TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES PROJECT LOCATION MAP LIST OF APPENDICES WATER DISTRICT MAP & DESCRIPTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
|
|
- Jared Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL... 1 II. PROJECT PLANNING AREA... 1 III. EXISTING FACILITIES... 2 IV. NEED FOR PROJECT... 2 V. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED... 3 VI. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE... 5 VII. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET... 7 VIII. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION... 8 IX. CONCLUSIONS... 8 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F WATER DISTRICT MAP & DESCRIPTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS UNIT DEFINITIONS HEALTH DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE WATER SYSTEM MODEL FARM AGREEMENTS i
3 I. General The Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, and Elba have received interest in establishing a water district. A water district is a special use district required by Town Law where a specific area of the town receives a specific benefit. The cost for receiving this benefit will be borne solely by those property owners in that specific area. The purpose of this project is to provide safe and reliable potable water supply and fire protection to residences in the proposed water districts. II. Project Planning Area A. Location The project area has been identified through public interest. The Batavia North Water District, Oakfield Water District No. 6, and Elba Water District No. 1 will connect to existing Town of Batavia water districts and include 104,700 linear feet of new 8-inch and 12-inch diameter water main. The water main will be installed along Batavia-Oakfield Townline Road, Hutton Road, Lewiston Road, Fisher Road, Batavia-Elba Townline Road, Pekin Road, Oak Orchard Road, State Street Road, Bank Street Road, Norton Road, and Batavia-Stafford Townline Road. The new water main will serve a total of approximately 310 units and is shown as the solid red line in Figure 1. B. Environmental Resources Present There are farmlands present in the project area. All construction will be taking place in existing road-right of ways and proper construction mitigation and restoration efforts will be implemented based on standard practices common to the industry. C. Growth Areas and Population Trends The project area is primarily residential and agricultural. The Town census populations are listed in the table below Census Population 2010 Census Population Percent Change Town of Batavia - 5,915 6, % Town of Elba - 2,439 2, % Town of Oakfield - 3,203 3, % Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -1- March 2014
4 III. Existing Facilities A. Location Map The existing private well area is shown by the location of the proposed facilities in Figure 1. B. History The entire area of the proposed water districts is presently served by private wells. C. Condition of Facilities The Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, and Elba have received complaints about the quality, and at times, quantity of the private water supplies in the area. From public input it is known that many wells in this area are contaminated with high levels of sulfur, iron, nitrates, coliform, and high hardness level. Many of these wells require expensive treatment systems to make the water acceptable for domestic use. D. Financial Status of any Operating Facilities The residents of the entire area have private wells and furnish the operation and maintenance costs themselves. E. Existing & Future Water Demand The existing demands for the proposed service area are as follows: Average Day Maximum Day Peak Hour 50,300 gpd 100,600 gpd 201,200 gpd The future demands for the proposed service area are anticipated to utilize a 2% increase per year. Although the 2010 census data indicates a 15% population growth for the Town of Batavia, analysis has shown that this number is inflated. The 2010 census data includes housing facilities that were not counted in the 2000 Census. The 2% increase being used takes into account more accurate population projections and the land use of the area. IV. Need For Project A. Health and Safety The proposed water distribution project will provide safe potable water to the residents of the proposed water districts and will eliminate the health risks associated with the quality and quantity of ground water in the area. Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -2- March 2014
5 The Genesee County Health Department began testing wells in the northeast area of the Town of Batavia in March 2010 due to suspected manure contamination. The initial findings showed both bovine and human bacteria present in the wells. The results from the northeast area of the Town of Batavia through April 28, 2010 include the following: 14 out of 38 tested positive for Bacteria 12 out of 13 test results showed nitrate levels between 0.05 and 9.99 ppm, with the remaining sample greater than 10 ppm. As a result of the testing in the northeast area, the Town of Batavia initiated well testing in other areas with the following results: 11 out of 52 tested positive for Bacteria 28 out of 47 test results showed nitrate levels between 0.05 and 9.99 ppm, and 3 out of 47 test results greater than 10 ppm. A letter from the New York State Department of Health has been included as Appendix D. B. System O & M A water distribution network will replace expensive individual water treatment units; this will reduce the operation and maintenance costs borne by the residents at this time. The Town of Batavia will provide operation and maintenance of the water districts. C. Growth While economic development is viewed as a project benefit, balancing economic development and land protection is necessary, critical, and provided for. The Town intends to limit water service connections within the boundaries of Agricultural Districts to only agricultural structures or land and structures that have already been approved for development. Thus, there are no anticipated long-term impacts to the Agricultural Districts as a result of the proposed action including no change in use of agricultural/residential lands within the Agricultural District. V. Alternatives Considered A. Description 1. Alternative 1 Null Alternative This alternative proposes to do nothing. This would mean continued health risks for the residents of the proposed water districts. 2. Alternative 2 New Water Distribution System This proposed action includes the installation of approximately 104,700 linear feet of 8-inch and 12-inch water main along Batavia-Oakfield Townline Road, Hutton Road, Lewiston Road, Fisher Road, Batavia-Elba Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -3- March 2014
6 Townline Road, Oak Orchard Road, State Street Road, Bank Street Road, Norton Road, and Batavia-Stafford Townline Road. The water main will be PVC as the Town of Batavia utilizes PVC for their standard material. Various water main diameters were analyzed and the selected sizes were chosen based on providing adequate fire flows and taking into account future service areas. The proposed water main will be installed in the rightof-way in order to provide services to the residents on each side of the roadways. 3. Alternative 3 New Water Distribution System New Source of Supply B. Design Criteria The additional capital cost of a new treatment system along with the establishment of a local source of supply would result in unit cost over $2,000 per year. The proposed Townline Water Project will be designed in accordance with New York State Department of Health standards and Ten State Standards to provide safe potable water and fire protection to the water district s residents. C. Map Figure 1 shows the map of the proposed water system. The legal map and description for each water district has been provided in Appendix A. D. Environmental Impacts There are no anticipated environmental impacts associated with any of the alternatives. However, an environmental review has been undertaken for Alternative 2. All construction will be done in existing road-right-of-ways and proper construction mitigation and restoration efforts will be implemented. E. Land Requirements There are no additional land requirements for Alternative 2. All water main construction is anticipated to take place within existing road right-of-ways. F. Construction Problems There is no known or anticipated construction problem for the new water district. G. Cost Estimates (Total Capital Costs) Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 $0 $6,115,230 $8,167,400 Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -4- March 2014
7 H. Advantages/Disadvantages Alternative 2 is the most viable alternative as it is consistent with the goals and needs of the Towns of Batavia, Elba, and Oakfield. The advantage of Alternative 2 is as follows: 1. It will eliminate the ongoing health problems and risks associated with the quality and quantity of ground water in the area. VI. Recommended Alternative The recommended alternative is Alternative 2: New Water Distribution System. A. Project Design 1. Water Supply The proposed water districts will receive water from Genesee County through the Monroe County Water Authority and the City of Batavia Water Supplies. 2. Treatment The City of Batavia Water Treatment Plant and the Monroe County Water Authority Shoremont Water Treatment Plant will provide treated water to the proposed water districts. The treated water will meet all the state and federal drinking water standards. 3. Storage A 1.5 and dual 1.25 million gallon water storage tanks will provide the water storage needs for this proposed water districts. No additional storage is required for this service area. 4. Pumping Stations Pumps located at the City of Batavia Water Treatment Plant and the MCWA s North Road Pump Station, pump water to the storage tanks and the distribution network. 5. Distribution Layout The distribution network is shown in Figure 1 at the end of this report for the project area. The Town of Batavia will be responsible for system operation and maintenance. Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -5- March 2014
8 6. Services The portion of the water service from the right-of-way to the main line will be installed under this project. The portion from the right-of-way to the home will be the responsibility of the homeowner. 7. Hydraulic Calculations B. Cost Estimate The hydraulic conditions of the proposed system were calculated using the WaterCAD hydraulic modeling software. They hydraulic analysis of the system includes the evaluation of available pressures and flows for the proposed Water District. Hydraulic analysis of the system included the evaluation of available pressures and flows during minimum day (average day 4), average day, maximum day (average day x 2), and peak hour (average day x 6) demand conditions. This analysis also evaluated the available fire flows under maximum day demands and determined the age of the water in the distribution system. The hydraulic analysis of the system indicates that adequate flows and pressures are available in the proposed system. Pressures in the new system range from 53 psi to 135 psi during average demand periods. Fire flows generally range from 631 gpm to 3,250 gpm in the proposed system. The project will meet NYSDOH standards and provide adequate fire flow. The estimated total capital cost for the Townline Water Project is detailed in Appendix B and summarized as follows: Construction cost with 5% Contingency $5,573,232 Legal & Administrative Costs $122,000 Engineering Costs $192,000 Services During Construction $228,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $6,115,230 Each District will bond separately for their share of the improvements. Several large dairy farms in the Town of Batavia and the Town of Elba have entered into agreements with their respective Towns to provide contributions to the project, making it more affordable to all. Those agreements are included as Appendix F. The funding and financing for the project will be provided by each of the proposed water districts. The total cost will be divided proportionally among the Districts so that every benefit unit in each district will pay equally toward the debt over the life of the bonding. Each District will own its proportionate share of the constructed facilities. Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -6- March 2014
9 C. Town of Batavia Water Rate Information The current water rate is $4.47 per 1,000 gallons of water used D. Definition of a Unit The Water District Benefit Basis Unit Definition is included in Appendix C. A summary is as follows: Residential Property - Single 1 Unit Residential property Double 1.5 Units Residential Property Triple 2.0 Units Developable Vacant Lot 0.1 Unit (Does not include land in Agricultural Districts or outside of the Smart Growth Area. These parcels are assessed a flat $10/year for the benefit of being in a Water District) Non-Residential Based on required/actual water usage Where: Number of Units = Usage/300GPD VII. Annual Operating Budget A1. Proposed Batavia North Water District Unit Costs The estimated average water district unit costs for the Town of Batavia are as follows: Total Capital Project Cost $6,115,230 District Share $3,081,191 Annual Debt Service (38 years, 3%) $136,988 Annual Farmer Contribution $32,175 Annual Debt after Farmer Contributions $104,813 Annual Debt Service/Unit (145 units) $723 Average Annual Water Cost/Unit $273 ($4.47/1,000 61,000 gal. /year) Total Estimated Average Unit Cost $996 per year A2. Proposed Oakfield Water District No. 6 Unit Costs The estimated average water district unit costs for the Town of Oakfield are as follows: Total Capital Project Cost $6,115,230 District Share $1,268,248 Annual Debt Service (38 years, 3%) $56,385 Annual Debt Service/Unit (78 units) $723 Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -7- March 2014
10 Average Annual Water Cost/Unit $273 ($4.47/1,000 61,000 gal. /year) Total Estimated Average Unit Cost $996 per year A3. Proposed Elba Water District No. 1 Unit Costs The estimated average water district unit costs for the Town of Elba are as follows: Total Capital Project Cost $6,115,230 District Share $1,765,791 Annual Debt Service (38 years, 3%) $78,506 Annual Farmer Contribution $15,617 Annual Debt after Farmer Contributions $62,889 Annual Debt Service/Unit (87 units) $723 Average Annual Water Cost/Unit $273 ($4.47/1,000 61,000 gal. /year) Total Estimated Average Unit Cost B. Other Costs $996 per year Service line $ 8-20/LF Well abandonment or separation $ VIII. Miscellaneous Information A. Options for property owner s well. 1. Abandon the well. 2. Keep well but separate it from public water plumbing. 3. Keep well and install backflow prevention. B. Service line information 1. A service line (up to R.O.W. line) will be installed to all residents. 2. There will be no future hook up charge for those that do not connect right away. IX. Conclusions The Towns of Batavia, Elba, and Oakfield are committed to providing safe and reliable potable water supply and fire protection to the residents in the project area. The Townline Water Project will be instrumental in achieving that goal. Map, Plan, and Report Towns of Batavia, Oakfield, & Elba Townline Water Project -8- March 2014
11 Figure 1 Project Location Map
12 3833 West Main St. Rd GENESEE COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK R Stephen Hawley Dr Pa rk Rd TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF STAFFORD Rd State S on Stegman Rd W Main Street Rd TOWNLINE WATER PROJECT LOCATION MAP Map Printed: 3/10/ I 90 Batavia Stafford Town Rd ist treet w Le Pratt Rd tr d Rd I 90 Batavia Stafford Town Rd et R Bank Stre E Saile Dr Oak Orchard Rd Kelsey Rd Slusser Rd d Galloway Rd I 90 re e 12" PROJECT LOCATION 12" 8" 8" Batavia Stafford Town Rd " 12 Downey Rd 8" St Rd 8" k on ist Batavia Elba Townline Rd 8" w Le TOWN OF BATAVIA I 90 q Norton Rd Rd 8" Harloff Rd d Ba n in 12 " " 12 S Pearl Rd Edgerton Rd 8" t 8" R Ford Oak Orchard Rd S in Batavia Oakfield Town Line Rd Batavia Elba Townline Rd Chapel St Bridge Rd Old Ford Rd Pe k 8" t Ba d Maple A ve S Main S t Weatherwax Rd Church St Pine St Haxton Ln Ma Macomber Rd Drake Street Rd Drake St S Hutton Rd e Av Fisher Rd k Maple Ave C e Av N Pearl St r Pa y ar Fox Rd N Pearl Rd yr Ma ltb Judge Rd anic S R le West Ave W Avenue Rd TOWN OF OAKFIELD Maltby Rd TOWN OF ELBA Rd S Pearl St on Mech d ist Albion Rd Bliss Rd Le w il rrv Miles
13 Appendix A Proposed District Map & Description
14 TOWN OF BATAVIA PROPOSED BATAVIA NORTH WATER DISTRICT The boundary of the proposed Town of Batavia, Batavia North Water District includes all that tract or parcel of land situated in the Town of Batavia, County of Genesee, State of New York, being described as follows: Beginning at a point which is the intersection of the Batavia/Alabama Municipal Boundary and the Batavia/Oakfield Municipal Boundary; thence, 1. Easterly, along the Batavia/Oakfield Municipal Boundary and the Batavia/Elba Municipal Boundary, a distance of 47,552 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of the Batavia Municipal Boundary; thence, 2. Southerly, along the Batavia/Stafford Municipal Boundary, a distance of 8,118 feet, more or less, to a point on the Batavia/Stafford Municipal Boundary at the easterly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 3. Westerly, along the easterly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 3,000 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 4. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , a distance of 3,098 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 5. Easterly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 217 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 6. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , through Tax Parcel number , and continuing along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 849 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 7. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 596 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 8. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 434 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 9. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 1,210 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 10. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 732 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax parcel number ; thence, 11. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 856 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 12. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 185 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 13. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 920 feet, more of less, to the centerline of Bank Street Road; thence, 14. Southerly, along centerline of Bank Street Road, a distance of 140 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline Bank Street Road at the intersection of the easterly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence,
15 15. Westerly, along the easterly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number and the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 991 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 16. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 112 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 17. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,349 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 18. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 156 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 19. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , , , and , a distance of 4,657 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 20. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , a distance of 1,178 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 21. Westerly, through Tax Parcel number , and along the existing boundary of the Consolidated Water District, a distance of 580 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 22. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and along the existing Consolidated Water District, a distance of 183 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 23. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number and continuing through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 346 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 24. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 175 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 25. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel numbers , , , across the right-of-way of State Street Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), and continuing through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,063 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 26. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 560 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 27. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 887 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 28. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 582 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 29. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel number , across Oak Orchard Road (66 feet wide right-of-way), and continuing through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,065 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of the existing Consolidated Water District; thence,
16 30. Southerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 972 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 31. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 3,613 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 32. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,926 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 33. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , a distance of 3,478 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number, ; thence, 34. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,002 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 35. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 1,119 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 36. Southerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 993 feet, more or less, to a southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 37. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 683 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 38. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,841 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 39. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,330 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 40. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,218 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 41. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 676 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 42. Southerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,028 feet, more or less, to a southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 43. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 651 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of ; thence, 44. Southerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , a distance of 1,602 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number at the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 45. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number and the westerly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number to the centerline of Lewiston Road (66 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 45 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Lewiston Road; thence, 46. Southwesterly, across Lewiston Road (66 feet wide righ-of-way), a distance of 36 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Lewiston Road; thence, 47. Northwesterly, along the centerline of Lewiston Road, a distance of 123 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the centerline of Lewiston Road and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 48. Westerly, along the easterly extension of the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , through Tax Parcel numbers and , and continuing
17 along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,174 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 49. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and , a distance of 1,320 feet, more or less, to the northerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 50. Northwesterly, along the southwesterly right-of-way of Lewiston Road, a distance of 73 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of Lewiston Road and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 51. Southwesterly, following the Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel number and continuing along a southeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 111 feet, more or less, to a southerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 52. Northwesterly, along a southwesterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 125 feet, more or less, to the westerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 53. Southwesterly, along a southeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 19 feet, more or less, to a westerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 54. Southeasterly, along a northeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 24 feet, more or less, to an easterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 55. Southwesterly, along a southeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 190 feet, more or less, to a southerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 56. Northwesterly, along a southwesterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 250 feet, more or less, to the westerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 57. Northeasterly, along the northwesterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 319 feet, more or less, to the northerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 58. Northwesterly, along the southwesterly right-of-way of Lewiston Road, a distance of 78 feet, more or less, to the easterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 59. Southwesterly, along the southeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 192 feet, more or less, to the southerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 60. Northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , , , and , a distance of 688 feet, more or less, to the westerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 61. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 401 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 62. Southerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,118 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 63. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,314 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax parcel number ; thence, 64. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,021 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 65. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 1,991 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the
18 easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 66. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 67. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,158 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 68. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 63 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing Consolidated Water District; thence, 69. Westerly, following the existing Consolidated Water District through Tax Parcel number and continuing across Downey Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 1,693 feet, more or less, to a point along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 70. Southerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 140 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 71. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 212 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 72. Northerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and continuing through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,177 feet, more or less, to a point along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 73. Westerly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , through Tax Parcel number , and continuing along the southerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , , , and , a distance of 9,335 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 74. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,314 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of ; thence, 75. Westerly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 159 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 76. Northerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 803 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a line 500 feet south of the centerline of Townline Road (66 feet wide right-of-way) and the westerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 77. Westerly, through Tax Parcel number and across Macomber Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 1,476 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a line 500 feet south of the centerline of Townline Road and the Batavia/Alabama Municipal Boundary; thence, 78. Northerly, along the Batavia/Alabama Municipal Boundary, a distance of 500 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. All as shown on the maps prepared by the Town of Batavia entitled, Proposed Batavia North Water District 2014 Water System Improvements, dated 3/2014. The Town of Batavia, Batavia North Water District, as described above, contains approximately 4,137.5 acres of land.
19 BATAVIA NORTH WATER DISTRICT 4,137.5± ACRES POINT OF BEGINNING TOWN OF OAKFIELD TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF ALABAMA TOWN OF BATAVIA
20 TOWN OF OAKFIELD TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF BATAVIA
21 TOWN OF OAKFIELD TOWN OF ELBA TOWN OF BATAVIA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF BATAVIA
22 TOWN OF ELBA TOWN OF BATAVIA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF BATAVIA
23 TOWN OF ELBA TOWN OF STAFFORD TOWN OF BATAVIA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
24 TOWN OF ELBA PROPOSED WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 The boundary of the proposed Town of Elba Water District No. 1 includes all that tract or parcel of land situated in the Town of Elba, County of Genesee, State of New York, being described as follows: Beginning at a point which is the intersection of the Elba, Batavia, and Oakfield Municipal Boundaries; thence, 1. Easterly, along the Elba/Batavia Municipal Boundary, a distance of 26,270 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of the Batavia Municipal Boundary; thence, 2. Northerly, through the right-of-way of Batavia Stafford Townline Road (66' wide rightof-way) and continuing along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 688 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 3. Easterly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 484 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 4. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 330 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 5. Northwesterly, along the northeasterly line of Tax Parcel number and continuing through the right-of-way of Bank Street Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 863 feet, more or less, to a point on the northwesterly right-of-way of Bank Street Road; thence, 6. Northeasterly, along the northwesterly right-of-way of Bank Street Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 417 feet, more or less, to the easterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 7. Northwesterly, along the northeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to the northerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 8. Southwesterly, along the northwesterly line of Tax Parcel number and through Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 159 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 9. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 457 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 10. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 366 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 11. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and and continuing through the right-of-way of Norton Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 1,060 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Norton Road; thence, 12. Northerly, along the westerly right-of-way of Norton Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 632 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 13. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,298 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence,
25 14. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 691 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 15. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 2,961 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 16. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,336 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 17. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , a distance of 7,815 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 18. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,315 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 19. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax parcel number , a distance of 3,562 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 20. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 358 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 21. Easterly, along the southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 107 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly line of Tax Parcel number that is 500 feet from the centerline of Oak Orchard Road (66 feet wide right-of-way); thence, 22. Northerly, along a line parallel to, and 500 feet distant easterly from, the centerline of Oak Orchard Road (66 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 6,056 feet, more or less, to point on the northerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 23. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 360 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 24. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 43 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax parcel number ; thence, 25. Northwesterly, along the northeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 63 feet, more or less, to a northerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 26. Southwesterly, along the Town/Village of Elba Municipal Boundary, a distance of 1,206 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 27. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 4,756 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 28. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 132 feet, more or less, to a point on the northerly line of Tax Parcel number that is 500 feet from the centerline of Oak Orchard Road (66 feet wide right-of-way); thence, 29. Southerly, along a line parallel to, and 500 feet distant westerly from, the centerline of Oak Orchard Road (66 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 4,053 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 30. Southeasterly, along a northeasterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 205 feet, more or less, to the easterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 31. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 60 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 32. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 239 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 33. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,644 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence,
26 34. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 35. Southwesterly, through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 606 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 36. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 136 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 37. Southwesterly, through and perpendicular to the right-of-way of Pekin Road (49.5 wide right-of-way), a distance of 50 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Pekin Road; thence, 38. Northwesterly, along the westerly right-of-way of Pekin Road (49.5 feet wide right-ofway), a distance of 59 feet, more or less, to the northerly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 39. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 40. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , and continuing through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 2,652 feet, more or less, to a point on an easterly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 41. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 887 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 42. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,225 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 43. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 236 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 44. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 236 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 45. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,398 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 46. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 380 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 47. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,413 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 48. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 160 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 49. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,246 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 50. Southerly, along the Elba/Oakfield Municipal Boundary, a distance of 2,173 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. All as shown on the maps prepared by the Town of Batavia entitled, "Town of Elba Water District No. 1," dated 3/2014. The Town of Elba Water District No. 1, as described above, contains approximately 1,793.9 acres of land.
27 TOWN OF ELBA WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 1,793.9± ACRES TOWN OF OAKFIELD POINT OF BEGINNING TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF BATAVIA
28 VILLAGE OF ELBA TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF BATAVIA
29 TOWN OF BATAVIA POINT OF BEGINNING TOWN OF STAFFORD TOWN OF BATAVIA
30 TOWN OF OAKFIELD PROPOSED WATER DISTRICT NO. 6 The boundary of the proposed Town of Oakfield, Water District No. 6 "West" includes all that tract or parcel of land situated in the Town of Oakfield, County of Genesee, State of New York, being described as follows: Beginning at a point which is the intersection of the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary and the Oakfield/Alabama Municipal Boundary; thence, 1. Easterly, along the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary, a distance of 21,299 feet, more or less, to a point on the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary at the intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 2. Northerly, along the southerly extension of the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and the Oakfield/Elba Municipal Boundary, a distance of 2,006 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 3. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 2,000 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 4. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 2,002 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 5. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , , across Fisher Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), and along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 3,295 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 6. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 344 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 7. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,464 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 8. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 3,060 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 9. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,799 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 10. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the easterly line of the Village of Oakfield Municipal Boundary, across Lewiston Road (66 feet wide rightof-way), and along the westerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , , and , a distance of 5,300 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 11. Easterly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 348 feet, more or less, to a northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 12. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 283 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 13. Easterly, along a southerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 605 feet, more or less, to a northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 14. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 675 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence,
31 15. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 651 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 16. Northerly along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 167 feet, more or less, to a point on the easterly line of Tax parcel number that is 500 feet northerly from the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary; thence, 17. Westerly, along a line parallel to and 500 feet northerly of the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary, a distance of 591 feet, more or less to a point on the easterly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 18. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 39 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 19. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 423 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 20. Southerly along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 21 feet, more or less to a point on the westerly line of Tax Parcel number that is 500 feet northerly from the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary; thence, 21. Westerly, along a line parallel to and 500 feet northerly from the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary, a distance of 543 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing South Pearl Water Benefit Area; thence, 22. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing South Pearl Water Benefit Area, a distance of 371 feet, more or less, to a southeasterly corner of said benefit area; thence, 23. Westerly, along the southerly line of the existing South Pearl Benefit Area and across South Pearl Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 537 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of said benefit area; thence, 24. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number and westerly line of the South Pearl Benefit Area, a distance of 204 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 25. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number and the existing South Pearl Benefit Area, a distance of 105 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 26. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 225 feet, more or less, to a point on an easterly line of Tax Parcel number and that is 500 feet from Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary; thence, 27. Westerly, along a line parallel to, and 500 feet northerly from, the Oakfield/Batavia Municipal Boundary, a distance of 556 feet, more or less, to a point on the easterly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence 28. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 37 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 29. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 149 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 30. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 230 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 31. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 478 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 32. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel numbers , a distance of 2,100 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence,
32 33. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , through Tax Parcel number , and continuing along the north line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 3,333 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 34. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 140 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 35. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,638 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 36. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 136 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 37. Westerly, along a northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 984 feet, more or less, to a southeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 38. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 66 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 39. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number and the westerly extension of the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 633 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Hutton Road (49.5 feet wide right-of-way); thence, 40. Northerly, along the centerline of Hutton Road, a distance of 1,566 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Hutton Road at the easterly extension of the northerly line of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 41. Westerly, along the easterly extension of northerly line of Tax Parcel number and the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 158 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 42. Southwesterly, along the northwesterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 472 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 43. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 1,341 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 44. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 1,125 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 45. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 2,716 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 46. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 225 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 47. Northerly, along the easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 50 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 48. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers , , and , and through Tax Parcel number , a distance of 265 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 49. Northerly, along an easterly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 375 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 50. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 348 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 51. Southerly, along a westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 149 feet, more or less, to a southwesterly corner Tax Parcel number ; thence,
33 52. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel numbers and , a distance of 554 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 53. Southerly, along the westerly line of Tax Parcel number , a distance of 70 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly corner of Tax Parcel number ; thence, 54. Westerly, along the northerly line of Tax Parcel number and the westerly extension of the northerly line of Tax Parcel number and across Macomber Road (66 feet wide right-of-way), a distance of 232 feet, more or less, to a point on the Oakfield/Alabama Municipal Boundary; thence, 55. Southerly, along the Oakfield/Alabama Municipal Boundary, a distance of 346 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. All as shown on a map prepared by the Town of Batavia entitled, "Town of Oakfield Water District No. 6," dated 3/2014. The Town of Oakfield Water District No. 6, as described above, contains approximately 1,367.4 acres of land.
34 SOUTH PEARL WATER BENEFIT AREA TOWN OF ALABAMA TOWN OF OAKFIELD WATER DISTRICT NO. 6 1,367.4 ACRES TOWN OF BATAVIA POINT OF BEGINNING TOWN OF BATAVIA
35 VILLAGE OF OAKFIELD SOUTH PEARL WATER BENEFIT AREA TOWN OF ELBA TOWN OF OAKFIELD WATER DISTRICT NO. 6 1,367.4± ACRES TOWN OF BATAVIA TOWN OF BATAVIA
36 Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost
37 TOWN OF BATAVIA, ELBA, & OAKFIELD PROPOSED TOWNLINE WATER PROJECT OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - TOWN FUNDED 1/9/2014 1/9/2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED TOTAL 1 Furnish and Install 8" Diameter PVC Water Main LF 74,900 $24.00 $1,797,600 2 Furnish and Install 12" Diameter PVC Water Main LF 29,500 $32.00 $944,000 3 Directional Drill with 8" Water Main (HDPE) LF 0 $ $0 4 Furnish and Install 24" Casing with 8" Diameter PVC Water Main LF 57 $ $17,100 5 Furnish and Install 24" Casing with 12" Diameter PVC Water Main LF 160 $ $48,000 6 Furnish and Install 8" In-Line Gate Valves Complete EA 64 $1, $70,400 7 Furnish and Install 12" In-Line Gate Valves Complete EA 27 $2, $54, " Dry Connection to Existing Water Main Complete EA 3 $2, $6,000 9 Wet Connection to Existing Water Main with 8" Tapping Sleeve and Valve EA 1 $4, $4, Wet Connection to Existing Water Main with 12" Tapping Sleeve and Valve EA 3 $6, $19, Furnish and Install Hydrant Assemblies EA 165 $4, $709, Furnish and Install Short Side Water Service EA 178 $2, $498, Furnish and Install Long Side Water Service EA 129 $3, $438, Rock Removal CY 6,640 $71.00 $471, Compaction Testing LS 1 0.5% of total 1-14 $25, Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Including Signs 2% of LS 1 and Flagmen Meeting NYSDOT Requirements total 1-15 $102, Mobilization LS 1 2% of total 1-15 $102,000 SUBTOTAL = $5,307,840 CONTINGENCY (5%) = $265,392 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL = $5,573,232 LEGAL & ADMINSTRATION (2.2%) = $122,000 ENGINEERING (3.45%) = $192,000 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION (4.1%) = $228,000 TOTAL = $6,115,232 TOTAL ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST $6,115,230 GRANT $0 LOAN $6,115,230 LOAN TERM (years) 38 INTEREST RATE 3.00% DEBT SERVICE $271,879 ANNUAL FARM CONTRIBUTION $47,790 NUMBER OF UNITS 310 ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE PER UNIT $723 ANNUAL WATER COST ($4.47/1,000 gallons, 61,000 gallons/year) $273 TOTAL ANNUAL UNIT COST $996
38 Appendix C Unit Definitions
39 Water District Benefit Basis Unit Definition Each single-family residential dwelling shall be considered one unit. Included in this category will be single-family houses, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. Multiple single-family dwellings on the same parcel of land will each be considered an individual unit. Each additional livable area for apartments, duplexes, triplexes, etc. will be assessed 0.5 units for each additional livable area above the base unit of one. Seasonal or non-continuous occupancy will not be taken into consideration when determining what constitutes a unit. Any facility will be considered as a minimum of one unit. All vacant land currently in a certified agricultural district is exempt and will not be assessed. All parcels of vacant land which are developable will each be assessed 0.1 units. All vacant parcels that are classified as "not developable," as set forth in this Map, Plan, and Report, shall be assessed the sum of Ten and No More Dollars ($10.00 and No More), per year. Non-residential, recreational, educational, commercial, industrial and agricultural facilities will be assigned an equivalent number of units based on the greater of the two methods as follows: 1. The average daily usage divided by 300 gpd (Average Daily Usage 300 = number of units). 2. Expected average daily usage (based on type of facility) divided by 300 gpd. Type of facility and expected flow rates (gals/day) are listed below. (1): Flow Rate Per Person Flow Rate Per Unit Type of Facility (Gals./day) (Gals./day) Campgrounds (Recreational Vehicle - Per site) Sewered sites 100 Central Facilities Served Sites, 300' Radius 100 Peripheral Sites, 500' Radius 75 Subtractions from above No Showers 25 Dual Service (Central Facilities and Sewered facilities 25 overlapping the central) Campgrounds (Summer Camp) Central Facilities 50 Separate Facilities Toilet 10 Shower 25 Kitchen 10 Camps, Day 13 Add for lunch 3 Add for showers 5 Carwash, assuming no recycle Tunnel, Per Car 80 Rollover, per Car 40 Wandwash, per 5 minutes cycle 20 Churches - Per seat 3 (With Catering - add food service value)
40 Clubs Country Type of Facility Flow Rate Per Person (Gals./day) Flow Rate Per Unit (Gals./day) Per Resident Member 75 Per Non-Resident Member 25 Factories Per person/shift 25 Add for showers 10 Food Service Operations (Per Seat) Ordinary Restaurant Hour Restaurant 50 Restaurant along Freeway 70 Tavern (little food service) 20 Curb service (Drive-in per car) 50 Catering, or Banquet Facilities 20 Hair Dresser Hospitals Hotels Per Station 170 Per bed 175 Per Room 120 add for banquet Facilities, Theatre, night club, as applicable Institutions (other than hospitals) Per person 125 Laundromats (Per machine) 580 Motels Per Living Unit 100 with Kitchen 150 Office Building (per use) Per Employee 15 Per Square Foot 0.1 Dentist - Per chair/day 750 Parks (per picnicker) Restrooms only 5 Showers and Restroom 10 Service Stations Per toilet (not including car wash) 400 Shopping Centers (Per sq. ft. -food extra) 0.1 Per Employee 15 Per Toilet 400 (1) Derived from Table 3. Expected Hydraulic Loading Rates, Design Standards for Wastewater Treatment Works Intermediate Size Sewage Facilities 1988.
41 Appendix D Health Department Correspondence
42
43
44 Appendix E Water System Models
45
46 Fire Flow Node FlexTable: Fire Flow Report (WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg) Current Time: hours Is Fire Flow Run Balanced? Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Pressure (Calculated System Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (System Lower Limit) (psi) Junction w/ Minimu m Pressure (Zone) Pressure (Calculat ed Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculat ed Residual) (psi) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Flow (Total Available) (gpm) Flow (Total Needed) (gpm) Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Fire Flow Iterations Label J (N/A) J , , J-16 J (N/A) J , , J-17 J (N/A) J , , J-18 J (N/A) J , , J-19 J (N/A) J , , J-20 J (N/A) J , , J-21 J (N/A) J , , J-22 J (N/A) J , , J-23 J (N/A) J , , J-24 J (N/A) J , , J-25 J (N/A) J , , J-26 J (N/A) J J-27 J (N/A) J , , J-28 J (N/A) J , , J-29 J (N/A) J , , J-30 J-44 TORREY 23.4 (N/A) J-44 TORREY , , J-31 J (N/A) J , , J-32 J-43 POST 27.8 (N/A) J-43 POST , , J-33 J (N/A) J , , J-34 J (N/A) J , , J-35 J (N/A) J , , J-36 J (N/A) J , , J-37 J (N/A) J J-38 J (N/A) J J-39 J (N/A) J J-40 J (N/A) J , , J-41 J (N/A) J , , J-42 LAMB J-42 LAMB 29.2 (N/A) J-42 LAMB , , J-43 POST J (N/A) J , , J-44 TORREY J (N/A) J , , J-45 OFFHAU S Page 1 of 1 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA /21/2014 Bentley WaterGEMS V8i (SELECTseries 3) [ ] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg
47 FlexTable: Junction Table (WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg) Current Time: hours ID Label J-16 J-17 J-18 J-19 J-20 J-21 J-22 J-23 J-24 J-25 J-26 J-27 J-28 J-29 J-30 J-31 J-32 J-33 J-34 J-35 J-36 J-37 J-38 J-39 J-40 J-41 J-42 LAMB J-43 POST J-44 TORREY J-45 OFFHAUS Elevation (ft) Zone <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> <None> Demand Collection <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 0 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> <Collection: 1 items> Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 1, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Pressure (psi) WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg 3/21/2014 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Bentley WaterGEMS V8i (SELECTseries 3) [ ] Page 1 of 1
48 FlexTable: Pipe Table (WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg) Current Time: hours Length (User Defined) (ft) Has User Defined Length? Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/s) Flow (gpm) Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Has Check Valve? Hazen- Williams C Material Diameter (in) Stop Node Start Node Length (Scaled) (ft) Label ID PVC 8.0 J-17 J-16 5, P PVC 8.0 J-19 J-18 3, P PVC 8.0 J-20 J-19 10, P PVC 8.0 J-21 J-20 7, P Ductile Iron 16.0 J-22 J-21 6, P Ductile Iron 12.0 J-23 J-22 3, P Ductile Iron 12.0 J-23 R-4 6, P Ductile Iron 12.0 J-22 R-4 7, P Ductile Iron 12.0 J-21 R-4 12, P PVC 12.0 J-24 J-17 5, P PVC 8.0 J-25 J-24 3, P PVC 12.0 J-26 J-25 5, P PVC 12.0 J-16 J-26 3, P Ductile Iron 12.0 R-4 J-24 13, P PVC 8.0 J-27 J-20 8, P PVC 8.0 J-28 J-19 1, P Ductile Iron 12.0 R-4 J-25 16, P PVC 8.0 J-29 J-20 2, P PVC 8.0 J-30 J-20 2, P PVC 12.0 J-32 J-31 3, P PVC 8.0 J-18 J-33 1, P PVC 8.0 J-34 J-33 1, P PVC 12.0 J-35 J-17 2, P PVC 12.0 J-36 J-35 4, P PVC 12.0 J-37 J-35 2, P PVC 8.0 J-38 J-16 8, P PVC 8.0 J-39 J-38 3, P PVC 8.0 J-40 J-38 4, P PVC 8.0 J-19 J-41 2, P PVC 8.0 J-42 LAMB J-17 8, P PVC 8.0 J-43 POST J-42 LAMB 2, P PVC 8.0 J-33 J-43 POST 2, P PVC 12.0 J-44 TORREY J-18 4, P PVC 12.0 J-31 J-44 TORREY 1, P PVC 12.0 J-45 OFFHAUS J-23 1, P PVC 12.0 J-18 J-45 OFFHAUS 4, P Page 1 of 1 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA /21/2014 Bentley WaterGEMS V8i (SELECTseries 3) [ ] Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCad-BNWD2014.wtg
49 Appendix F Farm Agreements
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
CITY OF PORTLAND, TEXAS SERVICE PLAN FOR ANNEXATION AREA
CITY OF PORTLAND, TEXAS SERVICE PLAN FOR ANNEXATION AREA Location and Acreage Approximately 1,863 acres of land in San Patricio County, located in the ETJ northwest of the existing City Limits. Metes and
More informationCITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 2015 AGENDA 2015 ANNEXATION MISC
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 2015 AGENDA 2015 ANNEXATION MISC-15-0005 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. APPLICANT: City of Papillion 122 East Third St. Papillion, NE 68046 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See
More informationCHAPTER 5 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CHAPTER 5 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Sec. 5-1. Purposes. Sec. 5-2. Definitions. Sec. 5-3. Determination of Necessity. Sec. 5-4. Establishment; Title. Sec. 5-5. Ordinance approving development plan
More informationMAP, PLAN AND REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED TOWNS OF VARICK AND ROMULUS WATER DISTRICT (NYS ROUTE 89) TOWNS OF ROMULUS & VARICK SENECA COUNTY, NEW YORK
MAP, PLAN AND REPORT OR THE PROPOSED TOWNS O VARICK AND ROMULUS WATER DISTRICT (NYS ROUTE 8) TOWNS O ROMULUS & VARICK SENECA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared or: TOWN O ROMULUS TOWN BOARD 45 Prospect St., PO
More information1 i12 4( H nnd Fl) (2 F Fxhtht I} Pa:e of
28231 11iB9 Exhibit 621A GIS Approved PROPOSED METES AND BOUNDS PD 621 PROPERTY AND SUBDISTRICT DESCRIPTIONS SUBDISTRICT 1 EXCLUDING Planned Development District (PDD) No. 339 (containing 9,865 square
More informationVILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK
14700 Ravinia Avenue Orland Park, IL 60462 www.orland-park.il.us Ordinance No: File Number: 2013-0239 AN ORDINANCE PROPOSING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2 IN THE, AND PROVIDING FOR
More informationVILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK
14700 Ravinia Avenue Orland Park, IL 60462 www.orland-park.il.us Ordinance No: File Number: 2013-0373 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 3 STATE OF ILLINOIS, COUNTIES OF COOK AND WILL
More informationSPRINGVILLE CITY, UTAH PRESSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DRAFT. MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN For the WEST FIELDS. February 11, 2014.
SPRINGVILLE CITY, UTAH PRESSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN For the WEST FIELDS February 11, 2014 Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. 240 West Center Street, Suite 200 Orem,
More informationSPRINGVILLE CITY, UTAH
SPRINGVILLE CITY, UTAH PRESSURE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN & CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN For the WEST FIELDS February 11, 2014 Adopted May 20, 2014 Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. 240 West Center Street,
More informationSummary of Legal Descriptions
Perimeter Descriptions Bounds Descriptions - perimeter descriptions without a direction of travel. Metes Descriptions - perimeter descriptions with a direction of travel described by a series of measurements.
More informationREZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to
Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* CHECK IF POINT OF CONTACT FOR APPLICATION Property
More informationTREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10 From: Date: Subject: Staff December 14, 2018 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS BYLAW NO. 2049
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS BYLAW NO. 2049 A Bylaw to Exempt from Taxation Certain Parcels of Land Used for Religious Worship Purposes, Hospital Purposes, Recreation Purposes and Charitable
More informationC-62 RELATED ACTS. Priv. Acts 1955, Ch. 275, "An Act to redefine the boundaries of the City of Belle Meade... C-63
C-62 RELATED ACTS Priv. Acts 1955, Ch. 275, "An Act to redefine the boundaries of the City of Belle Meade... C-63 C-63 CHAPTER NO. 275 1 HOUSE BILL NO. 758 (By Davidson Delegation) AN ACT to redefine the
More informationEngineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )
Engineer's Report for the Main Street Business Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year 2008-09) Prepared under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
More informationCONGLETON INDUSTRIAL PARK LT 6 EX W 300' & E 350' LT 7 BLK 1, a subdivision of land in the City of Overland Park, Johnson County, Kansas.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS Notice is hereby given that the City Planning Commission of Overland Park, Kansas, will hold a public hearing Monday, July
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON ORDER NO. 18-05-22-06 IN THE MATTER OF SURRENDER OF A PORTION OF COAST GUARD STATION ROAD (COUNTY ROAD NUMBER 65) AND A PORTION OF S. HARBOR
More information3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care
UTILITY REPORT FOR 3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care 1 st Submittal January 23, 2016 2 nd Submittal March 04, 2016 Prepared for: 3301 E. 120 th Ave, LLC. 8200 E. Maplewood Ave., Suite
More informationTOWNSHIP OF SCHUYUULL COUNTY OF SCRUYLMLL RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 7.9 RESOLUTION
TOWNSHIP OF SCHUYUULL COUNTY OF SCRUYLMLL RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 7.9, 1999 RESOLUTION C/9.3, DECLARING ThE INTENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SCHUYLKILL THAT THE PORTION OF UMON STREET ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY OF
More informationPW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works
Policy Statement: The Village of Kitscoty will provide snow and ice control on municipal streets and sidewalks according to determined priorities. Purpose: To provide direction and information to employees
More informationCITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 April 26, 2011
CITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 April 26, 2011 AGENCY: City of Perris PROJECT: Flood Control Maintenance District No. 1 TO: City Council
More informationEastlake Assited Living & Memory Care
UTILITY REPORT FOR Eastlake Assited Living & Memory Care 1 st Submittal January 23, 2016 2 nd Submittal March 04, 2016 June 7, 2016 Final Submittal August 08, 2016 Prepared for: 3301 E. 120 th Ave, LLC.
More informationVillages at Riverdale Thornton, CO
FINAL UTILITY REPORT Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO October 14, 216 Revised: March 29, 217 JN: 1539 Prepared for: PCS Group, Inc. 11 16 th Street #3 B-18 Denver, CO 8265 P: 33.531.495 Prepared by:
More informationLong Term Plan What is planned for Murchison?
Long Term Plan 2018-2028 What is planned for Murchison? 1.0 Introduction The following information provides an overview of significant projects Council has planned for the Murchison settlement in the Long
More informationProposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement
Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement The scope of work that follows incorporates and covers
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CLOSING DATE:
Request for Proposals 110 Westlake Drive City of West Lake Hills 110 Westlake Drive REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CLOSING DATE: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 City of West Lake Hills Request for Proposals 1 I. INTRODUCTION
More informationGIS Monroe Geographic Information System March 14, 2018
GIS Monroe Geographic Information System March 14, 2018 Goals Maintain Enterprise/County-wide geo-database Increase spatial accuracy of data Build and acquire more data layers Increase use of GIS; as another
More informationSnow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy
Page 1 CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Effective Date: Approved By: Approved On: March 17, 2015 City Council March 16, 2015 Revision Date: Resolution #: ------ PURPOSE: The City of Airdrie is responsible
More information2. That the designated areas consists of approximately acres, the population in the subject area is zero, and the land use type is industrial.
Joint Resolution City of Lewiston Minnesota Resolution 2016-16 Utica Township Resolution 6A In the matter of the Orderly Annexation Between the City of Lewiston and Utica Township Pursuant to Minnesota
More informationATTACHMENT A. Item #1 Minimum Bid: $3, Parcel No Assessed Value: $10,000 Acreage: 0
ATTACHMENT A Item #1 Minimum Bid: $3,634.59 Parcel No. 0610540500 Assessed Value: $10,000 Acreage: 0 Lots 5 and 6, Block 54, Town of Coulee Dam, Washington, according to the Second Revised Okanogan County
More informationAPPLICATION TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) SMALL SCALE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING 825 Ohio Avenue - Lynn Haven, FL 32444 (850) 265-2961 - (850) 265-3478 APPLICATION TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) SMALL SCALE Deadline to submit is 30 days
More informationMinutes for June 4, 2018 Special City Council Meeting
Minutes for June 4, 2018 Special City Council Meeting The special meeting of the Eureka City Council was called to order on June 4, 2018, at 5:35 p.m. by Mayor Miller in the council room of the Municipal
More informationTown of Barnstable. Department of Public Work. Snow and Ice Control Operations Plan
Town of Barnstable Department of Public Work Snow and Ice Control Operations Plan I. Mission: The mission of the Department of Public Works is to remove accumulations of snow and ice from town, county
More informationWater & Wastewater Facility Plan Update
ater & astewater Facility Plan Update South Kalispell Development Supplement to: ater Facility Plan Update, 2008 astewater Facility Plan Update, 2008 November, 2016 Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Basis
More informationCOUNCIL POLICY MANUAL
COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SECTION: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: SNOW & ICE CONTROL POLICY 2012/2013 GOAL: Pages: 1 of 10 Approval Date: Dec. 3, 2012 Res. # 1001/2012 To annually identify the winter maintenance costs
More informationProclaiming Certain Lands as Reservation for the Confederated Tribes of the
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/05/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-24174, and on govinfo.gov [4337-15] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
More informationAppendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014
Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand
More informationGIS Geographical Information Systems. GIS Management
GIS Geographical Information Systems GIS Management Difficulties on establishing a GIS Funding GIS Determining Project Standards Data Gathering Map Development Recruiting GIS Professionals Educating Staff
More informationFINAL PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR. Prepared by the
PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR Prepared by the Rapid City Growth Management Department January 17, 2008 INTRODUCTION Tax Increment Financing is a method of financing improvements and
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON ORDER NO. 18-04-10-06 IN THE MATTER OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED SURRENDER OF A PORTION OF COAST GUARD STATION ROAD (COUNTY
More informationI-94 COMMERCIAL LAND ±30.44 ACRES TH ST Eau Galle, WI 54747
PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS + + Located off I-94 and Hwy 63 Interchange 2,900 VPD + + Baldwin-Woodville Area School District + + Zoning: Commercial, Rural Residential + + 40 miles to St. Paul + + 25 miles to Menomonie,
More information73-2 have been satisfied; and
RESOLUTION NO. R- 86-104 W'dEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body, pursuant to the authority vested in Chapter 163 and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered
More informationSECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3
2018 SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3 IV. GENERAL FUND 001 DESCRIPTIONS... 4 V. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS... 6
More informationD C P\J C, D CD P\J R
COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DENVER THE MILE HIGH CITY Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* Property Owner Name Address
More informationTOWN OF WINCHESTER OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 71 Mount Vernon Street. Winchester, MA 01890
BRIAN SZEKELY TOWN PLANNER Winchester Board of Selectmen 71 Mt. Vernon St. Winchester, MA 01890 TOWN OF WINCHESTER OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 71 Mount Vernon Street Winchester, MA 01890 August 11,
More informationLegislation Passed June 9, 2015
Legislation Passed June, 0 The Tacoma City Council, at its regular City Council meeting of June, 0, adopted the following resolutions and/or ordinances. The summary of the contents of said resolutions
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GREEN MEADOWS ANNEXATION (Formally Known as Rude Annexation) (File No. A-17-04)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GREEN MEADOWS ANNEXATION (Formally Known as Rude Annexation) (File No. A-17-04) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Post Falls will hold a public hearing at City Hall,
More informationLAKEHAYEN UTILITY DISTRICT King County, Washington. Resolution No
LAKEHAYEN UTILITY DISTRICT King County, Washington Resolution No. 2014-1242 A Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the Lakehaven Utility District, King County, Washington, approving the establishment
More informationCoconino County Common Snow Plow Questions/Concerns
Coconino County Common Snow Plow Questions/Concerns I didn t know it snows so much in northern Arizona. Is this normal? According to the National Climatic Data Center, Flagstaff is the eighth snowiest
More informationRETA 6422: Mainstreaming Environment for Poverty Reduction Category 2 Subproject
RETA 6422: Mainstreaming Environment for Poverty Reduction Category 2 Subproject A. Basic Data 1. Subproject Title: Poverty-Environment Mapping to Support Decision Making 2. Country Director: Adrian Ruthenberg
More informationCITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 May 12, 2015
CITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 May 12, 2015 AGENCY: City of Perris PROJECT: Flood Control Maintenance District No. 1 TO: City Council
More informationMILLS COUNTY, IOWA FARMLAND FOR SALE PRICE REDUCED
MILLS COUNTY, IOWA FARMLAND FOR SALE PRICE REDUCED Owners: Riverdale Farm Corp. Acres: 302.59 Legal Description: Location: Description: See Attached From I-29/Highway 370 exit, 1 ¾ Miles west on Highway
More informationI-70 / Kipling Corridors Urban Renewal Plan
I-70 / Kipling Corridors Urban Renewal Plan Wheat Ridge, Colorado May 2009 Prepared for: Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority Wheat Ridge, Colorado City Council Prepared by: Leland Consulting Group (LCG)
More information2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015
P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n M e m b e r s C h a i r J a c o b B r i g g s V i c e C h a i r G a r y T y l e r T o n y T h o m p s o n J o l e n e C r e s s a l l A n d y H a l e D e r e c k B a
More informationFinance Department. Denton City Council Department Presentation
Denton City Council Department Presentation 1 FTE s By Functional Area FTE s By Functional Area FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 Budget FY 2017-18 Baseline Accounting 9 9 9 9 Accounts Payable 4 4 4 4 Budget
More informationEEC Modification Project. Initial Draft Resource Report 10 Alternatives. 569 Brookwood Village Suite 749 Birmingham, Alabama 35209
EEC Modification Project Initial Draft Resource Report 10 Alternatives 569 Brookwood Village Suite 749 Birmingham, Alabama 35209 April 2013 INITIAL DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 10 - ALTERNATIVES INITIAL DRAFT
More informationRESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:
RESOLUTION 2017-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT APPROVING PROPOSED BUDGET(S) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON
More informationEnvironmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation
Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 4.17 Environmental Justice This section summarizes the potential impacts described in Chapter 3, Transportation Impacts and Mitigation, and other sections of Chapter 4,
More information10/25/2017. Overview of the issue What is meandering What is an island Research and Analysis Conclusion
Preston Dowell Deputy County Surveyor St Louis County MN dowellp@stlouiscountymn.gov Overview of the issue What is meandering What is an island Research and Analysis Conclusion 1 The county needed to represent
More informationFor Sale - 56 Acre Sandstone Quarry State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075
14647 State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075 56 ACRES Vermilion Rd Gifford Rd Haigh Rd 44 Summary The Kipton sandstone quarry is included in 56 acre tract owned by Terry A. Johnson, of Huron, Ohio.
More informationWORK SESSION AGENDA COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE APRIL 1, 2019 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL MEETING
WORK SESSION AGENDA COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE APRIL 1, 2019 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL MEETING 1. Snow Removal Procedures Steven Lang 2. 2020 Budget Streets & Highways Tom Dankert
More informationCHAPTER 12 PLANNING & ZONING ARTICLE 6 - BUSINESS DISTRICT. Section Legal boundary descriptions for central business district.
CHAPTER 12 PLANNING & ZONING ARTICLE 6 - BUSINESS DISTRICT SECTIONS: Sections 12-6-101 to 199, inclusive. Central business district. Section 12-6-101. Legal boundary descriptions for central business district.
More informationRequest Applicant Owner Zoning Location Attachments Site and Surrounding Area Direction Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Land Use Access
Planning & Zoning Commissionn Planning & Development Department September, 0 Preliminary/Final Plat Westwood, Section, Phase Request Applicant Owner Zoning Location Attachments Subdivision of approximately.
More informationKENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT
KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT Presentation Outline Development of the 2013 State Hazard Mitigation Plan Risk Assessment Determining risk assessment scale Census Data Aggregation Levels
More informationUTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO
UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by: Bowman Consulting 63 Park Point Dr. Suite 1 Golden, CO 841 (33)-81-29 June 29, 215 Revised August 14, 215 Revised September 3, 215
More informationGIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line
PDD 631 Geographic Information Systems for Public Policy, Planning & Development GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line Biying Zhao 6679361256 Professor Barry Waite and Bonnie Shrewsbury May 12 th, 2015 Introduction
More informationCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA DATE: Monday, January 14, 2013 PLACE: City Hall Council Chambers TIME: 4:00 p.m. 1.00 ADOPTION OF MINUTES 1. Adopt January 7, 2013 Regular Council
More informationREVISED ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
REVISED ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1. The Project supports the government goals to provide adequate sanitation to 100% of the population and eradicate open defecation through the development of sewerage
More informationCommunity Erosion Assessment Napakiak, Alaska 15 January 2008
1. Community: Napakiak, Alaska Community Erosion Assessment Napakiak, Alaska 15 January 2008 Figure 1: Napakiak Location & Vicinity Map 2. Community Profile Summary: Napakiak is a 2 nd class city of 378
More informationDark Sky Initiative Draft Terms of Reference
Dark Sky Initiative Draft Terms of Reference July 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Initiative intent 2-3 3.0 Initiative goals 3 4.0 Legislation 3 5.0 Municipal Development Plan 3 6.0 Land
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationJohn Laznik 273 Delaplane Ave Newark, DE (302)
Office Address: John Laznik 273 Delaplane Ave Newark, DE 19711 (302) 831-0479 Center for Applied Demography and Survey Research College of Human Services, Education and Public Policy University of Delaware
More informationPUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DOCKET NO
Application of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for a Proposed 138 kv Transmission Line within Harris County, Texas PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
More informationTraffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology
More informationFINAL UTILITY REPORT Creekside Thornton, CO
FINAL UTILITY REPORT Creekside Thornton, CO March 4, 216 Revised: June 27, 216 JN: 1539 Prepared for: HW Sodbusters, LLC 2733 E. Parleys Way, Suite 3 Salt Lake City, UT 8419 P: 81.485.777 Prepared by:
More informationIntroducing GIS analysis
1 Introducing GIS analysis GIS analysis lets you see patterns and relationships in your geographic data. The results of your analysis will give you insight into a place, help you focus your actions, or
More informationPPT Slide. Slide 1 of 32. Notes:
Slide 1 of 32 This presentaion will describe the background of establishing an agricultural district in Westchester County and how GIS was used to map the district. file:///volumes/web/www/ce/conferences/gis%20present/testfarm/sld001.htm[4/6/11
More informationKing City URA 6D Concept Plan
King City URA 6D Concept Plan King City s Evolution Among the fastest growing cities 2000 Census 1,949 2010 Census 3,111 60% increase 2016 Census estimate 3,817 23% increase Average annual rate 4.3% Surpassing
More informationTown of Southwest Ranches Statement of Revenues and Expenditures From 10/1/2011 Through 12/31/2011. Current Period Actual
01 - General Fund Revenue Ad Valorem Taxes 311000 3,007,200.12 4,102,334.00 (1,095,133.88) Franchise Fee-Electric 313100 56,486.83 490,000.00 (433,513.17) Solid Waste Franchise Fee 313700 0.00 35,000.00
More informationSTORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3
STORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3 May 2018 STORMWATER REPORT I. Subdivision Data a. The parcel is adjacent to the existing Frito Lay property in Topeka; and the subject plat application encompasses
More informationNew Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH
New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH The City of Youngstown Youngstown State University Urban Strategies Inc. Youngstown needed
More informationVillage of Glenview: Community-wide Flood Risk Reduction Program (FRRP)
Village of Glenview: Community-wide Flood Risk Reduction Program (FRRP) Sarah Pasquesi, P.E. Project Engineer AECOM sarah.pasquesi@aecom.com Shane Schneider, P.E. Village Engineer Village of Glenview shanes@glenview.il.us
More informationCity of Eagleville Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2018
City of Eagleville Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2018 Work Sessions: March 9, 2017: March 23, 2017: April 13, 2017: General Fund Revenue Estimates Parks & Recreation State Street Aid Revenue and Expenses
More informationTOWN OF THORNTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE WINTER AND INCLEMENT WEATHER POLICY AND PRIORITIES
TOWN OF THORNTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE WINTER AND INCLEMENT WEATHER POLICY AND PRIORITIES Pursuant to RSA 231:92 a, the Thornton Board of Selectmen hereby establishes the following policy and procedure for winter
More informationTown of Southwest Ranches Statement of Revenues and Expenditures From 10/1/2010 Through 12/31/2010. Current Year Actual Prior Year Actual
01 - General Fund s 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 311000 2,951,391.73 3,149,911.30 4,225,184.00 (1,273,792.27) Franchise Fee-Electric 313100 0.00 102,088.65 565,000.00 (565,000.00) Solid Waste Franchise Fee 313700
More informationImplementation Status & Results Congo, Republic of Rep. of Congo - Water, Electricity & Urban Development SIL (LEN) (P106975)
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Congo, Republic of Rep. of Congo - Water, Electricity & Urban Development SIL (LEN) (P106975) Operation
More information2017 BLAWNOX PROPOSED BUDGET
2017 BLAWNOX PROPOSED BUDGET GENERAL FUND Revenue 301 Real Estate Taxes 2016 YTD 2016 Projected YE 2017 Budget 301.10 RE-Current Taxes (8 mills) 554,705.30 564,792.34 578,618.12 301.12 RE-Fire Service
More informationCity of Laramie, Wyoming SNOW AND ICE POLICY
City of Laramie, Wyoming SNOW AND ICE POLICY 11/02/89; rev 10/15/2007 I. INTRODUCTION The intention of this Policy is to set reasonable goals and general practices as a guide for the conduct of snow and
More informationAdopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017
2017-2018 Adopted Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017 Prepared by Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Christopher Rabing, Director of Fiscal Services FINANCIAL REPORTS School
More informationChecking private survey maps for compliance with Oregon statutes and file them in the Surveyor s Office as public records.
Department: Surveyor FY 2019 Proposed Budget Department Mission: To provide the citizens an organized facility to research the surveying records and to provide for the safe keeping of the public records
More informationMACo Briefing General Assembly of Maryland
MACo Briefing General Assembly of Maryland House Environment & Transportation Committee 1/22/2019 Introduction to Maryland Counties Maryland has 23 counties plus Baltimore City (which is legally both a
More informationContents. Ipswich City Council Ipswich Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (No. 1) Page
Ipswich City Council Ipswich Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (No. 1) 2014 Contents Page Part 1 Introduction 3 1. Short title 3 2. Commencement 3 3. Sustainable Planning Act 2009 3 4. Purpose
More informationAdopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016
2016-2017 Adopted Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016 Prepared by Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Christopher Rabing, Director of Fiscal Services FINANCIAL REPORTS School
More informationUrban Planning Word Search Level 1
Urban Planning Word Search Level 1 B C P U E C O S Y S T E M P A R E U O E U R B A N P L A N N E R T N S T D H E C O U N T Y G E R E R D W R E N I C I T Y C O U N C I L A A A S U G G C I L A G P R I R
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationMcHenry County Property Search Sources of Information
Disclaimer: The information in this system may contain inaccuracies or typographical errors. The information in this system is a digital representation of information derived from original documents; as
More informationCITY OF AURORA ORDINANCE NO. 82 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 153: ZONING. The City Council of the City of Aurora does ordain as follows:
CITY OF AURORA ORDINANCE NO. 82 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 153: ZONING The City Council of the City of Aurora does ordain as follows: Section 1. CHAPTER 153: ZONING, is hereby amended in accordance
More informationCity of Brainerd, Minnesota Snowplowing Policy
City of Brainerd, Minnesota Snowplowing Policy 1. Introduction The city of Brainerd, Minnesota, finds that it is in the best interest of the residents of the city to assume basic responsibility for control
More informationSECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4
2018 SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4 IV. GENERAL FUND 001 DESCRIPTIONS... 6 V. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS... 9
More informationTax Increment Finance Village of Coal Valley Route 6 Redevelopment Plan and Project Area
Tax Increment Finance Village of Coal Valley Route 6 Redevelopment Plan and Project Area Amendment No. 1 January 2018 Prepared by Original Document (June 2006) prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Tax
More information