 2methyl 3.8 Silanol, Trimethyl 4.4 Page 44 of 00

62 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:22 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 45 of 00

63 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 22:4 MB 04/20/7 5:9 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 46 of 00

64 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:9 04/2/7 L72659 Serial_No:05075:29 Page 47 of 00

65 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:9 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Hexane, 2methyl 2.3 Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl 7.7 Pentane, 2methyl 2.7 unknown cycloalkane 3.4 J Butane 5.3 Hexane, 3methyl 3. Pentane 3.5 Butane, 2Methyl 9.7 Undecane unknown cycloalkane 2.3 J Page 48 of 00

66 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:9 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 49 of 00

67 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 22:47 MB 04/20/7 5:24 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 50 of 00

68 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:24 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 5 of 00

69 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:24 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene ,3,5Trimethylbenzene ,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Methyl Alcohol.7 unknown benzene.3 J unknown siloxane 4.3 J Nonanal.7 Silanol, Trimethyl 2.4 Unknown.5 J Cyclotrisiloxane, Hexamethyl 3.6 Limonene.7 Page 52 of 00

70 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:24 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 53 of 00

71 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 23:20 MB 04/20/7 5:26 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 54 of 00

72 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:26 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 55 of 00

73 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:26 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene ,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene ,3,5Trimethylbenzene ,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Hexane, 2methyl.5 Pentane.5 Pentane, 2methyl.6 Methyl Alcohol 5 Octane 2.3 Hexane, 3methyl.7 Unknown 4.0 J unknown alkane.9 J Acetic acid, butyl ester Butane 2.2 Page 56 of 00

74 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:26 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 57 of 00

75 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/27/7 23:54 MB 04/20/7 5:33 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 58 of 00

76 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:33 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 59 of 00

77 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:33 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene ,3,5Trimethylbenzene ,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Undecane unknown cycloalkane 5.8 J unknown benzene J Propanol 6 unknown benzene 8. J unknown benzene 6.8 J Nonane (C9) 5.8 unknown siloxane 5.6 J unknown benzene 8 J unknown alkane 5.5 J Page 60 of 00

78 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:33 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 6 of 00

79 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/28/7 00:27 MB 04/20/7 5:46 04/2/7 Propylene 0.86 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane.2 isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 62 of 00

80 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:46 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 63 of 00

81 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:46 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Unknown 2.3 J Nonanal 7. unknown siloxane 2.0 J Decanal. Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 64 of 00

82 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L Air 48,TO5 04/28/7 00:59 MB 04/20/7 5:47 04/2/7 Propylene Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Page 65 of 00

83 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene 2Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene B L /0/ /20/7 5:47 04/2/7 L Serial_No:05075:29 Page 66 of 00

84 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:47 04/2/7 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene ,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20,2dichlorobenzene.20,2,4trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Nonane (C9) 4.3 Undecane 4.2 Unknown 3 J Pentane 53 Propanol, 2methyl 4.9 Butane 3.6 Dodecane (C2) 3 Acetic acid, butyl ester 3.6 Methyl Alcohol 36 Nonanal 5.5 Page 67 of 00

85 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 L /20/7 5:47 04/2/7 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 68 of 00

86 242997B Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 48,TO5 Analytical Date: 04/27/7 4:33 for sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99874 Chlorodifluoromethane Propylene 0.86 Propane Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane 0.43,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane.40 Methanol Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Butane Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Dichlorofluoromethane Vinyl bromide Acrolein.5 Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane.2 isopropyl Alcohol.23 Acrylonitrile.09 Pentane Ethyl ether 0.606,Dichloroethene Page 69 of 00

87 242997B Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 48,TO5 Analytical Date: 04/27/7 4:33 for sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99874 tertbutyl Alcohol.52 Methylene chloride.74 3Chloropropene Carbon disulfide 0.623,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Butanone.47 cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate.80 Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran.47 2,2Dichloropropane 0.924,2Dichloroethane nhexane Isopropyl Ether EthylTertButylEther 0.836,,Trichloroethane.09,Dichloropropene Benzene Thiophene Carbon tetrachloride.26 Cyclohexane Page 70 of 00

88 242997B Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 48,TO5 Analytical Date: 04/27/7 4:33 for sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99874 TertiaryAmyl Methyl Ether Dibromomethane.42,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane.34,4Dioxane 0.72 Trichloroethene.07 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Methyl Methacrylate 2.05 Heptane cis,3dichloropropene Methyl2pentanone 2.05 trans,3dichloropropene 0.908,,2Trichloroethane.09 Toluene Methylthiophene 0.803,3Dichloropropane Hexanone Methylthiophene Dibromochloromethane.70,2Dibromoethane.54 Butyl Acetate 2.38 Octane Tetrachloroethene.36,,,2Tetrachloroethane.37 Chlorobenzene 0.92 Page 7 of 00

89 242997B Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 48,TO5 Analytical Date: 04/27/7 4:33 for sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99874 Ethylbenzene Ethylthiophene 0.98 p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene 0.869,2,3Trichloropropane.2 Nonane (C9).05 Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene ochlorotoluene.04 npropylbenzene pchlorotoluene.04 4Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene tertbutylbenzene.0,2,4trimethylbenzene Decane (C0).6 Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20 secbutylbenzene.0,2,3trimethylbenzene pisopropyltoluene.0 Page 72 of 00

90 242997B Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 48,TO5 Analytical Date: 04/27/7 4:33 for sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99874,2Dichlorobenzene.20 nbutylbenzene.0 Indane Indene 0.95,2Dibromo3chloropropane.93 Undecane.28,2,4,5Tetramethylbenzene.0 Dodecane (C2).39,2,4Trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05,2,3Trichlorobenzene.48 Benzothiophene 2.74 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 2Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL No Tentatively Identified Compounds Page 73 of 00

91 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 LCS %Recovery LCSD %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99873 Chlorodifluoromethane Propylene Propane Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane Methanol Vinyl chloride ,3Butadiene Butane Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Dichlorofluoromethane Vinyl bromide Acrolein Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol Acrylonitrile Page 74 of 00

92 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 LCS %Recovery LCSD %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99873 Pentane Ethyl ether ,Dichloroethene tertbutyl Alcohol Methylene chloride Chloropropene Carbon disulfide ,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane trans,2dichloroethene ,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether Vinyl acetate Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran ,2Dichloropropane ,2Dichloroethane nhexane Isopropyl Ether Page 75 of 00

93 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 LCS %Recovery LCSD %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 Batch: WG99873 EthylTertButylEther ,,Trichloroethane ,Dichloropropene Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane TertiaryAmyl Methyl Ether Dibromomethane ,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane ,4Dioxane Trichloroethene ,2,4Trimethylpentane Methyl Methacrylate Heptane cis,3dichloropropene Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene ,,2Trichloroethane Toluene ,3Dichloropropane Page 76 of 00

94 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 LCS %Recovery LCSD %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 Batch: WG Hexanone Dibromochloromethane ,2Dibromoethane Butyl Acetate Octane Tetrachloroethene ,,,2Tetrachloroethane Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene p/mxylene Bromoform Styrene ,,2,2Tetrachloroethane oxylene ,2,3Trichloropropane Nonane (C9) Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene ochlorotoluene npropylbenzene pchlorotoluene Page 77 of 00

95 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 LCS %Recovery LCSD %Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 Batch: WG Ethyltoluene ,3,5Trimethylbenzene tertbutylbenzene ,2,4Trimethylbenzene 7030 Decane (C0) Benzyl chloride ,3Dichlorobenzene ,4Dichlorobenzene secbutylbenzene pisopropyltoluene ,2Dichlorobenzene nbutylbenzene ,2Dibromo3chloropropane Undecane Dodecane (C2) ,2,4Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 7030,2,3Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Page 78 of 00

96 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Duplicate Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 QC Batch ID: WG99875 QC Sample: L Propylene Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane ,2Dichloro,,2,2tetrafluoroethane Vinyl chloride,3butadiene Acetaldehyde Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethyl Alcohol Vinyl bromide Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane isopropyl Alcohol ,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride Q 3Chloropropene Carbon disulfide Page 79 of 00

97 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Duplicate Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 QC Batch ID: WG99875 QC Sample: L ,,2Trichloro,2,2Trifluoroethane trans,2dichloroethene,dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether Vinyl acetate 2Butanone cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran,2Dichloroethane nhexane,,trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cyclohexane,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane,4Dioxane Page 80 of 00

98 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Duplicate Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 QC Batch ID: WG99875 QC Sample: L Trichloroethene 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Heptane cis,3dichloropropene 4Methyl2pentanone trans,3dichloropropene,,2trichloroethane Toluene Hexanone Dibromochloromethane,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene p/mxylene Bromoform Styrene,,2,2Tetrachloroethane oxylene Page 8 of 00

99 Serial_No:05075:29 Lab Duplicate Analysis Batch Quality Control L B 05/0/7 Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits Associated sample(s): 06 QC Batch ID: WG99875 QC Sample: L Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride,3dichlorobenzene,4dichlorobenzene,2dichlorobenzene,2,4trichlorobenzene Naphthalene Hexachlorobutadiene Page 82 of 00

100 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Canister and Flow Controller Information Samplenum Client ID Media ID Media Type Date Prepared Bottle Order Cleaning Batch ID Can Leak Check Initial Pressure (in. Hg) Pressure on Receipt (in. Hg) Flow Controler Leak Chk Flow Out ml/min Flow In ml/min % RPD L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L CAN 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 2 04/9/ Pass Page 83 of 00

101 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Canister and Flow Controller Information Samplenum Client ID Media ID Media Type Date Prepared Bottle Order Cleaning Batch ID Can Leak Check Initial Pressure (in. Hg) Pressure on Receipt (in. Hg) Flow Controler Leak Chk Flow Out ml/min Flow In ml/min % RPD L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L CAN 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 2 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass L Flow 4 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass Page 84 of 00

102 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Canister and Flow Controller Information Samplenum Client ID Media ID Media Type Date Prepared Bottle Order Cleaning Batch ID Can Leak Check Initial Pressure (in. Hg) Pressure on Receipt (in. Hg) Flow Controler Leak Chk Flow Out ml/min Flow In ml/min % RPD L Flow 5 04/9/ Pass L L Can 04/9/ L79870 Pass Page 85 of 00

103 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF Air 48,TO5 04/7/7 6:03 RY 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Chlorodifluoromethane Propylene 0.86 Propane Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane 0.43 Freon4.40 Methanol Vinyl chloride 0.5,3Butadiene Butane Bromomethane Chloroethane Ethanol Dichlorofluoromethane Vinyl bromide Acrolein.5 Acetone Acetonitrile Trichlorofluoromethane.2 Isopropanol.23 Acrylonitrile.09 Pentane Ethyl ether 0.606,Dichloroethene Tertiary butyl Alcohol.52 Page 86 of 00

104 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Methylene chloride.74 3Chloropropene Carbon disulfide Freon3.53 trans,2dichloroethene 0.793,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether 0.72 Vinyl acetate Butanone.47 cis,2dichloroethene Ethyl Acetate.80 Chloroform Tetrahydrofuran.47 2,2Dichloropropane 0.924,2Dichloroethane nhexane Diisopropyl ether tertbutyl Ethyl Ether 0.836,,Trichloroethane.09,Dichloropropene Benzene Carbon tetrachloride.26 Cyclohexane tertamyl Methyl Ether Dibromomethane.42,2Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane.34,4Dioxane 0.72 Page 87 of 00

105 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Trichloroethene.07 2,2,4Trimethylpentane Methyl Methacrylate 2.05 Heptane cis,3dichloropropene Methyl2pentanone 2.05 trans,3dichloropropene 0.908,,2Trichloroethane.09 Toluene 0.754,3Dichloropropane Hexanone Dibromochloromethane.70,2Dibromoethane.54 Butyl acetate 2.38 Octane Tetrachloroethene.36,,,2Tetrachloroethane.37 Chlorobenzene 0.92 Ethylbenzene p/mxylene Bromoform 2.07 Styrene 0.852,,2,2Tetrachloroethane.37 oxylene 0.869,2,3Trichloropropane.2 Nonane.05 Isopropylbenzene Bromobenzene Page 88 of 00

106 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 2Chlorotoluene.04 npropylbenzene 4Chlorotoluene.04 4Ethyltoluene,3,5Trimethylbenzene tertbutylbenzene.0,2,4trimethylbenzene Decane.6 Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene.20,4dichlorobenzene.20 secbutylbenzene.0 pisopropyltoluene.0,2dichlorobenzene.20 nbutylbenzene.0,2dibromo3chloropropane.93 Undecane.28 Dodecane.39,2,4Trichlorobenzene.48 Naphthalene.05,2,3Trichlorobenzene.48 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.3 Tentatively Identified Compounds Units RDL No Tentatively Identified Compounds Page 89 of 00

107 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4Difluorobenzene Bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 90 of 00

108 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 Matrix: Anaytical Method: Analytical Date: Analyst: L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF Air 48,TO5SIM 04/7/7 6:03 RY 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Volatile Organics in Air by SIM Mansfield Lab Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane 0.43 Freon Vinyl chloride ,3Butadiene Bromomethane Chloroethane Acetone Trichlorofluoromethane Acrylonitrile.09,Dichloroethene Methylene chloride.74 Freon Halothane trans,2dichloroethene ,Dichloroethane Methyl tert butyl ether Butanone.47 cis,2dichloroethene Chloroform ,2Dichloroethane ,,Trichloroethane Benzene Carbon tetrachloride ,2Dichloropropane Page 9 of 00

109 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Volatile Organics in Air by SIM Mansfield Lab Bromodichloromethane ,4Dioxane Trichloroethene cis,3dichloropropene Methyl2pentanone 2.05 trans,3dichloropropene ,,2Trichloroethane Toluene Dibromochloromethane ,2Dibromoethane Tetrachloroethene ,,,2Tetrachloroethane Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene p/mxylene Bromoform Styrene ,,2,2Tetrachloroethane oxylene Isopropylbenzene 4Ethyltoluene ,3,5Trimethybenzene ,2,4Trimethylbenzene Benzyl chloride.04,3dichlorobenzene ,4Dichlorobenzene secbutylbenzene.0 pisopropyltoluene.0 Page 92 of 00

110 BATCH CANISTER CERTIFICATION CANISTER QC BAT Air Canister Certification Serial_No:05075:29 L /0/7 L79870 CAN 2303 SHELF 04/4/7 6:00 04/7/7 Volatile Organics in Air by SIM Mansfield Lab,2Dichlorobenzene nbutylbenzene.0,2,4trichlorobenzene Naphthalene ,2,3Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Internal Standard % Recovery Acceptance Criteria,4difluorobenzene bromochloromethane chlorobenzened Page 93 of 00

111 Serial_No:05075: B L /0/7 Sample Receipt and Container Information Were project specific reporting limits specified? YES Cooler Information Cooler N/A Custody Seal Present/Intact Container Information Container ID Container Type Cooler ph Temp deg C Pres Seal Analysis(*) L726590A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726590A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L72659A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726592A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726593A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726594A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726595A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) L726596A Canister 2.7 Liter N/A N/A N/A Y Absent TO5LL(30) Page 94 of 00 *Values in parentheses indicate holding time in days

112 Serial_No:05075:29 Acronyms L B 05/0/7 GLOSSARY EDL EPA LCS LCSD LFB MS MSD NA PA/DPA NI NP RPD SRM STLP TIC Estimated Detection Limit: This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values, when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit (). The EDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. The use of EDLs is specific to the analysis of PAHs using SolidPhase Microextraction (SPME). Environmental Protection Agency. Laboratory Control Sample: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: Refer to LCS. Laboratory Fortified Blank: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. Method Detection Limit: This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values, when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit (). The includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. Matrix Spike Sample: A sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target analyte concentration is available. Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate: Refer to MS. Not Applicable. Not Calculated: Term is utilized when one or more of the results utilized in the calculation are nondetect at the parameter's reporting unit. NNitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine. Not Ignitable. NonPlastic: Term is utilized for the analysis of Atterberg Limits in soil. Reporting Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a specific concentration. The includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as relative percent difference (RPD). Values which are less than five times the reporting limit for any individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values; although the RPD value will be provided in the report. Standard Reference Material: A reference sample of a known or certified value that is of the same or similar matrix as the associated field samples. Semidynamic Tank Leaching Procedure per EPA Method 35. Tentatively Identified Compound: A compound that has been identified to be present and is not part of the target compound list (TCL) for the method and/or program. All TICs are qualitatively identified and reported as estimated concentrations. Footnotes The reference for this analyte should be considered modified since this analyte is absent from the target analyte list of the original method. Terms Total: With respect to Organic analyses, a 'Total' result is defined as the summation of results for individual isomers or Aroclors. If a 'Total' result is requested, the results of its individual components will also be reported. This is applicable to 'Total' results for methods 8260, 808 and Analytical Method: Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method. (Example: EPA 8260B is shown as,8260b.) The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the References section of the Addendum. Data s A B Spectra identified as "Aldol Condensation Product". The analyte was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank. Flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (0x) the concentration found in the blank. For MCPrelated projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (0x) the concentration found in the blank. For DODrelated projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (0x) the concentration found in the blank A the analyte was detected above onehalf the reporting limit (or above the reporting limit for common lab contaminants) in the associated method blank. For Airrelated projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte above the reporting limit. For related projects (excluding Air), flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte, which was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank or above five times the Report Format: Data Usability Report Page 95 of 00

113 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 Data s C D E G H I M P Q R RE S J reporting limit for common lab contaminants (Phthalates, Acetone, Methylene Chloride, 2Butanone). Coelution: The target analyte coelutes with a known lab standard (i.e. surrogate, internal standards, etc.) for coextracted analyses. Concentration of analyte was quantified from diluted analysis. Flag only applies to field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte. Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of the calibration curve and/or linear range of the instrument. The concentration may be biased high due to matrix interferences (i.e, coelution) with nontarget compound(s). The result should be considered estimated. The analysis of ph was performed beyond the regulatoryrequired holding time of 5 minutes from the time of sample collection. The lower value for the two columns has been reported due to obvious interference. Reporting Limit () exceeds the MCP CAM Reporting Limit for this analyte. Presumptive evidence of compound. This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs), where the identification is based on a mass spectral library search. The RPD between the results for the two columns exceeds the methodspecified criteria. The quality control sample exceeds the associated acceptance criteria. For DODrelated projects, LCS and/or Continuing Calibration Standard exceedences are also qualified on all associated sample results. Note: This flag is not applicable for matrix spike recoveries when the sample concentration is greater than 4x the spike added or for batch duplicate RPD when the sample concentrations are less than 5x the. (Metals only.) Analytical results are from sample reanalysis. Analytical results are from sample reextraction. Analytical results are from modified screening analysis. Estimated value. This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs). Not detected at the reporting limit () for the sample. Report Format: Data Usability Report Page 96 of 00

114 Serial_No:05075:29 L B 05/0/7 REFEREES 48 Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air. Second Edition. EPA/6/R96/00b, January 999. LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES Alpha Analytical performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing laboratory industry. In the event of an error, the sole and exclusive responsibility of Alpha Analytical shall be to reperform the work at it's own expense. In no event shall Alpha Analytical be held liable for any incidental, consequential or special damages, including but not limited to, damages in any way connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Analytical. We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling, containers, sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field. Page 97 of 00

115 Serial_No:05075:29 Alpha Analytical, Inc. ID No.:7873 Facility: Companywide Revision 0 Department: Quality Assurance Published Date: /6/207 :00:05 AM Title: Certificate/Approval Program Summary Page of Certification Information The following analytes are not included in our Primary NELAP Scope of Accreditation: Westborough Facility EPA 624: m/pxylene, oxylene EPA 8260C: NPW:,2,4,5Tetramethylbenzene; 4Ethyltoluene, Azobenzene; SCM: Iodomethane (methyl iodide), Methyl methacrylate,,2,4,5 Tetramethylbenzene; 4Ethyltoluene. EPA 8270D: NPW: Dimethylnaphthalene,,4Diphenylhydrazine; SCM: Dimethylnaphthalene,,4Diphenylhydrazine. EPA 300: DW: Bromide EPA 6860: NPW and SCM: Perchlorate EPA 900: NPW and SCM: Amenable Cyanide Distillation EPA 902B: NPW: Total Cyanide EPA 9050A: NPW: Specific Conductance SM3500: NPW: Ferrous Iron SM4500: NPW: Amenable Cyanide, Dissolved Oxygen; SCM: Total Phosphorus, TKN, NO2, NO3. SM530C: DW: Dissolved Organic Carbon Mansfield Facility SM 40D: TSS EPA 3005A NPW EPA 8082A: NPW: PCB:, 5, 3, 87,0, 0, 4, 5, 53, 80, 83, 87. EPA TO5: Halothane, 2,4,4Trimethyl2pentene, 2,4,4Trimethylpentene, Thiophene, 2Methylthiophene, 3Methylthiophene, 2Ethylthiophene,,2,3Trimethylbenzene, Indan, Indene,,2,4,5Tetramethylbenzene, Benzothiophene, Methylnaphthalene. Biological Tissue Matrix: EPA 3050B The following analytes are included in our Massachusetts DEP Scope of Accreditation Westborough Facility: Drinking Water EPA 300.0: NitrateN, Fluoride, Sulfate; EPA 353.2: NitrateN, NitriteN; SM4500NO3F: NitrateN, NitriteN; SM4500FC, SM4500CE, EPA 80., SM230B, SM4500ClD, SM2320B, SM40C, SM4500HB EPA 332: Perchlorate; EPA 524.2: THMs and VOCs; EPA 504.: EDB, DBCP. Microbiology: SM9B; SM9223P/A, SM9223BColilertQT,SM9222D. NonPotable Water SM4500H,B, EPA 20., SM0B, SM40C, SM2320B, SM4500CLE, SM4500FBC, SM4500NH3BH, EPA 350.: AmmoniaN, LACHAT B: AmmoniaN, SM4500NO3F, EPA 353.2: NitrateN, EPA 35., SM4500PE, SM4500PB, E, SM4500SO4E, SM5220D, EPA 40.4, SM520B, SM530C, SM4500CLD, EPA 664, EPA 420., SM4500CE, SM40D. EPA 624: Volatile Halocarbons & Aromatics, EPA 608: Chlordane, Toxaphene, Aldrin, alphabhc, betabhc, gammabhc, deltabhc, Dieldrin, DDD, DDE, DDT, Endosulfan I, Endosulfan II, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide, PCBs EPA 6: SVOC (Acid/Base/Neutral Extractables), EPA 600/48045: PCBOil. Microbiology: SM9223BColilertQT; EnterolertQT, SM922E. Mansfield Facility: Drinking Water EPA 200.7: Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Na, Ca. EPA 200.8: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Se, TL. EPA 245. Hg. NonPotable Water EPA 200.7: Al, Sb, As, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, K, Se, Ag, Na, Sr, TL, Ti, V, Zn. EPA 200.8: Al, Sb, As, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Ag, TL, Zn. EPA 245. Hg. SM2340B For a complete listing of analytes and methods, please contact your Alpha Project Manager. Document Type: Form PreQualtrax Document ID: 083 Page 98 of 00

116 Page 99 of 00

117 Page 00 of 00

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd. 5/26/2017 Ms. Anna Kelley Hamilton Co. Environmental Services 250 Wm. Howard Taft Cincinnati OH 45219 Project Name: Sun Coke Project #: Workorder #: 1705303 Dear Ms. Anna Kelley The following report includes

More information

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR: SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD 21044 PREPARED FOR: HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM 10910 ROUTE 108 ELLICOTT

More information

Target Compound Results Summary

Target Compound Results Summary Phone/ (86)88-4800 / (86)88-471 http://www.emsl.com to1lab@emsl.com Customer ID: EMSL0A K12312.D 28 cc 0 0/01/2017 K12327.D 21 cc 600 Target Compound Results Summary Propylene 11-07-1 42.08 ND.0 ND 8.6

More information

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds Method TO-17 is used to analyze samples for volatile organic compounds collected on multi-bed sorbent tubes, which are thermally desorbed and cryo-focused on the capillary

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete ANALYTICAL REPORT Job Number: 640-4848-1 Job Description: Transform Complete For: American Master*Tech Scientific, Inc. 1330 Thurman Street PO BOX 2539 Lodi, CA 95240 Attention: Mr. Adam Kowalczyk Chad

More information

January 19, Dear Mr. Nightingale:

January 19, Dear Mr. Nightingale: January 19, 2011 Mr. Steven F. Nightingale, P.E. Manager, Permit Section Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Land 1021 North Grand Avenue East Springfield, Illinois 62794 Subject: Supplemental

More information

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist,, pp, EST Analytical Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in

More information

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website:

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website: R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J. 07852 Website: www.reactnj.org Email: info@reactnj.org RE: Air Test Results R.E.A.C.T. has facilitated an ambient air test

More information

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013. Date: 08-Mar-13 Work Order Sample Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received 1303004-01A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013 3/1/2013 Page 1 of 1 Date: 08-Mar-13 CASE NARRATIVE Samples

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5 ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue Savannah, GA 31404 Tel: (912)354-7858 Client For: Imperial Paints LLC PO BOX 489 Fairforest, South Carolina 29336

More information

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek JSB is an authorised partner of Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic s in Air Anne Jurek #111 Introduction The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) developed a new low level TO-15

More information

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air JSB is an authorised partner of Determination of Volatile Organic s in Air Anne Jurek #126 Introduction Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in many countries.

More information

STONY HOLLOW LANDFILL, INC S. Gettysburg Ave. Dayton, OH (937) (937) Fax

STONY HOLLOW LANDFILL, INC S. Gettysburg Ave. Dayton, OH (937) (937) Fax STONY HOLLOW LANDFILL, INC. 2460 S. Gettysburg Ave. Dayton, OH 45418 (937) 268 1133 (937) 267 5110 Fax May 1, 2018 Ms. Jennifer Marsee Unit Supervisor Regional Air Pollution Control Agency 117 South Main

More information

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters Application Note Abstract Water quality laboratories across the

More information

1. Introduction. 2. Sampling Activities

1. Introduction. 2. Sampling Activities CH2M HILL Canada Limited 72 Victoria Street Suite 0 Kitchener, ON N2G 4Y9 O +519 579 3500 F +519 579 8986 www.ch2m.com Tara Tran, MCIP, RPP Policy Planner The Corporation of the City of Brantford 100 Wellington

More information

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES PAGE: 1 of 14 CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING AND STORAGE 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS 6.0 REAGENTS

More information

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in

More information

CALA Directory of Laboratories

CALA Directory of Laboratories CALA Directory of Laboratories Membership Number: 2628 Laboratory Name: Caduceon Environmental Laboratories (Richmond Hill) Parent Institution: Caduceon Enterprises Inc. Address: 110 West Beavercreek Rd.

More information

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office at

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office at May 22, 2015 Jeannette DeBartolomeo Environmental Compliance Specialist MDE-OCP 1800 Washington Blvd. Suite 620 Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: Groundwater and Drinking Water Results Calvert Citgo (Former Alger

More information

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260 Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260 Application Note Abstract Due to regional shortages and increasing costs of helium, the preferred carrier gas in gas chromatography, alternative

More information

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis LINDSEY PYRON ANNE JUREK INTRODUCTION There are several demands and requirements imposed on chemists performing volatile organic analysis (VOC) in

More information

Date: March 6, 2008 RWDI Reference #: W B Pages (Including Cover):

Date: March 6, 2008 RWDI Reference #: W B Pages (Including Cover): RWDI AIR Inc. 650 W oodlawn R oa d W est, Guelph, Ontari o, Ca nad a N1K 1B8 Tel: (51 9) 823-1 31 1 E-mail: info@rwdi.com Fax: (51 9) 823-1 31 6 W eb: www. r wdi.com Date: March 6, 2008 RWDI Reference

More information

AIR QUALITY SURVEY OF SYNTHETIC TURF FIELDS CONTAINING CRUMB RUBBER INFILL

AIR QUALITY SURVEY OF SYNTHETIC TURF FIELDS CONTAINING CRUMB RUBBER INFILL AIR QUALITY SURVEY OF SYNTHETIC TURF FIELDS CONTAINING CRUMB RUBBER INFILL Prepared for New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene New York, NY Prepared by TRC Windsor, Connecticut March 2009

More information

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order:

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order: Date: 31-Jul-18 Work Order Sample Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received 1807123-01A Dam & Burger Water 7/25/2018 7/25/2018 1807123-02A 48th & RR Water 7/25/2018 7/25/2018

More information

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor s in Beer ANNE JUREK USEPA 524.2 Method Validation Using the Evolution Purge and Trap Concentrator and the Centurion WS Autosampler Application Note Environmental

More information

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS Application Note US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS Author Amy Nutter Applications Chemist, Teledyne Tekmar Abstract US EPA Method 8260 in conjunction

More information

F 2: Phase 2 Soil Vapor Investigation for Potential Off Site Vapor Intrusion

F 2: Phase 2 Soil Vapor Investigation for Potential Off Site Vapor Intrusion F 2: Phase 2 Soil Vapor Investigation for Potential Off Site Vapor Intrusion October 31, 2014 Mr. Bob Linder Essex Property Trust, Inc. 5141 California Avenue, #250 Irvine, California 92617 Subject: Phase

More information

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C Abstract In order to determine the concentration of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in soil and waste samples the USEPA developed

More information

Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017

Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017 Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017 Prepared by: Anchor QEA 90 Elwood Davis Rd, Suite 340 Liverpool, NY 13088 Prepared for: Consolidated

More information

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to Optimizing Standard Preparation ANNE JUREK Abstract: Standardd preparation can often be a time consuming, tedious process. The opportunity for human error or inconsistencies between individual preparation

More information

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler Application Note By: Teri Dattilio Introduction Purge and Trap concentration

More information

KSA Environmental Laboratory Inc.

KSA Environmental Laboratory Inc. February 26, 07 KSA Environmental Laboratory Inc. Hydrologic Associates - Miami Attn: Brad Waller 8925 S.W. 148th Street Suite 212 Miami, FL 33176 RE: Parkland KSA Workorder: Q0012 Dear Brad Waller, Enclosed

More information

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By: Nathan Valentine Abstract The US EPA developed Method 524.2¹, Measurement

More information

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley MATRIX Reference Code Analyte Code Description ASTM C471M- 14 2014 ASTM D5504-12 2012 3964 Orthorhombic Cyclooctasulfur 4842 1-Propanethiol 6113 2,5-Dimethylthiophene 4544 2-Ethylthiophene 4843 2-Propanethiol

More information

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices Application Note Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices Abstract By: Ed Price In today s laboratories, increased efficiency and productivity are of

More information

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator Application Note Introduction Environmental laboratories have utilized the Purge & Trap sample concentration technique for over

More information

Date Issued: April 01, 2013 Expiration Date: June 30, 2013

Date Issued: April 01, 2013 Expiration Date: June 30, 2013 State of Florida Department of Health~Bureau of Public Health Laboratories I his is to certify that ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - SIMI VALLEY 2655 PARK CENTER DRIVE, SUITE A SIMI VALLEY, CA 93065 has complied with

More information

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler Application Note By: Anne Jurek Abstract In order to determine the amount

More information

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1 Introduction Method 624 is for the determination of volatile organic compounds in industrial discharges and other liquid environmental samples by gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC/MS).

More information

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By Tyler Trent Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds

More information

ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. Eight Walkup Drive Westborough, Massachusetts (508)

ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. Eight Walkup Drive Westborough, Massachusetts (508) Eight Walkup Drive Westborough, Massachusetts 01581-1019 (508) 898-9220 www.alphalab.com MA:M-MA086 NH:200301-A CT:PH-0574 ME:MA086 RI:65 NY:11148 NJ:MA935 Army:USACE CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client: Fulham

More information

Chemical Solvents 1010 Dennison Road Cleveland, OH 44109 Chris Rander Client Project: S12054050614/2106050914 EA Group Workorder Number: 140500165 Received on May 9, 2014 The following analytical report

More information

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File MEMO To: Nate Nemani USEPA Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Mail Code: LU-9J Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File Arcadis of Michigan, LLC 300 S. Washington Square Suite 315 Lansing

More information

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds Permit Guidance 12 Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds Statutory references: ORC 6111.01, 6111.03, 6111.04 Rule references: OAC 3745-1-05,

More information

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1 Application Note US EPA Method 524.4 with the Tekmar Lumin P & T Concentrator and Thermo Scientific TRACE 1310 GC and ISQ LT MS System Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1 Abstract

More information

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler Application Note Abstract Automation is the key to increasing laboratory productivity and minimizing costs. It is

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT L White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA TOWN OF EASTHAM /19/17

ANALYTICAL REPORT L White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA TOWN OF EASTHAM /19/17 ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA 01507 ATTN: Phone: Vijay Jain (888) 377-7678 The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical. This report/data

More information

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract. Application Note 8 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-5 Application Note Environmental, Canister, TO-5, Air Monitoring, Air Toxics Abstract This application

More information

BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA Ph ; Fax

BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA Ph ; Fax BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA 94804-3614 Ph. 510-236-2325; Fax 510-236-2335 E-mail info@berkeleyanalytical.com VOC Emissions from Building Products Customer & Building

More information

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA Method 8260C Application Note Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water and soil matrices the USEPA

More information

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL Challenges of Water Monitoring Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) can have negative health impacts even at ppb levels VOC concentrations can

More information

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound When Using Nitrogen as a Gas Application Note By: Anne Jurek Abstract For many years Helium has been the gas of choice for purging Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

More information

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to. Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis Anne Jurek Introduction: Over the past decade, the need for environmental laboratoriess using purge and trap systems to report at or below the Method Detection

More information

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS ENVIRONMENTAL application note U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD 524.2 USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS Cheri Coody, Public Health Laboratory, Mississippi State Health Department, Jackson, MS USA Michael J.

More information

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Application Note US EPA Method 524.2 with the Teledyne Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator and Agilent 7890B GC / 5977A MS Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Abstract US EPA Method

More information

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS APPLICATION NOTE: TECHNOLOGY: INDUSTRY: AN1806 P+T VOC ENV US EPA Method 524.2 with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS Amy Nutter, Applications Chemist; Teledyne

More information

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California TETRA TECH, INC. February 5, 2016 Lynn Nakashima Berkeley Regional Office 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200C Berkeley, California 94710 Subject: Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond

More information

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek Applications Chemist Abstract A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples The United States Environmental

More information

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Lorinda Gardner, Director, R15 Date: Carlos Rubinstein, Texas Border Area Director From: Valerie E. Meyers, Ph.D. Toxicology Section,

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT L White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA TOWN OF EASTHAM /07/18

ANALYTICAL REPORT L White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA TOWN OF EASTHAM /07/18 Serial_No:06071815:08 ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: L1819953 White Water Inc. 253B Worcester Road Charlton, MA 01507 ATTN: Phone: Vijay Jain (888) 377-7678 06/07/18 The original project report/data package

More information

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs JSB is an authorised partner of Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs Anne Jurek #123 Abstract: The need to increase productivity and reduce cost is becoming of greater concern to environmental

More information

Readiness thru Health

Readiness thru Health DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CENTER FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 5158 BLACKHAWK ROAD ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21010-5403 MCHB-TS-RDE - MEMORANDUM FOR Command Surgeon (LTC (b) (6) ),

More information

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Introduction Purge and Trap (P&T) concentrators

More information

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements By Jason S. Herrington, PhD Abstract The following study evaluated the efficacy of pairing a Markes Unity with CIA Advantage preconcentrator with

More information

COMPLIANCE EMISSIONS TEST California Dept. of Public Health Standard Method Version 1.1 and FloorScore Flooring Evaluation

COMPLIANCE EMISSIONS TEST California Dept. of Public Health Standard Method Version 1.1 and FloorScore Flooring Evaluation COMPLIANCE EMISSIONS TEST California Dept. of Public Health Standard Method Version 1.1 and FloorScore Flooring Evaluation SAMPLE DESCRIPTION & TESTING PARAMETERS Tesoro Woods submitted exemplars of their

More information

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

Thermal Desorption Technical Support Thermal Desorption Technical Support Note 86a: US EPA Method TO-17 for Monitoring Air Toxics in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes and Automated, Cryogen-free Thermal Desorption Application Note Environmental,

More information

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Environmental Applications Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air By Jason S. Herrington Abstract The following study evaluated the efficacy of using Nutech s 8900DS preconcentrator

More information

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C APPLICATION NOTE 10441 Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C Authors Andrea Caruso, 1 Tommaso Albertini, 1 Jacob A. Rebholz 2 ; 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific,

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod ANALYTICAL REPORT Job Number: 200-33700-1 SDG Number: 33700 Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod For: Dawson Technical, LLC 900 Fort Street Mall Suite 1700 Honolulu, HI 96813 Attention: Troy Hile James

More information

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 JSB is an authorised partner of A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek #101 Introduction: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)

More information

JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2011 DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEM OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING REPORT #5 EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION ITHACA, NEW YORK

JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2011 DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEM OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING REPORT #5 EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION ITHACA, NEW YORK JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2011 DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEM OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING REPORT #5 EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION ITHACA, NEW YORK SITE NO. 7-55-010 January 25, 2012 DRAFT WSP Engineering

More information

BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA Ph ; Fax

BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA Ph ; Fax BERKELEY ANALYTICAL 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA 94804-3614 Ph. 510-236-2325; Fax 510-236-2335 E-mail info@berkeleyanalytical.com VOC Emissions from Building Products Customer & Building

More information

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc. Application Note SI-02408 Evaluation of EPA Method 524.3: a New Draft Method for the Analysis of VOCs in Drinking Water using GC/MS and V:Results GC/MS Software Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc. Introduction

More information

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Optimizing Standard Preparation JSB is an authorised partner of Optimizing Standard Preparation Anne Jurek #106 Abstract: Standard preparation can often be a time consuming, tedious process. The opportunity for human error or inconsistencies

More information

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to. ANNE JUREK Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis Using the EST Analyticall Sampling System and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s Introduction: The USEPA developedd Method 8260B for the determination

More information

LIMITED AMBIENT AIR QUALITY EVALUATION. Town of Flower Mound August 2011 Nine Monitoring Sites Flower Mound, Denton County, Texas

LIMITED AMBIENT AIR QUALITY EVALUATION. Town of Flower Mound August 2011 Nine Monitoring Sites Flower Mound, Denton County, Texas LIMITED AMBIENT AIR QUALITY EVALUATION Town of Flower Mound August 2011 Nine Monitoring Sites Flower Mound, Denton County, Texas Project 115069 October 4, 2011 A Report Prepared for: Town of Flower Mound

More information

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA Key Words: GC-TOFMS,

More information

PROJECT ID: W09341 LABORATORY REPORT NUMBER: L

PROJECT ID: W09341 LABORATORY REPORT NUMBER: L Serialized: 04/25/2016 09:49am QC21 JERRY HAAG LEBANON BOROUGH ELEMENTARY 6 MAPLE STREET LEBANON,NJ 08833 Regarding: LEBANON BOROUGH ELEMENTARY 6 MAPLE STREET LEBANON, NJ 08833 PROJECT ID: W09341 LABORATORY

More information

Drake Petroleum Company, Inc. Accutest Job Number: JB Total number of pages in report:

Drake Petroleum Company, Inc. Accutest Job Number: JB Total number of pages in report: e-hardcopy 2.0 Automated Report New Jersey 05/06/15 05/06/15 Technical Report for Drake Petroleum Company, Inc. 146282.003 PO#007805 Accutest Job Number: Sampling Date: 03/25/15 Report to: Brown & Caldwell

More information

McCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL INC Willow Pass Road Pittsburg CA

McCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL INC Willow Pass Road Pittsburg CA Comparison of VOC : s, Target Lists, MAI Acenaphthene 83-32-9 Acetalaldehyde (Ethanal) 75-07-0 Acetone 67-64-1 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 Acetophenone 96-86-2 Acrolein (Propenal) 107-02-8 Acrylamide 79-06-1

More information

Laboratory Report Number(s) Lone Tree Road (Deep) 10/5/15, 10/19/15, 6/13/16. Address Sample Date(s) Analyses Requested

Laboratory Report Number(s) Lone Tree Road (Deep) 10/5/15, 10/19/15, 6/13/16. Address Sample Date(s) Analyses Requested July 14, 216 Mr. Shaun Lehman MDEQ-OOGM Lansing District Office Constitution Hall 2 South 525 West Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48913 Re: Residential Well Sampling Hartland 36 Gas Plant SE/NE/NW Section

More information

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS HS-20 & GCMS-QP2010Ultra Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS Introduction Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) refer to a group

More information

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai)

More information

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling JSB is an authorised partner of Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling Anne Jurek Introduction: #134 Static headspace sampling has always been a viable option

More information

Vapor Intrusion Sampling Options: Performance Data for Canisters, Badges, and Sorbent Tubes for VOCs

Vapor Intrusion Sampling Options: Performance Data for Canisters, Badges, and Sorbent Tubes for VOCs Vapor Intrusion Sampling Options: Performance Data for s, Badges, and Sorbent Tubes for VOCs Linda S. Coyne SKC Inc., 863 Valley View Road, Eighty Four, PA 1533 George Havalias, Maria C. Echarte American

More information

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8 application Note Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry Authors Ruben Garnica Dawn May PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT USA Method by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ

More information

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018 Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Facility I.D. No. 17166 AEC Project No. 14-059

More information

SOM01.2/Trace Volatiles SOP HW-34 EPA/Region II TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOM01.2/Trace Volatiles SOP HW-34 EPA/Region II TABLE OF CONTENTS SOM01.2/Trace Volatiles SOP HW-34 EPA/Region II TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......... 1 Scope and Applicability. 1 Summary......... 1 Data Qualifiers..... 1 Lab Qualifiers...... 2 Reviewer Qualifications.

More information

AA-ANSIBIFMA-Jun2408, Page 1 of 16

AA-ANSIBIFMA-Jun2408, Page 1 of 16 356-001-01AA-ANSIBIFMA-Jun2408, Page 1 of 16 BERKELEY ANALYTICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC 815 Harbour Way South, Suite 6 Richmond, CA 94804-3612 Ph. 510-236-2325; Fax 510-236-2335 E-mail baalab@berkeleyanalytical.com

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 0 Community Drive Suite South Burlington, VT 00 Tel: (0)0-0 TestAmerica Job ID: 00-0- TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 00-0 Client For: ARCADIS U.S. Inc

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Kingston Job Description: Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Kingston Job Description: Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency ANALYTICAL REPORT Job Number: 420-106065-1 SDG Number: Kingston Job Description: Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency For: Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency PO Box 6219 999 Flatbush Road Kingston,

More information

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note Environmental Author Anne Jurek Applications

More information

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds INSTRUMENTS IN. Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic ompounds Application Note 00 Preconcentrator G/MS Analysis Authors Thomas X. Robinson, Daniel B. ardin, Entech

More information

University of Tennessee Safety Procedure

University of Tennessee Safety Procedure University of Tennessee Safety Procedure Program Subject: Chemicals Requiring Review Prior to Use Procedure Review/Revised: 12/15/08 Affected Area/Department: Laboratories at the University Date Effective:

More information

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK Automed Sampling of Methanol Extractions Applicion Note Environmental Author Anne Jurek Applicions Chemist EST Analytical Cincinni, OH

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 0 Community Drive Suite South Burlington, VT 00 Tel: (0)0-0 TestAmerica Job ID: 00-- Client For: ARCADIS U.S. Inc Massena Facility, Route East Chevrolet

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 0 Community Drive Suite South Burlington, VT 00 Tel: (0)0- TestAmerica Job ID: 00-- TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 00- Client For: ARCADIS U.S. Inc

More information

Allstate October 15, 2011 Location ID TCE (µg/m 3 ) PCE (µg/m 3 ) IA-15 ND ND IA-16 ND ND IA-17 ND ND IA-J9 ND ND IA-M11 ND ND IA-Q11 ND ND

Allstate October 15, 2011 Location ID TCE (µg/m 3 ) PCE (µg/m 3 ) IA-15 ND ND IA-16 ND ND IA-17 ND ND IA-J9 ND ND IA-M11 ND ND IA-Q11 ND ND Lockheed Martin Corporation 2950 N. Hollywood Way, Suite 125 Burbank, CA 91505 Telephone 817-495-0251 Fax 817-762-4884 December 29, 2011 Mr. George Mullen Winthrop Management L.P. 1111 Marcus Avenue Lake

More information

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 0 Community Drive Suite South Burlington, VT 00 Tel: (0)0-0 TestAmerica Job ID: 00-- TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 00- Client For: ARCADIS U.S. Inc

More information